Next Article in Journal
Research Progress on the Therapeutic Mechanisms of Stigmasterol for Multiple Diseases
Previous Article in Journal
Determination of Phosphate as an Ion-Association Complex of 11-Molybdovanadophosphate and Diindodicarbocyanine Based on Selective Oxidation of Excess Dye
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Investigating the Electronic and Molecular Adsorption Properties of Ti/Co-Doped Boron Carbon Nitride

by
Nada M. Alghamdi
1,
Hind M. Al-qahtani
2,
Amal Alkhaldi
1,
Mohamed M. Fadlallah
3,* and
Ahmed A. Maarouf
4,*
1
Department of Physics, College of Science, Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University, Dammam 31441, Saudi Arabia
2
Department of Physics, College of Science and Humanities, Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University, Jubail 35811, Saudi Arabia
3
Physics Department, Faculty of Science, Benha University, Benha 13518, Egypt
4
Department of Physics, Faculty of Basic Sciences, German University in Cairo, New Cairo City 11835, Egypt
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Molecules 2025, 30(9), 1873; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules30091873
Submission received: 27 November 2024 / Revised: 28 March 2025 / Accepted: 16 April 2025 / Published: 22 April 2025

Abstract

:
Two-dimensional (2D) hexagonal boron carbon nitride (h-BxCyNz) has garnered a lot of interest in the last two decades because of its remarkable physical and chemical characteristics. Because of the carbon atoms, it has a smaller gap than its cousin, boron nitride, and is hence more appropriate for a wider range of applications. In the frame of density functional theory, we discuss the structural, electronic, and magnetic properties of mono Ti-doped and Co-doped BC6N (Ti/Co-BC6N) at different sites of substitutional doping (Ti/Co) in the BC6N monolayer. The mono substitutional doping at the B (TiB/CoB), N (TiN/CoN), and two different C (C1 (TiC1/CoC1), C2 (TiC2/CoC2)) sites, are investigated. The position of the Ti/Co dopant is an important parameter that changes the electronic state, magnetic moment, and adsorption activity of the pristine BC6N nanosheet. We find that the adsorption of the gases NO, NO2, CO2, NH3, N2, and O2 is significantly improved on the doped sheet at all doped positions compared to the adsorption on the pristine structure. The Ti/Co-BC6N can adsorb NO and NO2 better than CO2 and NH3. TiC1-BC6N and TiB-BC6N are the best doped sheets for adsorbing NO and NO2, respectively. The CO2 and the N2 molecules are moderately adsorbed at all doped positions as compared to the other adsorbed molecules. Ti-doped sheets can adsorb the CO2, NH3, and O2 better than the corresponding Co-doped sheets. We also study the adsorption of molecular hydrogen on our single-atom Ti/Co-doped systems, as well as on 4-atom Ti and Co clusters embedded in the BC6N sheets. We show that the cluster-embedded sheets can adsorb up to four H2 molecules. These novel findings are important for many applications of BC6N, including spintronics, gas filtration, molecular sensing, and hydrogen storage.

1. Introduction

Two-dimensional (2D) nanostructures have attracted much theoretical and experimental attention since the preparation of graphene in 2004 [1]. The low dimensionality of these materials and the diversity of their composition and structural characteristics may have significant potential for technological use. The development of experimental techniques has increased interest in this field since it raises the possibility of creating novel 2D structures with particular chemical or physical characteristics.
Graphene, which has special electrical, mechanical, and optical characteristics that make it suitable for a wide range of technological applications [2], is arguably the most well-known two-dimensional (2D) material. Nevertheless, several drawbacks of graphene, such as the absence of an electronic gap, have prompted scientists to look for other graphene-like structures [3,4]. Hexagonal boron Nitride (h-BN) [5], Germanene [6], Silicene [7], MXenes [8,9], transition metal dichalcogenides (TMDs) [3,10], and Mo(W)Si2N4 [11,12,13] are samples of 2D structures that have attracted a lot of attention lately due to their several possible applications: gas sensing [14,15,16], field-effect transistors [17], hydrogen storage [18,19], sustainable ammonia production [20], and photocatalysis [21,22,23].
Since carbon, nitrogen, and boron are neighbor atoms in the periodic table, they can form bonds that result in a variety of (h-BxCyNz) compounds [24,25]. This has attracted a lot of attention [26] because substituting carbon for boron or nitrogen may lead to a spectrum of interesting properties without significantly distorting the lattice structure. It has been demonstrated that the graphene lattice can be changed from a semimetal to a semiconductor by adding BN grains, with a band gap created at the vanishing Dirac points [27,28,29]. Therefore, one expects that a wide range of physical characteristics might result from varying the relative compositions of the three elements in h-BxCyNz.
Various techniques, including the solvothermal approach, chemical vapor coating, and the chemical reaction approach [30], have been used to synthesize several ternary B-C-N structures (such as BCN, BC2N, BC4N, BC6N, and B2CN). Because BC2N is predicted to be more difficult than c-BN [27,31] and more chemically and thermally inert than diamond, it has additionally attracted interest from researchers. The applications of BCN are many and include the oxidation of pollutants and colorants, the extraction of hydrogen from water, the creation of transparent photovoltaic cells, UV absorption, optoelectronics, and catalysis for a variety of chemical interactions [32,33].
Implanting graphene quantum dots with atoms of boron and nitrogen gives BC6N 2D quantum dots [34], which were found to be semiconducting with a band gap of 1.2–1.3 eV [35,36]. BC6N has some of the physical and mechanical features of graphene, including high stiffness and high thermal conductivity [24,36], due to its graphene-like structure. Intensive research is being conducted to customize the characteristics of BC6N for a variety of uses. By substitutional and adsorption doping of BC6N [35,36], magnetic semiconductor behavior may become metallic, half-metallic, or diluted. Moreover, the BC6N electrostatic landscape can be changed by defects such as vacancies, making it more reactive to certain gases [35,36].
Due to their electronic activity, metals can be used to enhance the adsorption and catalytic properties of 2D nanomaterials. Among the different doping elements, titanium stands out due to its diverse chemical reactivity [37]. Ti-doped 2D materials open many applications in various fields. For example, in graphene, Ti has shown enhanced catalytic activity for oxygen reduction, a potential candidate for fuel cells and other microelectronic devices [37]. In TMDs, Ti has been found to improve the performance of semiconductor devices and enhance their gas-sensing properties [38].
Co-doping has also generated much interest in materials research. Co-doped 2D MoSe2 [39] can create active sites that enhance electrocatalysts for hydrogen evolution reduction reactions (HER). Doping MoS2 with Co forms a more stable 1T phase with much better catalytic activity [40]. The charge–discharge efficiency of black phosphorus nanosheets can reach more than 90% after doping with Co, which promotes its potential for electrochemical hydrogen storage [41]. The Co dopant improves the absorption of SWCNT for SOF2 and SO2, which makes Co-SWCNT a promising gas sensor for them [42]. The Co-MOF-5-synthesized materials demonstrate greater abilities to adsorb H2, CO2, and CH4 under high pressure than their Co-free homologues [43].
Although studies have been conducted on pristine BC6N, further research has to be carried out on structures doped with other atoms to improve the physical and chemical properties of the BC6N sheet. In this work, we investigate the electronic and molecular adsorption characteristics of Ti-doped and Co-doped BC6N in the frame of density functional theory. A 3 × 3 supercell of BC6N (consisting of 72 atoms) is used, and the effect of substitutional Ti-doping and Co-doping on electronic and magnetic properties, as well as the adsorption activity of these systems, is investigated. The unit cell of the studied structure has four symmetrically inequivalent sites: two C atoms (C1 and C2), B, and N. We consider the adsorption of four gases (NO, CO2, NO2, and NH3) on the pristine and doped systems.

2. Results and Discussion

To study the effect of doping on the structural, electronic, magnetic, and adsorption properties of BC6N, we use a 3 × 3 supercell. The optimized atomic structure of a monolayer is shown in Figure 1a with the bond lengths of C-C, C-B, and C-N being 1.41 Å, 1.47 Å, and 1.46 Å, respectively, which agree with previous studies [35,36,44,45]. The four distinct sites of the BC6N unit cell are shown: two are at the C1 and C2 sites, and two are at the N and B sites (all marked with red circles).
Figure 1b illustrates the density of states (DOS)/projected DOS (PDOS) of the pristine monolayer. It is semiconducting with a band gap of 1.3 eV, which is in good agreement with published work [35,36,44,45]. The band gap value of BC6N indicates that it may be a potential candidate structure for optoelectronic devices. The C 2p states are the main contributors to the valence band (VB) and conduction band (CB), with little contribution from the N 2p states in the VB, and B 2p states in the CB. Charge analysis shows that N and C1 gain some charge, while B and C2 lose some charge.

2.1. Ti-Doped and Co-Doped BC6N

The relaxed Ti-doped and Co-doped BC6N (Ti/Co-BC6N) sheets are shown in Figure 2. Systems with doping at the B ((TiB/CoB)), C1 (TiC1//CoC1), C2 (TiC2/CoC2), and N (TiN/CoN) sites exhibit some distortion around the Ti/Co dopant atom, with average nearest doping distances of 1.95 Å/1.76 Å, 1.98 Å/1.8 Å, 1.9 Å/1.8 Å, and 2 Å/1.8 Å respectively. The dopants protrude out of the plane by 1.70 Å/1.45 Å for the first three sites and by 1.8 Å/1.5 Å for the N site (Table 1). The average angles made at the dopants by their nearest neighbors are also shown. The formation energies indicate that TiN/CoN-BC6N has slightly smaller energy compared to other doped nanosheets. All doped systems have thermal stabilities compared to that of the pristine sheet (Table 1). The charge transfer ( Δ Q ) between the dopant and the sheet of all the considered structures is presented in Table 1.
We now inspect the DOS of the Ti/Co-doped systems (Figure 2e–h). TiB-BC6N has an asymmetric DOS. The CB has contributions from the 4d Ti states right below the Fermi energy and up to ∼0.6 eV. The C states dominate the VB as in the pristine structure. The structure is metallic as there is no gap in the two spin channels, and the asymmetry of those channels indicates that the sheet is magnetic with 0.9 μB. In the case of TiC1- and TiC2-BC6N, the structure is non-magnetic, as is obvious from the identical channels of the DOS. The band gaps decrease to 0.9 eV and 1.1 eV, compared to pristine BC6N because of the contribution of Ti 4 d states, as in the CB, The effect of substitutional doping of TiC1 is more significant in the band gap value than the corresponding effect for TiC2. For TiN-BC6N, the structure is a half-metal with no spin-up gap and a spin-down gap of 1.2 eV. The Fermi energy is shifted to the CB. The structure is magnetic with a moment of 0.92 μB, as illustrated by the asymmetrical spin-up and spin-down components.
For the DOS of CoB- and CoN-BC6N and as compared to the pristine, many states are created above the VB with a dominated Co 3 d states from −1.2 eV to −0.2 eV for CoB-doping and from −1.5 eV to −1.2 eV for CoN-doping. The contribution of Co-states in the VB is larger than in the CB, which contrasts with the effect in the case of TiB. The DOS of CoN-BC6N is disturbed more than the CoB-BC6N. The structures are semiconducting with a band gap of 1.2 eV for both structures. The symmetrical effect of Co-states in both spin directions refers to the zero magnetic moment.
Both CoC1- and CoC2-BC6N monolayers are dilute magnetic semiconductors (DMSCs) due to the significant contributions of Co 3 d states with a spin-up (down) band gap of 0.60 eV (1.1 eV) for CoC1-doping and 0.4 eV (0.3 eV) for CoC2-doping. The spectra of the CoC doped structures are more disturbed than the spectra of systems doped at the B and N positions. The Co 3 d contributions are noticed at the top of the VB, in the gap, and at the bottom of the CB. Doping at the C positions changes the magnetic moment to 1 μB due to the asymmetry of the DOS of the spin-up and spin-down components.
Experimental techniques such as UV-Vis absorption spectroscopy can be used to estimate the band gaps, while X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy and ultraviolet photoelectron spectroscopy can provide information on the valence and conduction band positions. In addition, scanning tunneling spectroscopy can offer a direct measurement of the electronic structure. These methods have been widely used in the literature to investigate the band structure of 2D materials [46], including boron–carbon–nitride-based systems.

2.2. Adsorption on Ti-/Co-BC6N Nanosheets

Now we address the gas-adsorption properties of our structures. We consider six gases NO, NO2, CO2, NH3, O2, and N2. The initial positions of each gas above the considered sheets are (@B), (@N), (@H1), and (@H2) for pristine BC6N, and (@B, @C1, @C2, and @N) for the doped Ti/Co-BC6N sheets. The gas-sheet systems are structurally relaxed. We then compute the adsorption energies and the electronic structures of the investigated nanosheets compared to the adsorption results on pristine structures.

2.2.1. NO Gas Adsorption

The bond length of N-O is 1.16 Å, which agrees well with previous publications [8]. The NO gas is adsorbed very weakly ( E a d < 0.2 eV ) above the pristine sheet at all adsorption positions [47] (Table 2). Therefore the NO gas adsorption on the sheet has negligible effects on the DOS of the pristine system.
When we use the Ti/Co-doped structures, the results are completely different. The Ti/Co dopant’s closest distance from the gas’s N atom is 2.0 Å/1.7 Å, 1.9 Å/1.7 Å, 1.9 Å/ 1.7 Å and 2.0 Å/1.8 Å for NO@TiB-/CoB-, NO@TiC1-/CoC1-, NO@TiC2-/CoC2- and NO@TiN-/CoN-BC6N, respectively. This means that the interaction between the NO gas and the doped sheets is stronger than that of the pristine sheet because the distances are much closer for the doped sheet compared to the pristine structure.
The distance between the N atom and the Ti-BC6N is larger than the corresponding distance in the case of Co-BC6N. Furthermore, the N-O length increases to 1.2 Å/1.2 Å for NO@TiB/CoB, NO@TiC1/CoC1 and @TiN/CoN, and 1.3 Å/1.2 Å for NO@TiC2/CoC2. The charge transfer for the Ti-doped system is higher than the corresponding charge transfer for the Co-doped system at the same position, and with higher adsorption energies: 2.9 eV/ 2.3 eV, 3.4 eV/1.9 eV, 2.4 eV/3.2 eV, and 2.6 eV/2.7 eV for TiB-/CoB-, TiC1-/CoC1, TiC2-/CoC2, and TiN-/CoN-BC6N sheets. The Ti dopant is more effective in adsorbing the NO at TiB and TiC1 than the corresponding cases using Co dopant. However, the Co dopant can adsorb the NO at CoC2 and CoN more than the corresponding Ti cases.
Figure 3e–h show the DOS/PDOS of NO@TiB and NO@TiN-BC6N. The top/bottom of the VB/CB is disturbed due to the contribution of the N and O 2 p states, such as for the spin-up/spin-down channel for the top/bottom of the VB/CB. The structures are DMSC with a band gap up (down) of 1.0 eV (1.3 eV) for NO@TiB-BC6N and 1.0 eV (1.2 eV) for NO@TiN-BC6N, and with a magnetic moment of 2 μB. The adsorption of NO gas on the TiC1 and TiC2 sites creates states at 0.4 eV and 0.6 eV, respectively. The NO adsorbed gas converts the TiC1-BC6N and TiC2-BC6N from a SC state to a DMSC state and nonmagnetic to magnetic with 1 μB. The spin-up (down) band gaps for TiC1-BC6N and TiC2-BC6N sheets are 1.2 eV (0.6 eV) and 1.1 eV (0.9 eV).
For adsorbed NO gas on the Co-BC6N at different adsorption positions, the contribution of N and O 2 p states has a significant effect around the Fermi energy of the Co-BC6N sheet. The adsorbed NO molecule converts the SC state of CoB- and CoN-BC6N to a DMSC with spin-up (down) band gaps of 0.5 eV (1.0 eV) and 0.4 eV (0.9 eV), respectively. In addition, the NO molecule converts the nonmagnetic sheet to a magnetic sheet by 1 μB for CoB- and CoN-BC6N. However, the molecule converts the CoC1- and CoC2-BC6N to an SC with a band gap of 1.1 eV and 0.4 eV, respectively. The NO molecule converts the magnetic sheet to a nonmagnetic sheet for CoB- and CoN-BC6N.

2.2.2. NO2 Gas Adsorption

We now discuss the adsorption NO2 adsorption results. In the NO2 isolated molecule, the angle and the bond length are 134° and 1.2 Å, respectively [8]. The adsorption of the molecule is extremely weak (0.1 eV) at all sites of the pristine system [47]. Due to that weak adsorption, its influence on the electronic properties of the pristine sheet is very small [47].
For the adsorption of NO2 on the Ti/Co-doped monolayers, in all structures, the bond length of N-O is ∼1.3 Å. We also find that the O-N-O angle decreases to 118.8 °/111.8°, 120.9°/123.7°, 110.8°/108.9°, and 121.1°/110.7° for TiB/CoB-, TiC1/CoC1-, TiC2/CoC2-, and TiN/CoN-BC6N, respectively. The significant interaction between Ti/Co-doped sheets and adsorbed NO2 is reflected in the change in angle. This is further supported by the charge transfer between the sheets and the gas (∼0.5e/0.4e) and the reduced distance between NO2 and the Ti/Co atom (Table 3). Similar to the adsorption of NO gas, the TiB-, TiN- and TiC1-BC6N can adsorb the NO2 molecule better than the CoB-, CoN- and CoC1-BC6N. On the other hand, CoC2-BC6N can adsorb NO2 better than TiC2-BC6N.
Figure 4e–h show the effect of NO2 on the DOS/PDOS of the Ti-BC6N sheets. The contribution of the O 2 p states is more significant than the N 2 p states of the gas. Adsorption changes the magnetic properties and the electronic state of Ti-BC6N, from metal to SC for NO2@TiB and from half-metal to SC for NO2@TiN with a band gap of 1 eV for both structures, from SC to DMSC for NO2@TiC1 with spin-up/down band gap of 0.6 eV/ 0.9 eV with a magnetic moment of 1 μB, and from SC to metal for NO2@TiC2. Regarding the DOS/PDOS of NO2 on the Co-doped nanosheets (Figure 4), the NO2 gas converts the CoB- and CoN-BC6N from SC to DMSC (with spin-up/down band gap of 1.2 eV/0.4 eV for CoB-BC6N and magnetic moment of 1 μB) and metal state, respectively. However, the NO2 adsorption changes the state of the CoC1- and CoC2-BC6N systems from DMSC to SC with a gap of 1.2 eV and 0.5 eV, respectively.

2.2.3. CO2 Gas Adsorption

The last triatomic gas we examine is CO2. Adsorption on the pristine system is extremely weak (0.2 eV) [47]. The story in the Ti/Co-BC6N is completely different. The doped monolayer adsorbs the CO2 at a distance of ∼2 Å/2.1 Å, and the O-C-O angle decreases significantly. The closest atom of the molecule to the sheet is the O atom except for CoB- and CoC1-BC6N sheets. The charge transfer and the adsorption energy of CO2 on Ti-doped sheets are larger than that of Co-doped sheets (Table 4).
The PDOS of the CO2@TiB- and CO2@TiN-BC6N systems show that they are DMSCs with spin-up/down and gap of 1.1 eV/0.4 eV and 1.1 eV/0.7 eV, respectively, while CO2@TiC1- and CO2@TiC2-BC6N sheets are SCs with gap of 1.2 eV and 1.1 eV, respectively. On the other hand, CO2@CoB- and CO2@CoN-BC6N are SCs with the same band gap of 1.1 eV and CO2@CoC1- and CO2@CoC2-BC6N are DMSCs with spin-up/down band gap of 0.9 eV/0.9 eV and 0.6 eV/0.4 eV, respectively (Figure 5e–h).

2.2.4. NH3 Gas Adsorption

NH3 is adsorbed very weakly on the pristine system (0.2 eV) [47]. For the Ti/Co-doped sheets, the closest atom of the sheets is the N atom, and the distance is smaller than the corresponding distance in the pristine sheet (Table 5). As with the previous systems, the Ti/Co-doped system greatly enhances the charge transfer and the adsorption of NH3. It is chemisorbed with an average energy of ∼1.4 eV/1.3 eV. The electronic structure becomes metal for NH3@TiB- and NH3@TiN-BC6N, SC with a band gap of 0.8 eV and 1.1 eV in both spin directions for NH3@TiC1-BC6N and NH3@TiC2-BC6N, respectively (Figure 6). For Co-doping, NH3@CoB-, NH3@CoN-BC6N are semiconductors with a band gap of 1.0 eV and 1.3 eV, respectively. NH3@CoC1-, NH3@CoC2-BC6N are DMSC with spin-up/down band gap of 0.5 eV/1.2 eV and 0.7 eV (0.6 eV), respectively (Figure 6e–h).

2.2.5. N2 Gas Adsorption

The fifth molecule that we study is nitrogen (N2). The N-N bond length is 1.11. N2 gas is adsorbed very weakly by 0.09 eV above the pristine surface at all adsorption positions, which is in agreement with recent studies of N2 adsorption on similar systems [48]. As a result, N2 gas adsorption on the sheet has a negligible effect on the DOS of a pristine system.
In the doped systems, the distance between the N atom of the gas and the dopant atom ranges from 2.0 Å to 2.9 Å for the Ti systems and from 1.6Å to 2.0 Å for the Co systems (Figure 7a–d). The adsorption energy ranges between ∼0.4 eV and ∼1.3 for Ti-doped systems, and slightly lower for the Co-doped systems (Table 6). The N2 adsorption causes some changes in the DOS/PDOS of Ti/Co-BC6N sheets (Figure 7a–d). The adsorption changes the metal TiB-BC6N and half-metal TiN-BC6N into DMSCs with spin-up (down) gaps of 0.6 (1.1) and 0.4 (0.8), respectively. However, the corresponding Co-doped structures remain SC. At the C1 and C2 positions, the Ti-doped structures are SC after adsorption, although with a smaller band gap. The N2@CoC1-BC6N flips from a DMSC to a metal, while the N2@CoC2-BC6N system remains a DMSC.

2.2.6. O2 Gas Adsorption

The last molecule that we study is O2. Oxygen has a bond length of 1.23 Å. Our calculations show that the O2 adsorption on the pristine BC6N is weak (∼0.1 eV), consistent with previous studies [49]. The distance between the O atom and the dopant atom ranges from 1.78 Å to 1.85 Å for the Ti systems, and from 1.81 Å to 1.94 Å for the Co systems (Figure 8a–d), indicating a stronger interaction than that of the sister molecule N2. This is also reflected in the energies, which indicate that O2 is chemisorbed to the dopants (Table 7).
Figure 8e–h show the influence of O2 on the DOS/PDOS of Ti/Co-BC6N systems. Adsorption of O2 on TiB-/CoB-BC6N and TiN-/CoN-BC6N shifted Fermi energy to the VB, resulting in an asymmetry between spin-up/down spectra with a greater contribution of the O2 2 p states in the VB, with the exception of @CoN, which has the O2 2 p states mainly located in the spin-up gap region. O2 adsorption converts the TiB structure from metal to half-metal, and vice versa for TiN. On the other hand, the structure was changed from SC to metal in both O2@CoB and CoN. The adsorption of O2@TiC1 and TiC2 leaves the two spectra unchanged (spin-symmetric and SC), with band gaps of 0.9 eV and 1 eV. As for the Co systems, O2@CoC1-BC6N remains SC, unlike O2@CoC2-BC6N which changes from SC to metal.

2.2.7. H2 Gas Adsorption

We now explore the potential of molecular hydrogen adsorption on our doped BC6N systems. We place the one and two H2 molecules consecutively close to the Ti/Co site at the 4 different doping locations. Figure 9 shows two of our systems, TiC1/CoC1, with 1 and 2 adsorbed H2 molecules. As we see in Table 8, the adsorption strength is intermediate, except for Ti/Co systems at the C1 site. We also notice that the Co-doped systems are slightly better for hydrogen storage than the Ti-doped systems. The relatively small adsorption energy may be attributed to the large saturation of the dopants with the neighboring lattice sites, which leaves little room for the charge transfer necessary for a strong H2 adsorption.
Now that we see that the single-atom doped systems may not be ideal for hydrogen storage, we explore the potential of other Ti- and Co-doped BC6N systems. Figure 10 shows our Ti-doped systems, where 4 Ti atoms are implanted in the BC6N skeleton, which may be experimentally realized in an implantation scheme. Given the symmetry of our BC6N pristine structure, there are two inequivalent locations where the 4-atom cluster can land: one centered around the B site, and the other around the C2 site (Figure 10 shows the systems with the cluster centered around the former). Centering the clusters around the N and C1 sites yields the same systems. We systematically add up to four H2 molecules, each time structurally relaxing our systems and obtaining the average H2 adsorption energies. The average is taken over the number of H2 molecules, according to:
E ad = E n H 2 + 4 Ti / Co @ BC 6 N E 4 Ti / Co @ BC 6 N n E H 2 n ,
where E Ad is the average adsorption energy per H2 molecule for n adsorbed molecules, E n H 2 + 4 Ti / Co @ BC 6 N is the total energy of the 4Ti-BC6N sheet with n H2 molecules adsorbed, E 4 Ti / Co @ BC 6 N is the total energy of the 4Ti/Co-BC6N sheet, and E H 2 is the total energy of a single H2 molecule. The H2 molecules can initially be placed in many locations around the cluster. The variability in the location may result in adsorption energy of the n th H2 that is higher than that of the preceding molecule. This may also be caused by a dynamic reorientation of the cluster or sheet atoms, resulting in higher adsorption energy. The relaxation process partially addresses the variability in the location by determining the atomic positions of a (possibly local) energy minimum. Therefore, the average adsorption energy per H2 molecule is preferred over the adsorption energy of a specific n th H2 addition, as the average accounts for the variability in the location of the hydrogen molecule around the cluster as well as any reorientation of the cluster atoms as more molecules are added.
As we see in Figure 10, the 4-atom Ti cluster protrudes out of the BC6N plane, with the BC6N sheet becoming slightly non-planar, with a vertical spread of about 1.53 Å. The sheet does not significantly change its shape as H2 is added. The average distances of the H2 molecules from the closest Ti atom are 1.61 Å, 2.07 Å, 2.07 Å, and 2.4 Å. The average adsorption energies are 0.48 eV, 0.36 eV, 0.85 eV, and 0.72 eV. For the systems where the Ti cluster is centered around the C2 site, the average H-Ti distances are slightly lower, whereas the average energies are higher (Table 9).
The corresponding Co-doped systems are shown in Figure 11. One striking difference from the Ti case is that the Co cluster takes a pyramidal shape, with one Co atom at the top. The sheet suffers some deformation, with a vertical spread of 1.32 Å. The average distances of the H2 molecules from the closest Co atom are 1.61 Å, 1.57 Å, 1.59 Å, and 1.54 Å. The average adsorption energies are 0.22 eV, 0.98 eV, 0.73 eV, and 0.60 eV. For the systems where the Co cluster is centered around the C2 site, the average H-Co distance and the average adsorption energies are highly similar (Table 9).
Our results of storing hydrogen on Ti- and Co-doped BC6N compares with previous work, which has shown that Ti-decorated h-BN monolayers can adsorb up to 5 H2 molecules per Ti atom, with an adsorption energy range from 0.68 eV for one molecule and up to 0.22 eV for five molecules [50]. Ti-decorated carbon-doped h-BN can store hydrogen at room temperature and mild pressure, with an average adsorption energy of 0.58 eV per molecule [51]. Li-decorated BC6N significantly enhances hydrogen storage capacity compared to pristine structures, as Double-sided Li-decorated BC6N can adsorb up to eight hydrogen molecules, with adsorption energies of 0.23–0.29 eV [24]. Further research demonstrated that 8Li-decorated BC6N could adsorb up to 32 H2 molecules [52].
One can determine the Ti/Co-doped BC6N’s potential for gas adsorption/filtration by calculating the average adsorption energy of each gas on the various adsorption positions. Table 10 illustrates that NH3 and CO2 are physisorbed on the Ti/Co-doped systems, whereas NO2 and NO are chemisorbed. This shows that our Ti/Co-doped BC6N-based sensors would work well for filtering NO2 and NO, and to a lesser degree for NH3 and CO2. Additionally, we have observed that the adsorption of NO2, NO, NH3, and CO2 alters our Ti/Co-doped systems’ band gaps in certain ways that could be used to create sensors for those gases. Consequently, the Ti/Co-BC6N systems investigated in this work represent promising candidate materials for NO2, No, NH3, and CO2 filtration and sensing. In addition, the Ti/Co cluster-doped BC6N systems show great potential for the adsorption of up to 4 H2 molecules.
The Ti- and Co-doped BC6N system exhibits promising adsorption characteristics for various gases, suggesting its applicability in gas-sensing, capture, and catalytic processes. The high adsorption energies observed for NO (2.0–3.4 eV) and NO2 (2.0–3.4 eV) indicate strong binding, making the material suitable for gas sensing and environmental monitoring of these toxic pollutants. Such sensors could be used to detect nitrogen oxides in industrial emissions and urban environments, improving air quality-control efforts [53]. The moderate adsorption energies for CO2 (0.4–2.2 eV) suggest potential applications in carbon-capture and storage (CCS) technologies, where reversible adsorption is crucial for efficient gas separation and sequestration [54].
Additionally, the material’s affinity for NH3 (1.2–1.5 eV) and N2 (0.5–1.5 eV) suggests it could serve as a selective gas filter or membrane for ammonia removal in industrial processes, such as fertilizer production and waste treatment [55]. The exceptionally high adsorption energy for O2 (3.0–5.0 eV) indicates potential applications in oxygen-storage and -release systems, which are critical for medical and industrial applications [56]. These results highlight the versatility of BC6N-based materials for next-generation adsorption technologies, combining tunable gas interactions with structural stability.
Experimental studies show that BxCyNz materials exhibit significantly higher gas uptake than graphene, with CO2 and CH4 adsorption increasing exponentially with surface area, unlike the linear trend in graphene. These findings, supported by theoretical calculations, highlight the superior adsorption capabilities of BxCyNz [57]. Similarly, another study demonstrates that vertically aligned MoS2 exhibits enhanced gas adsorption at its edge sites due to a high density of exposed edges, leading to stronger NO2 binding [58].
To the best of our knowledge, no experimental measurements have been reported for gas adsorption on Ti- and Co-doped boron carbon nitride systems. However, studies on similar Ti-doped 2D materials may provide useful insights. It has been found that NO gas molecules adsorb on Ti-doped graphene with an energiy of 1.72 eV [59]. Additionally, Ti-doped 2D materials exhibit strong adsorption capabilities for HCHO, CO, and SO2 [59], and acetone [60], with adsorption energies reaching up to 0.8 eV. These findings suggest that Ti- and Co-doped boron carbon nitride could also demonstrate promising gas-adsorption properties, which warrants experimental validation.

3. Computational Methods

We utilize the spin-polarized first-principles calculations using the Quantum Espresso software (V6.5) [61]. The generalized gradient approximation in the framework of the Perdew–Burke–Ernzerhof functional [62] is used to describe the exchange–correlation interaction. We use a 50 Ry energy cut-off. Our pristine system is a 3 × 3 supercell of BC6N monolayer with 72 atoms. The doped monolayers are created by substituting a dopant atom for C (2 positions), B, and N. We take a 20 Å vacuum spacing along the z-axis to suppress interactions between neighboring images. A minimum force of 0.001 Ry/Bohr is used to obtain the optimized atomic positions and supercell volume of the considered structures. Van der Waals correction [63,64] is considered in our calculations. Our choice of the k-point grid is determined by performing convergence tests on the total energy and electronic structure. A Monkhorst–Pack grid of 12 × 12 × 1 is used for the density of states calculations. Charge transfer from/to the BC6N sheets is calculated by the Löwdin method, and we complement this by showing the charge density difference maps (Supplementary Materials). In order to investigate the structural stability of different Ti-BC6N and Co-BC6N systems, we compute the formation energy per atom, E f , as:
E f = E ( Ti / Co - BC 6 N ) + E ( Y ) E ( BC 6 N ) E ( Ti / Co ) n ,
where E ( Ti / Co ) , E ( BC 6 N ) , E ( Y ) , and E ( Ti / CO - BC 6 N ) are the total energies of the isolated Ti/Co atom, the pristine sheet, the isolated removed Y atom (Y = C1, C2, B, or N), and the doped sheet, respectively, and n is the number of atoms in the supercell. The adsorption energy of a molecule is calculated by
E a d = E ( sheet ) + E ( molecule ) E ( sheet + molecule ) .
where E ( sheet + molecule ) , E ( sheet ) , and E ( molecule ) are the energies of the sheet with the adsorbed molecule, the sheet without the adsorbed molecule, and the isolated molecule, respectively.

4. Conclusions

This study employs first-principles calculations to investigate the structural, electronic, and molecular adsorption properties of Ti/Co-doped BC6N monolayers, focusing on various substitutional doping sites (B, N, and two distinct C positions). The stability of these doped structures is assessed via formation energy calculations. The findings indicate that Ti/Co doping significantly alters the electronic states and band gaps of BC6N nanosheets. The adsorption behaviors of NO, NO2, CO2, NH3, N2, and O2 molecules on both pristine and doped BC6N structures are analyzed. Doping improves the adsorption activity, particularly for NO, NO2, and O2 while CO2 exhibits weaker adsorption across all doped configurations. Adsorption also influences the electronic and magnetic properties of the doped sheets, potentially transitioning them between metallic, semiconducting, and diluted magnetic semiconducting states, or modifying their band gaps. Furthermore, the study explores H2 adsorption on Ti/Co-doped BC6N and on structures embedded with 4-atom Ti and Co clusters. Although single-atom doping results in relatively weak H2 adsorption, cluster-doped configurations can strongly adsorb up to four H2 molecules. These results suggest that Ti/Co-doped BC6N monolayers hold promise for applications in gas filtration, hydrogen storage, molecular sensing, and spintronics.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/molecules30091873/s1, Figure S1: DOS/projected DOS (PDOS) of: (a) NO@TBBC6N, (b) NO@TNBC6N, (c) NO@H1BC6N and (d) NO@H2BC6N. Figure S2: DOS/projected DOS (PDOS) of: (a) NO2@TBBC6N, (b) NO2@TNBC6N, (c) NO2@H1BC6N and (d) NO2@H2BC6N. Figure S3: DOS/projected DOS (PDOS) of: (a) CO2@TBBC6N, (b) CO2@TNBC6N, (c) CO2@H1BC6N and (d) CO2@H2BC6N. Figure S4: DOS/projected DOS (PDOS) of: (a) NH3@TBBC6N, (b) NH3@TNBC6N, (c) NH3@H1BC6N and (d) NH3@H2BC6N. Figure S5: The charge density of (a) NO@TiB, (b) NO@TiC1, (c) NO@TiC2 and (d) NO@TiN respectively from left to right. Isosurface yellow (blue) color represents higher (lower) charge density. Figure S6: The charge density of NO2@TiB, NO2@TiC1, NO2@TiC2 and NO2@TiN respectively from left to right. Isosurface yellow (blue) color represents higher (lower) charge density. Figure S7: The charge density of CO2@TiB, CO2@TiC1, CO2@TiC2 and CO2@TiN respectively from left to right. Isosurface yellow (blue) color represents higher (lower) charge density. Figure S8: The charge density of NH3@TiB, NH3@TiC1, NH3@TiC2 and NH3@TiN respectively from left to right. Isosurface yellow (blue) color represents higher (lower) charge density. Figure S9: The charge density of NO@CoB, NO@CoC1, NO@CoC2 and NO@CoN respectively from left to right. Isosurface yellow (blue) color represents higher (lower) charge density. Figure S10: The charge density of NO2@CoB, NO2@CoC1, NO2@CoC2 and NO2@CoN respectively from left to right. Isosurface yellow (blue) color represents higher (lower) charge density. Figure S11: The charge density of CO2@CoB, CO2@CoC1, CO2@CoC2 and CO2@CoN respectively from left to right. Isosurface yellow (blue) color represents higher (lower) charge density. Figure S12: The charge density of NH3@CoB, NH3@CoC1, NH3@CoC2 and NH3@CoN respectively from left to right. Isosurface yellow (blue) color represents higher (lower) charge density.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.A.M.; Data curation, N.M.A. and H.M.A.-q.; Formal analysis, N.M.A. and H.M.A.-q.; Investigation, N.M.A., H.M.A.-q., M.M.F. and A.A.M.; Methodology, A.A.M.; Project administration, A.A.M.; Resources, N.M.A., H.M.A.-q. and A.A.M.; Software, N.M.A. and H.M.A.-q.; Supervision, A.A.M.; Validation, M.M.F.; Visualization, N.M.A., H.M.A.-q., A.A. and M.M.F.; Writing—original draft, N.M.A. and H.M.A.-q.; Writing—review & editing, M.M.F., A.A. and A.A.M. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available in article.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to acknowledge the use of the resources of the Super-computing Laboratory at KAUST.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Abbreviations

The following abbreviations are used in this manuscript:
MDPIMultidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute
DOAJDirectory of open access journals
TLAThree letter acronym
LDLinear dichroism

References

  1. Bhimanapati, G.R.; Lin, Z.; Meunier, V.; Jung, Y.; Cha, J.; Das, S.; Xiao, D.; Son, Y.; Strano, M.S.; Cooper, V.R.; et al. Recent advances in two-dimensional materials beyond graphene. ACS Nano 2015, 9, 11509–11539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Choi, W.; Lahiri, I.; Seelaboyina, R.; Kang, Y.S. Synthesis of graphene and its applications: A review. Crit. Rev. Solid State Mater. Sci. 2010, 35, 52–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Li, X.; Zhu, H. Two-dimensional MoS2: Properties, preparation, and applications. J. Mater. 2015, 1, 33–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Manzeli, S.; Ovchinnikov, D.; Pasquier, D.; Yazyev, O.V.; Kis, A. 2D transition metal dichalcogenides. Nat. Rev. Mater. 2017, 2, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Darwish, A.A.; Fadlallah, M.M.; Badawi, A.; Maarouf, A.A. Adsorption of sugars on Al-and Ga-doped boron nitride surfaces: A computational study. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2016, 377, 9–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Liu, Y.; Liu, W.; Hou, J.; Dai, Y.; Yang, J. Coronoid nanographene C216 as hydrogen purification membrane: A density functional theory study. Carbon 2018, 135, 112–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Feng, J.w.; Liu, Y.j.; Wang, H.x.; Zhao, J.x.; Cai, Q.h.; Wang, X.z. Gas adsorption on silicene: A theoretical study. Comput. Mater. Sci. 2014, 87, 218–226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Alhajri, F.; Fadlallah, M.M.; Alkhaldi, A.; Maarouf, A.A. Hybrid MXene-Graphene/Hexagonal Boron Nitride Structures: Electronic and Molecular Adsorption Properties. Nanomaterials 2022, 12, 2739. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Faraji, M.; Bafekry, A.; Fadlallah, M.M.; Molaei, F.; Hieu, N.N.; Qian, P.; Ghergherehchi, M.; Gogova, D. Surface modification of titanium carbide MXene monolayers (Ti2C and Ti3C2) via chalcogenide and halogenide atoms. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2021, 23, 15319–15328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Helal, M.A.; El-Sayed, H.M.; Maarouf, A.A.; Fadlallah, M.M. Metal dichalcogenide nanomeshes: Structural, electronic and magnetic properties. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2021, 23, 21183–21195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Hong, Y.L.; Liu, Z.; Wang, L.; Zhou, T.; Ma, W.; Xu, C.; Feng, S.; Chen, L.; Chen, M.L.; Sun, D.M.; et al. Chemical vapor deposition of layered two-dimensional MoSi2N4 materials. Science 2020, 369, 670. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Bafekry, A.; Faraji, M.; Hoat, D.M.; Shahrokhi, M.; Fadlallah, M.M.; Shojaei, F.; Feghhi, S.A.H.; Ghergherehchi, M.; Gogova, D. MoSi2N4 single-layer: A novel two-dimensional material with outstanding mechanical, thermal, electronic and optical properties. J. Phys. Appl. Phys. 2021, 54, 155303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Fadlallah, M.M. Promising metal doped WSi2N4 monolayers for optoelectronic and spintronic applications. Mater. Sci. Semicond. Process. 2024, 173, 108164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Bafekry, A.; Faraji, M.; Fadlallah, M.; Abdolahzadeh Ziabari, A.; Bagheri Khatibani, A.; Feghhi, S.; Ghergherehchi, M.; Gogova, D. Adsorption of habitat and industry-relevant molecules on the MoSi2N4 monolayer. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2021, 564, 150326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Alkhaldi, A.; Fadlallah, M.M.; Alhajri, F.; Maarouf, A.A. Hybrid G/BN@2H-MoS2 Nanomaterial Composites: Structural, Electronic and Molecular Adsorption Properties. Nanomaterials 2022, 12, 4351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Fadlallah, M.M.; Maarouf, A.A.; Soliman, K.A. Boron nitride nanocones template for adsorbing NO2 and SO2: An ab initio investigation. Phys. E Low-Dimens. Syst. Nanostruct. 2019, 113, 188–193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Zhu, J.; Zhang, H.; Tong, Y.; Zhao, L.; Zhang, Y.; Qiu, Y.; Lin, X. First-principles investigations of metal (V, Nb, Ta)-doped monolayer MoS2: Structural stability, electronic properties and adsorption of gas molecules. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2017, 419, 522–530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Yadav, S.; Tam, J.; Singh, C.V. A first principles study of hydrogen storage on lithium decorated two dimensional carbon allotropes. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2015, 40, 6128–6136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Fadlallah, M.M.; Abdelrahman, A.G.; Schwingenschlögl, U.; Maarouf, A.A. Graphene and graphene nanomesh supported nickel clusters: Electronic, magnetic, and hydrogen storage properties. Nanotechnology 2019, 30, 085709. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Xu, H.; Zhang, F.; Fang, L.; Xu, Y.; Yu, Z.W.; Ma, L.; Guan, D.; Shao, Z. Deciphering the Nitrogen Activation Mechanisms on Group VIII Single Atoms at MoS2. Inorg. Chem. 2024, 63, 19570–19581. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Abbasi, A.; Sardroodi, J.J. The adsorption of sulfur trioxide and ozone molecules on stanene nanosheets investigated by DFT: Applications to gas sensor devices. Phys. E Low-Dimens. Syst. Nanostruct. 2019, 108, 382–390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Bafekry, A.; Faraji, M.; Fadlallah, M.M.; Jappor, H.; Hieu, N.; Ghergherehchi, M.; Gogova, D. Ab-initio-driven prediction of puckered penta-like PdPSeX (XO, S, Te) Janus monolayers: Study on the electronic, optical, mechanical and photocatalytic properties. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2022, 582, 152356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Naseri, M.; Bafekry, A.; Faraji, M.; Hoat, D.M.; Fadlallah, M.M.; Ghergherehchi, M.; Sabbaghi, N.; Gogova, D. Two-dimensional buckled tetragonal cadmium chalcogenides including CdS, CdSe, and CdTe monolayers as photo-catalysts for water splitting. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2021, 23, 12226–12232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Rahimi, R.; Solimannejad, M. Hydrogen storage on pristine and Li-decorated BC6N monolayer from first-principles insights. Mol. Phys. 2021, 119, e1827177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Bafekry, A.; Naseri, M.; Fadlallah, M.M.; Abdolhosseini Sarsari, I.; Faraji, M.; Bagheri Khatibani, A.; Ghergherehchi, M.; Gogova, D. A novel two-dimensional boron–carbon–nitride (BCN) monolayer: A first-principles insight. J. Appl. Phys. 2021, 130, 114301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Lu, Y.; Yu, Y.; Zhu, X.; Wang, M. Two predicted two-dimensional BCN structures: A first-principles study. Phys. E Low-Dimens. Syst. Nanostruct. 2021, 125, 114413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Bafekry, A.; Stampfl, C. Band gap control of graphenelike borocarbonitride g- BC 6 N bilayers by electrical gating. Phys. Rev. B 2020, 102, 195411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Rani, P.; Jindal, V. Designing band gap of graphene by B and N dopant atoms. RSC Adv. 2013, 3, 802–812. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Deng, X.; Wu, Y.; Dai, J.; Kang, D.; Zhang, D. Electronic structure tuning and band gap opening of graphene by hole/electron codoping. Phys. Lett. A 2011, 375, 3890–3894. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Kouvetakis, J.; Sasaki, T.; Shen, C.; Hagiwara, R.; Lerner, M.; Krishnan, K.; Bartlett, N. Novel aspects of graphite intercalation by fluorine and fluorides and new B/C, C/N and B/C/N materials based on the graphite network. Synth. Met. 1989, 34, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Sadeghi, S.N.; Allaei, S.M.V.; Zebarjadi, M.; Esfarjani, K. Ultra-high lattice thermal conductivity and the effect of pressure in superhard hexagonal BC 2 N. J. Mater. Chem. C 2020, 8, 15705–15716. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Nehate, S.; Saikumar, A.; Prakash, A.; Sundaram, K. A review of boron carbon nitride thin films and progress in nanomaterials. Mater. Today Adv. 2020, 8, 100106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Wang, J.; Chen, C.; Yang, C.; Fan, Y.; Liu, D.; Lei, W. Boron carbon nitride (BCN) nanomaterials: Structures, synthesis and energy applications. Curr. Graphene Sci. 2018, 2, 3–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Matsui, K.; Oda, S.; Yoshiura, K.; Nakajima, K.; Yasuda, N.; Hatakeyama, T. One-shot multiple borylation toward BN-doped nanographenes. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2018, 140, 1195–1198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Aghaei, S.; Aasi, A.; Farhangdoust, S.; Panchapakesan, B. Graphene-like BC6N nanosheets are potential candidates for detection of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) in human breath: A DFT study. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2021, 536, 147756. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Bafekry, A. Graphene-like BC6N single-layer: Tunable electronic and magnetic properties via thickness, gating, topological defects, and adatom/molecule. Phys. E Low-Dimens. Syst. Nanostruct. 2020, 118, 113850. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Wu, Y.; Yang, D.; Li, W.; Yang, W. Titanium-doped graphene as a superior bifunctional oxygen evolution and reduction electrocatalyst. ACS Nano 2018, 12, 2029–2037. [Google Scholar]
  38. Zhang, C.; Xie, Y.; Ma, Y.; Wang, Y. Doping-induced high-performance transition metal dichalcogenides monolayer transistors: A first-principles study. J. Appl. Phys. 2019, 125, 204302. [Google Scholar]
  39. Chen, X.; Qiu, Y.; Liu, G.; Zheng, W.; Feng, W.; Gao, F.; Cao, W.; Fu, Y.; Hu, W.; Hu, P. Tuning electrochemical catalytic activity of defective 2D terrace MoSe 2 heterogeneous catalyst via cobalt doping. J. Mater. Chem. A 2017, 5, 11357–11363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Liu, W.; Luo, C.; Zhang, S.; Zhang, B.; Ma, J.; Wang, X.; Liu, W.; Li, Z.; Yang, Q.H.; Lv, W. Cobalt-doping of molybdenum disulfide for enhanced catalytic polysulfide conversion in lithium–sulfur batteries. ACS Nano 2021, 15, 7491–7499. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Xu, J.; Li, H.; Li, Y.; Wang, M.; Li, Z.; Mo, F.; Zhang, C.; Zhu, L.; Nan, R.; Wang, P. Promotion of electrochemical hydrogen storage performance based on two-dimensional black phosphorus nanosheets doped by cobalt. Mater. Lett. 2021, 303, 130422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Zhang, X.; Chen, D.; Cui, H.; Dong, X.; Xiao, S.; Tang, J. Understanding of SF6 decompositions adsorbed on cobalt-doped SWCNT: A DFT study. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2017, 420, 371–382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Botas, J.A.; Calleja, G.; Sánchez-Sánchez, M.; Orcajo, M.G. Cobalt doping of the MOF-5 framework and its effect on gas-adsorption properties. Langmuir 2010, 26, 5300–5303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Aasi, A.; Mehdi Aghaei, S.; Panchapakesan, B. Outstanding performance of transition-metal-decorated single-layer graphene-like BC6N nanosheets for disease biomarker detection in human breath. ACS Omega 2021, 6, 4696–4707. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Babar, V.; Sharma, S.; Schwingenschlögl, U. Gas sensing performance of pristine and monovacant C6BN monolayers evaluated by density functional theory and the nonequilibrium green’s function formalism. J. Phys. Chem. C 2020, 124, 5853–5860. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Zhang, X.; Li, Z.; Zhang, Y.; Wang, Y.; Liu, Y.; Chen, W.; Zhang, Y.; Xie, Y. Single-phase perovskite oxide with super-exchange induced atomic-scale synergistic active centers enables ultrafast hydrogen evolution. Nat. Commun. 2020, 11, 5882. [Google Scholar]
  47. Alghamdi, N.M.; Fadlallah, M.M.; Al-qahtani, H.M.; Maarouf, A.A. Electronic and Molecular Adsorption Properties of Pt-Doped BC6N: An Ab-Initio Investigation. Nanomaterials 2024, 14, 762. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Choutipalli, V.S.K.; Ghosh, S.K.; Singh, A.K. Vacancy defect assisted enhanced nitrogen fixation in boron nitride nanomaterials. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2022, 602, 154406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Tang, S.; Wu, W.; Liu, L.; Gu, J. Oxygen-Molecule Adsorption and Dissociation on BCN Graphene: A First-Principles Study. ChemPhysChem 2017, 18, 101–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Rafique, M.; Uqaili, M.A.; Mirjat, N.H.; Tunio, M.A.; Shuai, Y. Ab-initio investigations on titanium (Ti) atom-doped divacancy monolayer h-BN system for hydrogen storage systems. Phys. E Low-Dimens. Syst. Nanostruct. 2019, 109, 169–178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Wang, T.; Wang, C.; Huo, Y.; Liu, M. Hydrogen storage in C-doped h-BN decorated with titanium atom: A computational study. Chem. Phys. Lett. 2022, 803, 139853. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Kalwar, B.A.; Fangzong, W.; Rafique, M.; Soomro, A.M.; Ahmed, Z.; Ahmed, I. Enhanced storage capacity of hydrogen based on Li-decorated 2D BC6N under ambient conditions: First-principles study. Comput. Mater. Sci. 2024, 231, 112621. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Zhao, X.; Zhang, X.; Wang, L.; Yang, Z.; Zhang, G.; Liu, M. High-performance NO2 gas sensors based on 2D materials: A review. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2018, 274, 605–626. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Goeppert, A.; Czaun, M.; Jones, J.P.; Surya Prakash, G.K.; Olah, G.A. Carbon dioxide capture from the air: A perspective. Energy Environ. Sci. 2014, 7, 1154–1161. [Google Scholar]
  55. Liu, G.; Zhang, L.; Jin, W. Ammonia-selective gas separation membranes: Recent advances and perspectives. J. Membr. Sci. 2019, 587, 117–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Wang, S.; Zhang, L.; Xia, Z.; Wang, Y.; Qu, Y. Oxygen storage and release properties of nanostructured oxides for energy and environmental applications. ACS Nano 2020, 14, 13115–13140. [Google Scholar]
  57. Kumar, N.; Subrahmanyam, K.S.; Chaturbedy, P.; Raidongia, K.; Govindaraj, A.; Hembram, K.P.; Mishra, A.K.; Waghmare, U.V.; Rao, C.N.R. Remarkable Uptake of CO2 and CH4 by Graphene-Like Borocarbonitrides, BxCyNz. ChemSusChem 2011, 4, 1662–1670. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Cho, S.Y.; Kim, S.J.; Lee, Y.; Kim, J.S.; Jung, W.B.; Yoo, H.W.; Kim, J.; Jung, H.T. Highly enhanced gas adsorption properties in vertically aligned MoS2 layers. ACS Nano 2015, 9, 9314–9321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Zhang, H.p.; Luo, X.g.; Lin, X.y.; Lu, X.; Leng, Y.; Song, H.t. Density functional theory calculations on the adsorption of formaldehyde and other harmful gases on pure, Ti-doped, or N-doped graphene sheets. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2013, 283, 559–565. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Jiang, L.; Chen, Z.; Cui, Q.; Xu, S.; Hou, X.; Tang, F. Density functional theory research on the adsorption properties of Ti-doped graphene for acetone and other gases. Mater. Sci. Semicond. Process. 2022, 138, 106252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Giannozzi, P.; Baroni, S.; Bonini, N.; Calandra, M.; Car, R.; Cavazzoni, C.; Ceresoli, D.; Chiarotti, G.L.; Cococcioni, M.; Dabo, I.; et al. QUANTUM ESPRESSO: A modular and open-source software project for quantum simulations of materials. J. Phys. Condens. Matter 2009, 21, 395502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Perdew, J.P.; Burke, K.; Ernzerhof, M. Generalized gradient approximation made simple. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1996, 77, 3865. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Grimme, S. Semiempirical GGA-type density functional constructed with a long-range dispersion correction. J. Comput. Chem. 2006, 27, 1787–1799. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Barone, V.; Casarin, M.; Forrer, D.; Pavone, M.; Sambi, M.; Vittadini, A. Role and effective treatment of dispersive forces in materials: Polyethylene and graphite crystals as test cases. J. Comput. Chem. 2009, 30, 934–939. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. A 3 × 3 optimized BC6N pristine monolayer: (a) top/side view. We refer to C, B, and N atoms by yellow, green, and blue spheres, respectively. Gas-adsorption positions are indicated with the solid red hexagons. Notation for different sites is as follows: atop N (TN), atop B (TB), atop the BNC hexagonal (H1), and atop the C hexagonal (H2). The red circles refer to the Ti/Co substitutional dopant positions, and (b) DOS/PDOS for pristine BC6N monolayer.
Figure 1. A 3 × 3 optimized BC6N pristine monolayer: (a) top/side view. We refer to C, B, and N atoms by yellow, green, and blue spheres, respectively. Gas-adsorption positions are indicated with the solid red hexagons. Notation for different sites is as follows: atop N (TN), atop B (TB), atop the BNC hexagonal (H1), and atop the C hexagonal (H2). The red circles refer to the Ti/Co substitutional dopant positions, and (b) DOS/PDOS for pristine BC6N monolayer.
Molecules 30 01873 g001
Figure 2. Ti/Co-BC6N monolayers with different substitutional doping positions: (ad) optimized TiB/CoB, TiC1/CoC1, TiC2/CoC2, and TiN/CoN structures, top/side view. The light-coral and magenta balls indicate the Ti and Co atoms, respectively. (eh) The corresponding DOS/PDOS.
Figure 2. Ti/Co-BC6N monolayers with different substitutional doping positions: (ad) optimized TiB/CoB, TiC1/CoC1, TiC2/CoC2, and TiN/CoN structures, top/side view. The light-coral and magenta balls indicate the Ti and Co atoms, respectively. (eh) The corresponding DOS/PDOS.
Molecules 30 01873 g002
Figure 3. (ad) Optimized monolayers of NO@Ti/Co-BC6N with different substitutional doping positions, top and side view: (a) NO@TiB/CoB, (b) NO@TiC1/CoC1, (c) NO@TiC2/CoC2, and (d) NO@TiN/CoN. (eh) The corresponding DOS/PDOS of the NO@Ti/Co−BC6N monolayers.
Figure 3. (ad) Optimized monolayers of NO@Ti/Co-BC6N with different substitutional doping positions, top and side view: (a) NO@TiB/CoB, (b) NO@TiC1/CoC1, (c) NO@TiC2/CoC2, and (d) NO@TiN/CoN. (eh) The corresponding DOS/PDOS of the NO@Ti/Co−BC6N monolayers.
Molecules 30 01873 g003
Figure 4. (ad) Optimized monolayers of NO2@Ti/Co-BC6N with different substitutional doping positions, top and side view: (a) NO2@TiB/CoB, (b) NO2@TiC1/CoC1, (c) NO2@TiC2/CoC2, and (d) NO2@TiN/CoN. (eh) The corresponding DOS/PDOS of the NO2@Ti/Co-BC6N structures.
Figure 4. (ad) Optimized monolayers of NO2@Ti/Co-BC6N with different substitutional doping positions, top and side view: (a) NO2@TiB/CoB, (b) NO2@TiC1/CoC1, (c) NO2@TiC2/CoC2, and (d) NO2@TiN/CoN. (eh) The corresponding DOS/PDOS of the NO2@Ti/Co-BC6N structures.
Molecules 30 01873 g004
Figure 5. (ad) Optimized structures of CO2@Ti/Co-BC6N at different substitutional doping positions, top and side view: (a) CO2@TiB/CoB, (b) CO2@TiC1/CoC1, (c) CO2@TiC2/CoC2, and (d) CO2@TiN/CoN. (eh) The corresponding DOS/PDOS of the CO2@Ti/Co-BC6N structures.
Figure 5. (ad) Optimized structures of CO2@Ti/Co-BC6N at different substitutional doping positions, top and side view: (a) CO2@TiB/CoB, (b) CO2@TiC1/CoC1, (c) CO2@TiC2/CoC2, and (d) CO2@TiN/CoN. (eh) The corresponding DOS/PDOS of the CO2@Ti/Co-BC6N structures.
Molecules 30 01873 g005
Figure 6. (ad) Optimized monolayers of NH3@Ti/Co-BC6N at different substitutional doping sites, top and side view: (a) NH3@TiB/CoB, (b) NH3@TiC1/CoC1, (c) NH3@TiC2/CoC2, and (d) NH3@TiN/CoN. (eh) The corresponding DOS/PDOS of the NH3@Ti/Co-BC6N structures.
Figure 6. (ad) Optimized monolayers of NH3@Ti/Co-BC6N at different substitutional doping sites, top and side view: (a) NH3@TiB/CoB, (b) NH3@TiC1/CoC1, (c) NH3@TiC2/CoC2, and (d) NH3@TiN/CoN. (eh) The corresponding DOS/PDOS of the NH3@Ti/Co-BC6N structures.
Molecules 30 01873 g006
Figure 7. (ad) Optimized monolayers of N2@Ti/Co-BC6N at different substitutional doping sites, top and side view: (a) N2@TiB/CoB, (b) N2@TiC1/CoC1, (c) N2@TiC2/CoC2, and (d) N2@TiN/CoN. (eh) The corresponding DOS/PDOS of the N2@Ti/Co-BC6N structures.
Figure 7. (ad) Optimized monolayers of N2@Ti/Co-BC6N at different substitutional doping sites, top and side view: (a) N2@TiB/CoB, (b) N2@TiC1/CoC1, (c) N2@TiC2/CoC2, and (d) N2@TiN/CoN. (eh) The corresponding DOS/PDOS of the N2@Ti/Co-BC6N structures.
Molecules 30 01873 g007
Figure 8. (ad) Optimized monolayers of O2@Ti/Co-BC6N at different substitutional doping sites, top and side view: (a) O2@TiB/CoB, (b) O2@TiC1/CoC1, (c) O2@TiC2/CoC2, and (d) O2@TiN/CoN. (eh) The adsorption corresponding to DOS/PDOS of the O2@Ti/Co-BC6N structures.
Figure 8. (ad) Optimized monolayers of O2@Ti/Co-BC6N at different substitutional doping sites, top and side view: (a) O2@TiB/CoB, (b) O2@TiC1/CoC1, (c) O2@TiC2/CoC2, and (d) O2@TiN/CoN. (eh) The adsorption corresponding to DOS/PDOS of the O2@Ti/Co-BC6N structures.
Molecules 30 01873 g008
Figure 9. (ad) Optimized structures of H2@Ti/Co-BC6N, with 1 and 2 adsorbed H2 molecules, top and side view.
Figure 9. (ad) Optimized structures of H2@Ti/Co-BC6N, with 1 and 2 adsorbed H2 molecules, top and side view.
Molecules 30 01873 g009
Figure 10. (ad) Optimized structures of H2@Ti-BC6N, with 1, 2, 3, and 4 adsorbed H2 molecules, top and side view.
Figure 10. (ad) Optimized structures of H2@Ti-BC6N, with 1, 2, 3, and 4 adsorbed H2 molecules, top and side view.
Molecules 30 01873 g010
Figure 11. (ad) Optimized structures of H2@Co-BC6N, with 1, 2, 3, and 4 adsorbed H2 molecules, top and side view.
Figure 11. (ad) Optimized structures of H2@Co-BC6N, with 1, 2, 3, and 4 adsorbed H2 molecules, top and side view.
Molecules 30 01873 g011
Table 1. Ti/Co-BC6N: The charge transfer ( Δ Q (e)), formation energy ( E f (meV)), magnetic moment (Mag ( μ B )), band gap ( E g up/down (dn) (eV)), average distance between the dopant and its nearest neighbors, r ¯ , and average angle between the dopant and its nearest neighbors, θ ¯ .
Table 1. Ti/Co-BC6N: The charge transfer ( Δ Q (e)), formation energy ( E f (meV)), magnetic moment (Mag ( μ B )), band gap ( E g up/down (dn) (eV)), average distance between the dopant and its nearest neighbors, r ¯ , and average angle between the dopant and its nearest neighbors, θ ¯ .
Systems Δ Q E f Mag E g (up) E g (dn) r ¯ θ ¯
BC6N--0.01.31.3--
TiB/CoB-BC6N0.78/0.1377/520.9/0.0-/1.2-/1.21.95/1.7682.92/93.79
TiC1/CoC1-BC6N0.82/0.0388/72−0.1/10.9/0.60.9/1.11.98/1.880.19/91.09
TiC2/CoC2-BC6N1.03/0.1858/650.0/11.1/0.41.1/0.31.9/1.7994.42/91.08
TiN/CoN-BC6N0.98/0.1746/210.9/0.0-/1.21.2/1.22/1.891.32/102.38
Table 2. NO@pristine [47] and Ti/Co-BC6N monolayers: The closest distance (Å), charge transfer ( Δ Q (e)), nearest atom (X), adsorption energy ( E a d (eV)), magnetic moment (Mag (μB)), band gap ( E g up/down (dn) (eV)).
Table 2. NO@pristine [47] and Ti/Co-BC6N monolayers: The closest distance (Å), charge transfer ( Δ Q (e)), nearest atom (X), adsorption energy ( E a d (eV)), magnetic moment (Mag (μB)), band gap ( E g up/down (dn) (eV)).
SystemsdX Δ Q E ad Mag E g (up) E g (dn)
@BBC6N2.8N0.00.21.00.41.1
@NBC6N3.1N0.00.11.01.10.4
@H1BC6N3.1N0.00.11.00.31.2
@H2BC6N2.9N−0.10.21.00.51.3
@TiB/CoB-BC6N2.0/1.7N/N−0.4/−0.12.9/2.32/11.0/0.51.3/1.0
@TiC1/CoC1-BC6N1.9/1.7N/N−0.3/−0.13.4/1.91/01.2/1.10.6/1.1
@TiC2/CoC2-BC6N1.9/1.7N/N−0.6/−0.12.4/3.21/01.1/0.40.9/0.4
@TiN/CoN-BC6N2.0/1.8N/N−0.3/−0.12.6/2.72/11.0/0.41.2/0.9
Table 3. NO2@pristine [47] and Ti/Co-BC6N: The closest distance (Å), O-N-O angle (θ°), charge transfer ( Δ Q (e)), nearest atom (X), adsorption energy ( E a d (eV)), magnetic moment (Mag ( μ B )), and band gap ( E g up/down (dn) (eV)).
Table 3. NO2@pristine [47] and Ti/Co-BC6N: The closest distance (Å), O-N-O angle (θ°), charge transfer ( Δ Q (e)), nearest atom (X), adsorption energy ( E a d (eV)), magnetic moment (Mag ( μ B )), and band gap ( E g up/down (dn) (eV)).
Systemsdθ°X Δ Q E ad Mag E g (up) E g (dn)
@BBC6N2.9126.7O−0.10.10.91.4-
@NBC6N3.0126.9O−0.20.10.91.4-
@H1BC6N3.0126.9O−0.10.1−0.9-1.3
@H2BC6N2.8128.6N−0.10.10.90.31.3
@TiB/CoB-BC6N2.0/1.8118.8/111.8O/O−0.5/−0.43.8/2.10/11.0/1.21.0/0.4
@TiC1/CoC1-BC6N1.9/1.8120.9/123.7O/N−0.5/−0.33.7/2.01/00.6/1.20.9/1.2
@TiC2/CoC2-BC6N2.1/2.0110.8/108.9O/O−0.5/−0.32.9/3.40.3/0-/0.5-/0.5
@TiN/CoN-BC6N2.1/2.0121.1/110.7O/O−0.5/−0.43.6/2.80/01.0/-1.0/-
Table 4. CO2@pristine [47] and Ti/Co-BC6N structures: The closest distance (Å), O-C-O angle (θ°), charge transfer ( Δ Q (e)), nearest atom (X), adsorption energy ( E a d (eV)), magnetic moment (Mag (μB)), and band gap ( E g up/down (dn) (eV)).
Table 4. CO2@pristine [47] and Ti/Co-BC6N structures: The closest distance (Å), O-C-O angle (θ°), charge transfer ( Δ Q (e)), nearest atom (X), adsorption energy ( E a d (eV)), magnetic moment (Mag (μB)), and band gap ( E g up/down (dn) (eV)).
Systemsdθ°X Δ Q E ad Mag E g (up) E g (dn)
@BBC6N3.3179.3C−0.020.20.01.31.3
@NBC6N3.2179.8C−0.010.20.01.31.3
@H1BC6N3.2179.3C−0.020.20.01.31.3
@H2BC6N3.2179.3C−0.020.20.01.31.3
@TiB/CoB-BC6N2.0/2.0139/151.9O/C−0.5/−0.31.1/0.41/01.1/1.10.4/1.1
@TiC1/CoC1-BC6N1.9/1.9128.1/145.4O/C−0.5/−0.32.2/0.40/11.2/0.91.2/0.9
@TiC2/CoC2-BC6N1.9/2.2126.6/177.9O/O−0.5/0.11.2/0.80/11.1/0.61.1/0.4
@TiN/CoN-BC6N2.1/2.2144.7/157.2O/O−0.4/−0.20.7/0.41/01.1/1.10.7/1.1
Table 5. NH3@pristine and Ti/Co-BC6N nanosheets: The closest distance (Å), H-N-H angle (θ°), charge transfer ( Δ Q (e)), nearest atom (X), adsorption energy ( E a d (eV)), magnetic moment (Mag (μB)), and band gap ( E g up/down (dn) (eV)).
Table 5. NH3@pristine and Ti/Co-BC6N nanosheets: The closest distance (Å), H-N-H angle (θ°), charge transfer ( Δ Q (e)), nearest atom (X), adsorption energy ( E a d (eV)), magnetic moment (Mag (μB)), and band gap ( E g up/down (dn) (eV)).
Systemsdθ°X Δ Q E ad Mag E g (up) E g (dn)
@BBC6N2.7102.2H−0.010.20.01.31.3
@NBC6N2.7106.4H−0.010.20.01.31.3
@H1BC6N2.7106.2H−0.010.20.01.31.3
@H2BC6N2.8106.2H−0.010.20.01.31.3
@TiB/CoB-BC6N2.3/2.1106.6/107.4N/N0.1/0.21.3/1.2−0.73/0-/1-/1
@TiC1/CoC1-BC6N2.2/2108.5/107.6N/N0.2/0.21.6/1.20/10.8/0.50.8/1.2
@TiC2/CoC2-BC6N2.3/2107.0/108.2N/N0.2/0.21.5/1.40/11.1/0.71.1/0.6
@TiN/CoN-BC6N2.3/2.1107.4/107.4N/N0.2/0.21.3/1.40/0-/1.3-/1.3
Table 6. N2@Ti/Co-BC6N monolayers: The closest distance (Å), charge transfer ( Δ Q (e)), nearest atom (X), adsorption energy ( E a d (eV)), magnetic moment (Mag (μB)), band gap ( E g up/down (dn) (eV)).
Table 6. N2@Ti/Co-BC6N monolayers: The closest distance (Å), charge transfer ( Δ Q (e)), nearest atom (X), adsorption energy ( E a d (eV)), magnetic moment (Mag (μB)), band gap ( E g up/down (dn) (eV)).
SystemsdX Δ Q E ad Mag E g (up) E g (dn)
@TBBC6N3.29N0.010.090.01.21.2
@TiB/CoB-BC6N2.4/1.84N/N−0.34/−0.170.94/0.861/00.6/1.11.1/1.1
@TiC1/CoC1-BC6N2.04/1.69N/N−0.34/−0.270.44/0.490/00.9/-0.9/-
@TiC2/CoC2-BC6N2.89/1.97N/N−0.17/−0.271.29/0.510/1.080.4/0.40.4/0.2
@TiN/CoN-BC6N2.23/1.87N/N−0.29/−0.110.39/0.661/00.4/1.10.8/1.1
Table 7. O2@Ti/Co-BC6N monolayers: The closest distance (Å), charge transfer ( Δ Q (e)), nearest atom (X), adsorption energy ( E a d (eV)), magnetic moment (Mag (μB)), band gap ( E g up/down (dn) (eV)).
Table 7. O2@Ti/Co-BC6N monolayers: The closest distance (Å), charge transfer ( Δ Q (e)), nearest atom (X), adsorption energy ( E a d (eV)), magnetic moment (Mag (μB)), band gap ( E g up/down (dn) (eV)).
SystemsdX Δ Q E ad Mag E g (up) E g (dn)
@TBBC6N2.8O0.170.1140.0--
@TiB/CoB-BC6N1.85/1.87O/O−0.72/−0.654.43/2.360.9/1.041.1/--/-
@TiC1/CoC1-BC6N1.82/1.85O/O−0.67/−0.585.06/3.660/−1.020.9/0.50.9/1
@TiC2/CoC2-BC6N1.83/1.81O/O−0.63/−0.544.63/3.140/0.871/-1/-
@TiN/CoN-BC6N1.78/1.94O/O−0.54/−0.553.81/1.960.7/−1.7-/--/-
Table 8. Average adsorption energies and number (storage) of hydrogen molecules on the Ti/Co-doped sheets.
Table 8. Average adsorption energies and number (storage) of hydrogen molecules on the Ti/Co-doped sheets.
System E a d a v e Ti/Co (eV)
1H2 @TiB/CoB-BC6N0.15/0.39
2H2 @TiB/CoB-BC6N0.2/0.40
1H2 @TiC1/CoC1-BC6N1.21/0.58
2H2 @TiC1/CoC1-BC6N0.79/0.39
1H2 @TiC2/CoC2-BC6N0.002/0.42
2H2 @TiC2/CoC2-BC6N0.1/0.24
1H2 @TiN/CoN-BC6N0.05/0.27
2H2 @TiN/CoN-BC6N0.16/−0.58
Table 9. Average adsorption energies of hydrogen molecules on the Ti/Co 4-atom cluster-doped systems.
Table 9. Average adsorption energies of hydrogen molecules on the Ti/Co 4-atom cluster-doped systems.
System E a d a v e Ti/Co-BC6N (eV)
1H2 @4TiB/4CoB-BC6N0.48/0.22
2H2 @4TiB/4CoB-BC6N0.36/0.98
3H2 @4TiB/4CoB-BC6N0.85/0.74
4H2 @4TiB/4CoB-BC6N0.72/0.60
1H2 @4TiC2/4CoC2-BC6N2.47/0.57
2H2 @4TiC2/4CoC2-BC6N1.33/1.18
3H2 @4TiC2/4CoC2-BC6N1.27/0.94
4H2 @4TiC2/4CoC2-BC6N1.03/0.79
Table 10. Average adsorption energies ( E a d a v e (eV)) on the Ti/Co-doped systems. The average is taken over the 4 different adsorption sites in each system. The lower 4 rows show the hydrogen adsorption on the systems doped with the 4-atom Ti/Co clusters, and the average is taken over the two equivalent cluster centers.
Table 10. Average adsorption energies ( E a d a v e (eV)) on the Ti/Co-doped systems. The average is taken over the 4 different adsorption sites in each system. The lower 4 rows show the hydrogen adsorption on the systems doped with the 4-atom Ti/Co clusters, and the average is taken over the two equivalent cluster centers.
Gas E a d a v e Ti/Co-BC6N (eV)
NO22.8/2.5
NO3.5/2.6
NH31.4/1.3
CO21.3/0.5
N20.77/0.63
O24.49/2.78
1H20.36/0.41
2H20.31/0.11
1H2@4Ti/Co-BC6N1.48/0.40
2H2@4Ti/Co-BC6N0.85/1.18
3H2@4Ti/Co-BC6N1.06/0.84
4H2@4Ti/Co-BC6N0.88/0.70
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Alghamdi, N.M.; Al-qahtani, H.M.; Alkhaldi, A.; Fadlallah, M.M.; Maarouf, A.A. Investigating the Electronic and Molecular Adsorption Properties of Ti/Co-Doped Boron Carbon Nitride. Molecules 2025, 30, 1873. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules30091873

AMA Style

Alghamdi NM, Al-qahtani HM, Alkhaldi A, Fadlallah MM, Maarouf AA. Investigating the Electronic and Molecular Adsorption Properties of Ti/Co-Doped Boron Carbon Nitride. Molecules. 2025; 30(9):1873. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules30091873

Chicago/Turabian Style

Alghamdi, Nada M., Hind M. Al-qahtani, Amal Alkhaldi, Mohamed M. Fadlallah, and Ahmed A. Maarouf. 2025. "Investigating the Electronic and Molecular Adsorption Properties of Ti/Co-Doped Boron Carbon Nitride" Molecules 30, no. 9: 1873. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules30091873

APA Style

Alghamdi, N. M., Al-qahtani, H. M., Alkhaldi, A., Fadlallah, M. M., & Maarouf, A. A. (2025). Investigating the Electronic and Molecular Adsorption Properties of Ti/Co-Doped Boron Carbon Nitride. Molecules, 30(9), 1873. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules30091873

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop