Next Article in Journal
Molecular Analysis of Sensory Axon Branching Unraveled a cGMP-Dependent Signaling Cascade
Previous Article in Journal
Molecular Pharmacology of VEGF-A Isoforms: Binding and Signalling at VEGFR2
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
IJMS
Volume 19
Issue 5
10.3390/ijms19051265
ijms-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Gastroprotective and Antioxidant Activity of Kalanchoe brasiliensis and Kalanchoe pinnata Leaf Juices against Indomethacin and Ethanol-Induced Gastric Lesions in Rats

by
Edilane Rodrigues Dantas De Araújo
1,
Gerlane Coelho Bernardo Guerra
2,
Daline Fernandes de Souza Araújo
3,
Aurigena Antunes De Araújo
2,
Júlia Morais Fernandes
1,
Raimundo Fernandes De Araújo Júnior
4,
Valéria Costa Da Silva
2,
Thaís Gomes De Carvalho
4,
Leandro De Santis Ferreira
5 and
Silvana Maria Zucolotto
1,*
1
Research Group on Bioactive Natural Products, Department of Pharmacy, Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte, 59012-570 Natal, Brazil
2
Department of Biophysics and Pharmacology, Biosciences Center, Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte, 59072-970 Natal, Brazil
3
Faculty of Health Sciences of Trairi, Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte, 59200-000 Santa Cruz, Brazil
4
Department of Morphology, Histology and Basic Pathology, Biosciences Center, Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte, 59072-970 Natal, Brazil
5
Department of Pharmacy, Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte, 59012-570 Natal, Brazil
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018, 19(5), 1265; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms19051265
Submission received: 7 March 2018 / Revised: 26 March 2018 / Accepted: 29 March 2018 / Published: 24 April 2018
(This article belongs to the Section Bioactives and Nutraceuticals)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Kalanchoe brasiliensis and Kalanchoe pinnata are used interchangeably in traditional medicine for treating peptic ulcers and inflammatory problems. In this context, this study aims to characterize the chemical constituents and evaluate the gastroprotective activity of the leaf juices of the two species in acute gastric lesions models. Thin Layer Chromatography (TLC) and Ultra High Performance Liquid Chromatography coupled to Mass Spectrometer (UHPLC-MS) were performed for chemical characterization. Wistar rats were pre-treated orally with leaf juices (125, 250 and 500 mg/kg) or ranitidine (50 mg/kg). The peaks observed in the chromatogram of K. brasiliensis showed similar mass spectra to flavonoid glycosides derived from patuletin and eupafolin, while K. pinnata showed mass spectra similar to compounds derived from quercetin, patuletin, eupafolin and kaempferol. K. brasiliensis at all doses and K. pinnata at doses of 250 mg/kg and 500 mg/kg significantly reduced the lesions in the ethanol induction model. In the indomethacin induction model, both species showed significant results at doses of 250 and 500 mg/kg. Also, the pre-treatment with leaf juices increased the antioxidant defense system, glutathione (GSH), whereas malondialdehyde (MDA), myeloperoxidase (MPO), interleukin-1β (IL-1β) and tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) levels were significantly decreased. Treatment with leaf juices led to the upregulation of zone occludes-1 (ZO-1) and the downregulation of inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS) and factor nuclear-κβ transcription (NF-κB-p65), while also showing a cytoprotective effect and maintaining mucus production. These findings show that the leaf juices of the two species showed gastroprotective effects on ethanol and gastric indomethacin injury which were a consequence of gastric inflammation suppression, antioxidant activity and the maintenance of cytoprotective defenses and mucosal structure architecture.

1. Introduction

The development of peptic ulcers is a result of an imbalance between endogenous mucosal mechanisms—mucus, bicarbonate, prostaglandins, nitric oxide (NO) and sulfhydryl compounds—and the presence of endogenous aggressive factors such hydrochloric acid and pepsin. Exogenous factors such as Helicobacter pylori, use of steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (corticosteroids) and non-steroids (NSAIDs), alcohol abuse and stress [1,2]. Peptic ulcers may develop in any region of the gastrointestinal tract, being more frequent in the stomach and duodenum. Gastric ulcers are usually related to weakening of the mucosal defense mechanisms and the presence of aggressive factors, whereas the development of duodenal ulcers is often associated with the hypersecretion of hydrochloric acid and pepsin, and in this situation even when the defense mechanisms are normal, they are not able to avoid aggression [3].
Ethanol attacks the gastric mucosa directly inducing lesions in the mucosa, because this acts to promote destruction of the mucosa’s protective layer due to depletion of mucus and bicarbonate, resulting in cellular necrosis. Cellular necrosis results from a cascade of events that involve the release of reactive oxygen species (ROS), infiltration of inflammatory cells that produce chemical markers, and leading to vasoconstriction, edema, hemorrhage and compromised blood flow with consequent ischemia and death of the gastric cells [4,5].
Indomethacin is a representative of the NSAID family and causes gastric lesions through inhibition of the enzyme cyclooxygenase-1 (COX-1) resulting in decreased production of endogenous prostaglandins, thereby rendering gastric mucosa susceptible to endogenous and exogenous attacks/aggression; in addition, this NSAID acts as a pro-oxidant catalyst initiating lipoperoxidation, producing ROS and, thus, interfering with the endogenous antioxidant systems of the mucosal cells, as well as inducing recruitment of leukocytes and boosting the inflammatory response [6,7].
Brazil holds the largest share of biodiversity, around 15–20% of the world total; among the elements that compose it, plants are a raw material for manufacturing herbal medicines and other medicines [8]. The World Health Organization (WHO) has expressed its position on the need to value the use of medicinal plants in health since the Declaration of Alma-Ata in 1978, considering that 80% of the world population uses these plants or preparations thereof with regard to Primary Health Care. Alongside this, the participation of the developing countries in this process stands out, since they have 67% of the vegetal species in the world [9].
Kalanchoe brasiliensis Cambess and Kalanchoe pinnata (Lamarck) Persoon, from the Crassulaceae family, both popularly known as “coirama” and “saião” are popularly used in treating peptic ulcers. The described method of use is the leaf juice of the fresh leaves [10]. Added to all of this, it is worth mentioning that the presence of the species K. pinnata is in the National Relation of Species of Interest of Health Unic System (RENISUS).
In this context, the present study was carried out to establish the action mechanism involved in gastroprotective activity of K. brasiliensis and K. pinnata leaf juices against gastric lesions induced by ethanol and by indomethacin in rats.

2. Results

2.1. TLC Profile of Kalanchoe brasiliensis and Kalanchoe pinnata Leaf Juices

TLC analyses of extracts showed a great variety of phenolic compounds. K. brasiliensis and K. pinnata leaf juices showed a different chromatographic profile. According to Wagner and Bladt (2001), the orange colors of spots revealed with NP Reagent and observed under UV—365 nm and the yellow colors of spots UV-365 nm, indicated the presence of flavonoids in K. brasiliensis and K. pinnata, respectively [11].

2.2. UHPLC-MS Profile of Kalanchoe brasiliensis and Kalanchoe pinnata Leaf Juices

The chromatographic profiles obtained by UHPLC-MS from K. brasiliensis leaf juice are shown in Figure 1, and for K. pinnata in Figure 2. The compounds were identified based on the mass spectral data and literature by searching for a comparison of Rf and the molecular formula of ions [12]. Table 1 and Table 2 summarizes the identified compounds.
Despite the species belonging to the same genus, it is possible to observe that the studied plant species leaf juices present a very different chemical profile. The K. pinnata profile can be considered simpler than K. brasiliensis, as already noted in the analysis by TLC. Twenty-seven (27) compounds were identified in the K. brasiliensis leaf juices, and the majority were correlated to glycosylated patuletin derived flavonoids and also derivatives of the flavonoid aglycone eupafolin. Isolation and characterization of patuletin and eupafolin derivatives have been already described for extracts of this species [12,13]. Eight (8) compounds were identified in the K. pinnata leaf juice and attributed to quercetin glycosylated, patuletin, eupafolin and kaempferol derivatives. The isolation of glycosides derived from quercetin, patuletin, eupafolin and kaempferol was previously described in K. pinnata leaves [12,14].
Thus, the major compounds identified by UHPLC-MS in the leaf juices of both species correspond to O-glycosylated flavonoids (Table 1 and Table 2). The sugars conjugated to these structures are hexoses, pentoses and deoxyhexoses. The only aglycone identified was the flavonoid kaempferol, and was only noted in K. pinnata leaf juice.

2.3. Macroscopic Evaluation of Gastric Lesions

Absolute ethanol caused intense damage to the gastric mucosa such as hemorrhagic erosions in gastric lesion control (Figure 3A 2). Pre-treatment with K. brasiliensis leaf juice at doses of 125 mg/kg (p < 0.01), 250 mg/kg (p < 0.001) and 500 mg/kg (p < 0.001) and K. pinnata leaf juice at doses of 125 mg/kg (p < 0.01), 250 mg/kg (p < 0.001) and 500 mg/kg (p < 0.001) significantly reduced lesions and GLI when compared to the gastric lesion control given orally (Figure 3A 10). Table 3 shows that the pre-treatment with K. brasiliensis and K. pinnata leaf juices were able to reduce the formation of gastric lesions induced by ethanol.
Indomethacin orally produced lesions in the gastric mucosa in gastric lesion control (Figure 3B 2). Pre-treatment orally with ranitidine, K. brasiliensis and K. pinnata leaf juice showed significant results at the doses of 250 mg/kg (p < 0.05) and 500 mg/kg (p < 0.01), (Figure 3B 10). Similarly, pre-treatment with leaf juice also showed a significant result at doses of 250 mg/kg (p < 0.01) and 500 mg/kg (p < 0.001), (Figure 3B 10). It is possible to observe in Table 4, which shows the percentages of inhibition, that the pre-treatment with K. brasiliensis and K. pinnata leaf juices were able to reduce the formation of gastric lesions induced by indomethacin.

2.4. Effect of Kalanchoe brasiliensis and Kalanchoe pinnata Leaf Juices on Glutathione (GSH) and Malondialdehyde (MDA) Levels and Myeloperoxidase (MPO) Activity

Ethanol and indomethacin introduction (orally) in rats resulted in a reduction in GSH levels in the gastric tissue of the gastric lesion control (Figure 4A,B). Pre-treatment with K. brasiliensis leaf juice significantly increased GSH levels at three doses (p < 0001) and K. pinnata at doses of 125 mg/kg (p < 0.05), 250 mg/kg (p < 0.01) and 500 mg/kg (p < 0.001) compared to the gastric lesion control on ethanol-induced gastric lesion (Figure 4A). In the acute gastric lesion induced by indomethacin, administration of K. brasiliensis leaf juice at doses of 250 mg/kg (p < 0.05) and 500 mg/kg (p < 0.01) and K. pinnata at doses of 250 mg/kg (p < 0.05) and 500 mg/kg (p < 0.01) significantly increased GSH levels compared to the gastric lesion control (Figure 4B). Pre-treatment with the drug ranitidine also elevated GSH levels in the ethanol induction model (p < 0.01) (Figure 4A) and in the indomethacin induction model (p < 0.01) (Figure 4B).
Ethanol and indomethacin (orally in rats) resulted in increased MDA levels in the gastric tissue of the gastric lesion control (Figure 4C,D). Pre-treatment with K. brasiliensis leaf juice at doses of 250 mg/kg (p < 0.01) and 500 mg/kg (p < 0.01) and K. pinnata leaf juice at the doses of 125 mg (p < 0.05), 250 mg/kg (p < 0.05) and 500 mg/kg (p < 0.01) were able to significantly reduce MDA levels compared to the gastric lesion control at induction of gastric lesions by ethanol (Figure 4C). In the acute gastric lesion model induced by indomethacin, pre-treatment with K. brasiliensis leaf juice was also able to reduce MDA levels at doses of 250 mg/kg (p < 0.05) and 500 (p < 0.01) and K. pinnata only at the dose of 500 mg/kg (p < 0.01) (Figure 4D). Ranitidine reduced MDA levels in the ethanol induction model (p < 0.05) (Figure 4C) and the indomethacin induction model (p < 0.01) (Figure 4D).
Ethanol and indomethacin (orally in rats) resulted in elevated MPO activity in the gastric tissue of the gastric lesion control (Figure 4E,F). Pre-treatment with K. brasiliensis leaf juice at doses of 125 mg/kg (p < 0.01), 250 mg/kg (p < 0.01) and 500 mg/kg (p < 0.001) were able to significantly reduce MPO enzyme activity compared to the gastric lesion control of gastric lesion induction by ethanol (Figure 4E). On the other hand, only at the dose of 500 mg/kg (p < 0.05) did K. pinnata leaf juice have a statistically significant result in comparison to the gastric lesion control of the ethanol gastric lesion induction (Figure 4E). Pre-treatment with the drug ranitidine reduced the activity of the MPO enzyme in both the ethanol-induced (p < 0.01) (Figure 4E) acute gastric lesion model and the indomethacin induction model (p < 0.001) (Figure 4F). Pre-treatment with K. brasiliensis leaf juice at doses of 125 mg/kg (p < 0.05), 250 mg/kg (p < 0.05) and 500 mg/kg (p < 0.001) were able to significantly reduce MPO enzyme activity compared to the gastric lesion control of the indomethacin gastric lesion induction (Figure 4F). On the other hand, K. pinnata leaf juice at doses of 125 mg/kg (p < 0.01), 250 mg/kg (p < 0.001) and 500 mg/kg (p < 0.001) were able to achieve a statistically significant result in comparison to the gastric lesion control of the indomethacin gastric lesion induction (Figure 4F).

2.5. Effect of Kalanchoe brasiliensis and Kalanchoe pinnata Leaf Juice Pre-Treatment on Interleukin-1β (IL-1β) and Tumor Necrosis Factor-α (TNF-α) Levels

Ethanol and indomethacin administered orally in rats elevated IL-1β and TNF-α levels in the gastric tissue. Pre-treatment with K. brasiliensis leaf juice at doses of 125 mg/kg (p < 0.05), 250 mg/kg (p < 0.05) and 500 mg/kg (p < 0.01), and K. pinnata leaf juice at doses of 125 mg/kg (p < 0.001), 250 mg/kg (p < 0.001) and 500 mg/kg (p < 0.001) were able to significantly suppress IL- 1β compared to the gastric lesion control in the ethanol-induced gastric lesion model (Figure 5A). It was also observed that the pre-treatment with K. brasiliensis leaf juice at doses of 125 mg/kg (p < 0.01), 250 mg/kg and 500 mg/kg (p < 0.001), and K. pinnata leaf juice at doses of 125 mg/kg (p < 0.001), 250 mg/kg (p < 0.001) and 500 mg/kg (p < 0.001) were able to decrease TNF-α levels in the inflammatory process in the gastric mucosa caused by ethanol (Figure 5C). Ranitidine also reduced IL-1β (p < 0.001) (Figure 5A) and TNF-α (p < 0.001) (Figure 5C) levels in the acute ethanol gastric lesion induction model.
In the indomethacin acute gastric lesion induction model, pre-treatment with K. brasiliensis and K. pinnata leaf juices at the three doses evaluated were able to significantly decrease IL-1β levels (p < 0.001) when compared to gastric lesion control level (Figure 5B). It was also observed that K. brasiliensis juice at doses of 125 mg/kg (p < 0.01), 250 mg/kg (p < 0.01) and 500 mg/kg (p < 0.001) and K. pinnata at doses of 250 mg/kg (p < 0.05) and 500 mg/kg (p < 0.05) significantly reduced TNF-α levels when compared to gastric lesion control level (Figure 5D). Ranitidine also reduced IL-1β (p < 0.001) (Figure 5B) and TNF-α (p < 0.01) levels (Figure 5D) in the indomethacin acute gastric lesion induction model.

2.6. Histology

According to the histological study, pathological changes were not observed in the healthy group stomachs, as indexed by a semi-quantitative scoring system. However, ethanol and indomethacin caused the appearance of severe gastric lesions in the gastric mucosa with the presence of extensive edema and infiltration of leukocytes in the submucosal layer (Figure 6 and Figure 7). Pre-treatment with K. brasiliensis and K. pinnata leaf juices at a dose of 125 mg/kg showed severe lesions of the mucosa with edema and leukocyte infiltration of the submucosal layer, while the dose of 250 mg/kg improved the severity of the lesions, presenting the mucosa with slight interruption of the superficial epithelium, edema and infiltration of moderate leucocytes in the submucosal layer. At the same time, when the animals received the K. brasiliensis and K. pinnata leaf juices at doses of 500 mg/kg and ranitidine (50 mg/kg) in the two implemented experimental models, reduced severity of the lesions, a slight interruption of the superficial epithelium with submucosal edema and mild leukocyte infiltration (Figure 6 and Figure 7), and preservation of mucosal structure architecture (crypts and gastric glands) were observed compared to gastric lesion control.

2.7. Study of Mucosal Glycoproteins

The gastric mucosa in rats pre-treated both samples of K. brasiliensis and K. pinnata at the doses of 500 mg/kg and ranitidine (50 mg/kg) displayed increased Periodic Acid Schiff-PAS staining intensity compared to the gastric lesion control in ethanol and indomethacin induction models, indicating an increase in the glycoprotein cell content of gastric mucosa in pretreated rats (Figure 8A,B).

2.8. Immunohistochemistry

The expression of the inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS) and factor nuclear kappa B-p65 (NF-κB-p65) in the gastric mucosa, expressed in inflammatory cells such as macrophages and lymphocytes, was in upregulated in gastric lesion control but downregulated in groups pre-treated with K. brasiliensis and K. pinnata leaf juices (500 mg/kg) and ranitidine (50 mg/kg) with a significant expression reduction for both markers (p < 0.01). Figure 9A,B show iNOS, and Figure 10A,B show NF-κB-p65.
Immunohistochemical analysis for ZO-1 revealed a strong brown color in epithelial cells such as in superficial mucosal, parietal and peptic cells of the gastric mucosa, marking in the ethanol and indomethacin healthy group compared to the gastric lesion control (Figure 11A,B). However, pre-treatment with K. brasiliensis and K. pinnata leaf juices at a dose of 500 mg/kg and ranitidine significantly increased ZO-1 expression.

2.9. Evaluation of Gastric Secretion

In the pylorus ligation assay, administration of K. brasiliensis and K. pinnata leaf juices at doses of 250 and 500 mg/kg were not able to change the total acidity or pH of the gastric juice (Table 5). Instead, ranitidine (50 mg/kg) reduced total acidity (p < 0.001) and significantly increased the pH (p < 0.001) of gastric juice compared to the control (Table 5).

3. Discussion

In the present study, we observed that the pre-treatment with K. brasileinsis and K. pinnata leaf juice protects the mucosa of rats against the gastric damage of indomethacin and ethanol-induced gastric lesions, suggesting that they exhibit a significant gastroprotective effect. In addition, pre-treatment with leaf juices of both species significantly reduced damage by improving parameters related to oxidative stress and inflammation on mucosal structures.
Several mechanisms are associated with the production of gastric mucosal lesions. Ethanol and indomethacin cause intense damage to the gastric mucosa in the form of ulcerative lesions. Ethanol attacks the gastric mucosa directly inducing mucosal injury, since it acts to reduce secretion of bicarbonate and the generation of mucus, in addition to the excessive production of ROS, disturbances in gastric microcirculation and lesion of the epithelial cells, causing rupture of mucous cell membranes and cytotoxic effects, along with consequent propagation of the inflammatory cascade [5]. On the other hand, indomethacin causes gastric lesions due to the weakening of the gastric mucosa caused by synthesis inhibition of prostaglandins by COX-1; in addition, NSAID also acts as a pro-oxidant catalyst and initiates the lipoperoxidation producing ROS and, thus, interfering with the antioxidant systems endogenous cells of the mucosa, and inducing the leukocyte recruitment and boosting the inflammatory response [6,7].
The administration of ethanol on the gastric mucosa causes lipid peroxidation, which together with the increase of free radicals generates oxidative stress, resulting in cell death [15,16]. Oxidative stress may play a major role in the induction and pathogenesis of stomach ulcers. Decreased GSH levels are observed in both the ethanol-induced acute gastric lesions induction model and indomethacin, making the gastric mucosa more susceptible to injury [17]. In addition to reducing GSH levels, ethanol and indomethacin affect the properties of gastric tissue by raising lipid peroxidation [18], with MDA being the main indicator of lipid peroxidation. Thus, MDA acts as a marker of ROS, mediated by the development of gastric lesions [15]. On the other hand, K. brasiliensis and K. pinnata leaf juice and ranitidine (50 mg/kg) had significant antioxidant activity, observed by reducing MDA levels (Figure 4C,D) and increasing the GSH levels (Figure 4A,B) in response to oxidative stress due to treatment with ethanol and indomethacin.
Gastric lesions caused by ethanol result in high neutrophil infiltration, releasing ROS that are extremely cytotoxic and promote the development of tissue lesions [19]. The MPO is the main constituent of the azurophilic granules of neutrophils, being readily released after activation, and contributing to innate immune defense [20]. Our results revealed the protection of the gastric mucosa and the inhibition of leukocyte infiltration in gastric tissue in rats pre-treated with leaf juices and with ranitidine (50 mg/kg) (Figure 4E,F). The activation and infiltration of neutrophils seems to be involved in the initial processes that form these lesions. Salga et al. [21] demonstrated that reducing neutrophil infiltration in ulcerated gastric tissues helped prevent gastric lesions in rats [21].
The involvement of proinflammatory cytokines such as IL-1β and TNF-α in the gastric lesion is remarkable [22,23]. TNF-α is one of the most aggressive factors in the inflammation, injury and carcinogenesis processes in various tissues, including the development of gastric mucosal ulcers [24]. IL-1β contributes to the development of lesions in the gastric mucosa after ethanol administration, because this cytokine acts by inducing accumulation of neutrophils, which leads to the release of inflammatory mediators [15]. TNF-α reduces gastric microcirculation around the ulcer and delays healing due to its ability to potentiate the inflammatory response [25]. Ethanol-induced gastric lesions and gastric epithelial cells undergo apoptosis triggered by locally increased TNF-α [26]. In the same context, NF-κB-p65 is a transcription factor that mediates crucial inflammatory events in gastric lesions induced by ethanol, including the expression of several proinflammatory targets such as TNF-α, chemokines and adhesion molecules [27,28,29]. In the inactive state, NF-κB-p65 (a heterodimer located in the cytosol of cells) is maintained inactive by binding to the inhibitory protein IκBα. Following exposure to stress signals such as ROS and inflammatory cytokines, IκBα undergoes phosphorylation and subsequent proteasomal degradation. In the present study, pre-treatment with leaf juice and ranitidine (50 mg/kg) was able to reduce levels of IL-1β (Figure 5A,B) and TNF-α (Figure 5C,D) and expression of NF-κB-p65 (Figure 10A,B) in both the ethanol and indomethacin induced acute gastric lesion induction model.
Histological results indicated that ethanol and indomethacin caused the appearance of severe to very serious gastric lesions in the gastric mucosa with the presence of extensive edema and infiltration of leukocytes in the submucosa layer. It was possible to observe that pre-treatment with the leaf juices of both species at a dose of 500 mg/kg exert a cytoprotective effect on the gastric mucosa (Figure 6 and Figure 7). Exposure to gastric lesions such as ethanol and NSAIDs results in a decrease of the protective mucus gel and the phospholipid layer, leading to acid diffusion and mucosal injury [30]. The results of our study showed intense staining of glycoprotein secretions of gastric wall mucosal glands in rats pre-treated with K. brasiliensis and K. pinnata leaf juice at a dose of 500 mg/kg and ranitidine (50 mg/kg) (Figure 8A,B). Mucus secretion is one of the important mechanisms of gastric mucosal defense against necrotizing agents [21,27,31], playing a significant role in the process of gastric lesion inhibition because the mucus/bicarbonate layer protects newly formed cells from acid and peptic lesions [32,33].
Previous studies have suggested that TNF-α and other proinflammatory cytokines activate NF-κβ, leading to the activation of transcription of several inflammatory genes, including iNOS. NO is described as the second major defense mechanism in the GI tract, so that it acts on the regulation of gastric mucosal integrity and acidity together with prostaglandin E2 (PGE2), as well as being involved in the inhibition of neutrophil aggregation and increased blood flow [34,35]. The inducible NOS-derived NO (iNOS) is produced in high amounts giving rise to inflammatory responses that will favor the formation of gastric lesions through the generation of ROS [36]. Pre-treatment with K. brasiliensis and K. pinnata leaf juices at a dose of 500 mg/kg and ranitidine (50 mg/kg) was able to reduce the expression of the iNOS enzyme in the gastric mucosa of rats, both in the ethanol and indomethacin induction models (Figure 9A,B).
Zo-1 is a trans-membrane protein that preserves the integrity of the tight junctions which are the indicators of epithelial integrity of the mucosa [37]. Immunohistochemical analysis showed that pre-treatment with K. brasiliensis and K. pinnata leaf juices at a dose of 500 mg/kg and ranitidine (50 mg/kg) was able to increase ZO-1 expression in the gastric mucosa of rats, both in the ethanol and indomethacin induction models (Figure 11A,B).
When we associate the results of the UHPLC-MS phytochemical analysis with the pharmacological results, it can be suggested that the flavonoids identified in the leaf juices of the two plant species can contribute, at least in part, in the reduction of the inflammatory process generated in the gastric mucosa. Flavonoids of different classes are known to have various biological activities and medicinal value. Most have anti-inflammatory properties and can suppress the expression and transcription of inflammatory cytokines [38]. In a study by Jabeen et al. [39] which used a rheumatoid arthritis induction model, it was observed that treatment with patuletin was able to decrease ROS; therefore, a decrease in nitric oxide concentration and an increase in glutathione levels were also observed. In addition, there was inhibition of TNF-α, IL-1β expression and decreased T-cell proliferation, thereby suppressing the inflammation.
Our results show preclinical evidence of the effect of these extracts as gastroprotectors. Previous studies reported in literature (using different extraction method) have demonstrated that the K. pinnata species presents gastroprotective activity [40,41,42,43,44] as well as only one study reported the gastroprotective activity of K. brasiliensis [45]. It is worth noting that when comparing our study with others described previously, we used an extraction method to obtain the leaf juices according to popular medicine without the use of toxic solvent. Beside, our work showed an investigation more detailed about the gastroprotective action mechanism added to chemical characterization of extracts, often not presented in the previous works.
Flavonoids were detected in both extracts according to the UHPLC-MS analysis. These secondary metabolites may be involved with the gastroprotective effect of the extract, since it has been reported that quercetin, a strong antioxidant, may protect gastric epithelial cells from oxidative damage by decreasing ROS production in acute gastric mucosa lesion [46]. In vivo studies have shown a gastroprotective effect of quercetin against gastric lesions induced by ethanol. Studies have shown that eupafolin has anti-inflammatory [47,48] and antioxidant properties [49]. Eupafolin was able to inhibit NO release in LPS stimulated macrophages [50]. This flavonoid also reduced iNOS and cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) in these cells [51]. In addition, eupafolin inhibited the adhesion of leukocytes to the endothelium by inhibition of intercellular adhesion molecule 1 (ICAM-1) expression [52]. Kaempferol has antioxidant and anti-inflammatory activity [53]. Regarding the anti-inflammatory activity of kaempferol, it has been described that this flavonoid presents mechanisms of inhibiting iNOS and COX-2 levels in a dose-dependent way [54].
In the literature, flavonoids are described as possessing both cytoprotective and antisecretion properties. In mammals, they exert a gastroprotective effect by increasing the levels of endogenous prostaglandin, decreasing histamine secretion, eliminating ROS and inhibiting H. pylori bacteria [55,56]. Flavonoids such as naringin, quercetin, silymarin, anthocyanosides, soforadine and rutin have been reported to have antiulcerogenic properties [57]. For this, future studies with the isolated flavonoids that have been identified in K. brasileinsis and K. pinnata leaf juices can be performed to investigate the role of these compounds in gastroprotective activity.
The current data revealed that pre-treatment with K. brasiliensis and K. pinnata leaf juices did not alter the evaluated acid secretion parameters (pH, total acidity and volume). In contrast, pre-treatment with ranitidine (50 mg/kg) reduced total acidity and increased the pH. Thus, we can suggest that K. brasiliensis and K. pinnata leaf juices did not show antisecretion activity.
In conclusion, the pre-treatment with K. brasiliensis and K. pinnata leaf juices increased the antioxidant defense system and glutathione (GSH), whereas malondialdehyde, myeloperoxidase, IL-1β and TNF-α levels were significantly decreased. In addition, the pre-treatment led to the upregulation of ZO-1 and the downregulation of iNOS and NF-κB-p65, while also showing a cytoprotective effect and maintaining mucus production. These findings show that the leaf juices of the two species have gastroprotective effects on ethanol and gastric indomethacin injury which were a consequence of gastric inflammation suppression, antioxidant activity and the maintenance of cytoprotective defenses and mucosal structure architecture.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Plant Material

K. brasiliensis and K. pinnata leaves were collected in a cultivation in “Escola Agrícola de Jundiaí” at Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte. The original samples were obtained of Horto Francisco José de Abreu at the Federal University of Ceará (UFC) in Fortaleza city, Ceará State, Brazil, in October of 2015. The botanical identification of the K. brasiliensis species was performed by Dr. Maria Iracema Bezerra Loyola, and a voucher specimen (nº 5468) was deposited at the Herbarium of the Bioscience Center of the Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte, Brazil. The botanical identification of the K. pinnata species was performed by Dr. Rúbia Santos Fonseca, and a voucher specimen (nº 57335) was deposited at the Prisco Bezerra Herbarium of the Federal University of Ceará, Brazil. The plant material collection was conducted under authorization of the Brazilian Authorization and Biodiversity Information System (SISBIO) (process number 35017) and the research by authorization of the National System for Management of Genetic Heritage (SISGEN) nº A7EA798.

4.2. Preparation of the Kalanchoe brasiliensis and Kalanchoe pinnata Leaf Juices

Fresh K. brasiliensis (3 kg) and K. pinnata (3 kg) leaves were extensively washed and extracted with water by turbo extraction for 5 minutes at a plant: solvent proportion of 1:1 (w/v) was put in an industrial blender. The leaf juices were not filtered so they could used and the pharmacological tests conducted in a manner similar to the use reported by the local population. The leaf juices were concentrated by rotaevaporator (model V-700, Buchi). One part of each amount of leaf juices was freeze-dried for UHPLC-MS analysis and biological activity assays, while another part was used for TLC analysis. The freeze-dried leaf juices were dissolved in distilled water for the biological assays.

4.3. Thin Layer Chromatography (TLC) Profile of the Kalanchoe brasiliensis and Kalanchoe pinnata Leaf Juices

Thin Layer Chromatography (TLC) was carried out on silica gel F254 (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany) using three different mobile phases: (1) ethyl acetate: formic acid: methanol: water (10:0.5:0.6:0.2 v/v/v/v); (2) ethyl acetate: formic acid: methanol: water (10:1.5:0.5:1.6 v/v/v/v) and (3) toluene: ethyl acetate: formic acid (5:5:0.5 v/v/v). After development, the plates were dried and the components observed under UV light (254 and 365 nm). The plates were sprayed with NP reagent (1% diphenylboryloxyethylamine in methanol; Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MI, USA) and visualized under UV-365 nm. The retention factors (Rf), color, and spot behavior were compared with chromatographic profiles of reference substances reported in the literature [11].

4.4. Ultra High Performance Liquid Chromatography (UHPLC-MS) Profile of the Kalanchoe brasiliensis and Kalanchoe pinnata Leaf Juices

A review was first made for analytical methods and molecular mass ions related to possible structures and fragments for the chromatographic method development by UHPLC-MS aiming to obtain the leaf juice profiles for K. brasiliensis and K. pinnata and aid in identifying the metabolites of both species. Thus, metabolite identification was based on retention factor (Rf) and comparison among the molecular formula and weight of each ion in majority peaks and the data already described in the literature [12,13,14].
The UHPLC-MS analysis was performed with Agilent model 1260 Infinity UHPLC and Agilent model 6230 mass spectrometer (ESI-TOF, Santa Clara, CA, USA). The column used was a Shimadzu Shim-pack XR-ODS (50 × 3.0 mm × 2.2 μm). The eluents were: (A) 0.1% formic acid and (B) 0.1% formic acid in acetonitrile for positive mode and (A) water and (B) acetonitrile for negative mode. The gradient used was 0–30 min 10–30% B, 30–31 min 30–100% B, 31–35 min 100% B, 35-36 min 100–10% B and 36–40 min 10% B. The temperature of the mobile phase was set at 30 °C and the injection volume was 20 μL. For mass spectrometer, the capillary was adjusted to 4 KV and nitrogen was used as nebulizer and dryer gas at 300 °C, 8 L/min and 35 psig. The acquisition was performed as scan mode in the negative mode for m/z 100 to 1700 and in positive mode m/z 100 to 2000.

4.5. Animal Stock

Female Wistar rats (180–250 g) of 8–10 weeks old were obtained from the vivarium Health Center of the Health Sciences Center from the Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN) (nº 074/2015, 11 January 2016). They were kept under standard environmental conditions (12 h dark/light cycle) and temperature (22 ± 2 °C). Water and industrialized dry food (Presence, Purina, Brazil) were made available ad libitum. All the experiments were conducted in accordance with the National Council for the Control of Animal Experimentation of Brazil (CONCEA), the International Guiding Principles for Biomedical Research Involving Animals of the Council of International Organizations of Medical Sciences (CIOMS) and were submitted to and approved by the Ethics Committee on Animal Use of the Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN), under license nº 074/2015. The animals were euthanized with an overdose of sodium thiopental (100 mg/kg, i.p.) associated with lidocaine (10 mg/mL) intraperitoneally in all protocols.

4.6. Gastric Lesion Induction by Ethanol

The induction of gastric lesion by ethanol was adapted from the method of Hollander and Tarnawski [58]. After 24 h of fasting, the rats (n = 7/group) were orally pre-treated at 1 h prior to induction. Group 1 (healthy) and 2 (gastric lesion control) received the vehicle (distilled water—10 mL/kg) orally. Group 3 received an oral dose of the 50 mg/kg ranitidine, and groups 4, 5 and 6 received an oral dose of the 125, 250 and 500 mg/kg respectively of K. brasiliensis leaf juice. Groups 7, 8 and 9 received an oral dose of the 125, 250 and 500 mg/kg respectively of K. pinnata leaf juice. After 1 h, all animals except Group 1 received an oral dose of the 0.5 mL/100 g absolute ethanol PA. The rats were then euthanized one hour later, the stomach removed by opening along the greatest curvature, washed with saline solution, and then macroscopically evaluated for measuring the injured areas. Stomach samples were stored at −80°C for analyses.

4.7. Gastric Lesion Induction by Indomethacin

The induction of gastric lesion by indomethacin was adapted from the method of Kakub and Gulfraz [59]. After 24 h of fasting, the rats (n = 7/group) were orally pre-treated at 1 h prior to induction. Group 1 (healthy) and 2 (gastric lesion control) received the vehicle (distilled water—10 mL/kg) orally. Group 3 received an oral dose of the 50 mg/kg ranitidine, and groups 4, 5 and 6 received an oral dose of the 125, 250 and 500 mg/kg respectively of K. brasiliensis leaf juices. Groups 7, 8 and 9 received an oral dose of the 125, 250 and 500 mg/kg respectively of K. pinnata leaf juices. After 1 h, all animals except Group 1 received oral dose of the 40 mg/kg indomethacin. The rats were then euthanized six hours later, the stomach removed by opening along the greatest curvature, washed with saline solution, and then macroscopically evaluated for measuring the injured areas. Stomach samples were stored at −80 °C for analyses.

4.8. Macroscopic Stomach Lesion Assessment

In order to determine the gastric lesion index, the scores were attributed as described by Magistretti et al. [60] with adaptations. The extent of gastric damage was quantified via measuring the area of gastric lesions. The stomach was thoroughly rinsed with saline to remove any contents. Then, the stomach samples were photographed. The digital photos were used for determination of the total stomach area (mm2) and area of the gastric lesions (mm2) using imageJ 1.48d software (National Institute of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA). For each stomach, the sum of areas of all forms of gastric lesions was recorded. The Gastric Lesion Index (GLI) and Percentage Inhibition (I%) were calculated according to equations: GLI = [lesion area (mm2)/total stomach area (mm2)] × 100 and I% = [(GLI gastric lesion control − GLI treated group)/GLI gastric lesion control] × 100.

4.9. Glutathione (GSH) Total

GSH content was measured via the assay described by Anderson et al. [61]. Stomach samples (n = 7) were stored at −80 °C until use. Stomach tissue homogenates (0.25 mL of a 5% tissue solution prepared in 0.02 M EDTA) were added to 320 mL of distilled water and 80 mL of 50% TCA. Samples were centrifuged at 3000 rpm for 15 min at 4 °C. The supernatant (400 mL) was added to 800 mL of 0.4 M Tris buffer at pH 8.9 and 20 μL of 0.01 M DTNB. The absorbance of each sample was measured at 420 nm, and the results were reported as units of GSH per milligram of tissue.

4.10. Malonyldialdehyde (MDA) Assay

MDA content was measured via the assay described by Esterbauer and Cheeseman [62]. Stomach samples were suspended in buffer Tris HCl 1:5 (w/v) and minced with scissors for 15 s. on an ice-cold plate. The resulting suspension was homogenized for 2 min with an automatic Potter homogenizer and centrifuged at 2500× g at 4 °C for 10 min. The supernatants were assayed to determine MDA content. The results are expressed as nanomoles of MDA per gram of tissue.

4.11. Myeloperoxidase (MPO) Activity

Stomach samples were harvested as described above and stored at −80 °C until required for assay. After homogenization and centrifugation (2000× g for 20 min), MPO activity was determined by a previously described colorimetric method [63]. Results are reported as units of MPO per gram of tissue.

4.12. Interleukin-1β (IL-1β) and Tumor Necrosis Factor-α (TNF-α) Assay

The tissue was homogenized and processed as described by Safieh-Garabedian et al. [64]. Levels of IL-1β (detection range: 62.5–4000 pg/mL; sensitivity or lower limit of detection [LLD]: 12.5 ng/mL of recombinant mouse IL-1β), and TNF-α (detection range: 62.5–4000 pg/mL; sensitivity or LLD: 50 ng/mL of recombinant mouse TNF-α) in the stomach samples were determined with a commercial ELISA kit (R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN, USA), as previously described. All samples were within the wavelength used in UV-VIS spectrophotometry (absorbance measured at 490 nm).

4.13. Histopathology Analysis

Specimens of the gastric walls for all the animal groups were fixed in 10% buffered formalin solution and processed by light microscopy using the paraffin slice technique. Sections with 5 μm thickness were stained with hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) stain for histological evaluation. The criteria for evaluating gastric lesions and leukocyte infiltration and distribution was carried out according to the parameters described by Dokmeci et al. [65]. Reported histopathological analyses were independently performed by 2 pathologists, blinded to the group identity.

4.14. Study of Mucosal Glycoproteins

The glandular portion sections of the rat stomach were stained with Periodic acid-Schiff (PAS) as described by McManus et al. [66].

4.15. Immunohistochemical Staining of Inducible Nitric Oxide Synthase (iNOS), Factor Nuclear-κβ (NF-κB-p65) and Zone Occludes-1 (ZO-1)

Thin stomach sections (3 μm) were obtained from each group (health, gastric lesion control, ranitidine, dose of 500 mg/kg of K. brasiliensis leaf juice and dose of 500 mg/kg of K. pinnata leaf juice) with a microtome and transferred to gelatine-coated slides. Each tissue section was then deparaffinized and rehydrated. The stomach tissue slices were washed with 0.3% Triton X-100 in phosphate buffer (PB) and quenched with endogenous peroxidase (3% hydrogen peroxide). Tissue sections were incubated overnight at 4 °C with primary antibodies (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, INTERPRISE, Santa Cruz, CA, USA) against iNOS, NF-κB-p65 and ZO-1 and primary antibodies (Spring-Abcam, Massachusetts, USA). Dilution tests (3 dilutions) were performed with all antibodies to identify the 1:500, 1:100 and 1:100 dilutions as appropriate, respectively. Slices were washed with phosphate buffer and incubated with a streptavidin/HRP-conjugated secondary antibody (Biocare Medical, Concord, CA, USA) for 30 min. Immunoreactivity to the various proteins was visualized with a colorimetric-based detection kit following the protocol provided by the manufacturer (TrekAvidin-HRP Label + Kit from Biocare Medical, Dako, CA, USA). Sections were counter-stained with hematoxylin. Known positive controls and negative controls were included in each sample set. Planimetry microscopy (Nikon E200 LED, Morphology Department/UFRN) with a high-power objective (40×) was utilized to score the intensity of cell immunostaining, according to the methodology used by Araújo Júnior et al. [67].

4.16. Evaluation of Gastric Secretion

The gastric anti-secretory activity of leaf juice of the two species was performed using the pylorus ligation method described by Takayama et al. [68] with adaptations. Rats were fasted for 24 h prior to the experiment. The animals were then anesthetized and incised in the abdomen, then the pylorus was identified and ligated with a surgical thread. Immediately after this procedure, the animals were treated intraduodenally with the vehicle (distilled water—10 mL/kg), 50 mg/kg ranitidine in distilled water, and a dose of the 250 and 500 mg/kg of K. brasiliensis or K. pinnata leaf juice. Four hours after ligation the animals were euthanized, and their stomachs were removed. The stomach contents were collected, measured, centrifuged, and subjected to analysis for titratable acidity against 0.01 N NaOH to pH 7. PH and gastric juice volume were also analyzed.

4.17. Statistical Analysis

All values are reported as the mean ± standard mean error or as mean ± standard deviation and were analyzed by one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey or Dunnett post-hoc test for multiple comparisons. Non-parametric data (score) are expressed as the median (range) and were analyzed using the Mann–Whitney test. All statistical analyzes were performed using GraphPad 5.0 software (Graph-Pad Software Inc., La Jolla, California, USA) and statistical significance was set at p < 0.05.

Author Contributions

Edilane Rodrigues Dantas de Araújo conceived and designed the experiment, analysed the data and interpreted the results and developed the manuscript; Daline Fernandes de Souza Araújo, Aurigena Antunes de Araújo, Raimundo Fernandes de Araújo Júnior, Valéria Costa da Silva and Thaís Gomes de Carvalho collaborated in the pharmacological experiments; Leandro de Santis Ferreira and Júlia Morais Fernandes collaborated in the analyzes of chemical constitution; Gerlane Coelho Bernardo Guerra and Silvana Maria Zucolotto supervised the work and proofread the manuscript.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank the Prisco Bezerra Herbarium of the Universidade Federal do Ceará, Brazil and Rúbia Santos Fonseca for botanical identification. The authors thank Ariane Teixeira dos Santos, Iuri Ruan Brilhante de Faria and Bruno Januário Patrício de Macêdo for their assistance with the in vivo experiments. This work was a partial requirement for the Master’s Degree by Edilane Rodrigues Dantas de Araújo obtained in the Programa de Pós-graduação em Ciências Farmacêuticas at UFRN. Edilane Rodrigues Dantas de Araújo thanks CAPES/FAPERN for the scholarship.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Abbreviations

CIOMSInternational Organizations of Medical Sciences
CONSEANational Council for the Control of Animal Experimentation of Brazil
COX-1Cyclooxygenase-1
COX-2Cyclooxygenase-2
DTNB5,5′-Dithiobis(2-nitrobenzoic acid)
GLGastric Lesion Control
GLIGastric Lesion Index
GSHGlutatione
HHealthy
H&EHematoxylin and Eosin
I%Percentage inhibition
IL-1βInterleukin 1 beta
iNOSInducible nitric oxide synthase
KBKalanchoe brasiliensis
KPKalanchoe pinnata
MDAMalondialdehyde
MPOMyeloperoxidase
NF-κBFactor nuclear-κβ transcription
NONitric oxide
NSAIDsNonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs
PASPeriodic acid-Schiff
PBPhosphate buffer
PGE2Prostaglandin E2
RRanitidine
RENISUSRelation of Species of Interest of Health Unic System
RfRetention factors
ROSReactive oxygen species
SISBIOBiodiversity Information System
TLCThin Layer Chromatography
TNF-αTumor necrosis factor alpha
UFCFederal University of Ceará
UFRNFederal University of Rio Grande do Norte
UHPLC-MSUltra High Performance Liquid Chromatography coupled to Mass Spectrometer
UVUltra violet
WHOWorld Health Organization
ZO-1Zone Occludes-1

References

  1. Saxena, B.S.; Singh, S. Investigations on gastroprotective effect of citalopram, an antidepressant drug against stress and pyloric ligation induced ulcers. Pharmacology 2011, 63, 1413–1426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Kangwan, N.; Park, J.M.; Kim, E.H.; Hahm, K.B. Quality of healing of gastric ulcers: Natural products beyond acid suppression. World J. Gastrointest. Pathophysiol. 2014, 5, 40–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Harbison, S.P.E.; Dempsey, D.T. Peptic ulcer disease. Curr. Prob. Surg. 2005, 42, 346–454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Rocha, N.F.M.; Oliveira, G.V.; Araújo, F.Y.; Rios, E.R.; Carvalho, A.M.; Vasconcelos, L.F.; Macêdo, D.S.; Soares, P.M.; Sousa, D.P.; Sousa, F.C. (−)-α-Bisabolol-induced gastroprotection is associated with reduction in lipid peroxidation, superoxide dismutase activity and neutrophil migration. Eur. J. Pharm. Sci. 2011, 44, 455–461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Sid, B.; Verrax, J.; Calderon, B.P. Role of oxidative stress in the pathogenesis of 426 alcohol-induced liver disease. Free Radic. Res. 2013, 47, 894–904. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Suleyman, H.; Albayrak, A.; Bilici, M.; Cardici, E.; Halici, Z. Different mechanisms in formation and prevention of indomethacin-inducd gastric ulcers. Inflammation 2010, 3, 224–234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Tarnawski, A.; Ahluwalia, A.K.; Jones, M. Gastric cytoprotection beyond ulcer healing actions of antacids. Curr. Pharm. Des. 2013, 19, 126–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Brazil. 2006; Fitoterapia no SUS e o Programa de Pesquisas de Plantas Medicinais da Central de Medicamentos. Ministério da Saúde. Available online: http://bvsms.saude.gov.br/bvs/publicacoes/fitoterapia_no_sus.pdf (accessed on 20 March 2016).
  9. Brazil. 2014; Resolução de Diretoria Colegiada n° 26 de 13 de Maio de 2014. Registro de Medicamentos Fitoterápicos no Brasil. Agência Nacional de Vigilância Sanitária. Ministério da Saúde. Available online: http://bvsms.saude.gov.br/bvs/saudelegis/anvisa/2014/rdc0026_13_05_2014.pdf (accessed on 20 March 2016).
  10. Lorenzi, H.; Mtos, F.J.A. Plantas Medicinais no Brasil: Nativas e Exóticas, 2nd ed.; Instituto Plantarum: Nova Odessa, Brazil, 2008; pp. 223–224. [Google Scholar]
  11. Wagner, H.; Bladt, S. Plant Drug Analysis: A Thin Layer Chromatography Atlas, 2nd ed.; Springer: Berlin, Germany, 2001. [Google Scholar]
  12. Fernandes, J.M.; Félix-Silva, J.; Cunha, L.M.; Gomes, J.A.S.; Siqueira, E.M.S.; Gimenes, L.P.; Lopes, N.P.; Soares, L.A.L.; Fernandes-Pedrosa, M.F.; Zucolotto, S.M. Inhibitory Effects of Hydroethanolic Leaf Extracts of Kalanchoe brasiliensis and Kalanchoe pinnata (Crassulaceae) against Local Effects Induced by Bothrops jararaca Snake Venom. PLoS ONE 2016, 12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Costa, S.S.; Jossang, A.; Bodo, B. Patuletinacetylr hamnosides from Kalanchoe brasiliensis as inhibitors of human lymphocyte proliferative activity. J. Nat. Prod. 1994, 57, 1503–1510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Muzitano, M.F.; Cruz, A.P.; Almeida, S.A.G.; Da-Silva, C.R.; Kaiser, C.; Guette, B.; Rossi-Bergmann; Costa, S.S. Quercitrin: Anantileishmanial flavonoid glycoside from Kalanchoe pinnata. Planta Med. 2006, 81–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Kwiecień, S.; Brzozowski, T.; Konturek, S.J. Effects of reactive oxygen species action on gastric mucosa in various models of mucosal injury. J. Physiol. Pharmacol. 2002, 53, 39–50. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  16. Repetto, M.G.; Llesuy, S.F. Antioxidant properties of natural compounds used in popular medicine for gastric ulcers. Braz. J. Med. Biol. Res. 2002, 35, 523–534. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Othman, A.I.; El-Missiry, M.A.; Amer, M.A. The protective action of melatonin on indomethacin-induced gastric and testicular oxidative stress in rats. Redox Rep. 2001, 6, 1–5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Rozza, A.; Moraes, T.M.; Kushima, H.; Tanimoto, A.; Marques, M.O.; Baub, T.M.; Hiruma-Lima, C.A.; Pellizzon, C.H. Gastroprotective mechanisms of Citrus lemon (Rutaceae) essential oil and its majority compounds limonene and β-pinene: Involvement of heat-shock protein-70, vasoactive intestinal peptide, glutathione, sulfhydryl compounds, nitric oxide and prostaglandin E2. Chem. Biol. Interact. 2011, 189, 82–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Cheng, C.; Koo, M. Effect of Centella asiatica on ethanol induced gastric mucosal lesions in rats. Life Sci. 2000, 67, 2647–2653. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Hansson, M.; Olsson, I.; Nauseef, W.M. Biosynthesis, processing, and sorting of human myeloperoxidase. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 2006, 445, 214–224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Salga, M.; Ali, H.; Abdulla, M.; Abdelwahab, S. Gastroprotective activity and mechanism of novel dichloride-zinc (II)-4–2(2-(5-methoxybenzylidenamino)ethyl) piperazin-1-iumphenolate complex on ethanol-induced gastric ulceration. Chem.-Biol. Interact. 2012, 195, 144–153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Huang, C.C.; Chen, Y.M.; Wang, D.C.; Chiu, C.C.; Lin, W.T.; Wang, C.Y.; Hsu, M.C. Cytoprotective effect of American ginseng in a rat ethanol gastric ulcer model. Molecules 2014, 19, 316–326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. El-Maraghy, S.A.; Rizk, S.M.; Shahin, N.N. Gastroprotective effect of crocin in ethanolinduced gastric injury in rats. Chem. Biol. Interact. 2015, 229, 26–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Mei, X.; Xu, D.; Xu, S.; Zheng, Y.; Xu, S. Novel role of Zn(II)–curcumin in enhancing cell proliferation and adjusting proinflammatory cytokine-mediated oxidative damage of ethanol-induced acute gastric ulcers. Chem. Biol. Interact. 2012, 197, 31–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Piotrowski, J.; Piotrowski, E.; Skrodzka, D.; Slomiany, A.; Slomiany, B.L. Gastric mucosal apoptosis induced by ethanol: Effect of antiulcer agents. Biochem. Mol. Biol. Int. 1997, 42, 247–254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Handa, O.; Naito, Y.; Takagi, T.; Shimozawa, M.; Kokura, S.; Yoshida, N.; Matsui, H.; Cepinskas, G.; Kvietys, P.R.; Yoshikawa, T. Tumor necrosis factor-alpha-induced cytokine-induced neutrophil chemoattractant-1 (CINC-1) production by rat gastric epithelial cells: Role of reactive oxygen species and nuclear factor-kappaB. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 2004, 309, 670–676. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Taha, M.M.; Salga, M.S.; Ali, H.M.; Abdulla, M.A.; Abdelwahab, S.I.; Hadi, A.H.A. Gastroprotective activities of Tunera diffusa wild. ex Schult. Reviited: Role of arbutin. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2012, 141, 273–281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Sangiovanni, E.; Vrhovsek, U.; Rossoni, G.; Colombo, E.; Brunelli, C.; Brembati, L.; Trivulsio, S.; Gasperotti, M.; Mattivi, F.; Bosisio, E.; et al. Ellagitannins from Rubus berries for the control of gastric inflammation: In vitro and in vivo studies. PLoS ONE 2013, 8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Li, W.; Huang, H.; Niu, X.; Fan, T.; Mu, Q.; Li, H. Protective effect of tetrahydrocoptisine against ethanol-induced gastric ulcer in mice. Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol. 2013, 272, 21–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Alqasoumi, S.; Al-Howiriny, T.A.; Al-Yahya, M.; Rafatulla, S. Gastroprotective effects of radish “raphanus sativus” L. on experimental gastric ulcer models in rats. Farmacia 2008, 46, 204–214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Hajrezaie, M.; Golbabapour, S.; Hassandarvish, P.; Nura Suleiman Gwaram, N.S.; Hadi, A.H.; Ali, H.M.; Majid, N.; Abdulla, M.A. Acute toxicity and gastroprotection studies of a new Schiff base derived copper (II) complex against ethanol-induced acute gastric lesions in rats. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e51537. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Golbabapour, S.; Hajrezaie, M.; Hassandarvish, P.; Abdul Majid, N.; Hadi, A.; Nordin, N.; Abdula, M.A. Acute toxicity and gastroprotective role of M. pruriens in ethanol-induced gastric mucosal injuries in rats. Int. J. Biomed. Res. 2013, 2013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Huang, S.; Chang, S.; Mu, S.; Jiang, H.; Wang, T.; Kao, J.; Huang, J.L.; Wu, C.Y.; Chen, Y.J.; Shie, J.J. Imiquimod activates p53-dependent apoptosis in a human basal cell carcinoma cell line. J. Dermatol. Sci. 2016, 81, 182–191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Tanaka, J.; Yuda, Y.; Ynouye, S.; Yamakawa, T. The role of nitric oxide in the gastric acid secretion induced by ischemia-reperfusion in the pylorus-ligated rat. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 2001, 13, 69–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Takeuchi, K.; Araki, H.; Kawachi, S.; Kunikata, T.; Mizoguchi, H.; Tashima, K. Regulatory mechanism of acid secretion in the damaged stomach: Role of endogenous nitric oxide. J. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2000, 15, 37–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Cho, C.H. Current roles of nitric oxide in gastrointestinal disorders. J. Physiol. Paris 2001, 95, 253–256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Laine, L.; Weinstein, W.M. Histology of alcoholic haemorrhagic gastritis; A prospective evaluation. Gastroenterology 1988, 94, 1254–1264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Davis, M.M. A new trigger for T cells. Cell 2002, 110, 285–287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Jabeen, A.; Mesaik, M.A.; Simjee, S.U.; Lubna; Bano, S.; Faizi, S. Anti-TNF-α and anti-arthritic effect of patuletin: A rare flavonoid from Tagetes patula. Int. Immunopharmacol. 2016, 36, 232–240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Pal, S.; Chaudhuri, A.K.N. Studies on the anti-ulcer activity of a Bryophyllum pinnatum leaf extract in experimental animals. J. Ethnopharmacol. 1991, 33, 97–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Adesanwo, J.K.; Raji, Y.; Olaleye, S.B.; Onasanwo, S.A.; Fadare, O.O.; Ige, O.O.; Odusanya, O.O. Antiulcer Activity of Methanolic Extract of Bryophyllum pinnatum in Rats. J. Biol. Sci. 2007, 7, 409–412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Braz, D.C.; Oliveira, L.R.S.; Viana, A.F.S.C. Atividade antiulcerogênica do extrato aquoso da Bryophyllum pinnatum (Lam.) Kurz. Revista Brasileira de Plantas Medicinais 2013, 15, 86–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Sobreira, F.; Hernandes, L.S.; Vetore-Neto, A.; Díaz, I.E.C.; Santana, F.C.; Mancini-Filho, J.; Bacchi, E.M. Gastroprotective activity of the hydroethanolic extract and ethyl acetate fraction from Kalanchoe pinnata (Lam.) Pers. Braz. J. Pharm. Sci. 2017, 53, e16027. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Sharma, A.L.; Bhot, M.A.; Chandra, N. Gastroprotective effect of aqueous extract and mucilage from Bryophyllum pinnatum (Lam.) Kurz. Ancient Sci. Life 2014, 33, 252–258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Costa, J.L.C. Avaliação Farmacológicadas Atividades Anti-Inflamatória e Antiulcerogênica do Extrato Seco Obtido por Aspersão de Kalanchoe brasiliensis Cambess e sua Toxicidade Reprodutiva em Ratas Wistar. Master’s Thesis, Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, Pernambuco, Brasil, 2010. [Google Scholar]
  46. Souza, R.F.; Giovani, W.F. Antioxidant properties of complexes of flavonoids with metal ions. Redox Rep. 2004, 9, 97–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Hu, X.T.; Ding, C.; Zhou, N.; Xu, C. Quercetin protects gastric epithelial cell from oxidative damage in vitro and in vivo. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 2015, 754, 115–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Tsai, M.H.; Lin, Z.C.; Liang, C.J.; Yen, F.L.; Chiang, Y.C.; Lee, C.W. Eupafolin inhibits PGE2 production and COX2 expression in LPS-stimulated human dermal fibroblasts by blocking JNK/AP-1 and Nox2/p47(phox) pathway. Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol. 2014, 279, 240–251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Sung, H.C.; Liang, C.J.; Lee, C.W.; Yen, F.L.; Hsiao, C.Y.; Wang, S.H.; Jiang-Shieh, Y.F.; Tsai, J.S.; Chen, Y.L. The protective effect of eupafolin against TNF-α-induced lung inflammation via the reduction of intercellular cell adhesion molecule-1 expression. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2015, 170, 136–147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Lin, F.J.; Yen, F.L.; Chen, P.C.; Wang, M.C.; Lin, C.N.; Lee, C.W.; Ko, H.H. HPLC-fingerprints and antioxidant constituents of Phyla nodiflora. Sci. World J. 2014, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Maas, M.; Deters, A.M.; Hensel, A. Anti-inflammatory activity of Eupatorium perfoliatum L. extracts, eupafolin, and dimeric guaianolide via iNOS inhibitory activity and modulation of inflammation-related cytokines and chemokines. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2011, 137, 371–381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Lai, Z.R.; Ho, Y.L.; Huang, S.C.; Huang, T.H.; Lai, S.C.; Tsai, J.C.; Wang, C.Y.; Huang, G.J.; Chang, Y.S. Antioxidant, anti-inflammatory and antiproliferative activities of Kalanchoe gracilis (L.) DC stem. Am. J. Chin. Med. 2011, 39, 1275–1290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Abo-Salem, O.M. Kaempferol attenuates the development of diabetic neuropathic pain in mice: Possible anti-inflammatory and anti-oxidant mechanisms. Maced. J. Med. Sci. 2014, 7, 424–430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Kim, S.K.; Kim, H.J.; Choi, S.E.; Park, K.H.; Choi, H.K.; Lee, M.W. Anti-oxidative and inhibitory activities on nitric oxide (NO) and prostaglandin E2 (COX-2) production of flavonoids from seeds of Prunus tomentosa Thunberg. Arch. Pharm. Res. 2008, 31, 424–428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Coelho, R.G.; Batista, L.M.; Santos, C.S.; Brito, A.R.M.S.; Vilegas, W. Phytochemical study and antiulcerogenic activity of Syngonanthus bisulcatus (Eriocaulaceae). J. Pharmacol. Sci. 2006, 42, 413–417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Olaleye, S.B.; Farombi, E.O. Attenuation of indomethacin- and HCl/ethanol-induced oxidative gastric mucosa damage in rats by kolaviron, a natural biflavonoid of Garcinia kola seed. Phytother. Res. 2006, 20, 14–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Borrelli, F.; Izzo, A.A. The Plant kingdom as a source of anti-ulcer remedies. Phytother. Res. 2000, 14, 581–591. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Hollander, D.; Tarnawski, A. Dietary essential fatty acids and the decline in peptic ulcer diseasea hypothesis. Gut 1986, 27, 239–242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Kakub, G.; Gulfraz, M. Cytoprotective effects of Bergenia ciliate sternb, extract on gastric ulcer in rats. Phytother. Res. 2007, 21, 1217–1220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Magistretti, J.; Brevi, S.; de Curtis, M. The antiulcer activity of Treculia acuminate extract against ethanol induced gastric ulcer in rats. J. Clin. Exp. Pharmacol. 1988, 41, 34–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Anderson, M.E. Determination of glutathione and glutathione disulfide in biological samples. Methods Enzymol. 1985, 113, 548–555. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Esterbauer, H.; Cheeseman, K.H. Determination of aldehydic lipid peroxidation products: Malonaldehyde and 4-hydroxynonenal. Methods Enzymol. 1990, 186, 407–421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Krawisz, J.E.; Sharon, P.S.W.; Stenson, W.F. Quantitative assay for acute intestinal inflammation based on myeloperoxidase activity. Assessment of inflammation in rat and hamster models. Gastroenterology 1984, 87, 1344–1350. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  64. Safieh-Garabedian, B.; Poole, S.; Allchorne, A.; Winter, J.; Woolf, C.J. Contribution of interleukin-1 beta to the inflammation-induced increase in nerve growth factor levels and inflammatory hyperalgesia. Br. J. Pharmacol. 1995, 115, 1265–1275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Dokmeci, D.; Akpolat, M.; Aydogdu, N.; Doganay, L.; Turan, F.N. L-carnitine inhibits ethanol-induced gastric mucosal injury in rats. Pharmacol. Rep. 2005, 57, 481–488. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  66. McManus, J. Histological and histochemical uses of periodic acid. Biotech. Histochem. 1948, 23, 99–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Araújo Júnior, R.F.; Reinaldo, M.P.O.S.; Brito, G.A.C.; Cavalcanti, P.F.; Freire, M.A.M.; De Medeiros, C.A.X.; Araújo, A.A. Olmesartan decreased levels of IL-1 b and COX-2, RANK/RANKL and up-regulated SOCs-1 in an intestinal mucositis model. PLoS ONE 2014, 12, e114923. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Takayama, C.; de-Faria, F.M.; de Almeida, A.C.; Valim-Araújo, D.A.; Rehen, C.S.; Dunder, R.J.; Socca, E.A.; Manzo, L.P.; Rozza, A.L.; Salvador, M.J.; et al. Gastroprotective and ulcer healing effects of essential oil from Hyptis spicigera Lam. (Lamiaceae). J. Ethnopharmacol. 2011, 135, 147–155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Ijms 19 01265 g001 550
Figure 1. UHPLC-MS chromatogram of K. brasiliensis leaf juice in positive and negative mode. Red: K. brasiliensis chromatogram in positive mode; Blue: K. brasiliensis chromatogram in negative mode. The numbers represent the identified substances. * Peak integration.
Figure 1. UHPLC-MS chromatogram of K. brasiliensis leaf juice in positive and negative mode. Red: K. brasiliensis chromatogram in positive mode; Blue: K. brasiliensis chromatogram in negative mode. The numbers represent the identified substances. * Peak integration.
Ijms 19 01265 g001
Ijms 19 01265 g002 550
Figure 2. UHPLC-MS chromatogram of K. pinnata leaf juice in positive and negative mode. Red: K. pinnata chromatogram in positive mode; Blue: K. pinnata chromatogram in negative mode. The numbers represent the identified substances. * Peak integration.
Figure 2. UHPLC-MS chromatogram of K. pinnata leaf juice in positive and negative mode. Red: K. pinnata chromatogram in positive mode; Blue: K. pinnata chromatogram in negative mode. The numbers represent the identified substances. * Peak integration.
Ijms 19 01265 g002
Ijms 19 01265 g003 550
Figure 3. Effect of pre-treatment with K. brasiliensis and K. pinnata leaf juice (125, 250 and 500 mg/kg) on the macroscopic appearance of the gastric mucosa in ethanol-induced and indomethacin-induced gastric mucosal lesions in rat (A) Ethanol-induced: (1) Healthy; (2) Gastric lesion control; (3) Ranitidine 50 mg/kg; (4) K. brasiliensis 125 mg/kg; (5) K. brasiliensis 250 mg/kg; (6) K. brasiliensis 500 mg/kg; (7) K. pinnata 125 mg/kg; (8) K. pinnata 250 mg/kg; (9) K. pinnata 500 mg/kg; (10) Results expressed as mean ± standard mean error, (n = 7). ANOVA and Dunnett’s post-test were used to calculate the statistical significance, ** p < 0.01 and *** p < 0.001 vs. gastric lesion control. Healthy, H; Gastric lesion control, GL; Ranitidine (50 mg/kg), R. (B) Indomethacin-induced: (1) Healthy; (2) Gastric lesion control; (3) Ranitidine 50 mg/kg; (4) K. brasiliensis 125 mg/kg; (5) K. brasiliensis 250 mg/kg; (6) K. brasiliensis 500 mg/kg; (7) K. pinnata 125 mg/kg; (8) K. pinnata 250 mg/kg; (9) K. pinnata 500 mg/kg; (10) Results expressed as mean ± standard mean error, (n = 7). ANOVA and Dunnett’s post-test were used to calculate the statistical significance, * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01 and *** p < 0.001 vs. gastric lesion control. Healthy, H; Gastric lesion control, GL; Ranitidine (50 mg/kg), R.
Figure 3. Effect of pre-treatment with K. brasiliensis and K. pinnata leaf juice (125, 250 and 500 mg/kg) on the macroscopic appearance of the gastric mucosa in ethanol-induced and indomethacin-induced gastric mucosal lesions in rat (A) Ethanol-induced: (1) Healthy; (2) Gastric lesion control; (3) Ranitidine 50 mg/kg; (4) K. brasiliensis 125 mg/kg; (5) K. brasiliensis 250 mg/kg; (6) K. brasiliensis 500 mg/kg; (7) K. pinnata 125 mg/kg; (8) K. pinnata 250 mg/kg; (9) K. pinnata 500 mg/kg; (10) Results expressed as mean ± standard mean error, (n = 7). ANOVA and Dunnett’s post-test were used to calculate the statistical significance, ** p < 0.01 and *** p < 0.001 vs. gastric lesion control. Healthy, H; Gastric lesion control, GL; Ranitidine (50 mg/kg), R. (B) Indomethacin-induced: (1) Healthy; (2) Gastric lesion control; (3) Ranitidine 50 mg/kg; (4) K. brasiliensis 125 mg/kg; (5) K. brasiliensis 250 mg/kg; (6) K. brasiliensis 500 mg/kg; (7) K. pinnata 125 mg/kg; (8) K. pinnata 250 mg/kg; (9) K. pinnata 500 mg/kg; (10) Results expressed as mean ± standard mean error, (n = 7). ANOVA and Dunnett’s post-test were used to calculate the statistical significance, * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01 and *** p < 0.001 vs. gastric lesion control. Healthy, H; Gastric lesion control, GL; Ranitidine (50 mg/kg), R.
Ijms 19 01265 g003
Ijms 19 01265 g004a 550Ijms 19 01265 g004b 550
Figure 4. Effect of pre-treatment with K. brasiliensis and K. pinnata leaf juice (125, 250 and 500 mg/kg) on GSH ((A) ethanol-induced and (B) indomethacin-induced), MDA ((C) ethanol-induced and (D) indomethacin-induced) and MPO ((E) ethanol-induced and (F) indomethacin-induced) in the gastric mucosa homogenate of lesions in rats. Results expressed as mean ± standard mean error, (n = 7). ANOVA and Tukey post-test were used to calculate the statistical significance, * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01 and *** p < 0.001 vs. gastric lesion control. Healthy, H; Gastric lesion control, GL; Ranitidine (50 mg/kg), R.
Figure 4. Effect of pre-treatment with K. brasiliensis and K. pinnata leaf juice (125, 250 and 500 mg/kg) on GSH ((A) ethanol-induced and (B) indomethacin-induced), MDA ((C) ethanol-induced and (D) indomethacin-induced) and MPO ((E) ethanol-induced and (F) indomethacin-induced) in the gastric mucosa homogenate of lesions in rats. Results expressed as mean ± standard mean error, (n = 7). ANOVA and Tukey post-test were used to calculate the statistical significance, * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01 and *** p < 0.001 vs. gastric lesion control. Healthy, H; Gastric lesion control, GL; Ranitidine (50 mg/kg), R.
Ijms 19 01265 g004aIjms 19 01265 g004b
Ijms 19 01265 g005 550
Figure 5. Effect of pre-treatment with K. brasiliensis and K. pinnata leaf juice (125, 250 and 500 mg/kg) on IL-1β ((A) ethanol-induced and (B) indomethacin-induced) and TNF-α ((C) ethanol-induced and (D) indomethacin-induced) in the gastric mucosa homogenate of lesions in rats. Results expressed as mean ± standard mean error, (n = 7). ANOVA and Tukey post-test were used to calculate the statistical significance, * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01 and *** p < 0.001 vs. gastric lesion control. Healthy, H; Gastric lesion control, GL; Ranitidine (50 mg/kg), R.
Figure 5. Effect of pre-treatment with K. brasiliensis and K. pinnata leaf juice (125, 250 and 500 mg/kg) on IL-1β ((A) ethanol-induced and (B) indomethacin-induced) and TNF-α ((C) ethanol-induced and (D) indomethacin-induced) in the gastric mucosa homogenate of lesions in rats. Results expressed as mean ± standard mean error, (n = 7). ANOVA and Tukey post-test were used to calculate the statistical significance, * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01 and *** p < 0.001 vs. gastric lesion control. Healthy, H; Gastric lesion control, GL; Ranitidine (50 mg/kg), R.
Ijms 19 01265 g005
Ijms 19 01265 g006 550
Figure 6. Effect of pre-treatment with K. brasiliensis and K. pinnata leaf juice (125, 250 and 500 mg/kg) on the histology of ethanol-induced gastric mucosal damage in rats. Histopathological characteristics of the gastric tissue of rats, showing the cut of the stomach in the longitudinal direction. (1) Healthy; (2) Gastric lesion control; (3) Ranitidine; (4) K. brasiliensis 125 mg/kg; (5) K. brasiliensis 250 mg/kg; (6) K. brasiliensis 500 mg/kg; (7) K. pinnata 125 mg/kg; (8) K. pinnata 250 mg/kg; (9) K. pinnata 500 mg/kg. The bar indicates gastric mucosa without changes; Circle and rectangle: necrotic lesions and severe distraction of the surface epithelium, respectively; Two white arrow: intense hemorrhage; One white arrow: small hemorrhage points; Two asterisks: intense inflammatory infiltrate; One asterisk: weak inflammatory infiltrate. Data expressed as mean ± standard mean error, (n = 5). Mann–Whitney used to calculate statistical significance, * p < 0.05 vs. gastric lesion control. Healthy, H; Gastric lesion control, GL; Ranitidine, R. K. brasiliensis, KB; K. pinnata, KP.
Figure 6. Effect of pre-treatment with K. brasiliensis and K. pinnata leaf juice (125, 250 and 500 mg/kg) on the histology of ethanol-induced gastric mucosal damage in rats. Histopathological characteristics of the gastric tissue of rats, showing the cut of the stomach in the longitudinal direction. (1) Healthy; (2) Gastric lesion control; (3) Ranitidine; (4) K. brasiliensis 125 mg/kg; (5) K. brasiliensis 250 mg/kg; (6) K. brasiliensis 500 mg/kg; (7) K. pinnata 125 mg/kg; (8) K. pinnata 250 mg/kg; (9) K. pinnata 500 mg/kg. The bar indicates gastric mucosa without changes; Circle and rectangle: necrotic lesions and severe distraction of the surface epithelium, respectively; Two white arrow: intense hemorrhage; One white arrow: small hemorrhage points; Two asterisks: intense inflammatory infiltrate; One asterisk: weak inflammatory infiltrate. Data expressed as mean ± standard mean error, (n = 5). Mann–Whitney used to calculate statistical significance, * p < 0.05 vs. gastric lesion control. Healthy, H; Gastric lesion control, GL; Ranitidine, R. K. brasiliensis, KB; K. pinnata, KP.
Ijms 19 01265 g006
Ijms 19 01265 g007 550
Figure 7. Effect of pre-treatment with K. brasiliensis and K. pinnata leaf juice (125, 250 and 500 mg/kg) on the histology of indomethacin-induced gastric mucosal damage in rats. Histopathological characteristics of the gastric tissue of rats, showing the cut of the stomach in the longitudinal direction. (1) Healthy; (2) Gastric lesion control; (3) Ranitidine; (4) K. brasiliensis 125 mg/kg; (5) K. brasiliensis 250 mg/kg; (6) K. brasiliensis 500 mg/kg; (7) K. pinnata 125 mg/kg; (8) K. pinnata 250 mg/kg; (9) K. pinnata 500 mg/kg. The bar indicates gastric mucosa without changes; Two asterisks: intense inflammatory infiltrate; One asterisk: weak inflammatory infiltrate; Circle: destruction of mucosal layer; White arrow: congestion of blood vessels; Rectangle: necrotic lesions. Data expressed as mean ± standard mean error, (n = 5). Mann–Whitney used to calculate statistical significance, * p < 0.05 vs. gastric lesion control. Healthy, H; Gastric lesion control, GL; Ranitidine, R. K. brasiliensis, KB; K. pinnata, KP.
Figure 7. Effect of pre-treatment with K. brasiliensis and K. pinnata leaf juice (125, 250 and 500 mg/kg) on the histology of indomethacin-induced gastric mucosal damage in rats. Histopathological characteristics of the gastric tissue of rats, showing the cut of the stomach in the longitudinal direction. (1) Healthy; (2) Gastric lesion control; (3) Ranitidine; (4) K. brasiliensis 125 mg/kg; (5) K. brasiliensis 250 mg/kg; (6) K. brasiliensis 500 mg/kg; (7) K. pinnata 125 mg/kg; (8) K. pinnata 250 mg/kg; (9) K. pinnata 500 mg/kg. The bar indicates gastric mucosa without changes; Two asterisks: intense inflammatory infiltrate; One asterisk: weak inflammatory infiltrate; Circle: destruction of mucosal layer; White arrow: congestion of blood vessels; Rectangle: necrotic lesions. Data expressed as mean ± standard mean error, (n = 5). Mann–Whitney used to calculate statistical significance, * p < 0.05 vs. gastric lesion control. Healthy, H; Gastric lesion control, GL; Ranitidine, R. K. brasiliensis, KB; K. pinnata, KP.
Ijms 19 01265 g007
Ijms 19 01265 g008 550
Figure 8. Effect of pre-treatment with K. brasiliensis and K. pinnata leaf juice (500 mg/kg) on gastric tissue glycoprotein-PAS staining in ethanol-induced and indomethacin-induced gastric lesions in rats. (A) Ethanol-induced: (1) Healthy; (2) Gastric lesion control; (3) Ranitidine 50 mg/kg; (4) K. brasiliensis 500 mg/kg; (5) K. pinnata 500 mg/kg. (B) Indomethacin-induced: (1) Healthy; (2) Gastric lesion control; (3) Ranitidine 50 mg/kg; (4) K. brasiliensis 500 mg/kg; (5) K. pinnata 500 mg/kg. White arrow: the strong PAS staining; Circle: preservation of mucus in goblet cells.
Figure 8. Effect of pre-treatment with K. brasiliensis and K. pinnata leaf juice (500 mg/kg) on gastric tissue glycoprotein-PAS staining in ethanol-induced and indomethacin-induced gastric lesions in rats. (A) Ethanol-induced: (1) Healthy; (2) Gastric lesion control; (3) Ranitidine 50 mg/kg; (4) K. brasiliensis 500 mg/kg; (5) K. pinnata 500 mg/kg. (B) Indomethacin-induced: (1) Healthy; (2) Gastric lesion control; (3) Ranitidine 50 mg/kg; (4) K. brasiliensis 500 mg/kg; (5) K. pinnata 500 mg/kg. White arrow: the strong PAS staining; Circle: preservation of mucus in goblet cells.
Ijms 19 01265 g008
Ijms 19 01265 g009 550
Figure 9. Immunohistochemical analysis of iNOS enzyme expression in the gastric mucosa in ethanol and indomethacin-induced gastric lesions in rats. Immunohistochemical analysis of iNOS enzyme expression in rat gastric tissue, showing the cut of the stomach in the longitudinal direction. (A) Ethanol-induced: (1) Healthy; (2) Gastric lesion control; (3) Ranitidine 50 mg/kg; (4) K. brasiliensis 500 mg/kg; (5) K. pinnata 500 mg/kg. (B) Indomethacin-induced: (1) Healthy; (2) Gastric lesion control; (3) Ranitidine 50 mg/kg; (4) K. brasiliensis 500 mg/kg; (5) K. pinnata 500 mg/kg. Data expressed as mean ± standard mean error, (n = 5). Mann–Whitney used to calculate statistical significance, ** p < 0.01 vs. gastric lesion control. Healthy, H; Gastric lesion control, GL; Ranitidine, R. K. brasiliensis, KB; K. pinnata, KP.
Figure 9. Immunohistochemical analysis of iNOS enzyme expression in the gastric mucosa in ethanol and indomethacin-induced gastric lesions in rats. Immunohistochemical analysis of iNOS enzyme expression in rat gastric tissue, showing the cut of the stomach in the longitudinal direction. (A) Ethanol-induced: (1) Healthy; (2) Gastric lesion control; (3) Ranitidine 50 mg/kg; (4) K. brasiliensis 500 mg/kg; (5) K. pinnata 500 mg/kg. (B) Indomethacin-induced: (1) Healthy; (2) Gastric lesion control; (3) Ranitidine 50 mg/kg; (4) K. brasiliensis 500 mg/kg; (5) K. pinnata 500 mg/kg. Data expressed as mean ± standard mean error, (n = 5). Mann–Whitney used to calculate statistical significance, ** p < 0.01 vs. gastric lesion control. Healthy, H; Gastric lesion control, GL; Ranitidine, R. K. brasiliensis, KB; K. pinnata, KP.
Ijms 19 01265 g009
Ijms 19 01265 g010 550
Figure 10. Immunohistochemical analysis of NF-κB-p65 expression in the gastric mucosa in ethanol-induced and indomethacin-induced gastric lesions in rats. Immunohistochemical analysis of NF-κB-p65 expression in rat gastric tissue, showing the cut of the stomach in the longitudinal direction. (A) Ethanol-induced: (1) Healthy; (2) Gastric lesion control; (3) Ranitidine 50 mg/kg; (4) K. brasiliensis 500 mg/kg; (5) K. pinnata 500 mg/kg. (B) Indomethacin-induced: (1) Healthy; (2) Gastric lesion control; (3) Ranitidine 50 mg/kg; (4) K. brasiliensis 500 mg/kg; (5) K. pinnata 500 mg/kg. Data expressed as mean ± standard mean error, (n = 5). Mann–Whitney used to calculate statistical significance, * p < 0.05. vs. gastric lesion control. Healthy, H; Gastric lesion control, GL; Ranitidine, R. K. brasiliensis, KB; K. pinnata, KP.
Figure 10. Immunohistochemical analysis of NF-κB-p65 expression in the gastric mucosa in ethanol-induced and indomethacin-induced gastric lesions in rats. Immunohistochemical analysis of NF-κB-p65 expression in rat gastric tissue, showing the cut of the stomach in the longitudinal direction. (A) Ethanol-induced: (1) Healthy; (2) Gastric lesion control; (3) Ranitidine 50 mg/kg; (4) K. brasiliensis 500 mg/kg; (5) K. pinnata 500 mg/kg. (B) Indomethacin-induced: (1) Healthy; (2) Gastric lesion control; (3) Ranitidine 50 mg/kg; (4) K. brasiliensis 500 mg/kg; (5) K. pinnata 500 mg/kg. Data expressed as mean ± standard mean error, (n = 5). Mann–Whitney used to calculate statistical significance, * p < 0.05. vs. gastric lesion control. Healthy, H; Gastric lesion control, GL; Ranitidine, R. K. brasiliensis, KB; K. pinnata, KP.
Ijms 19 01265 g010
Ijms 19 01265 g011 550
Figure 11. Immunohistochemical analysis of ZO-1 expression in the gastric mucosa in ethanol-induced and indomethacin-induced gastric lesions in rats. Immunohistochemical analysis of ZO-1 expression in rat gastric tissue, showing the cut of the stomach in the longitudinal direction. (A) Ethanol-induced: (1) Healthy; (2) Gastric lesion control; (3) Ranitidine 50 mg/kg; (4) K. brasiliensis 500 mg/kg; (5) K. pinnata 500 mg/kg. (B) Indomethacin-induced: (1) Healthy; (2) Gastric lesion control; (3) Ranitidine 50 mg/kg; (4) K. brasiliensis 500 mg/kg; (5) K. pinnata 500 mg/kg. Data expressed as mean ± standard mean error, (n = 5). Mann–Whitney used to calculate statistical significance, * p <0.05 and ** p < 0.01 vs. gastric lesion control. Healthy, H; Gastric lesion control, GL; Ranitidine, R. K. brasiliensis, KB; K. pinnata, KP.
Figure 11. Immunohistochemical analysis of ZO-1 expression in the gastric mucosa in ethanol-induced and indomethacin-induced gastric lesions in rats. Immunohistochemical analysis of ZO-1 expression in rat gastric tissue, showing the cut of the stomach in the longitudinal direction. (A) Ethanol-induced: (1) Healthy; (2) Gastric lesion control; (3) Ranitidine 50 mg/kg; (4) K. brasiliensis 500 mg/kg; (5) K. pinnata 500 mg/kg. (B) Indomethacin-induced: (1) Healthy; (2) Gastric lesion control; (3) Ranitidine 50 mg/kg; (4) K. brasiliensis 500 mg/kg; (5) K. pinnata 500 mg/kg. Data expressed as mean ± standard mean error, (n = 5). Mann–Whitney used to calculate statistical significance, * p <0.05 and ** p < 0.01 vs. gastric lesion control. Healthy, H; Gastric lesion control, GL; Ranitidine, R. K. brasiliensis, KB; K. pinnata, KP.
Ijms 19 01265 g011
Table
Table 1. Compounds identified by UHPLC-MS in Kalanchoe brasiliensis leaf juice.
Table 1. Compounds identified by UHPLC-MS in Kalanchoe brasiliensis leaf juice.
Peak[M + H]+[M − H]−CompoundsPeak[M + H]+[M − H]−CompoundsPeak[M + H]+[M − H]−Compounds
1787.2277 Patuletin-O-hexoside-di-O-deoxy-hexoside10667.1871665.1798Patuletin-O-deoxy-hexoside-O-acetyl-deoxy-hexoside19 707.1892Patuletin-di-O-acetyl-deoxy-hexoside
2641.1698 Patuletin-O-hexoside-O-deoxy-hexoside11667.1874665.179Patuletin-O-deoxy-hexoside-O-acetyl-deoxy-hexoside20 707.1886Patuletin-di-O-acetyl-deoxy-hexoside
3771.2316 Eupafolin-O-hexoside-di-O-deoxy-hexoside12651.1913649.1833Eupafolin-O-deoxy-hexoside-O-acetyl-deoxy-hexoside21709.1962707.1898Patuletin-di-O-acetyl-deoxy-hexoside
4479.1179477.1102Patuletin-O-deoxy-hexoside13651.1916649.1833Eupafolin-O-deoxy-hexoside-O-acetyl-deoxy-hexoside22693.2003 Eupafolin-di-O-acetyl-deoxy-hexoside
5609.1811 Eupafolin-di-O-deoxy-hexoside14 649.1832Eupafolin-O-deoxy-hexoside-O-acetyl-deoxy-hexoside23709.195707.1891Patuletin-di-O-acetyl-deoxy-hexoside
6667.1874665.1802Patuletin-O-deoxy-hexoside-O-acetyl-deoxy-hexoside15667.1856665.1782Patuletin-O-deoxy-hexoside-O-acetyl-deoxy-hexoside24 707.1896Patuletin-di-O-acetyl-deoxy-hexoside
7 665.1805Patuletin-O-deoxy-hexoside-O-acetyl-deoxy-hexoside16 707.1891Patuletin-di-O-acetyl-deoxy-hexoside25 707.1904Patuletin-di-O-acetyl-deoxy-hexoside
8 665.1806Patuletin-O-deoxy-hexoside-O-acetyl-deoxy-hexoside17709.1967707.1883Patuletin-di-O-acetyl-deoxy-hexoside26 691.1957Eupafolin-di-O-acetyl-deoxy-hexoside
9 665.1798Patuletin-O-deoxy-hexoside-O-acetyl-deoxy-hexoside18 707.1893Patuletin-di-O-acetyl-deoxy-hexoside27 707.1905Patuletin-di-O-acetyl-deoxy-hexoside
Table
Table 2. Compounds identified by UHPLC-MS in Kalanchoe pinnata leaf juice.
Table 2. Compounds identified by UHPLC-MS in Kalanchoe pinnata leaf juice.
Peak[M + H]+[M − H]−Compounds
1641.1353 Patuletin-O-deoxy-hexoside-O-hexoside.
2 463.0937Quercetin-O-hexoside
3463.0869 Kaempferol
4581.1527579.1425Quercetin-O-deoxy-hexoside-O-pentoside
5 579.1426Quercetin-O-deoxy-hexoside-O-pentoside
6581.1513579.1421Quercetin-O-deoxy-hexoside-O-pentoside
7565.1558 Kaempferol-O-deoxy-hexoside-O-pentoside
8595.1667 Eupafolin-O-deoxy-hexoside-O-pentoside
Table
Table 3. Effect of pre-treatment with K. brasiliensis and K. pinnata leaf juice (125, 250 and 500 mg/kg) in the lesion area and percent inhibition in the ethanol-induced model.
Table 3. Effect of pre-treatment with K. brasiliensis and K. pinnata leaf juice (125, 250 and 500 mg/kg) in the lesion area and percent inhibition in the ethanol-induced model.
Experimental GroupLesion Area (mm)Percent of Inhibition (%)
Gastric lesion93.83 ± 14.00-
Ranitidine (50 mg/kg)31.86 ± 9.17 ***80.02
K. brasiliensis 125 mg/kg65.42 ± 15.67 **37.31
K. brasiliensis 250 mg/kg50.33 ± 4.08 ***50.37
K. brasiliensis 500 mg/kg18.80 ± 5.71 ***76.18
K. pinnata 125 mg/kg77.71 ± 15.68 **31.96
K. pinnata 250 mg/kg43.28 ± 10.04 ***62.87
K. pinnata 500 mg/kg21.33 ± 6.37 ***81.71
Results expressed as mean ± standard deviation, (n = 7). ANOVA and Dunnett post-test were used to calculate the statistical significance, ** p < 0.01 and *** p < 0.001 vs. gastric lesion control.
Table
Table 4. Effect of pre-treatment with Kalanchoe brasiliensis and Kalanchoe pinnata leaf juice (125, 250 and 500 mg/kg) in the lesion area and inhibition percentage in the indomethacin-induced model.
Table 4. Effect of pre-treatment with Kalanchoe brasiliensis and Kalanchoe pinnata leaf juice (125, 250 and 500 mg/kg) in the lesion area and inhibition percentage in the indomethacin-induced model.
Experimental GroupLesion Area (mm)Inhibition Percentage (%)
Gastric lesion48.20 ± 4.55-
Ranitidine (50 mg/kg)14.75 ± 3.59 ***67.02
K. brasiliensis 125 mg/kg31.83 ± 1.4731.50
K. brasiliensis 250 mg/kg26.00 ± 5.29 *47.18
K. brasiliensis 500 mg/kg18.75 ± 5.73 *63.53
K. pinnata 125 mg/kg30.25 ± 0.9528.15
K. pinnata 250 mg/kg21.00 ± 4.8359.51
K. pinnata 500 mg/kg20.57 ± 5.85 *63.13
Results expressed as mean ± standard deviation, (n = 7). ANOVA and Dunnett post-test were used to calculate the statistical significance, * p < 0.5 and *** p < 0.001 vs. gastric lesion control.
Table
Table 5. Effect of pre-treatment with K. brasiliensis and K. pinnata leaf juices (250 and 500 mg/kg) on pH, total acidity and intragastric volume using the pylorus ligation model.
Table 5. Effect of pre-treatment with K. brasiliensis and K. pinnata leaf juices (250 and 500 mg/kg) on pH, total acidity and intragastric volume using the pylorus ligation model.
Experimental GroupspHIntragastric Volume (mL)Acidity (mEq [H+])
Positive Control1.82 ± 0.032.23 ± 0.2560.83 ± 17.09
Ranitidine (50 mg/kg)3.38 ± 1.60 ***2.10 ± 0.9510.35 ± 24.33 ***
K. brasiliensis 250 mg/kg1.80 ± 0.072.00 ± 0.4539.61 ± 4.87
K. brasiliensis 500 mg/kg1.83 ± 0.062.28 ± 0.4442.92 ± 12.11
K. pinnata 250 mg/kg1.72 ± 0.052.20 ± 0.2041.21 ± 3.06
K. pinnata 500 mg/kg1.74 ± 0.052.13 ± 0.3245.39 ± 2.41
Results expressed as mean ± standard deviation, (n = 7). ANOVA and Tukey post-test were used to calculate the statistical significance, *** p < 0.001 vs. positive control group.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

De Araújo, E.R.D.; Guerra, G.C.B.; Araújo, D.F.d.S.; De Araújo, A.A.; Fernandes, J.M.; De Araújo Júnior, R.F.; Da Silva, V.C.; De Carvalho, T.G.; Ferreira, L.D.S.; Zucolotto, S.M. Gastroprotective and Antioxidant Activity of Kalanchoe brasiliensis and Kalanchoe pinnata Leaf Juices against Indomethacin and Ethanol-Induced Gastric Lesions in Rats. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018, 19, 1265. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms19051265

AMA Style

De Araújo ERD, Guerra GCB, Araújo DFdS, De Araújo AA, Fernandes JM, De Araújo Júnior RF, Da Silva VC, De Carvalho TG, Ferreira LDS, Zucolotto SM. Gastroprotective and Antioxidant Activity of Kalanchoe brasiliensis and Kalanchoe pinnata Leaf Juices against Indomethacin and Ethanol-Induced Gastric Lesions in Rats. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2018; 19(5):1265. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms19051265

Chicago/Turabian Style

De Araújo, Edilane Rodrigues Dantas, Gerlane Coelho Bernardo Guerra, Daline Fernandes de Souza Araújo, Aurigena Antunes De Araújo, Júlia Morais Fernandes, Raimundo Fernandes De Araújo Júnior, Valéria Costa Da Silva, Thaís Gomes De Carvalho, Leandro De Santis Ferreira, and Silvana Maria Zucolotto. 2018. "Gastroprotective and Antioxidant Activity of Kalanchoe brasiliensis and Kalanchoe pinnata Leaf Juices against Indomethacin and Ethanol-Induced Gastric Lesions in Rats" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 19, no. 5: 1265. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms19051265

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop