Next Article in Journal
Pharmacological Inhibition of mTORC2 Reduces Migration and Metastasis in Melanoma
Previous Article in Journal
Extracellular Matrix Composition Modulates the Responsiveness of Differentiated and Stem Pancreatic Cancer Cells to Lipophilic Derivate of Gemcitabine
Previous Article in Special Issue
Polyethylene Glycol 35 as a Perfusate Additive for Mitochondrial and Glycocalyx Protection in HOPE Liver Preservation
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Editorial

New Insights in Molecular Mechanisms and Pathophysiology of Ischemia-Reperfusion Injury 2.0: An Updated Overview

by
Arnau Panisello-Roselló
1,2,
Joan Roselló-Catafau
1,* and
René Adam
2
1
Ischemia-Reperfusion Unit, Experimental Pathology Department, Institut d’Investigacions Biomèdiques de Barcelona (IIBB)-IDIBAPS, Spanish Research Council (CSIC), 08036 Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain
2
Centre Hépato-Biliaire, AP-PH, Hôpital Paul Brousse, 94800 Paris, France
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22(1), 28; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22010028
Submission received: 6 December 2020 / Revised: 15 December 2020 / Accepted: 18 December 2020 / Published: 22 December 2020
Ischemia reperfusion injury (IRI) is related to different surgical interventions such as organ resection and transplantation, and therefore its prevention is of great interest. However, several decades of investigations have not, unfortunately, lead to a definitive solution for the treatment of IRI due to its complex and multifactorial pathophysiology with a plethora of underlying mechanisms that are shared among different organs (heart, brain, liver, kidney, etc.) [1,2,3]. The deep exploration of specific IRI pathophysiological and molecular mechanisms is needed to define strategies to reduce its deleterious effects.
IRI is the most important cause of graft failure in transplantation besides immunological rejection. This is the result of cumulative damage that depends on the strength, duration and intensity of the different episodes inherent to transplantation, and leads to the appearance of organ primary/secondary failure, which may happen as a consequence of a re-transplantation [4,5].
Along this Special Issue “Molecular Mechanisms and Pathophysiology of Ischemia-Reperfusion Injury 2.0” we provide a broad overview of the recent insights on several strategies adopted influencing different molecular and pathophysiological mechanisms involved in different organs such as heart, brain, liver and kidney. These strategies in clinical surgery and transplantation embrace the current understanding of some of the underlying pathophysiological molecular pathways and in turn better knowledge of them is determinant to counteract the IRI deleterious effects. Here, we report new advances in IRI molecular mechanisms associated with different strategies, such as ischemic preconditioning (IP) and post-conditioning (Post C) [6,7,8], which are used to reduce the deleterious effects of IRI; including other new approaches based on using micro RNAs (miRNAs) [9,10,11] or mesenchymal cells [12].
It is well-known that the activation of molecular sensors, such as nitric oxide and AMPK, are tied to IP and PostC [13,14,15]. On this line, recent investigations have produced evidence that the action on the melatonin receptor agonists on melatonin 1 (MT1) and 2 (MT2) receptors induced by Ramelteon is an effective heart preconditioning tool against IRI [16]. In addition, recent PostC investigations have shown that AMPK activation is associated with increased glucose metabolism activity in a model of isolated heart after circulatory death [17]. Alternatively, the use of mi-RNAs has been shown to be efficient in countering the deleterious effects of IRI [9,10,11], although it may interfere with the induction of other specific mi-RNAs when pathological conditions such as hypercholesterinemia are present in preconditioned hearts [18].
Moreover, there is growing evidence in the brain that factors such as CELSR1 (Cadherin epidermal growth factor (EGF) laminin G (LAG) seven-pass G-type receptor) are responsible for neuroprotective effects on cerebral ischemia injury [19]. This is consistent with the recent investigations of Schuhmann, M.K. et al. [20] demonstrating that targeting platelet GPVI plus rt-PA administration but not α2β1-Mediated Collagen Binding also limits the deleterious effects of ischemia in mice brain injury.
Recent efforts have been conducted to avoid the detrimental injury effects that occur during liver resection interventions by inhibiting iNOS with L-NAME [21], as well as those associated with the rewarming injury after cold graft preservation, which are relevant in the context of transplantation [22]. With this in mind, several machine perfusion (MP) strategies [23,24,25] have been introduced to better preserve the graft before the subsequent liver transplantation. In general terms, the main goal is to provide vascular flow and oxygen to the donor graft during preservation; either in hypothermic oxygenated perfusion (HOPE) [23,24] (using a perfusion solution, normally Belzer-MPS) or in normothermic MP perfusion (NMP) [25] (using blood or other fluids with oxygen carrying capacity). These strategies can be applied either immediately after organ procurement or after static cold storage (SCS). In any case, the oxygenation of the organs is an unsolved problem that attracts the interest and efforts of researchers in the field [26,27].
Several MP investigations in kidney have shown the benefits of incorporating antioxidants, such as Vectisol, which decreases the early levels of the detrimental radical oxygen species (ROS) [28] or mesenchymal cells, opening a new window to administer cell therapy to damaged organs [29] through MP in different preclinical transplantation models. These promising MP perspectives in kidney [28,29,30] have been extended to liver by using HOPE to rescue vulnerable livers, such as the ones from donors after cardiac death (DCD) and steatotic ones [24,25]. In this sense, the recent investigations by Schlegel et al. [23] have established the protection mechanisms of HOPE based on the metabolism of succinate. However, the establishment of new markers to evaluate the quality of the liver grafts is a pending challenge for the immediate future in IRI investigations [31,32,33]. Recently, a new perfusate named IGL2 containing PEG35 as oncotic agent [34] has been proposed for HOPE. IGL2 benefits are associated with a better preservation of the mitochondria integrity, thus assuring the most suitable restoration of the mitochondrial function and avoiding the inherent redox stress, as suggested by Hofmann et al. [35]. In addition, PEG35 would facilitate the mechano-transduction processes due to its fluid dynamic properties in HOPE [36]. Finally, it is important to consider the potential use of PEG35 as an additive to the perfusates used in NMP, such as blood and solutions containing oxygen carriers. This would be consistent with the benefits of i.v. PEG35 administration in rats subjected to warm ischemia reperfusion [37] where the deleterious effects of IRI were prevented. Further investigations are needed.
In conclusion, the challenge for the upcoming years is to explore in depth the complex molecular pathophysiological mechanisms inherent to IRI in order to establish new frontiers for future interventions in clinical transplantation.

Author Contributions

A.P.-R. participated in the original draft preparation, writing and editing of the work. J.R.-C. participated in the funding acquisition, conceptualization, supervision, reviewing and editing of the work. R.A. Participated in the conceptualization, supervision and reviewing of the work. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This study was supported by grant from the European Comission H2020-MSCA-ITN-ETN-2016 “FOIE GRAS—Metabolism and the Liver-Gut Axis in Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease” and by Fondo de Investigaciones Sanitarias, Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad (Madrid, Spain), No PI 115/00110.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Wua, M.Y.; Yiang, G.T.; Wan-Ting Liac, W.T.; Cheng, Y.L.; Cheng, P.W.; Li, C.Y.; Li, C.J. Current mechanistic concepts in ischemia and reperfusion injury. Cell Physiol. Biochem. 2018, 46, 1650–1667. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Panisello, A.; Rosello-Catafau, J. Molecular mechanisms and pathophysiology of ischemia-reperfusion injury. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018, 19, 4093. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  3. Soares, R.O.S.; Losada, D.M.; Jordani, M.C.; Évora, P.; Castro-e-Silva, O. Ischemia/Reperfusion Injury Revisited: An Overview of the Latest Pharmacological Strategies. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 5034. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. Iyer, A.; Kumarasinghe, G.; Hicks, M.; Watson, A.; Gao, L.; Doyle, A.; Keogh, A.; Kotlyar, E.; Hayward, C.; Dhital, K.; et al. Primary Graft Failure after Heart Transplantation. J. Transplant. 2011, 2011, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Weiss-Salz, I.; Mandel, M.; Galai, N.; Nave, I.; Boner, G.; Mor, E.; Richard Nakache, R.; Simchen, E.; Israeli Transplantation Consortium. Factors associated with primary and secondary graft failure following cadaveric kidney transplant. Clin. Transplant. 2004, 18, 571–755. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Derek, J.; Hausenloy, D.J.; Yellon, D. Preconditioning and postconditioning: Underlying mechanisms and clinical application. Atherosclerosis 2009, 204, 334–341. [Google Scholar]
  7. Rougemont, O.; Lehmann, K.; Clavien, P.A. Preconditioning, ischemia, organ preservation and postconditioning to prevent ischemia reperfusion injury to liver. Liver Transplant. 2009, 15, 1172–1182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Bueno, R.T.; Módolo, R.P.; Domingues, M.A.C.; de Carvalho, L.R.; do Nascimento, P., Jr.; Módolo, N.S.P. Effects of Ischemic Preconditioning and Postconditioning in a Renal Ischemia-Reperfusion Injury Model: A Comparative Experimental Study in Rats. Transplant. Proc. 2018, 50, 3811–3815. [Google Scholar]
  9. Li, Z.; Rana, T.M. Therapeutic targeting of microRNAs: Current status and future challenges. Nat. Rev. Drugs Discov. 2014, 13, 622–638. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Sabet-Sarvestan, F.; Azarpira, N. microRNAs Alterations of Myocardium and Brain Ischemia-Reperfusion Injury: Insight to Improve Infarction. Immunol. Investig. 2020, 7, 1–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Hu, Y.; Deng, H.; Xu, S.; Zhang, J. MicroRNAs Regulate Mitochondrial Function in Cerebral Ischemia-Reperfusion Injury. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2015, 16, 24895–24917. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Oliva, J. Therapeutic Properties of Mesenchymal Stem Cell organ ischemia-Reperfusion Injury. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 5511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  13. Padrissa-Altés, M.A.; Zaouali, J.; Roselló, C. AMP-activated protein kinase as a target for preconditioning in transplantation medicine. Transplantation 2010, 90, 1241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Guo, L.; Xu, J.-M.; Mo, X.-Y. Ischemic postconditioning regulates cardiomyocyte autophagic activity following ischemia/reperfusion injury. Mol. Med. Rep. 2015, 12, 1169–1176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  15. Shao, J.; Miao, C.; Geng, Z.; Gu, M.; Wu, Y.; Li, Q. Effect of eNOS on Ischemic postconditioing induced -autophagy against ischemia-reperfusion injury in mice. Biomed. Res. Int. 2019, 2019, 5201014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Torregroza, C.; Jalajel, O.; Raupach, A.; Feige, K.; Bunte, S.; Heinen, A.; Mathes, A.; Hollmann, M.W.; Huhn, R.; Stroethoff, M. Activation of PKG and Akt is required for cardioprotection by Ramelteon-induced preconditioning and is located upstream of mKCa-channels. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 2585. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  17. Arnold, M.; Méndez-Carmona, N.; Gulac, P.; Wyss, R.K.; Rutishauser, N.; Segiser, A.; Carrel, T.; Longnus, S. Mechanical postconditioning promotes glucose metabolism and AMPK activity in parallel with improved post-Ischemic recovery in an isolated rat heart model of donation after circulatory death. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 964. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Szabó, M.R.; Gáspár, R.; Pipicz, M.; Zsindely, N.; Diószegi, P.; Sárközy, M.; Bodai, L.; Csont, T. Hypercholesterolemia interferes with induction of miR-125b-1-3p in preconditioned hearts. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 3744. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Wang, L.-H.; Zhang, G.-L.; Liu, X.-Y.; Peng, A.; Ren, H.-Y.; Huang, S.-H.; Liu, T.; Wang, X.-J. CELSR1 promotes neuroprotection in cerebral ischemic injury mainly through the Wnt/PKC signaling pathway. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Schuhmann, M.K.; Kraft, P.; Bieber, M.; Kollikowski, A.M.; Schulze, H.; Nieswandt, B.; Pham, M.; Stegner, D.; Stoll, G. Targeting platelet GPVI Plusrt-PA administration but not α2β1-mediated collagen binding protects against ischemic brain damage in mice. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 2019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  21. Iwasaki, J.; Afify, M.; Bleilevens, C.; Klinge, U.; Weiskirchen, R.; Steitz, J.; Vogt, M.; Yagi, S.; Nagai, K.; Uemoto, S.; et al. The impact of a nitric oxide synthase inhibitor (L-NAME) on ischemia–reperfusion injury of cholestatic livers by Pringle maneuver and liver resection after bile duct ligation in rats. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 2114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  22. Minor, T.; von Horn, C. Rewarming injury after cold preservation. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 2059. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  23. Schlegel, A.; Muller, X.; Mueller, M.; Stepanova, A.; Kron, P.; De Rougemont, O.; Muiesan, P.; Clavien, P.-A.; Galkin, A.; Meierhofer, D.; et al. Hypothermic oxygenated perfusion protects from mitochondrial injury before liver transplantation. EBioMedicine 2020, 60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Dutkowsky, P.; Guarrera, J.V.; de Jonge, J.; Martins, P.N.; Porte, R.J.; Clavien, P.A. Evolving Trends in Machine Perfusion for Liver Transplantation. Gastroenterology 2019, 156, 1542. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  25. Consortium for Organ Preservation in Europe; Nasralla, D.; Coussios, C.C.; Mergental, H.; Akhtar, M.Z.; Butler, A.J.; Ceresa, C.D.L.; Chiocchia, V.; Dutton, S.J.; García-Valdecasas, J.C.; et al. A randomized trial of normothermic preservation in liver transplantation. Nature 2018, 557, 50–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Aubert, V.; Kaminski, J.; Guillaud, F.; Hauet, T.; Hannaert, P. A computer model of oxygen dynamics in the cortex of the rat kidney at the cell-tissue level. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 6246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Kerforne, T.; Giraud, S.; Danion, J.; Thuillier, R.; Couturier, P.; Hebrard, W.; Mimoz, O.; Hauet, T. Rapid or slow time to brain death? Impact on kidney graft injuries in an allotransplantation porcine model. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 3671. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Soussi, D.; Danion, J.; Baulier, E.; Favreau, F.; Sauvageon, Y.; Bossard, V.; Matillon, X.; Turpin, F.; Belgsir, E.M.; Thuillier, R.; et al. Vectisol formulation enhances solubility of resveratrol and brings its benefits to kidney transplantation in a preclinical porcine model. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 2268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Ploeg, R.; Leuvenink, H.; Moers, C. Infusing mesenchymal stromal cells into porcine kidneys during normothermic machine perfusion: Intact MSCs can be traced and localised to glomeruli. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 3607. [Google Scholar]
  30. Kasil, A.; Giraud, S.; Couturier, P.; Amiri, A.; Danion, J.; Donatini, G.; Matillon, X.; Hauet, T.; Badet, L. Individual and combined impact of oxygen and oxygen transporter supplementation during kidney machine preservation in a porcine preclinical kidney transplantation model. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 20, 1992. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Bhogal, R.H.; Mirza, D.F.; Afford, S.C.; Mergental, H. Biomarkers of liver injury during transplantation in an era of Machine Perfusion. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 1578. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  32. Schiefer, J.; Faybik, P.; Koch, M.D.S.; Tudor, B.; Kollmann, D.; Kuessel, L.; Krenn, C.G.; Berlakovich, G.; Baron, D.M.; Baron-Stefaniak, J. Glycocalyx damage within human liver grafts correlates with graft Injury and postoperative graft function after orthotopic liver transplantation. Transplantation 2020, 104, 72–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  33. Rosello-Rosello, A.; Castro Benítez, C.; Lopez, A.; Teixeira, S.R.; Roselló-Catafau, J.; Adam, R. Glycocalix as useful marker of endothelial injury in liver transplantation: Role of preservation solution. Transplantation 2020, 104, e356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Rosello, A.P.; Da Silva, R.T.; Castro, C.; Bardallo, R.G.; Calvo, M.; Folch-Puy, E.; Carbonell, T.; Palmeira, C.M.; Roselló-Catafau, J.; Adam, R. Polyethylene Glycol 35 as a Perfusate Additive for Mitochondrial and Glycocalyx Protection in HOPE Liver Preservation. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 5703. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Hofmann, J.; Otarashvili, G.; Meszaros, A.; Ebner, S.; Weissenbacher, A.; Cardini, B.; Oberhuber, R.; Resch, T.; Öfner, D.; Schneeberger, S.; et al. Restoring Mitochondrial Function While Avoiding Redox Stress: The Key to Preventing Ischemia/Reperfusion Injury in Machine Perfused Liver Grafts? Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 3132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Panisello-Rosello, A.; Roselló-Catafau, J. HOPE (Hypothermic oxygenated perfusion) strategies in the era of dynamic liver graft strategies. E-BioMedicine 2020, 61, 10371. [Google Scholar]
  37. Bejaoui, M.; Pantazi, E.; Calvo, M.; Folch-Puy, E.; Serafín, A.; Pasut, G.; Panisello, A.; Adam, R.; Roselló-Catafau, J. Polyethylene Glycol Preconditioning: An Effective Strategy to Prevent Liver Ischemia Reperfusion Injury. Oxidative Med. Cell. Longev. 2016, 2016, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Panisello-Roselló, A.; Roselló-Catafau, J.; Adam, R. New Insights in Molecular Mechanisms and Pathophysiology of Ischemia-Reperfusion Injury 2.0: An Updated Overview. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 28. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22010028

AMA Style

Panisello-Roselló A, Roselló-Catafau J, Adam R. New Insights in Molecular Mechanisms and Pathophysiology of Ischemia-Reperfusion Injury 2.0: An Updated Overview. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2021; 22(1):28. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22010028

Chicago/Turabian Style

Panisello-Roselló, Arnau, Joan Roselló-Catafau, and René Adam. 2021. "New Insights in Molecular Mechanisms and Pathophysiology of Ischemia-Reperfusion Injury 2.0: An Updated Overview" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 22, no. 1: 28. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22010028

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop