Next Article in Journal
The ULK1/2 and AMPK Inhibitor SBI-0206965 Blocks AICAR and Insulin-Stimulated Glucose Transport
Next Article in Special Issue
Estrogen Receptors and Endometriosis
Previous Article in Journal
Subcellular Localization of Copper—Cellular Bioimaging with Focus on Neurological Disorders
Previous Article in Special Issue
Mimicking Sampson’s Retrograde Menstrual Theory in Rats: A New Rat Model for Ongoing Endometriosis-Associated Pain
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
IJMS
Volume 21
Issue 7
10.3390/ijms21072343
ijms-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Different Expression Pattern of TIM-3 and Galectin-9 Molecules by Peripheral and Peritoneal Lymphocytes in Women with and without Endometriosis

by
Matyas Meggyes
1,2,
Laszlo Szereday
1,2,
Noemi Bohonyi
3,
Miklos Koppan
3,
Sarolta Szegedi
3,
Anna Marics-Kutas
3,
Mirjam Marton
1,
Anett Totsimon
1 and
Beata Polgar
1,2,*
1
Department of Medical Microbiology and Immunology, Clinical Centre, Medical School, University of Pecs, 12 Szigeti Street, 7624 Pecs, Hungary
2
Janos Szentagothai Research Centre, University of Pecs, 20 Ifjusag Street, H-7624 Pecs, Hungary
3
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Clinical Centre, Medical School, University of Pecs, 17 Edesanyak Street, H-7624 Pecs, Hungary
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21(7), 2343; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21072343
Submission received: 24 February 2020 / Revised: 22 March 2020 / Accepted: 25 March 2020 / Published: 28 March 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Molecular Research of Endometrial Pathophysiology 2.0)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Endometriosis is a gynecological condition that is associated with chronic pelvic inflammation, pain, and infertility. Although substantial evidence supports that immunological alterations contribute to its pathogenesis and we previously posed a pivotal role of Galectin-9 (Gal-9) in this disorder, the involvement of the TIM-3/Gal-9 pathway in the development of endometriosis-associated immunological abnormalities is not yet known. In the present study, multicolor flow cytometry was used to compare the immunophenotype and cell surface expression of TIM-3 and Gal-9 molecules on peripheral blood (PB) and peritoneal fluid (PF) lymphocytes of women with and without endometriosis. We found an altered distribution of different lymphocyte subpopulations, a markedly decreased TIM-3 labeling on all T and NK subsets and a significantly increased Gal-9 positivity on peripheral CD4+ T and Treg cells of the affected cohort. Furthermore, a significantly increased TIM-3 expression on CD4+T-cells and elevated Gal-9 labeling on all T and NK subsets was also revealed in the PF of the examined patients. In conclusion, our results suggest a persistent activation and disturbed TIM-3/Gal-9-dependent regulatory function in endometriosis, which may be involved in the impaired immune surveillance mechanisms, promotes the survival of ectopic lesions, and aids the evolution of reproductive failures in endometriosis.

1. Introduction

Endometriosis is a common chronic, progressive gynecologic condition that influences the quality of life and can lead to infertility. This complex, estrogen-dependent neuroimmunoendocrine disorder affects 3–10% of women in their reproductive years and 20–50% of women with infertility [1]. It is defined by the presence of endometrial glandular cells; stromal cells are growing and developing outside the uterine cavity, mainly on the pelvic peritoneum and/or ovaries. Typical symptoms of endometriosis are not pathognomonic and include menstruation-associated chronic pelvic pain, dyspareunia, dysmenorrhea, pelvic inflammation, and infertility [2]. Currently, its medical treatment is mainly based on surgery and/or ovarian suppressive agents that could be effective in the temporary relief of symptoms and infertility. Still, up to this day, no treatment is available to cure the disease [3].
It is well known that multiple factors are responsible for the aetiopathogenesis of endometriosis involving a variety of environmental, genetic, epigenetic, endocrine, or immune factors [4,5]. While the pathophysiology of the disease is still unknown, there is growing evidence that endometriosis is associated with disturbed local and systemic immune responses [6]. Impaired cellular and humoral immunity, increased activity of peritoneal macrophages, altered function of neutrophils, dendritic cells, T and B lymphocytes, and decreased natural killer (NK) cell activity are all involved in its immunopathogenesis [7]. In addition, an elevated level of Forkhead box P3 (FoxP3) expressing regulatory T cells (Treg) [8] and altered production of growth factors and cytokines could also play a crucial role in the implantation of ectopic lesions [9]. Further studies have found a link between endometriosis and oxidative stress [10] or microbial dysbiosis [11].
Originally described as a strong eosinophil chemoattractant, Galectin-9 (Gal-9) is one of the members of the tandem-repeat type galectin family containing two carbohydrate recognition domains and a linker peptide with an affinity for β-galactosides [12]. Gal-9 has several isoforms [13,14,15] and is encoded on the short arm of chromosome 17. The LGALS9 gene consists of 11 exons whose alterative splicing can influence the valency and function of the encoded molecules [16]. Many cell types expressing Gal-9 [17] considered a known pleiotropic immune-modulator either by ameliorating the inflammatory process [18] or by exhibiting anti-inflammatory properties. It can activate inflammatory response and enhance the production of pro-inflammatory cytokines by monocytes and T helper 1 (Th1) cells. In addition, it is capable of inducing the apoptosis of Th1, Th17, and to a lesser extent, CD8+ T cytotoxic effector cells promote the differentiation of naïve T cells into Tregs by increasing FoxP3 expression [12] and suppress the differentiation of Th17 lymphocytes [19]. A recent study identified a novel CD4+ Th cell subset that expresses Gal-9 on its surface and secretes Gal-9 upon T cell receptor (TCR) stimulation, thereby regulate Th17/Treg development [20]. The therapeutic potential of Gal-9 is proved in several autoimmune disease models [21], in transplantation [22], in allergic asthma [23], and different malignancies [12].
Gal-9 can interact with various extracellular matrix proteins and cell surface ligands, as well as the inhibitory T-cell immunoglobulin and mucin domain-3 (TIM-3) receptor. The TIM-receptor family consists of three members in humans (TIM-1,-3,-4) and eight in mice (TIM-1-8). They are expressed by various immune cells, including T, NK, and antigen-presenting cells, and implicated in the regulation of pivotal immunological processes such as T cell proliferation, survival, and tissue inflammation [24,25]. The amount of data supports that TIM-3 is a potent regulator of both the adaptive and innate immune response, and negatively regulates T cell responses by inducing the apoptosis of Th1 cells [26]. To date, numerous studies investigated the interaction between Gal-9 and TIM-3 and found that the commitment of TIM-3 by Gal-9 may function as a regulator of Th1 immunity by abrogating Th1/Th17-driven immune responses, therefore modulate the Th1/Th2 cytokine balance [20]. A growing body of evidence demonstrates that galectins are widely expressed in the female reproductive system. Although it is well established that these lectins can control host-pathogen interactions, the function of the endometrium, the local immune response as well as implantation, placentation, and immune tolerance towards the fetus [27], their exact role in endometriosis is poorly examined. Previous literature data indicate that Gal-9 is mainly expressed by endometrial epithelial cells [28], and its production can be induced by tissue damage or pro-inflammatory cytokines (IFNγ, IL-1β, TNFα [29,30]). Furthermore, we found an overexpression and an elevated serum level of Gal-9 in endometriosis [31]. In this regard, we hypothesize, that the dysregulated TIM-3/Gal-9 immune checkpoint pathway has a crucial role in the immuno-pathogenesis of this disease.
Here we demonstrate that the distribution and the cell surface expression of the TIM-3 receptor and the Gal-9 ligand are significantly altered on different peripheral and peritoneal T and NK cell subsets of endometriosis-affected patients. Furthermore, our results indicate a persistent activation and a dysregulated TIM-3-dependent regulatory pathway in endometriosis, which may impair the local immune-surveillance mechanisms, could promote the survival of ectopic endometriotic implants and aid the development of endometriosis-associated reproductive failures.

2. Results

2.1. Immunophenotypic Characterization of Peripheral Blood and Peritoneal Fluid Mononuclear Cells in Patients with Endometriosis and Non-endometriotic Women

As the exact immunophenotypic composition of the peripheral blood (PB) and peritoneal fluid (PF) immune cell populations in endometriosis were not yet characterized by our Research Team and previous literature data provided inconsistent results, our first aim was to determine the distribution of different T and NK cells in the peripheral blood mononuclear cell (PBMC) subsets of non-endometriotic (NE) control and endometriosis (E)-affected women and in the peritoneal fluid leukocytes (PTL) of the examined patients. Although all E-cases were confirmed by laparoscopy and their demographic data was evaluated in detail (Table 1), but the clinical classification was not done as the patients suffered from different forms and various extents of the disease. Unfortunately currently, neither the best-known rASRM nor the ENZIAN scoring system could accurately be used for the unified, comparative classification of all lesion types [32,33,34]. Moreover, the parallel use of both scoring systems for classification would be inappropriate as they refer to the different locations of lesions. Although the revised ENZIAN scoring may provide an excellent complement to the rASRM score for a morphological description of deep infiltrating endometriosis (DIE), however, this system is not in use in our clinical practice [35]. In the case of NE-cohort, under the EU-General Data Protection Regulation (EU-GDPR) and the Privacy, Informational, and Healthy data Act, with special regard to the confidentiality and privacy of voluntary non-remunerated blood donation, all personal and health-related data obtained about the donors during blood donation were processed anonymously, confidentially and securely and were not disclosed to the Research team for analysis.
During analysis, the percentage of CD3+ T, CD4+ T, CD8+ T, Treg lymphocytes, as well as total CD56+ NK, CD56dim NK, CD56bright NK, and NKT-like cells were determined and compared based on the flow cytometric gating strategy indicated on Figure 1.
We found that in the E-PBMC samples, a significantly lower number of CD3+ T, CD4+ T, and Treg cells were detected; however, the frequency of total NK and CD56dim NK cells was significantly higher in the affected group when compared to NE samples. As peritoneal fluid was also collected, we could compare the local and peripheral distribution of these subsets in endometriosis. In the E-PTL samples, we detected a significantly higher number of CD8+ T, CD56bright NK, and NKT-like cells than in the periphery. In contrast, the frequency of CD4+ T and Treg cells were significantly lower in the E-PTL samples than in the E-PBMC (Table 2).
It is known that the level of FoxP3 expression by Treg cells is proportional to their suppressive capacity [36]. As literature data indicate that Treg dysfunction plays an important role in the development of endometriosis, we compared their relative FoxP3 expression in NE-PBMC, E-PBMC, and E-PTL cohorts. As indicated in Figure 2, the Mean Fluorescent Intensity (MFI) values of FoxP3 by Treg cells were significantly lower in the E-PBMC samples than that of the NE-PBMC specimens and showed the lowest MFI values when compared to the E-PTL Tregs of the evolved patients.

2.2. Altered TIM-3 Expression by Peripheral Blood and Peritoneal Fluid Mononuclear Cell Subsets in Patients with Endometriosis and Non-Endometriotic Women

Previously, Popovici et al. [28] have found that the mRNA and protein expression of Gal-9 is exclusively increased at the mid- and late-secretory and decidual phases of normal endometrium. Furthermore, our recent study demonstrated a Gal-9 mRNA overexpression in ectopic endometriotic lesions and a significantly increased soluble Gal-9 level in the serum of endometriosis-affected patients compared to non-endometriotic controls [31]. Although these data pose a fundamental role of Gal-9 in endometriosis, the involvement of the TIM-3/Gal-9 regulatory pathway in the development of endometriosis-associated immunological abnormalities is not yet known. Therefore, our next goal was to characterize the cell surface expression of the TIM-3 immune-checkpoint receptor on different PBMC subsets of the NE group and in the E-PBMC and E-PTL samples of the endometriosis cohort.
When we compared the TIM-3 expression by different subsets of peripheral T cells, a significantly decreased labeling was observed on CD3+ T, CD4+ T, and CD8+ T cells, however, a significantly elevated positivity was found on FoxP3+ Treg cells of the examined patients when compared them to NE-PBMC group (Figure 3A–D). E-PTL cells exhibited markedly increased TIM-3 labeling on all of the examined T subsets (Figure 3A–D) in comparison to the E-PBMC samples. In contrast, a significantly decreased TIM-3 positivity was observed on all of the tested peripheral CD56+ NK subsets (Figure 4A–C). At the same time, its labeling was markedly elevated on the peritoneal NKT-like cells of women with endometriosis (Figure 4D).

2.3. Differential Expression of Cell Surface Galectin-9 by Peripheral Blood and Peritoneal Fluid Mononuclear Cell Subsets in Patients with Endometriosis and Non-Endometriotic Women

Although the overexpression of intracellular and secreted Gal-9 was previously proven by our research group in endometriosis [31], the cell surface expression of this lectin has not yet been characterized in this disorder. Comparing the surface Gal-9 positivity on PB-T cells, a significantly elevated expression was revealed on peripheral CD4+ T and Treg cells of E-samples than in the NE- group (Figure 5B,D). In addition, a markedly increased Gal-9 expression was also found on CD3+ T, CD8+ T, and Treg cells isolated from the PF of the affected women when compared to the periphery of the same group (Figure 5A,C,D).
Analyzing the cell surface Gal-9 expression on E-PTL NK cells, a significantly increased labeling was detected on either of the total NK, the CD56dim NK, and CD56bright NK cells in comparison to their peripheral counterparts. The Gal-9 positivity of NKT-like cells was not altered (Figure 6A–D).

3. Discussion

Endometriosis is a progressive, chronic, estrogen-dependent inflammatory disorder that is associated with chronic pelvic pain and infertility. Although an in-depth understanding of its pathophysiology is still largely elusive, it is well accepted that dysregulated immune-, vascular- and neuroendocrine pathways are highly involved in the development of this disorder. Studies published to date suggest that endometriosis could be considered a local disease with systemic subclinical manifestations [37]; however, the involvement of immunophenotypic alterations in its pathogenesis is still a subject of controversy.
In this study, multicolor flow cytometry was used to characterize the distribution and to compare the cell surface expression of TIM-3 and Gal-9 molecules on different peripheral and peritoneal T and NK cell subsets of women with and without endometriosis. This research was subjected to some limitations that have to be considered and could be addressed in future research. The first limitation is related to the restricted sample size that was used for analysis. The second limitation concerns methodical problems. Albeit all endometriosis cases were confirmed by laparoscopy and their clinical data were evaluated in detail (Table 1), but clinical scoring was not done.
Furthermore, as our controls were non-endometriotic women, their pelvic status was not examined by laparoscopy, and under the EU-GDPR and the Privacy, Informational and Healthy data Act regulations their sensitive personal and clinical data were not disclosed to the research team to fulfill the comparative demographic analysis. Finally, we restricted our trials only on immunophenotypic analysis, but functional tests were not performed as merely frozen cells were available. Despite these limitations, the strength of our present work is to highlight a critical role of the immunological dysregulation in endometriosis and to expose the involvement of the TIM-3/Gal-9 immune checkpoint pathway in this gynecological disorder.
The phenotypic characterization of different PBMC populations revealed significantly lower frequencies of CD3+ T, CD4+ T, and Treg cells in endometriosis compared to non-endometriotic controls. In addition, a markedly higher number of peripheral CD56dim NK, a slightly elevated CD56bright NK and decreased NKT-like frequencies were also found in the affected cohort. Investigating these lymphocyte subsets in the peritoneal fluid of the affected women showed a significantly lower percentage of CD4+ T, Treg, and CD56dim NK cells, a higher number of CD8+ T, CD56bright NK, and NKT-like cells compared to the periphery. Albeit comparison of the peripheral CD4+/CD8+ and CD4+/Treg ratios did not result in any significant differences between the NE-PBMC and E-PBMC samples, the CD4+/CD8+ ratio was inverted in the PF of the affected women, suggesting a peritoneal redistribution of CD8+ T cells in this disease (Table 2). Confronting the known literature data with our recent findings indicated, that while some of the earlier reports were in accordance with our data [7,38,39,40], others were contrary with our results [41,42,43,44], or did not find any significant difference [10,45] in the distribution of PBMC or PTL subsets in women with or without endometriosis. Based on these inconsistent results, we conceive that not the quantitative differences, but the dysregulated immune response might be the major contributing factor in the immunopathogenesis of this disease.
As ectopic implants closely interact with the surrounding microenvironment, altered or disturbed expression of molecules that can modulate their survival could be involved in the expansion of the ectopic lesions. One of these molecules might be the β-galactoside-binding galectins, which are pivotal in the regulation of cell adhesion, migration, invasion, angiogenesis, and in the control of innate and adaptive immunity [27,46,47]. Although the roles of Gal-1 and Gal-3 have already been described in endometriosis [48,49], the involvement of Gal-9 in the pathogenesis of this disease is still not known.
Gal-9 is reported to have distinct functions intracellularly, in the extracellular compartments, or on the cell surface [9]. Recently we have demonstrated that Gal-9 mRNA is overexpressed in the eutopic endometrium, invectopic lesions, and in E-PTL of patients with endometriosis. In addition, we detected increased soluble Gal-9 levels in the serum of the affected patients compared to NE-women, which was positively correlated with the severity of the disease [31]. In the present study, we detected a notable cell surface Gal-9 positivity 3.56 ± 4.76%–70.46 ± 32.98% [mean ± SD%] of the examined T and NK subpopulations and observed that (except NKT-like cells) its presence was more prominent on the E-PTL subsets than in the periphery, which is in contrast to the earlier published data of Madireddi et al. [50] who could not detect Gal-9 expression on the cell surface of activated T cells; however, this group examined mouse lymphocytes instead of human T cells. We established that the surface Gal-9 positivity was significantly elevated on CD4+ T and Treg cells isolated from E-PBMC samples in comparison to NE-PBMC. In addition, we revealed that the Gal-9 expression was significantly elevated by peritoneal CD8+ T, CD56+ NK, CD56dim NK, and CD56bright NK cells compared to their peripheral counterparts showing the highest expression on peritoneal Treg cells. Although the surface Gal-9 positivity of peritoneal CD4+ T cells was also elevated, it did not reach the level of statistical significance.
The best characterized binding partner of Gal-9 is the TIM-3 immune checkpoint receptor, which was initially identified on terminally differentiated IFN-γ producing helper and cytotoxic T cells. During physiological conditions, engagement of TIM-3 with Gal-9 influences T cell tolerance negatively regulates IFN-γ secretion, and induces apoptosis of Th1 and Th17 cells; hence plays an important role in the regulation of Th1/Th17 polarization. In our previous research immune checkpoint interactions were examined in the context of healthy and pathological pregnancies although much fewer studies have been published about the TIM-3 and Gal-9 molecules in the pathogenesis of endometriosis [51,52]. In the present study, we found a decreased CD4+ T cell number in endometriosis, which was more prominent in the PF than in the PB of the patients. In addition, we found that the TIM-3 receptor expression by CD4+ T cells was significantly lower in the PB than in the PF, resulting in a diminished TIM-3/Gal-9-dependent regulatory impact on the periphery. These results indicate that the “suicidogenic” effect of high dose Gal-9 on Th1 and Th17 cells is more robust in the pelvis, where ectopic lesions are present, and a higher level of soluble lectin is produced.
In our study, we detected a significantly increased TIM-3 expression by CD8+ T cells in the PF of women with endometriosis compared to the periphery. As activated CD8+ T cells are less susceptible to the death-inducing effect of Gal-9 than CD4+ Th1 cells [53] besides local redistribution, it might explain why we observed a higher number of CD8+ T cell in the PF samples. In addition, we showed that although the percentage of Treg cells was decreased, their surface Gal-9 and TIM-3 expression were significantly elevated in both the PB and, more abundantly, in the PF of patients with endometriosis. Tanaka et al. [36] found a significantly decreased CD45RA-/Foxp3high activated (suppressive) Treg number in the eutopic endometrium and endometrioma samples of the affected women which were in accordance with our recent data Albeit elevated TIM-3 receptor expression identifies a Treg subset highly effective in inhibiting pathological Th1 and Th17-biased immune response [54], we suppose, that the observed decrease in peripheral and peritoneal Treg numbers and the decreased FoxP3 expression may mark diminished regulatory function in endometriosis. In virtue of the above-mentioned data, we reconfirm a theory of dysregulated immune response wherein the decreased suppressive capacity of Treg cells exaggerates peritoneal inflammation, stimulates local angiogenesis, thus facilitates the progression of the disease.
Previous literature data indicate that Gal-9 promotes the differentiation and FoxP3 expression of Treg cells while suppressing the development of Th17 cells [15]. As earlier, we revealed a significantly elevated Gal-9 level in the serum of women with endometriosis [31], it seems conflicting, why we could not see the elevation of the Treg subpopulation in this disorder? It is well known now that fine regulation of the genetic signature of suppressive activity is critical for the development of Treg cells and the optimal control of the local immune response. In the context of endometriosis, we can imagine that a local inflammatory environment and strong immune-activation might have a disruptive effect on the stability of Tregs and may reprogram them towards immune-boosting or autoreactive effectors even at the presence of high Gal-9 level as indicated by present reports [55,56].
In contrast to Tregs, we found that the TIM-3 receptor expression was significantly lower on both CD56dim NK and CD56bright NK subsets of the E-PBMC samples that on that of the NE-PBMC lymphocytes. It was found that the effect of Gal-9 on NK cells is bimodal since, as an activating co-receptor, it can enhance the IFNγ production of TIM-3high+ NK cells, but in some circumstances, it can also deliver inhibitory signals during chronic conditions [57,58,59]. We suppose that similarly to chronic HIV infection, persistent signaling through TIM-3 receptor induced by high local Gal-9 production might result in the downregulation of TIM-3 expression by NK cells; therefore, it can contribute to the previously described NK cell dysfunction in endometriosis. In addition and based on the recently published data of Motamedi et al. [60], we propose that the significantly elevated number of Gal-9+ NK cells in the PF of patients with endometriosis may mark functionally impaired killer cells, that express negligible amounts of perforin and granzyme (which is detrimental to their cytotoxic abilities) but can produce a high level of IFNγ, where the role is particularly highlighted in the pathogenesis of endometriosis.
In the current study, we revealed a significantly elevated TIM-3 receptor expression on peritoneal NKT-like cells of endometriosis-affected women in comparison to the periphery. As TIM-3+ NKT-like cells can proliferate and secrete a range of cytokines upon stimulation [61], we think, that they are in a functional activated state. Based on the results of Kadowaki et al. [62], we hypothesize that a high local Gal-9 concentration plays an important role in the regulation of TIM-3+ NKT-like cells by inducing their local, activation-dependent proliferation, and enhancing their capacity to produce a high amount of IL-17. Further studies are required to ascertain how the engagement of TIM-3 by Gal-9 affects the survival and cytokine production on different NKT-like subsets in endometriosis.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Ethical Approval

The trial was approved by the Regional Committee for Research Ethics of the University of Pecs Medical School, Hungary (2015) and was recorded on the Institutional Research Register with a registration number of 5816. The study protocol conforms to the ethical guidelines of the 1975 Declaration of Helsinki. Written informed consent was obtained from all participating individuals.

4.2. Patients and Sample Collection

Specimens were collected at the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Medical School, University of Pecs, Hungary. Diagnostic or operative laparoscopy was performed in a total of 23 reproductive age women (range 24–40 years, demographic data are presented in Table 1), whose endometriosis was classified during laparoscopy according to the anatomical localization of the endometriotic lesions. After surgical intervention, endometriosis was confirmed histologically in all of the involved cases. Before surgery, 10 mL of peripheral venous blood were collected from all of the endometriosis-affected women by venipuncture (n = 12) in K2EDTA containing tubes (E-PBMC cohort). In n = 11 cases, peritoneal fluid was aspirated during laparoscopy from the pouch of Douglas before any surgical manipulation (E-PTL cohort). Special precaution was taken to avoid blood or other fluid (saline, methylene blue dye) contamination. In addition, peripheral venous blood from age-matched female volunteers (n = 10) was obtained from the Hungarian National Blood Transfusion Center, Regional Centre Pecs, Hungary, and were used as non-endometriotic control samples (NE-PBMC cohort). The health status of the blood volunteers was identified by a mini-interview, and all of those women who reported gynecologic problems were excluded from the study. Under the EU-GDPR and due to the Privacy, Informational and Healthy data Act regulations, all personal and health-related data obtained about the donors during blood donation were processed anonymously, confidentially and securely, and were not provided to the Research team for further demographic analysis. After collection, all of the biological specimens were immediately transported to the Lab for further analysis. In the whole study, all of the examined peripheral blood and peritoneal fluid samples were handled and treated uniformly.

4.3. Lymphocyte Separation, Cryopreservation, and Thawing

Peripheral blood mononuclear cells of non-endometriotic and endometriosis-affected women were purified from K2EDTA-treated venous blood samples on Ficoll–Paque (GE Healthcare, Little Chalfont, UK), density- gradient centrifugation at 2000 rpm for 20 min. PBMC were collected from the interphase, washed in complete Rosewell Park Memorial Institute medium [RPMI1640 (Lonza Basel, Switzerland)] supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS, Gibco by Life Technologies, Grand Island, NY, USA) for 6 min at 1200 rpm. The cell-containing pellet was resuspended in heat-inactivated human AB-serum (Biowest, Nuaillé, France) containing 10% Dimethyl-sulfoxide (DMSO, Sigma-Aldrich St. Louis, MO, USA) for cryoprotection. Next, the isolated PBMC were aliquoted in cryovials and stored at −80 °C in the mechanical freezer. Thawing was carried out on the day of immunolabeling. Aspirated peritoneal fluid samples were centrifuged for 10 min at 3000 rpm, and the obtained cell-pellet was resuspended in complete RPMI medium. Peritoneal fluid leukocytes were isolated on Ficoll-Paque gradient similarly to PBMC, resuspended in human AB serum supplemented with 10% DMSO, next aliquoted in cryovials and stored in −80 °C freezer until further use.

4.4. Antibodies

Freshly thawed PBMC and PTL samples were used for surface and intracellular immuno-labeling and flow cytometric analysis. The following antibodies were used: fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC)-conjugated anti-human CD4 (Clone: RPA-T4, BD Biosciences, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA), phycoerythrin (PE)-conjugated anti-human Gal-9 (Clone: 9M1–3, Biolegend, San Diego, CA, USA), PE-conjugated anti-human TIM-3 (Clone: 344823, R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN, USA), Peridinin-chlorophyll protein (PerCP)-conjugated anti-human CD56 (Clone: B159, BD Biosciences Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA), allophycocyanin (APC)-conjugated anti-human TIM-3 (Clone: 344823, R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN, USA), APC-conjugated anti-human FoxP3 (Clone: 236A/E7, eBioscience, Santa Clara, CA, USA), APC-H7 conjugated anti-human CD8 (Clone: SK1, BD Biosciences, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA) and Brilliant Violet (BV) 510-conjugated anti-human CD3 (Clone: UCHT1, BD Biosciences, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA). Control antibodies included isotype-matched FITC-, PE-, APC-, APC-H7, or BV510-conjugated mouse antibodies.

4.5. Immunolabeling of Leukocytes and Flow Cytometric Analysis

Cryopreserved PBMC or PTL cells were thawed in a 37 °C water bath as quickly as possible and was washed twice with RPMI medium to remove DMSO. 1 × 106 cells were resuspended in 100 μL Dulbecco’s phosphate saline buffer/tube (D-PBS, Lonza, Basel, Switzerland) and were incubated for 30 min at room temperature with fluorochrome-conjugated monoclonal antibodies. After staining, the cells were washed with D-PBS, fixed in 300 μL of 1% paraformaldehyde (PFA) solution, and stored at 4 °C in darkness until Fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) analysis. Flow cytometry was carried out using the BD FACSCanto II flow cytometer (BD Immunocytometry Systems, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA) equipped with BD FACSDIVA V6 software (BD Biosciences, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA) for data acquisition and analysis.

4.6. FoxP3 Intracellular Labeling

After surface labeling, intracellular FoxP3 staining was also performed using the FoxP3 Staining Buffer Set (eBioscience, Santa Clara, CA, USA) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. Briefly, isolated leukocytes were permeabilized in 1 mL Fixation/Permeabilization buffer (Concentrate/Diluent 1:4) at 4 °C for 1 h. Then the samples were washed twice in 1× F/P buffer and stained with APC-conjugated anti-human FoxP3 monoclonal antibody at 4 °C for 1 h in the dark. After 2× washing cells were resuspended in D-PBS, fixed with 1% PFA, and evaluated by FACS.

4.7. Statistical Analysis

Clinical data were provided to the Research Team only after executing the study. The localization of endometriotic lesions was established during laparoscopy, and it was used as a reference for the anatomical classification of endometriosis. During statistical analysis, the obtained FACS data were first evaluated by descriptive statistical methods such as mean, SD, and frequency and the distribution of the data sets was determined. As only two independent groups (NE-PBMC vs. E-PBMC or E-PBMC vs. E-PTL) were compared at once and the examined values demonstrated normal distribution, two-tailed Student’s t-test was used as a statistical method to compare sample means on one variable. Multiple comparisons were not made. Differences were considered significant if the calculated p-value was ≤0.05.

5. Conclusions

Our results indicate a persistent activation and a disturbed regulatory function of the TIM-3/Gal-9 pathway in endometriosis, suggesting its potential impact in the evolution of the altered immune-effector mechanisms in the survival of ectopic lesions and the development of endometriosis-associated reproductive failures. We hope that our results may add deeper insight into the pathogenesis of this enigmatic disease by revealing a dysfunctional regulatory mechanism that may contribute to the immunological evolvement of endometriosis and may pave the way for the development of new therapeutic possibilities for the clinical practice.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, B.P.; methodology, M.M., L.S., and B.P.; formal analysis, M.M., and B.P.; investigation, M.M., Mi.M., and A.T.; resources, M.M., N.B., M.K., S.S., L.S., and B.P.; data curation, M.M., B.P., S.S., and A.M.-K.; writing—original draft, M.M. and B.P.; writing—review and editing, B.P., M.M., and L.S.; visualization, M.M., and B.P.; supervision, B.P., L.S., and M.K.; project administration, B.P.; funding acquisition, L.S. and B.P. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This study was supported by Grants from National Research, Development and Innovation Office-NKFIH (K119529), and PTE-TANDEM Internal Scientific Grants of Pecs University, Medical School (KA-2019-48).

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank for the institutional and technical support of the University of Pecs, Medical Centre and Janos Szentagothai Research Centre. In addition, we are grateful to the women who donated their peripheral blood and peritoneal fluid samples for the project.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study, in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data, in the writing of the manuscript, or in the decision to publish the results.

Abbreviations

TIMT-cell immunoglobulin and mucin domain
GalGalectin
PB Peripheral blood
PFPeritoneal fluid
NKNatural Killer cell
CDCluster of differentiation
TregRegulatory T cell
FoxP3Forkhead box P3
Th T helper cell
TCRT cell receptor
IFNγInterferon gamma
ILInterleukin
IL-1βInterleukin 1 beta
TNFα Tumor Necrosis Factor alpha
PBMCPeripheral blood mononuclear cell
NE Non-endometriotic
EEndometriosis
PTLPeritoneal fluid leukocytes
rASRMrevised American Society of Reproductive Medicine
EU European Union
GDPRGeneral Data Protection Regulation
SD Standard deviation
BMIBody mass index
GnRHGonadotropin releasing hormone
DIEDeep infiltrative endometriosis
NKTNatural Killer T cell
n.s.Non-significant
MFIMean Fluorescent Intensity
K2EDTADipotassium-Ethylene Diamine Tetraacetic Acid
RPMIRoswell Park Memorial Institute
FBSFetal bovine serum
DMSO Dimethyl sulfoxide
FITCFluorescein isothiocyanate
PEPhycoerythrin
PerCPPeridinin-chlorophyll protein
APCAllophycocyanin
D-PBSDulbecco’s phosphate saline buffer
PFAParaformaldehyde
FACS Fluorescence-activated cell sorting

References

  1. Barbosa, C.P.; De Souza, Â.M.B.; Bianco, B.; Christofolini, D.M.; Mafra, F.A.; De Lima, G.R. OC-125 immunostaining in endometriotic lesion samples. Arch. Gynecol. Obstet. 2010, 281, 43–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Giudice, L.C.; Kao, L.C. Endometriosis. Lancet 2004, 364, 1789–1799. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Liu, H.; Lang, J.H. Is abnormal eutopic endometrium the cause of endometriosis? The role of eutopic endometrium in pathogenesis of endometriosis. Med. Sci. Monit. 2011, 17, 92–99. [Google Scholar]
  4. Burney, R.O.; Giudice, L.C. Pathogenesis and pathophysiology of endometriosis. Fertil. Steril. 2012, 98, 511–519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  5. Koninckx, P.R.; Ussia, A.; Adamyan, L.; Wattiez, A.; Gomel, V.; Martin, D.C. Pathogenesis of endometriosis: The genetic/epigenetic theory. Fertil. Steril. 2019, 111, 327–340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Ahn, S.H.; Monsanto, S.P.; Miller, C.; Singh, S.S.; Thomas, R.; Tayade, C. Pathophysiology and immune dysfunction in endometriosis. BioMed Res. Int. 2015, 2015, 795976. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Olkowska-Truchanowicz, J.; Bocian, K.; Maksym, R.B.; Białoszewska, A.; Włodarczyk, D.; Baranowski, W.; Ząbek, J.; Korczak-Kowalska, G.; Malejczyk, J. CD4+ CD25+ FOXP3+ regulatory T cells in peripheral blood and peritoneal fluid of patients with endometriosis. Hum. Reprod. 2013, 28, 119–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Budiu, R.A.; Diaconu, I.; Chrissluis, R.; Dricu, A.; Edwards, R.P.; Vlad, A.M. A conditional mouse model for human MUC1-positive endometriosis shows the presence of anti-MUC1 antibodies and Foxp3+ regulatory T cells. Dis. Model. Mech. 2009, 2, 593–603. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Barcz, E.; Kamiński, P.; Marianowski, L. Role of cytokines in pathogenesis of endometriosis. Med. Sci. Monit. 2000, 6, 1042–1046. [Google Scholar]
  10. Mier-Cabrera, J.; Jiménez-Zamudio, L.; García-Latorre, E.; Cruz-Orozco, O.; Hernández-Guerrero, C. Quantitative and qualitative peritoneal immune profiles, T-cell apoptosis and oxidative stress-associated characteristics in women with minimal and mild endometriosis. BJOG 2011, 118, 6–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Khan, K.N.; Fujishita, A.; Hiraki, K.; Kitajima, M.; Nakashima, M.; Fushiki, S.; Kitawaki, J. Bacterial contamination hypothesis: A new concept in endometriosis. Reprod. Med. Biol. 2018, 17, 125–133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  12. Wiersma, V.R.; de Bruyn, M.; Helfrich, W.; Bremer, E. Therapeutic potential of Galectin-9 in human disease. Med. Res. Rev. 2013, 33 (Suppl. S1), E102–E126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Spitzenberger, F.; Graessler, J.; Schroeder, H.E. Molecular and functional characterization of galectin 9 mRNA isoforms in porcine and human cells and tissue. Biochimie 2001, 83, 851–862. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Heusschen, R.; Freitag, N.; Tirado-González, I.; Barrientos, G.; Moschansky, P.; Muñoz-Fernández, R.; Leno-Durán, E.; Klapp, B.F.; Thijssen, V.L.J.L.; Blois, S.M. Profiling Lgals9 splice variant expression at the fetal-maternal interface: Implications in normal and pathological human pregnancy. Biol. Reprod. 2013, 88, 22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Wu, W.; Shi, Y.; Li, S.; Zhang, Y.; Liu, Y.; Wu, Y.; Chen, Z. Blockade of Tim-3 signaling restores the virus-specific CD8+ T-cell response in patients with chronic hepatitis B. Eur. J. Immunol. 2012, 42, 1180–1191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Bi, S.; Earl, L.A.; Jacobs, L.; Baum, L.G. Structural features of galectin-9 and galectin-1 that determine distinct T cell death pathways. J. Biol. Chem. 2008, 283, 12248–12258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Li, S.; Yu, Y.; Koehn, C.D.; Zhang, Z.; Su, K. Galectins in the pathogenesis of rheumatoid arthritis. J. Clin. Cell. Immunol. 2013, 4, 1000164. [Google Scholar]
  18. Naka, E.L.; Ponciano, V.C.; Cenedeze, M.A.; Pacheco-Silva, A.; Câmara, N.O.S. Detection of the Tim-3 ligand, galectin-9, inside the allograft during a rejection episode. Int. Immunopharmacol. 2009, 9, 658–662. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Seki, M.; Oomizu, S.; Sakata, K.-M.; Sakata, A.; Arikawa, T.; Watanabe, K.; Ito, K.; Takeshita, K.; Niki, T.; Saita, N.; et al. Galectin-9 suppresses the generation of Th17, promotes the induction of regulatory T cells, and regulates experimental autoimmune arthritis. Clin. Immunol. 2008, 127, 78–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Oomizu, S.; Arikawa, T.; Niki, T.; Kadowaki, T.; Ueno, M.; Nishi, N.; Yamauchi, A.; Hattori, T.; Masaki, T.; Hirashima, M. Cell surface galectin-9 expressing Th cells regulate Th17 and Foxp3+ Treg development by galectin-9 secretion. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e48574. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Rabinovich, G.A.; Liu, F.-T.; Hirashima, M.; Anderson, A. An emerging role for galectins in tuning the immune response: Lessons from experimental models of inflammatory disease, autoimmunity and cancer. Scand. J. Immunol. 2007, 66, 143–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Wang, F.; He, W.; Yuan, J.; Wu, K.; Zhou, H.; Zhang, W.; Chen, Z.K. Activation of Tim-3-Galectin-9 pathway improves survival of fully allogeneic skin grafts. Transpl. Immunol. 2008, 19, 12–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Niki, T.; Tsutsui, S.; Hirose, S.; Aradono, S.; Sugimoto, Y.; Takeshita, K.; Nishi, N.; Hirashima, M. Galectin-9 is a high affinity IgE-binding lectin with anti-allergic effect by blocking IgE-antigen complex formation. J. Biol. Chem. 2009, 284, 32344–32352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  24. Jemielity, S.; Wang, J.J.; Chan, Y.K.; Ahmed, A.A.; Li, W.; Monahan, S.; Bu, X.; Farzan, M.; Freeman, G.J.; Umetsu, D.T.; et al. TIM-family proteins promote infection of multiple enveloped viruses through virion-associated phosphatidylserine. PLoS Pathog. 2013, 9, e1003232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Freeman, G.J.; Casasnovas, J.M.; Umetsu, D.T.; DeKruyff, R.H. TIM genes: A family of cell surface phosphatidylserine receptors that regulate innate and adaptive immunity. Immunol. Rev. 2010, 235, 172–189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Hastings, W.D.; Anderson, D.E.; Kassam, N.; Koguchi, K.; Greenfield, E.A.; Kent, S.C.; Zheng, X.X.; Strom, T.B.; Hafler, D.A.; Kuchroo, V.K. TIM-3 is expressed on activated human CD4+ T cells and regulates Th1 and Th17 cytokines. Eur. J. Immunol. 2009, 39, 2492–2501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Than, N.G.; Romero, R.; Balogh, A.; Karpati, E.; Mastrolia, S.A.; Staretz-Chacham, O.; Hahn, S.; Erez, O.; Papp, Z.; Kim, C.J. Galectins: Double-edged swords in the cross-roads of pregnancy complications and female reproductive tract inflammation and neoplasia. J. Pathol. Transl. Med. 2015, 49, 181–208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Popovici, R.M.; Krause, M.S.; Germeyer, A.; Strowitzki, T.; von Wolff, M. Galectin-9: A new endometrial epithelial marker for the mid- and late-secretory and decidual phases in humans. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2005, 90, 6170–6176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Imaizumi, T.; Kumagai, M.; Sasaki, N.; Kurotaki, H.; Mori, F.; Seki, M.; Nishi, N.; Fujimoto, K.; Tanji, K.; Shibata, T.; et al. Interferon-gamma stimulates the expression of galectin-9 in cultured human endothelial cells. J. Leukoc. Biol. 2002, 72, 486–491. [Google Scholar]
  30. Steelman, A.J.; Smith, R.; Welsh, C.J.; Li, J. Galectin-9 protein is up-regulated in astrocytes by tumor necrosis factor and promotes encephalitogenic T-cell apoptosis. J. Biol. Chem. 2013, 288, 23776–23787. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Brubel, R.; Bokor, A.; Pohl, A.; Schilli, G.K.; Szereday, L.; Bacher-Szamuel, R.; Rigo, J.; Polgar, B. Serum galectin-9 as a noninvasive biomarker for the detection of endometriosis and pelvic pain or infertility-related gynecologic disorders. Fertil. Steril. 2017, 108, 1016–1025.e2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  32. Adamson, G.D. Endometriosis classification: An update. Curr. Opin. Obstet. Gynecol. 2011, 23, 213–220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Khazali, S. Endometriosis classification-the quest for the holy grail? J. Reprod. Infertil. 2016, 17, 67. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  34. Andres, M.P.; Borrelli, G.M.; Abrão, M.S. Endometriosis classification according to pain symptoms: Can the ASRM classification be improved? Best Pract. Res. Clin. Obstet. Gynaecol. 2018, 51, 111–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Haas, D.; Shebl, O.; Shamiyeh, A.; Oppelt, P. The rASRM score and the Enzian classification for endometriosis: Their strengths and weaknesses. Acta Obstet. Gynecol. Scand. 2013, 92, 3–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Tanaka, Y.; Mori, T.; Ito, F.; Koshiba, A.; Takaoka, O.; Kataoka, H.; Maeda, E.; Okimura, H.; Mori, T.; Kitawaki, J. Exacerbation of endometriosis due to regulatory T-Cell dysfunction. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2017, 102, 3206–3217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Agic, A.; Xu, H.; Finas, D.; Banz, C.; Diedrich, K.; Hornung, D. Is endometriosis associated with systemic subclinical inflammation? Gynecol. Obstet. Investig. 2006, 62, 139–147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Oosterlynck, D.J.; Meuleman, C.; Lacquet, F.A.; Waer, M.; Koninckx, P.R. Flow cytometry analysis of lymphocyte subpopulations in peritoneal fluid of women with endometriosis. Am. J. Reprod. Immunol. 1994, 31, 25–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Gallinelli, A.; Chiossi, G.; Giannella, L.; Marsella, T.; Genazzani, A.D.; Volpe, A. Different concentrations of interleukins in the peritoneal fluid of women with endometriosis: Relationships with lymphocyte subsets. Gynecol. Endocrinol. 2004, 18, 144–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Dias, J.A.; Podgaec, S.; de Oliveira, R.M.; Carnevale Marin, M.L.; Baracat, E.C.; Abrão, M.S. Patients with endometriosis of the rectosigmoid have a higher percentage of natural killer cells in peripheral blood. J. Minim. Invasive Gynecol. 2012, 19, 317–324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Badawy, S.Z.; Cuenca, V.; Stitzel, A.; Tice, D. Immune rosettes of T and B lymphocytes in infertile women with endometriosis. J. Reprod. Med. 1987, 32, 194–197. [Google Scholar]
  42. Iwasaki, K.; Makino, T.; Maruyama, T.; Matsubayashi, H.; Nozawa, S.; Yokokura, T. Leukocyte subpopulations and natural killer activity in endometriosis. Int. J. Fertil. Menopausal Stud. 1993, 38, 229–234. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  43. Szyllo, K.; Tchorzewski, H.; Banasik, M.; Glowacka, E.; Lewkowicz, P.; Kamer-Bartosinska, A. The involvement of T lymphocytes in the pathogenesis of endometriotic tissues overgrowth in women with endometriosis. Mediat. Inflamm. 2003, 12, 131–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Khan, K.N.; Yamamoto, K.; Fujishita, A.; Muto, H.; Koshiba, A.; Kuroboshi, H.; Saito, S.; Teramukai, S.; Nakashima, M.; Kitawaki, J. Differential levels of regulatory T cells and T-helper-17 cells in women with early and advanced endometriosis. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2019, 104, 4715–4729. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Gogacz, M.; Winkler, I.; Bojarska-Junak, A.; Tabarkiewicz, J.; Semczuk, A.; Rechberger, T.; Adamiak, A. T regulatory lymphocytes in patients with endometriosis. Mol. Med. Rep. 2014, 10, 1072–1076. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Vinatier, D.; Cosson, M.; Dufour, P. Is endometriosis an endometrial disease? Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol. 2000, 91, 113–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Shaco-Levy, R.; Sharabi, S.; Benharroch, D.; Piura, B.; Sion-Vardy, N. Matrix metalloproteinases 2 and 9, E-cadherin, and β-catenin expression in endometriosis, low-grade endometrial carcinoma and non-neoplastic eutopic endometrium. Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol. 2008, 139, 226–232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Vergetaki, A.; Jeschke, U.; Vrekoussis, T.; Taliouri, E.; Sabatini, L.; Papakonstanti, E.A.; Makrigiannakis, A. Galectin-1 overexpression in endometriosis and its regulation by neuropeptides (CRH, UCN) indicating its important role in reproduction and inflammation. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e114229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Noël, J.-C.; Chapron, C.; Borghese, B.; Fayt, I.; Anaf, V. Galectin-3 is overexpressed in various forms of endometriosis. Appl. Immunohistochem. Mol. Morphol. AIMM 2011, 19, 253–257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Madireddi, S.; Eun, S.-Y.; Lee, S.-W.; Nemčovičová, I.; Mehta, A.K.; Zajonc, D.M.; Nishi, N.; Niki, T.; Hirashima, M.; Croft, M. Galectin-9 controls the therapeutic activity of 4-1BB-targeting antibodies. J. Exp. Med. 2014, 211, 1433–1448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Meggyes, M.; Miko, E.; Szigeti, B.; Farkas, N.; Szereday, L. The importance of the PD-1/PD-L1 pathway at the maternal-fetal interface. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2019, 19, 74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  52. Miko, E.; Meggyes, M.; Bogar, B.; Schmitz, N.; Barakonyi, A.; Varnagy, A.; Farkas, B.; Tamas, P.; Bodis, J.; Szekeres-Bartho, J.; et al. Involvement of Galectin-9/TIM-3 pathway in the systemic inflammatory response in early-onset preeclampsia. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, 71811. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Kashio, Y.; Nakamura, K.; Abedin, M.J.; Seki, M.; Nishi, N.; Yoshida, N.; Nakamura, T.; Hirashima, M. Galectin-9 induces apoptosis through the calcium-calpain-caspase-1 pathway. J. Immunol. 2003, 170, 3631–3636. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  54. Gautron, A.S.; Dominguez-Villar, M.; de Marcken, M.; Hafler, D.A. Enhanced suppressor function of TIM-3+FoxP3+ regulatory T cells. Eur. J. Immunol. 2014, 44, 2703–2711. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  55. Pedros, C.; Duguet, F.; Saoudi, A.; Chabod, M. Disrupted regulatory T cell homeostasis in inflammatory bowel diseases. World J. Gastroenterol. 2016, 22, 974–995. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Zhang, Z.; Zhou, X. Foxp3 instability helps ttregs distinguish self and non-self. Front. Immunol. 2019, 10, 2226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  57. Ju, Y.; Hou, N.; Meng, J.; Wang, X.; Zhang, X.; Zhao, D.; Liu, Y.; Zhu, F.; Zhang, L.; Sun, W.; et al. T cell immunoglobulin- and mucin-domain-containing molecule-3 (Tim-3) mediates natural killer cell suppression in chronic hepatitis B. J. Hepatol. 2010, 52, 322–329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Jost, S.; Moreno-Nieves, U.Y.; Garcia-Beltran, W.F.; Rands, K.; Reardon, J.; Toth, I.; Piechocka-Trocha, A.; Altfeld, M.; Addo, M.M. Dysregulated Tim-3 expression on natural killer cells is associated with increased Galectin-9 levels in HIV-1 infection. Retrovirology 2013, 10, 74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  59. Szereday, L.; Meggyes, M.; Berki, T.; Miseta, A.; Farkas, N.; Gervain, J.; Par, A.; Par, G. Direct-acting antiviral treatment downregulates immune checkpoint inhibitor expression in patients with chronic hepatitis C. Clin. Exp. Med. 2020. (published online, ahead of print). [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  60. Motamedi, M.; Shahbaz, S.; Fu, L.; Dunsmore, G.; Xu, L.; Harrington, R.; Houston, S.; Elahi, S. Galectin-9 expression defines a subpopulation of nk cells with impaired cytotoxic effector molecules but enhanced IFN-γ production, dichotomous to TIGIT, in HIV-1 infection. ImmunoHorizons 2019, 3, 531–546. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Tang, Z.-H.; Liang, S.; Potter, J.; Jiang, X.; Mao, H.-Q.; Li, Z. Tim-3/galectin-9 regulate the homeostasis of hepatic NKT cells in a murine model of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. J. Immunol. 2013, 190, 1788–1796. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Kadowaki, T.; Morishita, A.; Niki, T.; Hara, J.; Sato, M.; Tani, J.; Miyoshi, H.; Yoneyama, H.; Masaki, T.; Hattori, T.; et al. Galectin-9 prolongs the survival of septic mice by expanding Tim-3-expressing natural killer T cells and PDCA-1+ CD11c+ macrophages. Crit. Care 2013, 17, R284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
Ijms 21 02343 g001 550
Figure 1. Gating strategy for flow cytometry analysis. Selection method of the investigated peripheral and peritoneal CD3+ T, CD4+ T, CD8+ T, CD4+ Treg, CD56+ NK, CD56dim NK, CD56bright NK, and NKT-like immune cell subpopulations.
Figure 1. Gating strategy for flow cytometry analysis. Selection method of the investigated peripheral and peritoneal CD3+ T, CD4+ T, CD8+ T, CD4+ Treg, CD56+ NK, CD56dim NK, CD56bright NK, and NKT-like immune cell subpopulations.
Ijms 21 02343 g001
Ijms 21 02343 g002 550
Figure 2. Comparison of the Mean Fluorescent Intensity (MFI) values of FoxP3 positive peripheral (PBMC) and peritoneal (PTL) Treg cells in non-endometriotic (NE) women and patients with endometriosis (E). Left: The solid bars represent medians of 10, 12, and 11 determinations, the boxes show the interquartile ranges, and the whiskers show the most extreme observations. The middle square within the box represents the mean value. Statistically significant differences with p-values of *** < 0.01 are indicated. Right: representative dot plot and histogram figures showing the analysis of CD4+/FoxP3+ Treg cells in NE-PBMC, E-PBMC and E-PTL samples.
Figure 2. Comparison of the Mean Fluorescent Intensity (MFI) values of FoxP3 positive peripheral (PBMC) and peritoneal (PTL) Treg cells in non-endometriotic (NE) women and patients with endometriosis (E). Left: The solid bars represent medians of 10, 12, and 11 determinations, the boxes show the interquartile ranges, and the whiskers show the most extreme observations. The middle square within the box represents the mean value. Statistically significant differences with p-values of *** < 0.01 are indicated. Right: representative dot plot and histogram figures showing the analysis of CD4+/FoxP3+ Treg cells in NE-PBMC, E-PBMC and E-PTL samples.
Ijms 21 02343 g002
Ijms 21 02343 g003 550
Figure 3. Comparison of the TIM-3 receptor expression by peripheral (PBMC) and peritoneal (PTL) CD3+ T (A), CD4+ T (B), CD8+ T (C) and Treg (D) cell subpopulations in non-endometriotic (NE) women and patients with endometriosis (E). Left: the solid bars represent medians of 10, 12, and 11 determinations; the boxes show the interquartile ranges, and the whiskers show the most extreme observations. The middle square within the box represents the mean value. Statistically significant differences with p-values of *** < 0.01 are indicated. Right: representative histograms and dot plots showing TIM-3 receptor expression by T cells in NE-PBMC, E-PBMC and E-PTL samples.
Figure 3. Comparison of the TIM-3 receptor expression by peripheral (PBMC) and peritoneal (PTL) CD3+ T (A), CD4+ T (B), CD8+ T (C) and Treg (D) cell subpopulations in non-endometriotic (NE) women and patients with endometriosis (E). Left: the solid bars represent medians of 10, 12, and 11 determinations; the boxes show the interquartile ranges, and the whiskers show the most extreme observations. The middle square within the box represents the mean value. Statistically significant differences with p-values of *** < 0.01 are indicated. Right: representative histograms and dot plots showing TIM-3 receptor expression by T cells in NE-PBMC, E-PBMC and E-PTL samples.
Ijms 21 02343 g003
Ijms 21 02343 g004 550
Figure 4. Comparison of the TIM-3 receptor expression by peripheral (PBMC) and peritoneal (PTL) CD56+ NK (A), CD56dim NK (B), CD56bright (C) and NKT-like (D) cell subpopulations in non-endometriotic (NE) women and patients with endometriosis (E). The solid bars represent medians of 10, 12, and 11 determinations, the boxes show the interquartile ranges, and the whiskers show the most extreme observations. The middle square within the box shows the mean value. Statistically significant differences for p-values of *** < 0.01, ** < 0.03, and * < 0.05 are indicated.
Figure 4. Comparison of the TIM-3 receptor expression by peripheral (PBMC) and peritoneal (PTL) CD56+ NK (A), CD56dim NK (B), CD56bright (C) and NKT-like (D) cell subpopulations in non-endometriotic (NE) women and patients with endometriosis (E). The solid bars represent medians of 10, 12, and 11 determinations, the boxes show the interquartile ranges, and the whiskers show the most extreme observations. The middle square within the box shows the mean value. Statistically significant differences for p-values of *** < 0.01, ** < 0.03, and * < 0.05 are indicated.
Ijms 21 02343 g004
Ijms 21 02343 g005 550
Figure 5. Comparison of the surface Gal-9 ligand expression by peripheral (PBMC) and peritoneal (PTL) CD3+ T (A), CD4+ T (B), CD8+ T (C) and Treg (D) cell subpopulations in non-endometriotic (NE) women and patients with endometriosis (E). Left: the solid bars represent medians of 10, 12, and 11 determinations; the boxes show the interquartile ranges, and the whiskers show the most extreme observations. The middle square within the box shows the mean value. Statistically significant differences for p-values of *** < 0.01 and * < 0.05 are indicated. Right: representative histograms and dot plots showing Gal-9 ligand expression by T cells in NE-PBMC, E-PBMC and E-PTL samples.
Figure 5. Comparison of the surface Gal-9 ligand expression by peripheral (PBMC) and peritoneal (PTL) CD3+ T (A), CD4+ T (B), CD8+ T (C) and Treg (D) cell subpopulations in non-endometriotic (NE) women and patients with endometriosis (E). Left: the solid bars represent medians of 10, 12, and 11 determinations; the boxes show the interquartile ranges, and the whiskers show the most extreme observations. The middle square within the box shows the mean value. Statistically significant differences for p-values of *** < 0.01 and * < 0.05 are indicated. Right: representative histograms and dot plots showing Gal-9 ligand expression by T cells in NE-PBMC, E-PBMC and E-PTL samples.
Ijms 21 02343 g005
Ijms 21 02343 g006 550
Figure 6. Comparison of the cell surface Gal-9 expression by peripheral (PBMC) and peritoneal (PTL) CD56+ NK (A), CD56dim NK (B), CD56bright (C) and NKT-like (D) cell subpopulations in non-endometriotic (NE) women and patients with endometriosis (E). The solid bars represent medians of 10, 12, and 11 determinations; the boxes show the interquartile ranges, and the whiskers show the most extreme observations. The middle square within the box shows the mean value. Statistically significant differences for p-values of *** < 0.01 are indicated.
Figure 6. Comparison of the cell surface Gal-9 expression by peripheral (PBMC) and peritoneal (PTL) CD56+ NK (A), CD56dim NK (B), CD56bright (C) and NKT-like (D) cell subpopulations in non-endometriotic (NE) women and patients with endometriosis (E). The solid bars represent medians of 10, 12, and 11 determinations; the boxes show the interquartile ranges, and the whiskers show the most extreme observations. The middle square within the box shows the mean value. Statistically significant differences for p-values of *** < 0.01 are indicated.
Ijms 21 02343 g006
Table
Table 1. Demographic and clinical characteristics of the endometriosis affected cohorts.
Table 1. Demographic and clinical characteristics of the endometriosis affected cohorts.
E-PBMC (n = 12)E-PTL (n = 11)p-Value
Mean age (years ± SD)31.92 ± 4.33729.00 ± 4.3130.1218
Age ranges at diagnosis (years)26–4024–38-
Mean BMI (kg/m2 ± SD)24.11 ± 4.89521.09 ± 2.8800.1009
Gynecological History – n (%)
Normal cycle length (25–35 days) 4 (33.33)3 (27.27)-
Irregular cycle4 (33.33)4 (36.36)-
Suppressed cycle (GnRH analogue)0 (0.00)1 (9.09)-
Fertility Data – n (%)
Previous normal pregnancy4 (33.33)0 (0.00)-
Previous pathological pregnancy2 (16.67)1 (9.09)-
Infertility7 (58.33)9 (81.82)-
Endometriosis-Related Data – n (%)
Previous laparoscopic intervention8 (66.67)8 (72.73)-
Pharmacologic treatment3 (25.00)4 (36.36)-
Pelvic pain8 (66.67)5 (45.45)-
Dysmenorrhea9 (75.00)9 (81.82)-
Dyspareunia5 (41.67) 6 (54.55)-
Dyschesia8 (66.67)8 (72.73)-
Dysuria1 (8.33)1 (9.09)-
Type of Endometriosis – n (%)
Peritoneal1 (8.33)3 (27.27)-
Ovarian endometriosis2 (16.67)2 (18.18)-
Deep infiltrating endometriosis (DIE)3 (25.00)2 (18.18)-
Combined (DIE + other)6 (50.00)4 (36.36)-
Other Associated Diseases – n (%)
Autoimmunity0 (0.00)1 (9.09)-
Insulin resistance1 (8.33)2 (18.18)-
Comparative demographic and clinical analysis of data collected from endometriosis-affected cohorts. Statistical analysis was made by Student’s t-test for continuous variables and the calculated results were indicated as mean values ± standard deviation [mean ± SD]. In all of the categorical variables, the actual case number and percentage of total cases [n (%)] are presented.
Table
Table 2. Phenotype characteristics of the analyzed mononuclear cell populations.
Table 2. Phenotype characteristics of the analyzed mononuclear cell populations.
NE-PBMCE-PBMCp-ValueE-PBMCE-PTLp-Value
CD363.85 ± 8.4953.52 ± 11.43<0.0353.52 ± 11.4357.09 ± 4.10n.s.
CD437.09 ± 6.5026.45 ± 8.83<0.0126.45 ± 8.8314.90 ± 4.66<0.001
CD820.78 ± 7.2718.73 ± 3.33n.s.18.73 ± 3.3332.11 ± 9.90<0.01
Treg3.41 ± 1.201.56 ± 0.53<0.0011.56 ± 0.531.03 ± 0.47<0.03
CD4/CD82.03 ± 0.841.45 ± 0.61n.s.2.03 ± 0.840.49 ± 0.16<0.01
CD4/Treg11.88 ± 3.8618.01 ± 5.88n.s.11.88 ± 3.8620.10 ± 13.16n.s.
CD56+ NK15.34 ± 7.2026.40 ± 10.99<0.0226.40 ± 10.9924.07 ± 14.06n.s.
CD56dim NK14.01 ± 6.7525.10 ± 10.85<0.0125.10 ± 10.8519.03 ± 12.80n.s.
CD56bright NK1.36 ± 0.691.60 ± 0.91n.s.1.60 ± 0.915.30 ± 4.09<0.01
NKT-like8.57 ± 3.586.38 ± 4.61n.s.6.38 ± 4.6112.72 ± 4.48<0.01
Statistical comparisons were performed by Student’s t-test between peripheral blood mononuclear cells of non-endometriotic women (NE-PBMC) vs. patients with endometriosis (E-PBMC), and between peripheral (E-PBMC) vs peritoneal leukocytes of endometriosis affected women (E-PTL). The calculated results were presented as the mean value ± standard deviation (mean ± SD) and the differences were considered significant when the p-values were ≤0.05. The percentage of lymphocyte subpopulations and their p-values indicating significant differences are marked in bold and “n.s.” marks non-significant values.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Meggyes, M.; Szereday, L.; Bohonyi, N.; Koppan, M.; Szegedi, S.; Marics-Kutas, A.; Marton, M.; Totsimon, A.; Polgar, B. Different Expression Pattern of TIM-3 and Galectin-9 Molecules by Peripheral and Peritoneal Lymphocytes in Women with and without Endometriosis. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 2343. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21072343

AMA Style

Meggyes M, Szereday L, Bohonyi N, Koppan M, Szegedi S, Marics-Kutas A, Marton M, Totsimon A, Polgar B. Different Expression Pattern of TIM-3 and Galectin-9 Molecules by Peripheral and Peritoneal Lymphocytes in Women with and without Endometriosis. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2020; 21(7):2343. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21072343

Chicago/Turabian Style

Meggyes, Matyas, Laszlo Szereday, Noemi Bohonyi, Miklos Koppan, Sarolta Szegedi, Anna Marics-Kutas, Mirjam Marton, Anett Totsimon, and Beata Polgar. 2020. "Different Expression Pattern of TIM-3 and Galectin-9 Molecules by Peripheral and Peritoneal Lymphocytes in Women with and without Endometriosis" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 21, no. 7: 2343. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21072343

APA Style

Meggyes, M., Szereday, L., Bohonyi, N., Koppan, M., Szegedi, S., Marics-Kutas, A., Marton, M., Totsimon, A., & Polgar, B. (2020). Different Expression Pattern of TIM-3 and Galectin-9 Molecules by Peripheral and Peritoneal Lymphocytes in Women with and without Endometriosis. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 21(7), 2343. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21072343

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop