Next Article in Journal
An Efficient Method for Genomic DNA Extraction from Different Molluscs Species
Next Article in Special Issue
Coenzyme Q10 Ameliorates Ultraviolet B Irradiation Induced Cell Death Through Inhibition of Mitochondrial Intrinsic Cell Death Pathway
Previous Article in Journal
3,3′-Diethylthiatricarbocyanine Iodide: A Highly Sensitive Chiroptical Reporter of DNA Helicity and Sequence
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
IJMS
Volume 12
Issue 11
10.3390/ijms12118063
ijms-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Chromatin Structure Following UV-Induced DNA Damage—Repair or Death?

by
Andrew W. Farrell
,
Gary M. Halliday
* and
James Guy Lyons
Discipline of Dermatology, Bosch Institute, Sydney Cancer Centre, The University of Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2011, 12(11), 8063-8085; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms12118063
Submission received: 14 September 2011 / Revised: 5 October 2011 / Accepted: 31 October 2011 / Published: 17 November 2011
(This article belongs to the Special Issue UV-Induced Cell Death)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
In eukaryotes, DNA is compacted into a complex structure known as chromatin. The unravelling of DNA is a crucial step in DNA repair, replication, transcription and recombination as this allows access to DNA for these processes. Failure to package DNA into the nucleosome, the individual unit of chromatin, can lead to genomic instability, driving a cell into apoptosis, senescence, or cellular proliferation. Ultraviolet (UV) radiation damage causes destabilisation of chromatin integrity. UV irradiation induces DNA damage such as photolesions and subjects the chromatin to substantial rearrangements, causing the arrest of transcription forks and cell cycle arrest. Highly conserved processes known as nucleotide and base excision repair (NER and BER) then begin to repair these lesions. However, if DNA repair fails, the cell may be forced into apoptosis. The modification of various histones as well as nucleosome remodelling via ATP-dependent chromatin remodelling complexes are required not only to repair these UV-induced DNA lesions, but also for apoptosis signalling. Histone modifications and nucleosome remodelling in response to UV also lead to the recruitment of various repair and pro-apoptotic proteins. Thus, the way in which a cell responds to UV irradiation via these modifications is important in determining its fate. Failure of these DNA damage response steps can lead to cellular proliferation and oncogenic development, causing skin cancer, hence these chromatin changes are critical for a proper response to UV-induced injury.

1. Chromatin

Eukaryotic cells compact their DNA into repeating arrays of nucleosomes comprised of 146 bp of DNA wrapped around an octamer of histone proteins—a tetramer of H3 and H4 flanked by two H2A and H2B dimers [1], otherwise known as chromatin. A fifth histone protein, H1, promotes chromatin structure of a higher order by facilitating the compaction of nearby nucleosomes at the entry and exit points. “Linker DNA” connects these core proteins, which is typically 30–50 bp in length [2]. Chromatin has been subdivided into two functionally distinct classes. Firstly, euchromatin which is decondensed in the interphase of the cell cycle and contains most of the actively transcribed genes, and secondly heterochromatin which remains condensed throughout the whole cell cycle and contains mostly inactive genes [3,4]. Each core histone contains a globular domain and an N-terminal tail protruding from the nucleosome. The nucleosome is in a constant dynamic equilibrium between a fully wrapped state and a collection of partially unwrapped states. This unwrapping transiently exposes buried DNA sites for access. However the conversion between these states is dynamic and rapid. Any process that requires access to DNA must therefore overcome this chromatin structural barrier [5].
This nucleosomal structure is the platform for which many variations, modifications and binding of proteins all impact DNA and cell functions. A number of chromatin remodelling complexes use adenosine 5′-triphosphate (ATP) to alter chromatin structure, making the DNA accessible to the proteins which bind chromatin and regulate cellular processes. This can influence the epigenetic modifications of various histones, as well as the alteration of the N-terminal tail of chromatin by histone chaperones, in turn influencing the dynamic state of chromatin [6]. These chromatin-remodelling factors are important in the link between chromatin structure and cellular processes such as transcription, replication, recombination, aging, repair, cell cycle control, death signalling and responses to external stimuli such as ultraviolet (UV) radiation.

2. UV Damage and the Cellular Response

Chromatin is under constant threat from both endogenous and exogenous sources. Among these sources, UV radiation is one of the most prevalent inducers of DNA damage in our environment. The photolesions induced by UV inhibit the replication of DNA, as well as transcription thus causing genomic instability [7]. If they are not repaired prior to cell division, these photolesions can result in an incorrect nucleotide, or mutation, being incorporated into newly synthesised DNA. When UV reaches the skin, a major part of it is reflected, while the rest is absorbed. UVB radiation (290–320 nm) is absorbed mostly by the upper epidermal layers, while UVA (320–400 nm) penetrates deeper into the skin, reaching the basal layer of the epidermis [8]. UVB radiation has been shown to cause different types of DNA damage, including the formation of dimeric photoproducts between adjacent pyrimidine dimers on each strand. There are two major types of these lesions induced by UV irradiation: cyclobutane pyrimidine dimers (CPDs) and Pyrimidine (6–4) Pyrimidone photoproducts (6-4PPs). Although UVA has also been shown to result in the formation of pyrimidine dimers [9,10], it requires much more energy than UVB to incur this damage. However, UVA causes greater levels of oxidative damage than UVB, and has been shown to cause increased 8-oxo-deoxyguanine (8-oxo-dG) lesions, which result from the oxidation of deoxyguanine moieties [11].

2.1. DNA Repair

To counteract these DNA lesions, eukaryotes have evolved a number of processes that make it possible for the cell to recover from damage. The inherent biological tendency is to maintain genetic homeostasis. To accomplish this, DNA damage induces cellular responses leading to cell cycle arrest. A cell can repair or tolerate the DNA damage, or the cells that harbor damage can be removed from the population via induced death. Diverse DNA repair pathways have been conserved in a large number of species as they have evolved over time to repair different forms of lesions [3]. The nucleotide excision repair (NER) pathway is primarily involved in removing helix-distorting lesions such as CPDs and 6-4PPs induced by UV [12]. Upon UV radiation, cells are arrested in the G1 and G2 phases of the cell cycle, both of which are regulated by the tumour suppressor P53 [13]. In eukaryotic cells, the NER pathway is subdivided into two pathways: global genome repair (GGR), which repairs lesions located anywhere within the genome, and transcription coupled repair (TCR) which repairs genes in the transcribed strand of active genes [14]. In mammals, congenital defects in GGR and TCR lead to an increased sensitivity towards DNA damaging agents such as UV and disorders such as Cockayne’s Syndrome [15]. Both pathways have a core set of repair factors involved, but have specific factors involved in the initial stages of recognition. GGR is initiated by the activation of several DNA-damage binding proteins, most importantly the XPC-HR23B centrin-2 complex and/or the DDB1-DDB2 (DNA damage binding protein 1 and 2) heterodimer complex [16]. Repair of damage in the transcribed strands (TCR) is initiated by two distinct damage recognition mechanisms. Both the ATP-dependent chromatin remodelling protein Cockayne Syndrome protein B (CSB) and the WD40 domain containing protein Cockayne Syndrome protein A (CSA) are recruited to the site of damage [17]. TCR is then theorised to be initiated by the abrogation of RNA polymerase II during transcription [18].
Subsequent steps are performed by a common set of NER factors that are shared by GGR and TCR. This involves the unwinding of the DNA duplex at the sites of damage by Xeroderma Pigmentosum group B and D helicases (XPB and XPD), which are subunits of the transcription factor IIH (TFIIH) complex [19,20]. XPA is then recruited to stabilise the repair complex and to orient the dual incision of the DNA lesion by two structure-specific endonucleases, XPG and ERCC1-XPF, leading to the removal of a section of single stranded DNA with a gap of 25–30 nucleotides. This gap is then filled by DNA synthesis and ligation via DNA polymerase δ/ε, replication factor C (RFC), PCNA, RPA and DNA ligase I (Figure 1) [21,22].
Another form of repair named base excision repair (BER) is responsible for removing small, single base non-helix-distorting oxidative lesions from DNA, commonly induced by UVA radiation [23]. These oxidative lesions are induced by highly reactive oxygen radicals that can attack DNA strands. Of all of these oxidative lesions, 8-oxo-dG lesions are the most prevalent and are predominantly repaired by the human 8-oxoguanine DNA glycosylase-1 (hOGG1) enzyme via the BER pathway, the function of which is dependent on CSB [24].
The bulk of chromatin assembly occurs during the S phase of cell division, when a cell is undergoing replication [5]. The duration of cell cycle arrest also determines the amount of DNA repair occurring during this stage. The duration of S-phase entry delay triggered by G1/S checkpoint is proportionately beneficial to the removal of DNA lesions [25]. Prolonged cell cycle arrest leads to a dramatic change in transcription, as well as post-translational modifications of histone tails, resulting in more efficient lesion removal [26]. The transcription factor and tumour suppressor P53 is known to interact with NER-associated regulatory proteins and thus is important in the NER response. Further, cells which commonly undergo P53 mutations preferentially undergo DNA repair and not apoptosis [27]. Mammalian NER-deficient mutants are also hypersensitive to UV radiation, which is mainly due to induction of apoptosis [28,29], showing that the main apoptosis trigger is due to unrepaired photoproducts. This was further confirmed in experiments with CPD-photolyase transfected cells, showing that the removal of lesions from DNA avoids apoptosis induction [30,31]. Although the formation of CPDs and 6–4PPs is the primary initiator of apoptosis, induction of these lesions is not enough to induce apoptosis [32]. If the lesion is not adequately repaired via NER, it can replicate and form more serious secondary lesions referred to as double-strand breaks (DSBs), forcing the cell into induced death so that they do not undergo cellular proliferation and oncogenic transformation, leading to the development of cancer.

2.2. Apoptosis

Apoptosis is an essential process of the cell involved in maintaining homeostatic control of cell number and eliminating cells capable of inflicting harm to an organism. Cells with damaged DNA that is too extensive to be repaired are removed by apoptosis. Thus, a defect in this process contributes to many diseases, including cancer. When a cell is inflicted with damage, this causes the blockage of DNA replication, leading to the collapse of replication forks and lesion formation, inducing apoptosis. This causes the cell to shrink and the chromatin to condense, degrade and separate into individual bodies, a phenomenon known as membrane blebbing [33]. A family of cysteine-dependent aspartate-directed proteases, named caspases, is responsible for the proteolytic cleavage of cellular proteins, internucleosomal DNA fragmentation and propagation of death signalling. This leads to the engulfment of these apoptotic bodies by neighbouring macrophages and dendritic cells [34]. The process of apoptosis is different to other forms of cell death such as necrosis, which is a premature passive process that results in the breakdown of the cell wall in response to environmental stress [35].
Apoptosis functions through two major pathways in mammalian cells, depending on the stimulating factor: the intrinsic and the extrinsic pathways. Both of these pathways require the recruitment of the cell death initiator caspases-8, -9 and -10. Numerous stresses such as DNA-damaging agents and cytotoxic drugs activate the intrinsic pathway, perturbing the structure and function of the mitochondrial outer membrane, releasing several intermembrane proteins, such as cytochrome c. Cytochrome c and APAF-1 (apoptotic protease activating factor-1) form a large oligomeric complex named the apoptosome, leading to the recruitment of the caspase-9 enzyme and cell death. On the other hand, the extrinsic pathway functions through specific cell surface death receptors such as tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF) and Fas. The ligand binding of these receptors leads to recruitment of cytosolic proteins such as the Fas-associated death domain protein (FADD) and caspase-8 and -10, resulting in the formation of the death-inducing signalling complex [36,37].
Apoptosis of a cell can be triggered by many endogenous or exogenous sources. However, in skin cells, one of the most common routes of damage is by exposure to UV. One of the hallmarks of keratinocytes exposed to high dose UV is the induction of apoptosis when high levels of genetic damage are induced [37]. UV-mediated apoptosis is a highly complex process, in which there is a synergistic contribution from many molecular pathways, and thus not all of these can be covered by this review. Exposure of the cell to UV causes the blockage of DNA replication, leading to the collapse of replication forks and DSB formation. If DNA damage is not efficiently repaired, the arrested cells may undergo P53-dependent apoptosis. In response to UV damage signalling, P53 undergoes extensive post-translational modifications at specific residues, resulting in activation of numerous downstream genes including P21, GADD45a and MDM2, leading to activation of caspases-9 and -3 [38,39]. Mice with absent P53 are more prone to UV-induced damage [38] and keratinocytes with knocked down P53 show increased cell death via lower levels of anti-apoptotic proteins [39]. Also, keratinocytes lacking GADD45a display highly reduced apoptotic sunburn cell formation [40]. However, the effect of P53 on apoptosis/repair varies in tissue types [27]. UV-induced apoptosis can also be initiated via the extrinsic pathway by several members of the TNF (tumour necrosis factor) family, including Fas ligand (or CD95L) and TNFR-1 and two tumour necrosis factor-related apoptosis-inducing ligand (TRAIL) receptors, in turn leading to caspase activation [41,42]. Inhibition of caspase-3, the downstream protease of the CD95L signaling pathway, inhibits UV-induced apoptosis, while blockade of caspase-8 only inhibits UV-induced apoptosis partially, showing that UV-mediated DNA damage is not dependent on caspase-8 [37]. Recent studies have revealed that the intrinsic mitochondrial pathway plays an essential role as an integrator and coordinator of UV-induced cell death pathways in keratinocytes. However, the exact contribution of certain caspase-initiated pathways remains to be thoroughly investigated [42].

2.3. Structural Changes of Chromatin Following UV

UVB radiation is known to be a potent agent for the initiation of programmed cell death. Although chromatin is known to undergo conformational changes following DNA damage and during apoptosis, the direct evidence of this is limited and more research is required into UV effects on chromatin structure.
In rat glioma cells, UV induces chromosomal giant DNA formation, followed by internucleosomal DNA fragmentation associated with apoptosis via caspase activation and large-scale chromatin structural changes [43]. In permeabilised erythroleukemia cells, varying doses of UV treatment also had differing effects on the chromatin of the cells. In response to low doses of UV radiation (6 J/m2), only small structural changes in the chromatin were noted. However, higher doses of UV (24 J/m2) manifested in the reversal of permeabilisation of the cell and the blocking of chromatin condensation at its fibillary stage, covering the chromosome with fibillary chromatin. This caused the prevention of the opening of the nucleus, forcing the cells into apoptosis, most likely due to repair factors not being able to access the site of the DSB [44]. However, the amount of apoptotic bodies observed was much less than that of gamma irradiation-induced DNA damage [45]. In UV-treated mouse microglial cells, UV-induced apoptotic cells showed condensed chromatin accumulating at the nuclear periphery. Surprisingly, the chromatin did not undergo fragmentation, but instead translocated to the cytoplasm [46]. This suggests that UV-induced chromatin degradation is not restricted to the nucleus alone, but this has not been shown for other cell models. Lastly, in the human HaCaT keratinocyte cell line, UVB irradiation is found to cause rapid increases in the formation of CPDs and chromatin condensation, leading to increased apoptosis [47].

3. The Role of Histone Modifications and Chromatin Remodeling Complexes in Response to UV-Induced DNA Damage

3.1. Recognition of a Lesion by γ-H2AX and the Role of Chromatin Remodeling Complexes

The association of DNA with histones in chromatin prevents DNA repair proteins from accessing photolesions. However, this barrier may be overcome if the DNA lesions change the structural properties of nucleosomes, promoting enzymes to repair these lesions. The cell has several mechanisms by which chromatin can be manipulated to access DNA. These include ATP-dependent chromatin remodeling complexes, incorporation of histone variants into the nucleosome and covalent histone modifications [48]. During interphase, the relaxed chromatin of the eukaryotic cell undergoes a distinct change, resulting in the formation of a highly condensed mitotic chromosome. The biochemical mechanisms responsible for apoptosis, such as chromatin condensation, DNA fragmentation, and release of nuclear proteins, although commonly used as markers for apoptosis, are not fully understood [49]. Post-translational modifications of histone tails such as phosphorylation, acetylation, ubiquitylation and methylation, as well as nucleosome remodelling are also evident in the dynamic changes that occur during the condensation/relaxation process of a cell (Table 1). All of these are important in the response of chromatin to UV-induced DNA damage, including repair and apoptosis (Figure 2).
ATP-dependent chromatin remodeling complexes (CRCs) are divided into 4 families, including the ISWI (imitation of switch), SWI/SNF (switch/sucrose non-fermenting), INO (inositol) and CHD (chromodomain helicase/ATPase DNA binding protein) families. All of these CRCs are important in the chromatin remodelling process, and exhibit mechanistic differences [50]. These CRCs contact both DNA and histones, allowing for nucleosome repositioning or removal. Although they are known to play a role in transcription, recently many of these CRCs have been found to play key roles in the repair of DSBs in yeast, functioning by allowing access of repair proteins and critical histone modifications at the DSB site following DNA damage.
Core histones are mostly globular molecules, although they also possess an unstructured N-terminal tail where many post-translational modifications occur [48]. Phosphorylation, ubiquitylation and methylation of proteins plays a primary role in the DNA damage response by facilitating access of various repair proteins to DNA breaks, as well as cell signalling and promoting chromosomal stability. Acetylation plays an important role downstream of these modifications, important for cell cycle progression and the stabilization of chromatin post DNA damage [51]. Upon the formation a of DSB, DNA repair pathways, as well as signals for checkpoint activation to arrest the cell cycle are activated by the cell. The three phosphatidylinositol-3 kinase-like kinases (PIKKs), ataxia-telangiectasia-mutated (ATM), ataxia-telangiectasia-Rad3 related (ATR) and DNA-damage-dependent protein kinase (DNA-PK) are first activated, signaling the presence of a DSB to cell cycle machinery. Although all of these recognize DSBs, ATM and DNA-PK mainly function after ionizing radiation, whereas ATR mainly responds to UV irradiation [52,53]. These in turn phosphorylate P53, either leading to the activation of cell cycle arrest proteins such as P21 and Chk2 or pro-apoptotic proteins such as Bax and various caspases [54].
These three PIKKs are all also responsible for the phosphorylation of the H2A histone variant H2AX (γ-H2AX) at Serine-139 on the C-terminal tail, which serves as a binding site for repair and checkpoint proteins, allowing for DNA repair events to be facilitated. Phosphorylated P53 rapidly co-localises and forms a complex with γ-H2AX [55]. It also forms during early apoptosis, induced by death receptor agonists and stimuli that activate the intrinsic apoptotic pathway [56]. This histone variant is found in higher eukaryotes and constitutes approximately 10% of total mammalian H2A. γ-H2AX is initiated in the nuclear periphery adjacent to the nuclear envelope while H2AX remains in the nucleus. This is referred to as the “γ-H2AX ring”. This phosphorylation event is the earliest histone modification event following induction of a DSB and is the most characterized modification following DNA damage [51,52,56]. Caffeine, a known inhibitor of PIKKs, prevents the induction of γ-H2AX and as such increases the amount of cells undergoing UV-induced apoptosis due to a DNA repair defect [57,58]. The mediator of DNA damage checkpoint protein 1 (MDC1) also binds directly to γ-H2AX at sites of DSBs and this is vital in the recruitment of repair factors such as MRE11, RAD50/51, NBS1, FANCD2, 53BP1 and BRCA1 [59,60]. This thereby mediates checkpoint signaling to effector kinases CHK1 and CHK2 [61] and further ATM recruitment results in enhanced accumulation of repair factors.
The chromatin remodeling SWI/SNF complex binds to γ-H2AX, and knockout of the SWI/SNF complex results in inefficient CPD removal and increased DNA sensitivity following DNA damage [62–64]. Therefore, the SWI/SNF complex promotes H2AX phosphorylation by directly acting on chromatin. Recently, Lee and colleagues [65] found that the catalytic ATPase subunit of SWI/SNF, BRG1, binds to γ-H2AX nucleosomes by interacting with acetylated H3 through its bromodomain. When BRG1 was deleted, they found that this caused a significant defect in the repair of DSBs. Moreover, if SWI/SNF or BRG1 were inactivated, the cells became highly susceptible to DNA-damage induced apoptosis due to a prolonged activation of P53 [101]. The alternative ATPase subunit of SWI/SNF, BRM has also been shown to be a tumour suppressor in various tissues. Both BRG1 and BRM were found to be downregulated from the progression of a benign skin lesion into malignant skin cancers, suggesting that these subunits could play an important role in the response to UV-induced DNA damage [102]. Recently, a novel hotspot mutation in a highly conserved region of BRM was discovered in non-melanoma skin cancer, however the effect of this mutation remains elusive [103]. Moreover, cells from BRM knockout mice undergo UV-radiation induced apoptosis more readily than cells from normal mice [104] and this is likely due to cleavage of BRM by cathepsin G [105].
A study with SWI/SNF deficient cells showed that these cells had highly reduced levels of the P53-regulated proteins P21 and GADD45 following UV-induced damage, suggesting that SWI/SNF promotes apoptosis via induction of these two cell cycle control proteins [63]. It should also be noted that SNF5, another subunit of the SWI/SNF complex, has also been found to be important in the DNA damage response. Cells with knockout of SNF5 led to a hypersensitive DNA damage response, and also an aberrant apoptotic effect and change in P53 activity, leading to a proliferative defect [106,107]. Other studies have also shown that SNF5 interacts with UV damage recognition factor XPC and co-localises with XPC at the damage site. SNF5 deficiency led to a defect in downstream ATM and H2AX phosphorylation [108].
The chromatin-remodeling INO80 complex is also recruited to the site of a DSB via interaction with γ-H2AX, where it is thought to induce histone eviction so as to facilitate the access of repair proteins to the site of damage, promoting the restoration of chromatin structure [109,110]. The SWR1 complex, a member of the INO80 subfamily, has also been shown to make a direct contribution to DSB repair via association with the γ-H2AX complex [111]. The chromatin-remodeling protein RSC is also required for DSB repair following synapsis for the completion of the recombinational repair event [62]. The phosphorylation of γ-H2AX also serves as a platform for other complexes. It is required for the recruitment of the TIP60-HAT complex, integral in the DNA damage response in mammals [112]. TIP60 in turn acetylates H4 at multiple sites, required for the recruitment of other DNA damage proteins [113]. It should also be noted that γ-H2AX dephosphorylation by wild-type P53-induced phosphatase (WIP1) is also necessary following recovery from checkpoint arrest and cell-cycle progression following chromatin recovery from UV-induced DNA damage [114]. In repair-deficient XP-B cells, which lack functional XPB DNA repair helicase, γ-H2AX induction still occurs following UV-induced damage, as well as phosphorylation of ATM and NBS1, suggesting that these events still occur in the absence of NER [60]. The activation of P53 was prolonged in these XP-B cells, thus failing to induce downstream targets such as WIP1, GADD45A and MDM2, inhibiting apoptosis [60,115]. Further, overexpression of WIP1 blocks recruitment of the repair proteins MDC1 and 53BP1 to UV-induced damage sites, inhibiting repair and promoting apoptosis [115]. These findings suggest an important role for WIP1 in apoptosis.
Collectively, these data show that ATP-dependent CRCs form a cooperative feedback activation loop with γ-H2AX, influencing the recruitment of repair factors and checkpoint proteins to assist in DSB repair. Moreover, upon inefficient repair of DNA, this dynamic interaction can encourage the apoptotic response of a cell. This interaction is vital in both the repair and apoptotic signalling of a cell following UV-induced DNA damage. However, it is unclear whether these chromatin remodeling pathways directly regulate this response or if it is due to other indirect pathways.

3.2. Modifications Following γ-H2AX in the UV-Induced DNA Damage Response

Following phosphorylation of H2AX, many other chromatin events take place, affecting whether a cell recovers from UV-induced DNA damage via NER or is forced into apoptosis (Figure 3). It has been shown that phosphorylation of histone H2A, H2B, H3 and H4, dephosphorylation of histone H1, acetylation of H2B and H4, as well as methylation of histone H3 and H4 are all associated in the apoptotic process [116]. However, the apoptotic response of the cell following UV-irradiation still remains elusive.
Histone H2B phosphorylation at serine-14 (S14) is a hallmark of apoptosis and has been associated with the condensation of chromatin [66,67]. The phosphorylation of H2B at S14 is mediated by mammalian sterile twenty (MST1) kinase, following caspase-3 mediated cleavage of MST1 [67]. Recently, it was also shown that H2BS14 phosphorylation occurred following UVB irradiation and this was mediated by activated MAPKs (such as ERK1/2, JNK1/2 and P38), showing that H2BS14 phosphorylation is mediated by both MAPKs and caspase-3/MST1 pathways [68]. Moreover, SWI/SNF binds to the H2B N-terminus in yeast [69], and mutation or deletion of the H2B N-terminal domain leads to an increased UV sensitivity [70]. This is most likely due to an inability to recruit SNF5 leading to a defect in NER due to altered chromatin structure, and thus a high UV sensitivity [71]. Ubiquitylation of histone H2A also occurs in response to UV radiation [95], as well ubiquitylation of H2B [98], H3 and H4 [99] although these latter modifications are to a much lower extent in comparison to H2A. The ubiquitylation of H2A is dependent on RNF8, which is recruited to sites of UV damage, and is essential for the recruitment of repair factors 53BP1 and BRCA1 [96].
A correlation between early apoptotic dephosphorylation of H1 and the onset of chromatin fragmentation has also been described [72]. However, more recent evidence has suggested that the dephosphorylation of H1 may not be a prerequisite to the onset of apoptotic DNA fragmentation [73]. Moreover, histone H1.2 is increased and forms a protein complex with APAF-1, caspase-9 and CYT-C in response to UV irradiation, showing that histone H1.2 acts a positive regulator of apoptosome formation [74]. A reduction in histone H1.2 expression also inhibits DSB induced apoptosis in thymocytes [75]. The phosphorylation of H4 at serine-1 has also been found to be induced by DNA damage and this is mediated by casein kinase 2 (CK2) [76].
Methylations on histone H3 and H4 are also known to occur in response to UV irradiation and are important in gene regulation and chromatin structure. Although most damage related histone modifications occur at the N-terminus, many have been identified to occur within the core portion of these proteins. Methylation of lysine-79 in histone H3 (H3K79), a highly conserved modification catalysed by histone methyltransferase DOT1 [79] also occurs following UV-induced DNA damage. Methylated H3K79 serves as a binding site for RAD9/53BP1 that has involvement in several damage checkpoints [80,81]. In yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae, it was found that mutated H3K79 affected the response to UV-induced damage. Furthermore, mutation of lysines in the H4 N-terminus altered the distribution of H3K79 methylation states, showing that these modifications coordinate DNA damage checkpoint and repair pathways [82,83]. Impaired NER seen in these mutants is most likely due to increased binding of SIR complexes, as deletion of SIR1 or SIR2 in these mutants significantly increases the amount of CPD removal following UV irradiation in yeast [84].
SNF5-inactivated T-cell lymphomas showed increased EZH2, a Polycomb (PcG) group protein, which is highly expressed in various cancers. EZH2 is known to mediate gene silencing by catalyzing trimethylation of histone H3K27 at the promoters of various target genes such as P16. SNF5 deficiency in these cells led to fully penetrant and rapid tumour formation, largely due to a defect in cellular senescence [117]. Several other PcG proteins are also involved in the methylation and ubiquitylation of histones and are recruited to sites of DNA damage [118]. BMI1 and RING2 are required for the accumulation of ubiquitylated γ-H2AX at DSB sites [97]. These proteins are believed to be recruited in a poly (ADP ribose) polymerase (PARP)1/2 manner [119]. The DNA repair and apoptotic activities of the tumour suppressor ING1 requires interaction with trimethylated histone H3 lysine 4 [85]. Overexpressed ING1 activates P53 target genes, including P21 and proapoptotic Bax, promoting P53-dependent apoptosis [120,121]. Mutations of ING1 decrease H3K4 trimethylation, and these mutants have impaired UV-induced DNA repair and apoptosis [85].
Although the signalling pathways and modifications mentioned above which occur in response to DNA damage are quite well depicted, the precise molecular decisions which determine the strategy of the cell in either repairing/surviving or undergoing cell death are not completely understood, in particular the response to UV. However, one recently discovered modification might serve to answer these questions in the future. The C-terminus of H2AX shows a tyrosine (Tyr 142 in mammals) in metazoans, however, this is not present in other organisms such as yeast. This particular site is phosphorylated following DNA damage by WSTF (Williams-Beuren syndrome transcription factor), a component of the ISWI ATP-dependent chromatin-remodeling complex, and this phosphorylation promotes the recruitment of pro-apoptotic factors to γ-H2AXS139, inhibiting the recruitment of repair factors to this site [77,78]. Furthermore, Tyr 142 (Y142) dephosphorylation is also dependent on EYA1/3 phosphatases and deletion of either of these phosphatases results in increased Y142 phosphorylation. An increase in apoptotic cell death was observed when EYA phosphatases were knocked out in response to DNA damage and EYA was found to interact with H2AX in the context of chromatin. EYA is recruited to H2AX foci in response to DSBs and this was found to be dependent on the phosphorylation of both ATR/ATM. Peptides corresponding to the C-terminal domain of H2AX with phosphorylation of both S139 and Y142 were constructed and it was found that peptides lacking phosphorylation marks or where Y142 were mutated failed to interact with MDC1, a critical protein for the signaling of downstream repair factors [78]. If repair of the cell is possible, Y142 is dephosphorylated and the DNA damage response machinery is recruited into chromatin in regions flanking the lesion. However if the damage is too severe, Y142 phosphorylation remains and apoptosis is promoted by the association with γ-H2AX and pro-apoptotic JNK1 [78]. It has also been proposed that the γ-H2AX ring together with H2B S14 phosphorylation and H2AX Y142 phosphorylation form a “histone phosphorylation apoptotic code” following formation of a DSB, vital for the repair and apoptotic response of the cell [56,116]. These data suggest that the Y142 site is important for both repair and apoptosis following induction of DSB, however to date this site has not been investigated in response to UV irradiation, but it is possible that it is important for the cellular response since γ-H2AX foci induction is already known to be imperative in the response to UV-induced DNA damage.

3.3. Maintenance of Chromatin Following Repair—Histone Acetylation

Recently, the acetylation of core histones on the amino-terminal tails of lysine residues, mediated by histone acetyltransferases (HATs) has been of much clinical interest. This is due to the fact that this acetylation is indeed reversible, catalysed by histone deacetylase (HDAC) enzymes. This deacetylation results in a more compacted chromatin structure, inhibitory to many cellular processes. This in turn affects the formation of UV-induced DNA lesions due to this change in chromatin conformation, preventing transcription and entry of cells into S phase. With the use of histone deacetylase inhibitors such as Trischostatin A (TSA), it is possible to sensitise cancer cells to UV-induced apoptosis, as well as promoting growth arrest and differentation [122,123], thus promoting an anti-cancer effect. Acetylations of histones H3 and H4 have been shown to play a role in the UV damage response. The release of HDACs and the subsequent acetylation of histone H3 and H4 ensures progression from the G1 to S phase of the cell cycle and the restructuring of chromatin post DNA damage [87]. These events have been found to follow modifications such as H2AX phosphorylation and H3K79 methylation, and are important in both the opening and restoring of chromatin following DNA damage. Induction of maximum core histone acetylation enhances NER following UV irradiation [16].
The P300 histone acetyltransferase mediates the UV-induced acetylation of H3 histones. Inactivation of P300 prevents UV-induced H3 acetylation as well as activation of γ-H2AX and P53, indicating that P300 is involved in UV induction of γ-H2AX and P53. Furthermore, UV-induced acetylation of histone H3 does not occur in the absence of P53 [88]. RAD16, a catalytic subunit of SWI/SNF, also mediates hyperacetylation of H3 histones in yeast [84]. In heterochromatic regions in Drosophila cells, a decrease in trimethylated histone H3 lysine-9 levels is found in response to UV-induced DNA damage and this process is dependent on a fly homolog of P53 [86]. Acetylation of H3K9 also increases following UV irradiation [89] and this process is also dependent on this P53 homolog. This result suggests that crosstalk between these histone modifications may occur following UV irradiation. Upon DNA damage, a histone demethylase may be recruited, reversing the trimethylation of the H3K9 site, permitting acetylation by HATs and an increased NER response [16].
In response to UV irradiation, the histone chaperone anti-silencing function-1 (ASF1) is important for the DNA damage checkpoint by facilitating the acetylation of histone H3 on lysine 56 by the histone acetyltransferase RTT109 [90]. Knockdown of ASF1 post-UV results in defective H3K79 acetylation as well as a fault in γ-H2AX dephosphorylation, and this was regulated by the damage response protein ATM. Thus, ASF1 and the acetylation of H3K79 are integral for UV-induced cell cycle arrest [91]. It should also be noted that UV irradiation also results in increased acetylation levels of H3K14 and H3K18 in Drosophila, as well as phosphorylation at serine 10. The loss of P53 perturbs the normal regulation of S10 phosphorylation, as well as H3K14 but not H3K18 acetylation, affecting recovery of cells from G2-M arrest, most likely forcing cells into apoptosis [92]. The acetylation status of histone H4 is also dramatically decreased in UV irradiated G1 phase checkpoint cells, suggesting that acetylation of core histones is necessary for the G1/S transition [93]. Both hypoacetylated and trimethylated histone H4 is also released from nuclei early in apoptosis [94].
If DNA is successfully repaired, a variant of histone H3, H3.1, becomes incorporated at sites of UV-induced DNA damage in vivo, and this event is facilitated by a histone chaperone named chromatin assembly factor 1 (CAF-1) outside of S-phase, contributing to the maintenance of chromatin assembly [100]. These observations show that new histones can also become incorporated that do not contain the modifications present in histones before the DNA was damaged.

4. Conclusions

The maintenance of genomic stability following UV-induced DNA damage in eukaryotic cells is a complex process, in which histone modifications and nucleosome remodelling via ATP-dependent chromatin remodelling complexes, such as SWI/SNF, are tightly regulated. Cross-talk between these histones is critical in the dynamic response of chromatin to UV damage to signal and recruit repair factors and pro-apoptotic proteins. However, much more research must be done to understand these interactions. The discovery of novel modifications such as H2AX Y142 and its interaction with other histone modifications, chromatin remodelling complexes and damage response enzymes such as P53 are likely to shine more light on the response of a cell to UV as more is discovered about this site and its various interactions. It will be important to determine whether this site is indeed important in the UV-induced DNA damage response. A greater understanding of the many changes following histone modifications to UV-induced damage could undoubtedly lead to an improved outcome for patients. This is already apparent in drugs being trialled such as the histone deacetylase inhibitor TSA, which is showing great promise in reducing UV-induced cellular transformation in humans.

Acknowledgements

Andrew Farrell is supported by a Dora Lush Biomedical Postgraduate Scholarship from the Australian National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) and work in the laboratory is funded by NHMRC Project Grant 632717 and by the Epiderm Dermatological Research & Education Foundation.
  • Conflicts of InterestThe authors declare no conflict of interest.

Abbreviations

6-4PP
pyrimidine 6-4 pyrimidone photoproduct
8-oxo-dG
8-oxodeoxyguanine
γ-H2AX
phosphorylated histone H2AX
APAF-1
apoptotic protease activating factor-1
ASF1
anti-silencing function-1
ATM
ataxia-telangiectasia-mutated
ATP
adenosine 5′-triphosphate
ATR
ataxia-telangiectasia Rad3-related
BER
base excision repair
CAF1
chromatin assembly factor-1
CK2
casein kinase 2
CPD
cyclobutane pyrimidine dimer
CSB
Cockayne syndrome B
CYT-C
cytochrome-c
DNA-PK
DNA-damage-dependent protein kinase
DSB
double strand break
FADD
Fas-associated death domain protein
GADD45a
growth arrest and DNA-damage-inducible alpha
GGR
global genome repair
HAT
histone acetyltransferase
HDAC
histone deacetylase
hOGG1
human 8-oxoguanine DNA glycosylase-1
INO
inositol
ISWI
imitation of switch
MDC1
mediator of DNA-damage checkpoint 1
MDM2
P53 binding protein homolog
MST1
mammalian sterile twenty kinase-1
NER
nucleotide excision repair
PARP
poly(ADP ribose) polymerase
PcG
Polycomb
PCNA
proliferating cell nuclear antigen
PIKK
phosphatidylinositol-3 kinase-like kinase
RF
replication factor
RP
replication protein
SWI/SNF
switch/sucrose
TCR
transcription coupled repair
TFIIH
transcription factor IIH
TNF
tumour necrosis factor
TRAIL
tumour necrosis factorrelated apoptosis-inducing ligand
TSA
Trischostatin A
UV
ultraviolet
WIP1
wild-type P53-induced phosphatase-1
WSTF
Williams-Beuren syndrome transcription factor
XP
Xeroderma pigmentosum complex.

References

  1. Luger, K.; Mäder, A.W.; Richmond, R.K.; Sargent, D.F.; Richmond, T.J. Crystal structure of the nucleosome core particle at 2.8 A resolution. Nature 1997, 389, 251–260. [Google Scholar]
  2. Kornberg, R.D.; Lorch, Y. Twenty-five years of the nucleosome, fundamental particle of the eukaryote chromosome. Cell 1999, 98, 285–294. [Google Scholar]
  3. Horáková, A.H.; Bártova, E.; Kozubek, S. Chromatin structure with respect to histone signature changes during cell differentiation. Cell Struct. Funct 2010, 35, 31–44. [Google Scholar]
  4. Verzijlbergen, K.F.; Faber, A.W.; Stulemeijer, I.J.; van Leeuwen, F. Multiple histone modifications in euchromatin promote heterochromatin formation by redundant mechanisms in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. BMC Mol. Biol 2009, 10, 76–91. [Google Scholar]
  5. Li, G.; Levitus, M.; Bustamante, C.; Widom, J. Rapid spontaneous accessibility of nucleosomal DNA. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol 2005, 12, 46–53. [Google Scholar]
  6. Chakravarthy, S.; Park, Y.J.; Chodaparambil, J.; Edaythumangalam, R.S.; Luger, K. Structure and dynamic properties of nucleosome core particles. FEBS Lett 2005, 579, 895–898. [Google Scholar]
  7. Friedberg, E.C. DNA damage and repair. Nature 2003, 421, 436–440. [Google Scholar]
  8. Matsunaga, T.; Hieda, K.; Nikaido, O. Wavelength dependent formation of thymidine dimers and (6-4) photoproducts in DNA by monochromatic ultraviolet light ranging from 150 to 365 nm. Photochem. Photobiol 1991, 54, 403–410. [Google Scholar]
  9. Rochette, P.J.; Therrein, J.P.; Drouin, R.; Perdiz, D.; Bastien, N.; Drobetsky, E.A.; Sage, E. UVA-induced cyclobutane pyrimidine dimers form predominantly at thymidine-thymine dipyrimidines and correlate with the mutation spectrum in rodent cells. Nucleic Acids Res 2003, 31, 2786–2794. [Google Scholar]
  10. Mouret, S.; Baudion, C.; Charvernon, M.; Favier, A.; Cadet, J.; Douki, T. Cyclobutane pyrimidine dimers are predominant DNA lesions in whole human skin exposed to UVA radiation. Proc. Natl. Acad Sci. USA 2006, 103, 13765–13770. [Google Scholar]
  11. Dahle, J.; Kvam, E. Induction of delayed mutations and chromosomal instability in fibroblasts after UVA-, UVB-, and X-radiation. Cancer Res 2003, 63, 1464–1469. [Google Scholar]
  12. Riedl, T.; Hanaoka, F.; Egly, J.M. The comings and goings of nucleotide excision repair factors on damaged DNA. EMBO J 2003, 22, 5293–5303. [Google Scholar]
  13. Decraene, D.; Agostinis, P.; Pupe, A.; de Heas, P.; Garmyn, M. Acute response of human skin to solar radiation: regulation and function of the p53 protein. J. Photochem. Photobiol. B 2001, 63, 78–83. [Google Scholar]
  14. Hanawalt, P.C. Subpathways of nucleotide excision repair and their regulation. Oncogene 2002, 21, 8949–8956. [Google Scholar]
  15. de Boer, J.; Hoeijmakers, J.H. Nucleotide excision repair and human syndromes. Carcinogenesis 2000, 21, 453–460. [Google Scholar]
  16. Palomera-Sanchez, Z.; Zurita, M. Open, repair and close again: Chromatin dynamics and the response to UV-induced DNA damage. DNA Repair (Amst) 2011, 10, 119–125. [Google Scholar]
  17. Henning, K.A.; Li, L.; Iyer, N.; McDaniel, L.D.; Reagan, M.S.; Legerski, R.; Schultz, R.A.; Stefanini, M.; Lehmann, A.R.; Mayne, L.V.; et al. The Cockayne syndrome group A gene encodes a WD repeat protein that interacts with CSB protein and a subunit of RNA polymerase II TFIIH. Cell 1995, 82, 555–564. [Google Scholar]
  18. Fousteri, M.; Vermeulen, W.; van Zeeland, A.A.; Mullenders, L.H. Cockayne syndrome A and B proteins differentially regulate recruitment of chromatin remodeling and repair factors to stalled RNA polymerase II in vivo. Mol. Cell 2006, 23, 471–482. [Google Scholar]
  19. Schaeffer, L.; Roy, R.; Moncollin, V.; Vermeulen, W.; Hoeijmakers, J.H.; Chambon, P.; Egly, J.M. DNA repair helicase: a component of BTF2 (TFIIH) basic transcription factor. Science 1993, 260, 58–63. [Google Scholar]
  20. Evans, E.; Moggs, J.G.; Hwang, J.R.; Egly, J.M.; Wood, R.D. Mechanism of open complex and dual incision formation by human nucleotide excision repair factors. EMBO J 1997, 16, 6559–6573. [Google Scholar]
  21. O’Donovan, A.; Davies, A.A.; Moggs, J.G.; West, S.C.; Wood, R.D. XPG endonuclease makes the 3′ incision in human nucleotide excision repair. Nature 1994, 371, 432–435. [Google Scholar]
  22. Matsunaga, T.; Mu, D.; Park, C.H.; Reardon, J.T.; Sancar, A. Human DNA repair excision nuclease. Analysis of the roles of the subunits involved in dual incisions by using anti-XPG and anti-ERCC1 antibodies. J. Biol. Chem 1995, 270, 20862–20869. [Google Scholar]
  23. Llu, Y.; Prasad, R.; Beard, W.A.; Kedar, P.S.; Hou, E.W.; Shock, D.D.; Wilson, S.H. Coordination of steps in single-nucleotide base excision repair mediated by apurinic/apyrimidinic endonuclease 1 and DNA polymerase beta. J. Biol. Chem 2007, 282, 13532–13541. [Google Scholar]
  24. Javeri, A.; Lyons, J.G.; Huang, X.X.; Halliday, G.M. Downregulation of Cockayne syndrome B protein reduces human 8-oxoguanine DNA glycosylase-1 expression and repair of UV radiation-induced 8-oxo-7,8-dihydro-2′-deoxyguanine. Cancer Sci 2011, 102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Maher, V.M.; Dorney, D.J.; Mendrala, A.L.; Konze-Thomas, B.; McCormick, J.J. DNA excision repair processes in human cells can eliminate the cytotoxic and mutagenic consequences of ultraviolet irradiation. Mutat. Res 1979, 62, 311–323. [Google Scholar]
  26. Konze-Thomas, B.; Hazard, R.M.; Maher, V.M.; McCormick, J.J. Extent of excision repair before DNA synthesis determines the mutagenic but not the lethal effect of UV radiation. Mutat. Res 1982, 94, 421–434. [Google Scholar]
  27. Smith, M.L.; Fornace, A.J.J. P53-mediated protective responses to UV irradiation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1997, 94, 12255–12257. [Google Scholar]
  28. Dunkern, T.R.; Fritz, G.; Kaina, B. Ultraviolet light-induced DNA damage triggers apoptosis in nucleotide excision repair-deficient cells via Bcl-2 decline and caspase-3/-8 activation. Oncogene 2001, 20, 6026–6038. [Google Scholar]
  29. Lehmann, A.R. DNA repair-deficient diseases, xeroderma pigmentosum, Cockayne syndrome and trichothiodystrophy. Biochimie 2003, 85, 1101–1111. [Google Scholar]
  30. Chigancas, V.; Miyaji, E.N.; Muotri, A.R.; de Fatima Jacysyn, J.; Amarante-Mendes, G.P.; Yasui, A.; Menck, C.F. Photorepair prevents ultraviolet-induced apoptosis in human cells expressing the marsupial photolyase gene. Cancer Res 2000, 60, 2458–2463. [Google Scholar]
  31. Jans, J.; Schul, W.; Sert, Y.G.; Rijksen, Y.; Rebel, H.; Eker, A.P.; Nakajima, S.; van Steeg, H.; de Gruijl, F.R.; Yasui, A.; et al. Powerful skin cancer protection by a CPD-photolyase transgene. Curr. Biol 2005, 15, 105–115. [Google Scholar]
  32. Kaina, B. DNA damage-triggered apoptosis: critical role of DNA repair, double-strand breaks, cell proliferation and signaling. Biochem. Pharmacol 2003, 66, 1547–1554. [Google Scholar]
  33. Yuan, J. Evolutionary conservation of a genetic pathway of programmed cell death. J. Cell Biochem 1996, 60, 4–11. [Google Scholar]
  34. Vermuelen, K.; Van Bockstaele, D.R.; Berneman, Z.N. Apoptosis: mechanisms and relevance in cancer. Ann. Hematol 2005, 84, 627–639. [Google Scholar]
  35. Jin, Z.; El-Deiry, W.S. Overview of cell death signaling pathways. Cancer Biol. Ther 2005, 4, 139–163. [Google Scholar]
  36. Danial, N.N.; Korsmeyer, S.J. Cell death: critical control points. Cell 2004, 116, 205–219. [Google Scholar]
  37. Kulms, D.; Schwarz, T. Molecular mechanisms of UV-induced apoptosis. Photodermatol. Photoimmunol. Photomed 2000, 16, 195–201. [Google Scholar]
  38. Ziegler, A.; Jonason, A.S.; Leffel, D.J.; Simon, J.A.; Sharma, H.W.; Kimmelman, J.; Remington, L.; Jacks, T.; Brash, D.E. Sunburn and p53 in the onset of skin cancer. Nature 1994, 372, 773–776. [Google Scholar]
  39. Chaturvedi, V.; Sitailo, L.A.; Qin, J.Z. Knockdown of p53 levels in human keratinocytes accelerates Mcl-1 and Bcl-x(L) reduction thereby enhancing UV-light induced apoptosis. Oncogene 2005, 24, 5299–5312. [Google Scholar]
  40. Hildesheim, J.; Bulavin, D.V.; Anver, M.R.; Alvord, W.G.; Hollander, M.C.; Vardanian, L.; Fornace, A.J. Gadd45a protects against UV irradiation-induced skin tumors, and promotes apoptosis and stress signaling via MAPK and p53. Cancer Res 2002, 62, 7305–7315. [Google Scholar]
  41. Rodust, P.M.; Stockfleth, E.; Ulrich, C.; Leverkus, M.; Eberle, J. UV-induced squamous cell carcinoma—a role for antiapoptotic signalling pathways. Br. J. Dermatol 2009, 161, 107–115. [Google Scholar]
  42. Kulms, D.; Pöppelmann, B.; Yarosh, D.; Luger, T.A.; Krutmann, J.; Schwarz, T. Nuclear and cell membrane effects contribute independently to the induction of apoptosis in human cells exposed to UVB radiation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1999, 96, 7974–7979. [Google Scholar]
  43. Higuchi, Y.; Mizukami, Y.; Yoshimoto, T. Ultraviolet ray induces chromosomal giant DNA fragmentation followed by internucleosomal DNA fragmentation associated with apoptosis in rat glioma cells. Ann. NY Acad. Sci 2003, 1010, 326–330. [Google Scholar]
  44. Ujvarosi, K.; Hunyadi, J.; Nagy, G.; Pocsi, I.; Banfalvi, G. Preapoptotic chromatin changes induced by ultraviolet B irradiation in human erythroleukemia K562 cells. Apoptosis 2007, 12, 2089–2099. [Google Scholar]
  45. Nagy, G.; Gacsi, M.; Rehak, M.; Basnakian, A.G.; Klaisz, M.; Banfalvi, G. Gamma irradiation-induced apoptosis in murine pre-B cells prevents the condensation of fibrillar chromatin in early S phase. Apoptosis 2004, 9, 765–776. [Google Scholar]
  46. Zierler, S.; Klein, B.; Furtner, T.; Bresgen, N.; Lütz-Meindl, U.; Kerschbaum, H.H. Ultraviolet irradiation-induced apoptosis does not trigger nuclear fragmentation but translocation of chromatin from nucleus into cytoplasm in the microglial cell-line, BV-2. Brain Res 2006, 1121, 12–21. [Google Scholar]
  47. Saitoh, Y.; Miyanishi, A.; Mizuno, H.; Kato, S.; Aoshima, H.; Kokubo, K.; Miwa, N. Super-highly hydroxylated fullerene derivative protects human keratinocytes from UV-induced cell injuries together with the decreases in intracellular ROS generation and DNA damages. J. Photochem. Photobiol 2011, 102, 69–76. [Google Scholar]
  48. Vaquero, A.; Loyola, A.; Reinberg, D. The constantly changing face of chromatin. Sci. Aging Knowledge Environ 2003, 2003, RE4. [Google Scholar]
  49. Martelli, A.M.; Zweyer, M.; Ochs, R.L.; Tazzari, P.L.; Tabellini, G.; Narducci, P.; Bortul, R. Nuclear apoptotic changes: an overview. J. Cell Biochem 2001, 82, 634–646. [Google Scholar]
  50. Imbalzano, A.N.; Xiao, H. Functional properties of ATP-dependent chromatin remodeling enzymes. Adv. Protein Chem 2004, 67, 157–179. [Google Scholar]
  51. Altaf, M.; Saksouk, N.; Côté, J. Histone modifications in response to DNA damage. Mutat. Res 2007, 618, 81–90. [Google Scholar]
  52. Ward, I.M.; Chen, J. Histone H2AX is phoshorylated in an ATR-dependent manner in response to replicational stress. J. Biol. Chem 2001, 276, 47759–47762. [Google Scholar]
  53. Stiff, T.; O’Driscoll, M.; Rief, N.; Iwabuchi, K.; Lobrich, M.; Jeggo, P.A. ATM and DNA-PK function redundantly to phosphorylate H2AX after exposure to ionizing radiation. Cancer Res 2004, 64, 2390–2396. [Google Scholar]
  54. Solier, S.; Sordet, O.; Kohn, K.W.; Pommier, Y. Death receptor-induced activation of the Chk2- and histone H2AX-associated DNA damage response pathways. Mol. Cell Biol 2009, 29, 68–82. [Google Scholar]
  55. Garinis, G.A.; Mitchell, J.R.; Moorhouse, M.J.; Hanada, K.; de Waard, H.; Vandeputte, D.; Jans, J.; Brand, K.; Smid, M.; van der Spek, P.J.; et al. Transcriptome analysis reveals cyclobutane pyrimidine dimers as a major source of UV-induced DNA breaks. EMBO J 2005, 24, 3952–3962. [Google Scholar]
  56. Solier, S.; Pommier, Y. The apoptotic ring: A novel entity with phosphorylated histones H2AX and H2B and activated DNA damage response kinases. Cell Cycle 2009, 8, 1853–1859. [Google Scholar]
  57. Halicka, H.D.; Huang, X.; Traganos, F.; King, M.A.; Dai, W.; Darzynkiewicz, Z. Histone H2AX phosphorylation after cell irradiation with UV-B: relationship to cell cycle phase and induction of apoptosis. Cell Cycle 2005, 4, 339–345. [Google Scholar]
  58. Han, W.; Ming, M.; He, Y.Y. Caffeine Promotes Ultraviolet B-induced Apoptosis in Human Keratinocytes without Complete DNA Repair. J. Biol. Chem 2011, 286, 22825–22832. [Google Scholar]
  59. Kim, J.E.; Minter-Dykhouse, K.; Chen, J. Signaling networks controlled by the MRN complex and MDC1 during early DNA damage responses. Mol. Carcinog 2006, 45, 403–408. [Google Scholar]
  60. Oh, K.S.; Bustin, M.; Mazur, S.J.; Appella, E.; Kraemer, K.H. UV-induced histone H2AX phosphorylation and DNA damage related proteins accumulate and persist in nucleotide excision repair-deficient XP-B cells. DNA Repair (Amst) 2011, 10, 5–15. [Google Scholar]
  61. Kim, H.; Chen, J. New players in the BRCA1 mediated DNA damage responsive pathway. Mol. Cells 2008, 25, 457–461. [Google Scholar]
  62. Chai, B.; Huang, J.; Cairns, B.R.; Laurent, B.C. Distinct roles for the RSC and Swi/Snf ATP-dependent chromatin remodelers in DNA double-strand break repair. Genes Dev 2005, 19, 1656–1661. [Google Scholar]
  63. Gong, F.; Fahy, D.; Liu, H.; Wang, W.; Smerdon, M.J. Role of the mammalian SWI/SNF chromatin remodeling complex in the cellular response to UV damage. Cell Cycle 2008, 7, 1067–1074. [Google Scholar]
  64. Park, J.H.; Park, E.J.; Lee, H.S.; Kim, S.J.; Hur, S.K.; Imbalzano, A.N.; Kwon, J. Mammalian SWI/SNF complexes facilitate DNA double-strand break repair by promoting gamma-H2AX induction. EMBO J 2006, 25, 3986–3997. [Google Scholar]
  65. Lee, H.S.; Park, J.H.; Kim, S.J.; Kwon, S.J.; Kwon, J. A cooperative activation loop among SWI/SNF, gamma-H2AX and H3 acetylation for DNA double-strand break repair. EMBO J 2010, 29, 1434–1445. [Google Scholar]
  66. Cheung, W.L.; Ajiro, K.; Samejima, K.; Kloc, M.; Cheung, P.; Mizzen, C.A.; Beeser, A.; Etkin, L.D.; Chernoff, J.; Earnshaw, W.C.; et al. Apoptotic phosphorylation of histone H2B is mediated by mammalian sterile twenty kinase. Cell 2003, 113, 507–517. [Google Scholar]
  67. Hu, Y.; Liu, Z.; Yang, S.J.; Ye, K. Acinus-provoked protein kinase C delta isoform activation is essential for apoptotic chromatin condensation. Cell Death Differ 2007, 14, 2035–2046. [Google Scholar]
  68. Lu, C.; Shi, Y.; Luo, Y.; Duan, L.; Hou, Y.; Hu, H.; Wang, Z.; Xiang, P. MAPKs and Mst1/Caspase-3 pathways contribute to H2B phosphorylation during UVB-induced apoptosis. Sci. China Life Sci 2010, 53, 663–668. [Google Scholar]
  69. Recht, J.; Osley, M.A. Mutations in both the structured domain and N-terminus of histone H2B bypass the requirement for SWI/SNF in yeast. EMBO J 1999, 18, 229–240. [Google Scholar]
  70. Parra, M.A.; Kerr, D.; Fahy, D.; Pouchnik, D.J.; Wyrick, J.J. Deciphering the roles of histone H2B N-terminal domain in genome-wide transcription. Mol. Cell Biol 2006, 26, 3842–3852. [Google Scholar]
  71. Nag, R.; Kyriss, M.; Smerdon, J.W.; Wyrick, J.J.; Smerdon, M.J. A cassette of N-terminal amino acids of histone H2B are required for efficient cell survival, DNA repair and SWI/SNF binding in UV irradiated yeast. Nucleic Acids Res 2009, 38, 1450–1460. [Google Scholar]
  72. Kratzmeier, M.; Albig, W.; Hanecke, K.; Doenecke, D. Rapid dephosphorylation of H1 histones after apoptosis induction. J. Biol. Chem 2000, 275, 30478–30486. [Google Scholar]
  73. Goebel, W.; Obermeyer, N.; Bleicher, N.; Kratzmeier, M.; Eibl, H.J.; Doenecke, D.; Albig, W. Apoptotic DNA fragmentation is not related to the phosphorylation state of histone H1. Biol. Chem 2007, 388, 197–206. [Google Scholar]
  74. Ruiz-Vela, A.; Korsmeyer, S.J. Proapoptotic histone H1.2 induces CASP-3 and -7 activation by forming a protein complex with CYT c, APAF-1 and CASP-9. FEBS Lett 2007, 581, 3422–3428. [Google Scholar]
  75. Konishi, A.; Shimizu, S.; Hirota, J.; Takao, T.; Fan, Y.; Matsuoka, Y.; Zhang, L.; Yoneda, Y.; Fujii, Y.; Skoultchi, A.I.; et al. Involvement of histone 1.2 in apoptosis induced by DNA double-strand breaks. Cell 2003, 114, 673–688. [Google Scholar]
  76. Cheung, W.L.; Turner, F.B.; Krishnamoorthy, T.; Wolner, B.; Ahn, S.H.; Foley, M.; Dorsey, J.A.; Peterson, C.L.; Berger, S.L.; Allis, C.D. Phosphorylation of histone H4 serine 1 during DNA damage requires casein kinase II in S. cerevisiae. Curr. Biol 2005, 15, 656–660. [Google Scholar]
  77. Xiao, A.; Li, H.; Shechter, D.; Ahn, S.H.; Fabrizio, L.A.; Erdjument-Bromage, H.; Ishibe-Murakami, S.; Wang, B.; Tempst, P.; Hofmann, K.; et al. WSTF regulates the H2A.X DNA damage response via a novel tyrosine kinase activity. Nature 2009, 457, 57–62. [Google Scholar]
  78. Cook, P.J.; Ju, B.G.; Telese, F.; Wang, X.; Glass, C.K.; Rosenfeld, M.G. Tyrosine dephosphorylation of H2AX modulates apoptosis and survival decisions. Nature 2009, 458, 591–596. [Google Scholar]
  79. Feng, Q.; Wang, H.; Ng, H.H.; Erdjument-Bromage, H.; Tempst, P.; Struhl, K.; Zhang, Y. Methylation of H3-lysine 79 is mediated by a new family of HMTases without a SET domain. Curr. Biol 2002, 12, 1052–1058. [Google Scholar]
  80. Huyen, Y.; Zgheib, O.; Ditullio, R.A.; Gorgoulis, V.G.; Zacharatos, P.; Petty, T.J.; Sheston, E.A.; Mellert, H.S.; Stavridi, E.S.; Halazonetis, T.D. Methylated lysine 79 of histone H3 targets 53BP1 to DNA double-strand breaks. Nature 2004, 432, 406–411. [Google Scholar]
  81. Toh, G.W.; O’Shaughnessy, A.M.; Jimeno, S.; Dobbie, I.M.; Grenon, M.; Maffini, S.; O’Rorke, A.; Lowndes, N.F. Histone H2A phosphorylation and H3 methylation are required for a novel Rad9 DSB repair function following checkpoint activation. DNA Repair (Amst) 2006, 5, 693–703. [Google Scholar]
  82. Bostelman, L.J.; Keller, A.M.; Albrecht, A.M.; Arat, A.; Thompson, J.S. Methylation of histone H3 lysine-79 by Dot1p plays multiple roles in the response to UV damage in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. DNA Repair (Amst) 2007, 6, 383–395. [Google Scholar]
  83. Evans, M.L.; Bostelman, L.J.; Albrecht, A.M.; Keller, A.M.; Strande, N.T.; Thompson, J.S. UV sensitive mutations in histone H3 in Saccharomyces cerevisiae that alter specific K79 methylation states genetically act through distinct DNA repair pathways. Curr. Genet 2008, 53, 259–274. [Google Scholar]
  84. Chaudhuri, S.; Wyrick, J.J.; Smerdon, J.W. Histone H3 Lys79 methylation is required for efficient nucleotide excision repair in a silenced locus of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Nucleic Acids Res 2009, 37, 1690–1700. [Google Scholar]
  85. Peña, P.V.; Hom, R.A.; Hung, T.; Lin, H.; Kuo, A.J.; Wong, R.P.; Subach, O.M.; Champagne, K.S.; Zhao, R.; Verkhusha, V.V.; et al. Histone H3K4me3 binding is required for the DNA repair and apoptotic activities of ING1 tumor suppressor. J. Mol. Biol 2008, 380, 303–312. [Google Scholar]
  86. Palomera-Sanchez, Z.; Bucio-Mendez, A.; Valadez-Graham, A.V.; Reynaud, E.; Zurita, M. Drosophila p53 is required to increase levels of the Dkdm4B demethylase after UV induced DNA damage to demethylate histone H3 lysine 9. J. Biol. Chem 2010, 285, 31370–31379. [Google Scholar]
  87. Magnaghi-Jaulin, L.; Groisman, R.; Naguibneva, I.; Robin, P.; Lorain, S.; Le Villain, J.P.; Troalen, F.; Trouche, D.; Harel-Bellan, A. Retinoblastoma protein represses transcription by recruiting a histone deacetylase. Nature 1998, 391, 601–605. [Google Scholar]
  88. Kim, M.; Shin, J.; Eun, H.C.; Chung, J.H. The role of p300 histone acetyltransferase in UV-induced histone modifications and MMP-1 gene transcription. PLoS One 2009, 4, e4864. [Google Scholar]
  89. Rebollar, E.; Valadez-Graham, V.; Vászquez, M.; Reynaud, E.; Zurita, M. Role of the p53 homologue from Drosophila melanogaster in the maintenance of hsitone H3 acetylation and response to UV-light irradiation. FEBS Lett 2006, 580, 642–648. [Google Scholar]
  90. Recht, J.; Tsubota, T.; Tanny, J.C.; Diaz, R.L.; Berger, J.M.; Zhang, X.; Garcia, B.A.; Shabanowitz, J.; Burlingame, A.L.; Hunt, D.F.; et al. Histone acetylation Asf1 is required for histone H3 lysine 56 acetylation, a modification associated with S phase in mitosis and meiosis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2006, 103, 6988–6993. [Google Scholar]
  91. Battu, A.; Ray, A.; Wani, A.A. ASF1A and ATM regulate H3K56-mediated cell-cycle checkpoint recovery in response to UV irradiation. Nucleic Acids Res 2011, 39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Allison, S.J.; Milner, J. Loss of p53 has site-specific effects on histone H3 modification, including serine 10 phosphorylation important for the maintenance of ploidy. Cancer Res 2003, 63, 6674–6679. [Google Scholar]
  93. Koprinarova, M.; Russev, G. Histone H4 acetylation during UV light induced G1 and S phase arrest of the cell cycle. Cell Cycle 2008, 7, 1–3. [Google Scholar]
  94. Bolx-Chornet, M.; Fraga, M.F.; Villar-Garea, A.; Caballero, R.; Espada, J.; Nuñez, A.; Casado, J.; Largo, C.; Casal, J.I.; Cigudosa, J.C.; et al. Release of hypoacetylated and trimethylated histone H4 is an epigenetic marker of early apoptosis. J. Biol. Chem 2006, 281, 13540–13547. [Google Scholar]
  95. Bergink, S.; Salomons, F.A.; Hoogstraten, D.; Groothuis, T.A.; de Waard, H.; Wu, J.; Yuan, L.; Citterio, E.; Houtsmuller, A.B.; Neefjes, J.; et al. DNA damage triggers nucleotide excision repair-dependent monoubiquitylation of histone H2A. Genes Dev 2006, 20, 1343–1352. [Google Scholar]
  96. Marteijn, J.A.; Bekker-Jensen, S.; Mailand, N.; Lans, H.; Schwertman, P.; Gourdin, A.M.; Dantuma, N.P.; Lukas, J.; Vermuelen, W. Nucleotide excision repair-induced H2A ubiquitination is dependent on MDC1 and RNF8 and reveals a universal DNA damage response. J. Cell Biol 2009, 186, 835–847. [Google Scholar]
  97. Ismail, I.H.; Andrin, C.; McDonald, D.; Hendzel, M.J. BMI1-mediated histone ubiquitylation promotes DNA double-strand break repair. J. Cell Biol 2010, 191, 45–60. [Google Scholar]
  98. Robzyk, K.; Recht, J.; Osley, M.A. Rad6-dependent ubiquitination of histone H2B in yeast. Science 2000, 287, 501–504. [Google Scholar]
  99. Wang, H.; Zhai, L.; Xu, J.; Joo, H.Y.; Jackson, S.; Erdjument-Bromage, H.; Tempst, P.; Xiong, Y.; Zhang, Y. Histone H3 and H4 ubiquitylation by the CUL4-DDB-ROC1 ubiquitin ligase facilitates cellular response to DNA damage. Mol. Cell 2006, 22, 383–394. [Google Scholar]
  100. Polo, S.E.; Roche, D.; Almouzni, G. New histone incorporation marks site of UV repair in human cells. Cell 2006, 127, 481–493. [Google Scholar]
  101. Park, J.H.; Park, E.J.; Hur, S.K.; Kim, S.J.; Kwon, J. Mammalian SWI/SNF chromatin remodeling complexes are required to prevent apoptosis after DNA damage. DNA Repair (Amst) 2009, 8, 29–39. [Google Scholar]
  102. Bock, V.L.; Lyons, J.G.; Huang, X.X.; Jones, A.M.; McDonald, L.A.; Scolyer, R.A.; Moloney, F.J.; Barnetson, R.S.; Halliday, G.M. BRM and BRG1 subunits of the SWI/SNF chromatin remodelling complex are downregulated upon progression of benign skin lesions into invasive tumours. Br. J. Dermatol 2011, 164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Moloney, F.J.; Lyons, J.G.; Bock, V.L.; Huang, X.X.; Bugeja, M.J.; Halliday, G.M. Hotspot mutation of brahma in non-melanoma skin cancer. J. Invest. Dermatol 2009, 129, 1012–1015. [Google Scholar]
  104. Reyes, J.C.; Barra, J.; Muchardt, C.; Camus, A.; Babinet, C.; Yaniv, M. Altered control of cellular proliferation in the absence of mammalian brahma (SNF2α). EMBO J 1998, 17, 6979–6991. [Google Scholar]
  105. Biggs, J.R.; Yang, J.; Gullberg, U.; Muchardt, C.; Yaniv, M.; Kraft, A.S. The human brm protein is cleaved during apoptosis: The role of cathepsin G. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2001, 98, 3814–3819. [Google Scholar]
  106. Klochendler-Yeivin, A.; Picarsky, E.; Yaniv, M. Increased DNA damage sensitivity and apoptosis in cells lacking the Snf5/Ini5 subunit of the SWI/SNF chromatin remodeling complex. Mol. Cell Biol 2006, 26, 2661–2674. [Google Scholar]
  107. Isakoff, M.S.; Sansam, C.G.; Tamayo, P.; Subramanian, A.; Evans, J.A.; Filmore, C.M.; Wang, X.; Biegel, J.A.; Pomeroy, S.L.; Mesirov, J.P.; et al. Inactivation of the Snf5 tumor suppressor stimulates cell cycle progression and cooperates with p53 loss in oncogenic transformation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2005, 102, 17745–17750. [Google Scholar]
  108. Ray, A.; Mir, S.N.; Wani, G.; Zhao, Q.; Battu, A.; Zhu, Q.; Wang, Q.E.; Wani, A.A. Human SNF5/INI1, a component of the human SWI/SNF chromatin remodeling complex, promotes nucleotide excision repair by influencing ATM recruitment and downstream H2AX phosphorylation. Mol. Cell Biol 2009, 29, 6206–6219. [Google Scholar]
  109. Morrison, A.J.; Highland, J.; Krogan, N.J.; Arbel-Eden, A.; Greenblatt, J.F.; Haber, J.E.; Shen, X. INO80 and gamma-H2AX interaction links ATP-dependent chromatin remodeling to DNA damage repair. Cell 2004, 119, 767–775. [Google Scholar]
  110. van Attikum, H.; Fritsch, O.; Hohn, B.; Gasser, S.M. Recruitment of the INO80 complex by H2A phosphorylation links ATP-dependent chromatin remodeling with DNA double-strand break repair. Cell 2004, 119, 777–788. [Google Scholar]
  111. van Attikum, H.; Fritsch, O.; Gasser, S.M. Distinct roles for the SWR1 and INO80 chromatin remodeling complexes at chromosomal double-strand breaks. EMBO J 2007, 26, 4113–4125. [Google Scholar]
  112. Ikura, T.; Ogryzko, V.V.; Grigoriev, M.; Groisman, R.; Wang, J.; Horikoshi, M.; Scully, R.; Qin, J.; Nakatani, Y. Involvement of the TIP60 histone acetylase complex in DNA repair and apoptosis. Cell 2000, 102, 463–473. [Google Scholar]
  113. Murr, R.; Loizou, J.I.; Yang, Y.G.; Cuenin, C.; Li, H.; Wang, Z.Q.; Herceg, Z. Histone acetylation by Trrap-Tip60 modulates loading of repair proteins and repair of double-strand breaks. Nat. Cell Biol 2006, 8, 91–99. [Google Scholar]
  114. Cha, H.; Lowe, J.M.; Li, H.; Lee, J.S.; Belova, G.I.; Bulavin, D.V.; Fornace, A.J. Wip1 directly dephosphorylates gamma-H2AX and attenuates the DNA damage response. Cancer Res 2010, 70, 4112–4122. [Google Scholar]
  115. Moon, S.; Lin, L.; Zhang, X.; Nguyen, T.; Darlington, Y.; Waldman, A.S.; Lu, X.; Donehower, L.A. Wild-type p53-induced phosphatase 1 dephosphorylates histone variant γ-H2AX and suppresses DNA double strand break repair. J. Biol. Chem 2010, 285, 12935–12947. [Google Scholar]
  116. Füllgrabe, J.; Hajji, N.; Joseph, B. Cracking the death code: apoptosis-related histone modifications. Cell Death Differ 2010, 17, 1238–1243. [Google Scholar]
  117. Wilson, B.G.; Wang, X.; Shen, X.; McKenna, E.S.; Lemieux, M.E.; Cho, Y.J.; Koellhoffer, E.C.; Pomeroy, S.L.; Orkin, S.H.; Roberts, C.W. Epigenetic antagonism between polycomb and SWI/SNF complexes during oncogenic transformation. Cancer Cell 2010, 18, 316–328. [Google Scholar]
  118. Morey, L.; Helin, K. Polycomb group protein-mediated repression of transcription. Trends Biochem. Sci 2010, 35, 323–332. [Google Scholar]
  119. Chou, D.M.; Adamson, B.; Dephoure, N.E.; Tan, X.; Nottke, A.C.; Hurov, K.E.; Gygi, S.P.; Colaiacovo, M.P.; Elledge, S.J. A chromatin localization screen reveals poly (ADP ribose)-regulated recruitment of the repressive polycomb and NuRD complexes to sites of DNA damage. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2010, 107, 18475–18480. [Google Scholar]
  120. Garkavtsev, I.; Grigorian, I.A.; Ossovskaya, V.S.; Chernov, M.V.; Chumakov, P.M.; Gudkov, A.V. The candidate tumour suppressor p33ING1 cooperates with p53 in cell growth control. Nature 1998, 391, 295–298. [Google Scholar]
  121. Zeremski, M.; Hill, J.E.; Kwek, S.S.; Grigorian, I.A.; Gurova, K.V.; Garkavtsev, I.; Diatchenko, L.; Koonin, E.V.; Gudkov, A.V. Structure and regulation of the mouse ing1 gene. Three alternative transcripts encode two phd finger proteins that have opposite effects on p53 function. J. Biol. Chem 1999, 274, 4890–4893. [Google Scholar]
  122. Kim, M.S.; Baek, J.H.; Chakravarty, D.; Sidransky, D.; Carrier, F. Sensitization to UV-induced apoptosis by the histone deacetylase inhibitor Trichostatin A (TSA). Exp. Cell Res 2005, 306, 94–102. [Google Scholar]
  123. Lane, A.A.; Chabner, B.A. Histone deacetylase inhibitors in cancer therapy. J. Clin. Oncol 2009, 27, 5459–5468. [Google Scholar]
Ijms 12 08063f1 1024
Figure 1. The mechanisms of NER following UV radiation. Photolesions are recognised by both TCR and GGR, both of which have specific recognition factors involved. These two pathways then integrate, with several repair proteins assembling at the site of damage, unwinding the DNA, and orienting the excision of the photolesion. This is then followed by new DNA synthesis and ligation.
Figure 1. The mechanisms of NER following UV radiation. Photolesions are recognised by both TCR and GGR, both of which have specific recognition factors involved. These two pathways then integrate, with several repair proteins assembling at the site of damage, unwinding the DNA, and orienting the excision of the photolesion. This is then followed by new DNA synthesis and ligation.
Ijms 12 08063f1
Ijms 12 08063f2 1024
Figure 2. The involvement of histone modifications in cell decisions following UV damage. Chromatin consists of DNA wrapped around nucleosomes in higher order structures. UV damage causes damage to this DNA in the form of photolesions, influencing the recruitment of ATM/ATR, SWI/SNF and an arrangement of NER proteins. ATM/ATR is responsible for the phosphorylation of histone H2AX, serving as a binding site for various repair and checkpoint proteins. This is followed by H2A/H2B ubiquitylation and H3 methylation, as well as acetylation of H3 and H4 histones, leading to repair synthesis. However, if repair is not possible, histone H2B is phosphorylated, influencing apoptosis.
Figure 2. The involvement of histone modifications in cell decisions following UV damage. Chromatin consists of DNA wrapped around nucleosomes in higher order structures. UV damage causes damage to this DNA in the form of photolesions, influencing the recruitment of ATM/ATR, SWI/SNF and an arrangement of NER proteins. ATM/ATR is responsible for the phosphorylation of histone H2AX, serving as a binding site for various repair and checkpoint proteins. This is followed by H2A/H2B ubiquitylation and H3 methylation, as well as acetylation of H3 and H4 histones, leading to repair synthesis. However, if repair is not possible, histone H2B is phosphorylated, influencing apoptosis.
Ijms 12 08063f2
Ijms 12 08063f3 1024
Figure 3. The effect of histones and activated enzymes post UV. P/Ph = phosphorylation, DePh = dephosphorylation, Ac = acetylation, Ub = ubiquitylation, Me = methylation. Upon UV-induced DNA damage, photoproducts are formed, triggering the ATM/ATR response, in turn phosphorylating P53 and activating P21, leading to cell cycle arrest. The amount of damage, as well as histone modifications and protein activation then determines the fate of the cell.
Figure 3. The effect of histones and activated enzymes post UV. P/Ph = phosphorylation, DePh = dephosphorylation, Ac = acetylation, Ub = ubiquitylation, Me = methylation. Upon UV-induced DNA damage, photoproducts are formed, triggering the ATM/ATR response, in turn phosphorylating P53 and activating P21, leading to cell cycle arrest. The amount of damage, as well as histone modifications and protein activation then determines the fate of the cell.
Ijms 12 08063f3
Table
Table 1. Post-translational modifications following UV damage and their association with repair and/or apoptosis. ND = Not determined.
Table 1. Post-translational modifications following UV damage and their association with repair and/or apoptosis. ND = Not determined.
Histone residueModification typeEnzymes involvedAssociated with?References
H2AX S139PhosphorylationATM/ATR, DNA-PK, P53, MDC1, SWI/SNFRepair and apoptosis[50–65]
H2B S14PhosphorylationMST1, MAPKsApoptosis[66–71]
H1
H1.2		Phosphorylation/DephosphorylationNDApoptosis[72–76]
H2AX Y142 (?)PhosphorylationWSTFApoptosis[77]
H2AX Y142 (?)DephosphorylationEYA1Repair[78]
H3 K79
H3 K4
H3 K9		MethylationDOT1, SIR
ING1
P53		Repair and apoptosis[79–84]
[85]
[16,86]
H3AcetylationP53, P300, ASF1, TIP60Repair[87–92]
H4
H2A		AcetylationND
RNF8, PcGs		Repair[93,94]
[95–97]
H2B
H3/H4		UbiquitylationRAD6
CUL4-DDB-ROC1		Repair[98]
[99]
H3.1IncorporationCAF-1Repair[100]

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Farrell, A.W.; Halliday, G.M.; Lyons, J.G. Chromatin Structure Following UV-Induced DNA Damage—Repair or Death? Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2011, 12, 8063-8085. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms12118063

AMA Style

Farrell AW, Halliday GM, Lyons JG. Chromatin Structure Following UV-Induced DNA Damage—Repair or Death? International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2011; 12(11):8063-8085. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms12118063

Chicago/Turabian Style

Farrell, Andrew W., Gary M. Halliday, and James Guy Lyons. 2011. "Chromatin Structure Following UV-Induced DNA Damage—Repair or Death?" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 12, no. 11: 8063-8085. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms12118063

APA Style

Farrell, A. W., Halliday, G. M., & Lyons, J. G. (2011). Chromatin Structure Following UV-Induced DNA Damage—Repair or Death? International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 12(11), 8063-8085. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms12118063

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop