Next Article in Journal
Targeting Cancer with Phytochemicals via Their Fine Tuning of the Cell Survival Signaling Pathways
Next Article in Special Issue
YAP Activation Drives Liver Regeneration after Cholestatic Damage Induced by Rbpj Deletion
Previous Article in Journal
Relative Contribution of PIN-Containing Secretory Vesicles and Plasma Membrane PINs to the Directed Auxin Transport: Theoretical Estimation
Previous Article in Special Issue
Metabolomic Profiling of Portal Blood and Bile Reveals Metabolic Signatures of Primary Sclerosing Cholangitis
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
IJMS
Volume 19
Issue 11
10.3390/ijms19113567
ijms-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Impact of Machine Perfusion on Biliary Complications after Liver Transplantation

by
Andrea Schlegel
1,2,3,* and
Philipp Dutkowski
1
1
Department of Surgery & Transplantation, University Hospital Zurich, 8091 Zurich, Switzerland
2
The Liver Unit, Queen Elizabeth University Hospital Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TH, UK
3
NIHR Liver Biomedical Research Unit, University Hospitals Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TH, UK
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018, 19(11), 3567; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms19113567
Submission received: 2 October 2018 / Revised: 1 November 2018 / Accepted: 5 November 2018 / Published: 12 November 2018
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Molecular and Cellular Interactions in Biliary Tree Development, Diseases and Cancer)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
We describe in this review the different types of injuries caused to the biliary tree after liver transplantation. Furthermore, we explain underlying mechanisms and why oxygenated perfusion concepts could not only protect livers, but also repair high-risk grafts to prevent severe biliary complications and graft loss. Accordingly, we summarize experimental studies and clinical applications of machine liver perfusion with a focus on biliary complications after liver transplantation. Key points: (1) Acute inflammation with subsequent chronic ongoing liver inflammation and injury are the main triggers for cholangiocyte injury and biliary tree transformation, including non-anastomotic strictures; (2) Hypothermic oxygenated perfusion (HOPE) protects livers from initial oxidative injury at normothermic reperfusion after liver transplantation. This is a unique feature of a cold oxygenation approach, which is effective also end-ischemically, e.g., after cold storage, due to mitochondrial repair mechanisms. In contrast, normothermic oxygenated perfusion concepts protect by reducing cold ischemia, and are therefore most beneficial when applied instead of cold storage; (3) Due to less downstream activation of cholangiocytes, hypothermic oxygenated perfusion also significantly reduces the development of biliary strictures after liver transplantation.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

The ultimate goal and task for new preservation strategies is to treat and repair high-risk organs, which were previously deemed not transplantable. With a steadily increasing amount of data, the transplant community learns that such approaches may enable us to prevent severe reperfusion injury and subsequent complications after liver transplantation. With the improvement of anesthesiological and surgical techniques, the majority of transplant recipients achieve an initial recovery, and the rate of primary-non-function (PNF) is low [1]. However, the major problems in the field remain the biliary complications after liver transplantation, and accordingly there are two main strategies physicians put their focus on [2]. The first is to understand which donor-recipient risk combinations should be avoided and when to say “no” to prevent severe biliary complications [3]. The second is to treat livers before implantation to improve their quality with the use of novel machine perfusion technology [4]. In order to achieve this goal, an understanding of the underlying mechanism of biliary injury in the setting of liver transplantation appears mandatory, which is therefore the first subject of this review. Secondly, we will focus on recent literature including experimental and clinical studies assessing the impact of machine perfusion technology on the biliary tree and on biliary complications after liver transplantation.

2. Overview of Biliary Injury and Underlying Mechanism in the Setting of Liver Transplantation

Anastomotic and non-anastomotic biliary strictures (AS and NAS) are the most common biliary complications after liver transplantation, with a frequency of 1–15% and 5–30%, respectively [5,6] (Figure 1). Donation after circulatory death (DCD) livers experience a certain period of warm ischemia in the donor, which has been recognized in combination with cold storage and other risk factors as a main cause of the higher incidence of NAS after DCD liver transplantation [7]. In addition, altered bile acid composition level, triggered by hepatocyte transporter injury and immune-mediated processes play a cumulative role in the pathogenesis of biliary injury and subsequent formation of biliary strictures (Figure 1) [8]. Relatively short periods of ischemia already induce a rapid cellular energy depletion in the very sensitive biliary epithelial cells (cholangiocytes) [9], which subsequently detach from the basement membrane due to a loss of their intercellular connections. In this context, several clinical studies have described a significant loss of epithelial cells in large extrahepatic bile ducts after transplantation of otherwise relatively low-risk livers, donated after brain death (DBD) [10]. Despite the observation that biliary injury is almost universally present (>80%) already before graft implantation, biliary strictures are seen in only a minority of transplant recipients, which has led to the hypothesis that the ability of the bile duct wall and epithelium to regenerate is an important feature of the pathogenesis of biliary strictures. While it is clear that regeneration of the larger bile ducts requires sufficient oxygen and nutrient supply, this process depends also on the condition of peribiliary glands in the deeper layers of the bile duct wall, which represent the niche for progenitor cells. Underlining this theory, newly developed biliary epithelial cells can migrate from the peribiliary glands through small connecting canals to the bile duct lumen, where they restore the epithelial lining.
The current main explanation for a higher rate of NAS in DCD transplants is therefore an initial cellular lack of oxygen in hepatocytes and cholangiocytes, leading first to insufficient oxygenation of the progenitor niche with subsequently impaired regeneration of the larger bile ducts [11]. Secondly, during reperfusion, mitochondrial-derived oxidative stresses in biliary epithelial cells trigger the release of reactive oxygen species (ROS) and multiple downstream pathways, including danger signaling, inflammasome activation, and the release of profibrogenic cytokines, which reinforce cholangiocyte and hepatocyte injury (Figure 1 and Figure 2). The third cause of biliary injury are immune-mediated pathways, which depend on blood-type antigens expressed on the biliary epithelia of donor bile ducts, and lead to an ABO antibody-mediated direct injury of biliary epithelial cells (Figure 1). Accordingly, ABO-incompatible liver transplantation has been shown to result in higher rates of NAS [12]. In addition, C-C-Motiv-Chemokin-Receptor 5 Δ 32 (CCR5-Δ 32) -mutation leads to a higher incidence of NAS, due to an impaired attraction of regulatory T cells and dysfunction of the immune defense in the neighborhood of bile ducts [13].
Finally, a disturbed bile salt-phospholipid ratio of bile fluid further destroys sensitive biliary epithelial cells and is caused by insufficient bile salt transporters in hepatocytes, such as Bile salt export pump (BSEP) and multidrug resistance-3 (MDR 3) [14]. ATP-depletion during warm and cold ischemia mainly contributes to this alteration in transporter function. An additionally impaired micelle formation leads to a further decrease of phospholipids in bile, with a subsequent direct bile-salt mediated injury of cholangiocytes, and an increased rate of NAS [11]. Similarly, a decent HCO3- (bicarb) concentration in bile is required to protect cholangiocytes from direct penetration by bile salts and is frequently altered during initial reperfusion [15]. Injured cholangiocytes may also lose their ability to reabsorb a sufficient amount of bile acids. Such features contribute to an increased accumulation of toxic bile salts in cholangiocytes with subsequent cholangiocyte and hepatocyte injury, mainly in larger bile ducts (Figure 1 and Figure 2).

3. Risk Factors for Development of Biliary Complications after Liver Transplantation

Before the era of cold storage, ex-situ perfusion of organs had already received particular interest with the aim to maintain organ function outside of the human body by continuously supplying oxygen and nutrients. Yet, with the advent of modern preservation solutions, simple cooling became very attractive and efficient for keeping an organ transplantable for several hours, without severe loss of viability. Accordingly, cold storage remains also nowadays an easy and very successful preservation technique for normal or ideal liver grafts, actually confirmed by a recent benchmark study of cold stored “ideal” primary liver transplants [16]. However, for non-ideal, or so-called marginal liver grafts, the limits of static preservations and techniques have been widely recognized, and machine perfusion techniques have recently been acknowledged for their potential advantages in optimizing organ functions in these grafts. It is notable that definitions of such extended criteria donor livers (ECD) are somewhat arbitrary and include, for example, an advanced donor age of 60–80 years, hepatic steatosis of 15–30 %, and prolonged cold storage of more than 10–12 h [16,17,18,19,20,21]. Importantly, most European centers routinely face liver offers from donors above 60 years of age, together with a significant amount of steatosis in the era of non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) [22,23], implicating that the “normal” liver graft today is often already aged between 60 and 70 years, with significant macrosteatosis up to 15%, and cold ischemia up to 10 h. Of note, such data differs from the US data, underlined by a significantly lower donor risk index (DRI) [24].
The extended criteria in Europe includes currently liver grafts with high amounts of macrosteatosis (>30 or >40 % (EASL guidelines), prolonged cold ischemia (>12 h), additional donor warm ischemia (DCD), or a very high donor age (>80 years) (EASL guidelines) [25]. Those liver grafts will likewise need optimization before implantation, especially when combined with risky recipients (including retransplantation and high model of end-stage liver disease—MELD score patients) [26].

4. General Strategies of Biliary Tree Protection

The general concepts used to improve outcomes in liver transplantations mainly include technical factors, e.g., quick retrievals with short hepatectomy times (below 40 min) [27,28] and extensive bile duct flushes in-situ and ex-situ [27] to remove toxic bile acids [29]. Since well-known risk factors, including donor age [30], donor Body-Mass-Index (BMI) and amount of steatosis [30], and the duration of donor warm ischemia (asystolic warm ischemia < 10 min) [31] are unchangeable, careful selection is the only remaining option to reduce the overall risk. Several transplant programs tend therefore to limit, for example, their cold ischemia to 6 h for DCD and fatty livers [3], and aim to reduce the period between portal vein and arterial anastomosis to supply enough oxygen to the biliary tree as quickly as possible after normothermic reperfusion. It is unclear whether simultaneous portal and arterial reperfusion provides real benefit in terms of biliary injury. In addition, a reduced portal clamping time, by application of a portocaval shunt may protect from bacterial translocation and subsequent LPS-induced aggravation of reperfusion injury [31,32].

5. Machine Perfusion

In addition to a reduction of cold and warm ischemia times, ex-situ graft treatment by dynamic preservation techniques appears as a further option to achieve repair of pre-injured liver grafts before implantation. For the livers, two main perfusion approaches are tested in the clinic; either perfusion with blood at physiologic, normothermic or sub-normothermic conditions or perfusion with cooled oxygenated artificial fluids. Normothermic machine perfusion (NMP) aims to replace the cold storage and is applied either in-situ, in donors before procurement (normothermic regional perfusion—NRP), or ex-situ during organ transport [33,34,35,36]. Consecutively, the first randomized controlled NMP trial on livers predominantly donated after brain death (DBD) showed an excellent 1-year patient- and graft- survival rate of 97% [37]. The rates of biliary complications were however not significantly different between the normothermic and cold storage groups and appeared high in both study arms for DCD livers (NAS: 11 vs. 26%, AS: 48 vs. 58%) (Table 1 and Table 2) [37]. Despite the advantages to solving logistical issues, the effects of normothermic machine perfusion (and more specifically normothermic perfusion after cold storage) became less obvious when the cold storage duration of the matched control group was further reduced [38].
Upfront normothermic perfusion already in the donor (NRP) is currently performed in Maastricht III DCD donors in Spain and in the UK with low rates of cholangiopathies [47,48]. One limitation of this approach is the fact that grafts which perform poorly during NRP are discarded, which amounts currently to a rate of approximately 40% non-usable grafts by NRP techniques [56].
In contrast to an upfront (NRP) or continuous normothermic machine perfusion (NMP) during the entire preservation period, hypothermic oxygenated perfusion (HOPE) is applied end-ischemically after cold storage [26,45,54]. Recent observational studies reported 5-year tumor death-censored patient survival above 95% in extended Maastricht III DCD livers (donated after cardiac death) treated by HOPE [50], comparable to DBD livers. Of note, endischemic HOPE resulted in no graft loss by ischemic cholangiopathy, despite application in high-risk grafts and despite a utilization rate of 90% (Table 1 and Table 2, Figure 3) [50]. HOPE treatment has also been applied recently in Maastricht Type II DCD livers, following initial NRP [51]. Such clinical results in humans were paralleled by experimental studies in livers [43,46] and also in kidneys [57].
Importantly, while the original HOPE treatment is applied only through the portal vein, the group from Groningen currently favors dual hypothermic oxygenated perfusion through the portal vein and the hepatic artery (D-HOPE) [52], and reported the first 20 extended DCD liver grafts with no graft loss in the D-HOPE group compared to un-perfused controls (Table 2) [53]. Randomized trials have been initiated to further evaluate the effect of HOPE and D-HOPE in DBD and DCD liver grafts (Hope-liver.com—Zurich, Groningen Institute for Organ transplantation (GIOT)). Another perfusion approach currently being explored is subnormothermic perfusion, either instead of cold storage or endischemically, and experimental studies have shown promising results in terms of reduction of reperfusion injury and later liver and bile duct histology with subsequently less biliary complications in preclinical studies [39,40,41,42].
Notably, randomized trials comparing concurrent dynamic preservation techniques (NRP vs. normothermic vs. hypothermic) have yet not been performed in any kind of solid organs, and the exact mechanism of protection for each technique remains controversial.

6. Suggested Decisive Mechanisms of Machine Liver Perfusion Techniques Against Biliary Injury

Recent research points to three targets for dynamic preservation technology in order to achieve fewer biliary complications after liver transplantation. First, accumulated citric acid metabolites, e.g., mainly succinate, during ischemia have been shown to trigger mitochondrial dysfunction in various tissues including livers, lungs, kidney, brain, and heart [58,59]. Active breakdown of these metabolites before reperfusion would therefore be of major importance to guarantee a well-functioning mitochondrial electron transport during early normothermic reperfusion. A currently unique approach to achieve this task is the introduction of oxygen to the ischemic tissue at cold instead of warm temperature, which results in metabolization of succinate without a concomitant release of reactive oxygen species [60]. Mitochondria are therefore primed by a relatively short phase of hypothermic oxygenated perfusion (HOPE) to function better upon reperfusion under normothermic conditions (Figure 3) [60]. Secondly, cellular energy stores are depleted during any kind of ischemia and need to be uploaded before implantation. Among the major ATP-consuming processes are bile salt transporters, ion channel pumps, and cellular mitotic activities [43]. The regenerative capacity of tissues, including the peribiliary glands, depends therefore on the presence of sufficient levels of phosphorylated nucleotides. Normothermic oxygenated perfusion has been shown to restore liver ATP levels as compared to cold storage (Figure 2) [44,61]. Remarkably though, hypothermic oxygenated perfusion achieves an even higher rate of energy tissue recharging due to a higher ATP yield per oxygen molecule below the Arrhenius breakpoint temperature of 15 °C [61,62,63].
Third, the consequences of normal-functioning mitochondria and uploaded ATP and ADP levels in the first minutes of ischemia reperfusion are multifactorial. These include the prevention of mitochondrial ROS release from complex I during implantation in all liver cells, including cholangiocytes and hepatocytes, and prevention of down-stream inflammasome activation during implantation (Figure 2) [60,64]. It remains unclear whether additional perfusion effects are equally important, such as improvement of arterial microvascular flow by perfusion approaches [46], nutritional support of cholangiocytes [35], and removal of accumulated toxic substances [11,55].

7. Prediction of Biliary Complications in Liver Transplantation

A low bile pH (<7.4) during normothermic machine perfusion before implantation serves currently as the best predictor for later ischemic biliary complications (Table 2) [49]. This parallels earlier results from the group of Robert Porte, who suggested to measure bicarbonate in the bile as a surrogate marker of cholangiocyte function [65]. In contrast, lactate clearance, liver enzyme release, and bile production during normothermic machine perfusion were only weak predictors for both graft function and biliary complications [49,66]. Bile pH analysis appears also not reliable during hypothermic perfusion due to insufficient bile production in the cold. Quantification of microRNA from cold flushes or perfusates has been somehow predictive for later biliary complications, but needs further validation [67]. Metabolomic and glyconomics assessments of the cold flush solution and liver biopsies before implantation have been published, but focus solely on the occurrence of primary non-function or early allograft dysfunction [68,69].

8. Conclusions and Future Perspective

Machine perfusion technology has a great potential to modify multiple cellular metabolic reactions prior to liver implantation, with significant impact on inflammation and also immune response pathways [60]. In terms of the suggested mechanistic view above, it would be of major importance to determine mitochondrial viability in cells during any machine perfusion approach, instead of analysis of surrogate markers in perfusate or bile. This would clarify whether the perfused liver has already been fully recharged and safely reconditioned to prevent major DAMP signaling and down-stream inflammasome activation during implantation [61,64]. We anticipate, therefore, that in the next few years a better understanding should be available, enabling a perfusion strategy which should be applied in accordance with the type and injury of each liver in order to prevent biliary injury.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.S. and P.D.; Writing-Review & Editing, A.S. and P.D.; Visualization, A.S.; Project Administration, A.S.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Abbreviations

ABOA and B represent cellular antigens, which initiate production of antithetical circulating antibodies in plasma
ADPAdenosine diphosphate
ATPAdenosine triphosphate
ASAnastomotic strictures
ASTAspartate-Aminotransferase
CCR5-Δ 32C-C-Motiv-Chemokin-Receptor 5 Δ 32
DAMP’sDanger associated molecular pattern’s
DBDDonation after brain death
DCDDonation after circulatory death
D-HOPEDual Hypothermic oxygenated perfusion
DWITDonor warm ischemia time
EADEarly allograft dysfunction
ECDExtended Criteria Donor
ECMOExtracorporeal membrane oxygenation
HAHepatic artery
HATHepatic artery thrombosis
HMPHypothermic machine perfusion
HOPEHypothermic oxygenated perfusion
ICIschemic cholangiopathy
KC’sKupffer cells
MELDModel of end stage liver disease
MPT poreMitochondria permeability transition pore
NASNon-anastomotic stenosis
NRPNormothermic regional perfusion
NMPNormothermic machine perfusion
PNFPrimary non function
PVPortal vein
ROSReactive oxygen species
SECSinusoidal endothelial cells
TLR-4Toll-like-receptor-4

References

  1. Dubbeld, J.; Hoekstra, H.; Farid, W.; Ringers, J.; Porte, R.J.; Metselaar, H.J.; Baranski, A.G.; Kazemier, G.; van den Berg, A.P.; van Hoek, B. Similar liver transplantation survival with selected cardiac death donors and brain death donors. Br. J. Surg. 2010, 97, 744–753. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  2. Nemes, B.; Gaman, G.; Polak, W.G.; Gelley, F.; Hara, T.; Ono, S.; Baimakhanov, Z.; Piros, L.; Eguchi, S. Extended criteria donors in liver transplantation Part I: Reviewing the impact of determining factors. Expert Rev. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2016, 10, 827–839. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Schlegel, A.; Kalisvaart, M.; Scalera, I.; Laing, R.; Mergental, H.; Mirza, D.; Perera, T.; Isaac, J.; Dutkowski, P.; Muiesan, P. The UK DCD Risk Score: A new proposal to define futility in donation-after-circulatory-death liver transplantation. J. Hepatol. 2018, 68, 456–464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Schlegel, A.A.; Kalisvaart, M.; Muiesan, P. Machine perfusion in liver transplantation: An essential treatment or just an expensive toy? Minerva. Anestesiol. 2018, 84, 236–245. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  5. Karimian, N.; Westerkamp, A.C.; Porte, R.J. Biliary complications after orthotopic liver transplantation. Current Opinion in Organ Transplantation. Curr. Opin. Organ. Transplant. 2014, 19, 209–216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Sanchez-Urdazpal, L.; Gores, G.J.; Ward, E.M.; Maus, T.P.; Wahlstrom, H.E.; Moore, S.B.; Wiesner, R.H.; Krom, R.A. Ischemic-type biliary complications after orthotopic liver transplantation. Hepatology 1992, 16, 49–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. DeOliveira, M.L.; Jassem, W.; Valente, R.; Khorsandi, S.E.; Santori, G.; Prachalias, A.; Srinivasan, P.; Rela, M.; Heaton, N. Biliary complications after liver transplantation using grafts from donors after cardiac death: Results from a matched control study in a single large volume center. Ann. Surg. 2011, 254, 716–722. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Op Den Dries, S.; Westerkamp, A.C.; Karimian, N.; Gouw, A.S.H.; Bruinsma, B.G.; Markmann, J.F.; Lisman, T.; Yeh, H.; Uygun, K.; Martins, P.N.; et al. Injury to peribiliary glands and vascular plexus before liver transplantation predicts formation of non-anastomotic biliary strictures. J. Hepatol. 2014, 60, 1172–1179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Op Den Dries, S.; Sutton, M.E.; Lisman, T.; Porte, R.J. Protection of bile ducts in liver transplantation: Looking beyond ischemia. Transplantation 2011, 92, 373–379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Hansen, T.; Hollemann, D.; Pitton, M.B.; Heise, M.; Hoppe-Lotichius, M.; Schuchmann, M.; Kirkpatrick, C.J.; Otto, G. Histological examination and evaluation of donor bile ducts received during orthotopic liver transplantation-a morphological clue to ischemic-type biliary lesion? Virchows Arch. 2012, 461, 41–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Karimian, N.; Op Den Dries, S.; Porte, R.J. The origin of biliary strictures after liver transplantation: Is it the amount of epithelial injury or insufficient regeneration that counts? J. Hepatol. 2013, 58, 1065–1067. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  12. Sanchez-Urdazpal, L.; Batts, K.P.; Gores, G.J.; Moore, S.B.; Sterioff, S.; Wiesner, R.H.; Krom, R.A. Increased bile duct complications in liver transplantation across the ABO barrier. Ann. Surg. 1993, 218, 152–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. op den Dries, S.; Buis, C.I.; Adelmeijer, J.; Van der Jagt, E.J.; Haagsma, E.B.; Lisman, T.; Porte, R.J. The combination of primary sclerosing cholangitis and CCR5-Δ32 in recipients is strongly associated with the development of nonanastomotic biliary strictures after liver transplantation. Liver Int. 2011, 31, 1102–1109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Yska, M.J.; Buis, C.I.; Monbaliu, D.; Schuurs, T.A.; Gouw, A.S.H.; Kahmann, O.N.H.; Visser, D.S.; Pirenne, J.; Porte, R.J. The role of bile salt toxicity in the pathogenesis of bile duct injury after non-heart-beating porcine liver transplantation. Transplantation 2008, 85, 1625–1631. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Beuers, U.; Hohenester, S.; de Buy Wenniger, L.J.M.; Kremer, A.E.; Jansen, P.L.M.; Elferink, R.P.J.O. The biliary HCO(3)(−) umbrella: A unifying hypothesis on pathogenetic and therapeutic aspects of fibrosing cholangiopathies. Hepatology 2010, 52, 1489–1496. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Muller, X.; Marcon, F.; Sapisochin, G.; Marquez, M.; Dondero, F.; Rayar, M.; Doyle, M.M.B.; Callans, L.; Li, J.; Nowak, G.; et al. Defining Benchmarks in Liver Transplantation: A Multicenter Outcome Analysis Determining Best Achievable Results. Ann. Surg. 2017, 267, 419–425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Goldberg, D.S.; Karp, S.J.; McCauley, M.E.; Markmann, J.F.; Croome, K.P.; Taner, C.B.; Heimbach, J.K.; Leise, M.D.; Fryer, J.P.; Bohorquez, H.E.; et al. Interpreting Outcomes in DCDD Liver Transplantation: First Report of the Multicenter IDOL Consortium. Transplantation 2017, 101, 1067–1073. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Stahl, J.E.; Kreke, J.E.; Malek, F.A.; Schaefer, A.J.; Vacanti, J. Consequences of cold-ischemia time on primary nonfunction and patient and graft survival in liver transplantation: A meta-analysis. PLoS ONE 2008, 3, e2468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  19. Marcon, F.; Schlegel, A.; Bartlett, D.; Bishop, D.; Mergental, H.; Roberts, K.; Roberts, K.; Mirza, D.; Isaac, J.; Muiesan, P.; et al. Utilisation of declined liver grafts yields comparable transplant outcomes and previous decline should not be a deterrent to graft use. Transplantation 2018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Croome, K.P.; Lee, D.D.; Perry, D.K.; Burns, J.M.; Nguyen, J.H.; Keaveny, A.P.; Taner, C.B. Comparison of longterm outcomes and quality of life in recipients of donation after cardiac death liver grafts with a propensity-matched cohort. Liver Transplant. 2017, 23, 342–351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Foley, D.P.; Fernandez, L.A.; Leverson, G.; Anderson, M.; Mezrich, J.; Sollinger, H.W.; D’Alessandro, A. Biliary complications after liver transplantation from donation after cardiac death donors: An analysis of risk factors and long-term outcomes from a single center. Ann. Surg. 2011, 253, 817–825. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Calzadilla, L.B.; Adams, L. The Natural Course of Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2016, 17, 774. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Dasari, B.V.M.; Schlegel, A.; Mergental, H.; Perera, M.T.P.R. The use of old donors in liver transplantation. Best Pract. Res. Clin. Gastroenterol. 2017, 31, 211–217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Feng, S.; Goodrich, N.P.; Bragg-Gresham, J.L.; Dykstra, D.M.; Punch, J.D.; DebRoy, M.A.; Greenstein, S.M.; Merion, R.M. Characteristics associated with liver graft failure: The concept of a donor risk index. Am. J. Transplant. 2006, 6, 783–790. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. European Association for the Study of the Liver. EASL Clinical Practice Guidelines: Liver transplantation. J. Hepatol. 2016, 64, 433–485. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Schlegel, A.; Muller, X.; Dutkowski, P. Hypothermic Liver Perfusion. Curr. Opin. Organ. Transplant. 2017, 22, 563–570. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Giorgakis, E.; Khorsandi, S.; Jassem, W.; Heaton, N. Minimization of Ischemic Cholangiopathy in Donation After Cardiac Death Liver Transplantation: Is It Thrombolytic Therapy or Warm Ischemic Time Stringency and Donor Bile Duct Flush? Am. J. Transplant. 2017, 18, 274–275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  28. Khorsandi, S.; Giorgakis, E.; Vilca-Melendez, H.; O’Grady, J.; Heneghan, M.; Aluvihare, V.; Suddle, A.; Agarwal, K.; Menon, K.; Prachalias, A.; et al. Developing a donation after cardiac death risk index for adult and pediatric liver transplantation. World J. Transplant. 2017, 7, 203–212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Moench, C.; Moench, K.; Lohse, A.W.; Thies, J.; Otto, G. Prevention of ischemic-type biliary lesions by arterial back-table pressure perfusion. Liver Transplant. 2003, 9, 285–299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Schlegel, A.; Scalera, I.; Perera, M.; Kalisvaart, M.; Mergental, H.; Mirza, D.; John, I.; Paolo, M. Impact of donor age in donation after cardiac death liver transplantation: Is the cut-off “60” still of relevance? Liver Transplant. 2017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Manzini, G.; Kremer, M.; Houben, P.; Gondan, M.; Bechstein, W.O.; Becker, T.; Berlakovich, G.A.; Friess, H.; Guba, M.; Hohenberger, W.; et al. Reperfusion of liver graft during transplantation: Techniques used in transplant centres within Eurotransplant and meta-analysis of the literature. Transplant. Int. 2013, 26, 508–516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Orci, L.A.; Lacotte, S.; Delaune, V.; Slits, F.; Oldani, G.; Lazarevic, V.; Rossetti, C.; Rubbia-Brandt, L.; Morel, P.; Toso, C. Effects of the gut–liver axis on ischaemia-mediated hepatocellular carcinoma recurrence in the mouse liver. J. Hepatol. 2018, 68, 978–985. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Oniscu, G.C.; Randle, L.V.; Muiesan, P.; Butler, A.J.; Currie, I.S.; Perera, M.T.P.R.; Forsythe, J.L.; Watson, C.J. In situ normothermic regional perfusion for controlled donation after circulatory death—The United Kingdom experience. Am. J. Transplant. 2014, 14, 2846–2854. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Brockmann, J.; Reddy, S.; Coussios, C.; Pigott, D.; Guirriero, D.; Hughes, D.; Morovat, A.; Roy, D.; Winter, L.; Friend, P.J. Normothermic perfusion: A new paradigm for organ preservation. Ann. Surg. 2009, 250, 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. op den Dries, S.; Karimian, N.; Westerkamp, A.C.; Sutton, M.E.; Kuipers, M.; Wiersema-Buist, J.; Ottens, P.J.; Kuipers, J.; Giepmans, B.N.; Leuvenink, H.G.; et al. Normothermic machine perfusion reduces bile duct injury and improves biliary epithelial function in rat donor livers. Liver Transplant. 2016, 22, 994–1005. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Liu, Q.; Nassar, A.; Farias, K.; Buccini, L.; Baldwin, W.; Mangino, M.; Bennett, A.; O’Rourke, C.; Okamoto, T.; Uso, T.D.; et al. Sanguineous normothermic machine perfusion improves hemodynamics and biliary epithelial regeneration in donation after cardiac death porcine livers. Liver Transplant. 2014, 20, 987–999. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  37. Nasralla, D.; Coussios, C.C.; Mergental, H.; Akhtar, M.Z.; Butler, A.J.; Ceresa, C.D.L.; Chiocchia, V.; Dutton, S.J.; García-Valdecasas, J.C.; Heaton, N.; et al. A randomized trial of normothermic preservation in liver transplantation. Nature 2018, 557, 50–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Bral, M.; Gala-Lopez, B.; Bigam, D.; Kneteman, N.; Malcolm, A.; Livingstone, S.; Andres, A.; Emamaullee, J.; Russell, L.; Coussios, C.; et al. Preliminary Single-Center Canadian Experience of Human Normothermic Ex Vivo Liver Perfusion: Results of a Clinical Trial. Am. J. Transplant. 2017, 17, 1071–1080. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Goldaracena, N.; Echeverri, J.; Spetzler, V.N.; Kaths, J.M.; Barbas, A.S.; Louis, K.S.; Adeyi, O.A.; Grant, D.R.; Selzner, N.; Selzner, M. Anti-inflammatory signaling during ex vivo liver perfusion improves the preservation of pig liver grafts before transplantation. Liver Transplant. 2016, 22, 1573–1583. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Spetzler, V.N.; Goldaracena, N.; Echiverri, J.; Kaths, J.M.; Louis, K.S.; Adeyi, O.A.; Yip, P.M.; Grant, D.R.; Selzner, N.; Selzner, M. Subnormothermic ex vivo liver perfusion is a safe alternative to cold static storage for preserving standard criteria grafts. Liver Transplant. 2016, 22, 111–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Fontes, P.; Lopez, R.; Van Der Plaats, A.; Vodovotz, Y.; Minervini, M.; Scott, V.; Soltys, K.; Shiva, S.; Paranjpe, S.; Sadowsky, D.; et al. Liver preservation with machine perfusion and a newly developed cell-free oxygen carrier solution under subnormothermic conditions. Am. J. Transplant. 2015, 15, 381–394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Knaak, J.M.; Spetzler, V.N.; Goldaracena, N.; Louis, K.S.; Selzner, N.; Selzner, M. Technique of subnormothermic ex vivo liver perfusion for the storage, assessment, and repair of marginal liver grafts. J. Vis. Exp. 2014, 13, e51419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Schlegel, A.; Graf, R.; Clavien, P.A.; Dutkowski, P. Hypothermic oxygenated perfusion (HOPE) protects from biliary injury in a rodent model of DCD liver transplantation. J. Hepatol. 2013, 59, 984–991. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Banan, B.; Xiao, Z.; Watson, R.; Xu, M.; Jia, J.; Upadhya, G.A.; Mohanakumar, T.; Lin, Y.; Chapman, W. Novel strategy to decrease reperfusion injuries and improve function of cold-preserved livers using normothermic ex vivo liver perfusion machine. Liver Transplant. 2016, 22, 333–343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  45. Westerkamp, A.C.; Mahboub, P.; Meyer, S.L.; Hottenrott, M.; Ottens, P.J.; Wiersema-Buist, J.; Gouw, A.S.; Lisman, T.; Leuvenink, H.G.; Porte, R.J. End-ischemic machine perfusion reduces bile duct injury in donation after circulatory death rat donor livers independent of the machine perfusion temperature. Liver Transplant. 2015, 21, 1300–1311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  46. Op Den Dries, S.; Sutton, M.E.; Karimian, N.; De Boer, M.T.; Wiersema-Buist, J.; Gouw, A.S.H.; Leuvenink, H.G.; Lisman, T.; Porte, R.J. Hypothermic oxygenated machine perfusion prevents arteriolonecrosis of the peribiliary plexus in pig livers donated after circulatory death. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e88521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Watson, C.; Hunt, F.; Butler, A.; Sutherland, A.; Upponi, S.; Currie, I.; Large, S.; Terrace, J.; Messer, S.; Oniscu, G.; et al. Normothermic regional perfusion (NRP) for DCD liver transplantation in the UK: Better graft survival with no cholangiopathy. In Proceedings of the 2018 Joint International Congress of ILTS, ELITA & LICAGE, Lisbon, Portugal, 23–26 May 2018. [Google Scholar]
  48. Hessheimer, A.; Coll, E.; Valdivieso, A.; Gómez, M.; Santoyo, J.; Ramírez, P.; Gómez-Bravo, M.Á.; López-Andujar, R.; Villar, J.; Jiménez, C.; et al. Superior outcomes using normothermic regional perfusion in cDCD liver transplantation. In Proceedings of the 2018 Joint International Congress of ILTS, ELITA & LICAGE, Lisbon, Portugal, 23–26 May 2018. [Google Scholar]
  49. Watson, C.; Kosmoliaptsis, V.; Pley, C.; Randle, L.; Fear, C.; Crick, K.; Gimson, A.E.; Allison, M.; Upponi, S.; Brais, R.; et al. Observations on the ex situ perfusion of livers for transplantation. Am. J. Transplant. 2018, 18, 2005–2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Schlegel, A.; Muller, X.; Kalisvaart, M.; Muellhaupt, B.; Perera, M.; Isaac, J.; Clavien, P.A.; Muiesan, P.; Dutkowski, P. Outcomes of liver transplantations from donation after circulatory death (DCD) treated by hypothermic oxygenated perfusion (HOPE) before implantation. J Hepatol. 2018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. De Carlis, R.; Di Sandro, S.; Lauterio, A.; Ferla, F.; Belli, L.; De Carlis, L. Donation after cardiac death liver transplantation with normothermic regional perfusion and hypothermic machine perfusion: Follow-up of the first Italian series. In Proceedings of the 2018 Joint International Congress of ILTS, ELITA & LICAGE, Lisbon, Portugal, 23–26 May 2018. [Google Scholar]
  52. van Rijn, R.; van Leeuwen, O.; Matton, A.; Burlage, L.; Wiersema-Buist, J.; van den Heuvel, M.C.; de Kleine, R.H.J.; de Boer, M.T.; Gouw, A.S.H.; Porte, R.J. Hypothermic oxygenated machine perfusion reduces bile duct reperfusion injury after transplantation of donation after circulatory death livers. Liver Transplant. 2018, 24, 655–664. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  53. Van Rijn, R.; Karimian, N.; Matton, A.; Burlage, L.; Wetserkamp, A.; Van den Berg, A.; de Kleine, R.H.J.; de Boer, M.T.; Lisman, T.; Porte, R.J. Dual hypothermic oxygenated machine perfusion in liver transplants donated after circulatory death. Br. J. Surg. 2017, 104, 907–917. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  54. Dutkowski, P.; Polak, W.G.; Muiesan, P.; Schlegel, A.; Verhoeven, C.J.; Scalera, I.; DeOliveira, M.L.; Kron, P.; Clavien, P.A. First Comparison of Hypothermic Oxygenated PErfusion Versus Static Cold Storage of Human Donation After Cardiac Death Liver Transplants: An International-matched Case Analysis. Ann. Surg. 2015, 262, 764–771. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Guarrera, J.V.; Henry, S.D.; Samstein, B.; Reznik, E.; Musat, C.; Lukose, T.I.; Ratner, L.E.; Brown, R.S., Jr.; Kato, T.; Emond, J.C. Hypothermic machine preservation facilitates successful transplantation of “orphan” extended criteria donor livers. Am. J. Transplant. 2015, 15, 161–169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Tsui, S.S.L.; Oniscu, G.C. Extending normothermic regional perfusion to the thorax in donors after circulatory death. Curr. Opin. Organ Transplant. 2017, 22, 245–250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Kron, P.; Schlegel, A.; de Rougemont, O.; Oberkofler, C.E.; Clavien, P.-A.; Dutkowski, P. Short, Cool, and Well Oxygenated—HOPE for Kidney Transplantation in a Rodent Model. Ann. Surg. 2016, 264, 815–822. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Chouchani, E.T.; Pell, V.R.; Gaude, E.; Aksentijević, D.; Sundier, S.Y.; Robb, E.L.; Logan, A.; Nadtochiy, S.M.; Ord, E.N.J.; Smith, A.C.; et al. Ischaemic accumulation of succinate controls reperfusion injury through mitochondrial ROS. Nature 2014, 515, 431–435. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  59. Niatsetskaya, Z.V.; Sosunov, S.A.; Matsiukevich, D.; Utkina-Sosunova, I.V.; Ratner, V.I.; Starkov, A.A.; Ten, V.S. The Oxygen Free Radicals Originating from Mitochondrial Complex I Contribute to Oxidative Brain Injury Following Hypoxia-Ischemia in Neonatal Mice. J. Neurosci. 2012, 32, 3235–3244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  60. Kron, P.; Schlegel, A.; Mancina, L.; Clavien, P.A.; Dutkowski, P. Hypothermic oxygenated perfusion (HOPE) for fatty liver grafts in rats and humans. J. Hepatol. 2018, 68, 82–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  61. Boteon, Y.; Laing, R.; Schlegel, A.; Wallace, L.; Smith, A.; Attard, J.; Bhogal, R.H.; Neil, D.A.; Hübscher, S.; Perera, M.T.P.; et al. Combined Hypothermic and Normothermic Machine Perfusion Improves Functional Recovery of Extended Criteria Donor Livers. Liver Transplant. 2018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Schlegel, A.; Kron, P.; Graf, R.; Dutkowski, P.; Clavien, P.A. Warm vs. cold perfusion techniques to rescue rodent liver grafts. J. Hepatol. 2014, 61, 1267–1275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Lazeyras, F.; Buhler, L.; Vallee, J.P.; Hergt, M.; Nastasi, A.; Ruttimann, R.; Morel, P.; Buchs, J.B. Detection of ATP by “in line”31P magnetic resonance spectroscopy during oxygenated hypothermic pulsatile perfusion of pigs’ kidneys. MAGMA 2012, 25, 391–399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Pinto, C.; Giordano, D.M.; Maroni, L.; Marzioni, M. Role of inflammation and proinflammatory cytokines in cholangiocyte pathophysiology. Biochim. Biophys. Acta Mol. Basis. Dis. 2017, 1864, 1270–1278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Sutton, M.E.; Op Den Dries, S.; Karimian, N.; Weeder, P.D.; De Boer, M.T.; Wiersema-Buist, J.; Gouw, A.S.; Leuvenink, H.G.; Lisman, T.; Porte, R.J. Criteria for Viability Assessment of Discarded Human Donor Livers during Ex Vivo Normothermic Machine Perfusion. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e110642. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Watson, C.J.E.; Jochmans, I. From “Gut Feeling” to Objectivity: Machine Preservation of the Liver as a Tool to Assess Organ Viability. Curr. Transplant. Rep. 2018, 5, 72–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  67. Verhoeven, C.J.; Farid, W.R.R.; De Ruiter, P.E.; Hansen, B.E.; Roest, H.P.; De Jonge, J.; Kwekkeboom, J.; Metselaar, H.J.; Tilanus, H.W.; Kazemier, G.; et al. MicroRNA profiles in graft preservation solution are predictive of ischemic-type biliary lesions after liver transplantation. J. Hepatol. 2013, 59, 1231–1238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Faitot, F.; Besch, C.; Battini, S.; Ruhland, E.; Onea, M.; Addeo, P.; Woehl-Jaeglé, M.L.; Ellero, B.; Bachellier, P.; Namer, I.J. Impact of real-time metabolomics in liver transplantation: Graft evaluation and donor-recipient matching. J. Hepatol. 2017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Verhelst, X.; Geerts, A.; Jochmans, I.; Vanderschaeghe, D.; Paradissis, A.; Vanlander, A.; Berrevoet, F.; Dahlqvist, G.; Nevens, F.; Pirenne, J.; et al. Glycome Patterns of Perfusate in Livers Before Transplantation Associate with Primary Nonfunction. Gastroenterology. 2018, 154, 1361–1368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Ijms 19 03567 g001 550
Figure 1. Type and etiology of injury of the biliary tree after liver transplantation. The site and type of biliary complication are highlighted, and potential causes are described throughout the entire biliary tree of a liver graft.
Figure 1. Type and etiology of injury of the biliary tree after liver transplantation. The site and type of biliary complication are highlighted, and potential causes are described throughout the entire biliary tree of a liver graft.
Ijms 19 03567 g001
Ijms 19 03567 g002 550
Figure 2. The mechanism of cholangiocyte injury during and after reperfusion in the setting of liver transplantation. The multifactorial mechanisms of injury are described in this figure. Two main drivers are responsible for the development of severe biliary complications: First, at reperfusion, oxygen free radicals are released from the complex of one of the mitochondrial chains in any affected cells, including hepatocytes and cholangiocytes (1). Secondly, the initial oxidative hit triggers downstream inflammation (2) and further aggravation with an ultimate chronic inflammatory status (3). Depending on the liver quality and the amount of graft injury in the donor and during preservation, ATP-dependent bile acid transporters have already an impaired function, which leads to higher vulnerability against toxic bile salts. Such a combination of injuries will likewise lead to an impaired ability to facilitate regeneration of hepatocytes and cholangiocytes (3). BA, Biliary acid; BSEP, Bile salt export pump; MDR, multidrug resistance.
Figure 2. The mechanism of cholangiocyte injury during and after reperfusion in the setting of liver transplantation. The multifactorial mechanisms of injury are described in this figure. Two main drivers are responsible for the development of severe biliary complications: First, at reperfusion, oxygen free radicals are released from the complex of one of the mitochondrial chains in any affected cells, including hepatocytes and cholangiocytes (1). Secondly, the initial oxidative hit triggers downstream inflammation (2) and further aggravation with an ultimate chronic inflammatory status (3). Depending on the liver quality and the amount of graft injury in the donor and during preservation, ATP-dependent bile acid transporters have already an impaired function, which leads to higher vulnerability against toxic bile salts. Such a combination of injuries will likewise lead to an impaired ability to facilitate regeneration of hepatocytes and cholangiocytes (3). BA, Biliary acid; BSEP, Bile salt export pump; MDR, multidrug resistance.
Ijms 19 03567 g002
Ijms 19 03567 g003 550
Figure 3. Hypothermic oxygenated perfusion (HOPE) in human and rat DCD livers. (A) An example of hypothermic oxygenated perfusion (HOPE) of an extended DCD liver graft prior to transplantation. (B) To confirm a complete perfusion with highly-oxygenated perfusate in the cold during HOPE, Fluorescein was added to the perfusate. Both human and rat livers showed a rapid complete perfusion in the cold, despite a low perfusion pressure of 3 mmHg or less. Notably, the entire biliary tree, including the distal tip where the anastomosis is performed with the recipient bile duct, appears also completely stained, which confirms that the perfusate and more importantly the oxygen has reached all liver cells including cholangiocytes. The approval numbers were KEK ZH 2012-1 (January 2012) and KEK ZH 2017-00309 (July 2017), both approved by the Cantonal Ethic Commission in Zurich.
Figure 3. Hypothermic oxygenated perfusion (HOPE) in human and rat DCD livers. (A) An example of hypothermic oxygenated perfusion (HOPE) of an extended DCD liver graft prior to transplantation. (B) To confirm a complete perfusion with highly-oxygenated perfusate in the cold during HOPE, Fluorescein was added to the perfusate. Both human and rat livers showed a rapid complete perfusion in the cold, despite a low perfusion pressure of 3 mmHg or less. Notably, the entire biliary tree, including the distal tip where the anastomosis is performed with the recipient bile duct, appears also completely stained, which confirms that the perfusate and more importantly the oxygen has reached all liver cells including cholangiocytes. The approval numbers were KEK ZH 2012-1 (January 2012) and KEK ZH 2017-00309 (July 2017), both approved by the Cantonal Ethic Commission in Zurich.
Ijms 19 03567 g003
Table
Table 1. Experimental studies analyzing the impact of machine perfusion on the biliary tree between 2013–2018.
Table 1. Experimental studies analyzing the impact of machine perfusion on the biliary tree between 2013–2018.
AuthorYearModelSpeciesTemp (°C)Perfusion Duration (h)Perfusion RouteOLTEndpointsOutcome
Goldaracena et al. [39]2016DBDPig33, 374PV + HAYesIschemia-Reperfusion Injury, bile duct injury, liver function (3 day follow up)Addition of anti-inflammatory substances during sub-and normothermic perfusion improve all endpoints and may reduce biliary injury
Spetzler et al. [40]2016DBDPig334PV + HAYesIschemia-Reperfusion Injury, bile duct injury, liver function, histologySubnormothermic perfusion improves outcomes after transplantation
Fontes et al. [41]2015Pig21PV + HAYesLiver function and injury, markers for biliary injury, inflammation and animal survivalSubnormothermic perfusion improves liver function, bile procudetion and survival and reduces the inflammation after liver transplantation, documentation of mediator release (regenerative pathways and inflammation) during subnormothermic perfusion
Knaak et al. [42]2014DCDPig333PV + HAYesEndothelial and biliary injury and liver function, animal survivalEndischemic subnormothermic perfusion reduces biliary and endothelial cell injury after transplantation
Schlegel et al. [43]2013DCDRat41PVYesIschemia-Reperfusion Injury, graft function, animal survival, biliary parameters and histology 4 weeks after OLTHOPE treated DCD livers showed significantly less biliary cirrhosis and fibrosis within 4 weeks after liver transplantation. Such reduced injury is mediated through less reperfusion injury after HOPE treatment
Banan et al. [44]2016DBDPig38, gradual rewarming + 384–8PV + HANoMarkers of hepatocyte injury and biliary tree injuryReduced biliary epithelial cell injury in gradually rewarmed grafts (rewarming + normotherm better preservation of biliary tree compared to direct normotherm perfusion)
Op den Dries et al. [35]2016DBD + DCDRat373PV + HANoMarkers of biliary function and injury, histologyNormothermic perfusion protects bile ducts when performed instead of cold storage
Westerkamp et al. [45]2015DCDRat10, 20, COR2PV + HANoMarkers of biliary function and injury, histologyLess injury of large bile duct epithelium compared to cold storage alone
Liu et al. [36]2014DCDPig3810PV + HANoMarkers of biliary function and injury, histologyNormothermic perfusion instead of cold storage improves regeneration of biliary epithelial cells
Op den Dries et al. [46]2014DBD + DCDPig104PV + HANoMarkers of biliary function and injury, histologyHypothermic perfusion prevents ateriolonecrosis of the peribiliary vascular plexus of the bile ducts
HOPE: Hypothermic oxygenated perfusion; DBD: Donation after brain death; DCD: Donation after circulatory death; PV: Portal vein; HA: Hepatic artery; COR: Controlled oxygenated rewarming, OLT: Orthotopic Liver Transplantation.
Table
Table 2. Impact of machine perfusion on biliary complications after liver transplantation (clinical studies, 2015–2018).
Table 2. Impact of machine perfusion on biliary complications after liver transplantation (clinical studies, 2015–2018).
AuthorYearModelnTechniqueTemp (°C)DevicePerfusion Duration (h)Perfusion RouteEndpointsOutcome
Watson et al. [47]2018DCD44NRP37Maquet/ECOPS2NRPPeak ALT, graft function, biliary complications, 90-day survivalNRP is a successful selection tool, DCD livers recovered with NRP showed significant less biliary complications (AS and NAS), no differences in graft survival
Hessheimer et al. [48]2018DCD97NRP37ECMO2NRPgraft function, biliary complications, 1-year graft survivalNRP is a successful selection tool, DCD livers recovered with NRP showed significant less biliary complications (AS and NAS), no significant differences in graft survival
Nasralla et al. ✫ [37]2018DBD + DCD121 (34 DCD)NMP37Organox metra9.1PV + HAAST release and 1-year survival after liver transplantationNo difference in biliary complications (AS, NAS), reduced AST release after reperfusion
Watson et al. [49]2018DBD + DCD22 (16 DCD)NMP37Liver Assist4–6PV + HAPost-Reperfusion syndrome, graft function, rate of PNF, biliary complication, bile duct histology and graft survival25% of transplanted DCD livers developed a NAS, Bile pH during NMP is currently the best predictor for biliary complications at the cutoff 7.5
Bral et al. ✢ [38]2017DBD + DCD9 (4 DCD)NMP37Organox Metra11.5PV + HAGraft function and injury, biliary complications, graft survivalLonger ITU and hospital stay in NMP group
Schlegel et al. [50]2018DCD50HOPE10Liver Assist2PVPost-Reperfusion syndrome, graft function, rate of PNF, HAT and ischemic cholangiopathy, 5-year graft survivalHOPE treated extended DCD liver grafts showed significant improved 5-year graft survival due to less PNF, HAT and ischemic cholangiopathy
De Carlis et al. [51]2018DCD (II, III)15ECMO + HOPE37, 10ECMO/Liver Assist2, 2ECMO, PV + HALiver function, biliary complications, 1-year survivalNo significant differences in biliary complications compared to DBD matching group, 2 NAS (endoscopically treated), no significant differences in survival
Van Rijn et al. [52]2018DCD20DHOPE10Liver Assist2PV + HAMarkers of biliary injury including
histology of bile ducts		D-HOPE treatment restored hepatic ATP and protects the biliary tree from reperfusion injury and complications
Van Rijn et al. [53]2017DCD10DHOPE10Liver Assist2PV + HALiver function, ATP content, biliary
complications, graft- and patient survival		D-HOPE treatment protect from reperfusion injury and improved 6 and 12 month graft survival and reduced biliary complications
Dutkowski et al. [54]2015DCD25HOPE10Liver Assist1–2PVGraft function, EAD, biliary complications, graft and patient survivalHOPE treated extended DCD liver grafts showed comparable outcomes to matched low-risk primary DBD transplants, biliary complications were reduced compared to untreated DCD liver transplants
Guarrera et al. [55]2015ECD (no DCD)20HMP4-8Medtronic4–7PV + HAIncidence of PNF, EAD, vascular and biliary complication, 1-year graft and patient survivalHMP showed significantly less biliary complications
All studies above are transplant studies, reporting the impact of the perfusion approach on biliary complications as primary or secondary endpoints; n represents the perfused livers or donors, where studies with at least 9–10 perfusions were included; HMP: Hypothermic machine perfusion; HOPE: Hypothermic oxygenated perfusion; DHOPE: Dual-HOPE; ECD: Extended criteria donors; DBD: Donation after brain death; DCD: Donation after circulatory death; PV: Portal vein; HA: Hepatic artery; EAD: Early allograft dysfunction; PNF: Primary non function; HAT: Hepatic artery thrombosis; Perfusion device: J. Guarrera, applied his HMP through a non-pulsatile pump (Medtronic, Minneapolis, MN, USA); AS: Anastomotic strictures; NAS: Non-anastomotic strictures; DCD (II, III): Maastricht II and III category DCD (Italy), 20 min stand off period in donor; NRP: Normothermic regional perfusion in donor; NMP: Normothermic Machine perfusion; AST: Aspartate-Aminotransferase; ✫: Randomized controlled trial, powered for AST release as primary endpoint; Reference [35] includes the first 20 livers of this randomized controlled trial; ✢: NMP livers were matched to cold storage livers, where the control group was of low risk with short cold ischemia time; ECMO: Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation; ALT: Alanine-Aminotransferase .

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Schlegel, A.; Dutkowski, P. Impact of Machine Perfusion on Biliary Complications after Liver Transplantation. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018, 19, 3567. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms19113567

AMA Style

Schlegel A, Dutkowski P. Impact of Machine Perfusion on Biliary Complications after Liver Transplantation. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2018; 19(11):3567. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms19113567

Chicago/Turabian Style

Schlegel, Andrea, and Philipp Dutkowski. 2018. "Impact of Machine Perfusion on Biliary Complications after Liver Transplantation" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 19, no. 11: 3567. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms19113567

APA Style

Schlegel, A., & Dutkowski, P. (2018). Impact of Machine Perfusion on Biliary Complications after Liver Transplantation. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 19(11), 3567. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms19113567

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop