Next Article in Journal
Analysis of the Circulating Tumor Cell Capture Ability of a Slit Filter-Based Method in Comparison to a Selection-Free Method in Multiple Cancer Types
Next Article in Special Issue
Biology of the mRNA Splicing Machinery and Its Dysregulation in Cancer Providing Therapeutic Opportunities
Previous Article in Journal
Targeting Casein Kinase 1 (CK1) in Hematological Cancers
Previous Article in Special Issue
ADAR1 Suppresses Interferon Signaling in Gastric Cancer Cells by MicroRNA-302a-Mediated IRF9/STAT1 Regulation
 
 
Review
Peer-Review Record

Alternative Splicing: Expanding the Landscape of Cancer Biomarkers and Therapeutics

Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21(23), 9032; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21239032
by Cláudia Bessa 1,2, Paulo Matos 1,2, Peter Jordan 1,2,*,† and Vânia Gonçalves 1,2,*,†
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21(23), 9032; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21239032
Submission received: 31 October 2020 / Revised: 24 November 2020 / Accepted: 25 November 2020 / Published: 27 November 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Targeting Dysregulated RNA Processing in Cancer)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

In this review article Bessa  and collaborators discuss the potential value of dysregulated splicing signatures in diagnosis and its exploitation in innovative therapeutic approaches

This is a timely review, very well written and provides a complete overview of the this topic. 

Minor points

I found funny that for three times authors misspelled splicing/spliceosome

1- page 2: splcicing 

2- page 4: spliceossome 

3- page 7: splicingevents 

Please define what OS stands for

Author Response

We thank the reviewer for the positive comments and have corrected all indicated spelling errors.

 

Reviewer 2 Report

I thoroughly enjoyed reading this review article. The authors started with a broad introduction on alternative splicing and expanded on its role in cancer. Both the table and figures are very detailed and well made. Overall, a great job! I have some minor changes as follows. 

I think an introduction to cancer is required before describing the role of alternative splicing in cancer. This can be brief.

Line 56 correct splicing spelling

Line 58 remove extra space

Line 202 correct interestingly spelling

Line 337 correct phosphorylation spelling

Line 468 correct adhesion spelling

Author Response

We thank the reviewer for the positive comments and have corrected all indicated spelling errors.We also followed the suggestion and included a small introductory context about cancer at the beginning of section 2.1. Dysregulation of alternative splicing in cancer, as follows.

2.1. Dysregulation of alternative splicing in cancer

Cancer mainly evolves through successive genetic alterations and genomic dysregulation, but is also affected by thetumor microenvironment. These renderoncogenes constitutively active, and inactivate tumour-suppressor genes.As a result, cancer cells acquire specific abilities during tumordevelopment, including self-sufficiency in growth signals, insensitivity to growth inhibitory signals, evasion of apoptosis, limitless replicative potential, sustained angiogenesis, and tissue invasion and metastasis [19]. These processes can also be dysregulated by AS, which in turn can generate variant proteins with altered physiological function[3]. Particularly, a recent systematic study performed by Kahles and colleagues reported that AS events are more frequent in cancer tissues compared to(...)

Back to TopTop