Next Article in Journal
Similarities in the General Chemical Composition of Colon Cancer Cells and Their Microvesicles Investigated by Spectroscopic Methods-Potential Clinical Relevance
Next Article in Special Issue
Heterologous Expression of Nitrate Assimilation Related-Protein DsNAR2.1/NRT3.1 Affects Uptake of Nitrate and Ammonium in Nitrogen-Starved Arabidopsis
Previous Article in Journal
A Meta-Analysis of Multiple Whole Blood Gene Expression Data Unveils a Diagnostic Host-Response Transcript Signature for Respiratory Syncytial Virus
Previous Article in Special Issue
Overexpression of OsPIN2 Regulates Root Growth and Formation in Response to Phosphate Deficiency in Rice
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
IJMS
Volume 21
Issue 5
10.3390/ijms21051824
ijms-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

The Role of Gibberellins in Regulation of Nitrogen Uptake and Physiological Traits in Maize Responding to Nitrogen Availability

by
Yubin Wang
1,
Qingqing Yao
1,
Yushi Zhang
1,
Yuexia Zhang
1,
Jiapeng Xing
1,
Benzhou Yang
1,
Guohua Mi
2,
Zhaohu Li
1,3 and
Mingcai Zhang
1,*
1
State Key Laboratory of Plant Physiology and Biochemistry, Engineering Research Center of Plant Growth Regulator, Ministry of Education, College of Agronomy and Biotechnology, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China
2
College of Resources and Environmental Science, Department of Plant Nutrition, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China
3
Center for Crop Functional Genomics and Molecular Breeding, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21(5), 1824; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21051824
Submission received: 19 January 2020 / Revised: 24 February 2020 / Accepted: 3 March 2020 / Published: 6 March 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Plant Nutrition: Physiological and Metabolic Responses, Molecular Mechanisms and Chromatin Modifications)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Modified gibberellin (GA) signaling leads to semi-dwarfism with low nitrogen (N) use efficiency (NUE) in crops. An understanding of GA-mediated N uptake is essential for the development of crops with improved NUE. The function of GA in modulating N uptake capacity and nitrate (NO3−) transporters (NRTs) was analyzed in the GA synthesis-deficient mutant zmga3ox grown under low (LN) and sufficient (SN) N conditions. LN significantly suppressed the production of GA1, GA3, and GA4, and the zmga3ox plants showed more sensitivity in shoots as well as LN stress. Moreover, the higher anthocyanin accumulation and the decrease of chlorophyll content were also recorded. The net NO3− fluxes and 15N content were decreased in zmga3ox plants under both LN and SN conditions. Exogenous GA3 could restore the NO3− uptake in zmga3ox plants, but uniconazole repressed NO3− uptake. Moreover, the transcript levels of ZmNRT2.1/2.2 were downregulated in zmga3ox plants, while the GA3 application enhanced the expression level. Furthermore, the RNA-seq analyses identified several transcription factors that are involved in the GA-mediated transcriptional operation of NRTs related genes. These findings revealed that GAs influenced N uptake involved in the transcriptional regulation of NRTs and physiological responses in maize responding to nitrogen supply.

1. Introduction

Gibberellins (GAs) are phytohormones containing a tetracyclic diterpenoid structure that controls diverse aspects of plant growth and development in higher plants in response to environmental stimuli [1,2]. GA biosynthesis is catalyzed by a series of key enzymes, among which GA 20-oxidase (GA20ox) and GA 3-oxidase (GA3ox) are involved in the synthesis of bioactive GAs, and its deactivation is catalyzed by GA 2-oxidase (GA2ox) [1]. Mutations in GA biosynthesis genes (GA20ox and GA3ox) decrease the levels of endogenous GAs and lead to dwarfism, whereas exogenous GA treatment can restore normal growth [3,4]. DELLA proteins (DELLAs) are the major component in the GA signaling pathway. GAs promote plant growth by stimulating the degradation of the growth-repressing DELLAs [5]. Most importantly, dwarfism in rice and wheat cultivars was selected for enhancing global food production during the “green revolution”. These dwarfing characteristics were modulated by changing the GA metabolic and signaling pathways [6]. For instance, the mutant wheats Rht-B1b and Rht-D1b, encoding DELLAs, were resistant to GA-induced loss of semi-dominant GA-insensitive dwarfism [7], while the rice semidwarf−1 (sd−1) gene was defective in GA 20-oxidase, leading to a decline in the bioactive GA abundance [8,9], which increased the accumulation of the DELLA protein SLR1 (Slender Rice1) [10].
Previous studies have demonstrated that GA plays essential roles in many aspects of the adaptation of plant growth during the nutrient-deficiency stresses. In Arabidopsis, phosphate (Pi) starvation enhanced the accumulation of DELLAs in the roots, and DELLA-mediated signaling contributed to the anthocyanin accumulation [11]. Moreover, low Pi induced the expression of high-affinity Pi transporters, which are impaired in the tomato GA biosynthetic mutant gib3 [12]. In addition, low potassium (K) promoted the accumulation of DELLA protein in the root, and the expression of high-affinity potassium transporter 5 (AtHAK5) was repressed in mutant gai−1, which reduced K uptake and decreased K deprivation tolerance [13]. Li et al. reported that a rice transcription factor (growth-regulation factor; OsGRF4) positively regulated N use, and an antagonistic relationship between OsGRF4 and DELLA protein OsSLR1 was maintained, which coordinated the plant growth and N metabolism [10]. DELLAs interact with anthocyanin pigmentation 1 (PAP1) to upregulate the expression of anthocyanin biosynthetic related genes under N deficiency [14]. However, the mechanism of N uptake and its allocation by GAs in crops subjected to different N level conditions is yet to be known.
It was reported that exogenous GA3 enhanced N use efficiency (NUE) in mustard, tomato, and cucumber [15,16,17]. In contrast, a decrease in N uptake was observed in mutant sd1 and Rht alleles [10]. Thus, sd1 reduced the rate of ammonium (NH4+) uptake and modulated N-responsive regulation in rice. A similar phenomenon was observed during the nitrate (NO3−) uptake in mutant wheat Rht-B1b plants [10]. Consequently, the dwarfism was the reason for more N fertilizer to be applied for higher yield during the “green revolution”, which resulted in lower NUE in crop production [6,18]. Plant NUE is inherently complex, and it is important to understand the function and regulation of the key components involved in N uptake, translocation, assimilation, and remobilization [19]. In consequence, GA signaling regulates the N uptake in crops, and it is necessary to enhance NUE for the development of new GA-insensitive dwarfing varieties [20]. Accordingly, it is essential to explore the physiological and molecular aspects of GAs in regulating N uptake and allocation in plants.
Maize is an important crop worldwide that is cultivated in aerobic soils. It requires a high amount of N fertilizer [21], and NUE has been the major limitation in the past 50 years [22]. It is essential to verify the physiological and molecular mechanisms in maize for breeding the N-efficient cultivars [23]. In general, nitrate is the major form of N source in aerobic soils [24], and NO3− transporters (NRTs) assist in NO3− uptake and its utilization throughout the lifecycle of plants [25,26]. Moreover, plant NO3− uptake generally involves low-affinity transport systems (LATS) and high-affinity transport systems (HATS). LATS and HATS have been associated with the NPF/NRT1 and NRT2 families (including NRT2.1 and NRT2.2), respectively [25]. Moreover, the expression of primary NPF (nitrate transporter1/peptide transporter family) genes, NPF6.3 and NRT2.1, can be regulated by auxin, ethylene, and cytokinin, which influence N uptake [27]. Low N reduces GA synthesis and represses plant growth. Exogenous GA3 can restore plant growth in maize even when subjected to low N supply [28]. Although modulating the action of GA can alter N uptake and allocation, little is known about how GA regulates N uptake in crops.
The aim of the present research is to investigate the role of GAs in the regulation of physiological responses to N supply in maize. The GA synthesis deficient mutant zmga3ox was constructed and combined with exogenous GA3 and uniconazole (an inhibitor of GA biosynthesis, Ucz) for analyzing N uptake under LN and SN conditions. Moreover, GA-mediated NO3− uptake was evaluated by using the non-invasive micro-test (NMT) and the 15N labeling technique. Furthermore, an RNA-seq assay was conducted to investigate the role of GAs in modulating N uptake at the transcript profiles. Thereby, the present study demonstrates the role of the GA in regulating the physiological responses in maize in correspondence to N supply.

2. Results

2.1. Characterization of zmga3ox Mutant in Maize

The GA3ox enzymes participate in the synthesis of bioactive GAs and catalyze the conversion of GA9 to bioactive GA4 and GA20 to GA1 and GA3 (Figure 1a). In order to verify the role of GAs in response to N supply in maize, the knockout mutants were generated using a type II CRISPR-Cas9 system [29]. A knockout mutant named zmga3ox was obtained, which conferred a 34-bp deletion causing a frameshift in ZmGA3ox (Figure 1b–d). Compared to the wild-type plant, the expression level of ZmGA3ox was hardly detected in the shoots and roots of zmga3ox plant (Figure S1). Meanwhile, the zmga3ox plant displayed growth inhibition, and exogenous GA3 could restore normal growth (Figure 1e). The concentrations of GA1, GA3, and GA4 in zmga3ox plant were significantly lower than those in wild-type plants (Figure 1f). Also, the zmga3ox plant had greater levels of GA9 and GA20 compared to the wild-type (Figure 1g). These results suggest that zmga3ox is an endogenous GA-defective mutant.

2.2. GAs Altered the Anthocyanin Accumulation and Chlorophyll Content in Leaves in Response to NO3− Supply

The anthocyanin and chlorophyll contents were determined in wild-type and zmga3ox seedlings by growing in LN and SN solutions with or without GA3 and Ucz. The zmga3ox plants were more sensitive to LN supply than the wild-type plant, and also the zmga3ox leaves were more purple. As expected, the GA3-treated leaves were less purple, but Ucz strengthened such effect. Moreover, the application of GA3 and Ucz had no effect on the anthocyanin accumulation under the SN condition (Figure 2a). LN significantly enhanced the accumulation of the anthocyanin in zmga3ox leaves, and the anthocyanin content was increased by 3-fold under the LN condition (Figure 2b). In addition, the chlorophyll content was decreased in zmga3ox leaves compared to the wild-type leaves under LN condition, and exogenous GA3 increased the chlorophyll content in both wild-type and zmga3ox leaves; however, Ucz treatment slightly decreased the chlorophyll content in both wild-type and zmga3ox leaves (Figure 2c). GA3 treatment declined the chlorophyll content in zmga3ox leaves under SN condition, while Ucz treatment enhanced the chlorophyll content. In addition, the photosynthetic rate, leaf areas, and O2− production rate were also measured in the wild-type and zmga3ox leaves treated with or without GA3 application. The zmga3ox leaves showed higher the photosynthetic rate than the wild-type leaves, while the photosynthetic rate was decreased by GA3 treatment (Figure S2a). Moreover, the leaf areas of the zmga3ox plants were significantly less than those of the wild-type plants (Figure S2b). Furthermore, the O2− production rate in zmga3ox leaves showed slightly lower than that in wild-type leaves (Figure S2c).

2.3. Supply of NO3− Modulated the Transcript Expression of GA Biosynthesis- and Metabolism-Related Genes

In order to understand the role of GAs in maize corresponding to NO3− supply, the content of GA1, GA3, and GA4 was determined by using the HPLC–MS/MS method. LN significantly decreased the content of GA1, GA3, and GA4 in roots as compared to SN (Figure 3a). The GA1 content could not be detected in the roots under the LN condition, while the GA3 and GA4 levels were lower under LN condition than those under the SN condition. The expression levels of ent-kaurene synthase genes ZmKS2 and ZmKS4 in GA biosynthesis pathway were significantly downregulated by LN in comparison to SN (Figure 3b). Similarly, LN significantly decreased the expression levels of ZmGA20ox1 and ZmGA20ox4 (Figure 3c). LN enhanced the expression levels of catabolic genes ZmGA2ox1, ZmGA2ox5, ZmGA2ox6, ZmGA2ox7, and ZmGA2ox12 (Figure 3d). The GA3 contents, as well as the expression of genes encoding enzymes of GA metabolism, were also determined in the zmga3ox mutant. As shown in Figure S3, the levels of GA3 were less under LN condition than those under the SN condition (Figure S3a). LN significantly down-regulated the expression levels of GA biosynthetic enzyme genes ZmKS2, ZmKS4, ZmGA20ox1, and ZmGA20ox4 (Figure S3b,c). Inversely, LN enhanced the expression levels of catabolic enzyme genes ZmGA2ox1, ZmGA2ox5, ZmGA2ox6, ZmGA2ox7, and ZmGA2ox12 (Figure S3d). The results indicated that LN caused a reduction in the bioactive GAS levels in roots by regulating the transcripts encoding GA 20-oxidases and GA 2-oxidases.

2.4. GAs Involved in Manipulating the NO3− Uptake

In order to characterize the function of GAs in regulating the N uptake, the net NO3− fluxes were measured by using the NMT technique in wild-type and zmga3ox roots. As shown in Figure 4a, the uptake of NO3− was evidently decreased in zmga3ox root compared to wild-type under SN and LN conditions. The mean NO3− fluxes were lower by 266% and 23.8% in zmga3ox root than wild-type under SN and LN conditions, respectively (Figure 4b). Moreover, LN repressed the 15N content in both wild-type and zmga3ox roots. The amount of 15N in zmga3ox roots was less than that in the wild-type roots under LN and SN conditions (Figure 4c). LN reduced the N content in root and shoot, and the zmga3ox plants had less N content than the wild-type plants under LN and SN conditions (Figure 4d). The N contents in zmga3ox root and shoot were less by 89.5% and 77.2% than those in wild-type under LN condition, and similar results were recorded for SN.
In order to further investigate the role of GAs in the regulation of N uptake, exogenous GA3 and Ucz were applied. GA3 treatment could increase the amount of 15N in wild-type and zmga3ox plants (Figure 4e). On the other hand, Ucz treatment significantly decreased the amount of 15N in wild-type and zmga3ox plants. The combined GA3 and Ucz treatments restored the amount of 15N in Ucz-treated plants while decreased that in GA3-treated plants.
To clarify the effects of GA on N uptake whether derived from differences in plant growth and nutritional status, the dry weight and total N content in the wild-type and zmga3ox plants were analyzed under LN or SN condition. Although the dry weight of shoots and roots were lower in zmga3ox plants than the wild-type plants under both LN and SN conditions, the inhibition rate of LN to SN in dry biomass of shoot or root presented no significant difference between wild-type and zmga3ox plants (Figure S4a–d). Similarly, the zmga3ox plants had lower total N content in shoots and roots compared to the wild-type plants. However, the inhibition rate of LN to SN in total N content of shoot or root showed significant difference between wild-type and zmga3ox plants (Figure S4e–h).

2.5. GAs Modulated the Transcript Expression of NO3− Uptake-Related Genes

In order to ascertain the mechanism of GA affecting the N uptake, the expression levels of NO3− uptake-related genes were detected in wild-type and zmga3ox roots subjected to SN and LN. As shown in Figure 5, the expression levels of ZmNRT2.1 and ZmNRT2.2 in zmga3ox roots were lower than those of wild-type roots under LN and SN conditions (Figure 5a,b). The transcript expression of ZmNRTs was also detected in the GA3-treated wild-type and zmga3ox plants. GA3 treatment could significantly enhance the expression levels of ZmNRT2.1 and ZmNRT2.2 in wild-type and zmga3ox plants under LN and SN conditions. Meanwhile, LN downregulated the expression of ZmNPF6.3b in wild-type and zmga3ox roots, while the expression level of ZmNPF6.3a showed no significant difference between wild-type and zmga3ox roots (Figure 5c). The zmga3ox root had higher expression levels of ZmNPF6.3b than the wild-type root under the LN condition (Figure 5d). In addition, the expression levels of ZmNPF6.3a and ZmNPF6.3b showed no significant difference in GA3-treated both wild-type and zmga3ox plants under both LN and SN conditions.

2.6. RNA-Sequencing Revealed Differentially Expressed Genes (DEGs) in the Wild-Type and zmga3ox Plants in Response to NO3− Supply

In order to gain molecular insights into the roles of GAs in the regulation of N uptake, the RNA-seq assay was conducted. This helped identify the differentially expressed genes (DEGs) in the wild-type and zmga3ox roots at 12, 60, and 108 h after the LN or SN treatment. The statistics of the clean reads in the RNA-seq are shown in Table S1. A total of 3054 DEGs were identified after filtering with a threshold of |log2FC| ≥ 1 under the FDR (false discovery rate) <0.05 (Table S2). The Venn diagrams showed the number of DEGs in different samples. A greater number of DEGs were downregulated compared to the number of upregulated DEGs under both the LN and SN conditions. Furthermore, a greater number of DEGs were identified under the SN treatment compared to the LN treatment. The samples collected after 108 h showed the maximum number of DEGs under the LN as well as SN conditions (Figure 6a). Besides, the heat map suggested that the level of change (fold change) in the expression of these DEGs was higher after 60 and 108 h than that after the 12 h treatment (Figure S5).
The GO (Gene Ontology) database and KEGG (Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes) enrichment analysis were employed to investigate the function of the 3054 DEGs and to understand the regulatory pathways that respond to the N supply in the zmga3ox mutant (Tables S3 and S4). The biosynthesis of phenylpropanoid and secondary metabolites was highly enriched in these DEGs (Figure 6b and Table S4). Moreover, the KEGG analysis revealed that the most significantly enriched pathway was the N-metabolism pathway, and this included the genes related to the NO3− transporter, NO3− reductase, and glutamate synthase (Figure 6b and Table S4). Thus, three NPF/NRT1 genes were downregulated, including ZmNPF6.2a, ZmNPF6.4, and ZmNPF7.3a. On the contrary, the expression of ZmNPF6.3b was upregulated under LN condition, and the expression of ZmNPF6.3d was upregulated under both LN as well as SN conditions (Figure 6c and Table S5). Also, two ZmNRT2s genes were identified and these ZmNRT2.1 and ZmNRT2.2 genes were downregulated. Moreover, the ZmNRT3.1a and ZmNRT3.1b genes also showed downregulated expression (Figure 6c and Table S5). The other eight important DEGs were identified as the N assimilation-related genes, including ZmNIA1, ZmNIA2, ZmGln2, ZmGln1, ZmNIR1, ZmNIA3, ZmGOGAT1 and the NH4+ transporter gene ZmAMT1.1b (Figure 6d and Table S5); most of these important DEGs were downregulated in the zmga3ox plants.
In order to further investigate the role of GAs in the transcript regulation of N uptake and assimilation, the transcripts of the important DEGs involved in this process were evaluated by the RT-qPCR analysis. As expected, all the selected genes had similar expression patterns in the RNA-seq results (Figure 7 and Table S5). LN decreased the expression levels of ZmNRT2.1 and ZmNRT2.2 compared to SN at 60 and 108 h after treatment, and the expression levels of ZmNRT2.1 and ZmNRT2.2 in the zmga3ox plant were lower than those in the wild-type plant, except for 12 h after LN treatment (Figure 7a,b). Similar trends were observed in the expression of ZmNPF6.4 under SN condition (Figure 7c). However, the expression levels of ZmNPF7.3a were upregulated by LN compared to that by SN, and the zmga3ox plant showed lower expression levels of ZmNPF7.3a than the wild-type plant after 60 and 108 h of the LN or SN treatments (Figure 7d). Inversely, LN significantly downregulated the expression levels of ZmNPF6.3b compared to SN, and the expression levels of ZmNPF6.3b in the zmga3ox plant were higher than those in the wild-type plant after 60 and 108 h of the LN treatment (Figure 7e). Meanwhile, the LN treatment downregulated the expression levels of ZmGOGAT1 and ZmNIR1 compared to the SN treatment, and the expression levels of ZmGOGAT1 and ZmNIR1 in the zmga3ox plant were lower than those in the wild-type plant at 60 and 108 h after the LN and SN treatments (Figure S6a,b). Similarly, the expression of ZmGln1 and ZmNIA1 was repressed at 60 and 108 h after the LN treatment, while the zmga3ox plant showed downregulated trend of ZmGln1 and ZmNIA1 than the wild-type plant (Figure S6c,d). Correspondingly, LN reduced the activities of nitrate reductase (NR) and glutamine synthase (GS); the activities of NR and GS in the zmga3ox plant were significantly lower than those in the wild-type plant (Figure S7).

2.7. Transcription Factors Involved in GA-Mediated NO3− Uptake

The transcriptional control of NO3− uptake is well-documented over the past decade, in which transcription factors (TFs) play an important regulatory role [30]. The RNA-seq analysis revealed that a total of 287 important DEGs were identified as TFs (Table S6). To predict the targets of transcriptional regulation, the TF-binding sites were predicted from the putative promoter sequences (2 kb upstream from the transcriptional start site) of the nine identified nitrate transporter genes. As shown in Figure 8a and Table S7, 25 TFs were predicted to be involved in the regulation of nitrate transporter genes. The number of binding sites of the MYB, WRKY, and ERF families was the greatest, followed by the LBD, TCP, and bZIP family TFs.
In order to investigate the potential correlations between the DEGs, a weighted-genes co-expression network analysis (WGCNA) was performed with the 3054 DEGs. As shown in Figure 8b, the genes related to nitrate transport were clustered along with the TFs displaying a predicted potential interaction into different colored modules; the genes with the same color suggest a strong co-expression relationship. For instance, ZmNRT2.1 and ZmNRT2.2 strongly co-expressed with ZmMYB14/24/37/48, ZmEREB93, ZmWRKY22, ZmHSF18, and ZmHB107. Thereafter, ZmTCP33, ZmLBD24, ZmbZIP160, ZmWRKY34, ZmERF98, and ZmMYB41 were selected for the RT–qPCR assay. The expression patterns of these genes showed a similar trend with the RNA-seq data. On the contrary, the expression levels of these TFs showed a downregulated trend in the zmga3ox plants under the LN and SN conditions, except for ZmbZIP160, which showed a marked upregulation (Figure 9). These results suggest that the GA-mediated N-uptake could occur by the transcriptional regulation of the expression of the ZmNRTs.

3. Discussion

The manipulation of the GA biosynthetic and signaling genes can modulate the plant stature and lead to a “green revolution” in the cereal crops [7,8]. However, the dwarfism contributed by the GA-related mutants occurs a lower NUE in rice and wheat production [6,18]. Actually, the mutant sd1 rice plants show a lower NH4+ uptake rate than the wild-type plants, and a lower 15NO3− uptake is also observed in the mutant Rht-B1b wheat plants [10]. In the present study, a mutant maize zmga3ox was constructed and these plants showed the dwarfed phenotype, while the addition of exogenous GA3 could restore normal growth (Figure 1). Moreover, the mutant zmga3ox plants presented significantly lower NO3− fluxes and 15NO3− uptake, which could be restored by exogenous GA3 (Figure 4). These results suggest that the N uptake was decreased by the GA deficiency in maize plant, and GA accumulation might affect the maize plant for the adaptation to the N supply in the soil. Although the zmga3ox plants had less dry weight of shoots and roots than the wild-type plants, GA deficiency could not change the inhibition rate of LN to SN in the plant growth compared to the wild-type plants (Figure S4a–d). However, the inhibition rate of LN to SN in the N content was significantly modulated by GA deficiency (Figure S4e–h). These indicate that GA deficiency could not change the effects of NO3−-mediated plant growth, while it might have a significant effect on N uptake in maize exposed to LN or SN conditions.
Anthocyanin accumulation is a typical characteristic of N starvation, and GAs regulate the N deficiency-induced anthocyanin accumulation in Arabidopsis or tomato [11,12,14]. Meanwhile, low anthocyanin content in leaves is observed under normal N or Pi condition, and GA3 application exhibits little effects on anthocyanin accumulation. Similar results were observed in this study, where LN significantly induced anthocyanin accumulation in the zmga3ox plants, and this phenomenon could be weakened by GA3 treatment (Figure 2). Furthermore, GA deficiency had a slight effect on anthocyanin accumulation under SN condition. These results suggest that GA signals are involved in altering the LN-induced anthocyanin accumulation in maize. Meanwhile, the zmga3ox leaves showed higher the photosynthetic rate and chlorophyll concentration than the wild-type leaves (Figure 2c and Figure S2a); however, the leaf areas of the zmga3ox plant were significantly less than those of the wild-type plant (Figure S2b), which mainly caused low plant growth in the zmga3ox plant (Figure S4a). Contrary to the anthocyanin accumulation, LN significantly decreased the chlorophyll content and N content in the zmga3ox plants. Thus, the zmga3ox plants presented a significant difference in N content compared to the wild-type plants (Figure S4). Combined with these results, it was possible that NO3− supply modulated the N accumulation for affecting the anthocyanin accumulation and chlorophyll content in the zmga3ox leaves. In addition, the anthocyanin accumulation is closely associated with the activities of the antioxidant enzyme system in tobacco [31], and higher anthocyanin concentration can decrease ROS accumulation in potato leaves [32]. Here, the O2− content in zmga3ox leaves slightly lower than that in wild-type leaves, while it showed a little higher than the anthocyanin content under SN condition (Figure S2c), which suggests that the anthocyanin accumulation might be involved in affecting the ROS accumulation in zmga3ox leaves. Further studies could research whether anthocyanin accumulation is involved in altering photosynthesis and ROS balance in zmga3ox leaves.
The NO3− is the main form of available inorganic N that is utilized by most plants from the aerobic soils, taken up by the roots and transported to the shoots before assimilation; this process is mediated by the NO3− transporters [19]. To date, many NPF/NRT families in Arabidopsis and rice have been functionally identified for their involvement in the root NO3− uptake [33]. Moreover, the expression of AtNPF6.3 and AtNRT2.1 is regulated by auxin, ethylene, and cytokinin in plants in response to N supply [27]. However, the process by which the GAs regulate the expression of NRTs in plants combined with sufficient or insufficient N is still unclear. In maize, only ZmNPF6.3a and ZmNPF6.3b genes have been cloned, ZmNPF6.3b is a dual-affinity nitrate transporter, while ZmNPF6.3a displays a low-affinity nitrate transport activity [34]. In the present study, the expression of ZmNPF6.3a was not significantly different in the wild-type and zmga3ox roots. Correspondingly, GA3 treatment could not alter the expression levels of ZmNPF6.3a and ZmNPF6.3b in wild-type and zmga3ox plants (Figure 5). These indicate that GAs might have a little effect on the transcriptional regulation of ZmNPF6.3a and ZmNPF6.3b in maize responding to NO3− supply. Several studies have demonstrated that the ZmNRT6.3a and OsNRT1.1a display NO3− transport activity in maize and rice, and overexpression of OsNRT1.1a in rice greatly improved N uptake, but the expression levels of ZmNRT6.3a and OsNRT1.1a are not regulated by N supply [34,35]. Meanwhile, the post-translational modifications of NRT1s, such as phosphorylation and ubiquitination, are also essential for NO3− uptake or transport [36,37]. Here, the expression levels of ZmNPF6.3a and ZmNPF6.3b in the zmga3ox plant had no significant difference with those of the wild-type plants under SN condition (Figure 5c,d), but the zmga3ox plant had lower the N content compared to the wild-type plants (Figure 4c). These indicate whether GA could be involved in regulating the post-translational modifications of ZmNRT6.3s for altering the LATS-mediated NO3− uptake, which would be further studied.
The NRT2.1 is the major HATS-type gene involved in the root NO3− uptake in Arabidopsis [25,26]. The AtNRT2.1/NRT2.2 double-knockout mutations result in up to 80% loss of the NO3−-inducible HATS (iHATS) activity and show severe growth restriction in the absence of the sole NO3− source [38]. Both the constitutive HATS (cHATS) and iHATS activities were impaired under the LN condition in the knock-outs of NRT2.1 in cucumber [39]. In the present study, the zmga3ox roots showed lower expression levels of ZmNRT2.1 and ZmNRT2.2, and this phenomenon was also found by RNA-seq analysis, while the exogenous GA3 could upregulate the expression of these genes. Moreover, the zmga3ox roots had lower expression levels of ZmNRT3.1a and ZmNRT3.1b, and the functionality of NRT2.1 relies on its interacting protein NRT3.1/NAR2.1, as observed in the studies on the rice plant [40]. Thus, the NO3− fluxes and 15NO3− uptake in zmga3ox plants were lower than those in the wild-type plants, and the GA3 treatment could increase the amount of 15N. Together, GA deficiency affected N uptake involved in the transcriptional regulation of ZmNRT2s in the maize plant subjected to NO3− supply.
According to Garnett et al., the transcript abundance of putative ZmNRT2.1 and ZmNRT2.2 is correlated with the root NO3− uptake capacity in maize [41]. A similar result was also observed in the rice plant wherein the expression abundance of OsNRT2.3a and OsNPF2.4 was significantly decreased in the sd1 mutant plant under normal N condition [10]. However, high NO3− supply increases the NRT2 transcript levels in Glycine max plants, although HATS-mediated NO3− influx presents a low level [42]. Similarly, the HvNRT2 transcript is upregulated by 20% to 30% in the barley plants exposed to 10 mM NO3− with tungstate (an inhibitor of nitrate reductase), while the NO3− influx is decreased by 50% [43]. In addition, the phosphorylation is crucial for NRT2 expression abundance in response to NO3− supply [44,45]. These indicate that the post-transcriptional modifications on iHATS-mediated NO3− might be exerted in the plants exposed to NO3− supply. In addition, the expression level of NRTs is not only regulated by the NO3− but also by the N metabolites, such as NH4+ or amino acids [40,44,46]. In addition to N metabolites, photosynthate (e.g., sucrose) may also influence NRTs expression [47]. Here, the KEGG analysis revealed that the most significantly enriched pathway included the N-metabolism and sucrose metabolism pathways (Figure 6b). These indicate that GAs significantly affect the N-metabolism and sucrose metabolism pathways in maize plants responded to NO3− supply. Together with the findings of GAs modulating the NO3− uptake, GAs could regulate the transcript expression of ZmNRT2.1 and ZmNRT2.2 in maize in response to N supply, and might also be involved in modulating the iHATS-mediated NO3− uptake, which will be further investigated.
The GAs also positively regulate other nutrient-acquisition related genes, such as the Pi transporter genes SlPT2 and SlPT7 [12], the K transporter gene AtHAK5 [13], and the iron-uptake regulated genes AtIRT1 (iron-regulated transporter) and AtFRO2 (iron-regulated ferric chelate reductase) [48]. Moreover, the DELLA proteins interact with the transcription factor AtFIT and AtbHLH38/39 for modulating FIT-regulated iron-uptake regulated genes [48]. Furthermore, the transcription factor OsGRF4 drives the expression of OsNRT2.3 and OsGS1.2 in spite of being suppressed by the DELLA protein SLR1 in rice [10]. In the present study, the RNA-seq analysis revealed the presence of 287 TF genes responding to GA in the maize roots under the LN and SN conditions (Table S6). Both the binding-site prediction and co-expression analyses suggested that the ERF, MYB, WRKY, TCP, bZIP, LBD, Dof, HsF, HB, and GAGT family TFs might govern the expression of nitrate transporter genes (Figure 8). In Arabidopsis, several TFs governing the NRT2.1 and NRT1.1 expression have been identified, including the transcription factor LBD family genes (LBD37/38/39), NLP family genes (NLP7), TCP family genes (TCP20), SBP-box family genes (SPL9), and bZIP family genes (TGA1/4) [30]. Among these TFs, the transcript expressions of ZmTCP33 and ZmLBD24 were significantly repressed in the zmga3ox plant under the LN and SN conditions (Figure 9a,b). The DELLA proteins could interact with class I TCP factors and block the TCP function by binding to their DNA-recognition domains in Arabidopsis [49]. However, the transcript expression of ZmbZIP160 was upregulated in the zmga3ox plant (Figure 9c). More interestingly, the number of MYB, WRKY, and ERF family binding sites was enriched to the greatest extent, and the co-expression analysis indicated that ZmNRT2.1 and ZmNRT2.2 co-expressed with ZmMYB14/24/37/48, ZmEREB93, and ZmWRKY22. This aspect needs further exploration; therefore, subsequent research would be conducted to explore the transcriptional regulation of GAs modulating the expression of ZmNRT2.1 or ZmNRT1.1 in N uptake of maize.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Plant Materials, Growth Conditions, and Treatment

The CRISPR/Cas9 vector used to produce the zmga3ox (GRMZM2G036340) was obtained from the Maize Functional Genomic Project of China Agricultural University. The lines were produced in the maize (Zea mays L.) inbred line B73-329 background. For hydroponic experiments, the seeds were surface-sterilized in a 10% (v/v) H2O2 solution for 20 min and washed 5 times with distilled water. After that, the seeds germinated on the sand in a growth chamber, at 28/22 °C with a 16/8 h light/dark cycle, relative humidity controlled to approximately 70–80%. After germinated on the sand for 7 d, the uniform seedlings with two visible leaves were transferred to a hydroponic box (12 seedlings per pot) containing 5 L nutrient solution after the endosperm of each seedling was removed. The seedlings were supplied with half-strength complete nutrient solution for 2 d and then transferred to the full-strength culture solution supplied with different NO3− concentrations (2.0 mM NO3−, SN; 0.05 mM NO3−, LN). To exclude the possibility of potassium (K+) interference, the concentrations of K+ in the LN solution were supplemented to the same levels as those of the SN solution using KCl. The complete nutrient solution for maize was modified Hoagland solution [50], consisting of 0.5 mM MgSO4, 0.1 mM KH2PO4, 1 mM CaCl2, 0.1 mM EDTA-Fe, 2 mM KNO3, and micronutrients (0.03 mM H3BO3, 0.0025 mM ZnSO4, 0.008 mM CuSO4, 0.005 mM MnSO4, and 0.0003 mM (NH4)6Mo7O24, and pH 5.8. The nutrient solution was renewed every other day. In addition, the nutrient solution, with or without 1 μM GA3 or 2 μM Ucz, was treated simultaneously with LN or SN treatment for 5 d.
For soil culture experiments, the wide-type and zmga3ox seeds were sown in plastic containers (20 × 20 × 30 cm deep) with a mixture of vermiculite and commercial garden soil (1:1; v/v) in a glasshouse. And 0.1 mM GA3 with 0.01% (v/v) Tween 20 were applied by foliar spray by using perfume bottles every other day.

4.2. The Measurement of Net NO3− Flux, 15NO3− Uptake and Total N Content

The net NO3− fluxes were measured in the maturation zone (approximately 700 μm from the root tip) of PR using the non-invasive micro-test (NMT) system (Younger; Xuyue (Beijing) Sci & Tech) [51]. For each experimental group, maize seedlings were selected at 5 d after LN or SN treatment, and the roots were immediately equilibrated in a Petri dish containing 10 mL of measuring solution (0.1 mM NH4NO3, 0.1 mM KCl, 0.1 mM CaCl2, 0.3 mM MES, pH 6.0) for 20 min, and then transferred to another Petri dish containing fresh measuring solution. The NO3− ion gradients close to the root surface (ca. 5 μm above the root surface) were determined by moving the flux microsensor between two positions (30 μm in distance) in the direction perpendicular to the root axis. The recording rate of ion flux was one reading per 6 s, and each measurement point was monitored for 10 min.
The N uptake assay in roots of the zmga3ox seedling was performed as described previously [10]. After LN or SN treatment for 5 d, the uniform seedlings were selected and rinsed the roots with 0.1 mM CaSO4 solution for 1 min, and then incubated in the nutrient solution containing 0.05 or 2 mM K15NO3 with a 99% atom excess of 15N, respectively, for 10min. After that, washed for 1 min in 0.1 mM CaSO4 solution before sampling. The samples were harvested and dried at 120 °C for 30 min, and then 65 °C for 72 h before being ground. The power was used for total 15N determination by isotope ratio mass spectrometry (Vario PYRO cube ISOprime 100, Cheadle Hulme, UK).
The roots and shoots of maize seedlings at 5 d after LN or SN treatment were separated for assay of N concentration following the Kjeldahl method [52]. Plant total N content was calculated as the product of N concentration and corresponding dry weight.

4.3. RNA Isolation and Reverse Transcription Quantitative Polymerase Chain Reaction (RT-qPCR) Analysis

Total RNA was isolated from each sample using the Plant RNeasy Mini kit (Tiangen, Beijing, China). Then the full-length cDNA was synthesized from 2 ug of RNA using Oligo d (T) primer and M-MLV reverse transcriptase (Takara, kusatsu, Japan). Quantitive PCR was conducted in an Applied Biosystems 7500 Fast Real-Time PCR System (Applied Biosystems, CA, USA) using SYBR® Premix Ex Taq™ (Takara, Japan) following the manufacturer’s instructions. ZmUBC (ubiquitin C) was used to normalize gene expression [53]. Fold change of gene expression values were calculated using the 2−ΔΔCt method [54]. The primers for qRT–PCR are listed in Table S8.

4.4. RNA-Seq Analysis

Three biological RNA replicates were obtained from the root of wild-type and zmga30x plants at 12, 60, and 108 h after LN or SN treatment, each biological replicate contained roots from three plants. Library construction for transcriptome sequencing was performed using the NEBNext UltraTM RNA Library Prep Kit for Illumina (NEB, Ipswich, MA, USA). The clustering of the index-coded samples was performed on a cBot Cluster Generation System using a TruSeq PE Cluster Kit v4-cBot-HS (Illumia) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. After cluster generation, the library preparations were sequenced on an Illumina Hiseq 4000 platform, and paired-end 150 bp reads were generated. Clean data (clean reads) were obtained by removing reads with adapter reads containing ploy-N and low quality reads from raw data. At the same time, Q20, Q30, GC-content, and sequence duplication levels of the clean data were calculated. All the downstream analyses were based on clean data with high quality. The filtered reads from each sample were aligned to the maize reference genome (B73 RefGen_v3, http://www.maizegdb.org/assembly/) using TopHat2 [55]. Gene expression levels were estimated by fragments per kilobase of transcript per million reads (FPKM) to compare among different samples. EdgeR software package [56] was used to detect genes differentially expressed between wild-type and zmga3ox mutant. K-means clustering analysis was conducted by cluster 3.0 between LN and SN at three time points and visualized by using Java TreeView. A gene was regarded as significantly differentially expressed if the false discovery rate (FDR) adjusted to a p-value < 0.05 and log2 (fold change) ≥1.
Gene Ontology (GO) and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathway annotation and enrichment analyses of DEGs were performed by the online agriGO software [57] and KOBAS 3.0 software [58], respectively.

4.5. Weighted Gene co-Expression Network Analysis (WGCNA)

The FPKM of DEGs was adopted to process the raw files as the input file for WGCNA. The expression data from all three time points were analyzed combined. The co-expression networks were constructed with R package WGCNA (version 1.66) [59]. The soft thresholding power was 14, minModuleSize was 20, deepSplit was 2, networkType was signed, and others were default settings following previous descriptions [60]. The co-expression network was visualized with Cytoscape 3.7.1 [61].

4.6. Transcription Factor-binding Site Prediction

Putative promoter sequences (2 kb upstream from the transcriptional start site) of DEGS were downloaded from Ensemble Plants (http://plants.ensembl.org). Then the TF-binding site prediction was performed with online software PlantRegMap (http://plantregmap.cbi.pku.edu.cn), according to Jin et al. [62].

4.7. GAs Concentration Analysis

The roots or shoots of wild-type and zmga3ox seedlings were collected at 5 d after LN or SN treatment. The endogenous concentration of GAs was determine by HPLC–MS/MS. Briefly, approximately 500 mg of tissue was ground in liquid nitrogen and then extracted with 5 mL of 90% aqueous MeOH. Simultaneously, 2 ng of each D-labeled gibberellin compound was added to each sample. The subsequent operation was performed as described by [63].

4.8. Assay of Physiological and Biochemical Properties

After LN treatment for 5 d, 0.2 g fresh leaves or roots of wild-type and zmga3ox seedlings were collected for analyzing the activities of GS and NR. Chlorophyll content was measured following Wu et al. [64]. The anthocyanin content was determined, as described previously [65]. The activities of GS and NR were determined, respectively, with the Glutamine Synthetase and Nitrate Reductase Kit (Solarbio LIFE SCIENCES, BC0910/ BC0080, Beijing, China) following the manufacturer’s instructions. The O2− production rate was determined with the protocol described by Chen et al. [66]. The photosynthetic rate was assessed by using an LI-6400 XT portable photosynthetic system (LI-COR, Lincoln, NE, USA). Leaf area was calculated by using a Li-3000C portable leaf meter.

4.9. Statistical Analysis

The data were statistically analyzed using SAS 9.0 (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA). The Student’s t-test was used for comparisons between two groups of data. For the data sets of more than two groups, one-way ANOVA with LSD (p < 0.05) was used.

5. Conclusions

Taken together, the results of the present study indicate that GA plays a significant role in the regulation of nitrogen uptake in the maize plant in response to N supply. LN significantly repressed the level of the bioactive GAs in the roots. Moreover, the shoots of the zmga3ox plants showed more sensitivity toward the LN stress, corresponding to the contribution of anthocyanin accumulation and the decrease of chlorophyll content. Also, the zmga3ox plants had low net NO3− fluxes leading to lesser 15N content compared to the wild-type plants. The transcript expression of ZmNRTs was downregulated in the zmga3ox roots under the LN and SN conditions. These results suggested that GAs regulated N uptake involved in transcriptional regulation of NRTs expression and the physiological responses in maize responding to nitrogen availability. This research thus provides a valuable theoretical basis for improving N efficiency in crop production.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary materials can be found at https://www.mdpi.com/1422-0067/21/5/1824/s1.

Author Contributions

M.Z., G.M., and Z.L. designed and conceived the experiments. Y.W. performed most of the experiments with the help from Y.Z. (Yushi Zhang), Y.Z. (Yuexia Zhang), J.X., B.Y.; Q.Y. performed the RNA-seq analysis; M.Z. supervised the project; Y.W. and M.Z. wrote the paper. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the National Nature Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 31425017) and the National Key Research and Development Program of China (Grant No. 2017YFD0300410).

Acknowledgments

The maize seeds were produced by the Maize Functional Genomic Platform of China Agricultura University.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors have declared no conflict of interests. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, or in the decision to publish the results.

Abbreviations

GAGibberellin
GSGlutamine Synthase
NRNitrate Reductase
LNLow Nitrate
NUENitrogen Use Efficiency
NMTNon-Invasive Micro-Test System
NRTNitrate Transport
PRPrimary Root
SNSufficient Nitrate
UczUniconazole
FPKMFragments per Kilobase of Transcript per Million Reads
FDRFalse Discovery Rate
DEGsDifferentially Expressed Genes
NRTNitrate Transporter
GRF4Growth-Regulattion Factor 4
HAK5High-Affinity Potassium Transporter 5;
SLR1Slender Rice1
SlPT2Tomato Phosphate Transporter
IRT1Iron-Regulated Transporter 1
FRO2Iron Regulated Ferric Chelate Reductase
WGCNAWeighted Gene co-Expression Network Analysis
GOGene Ontology
KEGGKyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes
NPFNitrate Transporter1/Peptide Transporter Family

References

  1. Yamaguchi, S. Gibberellin metabolism and its regulation. J. Plant Growth Regul. 2008, 59, 225–251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Colebrook, E.H.; Thomas, S.G.; Phillips, A.L.; Hedden, P. The role of gibberellin signalling in plant responses to abiotic stress. J. Exp. Biol. 2014, 217, 67–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  3. Chen, Y.; Hou, M.M.; Liu, L.J.; Wu, S.; Shen, Y.; Ishiyama, K.; Kobayashi, M.; McCarty, D.R.; Tan, B.-C. The maize DWARF1 encodes a Gibberellin 3-Oxidase and is dual localized to the nucleus and cytosol. Plant Physiol. 2014, 166, 2028–2039. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. Plackett, A.R.; Powers, S.J.; Fernandez-Garcia, N.; Urbanova, T.; Takebayashi, Y.; Seo, M.; Jikumaru, Y.; Benlloch, R.; Nilsson, O.; Ruiz-Rivero, O.; et al. Analysis of the developmental roles of the Arabidopsis gibberellin 20-oxidases demonstrates that GA20ox1, -2, and-3 are the dominant paralogs. Plant Cell 2012, 24, 941–960. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  5. Harberd, N.P.; Belfield, E.; Yasumura, Y.K. The angiosperm Gibberellin-GID1-DELLA growth regulatory mechanism: How an “inhibitor of an inhibitor” enables flexible response to fluctuating environments. Plant Cell 2009, 21, 1328–1339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  6. Hedden, P. Constructing dwarf rice. Nat. Biotechnol. 2003, 21, 873–874. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Peng, J.R.; Richards, D.E.; Hartley, N.M.; Murphy, G.P.; Devos, K.M.; Flintham, J.E.; Beales, J.; Fish, L.J.; Worland, A.J.; Harberd, N.P. ‘Green revolution’ genes encode mutant gibberellin response modulators. Nature 1999, 400, 256–261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Itoh, H.; Ueguchi-tanaka, M.; Sato, Y.; Ashikari, M.; Matsuoka, M. The gibberellin signaling pathway is regulated by the appearance and disappearance of SLENDER RICE1 in nuclei. Plant Cell 2002, 14, 57–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Asano, K.; Yamasaki, M.; Takuno, S.; Miura, K.; Katagiri, S.; Tomoko, I.; Doi, K.; Wu, J.; Ebana, K.; Matsumoto, T.; et al. Artificial selection for a green revolution gene during japonica rice domestication. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2011, 108, 11034–11039. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Li, S.; Tian, Y.H.; Wu, K.; Ye, Y.F.; Yu, J.P.; Zhang, J.; Liu, Q.; Hu, M.; Li, H.; Tong, Y.; et al. Modulating plant growth-metabolism coordination for sustainable agriculture. Nature 2018, 560, 595–600. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Jiang, C.F.; Gao, X.H.; Liao, L.L.; Harberd, N.P.; Fu, X.D. Phosphate starvation root architecture and anthocyanin accumulation responses are modulated by the Gibberellin-DELLA signaling pathway in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 2007, 145, 1460–1470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Zhang, Y.Q.; Zhou, Y.W.; Chen, S.Y.; Liu, J.L.; Fan, K.; Li, Z.W. Gibberellins play dual roles in response to phosphate starvation of tomato seedlings, negatively in shoots but positively in roots. J. Plant Physiol. 2019, 234, 145–153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Oliferuk, S.; Pérez, A.; Martinez, V.; Ródenas, R.; Ribio, F.; María, G.E.S. How DELLAs contribute to control potassium uptake under conditions of potassium scarcity? hypotheses and uncertainties. Plant Signal. Behav. 2017, 12, 1559–2324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Zhang, Y.Q.; Liu, Z.J.; Liu, J.P.; Liu, S.; Wang, J.F.; Liu, W.X.; Xu, W.F. GA-DELLA pathway is involved in regulation of nitrogen deficiency-induced anthocyanin accumulation. Plant Cell Rep. 2017, 36, 557–569. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Khan, N.A. Effect of gibberellic acid on carbonic anhydrase, photosynthesis, growth and yield of mustard. Biol. Plant. 1996, 38, 145–147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Nagel, O.W.; Lambers, H. Changes in the acquisition and partitioning of carbon and nitrogen in the gibberellin-deficient mutants A70 and W335 of tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.). Plant Cell Environ. 2002, 25, 883–891. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Bai, L.Q.; Deng, H.Q.; Zhang, X.C.; Yu, X.C.; Li, Y.S. Gibberellin is involved in inhibition of cucumber growth and nitrogen uptake at suboptimal root-zone temperatures. PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0156188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Gooding, M.J.; Addisu, M.; Uppal, R.K.; Snape, J.W.; Jones, H.E. Effect of wheat dwarfing genes on nitrogen-use efficiency. J. Agric. Sci. 2012, 150, 3–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Xu, G.H.; Fan, X.R.; Miller, A.J. Plant nitrogen assimilation and use efficiency. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 2012, 63, 153–182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Pingali, P.L. Green Revolution: Impacts, limits, and the path ahead. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2012, 109, 12302–12308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Rogers, E.D.; Benfey, P.N. Regulation of plant root system architecture: Implications for crop advancement. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 2015, 32, 93–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Lassaletta, L.; Billen, G.; Grizzetti, B.; Anglade, J.; Garnier, J. 50 year trends in nitrogen use efficiency of world cropping systems: The relationship between yield and nitrogen input to cropland. Environ. Res. Lett. 2014, 9, 105011. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Hirel, B.; Gouis, J.L.; Ney, B.; Gallais, A. The challenge of improving nitrogen use efficiency in crop plants: Towards a more central role for genetic variability and quantitative genetics within integrated approaches. J. Exp. Bot. 2007, 58, 2369–2387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Foyer, C.H.; Valadier, M.H.; Migge, A.; Becker, T.W. Drought-induced effects on nitrate reductase activity and mRNA and on the coordination of nitrogen and carbon metabolism in maize leaves. Plant Physiol. 1998, 1, 283–292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  25. Tsay, Y.F.; Chiu, C.C.; Tsai, C.B.; Ho, C.H.; Hsu, P.K. Nitrate transporters and peptide transporters. FEBS Lett. 2007, 581, 2290–2300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  26. Leran, S.; Varala, K.; Boyer, J.C.; Chiurazzi, M.; Crawford, N.; Daniel-Vedele, F.; David, L.; Dickstein, R.; Fernandez, E.; Forde, B.; et al. A unified nomenclature of NITRATE TRANSPORTER 1/PEPTIDE TRANSPORTER family members in plants. Trends Plant Sci. 2014, 19, 1360–1385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Kiba, T.; Kudo, T.; Kojima, M.; Sakakibara, H. Hormonal control of nitrogen acquisition: Roles of auxin, abscisic acid, and cytokinin. J. Exp. Bot. 2011, 62, 1399–1409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Mu, X.H.; Chen, Q.W.; Wu, X.Y.; Chen, F.J.; Yuan, L.X.; Mi, G.H. Gibberellins synthesis is involved in the reduction of cell flux and elemental growth rate in maize leaf under low nitrogen supply. Environ. Exp. Bot. 2018, 150, 198–208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Xing, H.L.; Dong, L.; Wang, Z.P.; Zhang, H.Y.; Han, C.Y.; Liu, B.; Wang, X.C.; Chen, Q.J. A CRISPR/Cas9 toolkit for multiplex genome editing in plants. BMC Plant Biol. 2014, 14, 327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Zhao, L.F.; Liu, F.; Crawford, N.M.; Yong, W. Molecular regulation of nitrate response in plants. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018, 19, 2039. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Naing, A.H.; Park, K.I.; Ai, T.N.; Chung, M.Y.; Han, J.S.; Kang, Y.W.; Lim, K.B.; Kim, C.K. Overexpression of snapdragon Delila (Del) gene in tobacco enhances anthocyanin accumulation and abiotic stress tolerance. BMC Plant Biol. 2017, 17, 65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  32. Cheng, Y.J.; Kim, M.D.; Deng, X.P.; Kwak, S.S.; Chen, W. Enhanced salt stress tolerance in transgenic potato plants expressing IbMYB1, a sweet potato transcription factor. J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2013, 23, 1737–1746. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  33. Xuan, W.; Beeckman, T.; Xu, G.H. Plant nitrogen nutrition: Sensing and signaling. Curr. Biol. Plant Biol. 2017, 39, 57–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Wen, Z.; Tyerman, S.D.; Dechorgnat, J.; Ovchinnikova, E.; Dhugga, K.S.; Kaiser, B.N. Maize NPF6 proteins are homologs of Arabidopsis CHL1 that are selective for both nitrate and chloride. Plant Cell 2017, 29, 2581–2596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  35. Wang, W.; Hu, D.; Yuan, D.Y.; Liu, Y.Q.; Che, R.H.; Hu, Y.Q.; Ou, S.; Liu, Y.; Zhang, Z.; Wang, H.; et al. Expression of the nitrate transporter gene OsNRT1.1A/OsNPF6.3 confers high yield and early maturation in rice. Plant Cell 2018, 30, 638–651. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. Ho, C.H.; Lin, S.H.; Hu, H.C.; Tsay, Y.F. CHL1 functions as a nitrate sensor in plants. Cell 2009, 138, 1184–1194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Liu, W.; Sun, Q.; Wang, K.; Du, Q.; Li, W.X. Nitrogen Limitation Adaptation (NLA) is involved in source-to-sink remobilization of nitrate by mediating the degradation of NRT1.7 in Arabidopsis. New Physiol. 2017, 214, 734–744. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Li, W.; Wang, Y.; Okamoto, M.; Crawford, N.M.; Siddiqi, M.Y.; Glass, A.D. Dissection of the AtNRT2.1:AtNRT2.2 inducible high-affinity nitrate transporter gene cluster. Plant Physiol. 2007, 143, 425–433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Li, Y.; Li, J.Q.; Yan, Y.; Liu, W.Q.; Zhang, W.N.; Guo, L.H.; Tian, Y.Q. Knock-Down of CsNRT2.1, a Cucumber Nitrate Transporter, Reduces Nitrate Uptake, Root length, and Lateral Root Number at Low External Nitrate Concentration. Front. Plant Sci. 2018, 9, 722. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Yan, M.; Fan, X.; Feng, H.M.; Miller, A.J.; Shen, Q.R.; Xu, G.H. Rice OsNAR2.1 interacts with OsNRT2.1, OsNRT2.2 and OsNRT2.3a nitrate transporters to provide uptake over high and low concentration ranges. Plant Cell Environ. 2011, 34, 1360–1372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Garnett, T.; Conn, V.; Plett, D.; Conn, S.; Zanghellini, J.; Mackenzie, N.; Enju, A.; Francis, K.; Holtham, L.; Roessner, U.; et al. The response of the maize nitrate transport system to nitrogen demand and supply across the lifecycle. New Phytol. 2013, 198, 82–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  42. Amarasinghe, B.H.R.; de Bruxelles, G.L.; Braddon, M.; Onyeocha, I.; Forde, B.G.; Udvardi, M.K. Regulation of GmNRT2 expression and nitrate transport activity in roots of soybean (Glycine max). Planta 1998, 206, 44–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Vidmar, J.J.; Zhuo, D.; Siddiqi, M.Y.; Schjoerring, J.K.; Touraine, B.; Glass, A.D. Regulation of high-affinity nitrate transporter genes and high-affinity nitrate influx by nitrogen pools in roots of barley. Plant Physiol. 2000, 123, 307–318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  44. Orsel, M.; Filleur, S.; Fraisier, V.; Daniel-Vedele, F.D. Nitrate transport in plants: Which gene and which control? J. Exp. Bot. 2002, 53, 825–833. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Zhou, X.; Liu, M.Y.; Wu, W.H.; Wang, Y. Phosphorylation at Ser28 stabilizes the Arabidopsis nitrate transporter NRT2.1 in response to nitrate limitation. J. Integr. Plant Biol. 2019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Zhuo, D.G.; Okamoto, M.; Vidmar, J.J.; Glass, A.D.M. Regulation of a putative high-affinity nitrate transporter (Nrt2;1At) in roots of Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant J. 1999, 17, 563–568. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Lejay, L.; Gansel, X.; Cerezo, M.; Tillard, P.; Muller, C.; Krapp, A.; von Wiren, N.; Daniel-Vedele, F.; Gojon, A. Regulation of root ion transporters by photosynthesis: Functional importance and relation with hexokinase. Plant Cell 2003, 15, 2218–2232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  48. Wild, M.; Davie, J.M.; Regnault, T.; Sakvarelidze-Achard, L.; Carrera, E.; Diaz, I.L.; Cayrel, A.; Dubeaux, G.; Vert, G.; Vert, G.; et al. Tissue-specific regulation of gibberellin signaling article tissue-specific regulation of gibberellin signaling fine-tunes Arabidopsis iron-deficiency responses. Dev. Cell 2016, 37, 190–200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  49. Daviere, J.M.; Wild, M.; Regnault, T.; Baumberger, N.; Eisler, H.; Genschik, P.; Achard, P. Report class I TCP-DELLA interactions in inflorescence shoot apex determine plant height. Curr. Biol. 2014, 24, 1923–1928. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Mengel, K.; Robin, P.; Salsac, L. Nitrate reductase activity in shoots and roots of maize seedlings as affected by the form of nitrogen nutrition and the pH of the nutrient solution. Plant Physiol. 1983, 71, 618–622. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Luo, J.; Qin, J.J.; He, F.F.; Li, H.; Liu, T.X.; Polle, A.; Peng, C.H.; Luo, Z.B. Net fluxes of ammonium and nitrate in association with H+ fluxes in fine roots of Populus popularis. Planta 2013, 237, 919–931. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Li, B.Z.; Xin, W.J.; Sun, S.B. Physiological and molecular responses of nitrogen-starved rice plants to re-supply of different nitrogen sources. Plant Soil 2006, 287, 145–159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Gao, Y.Q.; Wu, W.H.; Wang, Y. The K+ channel KZM2 is involved in stomatal movement by modulating inward K+ currents in maize guard cells. Plant J. 2017, 92, 662–675. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  54. Livak, K.J.; Schmittgen, T.D. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2−ΔΔCT method. Methods 2001, 25, 402–408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Kim, D.; Pertea, C.; Trapnell, C. TopHat2 accurate alignment of transcriptomes in the presence of insertions, deletions and gene fusions. Genome Biol. 2013, 14, R36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  56. Robinson, M.D.; McCarthy, D.J.; Smyth, G.K. edgeR: A bioconductor package for differential expression analysis of digital gene expression data. Bioinformatics 2010, 26, 139–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  57. Du, Z.; Zhou, X.; Ling, Y.; Zhang, Z.H.; Su, Z. agriGO: A GO analysis toolkit for the agricultural community. Nucleic Acids Res. 2010, 38, W64–W70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  58. Wu, J.M.; Mao, X.Z.; Cai, T.; Luo, J.C.; Wei, L.P. KOBAS server: A web-based platform for automated annotation and pathway identification. Nucleic Acids Res. 2006, 34, W720–W724. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Zhang, B.; Horvath, S. A general framework for weighted gene co-expression network analysis. Genet. Mol. Biol. 2005, 4, 1544–6115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Langfelder, P.; Horvath, S. WGCNA: An R package for weighted correlation network analysis. BMC Bioinform. 2008, 9, 559. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  61. Saito, R.; Smoot, M.E.; Ono, K.; Ruscheinski, J.; Wang, P.L.; Lotia, S.; Pico, A.R.; Bader, G.D.; Ideker, T. A travel guide to Cytoscape plugins. Nat. Methods 2012, 9, 1069–1076. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  62. Jin, J.P.; Tian, F.; Yang, Y.Q.; Kong, M.L.; Luo, J.C.; Gao, G. PlantTFDB 4.0: Toward a central hub for transcription factors and regulatory interactions in plants. Nucleic Acids Res. 2017, 45, D1040–D1045. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  63. Ma, X.D.; Ma, J.; Zhai, H.H.; Xin, P.Y.; Chu, J.F.; Qiao, Y.L.; Han, L.Z. CHR729 is a CHD3 protein that controls seedling development in rice. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0138934. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  64. Wu, X.Y.; Ding, C.H.; Baerson, S.R.; Lian, F.H.; Lin, X.H.; Zhang, L.Q.; Wu, C.F.; Hwang, S.Y.; Zeng, R.S.; Song, Y.Y. The roles of jasmonate signalling in nitrogen uptake and allocation in rice (Oryza sativa L.). Plant Cell Environ. 2018, 42, 659–672. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Vandenbussche, F.; Habricot, Y.; Condiff, A.S.; Maldiney, R.; Straeten, V.D.; Ahmad, M. HY5 is a point of convergence between cryptochrome and cytokinin signalling pathways in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant J. 2007, 49, 428–441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Chen, Y.E.; Cui, J.M.; Li, G.X.; Yuan, M.; Zhang, Z.W.; Yuan, S.; Zhang, H.Y. Effect of salicylic acid on the antioxidant system and photosystem II in wheat seedlings. Biol. Plant. 2016, 60, 139–147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Ijms 21 01824 g001 550
Figure 1. The ZmGA3ox knockout mutant characterization and phenotype analysis under sufficient nitrogen (SN) condition. (a) Schematic representations of the GAs biosynthesis pathway; (b) targeted mutagenesis of ZmGA3ox via CRISPR-Cas9; protospacer adjacent motif (PAM) sequences labelled in red; (c) sequence information of the gene-editing region in wild-type and zmga3ox plants; (d) alignment of the amino acid sequences of ZmGA3ox and zmga3ox. Only the sequences flanking the mutations were shown, and the frameshifted sequences in zmga3ox highlighted in red. (e) The phenotype of the zmga3ox and GA3-treated zmga3ox seedling. Bar = 20 cm. (f) The contents of GA1, GA3, and GA4 in shoots of zmga3ox and wild-type seedlings. ND: not detected. (g) The contents of GA9 and GA20 in shoots of zmga3ox and wild-type seedlings. Values were the means ± SD (n = 3). The asterisks indicated significant difference between wild-type and zmga3ox plants, as evaluated by Student’s t-tests ** p < 0.01.
Figure 1. The ZmGA3ox knockout mutant characterization and phenotype analysis under sufficient nitrogen (SN) condition. (a) Schematic representations of the GAs biosynthesis pathway; (b) targeted mutagenesis of ZmGA3ox via CRISPR-Cas9; protospacer adjacent motif (PAM) sequences labelled in red; (c) sequence information of the gene-editing region in wild-type and zmga3ox plants; (d) alignment of the amino acid sequences of ZmGA3ox and zmga3ox. Only the sequences flanking the mutations were shown, and the frameshifted sequences in zmga3ox highlighted in red. (e) The phenotype of the zmga3ox and GA3-treated zmga3ox seedling. Bar = 20 cm. (f) The contents of GA1, GA3, and GA4 in shoots of zmga3ox and wild-type seedlings. ND: not detected. (g) The contents of GA9 and GA20 in shoots of zmga3ox and wild-type seedlings. Values were the means ± SD (n = 3). The asterisks indicated significant difference between wild-type and zmga3ox plants, as evaluated by Student’s t-tests ** p < 0.01.
Ijms 21 01824 g001
Ijms 21 01824 g002 550
Figure 2. The anthocyanin accumulation and chlorophyll content in zmga3ox leaves under LN or SN condition. (a) Appearance of the GA3 or Ucz-treated wild-type and zmga3ox leaves at 7 d after LN or SN treatment. Bar = 10 cm. (b) The content of anthocyanin in zmga3ox shoots treated with GA3 or Ucz at 7 d after LN or SN treatment. Values were the means ± SD (n = 3). (c) The content of chlorophyll in zmga3ox shoots treated with GA3 or Ucz at 7 d after LN or SN treatment. Values were the means ± SD (n = 3). Different letters indicated significant difference calculated by Fisher’s LSD (p < 0.05).
Figure 2. The anthocyanin accumulation and chlorophyll content in zmga3ox leaves under LN or SN condition. (a) Appearance of the GA3 or Ucz-treated wild-type and zmga3ox leaves at 7 d after LN or SN treatment. Bar = 10 cm. (b) The content of anthocyanin in zmga3ox shoots treated with GA3 or Ucz at 7 d after LN or SN treatment. Values were the means ± SD (n = 3). (c) The content of chlorophyll in zmga3ox shoots treated with GA3 or Ucz at 7 d after LN or SN treatment. Values were the means ± SD (n = 3). Different letters indicated significant difference calculated by Fisher’s LSD (p < 0.05).
Ijms 21 01824 g002
Ijms 21 01824 g003 550
Figure 3. The GA contents and the expression levels of GA biosynthesis- and catabolic related genes in maize seedlings responded to LN and SN. (a) The contents of GA1, GA3, and GA4 in the wild-type roots at 5 d after LN and SN. ND: not detected. (b–d) The transcriptional levels of ent-kaurene synthases (b), GA 20-oxidases (c), and GA 2-oxidase (d) genes in the wild-type roots at 3 d after LN and SN treatment. (a–d) Values were the means ± SD (n = 3). The asterisks indicated significant difference compared with the control as evaluated by Student’s t-tests ** p < 0.01.
Figure 3. The GA contents and the expression levels of GA biosynthesis- and catabolic related genes in maize seedlings responded to LN and SN. (a) The contents of GA1, GA3, and GA4 in the wild-type roots at 5 d after LN and SN. ND: not detected. (b–d) The transcriptional levels of ent-kaurene synthases (b), GA 20-oxidases (c), and GA 2-oxidase (d) genes in the wild-type roots at 3 d after LN and SN treatment. (a–d) Values were the means ± SD (n = 3). The asterisks indicated significant difference compared with the control as evaluated by Student’s t-tests ** p < 0.01.
Ijms 21 01824 g003
Ijms 21 01824 g004 550
Figure 4. Nitrate uptake and allocation in zmga3ox plants under LN and SN conditions. (a–b) The net NO3− flux (a), and the mean NO3− flux (b) along the maturation zone of wild-type and zmga3ox primary root. Values were the means ± SD (n = 7). (c) The 15N content after 10 min 15N tracing assay in wild-type and zmga3ox plants; (d) total N content per plant in shoots and roots of wild-type and zmga3ox plants; (e) the 15N content in wild-type and zmga3ox seedlings treated with GA3 and/or uniconazole (Ucz). (c–e) Values were the means ± SD (n = 3). Different letters indicated significant difference calculated by Fisher’s LSD (p < 0.05).
Figure 4. Nitrate uptake and allocation in zmga3ox plants under LN and SN conditions. (a–b) The net NO3− flux (a), and the mean NO3− flux (b) along the maturation zone of wild-type and zmga3ox primary root. Values were the means ± SD (n = 7). (c) The 15N content after 10 min 15N tracing assay in wild-type and zmga3ox plants; (d) total N content per plant in shoots and roots of wild-type and zmga3ox plants; (e) the 15N content in wild-type and zmga3ox seedlings treated with GA3 and/or uniconazole (Ucz). (c–e) Values were the means ± SD (n = 3). Different letters indicated significant difference calculated by Fisher’s LSD (p < 0.05).
Ijms 21 01824 g004
Ijms 21 01824 g005 550
Figure 5. Effects of exogenous GA3 on the expression levels of ZmNRT2.1 (a), ZmNRT2.2 (b), ZmNPF6.3a (c), and ZmNPF6.3b (d) in wild-type and zmga3ox roots under LN and SN conditions. The roots were harvested at 72 h after GA3 treatment under LN and SN conditions. Values were the means ± SD (n = 3). Different letters indicated significant difference calculated by Fishe’s LSD (p < 0.05).
Figure 5. Effects of exogenous GA3 on the expression levels of ZmNRT2.1 (a), ZmNRT2.2 (b), ZmNPF6.3a (c), and ZmNPF6.3b (d) in wild-type and zmga3ox roots under LN and SN conditions. The roots were harvested at 72 h after GA3 treatment under LN and SN conditions. Values were the means ± SD (n = 3). Different letters indicated significant difference calculated by Fishe’s LSD (p < 0.05).
Ijms 21 01824 g005
Ijms 21 01824 g006 550
Figure 6. The DEGs involved in NO3− uptake and metabolism. (a) Venn diagrams showed the up- and downregulated significantly differentially expressed genes (DEGs) identified by RNA-seq in the wild-type and zmga3ox roots at 12, 60, and 108 h after LN and SN treatments, respectively; (b) list of the top 20 significant enriched KEGG pathway of significantly regulated DEGs. (c,d) Heatmap showed the DEGs involved in NO3− uptake and transport (c), N assimilation and NH4+ uptake (d). Genes annotated by MaizeGDB gene model were shown with gene name. Different expression levels were shown as log2FC, blue for downregulation and red for upregulation, as shown in color bar.
Figure 6. The DEGs involved in NO3− uptake and metabolism. (a) Venn diagrams showed the up- and downregulated significantly differentially expressed genes (DEGs) identified by RNA-seq in the wild-type and zmga3ox roots at 12, 60, and 108 h after LN and SN treatments, respectively; (b) list of the top 20 significant enriched KEGG pathway of significantly regulated DEGs. (c,d) Heatmap showed the DEGs involved in NO3− uptake and transport (c), N assimilation and NH4+ uptake (d). Genes annotated by MaizeGDB gene model were shown with gene name. Different expression levels were shown as log2FC, blue for downregulation and red for upregulation, as shown in color bar.
Ijms 21 01824 g006
Ijms 21 01824 g007 550
Figure 7. The expression levels of ZmNRT2.1 (a), ZmNRT2.2 (b), ZmNPF6.4 (c), ZmNPF7.3a (d), and ZmNPF6.3b (e) in wild-type and zmga3ox roots under LN and SN conditions. Roots were harvested at 12, 60, and 108 h after LN and SN treatments. Values were the means ± SD (n = 3). Different letters indicated significant difference between the wild-type and zmga3ox plants at the same time point calculated by Fisher’s LSD (p < 0.05).
Figure 7. The expression levels of ZmNRT2.1 (a), ZmNRT2.2 (b), ZmNPF6.4 (c), ZmNPF7.3a (d), and ZmNPF6.3b (e) in wild-type and zmga3ox roots under LN and SN conditions. Roots were harvested at 12, 60, and 108 h after LN and SN treatments. Values were the means ± SD (n = 3). Different letters indicated significant difference between the wild-type and zmga3ox plants at the same time point calculated by Fisher’s LSD (p < 0.05).
Ijms 21 01824 g007
Ijms 21 01824 g008 550
Figure 8. GAs regulated the expression of transcription factors in maize responded to NO3− supply. (a) Heatmap showing the significant expression of transcription factors in the 2-kb putative promoter region of nitrate transporter genes. Different expression levels were shown as log2FC, blue for downregulation and red for upregulation, as shown in the color bar. (b) Weighted gene co-expression network analysis (WGCNA) of DEGs.
Figure 8. GAs regulated the expression of transcription factors in maize responded to NO3− supply. (a) Heatmap showing the significant expression of transcription factors in the 2-kb putative promoter region of nitrate transporter genes. Different expression levels were shown as log2FC, blue for downregulation and red for upregulation, as shown in the color bar. (b) Weighted gene co-expression network analysis (WGCNA) of DEGs.
Ijms 21 01824 g008
Ijms 21 01824 g009 550
Figure 9. The expression levels of ZmTCP33 (a), ZmLBD24 (b), ZmBbZIP160 (c), ZmWRKY34 (d), ZmEREB93 (e), and ZmMYB41 (f) in wild-type and zmga3ox roots under LN and SN conditions. Roots were harvested at 12, 60, and 108 h after LN and SN treatments. Values were the means ± SD (n = 3). Different letters indicated significant difference between the wild-type and zmga3ox plants at the same time point calculated by Fisher’s LSD (p < 0.05).
Figure 9. The expression levels of ZmTCP33 (a), ZmLBD24 (b), ZmBbZIP160 (c), ZmWRKY34 (d), ZmEREB93 (e), and ZmMYB41 (f) in wild-type and zmga3ox roots under LN and SN conditions. Roots were harvested at 12, 60, and 108 h after LN and SN treatments. Values were the means ± SD (n = 3). Different letters indicated significant difference between the wild-type and zmga3ox plants at the same time point calculated by Fisher’s LSD (p < 0.05).
Ijms 21 01824 g009

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Wang, Y.; Yao, Q.; Zhang, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Xing, J.; Yang, B.; Mi, G.; Li, Z.; Zhang, M. The Role of Gibberellins in Regulation of Nitrogen Uptake and Physiological Traits in Maize Responding to Nitrogen Availability. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 1824. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21051824

AMA Style

Wang Y, Yao Q, Zhang Y, Zhang Y, Xing J, Yang B, Mi G, Li Z, Zhang M. The Role of Gibberellins in Regulation of Nitrogen Uptake and Physiological Traits in Maize Responding to Nitrogen Availability. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2020; 21(5):1824. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21051824

Chicago/Turabian Style

Wang, Yubin, Qingqing Yao, Yushi Zhang, Yuexia Zhang, Jiapeng Xing, Benzhou Yang, Guohua Mi, Zhaohu Li, and Mingcai Zhang. 2020. "The Role of Gibberellins in Regulation of Nitrogen Uptake and Physiological Traits in Maize Responding to Nitrogen Availability" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 21, no. 5: 1824. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21051824

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop