Next Article in Journal
Roadmap for Stroke: Challenging the Role of the Neuronal Extracellular Matrix
Next Article in Special Issue
Melanin-Like Nanomedicine in Photothermal Therapy Applications
Previous Article in Journal
Molecular Basis for Polyketide Ketoreductase–Substrate Interactions
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
IJMS
Volume 21
Issue 20
10.3390/ijms21207563
ijms-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Development of Silica-Based Biodegradable Submicrometric Carriers and Investigating Their Characteristics as in Vitro Delivery Vehicles

by
Mikhail V. Zyuzin
1,
Dingcheng Zhu
2,
Wolfgang J. Parak
2,
Neus Feliu
2,3,* and
Alberto Escudero
4,5,*
1
Department of Physics and Engineering, ITMO University, Lomonosova 9, St. Petersburg 191002, Russia
2
Center for Hybrid Nanostructures (CHyN), Universität Hamburg, 22607 Hamburg, Germany
3
Fraunhofer Center for Applied Nanotechnology (CAN), 20146 Hamburg, Germany
4
Departamento de Química Inorgánica. Facultad de Química, Universidad de Sevilla, Calle Profesor García González 1, E–41012 Seville, Spain
5
Instituto de Investigaciones Químicas (IIQ), Universidad de Sevilla–CSIC, Calle Américo Vespucio 49, E–41092 Seville, Spain
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21(20), 7563; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21207563
Submission received: 17 August 2020 / Revised: 24 September 2020 / Accepted: 3 October 2020 / Published: 13 October 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Nanoparticles: From Synthesis to Applications)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Nanostructured silica (SiO2)-based materials are attractive carriers for the delivery of bioactive compounds into cells. In this study, we developed hollow submicrometric particles composed of SiO2 capsules that were separately loaded with various bioactive molecules such as dextran, proteins, and nucleic acids. The structural characterization of the reported carriers was conducted using transmission and scanning electron microscopies (TEM/SEM), confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM), and dynamic light scattering (DLS). Moreover, the interaction of the developed carriers with cell lines was studied using standard viability, proliferation, and uptake assays. The submicrometric SiO2-based capsules loaded with DNA plasmid encoding green fluorescence proteins (GFP) were used to transfect cell lines. The obtained results were compared with studies made with similar capsules composed of polymers and show that SiO2-based capsules provide better transfection rates on the costs of higher toxicity.

1. Introduction

Nanostructured materials are widely applied in the field of drug and gene delivery [1,2,3]. For an effective drug administration, an appropriate design of the material providing the delivery of various bioactive compounds to the site of interest, a sufficient release profile, an improved solubility of drugs, among others, is demanded [4]. Drug carriers can be either based on organic (polymers, lipids) [5,6] or inorganic (gold, silver, iron oxide nanoparticles) [7,8] materials, or based on a combination of both [9,10]. Physicochemical properties of the developed drug vehicles, such as size, shape, and composition, regulate their interaction with cells and, consequently, their further fate in vitro and in vivo [11,12,13]. The whole field, however, suffers from the fact that carriers are in general endocytosed, and thus the delivered bioactive compounds remain trapped in endosomes/lysosomes [14]. Even when the exact mechanism for the cargo release is still unclear, there are attempts to enable release to the cytosol, for example, by chemical [15] of physical stimuli [16]. Such triggered release, in general, is not efficient, or induces toxicity [17,18,19]. In previous work, we have shown that upon hydrolysis SiO2-based capsules may rupture endo/lysosomal membranes after endocytosis, and thus warrant for the release of the encapsulated bioactive compounds to the cytosol of cells [20]. These capsules, however, were micrometer-sized, and there was no detailed assessment of the delivery efficiency and the toxicity, which is the subject of the present report.
Silica (SiO2)-based carriers of bioactive compounds attract attention due to their biocompatibility and a relatively low toxicity [21,22]. It is worth mentioning that here we consider amorphous SiO2 carriers formed in Stöber sol–gel reactions [23,24]. The porosity of SiO2-based structures can protect sensitive cargo from premature enzymatic degradation [25]. Indeed, due to the increased surface area and surface reactivity of SiO2 particles, different bioactive molecules can be adsorbed onto them by either the formation of H-bonds or due to London dispersion interactions [26]. Besides that, nanostructured SiO2 drug carriers are biodegradable at longer incubation times, and can be cleared from the body after several days [27]. The product of silica degradation is silicic acid, which is reported to act as a source of silicon (Si) for the formation of connective tissues [28]. Safety concerns of SiO2-based carriers are an issue [29,30], but the material compares well to other, more toxic carriers [31,32]. Another advantage of SiO2–based delivery platforms is the availability of low-cost synthesis methods that commonly take place in aqueous media and follow a sol-gel approach [33]. Such conventional approach for the formation of SiO2 particles includes the hydrolysis of various silanes or silicates with a subsequent SiO2 condensation [34]. This synthesis method allows for an accurate control of the physicochemical properties of the SiO2 particles such as size, shape, porosity, and others [35,36].
In order to increase the loading capacity of SiO2 -based carriers, SiO2 can be condensed and/or deposited onto sacrificial templates forming micellar structures [37]. For example, cetyltrimethylammonium bromide (CTAB) is a common surfactant molecule that is usually used for the further SiO2 deposition [38], though due to its toxicity this is not a favorable approach for biological applications [39,40]. Inorganic nano- and microparticles can be also used as templates for the formation of hollow SiO2-particles [41,42]. Among the latter, calcium carbonate (CaCO3) is often used as a core material for the SiO2 deposition [37], since CaCO3 is biocompatible and can be dissolved in mild conditions. The size of the CaCO3 particles determines the size of the resulting hollow SiO2 carries [36]. Although a large number of studies on the synthesis of SiO2-based drug delivery platforms can be found in the literature, there is still an increased interest in the developing of biocompatible SiO2 carriers with increased loading capacity, and also versatile in terms of encapsulated cargo, with the possibility of multiple drug loading. Moreover, comprehensive degradation studies of such carriers in biological fluids, as well as quantitative biological characterization in terms their performance, are also required.
In this work, we describe the synthesis of submicrometric SiO2 hollow capsules as carriers for biological molecules. The synthesis is based on the deposition of a SiO2 shell onto sacrificial CaCO3 templates that were further dissolved under mild conditions. Tetraethyl orthosilicate (TEOS) was used as a SiO2 source, and was added at different amounts to tune the SiO2 shell thickness. Different bioactive compounds were loaded into the sumicrometric cavity of the capsules, including dextran, proteins (DQ-OVA), and genetic material (deoxyribonucleic acid/DNA plasmids encoding green fluorescence protein/GFP) demonstrating the versatility of the developed carriers. For a comparative study, submicrometric capsules comprised of either synthetic or natural polymers were also synthesized [43].
The characterization of the submicrometric capsules of the different materials was performed using scanning electron microscopy (SEM), transmission electron microscopy (TEM), laser scanning confocal microscopy (CLSM), and dynamic light scattering (DLS). Moreover, the influence of biological fluids on the carriers and the encapsulated cargo was tested. Uptake by cell lines, and the effect on cell viability and proliferation of the obtained carriers was investigated with human cervical carcinoma (HeLa) cells. The SiO2-based submicrometric carriers were used to deliver DNA plasmids encoding GFP into cells at different incubation conditions, and the transfection efficiency was determined and compared with their polymer-based counterparts. Finally, the mechanisms of the improved transfection efficiency of SiO2-based submicrometric carriers were discussed. A schematic illustration of the performed steps in this study is depicted in Figure 1.

2. Results and Discussion

The main applied methodologies as used in this study are highlighted in Figure 1, and include the synthesis and characterization of submicrometric capsules (either SiO2 or polyelectrolyte-based), their biological characterization (including cellular uptake, effect on cell viability and proliferation, and degradation), and the delivery of DNA plasmids into HeLa cells, which was estimated using CLSM and flow cytometry.

2.1. Synthesis, Characterization, and Loading of Submicrometric Carriers Based on SiO2 and Polyelectrolytes

Submicrometric capsules loaded with different molecular cargos were synthesized by modifying the well-established approach based on the precipitation of CaCO3 cores in presence of the molecular cargo material (the so-called preloading strategy) [36,44]. The cores were further coated with either SiO2 or polyelectrolytes using the layer-by-layer (LbL) technique, and were finally dissolved yielding hollow capsules [36,43]. The used strategy to achieve smaller capsule sizes in comparison to previous protocols consisted of the precipitation of the salts (CaCl2 and Na2CO3) in a mixture of ethylene glycol (EG) and water [20]. To obtain a SiO2 shell around the particles, the CaCO3 cores were firstly stabilized with ɑ-methoxy-ω-mercapto poly(ethylene glycol) (CH3O-PEG-SH), and a further SiO2 layer was deposited onto the cores in ethanol by adding tetraethyl orthosilicate (TEOS) and ammonia. Different TEOS amounts (nominally low and high TEOS) were used with the aim of controlling the capsules' wall thickness. A final layer of poly(arginine) (PARG) was deposited onto the SiO2-based capsules to render the capsule surface positive charge. Polyelectrolyte-based capsules with two different architectures (biodegradable dextran sulfate/poly(arginine) (DEXS/PARG)4 and non-biodegradable polystyrene sulfonate/poly(allylamine hydrochloride) (PSS/PAH)4) were also synthesized using the LbL deposition approach on the submicrometric CaCO3 template cores [45].
Representative micrographs of the different sub-micrometric capsules are shown in Figure 2. The average capsules size (dc) as derived from SEM images, hydrodynamic diameters (dh), and zeta potentials (ζ) of all obtained samples are presented in Table 1. Slightly higher capsule size was observed for SiO2 capsules synthesized with higher amounts of TEOS, which can be attributed to the thicker capsule wall. In all cases, the capsules were obtained free of aggregation, as it is shown in confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM) images (Figures S4–S10). Polyelectrolyte capsules (DEXS/PARG)4 and (PSS/PAH)4 also did not show significant aggregation during the different layer deposition. The evolution of the hydrodynamic diameter and the zeta-potential after the subsequent polyelectrolyte layer depositions is shown in Figures S2 and S3. All data and details observed during the different synthesis steps, including DLS and ζ-potential measurements, are provided in the Supplementary Material, as well as the different techniques used for the quantification of the cargo encapsulating efficiency. We should point out that the amount of encapsulated cargo was used as criterion for the quantification and comparison of the further experiments carried out with the capsules.
Submicrometric SiO2 and polyelectrolyte capsules were loaded with various cargoes, using the coprecipitation (i.e. preloading) strategy, as described in the Supplementary Material. The bioactive compounds used as molecular cargos are enlisted in Table 2. As previously commented on, for all the biological experiments performed in this work, the amount of added capsules was based on the amount of encapsulated cargo. Thus, the cytotoxicity, proliferation, uptake, and transfection experiments were carried out with capsules containing the same amount of encapsulated cargo.
In order to estimate the amount of encapsulated DEX-blue molecules within each capsule cavity, a calibration curve (fluorescence intensities versus dye concentration) was plotted (Figure S13B). This linear regression was further used to calculate the amount of encapsulated DEX-blue. To do so, capsules were previously dissolved to eliminate quenching effects. The detailed calculation procedure is described in the Supplementary Material. Calculated concentrations of encapsulated molecular cargoes are presented in Table S1.
The amount of encapsulated DNA in previously dissolved biodegradable capsules (SiO2, polyelectrolyte) was measured with the commercially available Quant-IT RiboGreen RNA Assay Kit. As before, a calibration curve of DNA was firstly plotted (Figure S15B), and the amount of encapsulated DNA from previously dissolved capsules was calculated based on such calibration curve, as described in the Supplementary Material. The calculated amount of DNA encapsulated in biodegradable capsules (SiO2, polyelectrolytes) is presented in Table S2.

2.2. Biological Characterization of Submicrometric SiO2, (PSS-PAH)4, (DEXS-PARG)4 Capsules

In order to perform a biological characterization of the synthesized capsule carriers, their cellular uptake [46,47], impact on cell viability and proliferation [11,48], their degradation [49,50], and their use for delivering encapsulated bioactive molecular cargo [15,51] were studied.

2.2.1. Cell Viability Studies

Cell viability studies were performed with the widely used fluorescence-based resazurin assay [52]. Reduction of the viability of HeLa cells upon exposure to capsules was measured using different incubation procedures: (i) first 4 h of incubation in cell growth medium without fetal bovine serum (FBS), and then 20 h of incubation in the medium supplemented with FBS; (ii) 24 h of incubation in the cell growth medium supplemented with FBS. The two conditions were used as the transfection of cells varies upon the presence/absence of FBS [53,54]. The capsule concentration was quantified in terms of delivered encapsulated DEX-blue mDEX-blue [pg/cell]. Because of challenges in counting the number of capsules (due to their small size), the mass mDEX-blue of encapsulated DEX-blue per capsule was hard to determine. A rough estimate based on capsule concentration determination using a hemocytometer and further calculations are presented in the Supplementary Material, Table S1. From the viability assays for the different capsules and incubation conditions the mass of delivered DEX-blue mDEX-blue (50%) [pg/cell] was determined, which caused 50% reduction of cell viability (Figures S16–S21). The lower this number, the more toxic the capsules are to cells, i.e. cell viability already gets reduced at lower exposure concentrations. Capsules which had been added to cells for the first 4 h in FBS free medium had more toxic effect on cells (i.e. lower mDEX-blue (50%) values) than the ones added also during the first 4 h in FBS supplemented medium. This is often attributed to the increased capsule uptake by cells when incubated for the first 4 h in FBS free medium [55], though in the present study the difference in uptake between both conditions as shown in Figure 4 for 24 h incubation time was rather non-systematic. For shorter incubation time there was some increased uptake under serum-free conditions (Figures S24–S27). Among the different types of capsules, the polyelectrolyte-based capsules showed lower toxicity, when compared with their SiO2-based counterparts. A possible explanation of the higher reduction in cell viability when using SiO2 capsules is endo/lysosomal swelling upon hydrolyzation, followed by transient poration of endosomal/lysosomal membranes [56], which is a plausible mechanism for the release of the encapsulated cargo to the cellular cytosol [20]. Focusing on the SiO2-based capsules, the ones synthesised with less amount of TEOS showed less reduction in cell viability, as compared to the SiO2 capsules with a higher amount of TEOS (Figure 3). This is in line with the hypothesis that the SiO2 is hydrolyzed and causes endo/lysosomal swelling, which is an indicator for toxicity [56].
Additionally, cellular proliferation during the incubation with SiO2 capsules was tested by measuring intracellular DNA synthesis [56]. This was directly monitored by the incorporation of the thymidine-analog EdU (5-ethynyl-2′-deoxyuridine). EdU can be detected by a copper-catalyzed click-reaction between its alkyne group and an azide group-containing the fluorescent dye [57]. According to the obtained results for HeLa cells, reduction in proliferation was caused by SiO2 capsules (low and high amount of TEOS) from DEX-AF647 (which was used as quantifier for capsule concentrations) concentrations higher than 3 pg/cell (Figures S28 and S29). This is in line with previous findings, that proliferation is affected already at lower particle concentrations than cell viability (i.e. the m(DEX) (50%) [pg/cell] are higher for the viability assay (Figure 3B) than for the proliferation assay, Figures S28 and S29) [56].

2.2.2. Uptake Studies

The internalization of submicrometric capsules of various materials (SiO2 with low and high TEOS, PARG/DEXS, PAH/PSS) loaded with DEX-blue was tested with HeLa cells using flow cytometry [11,47]. It is worth noting that flow cytometry without the use of pH-sensitive fluorophores is not able to distinguish between internalized capsules and capsules attached onto the cell plasma membrane [58]. Therefore, here we are talking about capsule association with cells. Different incubation conditions were chosen to estimate the internalization (i.e., association) of submicrometric capsules by HeLa cells. Cells were incubated with the capsules (i) in the cell culture medium supplemented with FBS for 2, 4, 6, and 24 h; (ii) in the cell culture medium without FBS for 2, 4, and 6 h; (iii) first 2 h in the cell culture medium without FBS and then the medium was replaced with the cell culture medium supplemented with FBS; (iv) first 4 h in the cell culture medium without FBS and then the medium was replaced with the cell culture medium supplemented with FBS. The mean blue fluorescence signal <Iblue> coming from each cell due to associated DEX-blue loaded capsules was then plotted versus incubation conditions (Figure 4, Figures S24–S27).
Uptake (or to be more precisely, cell-capsule association) data reveal that all types of capsules were internalized by cells at comparable amounts (Figure 4A). Addition of more capsules (mDex-blue (added) = 3 pg/cell versus 1.5 pg/cell) resulted in more internalized capsules, in agreement with previous studies [11,47]. In general there is a tendency of cells to incorporate more capsules under serum-free conditions [47,59], which often is explained by cell starvation [55,60,61]. In the present work, however, this was observed in case of short incubation times (2, 4, 6 h), but at longer incubation times (24 h) no systematic dependence in this regard was detected (Figure 4A, Figures S24–S27).

2.2.3. Intracellular Degradation of SiO2 Capsules

After capsule internalization by cells, they are located in endosomal/lysosomal vesicles [46,62]. However, in general, embedded molecular cargo needs to be present in the cytosol to execute its biological functionality. Endosomal/lysosomal escape is one of the key problems for particle-based delivery applications. In case of biodegradable capsules, lower pH values and enzymes that are specialized on particle digestion may induce the degradation of the capsule carriers and the subsequent release of loaded cargo [20,49]. The observation of endosomal/lysosomal swelling after NP uptake has been suggested to be connected with this carrier degradation [56], which in particular has been reported for larger silica coated capsules [20]. It is proposed that a raise in osmotic pressure then transiently perforates the endosomal/lysosomal membranes, leading to the release of the cargo to the cytosol [15,20]. This is the process as attempted with classic carriers based on cationic polymers, such as poly(ethyleneimine) (PEI). However, it is in general inefficient, as increased transient lysis of the vesicular membranes increases toxicity.
To visualize the degradation of SiO2-based carriers with lower and higher amounts of TEOS, DQ-Ovalbumin (DQ-OVA) saturated with BODIPY dye was loaded into the capsule cavity [49]. In its non-degraded state, due to their close proximity, the fluorescence of the BODIPY molecules is mostly self-quenched. Enzymatic degradation of DQ-OVA leads to green fluorescence of the dye through the increase of the distance between the dye molecules [49,63]. Confocal microscopy images of HeLa cells that have been incubated with both types of SiO2-based capsules for 24 hours (Figure 4B) showed two types of fluorescence signals. Non-internalized capsules were characterized by the superposition of red and green fluorescence signals (red fluorescence is associated with dye dimers [64], and green fluorescence originates from non-quenched dye molecules), indicated with red arrows in Figure 4B. The bright green fluorescence spots (shown with green arrows) can be ascribed to capsules located in endosomal/lysosomal vesicles, where it is known that capsules start to degrade [20] and proteases decompose DQ-OVA [49,63]. The green background fluorescence in Figure 4B of cells with internalized capsules indicates that some decomposed DQ-OVA has been released to the cytosol. Hereby transient lysis of the endosomal/lysosomal membranes surrounding the capsules has most likely occurred by the hydrolyzation of SiO2 [20]. As there is higher green fluorescence in the grainy spots representing DQ-OVA inside endosomes/lysosomes as compared to the green background fluorescence representing DQ-OVA in the cytosol (Figure 4B), the release of DQ-OVA is not complete and not efficient, and in addition accompanied by higher toxicity of the SiO2-based capsules as compared to the control capsules (Figure 3B).

2.2.4. Stability of DNA in Biological Fluids

Apart from proteins, as demonstrated above for the case of DQ-OVA, SiO2-based capsules can also be used to deliver genetic material into cells [20]. As previously mentioned, after endocytosis capsules are located in endosomes/lysosomes, that contain more than 60 different enzymes for digesting alien compounds [65]. Moreover, lysosomal compartments possess acidic pH, leading to a faster degradation of its content. All these facts can affect the transfection process of cells [66]. Thus, particle-based delivery of DNA/RNA for the transfection of cells may fail in two different steps. First, inside endosomes/lysosomes the DNA/RNA may be degraded. Second, as already pointed out before, there will typically be an ineffective release of the DNA/RNA from endosomes/lysosomes to the cytosol. First, we investigated the potential degradation of DNA inside endosomes/lysosomes. In order to check the influence of pH and enzymes on DNA transfection, the commercial transfection reagent Lipofectamine 2000 was used. The stability of the plasmids encoding GFP used in this study was checked in different media, including (i) phosphate buffered saline (PBS) at pH = 4 (i.e., emulating the acidic pH inside ensomes/lysosomes), (ii) pronase (a mixture of several nonspecific endo- and exoproteases that digest proteins down to single amino acids, which are present in endosomes/lysosomes) at pH 7, (iii) pronase at pH 4, and (iv) as control PBS at pH 7. After incubation, the percentage of transfected cells was determined by flow cytometry (further and detailed information is provided in the Supplementary Material). According to the obtained data, two general observations could be drawn (Figure S33). On the one hand, higher transfection efficiencies were obtained for untreated DNA, which was also dose dependent (more added DNA gave rise to more transfected cells). On the other hand, the treatment of the DNA plasmids with pronase at acidic pH decreased the subsequent rate of transfected cells. These observations indicate that the environment of lysosomal compartments may affect the stability of the plasmids and thus the transfection efficiency. In order to improve the stability of DNA inside endosomes/lysosomes, the commercial drug chloroquine was added to the cells in order to increase the pH value inside endosomes/lysosomes [47,67], and thus, increase the DNA stability (Figure 5 and Figure 6, Figures S42–S45) [68].

2.2.5. Delivery of DNA Using SiO2-Based Capsules

In the next step DNA plasmids encoding GFP were encapsulated as molecular cargo to be delivered into HeLa cells. SiO2-based capsules with low and high amount of TEOS as well as biodegradable (PARG/DEXS)4 and non-degradable (PAH/PSS)4 capsules were used as carriers. Capsules were loaded with DNA and DEX-blue, which was used for allowing to localize the capsules via fluorescence microscopy. Different incubation conditions of capsules with HeLa cells were applied for the transfection studies: (i) 4 h in medium without FBS and then 20 h in medium supplemented with FBS; (ii) 24 h in medium supplemented with FBS; (iii) 4 h in medium without FBS and then 44 h in medium supplemented with FBS; (iv) 48 h in medium supplemented with FBS. It is worth noting that capsules were added to cells at different amounts, and the mass of added DNA (mDNA (added)) was used as criterion for the quantification. The roughly estimated amounts of DNA per capsule (mDNA) for the different types of biodegradable capsules are presented in Table S2. As previously mentioned, the bioactive compound chloroquine (7 µM) was optionally used to increase the pH inside lysosomes. Successful transfection of cells resulted in the expression of GFP, and thus, green intracellular fluorescence could be observed (Figure 5, Figures S34–S37). Transfected cells were additionally visualized with confocal microscopy, and the transfection efficiency was measured by flow cytometry in terms of GFP fluorescence intensity per cell.
According to the obtained data, the association (uptake and attachment) of capsules with cells (blue fluorescence signal due to co-encapsulated DEX-blue as measured by flow cytometry) occurred in a dose dependent manner (Figures S38–S41). As expected, almost no transfection was observed for non-degradable capsules (i.e., no green fluorescence within cells was observed), although it was possible to find single fluorescent cells. The reason for this could be the leakage of cargo from the non-degradable polyelectrolyte capsules [69]. For the all types of biodegradable capsules (SiO2 low TEOS, SiO2 high TEOS, and (DEXS/PARG)4), the transfection efficiency T (as defined as a percentage of cells expressing GFP) was also observed to be dose dependent: with an increase of the added amount of encapsulated DNA, transfection was also increased. SiO2 (low and high TEOS) capsules showed around 6–7 times higher transfection (32% of transfected cells) efficiency than biodegradable (DEXS/PARG)4 capsules (5% of transfected cells), as summarized in Figure 6, for an added amount of 25 pg(DNA)/cell. Further data are provided in Figures S42–S45.
The increased transfection of HeLa cells in the case of SiO2 capsules could be explained by the following hypothesis. To transfect cells with DNA plasmids, the delivered cargo has to reach the cell cytosol [15,20,70,71]. For this, after capsule-based delivery to endosomes/lysosomes, plasmids have to be released from these intracellular vesicles [72]. According to previous studies, the escape of cargo from the endocytic vesicles may occur upon transient rupture of these compartments. The endosomal/lysosomal membrane per se is neither permeable to the capsules nor to DNA. However, swelling of endocytic vesicles caused by osmotic pressure may lead to their disruption [15,20]. This would allow the DNA to enter the cytosol of cells, and then further into the cell nucleus, ultimately allowing for expression of the encoded protein (GFP in our study). In the case of SiO2 capsules, swelling and rupture of lysosomes can be attributed to the osmotic pressure established after the delivery of charged compounds and the products of the SiO2 capsule degradation. When considering both SiO2-based capsules, higher transfection efficiencies were observed for the capsules synthesized with the lower amount of TEOS, which can be possibly associated with their lower cytotoxicity. It should also be pointed out that the addition of chloroquine resulted in a rise of transfection of cells by 2–5%.

3. Materials and Methods

Synthesis of the capsules: Capsules were synthesized from submicrometric CaCO3 cores precipitated at room temperature in the presence of the desired biological cargo molecules in an ethylene glycol (EG): water mixture (5:1 in volume) [73]. After washing and centrifugation steps, the CaCO3 cores were first stabilized with 5 kDa CH3O-PEG-SH, and transferred to ethanol. A SiO2 layer was deposited by adding TEOS and NH4OH, and a final positive PARG (Mw = 15,000–70,000 Da) layer was added to render the capsules positively-charged. Two different TEOS amounts (nominally low and high TEOS) were used. Polyelectrolyte capsules were synthesized from the same CaCO3 cores by the Layer-by-Layer (LbL) strategy, consisting of the deposition of alternate negatively and positively-charged polyelectrolytes [43,74,75]. Capsules were loaded with different bioactive molecules: (i) Dextran labelled with Cascade Blue (DEX-blue), (ii) Dextran labelled with Alexa Fluor 647 (DEX-AF647), (iii) DQ-Ovalbumin (DQ-OVA), (iv) DNA plasmids encoding GFP.
Characterization: Capsules were observed by confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM, Meta 510, Zeiss, Jena, Germany), transmission electron microscopy (TEM, JEOL Model JEM 3010, Peabody, MA, USA) operating at an acceleration voltage of 300 keV and scanning electron microscopy (SEM-FEG Hitachi S4800, Krefeld, Germany). Particle size distributions were obtained from the CLSM micrographs by measuring the sizes of about one hundred of particles. Dynamic Light Scattering (DLS) and Zeta (ζ) potential measurements of the capsule suspensions in water were carried out at pH 7 in a Malvern Zetasizer Nano-ZS90 apparatus (WR14 1XZ United Kingdom). The amount of encapsulated biological cargo molecules was quantified by different fluorescence-based assays.
Cell culture: Human cervical carcinoma cells (HeLa) were grown in Dulbecco's Modified Eagle’s Medium (DMEM) supplemented with 10% vol. fetal bovine serum (FBS) and 1% penicillin/streptomycin at 37 °C in 5% CO2.
Degradation of capsules: The degradation of SiO2 capsules was qualitatively estimated with CLSM analysis. For this, HeLa cells were seeded into 8-well plates at an amount of 25,000 cells/well, with 250 µL of medium added per well. After 24 h, SiO2 capsules (low and high TEOS) loaded with DQ-OVA were added to the cells in each well (2 µL of the capsule stock solution) and HeLa cells were incubated with capsules for another 24 h. After that, confocal microscopy images were taken. Non-degraded DQ-OVA is self-quenched and emits a fluorescence signal in the red spectrum, whereas a bright green fluorescence signal is a sign of degraded DQ-OVA and, therefore, capsule degradation [63].
Uptake studies: HeLa cells were seeded into 24-well plates (500 µL of medium added per well). On the next day, capsules of each type loaded with DEX-blue were added to the cells at different amounts. HeLa cells were incubated with the different capsules at 37 °C, 5% CO2 at different conditions: (i) in the cell culture medium supplemented with FBS for 2, 4, 6, and 24 h; (ii) in the cell culture medium without FBS for 2, 4, and 6 h; (iii) first 2 h in the cell culture medium without FBS and then the medium was replaced with the cell culture medium supplemented with FBS; (iv) first 4 h in the cell culture medium without FBS and then the medium was replaced with the cell culture medium supplemented with FBS. After incubation, cells were washed 3 times and detached with trypsin-EDTA. Detached cells with associated capsules were dispersed in phosphate buffered saline (PBS) and the blue fluorescence signal originating from the capsules was recorded with a flow cytometer (LSRFortessa, BD, San Jose, CA, USA). Finally, the mean fluorescence intensity of the blue signal per cell was calculated and plotted versus the conditions of incubation.
Toxicity studies: HeLa cells were seeded into a 96-well plate with each well filled with Vmedium = 100 μL and left for 24 h. After 24 h, the growth medium was replaced with growth medium containing different types of capsules at different concentrations. Cells were then incubated with capsules at following conditions: (i) first 4 h of incubation in the cell growth medium without FBS, and then 20 h of incubation in the medium supplemented with FBS; (ii) 24 h of incubation in the cell growth medium supplemented with FBS. Then, the cells were washed once with PBS, and fresh cell growth medium containing 10% vol. resazurin was added to each well for 4 h at 37 °C and 5% CO2. The fluorescence was measured at 560 nm excitation and 575 nm emission wavelengths, using a fluorimeter (Fluorolog-3, Horiba JOBIN YVON, Bensheim, Germany). The viability of the hMSCs was assumed to be proportional to the recorded fluorescence intensity [56].
Transfection experiments: HeLa cells were seeded into 24-well plates at an amount of 40,000 cells/well (medium per well: Vmedium = 0.5 mL). Afterwards, capsules containing DNA plasmid and DEX-blue as molecular cargos were added to the cells at different amounts. Capsules were then incubated with cells (i) for 4 h in medium without FBS and then for 20 h in medium supplemented with FBS; (ii) for 24 h in medium supplemented with FBS; (iii) for 4 h in medium without FBS and then for 44 h in medium supplemented with FBS; (iv) for 48 h in medium supplemented with FBS. Additionally, 7 µM chloroquine was added to the cells (in cases when FBS-free medium was replaced by medium with FBS after 4 h of incubation, an additional 2 µM chloroquine was added). After incubation, cells were washed 3 times and detached with trypsin-EDTA. The blue (originating from DEX-blue) and green (originating from expressed GFP) fluorescence signals coming from each single cell were recorded with flow cytometry. Finally, the mean blue fluorescence intensity per cell, as well as the percentage of transfected cells (determined as cells with green fluorescence signal that was above the green fluorescence signal of untreated cells), was plotted versus the incubation conditions.
The complete details of all the experiments are provided in the Supplementary Material.

4. Conclusions

SiO2 capsules of submicrometric size were synthesised after the optimization of already established protocols yielding micrometric-sized capsules. The synthesis consisted of the deposition of a SiO2 layer onto submicrometric CaCO3 cores precipitated at room temperature in an ethylene glycol-water solution in presence of the desired cargo. Polymeric counterparts in the form of (PSS/PAH)4 and (DEXS/PARG)4 capsules were also synthesised for comparative reasons. The obtained capsules were shown to be suitable for the delivery of different molecules of biomedical interest, such as dextran, proteins (DQ-OVA), and also genetic material (DNA plasmids encoding GFP). Our results point out that SiO2-based capsules demonstrated higher efficiencies of transfection (up to 30%) compared to their polymer-based submicrometric and biodegradable counterparts (around 5%), to the costs of higher toxicity. This is the same dilemma as observed with classical PEI-based transfection. Improved endo/lysosomal escape of DNA to the cytosol goes hand in hand by increased toxicity. The increase of transfection may lie in optimizing the window of opportunity of different carriers, which may allow for improved transfection as tolerable toxicity.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary material can be found at https://www.mdpi.com/1422-0067/21/20/7563/s1.

Author Contributions

Funding acquisition, W.J.P.; Investigation, M.V.Z., N.F. and A.E.; Resources, D.Z.; Supervision, W.J.P., N.F. and A.E.; Writing—original draft, M.V.Z. and A.E.; Writing—review & editing, M.V. Z., D.Z., W.J.P., N.F. and A.E. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG, grant PA 794/21-1 to W.J.P.), and the sixth Research and Technology Transfer Plan of the University of Seville (VI PPIT-US to A.E.). A.E. also acknowledges the support of Noureddine Khiar (IIQ, CSIC–University of Seville, Seville, projects CTQ2016-78580-C2-1-R of the Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness, and COST action CA-18132). The part of this work related to the synthesis and characterization of polymer-based capsules for the delivery of bioactive compounds was founded by the Russian Foundation for Basic Research, No. 19-015-00098. The part of this work related to the biological studies was supported by the grant from the Russian Science Foundation, Grant No. 19-75-00039 (MVZ).

Acknowledgments

We thank Landysh Fatkhutdinova for the preparation of Figure 1.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Mura, S.; Nicolas, J.; Couvreur, P. Stimuli-responsive nanocarriers for drug delivery. Nat. Mater. 2013, 12, 991–1003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Koryakina, I.; Kuznetsova Daria, S.; Zuev Dmitry, A.; Milichko Valentin, A.; Timin Alexander, S.; Zyuzin Mikhail, V. Optically responsive delivery platforms: From the design considerations to biomedical applications. Nanophotonics 2020, 9, 39–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Tarakanchikova, Y.; Alzubi, J.; Pennucci, V.; Follo, M.; Kochergin, B.; Muslimov, A.; Skovorodkin, I.; Vainio, S.; Antipina, M.N.; Atkin, V.; et al. Biodegradable nanocarriers resembling extracellular vesicles deliver genetic material with the highest efficiency to various cell types. Small 2020, 16, 1904880. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Petros, R.A.; DeSimone, J.M. Strategies in the design of nanoparticles for therapeutic applications. Nature Reviews Drug Discovery 2010, 9, 615–627. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Maeki, M.; Kimura, N.; Sato, Y.; Harashima, H.; Tokeshi, M. Advances in microfluidics for lipid nanoparticles and extracellular vesicles and applications in drug delivery systems. Adv. Drug Del. Rev. 2018, 128, 84–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Zyuzin, M.V.; Timin, A.S.; Sukhorukov, G.B. Multilayer capsules inside biological systems: State-of-the-art and open challenges. Langmuir 2019, 35, 4747–4762. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Kim, C.-K.; Ghosh, P.; Rotello, V.M. Multimodal drug delivery using gold nanoparticles. Nanoscale 2009, 1, 61–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Sharifi, M.; Attar, F.; Saboury, A.A.; Akhtari, K.; Hooshmand, N.; Hasan, A.; El-Sayed, M.A.; Falahati, M. Plasmonic gold nanoparticles: Optical manipulation, imaging, drug delivery and therapy. J. Control. Release 2019, 311-312, 170–189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Timin, A.S.; Peltek, O.O.; Zyuzin, M.V.; Muslimov, A.R.; Karpov, T.E.; Epifanovskaya, O.S.; Shakirova, A.I.; Zhukov, M.V.; Tarakanchikova, Y.V.; Lepik, K.V.; et al. Safe and effective delivery of antitumor drug using mesenchymal stem cells impregnated with submicron carriers. ACS Appl. Mater. Inter. 2019, 11, 13091–13104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Timin, A.S.; Muslimov, A.R.; Zyuzin, M.V.; Peltek, O.O.; Karpov, T.E.; Sergeev, I.S.; Dotsenko, A.I.; Goncharenko, A.A.; Yolshin, N.D.; Sinelnik, A.; et al. Multifunctional scaffolds with improved antimicrobial properties and osteogenicity based on piezoelectric electrospun fibers decorated with bioactive composite microcapsules. ACS Appl. Mater. Inter. 2018, 10, 34849–34868. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Zyuzin, M.V.; Díez, P.; Goldsmith, M.; Carregal-Romero, S.; Teodosio, C.; Rejman, J.; Feliu, N.; Escudero, A.; Almendral, M.J.s.; Linne, U. , et al. Comprehensive and systematic analysis of the immunocompatibility of polyelectrolyte capsules. Bioconjugate Chem. 2017, 28, 556–564. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Parakhonskiy, B.; Zyuzin, M.V.; Yashchenok, A.; Carregal-Romero, S.; Rejman, J.; Mohwald, H.; Parak, W.J.; Skirtach, A.G. The influence of the size and aspect ratio of anisotropic, porous caco3 particles on their uptake by cells. J. Nanobiotechnol. 2015, 13, 53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  13. Nazarenus, M.; Zhang, Q.; Soliman, M.G.; del Pino, P.; Pelaz, B.; Carregal_Romero, S.; Rejman, J.; Rothen-Ruthishauser, B.; Clift, M.J.D.; Zellner, R.; et al. In vitro interaction of colloidal nanoparticles with mammalian cells: What have we learned thus far? Beilstein J. Nanotechnol. 2014, 5, 1477–1490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Czarnek, M.; Mason, D.; Haimovich, G.; Puntes, V.F.; Bergese, P.; Bereta, J.; Lévy, R. Re-evaluating the spherical-nucleic acid theory. ChemRxiv 2018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Ganas, C.; Weiß, A.; Nazarenus, M.; Rösler, S.; Kissel, T.; Rivera Gil, P.; Parak, W.J. Biodegradable capsules as non-viral vectors for in vitro delivery of pei/sirna polyplexes for efficient gene silencing. J. Control. Release 2014, 196, 132–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Ochs, M.; Carregal Romero, S.; Rejman, J.; Braeckmans, K.; De Smedt, S.C.; Parak, W.J. Light-addressable capsules as caged compound matrix for controlled in vitro release. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2013, 52, 695–699. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Ahmed, M.; Narain, R. Cell line dependent uptake and transfection efficiencies of pei–anionic glycopolymer systems. Biomaterials 2013, 34, 4368–4376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Dinçer, S.; Türk, M.; Pişkin, E. Intelligent polymers as nonviral vectors. Gene Ther. 2005, 12, S139–S145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Lee, C.-S.; Park, W.; Park, S.-J.; Na, K. Endolysosomal environment-responsive photodynamic nanocarrier to enhance cytosolic drug delivery via photosensitizer-mediated membrane disruption. Biomaterials 2013, 34, 9227–9236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Ott, A.; Yu, X.; Hartmann, R.; Rejman, J.; Schütz, A.; Ochs, M.; Parak, W.J.; Carregal Romero, S. Light-addressable and degradable silica capsules for delivery of molecular cargo to the cytosol of cells. Chem. Mater. 2015, 27, 1929–1942. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Knopp, D.; Tang, D.; Niessner, R. Review: Bioanalytical applications of biomolecule-functionalized nanometer-sized doped silica particles. Anal. Chim. Acta 2009, 647, 14–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Mamaeva, V.; Rosenholm, J.M.; Bate-Eya, L.T.; Bergman, L.; Peuhu, E.; Duchanoy, A.; Fortelius, L.E.; Landor, S.; Toivola, D.M.; Linden, M.; et al. Mesoporous silica nanoparticles as drug delivery systems for targeted inhibition of notch signaling in cancer. Mol. Ther. 2011, 19, 1538–1546. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  23. Guerrero-Martinez, A.; Perez-Juste, J.; Liz-Marzan, L.M. Recent progress on silica coating of nanoparticles and related nanomaterials. Adv. Mater. 2012, 22, 1182–1195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Chen, F.; Shi, R.; Xue, Y.; Chen, L.; Wan, Q.-H. Templated synthesis of monodisperse mesoporous maghemite/silica microspheres for magnetic separation of genomic DNA. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 2010, 322, 2439–2445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Chen, J.-F.; Ding, H.-M.; Wang, J.-X.; Shao, L. Preparation and characterization of porous hollow silica nanoparticles for drug delivery application. Biomaterials 2004, 25, 723–727. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Delle Piane, M.; Corno, M.; Ugliengo, P. Does dispersion dominate over h-bonds in drug-surface interactions? The case of silica-based materials as excipients and drug-delivery agents. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2013, 9, 2404–2415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Timin, A.S.; Muslimov, A.R.; Lepik, K.V.; Epifanovskaya, O.S.; Shakirova, A.I.; Mock, U.; Riecken, K.; Okilova, M.V.; Sergeev, V.S.; Afanasyev, B.V.; et al. Efficient gene editing via non-viral delivery of crispr–cas9 system using polymeric and hybrid microcarriers. Nanomed. Nanotechnol. Biol. Med. 2018, 14, 97–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Sripanyakorn, S.; Jugdaohsingh, R.; Dissayabutr, W.; Anderson, S.H.C.; Thompson, R.P.H.; Powell, J.J. The comparative absorption of silicon from different foods and food supplements. Br. J. Nutr. 2009, 102, 825–834. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Misra, V.; Rahman, Q.; Viswanathan, P.N. Binding of silicic acid by proteins and its relation to toxicity of silicate dusts. J. Appl. Toxicol. 1983, 3, 135–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Engelbrecht, F.M.; Burger, F.J. The toxicity of silicic acid. S. Afr. J. Lab. Clin. Med. 1961, 7, 16–21. [Google Scholar]
  31. Soenen, S.J.H.; Rivera Gil, P.; Montenegro, J.M.; Parak, W.J.; De Smedt, S.C.; Braeckmans, K. Cellular toxicity of inorganic nanoparticles: Common aspects and guidelines for improved nanotoxicity evaluation. Nano Today 2011, 6, 446–465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Maurer-Jones, M.A.; Gunsolus, I.L.; Murphy, C.J.; Haynes, C.L. Toxicity of engineered nanoparticles in the environment. Anal. Chem. 2013, 85, 3036–3049. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  33. Croissant, J.G.; Cattoën, X.; Wong Chi Man, M.; Durand, J.-O.; Khashab, N.M. Syntheses and applications of periodic mesoporous organosilica nanoparticles. Nanoscale 2015, 7, 20318–20334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Trofimov, A.D.; Ivanova, A.A.; Zyuzin, M.V.; Timin, A.S. Porous inorganic carriers based on silica, calcium carbonate and calcium phosphate for controlled/modulated drug delivery: Fresh outlook and future perspectives. Pharmaceutics 2018, 10, 167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  35. Wu, S.-H.; Mou, C.-Y.; Lin, H.-P. Synthesis of mesoporous silica nanoparticles. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2013, 42, 3862–3875. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Karpov, T.E.; Peltek, O.O.; Muslimov, A.R.; Tarakanchikova, Y.V.; Grunina, T.M.; Poponova, M.S.; Karyagina, A.S.; Chernozem, R.V.; Pariy, I.O.; Mukhortova, Y.R.; et al. Development of optimized strategies for growth factor incorporation onto electrospun fibrous scaffolds to promote prolonged release. ACS Appl. Mater. Inter. 2020, 12, 5578–5592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Muslimov, A.R.; Timin, A.S.; Bichaykina, V.R.; Peltek, O.O.; Karpov, T.E.; Dubavik, A.; Nominé, A.; Ghanbaja, J.; Sukhorukov, G.B.; Zyuzin, M.V. Biomimetic drug delivery platforms based on mesenchymal stem cells impregnated with light-responsive submicron sized carriers. Biomaterials Science 2020, 8, 1137–1147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Yeh, Y.-Q.; Chen, B.-C.; Lin, H.-P.; Tang, C.-Y. Synthesis of hollow silica spheres with mesostructured shell using cationic−anionic-neutral block copolymer ternary surfactants. Langmuir 2006, 22, 6–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Alkilany, A.; Murphy, C. Toxicity and cellular uptake of gold nanoparticles: What we have learned so far? J. Nanopart. Res. 2010, 12, 2313–2333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Hwang, T.-L.; Sung, C.T.; Aljuffali, I.A.; Chang, Y.-T.; Fang, J.-Y. Cationic surfactants in the form of nanoparticles and micelles elicit different human neutrophil responses: A toxicological study. Colloids Surf. B. Biointerfaces 2014, 114, 334–341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Knežević, N.Ž.; Ruiz-Hernández, E.; Hennink, W.E.; Vallet-Regí, M. Magnetic mesoporous silica-based core/shell nanoparticles for biomedical applications. RSC Advances 2013, 3, 9584–9593. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Timin, A.S.; Solomonov, A.V.; Kumagai, A.; Miyawaki, A.; Khashirova, S.Y.; Zhansitov, A.; Rumyantsev, E.V. Magnetic polymer-silica composites as bioluminescent sensors for bilirubin detection. Mater. Chem. Phys. 2016, 183, 422–429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Zyuzin, M.V.; Cassani, M.; Barthel, M.J.; Escudero, A.; Gavilan, H.; Silvestri, N.; Escudero, A.; Scarpellini, A.; Lucchesi, F.; Teran, F.J.; et al. Confining iron oxide nanocubes inside submicrometric cavities as a key strategy to preserve magnetic heat losses in an intracellular environment. ACS Appl. Mat. Interfaces 2019, 11, 41957–41971. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Becker, A.L.; Johnston, A.P.R.; Caruso, F. Layer-by-layer-assembled capsules and films for therapeutic delivery. Small 2010, 6, 1836–1852. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Zhao, S.; Caruso, F.; Dähne, L.; Decher, G.; Geest, B.G.D.; Fan, J.; Feliu, N.; Gogotsi, Y.; Hammond, P.T.; Hersam, M.C.; et al. The future of layer-by-layer assembly: A tribute to acs nano associate editor helmuth möhwald. ACS Nano 2019, 13, 66151–66169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  46. Kastl, L.; Sasse, D.; Wulf, V.; Hartmann, R.; Mircheski, J.; Ranke, C.; Carregal-Romero, S.; Martínez-López, J.A.; Fernández-Chacón, R.; Parak, W.J.; et al. Multiple internalization pathways of polyelectrolyte multilayer capsules into mammalian cells. ACS Nano 2013, 7, 6605–6618. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Ashraf, S.; Said, A.H.; Hartmann, R.; Assmann, M.-A.; Feliu, N.; Lenz, P.; Parak, W.J. Quantitative particle uptake by cells as analyzed by different methods. Angew. Chem. 2020, 59, 5438–5453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  48. Kirchner, C.; Javier, A.M.; Susha, A.S.; Rogach, A.L.; Kreft, O.; Sukhorukov, G.B.; Parak, W.J. Cytotoxicity of nanoparticle-loaded polymer capsules. Talanta 2005, 67, 486–491. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Rivera-Gil, P.; Koker, S.D.; Geest, B.G.D.; Parak, W.J. Intracellular processing of proteins mediated by biodegradable polyelectrolyte capsules. Nano Lett. 2009, 9, 4398–4402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Roy, S.; Elbaz, N.M.; Parak, W.J.; Feliu, N. Biodegradable alginate polyelectrolyte capsules as plausible biocompatible delivery carriers. ACS Applied Bio Materials 2019, 2, 3245–3256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Nazarenus, M.; Abasolo, I.; García-Aranda, N.; Voccoli, V.; Rejman, J.; Cecchini, M.; Jr, S.S.; Rivera_Gil, P.; Parak, W.J. Polymer capsules as a theranostic tool for a universal in vitro screening assay—the case of lysosomal storage diseases. Part. Part. Syst. Charact. 2015, 32, 991–998. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. O'Brien, J.; Wilson, I.; Orton, T.; Pognan, F.O. Investigation of the alamar blue (resazurin) fluorescent dye for the assessment of mammalian cell cytotoxicity. Eur. J. Biochem. 2000, 267, 5421–5426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Wallenstein, E.J.; Barminko, J.; Schloss, R.S.; Yarmush, M.L. Serum starvation improves transient transfection efficiency in differentiating embryonic stem cells. Biotechnol. Progr. 2010, 26, 1714–1723. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  54. Rashid, M.-U.; Coombs, K.M. Serum-reduced media impacts on cell viability and protein expression in human lung epithelial cells. J. Cell. Physiol. 2019, 234, 7718–7724. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  55. Ferruzza, S.; Rossi, C.S.; Scarino, M.Y. Serum-reduced and serum-free media for differentiation of caco-2 cells. ALTEX - Alternatives to animal experimentation 2013, 30, 159–168. [Google Scholar]
  56. Ma, X.; Hartmann, R.; Aberasturi, D.J.D.; Yang, F.; Soenen, S.J.H.; Manshian, B.B.; Franz, J.; Valdeperez, D.; Pelaz, B.; Feliu, N.; et al. Colloidal gold nanoparticles induce changes in cellular and subcellular morphology. ACS Nano 2017, 11, 7807–7820. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Kai, L.; Lee, L.A.; Xiaobing, L.; Qian, W. Fluorogenic “click” reaction for labeling and detection of DNA in proliferating cells. BioTechniques 2010, 49, 525–527. [Google Scholar]
  58. Semmling, M.; Kreft, O.; Muñoz Javier, A.; Sukhorukov, G.B.; Käs, J.; Parak, W.J. A novel flow-cytometry-based assay for cellular uptake studies of polyelectrolyte microcapsules. Small 2008, 4, 1763–1768. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Zyuzin, M.V.; Yan, Y.; Hartmann, R.; Gause, K.T.; Nazarenus, M.; Cui, J.; Caruso, F.; Parak, W.J. Role of the protein corona derived from human plasma in cellular interactions between nanoporous human serum albumin particles and endothelial cells. Bioconjugate Chem. 2017, 28, 2062–2068. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. James Kain, C.; Pooja, R.; Nandhini, M.; Sankha, B.; Jonathan, S.F. A role for ampk in increased insulin action after serum starvation. Am. J. Physiol.-Cell Physiol. 2010, 299, C1171–C1179. [Google Scholar]
  61. Wang, J.T.H.; Teasdale, R.D.; Liebl, D. Macropinosome quantitation assay. MethodsX 2014, 1, 36–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Hartmann, R.; Weidenbach, M.; Neubauer, M.; Fery, A.; Parak, W.J. Stiffness-dependent in vitro uptake and lysosomal acidification of colloidal particles. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2015, 54, 1365–1368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Chanana, M.; Rivera_Gil, P.; Correa-Duarte, M.A.; Parak, W.J.; Liz-Marzán, L.M. Physicochemical properties of protein-coated gold nanoparticles in biological fluids and cells before and after proteolytic digestion. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2013, 52, 4179–4183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Boonacker, E.; Van Noorden, C.J.F. Enzyme cytochemical techniques for metabolic mapping in living cells, with special reference to proteolysis. J. Histochem. Cytochem. 2001, 49, 1473–1486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  65. Alberts, B.; Johnson, A.; Lewis, J.; Raff, M.; Roberts, K.; Walter, P. Molecular Biology of the Cell, 4th ed.; Garland Science: New York, NY, USA, 2002. [Google Scholar]
  66. Fujiwara, Y.; Kikuchi, H.; Aizawa, S.; Furuta, A.; Hatanaka, Y.; Konya, C.; Uchida, K.; Wada, K.; Kabuta, T. Direct uptake and degradation of DNA by lysosomes. Autophagy 2013, 9, 1167–1171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  67. Rivera Gil, P.; Nazarenus, M.; Ashraf, S.; Parak, W.J. Ph sensitive capsules as intracellular optical reporters for monitoring lysosomal ph changes upon stimulation. Small 2012, 8, 943–948. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Akinc, A.; Thomas, M.; Klibanov, A.M.; Langer, R. Exploring polyethylenimine-mediated DNA transfection and the proton sponge hypothesis. J. Gene Med. 2005, 7, 657–663. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Kantner, K.; Rejman, J.; Kraf, K.V.L.; Soliman, M.G.; Zyuzin, M.V.; Escudero, A.; Pino, P.D.; Parak, W.J. Laterally and temporally controlled intracellular staining by light-triggered release of encapsulated fluorescent markers. Chem. Eur. J 2018, 24, 2098–2102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Ditto, A.J.; Shah, P.N.; Yun, Y.H. Non-viral gene delivery using nanoparticles. Expert Opinion on Drug Delivery 2009, 6, 1149–1160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Durymanov, M.; Reineke, J. Non-viral delivery of nucleic acids: Insight into mechanisms of overcoming intracellular barriers. Front. Pharmacol. 2018, 9, 971. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  72. Blanco, E.; Shen, H.; Ferrari, M. Principles of nanoparticle design for overcoming biological barriers to drug delivery. Nat. Biotechnol. 2015, 33, 941–951. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Bahrom, H.; Goncharenko, A.A.; Fatkhutdinova, L.I.; Peltek, O.O.; Muslimov, A.R.; Koval, O.Y.; Eliseev, I.E.; Manchev, A.; Gorin, D.; Shishkin, I.I.; et al. Controllable synthesis of calcium carbonate with different geometry: Comprehensive analysis of particle formation, cellular uptake, and biocompatibility. ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering 2019, 7, 19142–19156. [Google Scholar]
  74. Donath, E.; Sukhorukov, G.B.; Caruso, F.; Davis, S.A.; Möhwald, H. Novel hollow polymer shells by colloid-templated assembly of polyelectrolytes. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 1998, 37, 2202–2205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. De-Geest, B.G.; Vandenbroucke, R.E.; Guenther, A.M.; Sukhorukov, G.B.; Hennink, W.E.; Sanders, N.N.; Demeester, J.; Smedt, S.C.D. Intracellularly degradable polyelectrolyte microcapsules. Adv. Mater. 2006, 18, 1005–1009. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Ijms 21 07563 g001 550
Figure 1. Road map of implemented steps of synthesis, characterization, and biological application of SiO2-based delivery.
Figure 1. Road map of implemented steps of synthesis, characterization, and biological application of SiO2-based delivery.
Ijms 21 07563 g001
Ijms 21 07563 g002 550
Figure 2. Characterization of submicrometric capsules. Representative SEM images of (A) SiO2 capsules with low amount of tetraethyl orthosilicate (TEOS), (B) SiO2 capsules with high amount of TEOS, (C) (DEXS/PARG)4 capsules, and (D) (PSS/PAH)4 capsules.
Figure 2. Characterization of submicrometric capsules. Representative SEM images of (A) SiO2 capsules with low amount of tetraethyl orthosilicate (TEOS), (B) SiO2 capsules with high amount of TEOS, (C) (DEXS/PARG)4 capsules, and (D) (PSS/PAH)4 capsules.
Ijms 21 07563 g002
Ijms 21 07563 g003 550
Figure 3. (A) Confocal laser scanning microscopy images (overlay of transmission and blue fluorescence channels) of HeLa cells which were exposed to SiO2 (low TEOS) capsules loaded with DEX-blue for 24 h in cell culture medium supplemented with FBS. The amount of added capsules was mDEX-blue = 1.5 pg/cell. The scale bars correspond to 20 µm. (B) Cytotoxicity of submicrometric capsules: Amounts of added capsules with DEX-blue mDEX-blue (50%) upon which cell viability is reduced to 50% after 24 h incubation. The following schematics was used in the above histograms: gray circles: capsules, green circles: DNA, blue structures: DEX-blue. Data are extracted from the raw data shown in Figures S16–S21.
Figure 3. (A) Confocal laser scanning microscopy images (overlay of transmission and blue fluorescence channels) of HeLa cells which were exposed to SiO2 (low TEOS) capsules loaded with DEX-blue for 24 h in cell culture medium supplemented with FBS. The amount of added capsules was mDEX-blue = 1.5 pg/cell. The scale bars correspond to 20 µm. (B) Cytotoxicity of submicrometric capsules: Amounts of added capsules with DEX-blue mDEX-blue (50%) upon which cell viability is reduced to 50% after 24 h incubation. The following schematics was used in the above histograms: gray circles: capsules, green circles: DNA, blue structures: DEX-blue. Data are extracted from the raw data shown in Figures S16–S21.
Ijms 21 07563 g003
Ijms 21 07563 g004 550
Figure 4. Cellular uptake of submicrometric capsules. (A) Mean blue fluorescence intensity <Iblue> of HeLa cells after incubation with different submicrometric capsules loaded with DEX-blue. Cells were incubated with capsules at different conditions of incubation. The exposure concentration was mDex-blue(added) = 1.5 or 3 pg/cell. About 10,000 events were analyzed. The error bars correspond to the standard deviation from 3 independent experiments. Data are taken from the raw data shown in Figures S24–S27. (B) Microscope image showing the uptake of SiO2 (low TEOS) capsules loaded with DQ-Ovalbumin (DQ-OVA) by HeLa cells. The scale bar corresponds to 20 µm. Capsules outside cells in the extracellular medium are orange (superposition of green and red), degraded capsules are green [49]. The images show also release of the encapsulated DQ-OVA to the cytosol, seen as the green fluorescent intracellular background, which is not present in all cells, and which is different from the grainy structure of green fluorescence capsules still residing in endosomes/lysosomes.
Figure 4. Cellular uptake of submicrometric capsules. (A) Mean blue fluorescence intensity <Iblue> of HeLa cells after incubation with different submicrometric capsules loaded with DEX-blue. Cells were incubated with capsules at different conditions of incubation. The exposure concentration was mDex-blue(added) = 1.5 or 3 pg/cell. About 10,000 events were analyzed. The error bars correspond to the standard deviation from 3 independent experiments. Data are taken from the raw data shown in Figures S24–S27. (B) Microscope image showing the uptake of SiO2 (low TEOS) capsules loaded with DQ-Ovalbumin (DQ-OVA) by HeLa cells. The scale bar corresponds to 20 µm. Capsules outside cells in the extracellular medium are orange (superposition of green and red), degraded capsules are green [49]. The images show also release of the encapsulated DQ-OVA to the cytosol, seen as the green fluorescent intracellular background, which is not present in all cells, and which is different from the grainy structure of green fluorescence capsules still residing in endosomes/lysosomes.
Ijms 21 07563 g004
Ijms 21 07563 g005 550
Figure 5. Transfection studies. (A) green fluorescence proteins (GFP) expression observed by confocal laser scanning microscopy of SiO2 (low TEOS) capsules in HeLa cells using different exposure conditions. The added amount of capsules was mDNA (added) = 25 pg/cell. The scale bars correspond to 100 µm. (B) An example of transfected cells at higher magnification using SiO2 (low TEOS) capsules. The green channel corresponds to the GFP fluorescence, the blue channel to co-encapsulated DEX-blue. The scale bar corresponds to 20 µm.
Figure 5. Transfection studies. (A) green fluorescence proteins (GFP) expression observed by confocal laser scanning microscopy of SiO2 (low TEOS) capsules in HeLa cells using different exposure conditions. The added amount of capsules was mDNA (added) = 25 pg/cell. The scale bars correspond to 100 µm. (B) An example of transfected cells at higher magnification using SiO2 (low TEOS) capsules. The green channel corresponds to the GFP fluorescence, the blue channel to co-encapsulated DEX-blue. The scale bar corresponds to 20 µm.
Ijms 21 07563 g005
Ijms 21 07563 g006 550
Figure 6. Transfection studies. Transfection efficiency T of HeLa cells by (A) SiO2 (low TEOS), (B) SiO2 (high TEOS), (C) (DEXS/PARG)4, (D) (PSS/PAH)4 capsules using different incubation conditions at 25 pg(DNA)/cell added in presence (hatched boxes) or absence (blank boxes) of chloroquine.
Figure 6. Transfection studies. Transfection efficiency T of HeLa cells by (A) SiO2 (low TEOS), (B) SiO2 (high TEOS), (C) (DEXS/PARG)4, (D) (PSS/PAH)4 capsules using different incubation conditions at 25 pg(DNA)/cell added in presence (hatched boxes) or absence (blank boxes) of chloroquine.
Ijms 21 07563 g006
Table
Table 1. Capsule diameter dc as determined from SEM and hydrodynamic diameters dh and Zeta-potential (ζ) as determined from dynamic light scattering (DLS) measurements.
Table 1. Capsule diameter dc as determined from SEM and hydrodynamic diameters dh and Zeta-potential (ζ) as determined from dynamic light scattering (DLS) measurements.
Capsule Architecturedc [nm]dh [nm]ζ [mV]
SiO2 (low TEOS)602 ± 124744 ± 2529 ± 2
SiO2 (high TEOS)686 ± 195753 ± 5827± 1
(DEXS/PARG)4625 ± 71762 ± 8120 ± 1
(PSS/PAH)4694 ± 95690 ± 2016 ± 1
Table
Table 2. Amounts of biological molecules (volume Vbio and concentration Cbio of stock solution) added as molecular cargo for later encapsulation to the initial CaCl2·2H2O solution, V(CaCl2 solution) = 4 mL.
Table 2. Amounts of biological molecules (volume Vbio and concentration Cbio of stock solution) added as molecular cargo for later encapsulation to the initial CaCl2·2H2O solution, V(CaCl2 solution) = 4 mL.
Vbio [µL]Cbio [mg/mL]
Dextran labelled with Cascade Blue (DEX-blue) in water256.5
Dextran labelled with Alexa Fluor 647 (DEX-AF647) in water256.5
DQ-Ovalbumin (DQ-OVA) in water2002
GFP plasmids in Tris-EDTA buffer together with2001.8
Dextran Cascade Blue (DEX-blue) in water256.5

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zyuzin, M.V.; Zhu, D.; Parak, W.J.; Feliu, N.; Escudero, A. Development of Silica-Based Biodegradable Submicrometric Carriers and Investigating Their Characteristics as in Vitro Delivery Vehicles. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 7563. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21207563

AMA Style

Zyuzin MV, Zhu D, Parak WJ, Feliu N, Escudero A. Development of Silica-Based Biodegradable Submicrometric Carriers and Investigating Their Characteristics as in Vitro Delivery Vehicles. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2020; 21(20):7563. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21207563

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zyuzin, Mikhail V., Dingcheng Zhu, Wolfgang J. Parak, Neus Feliu, and Alberto Escudero. 2020. "Development of Silica-Based Biodegradable Submicrometric Carriers and Investigating Their Characteristics as in Vitro Delivery Vehicles" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 21, no. 20: 7563. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21207563

APA Style

Zyuzin, M. V., Zhu, D., Parak, W. J., Feliu, N., & Escudero, A. (2020). Development of Silica-Based Biodegradable Submicrometric Carriers and Investigating Their Characteristics as in Vitro Delivery Vehicles. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 21(20), 7563. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21207563

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop