Next Article in Journal
Differences in Expression of Genes Involved in Bone Development and Morphogenesis in the Walls of Internal Thoracic Artery and Saphenous Vein Conduits May Provide Markers Useful for Evaluation Graft Patency
Next Article in Special Issue
Characterization of QTLs for Seedling Resistance to Tan Spot and Septoria Nodorum Blotch in the PBW343/Kenya Nyangumi Wheat Recombinant Inbred Lines Population
Previous Article in Journal
PSMA-Targeting Positron Emission Agents for Imaging Solid Tumors Other Than Non-Prostate Carcinoma: A Systematic Review
Previous Article in Special Issue
Genome-Wide Association Study for Multiple Biotic Stress Resistance in Synthetic Hexaploid Wheat
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
IJMS
Volume 20
Issue 19
10.3390/ijms20194887
ijms-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Physical Mapping of Stem Rust Resistance Gene Sr52 from Dasypyrum villosum Based on ph1b-Induced Homoeologous Recombination

by
Huanhuan Li
1,
Zhenjie Dong
1,
Chao Ma
1,
Xiubin Tian
1,
Zengjun Qi
2,
Nan Wu
2,
Bernd Friebe
3,
Zhiguo Xiang
4,
Qing Xia
1,
Wenxuan Liu
1,* and
Tianya Li
5,*
1
College of Life Sciences, Henan Agricultural University, Zhengzhou 450002, China
2
State Key Laboratory of Crop Genetics and Germplasm Enhancement, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095, China
3
Wheat Genetic and Genomic Resources Center, Department of Plant Pathology, Throckmorton Plant Sciences Center, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS 66506-5502, USA
4
Henan Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Zhengzhou 450002, China
5
College of Plant Protection, Shenyang Agricultural University, Shenyang 110000, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20(19), 4887; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms20194887
Submission received: 18 September 2019 / Revised: 30 September 2019 / Accepted: 1 October 2019 / Published: 2 October 2019
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Mapping Plant Genes that Confer Resistance to Biotic Stress)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Wheat stem rust caused by Puccinia graminis f. sp. tritici (Pgt) had been a devastating foliar disease worldwide during the 20th century. With the emergence of Ug99 races, which are virulent to most stem rust resistance genes deployed in wheat varieties and advanced lines, stem rust has once again become a disease threatening global wheat production. Sr52, derived from Dasypyrum villosum and mapped to the long arm of 6V#3, is one of the few effective genes against Ug99 races. In this study, the wheat–D. villosum Robertsonian translocation T6AS·6V#3L, the only stock carrying Sr52 released to experimental and breeding programs so far, was crossed with a CS ph1b mutant to induce recombinants with shortened 6V#3L chromosome segments locating Sr52. Six independent homozygous recombinants with different segment sizes and breakpoints were developed and characterized using in situ hybridization and molecular markers analyses. Stem rust resistance evaluation showed that only three terminal recombinants (1381, 1380, and 1392) containing 8%, 22%, and 30% of the distal segment of 6V#3L, respectively, were resistant to stem rust. Thus, the gene Sr52 was mapped into 6V#3L bin FL 0.92–1.00. In addition, three molecular markers in the Sr52-located interval of 6V#3L were confirmed to be diagnostic markers for selection of Sr52 introgressed into common wheat. The newly developed small segment translocation lines with Sr52 and the identified molecular markers closely linked to Sr52 will be valuable for wheat disease breeding.

1. Introduction

Common wheat (Triticum aestivum L., 2n = 6x = 42) is one of the most important crops serving as a daily staple for human consumption worldwide. Stem rust caused by the fungus Puccinia graminis f. sp. tritici (Pgt) used to be one of the most destructive fungal diseases of common wheat [1,2]. During the twentieth century, several severe stem rust epidemics occurred in all major wheat growing areas, causing significant yield losses ranging from 10 to 59% [2,3,4]. In the past several decades, epidemics of stem rust were successfully controlled mainly due to widespread employment of resistance genes in wheat varieties [5]. However, a new Pgt race, Ug99 and its 13 variants known as the Ug99 race group, has emerged since 1999 [6,7]. These are virulent to the overwhelming majority of stem rust resistance genes that have been deployed in wheat breeding programs worldwide, including Sr24 [8], Sr31 [6], Sr36 [9], and Sr38 [10]. Therefore, currently only a few effective resistance genes against the Ug99 race group are present in common wheat varieties and advanced lines [11]. Thus, there is an urgent need to identify novel resistance genes from wild relatives of common wheat to broaden stem rust resistance resources in wheat breeding programs [12].
Dasypyrum villosum (2n = 2x = 14, VV), a wild relative of common wheat, possesses large numbers of valuable agricultural traits, such as resistance to various diseases, including powdery mildew [13], stripe rust [14], stem rust [15], wheat streak mosaic virus [16], and cereal cyst nematodes [17], tolerance to drought and salt [18,19], as well as high grain protein content [20], longer spikes, and more kernels [21]. Qi et al. (2011) identified a stem rust resistance gene, Sr52, derived from D. villosum, and mapped the gene to the long arm of chromosome 6V#3. They developed a Chinese Spring (CS)–D. villosum Robertsonian translocation line T6AS·6V#3L carrying Sr52 by inducing a centromere breakage-fusion of homoeologous chromosome 6V#3 and 6D [15].
Deleterious linkage drag, caused by the presence of additional genes on the alien chromosome segments introgressed into wheat, may lead to unfavorable agronomic and end-use quality traits limiting the direct utilization of alien genes in wheat improvement programs. The most effective method to reduce linkage drag includes developing wheat-alien recombinants with small alien segments by inducing recombination between the alien chromatin and its homoeologous region of wheat chromosome [22]. However, the Ph genes which control homologous chromosome pairing in common wheat, such as the Ph1 gene on chromosome 5BL, can prevent homoeologous chromosomes from pairing and recombining [23,24]. Lack of or suppression of Ph genes in common wheat can promote meiotic homoeologous recombination between wheat and its wild relatives [25]. A deletion mutant of Ph1 (ph1b) has been reported to be most effective to induce wheat-alien homoeologous recombination [16,26,27]. Some stem rust resistance genes, such as Sr32 and Sr39 from Aegilops speltoides [28,29], Sr43 from Thinopyrum ponticum [30], and Sr53 from Ae. geniculata [31], have been successfully introduced into common wheat from wild relatives based on ph1b-induced homoeologous recombination.
The objectives of this study were to develop wheat–D. villosum 6V#3L translocation lines with shortened 6V#3L segments carrying Sr52 by using ph1b-induced homoeologous recombination, to physically map Sr52 onto the shortened 6V#3L segment and also to select diagnostic polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based molecular markers for Sr52 detection. Our work provides three novel Sr52 germplasms with small 6V#3L segments and three Sr52 diagnostic molecular markers for wheat-breeding programs, and lays a foundation for further cloning of the stem rust resistance gene Sr52.

2. Results

2.1. Screening of D. villosum 6VL#3-Specific Molecular Markers

A total of 13 mapped full-length cDNA (FlcDNA)-based PCR primers were designed based on the sequence of the location of fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH)-mapped FLcDNAs that were physically mapped to homoeologous group 6 chromosomes of wheat. In addition, 15 expressed sequence tags (ESTs) and 3 intron-targeting primer pairs were synthesized based on previously reported sequences of 6VL- or 6VL#4-specific molecular markers [17,32,33,34], of which three EST molecular markers (CINAU871, 6L-4, and 6EST-426), two intron targeting markers (CINAU1517 and CINAU1532), and one mapped FlcDNA-based marker (6L11/MboI) were identified as 6V#3L-specific molecular markers. Sequences, physical location, and annealing temperature (Tm) of these 6V#3L-specific markers are summarized in Table 1.

2.2. Development of Segregating Populations for 6V#3L Recombinant Selection

In order to induce recombination between D. villosum chromosomes 6V#3L and homoeologous group 6 of common wheat, T6AS·6V#3L translocation line TA5617 was crossed with CS ph1b mutant stock TA3809. The 120 BC1F1 plants were identified using the ph1b-specific marker ABC302.3 [35] and 6VL#3-specific markers BE422631/HaeIII and 6L11/MboI, and select seven individuals with homozygous ph1b plus monosomic 6AS·6V#3L and 6A. The BC1F2 progenies derived from these individuals were then used as segregating populations for 6V#3L recombinant selection.

2.3. Initial Screening of Wheat–D. villosum 6V#3L Recombinants with Proximal and Distal Markers

A total of 250 BC1F2 plants derived from BC1F1 individuals with homozygous ph1b plus monosomic 6AS·6V#3L and 6A were screened by using 6V#3L-specific molecular markers BE422631/HaeIII, located in proximal bin C-6AL4-0.55, and 6L11/MboI, located in distal bin 6AL8-0.90-1.00. Six putative recombinants were selected based on disassociation of the two molecular markers, of which three plants (1386, 1382, and 1385) were positive for the proximal marker BE422631/HaeIII but negative for the distal marker 6L11/MboI, and the remaining three plants (1381, 1380, and 1392) had only distal 6V#3L marker 6L11/MboI. Genomic in situ hybridization (GISH) analyses of these six plants confirmed that the first three plants, lacking distal marker 6L11/MboI, were interstitial recombinants, whereas the last three plants, missing proximal marker BE422631/HaeIII, were terminal recombinants (Figure 1).

2.4. Analyses of Segment Sizes and Breakpoints of Chromosome 6V#3L

Homozygous progenies derived from six recombinant plants were used to further identify the segment sizes and breakpoints of the translocated chromosomes by eight 6V#3L-specific molecular markers described in Table 1, GISH, and nondenaturing fluorescence in situ hybridization (ND-FISH). The results of molecular markers and cytogenetic analyses revealed that all six recombinants were different in both segment size and breakpoints of chromosome 6V#3L (Table 2).
The combined GISH and ND-FISH patterns revealed that recombinants 1386, 1382, and 1385 were all interstitial translocation Ti6AS·6V#3L-6AL, and their breakpoints were at FL 0.70, FL 0.78, and FL 0.92, being equal to a segment size of 70%, 78%, and 92% of the long arm length of chromosome 6V#3, respectively (Figure 2). Molecular marker analyses of these three interstitial translocation lines using eight primer sets (Table 1) displayed that the diagnostic bands of five proximal 6V#3L-specific markers were present in 1385 while only two and three proximal 6V#3L-specific markers were present in 1386 and 1382, respectively (Figure 3). These results indicated that recombinant 1385 had the largest segment size of translocated chromosome 6V#3L, then followed by line 1382, and 1386 had the smallest segment size, in accordance with that of cytological analyses.
GISH patterns showed that recombinants 1381, 1380, and 1392 belonged to terminal translocation with breakpoints at FL 0.92, 0.78, and 0.70, which indicated that 6V#3L segment size was 8%, 22%, and 30% of the 6V#3L length, respectively (Figure 2). FISH analyses displayed that the translocated chromosomes were T6AS·6AL-6V#3L in recombinants 1381 and 1392 (Figure 2D,F), whereas it was T6DS·6DL-6V#3L in line 1380 (Figure 2E), being composed of full wheat chromosome arm 6DS, centromere, and proximal segment of chromosome 6DL conjoined to the distal segment of 6V#3L. In addition, recombination occurred between wheat chromosome 6A and 6D, producing a pair of T6AS.6AL-6DL translocated chromosomes in line 1380. Molecular marker analyses of these three terminal translocation lines revealed that six and five distal 6V#3L-specific markers were present in 1392 and 1380, respectively, whereas only three distal 6V#3L-specific markers were present in 1381 (Figure 3). Thus, the order of the segment sizes of the translocated chromosome 6V#3L in these three terminal translocation lines was 1381 < 1380 < 1392.

2.5. Physical Mapping of the Gene Sr52

All six homozygous translocation lines were evaluated for stem rust resistance, together with their recipient parent CS as a susceptible control, and CS–D. villosum 6V#3 disomic addition line TA7682 and CS–D. villosum T6AS·6V#3L translocation line TA5617 as resistant controls. The results showed that all three terminal translocation lines (1381, 1380, and 1392) were resistant to stem rust (ITs; to 1) (Figure 4), whereas all three interstitial translocation lines (1386, 1382, and 1385) were susceptible (ITs 3 to 4) (Figure 4). Since chromosome 6V#3L bin FL 0.92–1.00 was the only bin shared by all the resistant translocation lines, and moreover was absent from the sensitive translocation lines, the stem rust resistance gene Sr52 from D. villosum must be physically mapped to the interval of FL 0.92–1.00 of chromosome 6V#3L (Figure 5). Three 6V#3L-specific molecular markers (CINAU1532, 6L-4, and 6L11/MboI) present in all terminal translocation lines are also located in the same bin carrying Sr52 (Figure 3).

2.6. Validation of New Molecular Markers Linked to Sr52 on the Shortened D. villosum 6V#3L Chromosome Segments

The three molecular markers CINAU1532, 6L-4, and 6L11/MboI located in the same 6V#3L segment carrying Sr52 were further validated with 14 common wheat varieties and advanced breeding lines (Figure 6). The results showed that primer sets for all three markers generated polymorphic bands only in the materials carrying Sr52 including CS–D. villosum 6V#3 disomic addition line TA7682, CS–D. villosum T6AS·6V#3L translocation line TA5617, and the terminal small segment recombinants 1381, 1380, and 1392, but not in the susceptible CS or in the other 14 wheat cultivars and advanced breeding lines. Therefore, molecular markers CINAU1532, 6L-4, and 6L11/MboI can serve as diagnostic markers to perform marker-assisted selection of Sr52 in future wheat resistance breeding programs.

3. Discussion

Wild relatives of common wheat possess a valuable genetic pool of beneficial traits that could be used for wheat improvement. Development of compensating wheat-alien translocation lines with small alien segments has been considered an effective method to transfer the desirable genes from wild relatives to wheat cultivars in crop improvement programs [30,36]. The gene Sr52 from D. villosum is one of the few resistance genes effective against Ug99 races and was previously mapped to the long arm of 6V#3 [15]. In the present study, we attempted to reduce Sr52 linkage drag using ph1b-induced homoeologous recombination and selecting for the Sr52 recombinant with the least amount of alien chromatin. Of the three translocation lines (1381, 1380, and 1392) carrying Sr52, 6V#3L segments were shortened by approximately 92%, 78%, and 70%, respectively, compared with the original stock TA5617. These recombinants carrying Sr52 with substantial reduction of 6V#3L chromatin should be valuable germplasms for wheat stem rust resistance breeding as well as for eventual isolation of Sr52.
Integrating cytogenetic and molecular marker analyses play an important role in physical mapping of desirable agronomic genes from wild relatives of common wheat. For example, the powdery mildew resistance gene Pm57 was cytogenetically mapped to 2Ss#1L bin FL 0.75–0.87 [37]. A resistant gene(s) against powdery mildew from Agropyron cristatum was physically mapped to 2PL bin 0.66–0.86 [38]. The wheat yellow mosaic virus resistance gene Wss1 from D. villosum was located in the bin FL0.78–1.00 of 4VS [16]. The gene(s) conferring blue-grained character from Th. ponticum was located in bin 4AgL-6 of FL 0.75–0.89 [39]. In the present study, six wheat–D. villosum 6V#3L translocation lines possessing different segment sizes of D. villosum chromatin were identified. By combining cytogenetic and molecular marker analyses and evaluation of sensitivity to stem rust, the gene Sr52 was further mapped into the chromosome bin of FL 0.92–1.00, the very distal region of D. villosum 6V#3L.
Development and utilization of molecular markers closely linked to targeted genes was an effective method for selecting desirable traits in the early generation of the breeding program [21]. In this study, three molecular markers (CINAU1532, 6L-4, and 6L11/MboI) tightly linked to Sr52 were validated to be present only in lines carrying Sr52 but not in all 14 tested wheat varieties and advanced lines. These three markers will greatly facilitate the utilization of the recombinants with the shortened D. villosum 6V#3L segment carrying Sr52. Additionally, it could assist tracking Sr52 when pyramiding Sr52 with other useful disease resistance genes or superior agronomic traits-related loci in the future.
In conclusion, the gene Sr52 was further mapped to D. villosum chromosome 6V#3L distal bin FL 0.92–1.00 by integrated analyses of molecular markers, GISH, FISH, and stem rust sensitivity evaluation of six newly developed homozygous wheat–D. villosum translocation lines in this study. The three translocation lines carrying Sr52 with shortened D. villosum 6V#3L chromatin will provide potentially useful germplasms to breeders for wheat breeding programs aimed at eliminating susceptibility to stem rust. In addition, we identified three molecular markers closely linked to Sr52, which will be helpful for marker-assisted introgression of Sr52 into wheat varieties and breeding lines.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Plant Materials

The plant materials used in this study included common wheat CS TA3808, CS ph1b mutant stock TA3809, which lacked the Ph1 gene and thereby elevated homoeologous recombination, CS–D. villosum 6V#3 disomic addition line TA7682, CS–D. villosum T6AL·6V#3S translocation line TA5618, and T6AS·6V#3L translocation line TA5617. The long arm of chromosome 6V#3 in lines TA7682 and TA5617 carried Sr52 which conferred resistance to stem rust of wheat (Table 3). All materials were kindly provided by the Wheat Genetics Resource Center (WGRC) at Kansas State University and maintained at the experimental station of Henan Agricultural University, China.

4.2. Molecular Marker Analyses

Genomic DNA (gDNA) was extracted from fresh leaves at the two-leaf stage following the method of Li et al. (2017) [38]. The concentration and purity of DNA were measured with the NanoPhotometer P360 (Implen GmbH, München, Germany).
A total of eight PCR-based 6V#3L-specific molecular markers were used in the present study (Table 1), including two STS (Sequence tagged site)-PCR markers (BE422631/HaeIII and BE497099/MspI), developed by Qi et al. (2011) [15]. Marker BE422631/HaeIII is located in proximal bin C-6AL4-0.55 and BE497099/MspI in distal bin 6AL8-0.90-1.00. Three EST-PCR markers and two intron targeting markers were selected from previously reported 6VL- or 6V#4L-specific markers [17,32,33,34]. Molecular marker 6L11/MboI was developed based on mapped FlcDNA of wheat group-6 chromosomes [41].
PCR reactions were conducted in a 15 μL volume containing 2.0 μL template gDNA (100 ng/µl), 1.0 µl of each primer (5.0 µmol/l), 7.5 µl Taq MasterMix (CW Bio Inc., Beijing, China), and 3.5 µl ddH2O. The PCR program was conducted at 94 °C for 5 min, followed by 35 cycles of melting at 94 °C for 30 s, annealing at 55–66 °C (depending on the Tm of the primers) for 30 s, and extension at 72 °C for 1 min, with a final extension at 72 °C for 10 min. The PCR products were digested with restriction enzymes. Five microliters of a restriction enzyme mixture containing 2.85 μL of ddH2O, 2.0 μL of CutSmart buffer, and 0.15 μL of an enzyme stock solution were added to 15 μL of PCR products and incubated for 3.5 h at 37 °C. The PCR or restricted PCR products were separated on a 2.0% agarose gel, stained with ethidium bromide, and visualized by Tanon 2500 Gel Imaging System (Tanon Science & Technology Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China).

4.3. Cytogenetic Analyses

Chromosome preparations of root tip cells at the mitotic metaphase were obtained as described by Huang et al. (2018) [42]. The cytological observations were performed using a BX51 Olympus phase contrast microscope (Olympus Corporation, Tokyo, Japan).
The technique of GISH was performed according to Liu et al. (2017) [37]. Total gDNA of D. villosum labeled with fluorescein-12-dUTP was used as probe, and gDNA of common wheat CS was used as blocking for GISH. Fluorescent images were captured with an AxioCam MRc5 CCD camera using a Zeiss Axio Scope A1 fluorescence microscope (Carl Zeiss AG, Oberkochen, Germany). Images were processed using Photoshop CS 3.0 (Adobe Inc., San Jose, CA, USA).
After GISH, the hybridization signals were washed off with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) and reconducted ND-FISH as described by Huang et al. (2018) [42]. Eight single-strand oligonucleotides were then used as probes for dual-color ND-FISH [43]. The eight oligonucleotides included TAMRA (6-carboxytetramethylrhodamine)-modified oligonucleotides pAs1-1, pAs1-3, pAs1-4, pAs1-6, AFA-3, and AFA-4, and FAM (6-carboxyfuorescein)-modified oligonucleotides pSc119.2-1 and (GAA)10. All oligonucleotides were synthesized at Sangon Biotech Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China.

4.4. Stem Rust Evaluation

Evaluation of stem rust resistance was performed at the seedling stage using the major dominant race 21C3CTTTM in China as inoculants following the procedure of Li et al. (2017) [44]. Fourteen days after inoculation, infection types (ITs) were assessed using a 0–4 scale as described by Roelfs et al. (1988) [45], with 0 as immune, as necrotic flecks, 1 as small necrotic pustules, 2 as small to medium-sized chlorotic pustules with green islands, 3 as medium-sized chlorotic pustules, and 4 as large pustules without chlorosis. Plants with ITs 0–2 were classified to be resistant while plants with ITs 3–4 were scored as susceptible.

Author Contributions

W.L. and H.L. conceptualized the experiments and designed the methodology; H.L., T.L., Z.D. and C.M. performed the data curation and formal analysis; H.L., T.L., Z.D., C.M., X.T., Z.Q., N.W., Q.X., B.F. and Z.X. performed the investigation; W.L. supervised the experiment; H.L. and W.L. wrote the original manuscript; T.L. and B.F. contributed to the revision of the manuscript. All authors commented and approved the final version.

Funding

This research was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 31801361 and No. 31571658), the Scientific and Technological Research Project of Henan Province of China (No. 192102110011), the Henan Province Special Major Science and Technology Project (No. 161100110400), and the State Key Laboratory of Wheat and Maize Crop Science at Henan Agricultural University, China (No. 39990022).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Abbreviations

PCRPolymerase chain reaction
FlcDNAFull-length cDNA
ESTExpressed sequence tag
ITInfection type
GISHGenomic in situ hybridization
ND-FISHNondenaturing fluorescence in situ hybridization
DAPI4,6-diamino-2-phenyl indole
STSSequence tagged site
PBSPhosphate-buffered saline

References

  1. Periyannan, S.; Moore, J.; Ayliffe, M.; Bansal, U.; Wang, X.J.; Huang, L.; Deal, K.; Luo, M.C.; Kong, X.Y.; Bariana, H.; et al. The gene Sr33, an ortholog of barley Mla genes, encodes resistance to wheat stem rust race Ug99. Science 2013, 341, 786–788. [Google Scholar]
  2. Singh, R.P.; Hodson, D.P.; Huerta-Espino, J.; Jin, Y.; Njau, P.; Wanyera, R.; Herrera-Foessel, S.A.; Ward, R.W. Will stem rust destroy the world’s wheat crop? Adv Agron. 2008, 98, 271–309. [Google Scholar]
  3. Park, R.F. Stem rust of wheat in Australia. Aust. J. Agric. Res. 2007, 58, 558–566. [Google Scholar]
  4. Flath, K.; Miedaner, T.; Olivera, P.D.; Rouse, M.N.; Jin, Y. Genes for wheat stem rust resistance postulated in German cultivars and their efficacy in seedling and adult-plant field tests. Plant Breed. 2018, 137, 301–312. [Google Scholar]
  5. Leonard, K.J.; Szabo, L.J. Stem rust of small grains and grasses caused by Puccinia graminis. Mol Plant Pathol. 2005, 6, 99–111. [Google Scholar]
  6. Pretorius, Z.A.; Singh, R.P.; Wagoire, W.W.; Payne, T.S. Detection of virulence to wheat stem rust resistance gene Sr31 in Puccinia graminis. f. sp. tritici in Uganda. Plant Dis. 2000, 84, 203. [Google Scholar]
  7. A Global Wheat Rust Monitoring System: Pathotype Tracker—Where Is Ug99. 2019. Available online: https://rusttracker.cimmyt.org/?page_id=22 (accessed on 10 January 2019).
  8. Jin, Y.; Szabo, L.J.; Pretorius, Z.A.; Singh, R.P.; Ward, R.; Fetch, T., Jr. Detection of virulence to resistance gene Sr24 within race TTKS of Puccinia graminis f. sp. tritici. Plant Dis. 2008, 92, 923–926. [Google Scholar]
  9. Jin, Y.; Szabo, L.J.; Rouse, M.N.; Fetch, T., Jr.; Pretorius, Z.A.; Wanyera, R.; Njau, P. Detection of virulence to resistance gene Sr36 within the TTKS race lineage of Puccinia graminis f. sp. tritici. Plant Dis. 2009, 93, 367–370. [Google Scholar]
  10. Chen, S.; Guo, Y.; Briggs, J.; Dubach, F.; Chao, S.M.; Zhang, W.J.; Rouse, M.N.; Dubcovsky, J. Mapping and characterization of wheat stem rust resistance genes SrTm5 and Sr60 from Triticum monococcum. Theor. Appl. Genet. 2018, 131, 625–635. [Google Scholar]
  11. Singh, R.P.; Hodson, D.P.; Jin, Y.; Lagudah, E.S.; Ayliffe, M.A.; Bhavani, S.; Rouse, M.N.; Pretorius, Z.A.; Szabo, L.J.; Huerta-Espino, J. Emergence and spread of new races of wheat stem rust fungus: Continued threat to food security and prospects of genetic control. Phytopathology 2015, 105, 872–884. [Google Scholar]
  12. Chen, S.S.; Rouse, M.N.; Zhang, W.J.; Zhang, X.Q.; Guo, Y.; Briggs, J.; Dubcovsky, J. Wheat gene Sr60 encodes a protein with two putative kinase domains that confers resistance to stem rust. New Phytol. 2019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Xing, L.; Hu, P.; Liu, J.; Witek, K.; Zhou, S.; Xu, J.; Zhou, W.; Gao, L.; Huang, Z.; Zhang, R.; et al. Pm21 from Haynaldia villosa encodes a CC-NBS-LRR protein conferring powdery mildew resistance in wheat. Mol. Plant 2018, 11, 874–878. [Google Scholar]
  14. Zhang, J.; Jiang, J.; Wang, Y.; Guo, Y.L.; Long, H.; Deng, G.B.; Chen, Q.; Xuan, P. Molecular markers and cytogenetics to characterize a wheat-Dasypyrum villosum 3V(3D) substitution line conferring resistance to stripe rust. PLoS ONE 2018, 13, e0202033. [Google Scholar]
  15. Qi, L.L.; Pumphrey, M.O.; Friebe, B.; Zhang, P.; Qian, C.; Bowden, R.L.; Rouse, M.N.; Jin, Y.; Gill, B.S. A novel Robertsonian translocation event leads to transfer of a stem rust resistance gene (Sr52) effective against race Ug99 from Dasypyrum villosum into bread wheat. Theor. Appl. Genet. 2011, 123, 159–167. [Google Scholar]
  16. Zhao, R.H.; Wang, H.Y.; Xiao, J.; Bie, T.D.; Cheng, S.H.; Jia, Q.; Yuan, C.X.; Zhang, R.Q.; Cao, A.Z.; Chen, P.D.; et al. Induction of 4VS chromosome recombinants using the CS ph1b mutant and mapping of the wheat yellow mosaic virus resistance gene from Haynaldia villosa. Theor. Appl. Genet. 2013, 126, 2921–2930. [Google Scholar]
  17. Zhang, R.Q.; Feng, Y.G.; Li, H.F.; Yuan, H.X.; Dai, J.L.; Cao, A.Z.; Xing, L.P.; Li, H.L. Cereal cyst nematode resistance gene CreV effective against Heterodera filipjevi transferred from chromosome 6VL of Dasypyrum villosum to bread wheat. Mol. Breed. 2016, 36, 122. [Google Scholar]
  18. Zhong, G.Y.; Dvořák, J. Evidence for common genetic mechanisms controlling the tolerance of sudden salt stress in the tribe Triticeae. Plant Breed. 1995, 114, 297–302. [Google Scholar]
  19. Grądzielewska, A. The genus Dasypyrum-part 2. Dasypyrum villosum—A wild species used in wheat improvement. Euphytica 2016, 152, 441–454. [Google Scholar]
  20. Zhang, R.Q.; Zhang, M.Y.; Wang, X.E.; Chen, P.D. Introduction of chromosome segment carrying the seed storage protein genes from chromosome 1V of Dasypyrum villosum showed positive effect on bread-making quality of common wheat. Theor. Appl. Genet. 2014, 127, 523–533. [Google Scholar]
  21. Zhang, R.Q.; Hou, F.; Feng, Y.G.; Zhang, W.; Zhang, M.Y.; Chen, P.D. Characterization of a Triticum aestivum-Dasypyrum villosum T2VS·2DL translocation line expressing a longer spike and more kernels traits. Theor. Appl. Genet. 2015, 128, 2415–2425. [Google Scholar]
  22. Zhang, W.; Zhu, X.W.; Zhang, M.Y.; Shi, G.J.; Liu, Z.H.; Cai, X.W. Chromosome engineering-mediated introgression and molecular mapping of novel Aegilops speltoides-derived resistance genes for tan spot and Septoria nodorum blotch diseases in wheat. Theor. Appl. Genet. 2019, 132, 2605–2614. [Google Scholar]
  23. Riley, R.; Chapman, V. Genetic control of the cytologically diploid behaviour of hexaploid wheat. Nature 1958, 182, 713–715. [Google Scholar]
  24. Griffiths, S.; Sharp, R.; Foote, T.N.; Bertin, I.; Wanous, M.; Reader, S.; Colas, I.; Moore, G. Molecular characterization of Ph1 as a major chromosome pairing locus in polyploid wheat. Nature 2006, 439, 749–752. [Google Scholar]
  25. Gyawali, Y.; Zhang, W.; Chao, S.M.; Xu, S.; Cai, X.W. Delimitation of wheat ph1b deletion and development of ph1b-specific DNA markers. Theor. Appl. Genet. 2019, 132, 195–204. [Google Scholar]
  26. Mullan, D.J.; Mirzaghaderi, G.; Walker, E.; Colmer, T.D.; Francki, M.G. Development of wheat-Lophopyrum elongatum recombinant lines for enhanced sodium ‘exclusion’ during salinity stress. Theor. Appl. Genet. 2009, 119, 1313–1323. [Google Scholar]
  27. Danilova, T.V.; Poland, J.; Friebe, B. Production of a complete set of wheat-barley group-7 chromosome recombinants with increased grain β-glucan content. Theor. Appl. Genet. 2019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Mago, R.; Velin, D.; Zhang, P.; Bansal, U.; Harban, B.; Jin, Y.; Ellis, J.; Hoxha, S.; Dundas, L. Development of wheat-Aegilops speltoides recombinants and simple PCR-based markers for Sr32 and a new stem rust resistance gene on the 2S#1 chromosome. Theor. Appl. Genet. 2013, 126, 2943–2955. [Google Scholar]
  29. Mago, R.; Zhang, P.; Bariana, H.S.; Verlin, D.C.; Bansal, U.K.; Ellis, J.; Dundas, L. Development of wheat lines carrying stem rust resistance gene Sr39 with reduced Aegilops speltoides chromatin and simple PCR markers for marker-assisted selection. Theor. Appl. Genet. 2009, 119, 1441–1450. [Google Scholar]
  30. Niu, Z.; Klindworth, D.L.; Yu, G.; Friesen, T.L.; Chao, S.; Jin, Y.; Cai, X.; Ohm, J.B.; Rasmussen, J.B.; Xu, S.S. Development and characterization of wheat lines carrying stem rust resistance gene Sr43 derived from Thinopyrum ponticum. Theor. Appl. Genet. 2014, 127, 969–980. [Google Scholar]
  31. Liu, W.X.; Rouse, M.; Friebe, B.; Jin, Y.; Gill, B.; Pumphrey, M.O. Discovery and molecular mapping of a new gene conferring resistance to stem rust, Sr53, derived from Aegilops geniculata and characterization of spontaneous translocation stocks with reduced alien chromatin. Chromosome Res. 2011, 19, 669–682. [Google Scholar]
  32. Bie, T.D.; Zhao, R.H.; Jiang, Z.N.; Gao, D.R.; Zhao, B.; He, H.G. Efficient marker-assisted screening of structural changes involving Haynaldia villosa chromosome 6V using a double-distal-marker strategy. Mol. Breed. 2015, 35, 34. [Google Scholar]
  33. Sun, H.J.; Song, J.J.; Xiao, J.; Xu, T.; Wei, X.; Yuan, C.X.; Cao, A.Z.; Xing, L.P.; Wang, H.Y.; Wang, X.E. Development of EST-PCR markers specific to the long arm of chromosome 6V of Dasypyrum villosum. J. Integr. Agric. 2018, 17, 1720–1726. [Google Scholar]
  34. Zhang, X.D.; Wei, X.; Xiao, J.; Yuan, C.X.; Wu, Y.F.; Cao, A.Z.; Xing, L.P.; Chen, P.D.; Zhang, S.Z.; Wang, X.E.; et al. Whole genome development of intron targeting (IT) markers specific for Dasypyrum villosum chromosomes based on next-generation sequencing technology. Mol. Breed. 2017, 37, 115. [Google Scholar]
  35. Wang, X.W.; Lai, J.R.; Chen, L.H.; Liu, G.T. Molecular identification for Chinese Spring ph1b mutant. Scientia Agri. Sin. 1998, 31, 31–34. [Google Scholar]
  36. Patokar, C.; Sepsi, A.; Schwarzacher, T.; Kishii, M.; Heslop-Harrison, J.S. Molecular cytogenetic characterization of novel wheat-Thinopyrum bessarabicum recombinant lines carrying intercalary translocations. Chromosoma 2016, 125, 163–172. [Google Scholar]
  37. Liu, W.X.; Koo, D.; Xia, Q.; Li, C.X.; Bai, F.Q.; Song, Y.L.; Friebe, B.; Gill, B.S. Homoeologous recombination-based transfer and molecular cytogenetic mapping of powdery mildew-resistant gene Pm57 from Aegilops searsii into wheat. Theor. Appl. Genet. 2017, 130, 841–848. [Google Scholar]
  38. Li, H.H.; Jiang, B.; Wang, J.C.; Lu, Y.Q.; Zhang, J.P.; Pan, C.L.; Yang, X.M.; Li, X.Q.; Liu, W.H.; Li, L.H. Mapping of novel powdery mildew resistance gene (s) from Agropyron cristatum chromosome 2P. Theor. Appl. Genet. 2017, 130, 109–121. [Google Scholar]
  39. Liu, L.Q.; Luo, Q.L.; Li, H.W.; Li, B.; Li, Z.S.; Zheng, Q. Physical mapping of the blue-grained gene from Thinopyrum ponticum chromosome 4Ag and development of blue-grain-related molecular markers and a FISH probe based on SLAF-seq technology. Theor. Appl. Genet. 2018, 131, 2359–2370. [Google Scholar]
  40. Sears, E.R. Genetics society of canada award of excellence lecture an induced mutant with homoeologous pairing in common wheat. Can. J. Genet. Cytol. 1977, 19, 585–593. [Google Scholar]
  41. Danilova, T.V.; Friebe, B.; Gill, B.S. Development of a wheat single gene FISH map for analyzing homoeologous relationship and chromosomal rearrangements within the Triticeae. Theor. Appl. Genet. 2014, 127, 715–730. [Google Scholar] [Green Version]
  42. Huang, X.; Zhu, M.; Zhuang, L.; Zhang, S.; Wang, J.; Chen, X.; Wang, D.; Chen, J.; Bao, Y.; Guo, J.; et al. Structural chromosome rearrangements and polymorphisms identified in Chinese wheat cultivars by high-resolution multiplex oligonucleotide FISH. Theor. Appl. Genet. 2018, 131, 1967–1986. [Google Scholar]
  43. Du, P.; Zhuang, L.; Wang, Y.; Yuan, L.; Wang, Q.; Wang, D.; Dawadondup; Tan, L.; Shen, J.; Xu, H. Development of oligonucleotides and multiplex probes for quick and accurate identification of wheat and Thinopyrum bessarabicum chromosomes. Genome 2016, 60, 93–103. [Google Scholar]
  44. Li, T.Y.; Liao, K.; Xu, X.F.; Gao, Y.; Wang, Z.Y.; Zhu, X.F.; Jia, B.L.; Xuan, Y.H. Wheat ammonium transporter (AMT) gene family: Diversity and possible role in host-pathogen interaction with stem rust. Front. Plant Sci. 2017, 8, 1637. [Google Scholar]
  45. Roelfs, A.; Martens, J. An international system of nomenclature for Puccinia graminis f. sp. tritici. Phytopathology 1988, 78, 526–533. [Google Scholar]
Ijms 20 04887 g001 550
Figure 1. Screening of six wheat–D. villosum 6V#3L recombinants by combining molecular markers and GISH analyses. (A) Electrophoresis patterns of proximal 6V#3L-specific markers BE422631/HaeIII; (B) Electrophoresis patterns of distal 6V#3L-specific markers 6L11/MboI; (C) GISH analyses of wheat–D. villosum 6V#3L recombinants. D. villosum chromosomal segments were in green, while wheat chromosomes were in blue counterstained by DAPI. Lanes: M, 100 bp DNA Ladder; 1, CS; 2, CS–D. villosum 6V#3 disomic addition line TA7682; 3, CS–D. villosum T6AL·6V#3S translocation line TA5618; 4, CS–D. villosum T6AS·6V#3L translocation line TA5617 (Sr52 stock); 5–10, the newly developed CS–D. villosum 6V#3L translocation lines 1386, 1382, 1385, 1381, 1380, and 1392. Polymorphic bands of 6V#3L markers are indicated by arrows.
Figure 1. Screening of six wheat–D. villosum 6V#3L recombinants by combining molecular markers and GISH analyses. (A) Electrophoresis patterns of proximal 6V#3L-specific markers BE422631/HaeIII; (B) Electrophoresis patterns of distal 6V#3L-specific markers 6L11/MboI; (C) GISH analyses of wheat–D. villosum 6V#3L recombinants. D. villosum chromosomal segments were in green, while wheat chromosomes were in blue counterstained by DAPI. Lanes: M, 100 bp DNA Ladder; 1, CS; 2, CS–D. villosum 6V#3 disomic addition line TA7682; 3, CS–D. villosum T6AL·6V#3S translocation line TA5618; 4, CS–D. villosum T6AS·6V#3L translocation line TA5617 (Sr52 stock); 5–10, the newly developed CS–D. villosum 6V#3L translocation lines 1386, 1382, 1385, 1381, 1380, and 1392. Polymorphic bands of 6V#3L markers are indicated by arrows.
Ijms 20 04887 g001
Ijms 20 04887 g002 550
Figure 2. ND-FISH/GISH identification of homozygous CS–D. villosum 6V#3L recombinants developed in this study. (A1–F1) ND-FISH patterns of wheat–D. villosum 6V#3L recombinants. Red color indicates signals from oligos pAs1-3, pAs1-4, pAs1-6, AFA-3, AFA-4, and (AAC)10. Green color indicates signals from oligos pSc119.2-1 and (GAA)10. Blue color shows chromosomes counterstained with DAPI. (A2–F2) GISH patterns of wheat–D. villosum 6V#3L recombinants. Total genomic DNA of D. villosum was labeled with fluorescein-12-dUTP and visualized with green fluorescence. Chromosomes of wheat were counterstained with DAPI and visualized with blue fluorescence. A, Line 1386; B, Line 1382; C, Line 1385; D, Line 1381; E, Line 1380; F, Line 1392. Arrows point to the wheat–D. villosum 6V#3L translocated chromosomes.
Figure 2. ND-FISH/GISH identification of homozygous CS–D. villosum 6V#3L recombinants developed in this study. (A1–F1) ND-FISH patterns of wheat–D. villosum 6V#3L recombinants. Red color indicates signals from oligos pAs1-3, pAs1-4, pAs1-6, AFA-3, AFA-4, and (AAC)10. Green color indicates signals from oligos pSc119.2-1 and (GAA)10. Blue color shows chromosomes counterstained with DAPI. (A2–F2) GISH patterns of wheat–D. villosum 6V#3L recombinants. Total genomic DNA of D. villosum was labeled with fluorescein-12-dUTP and visualized with green fluorescence. Chromosomes of wheat were counterstained with DAPI and visualized with blue fluorescence. A, Line 1386; B, Line 1382; C, Line 1385; D, Line 1381; E, Line 1380; F, Line 1392. Arrows point to the wheat–D. villosum 6V#3L translocated chromosomes.
Ijms 20 04887 g002
Ijms 20 04887 g003 550
Figure 3. Identification of newly developed wheat–D. villosum 6V#3L translocation lines with different segment sizes and breakpoints by using D. villosum chromosome 6V#3L-specific molecular markers. The symbols ‘+’ and ‘-’ indicate the presence and absence of the 6V#3L-specific molecular markers, respectively.
Figure 3. Identification of newly developed wheat–D. villosum 6V#3L translocation lines with different segment sizes and breakpoints by using D. villosum chromosome 6V#3L-specific molecular markers. The symbols ‘+’ and ‘-’ indicate the presence and absence of the 6V#3L-specific molecular markers, respectively.
Ijms 20 04887 g003
Ijms 20 04887 g004 550
Figure 4. Evaluation of stem rust resistance of newly developed homozygous wheat–D. villosum 6V#3L translocation lines 1386, 1382, 1385, 1381, 1380, 1392, and their parents. CS: susceptible control; TA7682 and TA5617: resistant controls.
Figure 4. Evaluation of stem rust resistance of newly developed homozygous wheat–D. villosum 6V#3L translocation lines 1386, 1382, 1385, 1381, 1380, 1392, and their parents. CS: susceptible control; TA7682 and TA5617: resistant controls.
Ijms 20 04887 g004
Ijms 20 04887 g005 550
Figure 5. Physical mapping of gene Sr52 from D. villosum chromosome 6V#3L. Chromosome 6V#3L chromatin is shown in green and common wheat chromatin in blue. Translocation lines 1386, 1382, and 1385, as well as parent line CS, are susceptible to stem rust. Translocation lines 1381, 1380, and 1392, as well as TA5617, are resistant to stem rust. This shows that the Sr52 resistance gene must be located in bin FL 0.92–1.00 of chromosome 6V#3L, which is present in all resistant lines, but in none of the susceptible lines. The numbers on the left of chromosomes display the fragment length (FL) of 6V#3L breakpoints. The letters R and S indicate materials are resistant and susceptible to stem rust, respectively.
Figure 5. Physical mapping of gene Sr52 from D. villosum chromosome 6V#3L. Chromosome 6V#3L chromatin is shown in green and common wheat chromatin in blue. Translocation lines 1386, 1382, and 1385, as well as parent line CS, are susceptible to stem rust. Translocation lines 1381, 1380, and 1392, as well as TA5617, are resistant to stem rust. This shows that the Sr52 resistance gene must be located in bin FL 0.92–1.00 of chromosome 6V#3L, which is present in all resistant lines, but in none of the susceptible lines. The numbers on the left of chromosomes display the fragment length (FL) of 6V#3L breakpoints. The letters R and S indicate materials are resistant and susceptible to stem rust, respectively.
Ijms 20 04887 g005
Ijms 20 04887 g006 550
Figure 6. Validation of the usefulness of three molecular markers CINAU1532, 6L-4, and 6L11/MboI closely linked to Sr52. (A) CINAU1532; (B) 6L-4; (C) 6L11/MboI. Lanes: M, 100 bp DNA Ladder; 1, CS; 2, CS–D. villosum 6V#3 disomic addition line TA7682; 3, CS–D. villosum T6AS·6V#3L translocation line TA5617; 4–6, the newly developed D. villosum 6V#3L small segment translocation lines 1381, 1380, 1392, respectively, carrying Sr52; 7–20, wheat varieties Ping’an 602, Ping’an 0518, Zhoumai 18, Zhoumai 22, Yanzhan 4110, Tianmin 198, Xinong 979, Zhoumai 16, Aikang 58, Ningmai 13, Bainong 207, Bainong 64, Zhengzhou 366, and advanced breeding line 11113-5H-5, respectively. The arrows in panels A–C point to the polymorphic bands of the respective molecular markers closely linked to Sr52.
Figure 6. Validation of the usefulness of three molecular markers CINAU1532, 6L-4, and 6L11/MboI closely linked to Sr52. (A) CINAU1532; (B) 6L-4; (C) 6L11/MboI. Lanes: M, 100 bp DNA Ladder; 1, CS; 2, CS–D. villosum 6V#3 disomic addition line TA7682; 3, CS–D. villosum T6AS·6V#3L translocation line TA5617; 4–6, the newly developed D. villosum 6V#3L small segment translocation lines 1381, 1380, 1392, respectively, carrying Sr52; 7–20, wheat varieties Ping’an 602, Ping’an 0518, Zhoumai 18, Zhoumai 22, Yanzhan 4110, Tianmin 198, Xinong 979, Zhoumai 16, Aikang 58, Ningmai 13, Bainong 207, Bainong 64, Zhengzhou 366, and advanced breeding line 11113-5H-5, respectively. The arrows in panels A–C point to the polymorphic bands of the respective molecular markers closely linked to Sr52.
Ijms 20 04887 g006
Table
Table 1. Physical location, primer sequences, and PCR annealing temperature (Tm) of 6V#3L-specific molecular markers used in this study.
Table 1. Physical location, primer sequences, and PCR annealing temperature (Tm) of 6V#3L-specific molecular markers used in this study.
Marker NameForward Primer (5′–3′)Reverse Primer (5′–3′)EST No.Bin LocationTm (°C)Reference
BE422631/HaeIIICCCGCACAGTTCACAATAGAGCAGTTGCACCGTTTTATGABE422631C-6AL4-0.5559Qi et al. (2011) [15]
BE497099/MspITTCGCTCCACCAGGAGTCTAGTGTCTCGCCATGGAAGGBE4970996AL8-0.90-1.0060Qi et al. (2011) [15]
6L-4TGGCTGATGATTCTGCTTCACCACAAGGTTCAGCCAAGTTBE4711916AL8-0.90-1.0055Bie et al. (2015) [32]
6EST-426AAGTAGCAGCAGGTCAATCTGGATAGTAGGGGATGGCATTCTGATBE4064076AL4-0.55-0.9066Sun et al. (2018) [33]
6L11/MboICGGTATCGGGAAGTCCACTACGCGACCCTACTCTTCTGACBE4039506AL8-0.90-1.0063In this study
CINAU871TGGTGGCCAGCAAGTTAAGTGCTGTTCTTCATTGGGTTGTa#S131469696VL-0.78-0.92 255Zhang et al. (2016) [17]
CINAU1517GAAGCTCTGGAATCATGGCGCATGCCAGTTGAACTCCAGG- 16VL-0.70-0.78 262Zhang et al. (2017) [34]
CINAU1532CTGATGACTGCCAATGAATTTCTCAATGCCTCTCGACCAACTT-6VL-0.92-1.00 263Zhang et al. (2017) [34]
1 Molecular markers CINAU1517 and CIANU1532 belonged to intron-targeting markers specific for D. villosum chromosome 6V#3, thus having no corresponding EST numbers. 2 Bin location was mapped based on six wheat–D. villosum 6V#3L recombinants developed in this study.
Table
Table 2. The chromosome 6V#3 segment sizes and breakpoints of newly developed wheat–D. villosum 6V#3L translocation lines.
Table 2. The chromosome 6V#3 segment sizes and breakpoints of newly developed wheat–D. villosum 6V#3L translocation lines.
Line NameType of TranslocationTranslocated ChromosomeBreakpointSegment Size
1386interstitialTi6AS·6V#3L-6ALLong arm FL 0.7070% 6V#3L
1382interstitialTi6AS·6V#3L-6ALLong arm FL 0.7878% 6V#3L
1385interstitialTi6AS·6V#3L-6ALLong arm FL 0.9292% 6V#3L
1381terminalT6AS·6AL-6V#3LLong arm FL 0.928% 6V#3L
1380terminalT6DS·6DL-6V#3LLong arm FL 0.7822% 6V#3L
1392terminalT6AS·6AL-6V#3LLong arm FL 0.7030% 6V#3L
Table
Table 3. Genetic stocks used in the study.
Table 3. Genetic stocks used in the study.
WGRC Accession NumberDescriptionReference
TA3808common wheat CS- 1
TA3809CS ph1b mutant stockSears (1977) [40]
TA7682CS–D. villosum 6V#3 disomic addition lineLukaszewski,1991 (unpublished)
TA5618CS–D. villosum T6AL·6V#3S translocation lineQi et al. (2011) [15]
TA5617CS–D. villosum T6AS·6V#3L translocation lineQi et al. (2011) [15]
1 unknown authorship.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Li, H.; Dong, Z.; Ma, C.; Tian, X.; Qi, Z.; Wu, N.; Friebe, B.; Xiang, Z.; Xia, Q.; Liu, W.; et al. Physical Mapping of Stem Rust Resistance Gene Sr52 from Dasypyrum villosum Based on ph1b-Induced Homoeologous Recombination. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 4887. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms20194887

AMA Style

Li H, Dong Z, Ma C, Tian X, Qi Z, Wu N, Friebe B, Xiang Z, Xia Q, Liu W, et al. Physical Mapping of Stem Rust Resistance Gene Sr52 from Dasypyrum villosum Based on ph1b-Induced Homoeologous Recombination. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2019; 20(19):4887. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms20194887

Chicago/Turabian Style

Li, Huanhuan, Zhenjie Dong, Chao Ma, Xiubin Tian, Zengjun Qi, Nan Wu, Bernd Friebe, Zhiguo Xiang, Qing Xia, Wenxuan Liu, and et al. 2019. "Physical Mapping of Stem Rust Resistance Gene Sr52 from Dasypyrum villosum Based on ph1b-Induced Homoeologous Recombination" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 20, no. 19: 4887. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms20194887

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop