Next Article in Journal
A History of the Pharmacological Treatment of Bipolar Disorder
Next Article in Special Issue
Effects of Funneliformis mosseae on Root Metabolites and Rhizosphere Soil Properties to Continuously-Cropped Soybean in the Potted-Experiments
Previous Article in Journal
Assembly Mechanism for Aggregation of Amyloid Fibrils
Previous Article in Special Issue
Plant MicroRNAs in Cross-Kingdom Regulation of Gene Expression
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
IJMS
Volume 19
Issue 7
10.3390/ijms19072142
ijms-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Colletotrichum higginsianum as a Model for Understanding Host–Pathogen Interactions: A Review

by
Yaqin Yan
1,
Qinfeng Yuan
1,
Jintian Tang
1,
Junbin Huang
1,
Tom Hsiang
2,
Yangdou Wei
3 and
Lu Zheng
1,*
1
The Key Lab of Plant Pathology of Hubei Province, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430070, China
2
School of Environmental Sciences, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON N1G 2W1, Canada
3
Department of Biology, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK S7N 5E2, Canada
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018, 19(7), 2142; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms19072142
Submission received: 28 June 2018 / Revised: 18 July 2018 / Accepted: 18 July 2018 / Published: 23 July 2018
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Plant–Fungal Interactions)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Colletotrichum higginsianum is a hemibiotrophic ascomycetous fungus that causes economically important anthracnose diseases on numerous monocot and dicot crops worldwide. As a model pathosystem, the Colletotrichum–Arabidopsis interaction has the significant advantage that both organisms can be manipulated genetically. The goal of this review is to provide an overview of the system and to point out recent significant studies that update our understanding of the pathogenesis of C. higginsianum and resistance mechanisms of Arabidopsis against this hemibiotrophic fungus. The genome sequence of C. higginsianum has provided insights into how genome structure and pathogen genetic variability has been shaped by transposable elements, and allows systematic approaches to longstanding areas of investigation, including infection structure differentiation and fungal–plant interactions. The Arabidopsis-Colletotrichum pathosystem provides an integrated system, with extensive information on the host plant and availability of genomes for both partners, to illustrate many of the important concepts governing fungal–plant interactions, and to serve as an excellent starting point for broad perspectives into issues in plant pathology.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Colletotrichum is a large ascomycete genus comprising more than 190 species, many of which cause devastating diseases on a large range of agricultural and horticultural crops worldwide [1]. Among species of Colletotrichum, C. higginsianum is classfied in a main phyogenetic clade within the C. destructivum complex, and causes anthracnose disease on a wide range of cruciferous plants, such as species of Brassica and Raphanus as well as the model plant Arabidopsis thaliana [2,3,4]. Since most A. thaliana ecotypes are susceptible to C. higginsianum, the pathogen can be regarded as adapted for A. thaliana [5]. As a typical hemibiotrophic fungus, C. higginsianum develops a series of specialized infection structures including germ tubes, appressoria, primary biotrophic hyphae (BH), and secondary necrotrophic hyphae (NH) (Figure 1). Thus, C. higginsianum is one of the best-studied species within the genus Colletotrichum because of its interesting infection strategy, and the ease with which it can be cultured axenically and transformed with high efficiency by T-DNA transfer mediated by Agrobacterium tumefaciens. Furthermore, complete genome sequences and transcriptome data are available [6]. For these reasons, the C. higginsianum–Arabidopsis pathosystem has become an attractive model for research on the molecular basis of fungal pathogenicity and plant–fungal interactions.

2. Infection Strategies

At the start of the hemibiotrophic life cycle of C. higginsianum on Arabidopsis, conidia land on the leaf surface and produce germ tubes, which then produce appressoria to penetrate the leaf surface [7]. As they mature, cell walls of appressoria become melanized while suitable solutes will accumulate in the cytoplasm (Figure 1A). High turgor pressure builds up by water diffusion into appressoria, which provides the force for the peg to penetrate through the plant cell wall. Within a breached epidermal cell, the initial narrow hypha from the peg gives rise to a swollen, sac-like BH. The BH enlarge and form lateral bulbous lobes, resembling a haustorium. The fungus establishes itself as a biotroph within 36 h post infection by forming a multiseptate, multilobed structure, variable in shape and confined within the initially infected epidermal cells (Figure 1B). At this stage of the interaction, infected cells can still plasmolyse normally, and the host plasmalemma and tonoplast remained functional [8]. Upon subsequent colonization of neighbouring cells at 72 h post-infection, a switch in both hyphal morphology and trophic relationship occur. At the periphery of the lobed BH, outgrowths develop rapidly to produce narrow NH (Figure 1C). These numerous hyphae radiating from each BH grow through the adjacent cell walls and infect surrounding cells. Narrow NH grow rapidly, and hyphal spread will eventually lead to necrotic lesions with the appearance of water-soaked lesions on the surface of the infected host as soon as 84 h post-infection [9]. In necrotic tissues, acervuli form to produce numerous conidia.
Some Colletotrichum species including C. graminicola, C. falcatum, C. caudatum and C. sublineola have an intracellular hemibiotrophic infection stage with a short period of biotrophy [10,11,12]. Unlike C. higginsianum, the BH of these four species grow not only in the initially infected cell but also into cells adjacent to the first infected cell before the fungi switch to NH, which ramify throughout host cells [13]. Similarly, for infection by another hemibiotrophic fungus Magnaporthe oryzae, once the fungus has breached the outer plant surface, it begins an extended period of biotrophic invasion of successive host cells. Rice cells invaded by M. oryzae plasmolyze as hyphae colonize them, but plasmolysis stops when the fungus grows into neighboring rice cells. In this form of hemibiotrophy, necrotrophic growth appears to be triggered at four to five days post-inoculation, when macroscopic lesions appear [14]. In contrast, biotrophic infection by C. higginsianum is entirely restricted to the first infected epidermal cell, and development then switches to necrotrophic growth, which then spreads within and between host cells, and kills host cells ahead of infection.

3. Genomics and Genetics

3.1. Genome Sequencing and Assembly

Two largescale genome projects have been completed for C. higginsianum aiming to produce high-quality assemblies to provide resources for comparative genomics and molecular analyses of fungal pathogenicity, which allow the identification of genes relevant to each stage of plant infection. In 2012, the first genome of C. higginsianum strain IMI 349063 was reported by O’Connell using a multi-source method, including short-read data from 454 GSFLX (350 bp) and Illumina GAII (100 bp) sequencing platforms together with a smaller number of longer Sanger reads. Optical mapping showed that the genome of C. higginsianum strain IMI 349063 was 53.4 Mb distributed among 12 chromosomes, including two mini chromosomes less than 1 Mb in size [15]. However, the actual assembly was composed of over 10,000 contigs. This genome is smaller than other sequenced Colletotrichum genomes (88.3 Mb, 55.6 Mb and 57.4 Mb such as C. orbiculare (88.3 Mb), C. gloeosporioides (55.6 Mb) and C. graminicola (57.4 Mb) [15,16]. Surprisingly, more genes (16172) were predicted from the C. higginsianum assembly in contrast to assemblies of C. orbiculare (13479), C. gloeosporioides (15469) and C. graminicola (12006) [12,16]. One limitation of this assembly was that many of the predicted protein-coding genes were truncated or split between contigs, resulting in multiple gene calls. The fragmented nature of the assembly leading to incomplete gene calls was confirmed by a series of problematic experiments in our labs.
Recently, C. higginsianum strain IMI 349063 had been re-sequenced using the single-molecule real-time (SMRT) technique, and combined with previous optical mapping data, has achieved a gapless assembly of all 12 chromosomes except for the ribosomal DNA repeat cluster on chromosome 7 [17]. This assembly of nearly all chromosomes represents the most complete genome assembly to date of any Colletotrichum species, and becomes part of a short list of completely assembled genomes of phytopathogenic fungi, namely Zymoseptoria tritici, Sclerotinia sclerotiorum, Botrytis cinerea, Verticillium dahliae and Fusarium graminearum [18,19,20,21,22]. The final genome assembly of strain IMI 349063 contains 28 unitigs (chromosome 7 is represented by 13 small unitigs and the mitochondrial genome is represented by 3 unitigs) with a total length of 50.82 Mb. Based on the new gene annotation, a total of 14,651 protein-coding genes were predicted from the new genome assembly, 1521 fewer than the previous assembly [17].
Genome mining of C. higginsianum and C. graminicola for candidate secreted effector proteins (CSEPs), which serve as molecular weapons to evade or suppress plant immunity, revealed only 177 in C. graminicola, but 365 were found in C. higginsianum [12]. The CSEPs are mostly small, cysteine rich proteins, averaging 110 residues in C. higginsianum. The larger, more diversified CSEP repertoire of C. higginsianum might be an adaptation to evade defenses and invade a broader range of host plants. The more accurate gene annotation from the new assembly revealed many secondary metabolism (SM) key genes and putative biosynthetic pathways. Interestingly, the annotation demonstrated that C. higginsianum encodes one of the largest repertoires of SM key genes and SM gene clusters of any sequenced ascomycete, suggesting a large capacity to produce diverse metabolites [23,24,25,26,27,28]. Analysis of the mini-chromosomes showed that both are repeat-rich and AT-rich, gene-poor and highly enriched with genes encoding putative secreted effector proteins of unknown function, which are different in their content to the other 10 chromosome [17]. Surprisingly, a study revealed that strains lacking small chromosome 11 abort infection during biotrophy, while their ability to grow on artificial media was not affected, and that chromosome 12 can be lost without effects on virulence or growth on agar plates [29], indicating that a number of potential genes from chromosome 11 have critical functions in addressing plant host responses.
The complete genome assembly allows for analysis of genomic features including transposable elements, telomeres, structural rearrangements and large gene clusters. Moreover, this assembly can be a reference for investigations of other isolates of C. higginsianum or other Colletotrichum species, and such data should facilitate future studies including those on functional genomics in this important model phytopathogen.

3.2. Transcriptome Analyses

Several research studies have been carried out on transcriptomics of C. higginsianum associated with different developmental and infection stages. Based on flow cytometric purification, intracellular biotrophic hyphae of C. higginsianum from infected Arabidopsis leaves were purified for biotrophic stage transcriptome analysis. Six fungal genes, namely homologues of NmrA, saccharopine dehydrogenase, CIH1 and three unigenes were specifically expressed in planta during the biotrophic phase, and the three unigenes (3, 125 and 143) are likely to encode small, soluble secreted proteins of unknown function that represent candidate fungal effectors [30].
RNA-Seq data for samples from infected Arabidopsis corresponding to pre-penetration appressoria, the early biotrophic phase and the transition to necrotrophy have been released, and the transcription levels were found to be highly dynamic [15]. At the appressorial phase, genes encoding CAZymes that were predicted to degrade cutin, cellulose hemicellulose and pectin were upregulated, which may contribute to initial host penetration, together with a larger set of enzymes that potentially remodel the fungal cell wall. During early infection, the transcriptome was dominated by secondary metabolism genes, with the majority of expressed SM gene clusters being induced before penetration and during biotrophy, and not in vitro. Furthermore, the majority of CSEP-encoding genes were strongly induced during biotrophy, implying that effector production was especially prominent during the biotrophic stage. During the switch to nectrophy, there was induction of a wide variety of lytic enzymes, presumably as the fungus feeds on moribund and necrotic tissues to allow prolific growth and colonization leading to increased spore production. Among the lytic enzymes produced, there were CAZymes and putative secreted proteases that may cut the various types of polysaccharides associated with the host cell walls. Furthermore, there was induction of many genes encoding plasma membrane transporters which may be required for movement and assimilation of metabolic products of this degradative enzymatic activity such as sugars, oligopeptides, and amino acids [15].

3.3. Genetic Transformation

A high efficiency transformation system using Agrobacterium tumefaciens-mediated transformation (ATMT) is available for C. higginsianum [31]. It has become established as the method of random insertional mutagenesis and targeted gene disruption using homologous recombination.
Random insertional mutagenesis is a powerful approach for discovering novel pathogenicity genes in fungi. Based on the first application of ATMT for insertional mutagenesis of C. higginsianum, a T-DNA insertion library was generated [31]. By using a high-throughput infection assay on A. thaliana seedlings, among 8850 mutants, 40 mutants showed reproducible pathogenicity defects on Arabidopsis and Brassica plants, 6 were impaired in appressorial melanization, 15 had reduced penetration ability, 14 induced host papillae or hypersensitive cell death, and 5 were affected in the transition from biotrophy to necrotrophy [31]. Flanking sequence analysis of the tagged genes led to the isolation of 14 putative pathogenicity genes (Table 1). Similarly, another T-DNA insertion library of C. higginsianum was also generated containing 5012 ATMT mutants, and six virulence-deficient mutants were acquired (Table 1). Identification and analysis of the T-DNA tagged loci of these mutants revealed several potential genes possibly related to virulence factors such as genes encoding a copper amine oxidase, an exosome component EXOSC1/CSL4, and other hypothetical proteins [32]. Korn et al. (2015), from a collection of 7200 insertion mutants, isolated 75 mutants with reduced symptoms. Among them, 19 were affected in host penetration, while 17 were affected in later stages of infection [33]. The location of T-DNA insertions of only 16 mutants could be identified by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) for further gene functional analysis (Table 1).
Among the T-DNA insertion library, two C. higginsianum mutants defective in the switch from biotrophy to necrotrophy showed high homology to conserved importin-β2 proteins. This class of importins is known to mediate the nuclear importation of pre-mRNA processing proteins in mammals, yeast and plants [34,35]. Importins are considered essential for the asexual/sexual development in Trichoderma reesei and pathogenicity in Aspergillus nidulans, Phytophthora sojae [36,37,38]. Importantly, there have been no reports that importin proteins are involved in the transition from biotrophy to necrotrophy. Otherwise, many T-DNA tagged loci of these mutants were annotated as hypothetical proteins, and these genes have the potential to be involved in novel functional genes possibly related to virulence factors. There needs to be more attention and penetrating research on these genes.
To validate that the integrated T-DNA is responsible for the observed phenotypes, complementation experiments or the generation of targeted knockout mutants are important. Since targeted gene mutagenesis through homologous recombination occurs with relatively low frequency in C. higginsianum [33], an efficient gene knockout protocol, which could increase homologous recombination frequency to 60–90%, was established based on the inactivated Ku70 and Ku80 components of the non-homologous end-joining (NHEJ) pathway in C. higginsianum [33,39]. The method of inactivated NHEJ pathway components to increase the homologous recombination frequency was previously reported in other filamentous fungi, and this method raised the transformation efficiency to 60–90% in A. sojae and A. oryzae [40] and by over 80% in M. oryzae [41]. Overall, these findings indicate that insertional mutagenesis by ATMT could be a valuable tool for genome-wide analysis of gene function in this important model pathogen.

4. Virulence Factors

Genome and transcriptome analyses of C. higginsianum infecting A. thaliana has shown that this fungus has many virulence factors. However, relatively few molecular determinants of virulence in C. higginsianum have been experimentally verified (Table 2).

4.1. Mitogen-Activated Protein (MAP) Kinase and cAMP/PKA Signaling Pathway

Adhesion to the plant surface is the first step in initiation of the infection process in many plant pathogenic fungi [49]. Following adhesion, physical signals such as those involving tissue hardness and hydrophobicity or chemical signals (cutin monomers and leaf waxes) induce germination and appressorial formation in several plant pathogenic fungi [50]. In eukaryotic cells, the transduction of a variety of extracellular signals and the regulation of different developmental processes are regulated by mitogen-activated protein (MAP) kinase pathways and cAMP/PKA signaling pathways [50,51]. Thus, some intensive studies on these two pathways have been carried out based on the infection process of C. higginsianum. ChSte7, encoding a MAPKK orthologue gene Ste7 in yeast, was highly expressed in vegetative and invasive growth stages in C. higginsianum. Deletion of ChSte7 resulted in significant reduction in vegetative growth, inability to form appressoria and also reduced invasive growth inside host plant tissues, which was similar for M. oryzae, B. cinerea and Ustilago maydis [44]. A Fus3/Kss1 related MAPK gene in C. higginsianum, ChMK1, was also reported to play an important role in cell wall integrity, colony melanization, and pathogenicity on A. thaliana [46]. ChRgf, encoding a Ras guanine-nucleotide exchange factor protein, might be a control element of MAPK pathway (REF), and its deletion resulted in some phenotypes similar to those involving deletion of the two MAPK pathway genes: defects in vegetative growth, altered hyphal morphology, reduced conidiation, poor surface attachment and low germination on hydrophobic surfaces [45]. These results indicate that the MAPK pathway is involved in a critical conserved role to control the pathogenicity and growth of C. higginsianum through the extracellular signal transmission compared to other phytopathogenic fungi. Moreover, another extracellular signal transmission pathway, cAMP/PKA signaling pathway, was also studied in C. higginsianum. The PKA catalytic subunits ChPKA1 and adenylate cyclase ChAC deletion mutants were significantly reduced in hyphal growth rate, tolerance to cell wall inhibitors and conidiation, but had an increased tolerance to elevated temperatures and exogenous H2O2 [52]. In contrast, the ChPKA2 mutant had no detectable alteration of phenotypes, suggesting that ChPKA1 contributes mainly to PKA activities in C. higginsianum [52]. These findings suggest that the cAMP/PKA signaling pathway also contributes to growth, conidial formation, stress tolerance and pathogenesis in C. higginsianum.
The MAPK and cAMP/PKA signaling pathways are well known in regulation of appressorial morphogenesis and plant infection in M. oryzae, C. truncatum and some other phytopathogenic fungi [53,54,55,56], but investigation of these two signaling pathways in C. higginsianum still helped to provide insights into the mechanism of the C. higginsianum–cruciferous crop interaction, and to facilitate investigation of efficient management of anthracnose disease. Functional comparisons of MAPK and cAMP/PKA signaling pathways in C. higginsianum with other phytopathogenic fungi may provide a deeper understanding of pathogenic mechanisms of this fungus.
After adhesion to plant surfaces, the infection strategy of C. higginsianum includes two phases: an initial biotrophic phase and a subsequent necrotrophic growth phase [57]. For biotrophic growth and transition to necrotrophic growth, fine-tuned regulation of cell wall developmental processes are essential. For fungi, management of these processes involves many pathways, including kinases and the co-activator Mob-family proteins [58]. These pathways have been called morphogenesis-related [59] and the septum initiation network [60] in Saccharomyces pombe, or regulation of Ace2p activity and morphogenesis [61] and the mitotic exit network [62] both in S. cerevisiae. In this latter fungus, Cbk1 is the terminal kinase in the RAM pathway, and it is classified in the kinase subfamily of nuclear Dbf2-related or large tumor suppressor. The function of Mob-family proteins which are essential for the activation of NDR kinases was also studied in C. higginsianum [48]. The results showed that the C. higginsianum genome encodes three members of the Mob1/phocein protein family. ChMob1 is required for conidiation, cytokinesis and plant infection. ChMob2 binds to the conserved NDR/LATS kinase ChCbk1, and is involved in virulence on A. thaliana and is required for both conidiation and formation of functional appressoria. ChMob3 knockout mutants have no obvious phenotype in vegetative cells or during infection. Moreover, Mob2 and Cbk1 co-localize to the cytoplasm and are excluded from nuclei in conidia and during appressorial formation in vitro. Mutants in the two potential Mob2/Cbk1 complex targets ChSSD1 and ChACE2 genes show defects in pathogenicity.

4.2. Nutrition, Transporter and Amino Acid Biosynthesis

Several studies provide evidence that nutritional requirements, such as amino acid biosynthesis or nutrient availabilities, are important for fungal infection cycles and pathogenicity in many fungi [63,64,65,66]. In C. higginsianum, two arginine auxotroph mutants showed reduced penetration and invasive growth ability, which was restored when L-arginine was supplied. Thus arginine biosynthesis was shown to be dispensable for conidial germination and appressorial morphogenesis of C. higginsianum, suggesting that arginine reserves in conidia are sufficient for the completion of pre-penetration development. However, arginine biosynthesis was critical for initial host penetration by appressoria and early biotrophic growth inside living host cells [42]. Although not many genes related to nutritional requirements have been genetically analyzed in C. higginsianum so far, there are many such studies in other species of Colletotrichum. The GATA transcription factor, AreA, regulates the use of poor or complex nitrogen sources, and restricts their use when sufficient nitrogen sources are available within the organism. The AreA plays a critical role in fungal development, conidial production, and regulation of nitrogen metabolism and virulence in C. gloeosporioides [67]. Kre5 and Kre6 are the key enzymes in β-1,6-glucan synthesis and formation of branch points of the β-glucan network. In C. graminicola, RNAi-mediated reduction of KRE5 and KRE6 transcript abundance caused appressoria to burst and necrotrophic hyphae to swell, indicating that β-1,6-glucosidic bonds are essential in these cells [68]. The homologous proteins in C. higginsianum should play important roles in fungal development or virulence.
The ATP-binding cassette (ABC) and major facilitator superfamily (MFS) of transporters are two families that play important roles in transport processes. In recent research, MFS transporters are usually demonstrated to be involved in multidrug resistance in fungi [69]. MFS transporters are capable of transporting small molecules in response to ion gradients or function as drug:H+ antiporters in microorganisms. Mounting evidence indicates that MFS transporters may also indirectly control membrane potential by changing membrane lipid homeostasis and regulating internal pH and the stress response machinery and pathogenicity in fungi [70,71,72]. Moreover, some MFS transporters also are involved in secretion of phytotoxins [73,74,75,76]. Recently, a virulence-deficient mutant, Ch-1-T513, from a T-DNA insertion mutant library in C. higginsianum was found to have abnormal hyphae, which might be a key factor affecting virulence of the fungus. The study demonstrated that a MFS transporter named ChMfs1 is responsible for the mutant Ch-1-T513 phenotype, and ChMfs1 in C. higginsianum is the first reported to be involved in pathogenicity and the production of intra-hyphal hyphae [47].
The plasma membrane H+-ATPase is a proton pump that plays important energetic and regulatory roles in the physiology of plants and fungi controlling essential functions including nutrient uptake and intracellular pH regulation [77]. In fungal cells, the activity of the proton pump is regulated by a large number of environmental factors at both transcriptional and post-translational levels [78]. Structure and function of plasma membrane H+-ATPases have been extensively explored in fungi, revealing their role in vegetative growth, nutrient transport and pathogenicity [79,80,81,82,83]. In C. higginsianum, a potential plasma membrane H+-ATPase Pma2 was frequently targeted in five independent insertion mutants from the T-DNA insertion mutant library. Chpma2 deletion mutants form fully melanized appressoria but entirely fail to penetrate the host tissue. Targeted gene knockout of another plasma membrane pump gene, ChPMA1, gave a non-viable phenotype, indicating that ChPMA1 may be an essential gene and encode the major H+-transporting ATPase [33].

4.3. Effectors

In the case of plant pathogenic hemibiotrophs, colonization and the initial biotrophic interaction with host cells is facilitated by pathogen-encoded small, secreted proteins termed effectors [84]. Biotrophy-specific hyphal cells play important roles in transporting effectors into the host cells and in obtaining nutrition from the host [85]. Depending on the fungal species, the interfacial matrix is either continuous with the host plant apoplast such as for Puccinales or separated into an interfacial apoplastic compartment like that in M. oryzae. The interfacial membrane among a variety of pathosystems ranges from undifferentiated plant plasma membranes to highly specialized membranes with complicated elaborations and unique components [86]. Vesicles are abundant in both host and pathogen cytoplasm near the interface, implying that both are involved in active production of secreted compounds into and across interfacial zones [87,88]. Shimdada et al. found some evidence for localized specialization of the interfacial membrane around BH of C. higginsianum [5]. Biotrophic infection by C. higginsianum has differences from other biotrophic fungus, and the process of interfacial membrane exchange with the fungus deserves further study.
In C. higginsianum, inventories of putative effectors have been predicted from the annotated genomes of C. higginsianum revealing 18 genes, of which six were not predicted to be secreted, and two were chitinases, leaving 10 putative secreted LysM effectors [89]. The LysM domain comprises 40–60 amino acid residues and mediates binding to chitin and peptidoglycans [89]. Chitin is a microbe-associated molecular pattern (MAMP) that can be detected by plant pattern recognition receptors (PRRs) to activate a variety of MAMP-triggered immune responses [90]. To avoid recognition by host receptors, several ascomycetes are known to produce effector proteins which either block the activity of host plant chitinases or compete with host plant receptors which bind chitin fragments [91,92,93,94,95]. The function of two effectors, ChELP1 and ChELP2, homologs of LysM proteins were characterized in C. higginsianum. ChELP2 has been found to be located on the surface of bulbous biotrophic hyphae at the interface with living plant cells, but it has not been discovered in necrotrophic hyphae. In previous experiments, recombinant ChELP1 and ChELP2 were found to bind chitin oligomers in vitro with high specifity and high affinity. Both proteins suppressed chitin-triggered activation of two immunity-related plant mitogen-activated protein kinases in Arabidopsis. These results suggested a double role for these LysM proteins as effectors for suppressing chitin-triggered immunity and as proteins essential for appressorial development and function [43].
The role of secreted effector proteins during infection by hemibiotrophic plant pathogens is poorly understood. Based on deep transcriptome sequencing and computational mining of Expressed Sequence Tags from precise infection stages, a large of planta-expressed effector candidates were found in C. higginsianum. Most biotrophy-associated ChEC genes were dramatically upregulated exclusively in planta and distinct sets of effectors are deployed in successive waves by particular fungal cell types [96]. With fluorescent protein tagging and transmission electron microscopy-immunogold labelling, early expressed effector proteins are observed to be focally secreted from appressorial penetration pores before host invasion (Figure 1A). In addition, later-expressed effectors accumulate in structures formed at the interface between primary hyphae and living host cells (Figure 1B), implicating these hyphae in effector delivery. Furthermore, the coordinated expression and secretion of antagonistic biotrophy effectors and toxin effectors contribute to fungal virulence and the regulation of hemibiotrophy in C. higginsianum. These findings indicate new functions for fungal infection structures that have not been reported previously, specifically the localized release of effector proteins at the interface between fungal pathogen and plant host, and associated with the penetration pore. This provides the basis to model the switch to necrotrophy from biotrophy by this fungus [96]. Future research should attempt to decipher the nature of the plant signals inducing effector gene expression and the way that they are sensed by the pathogen.
Recently, 61 putative effector proteins were separately cloned into a plant expression vector providing an N-terminal GFP tag, and the tagged proteins were transiently expressed directly inside plant cells using ATMT [97]. Among them, subcellular localization of 16 candidate effectors was verified, nine were imported into plant nuclei, three were imported into the matrix of peroxisomes, three decorated cortical microtubule arrays, and one was associated with Golgi stacks [97]. These findings revealed that plant peroxisomes, microtubules and Golgi are novel targets for fungal effectors.

5. Molecular Interactions

Plants usually defend against microbial pathogens by activating both localized and systemic resistance responses. These responses include hypersensitive response [98], cell-wall fortification [99], synthesis of phytoalexins [100] and production of other antimicrobial secondary metabolites or pathogenesis-related proteins (PR proteins) [101]. Signaling molecules implicated in these inducible defense systems include salicylic acid (SA), jasmonic acid (JA), ethylene (ET), abscisic acid (ABA), auxin, gibberellins (GAs), cytokinins (CKs), brassinosteroids (BRs), and reactive oxygen species (ROS) [102,103]. These phytohormones can induce defense responses individually, and also interact synergistically or antagonistically to further orchestrate downstream signaling.
A large number of fungal and oomycete pathogens have been reported to infect the model plant A. thaliana, either naturally or in the laboratory. As a typical hemibiotrophic fungus, C. higginsianum develops a series of specialized infection structures. In particular, the intracellular BH of C. higginsianum are equivalent to haustoria, and hence this pathosystem can provide insights into the molecular basis of biotrophy in obligately parasitic organisms, such as rusts, powdery mildews, and downy mildews, all of which are not readily culturable or genetically manipulated.

5.1. Primary Metabolic Pathways

For successful establishment in host plants, biotrophic and hemibiotrophic fungi need to obtain nutrients from living host cells, and effectively evade the host defense system. Colonization by a fungal pathogen is associated with multiple metabolic changes in the plant host, notably increases in the expression of several genes involved in primary metabolic pathways, synthesis or degradation of carbohydrates, amino acids, lipids, and mineral transport [104]. It has been suggested that the role of primary metabolism during plant–pathogen interactions is to support cellular energy requirements for plant defense responses [105]. The mutation of lht1 (lysinehistidine transporter 1) in Arabidopsis can significantly reduce contents of glutamine, alanine, and proline, resulting in enhanced resistance not only to C. higginsianum but also to diverse bacterial and oomycete pathogens [106]. After inoculation with these pathogens, the lht1 mutant also exhibited increased callose deposition, higher accumulation of SA and constitutive expression of PR-1.
Furthermore, more evidence has suggested that components of primary metabolism also can act as signals regulating various aspects of plant defense. For example, fatty acids and lipids play important roles in plant defense and and biosynthesis of the major defense hormone JA [107]. Little is known about the role of plant primary metabolism in defense against attack by this hemibiotroph. To date, several metabolic functions have been identified that influence compatibility of C. higginsianum with the plant host. Glycerol-3-phosphate (G3P) is an important component in carbohydrate and lipid metabolic processes. Infection of Arabidopsis by C. higginsianum leads to an increase in G3P levels and a simultaneous decrease in glycerol levels in the plant. Cells impaired in the utilization of G3P accumulated higher levels of pathogen-induced G3P, and exhibited enhanced resistance [108]. The NADP-malic enzyme catalyses the oxidative decarboxylation of L-malate using NADP+ as coenzyme, producing pyruvate, CO2, and NADPH is present as a multigene family [109]. In A. thaliana, loss of cytosolic NADP-ME2 leads to increased susceptibility to infection by pathogens such as C. higginsianum. The data suggest that NADP-ME2 has a function during the basal defence response, where it may be required for ROS production after pathogen recognition [110]. Since primary metabolism is essential for survival, associated genes are unlikely to be to be eliminated during natural selection, in contrast to most R-genes which are only periodically important for survival (i.e., when pathogens attack). Therefore, engineering resistance against pathogens by selection of resistance-related genes that also have a primary metabolic function is expected to provide more durable resistance.

5.2. Phytohormones

Genetic studies with Arabidopsis-signaling mutants have shown that SA-dependent responses are deployed against biotrophic pathogens, whereas ethylene- or JA-dependent responses are more important for induced resistance to necrotrophic pathogens [111], suggesting that resistance to hemibiotrophic pathogens such as Colletotrichum may require a combination of these pathways [112]. Genome-wide studies using cDNA arrays in Arabidopsis infected with the C. higginsianum revealed that defense reactions activate the SA-dependent signaling pathway at the early stage of the interaction between Arabidopsis and C. higginsianum, and the subsequent defense reaction may depend on the JA-dependent signaling pathway because the correlation with SA signaling decreased rapidly and that of JA-signaling increased relatively [4]. Differential defense signalling crosstalk and PR gene expression are involved in cultivar-specific resistance of kimchi cabbage plants to anthracnose, black spot and black rot diseases, and the resistance is strongly associated with the hormone-dependent transcriptional induction of defence genes [113].

5.3. Resistance Genes

Molecular and biochemical bases of cultivar resistance to Colletotrichum spp. have been investigated using genetically diverse materials [114,115,116]. Innate disease resistance responses in plants are triggered by a dual surveillance system composed of nucleotide binding-leucine rich repeat (NB-LRR) proteins encoded by resistance genes and pattern recognition receptors (PRRs) [117]. The two layers are often called MAMPs-triggered immunity (MTI) and effector triggered immunity (ETI) [118].
By a combination of quantitative trait loci (QTL) and Mendelian mapping, a single putative R locus RCH1 was identified, at the tip of chromosome 4, in the resistant A. thaliana ecotype Eil-0 against C. higginsianum [119]. By using map-based cloning and natural variation analysis of 19 Arabidopsis ecotypes, another dominant resistance locus RCH2 was identified against C. higginsianum. The locus RCH2 maps to an extensive cluster of disease-resistance loci known as MRC-J in the Arabidopsis ecotype Ws-0. These indicate that Arabidopsis resistance to C. higginsianum is controlled by a gene-for-gene interaction.
In A. thaliana, NB-LRR-type resistance (R) genes to Pseudomonas syringae 4 (RPS4) and to Ralstonia solanacearum 1 (RRS1-R) were reported to also confer resistance to C. higginsianum [120,121]. RRS1-R and RPS4 were also found as a complex that could help detect effectors which target WRKY proteins [122,123]. Therefore, effectors in C. higginsianum that target WRKY proteins may be more likely to act as Avr genes.

6. Future Perspectives

This review provides an overview of recent significant studies on the pathogenesis of C. higginsianum and resistance mechanisms of Arabidopsis against this hemibiotrophic fungus. However, there are many issues worth investigating.
Firstly, the genome sequence of C. higginsianum has revealed a large number of putative effector proteins, but few effector proteins have been experimentally confirmed or characterized to date. The identification of virulence targets for the hundreds of candidate effectors predicted from genome sequencing remains a major challenge, partly because protocols for high-throughput plant cellular assays are lacking. Thus, establishing a reliable high-efficiency protocol for screening effectors of C. higginsianum would facilitate future functional identification in this important model pathogen. Moreover, previous studies showed that two effector proteins, ChELP1 and ChELP2, at the biotrophic stage in planta may be critical for suppressing chitin-triggered immune responses, while the basal expression levels in appressoria in vitro and in planta are required for efficient substrate penetration. Further work is needed to elucidate how these proteins contribute to appressorial function and the switch to invasive hyphal growth. The complete genome sequence of C. higginsianum revealed that chromosomes 11 and 12 are also enriched in genes encoding potential effector proteins which differ from the core genome. Lack of chromosome 11 leads to aborted infection during biotrophy, indicating that a number of potential genes from chromosome 11 have critical functions in manipulating plant host responses, and these can be selectively analyzed in future work to evaluate their possible function.
Secondly, comparative analyses of interactions between Arabidopsis and both non-adapted and adapted Colletotrichum species revealed that the adapted pathogen C. higginsianum induced papillary callose at a much lower frequency than non-adapted Colletotrichum species, indicating that this fungus may suppress pre-penetration resistance at the cell periphery [5]. The mechanism of C. higginsianum suppression of pre-penetration resistance remains to be elucidated by future experiments.
Finally, many genes for synthesis of secondary metabolites are up-regulated during plant infection, and many genes are specifically expressed during the biotrophic stage in C. higginsianum, indicating that appropriate gene expression during the biotrophic stage is a key for successful establishment of this fungus in host plants. Thus, the C. higginsianum-Arabidopsis pathosystem has tremendous potential for discovery of novel bioactive molecules, and identification of the corresponding biosynthetic pathways.

Author Contributions

Y.Y. conducted most of the research and wrote the draft manuscript. Y.Y., Q.Y. and J.T. revised the manuscript. T.H. provided critical comments and edited the manuscript. J.H. and Y.W. gave critical suggestions for the structure and writing of the manuscript. L.Z supervised all aspects of the study, reviewed it critically, and revised the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by grants funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 31101399) and the Specialized Research Fund for the Doctoral Program of Higher Education of China (No. 20110146120033).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Jayawardena, R.S.; Hyde, K.D.; Damm, U.; Cai, L.; Liu, M.; Li, X.H.; Zhang, W.; Zhao, W.; Yan, J.Y. Notes on currently accepted species of Colletotrichum. Mycosphere 2016, 7, 1192–1260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Damm, U.; O’Connell, R.J.; Groenewald, J.Z.; Crous, P.W. The Colletotrichum destructivum [italicize] species complex–hemibiotrophic pathogens of forage and field crops. Stud. Mycol. 2014, 79, 49–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Crouch, J.; O’Connell, R.; Gan, P.; Buiate, E.; Torres, M.F.; Beirn, L.; Shirasu, K.; Vaillancourt, L. The genomics of Colletotrichum. In Genomics of Plant-Associated Fungi: Monocot Pathogens; Dean, R.A., Lichens-Park, A., Kole, C., Eds.; Springer: Berlin, Germany, 2014; pp. 69–102. [Google Scholar]
  4. Narusaka, M.; Abe, H.; Kobayashi, M.; Kubo, Y.; Narusaka, Y. Comparative analysis of expression profiles of counterpart gene sets between Brassica rapa and Arabidopsis thaliana during fungal pathogen Colletotrichum higginsianum infection. Plant Biotechnol. J. 2006, 23, 503–508. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Shimada, C.; Lipka, V.; O’Connell, R.; Okuno, T.; Schulze-Lefert, P.; Takano, Y. Nonhost resistance in Arabidopsis-Colletotrichum interactions acts at the cell periphery and requires actin filament function. Mol. Plant-Microbe Interact. 2006, 19, 270–279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Zampounis, A.; Pigné, S.; Dallery, J.F.; Wittenberg, A.H.; Zhou, S.; Schwartz, D.C.; Thon, M.R.; O’Connell, R.J. Genome sequence and annotation of Colletotrichum higginsianum, a causal agent of crucifer anthracnose disease. Genome Announc. 2016, 4, e00821-16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. De Silva, D.D.; Crous, P.W.; Ades, P.K.; Hyde, K.D.; Taylor, P.W. Life styles of Colletotrichum species and implications for plant biosecurity. Fungal Biol. Rev. 2017, 31, 155–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Latunde-Dada, A.O.; O’connell, R.J.; Nash, C.; Pring, R.J.; Lucas, J.A.; Bailey, J.A. Infection process and identity of the hemibiotrophic anthracnose fungus (Colletotrichum destructivum) from cowpea (Vigna unguiculata). Mycol. Res. 1996, 100, 1133–1141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Münch, S.; Lingner, U.; Floss, D.S.; Ludwig, N.; Sauer, N.; Deising, H.B. The hemibiotrophic lifestyle of Colletotrichum species. J. Plant Physiol. 2008, 165, 41–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Prasanth, C.N.; Viswanathan, R.; Krishna, N.; Malathi, P.; Sundar, A.R.; Tiwari, T. Unraveling the genetic complexities in gene set of sugarcane red rot pathogen Colletotrichum falcatum through transcriptomic approach. Sugar Tech. 2017, 19, 604–615. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Crouch, J.A. Colletotrichum caudatum s.l. is a species complex. IMA Fungus 2014, 5, 17–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Buiate, E.A.; Xavier, K.V.; Moore, N.; Torres, M.F.; Farman, M.L.; Schardl, C.L.; Vaillancourt, L.J. A comparative genomic analysis of putative pathogenicity genes in the host-specific sibling species Colletotrichum graminicola and Colletotrichum sublineola. BMC Genom. 2017, 18, 67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Perfect, S.E.; Green, J.R. Infection structures of biotrophic and hemibiotrophic fungal plant pathogens. Mol. Plant Pathol. 2001, 2, 101–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Foster, A.J.; Ryder, L.S.; Kershaw, M.J.; Talbot, N.J. The role of glycerol in the pathogenic lifestyle of the rice blast fungus Magnaporthe oryzae. Environ. Microbiol. 2017, 19, 1008–1016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. O’Connell, R.J.; Thon, M.R.; Hacquard, S.; Amyotte, S.G.; Kleemann, J.; Torres, M.F.; Damm, U.; Buiate, E.A.; Epstein, L.; Alkan, N.; et al. Lifestyle transitions in plant pathogenic Colletotrichum fungi deciphered by genome and transcriptome analyses. Nat. Genet. 2012, 44, 1060–1065. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Gan, P.; Ikeda, K.; Irieda, H.; Narusaka, M.; O’Connell, R.J.; Narusaka, Y.; Takano, Y.; Kubo, Y.; Shirasu, K. Comparative genomic and transcriptomic analyses reveal the hemibiotrophic stage shift of Colletotrichum fungi. New Phytol. 2013, 197, 1236–1249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Dallery, J.F.; Lapalu, N.; Zampounis, A.; Pigné, S.; Luyten, I.; Amselem, J.; Wittenberg, A.H.; Zhou, S.; Queiroz, M.V.; Robin, G.P. Gapless genome assembly of Colletotrichum higginsianum reveals chromosome structure and association of transposable elements with secondary metabolite gene clusters. BMC Genom. 2017, 18, 667. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Faino, L.; Seidl, M.F.; Datema, E.; van den Berg, G.C.; Janssen, A.; Wittenberg, A.H.; Thomma, B.P. Single-molecule real-time sequencing combined with optical mapping yields completely finished fungal genome. Mbio 2015, 6, e00936-15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Van Kan, J.A.; Stassen, J.H.; Mosbach, A.; Van Der Lee, T.A.; Faino, L.; Farmer, A.D.; Papasotiriou, D.G.; Zhou, S.G.; Seidl, M.F.; Cottam, E. A gapless genome sequence of the fungus Botrytis cinerea. Mol. Plant Pathol. 2017, 18, 75–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Derbyshire, M.; Denton-Giles, M.; Hegedus, D.; Seifbarghy, S.; Rollins, J.; Van Kan, J.; Raffaele, S. The complete genome sequence of the phytopathogenic fungus Sclerotinia sclerotiorum reveals insights into the genome architecture of broad host range pathogens. Genome Biol. Evol. 2017, 9, 593–618. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Goodwin, S.B.; M’barek, S.B.; Dhillon, B.; Wittenberg, A.H.; Crane, C.F.; Hane, J.K.; Foster, A.J.; Van der Lee, T.A.; Grimwood, J.; Aerts, A. Finished genome of the fungal wheat pathogen Mycosphaerella graminicola reveals dispensome structure, chromosome plasticity, and stealth pathogenesis. PLoS Genet. 2011, 7, e1002070. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. King, R.; Urban, M.; Hammond-Kosack, M.C.; Hassani-Pak, K.; Hammond-Kosack, K.E. The completed genome sequence of the pathogenic ascomycete fungus Fusarium graminearum. BMC Genom. 2015, 16, 544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Zhang, Y.; Zhang, K.; Fang, A.; Han, Y.; Yang, J.; Xue, M.; Bao, J.; Hu, D.; Zhou, B.; Sun, X.; et al. Specific adaptation of Ustilaginoidea virens in occupying host florets revealed by comparative and functional genomics. Nat. Commun. 2014, 5, 3849. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Wiemann, P.; Sieber, C.M.; Von Bargen, K.W.; Studt, L.; Niehaus, E.M.; Espino, J.J.; Huß, K.; Michielse, C.B.; Albermann, S.; Wagner, D. Deciphering the cryptic genome: Genome-wide analyses of the rice pathogen Fusarium fujikuroi reveal complex regulation of secondary metabolism and novel metabolites. PLoS Pathog. 2013, 9, e1003475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Giles, S.S.; Soukup, A.A.; Lauer, C.; Shaaban, M.; Lin, A.; Oakley, B.R.; Wang, C.C.; Keller, N.P. Cryptic Aspergillus nidulans antimicrobials. Appl. Environ. Microb. 2011, 77, 3669–3675. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Inglis, D.O.; Binkley, J.; Skrzypek, M.S.; Arnaud, M.B.; Cerqueira, G.C.; Shah, P.; Wymore, F.; Wortman, J.R.; Sherlock, G. Comprehensive annotation of secondary metabolite biosynthetic genes and gene clusters of Aspergillus nidulans, A. fumigatus, A. niger and A. oryzae. BMC Microbiol. 2013, 13, 91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Chooi, Y.H.; Muria-Gonzalez, M.J.; Solomon, P.S.A. Genome-wide survey of the secondary metabolite biosynthesis genes in the wheat pathogen Parastagonospora nodorum. Mycology 2014, 5, 192–206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Yaegashi, J.; Oakley, B.R.; Wang, C.C. Recent advances in genome mining of secondary metabolite biosynthetic gene clusters and the development of heterologous expression systems in Aspergillus nidulans. J. Ind. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2014, 41, 433–442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Plaumann, P.L.; Schmidpeter, J.; Dahl, M.; Taher, L.; Koch, C. A dispensable chromosome is required for virulence in the hemibiotrophic plant pathogen Colletotrichum higginsianum. Front. Microbiol. 2018, 9, 1005. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Takahara, H.; Dolf, A.; Endl, E.; O’Connell, R. Flow cytometric purification of Colletotrichum higginsianum biotrophic hyphae from Arabidopsis leaves for stage-specific transcriptome analysis. Plant J. 2009, 59, 672–683. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Huser, A.; Takahara, H.; Schmalenbach, W.; O’Connell, R. Discovery of pathogenicity genes in the crucifer anthracnose fungus Colletotrichum higginsianum, using random insertional mutagenesis. Mol. Plant-Microbe Int. 2009, 22, 143–156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Liu, L.; Zhao, D.; Zheng, L.; Hsiang, T.; Wei, Y.; Fu, Y.; Huang, J. Identification of virulence genes in the crucifer anthracnose fungus Colletotrichum higginsianum by insertional mutagenesis. Microb. Pathog. 2013, 64, 6–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Korn, M.; Schmidpeter, J.; Dahl, M.; Müller, S.; Voll, L.M.; Koch, C. A genetic screen for pathogenicity genes in the hemibiotrophic fungus Colletotrichum higginsianum identifies the plasma membrane proton pump Pma2 required for host penetration. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0125960. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Guisbert, K.S.; Li, H.; Guthrie, C. Alternative 3′ pre-mRNA processing in Saccharomyces cerevisiae is modulated by Nab4/Hrp1 in vivo. PLoS Biol. 2006, 5, e6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Lee, B.J.; Cansizoglu, A.E.; Süel, K.E.; Louis, T.H.; Zhang, Z.; Chook, Y.M. Rules for nuclear localization sequence recognition by karyopherin β2. Cell 2006, 126, 543–558. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Araújo-Bazán, L.; Dhingra, S.; Chu, J.; Fernández-Martínez, J.; Calvo, A.M.; Espeso, E.A. Importin α is an essential nuclear import carrier adaptor required for proper sexual and asexual development and secondary metabolism in Aspergillus nidulans. Fungal Genet. Biol. 2009, 46, 506–515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Yang, X.; Ding, F.; Zhang, L.; Sheng, Y.; Zheng, X.; Wang, Y. The importin α subunit PsIMPA1 mediates the oxidative stress response and is required for the pathogenicity of Phytophthora sojae. Fungal Genet. Biol. 2015, 82, 108–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Ghassemi, S.; Lichius, A.; Bidard, F.; Lemoine, S.; Rossignol, M.N.; Herold, S.; Seiboth, V.S.; Seiboth, B.; Espeso, E.A.; Margeot, A. The β-importin KAP8 (Pse1/Kap121) is required for nuclear import of the cellulase transcriptional regulator XYR1, asexual sporulation and stress resistance in Trichoderma reesei. Mol. Microbiol. 2015, 96, 405–418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Ushimaru, T.; Terada, H.; Tsuboi, K.; Kogou, Y.; Sakaguchi, A.; Tsuji, G.; Kubo, Y. Development of an efficient gene targeting system in Colletotrichum higginsianum using a non-homologous end-joining mutant and Agrobacterium tumefaciens-mediated gene transfer. Mol. Genet. Genom. 2010, 284, 357–371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Takahashi, T.; Masuda, T.; Koyama, Y. Enhanced gene targeting frequency in ku70 and ku80 disruption mutants of Aspergillus sojae and Aspergillus oryzae. Mol. Genet. Genom. 2006, 275, 460–470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Villalba, F.; Collemare, J.; Landraud, P.; Lambou, K.; Brozek, V.; Cirer, B.; Morin, D.; Brue, C.; Beffa, B.; Lebrun, M.H. Improved gene targeting in Magnaporthe grisea by inactivation of MgKU80 required for non-homologous end joining. Fungal Genet. Biol. 2008, 45, 68–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Takahara, H.; Huser, A.; O’Connell, R. Two arginine biosynthesis genes are essential for pathogenicity of Colletotrichum higginsianum on Arabidopsis. Mycology 2012, 3, 54–64. [Google Scholar]
  43. Takahara, H.; Hacquard, S.; Kombrink, A.; Hughes, H.B.; Halder, V.; Robin, G.P.; Hiruma, K.; Neumann, U.; Shinya, T.; Kombrink, E.; et al. Colletotrichum higginsianum extracellular LysM proteins play dual roles in appressorial function and suppression of chitin-triggered plant immunity. New Phytol. 2016, 211, 1323–1337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Yuan, Q.; Chen, M.; Yan, Y.; Gu, Q.; Huang, J.; Zheng, L. ChSte7 is required for vegetative growth and various plant infection processes in Colletotrichum higginsianum. BioMed Res. Int. 2016, 2016, 1–11. [Google Scholar]
  45. Gu, Q.; Chen, M.; Huang, J.; Wei, Y.; Hsiang, T.; Zheng, L. Multifaceted roles of the Ras guanine-nucleotide exchange factor ChRgf in development, pathogenesis, and stress responses of Colletotrichum higginsianum. Phytopathology 2017, 107, 433–443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Wei, W.; Xiong, Y.; Zhu, W.; Wang, N.; Yang, G.; Peng, F. Colletotrichum higginsianum mitogen-activated protein kinase ChMK1: Role in growth, cell wall integrity, colony melanization, and pathogenicity. Front. Microbiol. 2016, 7, 1212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Liu, L.; Yan, Y.; Huang, J.; Hsiang, T.; Wei, Y.; Li, Y.; Gao, J.; Zheng, L. A novel MFS transporter gene ChMfs1 is important for hyphal morphology, conidiation, and pathogenicity in Colletotrichum higginsianum. Front. Microbiol. 2017, 8, 1953. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Schmidpeter, J.; Dahl, M.; Hofmann, J.; Koch, C. ChMob2 binds to ChCbk1 and promotes virulence and conidiation of the fungal pathogen Colletotrichum higginsianum. BMC Microbiol. 2017, 17, 22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Kubo, Y.; Harata, K.; Kodama, S.; Fukada, F. Development of the infection strategy of the hemibiotrophic plant pathogen, Colletotrichum orbiculare, and plant immunity. Physiol. Mol. Plant P 2016, 95, 32–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Zhao, X.; Mehrabi, R.; Xu, J.R. Mitogen-activated protein kinase pathways and fungal pathogenesis. Eukaryot. Cell 2007, 6, 1701–1714. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Jiang, C.; Zhang, X.; Liu, H.; Xu, J.R. Mitogen-activated protein kinase signaling in plant pathogenic fungi. PLoS Pathog. 2018, 14, e1006875. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Zhu, W.; Zhou, M.; Xiong, Z.; Peng, F.; Wei, W. The cAMP-PKA signaling pathway regulates pathogenicity, hyphal growth, appressorial formation, conidiation, and stress tolerance in Colletotrichum higginsianum. Front. Microbiol. 2017, 8, 1416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Li, Y.; Zhang, X.; Hu, S.; Liu, H.; Xu, J.R. PKA activity is essential for relieving the suppression of hyphal growth and appressorium formation by MoSfl1 in Magnaporthe oryzae. PLoS Genet. 2017, 13, e1006954. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Zhou, X.; Zhao, X.; Xue, C.; Dai, Y.; Xu, J.R. Bypassing both surface attachment and surface recognition requirements for appressorium formation by overactive ras signaling in Magnaporthe oryzae. Mol. Plant-Microbe Int. 2014, 27, 996–1004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Xiong, Q.; Xu, J.; Zhao, Y.; Wang, K. CtPMK1, a mitogen-activated-protein kinase gene, is required for conidiation, appressorium formation, and pathogenicity of Colletotrichum truncatum on soybean. Ann. Appl. Biol. 2015, 167, 63–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. He, P.; Wang, Y.; Wang, X.; Zhang, X.; Tian, C. The mitogen-activated protein kinase CgMK1 governs appressorium formation, melanin synthesis, and plant infection of Colletotrichum gloeosporioides. Front. Microbiol. 2017, 8, 2216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. O’Connell, R.; Herbert, C.; Sreenivasaprasad, S.; Khatib, M.; Esquerré-Tugayé, M.T.; Dumas, B. A novel Arabidopsis-Colletotrichum pathosystem for the molecular dissection of plant-fungal interactions. Mol. Plant -Microbe Int. 2004, 17, 272–282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Hergovich, A.; Stegert, M.R.; Schmitz, D.; Hemmings, B.A. NDR kinases regulate essential cell processes from yeast to humans. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2006, 7, 253–264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Hou, M.C.; Salek, J.; McCollum, D. Mob1p interacts with the Sid2p kinase and is required for cytokinesis in fission yeast. Curr. Biol. 2000, 10, 619–622. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Hou, M.C.; Wiley, D.J.; Verde, F.; McCollum, D. Mob2p interacts with the protein kinase Orb6p to promote coordination of cell polarity with cell cycle progression. J. Cell Sci. 2003, 116, 125–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  61. Nelson, B.; Kurischko, C.; Horecka, J.; Mody, M.; Nair, P.; Pratt, L.; Pratt, L.; Zougman, A.; McBroom, L.D.; Hughes, T.R.; et al. RAM: A conserved signaling network that regulates Ace2p transcriptional activity and polarized morphogenesis. Mol. Biol. Cell 2003, 14, 3782–3803. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Hotz, M.; Barral, Y. The Mitotic Exit Network: New turns on old pathways. Trends Cell Biol. 2014, 24, 145–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Liu, X.; Wang, J.; Xu, J.; Shi, J. FgIlv5 is required for branched-chain amino acid biosynthesis and full virulence in Fusarium graminearum. Microbiology 2014, 160, 692–702. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Zhou, W.; Shi, W.; Xu, X.W.; Li, Z.G.; Yin, C.F.; Peng, J.B.; Pan, S.; Chen, X.; Zhao, W.; Zhang, Y.; et al. Glutamate synthase MoGlt1-mediated glutamate homeostasis is important for autophagy, virulence and conidiation in the rice blast fungus. Mol. Plant Pathol. 2018, 19, 564–578. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Solomon, P.S.; Thomas, S.W.; Spanu, P.; Oliver, R.P. The utilisation of di/tripeptides by Stagonospora nodorum is dispensable for wheat infection. Physiol. Mol. Plant P 2003, 63, 191–199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Horst, R.J.; Doehlemann, G.; Wahl, R.; Hofmann, J.; Schmiedl, A.; Kahmann, R.; Kämper, J.; Voll, L.M. Ustilago maydis infection strongly alters organic nitrogen allocation in maize and stimulates productivity of systemic source leaves. Plant Physiol. 2010, 152, 293–308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Bi, F.; Ment, D.; Luria, N.; Meng, X.; Prusky, D. Mutation of AREA affects growth, sporulation, nitrogen regulation, and pathogenicity in Colletotrichum gloeosporioides. Fungal Genet. Biol. 2017, 99, 29–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Oliveira-Garcia, E.; Deising, H.B. Attenuation of PAMP-triggered immunity in maize requires down-regulation of the key β-1, 6-glucan synthesis genes KRE5 and KRE6 in biotrophic hyphae of Colletotrichum graminicola. Plant J. 2016, 87, 355–375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Paul, S.; Moye-Rowley, W.S. Multidrug resistance in fungi: Regulation of transporter-encoding gene expression. Front. Physiol. 2014, 5, 143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  70. Dos Santos, S.C.; Teixeira, M.C.; Dias, P.J.; Sá-Correia, I. MFS transporters required for multidrug/multixenobiotic (MD/MX) resistance in the model yeast: Understanding their physiological function through post-genomic approaches. Front. Physiol. 2014, 5, 180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  71. Chen, L.H.; Tsai, H.C.; Yu, P.L.; Chung, K.R. A major facilitator superfamily transporter-Mediated resistance to oxidative stress and fungicides requires Yap1, Skn7, and MAP kinases in the citrus fungal pathogen alternaria alternata. PLoS ONE 2017, 12, e0169103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Cui, Z.; Gao, N.; Wang, Q.; Ren, Y.; Wang, K.; Zhu, T. BcMctA, a putative monocarboxylate transporter, is required for pathogenicity in Botrytis cinereal. Curr. Genet. 2015, 61, 545–553. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Crutcher, F.K.; Liu, J.; Puckhaber, L.S.; Stipanovic, R.D.; Bell, A.A.; Nichols, R.L. FUBT, a putative MFS transporter, promotes secretion of fusaric acid in the cotton pathogen Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. vasinfectum. Microbiology 2015, 161, 875–883. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Crespo-Sempere, A.; Martínez-Culebras, P.V.; González-Candelas, L. The loss of the inducible Aspergillus carbonarius MFS transporter MfsA leads to ochratoxin a overproduction. Int. J. Food Mcrobiol. 2014, 181, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Temme, N.; Oeser, B.; Massaroli, M.; Heller, J.; Simon, A.; Gonzalez Collado, I.; Viaud, M.; Tudzynski, P. BcAtf1, a global regulator, controls various differentiation processes and phytotoxin production in Botrytis cinerea. Mol. Plant Pathol. 2012, 13, 704–718. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Choquer, M.; Lee, M.H.; Bau, H.J.; Chung, K.R. Deletion of a MFS transporter-like gene in Cercospora nicotianae reduces cercosporin toxin accumulation and fungal virulence. FEBS Lett. 2007, 581, 489–494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Pedersen, P.L.; Carafoli, E. Ion motive ATPases. I. Ubiquity, properties, and significance to cell function. Trends Biochem. Sci. 1987, 12, 146–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Portillo, F. Regulation of plasma membrane H+-ATPase in fungi and plants. BBA-Rev. Biomembranes 2000, 1469, 31–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Saliba, E.; Evangelinos, M.; Gournas, C.; Corrillon, F.; Georis, I.; André, B. The yeast H+-ATPase Pma1 promotes Rag/Gtr-dependent TORC1 activation in response to H+-coupled nutrient uptake. Elife 2018, 7, e31981. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  80. Charoenbhakdi, S.; Dokpikul, T.; Burphan, T.; Techo, T.; Auesukaree, C. Vacuolar H+-ATPase protects Saccharomyces cerevisiae cells against ethanol-induced oxidative and cell wall stresses. Appl. Environ. Microb. 2016, 82, 3121–3130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  81. Plaza, V.; Lagües, Y.; Carvajal, M.; Pérez-García, L.A.; Mora-Montes, H.M.; Canessa, P.; Larrondo, L.F.; Castillo, L. bcpmr1 encodes a P-type Ca2+/Mn2+-ATPase mediating cell-wall integrity and virulence in the phytopathogen Botrytis cinerea. Fungal Genet. Biol. 2015, 76, 36–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  82. Requena, N.; Breuninger, M.; Franken, P.; Ocón, A. Symbiotic status, phosphate, and sucrose regulate the expression of two plasma membrane H+-ATPase genes from the mycorrhizal fungus Glomus mosseae. Plant Physiol. 2003, 132, 1540–1549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  83. Wang, E.; Yu, N.; Bano, S.A.; Liu, C.; Miller, A.J.; Cousins, D.; Zhang, X.; Ratet, P.; Tadege, M.; Mysore, K.S.A. H+-ATPase that energizes nutrient uptake during mycorrhizal symbioses in rice and Medicago truncatula. Plant Cell 2014, 26, 1818–1830. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Vleeshouwers, V.G.; Oliver, R.P. Effectors as tools in disease resistance breeding against biotrophic, hemibiotrophic, and necrotrophic plant pathogens. Mol. Plant-Microbe Int. 2014, 27, 196–206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. Voegele, R.T.; Mendgen, K.W. Nutrient uptake in rust fungi: How sweet is parasitic life? Euphytica 2011, 179, 41–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Mims, C.W.; Richardson, E.A.; Holt, B.F., III; Dangl, J.L. Ultrastructure of the host pathogen interface in Arabidopsis thaliana leaves infected by the downy mildew Hyaloperonospora parasitica. Can. J. Bot. 2004, 82, 1001–1008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Micali, C.O.; Neumann, U.; Grunewald, D.; Panstruga, R.; O’connell, R. Biogenesis of a specialized plant–fungal interface during host cell internalization of Golovinomyces orontii haustoria. Cell Microbiol. 2011, 13, 210–226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  88. Presti, L.L.; Kahmann, R. How filamentous plant pathogen effectors are translocated to host cells. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2017, 38, 19–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  89. De Jonge, R.; Thomma, B.P. Fungal LysM effectors: Extinguishers of host immunity? Trends Microbiol. 2009, 17, 151–157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  90. Dodds, P.N.; Rathjen, J.P. Plant immunity: Towards an integrated view of plant–pathogen interactions. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2010, 11, 539–548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  91. Sánchez-Vallet, A.; Mesters, J.R.; Thomma, B.P. The battle for chitin recognition in plant-microbe interactions. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 2015, 39, 171–183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  92. Sánchez-Vallet, A.; Saleem-Batcha, R.; Kombrink, A.; Hansen, G.; Valkenburg, D.J.; Thomma, B.P.; Mesters, J.R. Fungal effector Ecp6 outcompetes host immune receptor for chitin binding through intrachain LysM dimerization. Elife 2013, 2, e00790. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  93. Mentlak, T.A.; Kombrink, A.; Shinya, T.; Ryder, L.S.; Otomo, I.; Saitoh, H.; Terauchi, R.; Nishizawa, Y.; Shibuya, N.; Thomma, B.P.; et al. Effector-mediated suppression of chitin-triggered immunity by Magnaporthe oryzae is necessary for rice blast disease. Plant Cell 2012, 24, 322–335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  94. Lee, W.S.; Rudd, J.J.; Hammond-Kosack, K.E.; Kanyuka, K. Mycosphaerella graminicola LysM effector-mediated stealth pathogenesis subverts recognition through both CERK1 and CEBiP homologues in wheat. Mol. Plant-Microbe Int. 2014, 27, 236–243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  95. Kombrink, A.; Rovenich, H.; Shi-Kunne, X.; Rojas-Padilla, E.; van den Berg, G.; Domazakis, E.; Thomma, B.P. Verticillium dahliae LysM effectors differentially contribute to virulence on plant hosts. Mol. Plant Pathol. 2017, 18, 596–608. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  96. Kleemann, J.; Rincon-Rivera, L.J.; Takahara, H.; Neumann, U.; van Themaat, E.V.L.; van der Does, H.C.; Hacquard, S.; Stüber, K.; Will, I.; Schmalenbach, W. Sequential delivery of host-induced virulence effectors by appressoria and intracellular hyphae of the phytopathogen Colletotrichum higginsianum. PLoS Pathog. 2012, 8, e1002643. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Robin, G.P.; Kleemann, J.; Neumann, U.; Cabre, L.; Dallery, J.F.; Lapalu, N.; O’Connell, R.J. Subcellular localization screening of Colletotrichum higginsianum effector candidates identifies fungal proteins targeted to plant peroxisomes, Golgi bodies and microtubules. Front. Plant Sci. 2018, 9, 562. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  98. Heath, M.C. Hypersensitive response-related death. In Programmed Cell Death in Higher Plants; Lam, E., Fukuda, H., Greenberg., J., Eds.; Springer: Dordrecht, Holland, 2000; pp. 77–90. ISBN 978. [Google Scholar]
  99. Hardham, A.R.; Jones, D.A.; Takemoto, D. Cytoskeleton and cell wall function in penetration resistance. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2007, 10, 342–348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  100. Ahuja, I.; Kissen, R.; Bones, A.M. Phytoalexins in defense against pathogens. Trends Plant Sci. 2012, 17, 73–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  101. Van Loon, L.C.; Rep, M.; Pieterse, C.M. Significance of inducible defense-related proteins in infected plants. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 2006, 44, 135–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  102. Shigenaga, A.M.; Argueso, C.T. No hormone to rule them all: Interactions of plant hormones during the responses of plants to pathogens. Semin. Cell Dev. Biol. 2016, 56, 174–178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  103. Koh, S.; André, A.; Edwards, H.; Ehrhardt, D.; Somerville, S. Arabidopsis thaliana subcellular responses to compatible Erysiphe cichoracearum infections. Plant J. 2005, 44, 516–529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  104. Kangasjärvi, S.; Neukermans, J.; Li, S.; Aro, E.M.; Noctor, G. Photosynthesis, photorespiration, and light signalling in defence responses. J. Exp. Bot. 2012, 63, 1619–1636. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  105. Rojas, C.M.; Senthil-Kumar, M.; Tzin, V.; Mysore, K. Regulation of primary plant metabolism during plant-pathogen interactions and its contribution to plant defense. Front. Plant Sci. 2014, 5, 17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  106. Liu, G.; Ji, Y.; Bhuiyan, N.H.; Pilot, G.; Selvaraj, G.; Zou, J.; Wei, Y. Amino acid homeostasis modulates salicylic acid–associated redox status and defense responses in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 2010, 22, 3845–3863. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  107. Lim, G.H.; Singhal, R.; Kachroo, A.; Kachroo, P. Fatty acid–and lipid-mediated signaling in plant defense. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 2017, 55, 505–536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  108. Chanda, B.; Venugopal, S.C.; Kulshrestha, S.; Navarre, D.A.; Downie, B.; Vaillancourt, L.; Kachroo, A.; Kachroo, P. Glycerol-3-phosphate levels are associated with basal resistance to the hemibiotrophic fungus Colletotrichum higginsianum in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 2008, 147, 2017–2029. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  109. Drincovich, M.F.; Casati, P.; Andreo, C.S. NADP-malic enzyme from plants: A ubiquitous enzyme involved in different metabolic pathways. FEBS Lett. 2001, 490, 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Voll, L.M.; Zell, M.B.; Engelsdorf, T.; Saur, A.; Wheeler, M.G.; Drincovich, M.F.; Weber, A.P.; Maurino, V.G. Loss of cytosolic NADP-malic enzyme 2 in Arabidopsis thaliana is associated with enhanced susceptibility to Colletotrichum higginsianum. New Phytol. 2012, 195, 189–202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  111. McDowell, J.M.; Dangl, J.L. Signal transduction in the plant immune response. Trends Biochem. Sci. 2000, 25, 79–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Thomma, B.P.; Tierens, K.F.; Penninckx, I.A.; Mauch-Mani, B.; Broekaert, W.F.; Cammue, B.P. Different micro-organisms differentially induce Arabidopsis disease response pathways. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2001, 39, 673–680. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Lee, Y.H.; Hong, J.K. Differential defence responses of susceptible and resistant kimchi cabbage cultivars to anthracnose, black spot and black rot diseases. Plant Pathol. 2015, 64, 406–415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Bhagwat, R.G.; Mehta, B.P.; Patil, V.A.; Sharma, H. Screening of cultivars/varieties against mango anthracnose caused by Colletotrichum gloeosporioides. Int. J. Environ. Agric. Res. 2015, 1, 21–23. [Google Scholar]
  115. Jacob, I.; Hartmann, S.; Schubiger, F.X.; Struck, C. Resistance screening of red clover cultivars to Colletotrichum trifolii and improving the resistance level through recurrent selection. Euphytica 2015, 204, 303–310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Mangandi, J.; Peres, N.A.; Whitaker, V.M. Identifying resistance to crown rot caused by Colletotrichum gloeosporioides in strawberry. Plant Dis. 2015, 99, 954–961. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Jones, J.D.; Dangl, J.L. The plant immune system. Nature 2006, 444, 323–329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  118. Chisholm, S.T.; Coaker, G.; Day, B.; Staskawicz, B.J. Host-microbe interactions: Shaping the evolution of the plant immune response. Cell 2006, 124, 803–814. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  119. Narusaka, Y.; Narusaka, M.; Park, P.; Kubo, Y.; Hirayama, T.; Seki, M.; Shiraishi, T.; Shida, T.; Nakashima, M.; Enju, A.; et al. RCH1, a locus in Arabidopsis that confers resistance to the hemibiotrophic fungal pathogen Colletotrichum higginsianum. Mol. Plant-Microbe Int. 2004, 17, 749–762. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  120. Narusaka, M.; Shirasu, K.; Noutoshi, Y.; Kubo, Y.; Shiraishi, T.; Iwabuchi, M.; Narusaka, Y. RRS1 and RPS4 provide a dual Resistance-gene system against fungal and bacterial pathogens. Plant J. 2009, 60, 218–226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  121. Birker, D.; Heidrich, K.; Takahara, H.; Narusaka, M.; Deslandes, L.; Narusaka, Y.; Reymond, M.; Parker, J.E.; O’Connell, R. A locus conferring resistance to Colletotrichum higginsianum is shared by four geographically distinct Arabidopsis accessions. Plant J. 2009, 60, 602–613. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  122. Sarris, P.F.; Duxbury, Z.; Huh, S.U.; Ma, Y.; Segonzac, C.; Sklena, J.; Derbyshire, P.; Cevik, V.; Rallapalli, G.; Saucet, S.B. A plant immune receptor detects pathogen effectors that target WRKY transcription factors. Cell 2015, 161, 1089–1100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  123. Le Roux, C.; Huet, G.; Jauneau, A.; Camborde, L.; Trémousaygue, D.; Kraut, A.; Zhou, B.; Levaillant, M.; Adachi, H.; Yoshioka, H. A receptor pair with an integrated decoy converts pathogen disabling of transcription factors to immunity. Cell 2015, 161, 1074–1088. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Ijms 19 02142 g001 550
Figure 1. Infection structure development and effector localization in Colletotrichum higginsianum. (A) Appressorial formation on the leaf surface at 24 hpi. Spores (S) adhere to the host cuticle and produce a germ tube (GT), and an appressorium (A) is formed to penetrate plant epidermal cells directly. Effectors, marked with yellow dots, accumulate at the appressorial pore (AP) and then are secreted from the pore; (B) the biotrophic infection phase at 40 hpi. A penetration peg (PP) develops from the base of the appressorium and penetrates the host cuticle and cell wall. Primary biotrophic hyphae (BH) develop inside the epidermal cell and invaginate the plant plasma membrane. The host protoplast remains alive during this biotrophic stage of the interaction. Effectors accumulate at the biotrophic interfacial bodies, the yellow layer outside the primary hyphae, and then are secreted to the host cell from the biotrophic interfacial bodies; (C) the necrotrophic infection phase at 55 hpi. Secondary necrotrophic hyphae (NH) later develop from the BH and spread into the surrounding cells without biotrophic interfacial bodies and directly penetrate host cytoplasm. The host epidermal cell shaded in dark gray then dies after NH production. All graphics were derived from original micrographs for easier visualization.
Figure 1. Infection structure development and effector localization in Colletotrichum higginsianum. (A) Appressorial formation on the leaf surface at 24 hpi. Spores (S) adhere to the host cuticle and produce a germ tube (GT), and an appressorium (A) is formed to penetrate plant epidermal cells directly. Effectors, marked with yellow dots, accumulate at the appressorial pore (AP) and then are secreted from the pore; (B) the biotrophic infection phase at 40 hpi. A penetration peg (PP) develops from the base of the appressorium and penetrates the host cuticle and cell wall. Primary biotrophic hyphae (BH) develop inside the epidermal cell and invaginate the plant plasma membrane. The host protoplast remains alive during this biotrophic stage of the interaction. Effectors accumulate at the biotrophic interfacial bodies, the yellow layer outside the primary hyphae, and then are secreted to the host cell from the biotrophic interfacial bodies; (C) the necrotrophic infection phase at 55 hpi. Secondary necrotrophic hyphae (NH) later develop from the BH and spread into the surrounding cells without biotrophic interfacial bodies and directly penetrate host cytoplasm. The host epidermal cell shaded in dark gray then dies after NH production. All graphics were derived from original micrographs for easier visualization.
Ijms 19 02142 g001
Table
Table 1. Summary of Colletotrichum higginsianum genes identified from T-DNA flanking sequences.
Table 1. Summary of Colletotrichum higginsianum genes identified from T-DNA flanking sequences.
MutantInsertion aT-DNA Insertion bPutative Function (NCBI Accession) cReference
path-51In predicted open reading frame (ORF)Unknown[31]
path-72In ORFHypothetical protein (FG06146.1)
1.5 kb upstreamHypothetical protein (FG06145.1)
path-81In predicted ORFUnknown
path-911 kb downstreamEndo–1,3(4)–β–glucanase (AFUA_1G05290)
path-121In ORFMFS transporter (NFIA_086030)
path-161In ORFOrnithine decarboxylase (AY602214)
path-191In ORFArg–6 protein (EAA35492.1)
path-232620 bp upstreamHypothetical protein (FG02446.1)
In predicted ORFUnknown
path-291730 bp upstreamATP–binding endoribonuclease (ACLA_048430)
path-351In ORFCarbamoyl–phosphate synthetase (EAA36214.1)
path-361620 bp upstreamImportin β2 subunit (AFUA_1G15900)
path-381In ORFImportin β2 subunit (AFUA_1G15900)
T7321168 bp downstreamCopper amine oxidase (XP_001826965)[32]
T7341In ORFHypothetical protein (ELA33048)
B302In ORFExosome component EXOSC1/CSL4 (EFQ29835)
850 bp upstreamDUF221 domain protein (EFY94646)
T45Unknown Hypothetical protein (EFQ29552)
vir-22supercontig_1.2671, 583, RBPhosphoribosylaminoimidazole carboxylase (EFQ26499.1)[33]
vir-102contig05930, 16777, LBKelch domain-containing protein (EFQ26610.1)
vir-122supercontig_1.3174,1154, LBPlasma-membrane proton-efflux P-type ATPase
vir-142supercontig_1.6150,870, RBABC transporter (EFQ25092.1)
supercontig_1.903,6335, LBNucleoside-diphosphate-sugar epimerase
vir-221supercontig_1.3174,1748, RBPlasma-membrane proton-efflux P-type ATPase
vir-241supercontig_1.3174,1422, RBPlasma-membrane proton-efflux P-type ATPase
vir-272supercontig_1.6150,873, RBABC transporter (EFQ25092.1)
supercontig_1.826,7944, RBSTE like transcription factor
vir-511supercontig_1.1848,6585, LBUnknown
vir-522contig 00557Alanine dehydrogenase/PNT domain containing protein (EFQ25467.1)
contig 11896FAD dependent oxidoreductase superfamily protein (XP_007280006)
vir-532supercontig_1.6692, RBUnknown
vir-563supercontig_1.66,3878, LBPeroxisomal membrane protein 24
vir-762supercontig_1.56,17248, LBSpindle assembly checkpoint component MAD1
vir-842supercontig_1.3742,1175, LBSporulation protein RMD1 (ELA35952.1)
vir-882supercontig_1.5277,868–879Mob1/phocein family protein (EFQ26211.1)
vir-972supercontig_1.3174,812, LBPlasma-membrane proton-efflux P-type ATPase
vir-1021supercontig_1.3174,793, LBPlasma-membrane proton-efflux P-type ATPase
a Number of insertion sites determined by Southern Blot analysis. b Locations of T-DNA insertion sites or position of the T-DNA border sequence in the Colletotrichum database Supercontigs. Sequence names are shown with left border (LB) or right border (RB). c Open reading frames (ORFs) predicted by Softberry were used in the BLAST search.
Table
Table 2. Genes involved in virulence have been reported in Colletotrichum higginsianum.
Table 2. Genes involved in virulence have been reported in Colletotrichum higginsianum.
GeneIDDescriptionReference
path-19CH063_11554Putative Arg6 precursor[42]
path-35CH063_15109Carbamoyl–phosphate synthetase[42]
Ch-MEL1unknownHypothetical protein[32]
ChPma2CH063_09060Plasma-membrane proton-efflux P-type ATPase[33]
ChELP1CH063_13023LysM effectors[43]
ChELP2CH063_04445LysM effectors[43]
ChSte7CH063 02455Serine/threonine protein kinases[44]
ChRgfCH063_04363Ras guanine-nucleotide exchange factor[45]
ChMK1CH063_08490 Fus3/Kss1-relatedMAPKgene[46]
ChMfs1CH063_12120Major facilitator superfamily (MFS) transporter[47]
ChMob2CH063_12012Mob1/phocein family protein[48]
ChCbk1CH063_12968NDR/LATS kinase[48]

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Yan, Y.; Yuan, Q.; Tang, J.; Huang, J.; Hsiang, T.; Wei, Y.; Zheng, L. Colletotrichum higginsianum as a Model for Understanding Host–Pathogen Interactions: A Review. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018, 19, 2142. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms19072142

AMA Style

Yan Y, Yuan Q, Tang J, Huang J, Hsiang T, Wei Y, Zheng L. Colletotrichum higginsianum as a Model for Understanding Host–Pathogen Interactions: A Review. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2018; 19(7):2142. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms19072142

Chicago/Turabian Style

Yan, Yaqin, Qinfeng Yuan, Jintian Tang, Junbin Huang, Tom Hsiang, Yangdou Wei, and Lu Zheng. 2018. "Colletotrichum higginsianum as a Model for Understanding Host–Pathogen Interactions: A Review" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 19, no. 7: 2142. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms19072142

APA Style

Yan, Y., Yuan, Q., Tang, J., Huang, J., Hsiang, T., Wei, Y., & Zheng, L. (2018). Colletotrichum higginsianum as a Model for Understanding Host–Pathogen Interactions: A Review. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 19(7), 2142. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms19072142

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop