Next Article in Journal
Rewarming Injury after Cold Preservation
Next Article in Special Issue
Roles of Natural Killer T Cells and Natural Killer Cells in Kidney Injury
Previous Article in Journal
Straightforward Protein-Protein Interaction Interface Mapping via Random Mutagenesis and Mammalian Protein Protein Interaction Trap (MAPPIT)
Previous Article in Special Issue
Cytotoxicity of Human Hepatic Intrasinusoidal CD56bright Natural Killer Cells against Hepatocellular Carcinoma Cells
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
IJMS
Volume 20
Issue 9
10.3390/ijms20092057
ijms-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Natural Killer Immunotherapy for Minimal Residual Disease Eradication Following Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation in Acute Myeloid Leukemia

by
Norimichi Hattori
* and
Tsuyoshi Nakamaki
Division of Hematology, Department of Medicine, Showa University School of Medicine, Tokyo 142-8555, Japan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20(9), 2057; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms20092057
Submission received: 5 April 2019 / Revised: 21 April 2019 / Accepted: 23 April 2019 / Published: 26 April 2019
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Natural Killer and NKT Cells)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
The most common cause of death in patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) who receive allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) is AML relapse. Therefore, additive therapies post allo-HSCT have significant potential to prevent relapse. Natural killer (NK)-cell-based immunotherapies can be incorporated into the therapeutic armamentarium for the eradication of AML cells post allo-HSCT. In recent studies, NK cell-based immunotherapies, the use of adoptive NK cells, NK cells in combination with cytokines, immune checkpoint inhibitors, bispecific and trispecific killer cell engagers, and chimeric antigen receptor-engineered NK cells have all shown antitumor activity in AML patients. In this review, we will discuss the current strategies with these NK cell-based immunotherapies as possible therapies to cure AML patients post allo-HSCT. Additionally, we will discuss various means of immune escape in order to further understand the mechanism of NK cell-based immunotherapies against AML.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) has been recognized as the only curative therapy for patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Allo-HSCT’s mode of action is primarily attributed to the graft-versus-leukemia (GVL) effect mediated by donor T-cells and natural killer (NK) cells. However, approximately 40% of the AML patients who undergo allo-HSCT will relapse, and the two-year post relapse survival among these patients is less than 20% [1,2,3,4,5,6]. With the use of targeted sequencing or flow cytometry, the persistent detection of minimal residual disease (MRD) is associated with post-transplantation relapse [7,8,9]. It is therefore important to provide additional therapies to eliminate MRD after allo-HSCT, particularly in high-risk AML. Donor lymphocyte infusion (DLI) or repeat allo-HSCT as a donor cell-based therapy has been associated with improved survival in patients who relapse after allo-HSCT [1,2,3,5,10]. Although the efficacy of therapeutic DLI in relapsed AML may be suboptimal, pre-emptive, or prophylactic, DLI may have an important role [5,11,12,13]. Use of the hypomethylating agent azacitidine appears to be effective in AML following allo-HSCT [14,15]. Additionally, pre-emptive treatment with azacitidine may prevent a relapse while monitoring for MRD (NCT01462578) [16].
Previously, it had been presumed that most additional therapies would not be able to suppress the proliferation of leukemia cells in the long term in relapsed AML after allo-HSCT. However, the early use of these therapies might prevent relapse in AML, and could be an important step toward improving prognosis. Recently, immunotherapies, including NK cells administration and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), have been reported as new treatment modalities after allo-HSCT in hematologic malignancies [17,18,19,20,21,22,23]. Previous studies had demonstrated that ICIs had antitumor immune responses for several solid tumors and hematologic malignancies [24,25,26]. However, their responses remained limited because of the lack of MHC classes I and II, which leads to less T-cell activation and proliferation, and is observed in ICI-resistant tumors [27,28,29]. In contrast, while NK cells express limited MHC (e.g., human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-Bw4, C1, and C2)-dependent receptors, they express non-MHC-dependent receptors including NKG2D, natural cytotoxicity receptors, CD96, T-cell immunoreceptor with Ig, and immunoreceptor tyrosine-based inhibition motif domains (TIGIT), DNAM-1, SLAMF6 (also known as NTB-A), NKRP1-B, and 2B4 [21,30,31]. Additionally, consistent with donor T-cell mediated GVL, donor T-cells’ contribution to graft versus host disease (GVHD) is dependent upon recognition of HLA disparities following allo-HSCT. While administration of some ICIs post allo-HSCT may lead to severe GVHD [17,24], donor NK cells confer alloreactivity against tumors without GVHD [32,33]. Recently, we have noted that high NK cell levels in the bone marrow microenvironment immediately following allo-HSCT were associated with better overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival [34]. Moreover, AML patients with lower TIGIT expression following allo-HSCT had superior OS and progression-free survival [35]. Therefore, strategies to activate NK cells in order to reinforce GVL effect as a pre-emptive or prophylactic immunotherapy may improve MRD clearance in high-risk AML after allo-HSCT (Figure 1). In this review, we focus on NK cell-based immunotherapies following allo-HSCT and explore emerging therapies to eradicate MRD.

2. Adoptive NK Cell Therapy and Cytokine-Based NK Cell Therapy

Previous studies have reported an association between clinical outcomes and NK cell recovery after allo-HSCT. This likely occurs because NK cells play an essential role in GVL effects and also in preventing infection following allo-HSCT [34,36,37]. To date, adoptive transfer of NK cells from allogeneic donors to patients with AML has been performed following allo-HSCT [38,39,40,41,42,43,44]. Additionally, NK cell infusion has been combined with the administration of IL-2 to boost in vivo expansion (Figure 2) [45,46,47,48]. T-regulatory cells (Tregs) are significantly increased in number following NK cell infusion and IL-2 administration, which may inhibit NK cell functionality and hinder the efficacy of adoptively transferred NK cells (Figure 3). In cases with prior IL-2-diphtheria toxin fusion protein treatment for the depletion of host Tregs, increased in vivo expansion of NK cells was noted, and relapsed/refractory AML patients were able to achieve complete remission (CR) (NCT00274846 and NCT01106950) [47]. Besides IL-2 administration, NK cells activated by IL-12, IL-15, IL-18, and IL-21 have enhanced antitumor functionality [49,50,51,52]. These cytokines also lead to an increase in varying degrees of host and/or donor CD8+ T-cells. Therefore, these therapies may result in adverse events, including severe GVHD. However, previous studies have demonstrated that adoptively transferred NK cells activated by these cytokines had GVL effect without life-threatening GVHD [49,50,51,52]. IL-15/IL-15Ra-Fc (ALT-803) therapy (NCT01885897), for instance, promoted an increase in CD8+ T-cells of the effector or effector memory phenotype without increasing Tregs, and no patient developed severe GVHD despite the induction of CD8+ T-cell activation [51]. One possible reason may be that the preferential expansion of NK cells mediates a reduction of GVHD by inhibiting CD8+ donor T-cell proliferation [53]. Although adoptive transfer of NK cells during allo-HSCT may be a promising therapy for AML, further studies are required in order to design protocols that balance the persistence of donor NK cells and host/donor T-cell activation. These studies must include the timing of transferred NK cells, NK cell dosage, combination with cytokines, the conditioning regimen, donor selection, and GVHD prophylaxis.

3. ICIs for Intensifying the Activation of NK Cells

NK cells express various co-inhibitory receptors, including killer immunoglobulin-like receptors (KIRs), NKG2A, programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1), cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4 (CTLA-4), T-cell immunoglobulin, and mucin domain-containing protein 3 (TIM-3), TIGIT, and lymphocyte activation gene 3 (LAG-3). These receptors have recently been recognized as immune checkpoints (Figure 2 and Figure 4). T-cells also express these immune checkpoints in which PD-1, CTLA-4, LAG-3, and B- and T-lymphocyte attenuator (BTLA) had greater expression than in NK cells (Figure 5) [54,55]. In order to block a receptor’s inhibitory signal, NK cell activation and leukemia cell killing are induced by a cognate ligand by ICIs. Therefore, administration of ICIs in the first few months post allo-HSCT might be a powerful tool for eradicating MRD following AML. Several clinical trials for ICIs as monotherapy or as part of combination treatment for AML after allo-HSCT have been reported recently [17,20,24,56,57,58]. CTLA-4 (e.g., ipilimumab) and PD-1 (e.g., nivolumab) blockade have been administered following allo-HSCT in several hematologic malignancies, and beneficial GVL responses have been achieved. However, serious immune-related adverse events and/or severe GVHD were accompanied by exposure to these two ICIs [59]. This might explain how increased donor-derived alloreactive T-cells might cause life-threatening GVHD [57,58]. It would be interesting to test whether NK cell-specific ICIs might enhance anti-leukemia activity without aggravating GVHD more than CTLA-4 or PD-1 blockade.
NK cells express various immune checkpoint receptors such as KIR-2D, NKG2A, PD-1, CTLA-4, TIGIT, TIM-3, LAG-3, and BTLA, which can interact with their cognate ligands on tumor cells or on several immune cells. Immune checkpoint inhibitors can interrupt their receptor’s inhibitory signal.
IPH2101, also known as anti-KIR1-7F9 monoclonal antibody (mAb; lirilumab is a recombinant version of this mAb), blocks common inhibitory KIRs (KIR2DL/DS-1, -2, and -3), which bind to HLA-C alleles and augment NK cell-mediated killing in HLA-C-expressing leukemia cells [60]. Although this KIR2D blockade showed no clinical effectiveness [61] in a phase 2 trial in smoldering multiple myeloma (NCT01248455), adoptive transfer of NK cells combined with IPH2101 after allo-HSCT may have a therapeutic benefit. With lirilumab as with ICIs, CD94-NKG2A receptors on NK cells primarily recognize HLA-E, which is expressed by leukemia cells. Anti-NKG2A mAb (monalizumab) administration showed anti-leukemia effects in hematologic malignancies [62,63,64]. Previous studies have demonstrated that anti-NKG2A mAb can induce NKG2A+ NK cell killing activity against HLA-E-expressing leukemia cells in vitro and in vivo [62,63,64]. Additionally, reduced numbers of NKG2A+ NK cells after allo-HSCT are associated with the occurrence of severe GVHD [65,66]. Moreover, NKG2A+ NK cells inhibited T-cell proliferation and activation and might prevent GVHD [66]. Therefore, NKG2A+ NK cells may play a crucial role in GVHD and GVL effect following allo-HSCT, and monalizumab administration may have a promising clinical role following allo-HSCT.
TIGIT is expressed by both T and NK cells, and its ligands are the poliovirus receptors PVR (also known as CD155) and PVRL2 (also known as CD112) [30]. PVR is overexpressed in several tumors including AML, and its overexpression has been linked to a poor prognosis in AML [35,67,68]. Meanwhile, AML patients with higher TIGIT expression after allo-HSCT had an inferior prognosis [35]. Previous studies have shown that blockade of TIGIT could prevent the exhaustion of NK cells and enhance NK cell-dependent antitumor effect [20,69]. Additionally, CMV-induced adaptive NK cells had less TIGIT expression compared to conventional NK cells, and overcame myeloid-derived suppressor cell (MDSC)-mediated immune suppression. The cytotoxic function of NK cells co-cultured with MDSCs against tumor cells could be restored by blockade of TIGIT [70]. Unlike PD-1 and CTLA-4 inhibitors, NK cells may play a critical role in TIGIT-based immunotherapy, and blockade of TIGIT may have therapeutic effects in GVL by controlling NK-cell activity after allo-HSCT. However, because blockade of TIGIT can also promote T-cell activity [71], it is imperative to optimize the clinical setting to prevent severe GVHD and intensify the GVL effect in AML patients undergoing allo-HSCT.
TIM-3 is expressed on all mature CD56dimCD16+ NK cells and activated immature CD56brightCD16− NK cells. Its ligand is galectin-9 [72], which induces interferon-gamma (IFN-γ) production by NK cells [73]. TIM-3 blockade restores NK cell exhaustion and leads to an increased NK cell cytotoxicity in several cancers [74,75], whereas the TIM-3 antibody agonist leads to a decrease in the cytotoxicity of NK cells [72]. TIM-3 blockade reduces NK cell-mediated killing of pancreatic cancer cell lines [76]. Although a phase 1 study evaluating the blockade of TIM-3 (TSR-022) in advanced solid tumors is in progress (NCT02817633), further studies will be needed to determine the precise role of TIM-3 in AML after allo-HSCT.
LAG-3 (also known as CD223) is a ligand which has been identified as MHC class II. It is widely expressed not only on activated T and NK cells but also on dendritic and B-cells (Figure 5) [75,77,78]. LAG-3 is involved in inhibiting T-cell effector function, and blockade of LAG-3 promotes T-cell proliferation in vitro [79]. However, the function of LAG-3 on NK cells remains unclear. Blockade of LAG-3 had no effect on NK-cell-mediated cytotoxicity [80]. Further investigation on the role of LAG-3 on NK cells is necessary.
BTLA (also known as CD272), which belongs to the immunoglobulin superfamily, is expressed by most lymphocytes (Figure 5). BTLA acts as a negative modulator of immune responses regulating T-cell activation and proliferation [77,81,82]. Its ligand, herpesvirus entry mediator (HVEM, also known as TNFSF14), is expressed in several tumor cells [82,83]. Blocking BTLA-HVEM interaction leads to a decrease in suppressor T-cells in the tumor microenvironment and enhances antitumor immunity [84]. Additionally, BTLA blockade promotes an increase in NKT-cells and expression of cytotoxic marker genes [85]. However, the functional role of BTLA on NK cells is controversial and requires further investigation.

4. Bi/Trispecific Engagers and Chimeric Antigen Receptors (CAR) NK Cells

Bispecific and trispecific killer cell engagers (BiKEs and TriKEs), which are composed of a single-chain variable fragment (scFv) containing a variable heavy and variable light chain of an antibody, can specifically target both CD16 expressed on NK cells and tumor antigens (Figure 2). Previous studies have shown that NK-cell-mediated cytotoxicity could occur by CD16 × CD33 (1633) BiKEs that ligated CD16 on NK cells and CD33 on tumor cells, including myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) and AML [86,87]. Recently, 161533 TriKE, which is an NK-cell stimulatory cytokine with IL-15 added onto BiKE, has been found to restore NK cell proliferation and function through a low expression of TIGIT in NK cells. It is also able to enhance NK-cell-mediated cytotoxicity against MDS cells more than 1633 BiKE [88]. Moreover, NK cells treated with 161533 TriKE can overcome immune suppression mediated by MDSCs. Although IL-15 also stimulates cytotoxic T-cells, 161533 TriKE induces the proliferation of NK cells with minimal effect on T-cells [87]. Therefore, the administration of this agent after allo-HSCT may be a potentially promising treatment to decrease relapse of AML after allo-HSCT with less T-cell-mediated GVHD.
Chimeric antigen receptors (CARs) consist of scFv (extracellular domains) combined with CD3ζ, DAP10, or DAP12 as intracellular signal domains, and CD28, 4-1BB (also known as CD137), and 2B4 (also known as CD244) as costimulatory domains (Figure 2) [89,90,91,92,93]. In a murine allogeneic transplant model using donor-derived CD19-CAR T-cells, allogeneic CAR T-cells eliminated acute lymphoblastic leukemia [94]. However, its administration caused lethal GVHD. Additionally, CD123-redirected T-cells (CART123) eliminated AML and also eradicated normal hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs) in a mouse model because CD123 is highly expressed in HSC [95]. In a phase 1 clinical trial of CD33-CAR NK cells for relapsed and refractory AML patients (NCT02944162), the administration of CD33-CAR NK cells was not clinically efficacious [92]. Recently, cord blood-derived NK cells with CAR-CD19, IL-15, and inducible caspase-9-based suicide gene (iC9) (iC9/CAR.19/IL15-transduced CB-NK cells) enhanced their cytotoxicity against CD19-expressing tumors in a murine model [96]. CAR NK cells may provide a cost-effective treatment with a reduced risk of GVHD compared to CAR T-cells, but further clinical studies will be needed to demonstrate the safety and efficacy of CAR NK cells against AML following allo-HSCT.

5. AML Survival Mechanism against NK Cells

NK cell-based immunotherapies may emerge as a promising option for elimination of AML following allo-HSCT, but several factors may limit NK cell-based immunotherapies (Figure 3) [97,98,99]. For instance, the tumor microenvironment, which includes Tregs, tumor-associated macrophages, and MDSCs, which interfere with the function of NK cells, is a major limitation to the effectiveness of NK cells [70,87,100,101]. In addition, the tumor microenvironment possesses increased anti-inflammatory cytokines, such as TGF-β, IL-4, and IL-10, which cause immune evasion and result in decreased pro-inflammatory cytokines, including IFN-γ and IL-15, which stimulate NK cell activation [51,99,102]. Moreover, leukemia cells produce several enzymes such as indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase-1, arginase, prostaglandin-E2, CD39, and CD73, which reduce NK-cell proliferation and/or activity [98,99,100,103,104,105,106].
The incidence of HLA loss following allo-HCT is one of the major immune escape mechanisms that lead to relapse in AML, and may account for approximately one third of all relapses [107]. Because loss of mismatched HLA through copy-neutral loss of heterozygosity results in the elimination of the incompatible HLA alleles while keeping the expression of HLA class I molecules, cytotoxic killing by NK cells does not occur. Also, recent studies have shown that the downregulation of HLA class II molecules (HLA-DPA1, HLA-DPB1, HLA-DQB1, and HLA-DRB1) and their related molecules (CIITA, IFI30, HLA-DMA, HLA-DMB, and CD74) could allow leukemia relapse after allo-HSCT [108].
Patients who exhibited a high expression of CD200, CD47, PD-L1, PVR, or PVRL2, which is associated with an immune response or immune checkpoints, had a poor prognosis [35,67,109,110,111]. In addition to PD-1, exhausted T-cells, including exhausted CD8+ T-cells, express inhibitory receptors such as CTLA-4, LAG-3, and TIM-3 [21,112,113]. T-cell exhaustion contributes to AML relapse after allo-HSCT [113]. In contrast to T-cell exhaustion, expression of activating NKG2D ligands such as MHC class I-related chain A (MICA) and UL16-binding protein 1 (ULBP1) on AML cells at diagnosis is associated with an improved OS and a reduced incidence of relapse [114]. Activated NKG2D on NK cells recognizes NKG2D ligands (MICA/B and ULBPs) and enables the induction of NK-cell-mediated cytotoxicity on AML cells [115,116]. AML cells which express low levels of NKG2D ligands are able to evade immune surveillance by NK cells [115].
Janus kinase (JAK) mutations affect the interferon (IFN) signaling pathway by inducing an increase in STAT1 expression, the loss of beta-2-microglobulin, which can detect HLA class I antigen processing, and the loss of PTEN, which increases the production of immunosuppressive cytokines such as VEGF and can increase STAT3 expression. These mutations, which represent various mechanisms of resistance to ICIs, have been reported in several cancers [117,118,119,120], but it remains unknown in the case of AML. These studies demonstrated the association between T-cell activity and resistance to ICIs. However, the mechanisms of resistance to ICIs on NK cells are less well explored and require further elucidation.

6. Conclusions

Currently, there are numerous NK cell-based immunotherapies for AML post allo-HSCT that have been incorporated into pre-clinical and clinical trials. We have described some clinical trials associated with NK cell-based immunotherapies (Table 1). NK cell immunotherapies such as adoptive NK cells, cytokine-based therapies, ICIs, and bi/trispecific engagers have the potential to significantly enhance conventional therapies for the elimination of AML after allo-HSCT. In the future, combinations of these approaches require to be optimized to further enforce donor NK-cell mediated GVL in AML patients who received allo-HSCT. Moreover, for the next generation of NK-cell immunotherapies, therapeutic approaches based on CAR-engineered NK cells, memory-like NK cells, NKT-cells, and induced pluripotent stem cell-derived NK cells may be considered in a future study [49,89,121,122,123,124]. However, particularly with the use of ICIs, especially PD-1 or CTLA-4 blockade, after allo-HSCT, there is a distinct need for caution due to the risk of GVHD-related mortality. These ICIs appear to promote T-cell activity more than NK-cell activity against leukemia cells. Well-designed clinical trials should be required to demonstrate the safety and efficacy of these therapies. In addition, because NK cells have a short lifespan compared to T-cells, further improvements in manufacturing and expansion techniques are needed. Previously, immunotherapies had primarily focused on T-cell-mediated cytotoxicity. Thus, some mechanisms for NK-cell immunotherapies, including immune escape of AML, remain unclear. Further studies will be needed to predict which type of AML after allo-HSCT will be affected by NK-cell immunotherapies. The collection of large patient series and datasets will allow the investigation of the various factors which may potentially influence NK-cell immune responses. These factors will include the expression genes, mutations, alterations of resistance to immunotherapies in leukemia cells, tumor microenvironment consisting of Tregs, tumor-associated macrophages, MDSCs, and the production of cytokines.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Abbreviations

allo-HSCTallogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation
AMLacute myeloid leukemia
GVLgraft-versus-leukemia
NKNatural killer
MRDminimal residual disease
DLIDonor lymphocyte infusion
ICIsimmune checkpoint inhibitors
HLAhuman leukocyte antigen
TIGITT-cell immunoreceptor with Ig and immunoreceptor tyrosine-based inhibition motif domains
GVHDgraft versus host disease
OSoverall survival
TregsT-regulatory cells
CRcomplete remission
KIRskiller immunoglobulin-like receptors
PD-1programmed cell death protein 1
CTLA-4cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4
TIM-3T-cell immunoglobulin and mucin domain-containing protein 3
LAG-3lymphocyte activation gene 3
BTLAB- and T-lymphocyte attenuator
MDSCmyeloid-derived suppressor cell
HVEMherpesvirus entry mediator
BiKEsbispecific killer cell engagers
TriKEstrispecific killer cell engagers
MDSmyelodysplastic syndromes
CARschimeric antigen receptors
HSCshematopoietic stem cells
MICAMHC class I-related chain A
ULBP1UL16-binding protein 1
HSC_BMhematopoietic stem cells from bone marrow
early HPC_BMhematopoietic progenitor cells from bone marrow
CMPcommon myeloid progenitor cell
GMPgranulocyte monocyte progenitors
MEPmegakaryocyte-erythroid progenitor cell
PM_BMpromyelocyte from bone marrow
MY_BMmyelocyte from bone marrow
PMN_BMpolymorphonuclear cells from bone marrow
PMN_PBpolymorphonuclear cells from peripheral blood
B-cellsCD19+ B-cells
NK cellsCD56+ natural killer cells
mDCCD11c+ myeloid dendritic cells
pDCCD123+ plasmacytoid dendritic cells
HMshematological malignancies
MLmalignant lymphoma
ALLacute lymphoblastic leukemia
JAKJanus kinase
IFNinterferon

References

  1. Schmid, C.; Labopin, M.; Nagler, A.; Niederwieser, D.; Castagna, L.; Tabrizi, R.; Stadler, M.; Kuball, J.; Cornelissen, J.; Vorlicek, J.; et al. Treatment, risk factors, and outcome of adults with relapsed AML after reduced intensity conditioning for allogeneic stem cell transplantation. Blood 2012, 119, 1599–1606. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Bejanyan, N.; Weisdorf, D.J.; Logan, B.R.; Wang, H.L.; Devine, S.M.; de Lima, M.; Bunjes, D.W.; Zhang, M.J. Survival of patients with acute myeloid leukemia relapsing after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation: A center for international blood and marrow transplant research study. Biol. Blood Marrow Transplant. 2015, 21, 454–459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Schroeder, T.; Rachlis, E.; Bug, G.; Stelljes, M.; Klein, S.; Steckel, N.K.; Wolf, D.; Ringhoffer, M.; Czibere, A.; Nachtkamp, K.; et al. Treatment of acute myeloid leukemia or myelodysplastic syndrome relapse after allogeneic stem cell transplantation with azacitidine and donor lymphocyte infusions—A retrospective multicenter analysis from the German Cooperative Transplant Study Group. Biol. Blood Marrow Transplant. 2015, 21, 653–660. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Vyas, P.; Appelbaum, F.R.; Craddock, C. Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation for acute myeloid leukemia. Biol. Blood Marrow Transplant. 2015, 21, 8–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Tsirigotis, P.; Byrne, M.; Schmid, C.; Baron, F.; Ciceri, F.; Esteve, J.; Gorin, N.C.; Giebel, S.; Mohty, M.; Savani, B.N.; et al. Relapse of AML after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: Methods of monitoring and preventive strategies. A review from the ALWP of the EBMT. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2016, 51, 1431–1438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Kassim, A.A.; Savani, B.N. Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for acute myeloid leukemia: A review. Hematol. Oncol. Stem Cell Ther. 2017, 10, 245–251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Getta, B.M.; Devlin, S.M.; Levine, R.L.; Arcila, M.E.; Mohanty, A.S.; Zehir, A.; Tallman, M.S.; Giralt, S.A.; Roshal, M. Multicolor flow cytometry and multigene next-generation sequencing are complementary and highly predictive for relapse in acute myeloid leukemia after allogeneic transplantation. Biol. Blood Marrow Transplant. 2017, 23, 1064–1071. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Leung, W.; Pui, C.H.; Coustan-Smith, E.; Yang, J.; Pei, D.; Gan, K.; Srinivasan, A.; Hartford, C.; Triplett, B.M.; Dallas, M.; et al. Detectable minimal residual disease before hematopoietic cell transplantation is prognostic but does not preclude cure for children with very-high-risk leukemia. Blood 2012, 120, 468–472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Walter, R.B.; Gooley, T.A.; Wood, B.L.; Milano, F.; Fang, M.; Sorror, M.L.; Estey, E.H.; Salter, A.I.; Lansverk, E.; Chien, J.W.; et al. Impact of pretransplantation minimal residual disease, as detected by multiparametric flow cytometry, on outcome of myeloablative hematopoietic cell transplantation for acute myeloid leukemia. J. Clin. Oncol. 2011, 29, 1190–1197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Thanarajasingam, G.; Kim, H.T.; Cutler, C.; Ho, V.T.; Koreth, J.; Alyea, E.P.; Antin, J.H.; Soiffer, R.J.; Armand, P. Outcome and prognostic factors for patients who relapse after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Biol. Blood Marrow Transplant. 2013, 19, 1713–1718. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Orti, G.; Barba, P.; Fox, L.; Salamero, O.; Bosch, F.; Valcarcel, D. Donor lymphocyte infusions in AML and MDS: Enhancing the graft-versus-leukemia effect. Exp. Hematol. 2017, 48, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Jedlickova, Z.; Schmid, C.; Koenecke, C.; Hertenstein, B.; Baurmann, H.; Schwerdtfeger, R.; Tischer, J.; Kolb, H.J.; Schleuning, M. Long-term results of adjuvant donor lymphocyte transfusion in AML after allogeneic stem cell transplantation. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2016, 51, 663–667. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Bacchetta, R.; Lucarelli, B.; Sartirana, C.; Gregori, S.; Lupo Stanghellini, M.T.; Miqueu, P.; Tomiuk, S.; Hernandez-Fuentes, M.; Gianolini, M.E.; Greco, R.; et al. Immunological outcome in haploidentical-HSC Transplanted Patients treated with IL-10-anergized donor T-cells. Front. Immunol. 2014, 5, 16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Platzbecker, U.; Wermke, M.; Radke, J.; Oelschlaegel, U.; Seltmann, F.; Kiani, A.; Klut, I.M.; Knoth, H.; Röllig, C.; Schetelig, J.; et al. Azacitidine for treatment of imminent relapse in MDS or AML patients after allogeneic HSCT: Results of the RELAZA trial. Leukemia 2012, 26, 381–389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Craddock, C.; Jilani, N.; Siddique, S.; Yap, C.; Khan, J.; Nagra, S.; Ward, J.; Ferguson, P.; Hazlewood, P.; Buka, R.; et al. Tolerability and clinical activity of post-transplantation azacitidine in patients allografted for acute myeloid leukemia treated on the RICAZA Trial. Biol. Blood Marrow Transplant. 2016, 22, 385–390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Platzbecker, U.; Middeke, J.M.; Sockel, K.; Herbst, R.; Wolf, D.; Baldus, C.D.; Oelschlägel, U.; Mütherig, A.; Fransecky, L.; Noppeney, R.; et al. Measurable residual disease-guided treatment with azacitidine to prevent haematological relapse in patients with myelodysplastic syndrome and acute myeloid leukaemia (RELAZA2): An open-label, multicentre, phase 2 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2018, 19, 1668–1679. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Armand, P. Immune checkpoint blockade in hematologic malignancies. Blood 2015, 125, 3393–3400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Dietz, A.C.; Wayne, A.S. Cells to prevent/treat relapse following allogeneic stem cell transplantation. Hematol. Am. Soc. Hematol. Educ. Program 2017, 2017, 708–715. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Przespolewski, A.; Szeles, A.; Wang, E.S. Advances in immunotherapy for acute myeloid leukemia. Future Oncol. 2018, 14, 963–978. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Cooley, S.; Parham, P.; Miller, J.S. Strategies to activate NK cells to prevent relapse and induce remission following hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Blood 2018, 131, 1053–1062. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Wong, E.; Davis, J.E.; Grigg, A.; Szer, J.; Ritchie, D. Strategies to enhance the graft versus tumour effect after allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Blazar, B.R.; MacDonald, K.P.A.; Hill, G.R. Immune regulatory cell infusion for graft-versus-host disease prevention and therapy. Blood 2018, 131, 2651–2660. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Falkenburg, F.; Ruggiero, E.; Bonini, C.; Porter, D.; Miller, J.; Malard, F.; Mohty, M.; Kröger, N.; Kolb, H.J. Prevention and treatment of relapse after stem cell transplantation by cellular therapies. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2019, 54, 26–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Hobo, W.; Hutten, T.J.A.; Schaap, N.P.M.; Dolstra, H. Immune checkpoint molecules in acute myeloid leukaemia: Managing the double-edged sword. Br. J. Haematol. 2018, 181, 38–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Rotte, A.; Jin, J.Y.; Lemaire, V. Mechanistic overview of immune checkpoints to support the rational design of their combinations in cancer immunotherapy. Ann. Oncol. 2018, 29, 71–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Li, X.; Shao, C.; Shi, Y.; Han, W. Lessons learned from the blockade of immune checkpoints in cancer immunotherapy. J. Hematol. Oncol. 2018, 11, 31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Jenkins, R.W.; Barbie, D.A.; Flaherty, K.T. Mechanisms of resistance to immune checkpoint inhibitors. Br. J. Cancer 2018, 118, 9–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Gide, T.N.; Wilmott, J.S.; Scolyer, R.A.; Long, G.V. Primary and acquired resistance to immune checkpoint inhibitors in metastatic melanoma. Clin. Cancer Res. 2018, 24, 1260–1270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. O’Donnell, J.S.; Teng, M.W.L.; Smyth, M.J. Cancer immunoediting and resistance to T-cell-based immunotherapy. Nat. Rev. Clin. Oncol. 2019, 16, 151–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Leung, W. Use of NK cell activity in cure by transplant. Br. J. Haematol. 2011, 155, 14–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. He, Y.; Tian, Z. NK cell education via nonclassical MHC and non-MHC ligands. Cell. Mol. Immunol. 2017, 14, 321–330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Holtan, S.G.; Pasquini, M.; Weisdorf, D.J. Acute graft-versus-host disease: A bench-to-bedside update. Blood 2014, 124, 363–373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Shaffer, B.C.; Hsu, K.C. How important is NK alloreactivity and KIR in allogeneic transplantation? Best Pract. Res. Clin. Haematol. 2016, 29, 351–358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  34. Hattori, N.; Saito, B.; Sasaki, Y.; Shimada, S.; Murai, S.; Abe, M.; Baba, Y.; Watanuki, M.; Fujiwara, S.; Kawaguchi, Y.; et al. Status of natural killer cell recovery in Day 21 bone marrow after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation predicts clinical outcome. Biol. Blood Marrow Transplant. 2018, 24, 1841–1847. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Hattori, N.; Kawaguchi, Y.; Sasaki, Y.; Shimada, S.; Murai, S.; Abe, M.; Baba, Y.; Watanuki, M.; Fujiwara, S.; Arai, N.; et al. Monitoring TIGIT/DNAM-1 and PVR/PVRL2 immune checkpoint expression levels in allogeneic stem cell transplantation for acute myeloid leukemia. Biol. Blood Marrow Transplant. 2019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Kim, S.Y.; Lee, H.; Han, M.S.; Shim, H.; Eom, H.S.; Park, B.; Kong, S.Y. Post-transplantation natural killer cell count: A predictor of acute graft-versus-host disease and survival outcomes after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Clin. Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk. 2016, 16, 527–535. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Minculescu, L.; Marquart, H.V.; Friis, L.S.; Petersen, S.L.; Schiødt, I.; Ryder, L.P.; Andersen, N.S.; Sengeloev, H. Early natural killer cell reconstitution predicts overall survival in T-cell-replete allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Biol. Blood Marrow Transplant. 2016, 22, 2187–2193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Passweg, J.R.; Tichelli, A.; Meyer-Monard, S.; Heim, D.; Stern, M.; Kühne, T.; Favre, G.; Gratwohl, A. Purified donor NK-lymphocyte infusion to consolidate engraftment after haploidentical stem cell transplantation. Leukemia 2004, 18, 1835–1838. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Yoon, S.R.; Lee, Y.S.; Yang, S.H.; Ahn, K.H.; Lee, J.H.; Lee, J.H.; Kim, D.Y.; Kang, Y.A.; Jeon, M.; Seol, M.; et al. Generation of donor natural killer cells from CD34+ progenitor cells and subsequent infusion after HLA-mismatched allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation: A feasibility study. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2010, 45, 1038–1046. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Stern, M.; Passweg, J.R.; Meyer-Monard, S.; Esser, R.; Tonn, T.; Soerensen, J.; Paulussen, M.; Gratwohl, A.; Klingebiel, T.; Bader, P.; et al. Pre-emptive immunotherapy with purified natural killer cells after haploidentical SCT: A prospective phase II study in two centers. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2013, 48, 433–438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Choi, I.; Yoon, S.R.; Park, S.Y.; Kim, H.; Jung, S.J.; Jang, Y.J.; Kang, M.; Yeom, Y.I.; Lee, J.L.; Kim, D.Y.; et al. Donor-derived natural killer cells infused after human leukocyte antigen-haploidentical hematopoietic cell transplantation: A dose-escalation study. Biol. Blood Marrow Transplant. 2014, 20, 696–704. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Choi, I.; Yoon, S.R.; Park, S.Y.; Kim, H.; Jung, S.J.; Kang, Y.L.; Lee, J.H.; Lee, J.H.; Kim, D.Y.; Lee, J.L.; et al. Donor-derived natural killer cell infusion after human leukocyte antigen-haploidentical hematopoietic cell transplantation in patients with refractory acute leukemia. Biol. Blood Marrow Transplant. 2016, 22, 2065–2076. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Björklund, A.T.; Carlsten, M.; Sohlberg, E.; Liu, L.L.; Clancy, T.; Karimi, M.; Cooley, S.; Miller, J.S.; Klimkowska, M.; Schaffer, M.; et al. Complete remission with Reduction of High-Risk Clones following haploidentical NK-Cell Therapy against MDS and AML. Clin. Cancer Res. 2018, 24, 1834–1844. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Dolstra, H.; Roeven, M.W.H.; Spanholtz, J.; Hangalapura, B.N.; Tordoir, M.; Maas, F.; Leenders, M.; Bohme, F.; Kok, N.; Trilsbeek, C.; et al. Successful transfer of umbilical cord blood CD34+ hematopoietic stem and progenitor-derived NK cells in older acute myeloid leukemia patients. Clin. Cancer Res. 2017, 23, 4107–4118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Miller, J.S.; Soignier, Y.; Panoskaltsis-Mortari, A.; McNearney, S.A.; Yun, G.H.; Fautsch, S.K.; McKenna, D.; Le, C.; Defor, T.E.; Burns, L.J.; et al. Successful adoptive transfer and in vivo expansion of human haploidentical NK cells in patients with cancer. Blood 2005, 105, 3051–3057. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  46. Rubnitz, J.E.; Inaba, H.; Ribeiro, R.C.; Pounds, S.; Rooney, B.; Bell, T.; Pui, C.H.; Leung, W. NKAML: A pilot study to determine the safety and feasibility of haploidentical natural killer cell transplantation in childhood acute myeloid leukemia. J. Clin. Oncol. 2010, 28, 955–959. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Bachanova, V.; Cooley, S.; Defor, T.E.; Verneris, M.R.; Zhang, B.; McKenna, D.H.; Curtsinger, J.; Panoskaltsis-Mortari, A.; Lewis, D.; Hippen, K.; et al. Clearance of acute myeloid leukemia by haploidentical natural killer cells is improved using IL-2 diphtheria toxin fusion protein. Blood 2014, 123, 3855–3863. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  48. Curti, A.; Ruggeri, L.; Parisi, S.; Bontadini, A.; Dan, E.; Motta, M.R.; Rizzi, S.; Trabanelli, S.; Ocadlikova, D.; Lecciso, M.; et al. Larger size of donor alloreactive NK cell repertoire correlates with better response to NK cell immunotherapy in elderly acute myeloid leukemia patients. Clin. Cancer Res. 2016, 22, 1914–1921. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Romee, R.; Rosario, M.; Berrien-Elliott, M.M.; Wagner, J.A.; Jewell, B.A.; Schappe, T.; Leong, J.W.; Abdel-Latif, S.; Schneider, S.E.; Willey, S.; et al. Cytokine-induced memory-like natural killer cells exhibit enhanced responses against myeloid leukemia. Sci. Transl. Med. 2016, 8, 357ra123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Song, Y.; Hu, B.; Liu, Y.; Jin, Z.; Zhang, Y.; Lin, D.; Zhu, Y.; Lei, L.; Gong, H.; Mei, Y.; et al. IL-12/IL-18-preactivated donor NK cells enhance GVL effects and mitigate GvHD after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Eur. J. Immunol. 2018, 48, 670–682. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Romee, R.; Cooley, S.; Berrien-Elliott, M.M.; Westervelt, P.; Verneris, M.R.; Wagner, J.E.; Weisdorf, D.J.; Blazar, B.R.; Ustun, C.; DeFor, T.E.; et al. First-in-human phase 1 clinical study of the IL-15 superagonist complex ALT-803 to treat relapse after transplantation. Blood 2018, 131, 2515–2527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Ciurea, S.O.; Schafer, J.R.; Bassett, R.; Denman, C.J.; Cao, K.; Willis, D.; Rondon, G.; Chen, J.; Soebbing, D.; Kaur, I.; et al. Phase 1 clinical trial using mbIL21 ex vivo-expanded donor-derived NK cells after haploidentical transplantation. Blood 2017, 130, 1857–1868. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Olson, J.A.; Leveson-Gower, D.B.; Gill, S.; Baker, J.; Beilhack, A.; Negrin, R.S. NK cells mediate reduction of GVHD by inhibiting activated, alloreactive T-cells while retaining GVT effects. Blood 2010, 115, 4293–4301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Bagger, F.O.; Rapin, N.; Theilgaard-Mönch, K.; Kaczkowski, B.; Thoren, L.A.; Jendholm, J.; Winther, O.; Porse, B.T. HemaExplorer: A database of mRNA expression profiles in normal and malignant haematopoiesis. Nucleic Acids Res. 2013, D1034–D1039. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Bagger, F.O.; Rapin, N.; Theilgaard-Mönch, K.; Kaczkowski, B.; Jendholm, J.; Winther, O.; Porse, B. HemaExplorer: A Web server for easy and fast visualization of gene expression in normal and malignant hematopoiesis. Blood 2012, 119, 6394–6395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Bashey, A.; Medina, B.; Corringham, S.; Pasek, M.; Carrier, E.; Vrooman, L.; Lowy, I.; Solomon, S.R.; Morris, L.E.; Holland, H.K.; et al. CTLA4 blockade with ipilimumab to treat relapse of malignancy after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation. Blood 2009, 113, 1581–1588. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Zhou, J.; Bashey, A.; Zhong, R.; Corringham, S.; Messer, K.; Pu, M.; Ma, W.; Chut, T.; Soiffer, R.; Mitrovich, R.C.; et al. CTLA-4 blockade following relapse of malignancy after allogeneic stem cell transplantation is associated with T-cell activation but not with increased levels of T regulatory cells. Biol. Blood Marrow Transplant. 2011, 17, 682–692. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Davids, M.S.; Kim, H.T.; Bachireddy, P.; Costello, C.; Liguori, R.; Savell, A.; Lukez, A.P.; Avigan, D.; Chen, Y.B.; McSweeney, P.; et al. Ipilimumab for patients with relapse after allogeneic transplantation. N. Engl. J. Med. 2016, 375, 143–153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Ijaz, A.; Khan, A.Y.; Malik, S.U.; Faridi, W.; Fraz, M.A.; Usman, M.; Tariq, M.J.; Durer, S.; Durer, C.; Russ, A.; et al. Significant risk of graft-versus-host disease with exposure to checkpoint inhibitors before and after allogeneic transplantation. Biol. Blood Marrow Transplant. 2019, 25, 94–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Romagné, F.; André, P.; Spee, P.; Zahn, S.; Anfossi, N.; Gauthier, L.; Capanni, M.; Ruggeri, L.; Benson, D.M., Jr.; Blaser, B.W.; et al. Preclinical characterization of 1-7F9, a novel human anti-KIR receptor therapeutic antibody that augments natural killer-mediated killing of tumor cells. Blood 2009, 114, 2667–2677. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Korde, N.; Carlsten, M.; Lee, M.J.; Minter, A.; Tan, E.; Kwok, M.; Manasanch, E.; Bhutani, M.; Tageja, N.; Roschewski, M.; et al. A phase II trial of pan-KIR2D blockade with IPH2101 in smoldering multiple myeloma. Haematologica 2014, 99, e81–e83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  62. Nguyen, S.; Dhedin, N.; Vernant, J.P.; Kuentz, M.; Al Jijakli, A.; Rouas-Freiss, N.; Carosella, E.D.; Boudifa, A.; Debré, P.; Vieillard, V. NK-cell reconstitution after haploidentical hematopoietic stem-cell transplantations: Immaturity of NK cells and inhibitory effect of NKG2A override GvL effect. Blood 2005, 105, 4135–4142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Godal, R.; Bachanova, V.; Gleason, M.; McCullar, V.; Yun, G.H.; Cooley, S.; Verneris, M.R.; McGlave, P.B.; Miller, J.S. Natural killer cell killing of acute myelogenous leukemia and acute lymphoblastic leukemia blasts by killer cell immunoglobulin-like receptor-negative natural killer cells after NKG2A and LIR-1 blockade. Biol. Blood Marrow Transplant. 2010, 16, 612–621. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Ruggeri, L.; Urbani, E.; André, P.; Mancusi, A.; Tosti, A.; Topini, F.; Bléry, M.; Animobono, L.; Romagné, F.; Wagtmann, N.; et al. Effects of anti-NKG2A antibody administration on leukemia and normal hematopoietic cells. Haematologica 2016, 101, 626–633. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Kordelas, L.; Steckel, N.K.; Horn, P.A.; Beelen, D.W.; Rebmann, V. The activating NKG2C receptor is significantly reduced in NK cells after allogeneic stem cell transplantation in patients with severe graft-versus-host disease. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2016, 17, 1797. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Hu, L.J.; Zhao, X.Y.; Yu, X.X.; Lv, M.; Han, T.T.; Han, W.; Huang, X.J. Quantity and quality reconstitution of NKG2A+ natural killer cells are associated with graft-versus-host disease after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation. Biol. Blood Marrow Transplant. 2019, 25, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Stamm, H.; Klingler, F.; Grossjohann, E.M.; Muschhammer, J.; Vettorazzi, E.; Heuser, M.; Mock, U.; Thol, F.; Vohwinkel, G.; Latuske, E.; et al. Immune checkpoints PVR and PVRL2 are prognostic markers in AML and their blockade represents a new therapeutic option. Oncogene 2018, 37, 5269–5280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Gao, J.; Zheng, Q.; Xin, N.; Wang, W.; Zhao, C. CD155, an onco-immunologic molecule in human tumors. Cancer Sci. 2017, 108, 1934–1938. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Zhang, Q.; Bi, J.; Zheng, X.; Chen, Y.; Wang, H.; Wu, W.; Wang, Z.; Wu, Q.; Peng, H.; Wei, H.; et al. Blockade of the checkpoint receptor TIGIT prevents NK cell exhaustion and elicits potent antitumor immunity. Nat. Immunol. 2018, 19, 723–732. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  70. Sarhan, D.; Cichocki, F.; Zhang, B.; Yingst, A.; Spellman, S.R.; Cooley, S.; Verneris, M.R.; Blazar, B.R.; Miller, J.S. Adaptive NK cells with low TIGIT expression are inherently resistant to myeloid-derived suppressor cells. Cancer Res. 2016, 76, 5696–5706. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  71. Johnston, R.J.; Comps-Agrar, L.; Hackney, J.; Yu, X.; Huseni, M.; Yang, Y.; Park, S.; Javinal, V.; Chiu, H.; Irving, B.; et al. The immunoreceptor TIGIT regulates antitumor and antiviral CD8(+) T-cell effector function. Cancer Cell 2014, 26, 923–937. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Ndhlovu, L.C.; Lopez-Vergès, S.; Barbour, J.D.; Jones, R.B.; Jha, A.R.; Long, B.R.; Schoeffler, E.C.; Fujita, T.; Nixon, D.F.; Lanier, L.L. Tim-3 marks human natural killer cell maturation and suppresses cell-mediated cytotoxicity. Blood 2012, 119, 3734–3743. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  73. Gleason, M.K.; Lenvik, T.R.; McCullar, V.; Felices, M.; O’Brien, M.S.; Cooley, S.A.; Verneris, M.R.; Cichocki, F.; Holman, C.J.; Panoskaltsis-Mortari, A.; et al. Tim-3 is an inducible human natural killer cell receptor that enhances interferon gamma production in response to galectin-9. Blood 2012, 119, 3064–3072. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  74. Gallois, A.; Silva, I.; Osman, I.; Bhardwaj, N. Reversal of natural killer cell exhaustion by TIM-3 blockade. Oncoimmunology 2014, 3, e946365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Kim, N.; Kim, H.S. Targeting checkpoint receptors and molecules for therapeutic modulation of natural killer cells. Front. Immunol. 2018, 9, 2041. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Van Audenaerde, J.R.M.; De Waele, J.; Marcq, E.; Van Loenhout, J.; Lion, E.; Van den Bergh, J.M.J.; Jesenofsky, R.; Masamune, A.; Roeyen, G.; Pauwels, P.; et al. Interleukin-15 stimulates natural killer cell-mediated killing of both human pancreatic cancer and stellate cells. Oncotarget 2017, 8, 56968–56979. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  77. Torphy, R.J.; Schulick, R.D.; Zhu, Y. Newly emerging immune checkpoints: Promises for future cancer therapy. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2017, 18, 2642. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Beldi-Ferchiou, A.; Caillat-Zucman, S. Control of NK cell activation by immune checkpoint molecules. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2017, 18, 2129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Maçon-Lemaître, L.; Triebel, F. The negative regulatory function of the lymphocyte-activation gene-3 co-receptor (CD223) on human T-cells. Immunology 2005, 115, 170–178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Huard, B.; Tournier, M.; Triebel, F. LAG-3 does not define a specific mode of natural killing in human. Immunol. Lett. 1998, 61, 109–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Krieg, C.; Boyman, O.; Fu, Y.X.; Kaye, J. B and T lymphocyte attenuator regulates CD8+ T-cell-intrinsic homeostasis and memory cell generation. Nat. Immunol. 2007, 8, 162–171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  82. Le Mercier, I.; Lines, J.L.; Noelle, R.J. Beyond CTLA-4 and PD-1, the generation Z of negative checkpoint regulators. Front. Immunol. 2015, 6, 418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  83. Gertner-Dardenne, J.; Fauriat, C.; Orlanducci, F.; Thibult, M.L.; Pastor, S.; Fitzgibbon, J.; Bouabdallah, R.; Xerri, L.; Olive, D. The co-receptor BTLA negatively regulates human Vγ9Vδ2 T-cell proliferation: A potential way of immune escape for lymphoma cells. Blood 2013, 122, 922–931. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Han, L.; Wang, W.; Fang, Y.; Feng, Z.; Liao, S.; Li, W.; Li, Y.; Li, C.; Maitituoheti, M.; Dong, H.; et al. Soluble B and T lymphocyte attenuator possesses antitumor effects and facilitates heat shock protein 70 vaccine-triggered antitumor immunity against a murine TC-1 cervical cancer model in vivo. J. Immunol. 2009, 183, 7842–7850. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. Sekar, D.; Govene, L.; Del Río, M.L.; Sirait-Fischer, E.; Fink, A.F.; Brüne, B.; Rodriguez-Barbosa, J.I.; Weigert, A. Downregulation of BTLA on NKT-cells promotes tumor immune control in a mouse model of mammary carcinoma. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018, 19, 752. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  86. Gleason, M.K.; Ross, J.A.; Warlick, E.D.; Lund, T.C.; Verneris, M.R.; Wiernik, A.; Spellman, S.; Haagenson, M.D.; Lenvik, A.J.; Litzow, M.R.; et al. CD16 × CD33 bispecific killer cell engager (BiKE) activates NK cells against primary MDS and MDSC CD33+ targets. Blood 2014, 123, 3016–3026. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  87. Vallera, D.A.; Felices, M.; McElmurry, R.; McCullar, V.; Zhou, X.; Schmohl, J.U.; Zhang, B.; Lenvik, A.J.; Panoskaltsis-Mortari, A.; Verneris, M.R.; et al. IL15 trispecific killer engagers (TriKE) make natural killer cells specific to CD33+ targets while Also Inducing Persistence, In Vivo Expansion, and Enhanced Function. Clin. Cancer Res. 2016, 22, 3440–3450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Sarhan, D.; Brandt, L.; Felices, M.; Guldevall, K.; Lenvik, T.; Hinderlie, P.; Curtsinger, J.; Warlick, E.; Spellman, S.R.; Blazar, B.R.; et al. 161533 TriKE stimulates NK-cell function to overcome myeloid-derived suppressor cells in MDS. Blood Adv. 2018, 2, 1459–1469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  89. Hu, Y.; Tian, Z.G.; Zhang, C. Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-transduced natural killer cells in tumor immunotherapy. Acta Pharmacol. Sin. 2018, 39, 167–176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Oberschmidt, O.; Kloess, S.; Koehl, U. Redirected primary human chimeric antigen receptor natural killer cells as an ‘off-the-shelf immunotherapy’ for improvement in cancer treatment. Front. Immunol. 2017, 8, 654. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Demoulin, B.; Cook, W.J.; Murad, J.; Graber, D.J.; Sentman, M.L.; Lonez, C.; Gilham, D.E.; Sentman, C.L.; Agaugue, S. Exploiting natural killer group 2D receptors for CAR T-cell therapy. Future Oncol. 2017, 13, 1593–1605. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  92. Tang, X.; Yang, L.; Li, Z.; Nalin, A.P.; Dai, H.; Xu, T.; Yin, J.; You, F.; Zhu, M.; Shen, W.; et al. First-in-man clinical trial of CAR NK-92 cells: Safety test of CD33-CAR NK-92 cells in patients with relapsed and refractory acute myeloid leukemia. Am. J. Cancer Res. 2018, 8, 1083–1089. [Google Scholar]
  93. Zhang, J.; Zheng, H.; Diao, Y. Natural killer cells and current applications of chimeric antigen receptor-modified NK-92 cells in tumor immunotherapy. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Jacoby, E.; Yang, Y.; Qin, H.; Chien, C.D.; Kochenderfer, J.N.; Fry, T.J. Murine allogeneic CD19 CAR T-cells harbor potent antileukemic activity but have the potential to mediate lethal GVHD. Blood 2016, 127, 1361–1370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Gill, S.; Tasian, S.K.; Ruella, M.; Shestova, O.; Li, Y.; Porter, D.L.; Carroll, M.; Danet-Desnoyers, G.; Scholler, J.; Grupp, S.A.; et al. Preclinical targeting of human acute myeloid leukemia and myeloablation using chimeric antigen receptor-modified T-cells. Blood 2014, 123, 2343–2354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Liu, E.; Tong, Y.; Dotti, G.; Shaim, H.; Savoldo, B.; Mukherjee, M.; Orange, J.; Wan, X.; Lu, X.; Reynolds, A.; et al. Cord blood NK cells engineered to express IL-15 and a CD19-targeted CAR show long-term persistence and potent antitumor activity. Leukemia 2018, 32, 520–531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Martín-Antonio, B.; Suñe, G.; Perez-Amill, L.; Castella, M.; Urbano-Ispizua, A. Natural killer cells: Angels and devils for immunotherapy. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2017, 18, 1868. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Daher, M.; Rezvani, K. Next generation natural killer cells for cancer immunotherapy: The promise of genetic engineering. Curr. Opin. Immunol. 2018, 51, 146–153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Zeiser, R.; Vago, L. Mechanisms of immune escape after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation. Blood 2018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Murray, S.; Lundqvist, A. Targeting the tumor microenvironment to improve natural killer cell-based immunotherapies: On being in the right place at the right time, with resilience. Hum. Vaccin. Immunother. 2016, 12, 607–611. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Sabry, M.; Lowdell, M.W. Tumor-primed NK cells: Waiting for the green light. Front. Immunol. 2013, 4, 408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  102. DiLillo, D.J.; Weinberg, J.B.; Yoshizaki, A.; Horikawa, M.; Bryant, J.M.; Iwata, Y.; Matsushita, T.; Matta, K.M.; Chen, Y.; Venturi, G.M.; et al. Chronic lymphocytic leukemia and regulatory B-cells share IL-10 competence and immunosuppressive function. Leukemia 2013, 27, 170–182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Folgiero, V.; Goffredo, B.M.; Filippini, P.; Masetti, R.; Bonanno, G.; Caruso, R.; Bertaina, V.; Mastronuzzi, A.; Gaspari, S.; Zecca, M.; et al. Indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase 1 (IDO1) activity in leukemia blasts correlates with poor outcome in childhood acute myeloid leukemia. Oncotarget 2014, 5, 2052–2064. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  104. Morvan, M.G.; Lanier, L.L. NK cells and cancer: You can teach innate cells new tricks. Nat. Rev. Cancer 2016, 16, 7–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  105. Zhang, J.; Han, X.; Hu, X.; Jin, F.; Gao, Z.; Yin, L.; Qin, J.; Yin, F.; Li, C.; Wang, Y. IDO1 impairs NK cell cytotoxicity by decreasing NKG2D/NKG2DLs via promoting miR-18a. Mol. Immunol. 2018, 103, 144–155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Häusler, S.F.; Montalbán del Barrio, I.; Strohschein, J.; Chandran, P.A.; Engel, J.B.; Hönig, A.; Ossadnik, M.; Horn, E.; Fischer, B.; Krockenberger, M.; et al. Ectonucleotidases CD39 and CD73 on OvCA cells are potent adenosine-generating enzymes responsible for adenosine receptor 2A-dependent suppression of T-cell function and NK cell cytotoxicity. Cancer Immunol. Immunother. 2011, 60, 1405–1418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  107. Vago, L.; Perna, S.K.; Zanussi, M.; Mazzi, B.; Barlassina, C.; Stanghellini, M.T.; Perrelli, N.F.; Cosentino, C.; Torri, F.; Angius, A.; et al. Loss of mismatched HLA in leukemia after stem-cell transplantation. N. Engl. J. Med. 2009, 361, 478–488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  108. Christopher, M.J.; Petti, A.A.; Rettig, M.P.; Miller, C.A.; Chendamarai, E.; Duncavage, E.J.; Klco, J.M.; Helton, N.M.; O’Laughlin, M.; Fronick, C.C.; et al. Immune escape of relapsed AML cells after allogeneic transplantation. N. Engl. J. Med. 2018, 379, 2330–2341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Damiani, D.; Tiribelli, M.; Raspadori, D.; Sirianni, S.; Meneghel, A.; Cavalllin, M.; Michelutti, A.; Toffoletti, E.; Geromin, A.; Simeone, E.; et al. Clinical impact of CD200 expression in patients with acute myeloid leukemia and correlation with other molecular prognostic factors. Oncotarget 2015, 6, 30212–30221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  110. Majeti, R.; Chao, M.P.; Alizadeh, A.A.; Pang, W.W.; Jaiswal, S.; Gibbs, K.D., Jr.; van Rooijen, N.; Weissman, I.L. CD47 is an adverse prognostic factor and therapeutic antibody target on human acute myeloid leukemia stem cells. Cell 2009, 138, 286–299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  111. Zajac, M.; Zaleska, J.; Dolnik, A.; Bullinger, L.; Giannopoulos, K. Expression of CD274 (PD-L1) is associated with unfavourable recurrent mutations in AML. Br. J. Haematol. 2018, 183, 822–825. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Wherry, E.J.; Kurachi, M. Molecular and cellular insights into T-cell exhaustion. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2015, 15, 486–499. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Kong, Y.; Zhang, J.; Claxton, D.F.; Ehmann, W.C.; Rybka, W.B.; Zhu, L.; Zeng, H.; Schell, T.D.; Zheng, H. PD-1(hi)TIM-3+ T-cells associate with and predict leukemia relapse in AML patients post allogeneic stem cell transplantation. Blood Cancer J. 2015, 5, e330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Mastaglio, S.; Wong, E.; Perera, T.; Ripley, J.; Blombery, P.; Smyth, M.J.; Koldej, R.; Ritchie, D. Natural killer receptor ligand expression on acute myeloid leukemia impacts survival and relapse after chemotherapy. Blood Adv. 2018, 2, 335–346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  115. Nowbakht, P.; Ionescu, M.C.; Rohner, A.; Kalberer, C.P.; Rossy, E.; Mori, L.; Cosman, D.; De Libero, G.; Wodnar-Filipowicz, A. Ligands for natural killer cell-activating receptors are expressed upon the maturation of normal myelomonocytic cells but at low levels in acute myeloid leukemias. Blood 2005, 105, 3615–3622. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  116. Salih, H.R.; Antropius, H.; Gieseke, F.; Lutz, S.Z.; Kanz, L.; Rammensee, H.G.; Steinle, A. Functional expression and release of ligands for the activating immunoreceptor NKG2D in leukemia. Blood 2003, 102, 1389–1396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  117. Zaretsky, J.M.; Garcia-Diaz, A.; Shin, D.S.; Escuin-Ordinas, H.; Hugo, W.; Hu-Lieskovan, S.; Torrejon, D.Y.; Abril-Rodriguez, G.; Sandoval, S.; Barthly, L.; et al. Mutations associated with acquired resistance to PD-1 blockade in melanoma. N. Engl. J. Med. 2016, 375, 819–829. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Benci, J.L.; Xu, B.; Qiu, Y.; Wu, T.J.; Dada, H.; Twyman-Saint Victor, C.; Cucolo, L.; Lee, D.S.M.; Pauken, K.E.; et al. Tumor interferon signaling regulates a multigenic resistance program to immune checkpoint blockade. Cell 2016, 167, 1540–1554.e12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Gettinger, S.; Choi, J.; Hastings, K.; Truini, A.; Datar, I.; Sowell, R.; Wurtz, A.; Dong, W.; Cai, G.; Melnick, M.A.; et al. Impaired HLA Class I antigen processing and presentation as a mechanism of acquired resistance to immune checkpoint inhibitors in lung cancer. Cancer Discov. 2017, 7, 1420–1435. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. George, S.; Miao, D.; Demetri, G.D.; Adeegbe, D.; Rodig, S.J.; Shukla, S.; Lipschitz, M.; Amin-Mansour, A.; Raut, C.P.; Carter, S.L.; et al. Loss of PTEN is associated with resistance to anti-PD-1 checkpoint blockade therapy in metastatic uterine leiomyosarcoma. Immunity 2017, 46, 197–204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Rotolo, A.; Caputo, V.S.; Holubova, M.; Baxan, N.; Dubois, O.; Chaudhry, M.S.; Xiao, X.; Goudevenou, K.; Pitcher, D.S.; Petevi, K.; et al. Enhanced anti-lymphoma activity of CAR19-iNKT-cells underpinned by dual CD19 and CD1d Targeting. Cancer Cell 2018, 34, 596–610.e11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Guan, P.; Bassiri, H.; Patel, N.P.; Nichols, K.E.; Das, R. Invariant natural killer T-cells in hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: Killer choice for natural suppression. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2016, 51, 629–637. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Hermanson, D.L.; Bendzick, L.; Pribyl, L.; McCullar, V.; Vogel, R.I.; Miller, J.S.; Geller, M.A.; Kaufman, D.S. Induced pluripotent stem cell-derived natural killer cells for treatment of ovarian cancer. Stem Cells 2016, 34, 93–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  124. Zeng, J.; Tang, S.Y.; Toh, L.L.; Wang, S. Generation of "Off-the-Shelf" Natural Killer Cells from Peripheral Blood Cell-Derived Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells. Stem Cell Reports 2017, 9, 1796–1812. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Ijms 20 02057 g001 550
Figure 1. Schematic diagram of immunotherapies for minimal residual disease (MRD) eradication after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) in acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Some patients with AML after conventional allo-HSCT will relapse. For the prevention of relapse, immunotherapies may play an important role in the elimination of MRD.
Figure 1. Schematic diagram of immunotherapies for minimal residual disease (MRD) eradication after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) in acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Some patients with AML after conventional allo-HSCT will relapse. For the prevention of relapse, immunotherapies may play an important role in the elimination of MRD.
Ijms 20 02057 g001
Ijms 20 02057 g002 550
Figure 2. Natural killer (NK) cell immunotherapies after allo-HSCT therapeutic approaches for the elimination of AML. NK cells-based immunotherapeutic concepts are based on stimulating NK cells by cytokines or immune checkpoint inhibitors, promoting antibody-dependent T-cell-mediated cytotoxicity by antibodies or bispecific and trispecific killer cell engagers, and improving NK cell responses by adoptive transfer of NK cells, such as allogenic NK cells or chimeric antigen receptor NK cells. Abbreviations: ICIs, immune checkpoint inhibitors; BiKEs, bispecific killer cell engagers; TriKEs; trispecific killer cell engagers; CAR, chimeric antigen receptor.
Figure 2. Natural killer (NK) cell immunotherapies after allo-HSCT therapeutic approaches for the elimination of AML. NK cells-based immunotherapeutic concepts are based on stimulating NK cells by cytokines or immune checkpoint inhibitors, promoting antibody-dependent T-cell-mediated cytotoxicity by antibodies or bispecific and trispecific killer cell engagers, and improving NK cell responses by adoptive transfer of NK cells, such as allogenic NK cells or chimeric antigen receptor NK cells. Abbreviations: ICIs, immune checkpoint inhibitors; BiKEs, bispecific killer cell engagers; TriKEs; trispecific killer cell engagers; CAR, chimeric antigen receptor.
Ijms 20 02057 g002
Ijms 20 02057 g003 550
Figure 3. Mechanisms of immune escape against NK cells in AML. The tumor microenvironment consisted of Tregs, TAMs, and MDSCs which can interfere with the function of NK cells, and its microenvironment is increased by anti-inflammatory cytokine including TGF-β, IL-4, and IL-10 and is decreased by pro-inflammatory cytokines including IFN-γ and IL-15. Leukemia cells can produce the metabolic enzymes such as IDO, arginase, CD39, and CD73, which reduce NK cell activity. Upregulation of immune checkpoint molecules including PD-L1, PVR, and PVLR2, low expression of NKG2D ligands such as MICA/B and ULBPs, or impaired expression of HLA can contribute to evading immune surveillance by NK cells. Abbreviations: TAM, tumor-associated macrophages; MDSCs, myeloid-derived suppressor cells; Tregs, regulatory T-cells. Red arrows indicate increased expression, enzymes, cytokine production, and cell proliferation; blue arrows indicate decreased expression and cytokine production.
Figure 3. Mechanisms of immune escape against NK cells in AML. The tumor microenvironment consisted of Tregs, TAMs, and MDSCs which can interfere with the function of NK cells, and its microenvironment is increased by anti-inflammatory cytokine including TGF-β, IL-4, and IL-10 and is decreased by pro-inflammatory cytokines including IFN-γ and IL-15. Leukemia cells can produce the metabolic enzymes such as IDO, arginase, CD39, and CD73, which reduce NK cell activity. Upregulation of immune checkpoint molecules including PD-L1, PVR, and PVLR2, low expression of NKG2D ligands such as MICA/B and ULBPs, or impaired expression of HLA can contribute to evading immune surveillance by NK cells. Abbreviations: TAM, tumor-associated macrophages; MDSCs, myeloid-derived suppressor cells; Tregs, regulatory T-cells. Red arrows indicate increased expression, enzymes, cytokine production, and cell proliferation; blue arrows indicate decreased expression and cytokine production.
Ijms 20 02057 g003
Ijms 20 02057 g004 550
Figure 4. Immune checkpoint inhibitors for targeted NK cell proteins and interactions between immune checkpoint receptors and ligands enhancing NK cell function.
Figure 4. Immune checkpoint inhibitors for targeted NK cell proteins and interactions between immune checkpoint receptors and ligands enhancing NK cell function.
Ijms 20 02057 g004
Ijms 20 02057 g005 550
Figure 5. Expression of immune checkpoint receptors in normal hematopoiesis. Expression levels of TIGIT, TIM-3, PD-1, CTLA-4, LAG-3, and BTLA in the hematopoietic system at different maturation stages are shown according to HemaExplorer54,55, based on curated microarray data. Abbreviations: HSC_BM, hematopoietic stem cells from bone marrow; early HPC_BM, hematopoietic progenitor cells from bone marrow; CMP, common myeloid progenitor cell; GMP, granulocyte monocyte progenitors; MEP, megakaryocyte-erythroid progenitor cell; PM_BM, promyelocyte from bone marrow; MY_BM, myelocyte from bone marrow; PMN_BM, polymorphonuclear cells from bone marrow; PMN_PB, polymorphonuclear cells from peripheral blood; B-cells, CD19+ B-cells; NK cells; CD56+ natural killer cells; mDC, CD11c+ myeloid dendritic cells; pDC, CD123+ plasmacytoid dendritic cells.
Figure 5. Expression of immune checkpoint receptors in normal hematopoiesis. Expression levels of TIGIT, TIM-3, PD-1, CTLA-4, LAG-3, and BTLA in the hematopoietic system at different maturation stages are shown according to HemaExplorer54,55, based on curated microarray data. Abbreviations: HSC_BM, hematopoietic stem cells from bone marrow; early HPC_BM, hematopoietic progenitor cells from bone marrow; CMP, common myeloid progenitor cell; GMP, granulocyte monocyte progenitors; MEP, megakaryocyte-erythroid progenitor cell; PM_BM, promyelocyte from bone marrow; MY_BM, myelocyte from bone marrow; PMN_BM, polymorphonuclear cells from bone marrow; PMN_PB, polymorphonuclear cells from peripheral blood; B-cells, CD19+ B-cells; NK cells; CD56+ natural killer cells; mDC, CD11c+ myeloid dendritic cells; pDC, CD123+ plasmacytoid dendritic cells.
Ijms 20 02057 g005
Table
Table 1. Selected list of clinical trials in NK cell-based immunotherapies.
Table 1. Selected list of clinical trials in NK cell-based immunotherapies.
Adoptive NK Cells
Clinical TrialCytokinesDiseasePhaseStatusallo-HSCT
NCT02229266IL-2AMLIIRecruiting
NCT00394381IL-2AML, MDSI/II Completedyes
NCT01370213IL-2AML, MDSIIUnknownyes
NCT01947322IL-2AMLI/II Completedyes
NCT03068819IL12, IL15, IL18AMLIRecruitingyes
NCT02782546ALT-803 (IL-15) AMLIIRecruitingyes
NCT02890758ALT-803 (IL-15) HMs, solid tumorsIRecruiting
NCT00460694IL-2HMsI/II Completedyes
NCT01823198IL-2HMsI/II Recruitingyes
NCT02809092IL-21AMLI/II Recruiting
NCT03300492-AML, MDSI/II Recruitingyes
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors
Clinical TrialTargetDiseasePhaseStatusallo-HSCT
IPH2101
NCT01256073KIRAMLICompleted
IPH2102
NCT01687387KIRAMLIICompleted
Lirilumab
NCT01687387KIR2DAMLIICompleted
NCT02399917KIR2DAMLIICompleted
Monalizumab
NCT02921685NKG2AHMsIRecruitingyes
Nivolumab
NCT03600155PD-1 and CTLA-4AMLIRecruitingyes
NCT02846376PD-1 and/or CTLA-4AML, MDSIRecruitingyes
NCT01822509PD-1 or CTLA-4HMsIActive, not recruitingyes
Pembrolizumab
NCT02981914PD-1AML, MDS, MLIRecruitingyes
Atezolizumab
NCT02862275PD-L1HMs, solid tumorsIRecruiting
Avelumab
NCT02953561PD-L1AMLI/II Recruiting
Durvalumab
NCT02775903PD-L1AML, MDSII Active, not recruiting
Ipilimumab
NCT03912064CTLA-4AML, MDSINot yet recruitingyes
NCT00060372CTLA-4AML, solid tumorsICompletedyes
OMP-313M32
NCT03119428TIGITsolid tumorsIActive, not recruiting
MTIG7192A
NCT03563716TIGIT and PD-L1solid tumorsIIActive, not recruiting
AB154
NCT03628677TIGITsolid tumorsIRecruiting
TSR-022
NCT02817633TIM-3 and PD-1solid tumorsIINot yet recruiting
NCT02817633TIM-3solid tumorsIRecruiting
MBG453
NCT03066648TIM-3AML, MDSIRecruiting
BMS-986016/BMS-936558
NCT02061761LAG-3MLI/IIRecruiting
Sym022
NCT03489369LAG-3ML, solid tumorsIRecruiting
NK Cell Engagers
Clinical TrialTargetDiseasePhaseStatus
TriKEs
NCT03214666CD16/IL-15/CD33 AML, MDSI/IINot yet recruiting
CAR-NK Cells
Clinical TrialTargetDiseasePhaseStatusOrigin of NK Cells
NCT02742727CD7AML, ALL, MLI/IIUnknownNK-92
NCT02944162CD33AMLI/IIUnknownNK-92
NCT03579927CD19MLI/IINot yet recruitingUCB
NCT03056339CD19ALL, MLI/IIRecruitingUCB
NCT02892695CD19ALL, MLI/IIRecruitingNK-92
NCT01974479CD19ALLISuspendedHaploidentical donor NK cells
NCT00995137CD19ALLICompletedExpanded donor NK cells
Abbreviations: allo-HSCT, allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation; AML, acute myeloid leukemia; MDS, myelodysplastic syndromes; HMs, hematological malignancies; ML, malignant lymphoma; ALL, acute lymphoblastic leukemia.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Hattori, N.; Nakamaki, T. Natural Killer Immunotherapy for Minimal Residual Disease Eradication Following Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation in Acute Myeloid Leukemia. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 2057. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms20092057

AMA Style

Hattori N, Nakamaki T. Natural Killer Immunotherapy for Minimal Residual Disease Eradication Following Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation in Acute Myeloid Leukemia. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2019; 20(9):2057. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms20092057

Chicago/Turabian Style

Hattori, Norimichi, and Tsuyoshi Nakamaki. 2019. "Natural Killer Immunotherapy for Minimal Residual Disease Eradication Following Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation in Acute Myeloid Leukemia" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 20, no. 9: 2057. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms20092057

APA Style

Hattori, N., & Nakamaki, T. (2019). Natural Killer Immunotherapy for Minimal Residual Disease Eradication Following Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation in Acute Myeloid Leukemia. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 20(9), 2057. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms20092057

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop