Next Article in Journal
Plasma Levels of snoRNAs are Associated with Platelet Activation in Patients with Peripheral Artery Disease
Next Article in Special Issue
Targeting the 16S rRNA Gene for Bacterial Identification in Complex Mixed Samples: Comparative Evaluation of Second (Illumina) and Third (Oxford Nanopore Technologies) Generation Sequencing Technologies
Previous Article in Journal
Experimental Measurement and Modeling of Hg(II) Removal from Aqueous Solutions Using Eucalyptus globulus Bark: Effect of pH, Salinity and Biosorbent Dosage
Previous Article in Special Issue
In Silico Approach for the Definition of radiomiRNomic Signatures for Breast Cancer Differential Diagnosis
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
IJMS
Volume 20
Issue 23
10.3390/ijms20235974
ijms-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Genome-Wide Identification and Analysis of the NPR1-Like Gene Family in Bread Wheat and Its Relatives

by
Xian Liu
1,
Zhiguo Liu
2,
Xinhui Niu
1,
Qian Xu
1,* and
Long Yang
2,*
1
State Key Laboratory of Crop Biology, College of Agronomy, Shandong Agricultural University, Taian 271018, China
2
Agricultural Big-Data Research Center, College of Plant Protection, Shandong Agricultural University, Taian 271018, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20(23), 5974; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms20235974
Submission received: 15 September 2019 / Revised: 13 November 2019 / Accepted: 24 November 2019 / Published: 27 November 2019
(This article belongs to the Special Issue In Silico Analyses: Translating and Making Sense of Omics Data)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
NONEXPRESSOR OF PATHOGENESIS-RELATED GENES 1 (NPR1), and its paralogues NPR3 and NPR4, are bona fide salicylic acid (SA) receptors and play critical regulatory roles in plant immunity. However, comprehensive identification and analysis of the NPR1-like gene family had not been conducted so far in bread wheat and its relatives. Here, a total of 17 NPR genes in Triticum aestivum, five NPR genes in Triticum urartu, 12 NPR genes in Triticum dicoccoides, and six NPR genes in Aegilops tauschii were identified using bioinformatics approaches. Protein properties of these putative NPR1-like genes were also described. Phylogenetic analysis showed that the 40 NPR1-like proteins, together with 40 NPR1-related proteins from other plant species, were clustered into three major clades. The TaNPR1-like genes belonging to the same Arabidopsis subfamilies shared similar exon-intron patterns and protein domain compositions, as well as conserved motifs and amino acid residues. The cis-regulatory elements related to SA were identified in the promoter regions of TaNPR1-like genes. The TaNPR1-like genes were intensively mapped on the chromosomes of homoeologous groups 3, 4, and 5, except TaNPR2-D. Chromosomal distribution and collinearity analysis of NPR1-like genes among bread wheat and its relatives revealed that the evolution of this gene family was more conservative following formation of hexaploid wheat. Transcriptome data analysis indicated that TaNPR1-like genes exhibited tissue/organ-specific expression patterns and some members were induced under biotic stress. These findings lay the foundation for further functional characterization of NPR1-like proteins in bread wheat and its relatives.

1. Introduction

Bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.), also known as common wheat, is a major grain crop with very high economic value globally. This allohexaploid bread wheat (T. aestivum, 2n = 6x = 42) is comprised of three closely homoeologous chromosome groups (AABBDD), originating from a series of natural hybridization events [1,2]. Firstly, diploid Triticum urartu (the A-genome donor) hybridized with an unknown diploid grass (considered probably as Aegilops speltoides, the B-genome donor) to produce tetraploid emmer wheat (Triticum dicoccoides, AABB). Subsequently, emmer wheat hybridized with diploid goat grass (Aegilops tauschii, the D-genome donor) to form hexaploid wheat around 8000 years ago. In field conditions, bread wheat is challenged by various fungal pathogens, such as Fusarium graminearum (Fusarium head blight, FHB), Puccinia striiformis (stripe rust), and Blumeria graminis (powdery mildew), which cause huge losses in yield and quality [3]. The salicylic acid (SA) signaling pathway is required for plant immunity against biotrophic and hemi-biotrophic pathogens [4,5]. NONEXPRESSOR OF PATHOGENESIS-RELATED GENES 1 (NPR1), and its paralogues NPR3 and NPR4, are bona fide SA receptors that act as master regulators in SA-mediated local and systemic immunity (also named systemic acquired resistance, SAR) [6,7,8,9]. Therefore, identification and analysis of these essential components involved in SA-dependent defense responses is very important to understand the immune mechanism in bread wheat and its relatives.
Plants have evolved a highly sophisticated and effective innate immune system to combat pathogens, including bacteria, fungi, viruses, and oomycetes [10,11,12]. Facing the pathogen challenges, the first line of defense initiates on the plant cell surface, called pathogen-associated molecular pattern (PAMP)-triggered immunity (PTI) [13,14]. Pattern-recognition receptors (PRRs) at the plasma membrane activate PTI responses by detection of PAMPs, such as fungal chitin, bacterial flagellin (flg22), and lipopolysaccharides (LPS) [15,16,17]. However, many microbial pathogens often secrete effectors in the infection process, which can depress PTI and lead to effector-triggered susceptibility (ETS) [18,19,20]. During evolution, plants have developed the second layer of local induced resistance, termed effector-triggered immunity (ETI) [21,22]. Plant intracellular sensors encoded by resistance (R) genes elicit ETI responses by recognizing these attacker-specific effectors. The R gene-mediated defenses confer strong resistance and effectively restrict the growth of pathogens via programmed cell death (PCD), designated as hypersensitive response (HR). This local immune response leads to biosynthesis and accumulation of plant defense hormone SA both at infection sites and in distal uninfected tissues, and then deployment of systemic acquired resistance (SAR) after HR in the whole plant. SAR confers a broad-spectrum, long-lasting, and systemic resistance to secondary infections, that is characterized by expression of many anti-microbial pathogenesis-related (PR) genes throughout plant’s tissues [23,24,25].
In the mid-1990s, scientists discovered a single recessive mutation of Arabidopsis thaliana by mutant screening that abolished SA- or its analog-induced SAR-related gene expression and exhibited enhanced disease susceptibility, named AtNPR1 [26], and also named AtNIM1 [27] and AtSAI1 [28]. In addition, AtNPR1 has roles beyond SA-induced defense responses, such as in rhizobacterium–triggered induced systemic resistance (ISR) [29], crosstalk between SA and jasmonic acid (JA) signaling pathways [30,31], and cold acclimation [32]. The AtNPR1 gene encodes a protein with two conserved protein–protein interaction domains: broad complex, tramtrack, and bric-a-brac/pox virus and zinc finger (BTB/POZ) domain at the N-terminus and ankyrin repeats in the central region [33,34,35,36]. With the completion of the Arabidopsis genome sequence, there are five AtNPR1 paralogs in Arabidopsis genome [37], named AtNPR2, AtNPR3, AtNPR4, Arabidopsis BLADE-ON-PETIOLE2 (AtBOP2; also named AtNPR5), and AtBOP1 (also named AtNPR6) [38,39,40]. Phylogenetic analysis divides the AtNPR1-like gene family into three functionally distinct clades. Each of the three clades contains two family members with functional redundancy. In the first clade, AtNPR1 and AtNPR2 are SA receptors and act as transcriptional co-activators in plant immunity [9,41]. In the second clade, AtNPR3 and AtNPR4 are also SA receptors and serve as transcriptional co-repressors in plant defense [9,42]. In the third clade, AtBOP1 and AtBOP2 are involved in plant growth and development [39,40].
In the absence of pathogen invasion, intracellular SA content is low and the NPR1 protein resides predominantly in the cytoplasm as an inactive oligomer formed via intermolecular disulfide bonds [43]. Moreover, NPR3 and NPR4, acting as transcriptional co-repressors, interact with TGA (TGACG motif-binding factor) transcription factors [42] to suppress transcription of SA-responsive genes in the nucleus [9]. In response to pathogen challenge, intracellular SA concentration rises rapidly, leading to conformational change of NPR1 from oligomer to monomer [43,44]. The monomeric NPR1 is then translocated into the nucleus mediated by its C-terminal bipartite nuclear localization signal (NLS) [45]. There, NPR1 binds SA and interacts with the same subset of TGAs to activate its transcriptional co-activator function [6,9]. Meanwhile, NPR1 recruits CDK8 (cyclin-dependent kinase 8) and WRKY (W-box-binding factor) transcription factors to the NPR1 promoter to positively regulate its own expression [46,47]. Moreover, SA-binding to NPR3 and NPR4 eliminates their transcriptional co-repressor activity on TGAs [9]. This enables TGAs to turn on defense-related gene expression and activates defense response. In addition to pathogen invasion, exogenous application of SA or its analogs (BTH; benzothiodiazole and INA; 2,6-dichloroisonicotinic acid) could also induce the resistance mechanism in plants [48,49]. Taken together, NPR1, and its paralogues NPR3 and NPR4, are all SA receptors through an antagonistic manner to finely regulate plant immune response dependent on distinct threshold levels of SA [9].
Arabidopsis NPR1 and its homologs have been proved to be involved in SA-mediated defense responses through genetic transformation in many plant species. For example, these NPR1-like genes likely function similar to AtNPR1, which acts as a positive regulator in the SA-mediated immunity. Transgenic rice (Oryza sativa) overexpressing OsNPR1 displayed enhanced resistance to bacterial blight pathogen Xanthomonas oryzae pv. oryzae (Xoo) and fungal blast pathogen Magnaporthe oryzae (Mo), and knockdown of OsNPR1 exhibited increased susceptibility to Xoo and Mo [50,51,52]. Transgenic mustard (Brassica juncea) overexpressing BjNPR1 showed enhanced resistance to fungal pathogens Alternaria brassicae and Erysiphe cruciferarum [53]. Overexpression of mulberry (Morus multicaulis) MuNPR1 in Arabidopsis displayed enhanced resistance to Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato DC3000 (PstDC3000) [54]. Knockdown of barley HvNPR1 [55,56], tobacco NtNPR1 [57], and tomato NPR1-like gene [58] showed elevated susceptibility to powdery mildew fungus, tobacco mosaic virus (TMV), and Ralstonia solanacearum, respectively. Moreover, these NPR1-like genes likely function similar to AtNPR3/4, which acts as a negative regulator in the SA-mediated resistance. Transgenic rice overexpressing OsNPR2 and OsNPR3 had no enhanced resistance to Xoo [51], and overexpression of OsNPR3 using its own promoter resulted in increased expression of several PR genes and enhanced resistance only after treatment with BTH [59]. Knockdown of Theobroma cacao TcNPR3 conferred resistance against Phytophthora tropicalis [60,61]. Overexpression of mulberry MuNPR4 [54] or strawberry FvNPRL-1 [62] in Arabidopsis both showed enhanced susceptibility to PstDC3000.
In emmer wheat, wNPR1 was isolated from Triticum turgidum ssp. durum by homology cloning strategy [63], and transgenic barley overexpressing wNPR1 displayed elevated resistance to Mo [64]. Overexpression of AtNPR1 or Secale cereale ScNPR1 in bread wheat both conferred enhanced FHB resistance [65,66,67,68]. Based on the above research, it is necessary to systematically identify and analyze the NPR1-like family in bread wheat (T. aestivum) and its relatives (T. urartu, T. dicoccoides, and Ae. tauschii). The recently published reference genome sequences provide an opportunity for this study [69,70,71,72]. Here, the NPR1-like family was identified from bread wheat and its relatives’ genomes. These putative NPR1-like genes were analyzed in detail, including molecular characterization, chromosomal distributions, phylogenetic classification, gene structures, protein domain compositions, conserved motifs and amino acid residues, and cis-regulatory elements. The collinearity analysis for NPR1-like genes was performed among bread wheat and its relatives. Furthermore, the expression pattern of TaNPR1-like genes in various tissues/organs and under biotic stress conditions was also analyzed using publicly available bread wheat RNA-sequencing (RNA-seq) datasets. Overall, these results provide an invaluable resource for further functional study of NPR1-like genes in bread wheat and its relatives.

2. Results

2.1. Identification, Phylogeny, and Characterization of NPR1-Like Genes in Bread Wheat and its Relatives

Utilizing bioinformatics tools that contain BLAST search and HMMER analysis, a total of 40 putative NPR1-like genes were identified from bread wheat and its relatives’ genomes. Among them, there were 17 in T. aestivum, five in T. urartu, 12 in T. dicoccoides, and six in Ae. tauschii (Table 1). To study the phylogeny of the NPR1-like family, an unrooted phylogenetic tree was constructed using the sequences of the 40 NPRs, and 4 OsNPRs, 5 PaNPRs, and 31 NPRs obtained through molecular cloning techniques from eight monocots and 15 dicots in the published literature (Table S1). Although individual phylogenetic analysis does not adequately perform functional annotation, phylogenetic grouping perhaps provides a reference for understanding functional diversification of the NPR1-like family. The results demonstrated that NPR1-like proteins were clustered into three major clades: clade I (AtNPR1/2 subfamily) containing OsNPR1 [50,51,52], BjNPR1 [53], MuNPR1 [54], HvNPR1 [55,56], and NtNPR1 [57], etc; clade II (AtNPR3/4 subfamily) containing OsNPR2 [51], OsNPR3 [59], TcNPR3 [60,61], and MuNPR4 [54], etc; and clade III (AtBOP1/2 subfamily) (Figure 1). In tetraploid and hexaploid wheat, homoeologous genes located in the branch ends of each clade belonging to the A, B, or D subgenomes, were regarded as the homeoalleles of one NPR1-like gene arising from allpolyploidization in genome evolution (Figure S1A,B). All of the 40 identified NPR1-like genes were named and classified based on the phylogenetic relationship of the Arabidopsis NPR1-like family.
For example, 17 bread wheat NPR1-like genes were identified and evenly distributed in the three clades, consistent with the NPR1-like genes in Arabidopsis (Table 1). Each branch end of the TaNPR1-like family was composed of three homeoalleles in A, B, and D subgenomes, except the TaNPR2 branch, which had two homeoalleles in A and D subgenomes. Clade I contained TaNPR1-A/-B/-D and TaNPR2-A/-D. TaNPR3-A/-B/-D and TaNPR4-A/-B/-D clustered in clade II. Clade III consisted of TaNPR5-A/-B/-D and TaNPR6-A/-B/-D. The TaNPR1-like genes were located on homoeologous group 3 chromosomes (TaNPR1-A/-B/-D, TaNPR3-A/-B/-D, and TaNPR5-A/-B/-D), homoeologous group 4 chromosomes (TaNPR2-A and TaNPR4-A/-B/-D), homoeologous group 6 chromosomes (TaNPR5-A/-B/-D), and homoeologous group 7 chromosomes (TaNPR2-D) (Figure S2). The sequence length of TaNPR proteins ranged from 487 (TaNPR2-D) to 618 (TaNPR3-A) amino acids. The average molecular weight was 59.87 kDa, varying between 51.62 kDa (TaNPR6-B) and 67.45 kDa (TaNPR3-A). The isoelectric points (pI) of TaNPR1-like members ranged from 5.18 (TaNPR2-A) to 6.12 (TaNPR5-A), with an average of 5.76, showing a weak acid. A single transcript was available in 10 of 17 TaNPR1-like genes, and the remaining seven genes had two splice variants.

2.2. Sequence and Structural Analysis of TaNPR1-Like Genes and Proteins

To further understand the potential functions of TaNPR1-like genes, the structural feature and sequence composition were analyzed using GSDS, NCBI-CDD, and the Clustal Omega program. The exon-intron distributions of TaNPR1-like genes were consistent with the corresponding phylogenetic clade in Arabidopsis (Figure 2A). Clade I, TaNPR1-A/-B/-D and TaNPR2-A/-D, and clade II, TaNPR3-A/-B/-D and TaNPR4-A/-B/-D, contained four exons and three introns. Clade III, TaNPR5-A/-B/-D and TaNPR6-A/-B/-D, had two exons and one intron. The protein domain composition revealed that all 17 TaNPR proteins contained an N-terminal BTB/POZ domain and ANK repeats in the central region similarly to AtNPR1 (Figure 2B). However, only clade I, TaNPR1-A/-B/-D and TaNPR2-A/-D, and clade II, TaNPR3-A/-B/-D and TaNPR4-A/-B/-D, contained the NPR1-like C-terminal region that was essential for AtNPR1 activity [35,36]. The C-terminal region contained penta-amino acid motif (LENRV), NIMIN-binding region, and nuclear localization signal (NLS) (Figure 2C) [45,73].
Multiple sequence alignments were performed to examine the conservation of residues, motifs, and domains in TaNPRs and known-function NPRs (AtNPR1 to AtNPR6, OsNPR1, and wNPR1) (Figure 2C). The results revealed that npr1-1 (His334Tyr), npr1-2 (Cys150Tyr) [33], and nim1-2 (His300Tyr) [74] point mutations in AtNPR1 were completely conserved in all 17 TaNPR1-like proteins. Moreover, nim1-4 (Arg432Lys) [74] in AtNPR1 and npr4-4D (Arg419Gln) [9] in AtNPR4 mutant sites were also conserved in clade I, TaNPR1-A/-B/-D and TaNPR2-A/-D, and clade II, TaNPR3-A/-B/-D and TaNPR4-A/-B/-D. Three cysteine residues (C82, C216, and C156) in AtNPR1 [43,44] that participated in its oligomer–monomer transition were also highly conserved in all 17 TaNPR1-like proteins, except C82 in TaNPR2-A/-D. The Arg432 residues in AtNPR1, Arg428 in AtNPR3, and Arg419 in AtNPR4 required for their perception of SA [9] were conservative among clade I, TaNPR1-A/-B/-D and TaNPR2-A/-D, and clade II, TaNPR3-A/-B/-D and TaNPR4-A/-B/-D. In addition, EAR-like motif (VDLNETP) required for AtNPR3/4 as a co-repressor factor [9] was also present in clade II, TaNPR3-A/-B/-D and TaNPR4-A/-B/-D. Therefore, TaNPR1-like genes belonging to the same Arabidopsis subfamily have similar gene structures and functional domain composition, as well as conserved motifs and amino acid residues, deducing that their orthologs probably display similar biological functions in bread wheat.

2.3. Analysis of cis-Regulatory Elements in the Promoter Regions of TaNPR1-like Genes

In plants, cis-regulatory elements control the expression of target genes by interacting with transcription factors [75]. Therefore, identifying potential cis-regulatory elements in the promoter regions of TaNPR1-like genes will provide useful information for understanding their regulatory expression. The 1000-bp upstream promoter sequences of TaNPR1-like genes were selected and submitted to the PlantCARE online service [76] for SA-responsive cis-regulatory identification.
The results showed that two hormone-related regulatory elements, CAAT-box and TATA-box, were overrepresented in all 17 TaNPR1-like gene promoters (Figure 3). The activation sequence-1 (as-1) element (TGACG) involved in transcription activation of several SA-regulated PR genes was detected in all TaNPR1-like gene promoters, except TaNPR1-B and TaNPR5-A/-B/-D. Moreover, the W-box element (TTGACC) was known to be the DNA-binding site for the SA-induced WRKY transcription factors [46]. This W-box motif enriched in the AtNPR1 and OsNPR1 promoter was only found in the TaNPR1-A/-B/-D promoter, suggesting that TaNPR1-A/-B/-D may be directly regulated by WRKYs in a manner similar to AtNPR1 [47].

2.4. Chromosomal Distribution and Collinearity Analysis of NPR1-like Genes among Bread Wheat and Its Relatives

To explore the orthologous relationships of NPR1-like genes among bread wheat and its relatives, 6 Ae. tauschii-NPRs and 6 T. aestivum-NPRs in the D subgenome, 12 T.dicoccoides-NPRs and 11 T. aestivum-NPRs in the AB subgenome, and 5 T.urartu-NPRs and 7 T.dicoccoides-NPRs in the A subgenome protein sequences were used to generate phylogenetic trees (Figure S1C–E). Pairs of six Aet/Ta-D, 11 Td/Ta-AB, and four Tu/Td-A orthologs were identified (Table S2) and mapped to genome chromosomes (Figure 4).
The collinearity analysis illustrated that six pairs of Aet/Ta-D orthologs were located on the same chromosomes with three on 3D, one on 4D, one on 5D, and one on 7D (Figure 4). Moreover, 10 Td-NPRs could be mapped to bread wheat AB subgenomes on the same chromosomes with three on 3A, one on 4A, one on 5A, three on 3B, one on 4B, and one on 5B, except TdNPR2-A-2/TaNPR2-A orthologous gene pairs (TdNPR2-A-2 on 7AS, TaNPR2-A on 4AL). Furthermore, four Tu/Td-A orthologous gene pairs were located on the same chromosomes, with three on 3A and one on 4A. However, orthologous TuNPR4 was located on T.urartu chromosome 4AS, corresponding to TdNPR4-A on T.dicoccoides chromosome 4AL. The orthologous gene pairs on different chromosomal positions indicated that chromosomal recombination events (chiasmata and crossing-over) had occurred during the evolutionary process. On the whole, however, the NPR1-like genes had an intact collinearity among bread wheat and its relatives, suggesting that the evolution of this gene family was more conservative following formation of hexaploid wheat.

2.5. Expression Analysis of TaNPR1-Like Genes in Various Tissues/Organs

To analyze the tissue/organ-specific expression patterns of TaNPR1-like genes, the expression data in eight tissues/organs (roots, stem axis, first leaf blade, shoot apical meristem, flag leaf, internode, glumes, and lemma) during the seedling and reproductive stages [77] were downloaded from the wheat URGI website.
The results revealed that TaNPR1-like genes were constitutively expressed in various tissues/organs, although the level of expression varied greatly (Figure 5). The expression level of TaNPR1-A/-B/-D was moderate and was relatively high in root and flag leaf tissues. The expression of TaNPR2-A/-D was much lower in most tissues/organs with a similar pattern as AtNPR2 in Arabidopsis tissues [78]. TaNPR3-A/-B/-D and TaNPR4-A/-B/-D had significantly higher expression in this family, showing relatively balanced expression in eight tissues. TaNPR5-A/-B/-D and TaNPR6-A/-B/-D had strong expression levels in the shoot apical meristem at the seeding stage and in internode, glume, and lemma tissues at the reproductive stage, but were weakly expressed in other tissues/organs (roots, stem axis, first leaf blade, and flag leaf). The results infer that TaNPR5-A/-B/-D and TaNPR6-A/-B/-D appear to be similarly related in growth and development to AtBOP1/2 [39,40].

2.6. Expression Analysis of TaNPR1-Like Genes in Response to Biotic Stress

To determine the potential functions of TaNPR1-like genes in response to biotic stress, the expression data under PAMP (chitin and flg22) treatment [77] and inoculation with F. graminearum [79] were obtained from the wheat URGI website.
In leaf tissue treated with fresh water/mock or PAMPs (chitin and flg22), the expression levels of TaNPR2-A/-D, TaNPR5-A/-B/-D, and TaNPR6-A/-B/-D were much lower (TPM < 0.3) than those of other family members (Figure 6A). The transcript levels of TaNPR1-A/-B/-D, TaNPR3-A/-B/-D, and TaNPR4-A/-B/-D were up-regulated after PAMP (chitin and flg22) treatment for 30 min compared with the mock group. In particular, the up-regulation extent of TaNPR1-A/-B/-D significant increased at 30 min. Additionally, the expression of TaNPR1-A/-B/-D, TaNPR3-A/-B/-D, and TaNPR4-A/-B/-D was not significantly different between control and experimental groups at 180 min. The results indicate that TaNPR1-A/-B/-D, TaNPR3-A/-B/-D, and TaNPR4-A/-B/-D could possibly partake in bread wheat early basal resistance.
In spike tissue inoculated with mock or F. graminearum, TaNPR2-A/-D transcripts showed the lowest level (TPM < 0.2) in this family (Figure 6B). Only TaNPR1-A/-B/-D was up-regulated at 30 and 50 h after inoculation (hai) compared with the mock group. There was no significant difference in TaNPR3-A/-B/-D and TaNPR4-A/-B/-D between control and experimental groups at 30 and 50 hai. Moreover, TaNPR5-A/-B/-D and TaNPR6-A/-B/-D were slightly down-regulated at 30 and 50 hai. The results imply that TaNPR1-A/-B/-D may have similar functions as AtNPR1 and ScNPR1 in response to F. graminearum in bread wheat [65,66,67,68].

3. Discussion

3.1. Identification and Phylogenic Analysis of NPR1-Like Family

In this study, we isolated five NPRs in diploid T. urartu, six in diploid Ae. tauschii, 12 in tetraploid emmer wheat (T. dicoccoides), and 17 in hexaploid wheat (T. aestivum) by genome-wide approaches. The NPR1-like family is a small community in triticeae crops similar to other plant species, such as four members in Oryza sativa [51], six in Arabidopsis [40], five in Persea Americana [79], six in Populus trichocarpa [80], three in Vitis vinifera [80], and four in Medicago truncatula [80]. The phylogenetic tree showed that the 40 identified NPR1-like genes in bread wheat and its relatives clustered into three major clades and distributed evenly among the clades (Figure 1). For example, NPR1 homologs in Ae.tauschii and T.aestivum divide into three clades and each clade contains two family members. Furthermore, the phylogenetic analysis of NPR1-like family further supports the previously evolutionary hypothesis [78]. It reveals that an ancestral gene of NPR1-like family through duplication differentiates into two main clades, NPR and BOP. Then, the progenitor NPR gene could undergo a second round of duplication event leading to the NPR1/2 and the NPR3/4 clades. Since the above-mentioned five monocots and five dicots have at least one member in each of the three clades (Figure 1) [78], the ancient duplication events resulting in functional divergence of NPR1-like genes likely occurred prior to the monocot-dicot split. After the monocot-dicot split, members of the three clades may have experienced another round of gene duplication events, leading to the current state of each clade with two related genes, such as six NPRs (AtNPR1/AtNPR2, AtNPR3/AtNPR4, and AtBOP1/AtBOP2) in Arabidopsis and six NPRs (AetNPR1/AetNPR2, AetNPR3/AetNPR4, and AetNPR5/AetNPR6) in Ae. tauschii (Figure 1).

3.2. Sequence and Structural Features of TaNPR1-Like Genes and Proteins

The sequence and structural features of TaNPR1-like genes further support the phylogenetic analysis. NPR1 homologs on the same clade of bread wheat and Arabidopsis share similar exon-intron structures (Figure 2A). Moreover, the structural organization of NPR1-like genes in clade I and II consisted of four exons and three introns, which were also conserved in other plant species, such as rice OsNPR1, OsNPR2, and OsNPR3 [51], barley HvNPR1 [55], Theobroma cacao TcNPR1 and TcNPR3 [61], and Persea americana PaNPR1, PaNPR2, and PaNPR4 [80]. This conservation across different species showed that the NPR1-like family was also conserved in the genomic structure.
On the other hand, all of the 17 TaNPR1-like proteins harbor the BTB/POZ and ANK repeat domains (Figure 2B). Only TaNPR1-A/-B/-D and TaNPR2-A/-D in clade I, and TaNPR3-A/-B/-D and TaNPR4-A/-B/-D in clade II, contain an NPR1-like C-terminal region. In particular, the Arg432 residues in AtNPR1, Arg428 in AtNPR3, and Arg419 in AtNPR4 required for binding SA were highly conserved in TaNPR1-A/-B/-D, TaNPR2-A/-D, TaNPR3-A/-B/-D, and TaNPR4-A/-B/-D (Figure 2C). Moreover, the transcriptional repression motif (VDLNETP) in the AtNPR3/4 C-terminal domain was also present in TaNPR3-A/-B/-D and TaNPR4-A/-B/-D. The results demonstrate that TaNPR1-A/-B/-D, TaNPR2-A/-D, TaNPR3-A/-B/-D, and TaNPR4-A/-B/-D may be SA receptors. TaNPR1-A/-B/-D and TaNPR2-A/-D likely act as transcriptional co-activators, and TaNPR3-A/-B/-D and TaNPR4-A/-B/-D likely act as transcriptional co-repressors to participate in SA-induced immunity in bread wheat.

3.3. Evolution and Expansion of NPR1-Like Family among Bread Wheat and Its Relatives

The gene duplication events deriving from tandem duplication, segmental duplication, and genome-wide polyploidization cause gene family expansion in plant genome evolution [81]. Chromosome distribution and collinearity analysis indicated that allopolyploid events were the main reason for the expansion of NPR1-like family in hexaploid wheat (Figure 4). The first polyploidy event of hybridization between T. urartu and A. speltoides resulted in the NPR1-like family being duplicated in T. turgidum. Subsequently, the second polyploidy event, which crossed tetraploid emmer wheat and Ae. tauschii, led to the 17 NPR1-like sequences in bread wheat, including six, five, and six genes from the A, B, and D subgenomes, respectively.
Although the NPR1-like family was conservative among bread wheat and its relatives, intrachromosomal serial replication and gene-loss events also occurred during the evolution process. For example, replication events appeared in emmer wheat TdNPR2-A and T. urartu TuNPR5, resulting in TdNPR2-A-1/TdNPR2-A-2 and TuNPR5-1/TuNPR5-2. Gene-loss events occurred in NPR2 on chromosome 7B of bread wheat and emmer wheat, and on chromosome 7A of T. urartu, and in NPR6 on chromosome 5A of T. urartu. To find the residual sequences of the missing NPR1-like genes, putative homologous chromosomal regions were identified between emmer wheat and T. urartu using MCScanX [82]. In the collinear chromosomal region containing TdNPR2-A, we manually found a gene (TuG1812G0700000282.01) on chromosome 7AL of T. urartu (Figure 4). The protein length (396 amino acids) translated by the gene is smaller than that of TdNPR2-A (570 amino acids). Moreover, this protein also contains ANK repeats and an NPR1-like C-terminal domain similar to TdNPR2-A, but its N-terminal BTB/POZ domain is unintegrated. Furthermore, TaNPR2-A/D have very low levels of expression both in normal tissues/organs and in stress-treated samples (Figure 5 and Figure 6), and the rice NPR1-like family has only one member (OsNPR1) in clade I (Figure 1). It is supposed that these functionally redundant genes may have been subjected to gradual pseudogenization or gene deletion during evolution.

3.4. Functional Divergence of TaNPR1-Like Genes

The tissue/organ-specific expression patterns usually reflect their corresponding biological functions. From in silico assessment of RNA-seq experiments, TaNPR5-A/-B/-D and TaNPR6-A/-B/-D in clade III exhibited specific expression in the shoot apical meristem, internode, glume, and lemma tissues (Figure 5), suggesting they may participate in growth and development.
The expression profiles of TaNPR1-like genes upon biotic stresses were also investigated to examine TaNPR1-like gene functions (Figure 6). Functional receptors on the plant cell membranes recognize PAMPs, which trigger the first line of defense, called PTI. SA binds to its receptors (NPR1, NPR3, and NPR4) to induce the expression of PR genes, which contribute to trigger immune responses [5]. Under mock or PAMP (chitin and flg22) treatments, the up-regulation of TaNPR1-A/-B/-D, TaNPR3-A/-B/-D, and TaNPR4-A/-B/-D in 17 NPR1-like members was significant at 30 min between mock and PAMP treatment groups, and there was no significant difference at 180 min (Figure 6A). Moreover, past studies have shown that overexpression of AtNPR1 or ScNPR1 in the transgenic bread wheat line enhances defense against F. graminearum [65,66,67,68]. Under mock or F. graminearum treatments, only TaNPR1-A/-B/-D was up-regulated at 30 and 50 hai (Figure 6B). Taken together, these putative candidates could be used as the preferred genes to prove their biological functions through molecular experiments in development and defense.

4. Methods

4.1. Sources of Sequence Data

The genome sequences of T. aestivum (Ta), T. dicoccoides (Td), and Ae. tauschii (Aet) were obtained from Ensembl Plants (http://plants.ensembl.org/index.html), and T. urartu (Tu) sequence was acquired from MBKbase (http://www.mbkbase.org). The NPR1-related protein sequences of Oryza sativa (Os), Hordeum vulgare (Hv), Brachypodium distachyon (Bd), Zea mays (Zm), T. dicoccoides (w), Musa acuminate (M), Gladiolus hybridus (Gh), Lilium (LhSor), Arabidopsis thaliana (At), Brassica juncea (Bj), Morus multicaulis (Mu), Nicotiana tabacum (Nt), Gossypium hirsutum (Gh), Glycine max (Gm), Malus domestica (Mp), Vitis vinifera (Vv), Solanum lycopersicum (Le), Theobroma cacao (Tc), Carica papaya (Cp), Ipomoea batatas (Ib), Populus deltoids (Pd), Pyrus pyrifolia (Pp), and Persea Americana (Pa) were downloaded from the GenBank database (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/genbank/). All sequence information is listed in Tables S1 and S3.

4.2. Identification of NPR1-Like Genes

To identify NPR1-like genes in bread wheat and its relatives (T. urartu, T. dicoccoides, and Ae. tauschii), three bioinformatics methods were executed, namely, BLASTP search, HMMER analysis, and validation of conservative domains. Firstly, a local protein database of bread wheat was established using the basic local alignment search tool (BLAST, ftp://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/blast/executables/blast+/LATEST/). All the Arabidopsis and rice NPR1-like protein sequences were used as queries to perform BLASTP searches against the local protein database (E-value < 1 × 10−5). Secondly, the hidden markov model (HMM) profile of six AtNPRs and four OsNPRs was constructed to search the protein database using HMMER3.0 (http://hmmer.org/). After removing the redundant sequences of the above two search results, a total of 120 candidate sequences were retrieved and verified for conserved domains using the NCBI conserved domain database (CDD, https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/cdd), Pfam database(https://pfam.xfam.org/), and InterPro database (http://www.ebi.ac.uk/interpro/). The candidate proteins without N-terminal BTB/POZ domain and ANK repeats in the central region were removed. Finally, a total of 20 putative NPR1-like protein sequences translated from 17 genes were identified from bread wheat genome. Using the same method, the NPR1-like genes of T.urartu, Ae. tauschii, and T.dicoccoides were retrieved from their genomic databases.

4.3. Analysis of NPR1-Like Gene Characteristics

Protein properties of identified NPR1-like genes, including protein length, molecular weights, and isoelectric points, were estimated using ExPASy (https://web.expasy.org/protparam/). Exon-intron structures of NPR1-like genes in bread wheat and Arabidopsis were displayed using the Gene Structure Display Server (GSDS, http://gsds.cbi.pku.edu.cn/) [83]. NCBI-CDD was used to identify the conservative domain compositions of 17 TaNPRs and 6 AtNPRs proteins, and the results were visualized by the TBtools software [84]. Multiple sequence alignments of TaNPRs and known-function NPRs were generated using the Clustal Omega program (https://www.ebi.ac.uk/Tools/msa/clustalo/) and visualized in Jalview Version 2 [85]. The promoter sequences (1000-bp upstream of the ATG translation start codon) of TaNPR1-like genes were extracted from the bread wheat genome sequence. cis-Regulatory elements were predicted in the PlantCARE database (http://bioinformatics.psb.ugent.be/webtools/plantcare/html/) [76]. The promoter sequences are listed in Table S4.

4.4. Phylogenetic Tree Construction, Chromosomal Location, and Homologous Relationships

To investigate the phylogenetic relationship of NPR1-like genes, the full-length protein sequences were aligned using ClustalW. Subsequently, an unrooted phylogenetic tree was constructed by MEGA v7.0 using the neighbor-joining (NJ) algorithm with the following parameters: bootstrap method (1000 replicates), Poisson model, and complete deletion. Chromosomal locations of NPR1-like genes in bread wheat and its relatives were obtained from general feature format (GFF3) files. MapChart software was used to map the distribution of TaNPR1-like genes. Phylogenetic trees for the T. aestivum AB subgenome-T. dicoccoides, T. aestivum D subgenome-Ae. tauschii, and T. dicoccoides A subgenome-T. urartu NPR1-like proteins were constructed in MEGA v7.0. In the phylogenetic trees, two genes from distinct species located in the same branch were defined as orthologs [86]. The orthologous gene pairs among bread wheat and its relatives were identified based on the homologous relationships (Table S2). Subsequently, the Circos tool [87] was used to display the chromosomal locations and homologous relationships of NPR1-like family among bread wheat and its relatives.

4.5. Expression Profiles of TaNPR1-Like Genes in RNA-Seq

To study the expression profiling of TaNPR1-like genes in different tissues/organs and under stress conditions, three sets of publicly available transcriptome data were downloaded from the wheat URGI (https://wheat-urgi.versailles.inra.fr/Seq-Repository/Expression). Raw data of the three datasets was also deposited in the NCBI Short Read Archive (SRA) database under accession numbers PRJEB25639 [77], ERS1978239 [77], and ERP003465 [79].
The PRJEB25639 data were collected from various tissues/organs of spring wheat cultivar Azhurnaya, such as roots, stem axis, first leaf blade, and shoot apical meristem at the seeding stage; and flag leaf blade, internode, glumes, and lemma at the reproductive stage. The ERS1978239 data were generated from leaf samples of three-week-old Chinese Spring (CS) after fresh water/mock or PAMP (chitin and flg22) treatments for 30 min and 180 min. The ERP003465 data were obtained from mature inflorescences of the FHB-resistant spring wheat line CM-82036 after mock or F. graminearum treatments for 30 and 50 h. For all the aforementioned transcriptome datasets, three biological replicates were in each treated sample. The expression levels of TaNPR1-like genes were quantified as transcripts per kilobase million (TPM).

5. Conclusions

In summary, a total of 40 NPR1-like genes were identified from bread wheat and its relatives’ (T. urartu, T. dicoccoides, and Ae. tauschii) genomes. The TaNPR1-like genes were analyzed in depth, comprising molecular characterization, chromosomal distributions, phylogenetic classification, gene structures, protein domain compositions, conserved motifs, and amino acid residues, as well as cis-regulatory elements. A good collinearity of NPR1-like genes was present among bread wheat and its relatives. Based on RNA-seq data, TaNPR1-like genes exhibited distinct tissue/organ specific expression patterns and TaNPR1-A/-B/-D, TaNPR3-A/-B/-D, and TaNPR4-A/-B/-D were induced under biotic stress conditions. These results will be helpful in designing experiments to determine the biological functions and understanding the evolutionary relationship of the NPR1-like gene family in bread wheat and its relatives.

Supplementary Materials

It can be found at: https://www.mdpi.com/1422-0067/20/23/5974/s1. Table S1: Information about the NPR1-like genes in various plants. Table S2: Orthologous gene pairs and chromosomal location of NPR1-like genes in bread wheat and its relatives. Table S3: The data of genome sequences used in this study. Table S4: The promoter sequences of TaNPR1-like genes. Figure S1: Analysis of NPR1-like orthologous and paralogous groups among bread wheat and its relatives. Figure S2: Physical location of TaNPR1-like genes on bread wheat chromosomes.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, Q.X. and L.Y.; formal analysis, X.L.; validation, Z.L. and X.N.; writing―original draft, X.L.; writing―review and editing, X.L., Q.X., and L.Y.

Funding

This study is funded by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (2016YFD0100602) and the Foundation of Shandong Province Modern Agricultural Technology System Innovation Team (SDAIT-25-02 to L.Y.).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Abbreviations

SAsalicylic acid
JAjasmonic acid
PRpathogenesis-related
NPR1NONEXPRESSOR OF PR GENES 1
BOPBLADE-ON-PETIOLE
PTIpathogen-associated molecular pattern-triggered immunity
ETIeffector-triggered immunity
PCDrapid programmed cell death
HRhypersensitive response
SARsystemic acquired resistance
ISRinduced systemic resistance
FHBFusarium head blight

References

  1. Marcussen, T.; Sandve, S.R.; Heier, L.; Spannagl, M.; Pfeifer, M.; Jakobsen, K.S.; Wulff, B.B.H.; Steuernagel, B.; Mayer, K.F.X.; Olsen, O.-A. Ancient hybridizations among the ancestral genomes of bread wheat. Science 2014, 345, 1250092. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Pont, C.; Leroy, T.; Seidel, M.; Tondelli, A.; Duchemin, W.; Armisen, D.; Lang, D.; Bustos-Korts, D.; Goué, N.; Balfourier, F.; et al. Tracing the ancestry of modern bread wheats. Nat. Genet. 2019, 51, 905–911. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Figueroa, M.; Hammond-Kosack, K.E.; Solomon, P.S. A review of wheat diseases—A field perspective. Mol. Plant Pathol. 2018, 19, 1523–1536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Glazebrook, J. Contrasting mechanisms of defense against biotrophic and necrotrophic pathogens. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 2005, 43, 205–227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Zhang, Y.; Li, X. Salicylic acid: Biosynthesis, perception, and contributions to plant immunity. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2019, 50, 29–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Wu, Y.; Zhang, D.; Chu, J.Y.; Boyle, P.; Wang, Y.; Brindle, I.D.; Luca, V.D.; Despres, C. The Arabidopsis NPR1 protein is a receptor for the plant defense hormone salicylic acid. Cell Rep. 2012, 1, 639–647. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Fu, Z.Q.; Yan, S.; Saleh, A.; Wang, W.; Ruble, J.; Oka, N.; Mohan, R.; Spoel, S.H.; Tada, Y.; Zheng, N.; et al. NPR3 and NPR4 are receptors for the immune signal salicylic acid in plants. Nature 2012, 486, 228–232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Manohar, M.; Tian, M.; Moreau, M.; Park, S.-W.; Choi, H.; Fei, Z.; Friso, G.; Asif, M.; Manosalva, P.; Dahl, C.C.V.; et al. Identification of multiple salicylic acid-binding proteins using two high throughput screens. Front Plant Sci. 2015, 5, 777. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Ding, Y.; Sun, T.; Ao, K.; Peng, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Li, X.; Zhang, Y. Opposite roles of salicylic acid receptors NPR1 and NPR3/NPR4 in transcriptional regulation of plant Immunity. Cell 2018, 173, 1454–1467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Jones, J.D.; Dangl, J.L. The plant immune system. Nature 2006, 444, 323–329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Chisholm, S.T.; Coaker, G.; Day, B.; Staskawicz, B.J. Host-microbe interactions: Shaping the evolution of the plant immune response. Cell 2006, 124, 803–814. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Spoel, S.H.; Dong, X. How do plants achieve immunity? Defence without specialized immune cells. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2012, 12, 89–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Bigeard, J.; Colcombet, J.; Hirt, H. Signaling mechanisms in pattern-triggered immunity (PTI). Mol. Plant 2015, 8, 521–539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Couto, D.; Zipfel, C. Regulation of pattern recognition receptor signalling in plants. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2016, 16, 537–552. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Zipfel, C.; Robatzek, S.; Navarro, L.; Oakeley, E.J.; Jones, J.D.G.; Felix, G.; Boller, T. Bacterial disease resistance in Arabidopsis through flagellin perception. Nature 2004, 428, 764–767. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Livajaa, M.; Zeidlerb, D.; Radc, U.V.; Durner, J. Transcriptional responses of Arabidopsis thaliana to the bacteria-derived PAMPs harpin and lipopolysaccharide. Immunobiology 2008, 213, 161–171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Boutrot, F.; Zipfel, C. Function, Discovery, and exploitation of plant pattern recognition receptors for broad-spectrum disease resistance. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 2017, 55, 257–286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Macho, A.P.; Schwessinger, B.; Ntoukakis, V.; Brutus, A.; Segonzac, C.; Roy, S.; Kadota, Y.; Oh, M.H.; Sklenar, J.; Derbyshire, P.; et al. A bacterial tyrosine phosphatase inhibits plant pattern recognition receptor activation. Science 2014, 343, 1509–1512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Chen, H.; Chen, J.; Li, M.; Chang, M.; Xu, K.; Shang, Z.; Zhao, Y.; Palmer, I.; Zhang, Y.; McGill, J.; et al. A bacterial type III effector targets the master regulator of salicylic acid signaling, NPR1, to subvert plant immunity. Cell Host Microbe. 2017, 22, 777–788. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Qi, G.; Chen, J.; Chang, M.; Chen, H.; Hall, K.; Korin, J.; Liu, F.; Wang, D.; Fu3, Z.Q. Pandemonium breaks out: Disruption of salicylic acid-mediated defense by plant pathogens. Mol. Plant 2018, 11, 1427–1439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Wu, L.; Chen, H.; Curtis, C.; Fu, Z. How plants deploy effector-triggered immunity to combat pathogens. Virulence 2014, 5, 710–721. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Cui, H.; Tsuda, K.; Parker, J.E. Effector-triggered immunity: From pathogen perception to robust defense. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 2015, 66, 487–511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Ryals, J.A.; Neuenschwander, U.H.; Willits, M.G.; Molina, A.; Steiner, H.-Y.; Hunt, M.D. Systemic acquired resistance. Plant Cell 1996, 8, 1809–1819. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Durrant, W.E.; Dong, X. Systemic acquired resistance. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 2004, 42, 185–209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Fu, Z.Q.; Dong, X. Systemic acquired resistance: Turning local infection into global defense. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 2013, 64, 839–863. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Cao, H.; Scott, A.; Bowling, A.; Susan Gordon, A.; Dong, X. Characterization of an Arabidopsis mutant that is nonresponsive to inducers of systemic acquired resistance. Plant Cell 1994, 6, 1583–1592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Delaney, T.P.; Friedrich, L.; Ryals, J.A. Arabidopsis signal transduction mutant defective in chemically and biologically induced disease resistance. Proc. Natl. Acad Sci. 1995, 92, 6602–6606. [Google Scholar]
  28. Shah, J.; Tsui, F.; Klessig, D.F. Characterization of a salicylic acid–insensitive mutant (sai1) of Arabidopsis thaliana, identified in a selective screen utilizing the SA-inducible expression of the tms2 gene. Mol. Plant-Microbe Interact. 1997, 10, 69–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Pieterse, C.M.J.; Wees, S.C.M.V.; Pelt, J.A.V.; Knoester, M.; Laan, R.; Gerrits, H.; Weisbeek, P.J.; Loon, L.C.V. A Novel signaling pathway controlling induced systemic resistance in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 1998, 10, 1571–1580. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Spoel, S.H.; Koornneef, A.; Claessens, S.M.C.; Korzelius, J.P.; Pelt, J.A.V.; Mueller, M.J.; Buchala, A.J.; Métraux, J.-P.; Brown, R.; Kazan, K.; et al. NPR1 modulates cross-talk between salicylate- and jasmonate-dependent defense pathways through a novel function in the cytosol. Plant Cell 2003, 15, 760–770. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Spoel, S.H.; Dong, X. Making sense of hormone crosstalk during plant immune responses. Cell Host Microbe 2008, 3, 348–351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Olate, E.; Jiménez-Gómez, J.M.; Holuigue, L.; Salinas, J. NPR1 mediates a novel regulatory pathway in cold acclimation by interacting with HSFA1 factors. Nat. Plants 2018, 4, 811–823. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Cao, H.; Glazebrook, J.; Clarke, J.D.; Volko, S.; Dong, X. The Arabidopsis NPR1 gene that controls systemic acquired resistance encodes a novel protein containing ankyrin repeats. Cell 1997, 88, 57–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  34. Aravind, L.; Koonin, E.V. Fold prediction and evolutionary analysis of the POZ domain: Structural and evolutionary relationship with the potassium channel tetramerization domain. J. Mol. Biol. 1999, 285, 1353–1361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Rochon, A.; Boyle, P.; Wignes, T.; Fobert, P.R.; Despres, C. The coactivator function of Arabidopsis NPR1 requires the core of its BTB/POZ domain and the oxidation of C-terminal cysteines. Plant Cell 2006, 18, 3670–3685. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  36. Boyle, P.; Su, E.L.; Rochon, A.; Shearer, H.L.; Murmu, J.; Chu, J.Y.; Fobert, P.R.; Despres, C. The BTB/POZ domain of the Arabidopsis disease resistance protein NPR1 interacts with the repression domain of TGA2 to negate its function. Plant Cell 2009, 21, 3700–3713. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Initiative, T.A.G. Analysis of the genome sequence of the fowering plant Arabidopsis thaliana. Nature 2000, 408, 796–815. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Liu, G.; Holub, E.B.; Alonso, J.M.; Ecker, J.R.; Fobert, P.R. An Arabidopsis NPR1-like gene, NPR4, is required for disease resistance. Plant J. 2005, 41, 304–318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Norberg, M.; Holmlund, M.; Nilsson, O. The BLADE ON PETIOLE genes act redundantly to control the growth and development of lateral organs. Development 2005, 132, 2203–2213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Hepworth, S.R.; Zhang, Y.; McKim, S.; Li, X.; Haughn, G.W. BLADE-ON-PETIOLE-dependent signaling controls leaf and floral patterning in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 2005, 17, 1434–1448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Castello, M.J.; Medina-Puche, L.; Lamilla, J.; Tornero, P. NPR1 paralogs of Arabidopsis and their role in salicylic acid perception. PLoS ONE 2018, 13, e0209835. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  42. Zhang, Y.; Cheng, Y.T.; Qu, N.; Zhao, Q.; Bi, D.; Li, X. Negative regulation of defense responses in Arabidopsis by two NPR1 paralogs. Plant J. 2006, 48, 647–656. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Mou, Z.; Fan, W.; Dong, X. Inducers of plant systemic acquired resistance regulate NPR1 function through redox changes. Cell 2003, 113, 935–944. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  44. Tada, Y.; Spoel, S.H.; Pajerowska-Mukhtar, K.; Mou, Z.; Song, J.; Wang, C.; Zuo, J.; Dong, X. Plant immunity requires conformational changes of NPR1 via S-nitrosylation and thioredoxins. Science 2008, 321, 952–956. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  45. Kinkema, M.; Fan, W.; Dong, X. Nuclear localization of NPR1 is required for activation of PR gene expression. Plant Cell 2000, 12, 2339–2350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  46. Yu, D.; Chen, C.; Chen, Z. Evidence for an important role of WRKY DNA binding proteins in the regulation of NPR1 gene expression. Plant Cell 2001, 13, 1527–1539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  47. Chen, J.; Mohan, R.; Zhang, Y.; Li, M.; Chen, H.; Palmer, I.A.; Chang, M.; Qi, G.; Spoel, S.H.; Mengiste, T.; et al. NPR1 promotes its own and target gene expression in plant defense by recruiting CDK8. Plant Physiol. 2019, 181, 289–304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. An, C.; Mou, Z. Salicylic acid and its function in plant immunity. J. Integr. Plant Biol. 2011, 53, 412–428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Tripathi, D.; Raikhy, G.; Kumar, D. Chemical elicitors of systemic acquired resistance—Salicylic acid and its functional analogs. Curr. Plant Biol. 2019, 17, 48–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Chern, M.; Fitzgerald, H.A.; Canlas, P.E.; Navarre, D.A.; Ronald, P.C. Overexpression of a rice NPR1 homolog leads to constitutive activation of defense response and hypersensitivity to light. Mol. Plant-Microbe Interact. 2005, 18, 511–520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Yuan, Y.; Zhong, S.; Li, Q.; Zhu, Z.; Lou, Y.; Wang, L.; Wang, J.; Wang, M.; Li, Q.; Yang, D.; et al. Functional analysis of rice NPR1-like genes reveals that OsNPR1/NH1 is the rice orthologue conferring disease resistance with enhanced herbivore susceptibility. Plant Biotechnol. J. 2007, 5, 313–324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Feng, J.-X.; Cao, L.; Li, J.; Duan, C.-J.; Luo, X.-M.; Le, N.; Wei, H.; Liang, S.; Chu, C.; Pan, Q.; et al. Involvement of OsNPR1/NH1 in rice basal resistance to blast fungus Magnaporthe oryzae. Eur. J. Plant Pathol. 2011, 131, 221–235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Ali, S.; Mir, Z.A.; Tyagi, A.; Mehari, H.; Meena, R.P.; Bhat, J.A.; Yadav, P.; Papalou, P.; Rawat, S.; Grover, A. Overexpression of NPR1 in Brassica juncea confers broad spectrum resistance to fungal pathogens. Front. Plant Sci. 2017, 8, 1693. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  54. Xu, Y.; Wang, H.; Qin, R.; Fang, L.; Liu, Z.; Yuan, S.; Gai, Y.; Ji, X. Characterization of NPR1 and NPR4 genes from mulberry (Morus multicaulis) and their roles in development and stress resistance. Physiol. Plant. 2018, 167, 302–316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Dey, S.; Wenig, M.; Langen, G.; Sharma, S.; Kugler, K.G.; Knappe, C.; Hause, B.; Bichlmeier, M.; Babaeizad, V.; Imani, J.; et al. Bacteria-triggered systemic immunity in barley is associated with WRKY and ETHYLENE RESPONSIVE FACTORs but not with salicylic acid. Plant Physiol. 2014, 166, 2133–2151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  56. Wang, X.; Yang, B.; Li, K.; Kang, Z.; Cantu, D.; Dubcovsky, J. A conserved Puccinia striiformis protein interacts with wheat NPR1 and reduces induction of pathogenesis-related genes in response to pathogens. Mol. Plant-Microbe Interact. 2016, 29, 977–989. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  57. Liu, Y.; Schiff, M.; Marathe, R.; Dinesh-Kumar, S.P. Tobacco Rar1, EDS1 and NPR1/NIM1 like genes are required for N-mediated resistance to tobacco mosaic virus. Plant J. 2002, 30, 415–429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Chen, Y.; Lin, Y.; Chao, T.; Wang, J.; Liu, A.; Ho, F.; Cheng, C. Virus-induced gene silencing reveals the involvement of ethylene-, salicylic acid- and mitogen-activated protein kinase-related defense pathways in the resistance of tomato to bacterial wilt. Physiol. Plant. 2009, 136, 324–335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Bai, W.; Chern, M.; Ruan, D.; Canlas, P.E.; Sze-to, W.H.; Ronald, P.C. Enhanced disease resistance and hypersensitivity to BTH by introduction of an NH1/OsNPR1 paralog. Plant Biotechnol. J. 2011, 9, 205–215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  60. Shi, Z.; Zhang, Y.; Maximova, S.N.; Guiltinan, M.J. TcNPR3 from Theobroma cacao functions as a repressor of the pathogen defense response. BMC Plant Biol. 2013, 13, 204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  61. Fister, A.S.; Landherr, L.; Maximova, S.N.; Guiltinan, M.J. Transient expression of CRISPR/Cas9 machinery targeting TcNPR3 enhances defense response in Theobroma cacao. Front. Plant Sci. 2018, 9, 268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  62. Shu, L.; Liao, J.; Lin, N.; Chung, C. Identification of a strawberry NPR-like gene involved in negative regulation of the salicylic acid-mediated defense pathway. PLoS ONE 2018, 13, e0205790. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Cantu, D.; Yang, B.; Ruan, R.; Li, K.; Menzo, V.; Fu, D.; Chern, M.; Ronald, P.C.; Dubcovsky, J. Comparative analysis of protein-protein interactions in the defense response of rice and wheat. BMC Genom. 2013, 14, 166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  64. Gao, J.; Bi, W.; Li, H.; Wu, J.; Yu, X.; Liu, D.; Wang, X. WRKY transcription factors associated with NPR1-mediated acquired resistance in barley are potential resources to improve wheat resistance to Puccinia triticina. Front. Plant Sci. 2018, 9, 1486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Makandar, R.; Essig, J.S.; Schapaugh, M.A.; Trick, H.N.; Shah, J. Genetically engineered resistance to Fusarium head blight in wheat by expression of Arabidopsis NPR1. Mol. Plant-Microbe Interact. 2006, 19, 123–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  66. Makandar, R.; Nalam, V.; Lee, H.; N Trick, H.; Dong, Y.; Shah, J. Salicylic acid regulates basal resistance to Fusarium head blight in wheat. Mol. Plant-Microbe Interact. 2011, 25, 431–439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  67. Gao, C.S.; Kou, X.J.; Li, H.P.; Zhang, J.B.; Saad, A.S.I.; Liao, Y.C. Inverse effects of Arabidopsis NPR1 gene on fusarium seedling blight and fusarium head blight in transgenic wheat. Plant Pathol. 2013, 62, 383–392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Yu, G.; Zhang, X.; Yao, J.; Zhou, M.; Ma, H. Resistance against Fusarium head blight in transgenic wheat plants expressing the ScNPR1 gene. J. Phytopathol. 2017, 165, 223–231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. IWGSC. Shifting the limits in wheat research and breeding using a fully annotated reference genome. Science 2018, 361, eaar7191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  70. Ling, H.Q.; Ma, B.; Shi, X.; Liu, H.; Dong, L.; Sun, H.; Cao, Y.; Gao, Q.; Zheng, S.; Li, Y.; et al. Genome sequence of the progenitor of wheat A subgenome Triticum urartu. Nature 2018, 557, 424–428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  71. Avni, R.; Nave, M.; Barad, O.; Baruch, K.; Twardziok, S.O.; Gundlach, H.; Hale, I.; Mascher, M.; Spannagl, M.; Wiebe, K.; et al. Wild emmer genome architecture and diversity elucidate wheat evolution and domestication. Science 2017, 357, 1509–1512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  72. Luo, M.C.; Gu, Y.Q.; Puiu, D.; Wang, H.; Twardziok, S.O.; Deal, K.R.; Huo, N.; Zhu, T.; Wang, L.; Wang, Y.; et al. Genome sequence of the progenitor of the wheat D genome Aegilops tauschii. Nature 2017, 551, 498–502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Maier, F.; Zwicker, S.; Huckelhoven, A.; Meissner, M.; Funk, J.; Pfitzner, A.J.; Pfitzner, U.M. NONEXPRESSOR OF PATHOGENESIS-RELATED PROTEINS1 (NPR1) and some NPR1-related proteins are sensitive to salicylic acid. Mol. Plant Pathol. 2011, 12, 73–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Ryals, J.; Weymann, K.; Lavvton, K.; Friedrich, L.; Ellis, D.; Steiner, H.-Y.; Johnson, J.; Delaney, T.P.; Jesse, T.; VOS, P.; et al. The Arabidopsis NIM1 protein shows homology to the mammalian transcription factor inhibitor I kappa B. Plant Cell 1997, 9, 425–439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  75. Priest, H.D.; Filichkin, S.A.; Mockler, T.C. cis-Regulatory elements in plant cell signaling. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2009, 12, 643–649. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Lescot, M.; Déhais, P.; Thijs, G.; Marchal, K.; Moreau, Y.; Peer, Y.V.D.; Rouzé, P.; Rombauts, S. PlantCARE, a database of plant cis-acting regulatory elements and a portal to tools for in silico analysis of promoter sequences. Nucleic Acids Res. 2002, 30, 325–327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Ramirez-Gonzalez, R.H.; Borrill, P.; Lang, D.; Harrington, S.A.; Brinton, J.; Venturini, L.; Davey, M.; Jacobs, J.; van Ex, F.; Pasha, A.; et al. The transcriptional landscape of polyploid wheat. Science 2018, 361, eaar6089. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  78. Shia, Z.; Maximovab, S.; Liua, Y.; Vericab, J.; Guiltinan, M.J. The salicylic acid receptor NPR3 is a negative regulator of the transcriptional defense response during early flower development in Arabidopsis. Mol. Plant 2013, 6, 802–816. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Kugler, K.G.; Siegwart, G.; Nussbaumer, T.; Ametz, C.; Spannagl, M.; Steiner, B.; Lemmens, M.; Mayer, K.F.; Buerstmayr, H.; Schweiger, W. Quantitative trait loci-dependent analysis of a gene co-expression network associated with Fusarium head blight resistance in bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). BMC Genom. 2013, 14, 728. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  80. Backer, R.; Mahomed, W.; Reeksting, B.J.; Engelbrecht, J.; Ibarra-Laclette, E.; van den Berg, N. Phylogenetic and expression analysis of the NPR1-like gene family from Persea americana (Mill.). Front. Plant Sci. 2015, 6, 300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  81. Lawton-Rauh, A. Evolutionary dynamics of duplicated genes in plants. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 2003, 29, 396–409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Wang, Y.; Tang, H.; DeBarry, J.D.; Tan, X.; Li, J.; Wang, X.; Lee, T.-H.; Jin, H.; Marler, B.; Guo, H.; et al. MCScanX: A toolkit for detection and evolutionary analysis of gene synteny and collinearity. Nucleic Acids Res. 2012, 40, e49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  83. Hu, B.; Jin, J.; Guo, A.; Zhang, H.; Luo, J.; Gao, G. GSDS 2.0: An upgraded gene feature visualization server. Bioinformatics 2015, 31, 1296–1297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  84. Chen, C.; Chen, H.; He, Y.; Xia, R. TBtools, a Toolkit for Biologists integrating various biological data handling tools with a user-friendly interface. bioRxiv 2018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Waterhouse, A.M.; Procter, J.B.; Martin, D.M.A.; Clamp, M.; Barton, G.J. Jalview Version 2—A multiple sequence alignment editor and analysis workbench. Bioinformatics 2009, 25, 1189–1191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  86. Koonin, E.V. Orthologs, paralogs, and evolutionary genomics. Annu. Rev. Genet. 2005, 39, 309–338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  87. Krzywinski, M.; Schein, J.; Birol, I.; Connors, J.; Gascoyne, R.; Horsman, D.; Jones, S.J.; Marra, M.A. Circos: An information aesthetic for comparative genomics. Genome Res. 2009, 19, 1639–1645. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Ijms 20 05974 g001 550
Figure 1. Phylogenetic analysis of NPR1 homolog proteins from different plant species. The tree was generated with MEGA v7.0 using the neighbor-joining (NJ) algorithm. NPR1-related proteins from eight monocot species Oryza sativa (Os), Hordeum vulgare (Hv), Brachypodium distachyon (Bd), Zea mays (Zm), T. dicoccoides (w), Musa acuminate (M), Gladiolus hybridus (Gh), Lilium (LhSor), and 15 dicot species Arabidopsis thaliana (At), Brassica juncea (Bj), Morus multicaulis (Mu), Nicotiana tabacum (Nt), Gossypium hirsutum (Gh), Glycine max (Gm), Malus domestica (Mp), Vitis vinifera (Vv), Solanum lycopersicum (Le), Theobroma cacao (Tc), Carica papaya (Cp), Ipomoea batatas (Ib), Populus deltoids (Pd), Pyrus pyrifolia (Pp), Persea Americana (Pa). All the GenBank accession numbers are listed in Table S1. a Gladiolus hybridus, b Gossypium hirsutum, T. aestivum (Ta), T. urartu (Tu), T. dicoccoides (Td), Ae. tauschii (Aet). Three major clades are distinguished with three colors, and NPRs from T. aestivum and Arabidopsis are labeled with red and green markers.
Figure 1. Phylogenetic analysis of NPR1 homolog proteins from different plant species. The tree was generated with MEGA v7.0 using the neighbor-joining (NJ) algorithm. NPR1-related proteins from eight monocot species Oryza sativa (Os), Hordeum vulgare (Hv), Brachypodium distachyon (Bd), Zea mays (Zm), T. dicoccoides (w), Musa acuminate (M), Gladiolus hybridus (Gh), Lilium (LhSor), and 15 dicot species Arabidopsis thaliana (At), Brassica juncea (Bj), Morus multicaulis (Mu), Nicotiana tabacum (Nt), Gossypium hirsutum (Gh), Glycine max (Gm), Malus domestica (Mp), Vitis vinifera (Vv), Solanum lycopersicum (Le), Theobroma cacao (Tc), Carica papaya (Cp), Ipomoea batatas (Ib), Populus deltoids (Pd), Pyrus pyrifolia (Pp), Persea Americana (Pa). All the GenBank accession numbers are listed in Table S1. a Gladiolus hybridus, b Gossypium hirsutum, T. aestivum (Ta), T. urartu (Tu), T. dicoccoides (Td), Ae. tauschii (Aet). Three major clades are distinguished with three colors, and NPRs from T. aestivum and Arabidopsis are labeled with red and green markers.
Ijms 20 05974 g001
Ijms 20 05974 g002 550
Figure 2. Gene structure and protein sequence comparison of TaNPR1-like genes with other known NPR1-like sequences. Exon-intron structures (A) of NPR1-like genes in Arabidopsis and T. aestivum. Exons, UTRs, and introns are denoted by yellow boxes, blue boxes, and grey lines, respectively. Conserved domain organization and distribution (B) of the BTB/POZ, ANK, and NPR1-like C-terminal region in Arabidopsis and T. aestivum NPR1-like proteins. Multiple alignment of amino acid sequences (C) of T. aestivum NPR1-like proteins (TaNPR1 to TaNPR6) and other NPR1-related proteins with experimentally confirmed functions (AtNPR1 to AtNPR6, OsNPR1, and wNPR1). The position of point mutation sites (npr1-1, npr1-2, nim1-2, and nim1-4 in AtNPR1), and three of the conserved cysteines residues (C82, C216, and C156 in AtNPR1) are marked with arrows. The conserved domains, BTB/POZ and ANK, and important motifs, putative hinge region (LENRV), EAR-like repression motif (VDLNETP), NIMIN-binding region, and nuclear localization signal (NLS), are highlighted with solid lines.
Figure 2. Gene structure and protein sequence comparison of TaNPR1-like genes with other known NPR1-like sequences. Exon-intron structures (A) of NPR1-like genes in Arabidopsis and T. aestivum. Exons, UTRs, and introns are denoted by yellow boxes, blue boxes, and grey lines, respectively. Conserved domain organization and distribution (B) of the BTB/POZ, ANK, and NPR1-like C-terminal region in Arabidopsis and T. aestivum NPR1-like proteins. Multiple alignment of amino acid sequences (C) of T. aestivum NPR1-like proteins (TaNPR1 to TaNPR6) and other NPR1-related proteins with experimentally confirmed functions (AtNPR1 to AtNPR6, OsNPR1, and wNPR1). The position of point mutation sites (npr1-1, npr1-2, nim1-2, and nim1-4 in AtNPR1), and three of the conserved cysteines residues (C82, C216, and C156 in AtNPR1) are marked with arrows. The conserved domains, BTB/POZ and ANK, and important motifs, putative hinge region (LENRV), EAR-like repression motif (VDLNETP), NIMIN-binding region, and nuclear localization signal (NLS), are highlighted with solid lines.
Ijms 20 05974 g002
Ijms 20 05974 g003 550
Figure 3. Analysis of potential cis-acting elements in the promoter regions of TaNPR1-like genes. The promoter regions (1000-bp upstream of the ATG translation start codon) of TaNPR1-like genes were used to analyze four specific SA-responsive cis-acting regulatory elements, including CAAT-box (yellow blocks), TATA-box (blue blocks), W-box (red blocks), and as-1 element (green blocks).
Figure 3. Analysis of potential cis-acting elements in the promoter regions of TaNPR1-like genes. The promoter regions (1000-bp upstream of the ATG translation start codon) of TaNPR1-like genes were used to analyze four specific SA-responsive cis-acting regulatory elements, including CAAT-box (yellow blocks), TATA-box (blue blocks), W-box (red blocks), and as-1 element (green blocks).
Ijms 20 05974 g003
Ijms 20 05974 g004 550
Figure 4. Chromosomal distribution and collinearity analysis of NPR1-like genes among bread wheat and relatives. Seven homologous groups of bread wheat chromosomes are represented by different colors. The genomes of Ae. tauschii, T. dicoccoides, and T. urartu surround the central T. aestivum. The NPR1-like genes are labeled according to their positions on the chromosomes. Homeoalleles of each TaNPR1-like gene are linked by lines with the corresponding color, except TaNPR2, which is connected by black lines since it is not located on the same subgenome. The collinearity of orthologous gene pairs among bread wheat and its relatives are displayed in the gray lines. A dotted line represents a possibly missing orthologous gene pair. Tandem duplication is indicated by asterisks.
Figure 4. Chromosomal distribution and collinearity analysis of NPR1-like genes among bread wheat and relatives. Seven homologous groups of bread wheat chromosomes are represented by different colors. The genomes of Ae. tauschii, T. dicoccoides, and T. urartu surround the central T. aestivum. The NPR1-like genes are labeled according to their positions on the chromosomes. Homeoalleles of each TaNPR1-like gene are linked by lines with the corresponding color, except TaNPR2, which is connected by black lines since it is not located on the same subgenome. The collinearity of orthologous gene pairs among bread wheat and its relatives are displayed in the gray lines. A dotted line represents a possibly missing orthologous gene pair. Tandem duplication is indicated by asterisks.
Ijms 20 05974 g004
Ijms 20 05974 g005 550
Figure 5. Expression profiles of TaNPR1-like genes across various tissues/organs by RNA-seq. The bread wheat tissues/organs at the seeding stage (roots, stem axis, first leaf blade, and shoot apical meristem) and reproductive stage (flag leaf blade, internode, glumes, and lemma) are marked on the horizontal axis. The unit of the y-axis is transcripts per kilobase million (TPM), and each TPM value of TaNPR1-like genes is the average of three biological replicates; error bars represent the SD.
Figure 5. Expression profiles of TaNPR1-like genes across various tissues/organs by RNA-seq. The bread wheat tissues/organs at the seeding stage (roots, stem axis, first leaf blade, and shoot apical meristem) and reproductive stage (flag leaf blade, internode, glumes, and lemma) are marked on the horizontal axis. The unit of the y-axis is transcripts per kilobase million (TPM), and each TPM value of TaNPR1-like genes is the average of three biological replicates; error bars represent the SD.
Ijms 20 05974 g005
Ijms 20 05974 g006 550
Figure 6. Expression pattern for TaNPR1-like genes under stress conditions by RNA-seq. Three-week-old leaf sections of Chinese Spring wheat plants treated with fresh water/mock or PAMPs (chitin and flg22) after 30 and 180 min (A). Mature inflorescences of the FHB-resistant CM-82036 treated with mock or Fusarium graminearum at 30 and 50 h after inoculation (hai) (B). The unit of the y-axis is transcripts per kilobase million (TPM), and each TPM value of TaNPR1-like genes is the average of three biological replicates; error bars represent the SD.
Figure 6. Expression pattern for TaNPR1-like genes under stress conditions by RNA-seq. Three-week-old leaf sections of Chinese Spring wheat plants treated with fresh water/mock or PAMPs (chitin and flg22) after 30 and 180 min (A). Mature inflorescences of the FHB-resistant CM-82036 treated with mock or Fusarium graminearum at 30 and 50 h after inoculation (hai) (B). The unit of the y-axis is transcripts per kilobase million (TPM), and each TPM value of TaNPR1-like genes is the average of three biological replicates; error bars represent the SD.
Ijms 20 05974 g006
Table
Table 1. Information about the NPR1-like genes in bread wheat and its relatives. Notes: AA, amino acid sequence length; MW, molecular weight; pI, isoelectric point; Splicing, alternative splicing number; a bar (-) represents only a single transcript (no splice variants); TdNPR1-A could also be named wNPR1 (98.9% identity), discovered by Cantu et al. [63].
Table 1. Information about the NPR1-like genes in bread wheat and its relatives. Notes: AA, amino acid sequence length; MW, molecular weight; pI, isoelectric point; Splicing, alternative splicing number; a bar (-) represents only a single transcript (no splice variants); TdNPR1-A could also be named wNPR1 (98.9% identity), discovered by Cantu et al. [63].
SpeciesCladeGene NameSequence ID Chromosome LocationAAMw (kDa)pISplicing
T.aestivumITaNPR1-ATraesCS3A02G105400.13A:69290641-69294697(+)57763.57 5.37-
TaNPR1-BTraesCS3B02G123800.13B:96812311-96816428(+)57763.83 5.492
TaNPR1-DTraesCS3D02G107500.13D:61072307-61076336(+)58063.78 5.27-
TaNPR2-ATraesCS4A02G470500.14A:731397493-731400686(–)48954.91 5.18-
TaNPR2-DTraesCS7D02G019000.17D:8353564-8356531(+)48754.49 5.88-
IITaNPR3-ATraesCS3A02G298800.23A:532934212-532938152(–)61867.45 5.62
TaNPR3-BTraesCS3B02G337700.13B:544108681-544112656(+)60966.45 5.592
TaNPR3-DTraesCS3D02G302900.13D:417737897-417741772(+)60766.31 5.45-
TaNPR4-ATraesCS4A02G294400.14A:595817163-595821455(+)60166.61 5.82-
TaNPR4-BTraesCS4B02G018900.24B:13944552-13947600(+)60166.90 5.82
TaNPR4-DTraesCS4D02G017500.14D:7769189-7773368(–)59666.39 5.86-
IIITaNPR5-ATraesCS3A02G489000.13A:716756231-716759651(+)51454.19 6.12-
TaNPR5-BTraesCS3B02G537400.13B:777578202-777581471(+)51454.20 6.06-
TaNPR5-DTraesCS3D02G484100.13D:581113138-581116563(–)51153.78 6.03-
TaNPR6-ATraesCS5A02G134700.25A:304537866-304540822(–)49351.65 6.112
TaNPR6-BTraesCS5B02G133700.15B:250233025-250236102(–)49351.62 6.112
TaNPR6-DTraesCS5D02G139600.15D:222737713-222740742(+)49351.72 6.112
T.urartuITuNPR1TuG1812G0300001179.01.T013A:64494723-64498668(+)57763.49 5.37-
IITuNPR3TuG1812G0300003503.01.T013A:544372634-544376515(+)60966.35 5.522
TuNPR4TuG1812G0400000243.01.T014A:12320155-12324208(–)60066.54 5.822
IIITuNPR5-1TuG1812G0300005248.01.T013A:705429640-705432414(+)51454.19 6.06-
TuNPR5-2TuG1812G0300005239.01.T013A:704992825-704995600(+)53158.25 9.482
T.dicoccoidesITdNPR1-ATRIDC3AG012960.13A:64964238-64967906(+)58063.81 5.37-
TdNPR1-BTRIDC3BG017420.13B:105475063-105478776(+)58063.94 5.438
TdNPR2-A-1TRIDC7AG001960.17A:5808627-5811849(+)57063.86 5.885
TdNPR2-A-2TRIDC7AG002040.27A:6071183-6076497(–)54961.66 5.575
IITdNPR3-ATRIDC3AG044830.23A:548025257-548029459(+)60966.37 5.455
TdNPR3-BTRIDC3BG050750.23B:556623106-556626770(+)60966.45 5.595
TdNPR4-ATRIDC4AG045270.34A:588643107-588646338(+)60166.61 5.823
TdNPR4-BTRIDC4BG003310.14B:13063896-13067432(+)53159.12 5.455
IIITdNPR5-ATRIDC3AG068800.53A:714043376-714046300(+)51654.33 6.139
TdNPR5-BTRIDC3BG078000.63B:789380796-789383751(+)51654.33 6.049
T.dicoccoidesIIITdNPR6-ATRIDC5AG022110.45A:290229998-290232860(+)49351.68 6.115
TdNPR6-BTRIDC5BG023740.45B:257840960-257843317(–)49351.62 6.115
Ae. tauschiiIAetNPR1AET3Gv20232400.23D:64296876-64300961(+)60866.59 5.415
AetNPR2AET7Gv20038900.27D:7720290-7726555(+)45450.19 5.463
IIAetNPR3AET3Gv20713100.13D:425287443-425291551(+)60766.31 5.453
AetNPR4AET4Gv20029500.24D:6713853-6718113(–)59666.37 5.867
IIIAetNPR5AET3Gv21117800.13D:592078399-592081502(–)51454.17 6.0613
AetNPR6AET5Gv20354800.25D:229230789-229233557(+)51554.18 6.638

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Liu, X.; Liu, Z.; Niu, X.; Xu, Q.; Yang, L. Genome-Wide Identification and Analysis of the NPR1-Like Gene Family in Bread Wheat and Its Relatives. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 5974. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms20235974

AMA Style

Liu X, Liu Z, Niu X, Xu Q, Yang L. Genome-Wide Identification and Analysis of the NPR1-Like Gene Family in Bread Wheat and Its Relatives. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2019; 20(23):5974. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms20235974

Chicago/Turabian Style

Liu, Xian, Zhiguo Liu, Xinhui Niu, Qian Xu, and Long Yang. 2019. "Genome-Wide Identification and Analysis of the NPR1-Like Gene Family in Bread Wheat and Its Relatives" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 20, no. 23: 5974. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms20235974

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop