Next Article in Journal
Analysis of Aldo–Keto Reductase Gene Family and Their Responses to Salt, Drought, and Abscisic Acid Stresses in Medicago truncatula
Next Article in Special Issue
Intramuscular Injection of Combined Calf Blood Compound (CFC) and Homeopathic Drug Tr14 Accelerates Muscle Regeneration In Vivo
Previous Article in Journal
Tuning of Titanium Microfiber Scaffold with UV-Photofunctionalization for Enhanced Osteoblast Affinity and Function
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
IJMS
Volume 21
Issue 3
10.3390/ijms21030745
ijms-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Divergent Regulation of Myotube Formation and Gene Expression by E2 and EPA during In-Vitro Differentiation of C2C12 Myoblasts

by
Orly Lacham-Kaplan
1,*,
Donny M. Camera
2 and
John A. Hawley
1
1
Exercise and Nutrition Research Program, Mary Mackillop Institute for Health Research, Australian Catholic University, Melbourne 3000, Australia
2
Department of Health and Medical Sciences, Swinburne University of Technology, Melbourne 3122, Australia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21(3), 745; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21030745
Submission received: 23 December 2019 / Revised: 20 January 2020 / Accepted: 21 January 2020 / Published: 23 January 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Molecular and Tissue Engineering Approaches in Musculoskeletal Regenerative Medicine 2.0)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Estrogen (E2) and polyunsaturated fatty acids (n-3PUFA) supplements independently support general wellbeing and enhance muscle regeneration in-vivo and myotube formation in-vitro. However, the combined effect of E2 and n-3PUFA on myoblast differentiation is not known. The purpose of the study was to identify whether E2 and n-3PUFA possess a synergistic effect on in-vitro myogenesis. Mouse C2C12 myoblasts, a reliable model to reiterate myogenic events in-vitro, were treated with 10nM E2 and 50μM eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) independently or combined, for 0–24 h or 0–120 h during differentiation. Immunofluorescence, targeted qPCR and next generation sequencing (NGS) were used to characterize morphological changes and differential expression of key genes involved in the regulation of myogenesis and muscle function pathways. E2 increased estrogen receptor α (Erα) and the expression of the mitogen-activated protein kinase 11 (Mapk11) within 1 h of treatment and improved myoblast differentiation and myotube formation. A significant reduction (p < 0.001) in myotube formation and in the expression of myogenic regulatory factors Mrfs (MyoD, Myog and Myh1) and the myoblast fusion related gene, Tmem8c, was observed in the presence of EPA and the combined E2/EPA treatment. Additionally, EPA treatment at 48 h of differentiation inhibited the majority of genes associated with the myogenic and striated muscle contraction pathways. In conclusion, EPA and E2 had no synergistic effect on myotube formation in-vitro. Independently, EPA inhibited myoblast differentiation and overrides the stimulatory effect of E2 when used in combination with E2.

1. Introduction

Satellite cells (SCs), the quiescent adult muscle stem cells, are responsible for muscle hypotrophy and regeneration during postnatal development and adulthood [1,2]. For regeneration, activated SCs differentiate into myocytes (fusible myoblasts) and fuse with damaged myofibers [1]. At the cellular level, activation of tissue-specific transcription factors and increased gene abundance prompts the exit of dividing SCs from the cell cycle into the myogenic (myogenesis) pathway [2,3]. Interaction between transcription factors and signal transduction pathways results in the expression of numerous myogenic regulatory factors (Mrfs) that govern the normal progress of myogenesis [2,3].
A reduced number of SCs and an inability to undergo myogenesis may be the outcome of, or contribute to skeletal muscle disorders such as atrophy, cachexia and sarcopenia [4]. In this regard, it has been the aim of many scientists to optimize myogenesis in-vitro to improve therapies to alleviate symptoms associated with muscle atrophy and degeneration.
The results from several studies suggest that the reproductive hormone estrogen (E2) and n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids (n-3PUFA) play favorable roles in maintaining skeletal muscle mass and function. For example, postmenopausal women undergoing estrogen-based hormone replacement therapy (HRT) to alleviate the symptoms associated with menopause have greater muscle mass and strength compared to women not undergoing HRT treatment [5,6,7,8]. Maintaining muscle function through nutritional strategies has also been an area of intense research [9] with considerable focus on fish oil. Fish oil contains n-3PUFA that are known to improve muscle strength, particularly in older women [10,11]. However, while some studies find supportive effects of E2 or n-3PUFA on myoblast differentiation in-vitro [12,13,14,15,16], others have shown an inhibition [17,18,19,20,21,22].
The cellular mechanism(s) activated by E2 and n-3PUFA regulating myogenesis are equivocal. MAPK/ERK and PI3k/Akt transduction pathways have been both positively and negatively implicated in regulating the transcription, translation and post-translation modifications of Mrfs to support myogenesis following E2 or fatty acid treatment [13,15,18,23]. Findings from several studies suggest a positive and synergistic effect of reproductive hormones and fish oil supplements on cardiovascular health of postmenopausal women [24,25,26]. However, their combined effect on muscle regeneration has not been investigated. In the present study we tested the hypothesis that E2 and n-3PUFA would induce a positive and synergistic effect on myogenesis in-vitro. From the numerous n-3PUFA investigated to date, eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) has been found to have the most significant effect regulating myogenesis in-vitro [14,16,17,22]. Hence, we examined myogenesis fate in mouse C2C12 myoblasts treated with E2 and EPA independently or in combination, for 0–24 h or 0–120 h from induction of differentiation, with a focus on morphological changes and differential expression of key genes involved in muscle differentiation and muscle function pathways.

2. Results

2.1. Morphological Changes and Myoblast Fusion Index

Morphological changes to C2C12 myoblasts cultured in control-vehicle (Con-Ve), E2, EPA and E2/EPA solutions were determined by immunofluorescence following treatment with anti-Desmin mouse antibody known to be expressed in both myoblasts and myotubes with increased expression as differentiation progresses [27]. When using immunofluorescent analyses, the staining is weak in the cytoplasm of undifferentiated myoblasts and gradually intensifies in elongated myocytes, early tubes and myotubes. Because of its structural distribution with myotube differentiation along the length of a muscle fiber and in close association with the plasma membrane and between myofibrils, Desmin staining defines the tube structure [28,29,30] making it a valid marker for early and mature myotubes.
In order to confirm the reliability of Desmin as a marker for in-vitro-derived C2C12 myotubes, in a separate experiment we treated the same cultures with Desmin and MYH antibodies at 120 h of differentiation using two different secondary fluorescent colors and showed that the staining overlapped (Figure 1), confirming that Desmin can be used as a marker for myotube development.
Morphological changes were recorded from the time differentiation was induced (0 h time), up to 120 h (Figure 2).
The highest number of elongated myoblasts at 48 h and the highest number of fully formed tubes at 120 h were both found in E2 treated cultures (Figure 2 and Figure 3). E2 treatment also resulted in the highest fusion index of all conditions and was significantly different compared with EPA and E2/EPA (p < 0.001, Figure 3). Cells treated with EPA or with E2/EPA had a significantly lower number of initial or mature myotubes (p < 0.01) and the lowest fusion index (p < 0.001) compared to Con-Ve and E2 treatments, respectively (Figure 2 and Figure 3).
The total number of nuclei within microscopic fields increased with time (p < 0.05) in all treatment groups with no differences between treatments at any given time point. Collectively, these morphological data indicate that exposure to E2 during myoblast differentiation improves myotube formation in-vitro while EPA and/or the combined E2/EPA treatment repressed formation of myotubes.

2.2. Gene Expression

2.2.1. Time-Dependent Expression of Individual Genes Relative to 18S Ribosomal RNA Using Real Time qPCR Analysis

Gpr30, Erα and Erβ

Expression of the three estrogen receptors Gpr30, Erα and Erβ at 0–24 h and 0–120 h are presented in Figure 4.
Relative expression of Erα peaked at 1 h (1.33-fold) only in cells treated with E2 followed by a downregulation at 6 and 24 h.
The expression of Gpr30 and Erβ did not change from 0–24 h. While the expression of Erα stayed low in all treatments at 6 and 120 h, the relative expression of Gpr30 and Erβ increased significantly (p < 0.001) at 120 h in both Con-Ve and E2 treated cells, but not in cultures treated with EPA or E2/EPA (Figure 4c–f). Collectively, these results suggest that Erα expression in muscle stem cells is E2 dependent and occurs during early stages of myogenesis. In contrast, both Gpr30′s and Erβ’s expression was independent of E2 and was associated with fully established myotubes.

Mapk11 and Akt1

Mapk11 expression increased significantly (1.6 fold; p < 0.001) at 1 h only in E2 treated cells (Figure 5a,b). Following this initial increase, Mapk11 expression decreased over time. Akt1 expression did not change throughout the five days of culture for any treatment (Figure 5c,d).

MyoD1, Myog, Myh1 and Myomaker (Tmem8c)

MyoD1 expression decreased over time in all treatments between 0–24 h (Figure 6a; p < 0.001). Expression of MyoD1, Myog and Myh1 increased at 120 h in Con-Ve and E2 (2–11 folds; p < 0.001) but did not change or decreased in EPA and E2/EPA treated cells (Figure 6b–d). The expression of Tmem8c increased over time in both Con-Ve and E2 treated cells (p < 0.05 at 48 h and p < 0.001 at 120 h) but not in EPA or E2/EPA treated cells (Figure 6e).

2.3. Next Generation Sequencing (NGS)

Differential expression analysis was completed on 12,987 from 26,586 genes identified in the mus musculus database. These genes had >10 reads in at least one of the three mRNA samples extracted from each treatment. Heatmaps and glimma plots of differentially expressed genes showed greater similarities between Con-Ve and E2 treated cells than cells treated with EPA (Figure 7).
In EPA treated cells, 6343 and 6248 genes had lower expression than Con-Ve and E2 treated cells, respectively, with 43.2% and 45.3% of the genes statistically different between the groups (p < 0.05). Totals of 6644 and 6739 genes had higher expression in EPA treated cells than in Con-Ve or E2 treated cells, respectively, with 39.5% and 42.4% of the genes statistically different between the groups (p < 0.05). A comparison between E2 and Con-Ve treatments showed that although 6491 genes had lower and 6497 had higher expression in E2 treated cells, only 8.9% and 7.6% genes were statistically different between the groups (p < 0.05), emphasizing similarities between the groups.

2.3.1. Pathway Enrichment Analyses, Gene Ontology and Gene Functional Category in Cultures at 48 h Treatment with Con-Ve, E2 and EPA

The 10 most significantly enriched pathways in E2 and EPA at 48 h of treatment when compared to untreated cells or to each other are presented in Figure 8. From these, the striated muscle contraction pathway was the most significantly enriched in E2 treated cells compared to Con-Ve cells (Figure 8a; p < 0.001) or EPA treated cells (Figure 8f; p < 0.001). The pathways enriched in EPA treated cells compared to Con-Ve or E2 treated cells were associated with inflammation and immune responses (Figure 8c; p < 0.003). The RAF/MAPK was also enriched at 48 h in EPA treated cells compared to Con-Ve cells (Figure 8e; p < 0.001). Gene ontology (GO) and functional category (GFC) analysis showed that genes associated with muscle structure and function had reduced expression in cells treated with EPA (Supplementary Tables S1 and S2).

2.3.2. Gene Expression Profile in the Myogenic and the Striated Muscle Contraction Pathways at 48 h Treatment with Con-Ve, E2 and EPA

We characterized the myogenic and striated muscle contraction pathways as they are responsible for muscle differentiation, structure and function. From the 24 genes identified in the myogenic pathway, 17 (71%) had higher expression in E2 treated cells compared with Con-Ve (Figure 9a). From these, Myod1, Cdc42, Cdh2, Mef2c and Myog were statistically different (p < 0.04–0.007). Genes significantly repressed by EPA treatment were Mef2a, Mef2c, Mef2d, Myog, TCF12, Cdh15, Cdh2, Cdc42, Spag9, Cdon, Tcf4, Me2, Ctnnal and Myod1 when compared with E2 (Figure 9c; p < 0.01–0.001). The number of reads for Mapk11, Myf5 and Myf6 was significantly higher in EPA treated cells (Figure 9c; p < 0.01–0.001).
A total of 41 out of 44 (93%) genes within the striated muscle contraction pathway had higher expression in E2 treated cells compared to Con-Ve cells with 20 (45%) significantly different (p < 0.001–0.05) including the myosin heavy chain gene family: Myh1, Myh3, Myh4, Myh6, Myh7 and Myh8. All 44 striated muscle contraction genes had lower expression in EPA than in E2 treated cells with 39 (89%) significantly different (p < 0.001–0.05), suggesting overall downregulation of the striated muscle contraction pathway after EPA treatment (Table 1).

2.3.3. Genes Unique to E2 and EPA Treated Cells

We identified genes uniquely expressed in E2 and in EPA treated cells (Supplementary Tables S3 and S4). Genes of interest from the genes expressed in E2 and not in EPA treated cells were: fibromodulin (Fmod), known to regulate myoblast differentiation by controlling calcium influx into the cells [31]; fibroblast growth factor binding protein 1 (Fgfbp1), secreted by muscle tissue to slow age-related degeneration [32]; Shisa family member 2 (Shisa2), known to participate in myoblast fusion [33], fox-1 homolog (Rbfox1), known to promote the transcription factor myocyte enhancer factor 2D (Mef2D) splicing and subsequent myogenesis [34] and Mef2D itself.
Genes unique to EPA treated cells were mostly associated with immune response. Other genes in this list included: orosomucoid 1 (orm1), known to increase muscle glycogen [35]; endothelial PAS domain protein 1 (Epas1), known to promote adipose differentiation [36]; and lipocalin 2 (Lcn2), which regulates muscle regeneration [37]. Of interest is also haptoglobin (Hp), known to regulate adipose tissue development and fat metabolism [38]; and interleukin 6 (Il6), known to promote muscle differentiation and hypertrophy except when prolonged high doses are used [39,40].

3. Discussion

Several studies have reported that E2 and n3-PUFA, independently, have a positive effect on muscle function particularly in older women, and have stimulatory effects on myotube formation in-vitro. However, their combined effect on muscle regeneration in-vivo or in-vitro is unknown. Our study is the first to report that E2 and EPA induce divergent outcomes on myoblast differentiation, and that they have no synergistic effect when used in combination. Sequential imaging over five days of treatment with 10 nM E2, a commonly used concentration, increased myotube number and fusion index. However, both significantly decreased when cells were treated with a concentration of 50 μM EPA alone or combined with 10 nM E2 (Figure 3).
The present study focused on gene expression analyzed by qPCR and NGS, and while protein expression would have provided additional information regarding post-transcriptional changes, the morphological changes necessary for myoblast commitment to the myogenic lineage and their progress in myogenesis, are largely dependent on a complex network of genes [1,2]. We show that EPA interferes with this network by repressing or maintaining expression of specific genes typically regulated during differentiation, resulting in an attenuated myogenic pathway (Figure 9). For example, the reduced expression of MyoD1 and Myog and increased expression of Myf6 (also known as Mrf4) and Myf5 in cells treated with EPA for 48 h suggests a lack of cellular commitment to the myogenic lineage (Figure 9) [2]. Mapk11 was also expressed higher in these cells compared to Con-Ve or E2 treated cells (Figure 8). Mapk11 supports myoblast proliferation and initiation of myogenesis and has been shown to be downregulated after activating MyoD and MEF2C in committed myoblasts [41,42]. Even if EPA treated cells were committed to the myogenic lineage, they had limited ability to fuse with each other to form tubes as EPA repressed the expression of Tmem8c (Figure 6) and Sisha 2 (Table S3), which are essential for myoblasts’ membrane fusion and myotube extension [33,43]. EPA treatment also repressed the expression of genes associated with muscle function such as the Myh gene family, linked to muscle fiber type and substrate metabolism (Table 1) [44].
E2 activates cellular pathways via its intracellular receptors, Erα and Erβ, resulting in the receptors’ translocation to the nucleus to act as transcription factors that regulate E2-dependent gene expression [45]. E2 also interacts with a membrane G-protein coupled receptor 30 (GPR30) [32]. Both the intracellular and membrane receptors have been associated with in-vitro myoblast differentiation through signal transduction pathways [13,23,46]. Elevated expression of Erβ and Gpr30 was independent of E2 treatment and was limited to cultures with fully formed myotubes in both Con-Ve and E2 treated cells. While the precise role of Erβ in fully formed myotubes is unknown, an increase in GPR30 during late myogenesis is attributed to its protective role from oxidative stress through activation of creatine kinase [46]. We observed a 1.3-fold increase in Erα expression at 1 h only in E2 treated cells followed by a downregulation. Although statistically not different to the Con-Ve group, we speculate that this peak in Erα expression is of biologically relevance and is E2 dependent. Ronda et al. [47] showed that the use of an antagonist of ERs and specific siRNAs to block Erα and Erβ expression resulted in Erα, but not Erβ, mediating ERK2 activation by 17β-estradiol.
Our findings show that Mapk11, and not Akt1, is the primary target to differentiation stimuli by E2. While Akt1 expression remained unchanged through differentiation for all treatment groups, we observed a significant increase in the expression of Mapk11 at 1 h with E2 treatment, supporting previous suggestions of regulation by the MAPK transduction cascade (Figure 5) [13,15,23,48]. The increase in Mapk11 expression also coincided with an increase Erα expression, suggesting that the regulation of myogenesis through activation of the MAPK transduction pathway may be via this E2 receptor.
Cotreatment of C2C12 cells with E2 was insufficient to suppress EPA’s negative effect on myogenesis. This dominant effect of EPA has been reported in previous work on E2-dependent tumours where n-3PUFA prevented cell proliferation by altering lipid composition of the plasma membrane and subsequently interfered with E2-dependent signaling cascades such as the MAPK/Erk pathway [49]. Moreover, higher n-3PUFA to E2 ratios were shown to have a greater inhibitory effect on tumour cell proliferation [49]. Thus, the inability of E2 to overturn EPA’s inhibitory effect in the present study may be related to the high EPA to E2 ratio (5000:1).
Our finding that n-3PUFA (i.e., EPA) inhibits myogenesis is in agreement with accumulating evidence showing the negative effect of n-3PUFA on myotube formation in-vitro [17,19,22]. These studies highlight the potential negative effects of n-3PUFA consumption during pregnancy when de novo myogenesis is initiated at the embryonic and neonatal stages because disruption to myogenesis at this time may lead to postnatal muscle deficiencies in mass and function [50]. However, the n-3PUFA to E2 ratio is reduced considerably during pregnancy, thus preventing any proposed inhibitory effect of n-3PUFA on muscle development in-utero. It is estimated that levels of circulating E2 are nearly 100 times higher [51,52] while n-3PUFA in the blood are approximately 10 times lower [53] during pregnancy. Indeed, n-3PUFA ingestion has been associated with positive effects on newborn visual and cognitive development [54] and had no detrimental effects on postnatal development or in follow-up years after birth [55].
In contrast to our original research hypothesis, cotreatment of E2 and n-3PUFA did not have a synergistic effect on in-vitro myogenesis, raising the possibility that dietary supplements of fish oil (i.e., n-3PUFA) may interfere with the positive affect estrogen has on muscle regeneration in women on HRT. Recently, Ghnaimawi et al. [17] showed that treatment of differentiating C2C12 myoblasts with 50 μM EPA and DHA for four days increased adipogenesis and inflammatory-related genes and reduced tube formation. We did not examine adipose cell formation in our cultures following treatment with EPA, but were able to identify that IL6 and adipose tissue related genes were uniquely expressed in cells treated with EPA (Tables S3 and S4). High doses of n-3PUFA intake have shown to increase the expression of uterine Il6 [56].
In the present study we characterized morphological and molecular changes of myoblasts treated with E2 and EPA independently or combined. EPA significantly impaired the expression of muscle differentiation genes and genes associated with muscle function within 48 h of treatment. In contrast, E2 improved myoblast fusion and myotube formation and enhanced the expression of genes within the striated muscle contraction pathway. This indicates that reproductive hormone can be used to stimulate myoblast entry into the myogenic pathway for therapeutic purposes.
Further investigation is required to explore if n-3PUFA ingestion will increase intramuscular adipose tissue and whether ingestion while under HRT may override the positive effect E2 has on skeletal muscle. Further studies are also required to identify the optimal E2 to n-3PUFA ratio when consumed together in order to maximize the beneficial effect on general wellbeing with no harmful effect on muscle health.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Cell Culture

C2C12 murine myoblasts at passage 7–9 [57] (LONZA, Sydney, Australia) were cultured in proliferation medium composed of 4.5 g/L glucose Dulbecco’s modified eagle medium (DMEM; Life Technologies, Melbourne, Australia) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS; Sigma, Melbourne, Australia) and 0.2% penicillin/streptomycin (PenStrep; Life Technologies). Cells were plated onto 1% Geltrex (Life Technologies) coated 96-well dishes in proliferation medium at a density of 30,000 cells/mL (6000 cells/well). Culture dishes were maintained at 37 °C in a humidified incubator at 5% CO2/air mixture for 48 h to reach 80%–90% confluence. At 80%–90% confluence, proliferation medium was replaced with differentiation medium (4.5 g/L glucose DMEM and 0.2% Pen/Strep) containing 2% horse serum (HS; Sigma).

4.2. E2 and EPA Treatments

EPA and E2 were purchased from Sigma-Merck (Sydney, Australia). The company has certified EPA’s 1 3C NMR identity conformed to structure. EPA was used within six months of purchase. Frozen (−80 °C) stock solutions of 10 M E2 and 100 mM EPA (Sigma) in 100% ethanol were diluted into concentrations of 100 µM and 20 nM, respectively. Solutions were placed in a 56 °C water bath until EPA was dissolved, followed by further 1–2 h incubation at room temperature to allow EPA/BSA and E2/BSA conjugation. Solutions were then diluted in 4.5 g/L DMEM containing 2% HS to a final working concentration of 50 µM EPA and 10 nM E2. These concentrations were chosen based on previously published reports [13,22,58]. A control-vehicle (Con-Ve) solution contained the same proportion of 2% bovine serum albumin (BSA), 2% horse serum (HS) and ethanol (0.1%) and was handled like the treatment groups.

4.3. Immunofluorescence, Mytube Formation and Fusion Parameters

In an independent experiment we have shown Desmin to overlap with MYH expression in in-vitro derived C2C12 myotubes at 120 h of differentiation (Figure 1). For this, confluent cells (80–90%) were cultured in Con-Ve for 120 h. At 120 h, cultures were washed, fixed and analyzed by immunofluorescence as previously described [29,59]. Fixed cultures were stained with the appropriate secondary antibodies (Alexa Fluor 488; green and 594; red, Life Technologies) and costained with 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI) (Life Technologies) following an overnight incubation with anti-mouse Desmin (Life Technologies) and anti-mouse skeletal muscle myosin heavy chain antibody (Life Technologies). For the time-dependent development studies, cultures were treated only with anti-Desmin followed by the appropriate secondary antibody. At 0, 48 and 120 h, cultures were washed, fixed and analysed by immunofluorescence as before.
Stained cultures were visualised under the EVOS-II imaging system using the appropriate fluorescent filters. Pictographs were taken under 20× magnification with five image fields (one in the centre of the well and four others around the centre) from each treatment at 0 (myoblasts before differentiation), 48 (elongating myoblasts and myocytes and initiation of mytubes) and 120 h (fully formed myotubes; Figure 1). The number of elongated Desmin-positive myoblasts with ≥1 DAPI stained nucleus was recorded at 48 h. At 120 h, the number of Desmin-positive myotubes containing ≥2 DAPI stained nuclei, the total number of DAPI stained nuclei within the field and the total number of DAPI stained nuclei within tubes were all recorded. Fusion index was calculated as the proportion of nuclei within tubes from the total number of nuclei in the field.

4.4. Transcriptome Analyses

4.4.1. RNA Extraction

Total RNA was extracted from cells using the PureLink RNA Mini Kit (Qiagen, Melbourne, Australia) following manufacturer’s instructions and stored at −80 °C until used for sequencing and target qPCR analyses.

4.4.2. Real Time Quantitative PCR

Taqman-FAM-labelled primer/probes for the different genes cDNA was synthesized by using oligo (dT)20, and SuperScript™ III Reverse Transcriptase (Life Technologies, Australia) according to the manufacturers’ instructions. Time-dependent qPCR of differential expression was used to identify hierarchy of gene expression activated by E2 or by EPA treatment. We examined expression of the E2 receptors alpha and beta (Erα: Esrra Mm00433143_ml, Erβ: Esrrb Mm00442411_ml) and G protein-coupled estrogen receptor-30 (Gpr30 Mm02620446_ml), known to initiate transduction cascades involved in myogenesis; the downstream target genes of these receptors, mitogen-activated protein kinase 11 (Mapk11 Mm004440955_ml) and serine/threonine kinase 1 (Akt1 Mm00437443_ml), known to activate Mrfs’ transcription and post-translation modification; the Mrf genes, myoblast determination protein (MyoD Mm00440387_ml), myogenin (Myog Mm00446194_ml), myosin heavy chain 1 (Myh1 Mm01332489_ml); and the mouse myoblast fusion gene, myomaker (Tmem8c Mm00481256_ml), involved in myoblast fusion, myotube extension and myotube maturation.
Expressions of Erα, Erβ, Gpr30, Mapk11, Akt1 and MyoD were measured at 0, 1, 6 and 24 h from initiation of differentiation. In a separate experiment, the expression of Erα, Erβ, Gpr30, Mapk11, Akt1, MyoD and Myog, Myh1 and Tmem8c was examined at 0, 48 and 120 h. 18S ribosomal RNA (Rn18s Mm03928990_ml) was used as housekeeping gene for the early and late gene expression experiments.
RT-qPCR samples were mixed with Taqman probes in a final reaction volume of 20 µL. PCR protocol included 2 min at 50 °C for UNG activation, 10 min at 95 °C followed by 40 cycles of 95 °C for 15 s and 60 °C for 60 s. Relative amounts of mRNAs to Rn18s were calculated as ∆∆CT from three independent repeats with duplicates (total n = 6).

4.4.3. Next Generation Sequencing (NGS) Using Illumina HiSeq 2500 RNA-seq

Differential gene expression was performed on mRNA extracted from Con-Ve, 10 nM E2 or 50 μM EPA treated cells at 48 h of differentiation. Transcripts were quantified, normalized and aligned against the Mus musculus genome database. The number of reads that were mapped to each known gene was summarized. A differential expression of genes (DEG) was used with "edgeR" (in R 3.5.0) to generate Log2FC (fold change) and significant differences (<0.05) represented by P and false discovery rate (FDR) for paired analyses of E2 vs. Con-Ve, EPA vs. Con-Ve and EPA vs. E2.
Gene ontology (GO) and gene functional category (GFC) analyses of upregulated and downregulated genes with Log2FC > 0.5 were performed using DAVID Bioinformatic (https://david.ncifcrf.gov) [60] followed by Pathway Enrichment (PE) analyses in Reactome (https://reactome.org) [61].

4.5. Statistical Analyses

All analyses within the study contained a total of three repeats with two replicates for each of the treatment groups (total n = 6). One- and two-way ANOVA were used to identify statistical differences associated with time and treatment, with p < 0.05 indicating significant differences for cell number, tube formation, fusion index and gene expression using the Holm–Sidak as post hoc test.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/1422-0067/21/3/745/s1.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, O.L.-K.; Methodology, O.L.-K. and D.M.C.; Investigation, O.L.-K. and D.M.C.; Resources, O.L.-K. and J.A.H.; Data Curation, O.L.-K., D.M.C. and J.A.H.; Writing—Original Draft Preparation, O.L.-K.; Writing, Review and Editing, O.L.-K., D.M.C. and J.A.H. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The study has been supported by ACURF2017, Australian Catholic University, to Orly Lacham-Kaplan.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Abbreviation

Akt1serine/threonine kinase 1
BSAbovine serum albumin
DAPI4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole
DMEMDulbecco’s modified eagle medium
DEGdigital expression of genes
E217β-estradiol
EPAeicosapentaenoic acid
ErαE2 receptor alpha
ErβE2 receptor beta
ERTestrogen-based hormone replacement therapy
FBS foetal bovine serum
FCfold change
FDRfalse discovery
GOgene ontology
GFCgene functional category
Gpr30G protein-coupled estrogen receptor-30
hhour
HRThormone replacement therapy
HShorse serum
Mapk11mitogen-activated protein kinase 11
Mrfsmyogenic regulatory factors
MyoDmyoblast determination protein
Myh1myosin heavy chain 1
Myogmyogenin
μLmicroliter
μMmicromolar
nMnanomolar
n-3PUFA3n polyunsaturated fatty acids
NGSnext generation sequencing
PEpathway enrichment
Pen/Streppenicillin/streptomycin
qPCRquantitative polymerase chain reaction
RNAribosomal nucleic acid
SCssatellite cells
Tmem8ctransmembrane protein 8C

References

  1. Dumont, N.A.; Bentzinger, C.F.; Sincennes, M.C.; Rudnicki, M.A. Satellite Cells and Skeletal Muscle Regeneration. Compr. Physiol. 2015, 5, 1027–1059. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Hernandez-Hernandez, J.M.; Garcia-Gonzalez, E.G.; Brun, C.E.; Rudnicki, M.A. The myogenic regulatory factors, determinants of muscle development, cell identity and regeneration. Semin. Cell Dev. Biol. 2017, 72, 10–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Zammit, P.S. Function of the myogenic regulatory factors Myf5, MyoD, Myogenin and MRF4 in skeletal muscle, satellite cells and regenerative myogenesis. Semin. Cell Dev. Biol. 2017, 72, 19–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. McKenna, C.; Fry, C. Altered satellite cell dynamics accompany skeletal muscle atrophy during chronic. Curr. Opin. Clin. Nutr. Metab. Care 2017, 20, 447–452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Laakkonen, E.K.; Soliymani, R.; Karvinen, S.; Kaprio, J.; Kujala, U.M.; Baumann, M.; Sipila, S.; Kovanen, V.; Lalowski, M. Estrogenic regulation of skeletal muscle proteome: a study of premenopausal women and postmenopausal MZ cotwins discordant for hormonal therapy. Aging Cell 2017, 16, 1276–1287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Qaisar, R.; Renaud, G.; Hedstrom, Y.; Pöllänen, E.; Ronkainen, P.; Kaprio, J.; Alen, M.; Sipilä, S.; Artemenko, K.; Bergquist, J. Hormone replacement therapy improves contractile function and myonuclear organization of single muscle fibres from postmenopausal monozygotic female twin pairs. J. Physiol. 2013, 591, 2333–2344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Tiidus, P.M.; Lowe, D.A.; Brown, M. Estrogen replacement and skeletal muscle: mechanisms and population health. J. Appl. Physiol. 2013, 115, 569–578. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Toivonen, M.H.; Pöllänen, E.; Ahtiainen, M.; Suominen, H.; Taaffe, D.R.; Cheng, S.; Takala, T.; Kujala, U.M.; Tammi, M.I.; Sipilä, S. OGT and OGA expression in postmenopausal skeletal muscle associates with hormone replacement therapy and muscle cross-sectional area. Exp. Gerontol. 2013, 48, 1501–1504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Mohseni, R.; Aliakbar, S.; Abdollahi, A.; Yekaninejad, M.S.; Maghbooli, Z.; Mirzaei, K. Relationship between major dietary patterns and sarcopenia among menopausal women. Aging Clin. Exp. Res. 2017, 29, 1241–1248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Dupont, J.; Dedeyne, L.; Dalle, S.; Koppo, K.; Gielen, E. The role of omega-3 in the prevention and treatment of sarcopenia. Aging Clin Exp Res 2019, 31, 825–836. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Rodacki, C.L.; Rodacki, A.L.; Pereira, G.; Naliwaiko, K.; Coelho, I.; Pequito, D.; Fernandes, L.C. Fish-oil supplementation enhances the effects of strength training in elderly women. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2012, 95, 428–436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Berio, E.; Divari, S.; Cucuzza, L.S.; Biolatti, B.; Cannizzo, F.T. 17β-estradiol upregulates oxytocin and the oxytocin receptor in C2C12 myotubes. PeerJ 2017, 5, e3124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  13. Galluzzo, P.; Rastelli, C.; Bulzomi, P.; Acconcia, F.; Pallottini, V.; Marino, M. 17β-Estradiol regulates the first steps of skeletal muscle cell differentiation via ER-α-mediated signals. Am. J. Physiol.-Cell Physiol. 2009, 297, C1249–C1262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Magee, P.; Pearson, S.; Allen, J. The omega-3 fatty acid, eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA), prevents the damaging effects of tumour necrosis factor (TNF)-alpha during murine skeletal muscle cell differentiation. Lipids Health Dis. 2008, 7, 24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  15. Murray, J.; Huss, J.M. Estrogen-related receptor α regulates skeletal myocyte differentiation via modulation of the ERK MAP kinase pathway. Am. J. Physiol.-Cell Physiol. 2011, 301, C630–C645. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  16. Saini, A.; Sharples, A.P.; Al-Shanti, N.; Stewart, C.E. Omega-3 fatty acid EPA improves regenerative capacity of mouse skeletal muscle cells exposed to saturated fat and inflammation. Biogerontology 2017, 18, 109–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Ghnaimawi, S.; Shelby, S.; Baum, J.; Huang, Y. Effects of eicosapentaenoic acid and docosahexaenoic acid on C2C12 cell adipogenesis and inhibition of myotube formation. Anim. Cells Syst. 2019, 23, 355–364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Go, G.-Y.; Lee, S.-J.; Jo, A.; Lee, J.-R.; Kang, J.-S.; Yang, M.; Bae, G.-U. Bisphenol A and estradiol impede myoblast differentiation through down-regulating Akt signaling pathway. Toxicol. Lett. 2018, 292, 12–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Hsueh, T.-Y.; Baum, J.I.; Huang, Y. Effect of eicosapentaenoic acid and docosahexaenoic acid on myogenesis and mitochondrial biosynthesis during murine skeletal muscle cell differentiation. Front. Nutr. 2018, 5, 15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Ogawa, M.; Yamaji, R.; Higashimura, Y.; Harada, N.; Ashida, H.; Nakano, Y.; Inui, H. 17β-estradiol represses myogenic differentiation by increasing ubiquitin-specific peptidase 19 through estrogen receptor α. J. Biol. Chem. 2011, 286, 41455–41465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Peng, Y.; Zheng, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Zhao, J.; Chang, F.; Lu, T.; Zhang, R.; Li, Q.; Hu, X.; Li, N. Different effects of omega-3 fatty acids on the cell cycle in C2C12 myoblast proliferation. Mol. Cell. Biochem. 2012, 367, 165–173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Zhang, J.; Xu, X.; Liu, Y.; Zhang, L.; Odle, J.; Lin, X.; Zhu, H.; Wang, X.; Liu, Y. EPA and DHA Inhibit Myogenesis and Downregulate the Expression of Muscle-related Genes in C2C12 Myoblasts. Genes 2019, 10, 64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  23. Hatae, J.; Takami, N.; Lin, H.; Honda, A.; Inoue, R. 17β-Estradiol-induced enhancement of estrogen receptor biosynthesis via MAPK pathway in mouse skeletal muscle myoblasts. J. Physiol. Sci. 2009, 59, 181–190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Stark, K.D.; Holub, B.J. Differential eicosapentaenoic acid elevations and altered cardiovascular disease risk factor responses after supplementation with docosahexaenoic acid in postmenopausal women receiving and not receiving hormone replacement therapy. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2004, 79, 765–773. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  25. Stark, K.D.; Park, E.J.; Maines, V.A.; Holub, B.J. Effect of a fish-oil concentrate on serum lipids in postmenopausal women receiving and not receiving hormone replacement therapy in a placebo-controlled, double-blind trial. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2000, 72, 389–394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Wander, R.C.; Du, S.-H.; Ketchum, S.O.; Rowe, K.E. Effects of interaction of RRR-alpha-tocopheryl acetate and fish oil on low-density-lipoprotein oxidation in postmenopausal women with and without hormone-replacement therapy. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 1996, 63, 184–193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Chen, Y.; Stegaev, V.; Kouri, V.P.; Sillat, T.; Chazot, P.L.; Stark, H.; Wen, J.G.; Konttinen, Y.T. Identification of histamine receptor subtypes in skeletal myogenesis. Mol. Med. Rep. 2015, 11, 2624–2630. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Henderson, C.A.; Gomez, C.G.; Novak, S.M.; Mi-Mi, L.; Gregorio, C.C. Overview of the muscle cytoskeleton. Compr. Physiol. 2017, 7, 891–944. [Google Scholar]
  29. Passey, S.L.; Bozinovski, S.; Vlahos, R.; Anderson, G.P.; Hansen, M.J. Serum amyloid A induces Toll-like receptor 2-dependent inflammatory cytokine expression and atrophy in C2C12 skeletal muscle myotubes. PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0146882. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Rall, J.A. What makes skeletal muscle striated? Discoveries in the endosarcomeric and exosarcomeric cytoskeleton. Adv. Physiol. Educ. 2018, 42, 672–684. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Lee, E.J.; Nam, J.H.; Choi, I. Fibromodulin modulates myoblast differentiation by controlling calcium channel. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2018, 503, 580–585. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Taetzsch, T.; Tenga, M.J.; Valdez, G. Muscle fibers secrete FGFBP1 to slow degeneration of neuromuscular synapses during aging and progression of ALS. J. Neurosci. 2017, 37, 70–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  33. Liu, Z.; Wang, C.; Liu, X.; Kuang, S. Shisa2 regulates the fusion of muscle progenitors. Stem Cell Res. 2018, 31, 31–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Runfola, V.; Sebastian, S.; Dilworth, F.J.; Gabellini, D. Rbfox proteins regulate tissue-specific alternative splicing of Mef2D required for muscle differentiation. J. Cell Sci. 2015, 128, 631–637. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  35. Lei, H.; Sun, Y.; Luo, Z.; Yourek, G.; Gui, H.; Yang, Y.; Su, D.-F.; Liu, X. Fatigue-induced orosomucoid 1 acts on CC chemokine receptor type 5 to enhance muscle endurance. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 18839. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. Shimba, S.; Wada, T.; Hara, S.; Tezuka, M. EPAS1 promotes adipose differentiation in 3T3-L1 cells. J. Biol. Chem. 2004, 279, 40946–40953. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Rebalka, I.A.; Monaco, C.M.; Varah, N.E.; Berger, T.; D’souza, D.M.; Zhou, S.; Mak, T.W.; Hawke, T.J. Loss of the adipokine lipocalin-2 impairs satellite cell activation and skeletal muscle regeneration. Am. J. Physiol.-Cell Physiol. 2018, 315, C714–C721. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Maffei, M.; Barone, I.; Scabia, G.; Santini, F. The multifaceted haptoglobin in the context of adipose tissue and metabolism. Endocr. Rev. 2016, 37, 403–416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Brandt, A.; Kania, J.; Reinholt, B.; Johnson, S. Human IL6 stimulates bovine satellite cell proliferation through a signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 (STAT3)-dependent mechanism. Domest. Anim. Endocrinol. 2018, 62, 32–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Muñoz-Cánoves, P.; Scheele, C.; Pedersen, B.K.; Serrano, A.L. Interleukin-6 myokine signaling in skeletal muscle: a double-edged sword? FEBS J. 2013, 280, 4131–4148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Bennett, A.M.; Tonks, N.K. Regulation of distinct stages of skeletal muscle differentiation by mitogen-activated protein kinases. Science 1997, 278, 1288–1291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Jones, N.C.; Fedorov, Y.V.; Rosenthal, R.S.; Olwin, B.B. ERK1/2 is required for myoblast proliferation but is dispensable for muscle gene expression and cell fusion. J. Cell. Physiol. 2001, 186, 104–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Millay, D.P.; Sutherland, L.B.; Bassel-Duby, R.; Olson, E.N. Myomaker is essential for muscle regeneration. Genes Dev. 2014, 28, 1641–1646. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  44. Weiss, A.; Leinwand, L.A. The mammalian myosin heavy chain gene family. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 1996, 12, 417–439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Eyster, K.M. The estrogen receptors: an overview from different perspectives. In Estrogen Receptors; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2016; pp. 1–10. [Google Scholar]
  46. Ronda, A.C.; Boland, R.L. Intracellular distribution and involvement of GPR30 in the actions of E2 on C2C12 cells. J. Cell. Biochem. 2016, 117, 793–805. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Ronda, A.C.; Buitrago, C.; Boland, R. Role of estrogen receptors, PKC and Src in ERK2 and p38 MAPK signaling triggered by 17β-estradiol in skeletal muscle cells. J. Steroid Biochem. Mol. Biol. 2010, 122, 287–294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Ronda, A.C.; Vasconsuelo, A.; Boland, R. 17β-estradiol protects mitochondrial functions through extracellular-signal-regulated kinase in C2C12 muscle cells. Cell. Physiol. Biochem. 2013, 32, 1011–1023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Cao, W.; Ma, Z.; Rasenick, M.M.; Yeh, S.; Yu, J. N-3 poly-unsaturated fatty acids shift estrogen signaling to inhibit human breast cancer cell growth. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e52838. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Brown, L.D. Endocrine regulation of fetal skeletal muscle growth: impact on future metabolic health. J. Endocr. 2014, 221, R13–R29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Berkane, N.; Liere, P.; Oudinet, J.-P.; Hertig, A.; Lefèvre, G.; Pluchino, N.; Schumacher, M.; Chabbert-Buffet, N. From pregnancy to preeclampsia: A key role for estrogens. Endocr. Rev. 2017, 38, 123–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Schock, H.; Zeleniuch-Jacquotte, A.; Lundin, E.; Grankvist, K.; Lakso, H.-Å.; Idahl, A.; Lehtinen, M.; Surcel, H.-M.; Fortner, R.T. Hormone concentrations throughout uncomplicated pregnancies: a longitudinal study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2016, 16, 146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Kawabata, T.; Kagawa, Y.; Kimura, F.; Miyazawa, T.; Saito, S.; Arima, T.; Nakai, K.; Yaegashi, N. Polyunsaturated Fatty Acid Levels in Maternal Erythrocytes of Japanese Women during Pregnancy and after Childbirth. Nutrients 2017, 9, 245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  54. Coletta, J.M.; Bell, S.J.; Roman, A.S. Omega-3 fatty acids and pregnancy. Rev. Obstet. Gynecol. 2010, 3, 163–171. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  55. Vahdaninia, M.; Mackenzie, H.; Dean, T.; Helps, S. The effectiveness of omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acid interventions during pregnancy on obesity measures in the offspring: an up-to-date systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur. J. Nutr. 2018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  56. Jones, M.L.; Mark, P.J.; Keelan, J.A.; Barden, A.; Mas, E.; Mori, T.A.; Waddell, B.J. Maternal dietary omega-3 fatty acid intake increases resolvin and protectin levels in the rat placenta. J. Lipid Res. 2013, 54, 2247–2254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  57. Yaffe, D.; Saxel, O. A myogenic cell line with altered serum requirements for differentiation. Differentiation 1977, 7, 159–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Guo, T.; Liu, W.; Konermann, A.; Gu, Z.; Cao, M.; Ding, Y. Estradiol modulates the expression pattern of myosin heavy chain subtypes via an ERalpha-mediated pathway in muscle-derived tissues and satellite cells. Cell. Physiol. Biochem. 2014, 33, 681–691. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Saiti, D.; Lacham-Kaplan, O. Density gradients for the isolation of germ cells from embryoid bodies. Reprod. Biomed. Online 2008, 16, 730–740. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Huang, D.W.; Sherman, B.T.; Zheng, X.; Yang, J.; Imamichi, T.; Stephens, R.; Lempicki, R.A. Extracting biological meaning from large gene lists with DAVID. Curr. Protoc. Bioinform. 2009, 27, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Fabregat, A.; Sidiropoulos, K.; Viteri, G.; Marin-Garcia, P.; Ping, P.; Stein, L.; D’Eustachio, P.; Hermjakob, H. Reactome diagram viewer: data structures and strategies to boost performance. Bioinformatics 2018, 34, 1208–1214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Ijms 21 00745 g001 550
Figure 1. Example of myotube immunofluorescence staining and overlap of Desmin and MYH staining at 120 h in-vitro derived C2C12 myotubes. (a) Phase-contrast 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (b) (DAPI), blue; (d) Desmin, green; (e) MYH, red; (c) Merged Phase and DAPI and (f) Merged Desmin and MYH. Nc, Nuclei; Db, debris. Images were taken by the EVOSII imaging system (Thermo Fisher) at ×20. Circles mark the same tube presented in phase-contrast and Desmin and MYH markers.
Figure 1. Example of myotube immunofluorescence staining and overlap of Desmin and MYH staining at 120 h in-vitro derived C2C12 myotubes. (a) Phase-contrast 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (b) (DAPI), blue; (d) Desmin, green; (e) MYH, red; (c) Merged Phase and DAPI and (f) Merged Desmin and MYH. Nc, Nuclei; Db, debris. Images were taken by the EVOSII imaging system (Thermo Fisher) at ×20. Circles mark the same tube presented in phase-contrast and Desmin and MYH markers.
Ijms 21 00745 g001
Ijms 21 00745 g002 550
Figure 2. Myotube immunofluorescence staining of C2C12 treated with control-vehicle (Con-Ve) (a,b); 17β-estradiol (E2) (c,d); eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) (e,f) and E2/EPA (g,h), at 48 and 120 h. Cultures were treated with anti-mouse Desmin followed by GFP secondary antibody (green) and nuclear DAPI (blue) staining. Images were taken by the EVOSII imaging system (Thermo Fisher) at ×20.
Figure 2. Myotube immunofluorescence staining of C2C12 treated with control-vehicle (Con-Ve) (a,b); 17β-estradiol (E2) (c,d); eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) (e,f) and E2/EPA (g,h), at 48 and 120 h. Cultures were treated with anti-mouse Desmin followed by GFP secondary antibody (green) and nuclear DAPI (blue) staining. Images were taken by the EVOSII imaging system (Thermo Fisher) at ×20.
Ijms 21 00745 g002
Ijms 21 00745 g003 550
Figure 3. Number of tubes in five microscopic fields at 48 and 120 h (a) and fusion index (b) following treatment of C2C12 with Con-Ve, E2, EPA and E2/EPA. Myotube formation and fusion index were higher in E2 treated cells than the other groups. (n = 3; a p < 0.01; b p < 0.001 between EPA or E2/EPA to control and E2 at the same time point) (±SEM).
Figure 3. Number of tubes in five microscopic fields at 48 and 120 h (a) and fusion index (b) following treatment of C2C12 with Con-Ve, E2, EPA and E2/EPA. Myotube formation and fusion index were higher in E2 treated cells than the other groups. (n = 3; a p < 0.01; b p < 0.001 between EPA or E2/EPA to control and E2 at the same time point) (±SEM).
Ijms 21 00745 g003
Ijms 21 00745 g004 550
Figure 4. Time-dependent expression of E2 receptors Gpr30, Erα and Erβ. The expression of Gpr30 and Erβ did not change at 0–24 h in all groups (a,e). Erα expression peaked at 1 h only in E2 treated cells followed by a decrease in expression at 6 and 24 h (c). The expression of Erα remained low for all other time points (d). The expression of Gpr30 and Erβ increased significantly at 120 h in both Con-Ve and E2 treated cells (b,f). (*, ** p < 0.001 compared to Con-Ve at the same time point). (±SEM).
Figure 4. Time-dependent expression of E2 receptors Gpr30, Erα and Erβ. The expression of Gpr30 and Erβ did not change at 0–24 h in all groups (a,e). Erα expression peaked at 1 h only in E2 treated cells followed by a decrease in expression at 6 and 24 h (c). The expression of Erα remained low for all other time points (d). The expression of Gpr30 and Erβ increased significantly at 120 h in both Con-Ve and E2 treated cells (b,f). (*, ** p < 0.001 compared to Con-Ve at the same time point). (±SEM).
Ijms 21 00745 g004
Ijms 21 00745 g005 550
Figure 5. Time-dependent expression of Mapk11 and Akt1 at 0–24 h and 0–120 h. Mapk11 expression peaked at 1 h only in E2 treated cells followed by a decrease in expression at all other time points (a,b). The expression of Akt1 was similar in all groups (c,d). (* p < 0.001 compared to Con-Ve at the same time point) (±SEM).
Figure 5. Time-dependent expression of Mapk11 and Akt1 at 0–24 h and 0–120 h. Mapk11 expression peaked at 1 h only in E2 treated cells followed by a decrease in expression at all other time points (a,b). The expression of Akt1 was similar in all groups (c,d). (* p < 0.001 compared to Con-Ve at the same time point) (±SEM).
Ijms 21 00745 g005
Ijms 21 00745 g006 550
Figure 6. Time-dependent expression of MyoD at 0–24 h and 0–120 h (a,b), myogenin (c), Myh1 (d) and Tmem8c (myomaker, e) at 0–120 h. Myod expression peaked slightly at 1 h in E2 treated cells. The expression of MyoD, myogenin and Myh1 and Tmem8c increased in Con-Ve and E2 treated cells, and at 120 h of treatment with no change in EPA or E2/EPA treated cells (* p < 0.01; ** p < 0.001 compared to Con-Ve at the same time point; ±SEM).
Figure 6. Time-dependent expression of MyoD at 0–24 h and 0–120 h (a,b), myogenin (c), Myh1 (d) and Tmem8c (myomaker, e) at 0–120 h. Myod expression peaked slightly at 1 h in E2 treated cells. The expression of MyoD, myogenin and Myh1 and Tmem8c increased in Con-Ve and E2 treated cells, and at 120 h of treatment with no change in EPA or E2/EPA treated cells (* p < 0.01; ** p < 0.001 compared to Con-Ve at the same time point; ±SEM).
Ijms 21 00745 g006
Ijms 21 00745 g007 550
Figure 7. Paired analyses of heatmaps of the top 50 differentially expressed genes (DEG) and glimma plots of genes following Illumina HiSeq 2500 RNA-seq. Differences were greater between E2 and EPA treated cells than with Con-Ve. Con-Ve, green; E2, orange; EPA, light purple. Expression levels are marked from lowest (blue) to highest (red). Red dots in glimma plots represent significant differences (≥0.05) in false discovery rate (FDR) values.
Figure 7. Paired analyses of heatmaps of the top 50 differentially expressed genes (DEG) and glimma plots of genes following Illumina HiSeq 2500 RNA-seq. Differences were greater between E2 and EPA treated cells than with Con-Ve. Con-Ve, green; E2, orange; EPA, light purple. Expression levels are marked from lowest (blue) to highest (red). Red dots in glimma plots represent significant differences (≥0.05) in false discovery rate (FDR) values.
Ijms 21 00745 g007
Ijms 21 00745 g008 550
Figure 8. The 10 most significantly enriched pathways for upregulated (a,c,e)- and downregulated (b,d,f) genes with Log2FC > 0.5 comparing E2 vs. Con-Ve (a,b), EPA vs. Con-Ve (c,d) and EPA vs. E2 (e,f). Pathway enrichment analyses were performed using DAVID Bioinformatic (https://david.ncifcrf.gov) followed by identification in Reactome (https://reactome.org).
Figure 8. The 10 most significantly enriched pathways for upregulated (a,c,e)- and downregulated (b,d,f) genes with Log2FC > 0.5 comparing E2 vs. Con-Ve (a,b), EPA vs. Con-Ve (c,d) and EPA vs. E2 (e,f). Pathway enrichment analyses were performed using DAVID Bioinformatic (https://david.ncifcrf.gov) followed by identification in Reactome (https://reactome.org).
Ijms 21 00745 g008
Ijms 21 00745 g009 550
Figure 9. Paired analyses of differentially expressed genes in the myogenic pathway. The majority of the myogenic pathway genes were not differently expressed in E2 treated cells compared to Con-Ve (a). Similar genes in EPA treated cells had significantly lower expression compared to Con-Ve (b) or E2 treated cells (c) (* p < 0.05–0.001 between treatments).
Figure 9. Paired analyses of differentially expressed genes in the myogenic pathway. The majority of the myogenic pathway genes were not differently expressed in E2 treated cells compared to Con-Ve (a). Similar genes in EPA treated cells had significantly lower expression compared to Con-Ve (b) or E2 treated cells (c) (* p < 0.05–0.001 between treatments).
Ijms 21 00745 g009
Table
Table 1. Expression profile of striated muscle contraction pathway genes.
Table 1. Expression profile of striated muscle contraction pathway genes.
Gene NameE2 vs. Con-VeEPA vs. Cont-VeEPA vs. E2
logFCp ValueFDRlogFCp ValueFDRlogFCp ValueFDR
Acta1actin, alpha 1, skeletal muscle0.560.0480.606−2.111 × 1050.0004−2.671 × 1060.0001
Acta2actin, alpha 2, smooth muscle, aorta0.350.0340.566−0.3280.0450.1138−0.680.00080.006
Actc1actin, alpha, cardiac muscle 10.660.0240.551−2.532 × 1060.0001−3.194 × 1074 × 105
Actg1actin, gamma, cytoplasmic 1−0.020.8310.985−0.490.00050.005−0.470.00060.005
Actn2actinin alpha 20.920.0010.364−2.294 × 1060.0002−3.221 × 1072 × 105
Actn3actinin alpha 30.240.0290.557−1.106 × 1069 × 105−1.351 × 1072 × 105
Actn4actinin alpha 40.050.3520.886−0.360.00010.002−0.423 × 1050.0007
Casq2calsequestrin 20.530.0340.566−2.431 × 1060.0001−2.972 × 1073 × 105
DesDesmin0.030.7050.977−0.525 × 1050.001−0.5510 × 1030.0007
Jsrp1junctional sarcoplasmic reticulum protein 10.170.3250.877−0.690.0010.014−0.860.00040.003
Mybpc1myosin binding protein C, slow-type1.160.00020.226−1.050.0010.013−2.213 × 1060.0001
Mybpc2myosin binding protein C, fast-type0.670.1280.740−2.230.0020.017−2.910.00030.003
Myh1myosin, heavy polypeptide 1, skeletal muscle, adult0.950.00060.300−2.002 × 1020.0001−2.969 × 1092 × 105
Myh3myosin, heavy polypeptide 3, skeletal muscle, embryonic0.600.0160.529−3.217 × 1083 × 105−3.8281 × 1081 × 105
Myh4myosin, heavy polypeptide 4, skeletal muscle0.996 × 1050.183−0.550.0050.029−1.551 × 1060.0001
Myh6myosin, heavy polypeptide 6, cardiac muscle, alpha1.100.00010.183−1.692 × 1050.0008−2.792 × 1073 × 105
Myh7myosin, heavy polypeptide 7, cardiac muscle, beta0.930.00040.262−1.340.00050.006−2.158 × 1060.0002
Myh8myosin, heavy polypeptide 8, skeletal muscle, perinatal1.180.00060.295−2.211 × 1050.0004−3.392 × 1073 × 105
Myl1myosin, light polypeptide 10.500.0350.566−0.830.0020.016−1.348 × 1050.001
Myl4myosin, light polypeptide 40.610.0470.604−1.740.00010.002−2.361 × 1050.0003
Myl9myosin, light polypeptide 9, regulatory0.090.6610.971−0.900.0020.016−1.000.0010.008
Myom1myomesin 10.520.0210.539−2.002 × 1060.0001−2.523 × 1074 × 105
Myom2myomesin 20.170.1380.754−0.861 × 1050.0005−1.032 × 1060.0001
NebNebulin0.400.0360.566−2.024 × 1078 × 105−2.429 × 1082 × 105
Smpxsmall muscle protein, X-linked0.490.0470.604−1.674 × 1050.001−2.164 × 1060.0002
Tcaptitin-cap0.870.0310.561−0.590.1690.285−1.470.0030.015
Tmod1tropomodulin 10.540.0080.482−0.840.00050.005−1.381 × 1050.0003
Tnnc1troponin C, cardiac/slow skeletal0.510.0600.624−1.430.00020.003−1.941 × 1050.0004
Tnnc2troponin C2, fast0.510.0720.646−1.727 × 1050.001−2.239 × 1060.0003
Tnni1troponin I, skeletal, slow 10.490.0680.639−1.902 × 1050.0007−2.403 × 1060.0001
Tnni2troponin I, skeletal, fast 20.390.1870.800−1.650.00010.003−2.053 × 1050.0007
Tnni3troponin I, cardiac 30.270.4570.918−0.900.050.129−1.180.0150.050
Tnnt1troponin T1, skeletal, slow0.320.1460.764−1.310.00010.002−1.641 × 1050.0004
Tnnt2troponin T2, cardiac0.290.2680.855−1.972 × 1050.0007−2.277 × 1060.0002
Tnnt3troponin T3, skeletal, fast0.390.1520.769−1.630.00010.001−2.0251 × 1050.0004
Tpm1tropomyosin 1, alpha0.130.1390.756−0.360.0010.009−0.490.00010.001
Tpm2tropomyosin 2, beta0.330.0610.629−0.680.0010.012−1.028 × 1050.001
Tpm3tropomyosin 3, gamma−0.090.3420.885−0.420.0010.009−0.330.0050.023
Tpm4tropomyosin 4−0.080.2990.868−0.140.0720.157−0.060.380.506
Ttntitin0.190.1520.769−1.174 × 1060.0002−1.371 × 1067E-05
Vimvimetin0.090.4190.904−0.030.7280.810−0.130.2580.381

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Lacham-Kaplan, O.; Camera, D.M.; Hawley, J.A. Divergent Regulation of Myotube Formation and Gene Expression by E2 and EPA during In-Vitro Differentiation of C2C12 Myoblasts. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 745. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21030745

AMA Style

Lacham-Kaplan O, Camera DM, Hawley JA. Divergent Regulation of Myotube Formation and Gene Expression by E2 and EPA during In-Vitro Differentiation of C2C12 Myoblasts. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2020; 21(3):745. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21030745

Chicago/Turabian Style

Lacham-Kaplan, Orly, Donny M. Camera, and John A. Hawley. 2020. "Divergent Regulation of Myotube Formation and Gene Expression by E2 and EPA during In-Vitro Differentiation of C2C12 Myoblasts" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 21, no. 3: 745. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21030745

APA Style

Lacham-Kaplan, O., Camera, D. M., & Hawley, J. A. (2020). Divergent Regulation of Myotube Formation and Gene Expression by E2 and EPA during In-Vitro Differentiation of C2C12 Myoblasts. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 21(3), 745. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21030745

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop