Next Article in Journal
Surface Charge Effects for the Hydrogen Evolution Reaction on Pt(111) Using a Modified Grand-Canonical Potential Kinetics Method
Previous Article in Journal
Antimicrobial Activity of Individual Volatile Compounds from Various Essential Oils
Previous Article in Special Issue
RuO2 Catalysts for Electrocatalytic Oxygen Evolution in Acidic Media: Mechanism, Activity Promotion Strategy and Research Progress
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Molecules
Volume 29
Issue 8
10.3390/molecules29081812
molecules-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Heteronuclear Dual Metal Atom Electrocatalysts for Water-Splitting Reactions

by
Lu Lu
1,* and
Xingcai Wu
2
1
Paris Curie Engineer School, Beijing University of Chemical Technology, Beijing 100029, China
2
Key Laboratory of Mesoscopic Chemistry of MOE, School of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210093, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Molecules 2024, 29(8), 1812; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules29081812
Submission received: 21 February 2024 / Revised: 6 April 2024 / Accepted: 11 April 2024 / Published: 16 April 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Synthesis and Applications of Novel Low-Dimensional Nanomaterials in Electrocatalysis)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Hydrogen is considered a promising substitute for traditional fossil fuels because of its widespread sources, high calorific value of combustion, and zero carbon emissions. Electrocatalytic water-splitting to produce hydrogen is also deemed to be an ideal approach; however, it is a challenge to make highly efficient and low-cost electrocatalysts. Single-atom catalysts (SACs) are considered the most promising candidate to replace traditional noble metal catalysts. Compared with SACs, dual-atom catalysts (DACs) are capable of greater attraction, including higher metal loading, more versatile active sites, and excellent catalytic activity. In this review, several general synthetic strategies and structural characterization methods of DACs are introduced, and recent experimental advances in water-splitting reactions are discussed. The authors hope that this review provides insights and inspiration to researchers regarding DACs in electrocatalytic water-splitting.

1. Introduction

Nowadays, fossil fuels are the main energy source for humanity. The combustion of fossil fuels produces carbon dioxide and leads to the greenhouse effect. With the shortage of traditional fossil fuels and the aggravation of environmental problems, it is pivotal to develop clean, cheap, convenient, and sustainable alternative energy.
Hydrogen energy is considered an ideal substitute for conventional fuels due to its widespread sources, high calorific value of combustion, and zero carbon emissions [1]. Currently, approximately 95% of the world’s hydrogen is generated from natural gas and fossil fuels through an energy-intensive process [2]. Compared with traditional technologies, electrocatalytic water-splitting systems can realize the use of renewable energy (e.g., solar energy) for uninterrupted and efficient hydrogen production. Thus, they have gained ever-rising attention in recent years [3].
The electrocatalytic water-splitting comprises a cathodic hydrogen evolution reaction (HER) and an anodic oxygen evolution reaction (OER) [4,5]. The efficiency and activity of the water-splitting system depend on the electrocatalysts. To date, only less than 4% of the hydrogen is produced by the electrocatalytic water-splitting systems [6] due to the high cost and unsatisfied economic benefits compared with conventional fossil energy production. Currently, metal-based electrocatalysts are widely applied in both HER and OER. For example, Pt group electrocatalysts are considered the benchmark for HER because of their excellent activities [7,8]. Noble metal-based electrocatalysts were reported to exhibit superior OER performances [9,10]. However, the high price and natural scarcity of noble metals hinder their practical applications for water-splitting electrocatalysts. Reducing the content of the noble metal in metal-based electrocatalysts is an effective and straightforward way to reduce cost. When the noble metal content is reduced, the utilization of the noble metal component should be increased to maintain the intrinsic activity. Therefore, many studies focus on increasing metal centers with low coordination by reducing the size of nanoparticle catalysts. In these studies, atomic-level catalysts have become a hotspot.
Single-atom catalysts (SACs) have atomic active sites dispersed on the surface of supports or alloying with another material [11]. By merit of maximum atom utilization and adjustable coordination, it has been widely investigated in the field of electrocatalysis since it was first reported by Zhang et al. in 2011 [12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19]. At the same time, SACs often suffer from the predicament of low loading (<1.5 wt%), which may limit the overall activity. Furthermore, some multi-electron-proton coupling reactions are limited at single-atom sites, and the random dispersion of SACs leads to an unsatisfied synergy [20].
As an extension of SAC, heteronuclear dual-atom catalysts (DACs) with co-doped multi-metals have drawn great attention in recent years. They retain the advantages of SACs and overcome the limitations of SACs, which can increase the metal loading, break the linear scaling relations [21], and adjust the electronic structure of the catalysts [22]. Meanwhile, the cooperation between the two metal components of DACs can generate a synergistic effect to enhance the intermediates’ adsorption and modulate reaction pathways due to the chemical/structural flexibility of active sites [23].
Although numerous high-quality reviews focused on DACs, including the definition of the DACs, the micro-structures, and different applications of DACs in various fields, establishing them as the next frontier after SACs [24,25,26,27,28], the discussion on the design of heterogeneous DACs for water-splitting is not sufficient. Therefore, it is valuable to review the progress of DACs in water-splitting reactions.
In this review, we present a comprehensive overview of the rational design and development of heterogeneous DACs in water-splitting reactions. First, we briefly introduce some synthetic strategies for heterogeneous DACs. Subsequently, the typical characterizations of DACs are summarized. Then, the recent experimental advances in water-splitting reactions are discussed in detail. Finally, this review provides a summary of the problems and challenges regarding the water-splitting technologies.

2. Synthetic Strategies for DACs

Efficient strategies were adopted to synthesize well-defined DACs. Each technique brings its advantages and drawbacks. We will introduce several common approaches to construction DACs for water-splitting reactions.

2.1. High-Temperature Pyrolysis

High-temperature pyrolysis is a general strategy to synthesize atomic-level reactive sites. The pyrolysis temperature and atmosphere composition are crucial for the formation of DACs. Benefiting from the tunable pore structure and large surface area, metal–organic frameworks (MOFs) and zeolitic imidazolate frameworks (ZIFs) have been widely used as precursors to fabricate DACs for water-splitting reactions.
For example, Pan et al. reported a MOF-assisted host–guest strategy to prepare Ni-Co DACs, as shown in Figure 1 [29]; the Ni and Co atoms were sealed in the cage of ZIF-8, which served as a host with suitable pore size. Then, the NiCo@ZIF-8 precursor was pyrolyzed under N2 at 920 °C to generate Ni-N4 and Co-N4 sites embedded into a 3D carbon substrate. During the process, the ZIF-8 was carbonized to form the N-C substrate to provide anchor sites; the anchored Co-N4 can adsorb and activate O2, which promotes the formation of key intermediate and accelerates the reaction kinetics. Meanwhile, the adjacent Ni-N4 can further improve the activity of Co-N4 and endow the electrocatalyst with outstanding HER activity in both acid and alkaline solutions. The NiCo DACs require overpotentials of 189 and 260 mV to reach the current density of 10 mA cm−2 in 1 M KOH and 0.5 M H2SO4, respectively.
In the study of Jia et al. [30], porous graphitic g-C3N4 was synthesized as a precursor, and then a Ni precursor, polydopamine, and phthalocyanine iron were coated on the surface of porous graphitic g-C3N4 in that order. After pyrolyzing under 900 °C, the porous graphitic g-C3N4 formed porous carbon nanosheets, the Fe/N4 and Ni/N4 sites formed on both sides of the carbon nanosheets with Janus structure (FeNijns/NC). During this process, the g-C3N4 was used as a sacrificial template to form the lamellar and porous morphology, which can bond and stabilize the Ni/Fe SAs and avoid the migration of the active sites. Experiments indicate that the overpotential of FeNijns/NC is 440 mV at 10 mA cm−2, and the Tafel slope is fitted to be 106 mV dec−1, demonstrating that FeNijns/NC possesses superior OER activity.
In short, high-temperature pyrolysis can regulate the dispersion of metal sites easily, and the structure and the active sites of DACs can be well-defined. However, some active metals may be incorporated into the bulk of the substrate materials, which can hardly be accessible during electrocatalysis. Meanwhile, undesirable impurities may be generated during the pyrolysis, which usually requires an additional etching process.

2.2. Wet Chemistry Impregnation

The wet chemistry impregnation method is low-cost and straightforward. The DACs were prepared by introducing the precursors to the surface of the matrix and then post-treatment, such as reduction or thermal treatment.
Li et al. prepared FeSO4·7H2O and Na2MoO4·2H2O solutions as metal precursors, then the as-obtained solution and a piece of Ni foam were transferred to an autoclave with a Teflon liner [31]. The reaction was kept at 120 °C for 24 h to synthesize FeMo dual-site catalysts (FeMo@CoNi-OH/Ni3S2), as shown in Figure 2. The electrocatalytic performance of FeMo@CoNi-OH/Ni3S2 was then investigated in both acidic and alkaline solutions. It exhibited excellent HER performance with 89 and 177 mV to reach 10 mA cm−2 in 1 M KOH and 0.5 M H2SO4, respectively, indicating it is more favorable for HER compared with the other contrast samples. The successful synthesis of Fe and Mo single atoms can provide atomic sites, and the difference in electronegativity between Fe and Mo led to charge rearrangement and a charge compensation effect, thus improving the electrochemical performance.
The wet chemistry impregnation usually adopts a certain amount of precursor to generate atomically dispersed metal sites. The type and concentration of the precursor can be modulated to prepare desired DACs; however, it is difficult to precisely regulate the location of the active sites, as some metal atoms may aggregate to form bulk sites.

2.3. Atomic Layer Deposition (ALD)

The ALD approach generally utilizes a gas-phase reaction of metal precursors with a solid substrate to synthesize DACs. It is a gas-phase deposition strategy to deposit the thin films onto the substrate accurately.
For example, Hu et al. used (methyl cyclopentadienyl)-platinum (MeCpPtMe3) and O3 as precursors and used high-purity N2 as purge gas and carrier gas; an N-doped carbon substrate was loaded on aluminum foil and then placed into the ALD chamber. After 50 cycles of ALD, PtNi-NC was obtained [32]. The electrochemical measurements indicated that PtNi-NC has an overpotential of 30 mV to achieve the current density of 10 mA cm−2 and a Tafel slope of 27 mV dec−1 in acidic solution, which is lower than those of 20 wt% Pt/C and other contrast electrocatalysts. The superior electrocatalytic performance of PtNi-NC can be attributed to the dual atoms, which have a synergistic effect by optimizing the local electronic structure and the charge distribution. The ALD technique is beneficial for controlling the composition and structure of the DACs, but it requires special equipment and harsh reaction conditions.

2.4. Template Assisted

The template-assisted method usually utilizes precursors to act as a template or pattern to synthesize DACs. For example, a SiO2 template can be etched by NaOH solution, which is applied to construct a hollow catalyst. Ma et al. synthesized Ni-N4 and Fe-N4 dual single-atomic sites with a template-assisted strategy [33]. Firstly, the positively charged SiO2 nanospheres were adopted as a hard template, and then electronegative [Ni(CN4)]2− was chosen to form Ni-N4 single-atom sites. Next, the formed SiO2@[Ni(CN4)]2− intermediate was encapsulated with graphene oxide (GO) to form SiO2@[Ni(CN4)]2−@GO. The iron (II) phthalocyanine (FePc) was then adsorbed on the outside of SiO2@[Ni(CN4)]2−@GO to obtain SiO2@[Ni(CN4)]2−@GO@FePc. Thereafter, the SiO2@[Ni(CN4)]2−@GO@FePc was treated at 700 °C and etched with NaOH solution to remove the SiO2 template, eventually leading to the formation of a Ni-N4 and Fe-N4 dual single-atomic site. This work successfully synthesizes the Janus hollow spheres derived from different single-atom catalysts, respectively, on the inner and outer surfaces. The OER polarization curves in O2-saturated 0.1 M KOH indicate that the Ni-N4/GHSs/Fe-N4 has a low overpotential of 0.39 V to reach a current density of 10 mA cm−2, which mainly originates from the Ni-N4/GHSs sites.
In other works, porous carbon [34], the metal–organic framework (MOF) [35], and a salt template [36] were also investigated to fabricate the template. It indicates that the template-assisted method can synthesize a porous micro-structure but, sometimes, the removal of some templates may cause damage to the nanostructure [37].

2.5. Ball Milling

The ball milling techniques can mix different precursors at atomic scales homogeneously. For example, Liu et al. employed the ball milling method to synthesize CuCo/NSC electrocatalysts [38]. First, metal precursors, nitrogen precursors, and sulfur precursors were ball-milled to generate the CuCo-NS bulk complex. The content of nitrogen and sulfur can be modulated by adjusting the mass ratio of the precursor. Then, the ball milling process was conducted to generate CuCo-NS, which dispersed onto the carbon black support uniformly. After pyrolyzing under an argon atmosphere at a high temperature, a pack of CuCo DACs was obtained. The detailed experiments and theoretical validation imply a coordinated atom (heteroatom N and S) surrounds CuCo DACs in various orbitals coordination shells. Subsequently, The HER performance of CuCo-DACs was investigated in 1 M KOH. One of the as-prepared DACs, which was denoted as CuCo/NSC1, displayed an overpotential of 159 mV at 10 mA cm−2 and a small Tafel slope of 75.9 mV dec−1. The distinct coordination environment of CuCo DACs can be attributed to their different electrochemical activities. The introduction of S into coordination shells can lead the metal atoms to attain higher valence states, proving advantageous for their reaction with ΔGH* in HER.
Except for the above-mentioned methods, ion exchange [39], atom trapping [40], the electrochemical method [41], and chemical vapor deposition [42] are also employed to prepare various DACs. But there remain some challenges, such as how to synthesize DACs with both high productivity and precise location. Only by solving these problems can the preparation of DACs become easier and accessible.

3. Characterizations of DACs

Characterization techniques are imperative for validating the structure–activity relationship of DACs. Tradition characterization techniques, including scanning electron microscopy (SEM), X-ray diffraction (XRD), and low-magnification transmission electron microscopy (TEM), can provide the basic crystal structure of nanomaterials. Thus, advanced characterization is crucial to identify the geometric and electronic configuration of the DACs. Various techniques were employed to confirm the existence of DACs. Here, we mainly focus on two typical techniques, high-resolution aberration-corrected high-angle annular dark-field scanning transmission electron microscopy (HAADF-STEM) and X-ray absorption near-edge structure (XANES) spectroscopy, to recognize the nature of DACs.

3.1. High-Angle Annular Dark-Field Scanning Transmission Electron Microscopy (HAADF-STEM)

The morphology and structure of DACs can be directly observed through electron microscopy. In particular, the aberration-corrected (AC) high-angle annular dark-field scanning transmission electron microscopy (HAADF-STEM) mode is widely applied for the characterization of DACs. It can scatter at high angles and is particularly sensitive to heavy atoms; the DACs can be clearly observed from the bright spots on the support. Usually, the heavier metal atoms with a higher Z number display bright dots in dark-field images [43].
For example, Patzke et al. used the HAADF-STEM to observe the atomic dispersion of Ni and Fe atoms in the N-doped graphene nanosheets (NiFe-CNG); the bright dots imply the metal atoms are homogeneously dispersed on the substrate (Figure 3). Energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS) mapping in HAADF-STEM is applied to further identify the atomic-resolution chemical composition and distribution. EDS confirms the uniform dispersion of metal, N, and O atoms in their as-prepared samples [44]. By modulating the molar ratio of Ni/Fe, the NiFe-CNG shows the best activity with an overpotential of 270 mV at the current density of 10 mA cm−2 and the lowest Tafel slope of 60 mV dec−1 in 0.1 M KOH. Combining experimental results and DFT calculations, it can be concluded that the OER benefits from the electronic interplay of the Ni-O-Fe atomic sites. The Ni/Fe dual atom can optimize local electronic structures and enhance the adsorption energies of intermediates, leading to a dual-site reaction pathway with the participation of both Ni and Fe.
The non-noble metal can also be recognized by the HAADF-STEM. In the study by Liu et al., the HAADF-STEM confirms the presence of both single atoms and dual single atoms in Fe3Co7-NC. The corresponding elemental mapping images show that Fe, Co, N, and C are uniformly dispersed over the entire matrix [45]. The Fe3Co7-NC exhibits superior OER performance with an overpotential of 343 mV and a corresponding Tafel slope of 68 mV dec−1 in 0.1 M KOH, indicating the synergistic effect of Fe-Co dual atoms. Combined with first-principles calculations, it suggests that the interaction between Fe and Co to form the Fe-O-O-Co bond enhances the formation of key intermediates for the OER.
Nowadays, the HAADF-STEM has become a unique and effective tool for the identify of DACs due to its structural visualization, but it is difficult to distinguish the atomic sites in different depths. It usually needs to be combined with other characterization techniques to recognize the DACs.

3.2. X-ray Absorption Spectroscopy

The X-ray absorption spectrum (XAS) is another useful tool to characterize the DACs. It provides a variety of information, including valences, coordination configurations, and structures. The X-ray absorption near edge structure (XANES) indicates the oxidation state of the materials, and the extended X-ray absorption fine structure (EXAFS) shows the coordination environment of the catalyst through Fourier or wavelet (FT or WT) analysis and EXAFS fitting [25].
Zhao et al. carried out XAS to observe the chemical states and coordination configurations of Ru/Co dual-sites anchored on N-doped carbon (Ru/Co-N-C-800 °C) [46]. In their XANES spectra, as shown in Figure 4, the near-edge absorption energy of the Ru K-edge was located between the Ru foil and RuO2, which is close to the RuCl3, suggesting the main valence state of Ru in Ru/Co-N-C-800 °C is about +3. Compared with RuO2, a pre-edge peak of Ru in Ru/Co-N-C-800 °C is related to the transition of Ru 1 s to the unoccupied Ru 4d level [47]. Additionally, the energy of Ru K-edge spectra of Ru/Co-N-C-800 °C decreased when compared with the Ru-N-C-800 °C, implying the valence of Ru decreases after introducing Co sites. As shown in Figure 4b, the normalized Co adsorption spectrum for Co K-edge spectra in Ru/Co-N-C-800 °C is positioned between CoO and Co foil, implying the oxidation of Co in Ru/Co-N-C-800 °C. A pre-edge peak (A) at ~7709.6 eV can be assigned to the dipole-forbidden but quadrupole-allowed transition, referring to the 3d and 4p orbital hybridization of the Co atoms [48]. The Fourier-transformed (FT) k3-weighted EXAFS (FT-EXAFS) was further conducted. The dominant peak for Ru/Co-N-C-800 °C can be assigned to the Ru-N/C bond; there are no Ru-Ru peaks that can be detected in the Ru/Co-N-C-800 °C. In the FT-EXAFS of Co K-edge, the peaks at ~2.2 Å exclude the presence of metal–metal bonds, confirming the isolation of Ru and Co atoms. The WT of K3-weighted EXAFS spectra further confirm the isolation of Ru and Co atoms. The only dominant peak for Ru at 4.3 Å in Ru/Co-N-C-800 °C is ascribed to the Ru-N structure. Similarly, only Co-N paths are detected, confirming the presence of Co-N bonds.
The above analysis of composition and atomic structure confirms the presence of both Ru and Co single atoms. The HER activity of Ru/Co-N-C-800 °C was then investigated. The overpotential of Ru/Co-N-C-800 °C to deliver a current density of 10 mA cm−2 is 19 and 17 mV in 1 M KOH and 0.5 M H2SO4, even outperforming commercial Pt/C under the same conditions. DFT calculations were conducted to validate the synergistic effect between Ru-N4 and Co-N4 sites. It indicates that the interaction between Ru and H intermediate can be weakened by CO-N4 sites and achieve remarkable HER activity.
In another work by Lee et al., the XANES and EXAFS were conducted to investigate the coordination environment of the Fe and Co species of the FeCo-N4-hollow carbonized shell (FeCo-N4/HCS) [49]. Based on the Fe K-edge XANES, FeCo-N4/HCS shows the position of the absorption threshold between Fe2O3 and iron phthalocyanine (FePc), indicating the average valence state of Fe situates between +2 and +3 [50], which can be caused by the drawing of Fe electrons to the adjacent N atoms [51]. In the FT-EXAFS, the main peak in FeCo-N4/HCS is similar to the FePc main peak, suggesting the dominant Fe-N coordination [52]. The EXAFS fitting exhibits that the average coordination number of Fe-N was 4.7, implying that each Fe atom is coordinated to five or four N atoms. WT-EXAFS further demonstrates the single-atom dispersion of Fe. On the other hand, the K-edge XANES of Co displays that the valence state of Co in FeCo-N4/HCS is ~+2 [53]. In the Co K-edge FT-EXAFS profile, the main peak can be attributed to the coordination of Co-N, suggesting the single-atomic state of Co species. The EXAFS fitting curves further indicate the single-atom Co-N4 model. The OER activity of FeCo-N4/HCS was tested in 1 M KOH. The overpotential is 391 mV, which delivers a current density of 10 mA cm−2, and the Tafel slope is 78.52 mV dec−1, indicating the superior OER kinetics and interfacial response. The outstanding electrochemical performance of FeCo-N4/HCS can be attributed to the highly dispersed atomic sites and hollow structure of carbonized shells, which can increase the electrocatalytic active surface area and accelerate the mass and charge transfer.
Notably, the information deduced from XAS is an average result, indicating that an inaccurate structure may be obtained if the materials have various coordination configurations. Thus, the XAS should unite with other tools to confirm the real structural information.
Additionally, X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS), Mössbauer spectroscopy, and Fourier-transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy can also be applied to research the DACs. The other unmentioned characterization methods for DACs can be seen in other reviews [54,55].

4. Electrocatalytic Applications

In this chapter, recent developments for DACs in water-splitting applications are summarized. The relationships between the structure of DACs and electrochemical properties is discussed, which provides a new inspiration for the design of DACs.

4.1. Hydrogen Evolution Reaction

Electrochemical hydrogen evolution reaction provides a cost-efficient and sustainable method to generate high-purity H2 effectively, which is an important component of developing green energy technologies [56,57,58,59,60]. The widely accepted electron-transfer steps of HER in both acid and alkaline electrolytes are summarized in Table 1.
According to the reaction pathway, the HER in alkaline solutions includes Tafel, Heyrovsky, and Volmer steps, in which Tafel slopes are 30 mV dec−1, 40 mV dec−1, and 120 mV dec−1, respectively [61]. The reaction rate of HER is determined by the ΔGH* (the adsorption-free energy of hydrogen on the catalyst surface). The closer the ΔGH* to zero, the more conducive to achieving rapid HER kinetics by balancing the adsorption and desorption of H* on the surface [62,63,64]. The ΔGH* mainly relies on the intrinsic electronic properties of the electrocatalysts. Thus, the reasonable design of a DAC catalyst is very crucial.
So far, Pt group metal (PGM) has been widely considered as the state-of-the-art electrocatalyst for HER due to the optimal ΔGH* value and rapid reaction kinetics [24]. However, their practical applications are inhibited by the high price and natural scarcity. To solve this problem, PGM-based DACs were researched in HER, including Pt, Pd, and Ru dual atom sites. We will introduce some typical DACs to the HER in different electrolytes.
For example, Sun et al. utilized an atomic layer deposition process to prepare high-quality Pt-Ru dimer structures on nitrogen-doped carbon nanotubes. The electrocatalytic performance of the Pt-Ru dimer was investigated in H2SO4 by cyclic voltammograms. It shows much higher mass activity (more than 50 times) compared with the commercial Pt/C. Both the XAS spectra and theoretical calculations reveal the formation of the Rt-Ru bond. Detailed studies indicate that the high HER activity can be attributed to the introduction of Pt, which can modulate the electronic structure between Ru and H [65].
In another work, Yu et al. developed a Pt1Ru1/NMHCS-A DAC, which consists of a Pt-Ru dimer and an activated N-doped mesoporous hollow carbon sphere. The Pt1Ru1/NMHCS-A has a superior HER activity in an acid solution due to the synergistic effect and electron redistribution effect in the Pt1Ru1 dimer, which can simultaneously accelerate the H2 production. The Pt1Ru1/NMHCS-A exhibits a quite small overpotential of 22 mV to drive a current density of 10 mA cm−2. Meanwhile, a small Tafel slope of 38 mV dec−1 implies a Volmer–Heyrovsky mechanism in the HER process. The spectroscopic investigations and theoretical calculations reveal that electron redistribution is promoted by Ru atoms, and the Pt can accumulate protons for the HER process, leading to optimal HER activity [66].
The DACs composed of noble metal and transition metal were also proven to be effective in acidic solutions. Wang et al. report dual single-atom Rh-Fe as an excellent electrocatalyst (FR-NCS) for the HER in 0.5 M H2SO4, the FR-NCS exhibited an ultralow overpotential of 36 mV at 10 mA cm−2 with a corresponding Tafel slope of 26 mV dec−1, which is superior to 20 wt% Pt/C and other single-atom electrocatalysts. Experiments and first-principles calculations indicate that the interaction of H on the Rh site is stronger than that of Fe sites. The Rh sites enhance the adsorption and evolution of H, and Fe sites facilitate the charge distribution. The excellent activity of FR-NCS for HER can be attributed mainly to the synergistic effect between Rh and Fe sites [67].
The electrocatalytic activities of DACs in alkaline electrolytes have also been researched. For example, Cheng et al. prepared Pt1Mo1/Ni3Se2 dual-atom catalysts. As shown in Figure 5a, it only needs 53 mV to reach the current density of 10 mA cm−2 in 1 M KOH media, which outperforms the contrast electrocatalysts. The Pt1Mo1/Ni3Se2 shows a smaller Tafel slope of 49.6 mV dec−1 in Figure 5b, implying the quick reaction kinetics over it. Meanwhile, its mass activity is 4.13 times higher than that of Pt/C at 200 mV (Figure 5c). Combining the experimental results and density functional theory calculations, the introduction of Mo atoms can effectively regulate the hydrogen adsorption energy of Pt sites and boost the HER activity. Generally, the synergistic effect between Pt and Mo sites can realize the charge redistribution, thus optimizing the adsorption of H* and enhancing the electrochemical performance [68]. This work provides a new strategy for the development of DAC, which is compatible with commercial Pt/C in alkaline media.
In another work, Zhang et al. fabricated a bimetallic Ru and Ni co-modified MoS2; the as-prepared Ru/Ni-MoS2 has excellent HER activity in 1 M KOH solution [69]. It displays an ultrasmall overpotential of 32 mV with the corresponding Tafel slope of 41 mV dec−1. Experiments and theoretical calculations unveil that the Ru atoms were anchored on the Ni atoms atop sites, the Ni atoms bonded with S atoms served as a hydrogen acceptor and Ru atoms served as a hydroxyl acceptor, and the synergistic effect accelerated the water dissociation and the HER reaction.
Some non-noble metal-based DACs were confirmed to be excellent HER electrocatalysts in alkaline electrolytes. Rogach et al. prepared dual-atom CoNi on the surface of Ti3C2Tx (CoNi-Ti3C2Tx) [70]. The HER performance was evaluated in 1.0 M KOH. It displayed a HER overpotential of 31 mV to deliver 10 mA cm−2 and a Tafel slope of 33 mV dec−1. The Ti3C2Tx MXene was modified by L-tryptophan molecules so the substrate can stabilize Co and Ni atoms by forming metal-O/metal-N bonds. Efficient electron transfer occurs in CoNi-Ti3C2Tx, which lowers the energy barriers of HER.
DACs adapt to various pH values and can benefit the efficient hydrogen production from water. In the study by Fan et al., they developed a dual-atom catalyst consisting of an O-coordinated W-Mo heterodimer embedded in N-doped graphene (NG) [42]. The W1Mo1-NG DAC enables Pt-like activity and ultrahigh stability for HER in pH-universal electrolytes. The W1Mo1-NG produced a current density of 10 mA cm−2 at an overpotential of 25 mV in 0.5 M H2SO4 and 67 mV in 1 M KOH. In addition, the Tafel slope of W1Mo1-NG was 72 mV dec−1 and 98 mV dec−1 in acid and alkaline electrolytes, respectively. The distinctive W-O-Mo-O-C configuration in W1Mo1-NG serves as the active site for HER, endowing the electrocatalyst with superior activity and stability.
DACs can achieve effective HER across a wide pH span, outperforming the performance of Pt/C. Qu and co-workers prepared N-coordinated Ir-Mo DAC on a carbon matrix [71]. The as-prepared Ir-Mo DAC/NC has an overpotential of 11.3 mV at 10 mA cm−2 in 0.5 M H2SO4, surpassing that of Ir/C and Pt/C (Figure 6a). In this environment, it also achieves a low Tafel slope of 22.67 mV dec−1 (Figure 6b). The mass activity of Ir-Mo DAC/NC surpasses the commercial Pt/C and Ir/C catalysts in acidic electrolytes, as displayed in Figure 6c. The HER activity of Ir-Mo DAC/NC was further evaluated in 1 M KOH (Figure 6d–f) to investigate its pH universality. It has an overpotential of 23 mV to deliver a current density of 10 mA cm2 with a corresponding Tafel slope of 25.24 mV dec−1 and a mass activity of 1569 mA/mgIr, all of which are better than the commercial Ir/C and Pt/C. DFT calculations indicate that the electronic synergy between Ir and Mo modulates the interaction between the intermediates and active sites, arising outstanding electrochemical performance.
In another work by Wang et al., they synthesized NiPt dual atom in situ on porous carbon sponges (NiPt/CMS) as HER self-supporting electrodes [72]. It had an overpotentials of 67 mV in 1 M KOH and 66 mV in 0.5 M H2SO4 to deliver a current density of 10 mA cm−2. The superior HER activity of NiPt/CMS can be attributed to the distinctive structure configuration and strong synergistic effect between Ni and Pt atomic sites.
Table 2 provides a performance summary of the state-of-the-art DACs for HER. Based on the above results, DACs occupy a dominant position in HER, including both acidic electrolytes and alkaline electrolytes.

4.2. Oxygen Evolution Reaction

OER process is the half-reaction of electrochemical water splitting relative to HER; it also plays a crucial role in rechargeable metal–air batteries corresponding with ORR.
The OER consists of different four-step electron transfers in both acidic and alkaline electrolytes, as summarized in Table 3. The OER process is more intrinsically sluggish and results in large overpotential when compared with HER [73,74,75]. Meanwhile, the reaction processes are different in various electrolytes with different pH values.
To date, the Fe-, Ni-, and Co-based DACs are the most studied electrocatalysts for OER. An OER in acidic electrolytes is hindered by sluggish kinetics and limited stability. Thus, an OER under alkaline conditions is preferable [76,77,78].
For example, Peng et al. developed atomically dispersed Fe-Ni active sites embedded in a nitrogen-doped carbon substrate (FeNi NPs/NC); the as-obtained FeNi electrocatalyst displays a low overpotential of 270 mV to deliver a current density of 10 mA cm−2 for the OER in 1 M KOH. The density functional theory calculation indicates that the rate-determining step to be overcome in bimetallic FeNi SAs/NC is smaller than those of reference samples, suggesting that the synergetic coupling between Fe and Ni atoms can enhance the OER performance. In this work, Fe atoms facilitate the four-electron reaction process, while Ni atoms can modulate the electronic structure of Fe atoms and reduce the energy barrier of the rate-determining step [79].
The interaction between metals and supporting materials can affect the catalytic performance. In the work of Luo et al., they anchored dual metal atoms Ni and Fe via Fe-N4 and Ni-N4 coordination on nitrogen-doped graphene surfaces (NiFe-DG). The NiFe-DG exhibits high catalytic activity for OER; an overpotential of 358 mV was achieved as 10 mA cm−2 with a lower Tafel slope of 76 mv/dec than commercial Pt/C in 1 M KOH [80]. This study uses a supporting material to anchor and stabilize Ni and Fe sites, and the DFT calculations confirm that the introduction of structural defects in the supporting material may tune the active sites’ reactivity.
In another work, Lu et al. fabricated Fe-Ni DACs into nitrogen-doped carbon hollow spheres (Fe-NiNC) as an outstanding electrocatalyst for OER in alkaline electrolytes (Figure 7), which is comparable to the noble metal-based electrocatalysts. A small overpotential of 450 mV can be reached over Fe-NiNC-50 to deliver a current density of 10 mA cm−2 in 1 M KOH electrolyte. The Tafel plot for the Fe-NiNC and reference electrocatalysts are displayed in Figure 7b. The Fe-NiNC-50 has the smallest Tafel slope of 54 mV dec−1 among all the tested samples. The combined experiments and DFT calculations reveal that the OER mechanism on Fe-NiNC is different from those with single atoms. In the OER process, all the intermediates are inclined to adsorb on the Ni site in the presence of the OH ligand bonding to the Fe. The Fe-Ni pairs have a mutual effect on charge redistribution and enhancing the performance of OER [81].
Some other DACs, including dual-atomic Fe-Ni pairs dispersed in hierarchical porous nitrogen-doped carbon (FeNi-HPNC) [82], Fe and Ni co-anchored on defect-rich porous nitrogen and sulfur carbon frameworks (FeNi-SAs/DNSC) [83], dual-metal single atomic NiFe on N-doped carbon matrix (NiFe-N-C) [84], Fe-Ni dual-atom sites embedded in the N, P co-doped carbon matrix (FeNi-DAC) [85], were also reported as superior OER electrocatalysts in alkaline electrolytes.
The synergetic effect between Fe and Co makes it one of the most promising non-noble metal-based OER electrocatalysts. In the work of Liu et al., they conducted DFT calculations to analyze the activity originating from the synergistic effect between Fe and Co sites with metal–N4 configuration. With the guidance of DFT, they developed Fe-Co dual-metal sites (FeCo-NC) through a simple pyrolysis strategy [45]. The OER performance of Fe3Co7-NC was then evaluated in 0.1 M KOH; it possesses an overpotential of 343 mV at the current density of 10 mA cm−2, and the corresponding Tafel slope is 69 mV dec−1. In another work, Li et al. prepared a Co-Fe DACs (Co/Fe-SNC800) and its OER activity was then investigated in 1 M KOH [86]. The overpotential at a current density of 10 mA cm−2 was as low as 240 mV, lower than that of the commercial IrO2. Detailed experimental and theoretical investigations indicate the Co atoms served as active sites to initiate the activation of the reactants. The electronic interaction between Fe and Co can reduce the adsorption of oxygen species on the Fe sites and further facilitate the formation of intermediate species. In other works, various strategies and substrates were applied to construct Fe-Co DACs. For example, Fe-Co polyphthalocyanine compounds were embedded on a hollow, carbonized shell to synthesize FeCo-N4/HCS [49]; Fe-Co sites were immobilized into ZIF-8-derived carbon matrix to form Fe1Co3-NC-1100 [87]; and FeCo dual sites were dispersed into N/P co-doped carbon to generate FeCo-NPC [88]. These electrocatalysts were proven to have superior OER performance in alkaline electrolytes.
CoNi DACs are other candidates for OER in alkaline solutions. For example, Co-Ni DACs were dispersed on N-doped porous carbon frameworks as outstanding OER electrocatalysts (CoDNi-N/C) [89]. The synergetic effect between Co/Ni-N-C bonds originates from high OER activity, which shows an overpotential of 310 mV to generate a current density of 10 mA cm−2, surpassing the reported Pt/C electrocatalysts. In the work of Lou et al., the combination of experimental and theoretical calculations unveiled that heteronuclear NiCo can lower the energy barrier for OER [90]; the Ni/Co dual sites on nitrogen-doped carbon (a-NiCo/NC) were synthesized and had a small overpotential of 252 mV in 0.1 M KOH at a current density of 10 mA cm−2. Furthermore, the a-NiCo/NC exhibited a low Tafel slope of 49 mV dec−1, and the excellent OER activity and kinetics originated from the delicate design of the dual-metal sites. In another work, Li et al. constructed a Co1-PNC/Ni1-PNC electrocatalyst via the formation of a Co1-PN and Ni1-PN planar configuration [91]. The as-obtained CoNi DAC displayed a high OER activity in 1 M KOH; the overpotential to deliver the current density of 10 mA cm−2 was 390 mV, which is close to that of a commercial RuO2 catalyst. The direct coordination of P and N with Co/Ni DAC can modulate the binding interaction of intermediates, thus guaranteeing better OER performance.
Except for Fe, Co, and Ni, some other elements introduced into DACs have also proven effective. For example, Chen et al. regulated the Co d-orbital electron configuration by preparing Ir-Co DAC. The as-developed IrCo-N-C has an exceptional OER activity with a small overpotential of 330 mV at 10 mA cm−2 in 0.1 M KOH [92]. In another work, Hao et al. designed nitrogen-doped carbon-supported Co and Ru DAC for outstanding OER performance under alkaline conditions. The Co/Ru DACs display a low potential of 338 mV to reach 10 mA cm−2 current density in OER. DFT calculations certificate that Ru can optimize the adsorption energy of Co sites; this work provides a more reasonable strategy for designing DACs [93]. In a study by Li et al., a novel FeMn-DSAC, which comprised Fe-N4 and Mn-N4, was synthesized [94]. It requires an overpotential of 405 mV to reach a current density of 10 mA cm−2 with a corresponding Tafel slope of 96 mV dec−1, revealing its favorable OER activity.
Substantial research efforts have also been devoted to developing DACs that have excellent activity and are durable for acidic OER. For example, in the work of Zhao et al., the OER performance of Ru/Co-N-C-800 °C and contrast samples were evaluated in both alkaline and acidic solutions [46]. Notably, Ru/Co-N-C-800 °C with dual-atom sites significantly improve OER activity compared to Ru-N-C-800 °C and commercial RuO2, suggesting that the active sites in Ru/Co-N-C-800 °C are Ru-N4 sites, which can be further optimized by introducing of Co-N4 sites. The overpotential for Ru/Co-N-C-800 °C to reach a current density of 10 mA cm−2 are 276 and 232 mV in 1 M KOH and 0.5 M H2SO4, respectively. The Tafel slope was 67.5 mV dec−1 in 0.5 M H2SO4, implying Ru/Co-N-C-800 °C has superior activity in both alkaline and acidic media. The detailed investigation suggests that RuCo dual sites possess high surface coverage of OH* and improve OER performance.
In another work, Zang et al. synthesized a pyrolysis-free Ni/Fe bimetallic electrocatalysts (CPF-Fe/Ni) as a superior OER electrocatalyst with a simple method and low preparation cost [95]. Its overpotential at 10 mA cm−2 is 23 mV and 42 mV in 0.5 M H2SO4 and 1 M KOH, respectively. The introduction of Ni atoms weakened the adsorption of intermediates, leading to an optimized energy level and enhanced reaction activity. However, the reaction kinetics in the neutral electrolyte (1 M KCl) are slow due to the low concentration of adsorbed reactants.
In summary, OER with a four-electron transfer process has sluggish kinetics and results in a large overpotential. Table 4 summarizes the recently reported DACs for OER. The most widely researched electrocatalysts for OER are the noble metal oxide (e.g., RuO2, IrO2), but the high costs hinder their practical applications [96]. DACs with intriguing properties are expected to realize outstanding OER performance. However, how to balance the competition between the rate-limiting steps of reversible oxygen reduction and oxygen evolution reaction remains a challenge.

5. Summary and Perspective

Facing the energy crisis and environmental problems, the development of catalysts brings new opportunities. DACs have drawn extensive attention due to their maximum atom utilization, atomic active sites, adjustable electronic configuration, and outstanding catalytic performance. In this paper, we summarized the preparation strategies, characterizations, and catalytic applications of DACs in water-splitting reactions reported in recent years.
Even though DACs exhibit efficient activity during water-splitting reactions, they still face challenges in several aspects:
(1)
Despite great progress in the synthesis of DACs, the accurate control of the atomic structure and uniform dispersion are still in the initial stage. For example, impurities (e.g., SACs and nanoclusters) are inclined to generate during high-temperature pyrolysis. Meanwhile, the accurate amount of metal precursors is difficult to control; single atoms or metal clusters generate inevitably at the same time. The question of how to synthesize DACs in which one metal atom is merely bonded to another remains unresolved. Thus, it is necessary to combine different synthetic strategies and develop new synthetic methods. Additionally, DACs consist of main group elements worth exploring. The design of heteronuclear DACs, which combines transition and main-group metals, can uncover the synergistic effect between these elements.
(2)
Different supports for DACs will bring different electronic structures and enhance performance. MOFs, ZIFs, covalent organic frameworks, and g-C3N4 are widely applied to serve as supports for DACs; there is plenty of room for optimization. An interesting aspect of metal supports, such as metallene [97,98], which has a two-dimensional nanosheet morphology, may offer cooperative electronic interactions with guest metal atoms. Meanwhile, the stability and catalytic properties of DACs supported by different supports need to be further explored.
(3)
Different characterization techniques can identify the structure of DACs, such as HAADF-STEM and XAS. For example, the HAADF-STEM can observe the DACs with an atomic-level resolution, and XAS can analyze the local structure of the DACs regarding the metal–metal interaction, oxidation state, bond length, and coordination environment. At the same time, it is difficult to monitor the structure change and evolution during the reaction in situ constantly. The real active sites under working conditions may be different from those of the ex situ conditions. More advanced in situ/operando equipment should be considered, which can provide more information about the structure–activity relationship and guide the design of DACs.
(4)
The stability timescale of electrocatalysts for water-splitting in industrial applications is usually months or even years, which is far beyond the laboratory research lever. Even the Pt/C catalyst with excellent performance can only be used for 40 h [99]. DACs face the risk of the agglomeration and leaching of metal atoms in actual operation (operating under high current densities); the controlled synthesis of high-quality and stable DACs remains a major obstacle.
(5)
Due to the shortage of freshwater resources, the electrolysis of seawater has become a research hotspot. Therefore, it is important to develop robust and inexpensive DACs for seawater electrolysis reactions.
Overall, this review systematically summarizes the recent advances of DACs for HER and OER electrocatalysis. DACs are promising candidates for water-splitting reactions due to their unique structures and performance. During the past years, a wide range of SACs, metal oxides, and two-dimensional materials was systematically investigated for the water-splitting reaction. Table 5 and Table 6 provide some of them for HER and OER as comparisons for DACs. There is still a long way to go before DACs are widely applied in practical applications, and continuous efforts should be devoted to this highly exciting research field.

Author Contributions

L.L.: writing—original draft, X.W.: writing—review and editing. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The authors acknowledge financial support from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 22303004).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

No new data were created or analyzed in this study. Data sharing is not applicable to this article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Wu, H.; Huang, Q.; Shi, Y.; Chang, J.; Lu, S. Electrocatalytic water splitting: Mechanism and electrocatalyst design. Nano Res. 2023, 16, 9142–9157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Wu, H.; Cheng, Y.J.; Wang, B.Y.; Wang, Y.; Wu, M.; Li, W.D.; Liu, B.Z.; Lu, S.Y. Carbon dots-confined CoP-CoO nanoheterostructure with strong interfacial synergy triggered the robust hydrogen evolution from ammonia borane. J. Energy Chem. 2021, 57, 198–205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Wang, X.; Xu, L.; Li, C.; Zhang, C.; Yao, H.; Xu, R.-b.; Cui, P.; Zheng, X.; Gu, M.D.; Lee, J.; et al. Developing a class of dual atom materials for multifunctional catalytic reactions. Nat. Commun. 2023, 14, 7210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Tang, J.; Xu, X.; Tang, T.; Zhong, Y.; Shao, Z. Perovskite-Based Electrocatalysts for Cost-Effective Ultrahigh-Current-Density Water Splitting in Anion Exchange Membrane Electrolyzer Cell. Small Methods 2022, 6, 2201099. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Sun, H.; Xu, X.; Kim, H.; Shao, Z.; Jung, W. Advanced electrocatalysts with unusual active sites for electrochemical water splitting. InfoMat 2024, 6, e12494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Yang, Q.; Liu, H.; Yuan, P.; Jia, Y.A.; Zhuang, L.; Zhang, H.; Yan, X.; Liu, G.; Zhao, Y.; Liu, J.; et al. Single Carbon Vacancy Traps Atomic Platinum for Hydrogen Evolution Catalysis. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2022, 144, 2171–2178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Su, Q.; Sheng, R.; Liu, Q.; Ding, J.; Wang, P.; Wang, X.; Wang, J.; Wang, Y.; Wang, B.; Huang, Y. Surface reconstruction of RuO2/Co3O4 amorphous-crystalline heterointerface for efficient overall water splitting. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2024, 658, 43–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Liu, J.; Zheng, Y.; Jiao, Y.; Wang, Z.; Lu, Z.; Vasileff, A.; Qiao, S.-Z. NiO as a Bifunctional Promoter for RuO2 toward Superior Overall Water Splitting. Small 2018, 14, 1704073. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Li, S.; Wang, R.; Xie, M.; Xu, Y.; Chen, J.; Jiao, Y. Construction of trifunctional electrode material based on Pt-Coordinated Ce-Based metal organic framework. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2022, 622, 378–389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Wang, D.; Li, Q.; Han, C.; Lu, Q.; Xing, Z.; Yang, X. Atomic and electronic modulation of self-supported nickel-vanadium layered double hydroxide to accelerate water splitting kinetics. Nat. Commun. 2019, 10, 3899. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Abdelghafar, F.; Xu, X.; Jiang, S.P.; Shao, Z. Designing single-atom catalysts toward improved alkaline hydrogen evolution reaction. Mater. Rep. Energy 2022, 2, 100144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Qiao, B.; Wang, A.; Yang, X.; Allard, L.F.; Jiang, Z.; Cui, Y.; Liu, J.; Li, J.; Zhang, T. Single-atom catalysis of CO oxidation using Pt1/FeOx. Nat. Chem. 2011, 3, 634–641. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Mosallanezhad, A.; Wei, C.; Ahmadian Koudakan, P.; Fang, Y.; Niu, S.; Bian, Z.; Liu, B.; Huang, T.; Pan, H.; Wang, G. Interfacial synergies between single-atomic Pt and CoS for enhancing hydrogen evolution reaction catalysis. Appl. Catal. B 2022, 315, 121534. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Chen, W.; Pei, J.; He, C.-T.; Wan, J.; Ren, H.; Wang, Y.; Dong, J.; Wu, K.; Cheong, W.-C.; Mao, J.; et al. Single Tungsten Atoms Supported on MOF-Derived N-Doped Carbon for Robust Electrochemical Hydrogen Evolution. Adv. Mater. 2018, 30, 1800396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Liu, D.; Li, X.; Chen, S.; Yan, H.; Wang, C.; Wu, C.; Haleem, Y.A.; Duan, S.; Lu, J.; Ge, B.; et al. Atomically dispersed platinum supported on curved carbon supports for efficient electrocatalytic hydrogen evolution. Nat. Energy 2019, 4, 512–518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Zhang, F.-F.; Cheng, C.-Q.; Wang, J.-Q.; Shang, L.; Feng, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Mao, J.; Guo, Q.-J.; Xie, Y.-M.; Dong, C.-K.; et al. Iridium Oxide Modified with Silver Single Atom for Boosting Oxygen Evolution Reaction in Acidic Media. ACS Energy Lett. 2021, 6, 1588–1595. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Cao, L.; Luo, Q.; Chen, J.; Wang, L.; Lin, Y.; Wang, H.; Liu, X.; Shen, X.; Zhang, W.; Liu, W.; et al. Dynamic oxygen adsorption on single-atomic Ruthenium catalyst with high performance for acidic oxygen evolution reaction. Nat. Commun. 2019, 10, 4849. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Tang, L.; Yu, L.; Ma, C.; Song, Y.; Tu, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Bo, X.; Deng, D. Three-dimensional CoOOH nanoframes confining high-density Mo single atoms for large-current-density oxygen evolution. J. Mater. Chem. A 2022, 10, 6242–6250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Yin, J.; Jin, J.; Lu, M.; Huang, B.; Zhang, H.; Peng, Y.; Xi, P.; Yan, C.-H. Iridium Single Atoms Coupling with Oxygen Vacancies Boosts Oxygen Evolution Reaction in Acid Media. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2020, 142, 18378–18386. [Google Scholar]
  20. Cao, D.; Wang, J.; Xu, H.; Cheng, D. Construction of Dual-Site Atomically Dispersed Electrocatalysts with Ru-C5 Single Atoms and Ru-O4 Nanoclusters for Accelerated Alkali Hydrogen Evolution. Small 2021, 17, 2101163. [Google Scholar]
  21. He, T.; Santiago, A.R.P.; Kong, Y.; Ahsan, M.A.; Luque, R.; Du, A.; Pan, H. Atomically Dispersed Heteronuclear Dual-Atom Catalysts: A New Rising Star in Atomic Catalysis. Small 2021, 18, e2106091. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Li, R.; Wang, D. Superiority of Dual-Atom Catalysts in Electrocatalysis: One Step Further Than Single-Atom Catalysts. Adv. Energy Mater. 2022, 12, 2103564. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Ying, Y.; Luo, X.; Qiao, J.; Huang, H. “More is Different”: Synergistic Effect and Structural Engineering in Double-Atom Catalysts. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2020, 31, 2007423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Gao, Y.; Liu, B.; Wang, D. Microenvironment Engineering of Single/Dual-Atom Catalysts for Electrocatalytic Application. Adv. Mater. 2023, 35, 2209654. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. He, Y.; Zhou, X.; Jia, Y.; Li, H.; Wang, Y.; Liu, Y.; Tan, Q. Advances in Transition-Metal-Based Dual-Atom Oxygen Electrocatalysts. Small 2023, 19, e2206477. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  26. Choi, J.; Seo, S.; Kim, M.; Han, Y.; Shao, X.; Lee, H. Relationship between Structure and Performance of Atomic-Scale Electrocatalysts for Water Splitting. Small 2023, e2304560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Shang, H.; Liu, D. Atomic design of carbon-based dual-metal site catalysts for energy applications. Nano Res. 2023, 16, 6477–6506. [Google Scholar]
  28. Xu, W.-X.; Wang, Y.; Zhang, C.; Ma, X.; Wu, J.; Liu, Y.; Lu, B.; Zhang, H.; Ming, C.; Xiang, J. Insights into the Electronic Structure Coupling Effect of Dual-metal Atomic Electrocatalytic Platform for Efficient Clean Energy Conversion. Chem. Eng. J. 2023, 461, 141911. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Li, M.; Zhu, H.; Yuan, Q.; Li, T.; Wang, M.; Zhang, P.; Zhao, Y.; Qin, D.; Guo, W.; Liu, B.; et al. Proximity Electronic Effect of Ni/Co Diatomic Sites for Synergistic Promotion of Electrocatalytic Oxygen Reduction and Hydrogen Evolution. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2022, 33, 2210867. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Liu, X.; Zhao, F.; Jiao, L.; Fang, T.; Zhao, Z.; Xiao, X.; Li, D.; Yi, K.; Wang, R.; Jia, X. Atomically Dispersed Fe/N4 and Ni/N4 Sites on Separate-Sides of Porous Carbon Nanosheets with Janus Structure for Selective Oxygen Electrocatalysis. Small 2023, 19, e2300289. [Google Scholar]
  31. Fang, W.; Wu, Y.; Xin, S.; Hu, Y.; Dang, J.; Li, M.; Chen, B.; Zhao, H.; Lib, Z. Fe and Mo Dual-Site Single-Atom Catalysts for High-Efficiency Wide-pH Hydrogen Evolution and Alkaline Overall Water Splitting. Chem. Eng. J. 2023, 468, 143605. [Google Scholar]
  32. Da, Y.; Tian, Z.; Jiang, R.; Liu, Y.; Lian, X.; Xi, S.; Shi, Y.; Wang, Y.; Lu, H.; Cui, B.; et al. Dual Pt-Ni atoms dispersed on N-doped carbon nanostructure with novel (NiPt)-N4C2 configurations for synergistic electrocatalytic hydrogen evolution reaction. Sci. China Mater. 2022, 66, 1389–1397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Chen, J.; Li, H.; Fan, C.; Meng, Q.; Tang, Y.; Qiu, X.; Fu, G.; Ma, T. Dual Single-Atomic Ni-N4 and Fe-N4 Sites Constructing Janus Hollow Graphene for Selective Oxygen Electrocatalysis. Adv. Mater. 2020, 32, 2003134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Zhao, J.; Zong, L.; Cui, L.; Lu, F.; Xiao, Z.; Wang, L. Synthesis of dual-metal single atom in porous carbon with efficient oxygen reduction reaction in both acidic and alkaline electrolytes. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2022, 633, 828–835. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  35. Han, X.; Ling, X.; Yu, D.; Xie, D.; Li, L.; Peng, S.; Zhong, C.; Zhao, N.; Deng, Y.; Hu, W. Atomically Dispersed Binary Co-Ni Sites in Nitrogen-Doped Hollow Carbon Nanocubes for Reversible Oxygen Reduction and Evolution. Adv. Mater. 2019, 31, 1905622. [Google Scholar]
  36. Du, C.; Gao, Y.; Chen, H.; Li, P.; Zhu, S.; Wang, J.; He, Q.; Chen, W. A Cu and Fe dual-atom nanozyme mimicking cytochrome c oxidase to boost the oxygen reduction reaction. J. Mater. Chem. A 2020, 8, 16994. [Google Scholar]
  37. Xie, Y.; Kocaefe, D.; Chen, C.; Kocaefe, Y. Review of Research on Template Methods in Preparation of Nanomaterials. J. NanoMater. 2016, 2016, 2302595. [Google Scholar]
  38. Chen, Y.; Mao, J.; Zhou, H.; Xing, L.; Qiao, S.; Yuan, J.; Mei, B.; Wei, Z.; Zhao, S.; Tang, Y.; et al. Coordination Shell Dependent Activity of CuCo Diatomic Catalysts for Oxygen Reduction, Oxygen Evolution, and Hydrogen Evolution Reaction. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2024, 34, 2311664. [Google Scholar]
  39. Zheng, J.; Ye, J.; Ortuño, M.A.; Fulton, J.L.; Gutiérrez, O.Y.; Camaioni, D.M.; Motkuri, R.K.; Li, Z.; Webber, T.E.; Mehdi, B.L.; et al. Selective Methane Oxidation to Methanol on Cu-Oxo Dimers Stabilized by Zirconia Nodes of an NU-1000 Metal-Organic Framework. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2019, 141, 9292–9304. [Google Scholar]
  40. Zhou, X.; Han, K.; Li, K.; Pan, J.; Wang, X.; Shi, W.; Song, S.; Zhang, H. Dual-Site Single-Atom Catalysts with High Performance for Three-Way Catalysis. Adv. Mater. 2022, 34, 2201859. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Bai, L.; Hsu, C.-S.; Alexander, D.T.L.; Chen, H.M.; Hu, X. A Cobalt-Iron Double-Atom Catalyst for the Oxygen Evolution Reaction. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2019, 141, 14190–14199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Yang, Y.; Qian, Y.; Li, H.; Zhang, Z.; Mu, Y.; Do, D.; Zhou, B.; Dong, J.; Yan, W.; Qin, Y.; et al. O-coordinated W-Mo dual-atom catalyst for pH-universal electrocatalytic hydrogen evolution. Sci. Adv. 2020, 6, eaba6586. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Pu, T.; Ding, J.; Zhang, F.; Wang, K.; Cao, N.; Hensen, E.J.M.; Xie, P. Dual Atom Catalysts for Energy and Environmental Applications. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2023, 62, e202305964. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Wan, W.; Zhao, Y.; Wei, S.; Triana, C.A.; Li, J.; Arcifa, A.; Allen, C.S.; Cao, R.; Patzke, G.R. Mechanistic insight into the active centers of single/dual-atom Ni/Fe-based oxygen electrocatalysts. Nat. Commun. 2021, 12, 5589. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Gu, T.; Zhang, D.; Yang, Y.; Peng, C.; Xue, D.; Zhi, C.; Zhu, M.; Liu, J. Dual-Sites Coordination Engineering of Single Atom Catalysts for Full-Temperature Adaptive Flexible Ultralong-Life Solid-State Zn−Air Batteries. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2023, 33, 2212299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Rong, C.; Shen, X.; Wang, Y.; Thomsen, L.; Zhao, T.; Li, Y.; Lu, X.; Amal, R.; Zhao, C. Electronic Structure Engineering of Single-Atom Ru Sites via Co–N4 Sites for Bifunctional pH-Universal Water Splitting. Adv. Mater. 2022, 34, 2110103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Sardar, K.; Petrucco, E.; Hiley, C.I.; Sharman, J.D.B.; Wells, P.P.; Russell, A.E.; Kashtiban, R.J.; Sloan, J.; Walton, R.I. Water-Splitting Electrocatalysis in Acid Conditions Using Ruthenate-Iridate Pyrochlores. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2014, 53, 10960–10964. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Yang, H.B.; Hung, S.-F.; Liu, S.; Yuan, K.; Miao, S.; Zhang, L.; Huang, X.; Wang, H.-Y.; Cai, W.; Chen, R.; et al. Atomically dispersed Ni(i) as the active site for electrochemical CO2 reduction. Nat. Energy 2018, 3, 140–147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Zhao, M.; Sun, J.; Luo, T.; Yan, Y.; Huang, W.; Lee, J.M. π-Conjugated Macrocycles Confined Dual Single-Atom Catalysts on Graphitized Bubbles for Oxygen Reduction, Evolution, and Batteries. Small 2023, e2309351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Wan, X.; Liu, X.; Li, Y.; Yu, R.; Zheng, L.; Yan, W.; Wang, H.; Xu, M.; Shui, J. Fe–N–C electrocatalyst with dense active sites and efficient mass transport for high-performance proton exchange membrane fuel cells. Nat. Catal. 2019, 2, 259–268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Wei, Y.S.; Sun, L.; Wang, M.; Hong, J.; Zou, L.; Liu, H.; Wang, Y.; Zhang, M.; Liu, Z.; Li, Y.; et al. Fabricating Dual-Atom Iron Catalysts for Efficient Oxygen Evolution Reaction: A Heteroatom Modulator Approach. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2020, 59, 16013–16022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Lei, C.; Chen, H.; Cao, J.; Yang, J.; Qiu, M.; Xia, Y.-q.; Yuan, C.; Yang, B.; Li, Z.; Zhang, X.; et al. Fe-N4 Sites Embedded into Carbon Nanofiber Integrated with Electrochemically Exfoliated Graphene for Oxygen Evolution in Acidic Medium. Adv. Energy Mater. 2018, 8, 1801912. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Yin, P.; Yao, T.; Wu, Y.; Zheng, L.; Lin, Y.; Liu, W.; Ju, H.; Zhu, J.; Hong, X.; Deng, Z.; et al. Single Cobalt Atoms with Precise N-Coordination as Superior Oxygen Reduction Reaction Catalysts. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2016, 55, 10800–10805. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Bhavani, P.; Praveen Kumar, D.; Suk Yoo, J.; Hussain, M.; Weon, S.; Kim, W.; Park, Y.-K. Dual-Atomic-Site-Integrated Photocatalysts for Green Energy Synthesis. Chem. Eng. J. 2023, 467, 143429. [Google Scholar]
  55. Liu, K.; Li, J.; Liu, Y.; Wang, M.; Cui, H. Dual metal atom catalysts: Advantages in electrocatalytic reactions. J. Energy Chem. 2023, 79, 515–534. [Google Scholar]
  56. Yang, J.; Li, W.-H.; Tan, S.; Xu, K.; Wang, Y.; Wang, D.; Li, Y. The electronic metal-support interaction directing the design of single atomic site catalyst: Achieving high efficiency towards hydrogen evolution. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2021, 60, 19085–19091. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Adamson, W.; Bo, X.; Li, Y.; Suryanto, B.H.R.; Chen, X.; Zhao, C. Co-Fe binary metal oxide electrocatalyst with synergistic interface structures for efficient overall water splitting. Catal. Today 2020, 351, 44–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Yang, W.-D.; Xiang, J.; Zhao, R.-D.; Loy, S.; Li, M.-T.; Ma, D.-M.; Li, J.; Wu, F.-F. Nanoengineering of ZnCo2O4@CoMoO4 heterogeneous structures for supercapacitor and water splitting applications. Ceram. Int. 2023, 49, 4422–4434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Chen, C.; Suo, N.; Han, X.; He, X.; Dou, Z.; Lin, Z.; Cui, L. Tuning the morphology and electron structure of metal-organic framework-74 as bifunctional electrocatalyst for OER and HER using bimetallic collaboration strategy. J. Alloys Compd. 2021, 865, 158795. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Li, C.; Liu, M.; Ding, H.; He, L.; Wang, E.; Wang, B.; Fan, S.; Liu, K. A lightly Fe-doped (NiS2/MoS2)/carbon nanotube hybrid electrocatalyst film with laser-drilled micropores for stabilized overall water splitting and pH-universal hydrogen evolution reaction. J. Mater. Chem. A 2020, 8, 17527–17536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Pang, C.; Zhu, S.; Xu, W.; Liang, Y.; Li, Z.; Wu, S.; Jiang, H.; Wang, H.; Cui, Z. Self-standing Mo-NiO/Ni electrocatalyst with nanoporous structure for hydrogen evolution reaction. Electrochim. Acta 2023, 439, 141621. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Zhou, X.; Tian, Y.; Luo, J.; Jin, B.; Wu, Z.; Ning, X.; Zhan, L.; Fan, X.; Zhou, T.; Zhang, S.; et al. MoC Quantum Dots@N-Doped-Carbon for Low-Cost and Efficient Hydrogen Evolution Reaction: From Electrocatalysis to Photocatalysis. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2022, 32, 2201518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Zhao, X.; Wu, G.; Zheng, X.; Jiang, P.; Yi, J.D.; Zhou, H.; Gao, X.; Yu, Z.; Wu, Y. A Double Atomic-Tuned RuBi SAA/Bi@OG Nanostructure with Optimum Charge Redistribution for Efficient Hydrogen Evolution. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2023, 62, e202300879. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Zhang, X.Y.; Xu, L.L.; Wu, X.C.; Tao, Y.R.; Xiong, W.W. Ta3N5 nanobelt-loaded Ru nanoparticle hybrids’ electrocatalysis for hydrogen evolution in alkaline media. Molecules 2023, 28, 1100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Zhang, L.; Si, R.; Liu, H.; Chen, N.; Wang, Q.; Adair, K.; Wang, Z.; Chen, J.; Song, Z.; Li, J.; et al. Atomic layer deposited Pt-Ru dual-metal dimers and identifying their active sites for hydrogen evolution reaction. Nat. Commun. 2019, 10, 5453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Zhao, W.; Luo, C.; Lin, Y.; Wang, G.-B.; Chen, H.M.; Kuang, P.; Yu, J. Pt–Ru Dimer Electrocatalyst with Electron Redistribution for Hydrogen Evolution Reaction. ACS Catal. 2022, 12, 5540–5548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Zhou, Y.; Song, E.; Chen, W.; Segre, C.U.; Zhou, J.; Lin, Y.C.; Zhu, C.; Ma, R.; Liu, P.; Chu, S.; et al. Dual-Metal Interbonding as the Chemical Facilitator for Single-Atom Dispersions. Adv. Mater. 2020, 32, 2003484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Ma, M.; Xia, W.; Guo, X.-W.; Liu, W.; Cao, D.; Cheng, D. Constructing Ni3Se2-Nanoisland-Confined Pt1Mo1 Dual-Atom Catalyst for Efficient Hydrogen Evolution in Basic Media. Small Struct. 2023, 5, 2300284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Ge, J.; Zhang, D.; Qin, Y.; Dou, T.; Jiang, M.; Zhang, F.; Lei, X. Dual-metallic single Ru and Ni atoms decoration of MoS2 for high-efficiency hydrogen production. Appl. Catal. B 2021, 298, 120557. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Zhao, X.; Li, W.-P.; Cao, Y.; Portniagin, A.; Tang, B.; Wang, S.; Liu, Q.; Yu, D.Y.W.; Zhong, X.; Zheng, X.; et al. Dual-Atom Co/Ni Electrocatalyst Anchored at the Surface-Modified Ti3C2Tx MXene Enables Efficient Hydrogen and Oxygen Evolution Reactions. ACS Nano 2024, 18, 4256–4268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Shi, J.; Li, R.; Zhang, J.; Wang, Y.; Ma, W.; Yue, Z.; Jin, C.; Liu, Y.; Zheng, L.; Bai, J.; et al. N-Coordinated Iridium–Molybdenum Dual-Atom Catalysts Enabling Efficient Bifunctional Hydrogen Electrocatalysis. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2024, 16, 889–897. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Li, S.; Yu, J.; Liu, Q.; Liu, J.; Song, D.; Zhang, H.; Li, R.; Zhang, Y.; Wang, J. Preparation of carbon sponge loaded NiPt dual-metal single atom as self-supporting electrode based on inkjet printing technology for efficient hydrogen evolution. Carbon 2023, 215, 118456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Li, X.; Deng, C.; Kong, Y.; Huo, Q.; Mi, L.; Sun, J.; Cao, J.; Shao, J.; Chen, X.; Zhou, W.; et al. Unlocking the Transition of Electrochemical Water Oxidation Mechanism Induced by Heteroatom Doping. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2023, 62, e202309732. [Google Scholar]
  74. Wang, A.; Dou, Y.; Yang, X.; Wang, Q.; Sudi, M.S.; Zhao, L.; Shang, D.; Zhu, W.; Ren, J. Efficient oxygen evolution reaction from iron-molybdenum nitride/molybdenum oxide heterostructured composites. Dalton Trans. 2023, 52, 11234–11242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Zhang, R.; Pan, L.; Guo, B.; Huang, Z.-F.; Chen, Z.; Wang, L.; Zhang, X.; Guo, Z.; Xu, W.; Loh, K.P.; et al. Tracking the Role of Defect Types in Co3O4 Structural Evolution and Active Motifs during Oxygen Evolution Reaction. J. Mater. Chem. A 2023, 145, 2271–2281. [Google Scholar]
  76. Li, J.; Li, J.; Ren, J.; Hong, H.; Liu, D.; Liu, L.; Wang, D. Electric-Field-Treated Ni/Co3O4 Film as High-Performance Bifunctional Electrocatalysts for Efficient Overall Water Splitting. Nano-Micro Lett. 2022, 14, 148. [Google Scholar]
  77. Yan, L.; Zhang, B.; Wu, S.; Yu, J. A general approach to the synthesis of transition metal phosphide nanoarrays on MXene nanosheets for pH-universal hydrogen evolution and alkaline overall water splitting. J. Mater. Chem. A 2020, 8, 14234–14242. [Google Scholar]
  78. Oh, N.K.; Seo, J.; Lee, S.; Kim, H.-J.; Kim, U.; Lee, J.; Han, Y.-K.; Park, H. Highly efficient and robust noble-metal free bifunctional water electrolysis catalyst achieved via complementary charge transfer. Nat. Commun. 2021, 12, 4606. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  79. Yu, D.; Ma, Y.; Hu, F.; Lin, C.C.; Li, L.; Chen, H.-Y.; Han, X.; Peng, S. Dual-Sites Coordination Engineering of Single Atom Catalysts for Flexible Metal–Air Batteries. Adv. Energy Mater. 2021, 11, 2101242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Khan, K.; Yan, X.; Yu, Q.; Bae, S.-H.; White, J.J.; Liu, J.; Liu, T.; Sun, C.-J.; Kim, J.; Cheng, H.M.; et al. Stone-Wales defect-rich carbon-supported dual-metal single atom sites for Zn-air batteries. Nano Energy 2021, 90, 106488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Zhu, X.; Zhang, D.; Chen, C.-J.; Zhang, Q.; Liu, R.S.; Xia, Z.; Dai, L.; Amal, R.; Lu, X. Harnessing the interplay of Fe–Ni atom pairs embedded in nitrogen-doped carbon for bifunctional oxygen electrocatalysis. Nano Energy 2020, 71, 104597. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Yan, J.; Tian, M.; Shi, R.; Gu, T.; Zeng, K.; Zhou, J.; Zhang, Q.; Rümmeli, M.H.; Yang, R. Enhanced dual atomic Fe-Ni sites in N-doped carbon for bifunctional oxygen electrocatalysis. Mater. Today Energy 2022, 30, 101171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Zhang, X.; Li, Y.; Jiang, M.; Wei, J.; Ding, X.; Zhu, C.; He, H.; Lai, H.; Shi, J. Engineering the coordination environment in atomic Fe/Ni dual-sites for efficient oxygen electrocatalysis in Zn-air and Mg-air batteries. Chem. Eng. J. 2021, 426, 130758. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Meng, H.; Wu, B.; Zhang, D.; Zhu, X.; Luo, S.; You, Y.; Chen, K.; Long, J.; Zhu, J.; Liu, L.; et al. Optimizing electronic synergy of atomically dispersed dual-metal Ni–N4 and Fe–N4 sites with adjacent Fe nanoclusters for high-efficiency oxygen electrocatalysis. Energy Environ. Sci. 2024, 17, 704–716. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Wang, Z.; Li, C.; Liu, Y.; Wu, Y.; Zhang, S.; Deng, C. Atomically dispersed Fe-Ni dual sites in heteroatom doped carbon tyres for efficient oxygen electrocatalysis in rechargeable Zn-Air battery. J. Energy Chem. 2023, 83, 264–274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Chen, C.; Sun, M.; Zhang, F.; Li, H.; Sun, M.; Fang, P.; Song, T.; Chen, W.; Dong, J.; Rosen, B.; et al. Adjacent Fe Site boosts electrocatalytic oxygen evolution at Co site in single-atom-catalyst through a dual-metal-site design. Energy Environ. Sci. 2023, 16, 1685–1696. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. He, Y.; Yang, X.; Li, Y.; Liu, L.; Guo, S.; Shu, C.; Liu, F.; Liu, Y.; Tan, Q.; Wu, G. Atomically Dispersed Fe–Co Dual Metal Sites as Bifunctional Oxygen Electrocatalysts for Rechargeable and Flexible Zn–Air Batteries. ACS Catal. 2022, 12, 1216–1227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Zhou, Y.; Liu, Y.; Wang, Z.; Li, C.; Wang, Z.; Zhang, S.; Deng, C. Fe-Co dual atomic doublets on N, P codoped carbon as active sites in the framework of heterostructured hollow fibers towards high-performance flexible Zn-Air battery. Energy Storage Mater. 2023, 59, 102772. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Li, Z.; He, H.; Cao, H.; Sun, S.; Diao, W.; Gao, D.; Lu, P.; Zhang, S.; Guo, Z.; Li, M.; et al. Atomic Co/Ni dual sites and Co/Ni alloy nanoparticles in N-doped porous Janus-like carbon frameworks for bifunctional oxygen electrocatalysis. Appl. Catal. B 2019, 240, 112–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Pei, Z.; Lu, X.F.; Zhang, H.; Li, Y.; Luan, D.; Lou, X.W. Highly Efficient Electrocatalytic Oxygen Evolution Over Atomically Dispersed Synergistic Ni/Co Dual Sites. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2022, 61, e202207537. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Hu, B.; Huang, A.; Zhang, X.; Chen, Z.; Tu, R.; Zhu, W.; Zhuang, Z.; Chen, C.; Peng, Q.; Li, Y. Atomic Co/Ni dual sites with N/P-coordination as bifunctional oxygen electrocatalyst for rechargeable zinc-air batteries. Nano Res. 2021, 14, 3482–3488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Xiao, M.; Zhu, J.; Li, S.; Li, G.; Liu, W.; Deng, Y.-P.; Bai, Z.; Ma, L.; Feng, M.; Wu, T.; et al. 3d-Orbital Occupancy Regulated Ir-Co Atomic Pair Toward Superior Bifunctional Oxygen Electrocatalysis. ACS Catal. 2021, 11, 8837–8846. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Zhang, L.; Yao, J.; Zhang, J.; He, W.; Li, Y.; Liang, L.; Liu, C.; Liu, H.; Hao, Q. Engineering Co and Ru dual-metal atoms on nitrogen-doped carbon as highly efficient bifunctional oxygen electrocatalysts. Catal. Sci. Technol. 2022, 12, 5435–5441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Cui, T.; Wang, Y.-P.; Ye, T.; Wu, J.; Chen, Z.; Li, J.; Lei, Y.; Wang, D.; Li, Y. Engineering Dual Single-Atom Sites on 2D Ultrathin N-doped Carbon Nanosheets Attaining Ultra-Low-Temperature Zinc-Air Battery. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2022, 61, e202115219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  95. Zang, Y.; Lu, D.-Q.; Wang, K.; Li, B.; Peng, P.; Lan, Y.; Zang, S. A pyrolysis-free Ni/Fe bimetallic electrocatalyst for overall water splitting. Nat. Commun. 2023, 14, 1792. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Suen, N.T.; Hung, S.-F.; Quan, Q.; Zhang, N.; Xu, Y.J.; Chen, H.M. Electrocatalysis for the oxygen evolution reaction: Recent development and future perspectives. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2017, 46, 337–365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Li, L.; Bu, L.; Huang, B.; Wang, P.; Shen, C.; Bai, S.; Chan, T.-S.; Shao, Q.; Hu, Z.; Huang, X. Compensating Electronic Effect Enables Fast Site-to-Site Electron Transfer over Ultrathin RuMn Nanosheet Branches toward Highly Electroactive and Stable Water Splitting. Adv. Mater. 2021, 33, 2105308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  98. Wang, H.; Wang, W.; Mao, Q.; Yu, H.; Deng, K.; Xu, Y.; Li, X.; Wang, Z.; Wang, L. Tensile strained PdNi bimetallene for energy-efficient hydrogen production integrated with formate oxidation. Chem. Eng. J. 2022, 450, 137995. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Wu, X.; Zhou, S.; Wang, Z.; Liu, J.; Pei, W.; Yang, P.; Zhao, J.; Qiu, J. Engineering Multifunctional Collaborative Catalytic Interface Enabling Efficient Hydrogen Evolution in All pH Range and Seawater. Adv. Energy Mater. 2019, 9, 1901333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Molecules 29 01812 g001
Figure 1. Schematic illustration of the synthesis process of NiCo DASs/N-C. Reproduced with permission [29]. Copyright 2022, Wiley-VCH GmbH.
Figure 1. Schematic illustration of the synthesis process of NiCo DASs/N-C. Reproduced with permission [29]. Copyright 2022, Wiley-VCH GmbH.
Molecules 29 01812 g001
Molecules 29 01812 g002
Figure 2. Schematic depiction of the synthesis route for FeMo@CoNi-OH/Ni3S2. Reproduced with permission [31]. Copyright 2023 Elsevier B.V.
Figure 2. Schematic depiction of the synthesis route for FeMo@CoNi-OH/Ni3S2. Reproduced with permission [31]. Copyright 2023 Elsevier B.V.
Molecules 29 01812 g002
Molecules 29 01812 g003
Figure 3. HAADF-STEM images of (a) Ni-CNG, (b) Co-CNG, and (c) Fe-CNG. (d–f) HAADF-STEM images of NiFe-CNG at different magnifications. The uniformly distributed bright dots represent metal atoms. (g) EDS mapping of NiFe-CNG recorded along with the SEM images. Reproduced with permission [44]. Copyright 2021 Springer Nature.
Figure 3. HAADF-STEM images of (a) Ni-CNG, (b) Co-CNG, and (c) Fe-CNG. (d–f) HAADF-STEM images of NiFe-CNG at different magnifications. The uniformly distributed bright dots represent metal atoms. (g) EDS mapping of NiFe-CNG recorded along with the SEM images. Reproduced with permission [44]. Copyright 2021 Springer Nature.
Molecules 29 01812 g003
Molecules 29 01812 g004
Figure 4. (a) Ru K-edge XANES spectra, (b) Co K-edge XANES spectra, (c,d) the corresponding Fourier transforms of EXAFS spectra of the samples, (e,f) wavelet transform of Ru and Co in Ru/Co-N-C-800 °C, respectively, (g,h) Ru K-edge and Co K-edge FT-EXAFS and the corresponding EXAFS fitting curves at R space for Ru/Co-N-C-800 °C, (i) structural model of Ru/Co-N-C-800 °C. Reproduced with permission [46]. Copyright 2022 Wiley-VCH GmbH.
Figure 4. (a) Ru K-edge XANES spectra, (b) Co K-edge XANES spectra, (c,d) the corresponding Fourier transforms of EXAFS spectra of the samples, (e,f) wavelet transform of Ru and Co in Ru/Co-N-C-800 °C, respectively, (g,h) Ru K-edge and Co K-edge FT-EXAFS and the corresponding EXAFS fitting curves at R space for Ru/Co-N-C-800 °C, (i) structural model of Ru/Co-N-C-800 °C. Reproduced with permission [46]. Copyright 2022 Wiley-VCH GmbH.
Molecules 29 01812 g004
Molecules 29 01812 g005
Figure 5. Electrochemical HER performance in 1.0 M KOH. (a) Linear sweep voltammetry curves of Ni3Se2, Mo/Ni3Se2, Pt1/Ni3Se2, Pt1Mo1/Ni3Se2, and Pt/C. (b) Tafel slope curves. (c) Comparison of mass activity for Pt1/Ni3Se2, Pt1Mo1/Ni3Se2, and Pt/C. Reproduced with permission [68]. Copyright 2023 Wiley-VCH GmbH.
Figure 5. Electrochemical HER performance in 1.0 M KOH. (a) Linear sweep voltammetry curves of Ni3Se2, Mo/Ni3Se2, Pt1/Ni3Se2, Pt1Mo1/Ni3Se2, and Pt/C. (b) Tafel slope curves. (c) Comparison of mass activity for Pt1/Ni3Se2, Pt1Mo1/Ni3Se2, and Pt/C. Reproduced with permission [68]. Copyright 2023 Wiley-VCH GmbH.
Molecules 29 01812 g005
Molecules 29 01812 g006
Figure 6. (a) LSV curves in 0.5 M H2SO4, (b) Tafel slope for the samples, (c) mass activity at 30 mV in 0.5 M H2SO4 electrolyte for these samples. (d) LSV curves in 1 M KOH, (e) Tafel slope for the samples, and (f) mass activity at 30 mV in 1 M KOH electrolyte. Reprinted with permission from [71]. Copyright 2024 American Chemical Society.
Figure 6. (a) LSV curves in 0.5 M H2SO4, (b) Tafel slope for the samples, (c) mass activity at 30 mV in 0.5 M H2SO4 electrolyte for these samples. (d) LSV curves in 1 M KOH, (e) Tafel slope for the samples, and (f) mass activity at 30 mV in 1 M KOH electrolyte. Reprinted with permission from [71]. Copyright 2024 American Chemical Society.
Molecules 29 01812 g006
Molecules 29 01812 g007
Figure 7. (a) LSV for the catalysts in 1 M KOH. (b) Tafel plots of the catalysts in 1 M KOH. Reproduced with permission [81]. Copyright 2020 Elsevier B.V.
Figure 7. (a) LSV for the catalysts in 1 M KOH. (b) Tafel plots of the catalysts in 1 M KOH. Reproduced with permission [81]. Copyright 2020 Elsevier B.V.
Molecules 29 01812 g007
Table 1. Electron-transfer steps of HER.
Table 1. Electron-transfer steps of HER.
AcidAlkaline
* + H+ + e− → H** + H2O + e− → OH− + H*
* + H+ + e− + H* → H2Had + H2O + e− → OH− + H2
2 H* → H22 H* → H2
Table 2. Summary of HER performance for reported DACs electrocatalysts.
Table 2. Summary of HER performance for reported DACs electrocatalysts.
ElectrocatalystsOverpotential to Reach the Current Density of 10 mA cm−2 Tafel Slope Ref.
NiCo DASs/N-C189 mV in 1 M KOH
260 mV in 0.5 M H2SO4		72.5 mV dec−1 in 1 M KOH and 82.4 mV dec−1 0.5 M H2SO4[29]
FeMo@CoNi-OH/Ni3S289 mV in 1 M KOH and 177 mV in 0.5 M H2SO492.2 mV dec−1 in 1 M KOH and 89.3 mV dec−1 in 0.5 M H2SO4[31]
PtNi-NC30 mV in 0.5 M H2SO427 mVdec−1 in 0.5 M H2SO4[32]
Fe/Ni-N-PCS360 mV in 1 M KOH57 mV dec−1 in 1 M KOH[34]
CuCo/NSC1159 mV in 1 M KOH75.9 mV dec−1 in 1 M KOH[38]
W1Mo1-NG24 mV in 0.5 M H2SO4 and 67 mV in 1 M KOH30 mV dec−1 in 0.5 M H2SO4 and 45 mV dec−1 in 1 M KOH[42]
Ru/Co-N-C-800 °C19 mV in 1 M KOH and 17 mV in 0.5 M H2SO427.8 mV dec−1 in 1 M KOH and 23.3 mV dec−1 in 0.5 M H2SO4[46]
Pt1Ru1/NMHCS-A22 mV in 0.5 M H2SO438 mV dec−1 in 0.5 M H2SO4[66]
FR-NCS22 mV in 0.5 M H2SO426 mV dec−1 in 0.5 M H2SO4[67]
Pt1Mo1/Ni3Se253 mV in 1 M KOH49.6 mV dec−1 in 1 M KOH[68]
Ru/Ni-MoS232 mV in 1 M KOH41 mV dec−1 in 1 M KOH[69]
CoNi-Ti3C2Tx31 mV in 1 M KOH33 mV dec−1 in 1 M KOH[70]
Ir-Mo DAC/NC11.3 mV in 0.5 M H2SO4 and 23 mV in 1 M KOH22.67 mV dec−1 in 0.5 M H2SO4 and 25.24 mV dec−1 in 1 M KOH[71]
NiPt/CMS66 mV in 0.5 M H2SO4 and 67 mV in 1 M KOH72 mV dec−1 in 0.5 M H2SO4 and 98 mV dec−1 in 1 M KOH[72]
Table 3. Electron-transfer steps of OER.
Table 3. Electron-transfer steps of OER.
AcidAlkaline
H2O → OH* + H+ + e−2H2O → OH* + 3OH− + e−
OH* → O* + H+ + e−OH* + OH− → O* + H2O + e−
O* + H2O → OOH* + H+ + e−O* + OH− → OOH* + 3 e−
OOH* → O2 + H+ + e−OOH* + OH− → O2 + H2O + e−
Table 4. Summary of OER performance for reported DACs electrocatalysts.
Table 4. Summary of OER performance for reported DACs electrocatalysts.
Electrocatalysts Overpotential (Ej10) to Deliver a Current Density of 10 mA cm−2 Tafel Slope Ref.
FeNijns/NC440 mV in 1 M KOH106 mV dec−1 in 1 M KOH[30]
FeMo@CoNi-OH/Ni3S2160 mV in 1 M KOH73.5 mV dec−1 in 1 M KOH[31]
Ni-N4/GHSs/Fe-N4390 mV in 0.1 M KOH81 mV dec−1 in 0.1 M KOH[33]
CuCo/NSC2339 mV in 1 M KOH45.3 mV dec−1 in 1 M KOH[38]
NiFe-CNG270 mV in 0.1 M KOH60 mV dec−1 in 0.1 M KOH[44]
Fe3Co7-NC343 mV in 0.1 M KOH69 mV dec−1 in 0.1 M KOH[45]
Ru/Co-N-C-800 °C232 mV in 0.5 M H2SO4 and 276 mV in 1 M KOH67.5 mV dec−1 in 0.5 M H2SO4 and 65.7 mV dec−1 in 1 M KOH[46]
Pt1Mo1/Ni3Se253 mV in 1 M KOH49.6 mV dec−1 in 1 M KOH[68]
FeNi NPs/NC270 mV in 1 M KOH56.84 mV dec−1 in 1 M KOH[79]
NiFe-DG358 mV in 1 M KOH67 mV dec−1 in 1 M KOH[80]
Fe-NiNC450 mV in 1 M KOH54 mV dec−1 in 1 M KOH[81]
FeNi-HPNC-2360 mV in 0.1 M KOH83 mV dec−1 in 0.1 M KOH[82]
FeNi-SAs/DNSC350 mV in 1 M KOH55 mV dec−1 in 1 M KOH[83]
NiFe-N-C323 mV in 0.1 M KOH36 mV dec−1 in 0.1 M KOH[84]
FeNi-NPC HT321 mV in 0.1 M KOH62.9 mV dec−1 in 0.1 M KOH[85]
Co/Fe-SNC800240 mV in 1 M KOH42.97 mV dec−1 in 1 M KOH[86]
FeCo-N4/HCS391 mV in 1 M KOH78.52 mV dec−1 in 1 M KOH[49]
Fe1Co3-NC-1100349 mV in 0.1 M KOH99.93 mV dec−1 in 0.1 M KOH[87]
FeCo-NPC317 mV in 0.1 M KOH53.8 mV dec−1 in 0.1 M KOH[88]
CoDNi-N/C360 mV in 0.1 M KOH72 mV dec−1 in 0.1 M KOH[89]
a-NiCo/NC252 mV in 1 M KOH39 mV dec−1 in 1 M KOH[90]
Co1-PNC/Ni1-PNC390 mV in 1 M KOH117 mV dec−1 in 1 M KOH[91]
IrCo-N-C330 mV in 0.1 M KOH79 mV dec−1 in 0.1 M KOH[92]
Co/Ru SAs-N-C338 mV in 0.1 M KOHUnknown[93]
FeMn-DSAC405 mV in 0.1 M KOH96 mV dec−1 in 0.1 M KOH[94]
CPF-Fe/Ni201 mV in 0.5 M H2SO4 and 194 mV in 1 M KOH23 mV dec−1 in 0.5 M H2SO4 and 147 mV dec−1 in 1 M KOH[95]
Table 5. Summary of HER performance for some reported electrocatalysts.
Table 5. Summary of HER performance for some reported electrocatalysts.
ElectrocatalystsOverpotential to Reach the Current Density of 10 mA cm−2 Tafel Slope Ref.
SACsPt@CoS 28 mV in 1 M KOH 31 mV dec−1 in 1 M KOH[13]
W-SAC 85 mV in 1 M KOH 53 mV dec−1 in 1 M KOH[14]
Pt1/OLCh 38 mV in 0.5 M H2SO4 36 mV dec−1 in 0.5 M H2SO4[15]
Ru ADCe 18 mV in 1 M KOH 41 mV dec−1 in 1 M KOH [20]
Metal oxideRuO2/Co3O4 57 mV in 1 M KOH 48.85 mV dec−1 in 1 M KOH [7]
CoO/Fe3O4 220 mV in 1 M KOH 73 mV dec−1 in 1 M KOH [57]
ZnCo2O4@CoMoO4 114 mV in 1 M KOH 114 mV dec−1 in 1 M KOH [58]
Mo-NiO/Ni nanopores 34 mV in 1 M KOH 49 mV dec−1 in 1 M KOH [61]
2D materialsNiFe-MOF-74 195 mV in 1 M KOH 136 mV dec−1 in 1 M KOH [59]
MoS2/NiS2 62 mV in 1 M KOH 50.1 mV dec−1 in 1 M KOH [60]
RuMn 20 mV in 1 M KOH and 18 mV in 0.5 M H2SO4 32.2 mV dec−1 in 1 M KOH and 41.2 mV dec−1 in 0.5 M H2SO4[97]
PdNi 59 mV in 1 M KOH 108 mV dec−1 in 1 M KOH [98]
Table 6. Summary of OER performance for some reported electrocatalysts.
Table 6. Summary of OER performance for some reported electrocatalysts.
ElectrocatalystsOverpotential to Reach the Current Density of 10 mA cm−2 Tafel Slope Ref.
SACsAg1/IrOx 224 mV in 0.5 M H2SO450 mV dec−1 in 0.5 M H2SO4[16]
Ru-N-C 267 mV in 0.5 M H2SO452.6 mV dec−1 in 0.5 M H2SO4[17]
Mo-CoOOH 249 mV in 1 M KOH 60.5 mV dec−1 1 M KOH[18]
Ir-NiCo2O4 NSs 240 mV in 0.5 M H2SO460 mV dec−1 in 0.5 M H2SO4[19]
Metal oxideNiFeOx-P 255 mV in 1 M KOH 27.07 mV dec−1 in 1 M KOH[73]
Fe-Mo5N6/MoO3-550 201 mV in 1 M KOH 50.5 mV dec−1 in 1 M KOH[74]
Co3O4-VCo 262 mV in 1 M KOH 60.5 mV dec−1 in 1 M KOH[75]
Ni/Co3O4 311 mV in 1 M KOH 43 mV dec−1 in 1 M KOH[76]
2D materialsCe-MOF@Pt 340 mV in 1 M KOH 47.9 mV dec−1 in 1 M KOH[9]
NiVRu-LDH 190 mV in 1 M KOH 83 mV dec−1 in 1 M KOH[10]
CoP/Ti3C2 MXene 280 mV in 1 M KOH 95.4 mV dec−1 in 1 M KOH[77]
LSC/K-MoSe2 230 mV in 1 M KOH 79 mV dec−1 in 1 M KOH[78]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Lu, L.; Wu, X. Heteronuclear Dual Metal Atom Electrocatalysts for Water-Splitting Reactions. Molecules 2024, 29, 1812. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules29081812

AMA Style

Lu L, Wu X. Heteronuclear Dual Metal Atom Electrocatalysts for Water-Splitting Reactions. Molecules. 2024; 29(8):1812. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules29081812

Chicago/Turabian Style

Lu, Lu, and Xingcai Wu. 2024. "Heteronuclear Dual Metal Atom Electrocatalysts for Water-Splitting Reactions" Molecules 29, no. 8: 1812. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules29081812

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop