Next Article in Journal
Unraveling the Role of Leptin in Liver Function and Its Relationship with Liver Diseases
Next Article in Special Issue
Psoriasis: Pathogenesis, Comorbidities, and Therapy Updated
Previous Article in Journal
Cell-free Stem Cell-Derived Extract Formulation for Regenerative Medicine Applications
Previous Article in Special Issue
Molecular and Cellular Mechanisms of Itch in Psoriasis
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

UBAC1/KPC2 Regulates TLR3 Signaling in Human Keratinocytes through Functional Interaction with the CARD14/CARMA2sh-TANK Complex

Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21(24), 9365; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21249365
by Pellegrino Mazzone 1, Michele Congestrì 2, Ivan Scudiero 1, Immacolata Polvere 2,3, Serena Voccola 3, Lucrezia Zerillo 3, Gianluca Telesio 1, Pasquale Vito 2,3,*, Romania Stilo 2 and Tiziana Zotti 2,3
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21(24), 9365; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21249365
Submission received: 8 November 2020 / Revised: 7 December 2020 / Accepted: 8 December 2020 / Published: 9 December 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Psoriasis: Pathogenesis, Comorbidities, and Therapy Updated)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Nice study. Well performed and presented.It is a very well designed work, with materials and methods that allow the results to be perfectly understood The discussion and conclusion are consistent with the results. This is a very new job. 

Author Response

Dear Editor,

We thank the reviewer for appreciating the manuscript.

Reviewer 2 Report

In the manuscript entitled "UBAC1/KPC2 regulates TLR3 signaling in human keratinocytes through functional interaction with the CARD14/CARMA2sh-TANK complex", the authors have found the UBA Domain Containing 1 (UBAC1) as an interactor of CARMA2sh in human keratinocytes. The topic is interesting and the data is convicing.

There is only one point, it would be better if it could be improved. The statistical data of repeated experiments could be shown for the blots.

Author Response

Dear Editor,

We thank the reviewer for appreciating the manuscript.

The blot experiments shown in Fig. 1 are qualitative (the answer is yes/not). We added in the figure legend the statement  that data shown is representative of three independent experiments.

The statistical data of repeated experiments for the blots shown in Fig. 3, which are quantitative,  will be  provided as supplementary material.   

Back to TopTop