Now we address the gas-adsorption properties of our structures. We consider six gases NO, NO2, CO2, NH3, O2, and N2. The initial positions of each gas above the considered sheets are (@B), (@N), (@H1), and (@H2) for pristine BC6N, and (@B, @C1, @C2, and @N) for the doped Ti/Co-BC6N sheets. The gas-sheet systems are structurally relaxed. We then compute the adsorption energies and the electronic structures of the investigated nanosheets compared to the adsorption results on pristine structures.
2.2.1. NO Gas Adsorption
The bond length of N-O is 1.16 Å, which agrees well with previous publications [
8]. The NO gas is adsorbed very weakly (
) above the pristine sheet at all adsorption positions [
47] (
Table 2). Therefore the NO gas adsorption on the sheet has negligible effects on the DOS of the pristine system.
When we use the Ti/Co-doped structures, the results are completely different. The Ti/Co dopant’s closest distance from the gas’s N atom is 2.0 Å/1.7 Å, 1.9 Å/1.7 Å, 1.9 Å/ 1.7 Å and 2.0 Å/1.8 Å for NO@TiB-/CoB-, NO@TiC1-/CoC1-, NO@TiC2-/CoC2- and NO@TiN-/CoN-BC6N, respectively. This means that the interaction between the NO gas and the doped sheets is stronger than that of the pristine sheet because the distances are much closer for the doped sheet compared to the pristine structure.
The distance between the N atom and the Ti-BC6N is larger than the corresponding distance in the case of Co-BC6N. Furthermore, the N-O length increases to 1.2 Å/1.2 Å for NO@TiB/CoB, NO@TiC1/CoC1 and @TiN/CoN, and 1.3 Å/1.2 Å for NO@TiC2/CoC2. The charge transfer for the Ti-doped system is higher than the corresponding charge transfer for the Co-doped system at the same position, and with higher adsorption energies: 2.9 eV/ 2.3 eV, 3.4 eV/1.9 eV, 2.4 eV/3.2 eV, and 2.6 eV/2.7 eV for TiB-/CoB-, TiC1-/CoC1, TiC2-/CoC2, and TiN-/CoN-BC6N sheets. The Ti dopant is more effective in adsorbing the NO at TiB and TiC1 than the corresponding cases using Co dopant. However, the Co dopant can adsorb the NO at CoC2 and CoN more than the corresponding Ti cases.
Figure 3e–h show the DOS/PDOS of NO@Ti
B and NO@Ti
N-BC
6N. The top/bottom of the VB/CB is disturbed due to the contribution of the N and O
states, such as for the spin-up/spin-down channel for the top/bottom of the VB/CB. The structures are DMSC with a band gap up (down) of 1.0 eV (1.3 eV) for NO@Ti
B-BC
6N and 1.0 eV (1.2 eV) for NO@Ti
N-BC
6N, and with a magnetic moment of 2
μB. The adsorption of NO gas on the Ti
C1 and Ti
C2 sites creates states at 0.4 eV and 0.6 eV, respectively. The NO adsorbed gas converts the Ti
C1-BC
6N and Ti
C2-BC
6N from a SC state to a DMSC state and nonmagnetic to magnetic with 1
μB. The spin-up (down) band gaps for Ti
C1-BC
6N and Ti
C2-BC
6N sheets are 1.2 eV (0.6 eV) and 1.1 eV (0.9 eV).
For adsorbed NO gas on the Co-BC6N at different adsorption positions, the contribution of N and O states has a significant effect around the Fermi energy of the Co-BC6N sheet. The adsorbed NO molecule converts the SC state of CoB- and CoN-BC6N to a DMSC with spin-up (down) band gaps of 0.5 eV (1.0 eV) and 0.4 eV (0.9 eV), respectively. In addition, the NO molecule converts the nonmagnetic sheet to a magnetic sheet by 1 μB for CoB- and CoN-BC6N. However, the molecule converts the CoC1- and CoC2-BC6N to an SC with a band gap of 1.1 eV and 0.4 eV, respectively. The NO molecule converts the magnetic sheet to a nonmagnetic sheet for CoB- and CoN-BC6N.
2.2.2. NO2 Gas Adsorption
We now discuss the adsorption NO
2 adsorption results. In the NO
2 isolated molecule, the angle and the bond length are 134° and 1.2 Å, respectively [
8]. The adsorption of the molecule is extremely weak (0.1 eV) at all sites of the pristine system [
47]. Due to that weak adsorption, its influence on the electronic properties of the pristine sheet is very small [
47].
For the adsorption of NO
2 on the Ti/Co-doped monolayers, in all structures, the bond length of N-O is ∼1.3 Å. We also find that the O-N-O angle decreases to 118.8 °/111.8°, 120.9°/123.7°, 110.8°/108.9°, and 121.1°/110.7° for Ti
B/Co
B-, Ti
C1/Co
C1-, Ti
C2/Co
C2-, and Ti
N/Co
N-BC
6N, respectively. The significant interaction between Ti/Co-doped sheets and adsorbed NO
2 is reflected in the change in angle. This is further supported by the charge transfer between the sheets and the gas (∼0.5
e/0.4
e) and the reduced distance between NO
2 and the Ti/Co atom (
Table 3). Similar to the adsorption of NO gas, the Ti
B-, Ti
N- and Ti
C1-BC
6N can adsorb the NO
2 molecule better than the Co
B-, Co
N- and Co
C1-BC
6N. On the other hand, Co
C2-BC
6N can adsorb NO
2 better than Ti
C2-BC
6N.
Figure 4e–h show the effect of NO
2 on the DOS/PDOS of the Ti-BC
6N sheets. The contribution of the O
states is more significant than the N
states of the gas. Adsorption changes the magnetic properties and the electronic state of Ti-BC
6N, from metal to SC for NO
2@Ti
B and from half-metal to SC for NO
2@Ti
N with a band gap of 1 eV for both structures, from SC to DMSC for NO
2@Ti
C1 with spin-up/down band gap of 0.6 eV/ 0.9 eV with a magnetic moment of 1
μB, and from SC to metal for NO
2@Ti
C2. Regarding the DOS/PDOS of NO
2 on the Co-doped nanosheets (
Figure 4), the NO
2 gas converts the Co
B- and Co
N-BC
6N from SC to DMSC (with spin-up/down band gap of 1.2 eV/0.4 eV for Co
B-BC
6N and magnetic moment of 1
μB) and metal state, respectively. However, the NO
2 adsorption changes the state of the Co
C1- and Co
C2-BC
6N systems from DMSC to SC with a gap of 1.2 eV and 0.5 eV, respectively.
2.2.6. O2 Gas Adsorption
The last molecule that we study is O
2. Oxygen has a bond length of 1.23 Å. Our calculations show that the O
2 adsorption on the pristine BC
6N is weak (∼0.1 eV), consistent with previous studies [
49]. The distance between the O atom and the dopant atom ranges from 1.78 Å to 1.85 Å for the Ti systems, and from 1.81 Å to 1.94 Å for the Co systems (
Figure 8a–d), indicating a stronger interaction than that of the sister molecule N
2. This is also reflected in the energies, which indicate that O
2 is chemisorbed to the dopants (
Table 7).
Figure 8e–h show the influence of O
2 on the DOS/PDOS of Ti/Co-BC
6N systems. Adsorption of O
2 on Ti
B-/Co
B-BC
6N and Ti
N-/Co
N-BC
6N shifted Fermi energy to the VB, resulting in an asymmetry between spin-up/down spectra with a greater contribution of the O
2 states in the VB, with the exception of @Co
N, which has the O
2 states mainly located in the spin-up gap region. O
2 adsorption converts the Ti
B structure from metal to half-metal, and vice versa for Ti
N. On the other hand, the structure was changed from SC to metal in both O
2@Co
B and Co
N. The adsorption of O
2@Ti
C1 and Ti
C2 leaves the two spectra unchanged (spin-symmetric and SC), with band gaps of 0.9 eV and 1 eV. As for the Co systems, O
2@Co
C1-BC
6N remains SC, unlike O
2@Co
C2-BC
6N which changes from SC to metal.
2.2.7. H2 Gas Adsorption
We now explore the potential of molecular hydrogen adsorption on our doped BC
6N systems. We place the one and two H
2 molecules consecutively close to the Ti/Co site at the 4 different doping locations.
Figure 9 shows two of our systems, Ti
C1/Co
C1, with 1 and 2 adsorbed H
2 molecules. As we see in
Table 8, the adsorption strength is intermediate, except for Ti/Co systems at the C1 site. We also notice that the Co-doped systems are slightly better for hydrogen storage than the Ti-doped systems. The relatively small adsorption energy may be attributed to the large saturation of the dopants with the neighboring lattice sites, which leaves little room for the charge transfer necessary for a strong H
2 adsorption.
Now that we see that the single-atom doped systems may not be ideal for hydrogen storage, we explore the potential of other Ti- and Co-doped BC
6N systems.
Figure 10 shows our Ti-doped systems, where 4 Ti atoms are implanted in the BC
6N skeleton, which may be experimentally realized in an implantation scheme. Given the symmetry of our BC
6N pristine structure, there are two inequivalent locations where the 4-atom cluster can land: one centered around the B site, and the other around the C2 site (
Figure 10 shows the systems with the cluster centered around the former). Centering the clusters around the N and C1 sites yields the same systems. We systematically add up to four H
2 molecules, each time structurally relaxing our systems and obtaining the average H
2 adsorption energies. The average is taken over the number of H
2 molecules, according to:
where
is the average adsorption energy per H
2 molecule for
n adsorbed molecules,
is the total energy of the 4Ti-BC
6N sheet with
n H
2 molecules adsorbed,
is the total energy of the 4Ti/Co-BC
6N sheet, and
is the total energy of a single H
2 molecule. The H
2 molecules can initially be placed in many locations around the cluster. The variability in the location may result in adsorption energy of the
H
2 that is higher than that of the preceding molecule. This may also be caused by a dynamic reorientation of the cluster or sheet atoms, resulting in higher adsorption energy. The relaxation process partially addresses the variability in the location by determining the atomic positions of a (possibly local) energy minimum. Therefore, the average adsorption energy per H
2 molecule is preferred over the adsorption energy of a specific
H
2 addition, as the average accounts for the variability in the location of the hydrogen molecule around the cluster as well as any reorientation of the cluster atoms as more molecules are added.
As we see in
Figure 10, the 4-atom Ti cluster protrudes out of the BC
6N plane, with the BC
6N sheet becoming slightly non-planar, with a vertical spread of about 1.53 Å. The sheet does not significantly change its shape as H
2 is added. The average distances of the H
2 molecules from the closest Ti atom are 1.61 Å, 2.07 Å, 2.07 Å, and 2.4 Å. The average adsorption energies are 0.48 eV, 0.36 eV, 0.85 eV, and 0.72 eV. For the systems where the Ti cluster is centered around the C2 site, the average H-Ti distances are slightly lower, whereas the average energies are higher (
Table 9).
The corresponding Co-doped systems are shown in
Figure 11. One striking difference from the Ti case is that the Co cluster takes a pyramidal shape, with one Co atom at the top. The sheet suffers some deformation, with a vertical spread of 1.32 Å. The average distances of the H
2 molecules from the closest Co atom are 1.61 Å, 1.57 Å, 1.59 Å, and 1.54 Å. The average adsorption energies are 0.22 eV, 0.98 eV, 0.73 eV, and 0.60 eV. For the systems where the Co cluster is centered around the C2 site, the average H-Co distance and the average adsorption energies are highly similar (
Table 9).
Our results of storing hydrogen on Ti- and Co-doped BC
6N compares with previous work, which has shown that Ti-decorated
h-BN monolayers can adsorb up to 5 H
2 molecules per Ti atom, with an adsorption energy range from 0.68 eV for one molecule and up to 0.22 eV for five molecules [
50]. Ti-decorated carbon-doped
h-BN can store hydrogen at room temperature and mild pressure, with an average adsorption energy of 0.58 eV per molecule [
51]. Li-decorated BC
6N significantly enhances hydrogen storage capacity compared to pristine structures, as Double-sided Li-decorated BC
6N can adsorb up to eight hydrogen molecules, with adsorption energies of 0.23–0.29 eV [
24]. Further research demonstrated that 8Li-decorated BC
6N could adsorb up to 32 H
2 molecules [
52].
One can determine the Ti/Co-doped BC
6N’s potential for gas adsorption/filtration by calculating the average adsorption energy of each gas on the various adsorption positions.
Table 10 illustrates that NH
3 and CO
2 are physisorbed on the Ti/Co-doped systems, whereas NO
2 and NO are chemisorbed. This shows that our Ti/Co-doped BC
6N-based sensors would work well for filtering NO
2 and NO, and to a lesser degree for NH
3 and CO
2. Additionally, we have observed that the adsorption of NO
2, NO, NH
3, and CO
2 alters our Ti/Co-doped systems’ band gaps in certain ways that could be used to create sensors for those gases. Consequently, the Ti/Co-BC
6N systems investigated in this work represent promising candidate materials for NO
2, No, NH
3, and CO
2 filtration and sensing. In addition, the Ti/Co cluster-doped BC
6N systems show great potential for the adsorption of up to 4 H
2 molecules.
The Ti- and Co-doped BC
6N system exhibits promising adsorption characteristics for various gases, suggesting its applicability in gas-sensing, capture, and catalytic processes. The high adsorption energies observed for NO (2.0–3.4 eV) and NO
2 (2.0–3.4 eV) indicate strong binding, making the material suitable for gas sensing and environmental monitoring of these toxic pollutants. Such sensors could be used to detect nitrogen oxides in industrial emissions and urban environments, improving air quality-control efforts [
53]. The moderate adsorption energies for CO
2 (0.4–2.2 eV) suggest potential applications in carbon-capture and storage (CCS) technologies, where reversible adsorption is crucial for efficient gas separation and sequestration [
54].
Additionally, the material’s affinity for NH
3 (1.2–1.5 eV) and N
2 (0.5–1.5 eV) suggests it could serve as a selective gas filter or membrane for ammonia removal in industrial processes, such as fertilizer production and waste treatment [
55]. The exceptionally high adsorption energy for O
2 (3.0–5.0 eV) indicates potential applications in oxygen-storage and -release systems, which are critical for medical and industrial applications [
56]. These results highlight the versatility of BC
6N-based materials for next-generation adsorption technologies, combining tunable gas interactions with structural stability.
Experimental studies show that B
xC
yN
z materials exhibit significantly higher gas uptake than graphene, with CO
2 and CH
4 adsorption increasing exponentially with surface area, unlike the linear trend in graphene. These findings, supported by theoretical calculations, highlight the superior adsorption capabilities of B
xC
yN
z [
57]. Similarly, another study demonstrates that vertically aligned MoS
2 exhibits enhanced gas adsorption at its edge sites due to a high density of exposed edges, leading to stronger NO
2 binding [
58].
To the best of our knowledge, no experimental measurements have been reported for gas adsorption on Ti- and Co-doped boron carbon nitride systems. However, studies on similar Ti-doped 2D materials may provide useful insights. It has been found that NO gas molecules adsorb on Ti-doped graphene with an energiy of 1.72 eV [
59]. Additionally, Ti-doped 2D materials exhibit strong adsorption capabilities for HCHO, CO, and SO
2 [
59], and acetone [
60], with adsorption energies reaching up to 0.8 eV. These findings suggest that Ti- and Co-doped boron carbon nitride could also demonstrate promising gas-adsorption properties, which warrants experimental validation.