Next Article in Journal
NMR Investigations of Crystalline and Glassy Solid Electrolytes for Lithium Batteries: A Brief Review
Previous Article in Journal
Characteristic Analysis of Homo- and Heterodimeric Complexes of Human Mitochondrial Pyruvate Carrier Related to Metabolic Diseases
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Akkermansia muciniphila Aspartic Protease Amuc_1434* Inhibits Human Colorectal Cancer LS174T Cell Viability via TRAIL-Mediated Apoptosis Pathway

Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21(9), 3385; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21093385
by Xin Meng 1,†, Jinrui Zhang 1,†, Hao Wu 2, Dahai Yu 1,* and Xuexun Fang 1,*
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Reviewer 3: Anonymous
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21(9), 3385; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21093385
Submission received: 16 April 2020 / Revised: 7 May 2020 / Accepted: 9 May 2020 / Published: 11 May 2020
(This article belongs to the Section Molecular Biology)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

This paper is related to the induction of apoptosis of Amuc_1343 * for colon cancer.
The authors reported that Amuc_1434 * induces apoptosis of colorectal cancer cells through TRAIL signaling.
The results presented in this paper demonstrate well the hypotheses presented by the authors.

Also, the paper is well written. However, some modifications are required for this article to be published in this journal.

1. The separation process for Amuc_1434 * should be simplified.
2. In order to prove the induction of apoptosis through TRAIL signaling of Amuc_1434 *, it is necessary to investigate the effect of Amuc_1434 * on apoptosis according to TRAIL inhibition.


 Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

Comments for revision:

  1. Data should be shown that the cell death phenotype is dependent on Muc2 degradation by the protease by inhibiting protease activity or some other method.
  2. Figure 3B, Please clarify what is being graphed here. It does not appear to be representative of the flow data in A. Or, more representative flow data should be shown in A.
  3. Figure 3A, axes should be labeled with the respective dyes.
  4. Figure 4A, overlaying the graphs would be a better way to show the differences.
  5. Figure 4B, JC-1 staining should be quantified.
  6. Figure legends or methods should describe the number of technical and biological replicates.
  7. Discussion should include a mechanism for how Muc2 degradation leads to upregulation of the TRAIL pathway. If you block TRAIL, is cell death blocked?

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 3 Report

The paper was well prepared but some minor defects were found. Authors ensure using statistical analysis expression of the results is as mean ±
313 standard deviation nut theu presented in graphics the mean and SEM. It should be clarified. 

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Round 2

Reviewer 2 Report

The authors have addressed my comments.

Back to TopTop