2.1. Structure of G3–LiC4F9SO3 and G3–LiCF3SO3 Mixtures
Figure 1 presents simulation snapshots for different compositions of the [(G3)
nLi][C
4F
9SO
3] mixtures. Hydrophobic interaction among the C
4F
9 groups causes pure LiC
4F
9SO
3 to form distinct polar and nonpolar regions that percolate throughout the simulation box. Strands of Li
+ ions and SO
3 end groups of the anion generate polar domains with a lamellar structure (
Figure S1). The nonpolar subphase is composed of fluoroalkyl moieties. Mixing LiC
4F
9SO
3 with G3 disrupts the mesostructural organization inherent to LiC
4F
9SO
3, leading to a complex liquid phase mediated by cation–solvent, cation–anion, and polar–apolar interactions. The smaller CF
3SO
3− anion lacks a large enough fluorinated group to support polar–apolar domain segregation in both high-temperature LiCF
3SO
3 and [(G3)
1Li][CF
3SO
3].
Despite their simplicity, radial distribution functions,
g(
r)s, are a fundamental tool for understanding the local structure of liquids. The
g(
r)s extracted from the MD trajectories provide the probability of finding a pair of selected sites at a given distance. From their maxima and minima, one can infer preferential atomic positions and define the microstructural pattern of a condensed phase. Furthermore, the Fourier transform of
g(
r) yields the total scattering functions, which give the X-ray or neutron diffraction profiles when weighted by the appropriate factor. The
g(
r)s between the Li
+ ions and O atoms of C
4F
9SO
3− and G3 are provided in
Figure 2. Both cases show a sharp first peak located at 0.20 nm. Two less intense peaks appear in the C
4F
9SO
3–Li
g(
r) functions at 0.43 and 0.62 nm. These additional features correspond to the second and third solvation shells centered on the Li
+ ion, respectively. In contrast, the Li–G3
g(
r) functions show a featureless second band near 0.65 nm. Integration of
g(
r) gives the number of neighboring atoms surrounding the central Li
+ ion as a function of distance. These results are presented as dotted lines in
Figure 2. Lithium ions are tetrahedrally coordinated by O atoms from the C
4F
9SO
3− anion in LiC
4F
9SO
3 when the coordination shell boundary is placed at ca. 0.30 nm. As the G3 content increases, the integrated
g(
r) functions reveal a gradual replacement of anions by G3 molecules in the vicinity of the cation. With respect to the fluorobutyl part of the anion, the
g(
r) functions between the terminal C atoms of the anion produce the peak at 0.49 nm. If the end of the first solvation shell is placed at ca. 0.8 nm, the integrated
g(
r) function shows a reduction in the number of neighboring anion tails from ~10 in the pure salt to ~0.50 in [(G3)
10Li][C
4F
9SO
3]. This emphasizes the overall separation of the anion species as G3 is introduced into the system.
Radial distribution functions for [(G3)
1Li][CF
3SO
3] are also presented in
Figure 2 to explore the role of anion tail size on the liquid structure of these systems. The
g(
r) profiles for Li-O
anion and Li-O
G3 are quite similar in [(G3)
1Li][CF
3SO
3] and [(G3)
1Li][C
4F
9SO
3]. For example, the first sharp peak in the Li–O
anion g(
r) function is 0.20 nm, and the average coordination number around Li
+ is approximately four. The
g(
r) data relating distances between the C atoms of the CF
3SO
3− ion is somewhat different from the C
4F
9SO
3− anion. The smaller trifluoromethyl group in CF
3SO
3− causes a displacement in the
g(
r) maxima from 0.47 to 0.81 nm for LiCF
3SO
3 and [(G3)
1Li][CF
3SO
3], respectively. A similar shift is not observed in the corresponding [(G3)
nLi][C
4F
9SO
3] series.
X-ray total structure factors are displayed in
Figure 3 for scattering vectors
q up to 20 nm
−1. Pure LiC
4F
9SO
3 exhibits a pre-peak in the low-
q region (2 ≤
q/nm
−1 ≤ 6), which is a characteristic of segregated polar and apolar domains. This so-called first sharp diffraction peak indicates breaking of the overall charge-ordering homogeneity due to intramolecular polarity differences within the ions. The result is the self-assembly of ions into mesoscopic structural motifs characterized by complex ionic disorder and charge confinement. By way of comparison, nanoscale structural organization is present for intermediate chain lengths of the 1-alkyl-3-methylimidazolium cation, and cations containing butyl side chains are on the cusp of polar–apolar structural organization [
9,
11]. The intermediate peak located between 6 and 10 nm
−1 arises from cation–cation and anion–anion distances within the polar network, while the peak at a larger
q value (10 ≤
q/nm
−1 ≤ 20) accounts for a multitude of correlations between adjacent atoms (direct contact or adjacency peak). Total structure factor data,
S(
q), indicate the restoration of the global charge-ordering homogeneity and dilution of the same-charge correlations as the G3 content in the mixture increases. Also, the displacement of the direct contact peak to higher reciprocal distances (i.e., to shorter distances in direct space) is the outcome of the decrease in concentration of the bulky F atoms.
The size of the polar and apolar domains may be determined from probability distribution functions that measure different aggregate sizes; these results are visualized through histograms in
Figure 4. Polar domains of the type Li
+—SO
3−—Li
+—SO
3− are found in all of the systems; however, the size of these domains depends on the relative amount of G3 and the length of the anion’s fluorinated tail. For instance, the polar domains contain up to 50 units in [(G3)
1Li][C
4F
9SO
3], but these domains are broken into smaller-sized aggregates when the G3 content increases to [(G3)
10Li][C
4F
9SO
3] where the maximum cluster sizes equal four units. Nonpolar domains composed of the fluoroalkyl groups of the anion are also analyzed. The aggregate distributions indicate the presence of small clusters of anions (up to nine units) even in [(G3)
10Li][C
4F
9SO
3]. This underscores the affinity of the fluorobutyl groups to form supramolecular networks through their hydrophobic interactions.
The CF
3 portion of the CF
3SO
3− anion is too short to support polar–apolar structural organization, and the [(G3)
1Li][CF
3SO
3] compound is characterized by a global charge ordering that permeates throughout the bulk phase. This is evident from the absence of a first sharp diffraction peak in the low-
q region of the
S(
q) plots and probability distributions that have nearly all of the LiCF
3SO
3 in the MD simulation box participating in polar domain clusters (up to 300 units). Charge alternation is a feature of room-temperature molten salts. The lack of the charge-ordering peak is most likely a consequence of complete interference cancelation of peaks (same-charge correlations) and anti-peaks (different-charge correlations) [
34,
35,
36]. Interestingly, the G3 molecule plays a different role in [(G3)
1Li][CF
3SO
3] compared to [(G3)
1Li][C
4F
9SO
3]. Adding G3 increases the polar part, which introduces some overall charge ordering and attenuates the charge-ordering peak in
S(
q) for the [(G3)
nLi][C
4F
9SO
3] mixtures. The increase in polar parts of the [(G3)
1Li][CF
3SO
3] system breaks this global charge ordering, resulting in a more prominent intermediate peak in the 1:1 mixture.
2.2. Coordinative Interactions between G3 and Li+ Ions
A connectivity analysis for pure LiC
4F
9SO
3 and its mixtures with G3 was carried out to clarify the environment around the Li
+ ions. These results are presented in
Table 1. The Li–O
i parameter indicates the number of O atoms of species
i coordinated with the cation, while Li-
i represents the number of those species coordinated to the same Li
+ cation. In the pure salt, the Li-O
anion and Li-anion data place the average number of anions coordinating a central Li
+ ion at slightly fewer than four, and the anions predominantly interact with Li
+ via a single O atom from each sulfonate group. The slightly larger Li-O
anion values in comparison to Li-anion point to a small contribution of bidentate binding of the anions to the cation. Monodentate anion coordination prevails in all studied compositions.
There is one G3 molecule in the first solvation shell of Li+ for mixtures up to [(G3)5Li][C4F9SO3]. G3 molecules are relatively bulky, and it is difficult to accommodate a second G3 molecule around the small cation. Moreover, G3 coordination must overcome the Coulombic attraction between ion pairs to break the cation free from the anion. Solvation shells with two G3 molecules are more prevalent in [(G3)10Li][C4F9SO3], where the fraction of free anions (and thus solvent-separated ion pairs) reaches 50%. Overall, the same observations for [(G3)nLi][C4F9SO3] mixtures are valid for [(G3)1Li][CF3SO3]. In pure LiCF3SO3, there are four anions coordinated by one O atom to the central cation, with a small contribution of bidentate binding. In the 1:1 mixture, the MD simulations reveal one G3 molecule and two CF3SO3− ions in the first solvation shell of the cations.
Venn diagrams depicting the connectivity between Li
+ ions and O atoms of G3 molecules at 298 K are shown in
Figure 5. The threshold used to account for the connectivity was the end of the first peak in
g(
r) Li-O
G3 (ca. 0.275 nm) [
26]. As expected, the total number of G3 molecules that interact with Li
+ ions and the number of O atoms per G3 molecule bound to those ions are sensitive to sample composition. For example, 15.8% of G3 molecules coordinate Li
+ in the [(G3)
10Li][C
4F
9SO
3] sample, and only 25.3% of those molecules experience tetradentate coordination. The presence of a second G3 molecule around the cation results in a larger tridentate population size. Changing the composition to [(G3)
5Li][C
4F
9SO
3] raises the overall fraction of “interacting” G3 molecules to 26.4% as well as the number of tetradentate interaction motifs to 40.9%. Further increases in LiC
4F
9SO
3:G3 ratios to 1:2 and 1:1 increase the percentage of tetradentate G3 among coordinating G3 molecules to 42.4% and 50.3%, respectively. Shortening the fluorinated tail has a marginal impact on tetradentate G3 population sizes. For instance, tetradentate G3 comprises 51.9% of the coordinating G3 molecules in the [(G3)
1Li][CF
3SO
3] mixture.
MD simulations also reveal an alteration in the G3 conformation upon cation coordination.
Figure 6 portrays the numbering sequence adopted for the G3 molecule to aid in the discussion of the molecular conformation. Given the symmetry of the G3 moiety, the equivalent dihedral angles of both halves of the molecule were analyzed together. The averaged distribution analyses of torsion angles are provided in
Figures S2 and S3. When referring to dihedral angles, we use the following notation: g
± for gauche (±30° to ±90°) and t for trans (150° to 210°).
For the dihedrals of the type COCC, Li–O binding increases the trans population size when moving from pure G3 to [(G3)1Li][C4F9SO3] (ca. 14% for and 8% for and ). The OCCO portion of the molecule is predominantly in a gauche conformation for pure G3, and binding with Li+ further increases the population size of gauche conformers at the expense of the trans conformers. For example, there are reductions of ca. 72% and 87% in trans conformers for and , respectively, in [(G3)1Li][C4F9SO3]. Additionally, these dihedrals are displaced to smaller angles.
Complexes between lithium salts and oligomeric ethylene oxides have been extensively studied due to their relevance in lithium battery applications, and it is helpful to compare our MD simulation results with several noteworthy cases. Poly(ethylene oxide) and short-chain ethylene oxide oligomers frequently adopt helical conformations of the (tgt)
n type [
37,
38,
39,
40]. Lithium ions are six-fold coordinated in the (G3)
1LiN(SO
2CF
3)
2 crystal. Each Li
+ is coordinated by the four O atoms of a G3 molecule as well as two O atoms attached to separate S atoms of a single N(SO
2CF
3)
2− anion [
41]. Thus, cations and anions form bidentate contact ion pairs in this solvate structure with the anion arranged in a cisoid conformation. The G3 molecule adopts a tg
−t.tg
+g
+.tg
+t sequence of torsion angles. The (G3)
1(LiCF
3SO
3)
2 and (G3)
1LiN(SO
2C
2F
5)
2 compounds both exhibit five-fold Li
+ interaction motifs. In (G3)
1LiN(SO
2C
2F
5)
2, Li
+ ions interact with all four O atoms of a single G3 molecule plus a single O atom from the anion. This coordination environment produces a g
−g
−t.tg
+g
+.tg
+t torsion angle sequence for G3 [
42]. This is contrasted with (G3)
1(LiCF
3SO
3)
2, where Li
+ interacts with three O atoms from G3 and two O atoms from separate CF
3SO
3− anions. The G3 molecule adopts the familiar tg
+t.tg
−t.tg
+t conformation [
43]. Similar interaction motifs are found in liquid and polymeric systems [
44,
45,
46], including [(G3)
1Li][N(SO
2CF
3)
2] and [(G4)
1Li][N(SO
2CF
3)
2] SILs [
24,
26,
33,
47].
The cation–solvent interactions predicted by MD simulations may be experimentally verified with vibrational spectroscopy. Infrared and Raman spectra of [(G3)
nLi][C
4F
9SO
3] mixtures are given in
Figure 7. A number of the G3 bands experience wavenumber shifts and loss of intensity upon mixing with LiC
4F
9SO
3. For example, the 1101 cm
−1 band, which contains large amounts of C–O–C stretching motions [
40,
48,
49,
50], red shifts to 1090 cm
−1 in [(G3)
1Li][C
4F
9SO
3]. There are also relatively subtle changes to the CH
2 wagging modes at 1447 and 1472 cm
−1 as well as decreases in C–H stretching mode intensity. The latter is especially pronounced for the lower-wavenumber C–H bands. The 800 to 900 cm
−1 region is an especially important spectral region to consider because the bands that occur here are sensitive to the conformation of the ethylene oxide backbone. G3 bands found in this region are mixtures of CH
2 rocking, CO stretching, and CC stretching motions [
50]. The characteristic way G3 molecules wrap a Li
+ ion to accommodate tetradentate coordination induces conformational sequences in the backbone that lead to the appearance of a band at 870 cm
−1 [
31,
51,
52]. It is noteworthy that the 870 cm
−1 band is present in the crystalline and solution phases of diethylene glycol dimethyl ether (diglyme, G2) and LiCF
3SO
3 because it establishes the G3 conformational sequence found in the (G2)
1LiCF
3SO
3 crystal is also present in the solution phase [
51]. Moreover, the absence of this band in the Raman spectrum of pure G3 has led several groups to use it as a spectroscopic fingerprint for the presence of tetradentate [(G3)
1Li]
+ complexes in liquid-phase SILs [
24,
31,
44,
46]. Observing the 870 cm
−1 band in our vibrational spectra is compelling evidence for the presence of these species and confirms the MD simulation results.
Additional evidence for Li
+ coordination by G3 molecules and anions is obtained from far-IR spectra of [(G3)
1Li][C
4F
9SO
3] in
Figure S4. The SIL exhibits a broad IR band at 414 cm
−1 that shifts to 438 cm
−1 upon isotopic substitution with
6Li. This behavior strongly suggests that the band is best assigned as a lithium-ion “cage” mode. These vibrational modes occur when lithium ions undergo translatory motion in a cage-like environment defined by their neighboring atoms. A simplistic model for this mode views the lithium ion as a harmonic oscillator with the ligating O atoms being held stationary. This model predicts an 8% increase in the band wavenumber upon isotopic exchange, which compares quite well with the experimentally observed 6% increase.
2.3. Anion Dihedral Angle Distribution Analysis
Dihedral angle distribution functions for the perfluorobutyl part of the C
4F
9SO
3− anion are shown in
Figure S5. MD simulations reveal a relatively rigid perfluorobutyl chain with SCCC torsion angles adopting a trans conformation. The CCCC torsion angle is slightly skewed from the ideal trans conformation, with a small population of gauche conformers present. The LiC
4F
9SO
3 distributions are somewhat different from [(G3)
nLi][C
4F
9SO
3], but this is likely due to the higher temperature used in the simulation of the pure salt. Otherwise, the LiC
4F
9SO
3:G3 ratio has a negligible impact on anion conformation. These MD simulation results are augmented by DFT calculations on isolated C
4F
9SO
3− anions. The stationary-state structures and relative energies of select perfluorobutyl conformations are summarized in
Table 2. Consistent with the MD simulations, the tt conformation is the most stable among those investigated. This is followed by slightly less stable tg
± and g
±t conformers (1–2 kJ mol
−1 higher in energy).
Bands associated with the C
4F
9 group are challenging to assign given the potential for conformational flexibility. Therefore, a normal coordinate analysis was conducted on these five conformers to aid in the assignments of the anion’s vibrational modes. Calculated frequencies, IR intensities, and Raman activities are provided in
Table S1; a subset of these results for modes particularly sensitive to the conformation of the C
4F
9 group are collected in
Table 3. The majority of the conformationally sensitive anion modes fall between 800 and 680 cm
−1. Excellent agreement between experimental and calculated mode frequencies is achieved with the application of a 1.03 scaling factor. The calculations reveal small frequency differences between the g
+ and g
− conformers, making it impossible to distinguish these from one another in the experimental spectra. There is only one possible tt conformation, whereas the gt and tg conformations each have two uniquely different structures that produce the same vibrational spectrum. The expected intensity ratio should be tt:gt:tg = 1:2:2 if all species are present in equal amounts. However, the degeneracy of tg and gt conformers and comparable IR/Raman spectral activities will produce an intensity ratio of 1:4 (tt to the combined sum of gt and tg). The noticeably higher intensities of tt bands relative to the tg or gt bands in the experimental spectra underscore the conclusion that most C
4F
9SO
3− anions adopt a tt conformation.
Another perspective on anion structure comes from the disorder longitudinal acoustic mode (D-LAM), which is observed in polymeric and oligomeric C
nH
n+2, C
nH
n+2O
n, and C
nF
n+2 molecules [
52,
53]. These modes are characterized by atomic displacements parallel to the skeletal backbone. D-LAMs gain radial atomic motions if the molecule adopts other conformations, which shifts the mode’s frequency and broadens the band. Hence, G3′s D-LAM serves as an excellent probe of molecular conformation. Calculations put the tt conformer D-LAM at 173 cm
−1. The band wavenumber is higher when C
4F
9SO
3− anion adopts gauche conformations (183 cm
−1 for tg
±, 186 cm
−1 for g
+t, and 188 cm
−1 for g
−t conformers). Experimental data place D-LAM at 177 cm
−1 (
Figure S6). This further supports the conclusion that [(G3)
nLi][C
4F
9SO
3] contains a large population of tt anion conformers.
2.4. Ionic Association of Cations and Anions
Competition between G3 molecules and anions for Li
+ is apparent when the lithium complexes are discriminated by ligating molecules in the simulation boxes. The left column of
Figure 8 highlights events where Li
+ is complexed simultaneously by anions and G3 molecules. This is contrasted with events where the cations are surrounded only by anions (middle column) and G3 (right column). Even in [(G3)
10Li][C
4F
9SO
3], there is at least one anion located inside the solvation shell of about 50% of the Li
+ ions.
The ionic association of cations and anions affects the anion’s vibrational spectrum in several ways. First, coordination can lower the symmetry of the anion, thereby splitting bands by breaking mode degeneracy. Second, coordination can directly alter the local potential energy environment in which the anion vibrates. Vibrational mode force constants are modulated by the curvature of the corresponding potential energy function; therefore, ionically associated anions may have different band frequencies relative to the uncoordinated “free” anions. Third, ionic association is often accompanied by a redistribution of electric charge throughout a molecule. This affects vibrational mode dipole moment derivatives (IR band intensities) and polarizability derivatives (Raman band intensities).
Prior spectroscopic work on CF
3SO
3− suggests that Li
+ coordination occurs through the SO
3 group [
54,
55]. Therefore, we begin our analysis with the antisymmetric stretching motions of the S–O bonds ν
as(SO
3). These bands are presented in
Figure 9. [(G3)
1Li][C
4F
9SO
3] contains two ν
as(SO
3) bands at 1300 and 1250 cm
−1. These bands are somewhat closer together in [(G3)
1Li][CF
3SO
3] (43 cm
−1 separation as opposed to 50 cm
−1) and have collapsed into a single asymmetrically broadened band at 1261 cm
−1 when Li
+ is exchanged for the charge-protected tetrabutylammonium cation (TBA
+). Uncoordinated CF
3SO
3− ions have C
3v symmetry, and the ν
as(SO
3) modes belong to the doubly degenerate E irreducible representation of this point group. Monodentate or bidentate Li
+ coordination with the O atoms of CF
3SO
3− reduces the symmetry to C
s, causing the ν
as(SO
3) mode to split into the two observed bands. The C
4F
9SO
3− anion’s response to coordination—from a spectroscopic point of view—is strikingly similar to CF
3SO
3− [
54]. This is because both anions experience similar Li
+∙∙∙O–S-binding motifs. Uncoordinated C
4F
9SO
3− anions, however, have only approximate C
3v symmetry about the SO
3 portion of the anion. ν
as(SO
3) degeneracy is not expected for uncoordinated anions. This clarifies why a small amount of splitting is observed in the spectra of [(G3)
1TBA][C
4F
9SO
3] even though direct cation–anion coordination is precluded by the bulky nature of the cation.
The amount of νas(SO3) splitting might point to slight differences in the strength of the Li-anion coordinative bonds for [(G3)1Li][C4F9SO3] compared to [(G3)1Li][CF3SO3]. The SO3 symmetric stretching modes νs(SO3) give a similar picture as the band is approximately 20 cm−1 higher in [(G3)1Li][C4F9SO3] compared to [(G3)1Li][CF3SO3]. A simple Mulliken charge analysis places slightly more negative charge on the O atoms of C4F9SO3− (average = −0.940 for the tt conformer) compared to CF3SO3− (average = −0.899). This might explain the relative cation–anion interaction strengths.
We now examine anionic interactions from the perspective of the conformationally sensitive bands found in the 800–680 cm
−1 region.
Figure 10 compares the IR and Raman spectra of [(G3)
1Li][C
4F
9SO
3] and [(G3)
1TBA][C
4F
9SO
3]. Again, the TBAC
4F
9SO
3 salt proves indispensable for identifying spectroscopic signatures of solvent-separated or otherwise free anions. Replacing Li
+ with TBA
+ causes small (1–2 cm
−1) red shifts in the C
4F
9SO
3− bands while preserving the relative intensity ratios of the bands. Evidently, ionic association has a marginal effect on the conformational states of the fluorobutyl tails. Normal mode eigenvectors are included in
Figure 10 to aid in the interpretation of the frequency shifts. The depicted modes are a mixture of symmetric deformations of the CF
3 group, wagging motions of the CF
2 moieties, and CS stretching. It may seem surprising that these modes are sensitive to cation coordination since the atomic motions involved are far from the SO
3 group. However, this is similar to the LiCF
3SO
3 system where coordination triggers a redistribution of charge throughout the molecule and concomitant stiffening of the δ
s(CF
3) force constant [
56]. It appears that a similar situation is operative in the related LiC
4F
9SO
3 system.
Ionically associated anion abundances are composition dependent. The evolution of anion speciation is analyzed through the ~700 cm
−1 band in
Figure 11. This band is selected because it may be assigned solely to tt conformers and is free from band overlap with G3. The band occurs at 698 cm
−1 and is asymmetrically broadened toward low wavenumbers for [(G3)
10Li][C
4F
9SO
3], but the band shifts to higher wavenumbers and gains intensity when additional LiC
4F
9SO
3 is added to the mixture. In contrast, the IR spectrum of [(G3)
1TBA]C
4F
9SO
3 contains a single band at 697 cm
−1, which is assigned to spectroscopically free anions. Higher-wavenumber bands in [(G3)
nLi][C
4F
9SO
3] are then assigned to Li
+···C
4F
9SO
3− ion pairs.
Quantitative amounts of free and ion-paired tt anions were determined by fitting the IR spectra of [(G3)
1TBA][C
4F
9SO
3] and [(G3)
1Li][C
4F
9SO
3], respectively, with single Voigt functions. Intermediate compositions of [(G3)
nLi][C
4F
9SO
3] were then modeled with two Voigt functions set at approximately these frequencies. Population sizes of the two species are calculated from the integrated areas of the bands. Results are summarized and compared against the MD simulations in
Table 4. Discrepancies between the estimated population sizes are likely due to the effects of charge-scaling and band-fitting procedures. Reduced charges in MD simulations cause ions to be less bound to each other and have higher mobilities. Therefore, one possible explanation is that the scaled charges used in this study lead to underestimated amounts of ion pairs. An additional factor to consider is the difficulty associated with spectral deconvolution when bands are highly overlapped. The band centers differ by only 1–2 cm
−1, which could lead to higher amounts of experimental uncertainty in the resulting ion pair population sizes. In spite of these issues, the spectroscopic and MD simulations reveal the same basic trends: C
4F
9SO
3− anions become highly associated when the salt content is high.
Ionic association of the CF
3SO
3− anion is investigated through the symmetric deformation of the CF
3 part of the anion, δ
s(CF
3). This particular vibrational mode is quite sensitive to anionic speciation, which has led to its frequent use in assessing cation–anion assemblages [
56,
57].
Table 5 contains the curve-fitting results of δ
s(CF
3) for [(G3)
1Li][CF
3SO
3]; vibrational spectra are provided in
Figures S7 and S8. The vast majority of the anions participate in either LiCF
3SO
3 ion pairs (70%) or [Li
2CF
3SO
3]
+ aggregates (28%). Notably, the amount of free CF
3SO
3− is low in [(G3)
1Li][CF
3SO
3].