Next Article in Journal
Non-Thermal Plasma Couples Oxidative Stress to TRAIL Sensitization through DR5 Upregulation
Previous Article in Journal
Translation Regulation by eIF2α Phosphorylation and mTORC1 Signaling Pathways in Non-Communicable Diseases (NCDs)
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
IJMS
Volume 21
Issue 15
10.3390/ijms21155300
ijms-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Transcriptional Inhibition of Sp-IAG by Crustacean Female Sex Hormone in the Mud Crab, Scylla paramamosain

by
Qingling Jiang
,
Bei Lu
,
Guizhong Wang
and
Haihui Ye
*
College of Ocean and Earth Sciences, Xiamen University, Xiamen 361102, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21(15), 5300; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21155300
Submission received: 26 June 2020 / Revised: 22 July 2020 / Accepted: 24 July 2020 / Published: 26 July 2020
(This article belongs to the Section Molecular Genetics and Genomics)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
In crustaceans, the regulation of sex differentiation is mediated by insulin-like androgenic hormone (IAG) and crustacean female sex hormone (CFSH). CFSH is reported to inhibit IAG gene (Sp-IAG) expression in the mud crab Scylla paramamosain, but the regulatory mechanism is not well understood. A 2674 bp 5′ flanking Sp-IAG contains many potential transcription factor binding sites. In this study, analysis of serially deleted 5′ flanking Sp-IAG and site-directed mutation (SDM) of transcription factor binding sites of the same gene showed that the promoter activity of reporter vectors with Sox-5-binding site, signal transducers and activators of transcription (STAT)-binding site and activator protein 1 (AP-1)-binding site were significantly higher than that of vectors without these regions, suggesting that they were involved in transcriptional regulation of Sp-IAG expression. The expression analysis of these transcription factor showed that there was no difference in the level of mRNA in Sox-5 and AP-1 in androgenic gland treated with recombinant CFSH, but expression of Sp-STAT was significantly reduced, suggesting that CFSH regulates the expression of Sp-STAT, inhibiting its function to regulate Sp-IAG. Further experiment revealed that RNAi mediated Sp-STAT gene knockdown reduced the expression of Sp-IAG. These results suggested that Sp-CFSH regulates Sp-IAG by inhibiting STAT. This is a pioneering finding on the transcriptional mechanism of IAG gene in crustaceans.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Sexually dimorphic traits are widespread in various species, and rely on changes initiated and maintained by key reproductive hormones [1,2]. In male crustaceans only, sex differentiation is largely controlled by the androgenic gland (AG) [3]. The role of AG was first reported in amphipod Orchestia gammarellus [4]. Later, cDNA for androgenic gland hormone (AGH) from terrestrial isopod Armadillidium vulgare was isolated and characterized [5]. Removing AG or silencing the gene for AGH, as well as AG implantation or injection of AG extracts has been shown to affect primary and secondary sex characteristics in various crustacean species, including A. vulgare, the red-claw crayfish Cherax quadricarinatus and the giant freshwater prawn Macrobrachium rosenbergii [6,7,8,9,10,11]. For instance, in M. rosenbergii, removal of the AG caused sex reversal in juvenile males, while silencing Mr-AGH resulted in hypertrophy of AG and arrested testicular spermatogenesis [12,13].
In the mud crab Scylla paramamosain, AGH, also termed AG-specific insulin-like peptide (IAG), is widely distributed in various tissues of both sexes, and may be involved in ovarian development, somatic growth and mating behavior [14,15]. X-organ-sinus gland in eyestalk negatively regulates expression of Sp-IAG [15,16]. For the first time, Zhang et al. cloned 5′- region flanking Sp-IAG, and found many potential transcription factor binding sites, such as Sox-5, GATA-1, GATA-2, activator protein 1 (AP-1), and signal transducers and activators of transcription (STAT) [15]. Sox is a series of conserved genes, found in many species such as mammals, fish, reptiles, amphibians, birds, and insects, in which Sox-3, Sox-5, Sox-9, and Sox-17 regulate determination of male sex [17,18,19]. GATA proteins are important transcriptional regulators and play an important role in steroidogenesis, sex determination and differentiation [20,21,22,23].
Crustacean female sex hormone (CFSH) was first isolated from eyestalk of the Atlantic blue crab Callinectes sapidus, and is integral in the development of female secondary sexual characteristics including parental care and mating system [24]. In S. paramamosain, Sp-CFSH positively regulates formation of gonopores in females and inhibits expression of Sp-IAG in males [2,16]. It is interesting that CFSHs are homologous to interleukin-17 (IL-17) and highly conserved among brachyuran crabs [16]. Although structural homology does not always represent functional similarity, studies on the IL-17 signaling pathway could provide insight on how CFSH mediates its regulation function. Previous studies showed that IL-17 could influence transcription regulators such as AP-1, STAT, NF-κB (nuclear factor kappa-B), thereby controlling expression of specific downstream genes in mammals [25,26,27,28].
IAG and CFSH jointly regulate sex differentiation, and understanding their interaction can provide insight on how they perform their function in crustaceans. To date, there are no reports on the mechanism of IAG inhibition by CFSH. Here, this process was explored in S. paramamosain by analyzing transcriptional mechanism of IAG and expression of transcription factors in AGs treated with CFSH in vitro.

2. Results

2.1. Sp-IAG Promoter Activity

The green fluorescence (EGFP) were detected in human embryonic kidney cell line HEK293FT cells after transfection for 24 h, the results showed that EGFP can be detected in cells transfected with pEGFP-N1 (Figure 1A) and pEGFP-pSp-IAG (Figure 1B), but not in cells transfected with pEGFP-1 (Figure 1C). pEGFP-N1 used as a positive control contains cytomegalovirus (CMV) promoter, which can effectively turn on the expression of EGFP. EGFP in cells transfected with pEGFP-pSp-IAG demonstrated promoter activity at 5′-flanking sequence, while pEGFP-1 serving as negative control did not produce any fluorescence. Cells in bright fields are observed and shown in Figure 1D–F, separately.

2.2. Analysis of Promoter Activity by Serial Deletion of 5′-Flanking Region

According to distribution of binding sites for transcription factor in 5′-flanking sequence (Figure 2A), eight plasmids, pGL3-pSp-IAG1 to pGL3-pSp-IAG8, were constructed using pGL3-Basic and various regions of 5′-flanking sequence obtained by fixing the 3′ end and extending the 5′ end (Figure 2B). The sequencing results showed that the regions had no mutation and their lengths were 302, 420, 837, 967, 1235, 1845, 1986, and 2252 bp, respectively. Plasmids were transfected on HEK293FT cells, and luciferase activities of Firefly and Renilla determined to analyze the promoter activity. It was shown that the promoter activities of the eight plasmids were significantly higher than that of negative control (pGL3-basic) (Figure 2C). Compared with the previous plasmid, promoter activities were significantly enhanced in pGL3-pSp-IAG1 (Sox-5-binding site), pGL3-pSp-IAG2 (AP-1-binding site), pGL3-pSp-IAG3 (STAT-binding site), and pGL3-pSp-IAG6 (Sox-5-binding site), while there were no significant differences in pGL3-pSp-IAG4 (GATA-1-binding site, GATA-2-binding site), pGL3-pSp-IAG5 (GATA-1-binding site), and pGL3-pSp-IAG7. The promoter activity of pGL3-pSp-IAG8 (GATA-2-binding site) was significantly reduced than that of pGL3-pSp-IAG7.

2.3. Analysis of Promoter Activity by Site-Directed Mutation (SDM)

To analyze the regulation of transcription factor binding sites on promoter activity, SDM were performed on AP-1-binding site (pGL3-pSp-IAG2), STAT-binding site (pGL3-pSp-IAG3), Sox-5-binding site (pGL3-pSp-IAG6) and GATA-2-binding site (pGL3-pSp-IAG8). According to the sequencing results, plasmids with SDM were selected to detect the promoter activity. The results showed that promoter activities were significantly reduced in pGL3-pSp-IAG2-Mut (AP-1-binding site: TGCAGAC) (Figure 3A), pGL3-pSp-IAG3-Mut (STAT-binding site: CGAGATACGAGACGA) (Figure 3B), and pGL3-pSp-IAG6-Mut (Sox-5-binding site: GTCTCGTTAGCCT) (Figure 3C), while there was no significant difference in pGL3-pSp-IAG8-Mut (GATA-2-binding site: GGCTGCATTCTAG) (Figure 3D).

2.4. Analysis of Gene Expression in AG Treated by rCFSH In Vitro

The precipitate was resuspended in binding buffer with 8 M urea, then analyzed by 15% SDS-PAGE (Figure S1A) which showed that rCFSH (~20 kDa) was expressed in E. coli BL21. Figure S1B showed that the purified rCFSH was analyzed by 15% SDS-PAGE, while Figure S1C showed that the renatured protein was analyzed by Western blotting with prepared anti-His-tag rabbit antibody, which confirmed that the antibody could specifically bind to the purified protein. Based on analysis of promoter activity by SDM, AP-1-binding site, STAT-binding site, and Sox-5-binding site may be involved in the regulation of Sp-IAG expression. Therefore, AGs were cultured in vitro and treated with rCFSH to further analyze transcriptional regulation of Sp-IAG expression by rCFSH. qRT-PCR findings showed that expression of Sp-STAT (Figure 4B) and Sp-IAG (Figure 4D) were significantly reduced in AG treated with rCFSH, while there was no difference in the expression of Sp-AP-1 (Figure 4A) and Sp-Sox (Figure 4C).

2.5. Knockdown of Sp-STAT Reducing Expression of Sp-IAG

The role of Sp-STAT was examined by studying the loss of function of this gene by RNAi (dsRNA). Silencing outcomes showed that Sp-STAT-dsRNA administration significantly reduced the expression of Sp-STAT at 4 h, which was approximately 55% of those treated with saline or GFP (green fluorescent protein gene)-dsRNA (Figure 5A). qRT-PCR performed to analyze expression of Sp-IAG showed that the expression of Sp-IAG was also significantly reduced in AG treated with Sp-STAT-dsRNA for 4h (Figure 5B).

3. Discussion

IAG regulates various reproductive processes such as spermatogenesis, sex differentiation, and sexual shifts in crustaceans [14]. However, the transcriptional regulation of Sp-IAG expression is poorly understood. Previous studies established the endocrine axis of the eyestalk-AG-testis in male crustaceans [29,30]. AG is regulated by negative control of the eyestalk, however, the exact mechanism(s) for this inhibition is not well understood [29]. Sp-CFSH exclusively expressed in eyestalk ganglion can inhibit expression of Sp-IAG in S. paramamosain. Therefore, it is important to understand this mutual regulation to shed more insights on the endocrine axis of the eyestalk-AG-testis.
In this study, the HEK293FT cells were transfected with pEGFP-pSp-IAG to determine the promoter activity of the 5′-flanking sequence, and the promoter activity was demonstrated by green fluorescence protein (GFP) expression. Previous studies have shown that the promoter activity of genes in S. paramamosain can be analyzed in HEK293FT cells [31,32]. The Figure 1 shows the expression of GFP in HEK293FT cells. However, this expression is rather low for pEGFP-pSp-IAG (Figure 1B), suggesting that the lower transfection efficiency or weaker promoter activity of pEGFP-pSp-IAG. Usually, bigger plasmid bring about lower transfection efficiency. Therefore, compared with pEGFP-N1 (4733 bp), the transfection efficiency of pEGFP-pSp-IAG (6816 bp) could be greatly reduced. In addition, promoter activity is another factor affecting protein expression. Weak promoter activity leads to low GFP expression, while low fluorescence that does not meet detection criteria may be another reason for the small number of green HEK293FT cells transfected with pEGFP-pSp-IAG. Combined with potential transcriptional factor binding sites in 5′ end, GATA was predicted to be involved in transcription regulation of Sp-IAG. In this study, the promoter activity of regions flanking 5′ Sp-IAG end were analyzed by serial deletion, and it was shown that there was no difference in the promoter activity in pGL3-pSp-IAG5 (GATA-1-binding site) and pGL3-pSp-IAG4 plasmids, suggesting that GATA-1-binding site in pSp-IAG5 may not participate in regulating promoter activity. The promoter activity of pGL3-pSp-IAG8 was significantly stronger reduced than that of pGL3-pSp-IAG7, indicating that GATA-2-binding site may have been a negative regulatory element in pGL3-pSp-IAG8. However, analysis of SDM showed that the promoter activity of pGL3-pSp-IAG8-Mut was not significantly different from that of pGL3-pSp-IAG8, suggesting that the decrease in promoter activity of pGL3-pSp-IAG8 was not regulated by GATA-2-binding site in pSp-IAG8.
In this study, promoter activity was significantly increased in pGL3-pSp-IAG1 (Sox-5-binding site) and pGL3-pSp-IAG6 (Sox-5-binding site) than in previous plasmids (pGL3-basic and pGL3-pSp-IAG5), suggesting that Sox-5-binding site may participate in enhancing this activity, consistent with SDM results of decreased promoter activity in pGL3-pSp-IAG6-Mut. Sox is an important factor for male sex determination/differentiation in vertebrates or crustaceans [33,34]. In zebra fish, Sox-5 can bind the promoter for Dmrt1 (doublesex and mab-3-related transcription factor 1) inhibiting expression of the gene, which may influence the differentiation of gender [35]. In medaka, Sox-5 regulates expression of dmrt1bY. Moreover, knockout of Sox-5 reverses female to male [36]. Presence of Sox-5-binding site in the 5′-flanking region could explain the association of IAG and male sex differentiation, spermatogenesis and reproductive strategy in S. paramamosain. However, expression of Sp-Sox was not significantly difference in AG treated by rCFSH, suggesting that Sox-5 does not influence CFSH-mediated transcriptional regulation of Sp-IAG. To date, 5′-flanking regions for IAG have only been documented in the Chinese shrimp Fenneropenaeus chinensis and the oriental river prawn Macrobrachium nipponense and both contain cis-acting element of Sox-5-binding site, suggesting that in decapods, the transcriptional regulation mechanism of IAG may be conserved [15,37].
CFSHs are homologous to interleukin-17 (IL-17) and are highly conserved among brachyuran crabs [16]. Although structural homology does not necessarily represent functional similarity, studies on IL-17 signaling pathway can provide insight on CFSH signaling pathway. Previous studies showed that IL-17, as pro-inflammatory cytokine, is involved in innate and adaptive immunity in vertebrates [38,39]. It has been found that IL-17 regulates genes expression by inducing transcription regulators such as AP-1, STAT, and NF-κB [25,26,28,40,41]. Combined with the results on potential transcriptional factor binding sites in 5′ flanking region of Sp-IAG, AP-1-binding site and STAT-binding site were analyzed to explore transcriptional regulation of Sp-CFSH on Sp-IAG expression.
It was found that AP-1-binding site was involved in the regulation of Sp-IAG expression by activating regulation of promoter activity in regions flanking 5′ end of the gene. Serial deletion showed that promoter activity was significantly increased in pGL3-pSp-IAG2 (AP-1-binding site) than (pGL3-pSp-IAG1) plasmid, suggesting that AP-1-binding site may participate in enhancing the promoter activity, consistent with SDM findings on AP-1-binding site. In vertebrates, AP-1 is regarded as an intracellular transcriptional activation factor, regulating expression of target genes, in response to various stimulants on cells, such as growth factors, cytokines, bacterial and viral infections, but also regulates many cellular processes, including differentiation, cell proliferation, inflammation, and other cellular functions [42,43,44]. Studies show that JNK, ERKs, p38MAPK and PI3K/AKT signal transduction pathway regulates activity of AP-1 at both gene and protein level through phosphorylation of different substrates in rodent [45]. In this study, the level of Sp-AP-1 mRNA was not significantly different in AG treated with rCFSH, suggesting that expression of Sp-AP-1 at gene level is not involved in CFSH-mediated transcriptional regulation of Sp-IAG expression.
Janus kinase (JAK) signal transducer and activator of transcription (STAT) pathway is one of the main signaling pathways in eukaryotic cells, which controls many biological processes. In Drosophila, this pathway controls segmentation, eye development, immune response, sex determination, germ/stem cell development, and heterochromatin stability [46,47,48]. JAK/STAT pathway controls expression of insulin-like peptide 8 (dilp8) in Drosophila to coordinate regenerative disc growth with organisms’ developmental timing [49]. Additionally, JAK/STAT signaling is required in male-germline stem-cell maintenance, germ-cell function and migration in Drosophila [50,51,52,53]. In this study, serial deletion of regions flanking Sp-IAG 5′ end and SDM analysis of STAT-binding site in pGL3-pSp-IAG3 revealed that STAT-binding site could positively regulate the promoter activity of Sp-IAG. An interference of the cultured AG by Sp-STAT-dsRNA could effectively decrease the expression of Sp-IAG significantly, which further reaffirmed transcriptional activation of STAT in regulating expression of Sp-IAG. Recent studies have shown that JAK/STAT signaling is involved in regulating immunity in S. paramamosain, and expression of Sp-STAT can be significantly affected by various immunostimulants [54]. In this study, it was found that the level of Sp-STAT mRNA was significantly decreased in AG treated with rCFSH, suggesting that CFSH can inhibit expression of Sp-STAT at gene level, which in turn regulates the expression of Sp-IAG.
To our knowledge, this study presents the first attempt to comprehensively investigate the transcriptional mechanism of IAG expression in crustaceans. AP-1-binding site, Sox-5-binding site and STAT-binding site can regulate expression of Sp-IAG, in which STAT-binding site is involved in transcription regulation of Sp-CFSH on Sp-IAG expression. So far, CFSH receptor has not been identified in crustacean species, further study on CFSH receptor and its downstream signaling pathways are recommended for the interpretation Sp-IAG expression in S. paramamosain.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Animal Sources

Mud crabs (Scylla paramamosain) were obtained from a local market in Xiamen, Fujian Province, China. In this study, crabs at pre-molt stage in autumn were selected. Crabs (carapace width 11.5–14.3 cm, body weight 250–320 g) were anesthetized and dissected, collecting muscles and AGs at stage III of the gland development [16]. Muscles provided genomic DNA while AGs were used for in vitro incubation study. The crabs were reared in tanks (40 × 40 × 60 cm) with seawater (24 L, salinity 26 ± 1 ppm and temperature 27 ± 2 °C), and fed on the white Pacific shrimp (Litopenaeus vannamei) meat. All animal procedures were carried out in strict compliance with the National Institute of Health Guidelines for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals.

4.2. Transcriptional Activity Analysis of Sp-IAG Promoter

The 5′ region flanking Sp-IAG was amplified by PCR and then cloned in pMD19-T vector (TaKaRa, Dalian, China). Briefly, this region was digested with KpnI and BamHI (TaKaRa, Dalian, China), and ligated in a vector lacking gene promoters (pEGFP-1, YouBio, Changsha, China). The recombinant vector (pEGFP-pSp-IAG) was transfected on HEK293FT cells to determine transcriptional activity. The HEK293FT cells were obtained from the China Center for Type Culture Collection, Wuhan. After three passages, HEK293FT cells were cultured on 24-well plates in high glucose Dulbecco’s modified eagle medium (DMEM, HyClone, Logan, UT, USA) containing 10% FBS (fetal bovine serum) (Gibco, Grand Island, NY, USA) and 1% Penicillin-Streptomycin (Gibco, USA), at 37 °C for 12 h under 5% CO2. Transient transfection of cells was performed using LipofectamineTM 2000 Reagent (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) according to the manufacturer’s protocols. pEGFP-N1 contains cytomegalovirus (CMV) promoter, which effectively turns on the expression of EGFP. pEGFP-1 and pEGFP-N1 were used as negative and positive controls, respectively. After culture for 24 h, the cells were observed under a fluorescent microscope and green fluorescence of the live cells was observed under a Leica fluorescence microscopy imaging system (Leica, Solms, Germany).

4.3. Analysis of Promoter Activity by Serial Deletion of 5′ Region Constructs

Sequential deletion of fragments flanking 5′ Sp-IAG region were synthesized using primers (Table 1) containing KpnI and XhoI restriction sites (fixing the 3′-terminal and shrinking the 5′-terminal). After digestion with KpnI and XhoI (TaKaRa, Dalian, China), a series of recombinant vectors (pSp-IAG-1 to pSp-IAG-8) were constructed by connecting pGL3-Basic vector (a Luciferase Reporter Vector without promoter, Promega, Madison, WI, USA) with the synthesized fragments described above. The recombinant vectors were verified by sequencing and then transfected on HEK293FT cells using LipofectamineTM 2000 Reagent (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) according to the manufacturer’s protocols [32]. pRL-TK vector was used to normalize the transfection efficiency by co-transfected with the reporter constructs. Cells were collected after a 24 h culture. Firefly and Renilla luciferase activities were measured by Dual-Luciferase Reporter Assay System (Promega, Madison, WI, USA) and chemiluminescence was measured using Varioskan Flash (Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). Promoter activity was evaluated by the normalized mean of firefly luciferase action on Renilla luciferase activity.

4.4. Analysis of the Promoter Activity of the 5′ Region Flanking Sp-IAG with Site-Directed Mutagenesis (SDM)

SDM was performed by overlap extension PCR with primers containing the mutational bases (the transcription factor binding sites are shown in bold, Table 1), and was used to identify the function of transcription elements. pspIAG-2F/Sp-AP-R-mut, pspIAG-3F/Sp-STAT-R-mut, pspIAG-6F/Sp-Sox-R-mut, and pspIAG-8F/Sp-GATA-R-mut were utilized in amplifying pSp-AP-5′, pSp-STAT-5′, pSp-Sox-5′, and pSp-GATA-5′; Sp-AP-F-mut/Sp-STAT-F-mut/Sp-Sox-F-mut/Sp-GATA-F-mut while pspIAG-R was utilized in amplifying pSp-AP-3′, pSp-STAT-3′, pSp-Sox-3′, and pSp-GATA-3′. PCR conditions were 34 cycles, with initial 94 °C for 5 min; and subsequently 94 °C for 30 s, 57 °C for 30 s, 72 °C for 1 min, followed by final extension at 72 °C for 10 min using an ABI 2720 Thermal Cycler (Applied Biosystems). The second reaction was performed in an amplification system containing 2.0 µL 10× Ex Taq Buffer (Mg2+ Plus), 0.8 µL dNTP (2.5 mM), 0.1 µL Ex Taq (5U/μL) (TaKaRa, Dalian, China), 2 µL pSp-AP-5′/pSp-STAT-5′/pSp-Sox-5′/pSp-GATA-5, 2 µL pSp-AP-3′/pSp-STAT-3′/pSp-Sox-3′/pSp-GATA-3′, and 12.3 µL water, under initial 94 °C for 5 min; followed by 10 cycles, each at 94 °C for 40 s, 57 °C for 1 min, 72 °C for 1 min, 20 °C for 5 min followed by adding 0.4 µL pspIAG-2F/pspIAG-3F/pspIAG-6F/pspIAG-8F and 0.8 µL pspIAG-R (10μM) to the amplification system. The second reaction conditions were 35 cycles, each at 94 °C for 40 s, 57 °C for 1 min, 72 °C for 1 min, and 72 °C for 10 min. Amplification products were verified by sequencing. Products with SDM were purified and digested with KpnI and XholI (TaKaRa, Dalian, China), then ligated in pGL3-Basic vector. The reporter vectors were transiently transfected on HEK293FT cells and evaluated for relative luciferase activity by Dual-Luciferase Reporter Assay (Promage, Madison, WI, USA). Reporter vector with normal transcription element and pGL3-basic were used as positive and the negative controls, respectively.

4.5. Production of Recombinant CFSH

Recombinant CFSH (rCFSH) was produced as previously described [16]. Briefly, Sp-CFSH was amplified and cloned in pET-His (a prokaryotic expression vector). After sequencing and analysis, the recombinant vector was transfected on E. coli BL21 (DE3), and cultured in Luria-Bertani medium with 0.8 mM isopropyl-D-thiogalactopyranoside for 8 h at 37 °C. After collection and cleaning, the bacteria were suspended in binding buffer and dissociated by ultrasonic wave. Soluble and insoluble fractions were separated by centrifugation at 12,000× g for 10 min at 4 °C. The precipitate containing large amount of rCFSH was resuspended in binding buffer with 8 M urea, then which was analyzed by 15% SDS-PAGE and loaded on a Ni-NTA HisTrapTM FF crude column (GE Healthcare, Danderyd, Sweden) in accordance with the manufacturer’s instructions. Gradient elution was performed with a buffer containing 50 mM imidazole, 100 mM imidazole, 200 mM imidazole and 300 mM imidazole. Eluting solution was collected and examined with 15% SDS-PAGE. Finally, purified rCFSH was denatured with graded urea dialysis and confirmed by Western blotting. The proteins were stored at −80 °C.

4.6. Analysis of Gene Expression in AG Treated by rCFSH in Vitro

CFSH has been shown to inhibit expression of Sp-IAG in S. paramamosain. AGs of one crab were divided into two and cultured according to the established methods [55,56]. First, AGs were rinsed 9 times with saline containing penicillin G (300 IU/mL) and streptomycin (300 µg/mL) (Sigma-Aldrich Co. Louis, MO, USA), then pipetted on a 48-well plate and pre-incubated at 25 °C with 100 μL 2 × L15 medium (Gibco, Grand Island, NY, USA). The medium was changed after one hour for final incubation. Controls were incubated in 2 × L15 medium only while the test samples were incubated in 2 × L15 medium containing 10−6 M rCFSH (rCFSH group). AGs were collected after 8 h to determine the effects of rCFSH on Sp-AP-1/Sp-STAT/Sp-Sox/Sp-IAG expression. Four biological replicas were prepared in each experiment.

4.7. Sp-STAT Knockdown in Vitro

Green fluorescent protein gene (GFP), as an exogenous control, was cloned in pSicoR-EGFP vector [56]. As previously described [57], Sp-STAT and GFP were cloned and purified for synthesis of Sp-STAT-dsRNA and GFP-dsRNA by T7 and SP6 polymerase (Roche, Mannheim, Germany). AGs of one crab were divided into three. AGs were rinsed 9 times with saline containing penicillin G (300 IU/mL) and streptomycin (300 µg/mL) (Sigma-Aldrich Co. Louis, MO, USA), then pipetted on a 48-well plate and pre-incubated at 25 °C with 100 μL 2 × L15 medium (Gibco, Grand Island, NY, USA). The medium were changed after one hour for final incubation. They were incubated in 2 × L15 medium (positive control), 2 × L15 medium containing 1 µg/mL GFP-dsRNA (negative control) or 2 × L15 medium containing 1 µg/mL Sp-STAT-dsRNA, respectively. AGs were collected after either 2 or 4 h to evaluate effects of Sp-STAT mRNA knockdown. Then, samples with obvious interference efficiency were selected to detect the expression of Sp-IAG gene. Four biological replicas were evaluated in the experiments.

4.8. Quantification of Gene Expression

Total RNA was extracted from AGs using TRIzol (Invitrogen, USA). Quality and concentration of RNA was measured using a NanoDrop-2000 spectrophotometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA), and 200 ng of total RNA was reverse-transcribed with random primer using TransScriptII One-step gDNA Removal and cDNA Synthesis SuperMix (TransGen, Beijing, China) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. The cDNAs were diluted four times for quantitative reverse transcription PCR (qRT-PCR) analysis, with β-actin used as a reference gene. Primers in qRT-PCR assay had been previous used as shown in Table 1 [16,54]. Products of the reaction were sequenced to confirm the specificity of qRT-PCR. qRT-PCR was performed with SYBR Select Master Mix (TaKaRa, Dalian, Japan) under the following conditions: an initial 95 °C for 30 s, 40 cycles at 95 °C for 5 s, 58 °C for 30 s, and 72 °C for 30 s. The procedure was carried out in a 7500 Fast Real-time PCR System (Applied Biosystems). Melting curves were analyzed to exclude any non-specific products. qRT-PCR data were calculated by 2−ΔΔCt method.

4.9. Statistical Analysis

The 2−ΔΔCt method was used to analyze the qRT-PCR data. The statistical analysis was performed using SPSS 22.0, including Duncan’s multiple range tests and one-way ANOVA, and p-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary materials can be found at https://www.mdpi.com/1422-0067/21/15/5300/s1. Figure S1: Production of recombinant CFSH. A and B: rCFSH after lysis and purification analyzed by 15% SDS-PAGE; C: Western blotting analysis of the rCFSH after purification and renaturation. M: Protein marker. Arrows indicate the target protein product. Supplementary 2: The 5′ flanking region sequence of Sp-IAG. The deduced transcriptional start site (G) is marked by red and defined as position 1. The primers used to clone the 5′-flanking region sequence are marked in bold. The restriction sites are marked by underlined. The protective base is represented in lowercase letters.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, Q.J. and H.Y.; Methodology, Q.J.; Software, Q.J.; Validation, Q.J.; Formal analysis, Q.J.; Investigation, Q.J. and B.L.; Resources, G.W. and H.Y.; Data Curation, Q.J.; Writing - original draft, Q.J.; Writing-review editing, Q.J. and H.Y.; Visualization, Q.J.; Supervision, H.Y.; Project administration, H.Y.; Funding acquisition, H.Y. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This study was supported by the Natural Science Foundation of China (grant numbers 31972765, 31772827, 31472294).

Acknowledgments

pEGFP-N1 was kindly provided by Kejian Wang (Xiamen University, Xiamen, China). We would like to thank the anonymous reviewers for their helpful remarks and suggestions.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Abbreviations

CFSHcrustacean female sex hormone
IAGinsulin-like androgenic hormone
SDMsite-directed mutation
STATsignal transducers and activators of transcription
AP-1activator protein 1
RNAiRNA interfere
EGFPenhanced green fluorescent protein
rCFSHrecombinant CFSH
AGandrogenic gland
AGHandrogenic gland hormone
IL-17interleukin-17

References

  1. Li, J.; Yu, H.; Wang, W.; Fu, C.; Zhang, W.; Han, F.; Wu, H. Genomic and transcriptomic insights into molecular basis of sexually dimorphic nuptial spines in Leptobrachium leishanense. Nat. Commun. 2019, 10, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  2. Jiang, Q.; Lu, B.; Lin, D.; Huang, H.; Chen, X.; Ye, H. Role of crustacean female sex hormone (CFSH) in sex differentiation in early juvenile mud crabs, Scylla paramamosain. Gen. Comp. Endocrinol. 2020, 289, 113383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Charniaux-Cotton, H. Arthropoda-Crustacea: Sexual differentiation. Reprod. Biol. Invert. 1992, 5, 281–323. [Google Scholar]
  4. Charniaux-Cotton, H. Discovery in, an amphipod crustacean (Orchestia gammarella) of an endocrine gland responsible for the differentiation of primary and secondary male sex characteristics. Cr. Acad. Bulg. Sci. 1954, 239, 780–782. [Google Scholar]
  5. Okuno, A.; Hasegawa, Y.; Ohira, T.; Katakura, Y.; Nagasawa, H. Characterization and cDNA Cloning of Androgenic Gland Hormone of the Terrestrial Isopod Armadillidium vulgare. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 1999, 264, 419–423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Khalaila, I.; Katz, T.; Abdu, U.; Yehezkel, G.; Sagi, A. Effects of Implantation of Hypertrophied Androgenic Glands on Sexual Characters and Physiology of the Reproductive System in the Female Red Claw Crayfish, Cherax quadricarinatus. Gen. Comp. Endocrinol. 2001, 121, 242–249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  7. Sagi, A.; Khalaila, I. The crustacean androgen: A hormone in an isopod and androgenic activity in decapods. Am. Zool. 2001, 41, 477–484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Barki, A.; Karplus, I.; Khalaila, I.; Manor, R.; Sagi, A. Male-like behavioral patterns and physiological alterations induced by androgenic gland implantation in female crayfish. J. Exp. Boil. 2003, 206, 1791–1797. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Manor, R.; Aflalo, E.; Segall, C.; Weil, S.; Azulay, D.; Ventura, T.; Sagi, A. Androgenic gland implantation promotes growth and inhibits vitellogenesis in Cherax quadricarinatus females held in individual compartments. Invertebr. Reprod. Dev. 2004, 45, 151–159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Rosen, O.; Manor, R.; Weil, S.; Gafni, O.; Linial, A.; Aflalo, E.; Ventura, T.; Sagi, A. A Sexual Shift Induced by Silencing of a Single Insulin-Like Gene in Crayfish: Ovarian Upregulation and Testicular Degeneration. PLoS ONE 2010, 5, e15281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Ventura, T.; Rosen, O.; Sagi, A. From the discovery of the crustacean androgenic gland to the insulin-like hormone in six decades. Gen. Comp. Endocrinol. 2011, 173, 381–388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Sagi, A.; Snir, E.; Khalaila, I. Sexual differentiation in decapod crustaceans: Role of the androgenic gland. Invertebr. Reprod. Dev. 1997, 31, 55–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Ventura, T.; Manor, R.; Aflalo, E.; Weil, S.; Raviv, S.; Glazer, L.; Sagi, A. Temporal Silencing of an Androgenic Gland-Specific Insulin-Like Gene Affecting Phenotypical Gender Differences and Spermatogenesis. Endocrinology 2009, 150, 1278–1286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Huang, X.; Ye, H.; Huang, H.; Yang, Y.; Gong, J. An insulin-like androgenic gland hormone gene in the mud crab, Scylla paramamosain, extensively expressed and involved in the processes of growth and female reproduction. Gen. Comp. Endocrinol. 2014, 204, 229–238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Zhang, Y.; Qiao, K.; Wang, S.; Peng, H.; Shan, Z.; Wang, K. Molecular identification of a new androgenic gland-specific insulin-like gene from the mud crab, Scylla paramamosain. Aquac. 2014, 433, 325–334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Liu, A.; Liu, J.; Liu, F.; Huang, Y.; Wang, G.; Ye, H.-H. Crustacean Female Sex Hormone from the Mud Crab Scylla paramamosain is Highly Expressed in Prepubertal Males and Inhibits the Development of Androgenic Gland. Front. Physiol. 2018, 9, 924. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Denny, P.; Swift, S.; Brand, N.; Dabhade, N.; Barton, P.; Ashworth, A. A conserved family of genes related to the testis determining gene, SRY. Nucleic Acids Res. 1992, 20, 2887. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  18. Uwanogho, D.; Rex, M.; Cartwright, E.J.; Pearl, G.; Healy, C.; Scotting, P.J.; Sharpe, P.T. Embryonic expression of the chicken Sox2, Sox3 and Sox11 genes suggests an interactive role in neuronal development. Mech. Dev. 1995, 49, 23–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Clarkson, M.; Harley, V.R. Sex with two SOX on: SRY and SOX9 in testis development. Trends Endocrinol. Metab. 2002, 13, 106–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Tevosian, S.G.; Albrecht, K.; Crispino, J.D.; Fujiwara, Y.; Eicher, E.M.; Orkin, S.H. Gonadal differentiation, sex determination and normal Sry expression in mice require direct interaction between transcription partners GATA4 and FOG2. Development 2002, 129, 4627–4634. [Google Scholar]
  21. Robert, N.M.; Tremblay, J.J.; Viger, R.S. Friend of GATA (FOG)-1 and FOG-2 Differentially Repress the GATA-Dependent Activity of Multiple Gonadal Promoters. Endocrinology 2002, 143, 3963–3973. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  22. Tremblay, J.J.; Viger, R.S. Novel roles for GATA transcription factors in the regulation of steroidogenesis. J. Steroid Biochem. Mol. Boil. 2003, 85, 291–298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Viger, R.S.; Taniguchi, H.; Robert, N.M.; Tremblay, J.J.; And, N.M.R. The 25th Volume: Role of the GATA Family of Transcription Factors in Andrology. J. Androl. 2004, 25, 441–452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Zmora, N.; Chung, J.S. A Novel Hormone Is Required for the Development of Reproductive Phenotypes in Adult Female Crabs. Endocrinology 2014, 155, 230–239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Benderdour, M.; Tardif, G.; Pelletier, J.-P.; Di Battista, J.A.; Reboul, P.; Ranger, P.; Martel-Pelletier, J. Interleukin 17 (IL-17) induces collagenase-3 production in human osteoarthritic chondrocytes via AP-1 dependent activation: Differential activation of AP-1 members by IL-17 and IL-1beta. J. Rheumatol. 2002, 29, 1262–1272. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  26. Gao, C.; Liu, W.; Wang, X.R.; Liu, X.Z.; Zhao, S.G.; Fu, S.B. IL-17 stimulates migration of carotid artery vascular smooth muscle cells in an MMP-9 dependent manner via p38 MAPK and ERK1/2-dependent NF-κB and AP-1 activation. Cell. Mol. Neurobiol. 2009, 29, 1161–1168. [Google Scholar]
  27. Wu, J.; Guo, J.; Cao, Q.; Wang, Y.; Chen, J.; Wang, Z.; Yuan, Z. Autophagy impacts on oxaliplatin-induced hepatocarcinoma apoptosis via the IL-17/IL-17R-JAK2/STAT3 signaling pathway. Oncol. Lett. 2017, 13, 770–776. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Du, S.; Li, Z.; Xie, X.; Xu, C.; Shen, X.; Wang, N.; Shen, Y. IL-17 stimulates the expression of CCL2 in cardiac myocytes via Act1/TRAF6/p38MAPK dependent AP-1 activation. Scand. J. Immunol. 2020, 91, e12840. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Khalaila, I.; Manor, R.; Weil, S.; Granot, Y.; Keller, R.; Sagi, A. The eyestalk–androgenic gland–testis endocrine axis in the crayfish Cherax quadricarinatus. Gen. Comp. Endocrinol. 2002, 127, 147–156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Sroyraya, M.; Chotwiwatthanakun, C.; Stewart, M.J.; Soonklang, N.; Kornthong, N.; Phoungpetchara, I.; Hanna, P.; Sobhon, P. Bilateral eyestalk ablation of the blue swimmer crab, Portunus pelagicus, produces hypertrophy of the androgenic gland and an increase of cells producing insulin-like androgenic gland hormone. Tissue Cell 2010, 42, 293–300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Zhang, X.; Huang, D.; Jia, X.; Zou, Z.; Wang, Y.; Zhang, Z. Functional analysis of the promoter of the molt-inhibiting hormone (mih) gene in mud crab Scylla paramamosain. Gen. Comp. Endocrinol. 2018, 259, 131–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Liu, C.Y.; Jia, X.W.; Zou, Z.H.; Wang, X.W.; Wang, Y.L.; Zhang, Z.P. VIH from the mud crab is specifically expressed in the eyestalk and potentially regulated by transactivator of Sox9/Oct4/Oct1. Gen. Comp. Endocr. 2018, 255, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Wallis, M.C.; Waters, P.D.; Graves, J.M. Sex determination in mammals—Before and after the evolution of SRY. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 2008, 65, 3182–3195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Ma, K.; Qiu, G.; Feng, J.; Li, J. Transcriptome Analysis of the Oriental River Prawn, Macrobrachium nipponense Using 454 Pyrosequencing for Discovery of Genes and Markers. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e39727. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  35. Gao, S.; Zhang, T.; Zhou, X.; Zhao, Y.; Li, Q.; Guo, Y.; Cheng, H.; Zhou, R. Molecular cloning, expression ofSox5 and its down-regulation ofDmrt1 transcription in Zebrafish. J. Exp. Zoöl. Part B Mol. Dev. Evol. 2005, 304, 476–483. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Schartl, M.; Schories, S.; Wakamatsu, Y.; Nagao, Y.; Hashimoto, H.; Bertin, C.; Mourot, B.; Schmidt, C.; Wilhelm, D.; Centanin, L.; et al. Sox5 is involved in germ-cell regulation and sex determination in medaka following co-option of nested transposable elements. BMC Boil. 2018, 16, 16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  37. Li, S.; Li, F.; Sun, Z.; Xiang, J. Two spliced variants of insulin-like androgenic gland hormone gene in the Chinese shrimp, Fenneropenaeus chinensis. Gen. Comp. Endocrinol. 2012, 177, 246–255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Shabgah, A.G.; Fattahi, E.; Shahneh, F.Z. Interleukin-17 in human inflammatory diseases. Adv. Dermatol. Allergol. 2014, 31, 256–261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Kumar, P.; Monin, L.; Castillo, P.; Elsegeiny, W.; Horne, W.; Eddens, T.; Vikram, A.; Good, M.; Schoenborn, A.A.; Bibby, K.; et al. Intestinal Interleukin-17 Receptor Signaling Mediates Reciprocal Control of the Gut Microbiota and Autoimmune Inflammation. Immunity 2016, 44, 659–671. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Subramaniam, S.; Cooper, R.S.; Adunyah, S.E. Evidence for the Involvement of JAK/STAT Pathway in the Signaling Mechanism of Interleukin-17. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 1999, 262, 14–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. You, T.; Bi, Y.; Zhang, M.; Chen, X.; Zhang, K.; Li, J. IL-17 induces reactive astrocytes and up-regulation of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) through JAK/STAT signaling. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 41779. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Jochum, W.; Passegué, E.; Wagner, E.F. AP-1 in mouse development and tumorigenesis. Oncogene 2001, 20, 2401–2412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  43. Grötsch, B.; Brachs, S.; Lang, C.; Luther, J.; Derer, A.; Schlötzer-Schrehardt, U.; Bozec, A.; Fillatreau, S.; Berberich, I.; Hobeika, E.; et al. The AP-1 transcription factor Fra1 inhibits follicular B cell differentiation into plasma cells. J. Exp. Med. 2014, 211, 2199–2212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Li, J.K.; Nie, L.; Zhao, Y.P.; Zhang, Y.Q.; Wang, X.; Wang, S.S.; Liu, Y.; Zhao, H.; Cheng, L. IL-17 mediates inflammatory reactions via p38/c-Fos and JNK/c-Jun activation in an AP-1-dependent manner in human nucleus pulposus cells. J. Transl. Med. 2016, 14, 77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  45. He, S.; Minton, A.Z.; Ma, H.-Y.; Stankowska, D.L.; Sun, X.; Krishnamoorthy, R.R. Involvement of AP-1 and C/EBPβ in Upregulation of Endothelin B (ETB) Receptor Expression in a Rodent Model of Glaucoma. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e79183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  46. Baksa, K.; Parke, T.; Dobens, L.L.; Dearolf, C.R. The Drosophila STAT Protein, Stat92E, Regulates Follicle Cell Differentiation during Oogenesis. Dev. Boil. 2002, 243, 166–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  47. Arbouzova, N.I.; Zeidler, M.P. JAK/STAT signalling in Drosophila: Insights into conserved regulatory and cellular functions. Dev. 2006, 133, 2605–2616. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  48. Li, W.X. Canonical and non-canonical JAK–STAT signaling. Trends Cell Boil. 2008, 18, 545–551. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  49. Katsuyama, T.; Comoglio, F.; Seimiya, M.; Cabuy, E.; Paro, R. During Drosophila disc regeneration, JAK/STAT coordinates cell proliferation with Dilp8-mediated developmental delay. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2015, 112, E2327–E2336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Kiger, A.A.; Tulina, N.; Matunis, E. Stem Cell Self-Renewal Specified by JAK-STAT Activation in Response to a Support Cell Cue. Science. 2001, 294, 2542–2545. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Tulina, N. Control of Stem Cell Self-Renewal in Drosophila Spermatogenesis by JAK-STAT Signaling. Science 2001, 294, 2546–2549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Li, J.; Xia, F.; Li, W.X. Coactivation of STAT and Ras Is Required for Germ Cell Proliferation and Invasive Migration in Drosophila. Dev. Cell 2003, 5, 787–798. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  53. Brown, S.; Zeidler, M.P.; Hombría, J.C.-G. JAK/STAT signalling in Drosophila controls cell motility during germ cell migration. Dev. Dyn. 2006, 235, 958–966. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Deng, H.; Zhang, W.; Li, J.; Li, J.; Hu, L.; Yan, W.; Liu, S.; He, J.; Weng, S. A signal transducers and activators of transcription (STAT) gene from Scylla paramamosain is involved in resistance against mud crab reovirus. Fish Shellfish. Immunol. 2019, 94, 580–591. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Gong, J.; Ye, H.; Xie, Y.; Yang, Y.; Huang, H.; Li, S.; Zeng, C. Ecdysone receptor in the mud crab Scylla paramamosain: A possible role in promoting ovarian development. J. Endocrinol. 2015, 224, 273–287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  56. Huang, X.; Ye, H.; Feng, B.; Huang, H. Insights into insulin-like peptide system in invertebrates from studies on IGF binding domain-containing proteins in the female mud crab, Scylla paramamosain. Mol. Cell. Endocrinol. 2015, 416, 36–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Yang, Y.N.; Shu, L.; Jiang, Q.L.; Huang, H.Y.; Ye, H.H. Does the bone morphogenetic protein 7 inhibit oocyte maturation by autocrine/paracrine in mud crab? Gen. Comp. Endocr. 2018, 266, 119–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Ijms 21 05300 g001 550
Figure 1. The expression of green fluorescence (EGFP) in human embryonic kidney cell line HEK293FT cells. EGFP were detected in HEK293FT cells transfected with pEGFP-N1 (A), pEGFP-pSp-IAG (B), and pEGFP-1 (C). pEGFP-N1 and pEGFP-1 were used as positive control and negative control, respectively. After transfected for 24 h, the green fluorescence (EGFP) can be detected in (A) and (B) (positive control and target plasmid), but not in (C) (negative control) under a fluorescence microscope. Bright fields are documented in (D), (E), and (F) separately. A and D, B and E, C and F are with the same scale bar, respectively.
Figure 1. The expression of green fluorescence (EGFP) in human embryonic kidney cell line HEK293FT cells. EGFP were detected in HEK293FT cells transfected with pEGFP-N1 (A), pEGFP-pSp-IAG (B), and pEGFP-1 (C). pEGFP-N1 and pEGFP-1 were used as positive control and negative control, respectively. After transfected for 24 h, the green fluorescence (EGFP) can be detected in (A) and (B) (positive control and target plasmid), but not in (C) (negative control) under a fluorescence microscope. Bright fields are documented in (D), (E), and (F) separately. A and D, B and E, C and F are with the same scale bar, respectively.
Ijms 21 05300 g001
Ijms 21 05300 g002 550
Figure 2. Analysis of promoter activity by serial deletion of 5′-flanking region. (A) Schematic diagram on transcription regulatory binding sites. (B) Schematic diagram on serial deletion of Sp-IAG 5′-flanking region. (C) Analysis of relative luciferase activity; pGL3-basic was the negative control. The data are presented as mean ± standard error of mean (SEM) (n = 3) with different letters indicating significant differences at P < 0.05.
Figure 2. Analysis of promoter activity by serial deletion of 5′-flanking region. (A) Schematic diagram on transcription regulatory binding sites. (B) Schematic diagram on serial deletion of Sp-IAG 5′-flanking region. (C) Analysis of relative luciferase activity; pGL3-basic was the negative control. The data are presented as mean ± standard error of mean (SEM) (n = 3) with different letters indicating significant differences at P < 0.05.
Ijms 21 05300 g002
Ijms 21 05300 g003 550
Figure 3. Analysis of binding site of transcription factors with site-directed mutation (SDM). Schematic diagram of reporter vectors and analysis of relative luciferase activity of activator protein 1 (AP-1)-binding site (A), signal transducers and activators of transcription (STAT)-binding site (B), Sox-5-binding site (C) and GATA-2-binding site (D). pGL3-Basic was the negative control. Data are presented as mean ± SEM (n = 3) with different letters indicating significant differences at p < 0.05. The blue dots mark transcription factor binding sites, and blue dots and blue X represent transcription factor binding sites with SDM.
Figure 3. Analysis of binding site of transcription factors with site-directed mutation (SDM). Schematic diagram of reporter vectors and analysis of relative luciferase activity of activator protein 1 (AP-1)-binding site (A), signal transducers and activators of transcription (STAT)-binding site (B), Sox-5-binding site (C) and GATA-2-binding site (D). pGL3-Basic was the negative control. Data are presented as mean ± SEM (n = 3) with different letters indicating significant differences at p < 0.05. The blue dots mark transcription factor binding sites, and blue dots and blue X represent transcription factor binding sites with SDM.
Ijms 21 05300 g003
Ijms 21 05300 g004 550
Figure 4. Analysis of transcription factors expression in the androgenic gland (AG). The expression of AP-1 (A), STAT (B), Sox-5 (C), and Sp-IAG (D). Control: The AGs of control group; rCFSH: The AGs treated with 10−6 M rCFSH. The data are presented as mean ± SEM (n = 4) with different letters indicating statistical significance at p < 0.05.
Figure 4. Analysis of transcription factors expression in the androgenic gland (AG). The expression of AP-1 (A), STAT (B), Sox-5 (C), and Sp-IAG (D). Control: The AGs of control group; rCFSH: The AGs treated with 10−6 M rCFSH. The data are presented as mean ± SEM (n = 4) with different letters indicating statistical significance at p < 0.05.
Ijms 21 05300 g004
Ijms 21 05300 g005 550
Figure 5. Effect of Sp-STAT dsRNA on Sp-IAG expression in vitro. Expression of Sp-STAT analyzed at hour 2 and 4 (A). The expression of Sp-IAG was analyzed after incubated for 4 h, water and GFP (green fluorescent protein gene) were used as blank and negative controls, respectively (B). Data presented as mean ± SEM (n = 4). Different letters indicate statistical significance at p < 0.05.
Figure 5. Effect of Sp-STAT dsRNA on Sp-IAG expression in vitro. Expression of Sp-STAT analyzed at hour 2 and 4 (A). The expression of Sp-IAG was analyzed after incubated for 4 h, water and GFP (green fluorescent protein gene) were used as blank and negative controls, respectively (B). Data presented as mean ± SEM (n = 4). Different letters indicate statistical significance at p < 0.05.
Ijms 21 05300 g005
Table
Table 1. The primers used in the present study.
Table 1. The primers used in the present study.
NameSequence (5′→ 3′)Application
SpIAG-PFcggGGTACCTCCAGCTCTTAGGATGCGTCCA5′-flanking region sequence
SpIAG-PRcgcGGATCCAGGGAGGCCAAAGAAAACGTAG
pspIAG-1FcggGGTACC CTGAAACTTGTCAACATGCGGAGserial deletion of 5′-flanking region
pspIAG-2FcggGGTACC CTCTAAGTAAAAATTAGCAAAACAGACG
pspIAG-3FcggGGTACC GTTCCTGCCTCGTCATATCGC
pspIAG-4FcggGGTACCACAAATAAAGCGTGTATTCTGTGGTA
pspIAG-5FcggGGTACC CCGCAGCCAGAACCAATCT
pspIAG-6FcggGGTACC TGACTTGAACTGTTTCAAGGGAGAG
pspIAG-7FcggGGTACC TGATTCTAGCGGCGGACTGT
pspIAG-8FcggGGTACCCACTAGACCTTTTGGTGCTCGC
pspIAG-RccgCTCGAGAGGGAGGCCAAAGAAAACGTAG
Sp-AP-F-mutGTAGAGGTGTGCAGACAGCCCTGACCGAGCSDM
Sp-AP-R-mutGCTCGGTCAGGGCTGTCTGCACACCTCTAC
Sp-Sox-F-mutCAGCCGAATACAGGTCTCGTTAGCCTAACC
Sp-Sox-R-mutGGTTAGGCTAACGAGACCTGTATTCGGCTG
Sp-GATA-F-mutGGGTTGTGTGTCTGGCTGCATTCTAGTAAG
Sp-GATA-R-mutCTTACTAGAATGCAGCCAGACACACAACCC
Sp-STAT-F-mutCACGCAGTCGAGATACGAGACGACCGCTGA
Sp-STAT-R-mutTCAGCGGTCGTCTCGTATCTCGACTGCGTG
Sp-STATFCACCAGATCAAGGAGTGTGAGCGACAqPCR
Sp-STATRGGTGACAAGTGAGGACAGCAAGCGA
Sp-IAGFATCCTTTTCCTCCGTTTGCC
Sp-IAGRTCGGGTCTTCGTCTTGTTCC
Sp-cfshFCGTGTCCAGCATTTCTTGCAGTACC
Sp-cfshRTCATGTGTCCTATGATGGAGGAACG
Sp-akFTTCCTCCACCCTGTCCAACC
Sp-akRGAAGCGGTCACCCTCCTTGA
Sp-actinFCACACTTCACAGACCTTC
Sp-actinRCACAATGCCATCCTCTAC
Sp-STAT-dsFCTTGGTGCTCCACACACAACTAATSp-STAT knockdown
Sp-STAT-dsRCCATGTGGGGTTATTGGTATCTT
Sp-GFP-dsFTGGGCGTGGATAGCGGTTTGSp-GFP knockdown
Sp-GFP-dsRGGTCGGGGTAGCGGCTGAAG
CFSH-EFCGCGGATCCTCCTCCATCATAGGACACATGAATTCrCFSH expression
CFSH-ERGGACTAGTTTTATTCTCGCTTAAGTCGATGTAG

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Jiang, Q.; Lu, B.; Wang, G.; Ye, H. Transcriptional Inhibition of Sp-IAG by Crustacean Female Sex Hormone in the Mud Crab, Scylla paramamosain. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 5300. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21155300

AMA Style

Jiang Q, Lu B, Wang G, Ye H. Transcriptional Inhibition of Sp-IAG by Crustacean Female Sex Hormone in the Mud Crab, Scylla paramamosain. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2020; 21(15):5300. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21155300

Chicago/Turabian Style

Jiang, Qingling, Bei Lu, Guizhong Wang, and Haihui Ye. 2020. "Transcriptional Inhibition of Sp-IAG by Crustacean Female Sex Hormone in the Mud Crab, Scylla paramamosain" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 21, no. 15: 5300. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21155300

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop