Next Article in Journal
RAGE Up-Regulation Differently Affects Cell Proliferation and Migration in Pancreatic Cancer Cells
Next Article in Special Issue
Co-Culture of Primary Human Coronary Artery and Internal Thoracic Artery Endothelial Cells Results in Mutually Beneficial Paracrine Interactions
Previous Article in Journal
A Bioinformatic Pipeline Places STAT5A as a miR-650 Target in Poorly Differentiated Aggressive Breast Cancer
Previous Article in Special Issue
CCL4 Inhibition in Atherosclerosis: Effects on Plaque Stability, Endothelial Cell Adhesiveness, and Macrophages Activation
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Anti-Apolipoprotein A-1 IgG Influences Neutrophil Extracellular Trap Content at Distinct Regions of Human Carotid Plaques

Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21(20), 7721; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21207721
by Rafaela F. da Silva 1,2, Daniela Baptista 1, Aline Roth 1, Kapka Miteva 1, Fabienne Burger 1, Nicolas Vuilleumier 3,4, Federico Carbone 5,6, Fabrizio Montecucco 5,6, François Mach 1 and Karim J. Brandt 1,*
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Reviewer 3: Anonymous
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21(20), 7721; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21207721
Submission received: 9 September 2020 / Revised: 12 October 2020 / Accepted: 13 October 2020 / Published: 19 October 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Atherosclerosis: From Molecular Biology to Therapeutic Perspective)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

This study investigated NET markers upstream and downstream of atherosclerotic plaques in patients. Significant differences between the two sample sites were found and a link to anti-ApoA-1 was made. The manuscript is well written and scientifically sound.

 

Major comments

Introduction: The paragraph introducing NETs needs to be improved. NETs were first discovered over 15 years ago by Brinkmann et al in 2004. Furthermore ROS dependent and independent mechanisms have been shown. Additionally, there have been numerous reports detailing the negative effects of NETosis in specific conditions.

 

Figure 2. Why use average signal intensity instead of number/percentage of positive cells? For figures 2, 3 and 4, the results and interpretation would be improved if individual cells were counted instead signal intensity.

 

Figure 3: What percentage of DAPI positive cells are neutrophils? If this is known, it would be better to replace figure B with the total number of neutrophils.

 

Figure 4. How did you quantify H3Cit outside of the neutrophil? Can you be sure that the H3Cit is extracellular?

 

The manuscript would be improved if the authors assesed the influence of anti-ApoA-1 on NET formation in vitro.

Minor comments

 

Please use either British or American English, e.g.:

Analysed 87, 301 and 312

destabilization line 202.

210, 215. In the present study used twice.

Line 256. Double space between fact that

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

Authors investigated neutrophils accumulation in atherosclerotic plaques and reported neutrophil extracellular traps (NET) elements as potential markers of vulnerability. This paper is interesting, however following point should be described.

In clinical practice, we sometimes encounter the patient with internal carotid artery occlusion due to intraplaque hemorrhage. Authors should mention the relationship between NET and intraplaque hemorrhage.

 

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 3 Report

The authors have investigated the presence of NET markers in upstream and downstream regions of carotid artery atherosclerotic plaques. Samples from plaques were analyzed from patients for NET markers NE and H3Cit, with downstream plaques having a more vulnerable phenotype with elevated NET markers and neutrophils. There was also found to be a correlation between increased anti-apolipoprotein A-1 antibodies and increased H3Cit in downstream plaques. The study is interesting and provides important evidence of using NET markers and anti-apolipoprotein A-1 antibodies to possibly predict atherosclerotic plaque vulnerability. It can be improved by addressing the following points both major and minor:

Major Revisions:

  • Table 1 is mentioned in the text as showing patient demographics, but it is not included in the manuscript or supplementary information. Please include the table in the revised version of the manuscript.
  • For Figure 2, was % NE plaque area and % H3Cit plaque area calculated from the middle panels or bottom panels? If the area was calculated from a subset of images of the entire plaque for each patient, the number of images quantified per patient, the size of each analyzed image, and how the images were selected for analysis should be described in detail in the main text. If the entire plaque is analyzed, that should be stated. Similarly, selection of fluorescence images for analysis in Figures 3 and 4 should be explained in the main text with more detail as per Figure 2.

Minor Revisions:

  • *p<0.05 is mentioned but often *** is shown, which is not defined.
  • It could be mentioned in Figure 2’s caption that the specific staining for NE and H3Cit is shown in purple in the images.

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Back to TopTop