Next Article in Journal
Structural Characterization of Carbonic Anhydrase VIII and Effects of Missense Single Nucleotide Variations to Protein Structure and Function
Previous Article in Journal
Effect of Curcumin on Protein Damage Induced by Rotenone in Dopaminergic PC12 Cells
Previous Article in Special Issue
The Position and Complex Genomic Architecture of Plant T-DNA Insertions Revealed by 4SEE
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Editorial

Chromatin, Epigenetics and Plant Physiology

by
Miloslava Fojtová
1,2,3 and
Jiří Fajkus
1,2,3,*
1
Mendel Centre for Plant Genomics and Proteomics, CEITEC, Masaryk University, CZ-62500 Brno, Czech Republic
2
Laboratory of Functional Genomics and Proteomics, NCBR, Faculty of Science, Masaryk University, CZ-61137 Brno, Czech Republic
3
Department of Cell Biology and Radiobiology, Institute of Biophysics of the Czech Academy of Sciences, v.v.i., CZ-61265 Brno, Czech Republic
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21(8), 2763; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21082763
Submission received: 7 April 2020 / Revised: 14 April 2020 / Accepted: 14 April 2020 / Published: 16 April 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Chromatin, Epigenetics and Plant Physiology)
The ever-increasing interest in epigenetics comes from the fact that in the diverse life situations of organisms, e.g., in cell differentiation, developmental decisions, or responses to biotic and abiotic stresses, it is primarily the reprogramming of the regulation of the existing genetic information, rather than its direct change, that solves the problem. Epigenetic mechanisms allow the organism to channel the appropriate response through diverse particular molecular tools modifying distinct levels of the structure of chromatin. Chromatin is thus marked with certain signals, for example, DNA methylation, posttranslational modifications of histones, incorporation of specific histone variants, or chromatin remodeling. These signals, written by respective enzymes and complexes, termed as epigenetic writers (e.g., DNA methyltransferases, histone methyltransferases, and histone acetyltransferases) have to find their readers—biomolecules recognizing the specific mark, and erasers which are capable of resetting the program. Recent data suggest a deep interconnection of individual epigenetic players, which frequently act together as components of the same multi-subunit complexes. For example, methylcytosine binding protein MeCP2 (a reader) recruits histone deacetylase (an eraser) and H3K9 histone methyltransferase Suv39h1 (a writer), and in this way reinforces the repressive state of a chromatin region [1,2]. Recent research in plants brings many novel findings elucidating the interdependence of diverse epigenetic mechanisms and their crosstalk with various signaling pathways, including the action of phytohormones and reactive oxygen and nitrogen species. Using these molecular tools, chromatin structure decides which particular set of genes will be active in a particular physiological process.
The special issue “Chromatin, Epigenetics and Plant Physiology” in the International Journal of Molecular Sciences comprises two review articles and eight original research papers (Table 1). All contributions deal with important aspects of epigenetic regulations of crucial cellular processes involved in plant growth and development.
Four articles, one review, and three research papers deal with chromatin remodeling complexes. Wang et al. [3] provide a review on the role of Arabidopsis SWR1 and INO80 chromatin remodeling complexes involved in the regulation of the replacement of nucleosomal H2A/H2B dimers with H2A.Z/H2B. The authors describe the composition of the SWR1/INO80-c complex and discuss its diverse nuclear roles ranging from repair processes to regulation of gene expression. Guo et al. [4] report on the involvement of the chromatin remodeler encoded by the OsCHR4 gene in regulation of rice leaf morphology, via modulation of accumulation of cuticle wax on leaf surfaces and auxin biosynthesis. Expression profiles and subcellular localizations of tomato SWI3-like proteins were studied by Zhao et al. [5]. The authors further identify interactions of these subunits of the chromatin remodeling complex with proteins participating in the reproductive development. Their observations support the idea of evolutionary conservation of SWI3 physiological functions in different plant species. Similarly, the involvement of the SWI subunits of the chromatin remodeling complex in temperature-dependent regulation of plant growth and developmental responses in Arabidopsis is reported by Gratkowska-Zmuda et al. [6]. Altogether, these results demonstrate the importance of the proper chromatin remodeling in crucial cellular processes, including gene expression, cell cycle regulation, DNA replication and repair, and hormone signaling.
Results presented in two papers within the special issue “Chromatin, Epigenetics, and Plant Physiology” were obtained using specific advanced methodical approaches. Circular chromosome conformation capture (4C)-based method was utilized by Krispil et al. [7] for the detection of the entire scope of T-DNA insertions, by capturing the local enrichment of spatial chromosomal associations in their genomic proximity without prior knowledge of their genomic locations in Arabidopsis transgenic lines. This approach enables the identification of previously unmapped T-DNA insertions and related chromosomal rearrangements and is applicable to any plant with a sequenced genome. Lochmanová et al. [8] studied the acetylation of histone proteins by a mass spectrometry-based proteomic approach. They conclude that the effect of epigenetically active drugs on early plant development is complex and is not restricted to the ability of these compounds to modulate the levels of histone acetylation marks.
Koláčková et al. [9] solved an interesting problem of the spatial organization of parental genomes in the somatic nuclei of interspecific plant hybrids. They demonstrate that domains of introgressed chromosomes are highly stable among the tissue types and during the cell cycle phases. High-throughput sequencing of Arabidopsis seedlings exposed to methyl jasmonic acid was performed by Zhang et al. [10] to identify differentially expressed circular RNAs. Based on their data, differentially expressed circular RNAs are involved in metabolic and developmental processes and are supposed to play important roles in methyl jasmonic acid-mediated signaling. Boudichevskaia et al. [11] dealt with the characterization of the role of Arabidopsis KNL2 (kinetochore null 2), which is important for deposition of CENH3 at centromeric regions. Transcriptomic analysis of mutant plants reveals that the KNL2 gene loss of function affects processes of cell cycle regulation, transcription, development, and DNA repair. In the review article by R.M.S. et al. [12], the impact of redox components on activities of important epigenetic regulators was described. Authors provide an integrated view on the roles of oxidants (reactive oxygen species and nitric oxide) and antioxidants (pyridine nucleotides and glutathione) in the modulation of DNA methylation and histone modifications in plants.
Together, this collection offers diverse insights into the current plant epigenetics to allow readers to update their knowledge on the described phenomena and mechanisms in this highly complex and quickly evolving field.

Funding

M.F. and J.F. are supported by the European Regional Development Fund-Project ‘SINGING PLANT’ (CZ.02.1.01/0.0/0.0/16_026/0008446) and the Ministry of Education, Youth and Sports of the Czech Republic—project CEITEC 2020 (LQ1601).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Fuks, F.; Hurd, P.J.; Wolf, D.; Nan, X.S.; Bird, A.P.; Kouzarides, T. The Methyl-CpG-binding protein MeCP2 links DNA methylation to histone methylation. J. Biol. Chem. 2003, 278, 4035–4040. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  2. Jones, P.L.; Veenstra, G.J.C.; Wade, P.A.; Vermaak, D.; Kass, S.U.; Landsberger, N.; Strouboulis, J.; Wolffe, A.P. Methylated DNA and MeCP2 recruit histone deacetylase to repress transcription. Nat. Genet. 1998, 19, 187–191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Wang, J.; Gao, S.; Peng, X.; Wu, K.; Yang, S. Roles of the INO80 and SWR1 Chromatin Remodeling Complexes in Plants. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 4591. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. Guo, T.; Wang, D.; Fang, J.; Zhao, J.; Yuan, S.; Xiao, L.; Li, X. Mutations in the Rice OsCHR4 Gene, Encoding a CHD3 Family Chromatin Remodeler, Induce Narrow and Rolled Leaves with Increased Cuticular Wax. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 2567. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  5. Zhao, Z.; Li, T.; Peng, X.; Wu, K.; Yang, S. Identification and Characterization of Tomato SWI3-Like Proteins: Overexpression of SlSWIC Increases the Leaf Size in Transgenic Arabidopsis. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 5121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  6. Gratkowska-Zmuda, D.; Kubala, S.; Sarnowska, E.; Cwiek, P.; Oksinska, P.; Steciuk, J.; Rolicka, A.; Zaborowska, M.; Bucior, E.; Maassen, A.; et al. The SWI/SNF ATP-Dependent Chromatin Remodeling Complex in Arabidopsis Responds to Environmental Changes in Temperature-Dependent Manner. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 762. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  7. Krispil, R.; Tannenbaum, M.; Sarusi-Portuguez, A.; Loza, O.; Raskina, O.; Hakim, O. The Position and Complex Genomic Architecture of Plant T-DNA Insertions Revealed by 4SEE. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 2373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  8. Lochmanová, G.; Ihnatová, I.; Kuchaříková, H.; Brabencová, S.; Zachová, D.; Fajkus, J.; Zdráhal, Z.; Fojtová, M. Different Modes of Action of Genetic and Chemical Downregulation of Histone Deacetylases with Respect to Plant Development and Histone Modifications. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 5093. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Koláčková, V.; Perničková, K.; Vrána, J.; Duchoslav, M.; Jenkins, G.; Phillips, D.; Turkosi, E.; Šamajová, O.; Sedlářová, M.; Šamaj, J.; et al. Nuclear Disposition of Alien Chromosome Introgressions into Wheat and Rye Using 3D-FISH. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 4143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Zhang, J.; Liu, R.; Zhu, Y.; Gong, J.; Yin, S.; Sun, P.; Feng, H.; Wang, Q.; Zhao, S.; Wang, Z.; et al. Identification and Characterization of circRNAs Responsive to Methyl Jasmonate in Arabidopsis thaliana. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 792. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  11. Boudichevskaia, A.; Houben, A.; Fiebig, A.; Prochazkova, K.; Pecinka, A.; Lermontova, I. Depletion of KNL2 Results in Altered Expression of Genes Involved in Regulation of the Cell Cycle, Transcription, and Development in Arabidopsis. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 5726. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  12. Saravana Kumar, R.M.; Wang, Y.; Zhang, X.; Cheng, H.; Sun, L.; He, S.; Hao, F. Redox Components: Key Regulators of Epigenetic Modifications in Plants. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 1419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Table 1. Contributors to the special issue “Chromatin, Epigenetics and Plant Physiology”.
Table 1. Contributors to the special issue “Chromatin, Epigenetics and Plant Physiology”.
AuthorsTitleType
Wang et al. [3]Roles of the INO80 and SWR1 Chromatin Remodeling Complexes in PlantsReview
Guo et al. [4]Mutations in the Rice OsCHR4 Gene, Encoding a CHD3 Family Chromatin Remodeler, Induce Narrow and Rolled Leaves with Increased Cuticular WaxOriginal
Research
Zhao et al. [5]Identification and Characterization of Tomato SWI3-Like Proteins: Overexpression of SlSWIC Increases the Leaf Size in Transgenic ArabidopsisOriginal
Research
Gratkowska-Zmuda et al. [6]The SWI/SNF ATP-Dependent Chromatin Remodeling Complex in Arabidopsis Responds to Environmental Changes in Temperature-Dependent MannerOriginal
Research
Krispil et al. [7]The Position and Complex Genomic Architecture of Plant T-DNA Insertions Revealed by 4SEEOriginal
Research
Lochmanová
et al. [8]
Different Modes of Action of Genetic and Chemical Downregulation of Histone Deacetylases with Respect to Plant Development and Histone ModificationsOriginal
Research
Koláčková et al. [9]Nuclear Disposition of Alien Chromosome Introgressions into Wheat and Rye Using 3D-FISHOriginal
Research
Zhang et al. [10]Identification and Characterization of circRNAs Responsive to Methyl Jasmonate in Arabidopsis thalianaOriginal
Research
Boudichevskaia et al. [11]Depletion of KNL2 Results in Altered Expression of Genes Involved in Regulation of the Cell Cycle, Transcription, and Development in ArabidopsisOriginal
Research
R.M.S. et al. [12]Redox Components: Key-Regulators of Epigenetic Modifications in PlantsReview

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Fojtová, M.; Fajkus, J. Chromatin, Epigenetics and Plant Physiology. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 2763. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21082763

AMA Style

Fojtová M, Fajkus J. Chromatin, Epigenetics and Plant Physiology. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2020; 21(8):2763. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21082763

Chicago/Turabian Style

Fojtová, Miloslava, and Jiří Fajkus. 2020. "Chromatin, Epigenetics and Plant Physiology" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 21, no. 8: 2763. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21082763

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop