Next Article in Journal
AMPK: Regulation of Metabolic Dynamics in the Context of Autophagy
Previous Article in Journal
Drosophila Gut—A Nexus Between Dietary Restriction and Lifespan
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
IJMS
Volume 19
Issue 12
10.3390/ijms19123811
ijms-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Cell Wall Epitopes and Endoploidy as Reporters of Embryogenic Potential in Brachypodium Distachyon Callus Culture

by
Alexander Betekhtin
1,*,
Magdalena Rojek
1,
Katarzyna Nowak
2,
Artur Pinski
1,
Anna Milewska-Hendel
3,
Ewa Kurczynska
3,
John H. Doonan
4 and
Robert Hasterok
1
1
Department of Plant Anatomy and Cytology, Faculty of Biology and Environmental Protection, University of Silesia in Katowice, Katowice 40-007, Poland
2
Department of Genetics, Faculty of Biology and Environmental Protection, University of Silesia in Katowice, Katowice 40-007, Poland
3
Department of Cell Biology, Faculty of Biology and Environmental Protection, University of Silesia in Katowice, Katowice 40-007, Poland
4
National Plant Phenomics Centre, IBERS, Aberystwyth University, Aberystwyth SY23 3EE, UK
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018, 19(12), 3811; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms19123811
Submission received: 31 October 2018 / Revised: 26 November 2018 / Accepted: 27 November 2018 / Published: 29 November 2018
(This article belongs to the Section Molecular Plant Sciences)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Effective regeneration of callus tissue into embryos and then into whole plants is essential for plant biotechnology. The embryonic potential is often low and can further decrease with time in culture, which limits the utilisation of calli for transformation procedures and in vitro propagation. In this study, we show that the loss of embryogenic potential in callus cultures of Brachypodium distachyon is progressive over time. Flow cytometry analyses indicated endoploidy levels increased in 60- and 90-day-old calli with effective loss of the 2C DNA content peak in the latter. Analysis of indolic compounds content revealed a decrease in 60- and 90-day-old calli compared to either freshly isolated explants or 30-day-old calli. Immunohistochemical analysis revealed a decrease in arabinogalactan proteins (AGP) signal with the time of culture, but extensin (EXT) epitopes either increased (JIM12 epitopes) or decreased (JIM11 epitopes). The transcript accumulation levels of AGPs and EXTs confirmed these results, with most of AGP and EXT transcripts gradually decreasing. Some chimeric EXT transcripts significantly increased on the 30th day of culture, perhaps because of an increased embryogenic potential. Selected somatic embryogenesis-related genes and cyclins demonstrated a gradual decrease of transcript accumulation for YUCCA (YUC), AINTEGUMENTA-LIKE (AIL), BABY BOOM (BBM), and CLAVATA (CLV3) genes, as well as for most of the cyclins, starting from the 30th day of culture. Notably, WUSCHEL (WUS) transcript was detectable only on the 30th and 60th day and was not detectable in the zygotic embryos and in 90-day-old calli.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Somatic embryogenesis (SE) occurs when a single somatic cell or group of somatic cells, usually induced by external conditions of in vitro culture, changes its developmental programme and starts forming totipotent embryogenic cells capable of becoming complete plants [1]. Each stage of the process, from induction to seedling formation, is influenced by many different genetic, epigenetic, biochemical, and physiological factors. The correct progression of SE is controlled by a large group of transcription factors, e.g., BABY BOOM (BBM), WUSHEL (WUS), LEAFY COTYLEDON1 (LEC1) and LEAFY COTYLEDON2 (LEC2), FUSCA3 (FUS3), proteins associated with signal transduction pathways, among which major groups are SOMATIC EMBRYOGENESIS RECEPTOR KINASE (SERK proteins) and CLAVATA proteins (CLV1, 2 and 3), as well as proteins involved in the regulation of hormone biosynthesis and response, for example, YUCCA1 (YUC1). These proteins are involved, variously, in dedifferentiation, promotion, and maintenance of cell totipotency and embryogenic cell formation [1,2,3,4,5]. Somatic embryo development may also require spatio-temporal control of cell division and elongation [6]. The eukaryotic cell cycle is controlled by the large family of CYCLIN-DEPENDENT KINASES (CDKs). The activity of these kinases is positively regulated by binding to cyclins, some of which appear and disappear periodically during the cell cycle, and their gene expression is often modulated during the progression of SE [7,8].
The switch from a somatic to an embryogenic state also involves changes in the cell wall composition and architecture [9,10,11]. Cell wall components, such as hemicelluloses, pectins, and arabinogalactan proteins (AGPs) undergo significant changes during initiation and progression of SE [11,12,13], and some provide diagnostic markers for SE [10].
A high regeneration ability (or morphogenetic potential) of callus tissue facilitates many biotechnological applications. However, the loss of morphogenetic potential is a common phenomenon that can occur soon after callus initiation or even as late as after many years of culture [14,15,16,17]. In any case, poor regeneration is a common problem that restricts the application of biotechnological manipulations in many species. The mechanisms by which a tissue loses its regeneration ability is therefore of general interest.
Sequential subculture and prolonged culture may induce various deleterious changes in genome and epigenome organisation, cell structure, transcription and physiology. Changes at the genomic level can lead to the regeneration of phenotypically variable or even abnormal plants. This phenomenon, known as somaclonal variation (SV), is common in long-term in vitro culture. Several factors, such as, in particular, the source of the initial explant, media composition, exogenous hormones, and the culture conditions can all affect SV. A frequently observed cytological change associated with SV is chromosome aberration, which can involve changes in ploidy and structural chromosome rearrangements [18]. In addition to genetic changes in regenerated plants, prolonged culture can cause the accumulation of point mutations leading to the reduction of the morphogenic potential of the callus tissue [19,20,21]. For example, tissue culture of Quercus rubra and Catharantus roseus are characterised by the rapid loss of morphogenic potential [2,22,23]. The embryogenic calli of Fagopyrum tataricum can maintain a high level of genome stability up to 10 years [14]. The differences between morphogenic and non-morphogenic calli of F. tataricum may be related to greater genomic stability of the morphogenic ones. A long-term callus line of Lotus corniculatus maintained by regular subculture for 1.5–2.5 years had a relatively high regenerative capacity, but the production of shoots decreased as the callus line grew older [24].
In this work, we evaluated a number of processes that could be related to the gradual loss of embryogenic potential in the callus culture of Brachypodium distachyon. We used histological and immunolocalisation techniques to analyse the distribution of selected pectins, AGPs, extensins (EXTs), and hemicelluloses in the cell walls and internal cell compartments and on the embryogenic callus surface. Flow cytometry was used to follow how the nuclear DNA content changed with the time of culture. The transcript accumulation level of selected genes during the time course was also determined. It may be possible to develop one or more of these markers as a diagnostic tool to identify embryogenic calli or assess calli’s overall regenerative potential.

2. Results

2.1. Changes in Morphological, Histological, and Biochemical Features of B. Distachyon Calli during their Gradual Loss of Embryogenic Potential

In general, embryogenic calli on the 30th and 60th day of culture were either vitreous and friable or compact and composed of embryogenic masses that were yellowish in colour (Figure 1A,B). On the 90th day of culture, the callus was mostly vitreous and friable with some brownish parts (Figure 1C, red arrows). Histological analyses of 30- and 60-day-old calli revealed the presence of two cell types. i.e., embryogenic cells that were located at the callus surface and parenchymatous cells that were located inside the callus (Figure 1D,E). The embryogenic cells were characterised by the presence of several small vacuoles, dense cytoplasm, and a well-defined nucleus containing a distinct nucleolus. In contrast, the parenchymatous cells were larger and highly vacuolated, and their nuclei were located in the periphery next to the cell wall. On the 90th day of culture, the calli were characterised by the presence of mostly parenchymatous cells (Figure 1F) with few embryogenic-type cells.
Flow cytometry analyses revealed significant differences in the nuclear DNA content between calli at different times of culture (Figure 2). The zygotic embryo was usually characterised by the presence of nuclei with 2C and 4C DNA content, but a small peak representing nuclei with 8C DNA content was also present (Figure 2A). Separate analyses of embryogenic masses and non-embryogenic parts of 30-day-old calli demonstrated similar patterns of relative DNA contents in both parts, with 2C and 4C nuclei predominating (Figure 2B–D). However, parenchymatous cells from 60-day-old calli were significantly different, with clear peaks of DNA content ranging from 2C to 16C clearly observed (Figure 2E). In 90-day-old calli, in which it was difficult or impossible to distinguish different cell types, flow cytometry analysis revealed the presence of peaks representing 4C, 8C, and 16C DNA content (Figure 2E). The absence of a detectable 2C DNA content peak in 90-day-old calli was noted (Figure 2F, red arrow).
Analysis of indolic compounds in the explant and embryogenic calli revealed a gradual decrease of these molecules during culture (Figure 3). The highest contents (46.3 and 53.2 µg/g) were found in freshly isolated explants and in 30-day-old calli, respectively. On the 60th and 90th day of culture, the calli had the lowest content of indolic compounds (11.6 and 8.8 µg/g, respectively).

2.2. Localisation and Transcript Accumulation Level Analyses of Hydroxyproline-Rich Proteins (HRGPs), Pectins, and Hemicelluloses

To test whether selected hydroxyproline-rich protein (HRGPs), pectin, and hemicellulose epitopes were differently localised in callus cells on days 30 and 90, (highest and lowest embryogenic potential, respectively), immunocytochemical analyses were performed using the following monoclonal antibodies: JIM13, JIM16, and LM2 against specific cell wall epitopes such as AGPs and EXTs (JIM11 and JIM12), LM6, LM16, LM19, LM20 against pectins, and LM25 against hemicelluloses. The epitopes recognised by the monoclonal antibodies and relevant references are provided in Table 1.
The AGP-specific JIM13 epitope was distributed throughout the cell wall in 30-day-old calli (Figure A1A–C) but was also localised on the cell surface in 90-day-old calli, (Figure A1D–F). JIM16 epitope distribution also showed stage-related differences, being mostly present in intercellular spaces and the cell wall (Figure A1G–I) in 30-day-old calli and also accumulated in intracellular compartments in 90-day-old calli (Figure A1J–L). The LM2 epitope signal was the strongest in 30-day-old calli (Figure A2A–C), being present mostly in intracellular compartments, though some signal was detected also in the plasmalemma and rarely in the cell wall. After 90 days of culture, the signal was essentially limited to intracellular compartments (Figure A2D–F). The EXT-specific JIM11 epitope could not be detected at either time point (Figure A3A–F). The JIM12 epitope signal, weak on the 30th day (Figure A3G–I, H–red arrow), was significantly increased by the 90th day (Figure A3J–L) and localised in the cell wall at both time points. The signal from the pectin-specific LM16 epitope also significantly increased from the 30th to the 90th day of culture (Figure A4A–F) but was present in the form of dotted signal predominantly in intracellular compartments and very rarely in the cell wall. The LM19 epitope was distributed in the periclinal cell walls and in the cell corners, mostly in the second-third cell layers from the callus surface (Figure A4G-I). On the 90th day, this epitope was detected predominantly in cell corners (Figure A4J–L). In 30-day-old calli, the LM6 epitope was observed primarily in intracellular compartments, probably in the plasmalemma and in the cell wall (Figure A5A–C) but, on day 90, the signal was also detectable outside the callus cells (Figure A5D–F, F–red arrows), indicating that this epitope was secreted into the medium. LM20 was localised in the cell wall corners after 30 days of the culture (Figure A5G–I) and, after 90 days of culture, it was present in the entire cell wall (Figure A5J–K). The hemicellulose-specific LM25 antibody was detected in cell walls independently of the culture duration (Figure A6A–F).
Summarising these results over the entire culture period, immunohistochemical studies showed that: 1. AGPs decreased with the time of culture; 2. Among the extensin epitopes, the amount of JIM12 increased, but the amount of JIM11 decreased; 3. Among the pectin epitopes, arabinan-RGI did not change over time; LM19 and LM6 decreased, but LM20 increased with the time of culture; 4. Hemicelluloses remained constant.
Next, we used RT-PCR to see how transcript levels related to epitope signals. Transcript levels for selected AGPs (Bradi3g39740, Bradi2g60270, and Bradi2g31980) and EXTs (Bradi2g05080, Bradi1g22980, and Bradi2g00900) decreased throughout the time period (Figure 4A,C). Unlike AGPs and EXTs, the level of pectin methylesterase (Bradi3g24750) increased (Figure 4B). The transcript level of Bradi5g18950 and Bradi2g57740, which correspond to AGP and EXT (chimeric EXTs), demonstrated the highest accumulation in 30-day-old calli. Bradi2g57740 transcript (Figure 4D) was almost 5-fold higher in 30-day-old calli compared to all analysed EXTs (Figure 4C). Bradi3g12902 (chimeric EXT) revealed the highest accumulation on day 60. To summarise, the decreased immunolocalisation signals were broadly in accordance with the determined transcript accumulation levels.

2.3. Transcript Accumulation Analysis of the Genes Related to Meristem Development and Cell Division

Somatic embryogenesis involves de novo formation of new meristems. Therefore, we examined the transcript accumulation levels of genes associated with meristem development and cell division. Comparative analysis of 10 genes linked to SE suggested differences in their transcript accumulation levels across the time course examined. A detailed description of the genes studied and oligonucleotide primers used for RT-PCR is shown in Table A1. Genes such as YUC (Bradi1g72500 and Bradi5g01327), AIL (Bradi1g72890), BBM (Bradi2g57747 and Bradi4g14960) and CLV3 (Bradi1g05010) showed similar transcript accumulation patterns that decreased from the 30th day (Figure 5). The accumulation of SERK transcripts (Bradi3g46747 and Bradi5g12227) increased from the 30th to the 60th day and then decreased on the 90th day. Accumulation of LATE EMBRYOGENESIS ABUNDANT (LEA) transcripts (Bradi5g26600) increased throughout the time course. Interestingly, WUS (Bradi5g25113) transcript was detected only on the 30th and 60th day time points and was undetectable on the 90th day. The relative transcript accumulation of WUS (Bradi5g25113.1) and YUC (Bradi1g72500) genes was more than eight-fold and ten-fold higher at 30 days than in the embryos (Figure 5B).
Ten cell cycle-related genes have mostly similar patterns of transcript accumulation. CYCD3 (Bradi3g58300), CYCA3 (Bradi1g14820), CYCB1 (Bradi2g52760), CDKPK (Bradi1g54570), CDKB2 (Bradi3g40200), WEE (Bradi3g03112), and CYCD4 (Bradi4g32556) transcript levels were the highest in 30-day-old calli (Figure 6). Then, the levels decreased on the 60th and 90th day. Unlike other cell cycle-related transcripts, CDKA (Bradi3g02270) and CDKD (Bradi2g26510) showed their highest levels on the 60th and 90th day. The highest relative change in transcript level among all the cell cycle-related genes analysed was for CDKB1 (Bradi4g25980) (Figure 6B), whose expression increased from the 30th to 60th day and was ten-fold higher on the 60th day of culture compared to the embryos. However, CDKB1 transcripts then dramatically decreased on the 90th day.

3. Discussion

B. distachyon is a model plant widely used to study various aspects of cereal crop and forage grass biology [33,34], including the cytogenetic and molecular mechanisms underpinning development under both in vivo and in vitro conditions [10,35,36,37,38]. Genetic transformation technologies, critical for the discovery and validation of gene function, have been optimised for successful use in B. distachyon [39,40]. However, as we have demonstrated in the present work, B. distachyon tissue culture is also characterised by the rapid loss of embryogenic potential. The molecular mechanisms responsible for the loss of embryogenic potential remain elusive, but we show here endoploidy levels increasing in 60- and 90-day old calli, with effective elimination of the 2C DNA content peak in the latter. The indolic compounds content revealed a decrease in 60- and 90-day-old calli compared to either freshly isolated explants or 30-day-old calli. Moreover, the immunocytochemical analysis and the transcript accumulation levels of selected HRGPs and genes connected with meristem development and cell division revealed that most had significantly decreased signals or transcript accumulation levels on 60th and 90th day of culture. Conversely, transcript abundance for other genes significantly increased in 30-day-old calli, and this was correlated with an increased embryogenic state.
Endoploidy is a commonly observed phenomena that occurs during the culture of callus tissue of many species (Arabidopsis thaliana [41], Urginea indica [42], Rubus chamaemorus L. [43], and Vicia faba [44]). Long-term culture is conducive to increased level of endoploidy [41,45,46,47], which has been implicated in the reduction of the morphogenetic potential or in the regeneration of polyploid plants [45,48]. We found that increasing endoploidy from the 60th to the 90th day, including the loss of detectable 2C DNA content peaks on the 90th day of culture, correlated with loss of regenerative potential. The increase in nuclear DNA content are associated with significantly reduced regenerative capacity of callus tissue in Musa [49] or Cucumis sativus [45]. The gradual loss of embryogenic potential in B. distachyon callus culture could be also caused by a progressive accumulation of genomic changes, leading to the formation of non-totipotent polyploid cells. In most cases, loss of regenerative ability occurs in long-term culture (i.e., Sorghum bicolor [50] and U. indica [42]) but in other species can be observed after only weeks (i.e., hairy root culture of Onobrychis viciaefolia [51] and callus culture of Pennisetum americanum [52]). The retention of embryogenic potential can be preserved by changing media components, as it was shown in the culture of S. bicolor [50], Saccharum officinarum L. [16] and P. americanum [52]. The reduction or replacement of 2,4-Dichlorophenoxyacetic (2,4-D) can also be helpful in maintaining the regeneration ability. 2,4-D promotes the occurrence of chromosomal aberrations and somaclonal variation but at lower levels it can promote retention of a large pool of diploid cells with high embryogenic potential [53,54].
Changes in endogenous levels of indolic compounds are associated with SE. A preincubation period increases both free and conjugated indole-3-acetic acid (IAA), as well as indole-3-butyric acid in Coffea canephora [55]. The embryogenic suspensor mass of Abies alba contains significantly higher amounts of endogenous IAA with a medium supplemented with 2,4-D [56]. The decrease in endogenous IAA seems to be an important stimulus for the subsequent development of embryos. Hu et al. [57] demonstrated that the elevated level of endogenous auxin inhibits in vitro shoot organogenesis in citrus. In our work, we demonstrated the highest level of indolic compounds was in zygotic embryos and on the 30th day of culture. The level of these compounds significantly decreased on the 60th and 90th day of the culture. Accordingly, the level of indolic compounds is correlated with embryogenic potential. Mamedes-Rodrigues et al. [58] showed that embryogenic calli of B. distachyon are characterised by the highest potential for plantlet production on the 60th and 90th day of culture and detailed the metabolite profiles that highlighted an association of amino acids such as aspartic acid, asparagine, tryptophan, and glycine with embryogenic competence. Higher levels of plantlet regeneration, therefore, seem to be connected with a decreasing amount of indolic compounds, important for embryo maturation.
Association of HRGPs with morphogenesis in vitro has been previously described [59,60]. The HRGP family contains three members: highly glycosylated AGPs, moderately glycosylated EXTs, and slightly glycosylated proline-rich proteins (PRPs). Different types of AGPs seem to have different influences on SE. Some seem to stimulate SE, while others might be involved in its inhibition [28,61]. The expression of specific HRGP epitopes is correlated with SE, and some epitopes are effective markers of embryogenic cells [10,11,59]. Our immunolocalisation of specific HRGP epitopes demonstrate differences with respect to the times that coincide with AGP transcript accumulation. Some of the chimeric EXTs increased only on the 30th day of callus culture and seem to be good markers for embryogenic cells. Differential gene expression analysis of Picea balfouriana calli identified 431 significantly upregulated genes and 987 significantly downregulated genes in embryogenic tissues relative to non-embryogenic tissues [62]. Moreover, the authors reported the upregulation of the AGP genes in the embryogenic tissues. AGP epitopes in immature seeds are developmentally regulated, and the biological activity of AGPs in the formation of somatic embryos changes depending on the age of the seeds [62,63,64,65]. In an earlier study, we demonstrated the presence of AGP and EXT epitopes in the zygotic embryos of B. distachyon [66].
AGP levels tend to reduce as a function of culture time. AGPs are present in various plant organs including roots, stems, leaves, flowers, and seeds and have been implicated in many developmental processes, molecular interactions, plant signalling, and in embryogenesis (reviewed by [59]). Because AGPs are anchored to the cytoplasmic membrane by a glycosylphosphatidylinositol (GPI) anchor, they are good candidates for signalling molecules involved in signal exchange during in vitro culture [12,67]. The disappearance of some AGP epitopes during culture might be a manifestation of aging and of a loss of embryogenic potential. In carrot in vitro cultures, AGPs are present in embryogenic lines but undetectable in non-embryogenic or weakly embryogenic lines, supporting a correlation with SE [68].
In the primary cell wall, pectins form the matrix in which cellulose microfibrils and hemicelluloses are embedded [69]. Key pectins include homogalacturonan (HGA) and rhamnogalacturonan I (RGI). Pectin domains crosslink to each other via calcium and boron bonds [70,71]. These connections can be modified by pectin methylesterases (PMEs), which catalyse the demethylesterification of homogalacturonans [70]. Demethylesterification increases HGA capacity to crosslink via calcium ions, which causes cell wall stiffening, compaction, and enhanced cell–cell adhesion [72,73]. PMEs from bean hypocotyls may participate in cell wall degradation [74]. PMEs can change the pH and consequently activate other cell wall-degrading enzymes, thus facilitating cell expansion, growth, and separation [75,76]. In the present work, we found increased presence of LM20 epitopes as well as increased transcript accumulation levels of PECTIN METHYLESTERASE. This was associated with a decrease in embryogenic potential. Experimental manipulation of PMEs during embryogenesis is required to evaluate potential functional roles.
The correct progression of SE depends on several transcription factors as well as other proteins [77]. For example, LEC and BBM genes are embryo marker genes that play important roles in cell proliferation and embryogenesis in A. thaliana [78,79]. These genes are expressed in proliferating epidermal and subepidermal cells from which somatic embryos develop, and these clusters of cells are required for embryo identity. BBM is a member of the AIL clade of AP2/ERF transcription factors, and these transcription factors can convert somatic cells into totipotent embryogenic cells [80]. The mechanism of such conversion could be similar in B. distachyon, as we have found the highest transcript accumulation level of BBM and AIL genes on the 30th day of culture when histological analysis demonstrated the presence of the highest number of embryogenic masses. Transient expression of BBM could help to promote somatic embryogenesis in B. distachyon.
SERK, WUS, and CLV3 are meristem organisation genes that play a key role in the induction of embryogenesis, and their expression increases during the early stages [81,82]. Transcriptional activity of the WUS gene in A. thaliana cells is sufficient to maintain meristematic cells in the shoot and flower meristems [83]. In our research, the WUS gene was expressed only on the 60th and 90th day of culture which coincides with the highest potential of plantlet production [58]. WUS activates the expression of CLV3, while CLV3 inhibits the expression of the WUS gene, and this feedback system helps to maintain a constant pool of stem cells. The WUS gene also plays a key role in embryogenesis, facilitating the transfer of cells from somatic identity to an embryogenic fate, and is involved in the maintenance of embryogenic stem cells [84,85].
The SERK and LEA genes are associated with SE in various species, such as Dactylis glomerata and A. thaliana [86,87,88,89,90]. In our experiments, we found the highest transcript accumulation level of SERK genes on the 60th day. On the 90th day of culture, the transcript accumulation level was similar to the one on the 30th day of culture. It should be noted that the function of SERK genes is not restricted to SE. Along with the LEA genes, they are expressed under the influence of biotic and abiotic stress [82,91,92]. Callus aging coincides with the production of reactive oxygen species (ROS), stress molecules that are correlated with higher expression levels of SERK genes. In barley, the expression of HvSERK2 was rapidly induced by hydrogen peroxide treatment [93].
IAA is involved in the proper expression of SE-related genes. For example, in C. canephora, an increase in IAA and indole-3-butyric acid (IBA) is associated with higher expression of the YUC and TRYPTOPHAN AMINOTRANSFERASE (TAA) genes [55]. Wójcikowska et al. [94] demonstrated that YUCCA and TAA1 are involved in the tryptophan-dependent IPA–YUC auxin biosynthesis pathway and are associated with SE induction. A similar situation occurs in B. distachyon, where the increase in YUC (Bradi1g72500 and Bradi5g01327) transcript accumulation level is accompanied by high levels of indolic compounds on the 30th day of culture.
CDKs and cyclins are major regulators of the cell cycle, and their correct expression and activity are crucial for both cell differentiation and cell proliferation. We found higher transcript accumulation levels of all analysed CYC and CDK genes on the 30th day, which seems to be connected with normal cell cycle progression. However, the transcript accumulation level of the most analysed CYCs and CDKs decreased on the 60th and 90th day. Such differences seem to be connected with diversion of older cultures into the endoreduplication program, which requires lower CDK kinase activity [95]. These changes were demonstrated using flow cytometry, since we observed increased DNA content in the analysed probes. A key step for the inhibition of CYC/CDK activity is the upregulation of CYCLIN KINASE INHIBITORS (CKIs) during the endoreduplication process [95,96]. The overexpression of the R2 cDNA, which encodes the rice CDK-activating kinase, in tobacco leaves triggered callus formation without requiring exogenous cytokinins [97]. Moreover, R2 expression in the later stages did not prevent cell differentiation and progression to plant organs. Thus, it seems that CDKs control the differentiation fate of the cells during organogenesis. In Cocos nucifera, CDKA transcripts increase during embryogenic callus formation [8]. The expression level of CDKA decreases in germinated somatic embryos. In our research, we observed the increase of the CDKA transcript accumulation level from the 30th through the 60th and 90th day of embryogenic callus culture.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Plant Material Growth and In Vitro Culture Conditions

Immature zygotic embryos of B. distachyon reference line Bd21 were used as explants for embryogenic callus induction. Callus induction medium (CIM, pH 5.8) contained MS salts, vitamins, 30 g/L sucrose, 2.5 mg/L 2,4-D, and 8 g/L Select Agar. Petri dishes with embryos were incubated at 28 °C in the dark for embryogenic callus induction and subsequent callus culture. Calli with embryogenic complexes were transferred to fresh CIM every three weeks. Callus analyses were performed on the 30th, 60th, and 90th day after explant culture. All images were taken using a dissecting microscope SMZ 1500 (Nikon, Shinagawa, Tokyo, Japan) equipped with a digital camera DS-U2 (Nikon, Shinagawa, Tokyo, Japan).

4.2. Flow Cytometry

Flow cytometry was used to analyse changes in the ploidy level in B. distachyon callus. To determine the DNA content, zygotic embryos, embryogenic callus, and non-embryogenic parts were used on the 30th, 60th, and 90th day of culture. The samples were analysed using a CyFlow Space flow cytometer (Sysmex, Kobe, Japan) as in Wolny et al. [38].

4.3. Indolic Compounds Estimation

In order to estimate the IAA content, a colorimetric technique according to Bric et al. [98] was applied to detect indolic compounds. Explants—freshly isolated zygotic embryos—were placed in media designed to promote callus and SE formation and were analysed after 30, 60, and 90 days of culturing. In total, 100 mg of plant material was transferred to mortars containing 2 mL of 10 × PBS and homogenised. The solution was centrifuged (25 min; 18,000× g), and 2 mL of supernatant was mixed with 100 µL of 10 mM orthophosphoric acid and 4 mL of Salkowski’s reagent (150 mL H2SO4; 250 mL ddH2O; 7.5 mL 0.5 M FeCl3 × 6H2O). The pink colour developed after a 30 min incubation at room temperature, and the absorbance was read at 530 nm. The concentration of indolic compounds was determined by using a calibration curve of pure IAA as the standard, following linear regression analysis. Each analysis was carried out in three replicates.

4.4. Histological and Immunochemical Analysis

To determine the chemistry of the cell wall, a set of monoclonal antibodies that had been raised against specific cell wall epitopes such as AGPs (antibodies JIM13, JIM16, LM2), EXTs (JIM11 and JIM12), pectins (LM6, LM16, LM19, LM20), and hemicelluloses (LM25) was used. The references and information on the antibodies are shown in Table 1. The detailed procedure for histological sections observation and immunochemical analysis was as in Betekhtin et al. [10].

4.5. RT-PCR

In order to characterise the transcript accumulation level of selected genes, RT-PCR using a LightCycler® 480 SYBR Green I Master in a LightCycler® 480 Real-Time PCR System was used. The total RNA was isolated from immature zygotic embryos and from the callus cultivated for 30, 60, and 90 days. The primers used in this research are shown in Table A1. The genes encoding extensins with their division in classes was based on Liu et al. [99]. AGP genes were selected by keyword search in the Phytozome database (https://phytozome.jgi.doe.gov/pz/portal.html). The detailed procedure for RT-PCR was as in Betekhtin et al. [100].

5. Conclusions

Here, we describe the gradual decrease of the embryogenic potential in calli of B. distachyon. We show that numerous cell wall components undergo remodelling and that most analysed epitopes decrease in abundance as the calli lose competence. Loss of embryogenic potential is also accompanied by significant changes in the expression of genes connected with the cell wall, meristem development, and cell cycle. Moreover, we found an increase in the endoreduplication processes after 60 and 90 days of culture, which consequently leads to the disappearance of cells with 2C DNA content on 90th day. To understand more precisely the function of HRGPs and pectins during the formation of the embryogenic mass, specific inhibitors could be considered in future studies. CRISPR/Cas9-based targeted mutagenesis of selected cell wall, meristem development, and cell cycle genes may help to better understand the mechanisms governing the gradual loss of embryogenic potential in the tissue culture using B. distachyon as a model for other recalcitrant monocotyledonous species.

Author Contributions

Conceptualisation, A.B.; methodology, A.B., M.R., A.P., K.N., A.M.-H; formal analysis, A.B.; investigation, A.B., M.R., A.P., K.N, A.M.-H; resources, J.H.D., R.H., E.K.; data curation, A.B.; writing—original draft preparation, A.B., M.R.; writing—review and editing, A.B., M.R., K.N., E.K., J.H.D., R.H.; visualisation, A.B.; supervision, A.B.; funding acquisition, J.H.D., R.H., E.K.

Funding

This research was funded by the National Science Centre Poland (grant DEC-2014/14/M/NZ2/00519); J.H.D acknowledges funding from the Leverhulme Trust (Grant reference 10754).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Appendix A

Table
Table A1. Oligonucleotide primers used for RT-PCR reaction with the relevant description of the genes.
Table A1. Oligonucleotide primers used for RT-PCR reaction with the relevant description of the genes.
GenesDescription of the GenesPrimer Sequence (5′–3′)
AK437296ubiquitinpF–TCAAAATGCAAGAACGCAAA
pR–TCCACACTCCACTTGGTGCT
Cell cycle
Bradi1g54570protein kinase binding, CDKPKpF–TTGTGAAGAGGTTCGCGGATGC
pR–CCTTCAAGCTCCTTCAGATCC
Bradi3g02270cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK), subfamily CDKApF–CGAGAAGGTGGAGAAGATCG
pR–CGATGGTCTCGTTGGTGTAG
Bradi4g25980cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK), subfamily CDKB1pF –AAGTGTACAAGGCGCAGGAC
pR–ATCCCTTCGTCGTCCATCTC
Bradi3g40200cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK), subfamily CDKB2pF–AGGGCCAGACCATCCTCTAC
pR–GGATCTTCTCGTGGTTCTGG
Bradi2g26510cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK), subfamily CDKDpF–ACAATGGCCAGACATGGTTT
pR–CCATTGGAAACAATGAACGA
Bradi1g14820CYCLIN, subfamily CYCA3pF–ATCCTTGTTGACTGGCTCGT
pR–CGGTCGATGTAGGAGATGGT
Bradi2g52760CYCLIN, subfamily CYCB1pF–GTCCTGGGAAAGCAGAAGGT
pR–GGACGTTGACGACGTTGC
Bradi3g58300CYCLIN, subfamily CYCD3pF–AGCTGTGACTGCTTGCTCAT
pR–GATAAGGTCAGACGAGCGGG
Bradi4g32556CYCLIN-D4-1-RELATED, CYCD4pF–CTTGTCTGTAGCGGCCAAGA
pR–CTGGATCGTCATGGCTTCGA
Bradi3g03112wee1-like protein kinase (WEE)pF–AGGATTTCTTCTGCACCCCG
pR–GGAGATTTGGGGCAAGGGAT
Meristem development
Bradi1g72500flavin-dependent monooxygenase, YUCCA (YUC)pF–ACCGTCCAGTGGTACAAGTTTGAG
pR–AGCTTGCAGTAGTCCAAGGAGTG
Bradi5g01327lavin-dependent monooxygenase, YUCCA (YUC)pF–CACCGGCTACAAGAGCAATGTTCC
pR–ATATCCGTCCTTGCCGAACAAGCC
Bradi1g72890AINTEGUMENTA-LIKE (AIL)pF–TGTACCTTGGCACCTTCAGCAC
pR–ATGCGCTTCACGTCGTACTTGC
Bradi5g26600LATE EMBRYOGENESIS ABUNDANT (LEA)pF–GTGAATTGTCCGGCGTTGCTTAC
pR–ACCACCAGCAACATCACCATAGC
Bradi3g46747SOMATIC EMBRYOGENESIS RECEPTOR LIKE KINASE (SERK)pF–CTGCTGAACTGGGCAACCTAAC
pR–CATGCTGTTGTTGTTCAGACGAAG
Bradi5g12227SOMATIC EMBRYOGENESIS RECEPTOR LIKE KINASE (SERK)pF–AACTCCTGTGGCACAAGGTGACTC
pR–GCAAATCCAATTGCTGGGACTGC
Bradi2g57747BABY BOOM (BBM)pF–GATCTCTACTTGGGCACTTTCAGC
pR–AGTTAGTGACGGCGTTCAGC
Bradi5g14960BABY BOOM (BBM)pF–GAGGCTCATCTCTGGGACAATAGC
pR–CTCCTTGTCATAGCCACCTTGC
Bradi5g25113WUSCHEL (WUS)pF–GGATCGAGGGGAAGAACGT
Pr–TTGTTGTTGGGGGAGACGTC
Bradi1g05010CLAVATA 3 (CLV3)pF–AAGATCGCCTGGTCGAGCATAG
pR–TTCTGCCTCATCAGTCGGAAGC
Cell wall development
Bradi3g39740arabinogalactan proteinpF–GTACTATTCCCTGGCGGAGTTC
pR–CCATGTTGTCGGTGAGGTTGAG
Bradi2g60270arabinogalactan proteinpF–AGCAGAGCAATCCTCTAGTAGC
pR–TGGGTTCTTCTCGCCATTGTTA
Bradi5g18950arabinogalactan proteinpF–AATAAAGGGAAGTCACCGTCGC
pR–CCGTTCTTCTTGTCATGGACCT
Bradi2g31980arabinogalactan proteinpF–AGTACCCCCTTCGGTTTCGT
pR–TGGTCGATGGACGATGCGTC
Bradi2g57740extensin (chimeric EXT)pF–AATACAGCGTGGGCATCACA
pR–AGTCAGATCCTCCTGGTGCT
Bradi3g12902extensin (chimeric EXT)pF–CATCTGGACCTGCCAATGGT
pR–TCCCAGTTTTGGAGTCTCGC
Bradi2g05080leucine-rich repeat extensin (LRXs)pF–CTCCGGTTCAACGAGTTCGAG
pR–CGATGTTATCCGGGAGGTTGAA
Bradi2g00900proline-rich extensin-like receptor kinases (PERKs)pF–TAACTTTGAGGCACAGGTTGCT
pR–AGCCATGTATCCAAAAGTCCCC
Bradi1g22980formin-homolog extensin (FH EXTs)pF–CAGCAGAGCCTGTTGCTTGAC
pR–TTCTAGGTTTCCGTGCATGAGT
Bradi3g24750pectin methylesterasepF–CAAGACCAAGAACTTCGTCACC
pR–ATAACCCTGGATGTCTGGTCGT
Ijms 19 03811 g0a1 550
Figure A1. Immunolocalisation of JIM13 (A–F) and JIM16 (G–L) in B. distachyon callus. (A–C, G–I) 30th day of cultivation; (D–F, J–L) 90th day of cultivation. FB: fluorescent brightener. Scale bars, 10 μm.
Figure A1. Immunolocalisation of JIM13 (A–F) and JIM16 (G–L) in B. distachyon callus. (A–C, G–I) 30th day of cultivation; (D–F, J–L) 90th day of cultivation. FB: fluorescent brightener. Scale bars, 10 μm.
Ijms 19 03811 g0a1
Ijms 19 03811 g0a2 550
Figure A2. Immunolocalisation of LM2 (A–F) in B. distachyon callus. (A–C) 30th day of cultivation; (D–F) 90th day of cultivation. Scale bars, 10 μm.
Figure A2. Immunolocalisation of LM2 (A–F) in B. distachyon callus. (A–C) 30th day of cultivation; (D–F) 90th day of cultivation. Scale bars, 10 μm.
Ijms 19 03811 g0a2
Ijms 19 03811 g0a3 550
Figure A3. Immunolocalisation of JIM11 (A–F) and JIM12 (G–L) in B. distachyon callus. (A–C, G–I) 30th day of cultivation; (D–F, J–L) 90th day of cultivation. The red arrow indicates a very weak signal for JIM12. The greenish background on the photomicrographs is due to autofluorescence. Scale bars, 10 μm.
Figure A3. Immunolocalisation of JIM11 (A–F) and JIM12 (G–L) in B. distachyon callus. (A–C, G–I) 30th day of cultivation; (D–F, J–L) 90th day of cultivation. The red arrow indicates a very weak signal for JIM12. The greenish background on the photomicrographs is due to autofluorescence. Scale bars, 10 μm.
Ijms 19 03811 g0a3
Ijms 19 03811 g0a4 550
Figure A4. Immunolocalisation of LM16 (A–F) and LM19 (G–L) in B. distachyon callus. (A–C, G–I): 30th day of cultivation; (D–F, J–L) 90th day of cultivation. The greenish background on these photomicrographs is due to autofluorescence. Scale bars, 10 μm.
Figure A4. Immunolocalisation of LM16 (A–F) and LM19 (G–L) in B. distachyon callus. (A–C, G–I): 30th day of cultivation; (D–F, J–L) 90th day of cultivation. The greenish background on these photomicrographs is due to autofluorescence. Scale bars, 10 μm.
Ijms 19 03811 g0a4
Ijms 19 03811 g0a5 550
Figure A5. Immunolocalisation of LM6 (A-F) and LM20 (G–L) in B. distachyon callus. (A–C, G–I) 30th day of cultivation; (D–F, J–L) 90th day of cultivation. The red arrows indicate the presence of the epitope on the callus surface. Scale bars, 10 μm.
Figure A5. Immunolocalisation of LM6 (A-F) and LM20 (G–L) in B. distachyon callus. (A–C, G–I) 30th day of cultivation; (D–F, J–L) 90th day of cultivation. The red arrows indicate the presence of the epitope on the callus surface. Scale bars, 10 μm.
Ijms 19 03811 g0a5
Ijms 19 03811 g0a6 550
Figure A6. Immunolocalisation of LM25 (A–F) in B. distachyon callus. (A–C) 30th day of cultivation; (D–F) 90th day of cultivation. Scale bars, 10 μm.
Figure A6. Immunolocalisation of LM25 (A–F) in B. distachyon callus. (A–C) 30th day of cultivation; (D–F) 90th day of cultivation. Scale bars, 10 μm.
Ijms 19 03811 g0a6

References

  1. Roja-Herrera, R.; Quiroz-Figueroa, F.; Monforte-Gonzalez, M.; Sanchez-Teyer, L.; Loyola-Vargas, V.M. Differential gene expression during somatic embryogenesis in Coffea arabica L. revealed by RT-PCR differential display. Mol. Biotechnol. 2002, 21, 43–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Mujib, A.; Samaj, J. Somatic Embryogenesis; Springer: Berlin, Germany; New York, NY, USA, 2006; 357p. [Google Scholar]
  3. Yang, X.; Zhang, X. Regulation of somatic embryogenesis in higher plants. Crit. Rev. Plant Sci. 2010, 29, 36–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Gaj, M.D.; Zhang, S.; Harada, J.J.; Lemaux, P.G. Leafy cotyledon genes are essential for induction of somatic embryogenesis of Arabidopsis. Planta 2005, 222, 977–988. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Horstman, A.; Li, M.; Heidmann, I.; Weemen, M.; Chen, B.; Muino, J.M.; Angenent, G.C.; Boutilier, K. The BABY BOOM transcription factor activates the LEC1-ABI3-FUS3-LEC2 network to induce somatic embryogenesis. Plant Physiol. 2017, 175, 848–857. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Fehér, A.; Pasternak, T.P.; Dudits, D. Transition of somatic plant cells to an embryogenic state. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. 2003, 74, 201–228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Footitt, S.; Ingouff, M.; Clapham, D.; von Arnold, S. Expression of the viviparous 1 (Pavp1) and p34cdc2 protein kinase (cdc2Pa) genes during somatic embryogenesis in Norway spruce (Picea abies [L.] Karst). J. Exp. Bot. 2003, 54, 1711–1719. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Montero-Cortés, M.; Rodríguez-Paredes, F.; Burgeff, C.; Pérez-Nuñez, T.; Córdova, I.; Oropeza, C.; Verdeil, J.L.; Sáenz, L. Characterisation of a cyclin-dependent kinase (CDKA) gene expressed during somatic embryogenesis of coconut palm. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. 2010, 102, 251–258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Namasivayam, P.; Skepper, J.; Hanke, D. Identification of a potential structural marker for embryogenic competency in the Brassica napus spp. oleifera embryogenic tissue. Plant. Cell Rep. 2006, 25, 887–895. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Betekhtin, A.; Rojek, M.; Milewska-Hendel, A.; Gawecki, R.; Karcz, J.; Kurczynska, E.; Hasterok, R. Spatial distribution of selected chemical cell wall components in the embryogenic callus of Brachypodium distachyon. PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0167426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Potocka, I.; Godel, K.; Dobrowolska, I.; Kurczynska, E.U. Spatio-temporal localization of selected pectic and arabinogalactan protein epitopes and the ultrastructural characteristics of explant cells that accompany the changes in the cell fate during somatic embryogenesis in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant. Physiol Biochem. 2018, 127, 573–589. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Poon, S.; Heath, R.L.; Clarke, A.E. A chimeric arabinogalactan protein promotes somatic embryogenesis in cotton cell culture. Plant Physiol. 2012, 160, 684–695. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Pan, X.; Yang, X.; Lin, G.; Zou, R.; Chen, H.; Samaj, J.; Xu, C. Ultrastructural changes and the distribution of arabinogalactan proteins during somatic embryogenesis of banana (Musa spp. AAA cv. ‘Yueyoukang 1’). Physiol. Plant. 2011, 142, 372–389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Betekhtin, A.; Rojek, M.; Jaskowiak, J.; Milewska-Hendel, A.; Kwasniewska, J.; Kostyukova, Y.; Kurczynska, E.; Rumyantseva, N.; Hasterok, R. Nuclear genome stability in long-term cultivated callus lines of Fagopyrum tataricum (L.) Gaertn. PLoS ONE 2017, 12, e0173537. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Cai, T.; Butler, L. Plant regeneration from embryogenic callus initiated from immature inflorescences of several high-tannin sorghums. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. 1990, 20, 101–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Brisibe, E.A.; Miyake, H.; Tanigichi, T.; Maeda, E. Regulation of somatic embryogenesis in long-term callus cultures of sugarcane (Saccharum officinarum L.). New Phytol. 1990, 126, 301–307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Lambé, P.; Mutambel, H.S.; Deltour, R.; Dinant, M. Somatic embryogenesis in pearl millet (Pennisetum glaucum): Strategies to reduce genotype limitation and to maintain long-term totipotency. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. 1998, 55, 23–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Krishna, H.; Alizadeh, M.; Singh, D.; Singh, U.; Chauhan, N.; Eftekhari, M.; Sadh, R.K. Somaclonal variations and their applications in horticultural crops improvement. 3 Biotech 2016, 6, 54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Linacero, R.; Vazquez, A.M. Somaclonal variation in rye. Mutat. Res. 1993, 302, 201–205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Rakoczy-Trojanowska, M. The effects of growth regulators on somaclonal variation in rye (Secale cereale L.) and selection of somaclonal variants with increased agronomic traits. Cell. Mol. Biol. Lett. 2002, 7, 1111–1120. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  21. Sato, M.; Hosokawa, M.; Doi, M. Somaclonal variation is induced de novo via the tissue culture process: A study quantifying mutated cells in Saintpaulia. PLoS ONE 2011, 6, e23541. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Nic-Can, G.I.; Galaz-Avalos, R.M.; De-la-Pena, C.; Alcazar-Magana, A.; Wrobel, K.; Loyola-Vargas, V.M. Somatic embryogenesis: Identified factors that lead to embryogenic repression. A case of species of the same genus. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0126414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Phillips, R.L.; Kaepplert, S.M.; Olhoft, P. Genetic instability of plant tissue cultures: Breakdown of normal controls. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1994, 91, 5222–5226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Orshinskya, B.R.; Tomes, D.T. Effect of long-term culture and low temperature incubation on plant regeneration from a callus line of birdsfoot trefoil (Lotus corniculatus L.). J. Plant Physiol. 1985, 119, 389–397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Yates, E.A.; Knox, J.P. Investigations into the occurrence of plant cell surface epitopes in exudate gums. Carbohydr. Polym. 1994, 24, 281–286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Yates, E.A.; Valdor, J.F.; Haslam, S.M.; Morris, H.R.; Dell, A.; Mackie, W.; Knox, J.P. Characterization of carbohydrate structural features recognized by anti-arabinogalactan-protein monoclonal antibodies. Glycobiology 1996, 6, 131–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  27. Knox, J.P.; Linstead, P.J.; Peart, J.; Cooper, C.; Roberts, K. Developmentally regulated epitopes of cell surface arabinogalactan proteins and their relation to root tissue pattern formation. Plant J. 1991, 1, 317–326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  28. Smallwood, M.; Yates, E.A.; Willats, W.G.T.; Martin, H.; Knox, J.P. Immunochemical comparison of membrane-associated and secreted arabinogalactan-proteins in rice and carrot. Planta 1996, 198, 452–459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Smallwood, M.; Beven, A.; Donovan, N.; Neill, S.J.; Peart, J.; Roberts, K.; Knox, J.P. Localization of cell wall proteins in relation to the developmental anatomy of the carrot root apex. Plant J. 1994, 5, 237–246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Pedersen, H.L.; Fangel, J.U.; McCleary, B.; Ruzanski, C.; Rydahl, M.G.; Ralet, M.C.; Farkas, V.; von Schantz, L.; Marcus, S.E.; Andersen, M.C.; et al. Versatile high resolution oligosaccharide microarrays for plant glycobiology and cell wall research. J. Biol. Chem. 2012, 287, 39429–39438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Verhertbruggen, Y.; Marcus, S.E.; Haeger, A.; Verhoef, R.; Schols, H.A.; McCleary, B.V.; McKee, L.; Gilbert, H.J.; Knox, J.P. Developmental complexity of arabinan polysaccharides and their processing in plant cell walls. Plant J. 2009, 59, 413–425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  32. Verhertbruggen, Y.; Marcus, S.E.; Haeger, A.; Ordaz-Ortiz, J.J.; Knox, J.P. An extended set of monoclonal antibodies to pectic homogalacturonan. Carbohydr. Res. 2009, 344, 1858–1862. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. IBI. Genome sequencing and analysis of the model grass Brachypodium distachyon. Nature 2010, 463, 763–768. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Opanowicz, M.; Vain, P.; Draper, J.; Parker, D.; Doonan, J.H. Brachypodium distachyon: Making hay with a wild grass. Trends Plant Sci. 2008, 13, 172–177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Lusinska, J.; Majka, J.; Betekhtin, A.; Susek, K.; Wolny, E.; Hasterok, R. Chromosome identification and reconstruction of evolutionary rearrangements in Brachypodium distachyon, B. stacei and B. hybridum. Ann. Bot. 2018, 122, 445–459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Idziak, D.; Betekhtin, A.; Wolny, E.; Lesniewska, K.; Wright, J.; Febrer, M.; Bevan, M.W.; Jenkins, G.; Hasterok, R. Painting the chromosomes of Brachypodium: Current status and future prospects. Chromosoma 2011, 120, 469–479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Francin-Allami, M.; Merah, K.; Albenne, C.; Rogniaux, H.; Pavlovic, M.; Lollier, V.; Sibout, R.; Guillon, F.; Jamet, E.; Larre, C. Cell wall proteomic of Brachypodium distachyon grains: A focus on cell wall remodeling proteins. Proteomics 2015, 15, 2296–2306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Wolny, E.; Betekhtin, A.; Rojek, M.; Braszewska-Zalewska, A.; Lusinska, J.; Hasterok, R. Germination and the early stages of seedling development in Brachypodium distachyon. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018, 19, 2916. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Thole, V.; Peraldi, A.; Worland, B.; Nicholson, P.; Doonan, J.H.; Vain, P. T-DNA mutagenesis in Brachypodium distachyon. J. Exp. Bot. 2012, 63, 567–576. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Vain, P.; Thole, V.; Worland, B.; Opanowicz, M.; Bush, M.S.; Doonan, J.H. A T-DNA mutation in the RNA helicase eIF4A confers a dose-dependent dwarfing phenotype in Brachypodium distachyon. Plant J. 2011, 66, 929–940. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Fras, A.; Maluszynska, J. The correlation between the chromosome variation in callus and genotype of explants of Arabidopsis thaliana. Genetica 2004, 121, 145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Sumita Jha, S.S. Nuclear changes and oganogenesis during callus culture of Urginea indica Kunth. Indian Squill. Cytologia 1987, 52, 433–438. [Google Scholar]
  43. Thiem, B.; Śliwińska, E. Flow cytometric analysis of nuclear DNA content in cloudberry (Rubus chamaemorus L.) in vitro cultures. Plant Sci. 2003, 164, 129–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Zhang, D.L.; Li, K.Q.; Gu, W.; Hao, L.F. Chromosome aberration and ploidy equilibrium of Vicia faba in tissue culture. Theor. Appl. Genet. 1987, 75, 132–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Kubaláková, M.; Dolezel, J.; Lebeda, A. Ploidy instability of embryogenic cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.) callus culture. Biol. Plant. 1996, 38, 475–480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Maluszynska, J. The effect of B chromosomes and T-DNA on chromosomal variation in callus cells and regenerated roots of Crepis capillaris. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. 1997, 50, 113–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Kwasniewska, J.; Nawrocki, W.; Siwinska, D.; Maluszynska, J. DNA damage in Crepis capilaris cells in response to in vitro conditions Acta Biol. Cracov. Bot. 2012, 54, 93–101. [Google Scholar]
  48. Orzechowska, M.; Stępień, K.; Kamińska, T.; Siwinska, D. Chromosome variations in regenerants of Arabidopsis thaliana derived from 2- and 6-week-old callus detected using flow cytometry and FISH analyses. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. 2013, 112, 263–273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Roux, N.; Strosse, H.; Toloza, A.; Panis, B.; Doležel, J. Detecting ploidy level instability of banana embryogenic cell suspension cultures by flow cytometry. In Banana Improvement: Cellular Molecular Biology and Induced Mutations; Science Publishers Inc.: Enfield, UK, 2004. [Google Scholar]
  50. Pola, S.; Mani, N.S.; Raman, T. Long-term maintenance of callus cultures from immature embryo of Sorghum bicolor. World J. Agric. Sci. 2009, 5, 415–421. [Google Scholar]
  51. Xu, Z.Q.; Jia, J.F. The reduction of chromosome number and the loss of regeneration ability during subculture of hairy root cultures of Onobrychis viciaefolia transformed by Agrobacterium rhizogenes A4. Plant Sci. 1996, 120, 107–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Plus, J.; George, L.; Eapen, S.; Rao, P.S. Enhanced plant regeneration in pearl millet (Pennisetum americanum) by ethylene inhibitors and cefotaxime. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. 1993, 32, 91–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Mishiba, K.I.; Okamoto, T.; Mii, M. Increasing ploidy level in cell suspension cultures of Doritaenopsis by exogenous application of 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid. Physiol. Plant. 2001, 112, 142–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Ziauddin, A.; Kasha, K.J. Long-term callus cultures of diploid barley (Hordeum vulgare). II. Effect of auxins on chromosomal status of cultures and regeneration of plants. Euphytica 1990, 48, 279–286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Ayil-Gutierrez, B.; Galaz-Avalos, R.; Pena-Cabrera, E.; Loyola-Vargas, V. Dynamics of the concentration of IAA and some of its conjugates during the induction of somatic embryogenesis in Coffea canephora. Plant Signal. Behav. 2013, 8, e26998. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Vondráková, Z.; Eliášová, K.; Fischerová, L.; Vágner, M. The role of auxins in somatic embryogenesis of Abies alba. Cent. Eur. J. Biol. 2011, 6, 587–596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Hu, W.; Fagundez, S.; Katin-Grazzini, L.; Li, Y.; Li, W.; Chen, Y.; Wang, X.; Deng, Z.; Xie, S.; McAvoy, R.J.; et al. Endogenous auxin and its manipulation influence in vitro shoot organogenesis of citrus epicotyl explants. Hortic. Res. 2017, 4, 17071. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  58. Mamedes-Rodrigues, T.C.; Batista, D.S.; Vieira, N.M.; Matos, E.M.; Fernandes, D.; Nunes-Nesi, A.; Cruz, C.D.; Viccini, L.F.; Nogueira, F.T.S.; Otoni, W.C. Regenerative potential, metabolic profile, and genetic stability of Brachypodium distachyon embryogenic calli as affected by successive subcultures. Protoplasma 2018, 255, 655–667. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Showalter, A.M. Arabinogalactan-proteins: Structure, expression and function. Cell Mol. Life Sci. 2001, 58, 1399–1417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Xu, C.; Takac, T.; Burbach, C.; Menzel, D.; Samaj, J. Developmental localization and the role of hydroxyproline rich glycoproteins during somatic embryogenesis of banana (Musa spp. AAA). BMC Plant Biol. 2011, 11, 38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  61. Egertsdotter, U.; von Arnold, S. Importance of arabinogalactan proteins for the development of somatic embryos of Norway spruce (Picea abies). Physiol. Plant. 1995, 93, 334–345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Li, Q.; Zhang, S.; Wang, J. Transcriptome analysis of callus from Picea balfouriana. BMC Genom. 2014, 15, 553. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Kreuger, M.; Postma, E.; Brouwer, Y.; van Holst, G.J. Somatic embryogenesis of Cyclamen persicum in liquid medium. Physiol. Plant. 1995, 94, 605–612. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Saare-Surminski, K.; Preil, W.; Knox, P.; Lieberei, R. Arabinogalactan proteins in embryogenic and non-embryogenic callus cultures of Euphorbia pulcherrima. Physiol. Plant. 2000, 108, 180–187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Van Hengel, A.J.; Van Kammen, A.; De Vries, S.C. A relationship between seed development, Arabinogalactan-proteins (AGPs) and the AGP mediated promotion of somatic embryogenesis. Physiol. Plant. 2002, 114, 637–644. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Betekhtin, A.; Milewska-Hendel, A.; Lusinska, J.; Chajec, L.; Kurczynska, E.; Hasterok, R. Organ and tissue-specific localisation of selected cell wall epitopes in the zygotic embryo of Brachypodium distachyon. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018, 19, 725. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Tan, L.; Showalter, A.M.; Egelund, J.; Hernandez-Sanchez, A.; Doblin, M.S.; Bacic, A. Arabinogalactan-proteins and the research challenges for these enigmatic plant cell surface proteoglycans. Front. Plant Sci. 2012, 3, 140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. McCabe, P.F.; Valentine, T.A.; Forsberg, L.S.; Pennell, R.I. Soluble signals from cells identified at the cell wall establish a developmental pathway in carrot. Plant. Cell 1997, 9, 2225–2241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Majda, M.; Robert, S. The role of auxin in cell wall expansion. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018, 19, 951. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  70. Ridley, B.L.; O’Neill, M.A.; Mohnen, D. Pectins: Structure, biosynthesis, and oligogalacturonide-related signaling. Phytochemistry 2001, 57, 929–967. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Burton, R.A.; Gidley, M.J.; Fincher, G.B. Heterogeneity in the chemistry, structure and function of plant cell walls. Nat. Chem. Biol. 2010, 6, 724–732. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Virk, S.S.; Cleland, R.E. The role of wall calcium in the extension of cell walls of soybean hypocotyls. Planta 1990, 182, 559–564. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Hocq, L.; Pelloux, J.; Lefebvre, V. Connecting homogalacturonan-type pectin remodeling to acid growth. Trends Plant Sci. 2017, 22, 20–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Goldberg, R.; Pierron, M.; Durand, L.; Mutaftshiev, S. In vitro and in situ properties of cell wall pectinmethylesterases from mung bean hypocotyls. J. Exp. Bot. 1992, 43, 41–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Koutojansky, A. Molecular genetics of pathogenesis by soft-rot Erwininas. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 1987, 25, 405–430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Nari, J.; Noat, G.; Diamantidis, G.; Woudstra, M.; Ricard, J. Electrostatic effects and the dynamics of enzyme reactions at the surface of plant cells. III. Interplay between limited cell-wall autolysis, pectin methyl esterase activity and electrostatic effects in soybean cell wall. Eur. J. Biochem. 1986, 155, 199–210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Horstman, A.; Bemer, M.; Boutilier, K. A transcriptional view on somatic embryogenesis. Regeneration 2017, 4, 201–216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  78. Kurczynska, E.U.; Gaj, M.D.; Ujczak, A.; Mazur, E. Histological analysis of direct somatic embryogenesis in Arabidopsis thaliana (L.) Heynh. Planta 2007, 226, 619–628. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  79. Kulinska-Lukaszek, K.; Tobojka, M.; Adamiok, A.; Kurczynska, E. Expression of the BBM gene during somatic embryogenesis of Arabidopsis thaliana. Biol. Plant. 2011, 56, 389–394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Boutilier, K.; Offringa, R.; Sharma, V.K.; Kieft, H.; Ouellet, T.; Zhang, L.; Hattori, J.; Liu, C.M.; van Lammeren, A.A.; Miki, B.L.; et al. Ectopic expression of BABY BOOM triggers a conversion from vegetative to embryonic growth. Plant Cell 2002, 14, 1737–1749. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  81. Schmidt, E.D.; Guzzo, F.; Toonen, M.A.; de Vries, S.C. A leucine-rich repeat containing receptor-like kinase marks somatic plant cells competent to form embryos. Development 1997, 124, 2049–2062. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  82. Santos, M.O.; Aragao, F.J. Role of SERK genes in plant environmental response. Plant Signal. Behav. 2009, 4, 1111–1113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  83. Hamada, S.; Onouchi, H.; Tanaka, H.; Kudo, M.; Liu, Y.-G.; Shibata, D.; Machida, C.; Machida, Y. Mutations in the WUSCHEL gene of Arabidopsis thaliana result in the development of shoots without juvenile leaves. Plant J. 2000, 24, 91–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Somssich, M.; Je, B.I.; Simon, R.; Jackson, D. CLAVATA-WUSCHEL signaling in the shoot meristem. Development 2016, 143, 3238–3248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. Brand, U.; Grunewald, M.; Hobe, M.; Simon, R. Regulation of CLV3 expression by two homeobox genes in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 2002, 129, 565–575. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  86. Somleva, M.; Schmidt, E.; de Vries, S. Embryogenic cells in Dactylis glomerata L. (Poaceae) explants identified by cell tracking and by SERK expression. Plant Cell Rep. 2000, 19, 718–726. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Hecht, V.; Vielle-Calzada, J.P.; Hartog, M.V.; Schmidt, E.D.; Boutilier, K.; Grossniklaus, U.; de Vries, S.C. The Arabidopsis SOMATIC EMBRYOGENESIS RECEPTOR KINASE 1 gene is expressed in developing ovules and embryos and enhances embryogenic competence in culture. Plant Physiol. 2001, 127, 803–816. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  88. de Oliveira Santos, M.; Romano, E.; Yotoko, K.S.C.; Tinoco, M.L.P.; Dias, B.B.A.; Aragão, F.J.L. Characterisation of the cacao somatic embryogenesis receptor-like kinase (SERK) gene expressed during somatic embryogenesis. Plant Sci. 2005, 168, 723–729. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Thomas, C.; Meyer, D.; Himber, C.; Steinmetz, A. Spatial expression of a sunflower SERK gene during induction of somatic embryogenesis and shoot organogenesis. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2004, 42, 35–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  90. Ikeda-Iwai, M.; Satoh, S.; Kamada, H. Establishment of a reproducible tissue culture system for the induction of Arabidopsis somatic embryos. J. Exp. Bot. 2002, 53, 1575–1580. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  91. Salleh, F.M.; Evans, K.; Goodall, B.; Machin, H.; Mowla, S.B.; Mur, L.A.; Runions, J.; Theodoulou, F.L.; Foyer, C.H.; Rogers, H.J. A novel function for a redox-related LEA protein (SAG21/AtLEA5) in root development and biotic stress responses. Plant Cell Environ. 2012, 35, 418–429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  92. Magwanga, R.O.; Lu, P.; Kirungu, J.N.; Dong, Q.; Hu, Y.; Zhou, Z.; Cai, X.; Wang, X.; Hou, Y.; Wang, K.; et al. Cotton late embryogenesis abundant (LEA2) genes promote root growth and confer drought stresst tolerance in transgenic Arabidopsis thaliana. G3 2018, 8, 2781–2803. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  93. Li, Y.; Li, Q.; Guo, G.; He, T.; Gao, R.; Faheem, M.; Huang, J.; Lu, R.; Liu, C. Transient overexpression of HvSERK2 improves barley resistance to powdery mildew. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018, 19, 1226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  94. Wójcikowska, B.; Jaskóła, K.; Gąsiorek, P.; Meus, M.; Nowak, K.; Gaj, M.D. LEAFY COTYLEDON2 (LEC2) promotes embryogenic induction in somatic tissues of Arabidopsis, via YUCCA-mediated auxin biosynthesis. Planta 2013, 238, 425–440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  95. Del Pozo, J.C.; Manzano, C. Auxin and the ubiquitin pathway. Two players-one target: The cell cycle in action. J. Exp. Bot. 2014, 65, 2617–2632. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  96. Xu, Y.; Cao, H.; Chong, K. APC-targeted RAA1 degradation mediates the cell cycle and root development in plants. Plant Signal. Behav. 2010, 5, 218–223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  97. Yamaguchi, M.; Kato, H.; Yoshida, S.; Yamamura, S.; Uchimiya, H.; Umeda, M. Control of in vitro organogenesis by cyclin-dependent kinase activities in plants. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2003, 100, 8019–8023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  98. Bric, J.M.; Bostock, R.M.; Silverstone, S.E. Rapid in situ assay for indoleacetic Acid production by bacteria immobilized on a nitrocellulose membrane. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1991, 57, 535–538. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  99. Liu, X.; Wolfe, R.; Welch, L.R.; Domozych, D.S.; Popper, Z.A.; Showalter, A.M. Bioinformatic identification and analysis of extensins in the plant kingdom. PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0150177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  100. Betekhtin, A.; Milewska-Hendel, A.; Chajec, L.; Rojek, M.; Nowak, K.; Kwasniewska, J.; Wolny, E.; Kurczynska, E.; Hasterok, R. 5-Azacitidine induces cell death in a tissue culture of Brachypodium distachyon. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018, 19, 1806. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Ijms 19 03811 g001 550
Figure 1. Morphology and histology of representative structures in the in vitro culture of Brachypodium distachyon callus. (A–C) General morphology and (D–E) histological section of the callus on the 30th (A,D), 60th (B,E), and 90th (C,F) day of cultivation. The red arrows point at brownish parts of the callus. EM: embryogenic masses, PC: parenchymatous cells. Scale bars, (A–C)—1 mm, (D)—10 μm, (E)—50 μm, (F)—10 μm.
Figure 1. Morphology and histology of representative structures in the in vitro culture of Brachypodium distachyon callus. (A–C) General morphology and (D–E) histological section of the callus on the 30th (A,D), 60th (B,E), and 90th (C,F) day of cultivation. The red arrows point at brownish parts of the callus. EM: embryogenic masses, PC: parenchymatous cells. Scale bars, (A–C)—1 mm, (D)—10 μm, (E)—50 μm, (F)—10 μm.
Ijms 19 03811 g001
Ijms 19 03811 g002 550
Figure 2. Relative DNA content determined by flow cytometry in zygotic embryos (A) and in B. distachyon callus on the 30th (B–C, embryogenic and non-embryogenic parts, respectively), 60th (D–E, embryogenic and non-embryogenic parts, respectively), and 90th (F) day of cultivation. The red arrow demonstrates the absence of 2C DNA on the 90th day of cultivation.
Figure 2. Relative DNA content determined by flow cytometry in zygotic embryos (A) and in B. distachyon callus on the 30th (B–C, embryogenic and non-embryogenic parts, respectively), 60th (D–E, embryogenic and non-embryogenic parts, respectively), and 90th (F) day of cultivation. The red arrow demonstrates the absence of 2C DNA on the 90th day of cultivation.
Ijms 19 03811 g002
Ijms 19 03811 g003 550
Figure 3. Indolic compounds content on the 30th, 60th, and 90th day of cultivation. The asterisks * indicate values that are significantly different from the immature zygotic embryo control (Student’s t-test, p < 0.05; n = 3 ± SD).
Figure 3. Indolic compounds content on the 30th, 60th, and 90th day of cultivation. The asterisks * indicate values that are significantly different from the immature zygotic embryo control (Student’s t-test, p < 0.05; n = 3 ± SD).
Ijms 19 03811 g003
Ijms 19 03811 g004 550
Figure 4. Relative transcript accumulation levels of genes associated with cell wall architecture, i.e., AGPs (Bradi3g39740, Bradi2g60270, Bradi2g31980, and Bradi5g18950), EXTs (Bradi2g05080, Bradi1g22980, Bradi2g00900, Bradi3g12902, and Bradi2g57740), and PECTIN METHYLESTERASE (Bradi3g24750)), on the 30th, 60th, and 90th day of cultivation. Relative transcript accumulation levels of (A) AGPs, (B) EXTs, (C) PECTIN METHYLESTERASE, (D) chimeric EXT Bradi3g12902. The relative transcript accumulation levels were normalised to an internal control (AK437296, gene encoding for ubiquitin) and calibrated to the control (explants, zygotic embryos); *: value is significantly different from the control (Student’s t-test, p < 0.05; n = 3 ± SD).
Figure 4. Relative transcript accumulation levels of genes associated with cell wall architecture, i.e., AGPs (Bradi3g39740, Bradi2g60270, Bradi2g31980, and Bradi5g18950), EXTs (Bradi2g05080, Bradi1g22980, Bradi2g00900, Bradi3g12902, and Bradi2g57740), and PECTIN METHYLESTERASE (Bradi3g24750)), on the 30th, 60th, and 90th day of cultivation. Relative transcript accumulation levels of (A) AGPs, (B) EXTs, (C) PECTIN METHYLESTERASE, (D) chimeric EXT Bradi3g12902. The relative transcript accumulation levels were normalised to an internal control (AK437296, gene encoding for ubiquitin) and calibrated to the control (explants, zygotic embryos); *: value is significantly different from the control (Student’s t-test, p < 0.05; n = 3 ± SD).
Ijms 19 03811 g004
Ijms 19 03811 g005 550
Figure 5. Relative transcript accumulation levels of (A) YUC (Bradi5g01327), AIL (Bradi1g72890), SERK (Bradi3g46747 and Bradi5g12227), LEA (Bradi5g26600), BBM (Bradi2g577747 and Bradi4g14960), CLV3 (Bradi1g05010), and (B) WUS (Bradi5g25113) and YUC (Bradi1g72500) genes on the 30th, 60th, and 90th day of cultivation. The relative transcript accumulation levels were normalised to an internal control (AK437296, a gene encoding ubiquitin) and calibrated to the control (explants, zygotic embryos); *: value is significantly different from the control (Student’s t-test, p < 0.05; n = 3 ± SD).
Figure 5. Relative transcript accumulation levels of (A) YUC (Bradi5g01327), AIL (Bradi1g72890), SERK (Bradi3g46747 and Bradi5g12227), LEA (Bradi5g26600), BBM (Bradi2g577747 and Bradi4g14960), CLV3 (Bradi1g05010), and (B) WUS (Bradi5g25113) and YUC (Bradi1g72500) genes on the 30th, 60th, and 90th day of cultivation. The relative transcript accumulation levels were normalised to an internal control (AK437296, a gene encoding ubiquitin) and calibrated to the control (explants, zygotic embryos); *: value is significantly different from the control (Student’s t-test, p < 0.05; n = 3 ± SD).
Ijms 19 03811 g005
Ijms 19 03811 g006 550
Figure 6. Relative transcript accumulation levels of (A) CYCD3 (Bradi3g58300), CYCA3 (Bradi1g14820), CYCB1 (Bradi2g52760), CDKPK (Bradi1g54570), CDKA (Bradi3g02270), CDKB2 (Bradi3g40200), CDKD (Bradi2g26510), WEE (Bradi3g03112), and CYCD4 (Bradi4g32556), and (B) CDKB1 (Bradi4g25980) on the 30th, 60th and 90th day of culture. The relative transcript accumulation levels were normalised to an internal control (AK437296, gene encoding ubiquitin) and calibrated to the control (explants, zygotic embryos); *: value is significantly different from the control (Student’s t-test, p < 0.05; n = 3 ± SD).
Figure 6. Relative transcript accumulation levels of (A) CYCD3 (Bradi3g58300), CYCA3 (Bradi1g14820), CYCB1 (Bradi2g52760), CDKPK (Bradi1g54570), CDKA (Bradi3g02270), CDKB2 (Bradi3g40200), CDKD (Bradi2g26510), WEE (Bradi3g03112), and CYCD4 (Bradi4g32556), and (B) CDKB1 (Bradi4g25980) on the 30th, 60th and 90th day of culture. The relative transcript accumulation levels were normalised to an internal control (AK437296, gene encoding ubiquitin) and calibrated to the control (explants, zygotic embryos); *: value is significantly different from the control (Student’s t-test, p < 0.05; n = 3 ± SD).
Ijms 19 03811 g006
Table
Table 1. Antibodies used for immunocytochemistry, cognate epitopes, and references.
Table 1. Antibodies used for immunocytochemistry, cognate epitopes, and references.
AntibodyEpitopeReferences
Arabinogalactan proteins (AGPs)
JIM13βGlcA1->3αGalA1->2Rha[25,26,27]
JIM16AGP glycan[25,26,27]
LM2β-linked GlcA[26,28]
Extensins
JIM11Extensin[25,29]
JIM12Extensin[29]
Pectins
LM6αAra1-5αAra1-5αAra1-5αAra1-5Ara[30]
LM16Processed arabinan—rhamnogalacturonan (RG)-I domain[31,32]
LM19α-GalA(1-4)α-GalA(1-4)α-GalA(1-4)α-GalA[31,32]
LM20Homogalactouronan[32]
Hemicelluloses
LM25Xyloglucan[30]

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Betekhtin, A.; Rojek, M.; Nowak, K.; Pinski, A.; Milewska-Hendel, A.; Kurczynska, E.; Doonan, J.H.; Hasterok, R. Cell Wall Epitopes and Endoploidy as Reporters of Embryogenic Potential in Brachypodium Distachyon Callus Culture. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018, 19, 3811. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms19123811

AMA Style

Betekhtin A, Rojek M, Nowak K, Pinski A, Milewska-Hendel A, Kurczynska E, Doonan JH, Hasterok R. Cell Wall Epitopes and Endoploidy as Reporters of Embryogenic Potential in Brachypodium Distachyon Callus Culture. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2018; 19(12):3811. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms19123811

Chicago/Turabian Style

Betekhtin, Alexander, Magdalena Rojek, Katarzyna Nowak, Artur Pinski, Anna Milewska-Hendel, Ewa Kurczynska, John H. Doonan, and Robert Hasterok. 2018. "Cell Wall Epitopes and Endoploidy as Reporters of Embryogenic Potential in Brachypodium Distachyon Callus Culture" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 19, no. 12: 3811. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms19123811

APA Style

Betekhtin, A., Rojek, M., Nowak, K., Pinski, A., Milewska-Hendel, A., Kurczynska, E., Doonan, J. H., & Hasterok, R. (2018). Cell Wall Epitopes and Endoploidy as Reporters of Embryogenic Potential in Brachypodium Distachyon Callus Culture. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 19(12), 3811. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms19123811

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop