Next Article in Journal
The Neuronal-Specific SGK1.1 (SGK1_v2) Kinase as a Transcriptional Modulator of BAG4, Brox, and PPP1CB Genes Expression
Next Article in Special Issue
Promotion of Ni2+ Removal by Masking Toxicity to Sulfate-Reducing Bacteria: Addition of Citrate
Previous Article in Journal
Thermoresponsive Interplay of Water Insoluble Poly(2-alkyl-2-oxazoline)s Composition and Supramolecular Host–Guest Interactions
Previous Article in Special Issue
Chemical Structure, Property and Potential Applications of Biosurfactants Produced by Bacillus subtilis in Petroleum Recovery and Spill Mitigation
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Analysis of Bacterial and Archaeal Communities along a High-Molecular-Weight Polyacrylamide Transportation Pipeline System in an Oil Field

1
State Key Laboratory of Bioreactor Engineering and Institute of Applied Chemistry, East China University of Science and Technology,130 Meilong Road, Shanghai 200237, China
2
Daqing Oilfield Limited Company, Daqing 163453, China
3
School of Biological Sciences, The University of Hong Kong, Pokfulam Road, Hong Kong, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2015, 16(4), 7445-7461; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms16047445
Submission received: 29 October 2014 / Revised: 18 March 2015 / Accepted: 19 March 2015 / Published: 2 April 2015

Abstract

:
Viscosity loss of high-molecular-weight partially hydrolyzed polyacrylamide (HPAM) solution was observed in a water injection pipeline before being injected into subterranean oil wells. In order to investigate the possible involvement of microorganisms in HPAM viscosity loss, both bacterial and archaeal community compositions of four samples collected from different points of the transportation pipeline were analyzed using PCR-amplification of the 16S rRNA gene and clone library construction method together with the analysis of physicochemical properties of HPAM solution and environmental factors. Further, the relationship between environmental factors and HPAM properties with microorganisms were delineated by canonical correspondence analysis (CCA). Diverse bacterial and archaeal groups were detected in the four samples. The microbial community of initial solution S1 gathered from the make-up tank is similar to solution S2 gathered from the first filter, and that of solution S3 obtained between the first and the second filter is similar to that of solution S4 obtained between the second filter and the injection well. Members of the genus Acinetobacter sp. were detected with high abundance in S3 and S4 in which HPAM viscosity was considerably reduced, suggesting that they likely played a considerable role in HPAM viscosity loss. This study presents information on microbial community diversity in the HPAM transportation pipeline and the possible involvement of microorganisms in HPAM viscosity loss and biodegradation. The results will help to understand the microbial community contribution made to viscosity change and are beneficial for providing information for microbial control in oil fields.

1. Introduction

Partially hydrolyzed polyacrylamide with high-molecular-weight has been employed extensively as an oil-displacing agent for enhanced oil recovery in the petroleum industry [1,2]. A viscosity loss of the HPAM solution occurred in a consecutive transportation pipeline of a water injection system after six years operation. Subsequently this viscosity loss caused a decrease in oil recovery. The factors contributing to viscosity loss of the HPAM solution are speculated to be pH, temperature, salinity, mechanical force, shear force and microbial degradation. With the exception of microbial degradation [3], the other factors are controllable and have been studied thoroughly [4,5,6]. It has been reported that microorganisms are capable of metabolizing polymers and low-molecular-weight polymerization products [7], and bacteria such as Bacillus sphaericus, Acinetobacter sp., Bacillus cereus and Bacillus sp. isolated from soils and oilfields have been directly implicated in the biodegradation of HPAM by hydrolyzing the amide chain or cleaving the carbon chain to reduce HPAM viscosity [8].
With the advantage of the development of deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA)-based molecular techniques, microbial communities may be characterized more accurately and many microorganisms including culturable and non-culturable ones were identified in environments like soil [9], seawater [10], inland water [11] and oilfields [12,13,14]. Recently, the microbial communities in oilfields both of high and low temperatures have been analyzed [15,16,17]. The microbial communities related to the viscosity loss of the HPAM solution need to be analyzed.
In this study, the bacterial and archaeal compositions in different samples along the transportation pipeline were analyzed employing PCR (polymerase chain reaction)-amplification of 16S rRNA (ribonucleic acid) gene and clone library construction method. The corresponding relationship between environmental conditions and HPAM properties with microbial communities were revealed by CCA.

2. Results and Discussion

In this work, four samples were collected. They are the initial solution of sample 1 (S1) collected from make-up tank; Sample 2 solution (S2) gathered from the first filter; Sample 3 solution (S3) obtained between the first and the second filter; Sample 4 solution (S4) obtained between the second filter and the injection well, respectively. The diagram of the water injection system and sampling sites are shown in Figure 1.
Figure 1. Schematic diagram showing the water injection system and the sampling sites.
Figure 1. Schematic diagram showing the water injection system and the sampling sites.
Ijms 16 07445 g001

2.1. Physicochemical Information of Samples

Environmental factors and HPAM physicochemical properties of the samples were measured using different chemical methods (Table 1).
Table 1. Environmental factors and HPAM physicochemical properties of samples.
Table 1. Environmental factors and HPAM physicochemical properties of samples.
SamplesS1S2S3S4
Temperature (°C)25242324
Sampling distance (m)05015002050
pH6.687.507.527.59
Solids content (%)0.4510.5960.5540.469
Viscosity (mPa·S)132010711056865
Na+ (mg·L−1)805.0689.0466.0442.0
K+ (mg·L−1)38.126.231.16.1
Ca2+ (mg·L−1)43.523.146.364.0
Mg2+ (mg·L−1)11.015.99.114.0
Cl (mg·L−1)709.0144.2473.0173.0
NH4+ (mg·L−1)160.560.495.062.0
NO3 (mg·L−1)11.015.448.99.0
SO42− (mg L−1)561.3298.5190.058.7
PO43 (mg·L−1)NdNdNdNd
Formate (mg·L−1)Nd0.16NdNd
Acetate (mg·L−1)0.142.823.682.15
Propionate (mg·L−1)Nd0.10NdNd
Butyrate (mg·L−1)0.010.17NdNd
H2 (mmol·L−1)Nd0.06NdNd
CH4 (mmol·L−1)Nd1.360.920.05
CO2 (mmol·L−1)Nd32.354.147.97
HPAM concentration (mg·L−1)5240428040102940
HPAM hydrolysis degree (%)32.5535.0739.6541.13
HPAM Mη (×106)176.245.492.12
HPAM Rh (nm)2394.8692.5573.5282.1
HPAM PDI0.3630.3180.3120.436
(Nd: undetected; Mη: viscosity-average molecular weight; Rh: hydrodynamic radius; PDI: Polydispersity index).
HPAM properties of viscosity, concentration, Mη and Rh were decreasing, but the hydrolysis degree and pH are increasing with the sampling distance from S1 to S4. Laser light scattering testing (LLS) results of Rh and PDI are shown in Figure S1. Rh results indicated that the particle size of HPAM in the samples were reduced, which partially come from MW (molecular weight) changing especially for the lowest Rh ones and lower MW of HPAM can indicate HPAM degradation. Volatile fatty acids (formate, acetate, propionate and butyrate) were measured and high content of acetate were found in S2, S3 and S4 than in S1. The results indicated that the volatile fatty acids were mainly produced in this system. The detection of H2, CH4 and CO2 indicates the possibility of methanogens and sulfate-reducing bacteria (SRB) existing in the community. In addition, unpleasant smell, characteristic of H2S, occurs in the samples of S2, S3 and S4 when sampling.

2.2. Bacterial and Archaeal Community Compositions

The obtained 16S rRNA gene sequences belong to different operational taxonomic units (OTUs) and all of the valid sequences and OTUs were counted. The coverage and Shannon-Wiener index were calculated as shown in Table 2. Bacterial and archaeal community compositions were analyzed using phylogenetic analyses of 16S rRNA gene clone library [18].
Table 2. 16S rRNA gene and clone library analysis information of samples.
Table 2. 16S rRNA gene and clone library analysis information of samples.
SamplesS1S2S3S4
Bacteria
Valid sequences1597080121
OTU15261225
Coverage0.90000.81430.90000.8843
Shannon-Wiener index (nats)0.80352.87801.50092.3415
Archaea
Valid sequences307810229
OTU14666
Coverage0.70000.96150.96080.8966
Shannon-Wiener index2.24651.08570.46701.3863
All of the gene sequences are affiliated with the members of the phyla Proteobacteria, Spirochaetes, Lentisphaerae and Bacteroidetes and the classes of Betaproteobacteria, Gammaproteobacteria, Epsilonproteobacteria, Deltaproteobacteria, Alphaproteobacteria, Spirochaetes, Lentisphaeria, Sphingobacteria and Flavobacteriia. The results are presented in two phylogenetic trees (Figure 2a,b); (note: The microorganisms in sample S1 are represented by the microbial communities in the tap water for dissolving HPAM). The gene sequences from different samples are assigned with different colors: S1 in yellow, S2 in green, S3 in blue and S4 in red.
The relative abundances of bacterial orders were determined and are shown in Figure 3.
Figure 2. (a) Phylogenetic tree of bacterial 16S rRNA gene clones retrieved from four samples showing the distributions of OTUs and closely related sequences from GenBank database. The bootstrap values at the nodes of ≥75% (n = 1000 replicates) are reported. The scale bar represents 5% sequence divergence. The numbers in parentheses indicate the frequencies of appearance of identical clones in the total analyzed clones followed the accession number in GenBank. Methanosaeta sp. clone was used as outgroup; (b) Phylogenetic tree of bacterial 16S rRNA gene clones retrieved from samples showing the distributions of OTUs and closely related sequences from GenBank database. The bootstrap values at the nodes of ≥75% (n = 1000 replicates) are reported. The scale bar represents 5% sequences divergence. The numbers in parentheses indicate the frequencies of appearance of identical clones in the total analyzed clones followed the accession number in GenBank. The Methanosaeta sp. clone was used as outgroup. The gene sequences from different samples are assigned with different colors: S1 in yellow, S2 in green, S3 in blue and S4 in red.
Figure 2. (a) Phylogenetic tree of bacterial 16S rRNA gene clones retrieved from four samples showing the distributions of OTUs and closely related sequences from GenBank database. The bootstrap values at the nodes of ≥75% (n = 1000 replicates) are reported. The scale bar represents 5% sequence divergence. The numbers in parentheses indicate the frequencies of appearance of identical clones in the total analyzed clones followed the accession number in GenBank. Methanosaeta sp. clone was used as outgroup; (b) Phylogenetic tree of bacterial 16S rRNA gene clones retrieved from samples showing the distributions of OTUs and closely related sequences from GenBank database. The bootstrap values at the nodes of ≥75% (n = 1000 replicates) are reported. The scale bar represents 5% sequences divergence. The numbers in parentheses indicate the frequencies of appearance of identical clones in the total analyzed clones followed the accession number in GenBank. The Methanosaeta sp. clone was used as outgroup. The gene sequences from different samples are assigned with different colors: S1 in yellow, S2 in green, S3 in blue and S4 in red.
Ijms 16 07445 g002aIjms 16 07445 g002b
The relative abundances of bacterial orders were determined and are shown in Figure 3.
Figure 3. Relative abundance of bacterial orders detected in samples of an oilfield pipeline.
Figure 3. Relative abundance of bacterial orders detected in samples of an oilfield pipeline.
Ijms 16 07445 g003
Along the transportation pipeline, the bacterial community compositions from sample 1 (S1) to sample 4 (S4) changed. Burkholderiales and Pseudomonadales are the main dominating orders compared with the other community. However, the Burkholderiales decreased in abundance from 94% to 24%, with increasing distance from the make-up tank, whereas the Pseudomonadales increased in relative abundance from 2% to 60%. Rhodocyclales remained at low abundance from 0.6% to 0.8% with a bit of an increase to 2.9% and 1.3% in S2 and S3, respectively. Sulfate-reducing bacteria of Desulfobacterales (1.4%), Desulfuromonadales (2.9%) and Desulfovibrionales (1.3%) were detected in S2 and S3, respectively. Campylobacterales (9.1%), Enterobacteriales (1.7%) and Flavobacteriales (4.1%) were only shown in S4. The heat map was drawn [19] and is also shown in Figure 3, which displays that the bacterial community compositions of S1 are close to those of S2 and those of S3 are close to S4. From Burkholderiales to Caulobacterales, the abundance of each order is decreasing following the sequence from top to bottom.
Through the analysis of HPAM physicochemical properties, it was found that the viscosity of HPAM gradually decreased along the transportation pipeline, especially from S3 to S4. As some bacteria are heterotrophs, they can utilize carbohydrates as sources. HPAM also can be used as N, C or C/N sources in this environment. Some isolates were reported of being responsible for HPAM biodegradation directly, but unfortunately their sequences information is not available in the GenBank database. For example, Enterobacter agglomerans utilized HPAM as sole carbon or nitrogen source and degraded high MW HPAM to low MW ones [20]. The same order of Enterobacteriales was found in S4. Pseudomonas migula CJ419 was found to degrade HPAM viscosity by 30.4% [21], and bacteria belonging to Pseudomonadales sp. occurred with high abundance in both S3 and S4. SRB of Clostridium bifermentans H1 was found to utilize HPAM as sole carbon source, hydrolyze the amide group, degrade the side chain and change some functional groups, which finally results in reducing HPAM viscosity [22]. SRB also reduced the viscosity of 1000 mg/L HPAM solution by 20% after seven days of cultivation at 30 °C [23]. Similarly, SRB were detected in S2 and S3 including Desulfovibrionales in S3, Desulfobacterales and Desulfuromonadales in S2. The SRB metabolic product of sulfide was proved to reduce HPAM viscosity as well [24]. Acinetobacter sp. can degrade HPAM reducing its molecular weight and lowering viscosity by 78% [8]. These bacteria were detected in both S3 and S4 with high appearance frequency. HPAM viscosity reduced significantly from 1056 to 865 mPa·S, and from S3 to S4, and Acinetobacter sp. occurred with high abundance indicating that these bacteria have a large potential to be the main microorganisms to reduce HPAM viscosity.
Although isolates such as Bacillus cereus HWBI, Bacillus flexu HWBII, Bacillus cereus PM-2 and Bacillus sp. PM-3 were described to utilize polyacrylamide such as nitrogen and carbon sources [3,25], they were not detected in the analysis results of four samples. For other bacteria detected in the samples, their possible participation in HPAM biodegradation is not known. Sphingobacteriales are a main member of the Bacteroidetes and its principal genus is Cytophaga, which can degrade cellulose [26]. Victivallales is an uncultured bacterium, and was detected in bovine rumen, which has an auxiliary function on vegetal fiber degradation [27]. Flavobacterials can be used to degrade a mixture of anthracene, phenanthrene and pyrene [28]. Thus, these groups may possibly participate in HPAM biodegradation.
Archaea are essential and occurred together with bacteria. Archaeal community compositions were analyzed employing the same steps as the above bacterial community analysis and four specific groups were detected, as shown in Figure 4.
Based on the phylogenetic analysis, the relative abundance of archaeal orders in the samples from S1 to S4 was determined and is shown in Figure 5.
Along the transportation pipeline, Methanomicrobiales and Methanosarcinales are the two main orders occurring in the samples from S2 to S4. Methanosarcinales occurred in S2 with the relative abundance of 50%, in S3 with 91.7% and finally in S4 with 77.4% abundance. Methanomicrobiales occurred in S2 with 50% abundance but in S4 with only 19.4%. Methanobacteriales were detected twice with 3.2% abundance, respectively. The heat map also showed that archaeal communities of S3 are close to those of S4 (Figure S2).
Figure 4. Phylogenetic tree of archaeal clones from the samples of S1–S4 showing the distributions of OTUs and closely related sequences from GenBank database. The bootstrap values at the nodes of ≥75% (n = 1000 replicates) are reported. The scale bar represents 5% sequences divergence. The numbers in parentheses indicate the frequencies of appearance of identical clones in the total analyzed clones followed with the accession number. Pseudomonas sp. clone ATCC14606 was used as outgroup.
Figure 4. Phylogenetic tree of archaeal clones from the samples of S1–S4 showing the distributions of OTUs and closely related sequences from GenBank database. The bootstrap values at the nodes of ≥75% (n = 1000 replicates) are reported. The scale bar represents 5% sequences divergence. The numbers in parentheses indicate the frequencies of appearance of identical clones in the total analyzed clones followed with the accession number. Pseudomonas sp. clone ATCC14606 was used as outgroup.
Ijms 16 07445 g004
Figure 5. Relative abundance of archaeal orders detected in S1–S4 samples from an oilfield pipeline.
Figure 5. Relative abundance of archaeal orders detected in S1–S4 samples from an oilfield pipeline.
Ijms 16 07445 g005
Archaea were generally found to thrive in harsh environments, but they are also found in soil, ocean, marshland and oilfields [29]. Three orders of archaea were detected in all samples including Methanobacteriales, Methanomicrobiales and Methanosarcinales, and all of them are methanogens. Methanobacteriales and Methanomicrobiales are classified to be hydrogenotrophic methanogens utilizing H2 and CO2 as substrate to generate methane [30]. Methanosarcinales are classified to be acetoclastic methanogen utilizing acetate to generate methane [15]. Since acetate, H2, CO2 and CH4 were separately found in four samples, only acetate comes from the tap water and some of them were supposed to be related with HPAM biodegradation. It is assumed that these archaea utilized acetate or, H2/CO2 to produce CH4. Methanogenesis can then accelerate HPAM biodegradation indirectly [31].

2.3. Statistical Analysis of Canonical Correspondence Analysis (CCA)

The correlationship between the distribution of bacterial or archaeal species and environmental factors is revealed by CCA analysis (Figure 6).
Bacterial CCA analysis revealed that the bacteria belonging to Burkholderiales, Sphingomonadales, Rhizobiales and Caulobacterales were positively correlated with temperature, Mη, hydrolysis degree, HPAM concentration and viscosity, the concentration of Na+, K+ and NH4+. The bacteria belonging to Sphingobacteriales, Victivallales, Desulfuromonadales, Desulfobacterales, Spirochaetales and Rhodocyclales were positively correlated with the concentration of Mg2+ and SO42−. The members of the Enterobacteriales, Rhodobacterales, Desulfovibrionales, Flavobacteriales, Campylobacterales and Pseudomonadales were positively correlated with NO3 concentration, pH, hydrolysis degree and distance. As abundant anionic and cationic ions were detected in the samples, the SO42− can be utilized by Desulforomonadales in S2. HPAM contains many amide groups, which can be transformed into NH4+ and then NH4+ can be oxidized to NO3 by bacteria. Desulfovibrionales have a nitrate reductase to reduce NO3 into NH4+ [32]. Archaeal CCA results (Figure S3), suggesting that archaea belonging to Methanosarcinales were positively related with pH, hydrolysis degree and NO3 concentration and sampling distance. Methanomicrobiales were positively related to Mg2+ and SO42− concentration. Methanobacteriales was positively related to Cl and NH4+ concentration. Thermoplasmatales was positively related to Mη, viscosity, solids content and concentrations of K+ and Na+.
Figure 6. CCA ordination plots for the two dimensions to show the relationship between the bacterial diversity and environmental parameters analyzed using a 16S rRNA gene sequences in the water injection system of four samples. Correlations between environmental variables and CCA axes are represented by the length and angle of arrows (environmental factor vectors). Triangle means one or several species appearing position.
Figure 6. CCA ordination plots for the two dimensions to show the relationship between the bacterial diversity and environmental parameters analyzed using a 16S rRNA gene sequences in the water injection system of four samples. Correlations between environmental variables and CCA axes are represented by the length and angle of arrows (environmental factor vectors). Triangle means one or several species appearing position.
Ijms 16 07445 g006
The above analysis of the samples indicates that the microbial community diversity has a positive correlation with HPAM physicochemical properties. It is likely that the bacteria detected in the analyzed samples were involved in reducing HPAM viscosity. It is also likely that abundant members of the genus Acinetobacter were potentially involved in HPAM biodegradation which is consistent with the large HPAM viscosity loss from S3 to S4. Implication of other groups of microorganisms in HPAM biodegradation is not excluded.

3. Experimental Section

3.1. Description of Sampling

Four samples containing HPAM (Daqing Huagong Chemical Company, Daqing, China) were taken from four different sites of the water injection system in a Daqing oil field. In this system, potable water is used to dissolve polyacrylamide to be a solution. Sample 1 through sample 4 were designated as: S1 for initial solution containing approximately 5000 ppm of HPAM; S2 for HPAM solution prior to the first filter; S3 for HPAM solution between the first and the second filter; S4 for HPAM solution between the second filter and the injection well (Figure 1). All four samples were initially prepared with potable water [33]. Approximately ten liters of samples were collected directly into sterile containers together with the water. The containers were tightly sealed and immediately transported back to the laboratory for analysis.

3.2. Sample Analysis

Solid content and viscosity were tested according to the standard method SY/T5862-93 [34]. Hydrolysis content and Mη(viscosity-average molecular weight) were analyzed based on the standard method GB 17514-2008 [35,36]. The content of HPAM referring as the total amount of amide-N was determined by the starch-cadmium iodide colorimetric method [37]. The concentration of formate, acetate, propionate, butyrate, anionic ions and cationic ions in samples were quantified using Dionex 600 ion chromatography (Triad Scientific, Inc., Manasquan, NJ, USA) using DIS-5C and DIS-5A suppressors. Anions were separated on an AS11 HC analytical column (4 × 250 mm) with an AG11 HC guard column (4 × 50 mm), (both columns, Dionex, Manasquan, NJ, USA). Cations were separated on a CS 12A analytical column (4 × 250 mm) with a CG 12A guard column (4 × 50 mm) [38]. Samples were measured by a laser light scattering (LLS) spectrometer (ALV/CGS-2022) equipped with an ALV-High QE APD detector and an ALV-5000 digital correlator using a He-Ne laser (wavelength λ = 632.8 nm). The Laplace inversion of each measured intensity-intensity time correlation function G(2) (t,q) is in self-beating mode, which can result in a line width distribution G(Γ). The translational diffusion coefficient D is calculated by the slope of the Γ vs. q2 plot (Γ is decay time). Then the hydrodynamic radius < Rh > is obtained by the Stokes-Einstein equation Rh = kBT/(6πηD), (kB, T and η are the Boltzmann constant, temperature, and the solvent viscosity, respectively). Polydispersity index (PDI) was determined at the scattering angle of 90° [39]. The headspace gas like CH4, H2 and CO2 in the bottles were analyzed by gas chromatography (GC) equipped with a thermal conductivity detector (TCD) to detect H2 and a flame ionization detector (FID) for CH4. CO2 which is converted into CH4 by a conversion furnace (GC112A, Shanghai Precision Scientific Instrument Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China) [40].

3.3. Nucleic Acid Extraction and PCR Amplification

The samples were first filtered through polycarbonate membrane filters (0.22-µm-pore-size, Millipore, Bedford, MA, USA) aseptically in the laboratory. Afterwards the membranes were put into a sterile centrifuge tube subjected to beads beating. Total genomic community DNA was extracted by using AxyPrep™ Bacterial Genomic DNA Maxiprep Kit (Axygen Biosciences, Inc., Santa Clara, CA, USA) and stored at −20 °C before testing [41,42]. Agarose gel electrophoresis (1.0%, w/v) was used to determine the yield and integrity of DNA extraction. Universal PCR primer sets (Table 3) were applied for amplification of bacterial and archaeal 16S rRNA gene sequences, respectively [43].
Table 3. Primer sets information.
Table 3. Primer sets information.
Primer SetTarget OrganismsSequences (5'–3')Annealing Temperature
8FBacteriaAGAGTTTGATYMTGGCTCAG52 °C
805RBacteriaGACTACCAGGGTATCTAATCC52 °C
A109FArchaeaACKGCTCAGTAACACGT60 °C
A1041RArchaeaGGCCATGCACCWCCTCTC60 °C
The reaction mixture for PCR amplification contained 9 µL sterile ultrapure water, 2× Taq PCR Master Mix (Tiangen Biotech Co., Ltd., Beijing, China), 1 µL of the forward and reverse primers in one primer set (GenScript Co., Ltd., Nanjing, China), and 2 µL DNA template (80 ng DNA templates [44]). PCR amplification reaction was performed under the following conditions: initial denaturation of DNA at 94 °C for 1 min, followed by 30 cycles of 1 min denaturation at 94 °C, primer annealing at 52 °C (for bacteria)/60 °C (for archaea) for 1 min and extension at 72 °C for 1 min, and a final extension step at 72 °C for 10 min.

3.4. 16S rRNA Gene Clone Sequencing and Accession Numbers

The PCR products were gel-purified (U-Gene Gel Extraction kit II, Shanghai, China). Purified bacterial and archaeal DNAs were ligated with pMD®19-T simple vector (Takara Biomedical Technology, Dalian, China) by adding 4.5 µL of DNA and 0.5 µL of pMD® 19-T Simple vector to a 200 µL centrifugal tubes for reaction at 4 °C overnight. The ligated DNAs were then transformed into the competent Escherichia coli cells according to the manufacturer’s instruction (Shanghai Lifefeng Biotech Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China). The inserted 16S rRNA gene fragments were screened by PCR amplification with the vector specific primer set of M13-47 (5'-CGCCAGGGTTTTCCCAGTCACGAC-3') and RV-M (5'-GAGCGGATAACAATTTCACACAGG-3'). The reactions were carried out under the following conditions: Initial DNA denaturation at 95 °C for 5 min, 20 cycles of 1 min denaturation at 94 °C, primer annealing at 52 °C for 1 min, and extension at 72 °C for 1 min, a final extension at 72 °C for 10 min. The positive clones in each library were selected for sequencing with an automated ABI Prism 377 analyzer by using M13-47 sequencing primer. Primers and vectors were manually removed from the obtained DNA sequences using MEGA 5.0 software [45]. Chimeric sequences were verified and removed by using Bellerophon [46]. Sequences were clustered into the same operational taxonomic units (OTUs) using FastGroup II at a 97% similarity [47]. One representative sequence was chosen from each OTU to compare with the submitted sequences using the BLASTN network service [48]. The sequence without chimeras was initially submitted to the BLASTN program to determine their closest phylogenetic relatives. Phylogenetic trees were constructed based on the neighbor-joining algorithm using MEGA software. The confidence levels to the nodes of the consensus trees were assigned using bootstrap analysis with 1000 replicates. Partial 16S rRNA gene sequences of bacterial and archaeal genes were deposited in the GenBank database with the accession numbers from KF692357 to KF692428 and from KF692450 to KF692532, respectively.

4. Conclusions

Four samples were collected along a transportation pipeline system for high-molecular-weight polyacrylamide solution to be injected in an oil field. Microbial community compositions and the physicochemical properties of the samples were analyzed. Diverse bacterial groups were detected including Betaproteobacteria, Epsilonproteobacteria, Gammaproteobacteria, Alphaproteobacteria, Deltaproteobacteria, Spirochaetes, Lentisphaeria, Sphingobacteria and Flavobacteria together with the archaeal members of the orders Methanomicrobiales, Methanosarcinales, Methanobacteriales and Thermoplasmatales. The microbial community of S1 was similar to the one of S2 and that of S3 was similar to S4. Bacteria and archaea exhibited a positive correlationship with different HPAM physicochemical properties and environmental parameters. Our data, in conjunction with other literature reports, suggest that members of the genus Acinetobacter detected with high abundance in samples S3 and S4 would have been mainly involved in HPAM viscosity loss. This work will help to understand the microbial community contribution to viscosity change in this system and are beneficial for providing information for microbial control in oil fields.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary materials can be found at https://www.mdpi.com/1422-0067/16/04/7445/s1.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 41273084) and the 863 Program (Grant No.2013AA064403).

Author Contributions

Cai-Yun Li and Jing-Yan Li conducted the experiments; Jin-Feng Liu, Ji-Dong Gu and Bo-Zhong Mu contributed to the conception and design; The manuscript was drafted by Cai-Yun Li and Serge Maurice Mbadinga and edited by Jin-Feng Liu, Ji-Dong Gu and Bo-Zhong Mu.

Abbreviations

HPAM
hydrolyzed polyacrylamide
CCA
canonical correspondence analysis
LLS
laser light scattering
MW
molecular weight
Mη
viscosity-average molecular weight
Rh
hydrodynamic radius
PCR
polymerase chain reaction
RNA
ribonucleic acid
GC
gas chromatography
TCD
thermal conductivity detector
FID
flame ionization detector
DNA
deoxyribonucleic acid
OTUs
operational taxonomic units
PDI
polydispersity index
S1
sample 1
S2
sample 2
S3
sample 3
S4
sample 4

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Sandiford, B.B. Laboratory and field studies of water floods using polymer solutions to increase oil recoveries. J. Pet. Technol. 1964, 16, 917–922. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Austad, T.; Taugbøl, K. Chemical flooding of oil reservoirs 2. Dissociative surfactant-polymer interaction with a negative effect on oil recovery. Colloid Surfaces A-Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 1995, 103, 73–81. [Google Scholar]
  3. Bao, M.T.; Chen, Q.; Li, Y.; Jiang, G. Biodegradation of partially hydrolyzed polyacrylamide by bacteria isolated from production water after polymer flooding in an oil field. J. Hazard. Mater. 2010, 184, 105–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Shin, S.; Cho, Y.I. Temperature effect on the non-newtonian viscosity of an aqueous polyacrylamide solution. Int. Commun. Heat Mass 1993, 20, 831–844. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Henderson, J.M.; Wheatley, A.D. Factors effecting a loss of flocculation activity of polyacrylamide solutions: Shear degradation, cation complexation, and solution aging. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 1987, 33, 669–684. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Gao, B.; Jiang, L.; Kong, D. Studies on rheological behaviour of hydrophobically associating polyacrylamide with strong positive salinity sensitivity. Colloid Polym. Sci. 2007, 285, 839–846. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Gu, J.D.; Roman, M.; Esselman, T.; Mitchell, R. The role of microbial biofilms in deterioration of space station candidate materials. Int. Biodeterior. Biodegrad. 1998, 41, 25–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Matsuoka, H.; Ishimura, F.; Takeda, T.; Hikuma, M. Isolation of polyacrylamide-degrading microorganisms from soil. Biotechnol. Bioprocess Eng. 2002, 7, 327–330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Busscher, W.J.; Novak, J.M.; Caesar-TonThat, T.; Sojka, R.E. Amendments to increase aggregation in United States Southeastern coastal plain soils. Soil Sci. 2007, 172, 651–658. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Hernandez, J.; Fayos, A.; Ferrus, M.A.; Owen, R.J. Random amplified polymorphic DNA fingerprinting of Campylobacter jejuni and C. coli isolated from human faeces, seawater and poultry products. Res. Microbiol. 1995, 146, 685–696. [Google Scholar]
  11. Hahn, M.W. The microbial diversity of inland waters. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 2006, 17, 256–261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Silva, T.R.; Verde, L.C.L.; Santos Neto, E.V.; Oliveira, V.M. Diversity analyses of microbial communities in petroleum samples from Brazilian oil fields. Int. Biodeterior. Biodegrad. 2013, 81, 57–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Silva, C.C.; Jesus, E.C.; Torres, A.; Sousa, M.P.; Santiago, V.; Oliveira, V.M. Investigation of bacterial diversity in membrane bioreactor and conventional activated sludge processes from petroleum refineries using phylogenetic and statistical approaches. J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2010, 20, 447. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  14. Sette, L.; Simioni, K.M.; Vasconcellos, S.; Dussan, L.; Neto, E.S.; Oliveira, V. Analysis of the composition of bacterial communities in oil reservoirs from a southern offshore Brazilian basin. Antonie Leeuwenhoek 2007, 91, 253–266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Li, H.; Yang, S.Z.; Mu, B.Z.; Rong, Z.F.; Zhang, J. Molecular phylogenetic diversity of the microbial community associated with a high-temperature petroleum reservoir at an offshore oilfield. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 2007, 60, 74–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Hollaway, S.L.; Faw, G.M.; Sizemore, R.K. The bacterial community composition of an active oil field in the northwestern gulf of mexico. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 1980, 11, 153–156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Grabowski, A.; Nercessian, O.; Fayolle, F.; Blanchet, D.; Jeanthon, C. Microbial diversity in production waters of a low-temperature biodegraded oil reservoir. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 2005, 54, 427–443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Saitou, N.; Nei, M. The neighbor-joining method: A new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol. Biol. Evol. 1987, 4, 406–425. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  19. Wilkinson, L.; Friendly, M. The history of the cluster heat map. Am. Stat. 2009, 63, 179–184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Nakamiya, K.; Kinoshita, S. Isolation of polyacrylamide-degrading bacteria. J. Ferment. Bioeng. 1995, 80, 418–420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Chang, F.; Chen, L.; Chen, L.; Tian, Y.T.; Chen, W.L. Study on biodegradation of hydrolyzed polyacrylamide in polymer flooding produced wastewater. Chin. J. Environ. Eng. 2010, 11, 012. [Google Scholar]
  22. Ma, F.; Wei, L.; Wang, L.; Chang, C.C. Isolation and identification of the sulphate-reducing bacteria strain H1 and its function for hydrolysed polyacrylamide degradation. Int. J. Biotechn. 2008, 10, 55–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Huang, F.; Lu, X.Z. Study on biodegradation of partially hydrolyzed polyacrylamide used in oil-field. J. Wuhan Yejin Univ. Sci. Technol. 2001, 1, 012. [Google Scholar]
  24. Kang, W.L.; Zhou, Y.; Wang, Z.W.; Meng, L.W.; Liu, S.R.; Bai, B.J. Mechanism of sulfide effect on viscosity of HPAM polymer solution. J. Cent. South Univ. Technol. 2008, 15, 115–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Wen, Q.X.; Chen, Z.; Zhao, Y.; Zhang, H.; Feng, Y. Biodegradation of polyacrylamide by bacteria isolated from activated sludge and oil-contaminated soil. J. Hazard. Mater. 2010, 175, 955–959. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Manz, W.; Amann, R.; Ludwig, W.; Vancanneyt, M.; Schleifer, K.H. Application of a suite of 16s rRNA-specific oligonucleotide probes designed to investigate bacteria of the phylum cytophaga-flavobacter-bacteroides in the natural environment. Microbiology 1996, 142, 1097–1106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Liu, K.L.; Bu, D.P.; Wang, J.Q.; Yu, P.; Li, D.; Zhao, S.G.; He, Y.X.; Wei, H.Y.; Zhou, L.Y. Comparative analysis of rumen microbial communities in six species of cattle. J. China Agric. Univ. 2009, 14, 13–18. [Google Scholar]
  28. Lei, P.; Nie, M.Q.; Wen, X.M.; Ge, B.Z.; Zhang, Z.J.; Zhao, W.M. Study to degradation characters of preponderant Flavobacterials strains in a mixture of anthracene, phenanthrene and pyrene. J. Xian Jiaotong Univ. 2004, 38, 657–660. [Google Scholar]
  29. Woese, C.R.; Kandler, O.; Wheelis, M.L. Towards a natural system of organisms: Proposal for the domains archaea, bacteria, and eucarya. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1990, 87, 4576–4579. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Li, H.; Yang, S.Z.; Mu, B.Z.; Rong, Z.F.; Zhang, J. Molecular analysis of the bacterial community in a continental high-temperature and water-flooded petroleum reservoir. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 2006, 257, 92–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Hallmann, C.; Schwark, L.; Grice, K. Community dynamics of anaerobic bacteria in deep petroleum reservoirs. Nat. Geosci. 2008, 1, 588–591. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Bursakov, S.; Liu, M.Y.; Payne, W.J.; LeGall, J.; Moura, I.; Moura, J.J.G. Isolation and preliminary characterization of a soluble nitrate reductase from the sulfate reducing organism Desulfovibrio desulfuricans ATCC 27774. Anaerobe 1995, 1, 55–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Mijaylova Nacheva, P.; Ramírez Camperos, E.; Sandoval Yoval, L. Treatment of petroleum production wastewater for reuse in secondary oil recovery. Water Sci. Technol. 2008, 57, 875–882. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Gao, C. Viscosity of partially hydrolyzed polyacrylamide under shearing and heat. J. Petrol. Explor Prod. Technol. 2013, 3, 203–206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Zhao, X.; Liu, L.; Wang, Y.; Dai, H.; Wang, D.; Cai, H. Influences of partially hydrolyzed polyacrylamide (HPAM) residue on the flocculation behavior of oily wastewater produced from polymer flooding. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2008, 62, 199–204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. MacDonald, J.; Belrose, J.; Xie, Y.F.; Jackson, M. Nonselective cation channels and links to hippocampal ischemia, aging, and dementia. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 2013, 961, 433–447. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  37. Abdel-Halim, E.S.; Al-Deyab, S.S. Hydrogel from crosslinked polyacrylamide/guar gum graft copolymer for sorption of hexavalent chromium ion. Carbohydr. Polym. 2011, 86, 1306–1312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Hatsis, P.; Lucy, C.A. Effect of temperature on retention and selectivity in ion chromatography of anions. J. Chromatogr. 2001, 920, 3–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Wang, Y.; Lin, S.; Zang, M.; Xing, Y.; He, X.; Lin, J.; Chen, T. Self-assembly and photo-responsive behavior of novel ABC2-type block copolymers containing azobenzene moieties. Soft. Matter. 2012, 8, 3131–3138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Wang, L.Y.; Gao, C.X.; Mbadinga, S.M.; Zhou, L.; Liu, J.F.; Gu, J.D.; Mu, B.Z. Characterization of an alkane-degrading methanogenic enrichment culture from production water of an oil reservoir after 274 days of incubation. Int. Biodeterior. Biodegrad. 2011, 65, 444–450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Guan, J.; Zhang, B.L.; Mbadinga, S.; Liu, J.F.; Gu, J.D.; Mu, B.Z. Functional genes (dsr) approach reveals similar sulphidogenic prokaryotes diversity but different structure in saline waters from corroding high temperature petroleum reservoirs. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2014, 98, 1871–1882. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Guan, J.; Xia, L.P.; Wang, L.Y.; Liu, J.F.; Gu, J.D.; Mu, B.Z. Diversity and distribution of sulfate-reducing bacteria in four petroleum reservoirs detected by using 16s rRNA and dsrAB genes. Int. Biodeterior. Biodegrad. 2013, 76, 58–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Weisburg, W.G.; Barns, S.M.; Pelletier, D.A.; Lane, D.J. 16s ribosomal DNA amplification for phylogenetic study. J. Bacteriol. 1991, 173, 697–703. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  44. Aranda Iv, R.; Dineen, S.M.; Craig, R.L.; Guerrieri, R.A.; Robertson, J.M. Comparison and evaluation of RNA quantification methods using viral, prokaryotic, and eukaryotic RNA over a 104 concentration range. Anal. Biochem. 2009, 387, 122–127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Tamura, K.; Peterson, D.; Peterson, N.; Stecher, G.; Nei, M.; Kumar, S. MEGA5: Molecular evolutionary genetics analysis using maximum likelihood, evolutionary distance, and maximum parsimony methods. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2011, 28, 2731–2739. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Huber, T.; Faulkner, G.; Hugenholtz, P. Bellerophon: A program to detect chimeric sequences in multiple sequence alignments. Bioinformatics 2004, 20, 2317–2319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Yu, Y.; Breitbart, M.; McNairnie, P.; Rohwer, F. FastGroupII: A web-based bioinformatics platform for analyses of large 16s rDNA libraries. BMC Bioinform. 2006, 7, 57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Altschul, S.F.; Madden, T.L.; Schäffer, A.A.; Zhang, J.; Zhang, Z.; Miller, W.; Lipman, D.J. Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: A new generation of protein database search programs. Nucleic Acids Res. 1997, 25, 3389–3402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Li, C.-Y.; Li, J.-Y.; Mbadinga, S.M.; Liu, J.-F.; Gu, J.-D.; Mu, B.-Z. Analysis of Bacterial and Archaeal Communities along a High-Molecular-Weight Polyacrylamide Transportation Pipeline System in an Oil Field. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2015, 16, 7445-7461. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms16047445

AMA Style

Li C-Y, Li J-Y, Mbadinga SM, Liu J-F, Gu J-D, Mu B-Z. Analysis of Bacterial and Archaeal Communities along a High-Molecular-Weight Polyacrylamide Transportation Pipeline System in an Oil Field. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2015; 16(4):7445-7461. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms16047445

Chicago/Turabian Style

Li, Cai-Yun, Jing-Yan Li, Serge Maurice Mbadinga, Jin-Feng Liu, Ji-Dong Gu, and Bo-Zhong Mu. 2015. "Analysis of Bacterial and Archaeal Communities along a High-Molecular-Weight Polyacrylamide Transportation Pipeline System in an Oil Field" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 16, no. 4: 7445-7461. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms16047445

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop