Next Article in Journal
Towards Chemoenzymatic Syntheses of Both Enantiomers of Phosphoemeriamine
Previous Article in Journal
Process Optimization of Tinospora cordifolia Extract-Loaded Water in Oil Nanoemulsion Developed by Ultrasound-Assisted Homogenization
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Molecules
Volume 29
Issue 8
10.3390/molecules29081798
molecules-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

The Role of mRNA Alternative Splicing in Macrophages Infected with Mycobacterium tuberculosis: A Field Needing to Be Discovered

by
Weiling Hong
1,
Hongxing Yang
1,
Xiao Wang
1,
Jingyi Shi
1,
Jian Zhang
2 and
Jianping Xie
3,*
1
Jinhua Advanced Research Institute, Jinhua 321019, China
2
Zhejiang University Medical Center, Hangzhou 311113, China
3
Institute of Modern Biopharmaceuticals, State Key Laboratory Breeding Base of Eco-Environment and Bio-Resource of the Three Gorges Area, School of Life Sciences, Southwest University, Beibei, Chongqing 400715, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Molecules 2024, 29(8), 1798; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules29081798
Submission received: 19 January 2024 / Revised: 7 April 2024 / Accepted: 11 April 2024 / Published: 16 April 2024
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Mtb) is one of the major causes of human death. In its battle with humans, Mtb has fully adapted to its host and developed ways to evade the immune system. At the same time, the human immune system has developed ways to respond to Mtb. The immune system responds to viral and bacterial infections through a variety of mechanisms, one of which is alternative splicing. In this study, we summarized the overall changes in alternative splicing of the transcriptome after macrophages were infected with Mtb. We found that after infection with Mtb, cells undergo changes, including (1) directly reducing the expression of splicing factors, which affects the regulation of gene expression, (2) altering the original function of proteins through splicing, which can involve gene truncation or changes in protein domains, and (3) expressing unique isoforms that may contribute to the identification and development of tuberculosis biomarkers. Moreover, alternative splicing regulation of immune-related genes, such as IL-4, IL-7, IL-7R, and IL-12R, may be an important factor affecting the activation or dormancy state of Mtb. These will help to fully understand the immune response to Mtb infection, which is crucial for the development of tuberculosis biomarkers and new drug targets.

1. Introduction

Tuberculosis is an ancient infectious disease, the second most deadly infectious disease after COVID-19 [1]. Tuberculosis is caused by airborne transmission of the intracellular pathogen Mtb, which primarily infects macrophages in the alveoli [2]. The Global tuberculosis Report 2023 shows that 7.5 million people were diagnosed with tuberculosis in 2022, which is the highest record since the WHO began to monitor global tuberculosis in 1995 [3]. The global COVID-19 pandemic caused major setbacks in combating tuberculosis [4].
Nearly one third of the world’s population carries latent Mtb, but about one tenth will eventually develop into tuberculosis patients [5]. From this perspective, since the vast majority of people infected with Mtb do not develop the disease, there must be some powerful human anti-microbial mechanism preventing this. In the process of co-evolution, Mtb has been brilliantly adapted to the human host. It is clear that these pathogens, which cause chronic disease and persist in macrophages, must have acquired subtle strategies to resist host microbicidal mechanisms. Modulating the alternative splicing of host immune system-related proteins may be one of the effective strategies against host microbicidal mechanisms.
Alternative splicing in eukaryotic transcriptomes takes advantage of the use of different splicing sites and the use of differential exons/introns, resulting in transcription variations that produce different isoforms of specific proteins [6]. With the in-depth study of alternative splicing, researchers gradually realized that it has a regulatory effect on immunity. The host–microbial relationship affects the alternative splicing of immune-related proteins. In the study of tuberculosis, it has also been found that Mtb infection of macrophages causes great changes in the splicing of macrophages [7]. Alternative splicing of genes may affect whether infection occurs when exposed to Mtb, and whether infection can develop into a disease. Therefore, a comprehensive understanding of the alternative splicing of the human immune response to Mtb is essential for TB control and the development of new targets for vaccines and drugs.

2. Alternative Splicing

Constitutive splicing represents a crucial phase in RNA maturation, facilitating the excision of non-coding intronic sequences from the nascent transcript, thereby contributing to the generation of mature and functional messenger RNAs. To accomplish this essential task, the spliceosome—a complex ribonucleoprotein assembly consisting of various U spliceosomal RNAs and associated proteins—precisely identifies the splice junction and facilitates the execution of two crucial trans-esterification reactions, ultimately leading to the surgical removal of the intron from the pre-mRNA transcript. In a nutshell, the initial phase entails the specific interaction of U1 and U2 small nuclear ribonucleoproteins (snRNPs) with the 5′ splice site and the branch site, respectively, within the pre-mRNA transcript. During the subsequent step, the U4/U6-U5 tri-snRNP is recruited, and upon structural reorganization that follows, both U1 and U4 snRNPs are released, ultimately culminating in the formation of an activated B complex. The branch site approaches the 5′ splice site via the newly established connection between U6 and U2 snRNPs. Then, the 2′-hydroxyl group at the branch site initiates a nucleophilic attack on the 5′ phosphate of the first nucleotide of the intron, which constitutes the 5′ splice site and is typically a guanosine residue. The reaction cleaves the phosphodiester bond between the exon and the intron, while simultaneously forming a new phosphodiester bond between the branch site and the intron. During the second phase of the catalytic process, the recently liberated 3′ hydroxyl group initiates an attack on the ultimate nucleotide of the intron sequence, which usually consists of guanosine. This links the two exons together, resulting in the formation of the intron lariat (Figure 1a) [8,9,10,11].
In addition to the constitutive excision of introns, the mature transcript may also retain certain exons, exon fragments, or even introns through a formal process termed alternative splicing (AS), thereby complementing the constitutive intron removal. Gilber proposed alternative splicing (AS) of genes in 1978 [12]. His research has shown that the coding sequences of eukaryotic DNA are discontinuous and separated by non-coding sequences. These sequences are cleaved through different splicing methods to form mRNA with different sequences and functions. Early proposed a possible model for controlling the production of multiple transcripts by a single gene in 1982 [13]. Alternative splicing in plants was also discovered in 1989, and researchers speculated that this splicing method may be evolutionarily conservative in higher plants [14]. Alternative splicing is not only common in eukaryotes, but also exists in small amounts in archaea and bacteria [15,16]. Lower eukaryotes have fewer alternative splicing genes than higher eukaryotes, and vertebrates have higher alternative splicing genes than invertebrates [17,18]. Until the 1990s, scientists believed that only 5% of eukaryotic genes had alternative splicing [19]. With the development of the Human Genome Project (HGP) and Expressed Sequence Tag (EST), the possibility of analyzing alternative splicing of genomes based on bioinformatics has been realized. Pan used mRNA-Seq to analyze the complexity of alternative splicing in human tissues. New splicing sites were detected in about 20% of replicated exon genes, many of which were tissue-specific. Combined with EST-cDNA sequence data, they estimated that about 95% of human genes have alternative splicing [20,21].
Alternative splicing arises from a combination of stimulatory and inhibitory signals generated by multiple splicing factors in close proximity to weak splice sites. These signals either facilitate the assembly of the spliceosome at the specific location or destabilize it, resulting in a heterogeneous population of mature mRNAs. Factors that enhance splicing, including SR proteins, specifically associate with intronic or exonic splicing enhancers (ISE and ESE, respectively). In contrast, inhibitory factors like hnRNP proteins preferentially bind to intronic or exonic splicing silencers (ISS and ESS, respectively) (Figure 1b) [9,22]. The methods of alternative splicing mainly include exon skipping, alternative 5′SS selection, alternative 3′SS selection, mutually exclusive splicing, retained intron, alternative promoters, and alternative polyA [23,24,25,26]. Exon skipping is caused by the splicing of the exon and its two flanking introns from the transcript (Figure 2b), and is the most common alternative splicing method in mammals [27]. Exon skipping accounts for about 40% of the alternative splicing in higher eukaryotes, but is less common in lower eukaryotes [18,28]. Alternative 5′SS selection or alternative 3′SS selection occur when there are two or more splicing sites at the 5′ or 3′ end of the exon (Figure 2c,d). The proportion of alternative 3′SS selection and alternative 5′SS selection in higher eukaryotes is 18% and 8%, respectively [8]. Mutually exclusive splicing is the adjacent arrangement of two or more exons on the genome that contains only one of them when a mature mRNA molecule is formed by alternative splicing (Figure 2e). Mutually exclusive splicing is an important means of increasing the protein repertoire, by which the Down’s syndrome cell adhesion molecule1 (Dscam1) gene potentially generates 38,016 different isoforms. Our previous studies focused on the regulation mechanism and biological function of 38,016 isoform produced by mutually exclusive splicing of Dscam1 [29]. Retained intron is co-spliced as an exon into the mature mRNA because the intron fails to splice in the pre-mRNA (Figure 2f). Retained intron often occurs in genes with short introns. Intron retention is common in plants, fungi, and protozoa [8,30], and is less common in vertebrates and invertebrates, with an occurrence less than 5% [6,28,31]. Alternative promoters are the phenomenon in which the first exon of a gene produces alternative splicing (Figure 2g). The alternative polyA refers to the selection of the alternative polyadenylate site of the last exon (Figure 2h).

3. Global Changes in Gene Expression upon Infection with Mtb

Alternative splicing can affect the stability, structure, function, and localization of transcripts, thereby altering the chemical and physiological characteristics of proteins. The transcriptome of macrophages during Mtb infection has been extensively studied. However, the response of alternative splicing in macrophage infection with Mtb has only been studied in recent years, but has not received enough attention. In fact, when macrophages are infected with Mtb, the alternative splicing in the transcriptome changes dramatically [7,32,33,34]. The alterations were global, with genes (see Table S1) involved in functional categories such as splicing factor, immune response, autophagy, redox, and metabolism showing marked deviations in their splicing patterns in infected macrophages.

3.1. Alternative Splicing Causes Changes in Protein Activity

After macrophages are infected with Mycobacterium tuberculosis, the activity of some proteins is affected. This is because the splicing of these proteins has been altered, such as exon skipping, gene truncation mutations, and protein domain changes. The most significant splicing event observed after Mtb infection of lung epithelial cells was exon skipping, which was strain-specific [33]. Large amounts of truncated RAB8B variants contribute to Mtb survival by limiting RAB8B levels in cells [32]. The presence of premature stop codons hinders the translation of the truncated isoform, which in turn disrupts the autophagy process in macrophages and enables the virulent Mtb to evade elimination and persist. In addition, the expression of functional protein domains is affected by the alternative splicing of transcripts during Mtb infection. For example, large changes in the domains of most regulatory proteins in all kinases [7]. It is speculated that the kinase domain changes caused by the change of alternative splicing are mainly due to the important role of kinases in signal transduction. Exon skipping, truncated variants, and domain changes may cause proteins to lose their original activity. This suggests that Mtb may enhance its intracellular growth and reproduction through protein inactivation. We speculate that the regulation of cell alternative splicing during Mtb infection may serve as a target of anti-tuberculosis treatment.

3.2. TB-Specific Alternatively Spliced Isoforms

In addition, some genes exhibit tuberculosis-specific alternatively spliced isoforms, which have the potential to serve as biomarkers for the diagnosis of tuberculosis. The ABCC2, TNFAIP2, SLC26A11, IFI27, IFIT3, OAS1, OASL and GNB1 genes have a variety of TB-specific alternatively spliced isoforms, which may help explain the pathogenesis of TB and differential strain response [33]. Differential splicing of bacterial host-related TNFAIP2 transcripts may contribute to bacterial replication and persistence in lung epithelial cells [33]. S100A8-intron1-retention intron, RPS20-exon1 alternative promoter, KIF13B-exon4-skipping exit (SE), and UBE2B-exon7-SE as specific expressions can be used as molecular markers for the diagnosis of tuberculosis [35]. Existing diagnostic methods for tuberculosis often suffer from extended processing times and limited accuracy, making the exploration of promising biomarkers a consistent priority in tuberculosis research. Compared to traditional biomarkers for Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection, biomarkers developed through alternative splicing offer advantages such as higher diagnostic specificity [35], low cost, high efficiency, good reproducibility, and the possibility of early detection during infection.

3.3. The Expression of Splicing Factors Changes in Cells Infected with Mtb

The expression of splicing factors in cells infected with Mtb was inhibited. During Mtb infection, Protein-associated Splicing Factor (PSF) has been observed to be downregulated and plays a role in inhibiting apoptosis in Mtb-infected macrophages [36]. Serine/arginine-rich (SR) proteins play a pivotal role in the process of selective splicing and undergo tight regulation in diverse physiological as well as pathological settings [37]. After infection with H37Rv, the expression levels of SR proteins, SRSF2, SRSF3, SRp75, and SF3a in THP-1 cells were significantly downregulated [34]. The intricate interaction between viral and host SR proteins in regulating the expression of both viral and host genes has been extensively studied, revealing that viruses may efficiently exploit the host splicing machineries through the RS domain or RS-rich motifs present in their proteins, thereby benefiting their own gene expression [38]. In short, after infection with Mtb, the expression of splicing factors is downregulated, but the reasons for this change remain to be further studied.

4. Alternative Splicing in Host Response to Mtb Infection

4.1. The Role of IL-4/IL-4δ2 Ratio in Mtb Infection

IL-4, a multipotent cytokine, is one of the central regulatory factors of immunity in health and disease. It consists of four exons that encode the 15-kDa protein, composed of 129 amino acids. When the second exon is skipped by alternative splicing, it is described as IL-4δ2. IL-4δ2 has an antagonistic effect on IL-4 activity in human monocytes and B cells [39]. The mRNA level of IL-4 expression was higher in unstimulated peripheral blood mononuclear cells of tuberculosis patients [40]. High expression of IL-4 is thought to be detrimental to survival of Mtb infection [41]. The expression of IL-4δ2 was increased in latently infected healthy TB contacts (Figure 3) [41], but not in TB patients or uninfected individuals [42]. In whole blood from donors with pulmonary TB, the half-life of IL-4 mRNA was significantly prolonged by a factor of five, while IL-4δ2 mRNA was not (Figure 3) [43]. Progression from latent to active tuberculosis may depend on the potential ratio of IL-4 to IL-4δ2 [41]. In conclusion, whether a person develops into a TB patient after being infected with TB may depend on the expression level of IL-4/IL-4δ2 (Figure 3). Based on the effect of IL-4δ2, it is speculated that it can be used as a new therapeutic approach.

4.2. IL-7 and IL-7 R Isoforms Play Different Roles in Control of Mtb Infection

Interleukin-7 (IL-7) and its receptor (IL-7R) play a very important role in the differentiation and growth of immune cells, and they have alternative splicing in infectious diseases [44]. The expression of IL-7 receptor and IL-7 sensitivity of monocytes in the blood of tuberculosis patients are impaired, which has a potential impact on the ability to antimycobacterial [45].
Interleukin-7, which is secreted by macrophages after infection with Mtb, stimulates the development of antigen-presenting cells and ensures the persistence of T cells. Non-human primates increased the expression of the IL-7 protein in the lung tissue after the rBCG vaccine [46]. IL-7 can prolong the survival of mice and reduce the Mtb load in the lungs [47]. The six exons of IL7 produce nine isoforms by alternative splicing, including IL7δ3, IL7δ4, IL7δ5, IL 7δ3/4, IL 7δ4/5, IL7δ3/4/5, IL7δ3/4-52bp E2, and IL7δ4/5-52bp E2 in addition to full-length IL7c [46,48]. In peripheral blood monocytes of non-human primates, the highest expression level is IL-7c, followed by IL-7δ5 and IL-7δ4 (Figure 3) [46]. IL-7δ5 and IL-7δ4/5 were mainly expressed in the granuloma tissue from patients with latent tuberculosis (Figure 3) [48]. Although the transcription pattern of IL-7 did not change after BCG or virulent Mtb infection, the isoforms of IL-7 expression in the granuloma tissue of patients with latent tuberculosis were different. This differential expression suggests that different IL-7 isoforms may be related to the latent state of Mtb.
IL-7R has eight exons and generates three isoforms through alternative splicing, namely IL-7Rc, IL-7Rδ6, and IL-7Rδ5/6. The isoforms of IL-7R expression in different tissues of non-human primates are similar, but the proportions are different. The two main expression isoforms are IL-7Rc and IL-7Rδ6. The content of IL-7Rδ6 in the lungs, hilus LNs, and spleen is 90%, 30%, and 10%, respectively [46]. Soluble IL-7R(sIL-7R, IL-7Rδ6) may inhibit IL-7 activity by decreasing phosphorylation signaling [49]. sIL-7R acts as an isoform that inhibits IL-7 activity, and appears to have the opposite effect to full-length IL-7Rc. These opposite isoforms deserve our attention, as it may be the key to the development of TB when infected with Mtb. IL-7 reduces lung Mtb load in mice, while sIL-7R expression reduces IL-7 activity, allowing uncontrolled reproduction of Mtb.

4.3. IL12-Rβ1 Is Essential for Host Defence against Mtb Infection

IL-12Rβ1 encodes a transmembrane glycosylated protein and is a low affinity receptor for the IL-12p40 subunit [50]. It is extremely important for humans to resist various intracellular pathogens, including Mtb [51]. Human leukocytes express up to 13 different isoforms, of which 2 major isoforms are located on the cell surface and inside the cell, and the other 11 are minor isoforms [52]. In the absence of IL12Rβ1, the cytokines IL-12 and IL-23 could not play a proinflammatory role, and the growth of intracellular bacteria was not inhibited [52].
After infection with Mtb, the il12rb1 in dendritic cells produces an IL-12Rβ1ΔTM isoform by alternative splicing [53]. Compared with IL-12Rβ1, IL-12Rβ1ΔTM has altered C-terminal sequences and lacks transmembrane domains, which are localized in the intracellular reticulum similar to the endoplasmic reticulum. IL-12Rβ1ΔTM preserves a signal peptide, cytokine binding domain, and fibronectin domain of IL12Rβ1 [52]. The role of IL-12Rβ1ΔTM is to enhance IL-12Rβ1-dependent dendritic cell (DC) migration and activate Mtb-specific T cells [53]. The migration of DCs is required for the activation of naive T cells. Mice lacking IL-12Rβ1ΔTM will have an impact on their ability to control infection with Mtb in extrapulmonary lung organs [54]. Increased Mtb burden in IL-12Rβ1ΔTM-deficient mice is associated with decreased lymph node cell count and decreased Th1 development [54]. IL-12Rβ1ΔTM enhances resistance to Mtb infection by increasing TH1 cells response to IL-12 [54]. It is concluded that the alternative splicing of IL12Rβ1 plays a key role against Mtb infection.

4.4. The Protective Role for IL-32 Isoforms upon Mtb Infection

Interleukin-32 (IL-32) is a multifunctional cytokine [55], originally described as a transcript (NK4), that is expressed in activated natural killer or T cells [56].The IL-32 gene does not share sequence homology with other cytokines, but is named IL-32 because of its powerful pro-inflammatory effects [57]. The eight exons of IL-32 produce nine isoforms through alternative splicing, namely IL-32 α, IL-32 β, IL-32 γ, IL-32 δ, IL-32 ε, IL-32 ζ, IL-32 η, IL-32 θ, and IL-32s [58]. Among them, the four representative isoforms are IL-32α, IL-32β, IL-32γ, and IL-32δ. These isoforms may have different effects through heterodimeric interactions, but there is no interaction between homologous pairs [58]. There are 10 types of heterodimeric interactions that have been confirmed between IL-32 isoforms, of which IL-32γ is the most common and can interact with IL-32 δ, IL-32 ζ, IL-32 η, and IL-32 θ (Figure 4) [58].
Many studies have shown the role of IL-32 in anti-mycobacterium. Mtb induces IL-32 production through a Caspase-1/IL-18/Interferon-γ-dependent mechanism, and the amount produced is positively correlated with the concentration of Mtb [59]. IL-32 enhanced the production of proinflammatory cytokines TNF-α, IL-1β and IL-8, and decreased the number of Mtb in the infected macrophages [60]. Expression of human IL-32 in mice increases the number of innate and adaptive immune cells, which protects mice from infection by hypervirulent strain of Mtb [61]. The expression level of IL-32 in patients with pulmonary tuberculosis was lower than that in healthy people [62]. With the treatment of tuberculosis, the level of IL-32 gradually returned to normal [62]. Compared with healthy individuals, the expression of IL-32 in airway epithelial cells of the lungs infected with Mycobacterium aviruleum complex was significantly increased [63]. IL-32γ significantly reduces the growth of M. avium in macrophages [63]. The induction of IL-32 expression in monocytes infected with Mycobacterium leprae was performed in a NOD2-dependent manner [64]. Our previous research showed that Mycobacterium smegmatis with PPE32 significantly increases the expression of IL-32 in macrophages through the ERK1/2 signaling pathway [65].
The defensive role of IL-32 on Mtb may be due to the increased apoptosis of macrophages. Caspase-3 is considered to be the most important enzyme in the process of apoptosis. As the activator of Caspase-3, IL-32 is involved in cell apoptosis and reduces the viability of intracellular Mtb [60]. The anti-Mtb effects of IL-32γ are also mediated through caspase-3-independent apoptosis, including cathepsin- and caspase-1-mediated pyroptosis (Figure 5) [66]. However, the induction of apoptosis is not the only mechanism by which IL-32 prevents Mtb. IL-32 induced the vitamin D-dependent antimicrobial peptides cathelicidin and DEFB4 and has antibacterial activity in vitro when 25-hydroxyvitamin D is sufficient (Figure 5) [67]. Cathelicidin and DEFB4 are potent antimicrobial peptides that act against intracellular infection in macrophages [67].
Different IL-32 isoforms have different effects and regulation patterns in anti-tuberculosis treatment. Among these isoforms, IL 32β was the predominantly expressed isoform in activated T cells [68]. IL 32β and IL32γ have been studied extensively [69]. IL-32γ is considered to be the greatest biological active isoform in inducing proinflammatory cytokines, possibly because it contains a full range of exons [70]. Compared with mouse macrophages expressing IL-32γ and IL-32β, macrophages expressing IL-32γ alone were more effective in limiting the growth of Mtb [61]. The effect of IL-32 on the prevention of Mtb infection may depend on the relative abundance of different IL-32 isoforms [62]. Mtb stimulates peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) to decrease the expression of IL-32γ and increase the expression of IL-32β [62]. The ratio of IL-32γ/IL-32β correlated positively with IFN-γ and negatively correlated with IL-6, IL-1Ra, and IL-17 [62]. IFN-γ, IL-6, IL-1Ra, and IL-17 have been proven to play an important role in anti-tuberculosis treatment many times. In conclusion, different isoforms of IL-32 have different defense effects against Mtb. Considering that the defense effect of IL-32 on Mtb may be related to the apoptosis of macrophages, it is worth considering whether different isoforms play different roles by participating in macrophage apoptosis.

5. Discussion

In a primary TB infection, not all bacteria are destroyed, even if they are successfully controlled by the immune system. Some bacteria remain dormant in tissues for the rest of the life of the individual. TB latency is actually an active process of protective immune maintenance. This potential state deserves our attention for two reasons. First, in countries with low or moderate TB prevalence, most TB cases are caused by reactivation of latent infections. Second, latent bacteria may be in a physiological state similar to drug-resistant bacteria. So, how to prevent latent infection tuberculosis bacteria from being reactivated is an important question when directing the control of tuberculosis. Keeping Mtb in a latent state and preventing the transition to active disease may be an important way to prevent TB. The ratio of IL-4 to IL-4δ2 affects the progression of latent to active tuberculosis [41]. The expression pattern of IL-7 in patients with latent tuberculosis and Mtb infection is different [46,48]. Macrophages expressing IL-32γ alone were more effective in limiting the growth of Mtb [61]. All these factors suggest that the alternative splicing regulation of immune-related genes may be an important factor affecting the activation or dormancy state of Mtb. We speculate that alternative splicing is associated with the progression of latent to active tuberculosis and may be key to whether infected contacts will develop progressive disease or not.
Alteration of host gene expression is not only an effective way for the host to kill mycobacteria, but also a possible strategy for mycobacteria to successfully evade the immune system. An effective and simple way to alter gene expression is through alternative splicing of mRNA. After infection with Mycobacterium tuberculosis, cells undergo changes through 1. directly reducing the expression of splicing factors, 2. altering the original function of proteins through splicing, and 3. expressing unique isoforms [7,32,33,34,35]. These changes enable the bacteria to escape the immune system and exhibit antagonistic effects on immune genes. It may also be intentional by the host to more effectively guide the immune system against Mtb. All of these suggest that more study is needed to clarify the exact mechanism of cytokine and its splice variants in anti-TB. This will help to fully understand the immune response to Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection, and is crucial for the development of tuberculosis biomarkers and new drug targets.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/molecules29081798/s1, Table S1: Changes in alternative splicing after macrophage infection by Mycobacterium tuberculosis.

Author Contributions

W.H. conducted the literature search and completed the writing of the first draft of the article. H.Y. was responsible for the critical revision of the manuscript for key scientific content and ensured that the review remained objective and evidence-based. He also provided final approval for the version to be published. X.W. and J.S. provided important intellectual input during the early stages of the review, assisting in shaping the overall direction and focus of the article. J.Z. provided valuable insights from his expertise in the field. J.X. conceptualized the review. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work is supported by the Scientific Research Project of Jinhua Advanced Research Institute (G202204).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Bagcchi, S. WHO’s Global Tuberculosis Report 2022. Lancet Microbe 2023, 4, e20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Russell, D.G. Mycobacterium tuberculosis and the intimate discourse of a chronic infection. Immunol. Rev. 2015, 240, 252–268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. World Health Organization. Global Tuberculosis Report 2023; World Health Organization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2023.
  4. Ghebreyesus, T.A.; Kasaeva, T. Global Tuberculosis Report 2022; World Health Organization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2022.
  5. van Leth, F.; Van der Werf, M.J.; Borgdorff, M.W. Prevalence of tuberculous infection and incidence of tuberculosis: A re-assessment of the Styblo rule. Bull. World Health Organ. 2008, 86, 20–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Eddo, K.; Alon, M.; Gil, A. Different levels of alternative splicing among eukaryotes. Nucleic Acids Res. 2006, 35, 125–131. [Google Scholar]
  7. Kalam, H.; Singh, K.; Chauhan, K.; Fontana, M.F.; Kumar, D. Alternate splicing of transcripts upon Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection impacts the expression of functional protein domains. IUBMB Life 2018, 70, 845–854. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Kim, E.; Goren, A.; Ast, G. Alternative splicing: Current perspectives. Bioessays 2008, 30, 38–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Lee, Y.; Rio, D.C. Mechanisms and Regulation of Alternative Pre-mRNA Splicing. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 2015, 84, 291–323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Merkhofer, E.C.; Hu, P.; Johnson, T.L. Introduction to cotranscriptional RNA splicing. Methods Mol. Biol. 2014, 1126, 83–96. [Google Scholar]
  11. Yan, C.; Wan, R.; Shi, Y. Molecular Mechanisms of pre-mRNA Splicing through Structural Biology of the Spliceosome. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 2019, 11, a032409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Gilbert, W. Why genes in pieces? Nature 1978, 271, 501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Early, P.; Rogers, J.; Davis, M.; Calame, K.; Bond, M.; Wall, R.; Hood, L. Two mRNAs can be produced from a single immunoglobulin μ gene by alternative RNA processing pathways. Cell 1980, 20, 313–319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Werneke, J.M.; Chatfield, J.M.; Ogren, W.L. Alternative mRNA splicing generates the two ribulosebisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase activase polypeptides in spinach and Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 1989, 1, 815–825. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  15. Watanabe, Y.; Yokobori, S.; Inaba, T.; Yamagishi, A.; Oshima, T.; Kawarabayasi, Y.; Kikuchi, H.; Kita, K. Introns in protein-coding genes in Archaea. FEBS Lett. 2002, 510, 27–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Yokobori, S.I.; Itoh, T.; Yoshinari, S.; Nomura, N.; Sako, Y.; Yamagishi, A.; Oshima, T.; Kita, K.; Watanabe, Y.I. Gain and loss of an intron in a protein-coding gene in Archaea: The case of an archaeal RNA pseudouridine synthase gene. BMC Evol. Biol. 2009, 9, 198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Artamonova, I.I.; Gelfand, M.S. Comparative Genomics and Evolution of Alternative Splicing:  The Pessimists’Science. Chem. Rev. 2007, 107, 3407–3430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Alekseyenko, A.V.; Namshin, K.; Lee, C.J. Global analysis of exon creation versus loss and the role of alternative splicing in 17 vertebrate genomes. RNA 2007, 13, 661–670. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Sharp, P.A. Split genes and RNA splicing. Cell 1994, 77, 805–815. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Pan, Q.; Shai, O.; Lee, L.J.; Frey, B.J.; Blencowe, B.J. Deep surveying of alternative splicing complexity in the human transcriptome by high-throughput sequencing. Nat. Genet. 2008, 40, 1413–1415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Wang, E.T.; Sandberg, R.; Luo, S.; Khrebtukova, I.; Zhang, L.; Mayr, C.; Kingsmore, S.F.; Schroth, G.P.; Burge, C.B. Alternative isoform regulation in human tissue transcriptomes. Nature 2008, 456, 470–476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Wang, Y.; Liu, J.; Huang, B.O.; Xu, Y.M.; Li, J.; Huang, L.F.; Lin, J.; Zhang, J.; Min, Q.H.; Yang, W.M.; et al. Mechanism of alternative splicing and its regulation. Biomed. Rep. 2015, 3, 152–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Xing, Y.; Lee, C. Alternative splicing and RNA selection pressure—Evolutionary consequences for eukaryotic genomes. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2006, 7, 499–509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Chen, K.; Dai, X.; Wu, J. Alternative splicing: An important mechanism in stem cell biology. World J. Stem Cells 2015, 7, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Jin, Y.; Dong, H.; Shi, Y.; Bian, L. Mutually exclusive alternative splicing of pre-mRNAs. Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. RNA 2018, 9, e1468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Kim, H.K.; Pham, M.H.C.; Ko, K.S.; Rhee, B.D.; Han, J. Alternative splicing isoforms in health and disease. Pflügers Arch. 2018, 470, 995–1016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Hatje, K.; Kollmar, M. Expansion of the mutually exclusive spliced exome in Drosophila. Nat. Commun. 2013, 4, 2460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Sugnet, C.W.; Kent, W.J.; Ares, M., Jr.; Haussler, D. Transcriptome and genome conservation of alternative splicing events in humans and mice. Pac. Symp. Biocomput. 2004, 9, 66–77. [Google Scholar]
  29. Hong, W.; Zhang, J.; Dong, H.; Shi, Y.; Ma, H.; Zhou, F.; Xu, B.; Fu, Y.; Zhang, S.; Hou, S.; et al. Intron-targeted mutagenesis reveals roles for Dscam1 RNA pairing architecture-driven splicing bias in neuronal wiring. Cell Rep. 2021, 36, 109373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Wagner, S.D.; Berglund, J.A. Alternative Pre-mRNA Splicing. Acta Physiol. 2013, 1126, 45–54. [Google Scholar]
  31. Sakabe, N.J.; Souza, S.J.D. Sequence features responsible for intron retention in human. Bmc Genom. 2007, 8, 59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Kalam, H.; Fontana, M.F.; Kumar, D. Alternate splicing of transcripts shape macrophage response to Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection. PLoS Pathog. 2017, 13, e1006236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Mvubu, N.E.; Pillay, B.; Pillay, M. Infection of pulmonary epithelial cells by clinical strains of M. tuberculosis induces alternate splicing events. Gene 2020, 750, 144755. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Zhang, W.; Niu, C.; Fu, R.Y.; Peng, Z.Y. Mycobacterium tuberculosis H37Rv infection regulates alternative splicing in Macrophages. Bioengineered 2018, 9, 203–208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Lyu, M.; Zhou, J.; Zhou, Y.; Chong, W.; Xu, W.; Lai, H.; Niu, L.; Hai, Y.; Yao, X.; Gong, S.; et al. From tuberculosis bedside to bench: UBE2B splicing as a potential biomarker and its regulatory mechanism. Signal Transduct. Target. Ther. 2023, 8, 82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Danelishvili, L.; Yamazaki, Y.; Selker, J.; Bermudez, L.E. Secreted Mycobacterium tuberculosis Rv3654c and Rv3655c proteins participate in the suppression of macrophage apoptosis. PLoS ONE 2010, 5, e10474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Long, J.C.; Caceres, J.F. The SR protein family of splicing factors: Master regulators of gene expression. Biochem. J. 2009, 417, 15–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Lai, M.C.; Peng, T.Y.; Tarn, W.Y. Functional interplay between viral and cellular SR proteins in control of post-transcriptional gene regulation. Febs J. 2009, 276, 1517–1526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Arinobu, Y.; Atamas, S.P.; Otsuka, T.; Niiro, H.; Yamaoka, K.; Mitsuyasu, H.; Niho, Y.; Hamasaki, N.; White, B.; Izuhara, K. Antagonistic effects of an alternative splice variant of human IL-4, IL-4delta2, on IL-4 activities in human monocytes and B cells. Cell. Immunol. 1999, 191, 161–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Seah, G.T.; Rook, G.A. High levels of mRNA encoding IL-4 in unstimulated peripheral blood mononuclear cells from tuberculosis patients revealed by quantitative nested reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction; correlations with serum IgE levels. Scand. J. Infect. Dis. 2001, 33, 106–109. [Google Scholar]
  41. Fletcher, H.A.; Owiafe, P.; Jeffries, D.; Hill, P.; Rook, G.A.; Zumla, A.; Doherty, T.M.; Brookes, R.H.; Vacsel Study, G. Increased expression of mRNA encoding interleukin (IL)-4 and its splice variant IL-4delta2 in cells from contacts of Mycobacterium tuberculosis, in the absence of in vitro stimulation. Immunology 2004, 112, 669–673. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Demissie, A.; Abebe, M.; Aseffa, A.; Rook, G.; Fletcher, H.; Zumla, A.; Weldingh, K.; Brock, I.; Andersen, P.; Doherty, T.M.; et al. Healthy individuals that control a latent infection with Mycobacterium tuberculosis express high levels of Th1 cytokines and the IL-4 antagonist IL-4delta2. J. Immunol. 2004, 172, 6938–6943. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Dheda, K.; Chang, J.S.; Huggett, J.F.; Kim, L.U.; Johnson, M.A.; Zumla, A.; Rook, G.A. The stability of mRNA encoding IL-4 is increased in pulmonary tuberculosis, while stability of mRNA encoding the antagonistic splice variant, IL-4delta2, is not. Tuberculosis 2007, 87, 237–241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Krawczenko, A.; Kieda, C.; Dus, D. The biological role and potential therapeutic application of interleukin 7. Arch. Immunol. Ther. Exp. 2005, 53, 518–525. [Google Scholar]
  45. Adankwah, E.; Harelimana, J.D.; Minadzi, D.; Aniagyei, W.; Abass, M.K.; Batsa Debrah, L.; Owusu, D.O.; Mayatepek, E.; Phillips, R.O.; Jacobsen, M. Lower IL-7 Receptor Expression of Monocytes Impairs Antimycobacterial Effector Functions in Patients with Tuberculosis. J. Immunol. 2021, 206, 2430–2440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Rane, L.; Rahman, S.; Magalhaes, I.; Ahmed, R.; Spangberg, M.; Kondova, I.; Verreck, F.; Andersson, J.; Brighenti, S.; Maeurer, M.J. Increased (6 exon) interleukin-7 production after M. tuberculosis infection and soluble interleukin-7 receptor expression in lung tissue. Genes Immun. 2011, 12, 513–522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Maeurer, M.J.; Trinder, P.; Hommel, G.; Walter, W.; Freitag, K.; Atkins, D.; Storkel, S. Interleukin-7 or interleukin-15 enhances survival of Mycobacterium tuberculosis-infected mice. Infect. Immun. 2000, 68, 2962–2970. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Vudattu, N.K.; Magalhaes, I.; Hoehn, H.; Pan, D.; Maeurer, M.J. Expression analysis and functional activity of interleukin-7 splice variants. Genes Immun. 2009, 10, 132–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Crawley, A.M.; Faucher, S.; Angel, J.B. Soluble IL-7R alpha (sCD127) inhibits IL-7 activity and is increased in HIV infection. J. Immunol. 2010, 184, 4679–4687. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Chua, A.O.; Wilkinson, V.L.; Presky, D.H.; Gubler, U. Cloning and characterization of a mouse IL-12 receptor-beta component. J. Immunol. 1995, 155, 4286–4294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. de Jong, R.; Altare, F.; Haagen, I.A.; Elferink, D.G.; Boer, T.; van Breda Vriesman, P.J.; Kabel, P.J.; Draaisma, J.M.; van Dissel, J.T.; Kroon, F.P.; et al. Severe mycobacterial and Salmonella infections in interleukin-12 receptor-deficient patients. Science 1998, 280, 1435–1438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Ford, N.R.; Miller, H.E.; Reeme, A.E.; Waukau, J.; Bengtson, C.; Routes, J.M.; Robinson, R.T. Inflammatory signals direct expression of human IL12RB1 into multiple distinct isoforms. J. Immunol. 2012, 189, 4684–4694. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Robinson, R.T.; Khader, S.A.; Martino, C.A.; Fountain, J.J.; Teixeira-Coelho, M.; Pearl, J.E.; Smiley, S.T.; Winslow, G.M.; Woodland, D.L.; Walter, M.J.; et al. Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection induces il12rb1 splicing to generate a novel IL-12Rbeta1 isoform that enhances DC migration. J. Exp. Med. 2010, 207, 591–605. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Ray, A.A.; Fountain, J.J.; Miller, H.E.; Cooper, A.M.; Robinson, R.T.; Flynn, J.L. IL12Rβ1ΔTM is a secreted product of il12rb1 that promotes control of extrapulmonary tuberculosis. Infect. Immun. 2015, 83, 560–571. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Aass, K.R.; Kastnes, M.H.; Standal, T. Molecular interactions and functions of IL-32. J. Leukoc. Biol. 2021, 109, 143–159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Dahl, C.A.; Schall, R.P.; He, H.L.; Cairns, J.S. Identification of a novel gene expressed in activated natural killer cells and T cells. J. Immunol. 1992, 148, 597–603. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Kim, S.; Han, S.; Azam, T.; Yoon, D.; Dinarello, C. Interleukin-32: A cytokine and inducer of TNFalpha. Immunity 2005, 22, 131–142. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  58. Kang, J.W.; Park, Y.S.; Lee, D.H.; Kim, M.S.; Bak, Y.; Ham, S.Y.; Park, S.H.; Kim, H.; Ahn, J.H.; Hong, J.T.J.B. Interaction network mapping among IL-32 isoforms. Biochimie 2014, 101, 248–251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Netea, M.G.; Azam, T.; Lewis, E.C.; Joosten, L.; Wang, M.; Langenberg, D.; Meng, X.; Chan, E.D.; Yoon, D.Y.; Ottenhoff, T. Mycobacterium tuberculosis Induces Interleukin-32 Production through a Caspase-1/IL-18/Interferon-γ-Dependent Mechanism. PLoS Med. 2006, 3, e277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Bai, X.; Kim, S.H.; Azam, T.; McGibney, M.T.; Huang, H.; Dinarello, C.A.; Chan, E.D. IL-32 is a host protective cytokine against Mycobacterium tuberculosis in differentiated THP-1 human macrophages. J. Immunol. 2010, 184, 3830–3840. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Bai, X.; Shang, S.; Henao-Tamayo, M.; Basaraba, R.J.; Ovrutsky, A.R.; Matsuda, J.L.; Takeda, K.; Chan, M.M.; Dakhama, A.; Kinney, W.H.; et al. Human IL-32 expression protects mice against a hypervirulent strain of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2015, 112, 5111–5116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Koeken, V.; Verrall, A.J.; Ardiansyah, E.; Apriani, L.; Dos Santos, J.C.; Kumar, V.; Alisjahbana, B.; Hill, P.C.; Joosten, L.A.B.; van Crevel, R.; et al. IL-32 and its splice variants are associated with protection against Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection and skewing of Th1/Th17 cytokines. J. Leukoc. Biol. 2020, 107, 113–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Bai, X.; Ovrutsky, A.R.; Kartalija, M.; Chmura, K.; Kamali, A.; Honda, J.R.; Oberley-Deegan, R.E.; Dinarello, C.A.; Crapo, J.D.; Chang, L.Y.; et al. IL-32 expression in the airway epithelial cells of patients with Mycobacterium avium complex lung disease. Int. Immunol. 2011, 23, 679–691. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Schenk, M.; Mahapatra, S.; Le, P.; Kim, H.J.; Choi, A.W.; Brennan, P.J.; Belisle, J.T.; Modlin, R.L.J.I. Immunity, Human NOD2 Recognizes Structurally Unique Muramyl Dipeptides from Mycobacterium leprae. Infect. Immun. 2016, 84, 2429–2438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Deng, W.; Yang, W.; Jie, Z.; Elgaili, A.A.; Xie, J.J.O. Mycobacterium tuberculosis PPE32 promotes cytokines production and host cell apoptosis through caspase cascade accompanying with enhanced ER stress response. Oncotarget 2016, 7, 67347–67359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Bai, X.; Kinney, W.H.; Su, W.L.; Bai, A.; Ovrutsky, A.R.; Honda, J.R.; Netea, M.G.; Henao-Tamayo, M.; Ordway, D.J.; Dinarello, C.A.; et al. Caspase-3-independent apoptotic pathways contribute to interleukin-32gamma-mediated control of Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection in THP-1 cells. BMC Microbiol. 2015, 15, 39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Montoya, D.; Inkeles, M.S.; Liu, P.T.; Realegeno, S.; Teles, R.M.; Vaidya, P.; Munoz, M.A.; Schenk, M.; Swindell, W.R.; Chun, R.; et al. IL-32 is a molecular marker of a host defense network in human tuberculosis. Sci. Transl. Med. 2014, 6, 250ra114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Goda, C.; Kanaji, T.; Kanaji, S.; Tanaka, G.; Arima, K.; Ohno, S.; Izuhara, K. Involvement of IL-32 in activation-induced cell death in T cells. Int. Immunol. 2006, 18, 233–240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Li, W.; Deng, W.; Xie, J. The Biology and Role of Interleukin-32 in Tuberculosis. J. Immunol. Res. 2018, 2018, 1535194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Her, E.; Kim, S.J.; Kim, B.K.; Choi, W.S.; Yoon, D.Y.; Kim, S.H.; Bae, S.Y.; Choi, J.D.; Dinarello, C.A.; Lee, C.K. Identification of the most active interleukin-32 isoform. Immunology 2017, 126, 535–542. [Google Scholar]
Molecules 29 01798 g001
Figure 1. Overview of splicing reactions and involved regulatory signals/proteins. (a) The assembly and disassembly of the spliceosome during the entire splicing reaction. The figure shows the progressive interaction of spliceosome small ribonucleoprotein (snRNP) particles (U1, U2, U4, U5, and U6; brown, green, yellow, pink, and purple, respectively) during the removal of introns from pre-mRNA containing two exons (white and black). The name of the spliceosome complex and the catalytic steps of the reaction are marked. (b) The cis-acting elements stabilize or disrupt the assembly of splicing bodies on the pre-mRNA through positive and negative signals. The diagram illustrates a common segment of eukaryotic precursor mRNA, which comprises one exon flanked by two introns. Factors that promote splicing reactions at nearby splice sites, such as serine-arginine repeat (SR) proteins (shown in dark purple), frequently bind to Intronic and Exonic Splicing Enhancers (ISE and ESE, indicated in purple). Intronic and Exonic Splicing Silencers (ISS and ESS; pink) are often constrained by factors that inhibit splicing from nearby splice sites, such as heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoprotein particles (hnRNP) proteins (red). The * indicates a catalytically active complex.
Figure 1. Overview of splicing reactions and involved regulatory signals/proteins. (a) The assembly and disassembly of the spliceosome during the entire splicing reaction. The figure shows the progressive interaction of spliceosome small ribonucleoprotein (snRNP) particles (U1, U2, U4, U5, and U6; brown, green, yellow, pink, and purple, respectively) during the removal of introns from pre-mRNA containing two exons (white and black). The name of the spliceosome complex and the catalytic steps of the reaction are marked. (b) The cis-acting elements stabilize or disrupt the assembly of splicing bodies on the pre-mRNA through positive and negative signals. The diagram illustrates a common segment of eukaryotic precursor mRNA, which comprises one exon flanked by two introns. Factors that promote splicing reactions at nearby splice sites, such as serine-arginine repeat (SR) proteins (shown in dark purple), frequently bind to Intronic and Exonic Splicing Enhancers (ISE and ESE, indicated in purple). Intronic and Exonic Splicing Silencers (ISS and ESS; pink) are often constrained by factors that inhibit splicing from nearby splice sites, such as heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoprotein particles (hnRNP) proteins (red). The * indicates a catalytically active complex.
Molecules 29 01798 g001
Molecules 29 01798 g002
Figure 2. Graphical description of alternative splicing. (a) Normal splicing. (b) Exon skipping or inclusion. (c) Alternative 5′SS selection. (d) Alternative 3′SS selection. (e) Mutually exclusive splicing. (f) Retained intron. (g) Alternative promoters. (h) Alternative polyA. Grey rectangles represent component exons. Yellow and green rectangles represent variable exons. The black solid line indicates introns. The thin solid lines and dotted lines located on exons represent different splicing patterns.
Figure 2. Graphical description of alternative splicing. (a) Normal splicing. (b) Exon skipping or inclusion. (c) Alternative 5′SS selection. (d) Alternative 3′SS selection. (e) Mutually exclusive splicing. (f) Retained intron. (g) Alternative promoters. (h) Alternative polyA. Grey rectangles represent component exons. Yellow and green rectangles represent variable exons. The black solid line indicates introns. The thin solid lines and dotted lines located on exons represent different splicing patterns.
Molecules 29 01798 g002
Molecules 29 01798 g003
Figure 3. Alternative splicing of macrophages caused by Mtb infection. The difference in alternative splicing between Healthy people, TB patients, and Healthy TB contacts. The spherical structure of the lungs in TB patients is granuloma. The red arrows indicate increased protein expression.
Figure 3. Alternative splicing of macrophages caused by Mtb infection. The difference in alternative splicing between Healthy people, TB patients, and Healthy TB contacts. The spherical structure of the lungs in TB patients is granuloma. The red arrows indicate increased protein expression.
Molecules 29 01798 g003
Molecules 29 01798 g004
Figure 4. Different isoforms of IL32 and their interactions. The nine isoforms of IL-32 are listed from top to bottom: IL-32α, IL-32β, IL-32γ, IL-32δ, IL-32ε, IL-32ζ, IL-32η, IL-32θ, and IL-32s. The 1–8 exons of IL32 are arranged from left to right. ATG is the start codon. TGA is a stop codon. The black arcs with arrows represent interactions between different isoforms.
Figure 4. Different isoforms of IL32 and their interactions. The nine isoforms of IL-32 are listed from top to bottom: IL-32α, IL-32β, IL-32γ, IL-32δ, IL-32ε, IL-32ζ, IL-32η, IL-32θ, and IL-32s. The 1–8 exons of IL32 are arranged from left to right. ATG is the start codon. TGA is a stop codon. The black arcs with arrows represent interactions between different isoforms.
Molecules 29 01798 g004
Molecules 29 01798 g005
Figure 5. The protective role for IL-32 isoforms upon Mtb infection. Macrophage response after Mtb infection. The yellow rod is Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Cathelicidin and DEFB4 are antimicrobial peptides.
Figure 5. The protective role for IL-32 isoforms upon Mtb infection. Macrophage response after Mtb infection. The yellow rod is Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Cathelicidin and DEFB4 are antimicrobial peptides.
Molecules 29 01798 g005
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Hong, W.; Yang, H.; Wang, X.; Shi, J.; Zhang, J.; Xie, J. The Role of mRNA Alternative Splicing in Macrophages Infected with Mycobacterium tuberculosis: A Field Needing to Be Discovered. Molecules 2024, 29, 1798. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules29081798

AMA Style

Hong W, Yang H, Wang X, Shi J, Zhang J, Xie J. The Role of mRNA Alternative Splicing in Macrophages Infected with Mycobacterium tuberculosis: A Field Needing to Be Discovered. Molecules. 2024; 29(8):1798. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules29081798

Chicago/Turabian Style

Hong, Weiling, Hongxing Yang, Xiao Wang, Jingyi Shi, Jian Zhang, and Jianping Xie. 2024. "The Role of mRNA Alternative Splicing in Macrophages Infected with Mycobacterium tuberculosis: A Field Needing to Be Discovered" Molecules 29, no. 8: 1798. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules29081798

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop