Next Article in Journal
Effect of Thyrotropin on Osteopontin, Integrin αvβ3, and VCAM-1 in the Endothelium via Activation of Akt
Previous Article in Journal
Spider Silk-CBD-Cellulose Nanocrystal Composites: Mechanism of Assembly
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

DNA Interaction Studies of Selected Polyamine Conjugates

1
Department of Hospital Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmacy, Medical University of Lodz, 1 Muszynskiego Street, 90-151 Lodz, Poland
2
Food Science Department, Faculty of Pharmacy, Medical University of Lodz, 1 Muszynskiego Street, 90-151 Lodz, Poland
3
Department of Nucleic Acids Biochemistry, Medical University of Lodz, 251 Pomorska Street, 92-213 Lodz, Poland
4
Department of Medicinal Chemistry, Medical University of Lublin, 4 Jaczewskiego Street, 20-090 Lublin, Poland
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2016, 17(9), 1560; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms17091560
Submission received: 7 July 2016 / Revised: 9 September 2016 / Accepted: 9 September 2016 / Published: 19 September 2016
(This article belongs to the Section Biochemistry)

Abstract

:
The interaction of polyamine conjugates with DNA double helix has been studied. Binding properties were examined by ethidium bromide (EtBr) displacement and DNA unwinding/topoisomerase I/II (Topo I/II) activity assays, as well as dsDNA thermal stability studies and circular dichroism spectroscopy. Genotoxicity of the compounds was estimated by a comet assay. It has been shown that only compound 2a can interact with dsDNA via an intercalative binding mode as it displaced EtBr from the dsDNA-dye complex, with Kapp = 4.26 × 106 M−1; caused an increase in melting temperature; changed the circular dichroism spectrum of dsDNA; converted relaxed plasmid DNA into a supercoiled molecule in the presence of Topo I and reduced the amount of short oligonucleotide fragments in the comet tail. Furthermore, preliminary theoretical study has shown that interaction of the discussed compounds with dsDNA depends on molecule linker length and charge distribution over terminal aromatic chromophores.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Due to the biological significance of DNA double helix in cell growth and proliferation, drugs that target DNA and its associated processes e.g., replication, transcription and translation inevitably dominate in chemotherapy regimens [1]. Lots of research projects are aimed at designing new entities capable of selectively interacting with the double stranded DNA (dsDNA) of tumor cells [2]. Among DNA recognizing small molecules, intercalators constitute a very important group of potential anticancer drugs [3]. They interact reversibly with DNA double helix by insertion of planar, aromatic chromophore between adjacent base pairs at the intercalation site which leads to topological changes in the double helix (unwinding, lengthening). Distorting DNA spatial conformation disrupts many DNA-protein interactions and, consequently, can cause cell death [4]. Representative monointercalators with antitumor activity e.g., doxorubicin, are still valuable drugs. Unfortunately, their therapeutic efficacy is often diminished by lack of selectivity, resulting in severe adverse reactions as well as the development of drug resistance [5]. In order to overcome these problems, bisintercalators have been designed [6]. They have unique structural features characterized by the presence of two planar polyaromatic or heteroaromatic systems joined by linker chains of different length and rigidity [7,8,9]. Such compounds can bind to dsDNA by bisintercalation which causes much more pronounced alterations in double helix structure due to simultaneous intercalation at two sites. Moreover, it results in higher dsDNA affinity and sequence specificity in comparison to monointercalating agents [10]. The complete structural requirements for bisintercalators to exhibit antitumor activity still remain not fully explained and vary depending on the characteristics of both terminal ring systems and the type of the linker chain [11]. The latter is very often a polyamine derivative [12]. Naturally occurring polyamines are vital in regulating cellular processes including proliferation, differentiation and apoptosis. The molecular mechanism of their action involves direct binding to DNA and modulation of DNA-protein interactions [13]. As organic multivalent cations, polyamines exert DNA-binding ability through reversible electrostatic interactions between the positive charges of polyamine and the negative charges of DNA [14]. It was elucidated that biogenic polyamines bind to major and minor grooves as well as phosphate groups, while guanine and backbone phosphate groups are major targets for synthetic polyamine analogues [15]. It is also known that polyamine binding to DNA depends on the distance between the positive charges on the polyamine relative to distance between the negative charges on DNA phosphate groups [16]. The regiochemical distribution of positive charge along the polyamines plays a major role in the condensation of DNA [17]. In addition, polyamine analogues with higher valency are more efficacious than spermine in provoking DNA condensation [18]. Moreover, direct measurement of free energy change involved in DNA condensation for different polyamines showed that the equilibrium free energy of the attractive component was always twice that of the repulsive component which suggested that DNA aggregation and condensation could spontaneously occur in the presence of multivalent polyamines [19,20].
The ability of polyamines and their analogues to promote conformational changes within DNA and its condensation to nanoparticles can facilitate the transport of oligonucleotides through the cell membrane and be helpful in developing simple carrier systems for gene delivery [17,21,22,23].
Rapidly dividing tumor cells require large amounts of polyamines. As a consequence, increased uptake of extracellular polyamines into tumor cells can be observed [24] and gives the opportunity to recognize a polyamine transport system as a chance for selective drug delivery [25]. Due to the above, polyamine analogues were designed. They were sufficiently similar in structure to the parent compound to be recognized by cancer cells as polyamine-like but unable to substitute their functionality, which more effectively induced growth arrest and apoptosis [26,27]. It has also been proposed that cytotoxic drugs acting through direct interaction with DNA can be covalently linked to polyamine vectors and targeted more selectively to cancer cells, see [16] for a review.
Our quest for new anticancer drugs is focused on symmetrical compounds with bicyclic terminal chromophores designed in agreement with the bisintercalators’ structural requirements. We decided to link chromophore rings by an aminoalkyl chain as this type of linker is positively charged at a physiological condition and can interact with negatively charged phosphate groups of DNA [19,23]. Therefore, such a DNA binding linker could enhance affinity of bis-chromophore molecules to DNA and promote the formation of an intercalation complex by placing flat pendant moieties in an optimal position for stacking interactions [28]. This concept was used earlier by several other authors who obtained bisintercalators with higher DNA binding constants when compared to corresponding monointercalators [3,29].
It has been shown that dimeric molecules with chromone (1b) and quinoline (2a) scaffolds (Figure 1) are promising entities due to their drug-like properties [30] and antiproliferative activity toward highly aggressive melanoma cell line A375, prostate cancer cell lines PC-3, DU-145 and breast cancer cell line MCF-7. The IC50 values for the most active derivative 2a were in the range of 16.8 to 26.6 µM. In addition, 2a induced programed cell death in prostate and breast cancer cell lines by intrinsic pathway, which involved depolarization of mitochondria together with disruption of its membrane [31,32,33]. Our studies revealed that anticancer effectiveness of this group of compounds strongly depends on cancer cell line type [31,32,33] but these differences may also have their origin in the way the compounds bind to double helix. Therefore, expanding our knowledge about the possible interaction of these compounds with dsDNA or its associated targets such as topoisomerases is of equal importance. In addition, it is an indispensable part of the rational drug discovery process which will allow to obtain new effective substances for cancer therapy.
Based on previous data, it can be postulated that the biological activity of polyamine derivatives with bicyclic chromophores depends on the differences in their spatial structure [31,32,33]. Due to the fact that these compounds have been designed as potential intercalators, further studies are focused on the explanation of the influence of both molecule subunits, namely terminal aromatic rings, and the linker on the dsDNA binding properties. Therefore, four symmetrical compounds with different combinations of heteroaliphatic linker and terminal bicyclic systems have been chosen 1a, 1b, 2a, 2b (Figure 1). The following experimental methods [34], useful in distinguishing the binding mode of molecular ligands, i.e.,: ethidium bromide (EtBr) displacement and DNA unwinding/topoisomerase I/II (Topo I/II) activity assays as well as the analysis of dsDNA thermal stability (Tm-melting temperature) and circular dichroism (CD) spectroscopy have been performed. Moreover, the genotoxicity of examined polyamine conjugates was evaluated by the comet assay.

2. Results

2.1. Ethidium Bromide Displacement Assay

Due to the fact that tested compounds contain planar rings in their structures, it is possible that they may interact with DNA by the formation of an intercalation complex [35]. To check this possibility, a DNA intercalation assay was performed, using 9-aminoacridine (9AA) as a reference intercalator (see Figure S2). As shown in Figure 2, compounds 1a, 1b, 2a, 2b caused the reduction of EtBr/DNA complex fluorescence. This result indicates that all tested compounds compete with EtBr for binding sites and displace this dye from the DNA-drug complex.
Compounds containing quinoline rings 2a and 2b were found to be more potent DNA binders than their analogues 1a and 1b with chromone moieties. C50 values for 2a and 2b were 2.81 ± 0.53 µM and 11.10 ± 0.36 µM, respectively. C50 values for 1a and 1b were found as follows: 52.9 ± 3.18 µM and 104.67 ± 5.01 µM. Apparent DNA binding constants for 2a and 2b were higher by approximately one order of magnitude when compared with that of 1a and 1b (Table 1). Moreover, DNA binding parameters of tested compounds depend, not only, on the ring structure but also on the structure of a linker. In each pair of analogues, higher affinity to dsDNA (lower C50 and higher Kapp) was found for compounds possessing less flexible linker (Table 1). The most potent dsDNA binder, among all tested compounds, was 2a which was the only one compound exhibiting a higher affinity to double helix, than the reference compound 9AA.

2.2. Thermal Melting Studies

Compounds with DNA binding properties may stabilize the DNA duplex and increase oligonucleotide melting temperature (Tm), due to the complementary strands separation prohibition [37]. Examined compounds 1a, 1b, 2a, 2b were tested at a concentration of 15 μM after oligonucleotide strands hybridization (Table 2). Due to the fact that compound 2a showed higher thermal stability than the reference ds–nucleotide, it can be concluded that 2a induces some stabilization effects on the DNA double helix. Other examined compounds do not affect the thermal stability of DNA (Table 2).

2.3. DNA Unwinding Assay

Topo I relaxes supercoiled plasmid by causing single-strand breaks and religation. However, the presence of an intercalative agent induces additional negative supercoils and compensatory positive superhelical twists in circular DNA. It has been reported, that relaxed plasmid treated with Topo I and intercalative agent is converted to negatively supercoiled [38,39].
DsDNA binding properties of compounds 1a, 1b, 2a, 2b are presented in Figure 3A–D. Supercoiled DNA is fully relaxed in the presence of Topo I and in the absence of the compound. It has been observed that 2a, at the concentration >10 µM in the presence of Topo I, converted relaxed plasmid to supercoiled molecule, whereas the relaxation process has been still observed in the presence of compounds 1a, 1b and 2b even in a 30 µM drug concentration.

2.4. Topoisomerase I Activity Assay

To further elucidate the mechanism of 2a interaction with dsDNA, its influence on the Topo I activity was evaluated when tested at a constant concentration of 15 µM. As can be seen in Figure 4, supercoiled DNA is fully relaxed in the presence of Topo I and in the absence of the examined compound. It has been observed that 2a at the concentration of 15 µM did not inhibit the overall activity of Topo I as relaxed plasmid was converted to negatively supercoiled after 30 min of incubation time.

2.5. Topoisomerase II DNA Cleavage Assay

Topoisomerase II (Topo II) is an enzyme that catalyzes relaxation of supercoiled DNA by cutting both strands of a dsDNA molecule, passing one DNA helix through another, and resealing the cut in a process utilizing ATP [40]. Topo II is the target for several potent anticancer drugs e.g., etoposide (see Figure S2) that generate high levels of enzyme-DNA cleavage complexes [41]. Enhanced cleavage complex formation results from the ability of etoposide to inhibit DNA religation and stimulate enzyme-linked DNA breaks which induce cell death pathway [42]. To determine whether 2a enhances the Topo II-mediated DNA cleavage, the effect on DNA scission mediated by aforementioned enzyme was examined. As can be seen in Figure 5, compound 2a did not target Topo II catalytic activity as enzyme-mediated DNA strand breaks induced by 2a was not observed.

2.6. Comet Assay

Comet assay was conducted in order to determine the level of DNA damage after incubation with tested compounds. Figure 6A–D shows DNA damage in leukemia cells (MOLT-4) treated with 1a, 1b, 2a, 2b.
The results of the comet assay indicated that the level of DNA damage, after H2O2 treatment at a concentration of 15 μM was higher (p < 0.001) than in control without damaging agent. Moreover, compounds 1a, 1b, generated DNA damage in the absence of H2O2 in a concentration-dependent manner. The increase of DNA damage generated by 2a and 2b at a concentration of 5, 10, 15 µM, in the absence of pre-incubation with H2O2, was not observed (the increase was not statistically significant) (Figure 6C,D). However, in the presence of 2a (at a concentration of 15 µM) after prior incubation with H2O2, the decrease of DNA damage was denoted (Figure 6C, Figure S3). Therefore, it can be postulated that 2a with 1,4-bis(3-aminopropyl)piperazine as the linker may reduce considerably the effectiveness of the DNA migration, after lesion induction, due to insertion of molecules between stacked DNA base pairs. Contrary to that, compound 2b without piperazine moiety in the linker, under the same experimental condition, caused an increase in the percentage of short DNA fragments in the comet tail (Figure 6D). The same pattern of DNA lesion in the comet tail was denoted for compounds 1a and 1b (Figure 6A,B).

2.7. Circular Dichroism Spectroscopy

The CD spectroscopy is a useful method to assess changes in DNA conformation during ligand-DNA interactions. Calf thymus DNA (ct-DNA) exhibits two conservative CD bands, a positive band at 277 nm due to π–π base stacking and a negative band at 245 nm due to right handed helicity which is characteristic of DNA in the right-handed B form [43,44]. These bands are sensitive towards the binding of molecules; hence CD spectroscopy is useful in monitoring the conformational variations of DNA in the presence of the studied compound [45]. The CD spectra of the ct-DNA and ct-DNA/2a mixture in the Ultraviolet (UV) region were recorded. As shown in Figure 7, the positive (276 nm) and negative (245 nm) bands were reduced significantly in intensity, suggesting that compound 2a induced disturbance on DNA base stacking and DNA right-handed helicity, mainly due to its aromatic planarity. The decreases in the intensities of both positive and negative bands can usually be observed in the intercalative binding of small molecules to DNA [46]. The characteristics of the B-DNA form CD spectrum is still conserved and the arrangement of the DNA bases is altered.
Figure 8 shows the CD spectra of ds-oligonucleotide before and after the addition of compound 2a. Changes include the reduction in the negative value at 248 nm, the decrement in the peak at 270 nm, and a slight blue shift in ON2 band at 270 nm. Similarly to changes in CD spectra of ct-DNA, we can assume that the addition of 2a caused a disturbance to π–π base stacking and the right-handed helicity of double stranded oligonucleotide. Comparison between the CD spectra of ON1 and ON2 mixtures with added 2a shows that the intercalation effect occurred regardless of whether a ligand was added before or after hybridization of oligonucleotides.

3. Discussion

Our studies on polyamine conjugates with bicyclic terminal chromophores revealed that the most promising molecules are quinoline and chromone derivatives, exhibiting drug-like properties [30]. The representative compounds were active against melanoma cell line A375, prostate cancer cell lines PC-3, DU-145 and breast cancer cell line MCF-7. IC50 values for the most active derivative 2a were in the range of 16.8 to 26.6 µM depending on cancer cell line. In addition, 2a induced programed cell death in prostate and breast cancer cell lines by an intrinsic pathway, which involved depolarization of mitochondria together with disruption of its membrane [31,32,33]. The design of effective anticancer drugs requires not only the biological activity assessment but also an understanding of the mechanisms involved in the process of eliminating cancer cells. Discussed compounds were intended to act as bisintercalators, therefore we decided to perform experiments evaluating their ability to interact with double stranded DNA. From a variety of techniques, which are used to establish dsDNA binding properties of small molecules [34], EtBr displacement assay, thermal stability studies, DNA unwinding/topo I/II activity assays and circular dichroism have been chosen. Preliminary studies using the EtBr displacement assay indicated that polyamine conjugates bind to DNA with apparent binding constants in the range of 4.26 × 106 M−1 to 0.11 × 106 M−1 (Table 1). The fact that examined compounds have the ability to displace EtBr from DNA-dye complex (Figure 2) suggests that they may intercalate into double helix [35]. Possibly, the most favourable structure for intercalation into DNA is 2a, as this compound exhibited the highest DNA binding parameters exceeding well-known intercalator 9-aminoacridine (9AA). It is not clear whether other tested compounds are able to form intercalative complex with dsDNA, as their binding parameters were significantly lower than that assigned for 2a (Table 1). Moreover, it is possible that the reduction of fluorescence of the EtBr-DNA complex was caused by aminoalkyl linkers binding to DNA instead of the intercalation process. Such an effect of polyamines was reported by Vijayanathan et al. [17] who also used a EtBr displacement assay to measure the affinity of several polyamines to DNA. It is known that polyamines which are not intercalating compounds, induce changes in DNA double helix structure leading to DNA condensation and aggregation [19,23]. Structural changes accompanying these processes seem to destabilize the intercalation complex of EtBr with DNA. As a consequence, EtBr displacement assay is not sufficient to prove the intercalative binding of tested compounds to DNA. Therefore, dsDNA melting studies and topoisomerase assays were used to more definitively establish the nature of interactions between discussed polyamine conjugates and dsDNA. The analysis of Tm values has shown that only compound 2a increased dsDNA stability by 7 °C in comparison to the control. For other discussed compounds (1a, 1b, 2b) the changes of melting temperatures were negligible (Table 2). It is important to mention, that for reference compound 9AA, Tm = 78 °C was denoted. Based on the above data and principal rules governed to the intercalation process, it can be postulated that only compound 2a can be recognized as a potential intercalator. These findings were confirmed by a DNA unwinding assay in which only compound 2a, at the concentration >10 µM in the presence of Topo I, converted relaxed plasmid to negatively supercoiled DNA molecule (Figure 3C), whereas the relaxation process has still been observed in the presence of compounds 1a, 1b and 2b even in 30 µM drug concentration (Figure 3A,B,D). This result has been supported by a Topo I activity assay (Figure 4), which revealed that 2a did not inhibit the catalytic activity of Topo I. Contrary to that, in the absence of 9AA or 2a the relaxation of supercoiled DNA by Topo I is not disturbed. As far as the influence on Topo II activity is concerned, 2a did not induce an increase in Topo II-mediated DNA cleavage (Figure 5). Circular dichroism analysis has confirmed the intercalation of compound 2a to ct-DNA due to a reduction of the CD spectrum intensity simultaneously in the two areas at 245 and 277 nm. CD analysis of 2a intercalation to ds-oligonucleotide gave similar results.
Due to this fact, that the described results have been obtained for synthetic or isolated ds-oligonucleotide, we have decided to perform the comet assay experiment on leukemia cell line (MOLT-4) to check the binding ability of discussed compounds to genome. As shown in Figure 6, only compound 2a considerably reduced the effectiveness of the DNA migration, after lesion induction, probably due to the insertion of molecules between stacked DNA base pairs. For other discussed compounds, the percentage of DNA damage induced by H2O2 was at the same concentration level. The difference between 2a and 1a, 1b, 2b can be explained as the result of bisintercalative binding mode of 2a which “stapled” damaged DNA fragments (“zipper like effect”). To elucidate this phenomenon, the simply 3D structures optimization has been performed (Density functional theory (DFT), B3LYP/6-31G in gaseous phase). Obtained results showed that, in the case of molecules 1b and 2b with 3,3′-diamino-N-methyldipropylamine as the linker, the distance between terminal nitrogen atoms N1 and N2 (see Supplementary Materials Figure S1) was shorter than in 1a and 2a derivatives with piperazine as the central subunit (see Table S1, Figure S1). Moreover, the presence of a N-CH3 group in the center of molecules 1b, 2b forced their structure linearization. In contrast, replacing this group by a piperazine ring (1a, 2a) bended the molecules’ spatial geometry. The interaction of 2a with dsDNA may be additionally enhanced by the electrostatic interaction between positively charged piperazine nitrogen atoms and DNA backbone phosphate group. Finally, to determine the charge distribution, natural population analyses (NPA) with natural bond order (NBO) were performed using the B3LYP functional and 6-31G basis set. As shown in Table S1, the difference in charge distribution over aromatic terminal rings was denoted for compounds 2a, 2b, (−0.190/0.600 and −0.169/0.618, respectively), while for molecules, 1a and 1b almost the same negative value is retained (−0.647/−0.634 and −0.642/−0.637, respectively).

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Examined Compounds

Compounds 1a, 1b, 2a and 2b used in this study were selected from previously synthesized and in vitro evaluated polyamine derivatives on the basis of their diverse biological activity and proper chemical structure. Their synthesis and analytical data were described earlier [31,32]. Compound 1a was dissolved in water whereas compounds 1b, 2a, 2b were dissolved in dimethyl sulfoxide DMSO (final concentration was 0.1% in all samples).

4.2. Ethidium Bromide Displacement Assay

To check whether tested compounds may interact with DNA, an EtBr displacement assay was carried out according to the method described by Cain et al. [35]. A 3 mL buffer containing 2 mM Hepes, 0.01 mM EDTA, 9.4 mM NaCl 1.26 µM EtBr, pH 7.0 was mixed in a fluorescence cuvette with 1 µL of 1 mg/mL solution of calf thymus DNA (Worthington, Lakewood, NJ, USA). The cuvette was placed in a fluorescence spectrophotometer (Perkin-Elmer LS55, Waltham, MA, USA). Then 1 µL portions of compound solutions (20 mM in DMSO) were added step by step and after thorough mixing the intensity fluorescence was read (Ex 546 nm, Em 595 nm). This method is based on the competition of an added compound with EtBr for DNA intercalation sites. The fluorescence intensity of EtBr increases upon DNA binding. The addition of a compound displacing intercalated EtBr leads to quenching the fluorescence caused by the EtBr/DNA complex. The percent of fluorescence decrease was plotted against the concentration (µM) of each compound and C50 value of each was determined. C50 is defined as the concentration of the added compound required to reduce the fluorescence of the EtBr/DNA complex to 50%. C50 values were used to calculate apparent binding constants (Kapp) of tested compounds to DNA [36].

4.3. Thermal Melting Studies

In this study the following oligonucleotides:
  • 1: 5′-AAATTAATATGTATTGTATATAAATTATT-3′
  • 2: 3′-TTTAATTATACATAACATATATTTAATAA-5′
were employed. Oligonucleotides were purchased as HPLC-purified compounds from the Bioorganic Chemistry Department, Polish Academy of Science, Lodz, Poland (Geneworld synthesizer, K&A Laborgeraete GbR, Schaafheim, Germany) using nucleotide phosphoroamidites synthons as substrates (ChemGenes Corporation, Wilmington, MA, USA).
The hybridization was carried out in a reaction volume of 1 mL containing single stranded oligonucleotide 1 and 2, 0.1 M NaCl, 0.01 M MgCl2, by heating to 90 °C for 10 min followed by slow cooling to room temperature in the presence or absence of different drug concentrations. In this study, the following compounds were employed: 1ab, 2ab (15 µM), DMSO control (final concentration was 0.1%) and 9-Aminoacridine hydrochloride hydrate (9AA) (Sigma-Aldrich, Saint Louis, MO, USA) (100 µM) as a positive control. The DNA melting point was determined spectrophotometrically on Cary 1.3E UV-Vis spectrophotometer (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA) by using a computer equipped with Cary WinUV software (Agilent Technologies: Santa Clara, CA, USA). The absorbance changes at 260 nm was measured every minute in the range of 21 °C to 80 °C with an increment of 1 °C/min and 1 min as equilibration time. Tm values were obtained from the midpoint of the first-derivative plots. Studies were repeated two times [37].

4.4. DNA Unwinding Assay

4.4.1. Strains and Media

Escherichia coli DH5α cells with the plasmid pENTR4 were supplied from the Pharmaceutical Biotechnology Department, Medical University of Lodz. A Luria Broth (LB) medium (10 g tryptone, 5 g yeast extract, 2 g glucose and 10 g NaCl per liter of medium) was used for the growth of all cultures.

4.4.2. Bacterial Culture and Plasmid Isolation

Agar plate supplemented with kanamycin (30 μg/mL) was inoculated with E. coli DH5α containing pENTR4 plasmid and incubated overnight, at 37 °C. The bacterial colonies were resuspended and subsequently, 250 mL of an LB medium supplemented with kanamycin (30 μg/mL) was inoculated with the overnight culture equivalent to the 0.5 McFarland. The culture was incubated for 13 h at 37 °C with vigorous shaking (150 rpm). Plasmid was isolated from bacteria using a Plasmid Mini DNA purification system (A & A Biotechnology, Gdynia, Poland) as described by the manufacturer. Then, the supercoiled form was isolated from agarose gel using a Gel-Out Kit (A & A Biotechnology, Gdynia, Poland) as described by the manufacturer.
DNA unwinding assay was carried out according to the method described by Sappal et al. [39] with a few modifications. Supercoiled pENTR4 DNA (0.2 μg) was a substrate for the reaction. Bacterial Topo I was expressed in an Escherichia coli strain containing the cloned topA gene (New England Biolabs, Ipswich, MA, USA). Plasmid was incubated with 2 units of Topo I in reaction to the volume of 20 μL (10 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.5), 175 mM KCl, 5 mM MgCl2, 0.1 mM EDTA and 2.5% glycerol) in the presence of varying concentrations of the drug under study: 1a (0.5–30 µM), 1b (0.5–30 µM), 2a (0.5–30 µM), 2b (0.5–30 µM), DMSO control (final concentration was 0.1% in all samples) and 9AA (100 µM) as a positive control. Reactions were started after the addition of the enzyme and stopped after 60 min at 37 °C by extracting the plasmid DNA with phenol-chloroform (v/v) followed by adding a stop solution (0.77% SDS, 0.77 mM EDTA (pH 8.0). Samples were then added to an electrophoresis dye mixture (Polgen, Lodz, Poland), loaded onto 1% agarose gel running 1.5–2 V/cm in a TAE buffer (40 mM Tris-acetate, pH 8.5 and 10 mM EDTA). The gels were stained with EtBr 0.5 μg/mL, observed under UV light (at 260 nm) and photographed using a Gel Doc system (Syngene, Cambridge, UK).

4.5. Topoisomerase I Activity Assay

Double stranded, closed circular pBR322 plasmid originated from Thermo Fisher Scientific (Waltham, MA, USA).
Topoisomerase I activity assay was carried out according to the method described by Sappal et al. [39] with a few modifications. Supercoiled pBR322 DNA plasmid was incubated with six units of Topo I in a reaction volume of 20 µL (50 mM Potassium Acetate, 20 mM Tris-acetate, 10 mM Magnesium Acetate, 100 μg/mL BSA, pH 7.9) in the presence of 2a (15 µM) and 9AA (100 µM) as a positive control. The reactions were started after the addition of the enzyme and stopped up to 30 min (five time points: 1, 5, 10, 15 and 30 min) at 37 °C by extracting the plasmid DNA with phenol–chloroform (v/v) following by adding stop solution (0.77% SDS, 0.77 mM EDTA, pH 8.0). Samples were then added to an electrophoresis dye mixture (Polgen, Lodz, Poland), loaded onto 1% agarose gel running 1.5–2 V/cm in a TAE buffer (40 mM Tris-acetate, pH 8.5, and 10 mM EDTA). The gels were stained with EtBr 0.5 µg/mL, observed at UV light (260 nm) and photographed using a Gel Doc system (Syngene).

4.6. Topoisomerase II DNA Cleavage Assay

A topoisomerase II DNA cleavage reaction was carried out according to the method described by Sappal et al. [39] with a few modifications. Supercoiled pBR322 DNA was incubated with four units of Topo II in a reaction volume of 20 µL (35 mM Tris-HCl, 24 mM KCl, 4 mM MgCl2, 2 mM DTT, 1.75 mM ATP, 5 mM spermidine, 0.1 mg/mL BSA, 6.5% glycerol, pH 7.5) in the presence of 2a (5–30 µM) and etoposide (50 µM) as a positive control. The mixture was incubated for 15 min at 37 °C. After relative time has finished, the addition of 2 µL of 5% SDS and 1 µL of 375 mM EDTA, pH 8.0 followed by proteinase K treatment (digestion of proteinase K was performed in the presence of 2 µL of 0.8 mg/mL of protein and heated the mixture to 45 °C for 30 min) stopped the enzyme reaction. Samples were then added to an electrophoresis dye mixture (Polgen, Lodz, Poland), and loaded onto 1% agarose gel running 1.5–2 V/cm in a TAE buffer (40 mM Tris-acetate, pH 8.5, and 10 mM EDTA). The gels were stained with ethidium bromide 0.5 µg/mL, observed under UV light and photographed using a Gel Doc system (Syngene).

4.7. Comet Assay

MOLT-4 (acute lymphoblastic leukemia) cells were cultured in an RPMI-1640 medium supplemented with antibiotics (penicillin, streptomycin) and 10% fetal calf serum, in a 5% CO2-95% air atmosphere and at a temperature of 37 °C [47].
A comet assay was performed as described by Singh et al. [48] with a few modifications. To assess DNA damage, MOLT-4 cells were incubated at different concentration (5, 10, 15 µM) of the following compounds: 1a, 1b, 2a and 2b in the absence or presence of prior incubation with hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) to a final concentration of 15 µM (10 min on ice). A sample without compounds and a sample with DMSO (0.1%) were employed as a negative control, and a sample with H2O2 alone was employed as a positive control.
The cell suspensions (2 × 105 cells) were embedded in 40 µL of 1% low melting point agarose and spread on a slide precoated with a 1% normal melting point agarose. Agarose cell suspensions were allowed to solidify at 4 °C and the slides were transferred to a lysis solution (2.5 M NaCl, 0.1 M EDTA, 10 mM Tris and 1% Triton X-100, pH 10) at 4 °C for 60 min, then slides were placed in an electrophoresis chamber exposed to an alkaline buffer (0.3 M NaOH and 1 mM EDTA, pH 13) for 20 min by unwinding of DNA. Then, electrophoresis was performed for 20 min at 21 V/30 mA and electrophoresis slides were neutralized and stained with 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI).
The stained nuclei were visualized by a fluorescent microscope under 40× magnification. Images of comets for analysis were obtained using a camera conjugated to a fluorescent microscope (Delta Optical, Minsk Mazowiecki, Poland). Slides were scored using an image analysis system, Casp (J. Kochanowski University, Kielce, Poland). Measurements were made for 50 cells per slide and the percent of DNA in comet tail was used as a quantitative measure of the DNA damage.
All the values in this study were expressed as mean ± S.E.M. Differences between mean values were tested using the t-test. p-value less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant. The data were analyzed using STATISTICA 6.0 software (Statsoft, Tulsa, OK, USA).

4.8. Circular Dichroism Spectroscopy

Circular dichroism measurements were carried out on a Jasco J-815 spectropolarimeter under the following conditions: temperature 37 °C, rectangular 1 cm quartz cell, range 230–330 nm, resolution 0.2 nm, scan speed 50 nm/min.
The calf thymus DNA solution in a concentration of 100 µM was prepared in a TBS buffer containing 50 mM Tris-HCl, 150 mM NaCl, pH 7.4. The solution of ct-DNA gave a ratio of UV absorbance at 260 and 280 nm of 1.87, indicating that the DNA was free of protein contamination. The DNA concentration was determined by the UV absorbance at 260 nm using ε = 6600 M−1·cm−1. Ct-DNA was stabilized at 37 °C for 1 h and CD spectrum was measured. Next, 10 μL of 2a solution (in DMSO-TBS 1:9 v/v) was added giving a molar concentration ratio of 1:10 with respect to ct-DNA. The solution was incubated in the measuring cell for 1 h at 37 °C and then the CD spectrum was obtained. The CD spectra of buffer and 2a compound were checked for intrinsic CD effect, giving negative results.
The following oligonucleotides: 5′-AAATTAATATGTATTGTATATAAATTATT-3′ and 3′-TTTAATTATACATAACATATATTTAATAA-5′ were mixed in equimolar proportions in a TBS buffer, pH 7.4, containing 1 mM EDTA. Portions of 2.5 mL of the mixture were transferred to two quartz cuvettes (ON1 and ON2). An amount of 2.5 μL of the 2a solution was added to an ON1 cuvette (to give a molar concentration ratio of 1:1 with respect to ds-oligonucleotide), then both were sealed and heated at 95 °C for 5 min. Subsequently, they were annealed by slowly cooling to 37 °C. Preliminary experiments showed that after incubation of oligonucleotides, the UV absorption at 260 nm decreased by 30%, which indicated a double-strand formation. Molar concentration of double-stranded oligonucleotide (2.5 µM) was determined using OligoCalc: Oligonucleotide Properties Calculator [49]. After stabilization in 37 °C, CD spectra of both solutions were measured. Afterwards, 2.5 μL of 2a solution was added to a cuvette containing pure ds-oligonucleotide (ON2). The mixture was incubated in 37 °C for 1 h and CD spectrum was obtained.

4.9. Computational Methodology

The molecular geometries of neutral 1ab, 2ab in the gaseous phase were initially optimized by molecular mechanics using the universal force fields [50]. All subsequent calculations were performed by the density functional theory (DFT) using the generalized gradient approximation (GGA) exchange-correction functional, in which the B3LYP functional was implemented (Becke’s three-parameter hybrid HF/DFT exchange functional, and the Lee-Yang-Parr correlation functional) [51,52]. For all calculations, the 6-31G basis set was used [53]. For characterisation of the stationary point of all the investigated molecules, the harmonic vibration was calculated at the B3LYP/6-31G level, no imaginary frequencies have been found. To determine the charge distribution, natural population analyses (NPA) with natural bond order (NBO) were performed using the B3LYP functional and 6-31G basis set. The calculations of all the structures were achieved with Gaussian 09, Revision D.01 [54].

5. Conclusions

The experimental findings presented above clearly indicate that only compound 2a has the ability to interact with a double helix via intercalative binding mode. It displaced EtBr from a DNA-dye complex and exhibited the highest DNA binding parameters, exceeding even well-known intercalator 9-aminoacridine (9AA). In addition, the analysis of Tm values has shown that only compound 2a increased dsDNA stability by 7 °C in comparison to the control. For other discussed compounds (1a, 1b, 2b) the changes of melting temperatures were not statistically significant.
The proposed DNA unwinding assay has shown that only compound 2a, at the concentration >10 µM in the presence of Topo I, converted relaxed plasmid to a negatively supercoiled molecule. Moreover, 2a did not inhibit the overall activity of Topo I and did not stimulate DNA cleavage mediated by Topo II.
Circular dichroism spectroscopy confirmed the intercalation of compound 2a into ct-DNA and selected ds-oligonucleotide.
In the comet assay, compound 2a considerably reduced the effectiveness of the DNA migration, after lesion induction, which can be explained as the result of the bisintercalative binding mode of 2a which “stapled” damaged DNA fragments (“zipper like effect”). Preliminary theoretical study has shown that interaction of the discussed molecules with dsDNA depends on molecule linker length and charge distribution over terminal aromatic chromophores.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary materials can be found at www.mdpi.com/1422-0067/17/9/1560/s1.

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by the Medical University of Lodz, Poland, Research Programme No. 502-03/3-011-03/502-34-036, 503/3-045-02/503-31-002, 503/2-159-01/503-21-002 and in part by PLGrid Infrastructure (Prometheusa, ACC Cyfronet AGH). Special thanks for Marcin Cieslak CBMM PAN Lodz, Poland for leukemia cells.

Author Contributions

Marta Szumilak designed the current study, worked on discussion and wrote the paper. Marta Szumilak and Malgorzata Strek performed the EtBr displacement assay. Anna Merecz performed thermal melting studies, DNA unwinding assay, topoisomerase I/II activity assays, and comet assay. Andrzej Stanczak worked on manuscript. Tadeusz W. Inglot performed CD analysis. Boleslaw T. Karwowski performed theoretical study. All authors reviewed the manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Abbreviations

9AA9-aminoacridine
B3LYPBecke-Lee-Yang_Parr hybrid method
BSABovine Serum Albumin
C50the concentration of added compound required to reduce the fluorescence of the DNA/EtBr complex to 50%
DAPI4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole
DFTdensity functional theory
DMSOdimethyl sulfoxide
dsDNAdouble stranded Deoxyribonucleic acid
DTTDithiothreitol
ct-DNACalf thymus DNA
EDTAEthylenediaminetetraacetic acid (as disodium salt)
EtBrEthidium Bromide
GGAgeneralized gradient approximation
Kappapparent binding constant of a compound
NBOnatural bond order
NPAnatural population analyses
Tmmelting temperature
Topo Itopoisomerase I
TrisTris(hydroxymethyl)aminomethane
TBSTris-buffered saline

References

  1. Cheung-Ong, K.; Giaever, G.; Nislow, C. DNA-damaging agents in cancer chemotherapy: Serendipity and chemical biology. Chem. Biol. 2013, 20, 648–659. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Hurley, L.H. DNA and its associated processes as targets for cancer therapy. Nat. Rev. Cancer 2002, 2, 188–200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Brana, M.F.; Cacho, M.; Gradillas, A.; de Pascual-Teresa, B.; Ramos, A. Intercalators as anticancer drugs. Curr. Pharm. Des. 2001, 7, 1745–1780. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Markovits, J.; Pommier, Y.; Mattern, M.R.; Esnault, C.; Roques, B.P.; Le Pecq, J.B.; Kohn, K.W. Effects of the bifunctional antitumor intercalator ditercalinium on DNA in mouse leukemia L1210 cells and DNA topoisomerase II. Cancer Res. 1986, 46, 5821–5826. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  5. Zhang, G.S.; Fang, L.Y.; Zhu, L.Z.; Sun, D.X.; Wang, P.G. Syntheses and biological activity of bisdaunorubicins. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2006, 14, 426–434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Chaires, J.B.; Leng, F.F.; Przewloka, T.; Fokt, I.; Ling, Y.H.; PerezSoler, R.; Priebe, W. Structure-based design of a new bisintercalating anthracycline antibiotic. J. Med. Chem. 1997, 40, 261–266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Martinez, R.; Chacon-Garcia, L. The search of DNA-intercalators as antitumoral drugs: What worked and what did not work. Curr. Med. Chem. 2005, 12, 127–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Romerdahl, C.A.; Brana, M.F. Bis-Naphthalimides. In Cancer Therapeutics: Experimental and Clinical Agents; Teicher, B.A., Ed.; Humana Press: New York, NY, USA, 1997; Chapter 7; pp. 215–226. [Google Scholar]
  9. Le Pecq, J.B.; Le Bret, M.; Barbet, J.; Roques, B. DNA polyintercalating drugs: DNA binding of diacridine derivatives. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1975, 72, 2915–2919. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Gaugain, B.; Barbet, J.; Capelle, N.; Roques, B.P.; Le Pecq, J.B.; Lebret, M. DNA bifunctional intercalators. 2. Fluorescence properties and DNA binding interaction of an ethidium homodimer and an acridine ethidium heterodimer. Biochemistry 1978, 17, 5078–5088. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Cholody, W.M.; Hernandez, L.; Hassner, L.; Scudiero, D.A.; Djurickovic, D.B.; Michejda, C.J. Bisimidazoacridones and related-compounds—New antineoplastic agents with high selectivity against colon tumors. J. Med. Chem. 1995, 38, 3043–3052. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Stanczak, A.; Szumilak, M. Bisinterkalatory jako potencjalne leki przeciwnowotworowe. Wiad. Chem. 2009, 63, 847–875. [Google Scholar]
  13. Thomas, T.; Thomas, T.J. Polyamines in cell growth and cell death: Molecular mechanisms and therapeutic applications. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 2001, 58, 244–258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Deng, H.; Bloomfield, V.A.; Benevides, J.M.; Thomas, G.J. Structural basis of polyamine-DNA recognition: Spermidine and spermine interactions with genomic B-DNAs of different GC content probed by Raman spectroscopy. Nucleic Acids Res. 2000, 28, 3379–3385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. N’Soukpoe-Kossi, C.N.; Ouameur, A.A.; Thomas, T.; Shirahata, A.; Thomas, T.J.; Tajmir-Riahi, H.A. DNA interaction with antitumor polyamine analogues: A comparison with biogenic polyamines. Biomacromolecules 2008, 9, 2712–2718. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Palmer, A.J.; Wallace, H.M. The polyamine transport system as a target for anticancer drug development. Amino Acids 2010, 38, 415–422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Vijayanathan, V.; Thomas, T.; Shirahata, A.; Thomas, T.J. DNA condensation by polyamines: A laser light scattering study of structural effects. Biochemistry 2001, 40, 13644–13651. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Vijayanathan, V.; Thomas, T.; Antony, T.; Shirahata, A.; Thomas, T.J. Formation of DNA nanoparticles in the presence of novel polyamine analogues: A laser light scattering and atomic force microscopic study. Nucleic Acids Res. 2004, 32, 127–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Thomas, T.J.; Tajmir-Riahi, H.A.; Thomas, T. Polyamine-DNA interactions and development of gene delivery vehicles. Amino Acids 2016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Todd, B.A.; Parsegian, V.A.; Shirahata, A.; Thomas, T.J.; Rau, D.C. Attractive forces between cation condensed DNA double helices. Biophys. J. 2008, 94, 4775–4782. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Vijayanathan, V.; Thomas, T.; Thomas, T.J. DNA nanoparticles and development of DNA delivery vehicles for gene therapy. Biochemistry 2002, 41, 14085–14094. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Vijayanathan, V.; Lyall, J.; Thomas, T.; Shirahata, A.; Thomas, T.J. Ionic, structural, and temperature effects on dna nanoparticles formed by natural and synthetic polyamines. Biomacromolecules 2005, 6, 1097–1103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Vijayanathan, V.; Agostinelli, E.; Thomas, T.; Thomas, T.J. Innovative approaches to the use of polyamines for DNA nanoparticle preparation for gene therapy. Amino Acids 2014, 46, 499–509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Agostinelli, E.; Vianello, F.; Magliulo, G.; Thomas, T.; Thomas, T.J. Nanoparticle strategies for cancer therapeutics: Nucleic acids, polyamines, bovine serum amine oxidase and iron oxide nanoparticles (review). Int. J. Oncol. 2015, 46, 5–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Cullis, P.M.; Green, R.E.; Merson-Davies, L.; Travis, N. Probing the mechanism of transport and compartmentalisation of polyamines in mammalian cells. Chem. Biol. 1999, 6, 717–729. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Wallace, H.M.; Fraser, A.V.; Hughes, A. A perspective of polyamine metabolism. Biochem. J. 2003, 376, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Wallace, H.M.; Niiranen, K. Polyamine analogues—An update. Amino Acids 2007, 33, 261–265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Christensen, U.B.; Wamberg, M.; El-Essawy, F.A.G.; Ismail, A.E.H.; Nielsen, C.B.; Filichev, V.V.; Jessen, C.H.; Petersen, M.; Pedersen, E.B. Intercalating nucleic acids: The influence of linker length and intercalator type on their duplex stabilities. Nucleoside Nucleotides Nucleic 2004, 23, 207–225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Ferguson, L.R.; Denny, W.A. Genotoxicity of non-covalent interactions: DNA intercalators. Mutat. Res. 2007, 623, 14–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Szumilak, M.; Lewgowd, W.; Stanczak, A. In silico ADME studies of polyamine conjugates as potential anticancer drugs. Acta Pol. Pharm. 2016, 73, 717–723. [Google Scholar]
  31. Szulawska-Mroczek, A.; Szumilak, M.; Szczesio, M.; Olczak, A.; Nazarski, R.B.; Lewgowd, W.; Czyz, M.; Stanczak, A. Synthesis and biological evaluation of new bischromone derivatives with antiproliferative activity. Arch. Pharm. 2013, 346, 34–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Szumilak, M.; Szulawska-Mroczek, A.; Koprowska, K.; Stasiak, M.; Lewgowd, W.; Stanczak, A.; Czyz, M. Synthesis and in vitro biological evaluation of new polyamine conjugates as potential anticancer drugs. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2010, 45, 5744–5751. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Szumilak, M.; Galdyszynska, M.; Dominska, K.; Stanczak, A.; Piastowska-Ciesielska, A. Antitumor activity of polyamine conjugates in human prostate and breast cancer. Acta Biochim. Pol. 2016, in press. [Google Scholar]
  34. Palchaudhuri, R.; Hergenrother, P.J. DNA as a target for anticancer compounds: Methods to determine the mode of binding and the mechanism of action. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 2007, 18, 497–503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Cain, B.F.; Baguley, B.C.; Denny, W.A. Potential antitumor agents. 28. Deoxyribonucleic-acid polyintercalating agents. J. Med. Chem. 1978, 21, 658–668. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Jenkins, T.C. Optical absorbance and fluorescence techniques for measuring DNA-drug interactions. In Drug-DNA Interaction Protocols; Fox, K.R., Ed.; Humana Press: Totowa, NY, USA, 1997; Volume 90, pp. 195–218. [Google Scholar]
  37. Guedin, A.; Lacroix, L.; Mergny, J.-L. Thermal melting studies of ligand DNA interactions. In Drug-DNA Interaction Protocols, 2nd ed.; Fox, K.R., Ed.; Humana Press: New York, NY, USA, 2010; Volume 613, pp. 25–35. [Google Scholar]
  38. Gentry, A.C.; Juul, S.; Veigaard, C.; Knudsen, B.R.; Osheroff, N. The geometry of DNA supercoils modulates the DNA cleavage activity of human topoisomerase I. Nucleic Acids Res. 2011, 39, 1014–1022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Sappal, D.S.; McClendon, A.K.; Fleming, J.A.; Thoroddsen, V.; Connolly, K.; Reimer, C.; Blackman, R.K.; Bulawa, C.E.; Osheroff, N.; Charlton, P. Biological characterization of MLN944: A potent DNA binding agent. Mol. Cancer Ther. 2004, 3, 47–58. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  40. Lodish, H.; Berk, A.; Xipursky, S.L.; Matsudaira, P.; Baltimore, D.; Darnell, J. The Role of topoisomerases in DNA replication. In Molecular Cell Biology, 4th ed.W. H. Freeman: New York, NY, USA, 2000; Chapter 12.3. Available online: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK21703/ (accessed on 1 July 2016). [Google Scholar]
  41. Nitiss, J.L. Targeting DNA topoisomerase II in cancer chemotherapy. Nat. Rev. Cancer 2009, 9, 338–350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Burden, D.A.; Kingma, P.S.; Froelich-Ammon, S.J.; Bjornsti, M.A.; Patchan, M.W.; Thompson, R.B.; Osheroff, N. Topoisomerase II etoposide interactions direct the formation of drug-induced enzyme-DNA cleavage complexes. J. Biol. Chem. 1996, 271, 29238–29244. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  43. Tabatabaee, M.; Bordbar, M.; Ghassemzadeh, M.; Tahriri, M.; Tahrir, M.; Lighvan, Z.M.; Neumüller, B. Two new neutral copper(II) complexes with dipicolinic acid and 3-amino-1H-1,2,4-triazole formed under different reaction conditions: Synthesis, characterization, molecular structures and DNA-binding studies. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2003, 70, 364–371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Maheswari, P.U.; Palaniandavar, M. DNA binding and cleavage properties of certain tetrammine ruthenium(II) complexes of modified 1,10-phenanthrolines—Effect of hydrogen-bonding on DNA-binding affinity. J. Inorg. Biochem. 2004, 98, 219–230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Norden, B.; Tjerneld, F. Structure of methylene blue-DNA complexes studied by linear and circular dichroism spectroscopy. Biopolymers 1982, 21, 1713–1734. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Xu, H.; Zheng, K.C.; Chen, Y.; Li, Y.Z.; Lin, L.J.; Li, H.; Zhang, P.X.; Ji, L.N. Effects of ligand planarity on the interaction of polypyridyl Ru(II) complexes with DNA. Dalton Trans. 2003, 11, 2260–2268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Tidd, D.M.; Broughton, C.M.; Clark, R.E. Cpg oligodeoxynucleotide 5mer-induced apoptosis in MOLT-4 leukemia cells does not require caspase 3 or new protein synthesis. Nucleic Acids Res. 2003, 31, 2297–2304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Singh, N.P.; McCoy, M.T.; Tice, R.R.; Schneider, E.L. A simple technique for quantitation of low levels of DNA damage in individual cells. Exp. Cell Res. 1988, 175, 184–191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Kibbe, W.A. OligoCalc: An online oligonucleotide properties calculator. Nucleic Acids Res. 2007, 27, 43–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Rappe, A.K.; Casewit, C.J.; Colwell, K.S.; Goddard, W.A.; Skiff, W.M. UFF, a full periodic table force field for molecular mechanics and molecular dynamics simulations. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1992, 114, 10024–10035. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Becke, A.D. Density-functional thermochemistry. 3. The role of exact exchange. J. Chem. Phys. 1993, 98, 5648–5652. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Lee, C.; Yang, W.; Parr, R.G. Development of the Colle-Salvetti correlation-energy formula into a functional of the electron density. Phys. Rev. B 1988, 37, 785–789. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Wiberg, K.B.; Radom, L.; Schleyer, P.V.R.; Pople, J.A. Ab initio molecular orbital theory. J. Comput. Chem. 1986, 7, 379–379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Frisch, M.; Trucks, G.W.; Schlegel, H.; Scuseria, G.E.; Robb, M.A.; Cheeseman, J.R.; Montgomery, J.A.; Vreven, T.; Kudin, K.N.; Burant, J.C. Gaussian 03, Revision C. 02; Gaussian, Inc.: Wallingford, CT, USA, 2008. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. Chemical structure of examined compounds.
Figure 1. Chemical structure of examined compounds.
Ijms 17 01560 g001
Figure 2. Ethidium bromide (EtBr) displacement assay. Changes of EtBr-calf thymus DNA complex fluorescence observed after the addition of increasing amounts of tested compounds are displayed. (●) 1a; (○) 1b; (◊) 9-aminoacridine (9AA); (■) 2a; (□) 2b. Points represent means of three experiments ± Standard deviation (S.D).
Figure 2. Ethidium bromide (EtBr) displacement assay. Changes of EtBr-calf thymus DNA complex fluorescence observed after the addition of increasing amounts of tested compounds are displayed. (●) 1a; (○) 1b; (◊) 9-aminoacridine (9AA); (■) 2a; (□) 2b. Points represent means of three experiments ± Standard deviation (S.D).
Ijms 17 01560 g002
Figure 3. Influence of compounds 1a (A), 1b (B), 2a (C) and 2b (D) on conversion of relaxed plasmid DNA to supercoiled molecule. Control reactions were carried out in the absence of Topo I (supercoiled plasmid, SC) (lane 1), with Topo I (relaxed plasmid) (lane 2), with Topo I and 0.1% DMSO (lane 2A). Plasmid conformation was analyzed in increasing concentrations of investigated compounds (lane 3–9, concentration: 0.5; 1; 5; 10; 15; 20 and 30 µM, respectively) with constant Topo I concentration. 9AA (100 µM) was used as positive control (lane 10).
Figure 3. Influence of compounds 1a (A), 1b (B), 2a (C) and 2b (D) on conversion of relaxed plasmid DNA to supercoiled molecule. Control reactions were carried out in the absence of Topo I (supercoiled plasmid, SC) (lane 1), with Topo I (relaxed plasmid) (lane 2), with Topo I and 0.1% DMSO (lane 2A). Plasmid conformation was analyzed in increasing concentrations of investigated compounds (lane 3–9, concentration: 0.5; 1; 5; 10; 15; 20 and 30 µM, respectively) with constant Topo I concentration. 9AA (100 µM) was used as positive control (lane 10).
Ijms 17 01560 g003
Figure 4. Influence of 2a on Topo I activity. The rate at which relaxed plasmid DNA was converted to supercoiled molecule was monitored over a time course of 30 min. Lane 1—supercoiled plasmid, SC; lane 2—plasmid with Topo I after 30 min of incubation time; lane 3–7—plasmid with Topo I and in the presence of compound 2a at the concentration of 15 μM after following incubation times: 1; 5; 10; 15; 30 min, respectively; lane 8–12—plasmid with Topo I and 9AA at the concentration of 100 µM after following incubation times: 1; 5; 10; 15; 30 min, respectively (positive control).
Figure 4. Influence of 2a on Topo I activity. The rate at which relaxed plasmid DNA was converted to supercoiled molecule was monitored over a time course of 30 min. Lane 1—supercoiled plasmid, SC; lane 2—plasmid with Topo I after 30 min of incubation time; lane 3–7—plasmid with Topo I and in the presence of compound 2a at the concentration of 15 μM after following incubation times: 1; 5; 10; 15; 30 min, respectively; lane 8–12—plasmid with Topo I and 9AA at the concentration of 100 µM after following incubation times: 1; 5; 10; 15; 30 min, respectively (positive control).
Ijms 17 01560 g004
Figure 5. Influence of 2a on Topo II activity. The Topo II-mediated plasmid cleavage assay was carried out over constant enzyme concentration. Lane 1: supercoiled plasmid, SC; lane 2: plasmid with Topo II after 15 min of incubation time; lane 3: plasmid with Topo II and etoposide (50 µM) after 15 min of incubation time (positive control); lane 4–8: plasmid with Topo II and in the presence of compound 2a at the concentration of 5, 10, 15, 20, 30 µM, respectively.
Figure 5. Influence of 2a on Topo II activity. The Topo II-mediated plasmid cleavage assay was carried out over constant enzyme concentration. Lane 1: supercoiled plasmid, SC; lane 2: plasmid with Topo II after 15 min of incubation time; lane 3: plasmid with Topo II and etoposide (50 µM) after 15 min of incubation time (positive control); lane 4–8: plasmid with Topo II and in the presence of compound 2a at the concentration of 5, 10, 15, 20, 30 µM, respectively.
Ijms 17 01560 g005
Figure 6. DNA damage in leukemia cells induced by 1a (A), 1b (B), 2a (C) and 2b (D) (60 min, 37 °C) at concentrations of 5, 10 and 15 µM with and without prior H2O2 incubation (10 min, 4 °C) at a concentration of 15 µM with respect to the appropriate control (−H2O2/+H2O2). The values were measured as the average percentage of DNA in the comet tail ± SEM using alkaline version of comet assay.
Figure 6. DNA damage in leukemia cells induced by 1a (A), 1b (B), 2a (C) and 2b (D) (60 min, 37 °C) at concentrations of 5, 10 and 15 µM with and without prior H2O2 incubation (10 min, 4 °C) at a concentration of 15 µM with respect to the appropriate control (−H2O2/+H2O2). The values were measured as the average percentage of DNA in the comet tail ± SEM using alkaline version of comet assay.
Ijms 17 01560 g006
Figure 7. The circular dichroism spectra of pure ct-DNA 100 µM (solid) and ct-DNA incubated with 2a at concentration of 10 µM (dots).
Figure 7. The circular dichroism spectra of pure ct-DNA 100 µM (solid) and ct-DNA incubated with 2a at concentration of 10 µM (dots).
Ijms 17 01560 g007
Figure 8. The CD spectra of pure ds-oligonucleotide 2.5 µM (solid), ds-oligonucleotide with 2a at a concentration of 2.5 µM added before hybridization (ON1—dots) and ds-oligonucleotide with 2a at a concentration of 2.5 µM added after hybridization (ON2—dashes).
Figure 8. The CD spectra of pure ds-oligonucleotide 2.5 µM (solid), ds-oligonucleotide with 2a at a concentration of 2.5 µM added before hybridization (ON1—dots) and ds-oligonucleotide with 2a at a concentration of 2.5 µM added after hybridization (ON2—dashes).
Ijms 17 01560 g008
Table 1. C50 and Kapp values for tested compounds.
Table 1. C50 and Kapp values for tested compounds.
Compound* C50 ± SD Kapp × 106
(µM)(M−1)
1a52.90 ± 3.180.23
1b104.67 ± 5.010.11
2a2.81 ± 0.534.26
2b11.10 ± 0.361.08
9AA6.62 ± 0.931.81
* C50 is defined as the concentration of added compounds required to reduce the fluorescence of the DNA/EtBr complex to 50%; Kapp: the apparent DNA binding constant of examined compounds. Kapp was calculated as follows: Kapp = 1.26/C50 × KEtBr, with the value of KEtBr = 9.5 × 106 M−1 [36].
Table 2. Influence of examined compounds on the thermal stability of dsDNA.
Table 2. Influence of examined compounds on the thermal stability of dsDNA.
AdditiveOligonucleotideMelting Temperature, Tm (°C)
None (negative control)dsDNA64.97 ± 0.20
1adsDNA64.02 ± 0.00
1bdsDNA64.07 ± 0.14
2adsDNA70.7 ± 0.71
2bdsDNA64.5 ± 0.71
9AA (positive control)dsDNA78.00 ± 0.00

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Szumilak, M.; Merecz, A.; Strek, M.; Stanczak, A.; Inglot, T.W.; Karwowski, B.T. DNA Interaction Studies of Selected Polyamine Conjugates. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2016, 17, 1560. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms17091560

AMA Style

Szumilak M, Merecz A, Strek M, Stanczak A, Inglot TW, Karwowski BT. DNA Interaction Studies of Selected Polyamine Conjugates. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2016; 17(9):1560. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms17091560

Chicago/Turabian Style

Szumilak, Marta, Anna Merecz, Malgorzata Strek, Andrzej Stanczak, Tadeusz W. Inglot, and Boleslaw T. Karwowski. 2016. "DNA Interaction Studies of Selected Polyamine Conjugates" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 17, no. 9: 1560. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms17091560

APA Style

Szumilak, M., Merecz, A., Strek, M., Stanczak, A., Inglot, T. W., & Karwowski, B. T. (2016). DNA Interaction Studies of Selected Polyamine Conjugates. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 17(9), 1560. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms17091560

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop