Next Article in Journal
Therapeutic Potential of Tauroursodeoxycholic Acid for the Treatment of Osteoporosis
Next Article in Special Issue
Wnt/β-Catenin Signaling in Oral Carcinogenesis
Previous Article in Journal
EMT and EndMT: Emerging Roles in Age-Related Macular Degeneration
Previous Article in Special Issue
Targeting Wnt Signaling for the Treatment of Gastric Cancer
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
IJMS
Volume 21
Issue 12
10.3390/ijms21124272
ijms-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Wnt Signaling in Gynecologic Malignancies

by
Alexandra McMellen
1,
Elizabeth R. Woodruff
1,
Bradley R. Corr
2,3,
Benjamin G. Bitler
1,3 and
Marisa R. Moroney
2,*
1
Department of OB/GYN, Division of Reproductive Sciences, The University of Colorado, Aurora, CO 80045, USA
2
Department of OB/GYN, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, The University of Colorado, Aurora, CO 80045, USA
3
University of Colorado Comprehensive Cancer Center, Aurora, CO 80045, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21(12), 4272; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21124272
Submission received: 1 June 2020 / Revised: 12 June 2020 / Accepted: 13 June 2020 / Published: 16 June 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue The Wnt Signaling Pathway in Cancer)
Browse Figure
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Gynecologic malignancies, including ovarian cancer, endometrial cancer, and cervical cancer, affect hundreds of thousands of women worldwide every year. Wnt signaling, specifically Wnt/β-catenin signaling, has been found to play an essential role in many oncogenic processes in gynecologic malignancies, including tumorigenesis, metastasis, recurrence, and chemotherapy resistance. As such, the Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway has the potential to be a target for effective treatment, improving patient outcomes. In this review, we discuss the evidence supporting the importance of the Wnt signaling pathways in the development, progression, and treatment of gynecologic malignancies.

1. Introduction

Wnt signaling is one of the most studied signaling pathways and plays a critical role in multiple biological processes, including cell differentiation, proliferation, survival, and migration. There is significant evidence that Wnt signaling also plays a pivotal role in tumorigenesis and other oncogenic processes [1,2,3]. The Wnt signaling pathway is tightly regulated through both stimulatory and inhibitory mechanisms. When these regulatory mechanisms are lost or altered through mutations, Wnt signaling is aberrantly activated, resulting in deregulated cellular processes [2,4]. The hyperactivation of Wnt signaling has been implicated in tumorigenesis and cancer progression in several different cancer types, and Wnt target genes have been associated with tumor proliferation, metastasis, epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT), recurrence, chemoresistance, and anti-tumor immune regulation [2,3,5,6].
More recently, there is growing research evaluating the role of Wnt signaling in gynecologic malignancies. Specifically, Wnt signaling promotes metastasis and therapy resistance in ovarian cancer, plays a crucial role in tumorigenesis and recurrence in endometrial cancer, and participates in human papillomavirus (HPV) -related tumorigenesis and metastasis in cervical cancer [7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25]. For all of these gynecologic malignancies, Wnt signaling is also being evaluated as a possible therapeutic target [26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33]. In this review, we will discuss the Wnt signaling pathway as it is related to the development, progression, and treatment of gynecologic malignancies.

2. Wnt Signaling

There are three well-defined Wnt signaling pathways separated into two categories: canonical (β-catenin-dependent) and non-canonical (β-catenin-independent). The canonical pathway is a fundamental growth control pathway known to have important roles in many fields, including cancer. The non-canonical pathways mediate cell polarity and regulate levels of intracellular calcium [34].
There are 19 mammalian protein-encoding Wnt genes, many with unique functions. Wnt proteins undergo several post-translational modifications, including palmitoleoylation, which is accomplished by the palmitoyl transferase, Porcupine (PORCN). These modifications are critical for Wnt extracellular signaling, rendering the proteins hydrophobic so that they may be secreted from the cell. The transmembrane protein Wntless then traffics the Wnt proteins to the plasma membrane where they are secreted to signal targeted cells nearby. Wnt signaling then continues at the target cell membrane of the targeted cell where Wnt proteins bind to the Frizzled (FZD) transmembrane receptor and recruit the Dishevelled protein (DVL). There are 10 FZD receptors and at least 5 co-receptors (LRP5/6, ROR1/2, RyK). The specific FZD and co-receptors engaged by the Wnt ligand tailor the initiation of intracellular signaling and determine which Wnt signaling pathway, canonical or non-canonical, proceeds [3,34,35].

2.1. Non-Canonical Pathways—β-Catenin Independent

The non-canonical Wnt signaling pathways are introduced here. However, as the majority of Wnt signaling aberrations in gynecologic malignancies are in the canonical pathway, the majority of this review will focus on the canonical Wnt signaling pathway.

2.1.1. Planar Cell Polarity

There are six main components of the Planar Cell Polarity (PCP) pathway known as the core module. These components consist of three transmembrane proteins (FZD, Vangl, and Celser) and three cytoplasmic proteins (DVL, Prickle (Pk), and Diversin). These components ultimately activate the small Rho GTPase effector molecules, c-Jun N-terminal kinase (JNK) and Nemo-like kinase (NLK). The PCP Wnt pathway components are arranged asymmetrically within the cell in order to influence cell polarity [36]. Determination of cell polarity during development is vital for proper cell organization and tissue function. Defects in PCP signaling have been linked with some developmental diseases including polycystic kidney disease, heart defects, and deafness [36,37,38,39].

2.1.2. Calcium-Dependent Wnt Pathway

The calcium-dependent Wnt pathway controls gene expression by modulating intracellular levels of calcium [36]. This intracellular pathway is also initiated by Wnt ligand proteins, most commonly WNT5A, which has been implicated as a tumor suppressor in multiple cancer types [40,41,42,43]. In mice, the binding of WNT5A ligand to FZD and activation of the co-receptor ROR2 tyrosine kinase inhibit canonical Wnt signaling [44]. DVL and G proteins activate phospholipase C leading to increased diacylglycerol (DAG), inositol 1,4,5-triphosphate (IP3), and intracellular calcium [36]. The increase in these signaling molecules subsequently leads to the activation of calcium calmodulin-dependent protein kinase II (CaMKII) and protein kinase C (PKC). CaMKII and PKC consequently activate the transcription factors NFκB and CREB [36].

2.2. Canonical Pathway—β-Catenin Dependent

At the initiation of the intracellular canonical Wnt signaling pathway (also called the Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway), Wnt proteins bind to FZD as part of a larger receptor complex at the cell membrane. LGR4, LGR5, and LGR6 are members of the 7-transmembrane receptor family and are able to bind R-spondins (RSPO) with high affinity in order to enhance the Wnt signal when there is a low dose of Wnt ligand [34]. The receptor complex also includes lipoprotein receptor-related protein (LRP) receptors. Wnt protein-receptor interactions induce the sequestration of DVL proteins, leading to the disassembly of the β-catenin degradation complex and subsequent accumulation of cytosolic β-catenin. The β-catenin proteins then translocate to the nucleus via BCL9 and Pygo1 [45] where β-catenin interacts with the T-cell factor (TCF) and lymphoid enhancer factor (LEF) transcriptional activators resulting in upregulation of TCF/LEF target genes. In the absence of Wnt protein-mediated signaling, intracellular β-catenin levels are regulated by the degradation complex. The β-catenin protein is trapped by the degradation complex, which is composed of Axin, APC, GSK3β, and CK1α. Within the degradation complex, GSK3β and CK1α phosphorylate β-catenin, promoting its ubiquitination and subsequent proteasomal degradation [3,34,35].
The Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway has multiple identified regulatory mechanisms in addition to phosphorylation and ubiquitination of β-catenin by the degradation complex, as previously described [35]. Negative regulatory mechanisms include the protein Notum, which removes palmitoleate from Wnt proteins, preventing their extracellular secretion; Dickkopf (DKK) proteins that competitively bind to LRP5/6 receptors blocking the initiation of Wnt protein-mediated signaling; secreted Frizzled related proteins (sFRPs), which bind to FZD receptors also blocking the initiation of Wnt protein-mediated signaling; Wnt Inhibitory Factor (WIF), which inhibits signaling by binding directly to Wnt proteins [36]; the transmembrane molecules ZNRF3 and RNF43 which have E3 ubiquitin ligase activity and act on FZD molecules leading to their turn over [34].
Numerous mechanisms of Wnt/β-catenin hyperactivation have been described. Overexpression of Wnt ligands results in increased Wnt signaling [46]. Intracellularly, mutations within the destruction complex (e.g., APC) prevent the phosphorylation and subsequent ubiquitination of β-catenin [2]. Aberrant activation of PI3K (e.g., PIK3CA mutations), which is detected in many ovarian cancers, can result in inhibitory phosphorylation of GSK3β, rendering it unable to phosphorylate β-catenin and thus ultimately preventing β-catenin degradation [35]. Hotspot mutations in Exon 3 of the CTNNB1 gene (encodes for the β-catenin protein) alter the N-terminus of β-catenin and prevent its phosphorylation and degradation by the destruction complex. Concerning gynecologic malignancies, CTNNB1 mutations are detected in uterine endometrial, ovarian endometrioid, and ovarian clear cell carcinomas [7,47,48]. Hyperactivation of Wnt/β-catenin signaling through these mechanisms are implicated in tumorigenesis, tumor progression, recurrence, and chemoresistance in several cancers, including gynecologic malignancies [7,8,26,49,50].

3. Ovarian Cancer and Wnt Signaling

Epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) is the 5th leading cause of cancer-related death in women in the United States [51]. High grade serous ovarian cancer (HGSOC) is the most common histotype of EOC, accounting for over 70% of cases, and it mainly arises from fallopian tube epithelial cells [52]. The majority of HGSOC cases present at a later stage (III or IV) and have a poor prognosis (5-year survival <50%) due to difficulty in diagnosis, high recurrence rates and development of therapy resistance [53,54,55]. Once diagnosed, patients with HGSOC are frequently treated with cytoreductive surgery and platinum-based adjuvant chemotherapy. Approximately 80% of patients ultimately develop recurrent disease and eventual platinum chemotherapy resistance, limiting the options for and success of future treatment lines [53,55]. Improving our understanding of EOC tumorigenesis, metastasis, disease progression, and therapy resistance will allow for advancements in early diagnosis and therapeutics and ultimately, an improvement in patient outcomes.
Wnt/β-catenin signaling plays a role in HGSOC tumorigenesis, metastasis, and therapy resistance. According to The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA), while mutations in the pathway are rare, gene amplification or deletions of Wnt signaling components (148 genes, excluding TP53 and MYC, [56]) are detected in approximately 88% of HGSOC tumors (Table 1) [57]. For instance, DVL3, and LRP6 are amplified in 27% and 10% of cases, respectively. This suggests that the Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway can be hyperactivated in HGSOC through the amplification of pathway activators or deletions of pathway suppressors.

3.1. Tumorigenesis

Both canonical and non-canonical Wnt signaling can promote ovarian cancer cell survival in specific contexts. Wnt/β-catenin signaling promotes survival in HGSOC cells and its inhibition leads to impaired proliferation and migration [27]. For example, the Wnt ligand WNT10A activates canonical Wnt signaling in ovarian cancer cell lines leading to increased viability and cell migration [58]. Additionally, the poly(ADP) ribose polymerase (PARP) Tankyrase (TNKS) activates canonical Wnt signaling in ovarian cancer independent of Wnt ligands through destabilization of the destruction complex [49]. In this context, TNKS-activated Wnt/β-catenin signaling contributes to colony formation, migration, invasion, and tumorigenic potential of ovarian cancer cell lines, as well as the promotion of aerobic glycolysis, which is often observed in malignant cells [49]. Similarly independent of Wnt ligands, RSPO1 promotes ovarian cancer cell survival and migration through upstream activation of the Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway [59]. When either TNKS or RSPO1 are inhibited, Wnt/β-catenin signaling activity decreases and ovarian cancer cells undergo apoptosis [49,59].
The regulation of canonical and non-canonical Wnt signaling is complex and dysregulation resulting in hyperactivation or loss of different components of the signaling pathways can ultimately lead to tumorigenesis or disease progression. For example, activation of non-canonical Wnt signaling by overexpression of WNT5A (non-canonical PCP Wnt protein) in ascites fluid promotes metastatic stem-cell like behavior in HGSOC cells and results in worse survival [60]. Our group demonstrated that WNT5A was significantly underexpressed in primary human EOC compared to normal ovarian surface and fallopian tube (FT) epithelial tissue and that loss of WNT5A correlates with worse survival [42]. In EOC cell lines and tumors, WNT5A overexpression induces cellular senescence, a tumor-suppressive pathway, and antagonizes the β-catenin-dependent transcriptional activity. The regulation of canonical and non-canonical Wnt signaling is complex and dysregulation resulting in hyperactivation or loss of different components of the signaling pathways can ultimately lead to tumorigenesis or disease progression [42,60].

3.2. Metastasis

As previously mentioned, HGSOC is usually diagnosed at a late stage in which the tumor has metastasized to multiple sites. Most HGSOC arise via a non-classical metastatic process, which starts in a TP53-mutation lesion in the fimbriated end of the FT, then causes cancer cells to accumulate there and subsequently exfoliate, resist anoikis, and colonize the peritoneal cavity. This metastatic process appears to be mostly independent of the vasculature and lymphatics [55].
The epithelial to mesenchymal transition (EMT) is the process by which epithelial cells transform into a more motile, invasive mesenchymal phenotype. It conveys resistance to anoikis in cancer cells, thus promoting cancer cell migration and peritoneal metastasis in HGSOC [9]. Wnt/β-catenin signaling plays a crucial role in EMT and metastasis in many cancers, including ovarian [10,11]. In HGSOC cell lines, IL-8 promotes cell migration by activating Wnt/β-catenin signaling-mediated EMT [10]. Conversely, downregulation of Wnt/β-catenin signaling by Cyclin G2 results in inhibition of EMT, ultimately inhibiting cell proliferation, migration, and invasion [61].
Peritoneal metastasis of HGSOC is also promoted by WNT5A, which is abundant in ascites [60,62]. As previously mentioned, WNT5A activity (non-canonical PCP signaling) promotes the metastatic stem-cell like behavior of HGSOC cells and confers a poor prognosis. Similarly, WNT5A in the ascites of HGSOC induces the formation of metastatic peritoneal implants by promoting ovarian cancer cell adhesion to the peritoneum, as well as ovarian cancer cell migration and invasion. Host peritoneal and adipose tissue secrete the WTN5A protein and loss of the host WNT5A gene results in significantly reduced peritoneal metastasis [62]. Expression of various Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway molecules—not just WNT5A—are associated with disease outcomes in metastatic HGSOC. The expression of these Wnt molecules is dependent on anatomic/metastatic site, highlighting the importance of the tumor microenvironment (TME) and indicating that Wnt signaling activity in HGSOC varies depending on this TME [63].

3.3. Therapy Resistance

Wnt/β-catenin signaling is involved in HGSOC chemotherapy resistance [8,12,13]. Leucine-rich-repeat containing G protein-coupled receptor 6 (LGR6, a known activator of Wnt/β-catenin signaling) is upregulated in HGSOC and associated with poor chemotherapeutic response. Consistently, downregulation of LGR6 in loss-of-function assays attenuates the chemotherapy resistance by decreasing Wnt/β-catenin signaling activity [12]. Inhibition of β-catenin signaling using PRI-724 (an inhibitor of β-catenin interactions with its co-activator, CREB Binding Protein (CBP)) is sufficient to resensitize cells to cisplatin chemotherapy [13]. Also, treatment with sFRP4 (a known Wnt antagonist) alone and in combination with chemotherapies conveys chemotherapy-sensitization and improves the efficacy of chemotherapies [8]. These studies highlight that inhibition of the Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway may serve to overcome chemotherapy-resistant ovarian cancer.
Another essential therapy in the management of HGSOC is PARP inhibitors (PARPi), which are approved for upfront maintenance therapy in all advanced cases [64,65,66,67,68]. However, patients commonly experience disease recurrence and eventually develop PARPi-resistant disease [69]. Several mechanisms driving PARPi resistance have been identified, including epigenetic modifications, BRCA reversion mutations, kinase activation, and Wnt/β-catenin signaling [26,69,70,71]. Our group and an independent group recently published that Wnt/β-catenin signaling hyperactivation can promote PARPi resistance [26,72]. Fukumoto et al. observed that methylation of FZD10 mRNA promotes β-catenin activity and PARPi resistance in BRCA-deficient HGSOC cells. We demonstrated that hyperactivation of the canonical pathway via WNT3A overexpression was sufficient to promote PARPi resistance and increase DNA damage repair. Both studies observed that treatment with a Wnt inhibitor (Pyrvinium Pamoate and XAV939, respectively) was able to resensitize HGSOC cells to PARPi and lead to reduced tumor size in vivo [26,72], indicating that the Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway is a potential target for overcoming therapy resistance in HGSOC.

3.4. Immune Landscape

Tumor immune response plays a significant role in patient outcomes and can affect possible treatment strategies. Immunologically “hot” tumors refer to tumors that have immune cell infiltration, while “cold” tumors lack this immune response [73]. Specifically, increased T- and B-cell tumor infiltration conveys a better prognosis for patients with HGSOC [74,75]. In HGSOC tumors, increased Wnt/β-catenin signaling inversely correlates with an activated T-cell signature [76], suggesting Wnt/β-catenin signaling contributes to conveying a “cold” tumor immune microenvironment. Using a syngeneic immune-competent mouse model of HGSOC, Goldsberry et al. confirmed the negative correlation between Wnt signaling and T-cell infiltration [28]. Treatment with a PORCN inhibitor (CGX1321) decreased Wnt ligand secretion and, in turn, lead to increased T-cell, macrophage, and dendritic cell activity. This enhanced immune response was accompanied by decreased tumor burden and improved survival, suggesting that targeting Wnt signaling may lead to increased immune cell infiltration and heightened anti-tumor immunity [28]. In mouse models, Doo et al. demonstrated that EOC tumors treated with the PORCN inhibitor WNT974 had increased CD8+ T cells and enhanced functioning of infiltrating CD4+ and CD8+ T cells, indicating that inhibition of Wnt signaling with WNT974 has immunomodulatory effects in the tumor microenvironment of EOC [29].
Immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) strategies (e.g., anti-PD-L1) have conveyed limited benefit in patients with HGSOC compared to those with melanoma or lung cancer, but Wnt/β-catenin signaling may serve as a targetable pathway to improve response to ICB. For instance, in triple-negative breast cancer, Wnt/β-catenin signaling directly promotes the expression of CD274 (PD-L1) [77]. While further investigation in ovarian cancer is needed, combined Wnt inhibition with ICB could be effective in HGSOC tumors.
Beyond ICB, recent evidence suggests that the Wnt inhibitor DKK1 may serve as an immunotherapeutic target in ovarian cancer [78]. Overexpression of DKK1 altered the immune microenvironment of ovarian cancer, leading to decreased CD8+ T cells and natural killer cells and a reduction of interferon-gamma (IFNy) expression on activated CD8+ T cells. These reports provide a rationale for further investigation into the intersection of Wnt/β-catenin signaling and anti-tumor immune regulation.

3.5. Other Ovarian Cancer Histotypes

While mutations in the Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway are rare in HGSOC, they have been observed in other histotypes of ovarian cancer, namely endometrioid and mucinous carcinomas [79]. In mucinous ovarian cancer, aberrant activation of the Wnt pathway induces chemoresistance [80]. Aberrant Wnt/β-catenin signaling is present in up to 40% of endometrioid ovarian carcinoma, most frequently due to CTNNB1 mutations [81]. A CTNNB1 mutational analysis of 149 ovarian cancer samples detected 16% of endometrioid tumors harbored activating CTNNB1 mutations [82]. The CTNNB1 mutations, often called hotspot mutations, are focused around serine and threonine residues in exon 3, which encode known sites on β-catenin that are phosphorylated by GSK-3β. The most commonly mutated residues are Ser33 and Ser37, in which serine is changed to cystine, phenylalanine or tyrosine [14,82,83,84,85]. Thus, they prevent β-catenin degradation by the destruction complex [84,85]. Hyperactivation of the Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway via other genetic mutations, including MYC, APC, and CREBBP, promote cell malignant transformation in ovarian endometrioid carcinoma [86]. Dapper1 Antagonist of Catenin-1 (DACT1), an inhibitor of β-catenin, is underexpressed in EOC cell lines and tissue samples [87], and overexpressing DACT1 in a mucinous ovarian cancer cell line leads to smaller tumors in vivo, as well as significantly lower levels of critical mediators of the Wnt pathway, including DVL2, β-catenin, and phosphorylated GSK-3β [87]. All of this taken together demonstrates that targeting Wnt/β-catenin signaling may serve as a promising treatment strategy for EOC, regardless of histotype.

4. Endometrial Cancer

Endometrial cancer (EC) is the most common gynecologic malignancy in the United States and is one of the only cancers with an increasing incidence and mortality [51,88,89]. Currently, histopathologic features of EC tumors (histologic subtype and grade, disease stage, myometrial invasion, lymphovascular invasion (LVSI)) are used for risk-stratification and management decisions. However, there is a growing body of research evaluating the molecular make-up of EC and postulating that molecular classification of EC could improve risk-stratification, prognostication and treatment, ultimately improving clinical outcomes for EC patients [14,90,91]. The Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway is of particular importance in the classification and risk-stratification of EC with approximately 65% of EC tumors containing an alteration within the Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway (Table 2).

4.1. CTNNB1 as a Molecular Marker

One of the first and most comprehensive studies to molecularly classify EC was TCGA, which evaluated 373 cases of EC using whole-genome sequencing, exome sequencing, microsatellite instability assays, copy-number analyses, and DNA methylation testing [83]. TCGA identified four distinct genomic subgroups among EC that had significantly different survival outcomes and recurrence rates: polymerase epsilon (POLE) ultramutated, microsatellite instability (MSI) hypermutated, copy-number low (CNL), and copy-number high (CNH). The CNL subgroup is classified by frequent CTNNB1 exon 3 mutations, as well as microsatellite stability and overall low mutation rates. Following TCGA, multiple studies independently reproduced the molecular classification of EC into the same four distinct subgroups with the same clinical outcomes, emphasizing the prognostic implications of this molecular classification system [14,91,92,93,94].
Exon 3 mutation in the CTNNB1 gene occur in approximately 20–25% of endometrioid EC [83,84,95,96,97]. As demonstrated by both TCGA and Liu et al., most CTNNB1-mutant EC have a low overall genomic mutational rate, indicating that the CTNNB1 mutations have autonomous oncogenic relevance [14,83]. Among endometrioid EC, CTNNB1 mutations have been associated with low-risk histopathologic features, including low-grade histology, lack of lymph node metastasis, absence of LVSI and lower rates of deep myometrial invasion [15,94]. CTNNB1 mutations are also associated with younger age at diagnosis, which is also considered a low-risk factor in current risk-stratification [14,15,98].
Despite the association with histopathologic and clinical features considered to be low-risk in the current EC risk-stratification system, CTNNB1-mutant EC has poorer clinical outcomes [7,14,15,98]. Kurnit et al. demonstrated that CTNNB1 mutations were associated with decreased recurrence-free survival in low grade, early-stage EC [15]. Our group evaluated low-risk EC in a case-control study comparing recurrent Grade 1 Stage I EC to matched non-recurrent controls and found that CTNNB1 mutations occurred at significantly higher rates in the recurrent EC [7]. Liu et al. have similarly demonstrated that CTNNB1-mutant low-grade EC exhibits upregulation of the Wnt/β-catenin pathway and poorer overall survival [14]. The increased Wnt/β-catenin signaling activity in EC with CTNNB1 mutations was also demonstrated in a proteogenomic analysis of 95 EC by Yongchao et al. [84]. Based on these data, CTNNB1 mutations need to be further evaluated as a marker for risk-stratification among low-risk EC.
As previously described, CTNNB1 mutations result in the accumulation of the β-catenin protein, and subsequent translocation into the nucleus and increased transcriptional activity [84,85]. Ιmmunohistochemistry (IHC) analyses have shown that nuclear expression of β-catenin is significantly correlated with CTNNB1 mutations and can distinguish CTNNB1-mutant EC from wildtype with a sensitivity of 91% and 85% and a specificity of 89% and 100%, respectively [98,99]. IHC therefore, could be considered for use as a clinical screening mechanism for CTNNB1 mutations in EC [98,99].

4.2. Tumorigenesis

Wnt/β-catenin signaling is involved in both the regulation of the normal endometrium and the aberrant development of endometrial hyperplasia or malignancy [16,95,100]. The normal endometrium undergoes cyclical, structural changes as part of the female menstrual cycle. During the proliferative phase, estrogen promotes proliferation of the endometrial glands and stroma, and during the luteal/secretory phase, progesterone induces endometrial differentiation and secretory activity. An imbalance in this cycle, particularly continuous unopposed estrogen, can result in endometrial hyperplasia and/or malignancy [95,100].
Wnt/β-catenin signaling is present in the endometrium and is regulated in the same cyclical fashion by estradiol (E2) and progesterone in both patient endometrium samples and EC cell lines [100]. Specifically, Wnt/β-catenin signaling is active during E2 exposure (proliferative phase). Progesterone exposure (secretory phase) inhibits Wnt/β-catenin signaling through induction of DKK1 and the transcription factor, FOXO1. Similarly, inhibition of progesterone with mifepristone (competitive antagonist) results in upregulation of Wnt/β-catenin signaling [101]. These findings are in line with the known function of Wnt/β-catenin signaling in stem cells: Wnt/β-catenin signaling activity (“Wnt-On”) promotes proliferation, while lack of Wnt/β-catenin signaling (“Wnt-Off”) allows for differentiation [100].
Correct regulation of Wnt/β-catenin signaling in this cyclical fashion is required for normal endometrial function [16,17,95,100], as loss of β-catenin results in squamous metaplasia of the endometrium, while constitutively active β-catenin results in endometrial hyperplasia [16,17]. The addition of unopposed estrogen to the models containing activating β-catenin mutations results in EC, demonstrating the relationship between Wnt/β-catenin signaling and hormonal regulation in the endometrium. This relationship is also highlighted by the fact that progesterone-mediated downregulation of Wnt/β-catenin signaling inhibits EC progression [17]. Progesterone’s downregulation of Wnt/β-catenin signaling may play a significant mechanistic role in its treatment effects.
Other components of the Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway have been implicated in the EC tumorigenesis. WNT7A is a Wnt/β-catenin signaling protein and is overexpressed in EC compared to normal endometrium and benign endometrial lesions. This overexpression is associated with worse clinical outcomes (shorter disease-free survival and overall survival) [46]. These findings again indicate that hyperactivation of Wnt/β-catenin signaling plays a role in the development and progression of EC.

5. Cervical Cancer

Cervical cancer (CC) is the most common gynecologic malignancy in women worldwide and the third most common in the United States [51,102,103]. Human papilloma virus (HPV) 16 and HPV 18 are responsible for approximately 70% of CC cases, while other high-risk HPV (HR-HPV) types are responsible for approximately 20% of CC cases [103,104,105]. HPV proteins E6 and E7 promote tumorigenesis through inactivation of the tumor suppressors p53, Rb and p21. These tumor suppressors function by regulating the cell cycle and DNA repair pathways, therefore when inactivated by E6 and E7, cells undergo aberrant cell replication and accumulate DNA damage [104,105]. Although CC is primarily caused by HR-HPV, most HPV infections are cleared without causing cervical dysplasia, let alone cancer. Importantly, concomitant hyperactivation of Wnt/β-catenin signaling contributes to the progression of HPV-infection to tumor formation [18,104,105,106]. A variety of mutations and aberrations result in Wnt/β-catenin hyperactivation in CC [104,106,107,108]; based on TCGA, 83% of all CCs have at least one mutation within the Wnt signaling pathway [108] (Table 3). For instance, β-catenin transcriptional co-activators EP300 and CREBBP are mutated in 8% and 12% of cases, respectively. There is growing evidence that Wnt/β-catenin signaling plays a role in CC tumorigenesis and metastasis, and further research is needed.

5.1. Tumorigenesis

Wnt/β-catenin signaling is hyperactivated in CC and plays an important role in HPV-dependent tumorigenesis [106]. WNT5A [19], as well as WNT4 and WNT8A, are overexpressed in HPV 16 positive CC [20]. WNT11 overexpression in CC is positively associated with HR-HPV E6 protein expression [21], and WNT11 and HR-HPV E6 expression are correlated with the progression of CC [22]. Interestingly, WNT7A is downregulated in CC cells, and restoration of WNT7A expression in CC cells results in decreased cell proliferation [109].
β-catenin is differentially expressed between CC and normal cervix, with multiple studies showing β-catenin expression in the nucleus and cytoplasm of CC cells compared to at the cell membrane in normal cervical tissue [110,111], suggesting enhanced β-catenin transcriptional activity in the former. HPV E6 and E7 proteins potentiate Wnt/β-catenin signaling by stabilizing β-catenin and by promoting β-catenin/TCF transcriptional activity [104,106,112,113,114]. In transgenic mouse studies, combined overexpression of E7 and β-catenin produced higher rates of transformation to CC compared to overexpression of either E7 or β-catenin alone [18].
In CC, there is crosstalk between Wnt/β-catenin and other oncogenic signaling pathways. Sal-like 4 (SALL4) is overexpressed in CC and promotes cell proliferation and tumor formation [115]. SALL4 increases levels of β-catenin and its target genes by directly binding to the CTNNB1 promoter and trans-activating expression of CTNNB1 [115]. Treatment with the TNKS inhibitor XAV-939 significantly decreases CC cell proliferation [115]. KIF18B is another identified oncogene associated with CC cell proliferation and invasion, and loss of KIF18B correlates with decreased cell proliferation and migration, as well as with a loss of β-catenin expression and its target genes [116]. Long noncoding RNA (lncRNA) CASC11 promotes cell proliferation and survival via Wnt/β-catenin signaling [117]. Treatment with DKK1, a negative regulator of the Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway, leads to decreased cell survival [117]. DAX1 promotes cell growth, tumorigenicity, and tumorsphere formation through activation of the Wnt/β-catenin pathway [118] and transcriptionally represses GSK3B, preventing its expression and reducing the phosphorylation and proteasomal degradation of β-catenin [118]. Expression of SOX17 inhibits Wnt/β-catenin signaling activity in CC cells [119] and restrains the proliferation and tumor formation by transuppression of CTNNB1 [119]. All of this taken together demonstrates the important role the Wnt/β-catenin pathway plays in the development and progression of CC. Suppression of Wnt signaling consistently attenuates cell growth; thus, it may serve as a targetable pathway to improve patient outcomes.

5.2. Metastasis

CC is a disease that typically spreads by local extension. As such, the majority of CC cases that present with extra-cervical disease have local metastases to other pelvic organs. Distant metastases at the time of diagnosis are uncommon in CC (approximately 2%) and confer a poor prognosis with a 5-year survival rate of 16.5%. When distant metastases do occur, common sites include lung, bones, liver, and brain [103,120].
Wnt/β-catenin signaling has been found to play a role in the migration and invasion of CC. Both WNT5A and WNT11 promote CC cell proliferation and invasion, and both are also associated with CC metastasis and recurrence [19,22,121]. Sulfiredoxin (Srx) is an antioxidant enzyme that positively correlates with the progression of CC [23], and its expression is correlated with β-catenin expression [23]. Inhibition of the Wnt/β-catenin pathway with XAV-939 attenuates Srx expression and significantly inhibits invasion [23]. S100 calcium-binding protein A9 (S100A9) enhances proliferation and migration and induced EMT in CC [24], and β-catenin knockdown significantly suppresses this effect, suggesting that the effects of S100A9 are mediated through the Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway [24]. HOTAIR is a lncRNA known to be associated with invasion and metastasis of several cancers, including cervical [25]. Knockdown of the HOTAIR inhibits the Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway and EMT decreases cell proliferation and induces apoptosis in CC cells [25]. While this requires further investigation, these findings demonstrate that the Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway plays an important role in metastasis of CC and may serve as a treatment target to improve outcomes for patients with metastatic CC.

6. Targeting Wnt Signaling

As described, Wnt/β-catenin signaling plays a pivotal role in tumorigenesis, metastasis, recurrence, and chemoresistance of EOC, EC, and CC, suggesting that it may serve as a targetable pathway in these cancers. Several inhibitors have been developed that different target nodes of this pathway (Figure 1).

6.1. PORCN Inhibitors

PORCN is essential for Wnt ligand secretion. Several inhibitors that target PORCN in the endoplasmic reticulum prevent the palmitoylation of Wnt proteins, which in turn prevents their secretion [3,35,122]. LGK974, or WNT974, is an orally available small molecule PORCN inhibitor that decreases EOC cell viability in vitro and blocks tumor growth in vivo [29,58,122]. In EOC mouse EOC models WNT974 decreases tumor growth and ascites formation and prolongs survival. These effects are enhanced when WNT974 is administered with paclitaxel [29]. There is currently a Phase 1 clinical trial investigating LGK974 as a single agent treatment for patients with solid malignancies for whom no effective standard treatment is available such as pancreatic cancer, triple-negative breast cancer, and cervical squamous cell carcinoma (NCT01351103) [29].
CGX1321, another PORCN inhibitor, inhibits both canonical and non-canonical Wnt signaling pathways [123]. A phase 1 clinical trial (NCT02675946) investigating single-dose escalation of CGX1321 in solid tumors should be completed in June 2020. In a syngeneic mouse model of EOC, CGX1321 treatment lead to increased overall survival, decreased tumor burden, and increased immune cell infiltration/function [28]. Inhibitors of Wnt production (IWPs) are also known to target PORCN as well as certain isoforms of CK1 such as CK1δ and CK1ε, possibly disrupting the β-catenin destruction complex [124]. While PORCN inhibitors continue to progress through clinical trials, recent discoveries of Wnt-secretion independent activation of Wnt signaling [125], suggest a possible mechanism of resistance that needs further investigation.

6.2. WNT/FZD Inhibitors

Wnt signaling may also be inhibited by direct binding to and inhibition of Wnt ligands and FZD receptors. Ipafricept (OMP54F28; IPA) is a recombinant fusion protein that competes with the FZD8 receptor and binds directly to Wnt ligands [30,126]. IPA was investigated in a phase 1b dose-escalation study in combination with paclitaxel and carboplatin in patients with recurrent platinum-sensitive ovarian cancer. The combination of IPA, paclitaxel, and carboplatin produced response rates and survival outcomes similar to historical treatment regimens; however, bone toxicities at efficacy doses prevented further testing of this treatment regime in EOC [30]. OMP-18R5 (vantictumab is a monoclonal antibody that inhibits cancer growth by targeting FZD1, FZD2, FZD5, FZD7, and FZD8 [127,128]. OMP-18R5 decreases tumor growth in xenografts of breast, pancreatic, colon, lung, and head and neck cancers [127,129] and is being evaluated in a number of phase I trials for these tumor types. However, it has not been studied in gynecologic malignancies. Pavlovic et al. utilized combinatorial antibody engineering to generate F2.A from OMP-18R5 to broaden the specificity to include FZD4 [128]. F2.A is specific to Wnt signaling and does not inhibit Norrin, which also signals through FZD4. FA.2 inhibits pancreatic cancer tumor growth in xenograft models [128], but this inhibitor has also not been tested in gynecologic malignancies. Carbamazapine, an antiepileptic drug, has recently been found to bind the cysteine-rich domain (CRD) of FZD8 [130]. Carbamazapine, an antiepileptic drug, has recently been found to bind the cysteine-rich domain (CRD) of FZD8 [130], suggesting that carbamazapine may be worth exploration as a treatment in gynecologic malignancies.

6.3. DVL Inhibitors

DVL is important for transducing Wnt signals by recruiting components of the destruction complex to the cell membrane [36,131]. In order for DVL to function, it binds to the cytoplasmic tail of FZD proteins through its PDZ domain [132]. FJ9 is an inhibitor that disrupts the interaction between FZD and the PDZ domain of DVL. FJ9 was confirmed to downregulate Wnt/β-catenin signaling and suppress tumor cell growth in cervical, lung and colorectal cancer lines in vitro, as well as in a lung cancer xenograft [133].

6.4. Destruction Complex Inhibitors

Stabilizing the β-catenin destruction complex can lead to increased ubiquitination of β-catenin, making it an attractive drug target. Pyrvinium, an FDA approved drug, binds all CK1 family members in vitro, selectively potentiating CK1α kinase activity [134]. Colon cancer cells with APC mutations were sensitive to pyrvinium treatment with a decrease in both Wnt signaling and cell proliferation, suggesting that cancers with mutations in the Wnt/β-catenin pathway such as EC may be sensitive to pyrvinium as well [134]. Indeed, pyrvinium inhibits platinum-resistant EOC tumor growth and induces apoptosis in vitro and in vivo, and these effects are enhanced when pyrvinium is combined with paclitaxel. Pyrvinium has these effects on EOC by decreasing β-catenin levels and suppressing β-catenin-mediated transcription; when β-catenin is stabilized or overexpressed, EOC cells are no longer impacted by pyrvinium [31].
Pyrvinium pamoate (Pyr. Pam.) is also an FDA approved drug that stabilizes GSK-3β potentially through inhibition of Akt/PI3K, leading to decreased levels of β-catenin and its downstream targets [135]. Pyr. Pam. inhibits proliferation and invasion of endometrial stromal cells from endometriosis specimens [136] but has not yet been studied in EC cells. Our group has previously demonstrated that treatment with Pyr. Pam. is sufficient to sensitize ovarian cancer cells to PARPi and leads to decreased tumor size and ascites volume in vivo [26].
TNKS proteins are PARPs that can regulate the destruction complex [137]. TNKS poly-ADP ribosylates (PAR) Axin, which in the absence of Wnt/β-catenin signaling, leads to proteasomal degradation and in the presence of Wnt/β-catenin signaling can stabilize the interaction between Axin and LRP5/6 [137]. XAV939 is a TNKS inhibitor that leads to decreased β-catenin-dependent transcription through its regulation of Axin [122,138]. XAV939 treatment decreases the viability of EOC cell lines and increases radiosensitivity in CC cells [27,32].

6.5. Transcriptional Co-Activators/Target Gene Inhibitors

There are a number of co-activators of β-catenin-dependent transcription, including CREB binding protein (CBP) [35]. In Phase 1 clinical for patients with hepatitis C virus-related cirrhosis, intravenous PRI-724 (which inhibits the interaction between CBP and β-catenin [139]) over 12 weeks was well tolerated [140]. In chemotherapy-resistant EOC with hyperactivated β-catenin/CBP signaling, PRI-724 was able to induce sensitization to platinum therapy [33].
Several small molecules have been designed that inhibit CDC-like kinase (CLK) activity [141], thereby inhibiting Wnt/β-catenin gene expression through alternative splicing of transcribed RNA [141]. SM08502 reduces Wnt/β-catenin signaling and can be orally administered to significantly inhibit the growth of GI tumors in xenograft mouse models [141]. SM08502 is currently being investigated in Phase 1 clinical trial for patients with advanced solid tumors (NCT03355066).

6.6. Wnt Inhibitor Toxicities

As Wnt signaling is highly conserved and complex, playing an important role in many biological processes, targeting the Wnt signaling pathways carries a risk for significant side effects and toxicities [142,143]. The role of Wnt signaling in tissue homeostasis seems to be a particular source of toxicity, specifically in bone, intestinal, skin, and hair homeostasis, as well as in hematopoiesis [142]. As previously described, a phase Ib study evaluating IPA in combination with paclitaxel and carboplatin in patients with recurrent platinum-sensitive ovarian cancer demonstrated clinical activity but was limited by the toxicity of fragility fractures [30]. Evaluation of Wnt inhibitors in other disease types has demonstrated toxicities, including loss of bone density, liver injury, enteritis, and thrombocytopenia [122,140,144,145]. Further development and evaluation of Wnt inhibitors are needed to find ways to more precisely and safely target Wnt signaling in gynecologic malignancies.

7. Conclusions

Wnt signaling impacts EOC, EC, and CC in various ways, differing between cancer types and disease phases. Although the exact mechanisms are not yet clear, it is evident that Wnt/β-catenin signaling plays a vital role in EOC’s therapy resistance, recurrence in EC, metastasis in EOC and CC, and tumorigenesis for all three cancer types. Studies that have demonstrated Wnt/β-catenin signaling activity in gynecologic malignancies have not only illuminated important behaviors of these cancers but have also shed light on possible targets in the Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway for future treatments.
Targeted therapies against Wnt/β-catenin signaling are beginning to be evaluated in various cancer types, but further research evaluating Wnt/β-catenin signaling inhibitors in gynecologic malignancies is needed. Looking toward the future of inhibiting Wnt signaling in gynecologic malignancies and reducing systemic toxicities, research is needed for improved targeting of drugs to specific tissue. For instance, utilizing antibody–drug conjugates that target specific FZD receptors could increase cancer cell specificity and inhibit tumor progression. Further, given the contribution of Wnt signaling to immune cell response, there is strong rational to evaluate combinatorial immunotherapies and Wnt inhibitors.

Funding

There were no financial or other forms of outside support provided for this study.

Acknowledgments

Marisa R. Moroney is supported by the University of Colorado Gynecologic Oncology Fellowship and the Department of OB/GYN Academic Enrichment Fund. Bitler is supported by NIH (R00CA194318-03) and DOD OCRP (OC170228).

Conflicts of Interest

Bradley R. Corr sits on the advisory board of multiple pharmaceutical companies.

References

  1. Anastas, J.N.; Moon, R.T. Wnt signalling pathways as therapeutic targets in cancer. Nat. Rev. Cancer 2013, 13, 11–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Jung, Y.S.; Park, J.I. Wnt signaling in cancer: Therapeutic targeting of wnt signaling beyond beta-catenin and the destruction complex. Exp. Mol. Med. 2020, 52, 183–191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  3. Wiese, K.E.; Nusse, R.; van Amerongen, R. Wnt signalling: Conquering complexity. Development 2018, 145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. Grainger, S.; Willert, K. Mechanisms of wnt signaling and control. Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. Syst. Biol. Med. 2018, e1422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Groden, J.; Thliveris, A.; Samowitz, W.; Carlson, M.; Gelbert, L.; Albertsen, H.; Joslyn, G.; Stevens, J.; Spirio, L.; Robertson, M.; et al. Identification and characterization of the familial adenomatous polyposis coli gene. Cell 1991, 66, 589–600. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. van Schie, E.H.; van Amerongen, R. Aberrant wnt/ctnnb1 signaling as a therapeutic target in human breast cancer: Weighing the evidence. Front. Cell Dev. Biol. 2020, 8, 25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Moroney, M.R.; Davies, K.D.; Wilberger, A.C.; Sheeder, J.; Post, M.D.; Berning, A.A.; Fisher, C.; Lefkowits, C.; Guntupalli, S.R.; Behbakht, K.; et al. Molecular markers in recurrent stage i, grade 1 endometrioid endometrial cancers. Gynecol. Oncol. 2019, 153, 517–520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Deshmukh, A.; Kumar, S.; Arfuso, F.; Newsholme, P.; Dharmarajan, A. Secreted frizzled-related protein 4 (sfrp4) chemo-sensitizes cancer stem cells derived from human breast, prostate, and ovary tumor cell lines. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 2256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Teeuwssen, M.; Fodde, R. Wnt signaling in ovarian cancer stemness, emt, and therapy resistance. J. Clin. Med. 2019, 8, 1658. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Wen, J.; Zhao, Z.; Huang, L.; Wang, L.; Miao, Y.; Wu, J. Il-8 promotes cell migration through regulating emt by activating the wnt/beta-catenin pathway in ovarian cancer. J. Cell Mol. Med. 2020, 24, 1588–1598. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Weidle, U.H.; Birzele, F.; Kollmorgen, G.; Rueger, R. Mechanisms and targets involved in dissemination of ovarian cancer. Cancer Genom. Proteom. 2016, 13, 407–423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  12. Ruan, X.; Liu, A.; Zhong, M.; Wei, J.; Zhang, W.; Rong, Y.; Liu, W.; Li, M.; Qing, X.; Chen, G.; et al. Silencing lgr6 attenuates stemness and chemoresistance via inhibiting wnt/beta-catenin signaling in ovarian cancer. Mol. Ther. Oncolytics 2019, 14, 94–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  13. Nagaraj, A.B.; Joseph, P.; Kovalenko, O.; Singh, S.; Armstrong, A.; Redline, R.; Resnick, K.; Zanotti, K.; Waggoner, S.; DiFeo, A. Critical role of wnt/beta-catenin signaling in driving epithelial ovarian cancer platinum resistance. Oncotarget 2015, 6, 23720–23734. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  14. Liu, Y.; Patel, L.; Mills, G.B.; Lu, K.H.; Sood, A.K.; Ding, L.; Kucherlapati, R.; Mardis, E.R.; Levine, D.A.; Shmulevich, I.; et al. Clinical significance of ctnnb1 mutation and wnt pathway activation in endometrioid endometrial carcinoma. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 2014, 106, 106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  15. Kurnit, K.C.; Kim, G.N.; Fellman, B.M.; Urbauer, D.L.; Mills, G.B.; Zhang, W.; Broaddus, R.R. Ctnnb1 (beta-catenin) mutation identifies low grade, early stage endometrial cancer patients at increased risk of recurrence. Mod. Pathol. 2017, 30, 1032–1041. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Jeong, J.W.; Lee, H.S.; Franco, H.L.; Broaddus, R.R.; Taketo, M.M.; Tsai, S.Y.; Lydon, J.P.; DeMayo, F.J. Beta-catenin mediates glandular formation and dysregulation of beta-catenin induces hyperplasia formation in the murine uterus. Oncogene 2009, 28, 31–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Goad, J.; Ko, Y.A.; Kumar, M.; Jamaluddin, M.F.B.; Tanwar, P.S. Oestrogen fuels the growth of endometrial hyperplastic lesions initiated by overactive wnt/beta-catenin signalling. Carcinogenesis 2018, 39, 1105–1116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Bulut, G.; Fallen, S.; Beauchamp, E.M.; Drebing, L.E.; Sun, J.; Berry, D.L.; Kallakury, B.; Crum, C.P.; Toretsky, J.A.; Schlegel, R.; et al. Beta-catenin accelerates human papilloma virus type-16 mediated cervical carcinogenesis in transgenic mice. PLoS ONE 2011, 6, e27243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Lin, L.; Liu, Y.; Zhao, W.; Sun, B.; Chen, Q. Wnt5a expression is associated with the tumor metastasis and clinical survival in cervical cancer. Int. J. Clin. Exp. Pathol. 2014, 7, 6072–6078. [Google Scholar]
  20. Perez-Plasencia, C.; Vazquez-Ortiz, G.; Lopez-Romero, R.; Pina-Sanchez, P.; Moreno, J.; Salcedo, M. Genome wide expression analysis in hpv16 cervical cancer: Identification of altered metabolic pathways. Infect. Agent Cancer 2007, 2, 16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Wei, H.; Wang, N.; Zhang, Y.; Wang, S.; Pang, X.; Zhang, J.; Luo, Q.; Su, Y.; Zhang, S. Clinical significance of wnt-11 and squamous cell carcinoma antigen expression in cervical cancer. Med. Oncol. 2014, 31, 933. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Wei, H.; Wang, N.; Zhang, Y.; Wang, S.; Pang, X.; Zhang, S. Wnt-11 overexpression promoting the invasion of cervical cancer cells. Tumour Biol. 2016, 37, 11789–11798. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Lan, K.; Zhao, Y.; Fan, Y.; Ma, B.; Yang, S.; Liu, Q.; Linghu, H.; Wang, H. Sulfiredoxin may promote cervical cancer metastasis via wnt/beta-catenin signaling pathway. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2017, 18, 917. [Google Scholar]
  24. Zha, H.; Li, X.; Sun, H.; Duan, L.; Yuan, S.; Li, H.; Li, A.; Gu, Y.; Zhao, J.; Xie, J.; et al. S100a9 promotes the proliferation and migration of cervical cancer cells by inducing epithelialmesenchymal transition and activating the wnt/betacatenin pathway. Int. J. Oncol. 2019, 55, 35–44. [Google Scholar]
  25. Guo, X.; Xiao, H.; Guo, S.; Li, J.; Wang, Y.; Chen, J.; Lou, G. Long noncoding rna hotair knockdown inhibits autophagy and epithelial-mesenchymal transition through the wnt signaling pathway in radioresistant human cervical cancer hela cells. J. Cell Physiol. 2019, 234, 3478–3489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Yamamoto, T.M.; McMellen, A.; Watson, Z.L.; Aguilera, J.; Ferguson, R.; Nurmemmedov, E.; Thakar, T.; Moldovan, G.L.; Kim, H.; Cittelly, D.M.; et al. Activation of wnt signaling promotes olaparib resistant ovarian cancer. Mol. Carcinog. 2019, 58, 1770–1782. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Bocchicchio, S.; Tesone, M.; Irusta, G. Convergence of wnt and notch signaling controls ovarian cancer cell survival. J. Cell Physiol. 2019, 234, 22130–22143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Goldsberry, W.N.; Meza-Perez, S.; Londono, A.I.; Katre, A.A.; Mott, B.T.; Roane, B.M.; Goel, N.; Wall, J.A.; Cooper, S.J.; Norian, L.A.; et al. Inhibiting wnt ligand production for improved immune recognition in the ovarian tumor microenvironment. Cancers (Basel) 2020, 12, 766. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Doo, D.W.; Meza-Perez, S.; Londono, A.I.; Goldsberry, W.N.; Katre, A.A.; Boone, J.D.; Moore, D.J.; Hudson, C.T.; Betella, I.; McCaw, T.R.; et al. Inhibition of the wnt/beta-catenin pathway enhances antitumor immunity in ovarian cancer. Ther. Adv. Med. Oncol. 2020, 12, 1758835920913798. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Moore, K.N.; Gunderson, C.C.; Sabbatini, P.; McMeekin, D.S.; Mantia-Smaldone, G.; Burger, R.A.; Morgan, M.A.; Kapoun, A.M.; Brachmann, R.K.; Stagg, R.; et al. A phase 1b dose escalation study of ipafricept (omp54f28) in combination with paclitaxel and carboplatin in patients with recurrent platinum-sensitive ovarian cancer. Gynecol. Oncol. 2019, 154, 294–301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Zhang, C.; Zhang, Z.; Zhang, S.; Wang, W.; Hu, P. Targeting of wnt/beta-catenin by anthelmintic drug pyrvinium enhances sensitivity of ovarian cancer cells to chemotherapy. Med. Sci. Monit. 2017, 23, 266–275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  32. Zhang, J.; Si, J.; Gan, L.; Guo, M.; Yan, J.; Chen, Y.; Wang, F.; Xie, Y.; Wang, Y.; Zhang, H. Inhibition of wnt signalling pathway by xav939 enhances radiosensitivity in human cervical cancer hela cells. Artif. Cells Nanomed. Biotechnol. 2020, 48, 479–487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. Wu, G.; Cao, L.; Zhu, J.; Tan, Z.; Tang, M.; Li, Z.; Hu, Y.; Yu, R.; Zhang, S.; Song, L.; et al. Loss of rbms3 confers platinum resistance in epithelial ovarian cancer via activation of mir-126-5p/beta-catenin/cbp signaling. Clin. Cancer Res. 2019, 25, 1022–1035. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  34. Nusse, R.; Clevers, H. Wnt/beta-catenin signaling, disease, and emerging therapeutic modalities. Cell 2017, 169, 985–999. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Arend, R.C.; Londono-Joshi, A.I.; Straughn, J.M., Jr.; Buchsbaum, D.J. The wnt/beta-catenin pathway in ovarian cancer: A review. Gynecol. Oncol. 2013, 131, 772–779. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Taciak, B.; Pruszynska, I.; Kiraga, L.; Bialasek, M.; Krol, M. Wnt signaling pathway in development and cancer. J. Physiol. Pharmacol. 2018, 69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Simons, M.; Walz, G. Polycystic kidney disease: Cell division without a c(l)ue? Kidney Int. 2006, 70, 854–864. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Garriock, R.J.; D’Agostino, S.L.; Pilcher, K.C.; Krieg, P.A. Wnt11-r, a protein closely related to mammalian wnt11, is required for heart morphogenesis in xenopus. Dev. Biol. 2005, 279, 179–192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Curtin, J.A.; Quint, E.; Tsipouri, V.; Arkell, R.M.; Cattanach, B.; Copp, A.J.; Henderson, D.J.; Spurr, N.; Stanier, P.; Fisher, E.M.; et al. Mutation of celsr1 disrupts planar polarity of inner ear hair cells and causes severe neural tube defects in the mouse. Curr. Biol. 2003, 13, 1129–1133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Leris, A.C.; Roberts, T.R.; Jiang, W.G.; Newbold, R.F.; Mokbel, K. Wnt5a expression in human breast cancer. Anticancer Res. 2005, 25, 731–734. [Google Scholar]
  41. MacLeod, R.J.; Hayes, M.; Pacheco, I. Wnt5a secretion stimulated by the extracellular calcium-sensing receptor inhibits defective wnt signaling in colon cancer cells. Am. J. Physiol. Gastrointest Liver Physiol. 2007, 293, G403–G411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  42. Bitler, B.G.; Nicodemus, J.P.; Li, H.; Cai, Q.; Wu, H.; Hua, X.; Li, T.; Birrer, M.J.; Godwin, A.K.; Cairns, P.; et al. Wnt5a suppresses epithelial ovarian cancer by promoting cellular senescence. Cancer Res. 2011, 71, 6184–6194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  43. Wasniewski, T.; Kiezun, J.; Krazinski, B.E.; Kowalczyk, A.E.; Szostak, B.; Wierzbicki, P.M.; Kiewisz, J. Wnt5a gene and protein expression in endometrial cancer. Folia Histochem. Cytobiol. 2019, 57, 84–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  44. Mikels, A.; Minami, Y.; Nusse, R. Ror2 receptor requires tyrosine kinase activity to mediate wnt5a signaling. J. Biol. Chem. 2009, 284, 30167–30176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  45. Kramps, T.; Peter, O.; Brunner, E.; Nellen, D.; Froesch, B.; Chatterjee, S.; Murone, M.; Zullig, S.; Basler, K. Wnt/wingless signaling requires bcl9/legless-mediated recruitment of pygopus to the nuclear beta-catenin-tcf complex. Cell 2002, 109, 47–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  46. Liu, Y.; Meng, F.; Xu, Y.; Yang, S.; Xiao, M.; Chen, X.; Lou, G. Overexpression of wnt7a is associated with tumor progression and unfavorable prognosis in endometrial cancer. Int. J. Gynecol. Cancer 2013, 23, 304–311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Myers, A.; Barry, W.T.; Hirsch, M.S.; Matulonis, U.; Lee, L. Beta-catenin mutations in recurrent figo ia grade i endometrioid endometrial cancers. Gynecol. Oncol. 2014, 134, 426–427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Kim, S.; Jeong, S. Mutation hotspots in the beta-catenin gene: Lessons from the human cancer genome databases. Mol. Cells 2019, 42, 8–16. [Google Scholar]
  49. Yang, H.Y.; Shen, J.X.; Wang, Y.; Liu, Y.; Shen, D.Y.; Quan, S. Tankyrase promotes aerobic glycolysis and proliferation of ovarian cancer through activation of wnt/beta-catenin signaling. Biomed. Res. Int. 2019, 2019, 2686340. [Google Scholar]
  50. Fan, Y.; Shen, B.; Tan, M.; Mu, X.; Qin, Y.; Zhang, F.; Liu, Y. Long non-coding rna uca1 increases chemoresistance of bladder cancer cells by regulating wnt signaling. FEBS J. 2014, 281, 1750–1758. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Siegel, R.L.; Miller, K.D.; Jemal, A. Cancer statistics, 2020. CA Cancer J. Clin. 2020, 70, 7–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Klotz, D.M.; Wimberger, P. Cells of origin of ovarian cancer: Ovarian surface epithelium or fallopian tube? Arch. Gynecol. Obstet 2017, 296, 1055–1062. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Jayson, G.C.; Kohn, E.C.; Kitchener, H.C.; Ledermann, J.A. Ovarian cancer. Lancet 2014, 384, 1376–1388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Heintz, A.P.; Odicino, F.; Maisonneuve, P.; Beller, U.; Benedet, J.L.; Creasman, W.T.; Ngan, H.Y.; Pecorelli, S. Carcinoma of the fallopian tube. Int. J. Gynaecol. Obstet. 2003, 83 (Suppl. 1), 119–133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Lisio, M.A.; Fu, L.; Goyeneche, A.; Gao, Z.H.; Telleria, C. High-grade serous ovarian cancer: Basic sciences, clinical and therapeutic standpoints. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 952. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  56. Kanehisa, M. Toward understanding the origin and evolution of cellular organisms. Protein Sci. 2019, 28, 1947–1951. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Cancer Genome Atlas Research Network. Integrated genomic analyses of ovarian carcinoma. Nature 2011, 474, 609–615. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Li, P.; Liu, W.; Xu, Q.; Wang, C. Clinical significance and biological role of wnt10a in ovarian cancer. Oncol. Lett. 2017, 14, 6611–6617. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Liu, Q.; Zhao, Y.; Xing, H.; Li, L.; Li, R.; Dai, J.; Li, Q.; Fang, S. The role of r-spondin 1 through activating wnt/beta-catenin in the growth, survival and migration of ovarian cancer cells. Gene 2019, 689, 124–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Kotrbova, A.; Ovesna, P.; Gybel, T.; Radaszkiewicz, T.; Bednarikova, M.; Hausnerova, J.; Jandakova, E.; Minar, L.; Crha, I.; Weinberger, V.; et al. Wnt signaling inducing activity in ascites predicts poor outcome in ovarian cancer. Theranostics 2020, 10, 537–552. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Bernaudo, S.; Salem, M.; Qi, X.; Zhou, W.; Zhang, C.; Yang, W.; Rosman, D.; Deng, Z.; Ye, G.; Yang, B.B.; et al. Cyclin g2 inhibits epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition by disrupting wnt/beta-catenin signaling. Oncogene 2016, 35, 4816–4827. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Asem, M.; Young, A.M.; Oyama, C.; Claure De La Zerda, A.; Liu, Y.; Yang, J.; Hilliard, T.S.; Johnson, J.; Harper, E.I.; Guldner, I.; et al. Host wnt5a potentiates microenvironmental regulation of ovarian cancer metastasis. Cancer Res. 2020, 80, 1156–1170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Chehover, M.; Reich, R.; Davidson, B. Expression of wnt pathway molecules is associated with disease outcome in metastatic high-grade serous carcinoma. Virchows Archiv. 2020, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Coleman, R.L.; Oza, A.M.; Lorusso, D.; Aghajanian, C.; Oaknin, A.; Dean, A.; Colombo, N.; Weberpals, J.I.; Clamp, A.; Scambia, G.; et al. Rucaparib maintenance treatment for recurrent ovarian carcinoma after response to platinum therapy (ariel3): A randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet 2017, 390, 1949–1961. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  65. Mirza, M.R.; Monk, B.J.; Herrstedt, J.; Oza, A.M.; Mahner, S.; Redondo, A.; Fabbro, M.; Ledermann, J.A.; Lorusso, D.; Vergote, I.; et al. Niraparib maintenance therapy in platinum-sensitive, recurrent ovarian cancer. N. Engl. J. Med. 2016, 375, 2154–2164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Moore, K.; Colombo, N.; Scambia, G.; Kim, B.G.; Oaknin, A.; Friedlander, M.; Lisyanskaya, A.; Floquet, A.; Leary, A.; Sonke, G.S.; et al. Maintenance olaparib in patients with newly diagnosed advanced ovarian cancer. N. Engl. J. Med. 2018, 379, 2495–2505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Pujade-Lauraine, E.; Ledermann, J.A.; Selle, F.; Gebski, V.; Penson, R.T.; Oza, A.M.; Korach, J.; Huzarski, T.; Poveda, A.; Pignata, S.; et al. Olaparib tablets as maintenance therapy in patients with platinum-sensitive, relapsed ovarian cancer and a brca1/2 mutation (solo2/engot-ov21): A double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2017, 18, 1274–1284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  68. Swisher, E.M.; Lin, K.K.; Oza, A.M.; Scott, C.L.; Giordano, H.; Sun, J.; Konecny, G.E.; Coleman, R.L.; Tinker, A.V.; O’Malley, D.M.; et al. Rucaparib in relapsed, platinum-sensitive high-grade ovarian carcinoma (ariel2 part 1): An international, multicentre, open-label, phase 2 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2017, 18, 75–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  69. Bitler, B.G.; Watson, Z.L.; Wheeler, L.J.; Behbakht, K. Parp inhibitors: Clinical utility and possibilities of overcoming resistance. Gynecol. Oncol. 2017, 147, 695–704. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  70. Watson, Z.L.; Yamamoto, T.M.; McMellen, A.; Kim, H.; Hughes, C.J.; Wheeler, L.J.; Post, M.D.; Behbakht, K.; Bitler, B.G. Histone methyltransferases ehmt1 and ehmt2 (glp/g9a) maintain parp inhibitor resistance in high-grade serous ovarian carcinoma. Clin. Epigenetics 2019, 11, 165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Du, Y.; Yamaguchi, H.; Wei, Y.; Hsu, J.L.; Wang, H.L.; Hsu, Y.H.; Lin, W.C.; Yu, W.H.; Leonard, P.G.; Lee, G.R.t.; et al. Blocking c-met-mediated parp1 phosphorylation enhances anti-tumor effects of parp inhibitors. Nat. Med. 2016, 22, 194–201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Fukumoto, T.; Zhu, H.; Nacarelli, T.; Karakashev, S.; Fatkhutdinov, N.; Wu, S.; Liu, P.; Kossenkov, A.V.; Showe, L.C.; Jean, S.; et al. N(6)-methylation of adenosine of fzd10 mrna contributes to parp inhibitor resistance. Cancer Res. 2019, 79, 2812–2820. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  73. Galon, J.; Bruni, D. Approaches to treat immune hot, altered and cold tumours with combination immunotherapies. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 2019, 18, 197–218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Zhang, L.; Conejo-Garcia, J.R.; Katsaros, D.; Gimotty, P.A.; Massobrio, M.; Regnani, G.; Makrigiannakis, A.; Gray, H.; Schlienger, K.; Liebman, M.N.; et al. Intratumoral t cells, recurrence, and survival in epithelial ovarian cancer. N. Engl. J. Med. 2003, 348, 203–213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  75. Nielsen, J.S.; Sahota, R.A.; Milne, K.; Kost, S.E.; Nesslinger, N.J.; Watson, P.H.; Nelson, B.H. Cd20+ tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes have an atypical cd27- memory phenotype and together with cd8+ t cells promote favorable prognosis in ovarian cancer. Clin. Cancer Res. 2012, 18, 3281–3292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  76. Luke, J.J.; Bao, R.; Sweis, R.F.; Spranger, S.; Gajewski, T.F. Wnt/beta-catenin pathway activation correlates with immune exclusion across human cancers. Clin. Cancer Res. 2019, 25, 3074–3083. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  77. Castagnoli, L.; Cancila, V.; Cordoba-Romero, S.L.; Faraci, S.; Talarico, G.; Belmonte, B.; Iorio, M.V.; Milani, M.; Volpari, T.; Chiodoni, C.; et al. Wnt signaling modulates pd-l1 expression in the stem cell compartment of triple-negative breast cancer. Oncogene 2019, 38, 4047–4060. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  78. Betella, I.; Turbitt, W.J.; Szul, T.; Wu, B.; Martinez, A.; Katre, A.; Wall, J.A.; Norian, L.; Birrer, M.J.; Arend, R. Wnt signaling modulator dkk1 as an immunotherapeutic target in ovarian cancer. Gynecol. Oncol. 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Nguyen, V.H.L.; Hough, R.; Bernaudo, S.; Peng, C. Wnt/beta-catenin signalling in ovarian cancer: Insights into its hyperactivation and function in tumorigenesis. J. Ovarian Res. 2019, 12, 122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  80. Niiro, E.; Morioka, S.; Iwai, K.; Yamada, Y.; Ogawa, K.; Kawahara, N.; Kobayashi, H. Potential signaling pathways as therapeutic targets for overcoming chemoresistance in mucinous ovarian cancer. Biomed. Rep. 2018, 8, 215–223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  81. Kurman, R.J.; Shih Ie, M. Molecular pathogenesis and extraovarian origin of epithelial ovarian cancer--shifting the paradigm. Hum. Pathol. 2011, 42, 918–931. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  82. Wright, K.; Wilson, P.; Morland, S.; Campbell, I.; Walsh, M.; Hurst, T.; Ward, B.; Cummings, M.; Chenevix-Trench, G. Beta-catenin mutation and expression analysis in ovarian cancer: Exon 3 mutations and nuclear translocation in 16% of endometrioid tumours. Int. J. Cancer 1999, 82, 625–629. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Cancer Genome Atlas Research Network; Kandoth, C.; Schultz, N.; Cherniack, A.D.; Akbani, R.; Liu, Y.; Shen, H.; Robertson, A.G.; Pashtan, I.; Shen, R.; et al. Integrated genomic characterization of endometrial carcinoma. Nature 2013, 497, 67–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Dou, Y.; Kawaler, E.A.; Cui Zhou, D.; Gritsenko, M.A.; Huang, C.; Blumenberg, L.; Karpova, A.; Petyuk, V.A.; Savage, S.R.; Satpathy, S.; et al. Proteogenomic characterization of endometrial carcinoma. Cell 2020, 180, 729–748. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Klaus, A.; Birchmeier, W. Wnt signalling and its impact on development and cancer. Nat. Rev. Cancer 2008, 8, 387–398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Er, T.K.; Su, Y.F.; Wu, C.C.; Chen, C.C.; Wang, J.; Hsieh, T.H.; Herreros-Villanueva, M.; Chen, W.T.; Chen, Y.T.; Liu, T.C.; et al. Targeted next-generation sequencing for molecular diagnosis of endometriosis-associated ovarian cancer. J. Mol. Med. (Berl.) 2016, 94, 835–847. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Li, R.N.; Liu, B.; Li, X.M.; Hou, L.S.; Mu, X.L.; Wang, H.; Linghu, H. Dact1 overexpression in type i ovarian cancer inhibits malignant expansion and cis-platinum resistance by modulating canonical wnt signalling and autophagy. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 9285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  88. Jemal, A.; Siegel, R.; Xu, J.; Ward, E. Cancer statistics, 2010. CA Cancer J. Clin. 2010, 60, 277–300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Global Burden of Disease Cancer Collaboration; Fitzmaurice, C.; Akinyemiju, T.F.; Al Lami, F.H.; Alam, T.; Alizadeh-Navaei, R.; Allen, C.; Alsharif, U.; Alvis-Guzman, N.; Amini, E.; et al. Global, regional, and national cancer incidence, mortality, years of life lost, years lived with disability, and disability-adjusted life-years for 29 cancer groups, 1990 to 2016: A systematic analysis for the global burden of disease study. JAMA Oncol. 2018, 4, 1553–1568. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. McAlpine, J.N.; Temkin, S.M.; Mackay, H.J. Endometrial cancer: Not your grandmother’s cancer. Cancer 2016, 122, 2787–2798. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Talhouk, A.; McAlpine, J.N. New classification of endometrial cancers: The development and potential applications of genomic-based classification in research and clinical care. Gynecol. Oncol. Res. Pract. 2016, 3, 14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  92. Talhouk, A.; McConechy, M.K.; Leung, S.; Yang, W.; Lum, A.; Senz, J.; Boyd, N.; Pike, J.; Anglesio, M.; Kwon, J.S.; et al. Confirmation of promise: A simple, genomics-based clinical classifier for endometrial cancer. Cancer 2017, 123, 802–813. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  93. Stelloo, E.; Bosse, T.; Nout, R.A.; MacKay, H.J.; Church, D.N.; Nijman, H.W.; Leary, A.; Edmondson, R.J.; Powell, M.E.; Crosbie, E.J.; et al. Refining prognosis and identifying targetable pathways for high-risk endometrial cancer; a transportec initiative. Mod. Pathol. 2015, 28, 836–844. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  94. Saegusa, M.; Hashimura, M.; Yoshida, T.; Okayasu, I. Beta- catenin mutations and aberrant nuclear expression during endometrial tumorigenesis. Br. J. Cancer 2001, 84, 209–217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  95. Coopes, A.; Henry, C.E.; Llamosas, E.; Ford, C.E. An update of wnt signalling in endometrial cancer and its potential as a therapeutic target. Endocr. Relat. Cancer 2018, 25, R647–R662. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Byron, S.A.; Gartside, M.; Powell, M.A.; Wellens, C.L.; Gao, F.; Mutch, D.G.; Goodfellow, P.J.; Pollock, P.M. Fgfr2 point mutations in 466 endometrioid endometrial tumors: Relationship with msi, kras, pik3ca, ctnnb1 mutations and clinicopathological features. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e30801. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. McConechy, M.K.; Ding, J.; Cheang, M.C.; Wiegand, K.; Senz, J.; Tone, A.; Yang, W.; Prentice, L.; Tse, K.; Zeng, T.; et al. Use of mutation profiles to refine the classification of endometrial carcinomas. J. Pathol. 2012, 228, 20–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  98. Costigan, D.C.; Dong, F.; Nucci, M.R.; Howitt, B.E. Clinicopathologic and immunohistochemical correlates of ctnnb1 mutated endometrial endometrioid carcinoma. Int. J. Gynecol. Pathol. 2020, 39, 119–127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Kim, G.; Kurnit, K.C.; Djordjevic, B.; Singh, C.; Munsell, M.F.; Wang, W.L.; Lazar, A.J.; Zhang, W.; Broaddus, R. Nuclear beta-catenin localization and mutation of the ctnnb1 gene: A context-dependent association. Mod. Pathol. 2018, 31, 1553–1559. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Wang, Y.; Hanifi-Moghaddam, P.; Hanekamp, E.E.; Kloosterboer, H.J.; Franken, P.; Veldscholte, J.; van Doorn, H.C.; Ewing, P.C.; Kim, J.J.; Grootegoed, J.A.; et al. Progesterone inhibition of wnt/beta-catenin signaling in normal endometrium and endometrial cancer. Clin. Cancer Res. 2009, 15, 5784–5793. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  101. Catalano, R.D.; Critchley, H.O.; Heikinheimo, O.; Baird, D.T.; Hapangama, D.; Sherwin, J.R.; Charnock-Jones, D.S.; Smith, S.K.; Sharkey, A.M. Mifepristone induced progesterone withdrawal reveals novel regulatory pathways in human endometrium. Mol. Hum. Reprod. 2007, 13, 641–654. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  102. Bray, F.; Ferlay, J.; Soerjomataram, I.; Siegel, R.L.; Torre, L.A.; Jemal, A. Global cancer statistics 2018: Globocan estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J. Clin. 2018, 68, 394–424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  103. Bhatla, N.; Aoki, D.; Sharma, D.N.; Sankaranarayanan, R. Cancer of the cervix uteri. Int. J. Gynaecol. Obstet. 2018, 143 (Suppl. 2), 22–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Bello, J.O.; Nieva, L.O.; Paredes, A.C.; Gonzalez, A.M.; Zavaleta, L.R.; Lizano, M. Regulation of the wnt/beta-catenin signaling pathway by human papillomavirus e6 and e7 oncoproteins. Viruses 2015, 7, 4734–4755. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Chan, C.K.; Aimagambetova, G.; Ukybassova, T.; Kongrtay, K.; Azizan, A. Human papillomavirus infection and cervical cancer: Epidemiology, screening, and vaccination-review of current perspectives. J. Oncol. 2019, 2019, 3257939. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Yang, M.; Wang, M.; Li, X.; Xie, Y.; Xia, X.; Tian, J.; Zhang, K.; Tang, A. Wnt signaling in cervical cancer? J. Cancer 2018, 9, 1277–1286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  107. Zhang, L.; Jiang, Y.; Lu, X.; Zhao, H.; Chen, C.; Wang, Y.; Hu, W.; Zhu, Y.; Yan, H.; Yan, F. Genomic characterization of cervical cancer based on human papillomavirus status. Gynecol. Oncol. 2019, 152, 629–637. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. The Cancer Genome Atlas Research Network; Albert Einstein College of Medicine; Analytical Biological Services; Barretos Cancer Hospital; Baylor College of Medicine; Beckman Research Institute of City of Hope; Buck Institute for Research on Aging; Canada’s Michael Smith Genome Sciences Centre; Harvard Medical School; Helen F. Graham Cancer Center & Research Institute at Christiana Care Health Services; et al. Integrated genomic and molecular characterization of cervical cancer. Nature 2017, 543, 378–384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Ramos-Solano, M.; Meza-Canales, I.D.; Torres-Reyes, L.A.; Alvarez-Zavala, M.; Alvarado-Ruiz, L.; Rincon-Orozco, B.; Garcia-Chagollan, M.; Ochoa-Hernandez, A.B.; Ortiz-Lazareno, P.C.; Rosl, F.; et al. Expression of wnt genes in cervical cancer-derived cells: Implication of wnt7a in cell proliferation and migration. Exp. Cell Res. 2015, 335, 39–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Uren, A.; Fallen, S.; Yuan, H.; Usubutun, A.; Kucukali, T.; Schlegel, R.; Toretsky, J.A. Activation of the canonical wnt pathway during genital keratinocyte transformation: A model for cervical cancer progression. Cancer Res. 2005, 65, 6199–6206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  111. Rodriguez-Sastre, M.A.; Gonzalez-Maya, L.; Delgado, R.; Lizano, M.; Tsubaki, G.; Mohar, A.; Garcia-Carranca, A. Abnormal distribution of e-cadherin and beta-catenin in different histologic types of cancer of the uterine cervix. Gynecol. Oncol. 2005, 97, 330–336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Sominsky, S.; Kuslansky, Y.; Shapiro, B.; Jackman, A.; Haupt, Y.; Rosin-Arbesfeld, R.; Sherman, L. Hpv16 e6 and e6ap differentially cooperate to stimulate or augment wnt signaling. Virology 2014, 468–470, 510–523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  113. Sominsky, S.; Shterzer, N.; Jackman, A.; Shapiro, B.; Yaniv, A.; Sherman, L. E6 proteins of alpha and beta cutaneous hpv types differ in their ability to potentiate wnt signaling. Virology 2017, 509, 11–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Munoz-Bello, J.O.; Olmedo-Nieva, L.; Castro-Munoz, L.J.; Manzo-Merino, J.; Contreras-Paredes, A.; Gonzalez-Espinosa, C.; Lopez-Saavedra, A.; Lizano, M. Hpv-18 e6 oncoprotein and its spliced isoform e6*i regulate the wnt/beta-catenin cell signaling pathway through the tcf-4 transcriptional factor. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018, 19, 3153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  115. Chen, M.; Li, L.; Zheng, P.S. Sall4 promotes the tumorigenicity of cervical cancer cells through activation of the wnt/beta-catenin pathway via ctnnb1. Cancer Sci. 2019, 110, 2794–2805. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  116. Wu, Y.; Wang, A.; Zhu, B.; Huang, J.; Lu, E.; Xu, H.; Xia, W.; Dong, G.; Jiang, F.; Xu, L. Kif18b promotes tumor progression through activating the wnt/beta-catenin pathway in cervical cancer. Onco Targets Ther. 2018, 11, 1707–1720. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  117. Hsu, W.; Liu, L.; Chen, X.; Zhang, Y.; Zhu, W. Lncrna casc11 promotes the cervical cancer progression by activating wnt/beta-catenin signaling pathway. Biol. Res. 2019, 52, 33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Liu, X.F.; Li, X.Y.; Zheng, P.S.; Yang, W.T. Dax1 promotes cervical cancer cell growth and tumorigenicity through activation of wnt/beta-catenin pathway via gsk3beta. Cell Death Dis. 2018, 9, 339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Li, L.; Yang, W.T.; Zheng, P.S.; Liu, X.F. Sox17 restrains proliferation and tumor formation by down-regulating activity of the wnt/beta-catenin signaling pathway via trans-suppressing beta-catenin in cervical cancer. Cell Death. Dis. 2018, 9, 741. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Li, H.; Wu, X.; Cheng, X. Advances in diagnosis and treatment of metastatic cervical cancer. J. Gynecol. Oncol. 2016, 27, e43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  121. Shojima, K.; Sato, A.; Hanaki, H.; Tsujimoto, I.; Nakamura, M.; Hattori, K.; Sato, Y.; Dohi, K.; Hirata, M.; Yamamoto, H.; et al. Wnt5a promotes cancer cell invasion and proliferation by receptor-mediated endocytosis-dependent and -independent mechanisms, respectively. Sci. Rep. 2015, 5, 8042. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  122. Krishnamurthy, N.; Kurzrock, R. Targeting the wnt/beta-catenin pathway in cancer: Update on effectors and inhibitors. Cancer Treat. Rev. 2018, 62, 50–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  123. Jiang, J.; Lan, C.; Li, L.; Yang, D.; Xia, X.; Liao, Q.; Fu, W.; Chen, X.; An, S.; Wang, W.E.; et al. A novel porcupine inhibitor blocks wnt pathways and attenuates cardiac hypertrophy. Biochim. Biophys. Acta Mol. Basis Dis. 2018, 1864, 3459–3467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  124. Garcia-Reyes, B.; Witt, L.; Jansen, B.; Karasu, E.; Gehring, T.; Leban, J.; Henne-Bruns, D.; Pichlo, C.; Brunstein, E.; Baumann, U.; et al. Discovery of inhibitor of wnt production 2 (iwp-2) and related compounds as selective atp-competitive inhibitors of casein kinase 1 (ck1) delta/epsilon. J. Med. Chem. 2018, 61, 4087–4102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  125. Rao, D.M.; Shackleford, M.T.; Bordeaux, E.K.; Sottnik, J.L.; Ferguson, R.L.; Yamamoto, T.M.; Wellberg, E.A.; Bitler, B.G.; Sikora, M.J. Wnt family member 4 (wnt4) and wnt3a activate cell-autonomous wnt signaling independent of porcupine o-acyltransferase or wnt secretion. J. Biol. Chem. 2019, 294, 19950–19966. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  126. Jimeno, A.; Gordon, M.; Chugh, R.; Messersmith, W.; Mendelson, D.; Dupont, J.; Stagg, R.; Kapoun, A.M.; Xu, L.; Uttamsingh, S.; et al. A first-in-human phase i study of the anticancer stem cell agent ipafricept (omp-54f28), a decoy receptor for wnt ligands, in patients with advanced solid tumors. Clin. Cancer Res. 2017, 23, 7490–7497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  127. Gurney, A.; Axelrod, F.; Bond, C.J.; Cain, J.; Chartier, C.; Donigan, L.; Fischer, M.; Chaudhari, A.; Ji, M.; Kapoun, A.M.; et al. Wnt pathway inhibition via the targeting of frizzled receptors results in decreased growth and tumorigenicity of human tumors. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2012, 109, 11717–11722. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  128. Pavlovic, Z.; Adams, J.J.; Blazer, L.L.; Gakhal, A.K.; Jarvik, N.; Steinhart, Z.; Robitaille, M.; Mascall, K.; Pan, J.; Angers, S.; et al. A synthetic anti-frizzled antibody engineered for broadened specificity exhibits enhanced anti-tumor properties. MAbs 2018, 10, 1157–1167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  129. Le, P.N.; Keysar, S.B.; Miller, B.; Eagles, J.R.; Chimed, T.S.; Reisinger, J.; Gomez, K.E.; Nieto, C.; Jackson, B.C.; Somerset, H.L.; et al. Wnt signaling dynamics in head and neck squamous cell cancer tumor-stroma interactions. Mol. Carcinog. 2019, 58, 398–410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Zhao, Y.; Ren, J.; Hillier, J.; Lu, W.; Jones, E.Y. Antiepileptic drug carbamazepine binds to a novel pocket on the wnt receptor frizzled-8. J. Med. Chem. 2020, 63, 3252–3260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Orvell, C.; Kristensson, K. The effects of monoclonal antibodies against the hemagglutinin-neuraminidase and fusion protein on the release of sendai virus from infected cells. Arch. Virol. 1985, 86, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  132. Wong, H.C.; Bourdelas, A.; Krauss, A.; Lee, H.J.; Shao, Y.; Wu, D.; Mlodzik, M.; Shi, D.L.; Zheng, J. Direct binding of the pdz domain of dishevelled to a conserved internal sequence in the c-terminal region of frizzled. Mol. Cell 2003, 12, 1251–1260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  133. Fujii, N.; You, L.; Xu, Z.; Uematsu, K.; Shan, J.; He, B.; Mikami, I.; Edmondson, L.R.; Neale, G.; Zheng, J.; et al. An antagonist of dishevelled protein-protein interaction suppresses beta-catenin-dependent tumor cell growth. Cancer Res. 2007, 67, 573–579. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  134. Thorne, C.A.; Hanson, A.J.; Schneider, J.; Tahinci, E.; Orton, D.; Cselenyi, C.S.; Jernigan, K.K.; Meyers, K.C.; Hang, B.I.; Waterson, A.G.; et al. Small-molecule inhibition of wnt signaling through activation of casein kinase 1alpha. Nat. Chem. Biol. 2010, 6, 829–836. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  135. Zheng, L.; Liu, Y.; Pan, J. Inhibitory effect of pyrvinium pamoate on uveal melanoma cells involves blocking of wnt/beta-catenin pathway. Acta Biochim. Biophys. Sin. (Shanghai) 2017, 49, 890–898. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  136. Karamian, A.; Nazarian, H.; Ziai, S.A.; Zarnani, A.H.; Salehpour, S.; Paktinat, S.; Novin, M.G. Pyrvinium pamoate inhibits proliferation and invasion of human endometriotic stromal cells. Hum. Exp. Toxicol. 2020, 39, 662–672. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  137. Mariotti, L.; Pollock, K.; Guettler, S. Regulation of wnt/beta-catenin signalling by tankyrase-dependent poly(adp-ribosyl)ation and scaffolding. Br. J. Pharmacol. 2017, 174, 4611–4636. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  138. Tian, X.H.; Hou, W.J.; Fang, Y.; Fan, J.; Tong, H.; Bai, S.L.; Chen, Q.; Xu, H.; Li, Y. Xav939, a tankyrase 1 inhibitior, promotes cell apoptosis in neuroblastoma cell lines by inhibiting wnt/beta-catenin signaling pathway. J. Exp. Clin. Cancer Res. 2013, 32, 100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  139. Okazaki, H.; Sato, S.; Koyama, K.; Morizumi, S.; Abe, S.; Azuma, M.; Chen, Y.; Goto, H.; Aono, Y.; Ogawa, H.; et al. The novel inhibitor pri-724 for wnt/beta-catenin/cbp signaling ameliorates bleomycin-induced pulmonary fibrosis in mice. Exp. Lung Res. 2019, 45, 188–199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  140. Kimura, K.; Ikoma, A.; Shibakawa, M.; Shimoda, S.; Harada, K.; Saio, M.; Imamura, J.; Osawa, Y.; Kimura, M.; Nishikawa, K.; et al. Safety, tolerability, and preliminary efficacy of the anti-fibrotic small molecule pri-724, a cbp/beta-catenin inhibitor, in patients with hepatitis c virus-related cirrhosis: A single-center, open-label, dose escalation phase 1 trial. EBioMedicine 2017, 23, 79–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  141. Tam, B.Y.; Chiu, K.; Chung, H.; Bossard, C.; Nguyen, J.D.; Creger, E.; Eastman, B.W.; Mak, C.C.; Ibanez, M.; Ghias, A.; et al. The clk inhibitor sm08502 induces anti-tumor activity and reduces wnt pathway gene expression in gastrointestinal cancer models. Cancer Lett. 2020, 473, 186–197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  142. Kahn, M. Can we safely target the wnt pathway? Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 2014, 13, 513–532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  143. Cui, C.; Zhou, X.; Zhang, W.; Qu, Y.; Ke, X. Is beta-catenin a druggable target for cancer therapy? Trends Biochem. Sci. 2018, 43, 623–634. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  144. Madan, B.; McDonald, M.J.; Foxa, G.E.; Diegel, C.R.; Williams, B.O.; Virshup, D.M. Bone loss from wnt inhibition mitigated by concurrent alendronate therapy. Bone Res. 2018, 6, 17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  145. Zhong, Y.; Katavolos, P.; Nguyen, T.; Lau, T.; Boggs, J.; Sambrone, A.; Kan, D.; Merchant, M.; Harstad, E.; Diaz, D.; et al. Tankyrase inhibition causes reversible intestinal toxicity in mice with a therapeutic index <1. Toxicol. Pathol. 2016, 44, 267–278. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
Ijms 21 04272 g001 550
Figure 1. Therapeutic Targeting of the Wnt Signaling Pathway. Red letters = drug/compound name. Pre = pre-clinical development, Phase # = clinical trial phase. Clinical trial not necessarily for gynecologic malignancy. Figure generated with BioRender.
Figure 1. Therapeutic Targeting of the Wnt Signaling Pathway. Red letters = drug/compound name. Pre = pre-clinical development, Phase # = clinical trial phase. Clinical trial not necessarily for gynecologic malignancy. Figure generated with BioRender.
Ijms 21 04272 g001
Table
Table 1. Canonical and non-canonical Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway alterations in high grade serous ovarian cancer. The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA), Firehose Legacy. Wnt/β-catenin KEGG Pathway (150 genes). AMP = amplification, HOMDEL = homozygous deletion, Mut = mutated.
Table 1. Canonical and non-canonical Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway alterations in high grade serous ovarian cancer. The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA), Firehose Legacy. Wnt/β-catenin KEGG Pathway (150 genes). AMP = amplification, HOMDEL = homozygous deletion, Mut = mutated.
TCGA, OVCA, Firehose Legacy
Wnt/Beta-Catenin PathwayGeneAMPHOMDELMutAltered (AMP+HOMDEL+Mut)
Degradation ComplexAPC1.38%2.94%2.22%6.54%
Degradation ComplexCSNK2A18.29%0.17%0.32%8.78%
Degradation ComplexCSNK2B6.39%0.00%0.32%6.71%
InhibitorDKK45.87%0.17%0.00%6.04%
LigandCER13.97%1.38%0.00%5.35%
LigandWNT119.84%0.17%0.63%10.65%
LigandWNT167.08%0.52%0.95%8.55%
LigandWNT26.91%0.35%0.32%7.57%
LigandWNT3A7.94%0.00%0.00%7.94%
LigandWNT5B11.92%0.00%0.00%11.92%
LigandWNT7B0.35%6.56%0.63%7.54%
LigandWNT9A7.77%0.00%0.63%8.41%
ReceptorFZD30.86%6.04%0.00%6.91%
ReceptorFZD410.02%0.17%0.00%10.19%
ReceptorFZD620.90%0.17%0.00%21.07%
ReceptorLRP55.35%0.17%0.95%6.48%
ReceptorLRP610.02%0.17%0.32%10.51%
SignalingCACYBP5.87%0.00%0.00%5.87%
SignalingDAAM25.35%0.00%0.63%5.99%
SignalingDVL13.97%1.38%0.00%5.35%
SignalingDVL326.77%0.00%0.32%27.09%
SignalingPLCB17.08%0.17%1.27%8.52%
SignalingPLCB46.04%0.00%0.32%6.36%
SignalingPPARD6.04%0.00%0.63%6.68%
SignalingPPP2CB1.21%4.32%0.00%5.53%
SignalingPPP2R5A4.32%0.52%0.32%5.15%
SignalingPPP2R5D5.70%0.17%0.32%6.19%
SignalingPPP3CC0.17%7.25%0.32%7.74%
SignalingPRKACA15.37%0.00%0.00%15.37%
SignalingVANGL25.01%0.00%0.32%5.33%
SecretionPORCN6.56%0.69%0.63%7.89%
Transcriptional Target/RegulationCCND16.74%0.00%0.00%6.74%
Transcriptional Target/RegulationCCND211.57%0.17%0.00%11.74%
Transcriptional Target/RegulationCCND36.04%0.17%0.00%6.22%
Transcriptional Target/RegulationCHD84.15%0.35%1.59%6.08%
Transcriptional Target/RegulationCREBBP1.55%2.59%2.22%6.37%
Transcriptional Target/RegulationCTBP16.91%0.69%0.32%7.92%
Transcriptional Target/RegulationCTBP25.87%1.04%0.32%7.23%
Transcriptional Target/RegulationCUL111.23%0.69%0.00%11.92%
Transcriptional Target/RegulationJUN4.66%0.86%0.00%5.53%
Transcriptional Target/RegulationMMP77.60%0.52%0.32%8.43%
Transcriptional Target/RegulationMYC41.97%0.00%0.00%41.97%
Transcriptional Target/RegulationNFATC28.46%0.17%0.32%8.95%
Transcriptional Target/RegulationNKD214.34%0.17%0.00%14.51%
Transcriptional Target/RegulationRAC36.91%0.86%0.00%7.77%
Transcriptional Target/RegulationRUVBL15.53%0.00%0.00%5.53%
Transcriptional Target/RegulationSENP226.60%0.00%0.00%26.60%
Transcriptional Target/RegulationSOX1711.23%0.00%0.00%11.23%
Transcriptional Target/RegulationTBL1XR128.67%0.00%0.32%28.99%
Transcriptional Target/RegulationTP531.38%0.35%87.62%89.35%
100 genes with less than 5% altered.
Table
Table 2. Canonical and non-canonical Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway alterations in Uterine Corpus Endometrial Carcinoma. The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA), Firehose Legacy. Wnt/β-catenin KEGG Pathway (150 genes). AMP = amplification, HOMDEL = homozygous deletion, Mut = mutated.
Table 2. Canonical and non-canonical Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway alterations in Uterine Corpus Endometrial Carcinoma. The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA), Firehose Legacy. Wnt/β-catenin KEGG Pathway (150 genes). AMP = amplification, HOMDEL = homozygous deletion, Mut = mutated.
TCGA, EC, Firehose Legacy
Wnt/Beta-Catenin PathwayGeneAMPHOMDELMutAltered (AMP+HOMDEL+Mut)
Degradation ComplexAPC0.41%0.00%11.98%12.40%
ReceptorLRP60.83%0.00%7.85%8.68%
SignalingCTNNB10.00%0.41%29.75%30.17%
SignalingDVL37.02%0.83%3.72%11.57%
SignalingPPP2R1A0.83%0.41%10.74%11.98%
SignalingPRKACA5.79%0.00%2.48%8.26%
SignalingROCK22.89%0.00%5.79%8.68%
Transcriptional Target/RegulationCCND13.31%0.00%6.20%9.50%
Transcriptional Target/RegulationCHD80.41%0.00%7.85%8.26%
Transcriptional Target/RegulationCREBBP1.65%0.41%9.09%11.16%
Transcriptional Target/RegulationEP3001.65%0.00%9.09%10.74%
Transcriptional Target/RegulationMYC7.02%0.00%3.31%10.33%
Transcriptional Target/RegulationSENP26.20%0.83%2.89%9.92%
Transcriptional Target/RegulationSOX176.61%0.00%2.89%9.50%
Transcriptional Target/RegulationTBL1XR16.61%0.41%4.96%11.98%
Transcriptional Target/RegulationTP530.00%0.00%28.10%28.10%
126 genes with less than 5% altered.
Table
Table 3. Canonical and non-canonical Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway alterations in Cervical Squamous Cell Carcinoma and Endocervical Adenocarcinoma. The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA), Firehose Legacy. Wnt/β-catenin KEGG Pathway (150 genes). AMP = amplification, HOMDEL = homozygous deletion, Mut = mutated.
Table 3. Canonical and non-canonical Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway alterations in Cervical Squamous Cell Carcinoma and Endocervical Adenocarcinoma. The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA), Firehose Legacy. Wnt/β-catenin KEGG Pathway (150 genes). AMP = amplification, HOMDEL = homozygous deletion, Mut = mutated.
TCGA, CC, Firehose Legacy
Wnt/Beta-Catenin PathwayGeneAMPHOMDELMutAltered (AMP+HOMDEL+Mut)
ReceptorFZD66.89%0.13%0.39%7.41%
SignalingDVL317.73%0.00%0.20%17.93%
SignalingPRKACA7.65%0.38%0.39%8.42%
Transcriptional Target/RegulationMMP75.99%0.51%0.39%6.89%
Transcriptional Target/RegulationMYC21.43%0.00%0.20%21.63%
Transcriptional Target/RegulationNKD27.53%0.26%0.20%7.99%
Transcriptional Target/RegulationSENP217.35%0.00%0.20%17.55%
Transcriptional Target/RegulationTBL1XR119.26%0.38%0.98%20.62%
Transcriptional Target/RegulationTP530.38%0.51%61.18%62.07%
135 genes with less than 5% altered.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

McMellen, A.; Woodruff, E.R.; Corr, B.R.; Bitler, B.G.; Moroney, M.R. Wnt Signaling in Gynecologic Malignancies. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 4272. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21124272

AMA Style

McMellen A, Woodruff ER, Corr BR, Bitler BG, Moroney MR. Wnt Signaling in Gynecologic Malignancies. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2020; 21(12):4272. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21124272

Chicago/Turabian Style

McMellen, Alexandra, Elizabeth R. Woodruff, Bradley R. Corr, Benjamin G. Bitler, and Marisa R. Moroney. 2020. "Wnt Signaling in Gynecologic Malignancies" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 21, no. 12: 4272. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21124272

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop