Next Article in Journal
Laser Induced C60 Cage Opening Studied by Semiclassical Dynamics Simulation
Next Article in Special Issue
Accounting for Large Amplitude Protein Deformation during in Silico Macromolecular Docking
Previous Article in Journal
Symmetry-Adapted Rotator Functions for Molecules in Cylindrical Confinement
Previous Article in Special Issue
Computational Docking of Antibody-Antigen Complexes, Opportunities and Pitfalls Illustrated by Influenza Hemagglutinin
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

The Role of Reactive-Oxygen-Species in Microbial Persistence and Inflammation

1
Department of Periodontology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32610, USA
2
Emerging Pathogens Institute, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32610, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2011, 12(1), 334-352; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms12010334
Submission received: 4 November 2010 / Revised: 19 December 2010 / Accepted: 5 January 2011 / Published: 13 January 2011
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Molecular Recognition)

Abstract

:
The mechanisms of chronic infections caused by opportunistic pathogens are of keen interest to both researchers and health professionals globally. Typically, chronic infectious disease can be characterized by an elevation in immune response, a process that can often lead to further destruction. Reactive-Oxygen-Species (ROS) have been strongly implicated in the aforementioned detrimental response by host that results in self-damage. Unlike excessive ROS production resulting in robust cellular death typically induced by acute infection or inflammation, lower levels of ROS produced by host cells are increasingly recognized to play a critical physiological role for regulating a variety of homeostatic cellular functions including growth, apoptosis, immune response, and microbial colonization. Sources of cellular ROS stimulation can include “danger-signal-molecules” such as extracellular ATP (eATP) released by stressed, infected, or dying cells. Particularly, eATP-P2X7 receptor mediated ROS production has been lately found to be a key modulator for controlling chronic infection and inflammation. There is growing evidence that persistent microbes can alter host cell ROS production and modulate eATP-induced ROS for maintaining long-term carriage. Though these processes have yet to be fully understood, exploring potential positive traits of these “injurious” molecules could illuminate how opportunistic pathogens maintain persistence through physiological regulation of ROS signaling.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

One of the early responses of host innate immunity is the Reactive-Oxygen-Species (ROS) production in reaction to microbial invaders. Free oxygen radicals are highly toxic to pathogens and are utilized as a tool to prevent colonization of tissues by microorganisms. ROS are also a key part of the intracellular redox profile influencing a wide variety of signaling networks [1]. Therefore, the relatively high-level of oxidants, as seen in respiratory burst or low-levels in normal tissue, is likely a significant aspect of cell physiology during infection. Oxidative stress occurs when oxygen radical formation and levels exceed those of antioxidants, potentiating cell responses such as apoptosis, tumorgenesis, and immune-response [13]. However, the necessity of ROS for immune function could be exploited by “potential pathogens” to reduce host responses in order to enhance survival and colonization in their target host cells. Consistent with this view, characterization of molecular circuitries between the cellular ROS and a host derived small-danger-molecule “extracellular ATP” (eATP), which has lately been recognized as an important physiological signaling mediator that can convert opportunistic microbes into pro-inflammatory pathogens or provide long-term persistence for disease causing pathogens, is of great interest to current research [4,5]. Accordingly, we will first provide a general overview of recent literature on the mechanisms of production of cellular ROS and its role in establishment of microbes in host tissues. Then, we will present the novel subject of purinergic eATP and P2X7 coupling mediated cellular ROS and its significance for the microbial persistence and inflammation through examples that have recently become apparent.

2. Cellular ROS and Its Implications for Microbial Infections

ROS molecules participate in multi-faceted activities within cells, acting as secondary signaling molecules for inflammation and immune responses, in addition to directly harming microbes that invade tissues [6]. As a hallmark of innate immunity, it is important to understand the necessity of ROS signaling for host responses to challenges presented by microbial invasion. Efficient clearance of colonizing microorganisms is highly dependent on ROS, thus exploration of the mechanisms between oxygen radicals and innate immune responses associated with pathogen clearance has been an intriguing topic for researchers.

2. 1. Sources of Intracellular ROS Production as an Early Response

It is well known that ROS production is rapidly elevated during infection, serving to facilitate pathogen clearance as well as contributing to signaling cascades related to inflammation, cell proliferation, and immune responses [7]. Two of the best characterized sources of ROS during host cell- microbe interactions are the membrane associated NADPH oxidase complex and the mitochondrial electron transport chain (Mt-ETC). The Mt-ETC transiently produces radicals as electrons move between the complexes, primarily at Complexes I [8,9] and III [9] and these play key roles in activation of innate immunity.
The connection between innate immune responses, mitochondrial-ROS and microbial infection has been unclear in the past. Recent evidence suggests that a Nucleotide-Binding domain (NBD) and Leucine-Rich Repeat (LRR)-containing family member receptor (NLR), NLRX1, may provide an answer to this elusive question. NLRs, also well known as Nod-like receptors, are intracellular pathogen-associated molecular pattern (PAMPs) receptors, which serve to alert the cell to the presence of intracellular invaders. Though there are many NLRs, only one of these localizes to the mitochondria to facilitate innate immune responses, NLRX1 [10,11]. NLRX1 stimulates production of ROS molecules, which in turn can directly interact with the pathogen as well as act as a secondary signaling molecule [1214]. Originally identified to utilize the mitochondrion as a platform to mediate antiviral responses [11], NLRX1 now appears to also be important for immune responses to bacterial infections as well. Knowledge of bacterial-mitochondrial interactions are limited, however, a recent review provides a comprehensive overview of bacterial influences upon the mitochondrion, including NLRX1 [15]. NLRX1-induced ROS appears to be critical for bacterial infections, especially in terms of its signaling properties. A study performed using Shigella-infected and tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α)-primed cells showed that NLRX1 mediated ROS formation [16]. The downstream result of the elevated ROS levels in this particular study was enhanced NF- κB and Jun amino-terminal kinases-dependent (JNK) signaling, demonstrating the role for ROS as a secondary messenger for pro-inflammatory gene transcription and cytokine-based signal responses during infection. Another new study also provided evidence for the key role ROS-mediated signaling can have during infection. This group’s efforts showed that NLRX1 enhanced mitochondrial-derived ROS formation in response to Chlamydial infection [17]. Though only a small amount of evidence supports the importance of NLRX1-mediated ROS production during infection, this is most likely due to the recent idea that NLRX1 could be an important mediator of mitochondrial-ROS production during infections. Much like the mitochondria, NADPH oxidase is a primary site for generation of ROS molecules during microbial infection of host cells [18].
NADPH oxidase complexes are common sources of ROS typically associated with rapid respiratory burst mechanisms of professional phagocytic cells, and carry out the electron transferring reaction from NADPH to molecular oxygen (O2) in the membranes of phagosomes, endosomes, and the cell membrane [19]. The studies lately have shown the functionally active NADPH oxidase machinery in various cells types including epithelial and endothelial cells [20,21]. NADPH oxidase protein complexes consist of several phox subunits; the cytosolic p40, p47, and p67 in addition to p22 and gp91, which localize to the membrane. The latter two phox subunits, p22 and gp91, make up flavocytochrome b558, the catalytic, superoxide-generating core of NADPH oxidase [22]. A type of Rho-GTPase, called Rac, also associates with the complex [19,22] and mediates NADPH oxidase activity [19,23] and downstream inflammatory signaling processes [24]. Certain regulatory mechanisms are in place to control NADPH oxidase activity, including proteins and wide-sweeping signaling cascades. Control of Rac falls to the Rho-GDP dissociation inhibitor (Rho-GDI), which translocates Rac from the membrane to the cytoplasm, effectively deactivating NADPH oxidase [25,26]. Phosphoinositide-3 kinases (PI3Ks) also manage the NADPH oxidase complex through the modulation of Rac activity and direct binding of the p40/47 subunits [27]. Thus, the powerful induction of ROS and inflammatory signaling cascades by NADPH oxidase are under multiple levels of control, likely to ensure faithful activation of the complex and its downstream signaling intermediates. NADPH oxidase activation is vital for management of microbial invasion, but the precise mechanisms linking activation of the complex with elimination of microorganisms has been not completely characterized. A recent study of LyGDI (a monocyte-specific Rho-GDI [25]) may provide valuable insight into the underlying molecular mechanisms mediating NADPH oxidase activity in response to phagocytosis of microbes. LyGDI was shown to associate with caspase-recruiting domain-containing protein 9 (CARD9) at phagosomes harboring Listeria monocytogenes in macrophages [28]. The interaction between CARD9 and LyGDI allowed Rac to associate with the other NADPH oxidase components, thereby providing the activating signal for ROS production by NADPH oxidase. Identifying potential mechanisms for immune response element activation, such as CARD9-lyGDI association, could be crucial to understanding host immunity against microbial invasion.
Thus, the highly regulated NADPH oxidase is a potent contributor to resistance against infection by microorganisms. Due to the key role of NADPH oxidase for participating in immunity, it seems logical that it should be a target for microbial intervention. In actuality, microbes can subvert NADPH oxidase through direct interactions with the phox subunits and Rac. Additionally, mitochondrial-based ROS production can function to eliminate microorganisms. Much like NADPH oxidase, the mitochondrion appears to be a target for microbial interference. We will now provide examples of microbes demonstrated to modulate mitochondrial and NADPH oxidase-induced ROS to mediate immune evasion.

2. 2. Modulation of Intracellular ROS by Infection

Immune cells depend on ROS to not only kill phagocytosed microorganisms, but also to mediate inflammatory and immune signaling cascades. There is direct evidence that a wide variety of microbes can limit ROS, thus increasing the potential for persistent infection [29]. This novel strategy to promote microbial survival within the hostile host environment appears to be primarily the result of NADPH oxidase and mitochondrial-derived ROS modulation.
Many bacteria directly interfere with accumulation of ROS molecules via prevention of NADPH oxidase assembly. Francisella tularensis live vaccine strain was shown to not only escape neutrophil phagosomes, but also directly prevented NADPH oxidase assembly during intracellular infection [30]. This bacterium specifically prevented recruitment of gp91phox/p22phox and p47/p67phox subunits to the phagosome, thereby attenuating the oxidative burst mechanism utilized by neutrophils. Another bacterium, Anaplasma phagocytophilum, prevents p22 and gp91 incorporation into phagosomes containing the microbe, thus attenuating NADPH oxidase activity [31,32]. It is also suggested that A. phagocytophilum also directly scavenges ROS, providing an additional defense mechanism against oxygen radical-based host immunity [31].
A study of Chlamydia trachomatis, a bacterial pathogen associated with urogenital infections, demonstrated that the rapid induction of ROS within macrophages could be attenuated over a period of time [33]. This was shown to be accomplished by incorporation of the Rac subunit of NADPH oxidase to the Chlamydia-containing vacuole, thus inhibiting oxidative burst. The most important observation of this study, however, is that Chlamydia can alter the intracellular ROS content back to normal steady-state conditions [33]. By returning ROS levels to normal, as seen in uninfected cells, the Chlamydia essentially masks its presence by altering a key immune sensor and inflammation activating mechanism.
The ability to inhibit recruitment of NADPH oxidase subunits appears to be a common theme for many other pathogens, including Legionella pneumophila and Coxiella burnetii. C. burnetii, which is known to cause chronic Q fever in livestock and humans, prevents recruitment of p47/p67 to the phagosome and thus limits respiratory burst within infected neutrophils [34]. Prevention of p47 recruitment is also a facet of Legionella infection of macrophage-like cells [35]. Despite the fact that a strong majority of literature introducing this strategy involves hematopoietic-cell lineages, there is evidence supporting NADPH oxidase assembly interference during infection of other tissue types. For example, Bacillus anthracis edema toxin has been implicated in prevention of NADPH oxidase activity [36]. This was shown to be achieved through Protein Kinase A-mediated phosphorylation of the NADPH oxidase component p67, in intestinal epithelium [36].
Extracellular microorganisms also possess the ability to alter intracellular ROS production, contributing to persistence of infection. Burkholderia cenocepacia are opportunistic pathogens implicated in chronic inflammatory conditions including Cystic Fibrosis (CF). These bacteria have been demonstrated to inhibit ROS production in infected neutrophils, primarily through exopolysaccharide formation [37]. In addition to interfering with neutrophil chemotaxis, the exopolysaccharides demonstrated the ability to directly scavenge free oxygen radicals, regardless of their intracellular origination. B. cenocepacia also has been shown to exist in macrophage vacuoles with delayed NADPH oxidase incorporation, suggesting that it can persist within host cells by prevention of NADPH oxidase components and oxidative burst [38]. In another opportunistic bacterium associated with CF, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, secondary metabolite production by the pathogen has been shown to interfere with phagocytic engulfment of apoptotic cells [39]. This secondary metabolite, pyocyanin, mediates this process by reducing intracellular ROS levels and Rho GTPase activities in host cells, likely leading to enhanced inflammation at sites of infection due to failure to phagocytose dying cells [39].
Neisseria gonorrhoeae is known to suppress oxidative bursts in neutrophils [40]. This observation was not observed for nonviable N. gonorrhoeae, suggesting that live cell metabolic activity directly relates to suppression of oxidative burst. Though this study did not attempt to identify potential targets for inhibition of NADPH oxidase ROS, the observed reduction in oxygen radical production was shown to be dependent upon contact between the host cells and the metabolically active bacteria [40].
Candida albicans, an opportunistic fungal pathogen of humans, has the ability to suppress ROS production in host immune cells [41]. The precise mechanism utilized by C. albicans remains unclear, but a recent study presented findings indicating that the microorganism is capable of overcoming auto-induction of ROS, resulting in suppressed oxygen radical formation [41]. Another fungal pathogen, Aspergillus fumigatus, has been shown to limit ROS production in neutrophils [42,43].
Unlike the previously described organisms, Entamoeba histolytica, potentiates NADPH oxidase ROS accumulation in host cells, resulting in apoptosis [44]. This parasite utilizes the secondary signaling properties of NADPH oxidase-derived ROS molecules to influence Extracellular signal-Related Kinase (ERK) 1/2 signaling, eventually stimulating host cell death. Though typically associated with cell survival and proliferation, there is documented evidence supporting the potential for ERK1/2 to induce cell death [4547]. Infection of host cells by two other pathogens, Trypanosoma cruzi, the causative agent of Chagas’ disease, and Japanese encephalitis virus (JEV), also results in enhanced ROS formation. These two pathogens also utilize enhanced ROS to induce host cell death, thus allowing escape and likely contributing to spread of the pathogens through the apoptotic bodies.
JEV infection of promonocytic cells resulted in host cell apoptosis mediated by intracellular accumulation of ROS and activation of pro-apoptotic signaling [48]. Destruction of host cells by virus-induced ROS production could facilitate persistence of viral infection by enhancing the spread of virions. T. cruzi can infect humans and lie dormant, only to reemerge and cause chronic inflammatory destruction of organs. Interestingly, a recent study demonstrated that T. cruzi-induced ROS accumulation did not involve NADPH oxidase [49]. Further analysis in this report showed that enhanced ROS formation occurred due to pathogen-mediated mitochondrial membrane potential perturbation. Though this was not the first suggestion that T. cruzi optimizes infection and persistence through mitochondrial ROS accumulation and oxidative stress [50], this study does demonstrate the current level of interest that researchers have in regards to understanding microbial-mediated influences on ROS production.
Possession of the High Pathogenicity Island (HPI), encoding yersiniabactin, appears to play a role for pathogenesis of Yersinia and members of Enterobacteriaceae. A new study suggests that due to the iron-scavenging nature of yersiniabactin, it could provide a novel way to inhibit ROS formation by preventing the Haber-Weiss hydroxyl-radical-forming reaction in infected host cells [51]. Though this may be an indirect method to limit pathogen clearance by host cells, it is evident that bacteria possessing HPI display enhanced pathogenesis [51]. Additional Yersinia-related virulence factors have been extensively studied [5255]. However, more detail studies are required to fully characterize Yersinia-directed ROS inhibition, especially for determining the sources of mechanisms providing the ROS regulation.
Modulation of ROS levels appears to be a conserved strategy utilized by various microorganisms. Induction or inhibition of oxygen radicals could facilitate enhanced colonization, via reduced ROS-mediated host responses to infection. Additionally, regulation of cellular ROS by microorganisms can play a critical role in chronic inflammatory diseases and cancer. We will now focus on our main interest of signaling molecules, eATP and its putative receptor P2X7 generated ROS and the evidence for microbial modulation of this pathway to enhance microbial survival and persistence in host tissues.

3. eATP-P2X7 Receptor Signaling in Controlling Infection and Inflammation via Cellular ROS

3. 1. eATP as a “Danger Signal”

Adenosine-5′-triphosphate, ATP, is a nucleotide molecule utilized for a variety of processes, including cellular metabolism and signaling. ATP can be released into the extracellular environment by cells under normal conditions as well as a result of cellular stress, infection or cell death. Once outside of the cell, it is identified as extracellular ATP. eATP has become well recognized for its role as a “danger signal” for immune activation [56,57]. Effect of eATP is carried out via stimulation of cellular purinergic receptors and their associated signaling processes. Lately, this host-cell derived small molecule induced responses have become a key topic for researchers studying the pathogenic nature of a wide variety of microorganisms. This may represent a novel target for pathogen-mediated subversion of the host immune response.
The evidence supporting the role of eATP as a potent activator in innate immunity is quite large. Pro-inflammatory cytokine production and secretion is a well characterized event in numerous pathologies, and ATP clearly has a role in initiating these events. For example, eATP has been shown to elicit transcription of IL-6 in macrophages [58]. IL-6 plays an important role in phagocytic cell responses of innate immunity, primarily serving as a mediator of macrophage development from monocytic cells [59]. IL-6 stimulation of monocytes also suppresses dendritic cell (DC) formation, suggesting eATP may perform antagonistic roles in immunity, possibly in immunotolerance [60]. It should also be noted, that eATP has been implicated in maintenance of lung airway inflammation via DC activation [61], thus demonstrating the complex nature of eATP-mediated processes (For a detailed review regarding multifaceted capabilities of ATP on various cell types, readers should see [56] for more information). eATP is also involved in production of the inflammatory cytokine IL-1β, a participant in the regulation of cell differentiation, death, and inflammation. A study performed in 1998 characterized eATP-induced release of IL-1β from LPS-primed monocytes, while also confirming that this process was dependent on the purinergic P2X7 receptor [62]. It also appears that in other cell models, such as fetal astrocytes, IL-1β-mediated transcription factor expression is linked with ATP and P2 receptor signaling [63,64]. Elevated Nuclear Factor-kappaB (NF-κB) and activator protein-1 (AP-1) expression were seen when astrocytes were stimulated with eATP, suggesting a role for purinergic signaling in nervous system inflammatory pathologies [64].
Acting as a sensor for pathogens, the inflammasome promotes pro-inflammatory cytokine production, a process dependent upon generation of ROS. The inflammasome is a critical component of the innate immune system and facilitates heightened immune activities against pathogenic invaders, such as Chlamydia [65]. The inflammasome consists of Apoptosis-associated speck protein (ASC), caspase-1 and NLR3, NOD-like receptor protein 3 [66]. Cleavage of immature pro-IL-1β by capsase-1, results in mature IL-1β formation [67]. Acting as a secondary signaling molecule, ROS are required for NALP3 inflammasome formation [66] and recent studies demonstrate the necessity of ROS to mediate this process [43]. Furthermore, the processing of IL-1β in P. gingivalis-infected primary gingival epithelial cells was shown to require eATP stimulation via P2X7 receptor coupling for cytokine release [68]. This could imply that not only can eATP provide a pro-inflammatory stimulus to cells, but it can also directly influence final processing and release of cytokines.
Taken together, eATP signaling exhibits a multi-tiered influence on inflammation via innate immunity. A confounding question, however, is whether innate and adaptive immunity can be linked through eATP signaling and associated ROS production. A recent study of anticancer therapy has identified a role for eATP signaling in directing both innate and adaptive immunity. It is well known that dying and injured cells release ATP, even during anti-tumor treatments [69]. The present study also identified induction of Il-1β secretion from DCs in response to ATP release, resulting in priming of interferon-gamma (IFN-γ)-producing lymphocytes. Thus, eATP has effectively created a potent anticancer response, acting through inflammatory cytokine signaling to stimulate adaptive immunity [70]. Another novel finding linked eATP signaling with antigen presentation to coordinate Mycobacterial destruction. eATP and P2X7 coupling has been shown to rapidly induce shedding of MHC-II containing exosomes from macrophages as a result of inflammasome activation [71,72]. As we have mentioned before, ROS secondary signaling facilitates inflammasome formation and activity [66], thus ROS can mediate both innate and immune responses. The same group expanded their studies to include Mycobacterium infection of phagocytes, and found that the released exosomes contained MHC-II: Mtb Ag 85B (a Mycobacterial antigen) [73]. The antigen presenting MHCII:Mtb Ag 85B complexes were also shown to activate T-lymphocytes [73], thus providing an important insight into eATP-P2X7-mediated synergy of innate and adaptive immune responses.
It is tempting to speculate that innate and adaptive immunity can be linked to operate concurrently through eATP mediated ROS production. These mechanisms are likely facilitated by the secondary signaling capabilities of ROS, and we have seen clear evidence supporting the role of oxygen radicals in immune activation. However, it is important to recognize the highly complex and dynamic nature of the immune system, and coordination of both the innate and adaptive immunity is not likely to be exclusively limited to eATP purinergic signaling.

3. 2. P2X7 Receptor Activation by eATP Elicits Signaling Cascades through ROS

Purinergic receptor signaling lately has emerged as an important signaling pathway related to various cellular processes. P2X7 has been classically distinguished from the other P2 receptors due to the fact that it is a ligand-gated ion channel and it has low-affinity to eATP concentration. Upon eATP binding of P2X7, Ca2+ ions flow through the pore formed in the membrane of the cell, creating signal-transducing stimuli. This in turn activates several signaling intermediates, including NADPH oxidase ROS production, which can operate to influence pro-inflammatory and immune response elements, such as cytokine synthesis and transcription factor activation [7476].
A large body of evidence suggests that the signaling networks of eATP-P2X7 coupling are in fact dependent on ROS production. In 1997, it was discovered in microglial cells that NF-κB, a potent pro-inflammatory transcription factor, expression was influenced to a large degree by P2X7 [77]. This study also revealed that unlike other NF-κB complex formation resulting from other stimuli, such as LPS, ATP specifically stimulated formation of p65 homodimers. More importantly, the same study demonstrated that formation of NF-κB was abolished when cells were treated with antioxidants, thus providing strong evidence for the necessity of eATP-induced ROS generation for pro-inflammatory gene transcription [77].
Another recently described transcription factor, cyclic-AMP responsive element binding protein (CREB), which plays a protective role for cell survival, appears to be important during elevated ROS conditions (e.g., oxidative stress). Unlike NF-κB, which is associated with pro-inflammatory cytokine production and cell death, CREB protects cells against oxidative stress-induced cell death [7880]. It also seems that eATP-P2X7 coupling can influence the CREB pathway, perhaps offering cells a level of protection against oxidative stress-mediated cell death [79,81]. It remains to be seen how CREB participates in infection models, but it could provide a level of resistance to cell death in response to pathogenic challenge.
Much like the dualistic nature of ROS molecules themselves, the transcription factors that oxygen radicals influence can potentiate antagonistic responses in cells. Though we have already shown evidence for microbial modulation of ROS, primarily via NADPH oxidase interference, eATP-P2X7 coupling can also be a target for microorganisms seeking to alter ROS production for their long term carriage. NADPH oxidase complexes are now associated with P2X7 signaling cascades, thus interference directly at this receptor could provide another way for microbes to enhance survival and persistence.

3. 3. eATP-P2X7 Receptor Signaling Mediates Pathogen Killing

There is a noteworthy amount of research regarding eATP-induced pathogen elimination via the P2X7 receptor. Toxoplasma gondii, for example, has been demonstrated to be eliminated by eATP-P2X7 coupled production of ROS molecules, thus facilitating reduction of parasitic load within host cells [82] (Another study yielded similar results, however, this group did not test for ROS involvement in the observed clearance of T. gondii [83]). In these two studies, however, T. gondii-infected host cells were subjected to rapid eATP-mediated apoptosis, a response serving to likely control extracellular spread of Toxoplasma [82,83].
Another microorganism that establishes chronic intracellular infections and is also subject to P2X7-mediated elimination is M. tuberculosis. Studies of this organism in host cell models clearly provide evidence of eATP-P2X7 induced Mycobacterial elimination through multiple processes, including apoptosis [84], phospholipase-D [85], autophagy [86] and phagosome-lysosome fusion [87]. Thus, P2X7 is likely a major contributor against Mycobacterial immunity. In addition, there have been numerous studies suggesting that polymorphisms in the P2X7 gene may increase susceptibility to Mycobacterial infections, demonstrating the importance of functional P2X7 in these pathologies [8892].
Chlamydial infections of host cells are also found to be limited by eATP-P2X7 signaling processes. eATP-P2X7 stimulation of Phospholipase-D activity was shown to be required to limit some Chlamydial infections of epithelium and macrophages [9395]. Taken together, these studies show that eATP and P2X7 receptor signaling are important immune response elements to a variety of pathogenic infections. However, targeting of eATP-P2X7 coupling could be exhibited by pathogens, and in fact there are examples of microbes that exploit this to establish persistence and survival.

3. 4. Subversion of eATP-P2X7 Pathway by Persistent Microbes

Intracellular parasites can exhibit selective pressures on the P2X7 receptor-mediated signaling network, influencing host cell physiology to enhance survival. These effects are likely to be highly variable and dependent on multiple factors, including specific invading organism, host tissue type and physiology, environmental pressures, and even the presence of other colonizing organisms. This exploitation of eATP and the P2X7-mediated cell immune response represents a fascinating mechanism of overcoming host attempts to limit infection.
Some evidence suggests direct microbe-mediated modulation of P2X 7. Studies of Chlamydia psitacci show that the Ca2+ signal resulting from eATP-P2X7 coupling is diminished, resulting in reduced host cell apoptosis [96]. Though we have provided evidence for other organisms exhibiting ROS-modulatory effects to promote persistence, this study shows that P2X7 can also be a target to promote microbial survival in host tissues.
Leishmania amazonensis also has been demonstrated to interfere with eATP-P2X7 mediated signaling and associated ROS generation [97]. Identification of a multi-functional ATP utilizing enzyme ecto-Nucleoside diphosphate kinase (Ndk) in this protozoan has been attributed with eATP scavenging capabilities, reducing eATP-P2X7 induced host cell death during infection [98]. Additionally, the supernatant from M. bovis, an opportunistic pathogen, containing the Ndk protein decreases the activity of P2X7 receptor [99].
Porphyromonas gingivalis, a successful host-adapted pathogen capable of intracellular replication and spreading within the host cells, faces the challenge of host-mediated immune responses to clear the microorganism and prevent colonization [100102]. Similarly, P. gingivalis has also been shown to exploit eATP-P2X7 signaling associated with host cell death in primary gingival epithelial cells (GECs) [103]. The organism accomplishes this by secreting an Ndk homologue, which hydrolyses eATP, thereby decreasing P2X7 ligation, resulting in the inhibition of GEC cell death. Indeed, current studies by our laboratory of P. gingivalis indicate that the bacterium is also capable of modulating the cellular ROS levels and protecting primary GECs against eATP-P2X7 induced oxidative-stress by inhibiting the global ROS production upon prolonged infection in the host cells. This effect appears to be mediated by both utilizing host NADPH oxidase and mitochondria associated oxidative-stress pathways via time-dependent secretion of P. gingivalis-Ndk enzyme during the infection [104]. P. gingivalis infection has also been demonstrated to inhibit mitochondrial membrane depolarization, cytochrome c release, and activation of caspase 3 and pro-apoptotic Bad through pro-survival PI3K/AKT pathway [105107]. AKT and Extracellular signal-related kinase (ERK) 1 and 2, members of the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) network, have been studied in relation to P2X7, revealing interesting results. It was shown that ERK1/2 activity during LPS-stimulation of macrophages could be under control of P2X7 receptor [108,109]. In ovarian cancer cells, cellular ROS stimulation was found to be important for signal cascades, particularly for AKT and ERK [110]. As mentioned earlier, eATP was demonstrated to be required for release of IL-1β from P. gingivalis-infected GECs [68]. The same study also reported that GECs express functional Nalp3 inflammasome formation during the P. gingivalis infection, suggesting an additional role for ROS secondary signaling in this infection model.
Whether the ROS production and redox signaling are specifically influenced by the above discussed modulatory pathways during P. gingivalis infection remains to be seen. However, it is likely that eATP-P2X7 mediated ROS signaling play an important role in the persistent nature of this successful opportunist in the epithelial cells. As a model organism, P. gingivalis, a major etiological agent in the formation of chronic inflammatory/infectious diseases (namely periodontal diseases) could help explain some fundamental properties of chronic conditions associated with host-adapted opportunistic microbes, perhaps translating to new insights into other chronic inflammatory pathologies (Figure 1).
Intriguingly, a new study illustrated that NLRX1 and NADPH oxidase are both involved in Chlamydia trachomatis-induced ROS formation. NLRX1 and the ROS formed in the mitochondria actually promote the bacterial growth [17]. Depletion of NLRX1 and inhibition of NADPH oxidase ROS production attenuated Chlamydial load. In previous studies performed by the same group, it was discovered that Chlamydial growth was enhanced by ROS-mediated caspase-1 production via inflammasome formation [111]. It now seems that NLRX1 and NADPH oxidase play an important role in generating the ROS required to mediate signaling cascades resulting in caspase-1-dependent growth of Chlamydia [17]. It is logical to suggest that eATP can act as a physiological mediator for the cross-talk that takes place between the two pathways and include an additional layer of complexity in the whole host-microbe interaction.

4. Conclusions

It is quite notable that a number of distantly related intracellular pathogens exhibit similar abilities to influence inflammation and immune clearance by modulating eATP-P2X7 derived cellular ROS. This novel occurrence appears as a common theme that enhances survival of both the host and the invading microorganism, and it can be achieved through reduction of intracellular ROS through exploitation of host metabolic pathways by host-adapted microbes. More intriguingly, successful colonizers may also “unwittingly” have come to use physiological ROS signaling properties for their own designs including microbial utility of eATP induced ROS as growth signaling molecules. Overall, a large amount of recent evidence suggests that a wide array of pathogens have developed various complex, yet converging molecular strategies to limit or exacerbate ROS formation in order to subvert immune defenses and support self-survival and long term carriage in their target host cells.

Acknowledgement

This work is supported by the NIH-NIDCR grants R01DE016593 and R01DE019444.

References

  1. Circu, ML; Aw, TY. Reactive oxygen species, cellular redox systems, and apoptosis. Free Radic Biol Med 2010, 48(6), 749–762. [Google Scholar]
  2. Forman, HJ; Maiorino, M; Ursini, F. Signaling functions of reactive oxygen species. Biochemistry 2010, 49(5), 835–842. [Google Scholar]
  3. Kowaltowski, AJ; de Souza-Pinto, NC; Castilho, RF; Vercesi, AE. Mitochondria and reactive oxygen species. Free Radic Biol Med 2009, 47(4), 333–343. [Google Scholar]
  4. Guerra, AN; Gavala, ML; Chung, HS. Nucleotide receptor signalling and the generation of reactive oxygen species. Purinergic Signal 2007, 3 . [Google Scholar]
  5. Hewinson, J; Mackenzie, AB. P2X (7) receptor-mediated reactive oxygen and nitrogen species formation: from receptor to generators. Biochem Soc Trans 2007, 35 Pt 5, 1168–1170. [Google Scholar]
  6. Lau, AT; Wang, Y; Chiu, JF. Reactive oxygen species: current knowledge and applications in cancer research and therapeutic. J Cell Biochem 2008, 104(2), 657–667. [Google Scholar]
  7. Sareila, O; Kelkka, T; Pizzolla, A; Hultqvist, M; Holmdahl, R. NOX2 complex derived ROS as immune regulators. Antioxid Redox Signal 3635. [CrossRef]
  8. Koopman, WJ; Nitjmans, LG; Dieteren, CE; Roestenberg, P; Valsecchi, F; Smeitink, JA; Willems, PH. Mammalian mitochondrial complex I: biogenesis, regulation, and reactive oxygen species generation. Antioxid Redox Signal 2010, 12(12), 1431–1470. [Google Scholar]
  9. Barja, G. Mitochondrial free radical production and aging in mammals and birds. Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci 1998, 854, 224–238. [Google Scholar]
  10. Arnoult, D; Soares, F; Tattoli, I; Castanier, C; Philpott, DJ; Girardin, SE. An N-terminal addressing sequence targets NLRX1 to the mitochondrial matrix. J Cell Sci 2009, 122 Pt 17, 3161–3168. [Google Scholar]
  11. Moore, CB; Bergstralh, DT; Duncan, JA; Lei, Y; Morrison, TE; Zimmerman, AG; Accavitti-Loper, MA; Madden, VJ; Sun, L; Ye, Z; Lich, JD; Heise, MT; Chen, Z; Ting, JP. NLRX1 is a regulator of mitochondrial antiviral immunity. Nature 2008, 451(7178), 573–577. [Google Scholar]
  12. Groeger, G; Quiney, C; Cotter, TG. Hydrogen peroxide as a cell-survival signaling molecule. Antioxid Redox Signal 2009, 11(11), 2655–2671. [Google Scholar]
  13. Dworakowski, R; Alom-Ruiz, SP; Shah, AM. NADPH oxidase-derived reactive oxygen species in the regulation of endothelial phenotype. Pharmacol Rep 2008, 60(1), 21–28. [Google Scholar]
  14. Liou, GY; Storz, P. Reactive oxygen species in cancer. Free Radic Res 2010, 44(5), 479–496. [Google Scholar]
  15. Arnoult, D; Carneiro, L; Tattoli, I; Girardin, SE. The role of mitochondria in cellular defense against microbial infection. Semin Immunol 2009, 21(4), 223–232. [Google Scholar]
  16. Tattoli, I; Carneiro, L; Jéhanno, M; Magalhaes, JG; Shu, Y; Philpott, DJ; Arnoult, D; Girardin, SE. NLRX1 is a mitochondrial NOD-like receptor that amplifies NF-kappaB and JNK pathways by inducing reactive oxygen species production. EMBO Rep 2008, 9(3), 293–300. [Google Scholar]
  17. Abdul-Sater, AA; Saïd-Sadier, N; Lam, VM; Singh, B; Pettengill, MA; Soares, F; Tattoli, I; Lipinski, S; Girardin, SE; Rosenstiel, P; Ojcius, DM. Enhancement of reactive oxygen species production and chlamydial infection by the mitochondrial Nod-like family member, NLRX 1. J Biol Chem 2010, 285(53), 41637–41645. [Google Scholar]
  18. Grandvaux, N; Soucy-Faulkner, A; Fink, K. Innate host defense: Nox and Duox on phox’s tail. Biochimie 2007, 89(9), 1113–1122. [Google Scholar]
  19. Leto, TL; Morand, S; Hurt, D; Ueyama, T. Targeting and regulation of reactive oxygen species generation by Nox family NADPH oxidases. Antioxid Redox Signal 2009, 11(10), 2607–2619. [Google Scholar]
  20. Boots, AW; Hristova, M; Kasahara, DI; Haenan, GR; Bast, A; van der Vliet, A. ATP-mediated activation of the NADPH oxidase DUOX1 mediates airway epithelial responses to bacterial stimuli. J Biol Chem 2009, 284(26), 17858–17867. [Google Scholar]
  21. Mo, Y; Wan, R; Chien, S; Tollerud, DJ; Zhang, Q. Activation of endothelial cells after exposure to ambient ultrafine particles: the role of NADPH oxidase. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 2009, 236(2), 183–193. [Google Scholar]
  22. Vignais, PV. The superoxide-generating NADPH oxidase: Structural aspects and activation mechanism. Cell Mol Life Sci 2002, 59(9), 1428–1459. [Google Scholar]
  23. Petry, A; Weitnauer, M; Gorlach, A. Receptor activation of NADPH oxidases. Antioxid Redox Signal 2010, 13(4), 467–487. [Google Scholar]
  24. Williams, LM; Lali, F; Willetts, K; Balague, C; Godessart, N; Brennan, F; Feldmann, M; Foxwell, BM. Rac mediates TNF-induced cytokine production via modulation of NF-kappaB. Mol Immunol 2008, 45(9), 2446–2454. [Google Scholar]
  25. Dovas, A; Couchman, JR. RhoGDI: multiple functions in the regulation of Rho family GTPase activities. Biochem J 2005, 390 Pt 1, 1–9. [Google Scholar]
  26. DerMardirossian, C; Bokoch, GM. GDIs: Central regulatory molecules in Rho GTPase activation. Trends Cell Biol 2005, 15(7), 356–363. [Google Scholar]
  27. Hawkins, PT; Davidson, K; Stephens, LR. The role of PI3Ks in the regulation of the neutrophil NADPH oxidase. Biochem Soc Symp 2007, (74), 59–67. [Google Scholar]
  28. Wu, W; Hsu, YM; Bi, L; Songyang, Z; Lin, X. CARD9 facilitates microbe-elicited production of reactive oxygen species by regulating the LyGDI-Rac1 complex. Nat Immunol 2009, 10(11), 1208–1214. [Google Scholar]
  29. Cirillo, SL; Subbian, S; Chen, B; Weisbrod, TR; Jacobs, WR, Jr; Cirillo, JD. Protection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis from reactive oxygen species conferred by the mel2 locus impacts persistence and dissemination. Infect Immun 2009, 77(6), 2557–2567. [Google Scholar]
  30. McCaffrey, RL; Allen, LA. Francisella tularensis LVS evades killing by human neutrophils via inhibition of the respiratory burst and phagosome escape. J Leukoc Biol 2006, 80(6), 1224–1230. [Google Scholar]
  31. Carlyon, JA; Abdel-Latif, D; Pypaert, M; Lacy, P; Fikrig, E. Anaplasma phagocytophilum utilizes multiple host evasion mechanisms to thwart NADPH oxidase-mediated killing during neutrophil infection. Infect Immun 2004, 72(8), 4772–4783. [Google Scholar]
  32. Woldehiwet, Z. Immune evasion and immunosuppression by Anaplasma phagocytophilum, the causative agent of tick-borne fever of ruminants and human granulocytic anaplasmosis. Vet J 2008, 175(1), 37–44. [Google Scholar]
  33. Boncompain, G; Schneider, B; Delevoye, C; Kellermann, O; Dautry-Varsat, A; Subtil, A. Production of reactive oxygen species is turned on and rapidly shut down in epithelial cells infected with Chlamydia trachomatis. Infect Immun 2010, 78(1), 80–87. [Google Scholar]
  34. Siemsen, DW; Kirpotina, LN; Jutila, MA; Quinn, MT. Inhibition of the human neutrophil NADPH oxidase by Coxiella burnetii. Microbes Infect 2009, 11 . [Google Scholar]
  35. Harada, T; Miyake, M; Imai, Y. Evasion of Legionella pneumophila from the bactericidal system by reactive oxygen species (ROS) in macrophages. Microbiol Immunol 2007, 51(12), 1161–1170. [Google Scholar]
  36. Kim, JS; Bokoch, GM. Anthrax edema toxin inhibits Nox1-mediated formation of reactive oxygen species by colon epithelial cells. J Innate Immun 2009, 1(2), 145–152. [Google Scholar]
  37. Bylund, J; Burgess, LA; Cescutti, P; Ernst, RK; Speert, DP. Exopolysaccharides from Burkholderia cenocepacia inhibit neutrophil chemotaxis and scavenge reactive oxygen species. J Biol Chem 2006, 281(5), 2526–2532. [Google Scholar]
  38. Keith, KE; Hynes, DW; Sholdice, JE; Valvano, MA. Delayed association of the NADPH oxidase complex with macrophage vacuoles containing the opportunistic pathogen Burkholderia cenocepacia. Microbiology 2009, 155 Pt 4, 1004–1015. [Google Scholar]
  39. Bianchi, SM; Prince, LR; McPhillips, K; Allen, L; Marriott, HM; Taylor, GW; Hellewell, PG; Sabroe, I; Dockrell, DH; Henson, PW; Whyte, MK. Impairment of apoptotic cell engulfment by pyocyanin, a toxic metabolite of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2008, 177(1), 35–43. [Google Scholar]
  40. Criss, AK; Seifert, HS. Neisseria gonorrhoeae suppresses the oxidative burst of human polymorphonuclear leukocytes. Cell Microbiol 2008, 10(11), 2257–2270. [Google Scholar]
  41. Wellington, M; Dolan, K; Krysan, DJ. Live Candida albicans suppresses production of reactive oxygen species in phagocytes. Infect Immun 2009, 77(1), 405–413. [Google Scholar]
  42. Orciuolo, E; Stanzani, M; Canestraro, M; Galimberti, S; Carulli, G; Lewis, R; Petrini, M; Komanduri, KV. Effects of Aspergillus fumigatus gliotoxin and methylprednisolone on human neutrophils: implications for the pathogenesis of invasive aspergillosis. J Leukoc Biol 2007, 82(4), 839–848. [Google Scholar]
  43. Saïd-Sadier, N; Padilla, E; Langsley, G; Ojcius, DM. Aspergillus fumigatus stimulates the NLRP3 inflammasome through a pathway requiring ROS production and the Syk tyrosine kinase. PLoS One 2010, 5(4), e10008. [Google Scholar]
  44. Sim, S; Yong, TS; PArk, SJ; Im, KI; Kong, Y; Ryu, JS; Min, DY; Shin, MH. NADPH oxidase-derived reactive oxygen species-mediated activation of ERK1/2 is required for apoptosis of human neutrophils induced by Entamoeba histolytica. J Immunol 2005, 174(7), 4279–4288. [Google Scholar]
  45. Stanciu, M; Wang, Y; Kentor, R; Burke, N; Watkins, S; Kress, G; Reynolds, I; Klann, E; Angiolieri, MR; Johnson, JW; DeFranco, DB. Persistent activation of ERK contributes to glutamate-induced oxidative toxicity in a neuronal cell line and primary cortical neuron cultures. J Biol Chem 2000, 275(16), 12200–12206. [Google Scholar]
  46. Wang, X; Martindale, JL; Holbrook, NJ. Requirement for ERK activation in cisplatin-induced apoptosis. J Biol Chem 2000, 275(50), 39435–39443. [Google Scholar]
  47. Singh, S; Upadhyay, AK; Ajay, AK; Bhat, MK. p53 regulates ERK activation in carboplatin induced apoptosis in cervical carcinoma: a novel target of p53 in apoptosis. FEBS Lett 2007, 581(2), 289–295. [Google Scholar]
  48. Yang, TC; Lai, CC; Shiu, SL; Chuang, PH; Tzou, BC; Lin, YY; Tsai, FJ; Lin, CW. Japanese encephalitis virus down-regulates thioredoxin and induces ROS-mediated ASK1-ERK/p38 MAPK activation in human promonocyte cells. Microbes Infect 2010, 12 . [Google Scholar]
  49. Gupta, S; Bhatia, V; Wen, JJ; Wu, Y; Huang, MH; Garg, NJ. Trypanosoma cruzi infection disturbs mitochondrial membrane potential and ROS production rate in cardiomyocytes. Free Radic Biol Med 2009, 47(10), 1414–1421. [Google Scholar]
  50. Zacks, MA; Wen, JJ; Vyatkina, G; Bhatia, V; Garg, N. An overview of chagasic cardiomyopathy: pathogenic importance of oxidative stress. An Acad Bras Cienc 2005, 77(4), 695–715. [Google Scholar]
  51. Paauw, A; Leverstein-van Hall, MA; Van Kessel, KP; Verhoef, J; Fluit, AC. Yersiniabactin reduces the respiratory oxidative stress response of innate immune cells. PLoS One 2009, 4(12), e8240. [Google Scholar]
  52. Songsungthong, W; Higgins, MC; Rolán, HC; Murphy, JL; Mecsas, J. ROS-inhibitory activity of YopE is required for full virulence of Yersinia in mice. Cell Microbiol 2010, 12(7), 988–1001. [Google Scholar]
  53. Spinner, JL; Seo, KS; O’Loughlin, JL; Cundiff, JA; Minnich, SA; Bohach, GA; Kobayashi, SD. Neutrophils are resistant to Yersinia YopJ/P-induced apoptosis and are protected from ROS-mediated cell death by the type III secretion system. PLoS One 2010, 5(2), e9279. [Google Scholar]
  54. O’Loughlin, JL; Spinner, JL; Minnich, SA; Kobayashi, SD. Yersinia pestis two-component gene regulatory systems promote survival in human neutrophils. Infect Immun 2010, 78(2), 773–782. [Google Scholar]
  55. Walsh, ER; Sahu, N; Kearley, J; Benjamin, E; Kang, BH; Humbles, A; August, A. Strain-specific requirement for eosinophils in the recruitment of T cells to the lung during the development of allergic asthma. J Exp Med 2008, 205(6), 1285–1292. [Google Scholar]
  56. Bours, MJ; Swennen, EL; Di Virgilio, F; Cronstein, BN; Dagnelie, PC. Adenosine 5′-triphosphate and adenosine as endogenous signaling molecules in immunity and inflammation. Pharmacol Ther 2006, 112(2), 358–404. [Google Scholar]
  57. Trautmann, A. Extracellular ATP in the immune system: more than just a “danger signal”. Sci Signal 2009, 2(56), e6. [Google Scholar]
  58. Hanley, PJ; Musset, B; Reigunta, V; Limberg, SH; Dalpke, AH; Sus, R; Heeg, KM; Preisig-Müller, R; Daut, J. Extracellular ATP induces oscillations of intracellular Ca2+ and membrane potential and promotes transcription of IL-6 in macrophages. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2004, 101(25), 9479–9484. [Google Scholar]
  59. Mitani, H; Katayama, N; Araki, H; Ohishi, K; Kobayashi, K; Suzuki, H; Nishii, K; Masuya, M; Yasukawa, K; Minami, N; Shiku, H. Activity of interleukin 6 in the differentiation of monocytes to macrophages and dendritic cells. Br J Haematol 2000, 109(2), 288–295. [Google Scholar]
  60. Marteau, F; Gonzalez, NS; Communi, D; Goldman, M; Boeynaems, JM; Communi, D. Thrombospondin-1 and indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase are major targets of extracellular ATP in human dendritic cells. Blood 2005, 106(12), 3860–3866. [Google Scholar]
  61. Idzko, M; Hammad, H; van Nimwegen, M; Kool, M; Willart, MA; Muskens, F; Hoogsteden, HC; Luttmann, W; Ferrari, D; Di Virgilio, F; Virchow, JC, Jr; Lambrecht, BN. Extracellular ATP triggers and maintains asthmatic airway inflammation by activating dendritic cells. Nat Med 2007, 13(8), 913–919. [Google Scholar]
  62. Grahames, CB; Michel, AD; Chessell, IP; Humphrey, PP. Pharmacological characterization of ATP- and LPS-induced IL-1beta release in human monocytes. Br J Pharmacol 1999, 127(8), 1915–1921. [Google Scholar]
  63. Liu, JS; John, GR; Sikora, A; Lee, SC; Brosnan, CF. Modulation of interleukin-1beta and tumor necrosis factor alpha signaling by P2 purinergic receptors in human fetal astrocytes. J Neurosci 2000, 20(14), 5292–5299. [Google Scholar]
  64. John, GR; Simpson, GE; Woodroofe, MN; Lee, SC; Brosnan, CF. Extracellular nucleotides differentially regulate interleukin-1beta signaling in primary human astrocytes: implications for inflammatory gene expression. J Neurosci 2001, 21(12), 4134–4142. [Google Scholar]
  65. He, X; Mekasha, S; Mavrogiorgos, N; Fitzgerald, KA; Lien, E; Ingalls, RR. Inflammation and fibrosis during Chlamydia pneumoniae infection is regulated by IL-1 and the NLRP3/ASC inflammasome. J Immunol 2010, 184(10), 5743–5754. [Google Scholar]
  66. Martinon, F. Signaling by ROS drives inflammasome activation. Eur J Immunol 2010, 40(3), 616–619. [Google Scholar]
  67. Sarkar, A; Duncan, M; Hart, J; Hertlein, E; Guttridge, DC; Wewers, MD. ASC directs NF-kappaB activation by regulating receptor interacting protein-2 (RIP2) caspase-1 interactions. J Immunol 2006, 176(8), 4979–4986. [Google Scholar]
  68. Yilmaz, O; Sater, AA; Yao, L; Koutouzis, T; Pettengill, M; Ojcius, DM. ATP-dependent activation of an inflammasome in primary gingival epithelial cells infected by Porphyromonas gingivalis. Cell Microbiol 2010, 12(2), 188–198. [Google Scholar]
  69. Ghiringhelli, F; Apetoh, L; Tesniere, A; Aymeric, L; Ma, Y; Ortiz, C; Vermaelen, K; Panaretakis, T; Mignot, G; Ullrich, E; et al. Activation of the NLRP3 inflammasome in dendritic cells induces IL-1beta-dependent adaptive immunity against tumors. Nat Med 2009, 15(10), 1170–1178. [Google Scholar]
  70. Aymeric, L; Apetoh, L; Ghiringhelli, F; Tesniere, A; Martins, I; Kroemer, G; Smyth, MJ; Zitvogel, L. Tumor cell death and ATP release prime dendritic cells and efficient anticancer immunity. Cancer Res 2010, 70(3), 855–858. [Google Scholar]
  71. Qu, Y; Ramachandra, L; Mohr, S; Franchi, L; Harding, CV; Nunez, G; Dubyak, GR. P2X7 receptor-stimulated secretion of MHC class II-containing exosomes requires the ASC/NLRP3 inflammasome but is independent of caspase- 1. J Immunol 2009, 182(8), 5052–5062. [Google Scholar]
  72. Qu, Y; Franchi, L; Nunez, G; Dubyak, GR. Nonclassical IL-1 beta secretion stimulated by P2X7 receptors is dependent on inflammasome activation and correlated with exosome release in murine macrophages. J Immunol 2007, 179(3), 1913–1925. [Google Scholar]
  73. Ramachandra, L; Qu, Y; Wang, Y; Lewis, CJ; Cobb, BA; Takatsu, K; Boom, WH; Dubyak, GR; Harding, CV. Mycobacterium tuberculosis synergizes with ATP to induce release of microvesicles and exosomes containing MHC-II molecules capable of antigen presentation. Infect Immun 2010, 78(12), 5116–5125. [Google Scholar]
  74. Hewinson, J; Moore, SF; Glover, C; Watts, AG; MacKenzie, AB. A key role for redox signaling in rapid P2X7 receptor-induced IL-1 beta processing in human monocytes. J Immunol 2008, 180(12), 8410–8420. [Google Scholar]
  75. Noguchi, T; Ishii, K; Fukutomi, H; Naguro, I; Matsuzawa, A; Takeda, K; Ichijo, H. Requirement of reactive oxygen species-dependent activation of ASK1-p38 MAPK pathway for extracellular ATP-induced apoptosis in macrophage. J Biol Chem 2008, 283(12), 7657–7665. [Google Scholar]
  76. Parvathenani, LK; Tertyshnikova, S; Greco, CR; Roberts, SB; Robertson, B; Posmantur, R. P2X7 mediates superoxide production in primary microglia and is up-regulated in a transgenic mouse model of Alzheimer’s disease. J Biol Chem 2003, 278(15), 13309–13317. [Google Scholar]
  77. Ferrari, D; Wesselborg, S; Bauer, MK; Schulze-Osthoff, K. Extracellular ATP activates transcription factor NF-kappaB through the P2Z purinoreceptor by selectively targeting NF-kappaB p 65. J Cell Biol 1997, 139(7), 1635–1643. [Google Scholar]
  78. Zou, J; Crews, F. CREB and NF-kappaB transcription factors regulate sensitivity to excitotoxic and oxidative stress induced neuronal cell death. Cell Mol Neurobiol 2006, 26 . [Google Scholar]
  79. O’Driscoll, C; Wallace, D; Cotter, TG. bFGF promotes photoreceptor cell survival in vitro by PKA-mediated inactivation of glycogen synthase kinase 3beta and CREB-dependent Bcl-2 up-regulation. J Neurochem 2007, 103(3), 860–870. [Google Scholar]
  80. Bedogni, B; Pani, G; Colavitti, R; Riccio, A; Borrello, S; Murphy, M; Smith, R; Eboli, ML; Galeotti, T. Redox regulation of cAMP-responsive element-binding protein and induction of manganous superoxide dismutase in nerve growth factor-dependent cell survival. J Biol Chem 2003, 278(19), 16510–16519. [Google Scholar]
  81. Brautigam, VM; Frasier, C; Nikodemova, M; Watters, JJ. Purinergic receptor modulation of BV-2 microglial cell activity: potential involvement of p38 MAP kinase and CREB. J Neuroimmunol 2005, 166 . [Google Scholar]
  82. Corrêa, G; Marques da Silva, C; de Abreu Moreira-Souza, AC; Vommaro, RC; Coutinho-Silva, R. Activation of the P2X (7) receptor triggers the elimination of Toxoplasma gondii tachyzoites from infected macrophages. Microbes Infect 2010, 12(6), 497–504. [Google Scholar]
  83. Lees, MP; Fuller, SJ; McLeod, R; Boulter, NR; Miller, CM; Zakrzewski, AM; Mui, EJ; Witola, WH; Coyne, JJ; Hargrave, AC; Jamieson, SE; Blackwell, JM; Wiley, JS; Smith, NC. P2X7 receptor-mediated killing of an intracellular parasite, Toxoplasma gondii, by human and murine macrophages. J Immunol 2010, 184(12), 7040–7046. [Google Scholar]
  84. Lammas, DA; Stober, C; Harvey, CJ; Kendrick, N; Panchalingam, S; Kumararatne, DS. ATP-induced killing of mycobacteria by human macrophages is mediated by purinergic P2Z (P2X7) receptors. Immunity 1997, 7(3), 433–444. [Google Scholar]
  85. Kusner, DJ; Adams, J. ATP-induced killing of virulent Mycobacterium tuberculosis within human macrophages requires phospholipase D. J Immunol 2000, 164(1), 379–388. [Google Scholar]
  86. Biswas, D; Qureshi, OS; Lee, WY; Croudace, JE; Mura, M; Lammas, DA. ATP-induced autophagy is associated with rapid killing of intracellular mycobacteria within human monocytes/macrophages. BMC Immunol 2008, 9, 35. [Google Scholar]
  87. Fairbairn, IP; Stober, CB; Kumararatne, DS; Lammas, DA. ATP-mediated killing of intracellular mycobacteria by macrophages is a P2X (7)-dependent process inducing bacterial death by phagosome-lysosome fusion. J Immunol 2001, 167(6), 3300–3307. [Google Scholar]
  88. Britton, WJ; Fernando, SL; Saunders, BM; Sluyter, R; Wiley, JS. The genetic control of susceptibility to Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Novartis Found Symp 2007, 281, 79–89, discussion 89–92. [Google Scholar]
  89. Nino-Moreno, P; Portales-Pérez, D; Hernández-Castro, B; Portales-Cervantes, L; Flores-Meraz, V; Baranda, L; Gómez-Gómez, A; Acuna-Alonzo, V; Granados, J; González-Amaro, R. P2X7 and NRAMP1/SLC11 A1 gene polymorphisms in Mexican mestizo patients with pulmonary tuberculosis. Clin Exp Immunol 2007, 148(3), 469–477. [Google Scholar]
  90. Franco-Martinez, S; Nino-Moreno, P; Bernal-Silva, S; Baranda, L; Rocha-Meza, M; Portales-Cervantes, L; Lyseca-Espinosa, E; Gonzzalez-Amaro, R; Portales-Perez, D. Expression and function of the purinergic receptor P2X7 in patients with pulmonary tuberculosis. Clin Exp Immunol 2006, 146(2), 253–261. [Google Scholar]
  91. Fernando, SL; Saunders, BM; Sluyter, R; Skarratt, KK; Goldberg, H; Marks, GB; Wiley, JS; Britton, WJ. A polymorphism in the P2X7 gene increases susceptibility to extrapulmonary tuberculosis. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2007, 175(4), 360–366. [Google Scholar]
  92. Sambasivan, V; Murthy, KJ; Reddy, R; Vijayalakshimi, V; Hasan, Q. P2X7 gene polymorphisms and risk assessment for pulmonary tuberculosis in Asian Indians. Dis Markers 2010, 28(1), 43–48. [Google Scholar]
  93. Darville, T; Welter-Stahl, L; Cruz, C; Sater, AA; Andrews, CW, Jr; Ojcius, DM. Effect of the purinergic receptor P2X7 on Chlamydia infection in cervical epithelial cells and vaginally infected mice. J Immunol 2007, 179(6), 3707–3714. [Google Scholar]
  94. Coutinho-Silva, R; Stahl, L; Raymond, MN; Jungas, T; Verbeke, P; Burnstock, G; Darville, T; Ojcius, DM. Inhibition of chlamydial infectious activity due to P2X7R-dependent phospholipase D activation. Immunity 2003, 19(3), 403–412. [Google Scholar]
  95. Perfettini, JL; Darville, T; Gachelin, G; Souque, P; Huerre, M; Dautry-Varsat, A; Ojcius, DM. Effect of Chlamydia trachomatis infection and subsequent tumor necrosis factor alpha secretion on apoptosis in the murine genital tract. Infect Immun 2000, 68(4), 2237–2244. [Google Scholar]
  96. Coutinho-Silva, R; Perfettini, JL; Persechini, PM; Dautry-Varsat, A; Ojcius, DM. Modulation of P2Z/P2X (7) receptor activity in macrophages infected with Chlamydia psittaci. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 2001, 280(1), C81–89. [Google Scholar]
  97. Coutinho-Silva, R; Corrêa, G; Sater, AA; Ojcius, DM. The P2X (7) receptor and intracellular pathogens: a continuing struggle. Purinergic Signal 2009, 5(2), 197–204. [Google Scholar]
  98. Kolli, BK; Kostal, J; Zaborina, O; Chakrabarty, AM; Chang, KP. Leishmania-released nucleoside diphosphate kinase prevents ATP-mediated cytolysis of macrophages. Mol Biochem Parasitol 2008, 158(2), 163–175. [Google Scholar]
  99. Zaborina, O; Li, X; Cheng, G; Kapatral, V; Chakrabarty, AM. Secretion of ATP-utilizing enzymes, nucleoside diphosphate kinase and ATPase, by Mycobacterium bovis BCG: sequestration of ATP from macrophage P2Z receptors. Mol Microbiol 1999, 31(5), 1333–1343. [Google Scholar]
  100. Yilmaz, O. The chronicles of Porphyromonas gingivalis: the microbium, the human oral epithelium and their interplay. Microbiology 2008, 154 Pt 10, 2897–2903. [Google Scholar]
  101. Yilmaz, O; Verbeke, P; Lamont, RJ; Ojcius, DM. Intercellular spreading of Porphyromonas gingivalis infection in primary gingival epithelial cells. Infect Immun 2006, 74(1), 703–710. [Google Scholar]
  102. Avila, M; Ojcius, DM; Yilmaz, O. The oral microbiota: living with a permanent guest. DNA Cell Biol 2009, 28(8), 405–411. [Google Scholar]
  103. Yilmaz, O; Yao, L; Maeda, K; Rose, TM; Lewis, EL; Duman, M; Lamont, RJ; Ojcius, DM. ATP scavenging by the intracellular pathogen Porphyromonas gingivalis inhibits P2X7- mediated host-cell apoptosis. Cell Microbiol 2008, 10(4), 863–875. [Google Scholar]
  104. Choi, CH; DeGuzman, J; Yilmaz, O. Modulating of “danger signal” ATP induced reactiveoxygen- species production in primary gingival epithelial cells by Porphyromonas gingivalis; submitted for publication; 2011. [Google Scholar]
  105. Yilmaz, O; Jungas, T; Verbeke, P; Ojcius, DM. Activation of the phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase/Akt pathway contributes to survival of primary epithelial cells infected with the periodontal pathogen Porphyromonas gingivalis. Infect Immun 2004, 72(7), 3743–3751. [Google Scholar]
  106. Yao, L; Jermanus, C; Barbetta, B; Choi, C; Verbeke, P; Ojcius, DM; Yilmaz, O. Porphyromonas gingivalis infection sequesters pro-apoptotic Bad through Akt in primary gingival epithelial cells. Mol Oral Microbiol 2010, 25(2), 89–101. [Google Scholar]
  107. Mao, S; Park, Y; Hasegawa, Y; Tribble, GD; James, CE; Handfield, M; Stavropoulos, MF; Yilmaz, O; Lamont, RJ. Intrinsic apoptotic pathways of gingival epithelial cells modulated by Porphyromonas gingivalis. Cell Microbiol 2007, 9(8), 1997–2007. [Google Scholar]
  108. Hu, Y; Fisette, PL; Denlinger, LC; Guadarrama, AG; Sommer, JA; Proctor, RA; Bertics, PJ. Purinergic receptor modulation of lipopolysaccharide signaling and inducible nitric-oxide synthase expression in RAW 264.7 macrophages. J Biol Chem 1998, 273(42), 27170–27175. [Google Scholar]
  109. Auger, R; Motta, I; Benihoud, K; Ojcius, DM; Kanellopoulos, JM. A role for mitogen-activated protein kinase (Erk1/2) activation and non-selective pore formation in P2X7 receptor-mediated thymocyte death. J Biol Chem 2005, 280(30), 28142–28151. [Google Scholar]
  110. Saunders, JA; Rogers, LC; Klomsiri, C; Poole, LB; Daniel, LW. Reactive oxygen species mediate lysophosphatidic acid induced signaling in ovarian cancer cells. Free Radic Biol Med 2010, 49(12), 2058–2067. [Google Scholar]
  111. Abdul-Sater, AA; Koo, E; Häcker, G; Ojcius, DM. Inflammasome-dependent caspase-1 activation in cervical epithelial cells stimulates growth of the intracellular pathogen Chlamydia trachomatis. J Biol Chem 2009, 284(39), 26789–26796. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. Proposed mechanisms for modulation of intracellular ROS via P2X7, NADPH oxidase, and Mitochondrion Interference. (A) Invasive microorganisms subvert with NADPH oxidase-based ROS formation via interference of complex assembly; (B) Microbial scavenging of ROS produced by NADPH oxidase; (C) Interference of mitochondrion-based ROS production during infection; (D) Modulation of eATP-P2X7 signaling induction by nucleotide scavenging; (E) CREB could be involved in promoting host cell survival, and thus may potentiate microbial persistence.
Figure 1. Proposed mechanisms for modulation of intracellular ROS via P2X7, NADPH oxidase, and Mitochondrion Interference. (A) Invasive microorganisms subvert with NADPH oxidase-based ROS formation via interference of complex assembly; (B) Microbial scavenging of ROS produced by NADPH oxidase; (C) Interference of mitochondrion-based ROS production during infection; (D) Modulation of eATP-P2X7 signaling induction by nucleotide scavenging; (E) CREB could be involved in promoting host cell survival, and thus may potentiate microbial persistence.
Ijms 12 00334f1

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Spooner, R.; Yilmaz, Ö. The Role of Reactive-Oxygen-Species in Microbial Persistence and Inflammation. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2011, 12, 334-352. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms12010334

AMA Style

Spooner R, Yilmaz Ö. The Role of Reactive-Oxygen-Species in Microbial Persistence and Inflammation. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2011; 12(1):334-352. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms12010334

Chicago/Turabian Style

Spooner, Ralee, and Özlem Yilmaz. 2011. "The Role of Reactive-Oxygen-Species in Microbial Persistence and Inflammation" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 12, no. 1: 334-352. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms12010334

APA Style

Spooner, R., & Yilmaz, Ö. (2011). The Role of Reactive-Oxygen-Species in Microbial Persistence and Inflammation. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 12(1), 334-352. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms12010334

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop