Next Article in Journal
NLRP3 Inflammasome-Mediated Inflammation in Acute Pancreatitis
Next Article in Special Issue
α1-Microglobulin (A1M) Protects Human Proximal Tubule Epithelial Cells from Heme-Induced Damage In Vitro
Previous Article in Journal
Exosomal MicroRNAs in Pregnancy Provides Insight into a Possible Cure for Cancer
Previous Article in Special Issue
The Fungal Iron Chelator Desferricoprogen Inhibits Atherosclerotic Plaque Formation
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Heme Oxygenase Protects against Placental Vascular Inflammation and Abortion by the Alarmin Heme in Mice

Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21(15), 5385; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21155385
by Christiaan M. Suttorp 1,2, René E. M. van Rheden 1, Natasja W. M. van Dijk 1, Maria P. A. C. Helmich 1, Anne Marie Kuijpers-Jagtman 3,4,5 and Frank A. D. T. G. Wagener 1,2,*
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21(15), 5385; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21155385
Submission received: 9 July 2020 / Revised: 25 July 2020 / Accepted: 27 July 2020 / Published: 29 July 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Heme- and Hemoglobin Stress in Human Diseases)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

The authors analyzed the protective role of heme oxygenase-1 against placental vascular inflammation and abortion triggered by heme. The methodology of the work is appropriate and allows the replication. The references appropriately cover the literature. The conclusions of the study are original and clear without flaws. The present work established an important direct link between heme oxygenase-1 and its protective effect in heme-induced placental vascular inflammation and abortion that is supported by a carefully selected set of experiments.

Suggested improvement:

Are the increases in fetal body weights caused by oedema?

Author Response

Dear reviewer 1,

In main document the possibility that oedema has caused the increase in fetal body weight is discussed (line 235-242), see attachment.

 

 

 

 

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

The authors have done a good job of putting together a well-designed experiment and a nicely written manuscript. There are no major changes suggested. However, there are a couple of typos that could be corrected, page one, line 25 'proof' should be 'test', and page two, line 59 'defence' should be 'defense.' This is a solid paper that will contribute to the field.

Author Response

Dear Reviewer 2,

-Line 25, proof has been corrected into test.

-Line 59, defence has been corrected into defense

See also the changes in the main document, see attachment. 

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Back to TopTop