Next Article in Journal
Novel (+)-Neoisopulegol-Based O-Benzyl Derivatives as Antimicrobial Agents
Previous Article in Journal
Effects of Atypical Antipsychotics, Clozapine, Quetiapine and Brexpiprazole on Astroglial Transmission Associated with Connexin43
Previous Article in Special Issue
Cell Force-Driven Basement Membrane Disruption Fuels EGF- and Stiffness-Induced Invasive Cell Dissemination from Benign Breast Gland Acini
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
IJMS
Volume 22
Issue 11
10.3390/ijms22115624
ijms-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Nanomechanical Hallmarks of Helicobacter pylori Infection in Pediatric Patients

by
Piotr Deptuła
1,
Łukasz Suprewicz
1,
Tamara Daniluk
1,
Andrzej Namiot
2,
Sylwia Joanna Chmielewska
1,
Urszula Daniluk
3,
Dariusz Lebensztejn
3 and
Robert Bucki
1,*
1
Department of Medical Microbiology and Nanobiomedical Engineering, Medical University of Bialystok, PL-15222 Bialystok, Poland
2
Department of Human Anatomy, Medical University of Bialystok, PL-15230 Bialystok, Poland
3
Department of Pediatrics, Gastroenterology, Hepatology, Nutrition and Allergology, Medical University of Bialystok, Children’s Clinical Hospital, PL-15274 Bialystok, Poland
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22(11), 5624; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22115624
Submission received: 30 April 2021 / Revised: 22 May 2021 / Accepted: 24 May 2021 / Published: 25 May 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Biomechanics of Cancer Progression: From Single-Molecule Mechanics to Mechanomedicine)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Background: the molecular mechanism of gastric cancer development related to Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) infection has not been fully understood, and further studies are still needed. Information regarding nanomechanical aspects of pathophysiological events that occur during H. pylori infection can be crucial in the development of new prevention, treatment, and diagnostic measures against clinical consequences associated with H. pylori infection, including gastric ulcer, duodenal ulcer, and gastric cancer. Methods: in this study, we assessed mechanical properties of children’s healthy and H. pylori positive stomach tissues and the mechanical response of human gastric cells exposed to heat-treated H. pylori cells using atomic force microscopy (AFM NanoWizard 4 BioScience JPK Instruments Bruker). Elastic modulus (i.e., the Young’s modulus) was derived from the Hertz–Sneddon model applied to force-indentation curves. Human tissue samples were evaluated using rapid urease tests to identify H. pylori positive samples, and the presence of H. pylori cells in those samples was confirmed using immunohistopathological staining. Results and conclusion: collected data suggest that nanomechanical properties of infected tissue might be considered as markers indicated H. pylori presence since infected tissues are softer than uninfected ones. At the cellular level, this mechanical response is at least partially mediated by cell cytoskeleton remodeling indicating that gastric cells are able to tune their mechanical properties when subjected to the presence of H. pylori products. Persistent fluctuations of tissue mechanical properties in response to H. pylori infection might, in the long-term, promote induction of cancer development.

1. Introduction

Cancer disease is one of the leading causes of death worldwide, accounting for about one in six deaths. The World Health Organization (WHO) estimated that in the year 2018 cancers were diagnosed in 18 million people, and the number of cancer-related deaths exceeded 9.5 million [1]. Tumors of the large intestine and stomach are the third and fifth most common cancers, accounting for 10% and 6% of cancer cases, respectively. It should be mentioned that gastric cancer is the third most deadly cancer in the world [1]. One of the risk factors confirmed for gastric cancer is infection with the bacterium H. pylori [2,3,4,5,6], which is a spiral-shaped Gram-negative bacterium that infects more than half of the world’s population [2,7,8]. This bacterium colonizes the gastric mucosa and the surfaces of the gastric epithelium. It is estimated that up to 70% of the world’s population carries this bacterium, especially in developing countries [2,9,10]. H. pylori infection usually occurs in childhood, and when untreated, remains present in the life of the host [3,6,11]. The infection is usually associated with asymptomatic gastritis, and in the long-term it may result in more severe clinical outcomes, such as gastric ulcer, duodenal ulcer, and gastric cancer [2,3,4,12,13]. This bacterium has various virulence factors, including a cytotoxin-associated gene A (CagA), a vacuolating cytotoxin A (VacA), and various outer membrane proteins that allow this microorganism to move around and survive in the unfavorable environment of the human stomach. Moreover, CagA and VacA may deregulate the host’s intracellular signaling pathways, promoting neoplastic transformation [2,13,14]. CagA can interact with the host’s proteins to activate further signaling pathways, thereby activating the host’s inflammatory responses and cell proliferation. Activating the immune response additionally enhances the production of reactive oxygen species by increasing the oxidative stress leading to the cell and DNA damage, and thus promotes carcinogenesis. Uncontrolled cell proliferation also leads to mutations that occur during normal DNA replication of cells [2,14].
The molecular mechanism of H. pylori-induced gastric cancer has not been fully elucidated. It is necessary to understand all the mechanisms related to the induction and regulation of immune and inflammatory responses to H. pylori [2,15,16,17]. In recent years, scientific studies have appeared stating that the dysfunction of physiological processes during infection, mostly development of inflammation generates the changes in cells and tissues, which leads to changes in their rheological properties that might lead toward cancer development [18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25]. The information on the nanomechanical aspects of the pathological state of H. pylori gastric infection could be of key importance in the development of new bacterial eradication methods, preventive and diagnostic measures. Lately, more attention has been paid to the mechanical testing of tissue samples to understand thoroughly the physiological and pathological processes occurring at the cell and tissue levels [20,24,25,26]. All physiological processes and their dysfunctions during the development of infection are associated with structural changes that can be described at various structural/organization levels of tissues, cells, and cell organelles. These structures have specific mechanical properties. Cells or tissues frequently change their stiffness/rigidity during inflammation or the development and progression of a neoplastic disease [24,27,28,29]. These changes often precede those observed in typical histopathological examinations. The interest in the “mechanical aspects of inflammation” was possible due to the development of new techniques enabling measuring the rheological properties of biological samples—cells and tissues [20,30]. The atomic force microscopy (AFM) developed in the early 1990s offers the possibility of surface imaging at the nanoscale and nanomechanical characterization by indenting soft biological materials under physiological conditions [20,26,30]. AFM is very useful to evaluate the mechanics of biological, especially “live” or freshly isolated samples. There are also attempts to use it in the routine diagnosis of cancer [24,25,26]. The aim of the study was to assess the potential of atomic force microscopy to measure the mechanical properties of the gastric mucosa samples described as healthy and H. pylori infected that were collected during gastroscopy and human gastric cells culture upon exposure to heat-treated H. pylori cells. In addition, the study has attempted to describe possible mechanical markers of infection that could support development of new diagnostic, prevention and treatment methods of H. pylori infection.

2. Results

In the first set of the experiments, the stiffness of healthy and infected tissues was measured using the atomic force microscope. AFM testing consisted of the series of loading-unloading cycles over the tissue’s surface with a constant force of 2 nN using a cantilever with the polystyrene bead attached (Figure 1). Details of performed experiments are included in the Materials and Methods section.
Figure 2 shows the Young’s modulus values obtained using AFM indentation technique. Relative values of the Young’s modulus distributions from 4 healthy tissues (H. pylori negative, h1–h4) and 4 tissues identified as H. pylori positive (i1–i4), where the Young’s modulus of healthy and infected biopsies are compared. The inset shows mean values ± standard deviation for healthy and infected tissue samples. Panel b shows the mean values of tissues’ Young’s modulus for each healthy and infected tissue.
The summary histogram presented in Figure 2 shows the overall results obtained for all tested infected and healthy tissues. Distributions of the Young’s modulus values of the infected samples are shifted to lower values of the elastic modulus and a difference between healthy and infected tissue stiffness can be observed. The mean Young’s modulus value and the standard deviation calculated for healthy stomach tissue equals 3.27 ± 2.83 kPa, whereas for the infected biopsies 0.78 ± 0.82 kPa (inset in Figure 2a). Stiffness profiles observed in our study for the healthy stomach tissue are characterized by broad distribution, whereas the Young’s modulus distribution of the infected tissues is characterized by sharper peaks in the softer zones (lower Young’s modulus values). Only one of the infected tissue samples (i4) showed higher stiffness in comparison to the other infected tissues (Figure 2b; i4), but still it was softer than all healthy ones.
Figure 3 shows distributions of the Young’s modulus values measured for each healthy and infected by H. pylori sample with the fitted probability density function of the log normal distribution. Young’s modulus values of the infected samples were shifted to the lower values of the elastic modulus and a significant difference between healthy and infected tissues stiffness was observed.
In the next stage of the tissue evaluation, we assessed the presence of H. pylori within the tissue samples. Figure 4 shows microscopic pictures of biopsy samples after immunohistochemical staining with use of antibodies that recognize H. pylori antigens. Microscopic observations confirmed the presence of bacteria in the tissues marked as infected. H. pylori cells were visible in the mucosa layer and attached to the epithelial cells.
In the second stage of the study, changes in the stiffness of gastric cells exposed to H. pylori products were measured in time range from 0 to 72 h post H. pylori products addition (heat-inactivated H. pylori cells). AFM testing consisted of the series of loading-unloading cycles using a pyramid cantilever over the cell surfaces (near nuclei) with a constant force of 0.5 nN.
Figure 5 shows the mechanical response of gastric cells exposed to H. pylori products over time expressed as changes in their Young’s modulus. In the initial stage of infection, no apparent mechanical cell response was observed. Half an hour after the infection, slight stiffening of the cells was detected, while one hour after exposure a 23% decrease in cell stiffness was registered and lasted up to 24 h after H. pylori products addition. Gastric cell stiffness started to return close to its original value with time and 3 days after exposure, the cell stiffness reached 1.16 kPa.
Figure 6 shows distributions of the Young’s modulus values measured for each time step of gastric cell exposed to the bacterial products with the fitted probability density function of the log normal distribution. The distribution shapes are similar. No differences in the stiffness distribution are visible, which indicates a relative cell structure and mechanical properties homogeneity.
Figure 7 shows fluorescent images representing of F-actin organization in the gastric adenocarcinoma cells exposed to heat-treated H. pylori cells. Obtained Young’s modulus values correspond to those obtained for tissue samples collected from H. pylori infected subjects (Figure 5 and Figure 6). Changes in the internal organization of the cell’s cytoskeleton were visible within 15 min of bacterial products addition. One hour after exposure, changes in the cytoskeletons organization profoundly affected the mechanical properties of the cells (averaged value of Young’s modulus drops from 1.29 to 0.99 kPa). The cytoskeleton constituents of the cortex were changed. Actin fibers accumulate around the nucleus and the cells were less spread. The dorsal actin cortex was less uniform, a low number of stress fibers were observed. In all cases, F-actin was enriched around the cell periphery, but less in the case of cells from 15 min to 1 h after exposure. No significant changes in the structure of the cell nuclei were detected. Moreover, 72 h after exposure, the cells were spread again. Another remodeling of the internal structure of the cells was observed. Actin fibers were distant from the nucleus and the cells were more spread, a presence of stress fibers was observed. The possible mechanisms of this phenomenon are described in previous works [31,32,33,34,35], where, inter alia, effects of microbial toxins and inflammatory mediators on the F-actin organization in cytoskeleton of epithelial cells were investigated. Lipopolysaccharide (LPS) is a key component of Gram-negative bacteria cell walls. LPS has extremely strong pro-inflammatory properties. During the infection, LPS becomes the factor that triggers an inflammatory response. In order to detect pathogens the immune system is equipped with receptors called pattern recognition receptors (PRRs). These receptors are strategically localized in the cell and are key element of the immune system. The recognition of the pathogen and the initiation of the inflammatory process in epithelial cells are associated with the remodeling of the intracellular actin structure that translates into changes in the mechanical properties of the cells.

3. Discussion

Helicobacter pylori infection is one of the most common in the world and is considered an infectious disease that usually requires antibiotic treatment [1,2,4]. The knowledge about the involvement of H. pylori in the pathophysiology of gastrointestinal diseases is very extensive, but still incomplete. Continuous systemization of information is required to establish new treatments and prevention options via the development of new drugs and effective vaccines. Undoubtedly, understanding of the precise mechanisms of interaction between the pathogen and the host in the nanomechanical context opens up an unexplored possibility to collect new data that might serve in the development of future strategies against H. pylori.
The study assessed the potential of atomic force microscopy to measure the mechanical properties of the gastric mucosa in H. pylori infection as well as to study the response of gastric cells to infections with the use of a cell culture model. Biological structures at the organizational level, starting with cell organelles, through entire cells, tissues and ending with entire organs, have their own specific mechanical properties that influence their functions. They can be characterized by rheological parameters, such as elasticity and viscosity. Elasticity (stiffness) can be quantified using the appropriate modulus—Young’s modulus (the modulus of elasticity), which determines the resistance of a material to elastic deformation when an external stress is applied [20,36]. The modulus of elasticity of a material is defined as the slope of the stress—a strain curve in the area of elastic deformation [36]. It has been proven that the dysfunction of physiological processes during the development of diseases usually causes changes in biological structures, which translate into the changes in the mechanical properties of cells and tissues [19,20,37]. In recent years, the development of AFM enabled the nanoscale characterization of a wide spectrum of biomaterials, including human tissues [20,21,22,26,38,39]. Stiffness, along with viscosity, are the basic parameters that need to be defined.
In this study, it was observed that the values of Young’s modulus for healthy and infected gastric tissues, tested using the AFM method, are significantly different and higher for healthy tissue than for the tissue with confirmed H. pylori infection. Thus, it was confirmed that the dysfunction of the physiological processes during bacterial infection caused changes in the mucosa structure that translate into changes of its mechanical properties. However, earlier studies of tissues in the process of carcinogenesis indicated that pathological conditions in tissue structures affected the mechanocellular phenotype and were manifested by the changes in the tissue stiffness. Overall, neoplastic tissue with some exemption is stiffer than the normal tissue [20,21,24,25,26]. Changes in the stiffness of neoplastic tissues are closely related to the changes in the extracellular matrix, which provides structural support for the cells, enabling their proliferation, mobility and survival [40]. In the case of gastric mucosa, rheological changes may be related to deregulation of cellular functions caused by specific factors of H. pylori virulence. H. pylori is known to survive under acidic conditions due to the production of urease, which catalyzes the hydrolysis of urea to form ammonia, thus raising the pH of the environment. Rheological measurements on porcine gastric mucin (PGM) indicated that an increase in pH by H. pylori causes a decrease in its viscoelastic modules. Bacteria move freely at high pH, but are less mobile at low pH. It is postulated that the helicoid shape of H. pylori helps the bacterial cell penetrate the mucus gel, but the colonization is also influenced by the interaction of bacteria with mucins that results in changes of mucins rheological properties [41,42]. In the study [43], it was proved that the mucin characteristics, the disease state, and thus the microrheological properties, are different in different tissue locations. Additionally, this bacterium showed greater mobility in the tumor mucin solution of lower viscosity. Inflammatory processes activated by the virulence factors of H. pylori cells, causing gastritis and the formation of mucosa with inflammatory infiltration, might also play a role in decreasing the tissues stiffness [44,45,46]. As for the values of Young’s modules of healthy gastric tissues obtained in this study, they are consistent with the data shown previously [20,22,47]. The range of stiffness obtained for gastric mucosa is similar to data collected where an attempt was made to develop a nanomechanical profiling of other soft tissues. In all cases, the values of soft tissue stiffness measured in the conditions similar to physiological are taken into consideration. Inflammation has been identified as a risk factor for many types of cancers [48,49]. H. pylori infection resulting in chronic gastritis is a major factor in the initiation and development of gastric cancer [44,45,46]. H. pylori induces an inflammatory response both in gastric epithelial cells and in immune cells [40]. Moreover, the data suggest that H. pylori, via CagA, exhibits properties similar to malignant stem cells by inducing epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT)-like changes in gastric epithelial cells [50].
To mimic the individual gastric cell response to the presence of H. pylori, the gastric adenocarcinoma cell stiffness was assessed using a cell culture model. After 30 min of incubation, a slight increase in the cell stiffness was observed, followed by its decrease over the next 48 h when gastric cells were subjected to heat-treated H. pylori suspension. The mechanical changes were accompanied by the alterations in the internal structure of the actin cytoskeleton. Changes in the structure of cells and changes in the cell stiffness under the influence of pathogens were also observed in other studies [51,52,53]. The study [52] presents the results where human gastric neoplastic cells were treated with the tumor necrosis factor-inducing protein α (TNF-α) Tipα produced by H. pylori, which determines the protein as a carcinogen in the gastric epithelium. This protein influenced numerous properties, including cell migration, elongation, filopodia formation, vimentin expression, and decreased cell stiffness. Our study reports changes in the stiffness over a longer time range. Cells were simulated with heat-treated H. pylori for 72 h, which enabled the observation of the entire process of change in stiffness, including the return of cell stiffness close to the initial values after 48 h. This can be seen as a specific “mechanical cell relaxation”. At the molecular level, changes in the biomechanics of the gastric cells under the influence of H. pylori bacteria should be added to all the processes taking place in the gastric mucosa and epithelium under the influence of this and probably other pathogens, leading to inflammation and, in the long-term, to neoplasms. Viable cells are constantly exposed to mechanical stimuli from the surrounding extracellular matrix (ECM) or from neighboring cells. Mechanical stimuli are transformed into a biological response through intracellular molecular processes [54]. Cell functions and neoplastic processes are driven by the mechanical stiffness of tissues, which cells recognized through a specific molecular system [18,55]. This mechanism consists of dynamic molecular bonds between the extracellular matrix (ECM), integrins, adapter proteins, and the force-producing cytoskeleton of actomyosin. A mechanical link is created, referred to as a “molecular clutch” [55,56]. Cells use this molecular clutch to transmit and convert mechanical stimuli into biochemical signals leading to the regulation of transcription in the nucleus [55]. Mutations or abnormal activation of the sensory system of cells as well as pathological responses to mechanical stimuli are associated with myopathy, fibrosis, atherosclerosis, and cancer [54]. In this study, mechanical changes at the level of stomach cells and tissues under the influence of H. pylori bacteria were confirmed. These changes under the influence of chronic colonization and transfer of H. pylori genes in the stomach, may interfere with the transcription processes in the nuclei in the long-term and, thus, cause the risk of neoplastic formation. Cells are unable to adapt in time to continuous dynamic modifications of the microenvironment. Thus, a specific mechanopathology of the system takes place.
The study also assessed the potential of atomic force microscopy to determine the mechanical properties of healthy and infected H. pylori gastric biopsies and to extend diagnostic methods. Due to the fact that it is not advisable to undertake eradication therapy without confirmation of infection, in case of possessing the tissues after biopsy, their stiffness can be tested. Unfortunately, such measurements are currently time-consuming and require high accuracy in sample preparation and testing [52]; however, efforts are being made to simplify the procedures for tissue indentation testing and to develop new methods that will allow rapid measurements of tissue stiffness [20,57,58]. Moreover, in the case of children, there are rare indications for gastroscopy and biopsy [3]. Shear rheometers can be used to measure the rheological properties of soft tissues [24,26,29], but typical gastric biopsy tissue samples are too small to perform a correct measurement. Recent studies of brain tumors using magnetic resonance elastography indicate a high potential for the dissipative feature of tissue rheology as a new marker of tissue pathology [26,59,60], especially since it is a non-invasive method. The problem in magnetic resonance elastography may be that we must measure only one tissue layer. The AFM method is sensitive enough to measure such local stiffness within a nano-areas. The AFM strategy, to assess cancer development, should include a large number of measurements at different tissue locations in order to obtain its full mechanical profile. Currently, it is not possible to base the entire diagnosis on AFM tests, but the method has great potential and can be developed to establish standard non-invasive tests. One limitation of our study that should be mentioned is the number of collected and evaluated tissue samples that were identified as H. pylori positive (n = 4). However, in studies [24,25] where AFM was used as a tool for measuring tissue stiffness, similar number of fresh tissue samples was considered adequate. The value of this study is the fact that measurements of fresh tissues were taken. From previous work [61] it might be concluded that freezing tissue samples preceding AFM measurements disrupt the internal structure, influencing their mechanical properties. Another value is the fact that biopsies from children, in which they did not occur other inflammations, including chronic ones were measured. Overall, assessment of tissue rheological parameters in the future may provide the new mechanomarkers of gastric pathology, including those related to gastric infections and cancer development; the continuation of those studies are greatly encourage.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Tissue Samples

In this study, the series of 20 tissues collected from children over 12 month period (2019–2020) at the Department of Pediatrics, Gastroenterology, Hepatology, Nutrition, and Allergology, Medical University of Bialystok Children’s Clinical Hospital, Bialystok, Poland, were examined. Biopsy specimens were obtained from both male and female patients at the age of 14–15 years old. Together with mechanical measurements rapid urease tests and biological tests were made. Out of the entire series of biopsies, 4 were identified as H. pylori positive. The results from 4 healthy tissues were selected for mechanical comparison. Collection of tissue samples was performed in accordance with an IRB protocol (R-I-002/599/2018, 31 January 2019) approved by the Bioethics Committee of the Faculty of Medicine, Medical University of Bialystok, Bialystok, Poland. All tissue samples were stored in Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle Medium (DMEM, Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) and measured within four hours post-surgery.

4.2. Bacterial Strain

Clinical strain of H. pylori was collected from patient hospitalized in Department of Pediatrics, Gastroenterology, Hepatology, Nutrition and Allergology, Faculty of Medicine, Medical University of Bialystok, Bialystok, Poland. Bacteria were isolated from the obtained biopsies, and were cultured on BD™ Helicobacter Agar, Modified (Becton Dickinson, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA) in microaerophile conditions (10% of CO2 and 5% of O2) at 37 °C for three days. For heat inactivation, bacteria suspended in PBS at a concentration of 108 CFU/mL (O.D. ~ 0.5) were heat-treated (autoclaved at 121 °C for 30 min).

4.3. Cell Culture

To determine mechanical response of cells during H. pylori infection, the gastric adenocarcinoma AGS (ATCC® CRL-1739™, Manassas, VA, USA) cell line was used. Cells were cultured in Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle Medium (DMEM) (ATCC® 30-2002™, Manassas, VA, USA) supplemented with 10% of fetal bovine serum (FBS), penicillin (50 μg/mL) and streptomycin (50 μg/mL). Cells were maintained at 37 °C in an atmosphere containing 5% CO2 with saturated humidity. For AFM experiments, 1 × 105 cells were seeded onto 35 mm tissue culture dishes (TPP®, Trasadingen, Switzerland) and maintained overnight to fully adhere and spread. The following day, medium was aspirated, and cells were washed thrice with PBS. Medium was changed for serum and antibiotic free. Heat-inactivated bacteria was added to cells at final concentration of 1 × 106 CFU/mL and incubated for indicated time. After incubation, cells were washed three times with PBS, medium exchanged for fresh, filtered one, and investigated with AFM.

4.4. AFM Measurements

In this work, mechanical properties of human stomach tissues as well as mechanical response of human gastric cells to H. pylori infection were tested using atomic force microscopy. Small millimeter-scale tissue samples were measured with a NanoWizard 4 Bio Science JPK Instruments Bruker atomic force microscope (AFM) (Berlin, Germany) working in the Force Spectroscopy mode. Force indentation curves were collected using a silicon nitride cantilever with a nominal spring constant of 0.62 N/m and measured spring constant in the range of 0.4–0.6 N/m using thermal tune method, with a 4.5 μm diameter polystyrene bead attached (Figure 1c). The cantilevers were manufactured by Novascan Technologies, Inc. (Boone, NC, USA). For gastric cell indentation tests the MLCT-BIO Cantilevers with a nominal spring constant of 0.07 N/m and measured spring constant in the range of 0.04–0.06 N/m, manufactured by Bruker (Camarillo, CA, USA) were used.
The bead–tissue contact area during the experiment ranged from 10 to 30 μm2, depending on the depth of indentation. Tissues were glued onto a Petri dish and immersed in DMEM for measurements at room temperature. To account for cantilever bending, force curves were first taken from rigid substrate, and then the stiff surface was replaced by the compliant soft tissue sample. Up to 10 indentation maps consisting of 8 × 8 points corresponding to a scan area of 10 × 10 µm were made for each sample, taken from multiple places on the tissue surface. The differences between the cantilever deflection on a control, stiff surface and the compliant biological sample describes the deformation of the tissue under the bead load (Figure 1c). By plotting the force used for sample deformation against the depth of indentation that this force induced, so-called force-versus-indentation curves were obtained. To determine the elastic modulus (i.e., the Young’s modulus) the curves were fitted to the Hertz contact model using formulas described in work [24].
In the case of cell indentation up to 22 control and conditions incubated with heat-inactivated bacteria for every time point cells were measured. Moreover, 1 × 104 of the cells were seeded onto plastic TPP Petri-dishes and incubated overnight at 37 °C in an atmosphere containing 5% CO2. Next day, cells were washed with PBS and exposed to bacterial products for 0.25–72 h. Cell indentations for each time point were made at 37 °C in DMEM. Indentation maps consisting of 8 × 8 points corresponding to a scan area of 10 × 10 µm on the cell surface (areas near nucleus) were made. Histograms of the distributions of Young’s modulus values for each sample (tissues/cells) were prepared, and the mean values for all healthy and infected tissues and cells along with standard deviations were calculated.

4.5. Fluorescent Visualization of the Cells

To evaluate the organization of F-actin in the gastric adenocarcinoma cells during exposure to heat-treated H. pylori a fluorescent staining was performed, at condition corresponding to the Young’s modulus measurements. To do so, 1 × 104 of the cells were seeded onto glass coverslips and incubated overnight at 37 °C in an atmosphere containing 5% CO2. The next day, cells were washed with PBS and incubated with 1 × 105 CFU/mL of heat-inactivated bacteria suspended in serum and antibiotic free growth medium for 0.25–72 h. Then, cells were washed twice with PBS and fixed in 3.7% paraformaldehyde for 15 min, RT. Cells were washed again and permeabilized with 0.1% Triton X-100 for 10 min, RT. To block unspecific binding, cells were incubated for 30 min at RT with 1% bovine serum albumin (BSA) in PBS. After another wash, cells were incubated with rhodamine phalloidin solution (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Rockford, MI, USA) for 1 h, RT, in the dark. In the next step, cells were counterstained with NucBlue™ Live ReadyProbes™ Reagent Hoechst 33342 (Thermo Fisher Scientific) for 20 min, RT, protected from light. Preparation was mounted with anti-fade fluorescent mounting solution (Abcam, Cambridge, UK) and covered with glass coverslip. Cell structure visualization was performed using Leica DM4 B fluorescent microscope (Wetzlar, Germany).

4.6. Immunohistochemistry of the Tissue Samples

Biopsy samples were immunohistochemically treated with H. pylori antibodies (DAKO, FLEX Polyclonal Rabbit Anti-H. Pylori, Glostrup Denmark) by the streptavidin–biotin immunoperoxidase technique. The Autostainer Link 48 was used. Positive and negative controls were performed in addition to patient materials. Positive tissue control included H. Pylori infected gastric mucosa, the negative control was FLEX Negative Control, Mouse (Cat # IR750). Specimens were classified according to the presence of H. pylori under an optical microscope, (using an OLYMPUS BX53, Tokyo, Japan), and H. pylori positive specimens were stratified according to the respective staining pattern.

4.7. Statistical Analysis

The significance of differences was determined using the two-tailed Student’s t-test. Statistical analyses were performed using OriginPro 9.65 (OriginLab Corporation, Northampton, MA, USA). p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results are the average from all force curves for all infected or healthy tissues (Figure 2a), from all force curves for each infected or healthy tissue sample (Figure 2b), or from all force curves for all measured cells come from each time point (Figure 5). Overall average values of Young’s modulus are presented as mean ± SD, where mean is the average value for the patient from all curves, and SD is a standard deviation.

5. Conclusions

The molecular mechanism of H. pylori-induced gastric cancer has not been fully elucidated and distinct studies are still ongoing. In recent years, it has been proven that the dysfunction of physiological processes during infection and the development of inflammation generates changes in cells and tissues that affect their mechanical properties. In this study, mechanical changes were evaluated in gastric biopsies and stomach cells under the influence of H. pylori. A comparison of the mechanical properties of the healthy and infected tissues indicates that the infected tissues are softer than the healthy ones. At the same time, the examinations of the behavior of stomach cells exposed to heat-treated H. pylori highlight their mechanical response. The results obtained suggest that nanomechanical parameters can be considered as the new marker of “gastric tissue mechanopathology”. The combination of standard H. pylori infection detection tests and mechanical measurements may place tissue rheology as a complementary procedure in the diagnosis of gastric infections. Dynamic mechanical changes at the level of gastric cells and tissues under the influence of H. pylori bacteria may disrupt, in the long-term, intracellular molecular processes that translate into biological responses, inducing neoplastic processes.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, P.D., Ł.S., T.D., U.D., D.L., R.B.; methodology, P.D., Ł.S., T.D., A.N., S.J.C., R.B.; software, P.D., Ł.S., T.D.; validation, P.D. and R.B.; formal analysis, P.D. Ł.S., T.D., A.N.; investigation, P.D., Ł.S., T.D., A.N.; resources, U.D., D.L., R.B.; data curation, P.D., Ł.S., T.D.; writing—original draft preparation, P.D., Ł.S., S.J.C., R.B.; writing—review and editing, P.D., Ł.S., A.N., S.J.C., R.B; visualization, P.D., Ł.S., A.N.; supervision, U.D., D.L., R.B.; project administration, P.D., Ł.S.; funding acquisition, R.B. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by Medical University of Bialystok SUB/1/DN/20/004/1122 RB (to RB) / SUB/1/NN/21/001/1122 PD (to PD). Part of the study was conducted with the use of equipment purchased by the Medical University of Bialystok as part of the RPOWP 2007–2013 funding, Priority I, Axis 1.1, contract no. UDA- RPPD.01.01.00-20-001/15-00 dated 26.06.2015.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted according to the guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki, and approved by the Ethics Committee of the Faculty of Medicine, Medical University of Bialystok, Bialystok, Poland (IRB approval: R-I-002/599/2018).

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent statement: Informed consent was obtained from all children’s parents/legal guardians involved in the study.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Soliman, C.; Eastwood, S.; Truong, V.K.; Ramsland, P.A.; Elbourne, A. The membrane effects of melittin on gastric and colorectal cancer. PLoS ONE 2019, 14, e0224028. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  2. Alipour, M. Molecular Mechanism of Helicobacter pylori-Induced Gastric Cancer. J. Gastrointest. Cancer 2020, 1–8. [Google Scholar]
  3. Sabbagh, P.; Javanian, M.; Koppolu, V.; Vasigala, V.R.; Ebrahimpour, S. Helicobacter pylori infection in children: An overview of diagnostic methods. Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 2019, 2019, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Sokic-Milutinovic, A.; Alempijevic, T.; Milosavljevic, T. Role of Helicobacter pylori infection in gastric carcinogenesis: Current knowledge and future directions. World J. Gastroenterol. 2015, 21, 11654. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Necchi, V.; Candusso, M.E.; Tava, F.; Luinetti, O.; Ventura, U.; Fiocca, R.; Ricci, V.; Solcia, E. Intracellular, intercellular, and stromal invasion of gastric mucosa, preneoplastic lesions, and cancer by Helicobacter pylori. Gastroenterology 2007, 132, 1009–1023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Peng, C.; Hu, Y.; Ge, Z.-M.; Zou, Q.-M.; Lyu, N.-H. Diagnosis and treatment of Helicobacter pylori infections in children and elderly populations. Chronic Dis. Transl. Med. 2019, 5, 243–251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Debraekeleer, A.; Remaut, H. Future perspective for potential Helicobacter pylori eradication therapies. Future Microbiol. 2018, 13, 671–687. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Roszczenko-Jasińska, P.; Wojtyś, M.I.; Jagusztyn-Krynicka, E.K. Helicobacter pylori treatment in the post-antibiotics era—Searching for new drug targets. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2020, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Magalhães Queiroz, D.M.; Luzza, F. Epidemiology of Helicobacter pylori infection. Helicobacter 2006, 11, 1–5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Mentis, A.; Lehours, P.; Mégraud, F. Epidemiology and Diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori infection. Helicobacter 2015, 20, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  11. Seo, J.H.; Bortolin, K.; Jones, N.L. Helicobacter pylori infection in children. Helicobacter 2020, 25, e12742. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Thrift, A.P.; El-Serag, H.B. Burden of gastric cancer. Clin. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2020, 18, 534–542. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Chenjing, X.; Djaleel, M.S.; Yao, W.; Shunfu, X. Virulence of Helicobacter Pylori Outer Membrane Proteins: An Updated Review. Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 2020, 39, 1821–1830. [Google Scholar]
  14. Francescone, R.; Hou, V.; Grivennikov, S.I. Microbiome, inflammation and cancer. Cancer J. 2014, 20, 181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  15. Guevara, B.; Cogdill, A.G. Helicobacter pylori: A review of current diagnostic and management strategies. Dig. Dis. Sci. 2020, 65, 1917–1931. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Gravina, A.G.; Zagari, R.M.; de Musis, C.; Romano, L.; Loguercio, C.; Romano, M. Helicobacter pylori and extragastric diseases: A review. World J. Gastroenterol. 2018, 24, 3204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Engstrand, L.; Graham, D.Y. Microbiome and gastric cancer. Dig. Dis. Sci. 2020, 65, 865–873. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Janmey, P.A.; Winer, J.P.; Murray, M.E.; Wen, Q. The hard life of soft cells. Cell Motil. Cytoskelet. 2009, 66, 597–605. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Pogoda, K.; Jaczewska, J.; Wiltowska-Zuber, J.; Klymenko, O.; Zuber, K.; Fornal, M.; Lekka, M. Depth-sensing analysis of cytoskeleton organization based on AFM data. Eur. Biophys. J. 2012, 41, 79–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Stylianou, A.; Lekka, M.; Stylianopoulos, T. AFM assessing of nanomechanical fingerprints for cancer early diagnosis and classification: From single cell to tissue level. Nanoscale 2018, 10, 20930–20945. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Zemła, J.; Danilkiewicz, J.; Orzechowska, B.; Pabijan, J.; Seweryn, S.; Lekka, M. Atomic force microscopy as a tool for assessing the cellular elasticity and adhesiveness to identify cancer cells and tissues. Semin. Cell Dev. Biol. 2018, 73, 115–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Hayashi, K.; Iwata, M. Stiffness of cancer cells measured with an AFM indentation method. J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater. 2015, 49, 105–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Wyss, H.M.; Henderson, J.M.; Byfield, F.J.; Bruggeman, L.A.; Ding, Y.; Huang, C.; Suh, J.H.; Franke, T.; Mele, E.; Pollak, M.R. Biophysical properties of normal and diseased renal glomeruli. Am. J. Physiol. Cell Physiol. 2011, 300, C397–C405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. Deptuła, P.; Łysik, D.; Pogoda, K.; Cieśluk, M.; Namiot, A.; Mystkowska, J.; Król, G.; Głuszek, S.; Janmey, P.A.; Bucki, R. Tissue Rheology as a Possible Complementary Procedure to Advance Histological Diagnosis of Colon Cancer. ACS Biomater. Sci. Eng. 2020, 6, 5620–5631. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Cieśluk, M.; Pogoda, K.; Deptuła, P.; Werel, P.; Kułakowska, A.; Kochanowicz, J.; Mariak, Z.; Łysoń, T.; Reszeć, J.; Bucki, R. Nanomechanics and Histopathology as Diagnostic Tools to Characterize Freshly Removed Human Brain Tumors. Int. J. Nanomed. 2020, 15, 7509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Pogoda, K.; Janmey, P.A. Glial tissue mechanics and mechanosensing by glial cells. Front. Cell. Neurosci. 2018, 12, 25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Chin, L.; Xia, Y.; Discher, D.E.; Janmey, P.A. Mechanotransduction in cancer. Curr. Opin. Chem. Eng. 2016, 11, 77–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Akhtar, R.; Sherratt, M.J.; Cruickshank, J.K.; Derby, B. Characterizing the elastic properties of tissues. Mater. Today 2011, 14, 96–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Perepelyuk, M.; Chin, L.; Cao, X.; van Oosten, A.; Shenoy, V.B.; Janmey, P.A.; Wells, R.G. Normal and fibrotic rat livers demonstrate shear strain softening and compression stiffening: A model for soft tissue mechanics. PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0146588. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Stylianou, A.; Stylianopoulos, T. Atomic force microscopy probing of cancer cells and tumor microenvironment components. BioNanoScience 2016, 6, 33–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Ivanov, A.I.; Parkos, C.A.; Nusrat, A. Cytoskeletal regulation of epithelial barrier function during inflammation. Am. J. Pathol. 2010, 177, 512–524. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Chakravortty, D.; Kumar, K.N. Bacterial lipopolysaccharide induces cytoskeletal rearrangement in small intestinal lamina propria fibroblasts: Actin assembly is essential for lipopolysaccharide signaling. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2000, 1500, 125–136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. Haynes, J.; Srivastava, J.; Madson, N.; Wittmann, T.; Barber, D.L. Dynamic actin remodeling during epithelial–mesenchymal transition depends on increased moesin expression. Mol. Biol. Cell 2011, 22, 4750–4764. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Eutamene, H.; Theodorou, V.; Schmidlin, F.; Tondereau, V.; Garcia-Villar, R.; Salvador-Cartier, C.; Chovet, M.; Bertrand, C.; Bueno, L. LPS-induced lung inflammation is linked to increased epithelial permeability: Role of MLCK. Eur. Respir. J. 2005, 25, 789–796. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Su, B.; Ceponis, P.J.; Sherman, P.M. Cytoskeletal rearrangements in gastric epithelial cells in response to Helicobacter pylori infection. J. Med. Microbiol. 2003, 52, 861–867. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. McKee, C.T.; Last, J.A.; Russell, P.; Murphy, C.J. Indentation versus tensile measurements of Young’s modulus for soft biological tissues. Tissue Eng. Part B Rev. 2011, 17, 155–164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Baker, E.L.; Bonnecaze, R.T.; Zaman, M.H. Extracellular matrix stiffness and architecture govern intracellular rheology in cancer. Biophys. J. 2009, 97, 1013–1021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Engstrom, T.; Pogoda, K.; Cruz, K.; Janmey, P.; Schwarz, J. Compression stiffening in biological tissues: On the possibility of classic elasticity origins. Phys. Rev. E 2019, 99, 052413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Bilston, L.E. Soft tissue rheology and its implications for elastography: Challenges and opportunities. NMR Biomed. 2018, 31, e3832. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Malandrino, A.; Mak, M.; Kamm, R.D.; Moeendarbary, E. Complex mechanics of the heterogeneous extracellular matrix in cancer. Extrem. Mech. Lett. 2018, 21, 25–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Celli, J.P.; Turner, B.S.; Afdhal, N.H.; Keates, S.; Ghiran, I.; Kelly, C.P.; Ewoldt, R.H.; McKinley, G.H.; So, P.; Erramilli, S. Helicobacter pylori moves through mucus by reducing mucin viscoelasticity. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2009, 106, 14321–14326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  42. Bansil, R.; Celli, J.; Hardcastle, J.; Turner, B. The influence of mucus microstructure and rheology in Helicobacter pylori infection. Front. Immunol. 2013, 4, 310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  43. Su, C.; Padra, M.; Constantino, M.A.; Sharba, S.; Thorell, A.; Lindén, S.K.; Bansil, R. Influence of the viscosity of healthy and diseased human mucins on the motility of Helicobacter pylori. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Wang, F.; Meng, W.; Wang, B.; Qiao, L. Helicobacter pylori-induced gastric inflammation and gastric cancer. Cancer Lett. 2014, 345, 196–202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Kumar, S.; Dhiman, M. Inflammasome activation and regulation during Helicobacter pylori pathogenesis. Microb. Pathog. 2018, 125, 468–474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Shibata, W.; Sue, S.; Tsumura, S.; Ishii, Y.; Sato, T.; Kameta, E.; Sugimori, M.; Yamada, H.; Kaneko, H.; Sasaki, T. Helicobacter-induced gastric inflammation alters the properties of gastric tissue stem/progenitor cells. BMC Gastroenterol. 2017, 17, 145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  47. Plodinec, M.; Loparic, M.; Monnier, C.A.; Obermann, E.C.; Zanetti-Dallenbach, R.; Oertle, P.; Hyotyla, J.T.; Aebi, U.; Bentires-Alj, M.; Lim, R.Y.; et al. The nanomechanical signature of breast cancer. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2012, 7, 757–765. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Coussens, L.M.; Werb, Z. Inflammation and cancer. Nature 2002, 420, 860–867. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Grivennikov, S.I.; Greten, F.R.; Karin, M. Immunity, inflammation, and cancer. Cell 2010, 140, 883–899. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Bessede, E.; Staedel, C.; Amador, L.A.; Nguyen, P.; Chambonnier, L.; Hatakeyama, M.; Belleannee, G.; Megraud, F.; Varon, C. Helicobacter pylori generates cells with cancer stem cell properties via epithelial–mesenchymal transition-like changes. Oncogene 2014, 33, 4123–4131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Suprewicz, Ł.; Tokajuk, G.; Cieśluk, M.; Deptuła, P.; Sierpińska, T.; Wolak, P.; Wollny, T.; Tokajuk, J.; Głuszek, S.; Piktel, E. Bacteria Residing at Root Canals Can Induce Cell Proliferation and Alter the Mechanical Properties of Gingival and Cancer Cells. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 7914. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Watanabe, T.; Takahashi, A.; Suzuki, K.; Kurusu-Kanno, M.; Yamaguchi, K.; Fujiki, H.; Suganuma, M. Epithelial–mesenchymal transition in human gastric cancer cell lines induced by TNF-α-inducing protein of Helicobacter pylori. Int. J. Cancer 2014, 134, 2373–2382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Bellows, C.F.; Wheatley, B.M.; Moroz, K.; Rosales, S.C.; Morici, L.A. The effect of bacterial infection on the biomechanical properties of biological mesh in a rat model. PLoS ONE 2011, 6, e21228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  54. Martino, F.; Perestrelo, A.R.; Vinarský, V.; Pagliari, S.; Forte, G. Cellular mechanotransduction: From tension to function. Front. Physiol. 2018, 9, 824. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Elosegui-Artola, A.; Oria, R.; Chen, Y.; Kosmalska, A.; Pérez-González, C.; Castro, N.; Zhu, C.; Trepat, X.; Roca-Cusachs, P. Mechanical regulation of a molecular clutch defines force transmission and transduction in response to matrix rigidity. Nat. Cell Biol. 2016, 18, 540–548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  56. Case, L.B.; Waterman, C.M. Integration of actin dynamics and cell adhesion by a three-dimensional, mechanosensitive molecular clutch. Nat. Cell Biol. 2015, 17, 955–963. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Levental, I.; Levental, K.R.; Klein, E.A.; Assoian, R.; Miller, R.T.; Wells, R.G.; Janmey, P.A. A simple indentation device for measuring micrometer-scale tissue stiffness. J. Phys. Condens. Matter 2010, 22, 194120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  58. Plodinec, M.; Lim, R.Y. Nanomechanical characterization of living mammary tissues by atomic force microscopy. In Mammary Stem Cells; Humana Press: New York, NY, USA, 2015; pp. 231–246. [Google Scholar]
  59. Pepin, K.M.; McGee, K.P.; Arani, A.; Lake, D.S.; Glaser, K.J.; Manduca, A.; Parney, I.F.; Ehman, R.L.; Huston, J., III. MR Elastography Analysis of Glioma Stiffness and IDH1-Mutation Status. Am. J. Neuroradiol. 2018, 39, 31–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  60. Yin, Z.; Romano, A.J.; Manduca, A.; Ehman, R.L.; Huston, J., III. Stiffness and Beyond: What MR Elastography Can Tell Us About Brain Structure and Function Under Physiologic and Pathologic Conditions. Top. Magn. Reason. Imaging 2018, 27, 305–318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Kennedy, E.A.; Tordonado, D.S.; Duma, S.M. Effects of freezing on the mechanical properties of articular cartilage. Biomed. Sci. Instrum. 2007, 43, 342–347. [Google Scholar]
Ijms 22 05624 g001 550
Figure 1. Schematic representation of the experimental setting. Mechanical properties of stomach tissues (Panel a) were tested using atomic force microscopy (Panel b) and immunohistochemical staining (Panel d). Panel c shows a diagram of the method to assess Young’s modulus of tissues and cells. AFM experimental setup/installation: the main AFM components are a cantilever with spherical (a bead with diameter of 4.5 μm) and pyramidal tip, a laser source, a photosensitive photodiode, and a piezoelectric scanner that can apply a compressive force to soft tissues at the nanoscale. Application of the compressive force measured as a function of a sample’s position in Z-direction induces so called force vs. distance curves (Panel c). The difference between the cantilever deflection on a stiff glass or hard plastic surface (blue curve) and the soft sample (red curve) describes the deformation of the tissue sample under the load, which permits determination of a sample modulus of elasticity (Young’s modulus).
Figure 1. Schematic representation of the experimental setting. Mechanical properties of stomach tissues (Panel a) were tested using atomic force microscopy (Panel b) and immunohistochemical staining (Panel d). Panel c shows a diagram of the method to assess Young’s modulus of tissues and cells. AFM experimental setup/installation: the main AFM components are a cantilever with spherical (a bead with diameter of 4.5 μm) and pyramidal tip, a laser source, a photosensitive photodiode, and a piezoelectric scanner that can apply a compressive force to soft tissues at the nanoscale. Application of the compressive force measured as a function of a sample’s position in Z-direction induces so called force vs. distance curves (Panel c). The difference between the cantilever deflection on a stiff glass or hard plastic surface (blue curve) and the soft sample (red curve) describes the deformation of the tissue sample under the load, which permits determination of a sample modulus of elasticity (Young’s modulus).
Ijms 22 05624 g001
Ijms 22 05624 g002 550
Figure 2. Mechanical properties of the healthy (h1–h4) and infected (i1–i4) stomach tissues: (a) The Young’s modulus values distributions obtained for all healthy and infected tissue samples using AFM indentation technique. The inset in Figure 2a shows the mean values of tissues’ Young’s modulus ± standard deviation to highlight the difference between healthy and infected tissues. Statistical significance was determined using two-tailed Student’s t-test for overall values. (b) The mean values of tissues’ Young’s modulus ± standard deviation for each healthy and infected tissue. *** indicates statistical significance at p ≤ 0.001.
Figure 2. Mechanical properties of the healthy (h1–h4) and infected (i1–i4) stomach tissues: (a) The Young’s modulus values distributions obtained for all healthy and infected tissue samples using AFM indentation technique. The inset in Figure 2a shows the mean values of tissues’ Young’s modulus ± standard deviation to highlight the difference between healthy and infected tissues. Statistical significance was determined using two-tailed Student’s t-test for overall values. (b) The mean values of tissues’ Young’s modulus ± standard deviation for each healthy and infected tissue. *** indicates statistical significance at p ≤ 0.001.
Ijms 22 05624 g002
Ijms 22 05624 g003 550
Figure 3. Distributions of the Young’s modulus values obtained for healthy and infected tissues using AFM indentation technique: (a–d) the Young’s modulus distributions for the healthy tissues for each patient fitted with the log normal probability density function; (e–h) the Young’s modulus distributions for the infected tissues for each patient fitted with the log normal probability density function.
Figure 3. Distributions of the Young’s modulus values obtained for healthy and infected tissues using AFM indentation technique: (a–d) the Young’s modulus distributions for the healthy tissues for each patient fitted with the log normal probability density function; (e–h) the Young’s modulus distributions for the infected tissues for each patient fitted with the log normal probability density function.
Ijms 22 05624 g003
Ijms 22 05624 g004 550
Figure 4. Images of H. pylori detected using immunostaining of the gastric bioptates: (a–d) images of stained, healthy tissues; (e–h) images of stained infected tissues. Arrows indicate the sites of bacterial colonization. A scale bar equals 100 μm.
Figure 4. Images of H. pylori detected using immunostaining of the gastric bioptates: (a–d) images of stained, healthy tissues; (e–h) images of stained infected tissues. Arrows indicate the sites of bacterial colonization. A scale bar equals 100 μm.
Ijms 22 05624 g004
Ijms 22 05624 g005 550
Figure 5. Changes in the mechanical properties of the gastric adenocarcinoma cells during exposure to heat-inactivated H. pylori cells. The mean values of Young’s modulus ± standard deviation (about 20 cells for one time point were measured). The inset of Young’s modulus mean values in the bars shows cells’ stiffness changes from “zero” (CT) to 72 h time point.
Figure 5. Changes in the mechanical properties of the gastric adenocarcinoma cells during exposure to heat-inactivated H. pylori cells. The mean values of Young’s modulus ± standard deviation (about 20 cells for one time point were measured). The inset of Young’s modulus mean values in the bars shows cells’ stiffness changes from “zero” (CT) to 72 h time point.
Ijms 22 05624 g005
Ijms 22 05624 g006 550
Figure 6. The Young’s modulus values obtained for the gastric adenocarcinoma cells during exposure to H. pylori products: (a) control sample; (b–j) post-infection samples (0.25, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 8, 24, 48, and 72 h, respectively).
Figure 6. The Young’s modulus values obtained for the gastric adenocarcinoma cells during exposure to H. pylori products: (a) control sample; (b–j) post-infection samples (0.25, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 8, 24, 48, and 72 h, respectively).
Ijms 22 05624 g006
Ijms 22 05624 g007 550
Figure 7. Representative fluorescent images of F-actin organization in the gastric adenocarcinoma cells during exposure to heat-treated H. pylori cells and corresponding Young’s modulus measurements at set time points: (a) control cells 0 h; (b) 0.25 h of incubation; (c) 1 h of incubation; (d) 24 h of incubation; (e) 72 h of incubation.
Figure 7. Representative fluorescent images of F-actin organization in the gastric adenocarcinoma cells during exposure to heat-treated H. pylori cells and corresponding Young’s modulus measurements at set time points: (a) control cells 0 h; (b) 0.25 h of incubation; (c) 1 h of incubation; (d) 24 h of incubation; (e) 72 h of incubation.
Ijms 22 05624 g007
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Deptuła, P.; Suprewicz, Ł.; Daniluk, T.; Namiot, A.; Chmielewska, S.J.; Daniluk, U.; Lebensztejn, D.; Bucki, R. Nanomechanical Hallmarks of Helicobacter pylori Infection in Pediatric Patients. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 5624. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22115624

AMA Style

Deptuła P, Suprewicz Ł, Daniluk T, Namiot A, Chmielewska SJ, Daniluk U, Lebensztejn D, Bucki R. Nanomechanical Hallmarks of Helicobacter pylori Infection in Pediatric Patients. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2021; 22(11):5624. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22115624

Chicago/Turabian Style

Deptuła, Piotr, Łukasz Suprewicz, Tamara Daniluk, Andrzej Namiot, Sylwia Joanna Chmielewska, Urszula Daniluk, Dariusz Lebensztejn, and Robert Bucki. 2021. "Nanomechanical Hallmarks of Helicobacter pylori Infection in Pediatric Patients" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 22, no. 11: 5624. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22115624

APA Style

Deptuła, P., Suprewicz, Ł., Daniluk, T., Namiot, A., Chmielewska, S. J., Daniluk, U., Lebensztejn, D., & Bucki, R. (2021). Nanomechanical Hallmarks of Helicobacter pylori Infection in Pediatric Patients. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 22(11), 5624. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22115624

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop