Next Article in Journal
Comprehensive Identification of Drought Tolerance QTL-Allele and Candidate Gene Systems in Chinese Cultivated Soybean Population
Previous Article in Journal
PRPS-Associated Disorders and the Drosophila Model of Arts Syndrome
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
IJMS
Volume 21
Issue 14
10.3390/ijms21144828
ijms-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Simultaneous FTIR and Raman Spectroscopy in Endometrial Atypical Hyperplasia and Cancer

by
Edyta Barnas
1,†,
Joanna Skret-Magierlo
2,†,
Andrzej Skret
2,
Ewa Kaznowska
3,
Joanna Depciuch
4,*,
Kamil Szmuc
5,
Kornelia Łach
6,
Izabela Krawczyk-Marć
7 and
Jozef Cebulski
5
1
Institute of Health Sciences, College of Medical Sciences, University of Rzeszow, Kopisto 2a, 35-959 Rzeszów, Poland
2
Medical College of Rzeszow University, Institute of Medical Sciences, Kopisto 2a, 35-959 Rzeszów, Poland
3
Department of Pathomorphology, Chair of Morphological Sciences, College of Medical Sciences, University of Rzeszow, Kopisto 2a, 35-959 Rzeszow, Poland
4
Institute of Nuclear Physics, Polish Academy of Science, Radzikowskiego 152, 31-342 Krakow, Poland
5
Institute of Physics, College of Natural Sciences, University of Rzeszow, - St. Pigonia 1, 35-310 Rzeszów, Poland
6
Clinic of Paediatric Oncology and Haematology, College of Medical Sciences, University of Rzeszow, Kopisto 2a, 35-959 Rzeszow, Poland
7
Department of Human Histology, Chair of Morphological Sciences, College of Medical Sciences, University of Rzeszow, Kopisto 2a, 35-959 Rzeszow, Poland
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21(14), 4828; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21144828
Submission received: 17 June 2020 / Revised: 26 June 2020 / Accepted: 6 July 2020 / Published: 8 July 2020
(This article belongs to the Section Molecular Pathology, Diagnostics, and Therapeutics)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Currently, endometrial carcinoma (EC) is the most common genital cancer in high-income countries. Some types of endometrial hyperplasia (EH) may be progressing to this malignancy. The diagnosis of EC and EH is based on time consuming histopathology evaluation, which is subjective and causes discrepancies in reassessment. Therefore, there is a need to create methods of objective evaluation allowing the diagnosis of early changes. The study aimed to simultaneously asses Fourier Transform Infrared (FTIR) and Raman spectroscopy combined with multidimensional analysis to identify the tissues of endometrial cancer, atypical hyperplasia and the normal control group, and differentiate them. The results of FTIR and Raman spectroscopy revealed quantitative and qualitative changes in the nucleic acid and protein in the groups of cancer and atypical hyperplasia, in comparison with the control group. Changes in the lipid region were also observed in Raman spectra. Pearson correlation coefficient demonstrated a statistically significant correlation between Raman spectra for the cancer and atypical hyperplasia groups (0.747, p < 0.05) and for atypical hyperplasia and the controls (0.507, p < 0.05), while FTIR spectra demonstrated a statistically significant positive correlation for the same group as in Raman data and for the control and cancer groups (0.966, p < 0.05). To summarize, the method of spectroscopy enables differentiation of atypical hyperplasia and endometrial cancer tissues from the physiological endometrial tissue.

1. Introduction

The endometrium lining of the uterine cavity is a structure subjected to changes in the menstrual cycle or pregnancy, as well as during such periods of a woman’s life as puberty and menopause. Currently, endometrium becomes the subject of scientific interest due to the growing incidence of endometrial cancer in developed countries [1].
Endometrial hyperplasia is of particular interest since certain types of this hyperplasia may predispose to endometrial cancer. In developed countries, there are an estimated 200,000 new cases of endometrial hyperplasia per annum [2].
Simple and complex hyperplasia without atypia are not considered risk factors for endometrial cancer, whereas forms of hyperplasia with cytological atypia pose such a risk. The cases of endometrial cancer include type I cancer preceded by estrogen-stimulated hyperplasia and type II with a different mechanism of formation [3,4].
Prevalence of endometrial hyperplasia (EH) is approximately three times higher than endometrial cancer (EC) and atypical EH may be progressing to EC lesions [5]. Moreover, in the retrospective analysis of 170 patients with EH, subjected uterine curettage observed progression to EC in 13 patients during a 13.4-year follow-up. The progression from EH to EC amounted to 1% in the case of simple hyperplasia (SH, without atypia), 3% for complex hyperplasia (CH, without atypia), 8% for simple atypical hyperplasia (SAH) and 29% for complex atypical hyperplasia (CAH), respectively [6]. The distinction of these four types of hyperplasia is based on microscopic assessment largely based on quantitative, subjective evaluation.
Lacey et al. analyzed 138 cases of EH which progressed to EC for at least 1 year following EH diagnosis. The risk of developing EC after EH diagnosis (including simple and complex EH types) was estimated at 40%. However, in the case where the atypia was absent, the risk of progression was only at 10%. The authors postulated the need to improve the sensitivity and specificity of methods of EH diagnosis with particular focus on the rare non-atypical EH lesions likely to progress to EC [7].
Other studies based on the re-evaluation of preparations diagnosed with atypical hyperplasia showed that in these cases both diagnosed and undiagnosed cases were found [8,9,10]. Hence, methods based on research other than microscopy are sought.
Raman and infrared (IR) spectroscopy are the methods, which provide detailed information about chemical composition of different matters including biological samples. These techniques allow the determination of vibrations of functional groups, which build carbohydrate, deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA), protein and lipid compounds [11]. Moreover, the physical fundamentals of Raman and IR spectroscopy are different, therefore these methods are complementary [12].
Many papers have reported on using vibrational spectroscopy methods to determine chemical changes in the breast [13], lung [14], bone [15], thyroid [16] and brain [17] under the carcinogenesis. Moreover, spectroscopy data are based on physical models, which can be used in monitoring cancer treatment processes. Furthermore, IR spectroscopy enables the detection of changes between the control and cancer ovarian tissues [18]. There are several studies in the literature where IR spectroscopy was used to analyze endometrial tissues. Researchers studied normal endometrial tissue using two spectroscopic techniques (synchrotron radiation-based Fourier- transform infrared (SR-FTIR) microspectroscopy and globar focal plane array-based FTIR spectroscopy), to determine the putative stem cells which may represent clonogenic cells important in carcinogenesis. They identified a location of putative stem cells indicating PO2 in DNA and RNA nucleic acids and amide I and II vibrations as major discriminating factors [19]. Endometriosis is endometrial pathology defined as the spread of endometrial tissue outside the endometrial cavity. Like malignant lesions, endometriosis demonstrates atypia and is able to adhere, invade and disseminate [20]. The endometriosis may be diagnosed with a laparoscopy; therefore, research focuses on new non-invasive methods. So far, only one study presents the application of Raman spectroscopy among women suffering from endometriosis [21].
To the best our knowledge, the literature presents only three studies where authors analyzed pathological endometrial tissues using FTIR techniques [22,23,24], but Raman spectroscopy has not been studied so far in this respect. In this study, Raman and FTIR spectroscopy were applied for the first time in multidimensional analysis to identify and differentiate atypical hyperplasia, endometrial cancer tissues and the physiological endometrial tissue.

2. Results

The spectrum analysis performed in this study involved specifying individual peaks in the Raman and FTIR spectra of three groups: physiological endometrial tissue, atypical hyperplasia and cancer samples.
In the Raman spectra of atypical hyperplasia and cancer tissues, absence of peaks originating from stretching vibrations of CO, CC and OCH from rings of polysaccharides and pectin, were noticed in comparison with the control samples (Figure 1). Moreover, in the Raman spectrum of atypical hyperplasia tissues, lack of peaks corresponding to Proline, hydroxyproline, tyrosine, PO2− stretching from nucleic acids, Tryptophan and C–O stretching from lipids, as well as CH2 stretching from lipids, was observed in comparison with the control sample. A significant shift of peaks originating from the amide I and CH3 groups from lipids was visible when compared to the Raman spectra of the atypical hyperplasia and control tissues. Furthermore, in the cancer tissues, a significant shift of peaks corresponding to the tryptophan, amide I and CH2 groups from lipids, was observed in comparison with the control samples. When comparing the Raman spectra of atypical hyperplasia and cancer samples, in the first one, peaks corresponding to the proline, hydroxyproline, tyrosine and PO2− stretching groups from nucleic acids (~815 cm−1), tryptophan (~1370 cm−1) and the C–O and CH2 vibrations from lipids (~1740 cm−1 and 2919 cm−1, respectively), were not observed. Moreover, a significant shift of peaks originating from C–C stretching from proline and hydroxyproline, C–C, tryptophan (protein assignment) and amide I, were noticed in the Raman spectrum of atypical hyperplasia in comparison with the cancer spectrum. Furthermore, in the Raman spectrum of atypical hyperplasia, a lower Raman intensity in the range between 500 and 1800 cm−1 and a higher intensity in the CH2 lipids region (~2800 cm−1), were visible. A description of the vibrations which were visible in the Raman spectra with the differences between analyzed samples is presented in Table 1.
FTIR spectra can be divided into three basic groups corresponding to the basic building blocks of cell components. The following spectral regions can be distinguished: of the region 1000–1250 cm−1 responsible for the nucleic acid strand, the region 1500–1560 cm−1, 1600–1700 cm−1 of protein and the last region of lipids from a 2800–3000 cm−1 wavenumber.
In the FTIR spectra of the control and atypical hyperplasia samples, the absence of peaks originating from the stretching vibrations of C–O carbohydrates (1124 cm−1) and deformation N–H cytosine (1304 cm−1) were noticed in comparison with the carcinoma samples (Figure 2, Table 2). In the spectrum of carcinoma, the lack of peaks corresponding to CH2 wagging for proline from amino acids and collagen (~1341 cm−1) and carbonate band ʋ2(CO32−) of a wavenumber of ~1407 cm−1 was observed. Of note is the peak found at the level of 1073 cm−1, corresponding to the C–O stretching mode of the C–OH groups of serine, threonine and tyrosine of protein, shifted towards a lower wavenumber at 7 cm−1 and towards a higher wavenumber at 7 cm−1 for atypical hyperplasia and carcinoma, respectively. The characteristic absorption band belonging to the stretching vibrations of C–O, C–C and C–O–H deformation originated from proteins, glycogen and carbohydrates was found at the level of 1171 cm−1. The peak in the region of 1240 cm−1 arose from N–H bending, C–C and C–N stretching vibrations of amide III. Interestingly, these last two peaks shifted 4 and 3 cm−1, respectively, towards lower wavenumbers for the carcinoma samples alone.
The next maximum, located at 1407 cm−1 was attributed to carbonate band stretching and shifted towards a lower wavenumber at 13 cm−1 for atypical hyperplasia alone. The peaks of the wavenumber at 1466 and 1544 cm−1 corresponding to the CH2 scissoring modes and amide II shifted towards lower wavenumbers at 4 and 9 cm−1, respectively, for both the hyperplasia and carcinoma patients. Amide I, one of the main protein conformers, had absorption noticed in the area of 1642 cm−1. The higher wavenumbers (7 cm−1 for atypical hyperplasia and 4 cm−1 for carcinoma) were observed for both pathological tissues.
Changes were also found in the peak placement between the atypical hyperplasia and carcinoma tissues, mainly corresponding to proteins conformations. Analysis of the FTIR spectrum showed the massive shift (14 cm−1) of the C–O stretching mode of the C–OH groups of serine, threonine, and tyrosine for carcinoma (1080 cm−1) in comparison to hyperplasia (1066 cm−1). In the case of amide I and amide III compounds, the shift was found towards a lower wavenumber at 3 and 4 cm−1, respectively.
A summary of the peaks from FTIR spectra with the differences between analyzed samples is presented in Table 2.
To resolve whether it was sufficient to detect only the differences between the studied samples, principal component analysis (PCA) was used to analyze the obtained Raman (Figure 3a) and FTIR (Figure 3b) spectra. PCA analysis obtained from the Raman data showed that most of the control samples were separated from the Raman data obtained for the cancer and atypical hyperplasia tissues. Moreover, four out of thirteen Raman spectra of atypical hyperplasia were in the same part of the PCA plot as the Raman spectra of cancer. This means that it is possible to distinguish the Raman spectra of the control and atypical hyperplasia, as well as cancer tissues and atypical hyperplasia. While PCA analysis obtained for FTIR data (Figure 3b) showed that only the spectra of cancer tissues were similar to each other and could be separated from the other analyzed samples, PCA analysis also showed that, using FTIR spectroscopy, it was not possible to distinguish the spectra of the atypical hyperplasia and control tissues. Furthermore, hierarchical cluster analysis (HCA) showed that almost all Raman spectra (Figure 3) of atypical hyperplasia (black dot) created one separate group of similarity, when the control samples created two groups, however, these groups were not similar to atypical hyperplasia and cancer tissues. Moreover, HCA analysis showed a higher similarity between atypical hyperplasia and cancer tissues than between the control and atypical hyperplasia or the control and cancer. In the case of the FTIR results (Figure 3d) HCA analysis showed a similarity only between almost all cancer tissues; however, the control samples or atypical hyperplasia samples did not create homogenous groups.
The Pearson correlation coefficient presented in Table 3 showed that it possible to determine the correlation between the character/shape of the Raman and FTIR spectra obtained for the control, atypical hyperplasia and cancer tissues. The data can be summarized as follows. The Raman spectra demonstrated a positive and significant correlation between the nature of the spectrum of atypical hyperplasia and cancer tissues, as well as between the atypical hyperplasia and control tissues. However, the Pearson correlation coefficient showed no significant positive correlation between the control and cancer tissues. The Pearson correlation coefficient for FTIR data indicated that there was also a positive correlation between the FTIR spectra of atypical hyperplasia and cancer, as well as between the atypical hyperplasia and control tissues. Furthermore, the Pearson correlation coefficient also showed that there was a significant correlation between the FTIR spectra of the cancer and control tissues. These results are also visible in the PCA and HCA analysis obtained for Raman and FTIR spectra.

3. Discussion

In our innovative study both Raman and FTIR spectroscopy methods were used because they analyze the vibrational modes of specific functional groups qualitatively and quantitatively. The oldest study showed differences among endometrial cancer and normal tissues using FTIR in 17 females subjected to total abdominal hysterectomy (13 patients with grade I endometrial adenocarcinoma and 4 with grade III adenocarcinoma). The spectra of the malignant samples revealed the symmetric and asymmetric stretching bands of the phosphodiester backbones of nucleic acids, the CH stretching region, the C–O stretching bands of the C–OH groups of carbohydrates and cellular protein residuals and the pressure dependence of the CH2 stretching mode [22]. These results were in line with our results, but it is worth noting that the authors used the outdated scale. Our study used the newer histopathological classification system by The World Health Organisation (WHO) established in 1994 with a revision in 2003. It includes four categories of endometrial hyperplasia and is widely used within current clinical gynecological practice. In our study, the latest criteria for endometrial intraepithelial neoplasia (EIN) were not used. The EIN concept incorporated morphometric and molecular diagnostics to differentiate hyperplastic endometrial lesions into two groups: (a) benign EH and (b) EIN [38].
Researchers used transmission FTIR microspectroscopy to distinguish non-tamoxifen associated from tamoxifen-associated endometrial samples. The differences were observed in the protein region for benign or endometroid carcinoma tissues (1800–1480 cm−1) [23]. Differences inmethodology prevent us, however, from comparing our results with this study.
Moreover, evaluated different endometrial tissues from 76 patients undergoing hysterectomy, including 36 of endometrial cancer. AT-FTIR was used in this preliminary study allowing the differentiation of benign and malignant endometrial tissues (including various subtypes of both). The differences were presented in the structural protein (amide I/II region), these were larger in endometroid than non-endometroid cancers, especially in Amide I [24]. In our study, we also observed the changes in peak placement between atypical hyperplasia and carcinoma tissues, mainly corresponding to protein conformations. Analysis of the FTIR spectrum showed the massive shift (14 cm−1) of the C–O stretching mode of the C–OH groups of serine, threonine, and tyrosine for carcinoma (1080 cm−1) in comparison to hyperplasia (1066 cm−1). For amide I and amide III compounds, we noticed the shift towards a lower wavenumber at 3 and 4 cm−1, respectively, while in the Raman spectra of atypical hyperplasia and cancer tissues, the absence of peaks originating from stretching vibrations of CO, CC and OCH from the ring of polysaccharides and pectin, was noticed in comparison with the control samples. Furthermore, in the cancer tissues, a significant shift of peaks corresponding to the tryptophan, amide I, and CH2 groups from lipids was observed in comparison with the control samples. In addition, PCA analysis obtained from the Raman data showed that most of the control samples were separated from the Raman data obtained for cancer and atypical hyperplasia tissues, while PCA analysis obtained for FTIR data showed that only the spectra of cancer tissues are similar to each other and can be separated from the other analyzed samples. It is not possible to distinguish the spectra of the atypical hyperplasia and control tissues. HCA analysis showed that almost all Raman spectra (Figure 3b) have a higher similarity between atypical hyperplasia and cancer tissues, than between the control and atypical hyperplasia or the control and cancer. In the case of the FTIR results (Figure 3d), HCA analysis showed a similarity only between almost all cancer tissues, however, the control samples or atypical hyperplasia samples did not create groups of similarity.
Based on the analyses, it can be concluded that both FTIR and Raman spectroscopy provide qualitative and quantitative analyses of the vibrational modes of specific functional groups. Therefore, they are sometimes referred to as sister or complementary techniques. However, principal component analysis, as well as hierarchical component analysis (Figure 3), showed that, using only Raman spectroscopy, it is possible to distinguish the control samples from the atypical hyperplasia and cancer tissues. Moreover, the Pearson correlation coefficient obtained from the Raman results showed that the chemical compositions of atypical hyperplasia and cancer tissues were more correlated than the chemical composition characteristics for atypical hyperplasia and the control as well as the control and cancer tissues. However, in the case of the FTIR results, the Pearson correlation coefficient showed that the correlation between chemical compositions of the control and cancer tissues was more significant than for the tissues with atypical hyperplasia and cancer features. It may result from the fact that both methods are based on different physical fundamentals: change of the dipole moment in the case of FTIR, whilst change of bond polarity in the case of Raman spectroscopy [39,40]. Consequently, in the FTIR and Raman spectra a difference in the intensity of functional groups, as well as their absence, can be observed. However, in the literature information can be found about the risk of cancer disease in women with atypical hyperplasia, as well as about the similarity of the microscopy images of ovaries with cancer cells and atypical hyperplasia [41,42]. This could suggest that Raman spectroscopy offers more accurate results to distinguish the ovarian tissues with analyzed diseases.
During carcinogenesis in endometrium from simple hyperplasia through hyperplasia with atypia to cancer, genomic changes occur (such as aberrations in sub-regions: dup 14q32.33, del15q11.2, assessed by array Comparative Genomic Hybridization) [43]. In parallel, changes in the proteome assessed by mass spectrometry are also found [44].
No unequivocal endometrial cancer biomarker was found in the above studies. Our FTIR and Raman spectroscopy study may be a novel step in the search for this marker.

4. Materials and Methods

The study was approved by the institutional Bioethics Committee at the University of Rzeszow (Resolution No. 1/05/2019, dated 9 May 2019). A cross-sectional study was conducted from July 2019 to December 2019. The study was conducted on tissue samples from 45 patients. Among them, 16 suffered from endometrial cancer, 12 from atypical hyperplasia and 17 constitute the normal control group. The control group consisted of 17 patients with an average age of 62 years. Sixteen patients with an average age of 61 years with endometrial cancer were included in this study. The last group of 12 patients with an average age of 55 years were patients with the diagnosis of atypical hyperplasia. The tissue material came from a patient from the Podkarpackie Gynecology and Obstetrics Ward Oncology Centers in Brzozow, KSW Gynecology and Obstetrics Clinic No. 1 in Rzeszow and the Municipal Hospital in Rzeszow.

4.1. Materials Preparation

The samples collected from the women suffering from cancer, atypical hyperplasia and without pathological lesions were prepared for a histopathology evaluation in the uniform manner. The tissue samples were initially incubated in a liquid fixative for about 12 h. Next, ethanol was gradually replaced with xylene with a 10% increasing step, (from 50% to 99.8%). A paraffin infiltration of the tissue was performed at the temperature of 52 °C. Tissue blocks were embedded in paraffin by inserting the tissue section with the appropriate spatial orientation into a metal mold and pouring in molten wax. Each section was flattened on a hot water surface. For the spectroscopic measurements, the obtained samples were placed on CaF2 slides. The size of the samples used for the spectroscopic measurements was about 5 mm and the thickness 10 µm. Moreover, for each obtained sample, an immunohistochemical diagnostic was performed to confirm the presence or absence of cancer cells.

4.2. FT-Raman Measurement

An FT-Raman spectra measurement was performed using a Nicolet NXR 9650 FT-Raman Spectrometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) with Nd: YAG laser source (1064 nm) and a Germanium detector. A spectral range of 150 to 3700 cm−1 and a laser power of 500 mW were used. This power was constant for each sample and each measurement. An unfocused laser beam was used of approximately 100 μm in diameter and a spectral resolution of 8 cm−1. Raman spectra were processed using the Omnic/Thermo Scientific software (Thermo Fisher Scientific) based on 64 scans for measurements, which means the number of scans performed on one spot was 64, and the obtained spectrum was an average of these scans. All spectra were smoothed using the Savitzky–Golay algorithm for 7 points. Moreover, all spectra were normalized using vector normalization. Additionally, baseline corrections using a Rubberband correction were done. All these operations were performed using OPUS software (Bruker Optik GmbH, Ettlingen, Germany). Moreover, each sample was measured three times in three different places. Next, the spectra were averaged and this average was used for statistical analysis.

4.3. FTIR Measurements

The Fourier transform infrared spectrometer (FTIR), Vertex 70v from Bruker (Bruker, Ettlingen, Germeny), was used for the measurements. The samples were examined in the mid-IR range using attenuated total reflection (ATR) with diamond crystal. Data points were collected at a resolution of 2 cm−1 (32 scans). The analysis of the 800–3500 cm−1 wavenumber spectral range was performed. All measurements were made in triplicate and the next average spectrum was obtained for each sample. Data were processed using OPUS 7.0 Bruker Optik GmbH 2011. Vector normalization was used to normalize the spectra. A Rubberband baseline correction was also performed.

4.4. Multivariate Analysis and Pearson Correlation Coefficient

Principal component analysis (PCA) was performed to obtain information about the spectra variation among the sample types. PCA allowed dimensionality reduction reducing the number of variables for dataset, while maintaining as much variance as possible. Moreover, to obtain information about the similarity between the samples, hierarchical cluster analysis (HCA) was performed with Euclidean distance and using the paired group (UPGMA) algorithm. Hierarchical cluster analysis is a popular method for cluster analysis in big data research and data mining aiming to establish a hierarchy of clusters. As such, HCA attempts to group subjects with similar features into clusters. These two procedures were performed based on the selected spectral regions between 800 and 1800 cm−1. For this purpose, 518 points from the FTIR spectra and 259 points from the Raman spectra were analyzed. PCA as well as HCA analyses were performed for all obtained spectra, as well as for the average of spectra from each sample type. The correlation between the Raman and FTIR spectra in the control, atypical hyperplasia, and cancer groups was investigated with the Pearson correlation coefficient, adopting the level of statistical significance at p < 0.05 and a 95% confidence interval. For this purpose, fingerprint regions of the FTIR and FT-Raman spectra were used. All analyses were performed with Past 3.0 software (Øyvind Hammer, Natural History Museum, University of Oslo).

5. Conclusions

To the best of our knowledge, this study is the first to use both Fourier Transform Infrared and Raman spectroscopy combined with multidimensional analysis to identify and differentiate tissues of endometrial cancer, atypical hyperplasia and the normal control group.
The obtained results showed, that in comparison with the control group, the most visible structural changes in the non-control groups, which were observed as shift or absence of peaks, were noticed in the Raman and FTIR regions originating from DNA, RNA and proteins. The structural changes in the lipids were also visible in the Raman spectra. Consequently, the FTIR spectra showed a very significant decrease in the maximum absorbance corresponding to nucleic acid. Interestingly, this decrease intensified with the lesion from atypical hyperplasia to cancer. Moreover, a multivariate analysis and the Pearson correlation coefficient indicated that Raman spectroscopy allowed better differentiation between the control tissues and the atypical hyperplasia and cancer tissues, which may be related to the tissue structure and symmetry of the functional groups creating the tissue. However, our results may suggest the possibility of using the change in the individual peaks in the FTIR and Raman spectra as a potential means of the differentiation of cancer and atypical hyperplasia from normal endometrial tissues samples.
Further studies are needed to properly evaluate the role of Raman and FTIR spectroscopy as a diagnostic tool in carcinogenesis.

Author Contributions

E.B., J.S.-M., J.D. and K.Ł. wrote the main manuscript text and prepared Figure 1, Figure 2 and Figure 3. E.K. and I.K.-M. prepared the samples. E.B., A.S. and E.K. gave the manuscript idea. A.S. and J.C. managed the work. J.D. and K.Ł. analyzed the obtained spectra and made a multivariate analysis. K.S. analyzed peaks in FTIR spectra. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

References

  1. Ferlay, J.; Soerjomataram, I.; Dikshit, R.; Eser, S.; Mathers, C.; Rebelo, M.; Parkin, N.M.; Forman, D.; Bray, F. Cancer incidence and mortality worldwide: Sources, methods and major patterns in GLOBOCAN 2012. Int. J. Cancer 2015, 136, E359–E386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Ozdegirmenci, O.; Kayıkçıoğlu, F.; Bozkurt, U.; Akgul, M.A.; Haberal, A. Comparison of the Efficacy of Three Progestins in the Treatment of Simple Endometrial Hyperplasia without Atypia. Gynecol. Obstet. Investig. 2011, 72, 10–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Collins, F.; MacPherson, S.; Brown, P.; Bombail, V.; Williams, A.R.W.; Anderson, R.A.; Jabbours, H.N.; Saunders, P.T.K. Expression of oestrogen receptors, ERalpha, ERbeta, and ERbeta variants, in endometrial cancers and evidence that prostaglandin F may play a role in regulating expression of ERalpha. BMC Cancer 2019, 9, 330. [Google Scholar]
  4. Matias-Guiu, X.; Prat, J. Molecular pathology of endometrial carcinoma. Histopathology 2013, 62, 111–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Ellenson, L.H.; Ronnett, B.M.; Kurman, R.J. Precursor Lesions of Endometrial Carcinoma. In Blaustein’s Pathology of the Female Genital Tract; Springer: Boston, MA, USA, 2011; pp. 359–391. [Google Scholar]
  6. Kurman, R.J.; Kaminski, P.F.; Norris, H.J. The behavior of endometrial hyperplasia. A long-term study of “untreated” hyperplasia in 170 patients. Cancer 1985, 56, 403–412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Lacey, J.V., Jr.; Ioffe, O.B.; Ronnett, B.M.; Rush, B.B.; Richesson, D.A.; Chatterjee, N.; Langholz, B.; Glass, A.G.; Sherman, M.E. Endometrial carcinoma risk among women diagnosed with endometrial hyperplasia: The 34-year experience in a large health plan. Br. J. Cancer 2008, 98, 45–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Skov, B.G.; Broholm, H.; Engel, U.; Franzmann, M.-B.; Nielsen, A.L.; Lauritzen, A.F.; Skov, T. Comparison of the Reproducibility of the WHO Classifications of 1975 and 1994 of Endometrial Hyperplasia. Int. J. Gynecol. Pathol. 1997, 16, 33–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Kendall, B.S.; Ronnett, B.M.; Isacson, C.; Cho, K.R.; Hedrick, L.; Diener-West, M.; Kurman, R.J. Reproducibility of the Diagnosis of Endometrial Hyperplasia, Atypical Hyperplasia, and Well-Differentiated Carcinoma. Am. J. Surg. Pathol. 1998, 22, 1012–1019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Trimble, C.L.; Kauderer, J.; Zaino, R.; Silverberg, S.; Lim, P.C.; Burke, J.J.; Alberts, D.; Curtin, J. Concurrent endometrial carcinoma in women with a biopsy diagnosis of atypical endometrial hyperplasia. Cancer 2006, 106, 812–819. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Chan, J.W.; Taylor, D.S.; Zwerdling, T.; Lane, S.M.; Ihara, K.; Huser, T. Micro-Raman Spectroscopy Detects Individual Neoplastic and Normal Hematopoietic Cells. Biophys. J. 2006, 90, 648–656. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Depciuch, J.; Parlinska-Wojtan, M. Qualitative and quantitative changes in phospholipids and proteins investigated by spectroscopic techniques in olfactory bulbectomy animal depression model. J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal. 2018, 148, 24–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Depciuch, J.; Kaznowska, E.; Zawlik, I.; Wojnarowska-Nowak, R.; Cholewa, M.; Heraud, P.; Cebulski, J. Application of Raman Spectroscopy and Infrared Spectroscopy in the Identification of Breast Cancer. Appl. Spectrosc. 2016, 70, 251–263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Kaznowska, E.; Łach, K.; Depciuch, J.; Chaber, R.; Koziorowska, A.; Slobodian, S.; Kiper, K.; Chlebus, A.; Cebulski, J. Application of infrared spectroscopy for the identification of squamous cell carcinoma (lung cancer). Preliminary study. Infrared Phys. Technol. 2018, 89, 282–290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Chaber, R.; Arthur, C.; Depciuch, J.; Łach, K.; Raciborska, A.; Michalak, E.; Cebulski, J. Distinguishing Ewing sarcoma and osteomyelitis using FTIR spectroscopy. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 15081. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Depciuch, J.; Stanek-Widera, A.; Skrzypiec, D.; Lange, D.; Biskup-Frużyńska, M.; Kiper, K.; Stanek-Tarkowska, J.; Kula, M.; Cebulski, J. Spectroscopic identification of benign (follicular adenoma) and cancerous lesions (follicular thyroid carcinoma) in thyroid tissues. J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal. 2019, 170, 321–326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Depciuch, J.; Tołpa, B.; Witek, P.; Szmuc, K.; Kaznowska, E.; Osuchowski, M.; Król, P.; Cebulski, J. Raman and FTIR spectroscopy in determining the chemical changes in healthy brain tissues and glioblastoma tumor tissues. Spectrochim. Acta Part A Mol. Biomol. Spectrosc. 2020, 225, 117526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Auner, G.W.; Koya, S.K.; Huang, C.; Broadbent, B.; Trexler, M.; Auner, Z.; Elias, A.; Mehne, K.C.; Brusatori, M.A. Applications of Raman spectroscopy in cancer diagnosis. Cancer Metastasis Rev. 2018, 37, 691–717. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Theophilou, G.; Morais, C.; Halliwell, D.E.; Lima, K.M.G.; Drury, J.; Martin-Hirsch, P.L.; Stringfellow, H.F.; Hapangama, D.K.; Martin, F.L. Synchrotron- and focal plane array-based Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy differentiates the basalis and functionalis epithelial endometrial regions and identifies putative stem cell regions of human endometrial glands. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2018, 410, 4541–4554. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Sznurkowski, J.J. Endometriosis and the neoplastic process. Curr. Gynecol. Oncol. 2012, 10, 61–70. [Google Scholar]
  21. Parlatan, U.; Inanc, M.T.; Ozgor, B.Y.; Oral, E.; Bastu, E.; Unlu, M.B.; Basar, G. Raman spectroscopy as a non-invasive diagnostic technique for endometriosis. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 19795. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  22. Fung, M.F.K.; Senterman, M.K.; Mikhael, N.Z.; Lacelle, S.; Wong, P.T.T. Pressure-tuning fourier transform infrared spectroscopic study of carcinogenesis in human endometrium. Biospectroscopy 1996, 2, 155–165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Kelly, J.G.; Singh, M.N.; Stringfellow, H.F.; Walsh, M.J.; Nicholson, J.M.; Bahrami, F.; Ashton, K.M.; Pitt, M.A.; Martin-Hirsch, P.L.; Martin, F.L. Derivation of a subtype-specific biochemical signature of endometrial carcinoma using synchrotron-based Fourier-transform infrared microspectroscopy. Cancer Lett. 2009, 274, 208–217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Taylor, S.E.; Cheung, K.T.; Patel, I.I.; Trevisan, J.; Stringfellow, H.F.; Ashton, K.M.; Wood, N.J.; Keating, P.J.; Martin-Hirsch, P.L.; Martin, F.L. Infrared spectroscopy with multivariate analysis to interrogate endometrial tissue: A novel and objective diagnostic approach. Br. J. Cancer 2011, 104, 790–797. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  25. Laska, J.; Widlarz, J. Spectroscopic and structural characterization of low molecular weight fractions of polyaniline. Polymer 2005, 46, 1485–1495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Seballos, L.; Zhang, J.Z.; Sutphen, R. Surface-enhanced Raman scattering detection of lysophosphatidic acid. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2005, 383, 763–767. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  27. Shetty, G.; Kendall, C.; Shepherd, N.; Stone, N.; Barr, H. Raman spectroscopy: Elucidation of biochemical changes in carcinogenesis of oesophagus. Br. J. Cancer 2006, 94, 1460–1464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  28. Movasaghi, Z.; Rehman, S.; Rehman, I.U. Raman Spectroscopy of Biological Tissues. Appl. Spectrosc. Rev. 2007, 42, 493–541. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Shaikh, R.; Prabitha, V.G.; Dora, T.K.; Chopra, S.; Maheshwari, A.; Deodhar, K.; Rekhi, B.; Sukumar, N.; Krishna, C.M.; Subhash, N. A comparative evaluation of diffuse reflectance and Raman spectroscopy in the detection of cervical cancer. J. Biophotonics 2016, 10, 242–252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Paluszkiewicz, C.; Kwiatek, W.M. Analysis of human cancer prostate tissues using FTIR microscopy and SXIXE techniques. J. Mol. Struct. 2001, 565–566, 329–334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Argov, S.; Sahu, R.K.; Bernshtain, E.; Salman, A.; Shohat, G.; Zelig, U.; Mordechai, S. Inflammatory bowel diseases as an intermediate stage between normal and cancer: A FTIR-microspectroscopy approach. Biopolymers 2004, 75, 384–392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Richter, T.; Steiner, G.; Abu-Id, M.H.; Salzer, R.; Bergmann, R.; Rodig, H.; Johannsen, B. Identification of tumor tissue by FTIR spectroscopy in combination with positron emission tomography. Vib. Spectrosc. 2002, 28, 103–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Naumann, D. FT-infrared and FT-Raman spectroscopy in biomedical research. In Infrared and Raman Spectroscopy of Biological Materials; Gremlich, H.U., Yan, B., Eds.; Marcel Dekker: New York, NY, USA, 2001; pp. 323–377. [Google Scholar]
  34. Wong, P.T.; Wong, R.K.; Caputo, T.A.; Godwin, T.A.; Rigas, B. Infrared spectroscopy of exfoliated human cervical cells: Evidence of extensive structural changes during carcinogenesis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1991, 88, 10988–10992. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  35. Fujioka, N.; Morimoto, Y.; Arai, T.; Kikuchi, M. Discrimination between normal and malignant human gastric tissues by Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy. Cancer Detect. Prev. 2004, 28, 32–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Conti, C.; Ferraris, P.; Giorgini, E.; Rubini, C.; Sabbatini, S.; Tosi, G.; Anastassopoulou, J.; Arapantoni, P.; Boukaki, E.; Konstadoudakis, S.; et al. FT-IR microimaging spectroscopy: A comparison between healthy and neoplastic human colon tissues. J. Mol. Struct. 2008, 881, 46–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Barth, A. Infrared spectroscopy of proteins. Biochim. Biophys. Acta Bioenerg. 2007, 1767, 1073–1101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Sanderson, P.A.; Critchley, H.O.; Williams, A.R.; Arends, M.J.; Saunders, P.T. New concepts for an old problem: The diagnosis of endometrial hyperplasia. Hum. Reprod. Updat. 2017, 23, 232–254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Herzbeg, G. Infrared and Raman Spectra; Van Nostrand: New York, NY, USA, 1945; pp. 239–249. [Google Scholar]
  40. Woodward, L.A. Introduction to the Theory of Molecular Vibrations and Vibrational Spectroscopy; Clarendon Press: Oxford, UK, 1972; pp. 253–272. [Google Scholar]
  41. Gonthier, C.; Piel, B.; Touboul, C.; Walker, F.; Cortez, A.; Luton, D.; Daraï, E.; Koskas, M. Cancer Incidence in Patients with Atypical Endometrial Hyperplasia Managed by Primary Hysterectomy or Fertility-sparing Treatment. Anticancer Res. 2015, 35, 6799–6804. [Google Scholar]
  42. Oda, K.; Koga, K.; Hirata, T.; Maruyama, M.; Ikemura, M.; Matsumoto, Y.; Nagasaka, K.; Adachi, K.; Mori-Uchino, M.; Sone, K.; et al. Risk of endometrial cancer in patients with a preoperative diagnosis of atypical endometrial hyperplasia treated with total laparoscopic hysterectomy. Gynecol. Minim. Invasive Ther. 2016, 5, 69–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  43. Bednarek, M.; Constantinou, M.; Kępczyński, Ł.; Kassassir, A.; Sobczuk, A.; Wieszczycka, M.; Suzin, J.; Kałużewski, B. Evaluation of genomic imbalance in endometrial hyperplasia and carcinoma. Ginekol. Polska 2014, 85, 828–832. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Njoku, K.; Chiasserini, D.; Whetton, A.D.; Crosbie, E.J. Proteomic Biomarkers for the Detection of Endometrial Cancer. Cancers 2019, 11, 1572. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
Ijms 21 04828 g001 550
Figure 1. Raman spectra of: control (n = 17, green spectrum); atypical hyperplasia (n = 12, black spectrum) and cancer (n = 16, red spectrum) tissues.
Figure 1. Raman spectra of: control (n = 17, green spectrum); atypical hyperplasia (n = 12, black spectrum) and cancer (n = 16, red spectrum) tissues.
Ijms 21 04828 g001
Ijms 21 04828 g002 550
Figure 2. Fourier Transform Infrared (FTIR) spectra of: control (n = 17, green spectrum); atypical hyperplasia (n = 12, black spectrum) and cancer (n = 16, red spectrum) tissues.
Figure 2. Fourier Transform Infrared (FTIR) spectra of: control (n = 17, green spectrum); atypical hyperplasia (n = 12, black spectrum) and cancer (n = 16, red spectrum) tissues.
Ijms 21 04828 g002
Ijms 21 04828 g003a 550Ijms 21 04828 g003b 550
Figure 3. Principal component analysis (PCA) and hierarchical cluster analysis (HCA) analysis of Raman (a,c) and FTIR (b,d) spectra of control (n = 17, green dot); atypical hyperplasia (n = 12, black dot) and cancer (n = 16, red dot) tissues. Two-dimensional (2D) scores plot of endometrium tissues samples, due to differences in chemical compositions presented through the Raman spectral regions between 800–1800 cm−1.
Figure 3. Principal component analysis (PCA) and hierarchical cluster analysis (HCA) analysis of Raman (a,c) and FTIR (b,d) spectra of control (n = 17, green dot); atypical hyperplasia (n = 12, black dot) and cancer (n = 16, red dot) tissues. Two-dimensional (2D) scores plot of endometrium tissues samples, due to differences in chemical compositions presented through the Raman spectral regions between 800–1800 cm−1.
Ijms 21 04828 g003aIjms 21 04828 g003b
Table
Table 1. Raman shift with corresponding vibrations described in the Raman spectra of control (n = 17), atypical hyperplasia (n = 12) and cancer (n = 16) tissues [25,26,27,28,29].
Table 1. Raman shift with corresponding vibrations described in the Raman spectra of control (n = 17), atypical hyperplasia (n = 12) and cancer (n = 16) tissues [25,26,27,28,29].
No.Control (I)Athypical Hyperplasia (II)Carcinoma (III)ΔI-II [cm−1]ΔI-III [cm−1]ΔII-III [cm−1]Vibrations
1812*818max−6maxProline, hydroxyproline, tyrosine, PO2− stretching from nucleic acids
28908848806104C-C stretching from proline and hydroxyproline
31011**maxmax0Stretching vibrations of CO, CC, OCH from ring of polysaccharides and pectin
41065106410661−1−2PO2− stretching from nucleic acids
5129312961299−3−6−3Phosphodiester groups in nucleic acids
61359*1374max−15maxTryptophan
7144714471447000CH2 bending from lipids and proteins
81553155015583−5-8C=C, tryptophan (protein assignment)
916951675166820277Amide I
101776*1723max53maxC=O stretching from lipids
112798272027587840−38CH3 stretching from lipids
12*28692871maxmax−2CH2 stretching from lipids
*-Band not visible in the spectrum; max–maximum differences between spectra caused by absence of vibrations in one of the analyzed spectra; ΔI-II, ΔI-III, ΔII-III: differences in the peak positions between analyzed samples.
Table
Table 2. Fourier Transform InfraRed (FTIR) shift with corresponding vibrations described in the FTIR spectra of control (n = 17), atypical hyperplasia (n = 12) and cancer (n = 16) tissues [23,24,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37].
Table 2. Fourier Transform InfraRed (FTIR) shift with corresponding vibrations described in the FTIR spectra of control (n = 17), atypical hyperplasia (n = 12) and cancer (n = 16) tissues [23,24,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37].
No.Control (I)Athypical Hyperplasia (II)Carcinoma (III)ΔI-II [cm−1]ΔI-III [cm−1]ΔII-III [cm−1]Vibrations
1889889889000C-C, C-O deoxyribose, fatty acid, saccharide
21073106610807−7−14C-O stretching mode of C-OH groups of serine, threonine, and tyrosine of protein
3**1124maxmaxmaxνC-O Carbohydrates
4117111691167242ν(C-O), ν(C-C), def. C-O-H (proteins, glycogen, carbohydrates)
5124012411237−134Amide III (N-H bending, C-N stretch, C-C stretch) (proteins, DNA, phospholipids)
6**1304maxmaxmaxDeformation N-H cytosine
713411340*1maxmaxCH2 wagging for proline (amino acids and collagen)
8137713781378−1−10CH3, CH2 wagging (lipids/proteins)
914071394*13maxmaxcarbonate band ʋ(CO32−)
10146614621462440CH2 group scissoring modes
11154415351535990Amide II due to N-H bending and C-N stretching of proteins
12164216491646−7−43Amide I (ν(C=O), ν(CN), γ(CCN), δ(NH)) (proteins)
13284728482847−101Symmetric stretching of the CH2 group due to mainly lipids, with little contribution from proteins, carbohydrates and nucleic acids
14291529152915000CH2 asymmetric stretch: mainly lipids, with little contribution from proteins, carbohydrates, nucleic acids
15295729562956110CH3 asymmetric stretch: mainly lipids
1632843280328341−3ʋ̵NH stretching of the peptide bond (–NHCO) of proteins and ʋ̵OH groups of water
Table
Table 3. Pearson correlation (p < 0.05) test for Raman (a) and FTIR (b) spectra of control (n = 17, green dot); atypical hyperplasia (n = 12, black dot) and cancer (n = 16, red dot) tissues.
Table 3. Pearson correlation (p < 0.05) test for Raman (a) and FTIR (b) spectra of control (n = 17, green dot); atypical hyperplasia (n = 12, black dot) and cancer (n = 16, red dot) tissues.
Raman SpectroscopyFTIR Spectroscopy
Control n = 17Atypical Hyperplasia
n = 12		Cancer n = 16 Control n = 17Atypical Hyperplasia
n = 12		Cancer n = 16
Control n = 171.0000.507 *0.424Control n = 171.0000.966 *0.966 *
Atypical Hyperplasia
n = 12		0.507 *1.0000.747 *Atypical Hyperplasia
n = 12		0.966 *1.0000.950 *
Cancern = 160.4240.747 *1.000Cancern = 160.966 *0.950 *1.000
* - Statistically significant, when p < 0.05.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Barnas, E.; Skret-Magierlo, J.; Skret, A.; Kaznowska, E.; Depciuch, J.; Szmuc, K.; Łach, K.; Krawczyk-Marć, I.; Cebulski, J. Simultaneous FTIR and Raman Spectroscopy in Endometrial Atypical Hyperplasia and Cancer. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 4828. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21144828

AMA Style

Barnas E, Skret-Magierlo J, Skret A, Kaznowska E, Depciuch J, Szmuc K, Łach K, Krawczyk-Marć I, Cebulski J. Simultaneous FTIR and Raman Spectroscopy in Endometrial Atypical Hyperplasia and Cancer. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2020; 21(14):4828. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21144828

Chicago/Turabian Style

Barnas, Edyta, Joanna Skret-Magierlo, Andrzej Skret, Ewa Kaznowska, Joanna Depciuch, Kamil Szmuc, Kornelia Łach, Izabela Krawczyk-Marć, and Jozef Cebulski. 2020. "Simultaneous FTIR and Raman Spectroscopy in Endometrial Atypical Hyperplasia and Cancer" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 21, no. 14: 4828. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21144828

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop