Next Article in Journal
Diet-Regulating Microbiota and Host Immune System in Liver Disease
Next Article in Special Issue
Hydrogen Sulfide Reduces Ischemia and Reperfusion Injury in Neuronal Cells in a Dose- and Time-Dependent Manner
Previous Article in Journal
Impaired Morphogenesis and Function of Rat Adrenal Zona Glomerulosa by Developmental Low-Dose Exposure to DDT Is Associated with Altered Oct4 Expression
Previous Article in Special Issue
Management of Acute Lung Injury: Palmitoylethanolamide as a New Approach
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
IJMS
Volume 22
Issue 12
10.3390/ijms22126325
ijms-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Preclinical Development of FA5, a Novel AMP-Activated Protein Kinase (AMPK) Activator as an Innovative Drug for the Management of Bowel Inflammation

by
Luca Antonioli
1,*,†,
Carolina Pellegrini
2,†,
Matteo Fornai
1,
Laura Benvenuti
1,
Vanessa D’Antongiovanni
1,
Rocchina Colucci
3,
Lorenzo Bertani
4,
Clelia Di Salvo
1,
Giorgia Semeghini
1,
Concettina La Motta
2,
Laura Giusti
5,
Lorenzo Zallocco
2,
Maurizio Ronci
6,
Luca Quattrini
2,
Francesco Angelucci
2,
Vito Coviello
2,
Won-Keun Oh
7,
Quy Thi Kim Ha
7,
Zoltan H. Németh
8,9,
Gyorgy Haskó
8 and
Corrado Blandizzi
1add Show full author list remove Hide full author list
1
Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Pisa, 56126 Pisa, Italy
2
Department of Pharmacy, University of Pisa, 56126 Pisa, Italy
3
Department of Pharmaceutical and Pharmacological Sciences, University of Padova, 35122 Padova, Italy
4
Department of Translational Research and New Technologies in Medicine and Surgery, University of Pisa, 56126 Pisa, Italy
5
School of Pharmacy, University of Camerino, 62032 Camerino, Italy
6
Department of Pharmacy, University “G. d’Annunzio” of Chieti-Pescara, 66100 Chieti, Italy
7
Research Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, College of Pharmacy, Seoul National University, Seoul 151-742, Korea
8
Department of Anesthesiology, Columbia University, New York City, NY 10027, USA
9
Department of Surgery, Morristown Medical Center, Morristown, NJ 07960, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
The authors equally contributed.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22(12), 6325; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22126325
Submission received: 17 March 2021 / Revised: 8 June 2021 / Accepted: 10 June 2021 / Published: 13 June 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Signaling Pathways in Inflammation and Its Resolution: New Insights and Therapeutic Challenges)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Acadesine (ACA), a pharmacological activator of AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK), showed a promising beneficial effect in a mouse model of colitis, indicating this drug as an alternative tool to manage IBDs. However, ACA displays some pharmacodynamic limitations precluding its therapeutical applications. Our study was aimed at evaluating the in vitro and in vivo effects of FA-5 (a novel direct AMPK activator synthesized in our laboratories) in an experimental model of colitis in rats. A set of experiments evaluated the ability of FA5 to activate AMPK and to compare the efficacy of FA5 with ACA in an experimental model of colitis. The effects of FA-5, ACA, or dexamethasone were tested in rats with 2,4-dinitrobenzenesulfonic acid (DNBS)-induced colitis to assess systemic and tissue inflammatory parameters. In in vitro experiments, FA5 induced phosphorylation, and thus the activation, of AMPK, contextually to the activation of SIRT-1. In vivo, FA5 counteracted the increase in spleen weight, improved the colon length, ameliorated macroscopic damage score, and reduced TNF and MDA tissue levels in DNBS-treated rats. Of note, FA-5 displayed an increased anti-inflammatory efficacy as compared with ACA. The novel AMPK activator FA-5 displays an improved anti-inflammatory efficacy representing a promising pharmacological tool against bowel inflammation.

1. Introduction

Crohn’s disease and ulcerative colitis, the two major forms of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), are severe chronic pathologies characterized by a wide range of gastrointestinal and extra-digestive symptoms with a substantial negative impact on patient well-being [1]. Although the exact cause of IBDs remains still undetermined, available evidence indicates a deregulated immune response towards the commensal bacterial flora as responsible for intestinal inflammation in genetically predisposed individuals [1].
In particular, the enteric inflammatory response observed in IBD patients appears to be driven by an altered metabolic activity of gut epithelial lining, leading to severe intestinal barrier dysfunctions [2]. A large body of evidence highlighted that such alteration in tissue metabolism results from a combination of marked inflammatory cell recruitment (neutrophils and monocytes) in parallel with a high proliferation rate among lymphocyte populations [3]. This increased recruitment of immune cells coincides with a massive release of Th1/Th17- or Th2/Th9-related pro-inflammatory cytokines in Crohn’s disease or ulcerative colitis, respectively [4,5]. Increased reactive oxygen species (ROS) production and a defective pro-resolutive cytokine generation (i.e., transforming growth factor (TGF)-β and IL-10) are also prominent features [6].
Recently, more in-depth investigations have allowed us to better understand the molecular mechanisms underlying the pathogenic mechanisms involved in IBDs, and have paved the way toward novel therapies, mainly focused to curb the activity of key inflammatory cytokines (i.e., anti-TNF or anti-IL12/IL-23) or to dam immune cell homing (vedolizumab) [7]. Although these pharmacological approaches have made it possible to control the progression of IBDs, in a portion of the patient population they do not ensure adequate improvement/remission, even inducing in some cases severe adverse reactions [7]. However, the perspective for innovative IBD therapies is changing. In recent years, novel pharmacological approaches to manage chronic inflammatory disorders, including IBDs, have shifted focus toward the modulation of the immune cell metabolism [8].
In this regard, several authors reported a key role of the AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK), a heterotrimeric kinase complex, in regulating immune cell “metabolic plasticity” [9]. This drives the polarization of immune cell metabolism from a glycolytic and thus pro-inflammatory activity, toward an oxidative immunoregulatory phenotype [9]. Indeed, a reduced AMPK expression/activity has been observed in several immuno-inflammatory disorders, including IBDs [10,11]. When considering intestinal inflammation, Bai et al. (2010) reported an involvement of AMPK in the pathophysiology of experimental colitis, showing a beneficial effect of the commercially available AMPK activator acadesine in DSS-or TNBS-treated mice [12,13], leading them to hypothesize the pharmacological AMPK activation as a viable way to manage IBD patients.
Despite such promising beneficial effects of acadesine, it is worth noting that this drug displays some pharmacodynamic limitations, precluding its potential therapeutic development. Indeed, acadesine, beyond the fact that it is prone to quick catabolism by xanthine oxidase [10], also requires bioactivation by adenosine kinase [14], an enzyme that is downregulated at inflammatory sites [15], with a reduction of drug bioavailability.
Based on this background, the present study was aimed at designing and synthesizing a novel AMPK activator endowed with improved pharmacodynamic properties in comparison with acadesine, and efficacy in curbing intestinal inflammation in a rat model of DNBS colitis.

2. Results

2.1. Western Blot Analysis

In the first set of experiments, the cytotoxicity of novel compounds LA12, LA14, FA5, FA6, BP19, and BP22 was determined to estimate the optimum concentrations not toxic to C2C12 cells. The stimulatory effects on phosphorylated AMPK (Thr172) of LA14, FA5, FA6, BP19, BP22 (10 μM), and 2 μM of LA12 as concentrations without cytotoxicity (data not shown), respectively, were evaluated in differentiated mouse C2C12 skeletal myoblasts model (Supplemental Figure S1A). The incubation of C2C12 cells with LA14, FA5, BP19, and BP22 significantly increased the phosphorylation of AMPK at a concentration of 10 μM, whereas the total AMPK expression was not changed (Supplemental Figure S1A). In addition, stimulated phosphorylation of AMPK induced by FA5, BP19, and BP22 were compared with berberine as a standard AMPK activator (Supplemental Figure S1B).
Some studies reported that stimulation of phosphorylated AMPK (Thr172) is potentially related to the increase in SIRT 1 activity [16]. Therefore, using a Sirt1-p53 luciferase cell-based assay we evaluated the effect of novel compounds on SIRT 1 activation, showing that only FA5 significantly increased SIRT 1 activity (Supplemental Figure S2). Based on these data, we focused our attention on FA5, as a candidate with the potential for stimulation of phosphorylated AMPK (Thr172) associated with SIRT1 activation.

2.2. Protein Phosphorylation in Protein Extracts from C2C12 Cells

Based on Western blot (WB) analysis displaying an increased AMPK phosphorylation in C2C12 cell lines, we performed a proteomic analysis to investigate in-depth the change of phosphoproteome induced by FA5. Protein extracts were obtained from three independent experiments of control and FA5-treated cells performed in duplicate. The protein phosphorylation level was first assayed by 1DE separation followed by WB analysis using a specific phospho-threonine antibody, and a global change of phosho-immunoreactive bands was observed after FA5 treatment (data not shown). Then, identification of specific phosphorylated proteins was performed and aliquots of cellular protein extracts were analyzed by coupling two-dimensional electrophoresis (2DE) and WB (Figure 1A–C). Staining of immunoblot membranes with Ruthenium II tris (bathophenanthroline disulfonate) tetrasodium salt (RuBP) before the addition of the specific anti-serine phosphorylated peptides allow us to obtain two images, the first containing all transferred proteins and the second with immunoreactive spots, which can be exactly matched. Each spot intensity was normalized by the total protein intensity as visualized in the image of the membrane stained with RuBP.
Overall, we detected 76 spots differentially phosphorylated with fold change > 2, of which 54 were over phosphorylated after treatment with FA5. All differentially phosphorylated spots were identified by LC-MS/MS and collapsed in 55 proteins (of which 34 over phosphorylated and 21 under phosphorylated). The list of proteins with their accession number, molecular weight (MW), isoelectric point (pI), and mass parameters (coverage, number of unique peptides) are shown in Table 1. For some spots (spot number: 1408, 1409, 1060a, 494, 302, 917, 1313, 526, 315, 296, 1335), more than one identification was suggested as undistinguishable according to their MW and pI.

2.3. Gene Ontology and Pathways Analysis

To determine the biological relevance of differentially phosphorylated proteins, we carried out a gene ontology analysis using Panther. Concerning the biological processes, most proteins were assigned to the cellular process (49.1%) and metabolic processes (32.7%) clusters. The protein class analysis revealed that most proteins were nucleic acid-binding proteins (20%) and protein modifying enzymes (17%). Minor groups of proteins also clustered in metabolite interconversion enzyme (14.3%), cytoskeletal proteins (14.3%), translational protein (11.4%), and scaffold/adaptor protein (8.6%).
Then, the quantified phosphoproteome data were included in the Ingenuity Pathways Analysis (IPA) to evaluate the signaling networks regulated through FA5 treatment. The software generates two main networks, the “cancer, gastrointestinal disease, hepatic disease” and the “post-translational-modifications, protein folding, cancer” with 57 and 50 score values, respectively. Moreover, to search for the signaling molecules that could function upstream of the regulated phosphoproteins, we performed a prediction analysis of upstream kinases/regulators and of their activity state by correlating literature reported effects with observed phosphoprotein expressions. Four kinases (protein DBF4 homolog A (DBF4), casein kinase II subunit alpha (CSNK2A1), cAMP-dependent protein kinase catalytic subunit alpha (PRKACA), and cell division cycle 7-related protein kinase (CDC7)) appeared to be the most significant upstream regulators with p-values of 0.00085, 0.0023, 0.0034, and 0.0037, respectively. In addition to the kinases named above, also fasudil, an isoquinoline sulfonamide drug, was observed to be a significant upstream regulator. In this regard, Yoshikawa et al. suggested fasudil to counteract inflammatory cytokine effects through ROCK inhibition and to prompt its role in preventing colon carcinogenesis in patients with inflammatory bowel diseases [17].
Finally, to generate possible causal networks which explain observed phosphorylation expression changes, hidden connections in upstream regulators were also uncovered and the presence of AMPK among participant regulators was observed. These casual networks were shown to be master regulators of transient receptor potential vanilloid 1 (TRPV1), phosphatidylinositol 3,4,5-trisphosphate 3-phosphatase (TPTE2), and polyphosphoinositide phosphatase (FIG4). Controversial results have been reported concerning the anti-inflammatory effects induced by antagonists and agonists of TRPV1 in inflammatory bowel diseases, despite their clinical efficacy are currently investigated [18,19,20]. Noteworthy, FIG4 has a role as a regulatory complex of both the synthesis and turnover of phosphatidylinositol 3,5-bisphosphate (PtdIns(3,5)P2), whose metabolism has been suggested to be an unexpected and critical link between membrane trafficking in intestinal epithelial cells and the pathogenesis of inflammatory bowel disease [21].

2.4. In Vivo Experiments

2.4.1. Body and Spleen Weight

Measurement of body and spleen weight was assumed as indexes of systemic inflammation [22]. Six days after DNBS administration, rats displayed a significant decrease in their bodyweight in comparison with control animals (Figure 2A). Treatment with FA5 (0.5–30 mg/kg/day) or acadesine (10 mg/kg/day) induced a significant increase in the bodyweight of rats with colitis, whereas animals subjected to dexamethasone (0.1 mg/kg/day) administration did not have increased weights (Figure 2A). The induction of colitis was also characterized by a significant increase in spleen weight. This increment was dose-dependently reduced by FA5 or by acadesine, as well as by the dexamethasone administration (Figure 2B).

2.4.2. Colonic Length and Macroscopic Damage

Six days after DNBS administration, inflamed rats were characterized by a shortening of colonic length, as compared with control animals. Treatment of inflamed rats with FA5 (0.5–30 mg/kg/day), acadesine (10 mg/kg/day), or dexamethasone (0.1 mg/kg/day) attenuated significantly the decrease in colonic length (Figure 3A).
The administration of DNBS was characterized by colonic thickening and ulcerations, with marked areas of transmural inflammation. In addition, adhesions and bowel dilations were detected, with macroscopic damage accounting for 7.8 ± 0.6. In this setting, rats treated with FA5, acadesine, or dexamethasone showed a significant reduction in the macroscopic damage score (Figure 3B).

2.4.3. Histological Analysis

Histological examination of colonic specimens from DNBS-treated rats showed an evident inflammatory process associated with large areas of mucosal necrosis, where the glandular architecture was completely unsettled. Submucosa was thickened owing to the presence of edema and marked infiltration with inflammatory cells associated with vasodilation. The mucosa and submucosa surrounding the necrotic area exhibited inflammation associated with marked cellular infiltration, compared with tissues obtained from control animals. Colonic sections from inflamed rats displayed severe damage 6 days after DNBS treatment (Figure 4). Acadesine (10 mg/kg/day) and FA5 reduced the histological damage in colonic tissues obtained from inflamed rats (Figure 4). Dexamethasone (1 mg/kg) determines a significant improvement in microscopic scores (Figure 4).

2.4.4. Western Blot Analysis

Evaluation of AMPK activation. Western blot analysis showed a detectable expression of AMPK in colonic tissues from control rats (Figure 5). In tissues from animals with colitis, the expression of AMPK was significantly reduced (Figure 5). Such a decrease was counteracted by the administration of the novel AMPK activator FA5 (Figure 5).
Effect of FA5 on tight junction expression. Colonic mucosal scrapings from control animals and DNBS treated rats were assayed for zonulin-1 (ZO-1), occludin, and claudin-1. Control rats displayed the presence of both ZO-1, occludin, and claudin-1 in their colonic mucosa (Figure 6). The induction of experimental colitis induced a significant decrease in the tight junctions compared to control animals (Figure 6). The pharmacological activation of AMPK with FA5 determined a normalization of occludin expression in colonic tissues from rats with colitis (Figure 6). By contrast, no significant effect of FA5 was observed on ZO-1 or claudin (Figure 6)

2.4.5. Tissue TNF and IL-10 Levels

Colonic injury induced by DNBS was associated with a significant increase in tissue TNF levels in comparison with control rats (from 5.2 ± 1.0 to 9.4 ± 1.3 pg/mg). Treatments with FA5 (0.5–30 mg/kg/day), acadesine (10 mg/kg/day), or dexamethasone (0.1 mg/kg/day) significantly decreased the concentration of this pro-inflammatory cytokine (Figure 7A). Moreover, the induction of colitis was also followed by a marked decrease in the anti-inflammatory cytokine IL-10 (normal: 9.6 ± 1.7 pg/mL; DNBS: 4.2 ± 0.8 pg/mL). This reduction was counteracted significantly by FA5, acadesine, or dexamethasone administration (Figure 7B).

2.4.6. MDA Assay

MDA levels in colonic tissue from control rats were 160 ± 32.5 μmol/mg tissue and resulted markedly increased in animals with colitis (582 ± 38.5 μmol/mg tissue). Treatment with all test drugs attenuated significantly the increase in tissue MDA levels elicited by colitis induction (Figure 7C).

3. Discussion

In recent years, the perspective for designing innovative IBD therapies is changing, readdressing the attention from a paradigm aimed at “fighting inflammation,” mainly via non-biological (i.e., aminosalicylates, thiopurines, and steroids) or biological therapies (mainly acting on TNF, IL-23, or adhesion molecules), toward a novel pharmacological approach aimed at “targeting and advancing inflammation resolution” [23]. Indeed, there is increasing evidence to suggest that a failure in the “mediators of resolution” of inflammation may underpin autoimmune and inflammatory diseases, including IBDs [23]. Based on these premises, increasing efforts have been addressed toward the characterization of such pro-resolving mechanisms allowing to identify novel molecular targets useful to design resolution-based therapies for IBDs [23].
Among them, the AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK) represents a critical molecular target involved in reprogramming the immune cell populations from a pro-inflammatory glycolytic metabolism towards a more oxidative phosphorylation which characterize the pro-resolutive phenotype of immune cells [24]. The genetic or the pharmacological in vitro ablation of AMPK elicited a proinflammatory polarization of antigen-presenting cells [25], an increased activity of cytotoxic T lymphocytes and NK cells [26], and an imbalance between TH1/Treg cells [27], indicating the AMPK as a “master switch” of immune cell polarization to an anti-inflammatory functional phenotype [10].
At present, a set of preclinical experiments revealed a beneficial effect of acadesine, a commercially available AMPK activator in a mouse model of acute and relapsing TNBS-induced colitis [12,13]. However, acadesine displays some pharmacodynamic limitations: (i) it needs to be bioactivated by the enzyme adenosine kinase, which undergoes a marked down-regulation at inflammatory sites [10]; (ii) a reduced drug bioavailability resulting from a quick degradation via xanthine oxidase, limiting the potential therapeutical applications of acadesine [10]. It is worth noting that acadesine, being a mimic of AMP, exerts also AMPK-independent off-target effects [28], thus spurring the need to develop novel and more targeted AMPK activators.
The aims of the present study were: (a) to design and synthesize a novel AMPK activator (named FA5) endowed with improved pharmacodynamic properties in comparison with acadesine; (b) to evaluate, via in vitro experiments, the ability of FA5 to activate AMPK; (c) to perform a proteomic analysis aimed at evaluating the changes of the phosphoproteome induced by the novel AMPK activator FA5; (d) to compare the efficacy of FA5 with the commercially available AMPK activator acadesine in an experimental model of bowel inflammation.
The novel AMPK activator, 3-amino-5-phenylbenzofuran-2-carboxamide (FA5; Supplemental Figure S3) was designed by referring to the crucial pharmacophoric residues of acadesine [29], represented by the 4-carboxamide residue and the N3 atom of the five-membered heterocyclic ring. The 2,3-disubstituted furan fragment, chosen as a bioisostere of the imidazole scaffold, perfectly recalls the key structural elements of the reference compound, both from an electronic and a steric point of view. Moreover, the planar and aromatic phenyl core in place of the ribose portion provides high lipophilicity to the novel derivative while reducing consistently its topological polar surface area, thus ensuring in principle a favorable bioavailability profile.
In a set of in vitro experiments performed on C2C12, a murine myoblast cell line stably expressing AMPK [30,31,32], the incubation with FA5 induced phosphorylation, and thus the activation, of this enzyme. Interestingly, in the same cell line we observed that contextually to the activation of AMPK, FA5 elicited also a significant activation of SIRT-1. This evidence is in line with previous reports describing that the pharmacological stimulation of AMPK is followed by SIRT-1 activation as well as by the stimulation of mitochondrial biogenesis and function [33]. In the last years, the AMPK/SIRT-1 enzyme axis displayed a crucial role in counteracting the immune-inflammatory processes, blunting the activity of the pro-inflammatory transcription factors Stat3 and NF-κBp65, c-Jun (a component of the transcription factor AP-1), and Smad7, an inhibitor of TGF-β1 activity [34]. In this regard, a down-regulation has been described of the AMPK/SIRT-1 axis in the gut of IBD patients as well as in mice with an IBD-like colitis, also reporting the abrogation of pro-inflammatory cytokine production and a reduction of the intestinal damages following the treatment of mice with an AMPK or SIRT-1 activators [11,34].
The in vitro investigation was corroborated by a set of phosphoproteomic experiments, which confirmed the efficacy of FA5 in activating the AMPK enzyme complex as well as in stimulating SIRT-1. In the same set of experiments, we observed that the AMPK activator FA5 determined also a reduction in the downstream pathway ROCK, MAPK, and RhoA in C2C12. This is an intriguing point since the RhoA/ROCK signaling is tightly associated with the level of immune system activation and the production of pro-inflammatory factors [35]. Interestingly, Horowitz et al. reported an increased RhoA/ROCK in the bioptic samples from IBD patients when compared with healthy intestinal tissues [36]. In particular, a critical involvement of the RhoA/ROCK also in the epithelial barrier dysfunctions has been reported, affecting the apical junctional complex and thus epithelial barrier integrity, under adverse intestinal conditions (i.e., IBDs, celiac disease) [37].
In the last years, several studies have demonstrated evidence of mitochondrial stress and alterations in mitochondrial function within the immune cells and the intestinal epithelium of patients with IBD and mice undergoing experimental colitis [38]. In this regard, a growing body of evidence points to a specific regulation of various aspects of mitochondrial metabolism and homeostasis by AMPK, stimulating the lipid β-oxidation and suppressing the glycolysis [39]. In line with this view, the pharmacological activation of AMPK via FA5 incubation elicited a shift of the cellular metabolism from a glycolytic metabolism to β-oxidation of fatty acids and oxidative metabolism. It is worth noting that the mitochondrial metabolic shift is critically involved in driving immune cell phenotype and their function [40]. Indeed, in pro-inflammatory cells, such as activated monocytes or T and B cells, energy is generated by increasing glycolysis [41], while in regulatory cells, such as Treg cells or M2 macrophages, energy is generated by increasing mitochondrial function and beta-oxidation [42,43]. Evidence has reported that metformin, a first line of oral antidiabetic treatment, suppresses immune responses mainly through its direct effect on the cellular functions of various immune cell types by induction of AMPK and subsequent inhibition of mTORC1, and by inhibition of mitochondrial ROS production [44,45]. Metformin, interfering with the T helper 17/regulatory T cell balance, the germinal center formation, the autoantibody production, the macrophage polarization, the cytokine synthesis, neutrophil extracellular traps release, restored immune homeostasis, and improved disease severity in several models of inflammatory diseases [44].
The third part of the present study has been designed to evaluate the putative beneficial effect of FA5 administration in a rat model of experimental colitis. To pursue this aim, the experiments were performed in a rat model of DNBS-induced colitis, resembling human Crohn’s disease in terms of macroscopical (bodyweight loss, diarrhea, ulceration, and bleeding), histological, and immunological features including depletion of goblet cells and transmural infiltration of polymorphonuclear cells and predominant NF-κB-dependent Th1 activation [46]. The DNBS-induced colitis represents a useful experimental model to test the putative beneficial effects of novel anti-inflammatory compounds endowed with a potential therapeutic efficacy in human IBDs [47]. The suitability of this model was previously validated by our research group, confirming the efficacy of dexamethasone in ameliorating systemic and tissue inflammatory indexes [48].
In this set of experiments, we observed that the presence of intestinal inflammation is characterized by a reduction of AMPK expression in colonic tissues. This is in line with previous reports highlighting a marked reduction of AMPK phosphorylation in murine models of colitis [11,49,50,51] as well as in patients with IBDs [11]. Of note, our novel AMPK activator FA5 induced a significant activation of the AMPK enzyme complex. Based on these premises, we evaluated the efficacy of FA5 in counteracting the bowel inflammation in DNBS-induced colitis. In particular, we observed that in rats with colitis, FA5 and acadesine administration counteracted the bodyweight loss and the increment of spleen weight, regarded as systemic inflammatory indexes. In contrast, dexamethasone showed a detrimental effect on bodyweight, in virtue of its systemic glucocorticoid activity, leading to muscular atrophy. Moreover, treatments with both AMPK activators were associated with improvements in colonic shortening and in macroscopic and histologic damage scores associated with intestinal inflammation. In parallel, our findings showed a reduction of TNF and an increase in the anti-inflammatory cytokine IL-10 in the colonic tissues from animals with colitis, treated with FA5 or acadesine.
Of note, it has been demonstrated that the disruption of the intestinal epithelial barrier represents a crucial mechanism in the onset and development of IBDs [52]. Accordingly, we observed a marked decrease in tight junction expression in rats with colitis. This is in line with preclinical and clinical evidence that showed an altered expression of the tight junction proteins, including occludin, claudins, in the presence of intestinal inflammation [53]. Of note, the pharmacological activation of AMPK with FA5 exerted a restorative effect on tight junctions in rats with DNBS colitis, showing an ameliorative effect mainly on occludin expression.
MPK activation is consistent with previous studies reporting a significant role of this enzyme in the modulation of cytokine release from immune cell populations [10]. In line with our results, Bai et al. showed that the pharmacological stimulation of AMPK with acadesine reduced NF-kB activation in colonic tissues, resulting in a marked decrease in pro-inflammatory cytokines (TNF, IL-17, IL-12, IL-23, IFN-γ) and a down-regulation of iNOS expression in intestinal macrophages [12]. Interestingly, a set of studies showed that the pharmacological stimulation of AMPK elicited the re-polarization of leukocyte phenotypes inducing programs of anti-inflammatory gene expression, including IL-10 [54,55].
In parallel, DNBS-treated rats administered with FA5 or acadesine displayed a reduction in colonic MDA levels, a lipid peroxidation marker, thus indicating an antioxidant effect of both AMPK activators. It is widely recognized that AMPK exerts a pivotal role as an oxidative stress sensor and redox regulator in addition to its traditional role as an energy sensor and regulator [56]. Indeed, once activated AMPK is essential in maintaining intracellular redox status by inhibiting oxidant production by NADPH oxidases, mitochondria, or by eliciting the expression of antioxidant enzymes (i.e., SOD-2 and UCP-2) [56,57].
In conclusion, our results expand current knowledge about the beneficial effects of FA5, a novel AMPK activator in experimental colitis. Indeed, the pharmacological modulation of AMPK represents an intriguing molecular target to develop novel therapeutic strategies aimed at supporting the resolution of intestinal inflammation, via a metabolic reprogramming of immune cells and as well as the attenuation of pro-oxidative systems. Therefore, the present observations might pave the way to the design and clinical development of novel AMPK selective activators as a useful tool to manage patients with IBDs.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Synthesis of 3-Amino-5-phenylbenzofuran-2-carboxamide, FA5

The test compound FA5 was synthesized at the Department of Pharmacy of the University of Pisa, Italy, following the three-step procedure depicted in Supplemental Figure S3 [44]. Briefly, a mixture of the commercially available 5-bromo-2-hydroxybenzonitrile (1.00 mmol), 2-bromoacetamide (1.20 mmol), and Cs2CO3 (1.20 mmol) in DMF was heated and stirred until the intermediate, 2-(4-bromo-2-cyanophenoxy) acetamide, was obtained. The intermediate was then cyclized to the corresponding 3-amino-5-bromobenzofuran-2-carboxamide by heating it in an ethanolic solution in the presence of KOH. The reaction of the bromo-derivative (1.00 mmol) with phenyl boronic acid (1.20 mmol), Pd(OAc)2 (0.10 mmol), and PPh3 (0.20 mmol) in refluxing toluene and Na2CO3 2M yielded the target FA5. FA5 was purified by crystallization from AcOEt and characterized by physio-chemical and spectroscopic data. Yield 56%. M.p.: 163–165 °C. 1H-NMR (DMSOd6, δ, ppm): δ: 6.067 (s, 2H, exc.), 7.294 (bs, 2H, exc.), 7.376 (t, 1H, J = 7.36 Hz), 7.519–7.481 (m, 3H), 7.694 (d, 2H, J = 8.44 Hz), 7.734 (dd, 1H, J = 1.96, Hz J = 8.69 Hz).

4.2. In Vitro Experiments

4.2.1. Cell Culture and Protein Extraction

The C2C12 cell line (mouse skeletal myoblasts) was obtained from ATCC (Manassas, VA, USA). C2C12 cell lines were grown in Dulbecco’s Modified Eagles Medium (DMEM) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS) and 1% penicillin/streptomycin (100 units/mL/100 µg/mL) until 80% confluence. To prepare C2C12 myotubes, the cells were incubated with DMEM supplemented with 2% horse serum (HS). To investigate the effect of the specific compound, the myotube cell monolayer was gently rinsed with phosphate buffer saline (PBS) and once with DMEM medium without serum and then incubated for 24 h (h) in a serum-free medium. In order to determine the optimal rinsing conditions and incubation time, cell viability was evaluated by the trypan blue assay dye exclusion. After starvation, myotubes were incubated with FA5 compound (10 μM) or with vehicle (DMSO) for 30 min. After the incubation time, the medium was immediately removed, the cells were washed with PBS and lysed by scraping using the rehydration solution (7 M urea, 2 M thiourea, 4% CHAPS, 60 mM DTT) added with 50 mM NaF, 2 mM Na3VO4, 10 mM glycerophosphate, and 1 μL/106 cell protease inhibitors. Then, detached cells were collected, sonicated, and allowed to rehydrate for 1 h at room temperature (RT) with occasional stirring. Thereafter, the solution was centrifuged at 17,000× g for 15 min at RT to eliminate insoluble materials. The protein content was measured by the RC/DC assay (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA). Bovine serum albumin (BSA) was used as a standard.

4.2.2. Cytotoxicity Assay

C2C12 cell lines (mouse skeletal myoblasts) were maintained in growth medium of Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle’s Medium (DMEM) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS) (Gibco, Waltham, Massachusetts, USA), and the cells were incubated at 37 °C and 5% CO2. A cytotoxicity assay was carried out using the 3-(4,5-dimethyl-2-thiazolyl)-2,5-diphenyl-2H-tetrazolium bromide (MTT) (Sigma) to measure the cell viability. Briefly, C2C12 cells were seeded onto 96-well plates at 5000 cells/well and incubated for 12 h. Then, the cells were treated with different concentrations of compounds which dissolved in serum-free medium. After 24 h of incubation, the 2 mg/mL MTT solution (20 μL) was added to each well and incubated for 4 h. Formazan was dissolved in 100 μL of DMSO and then the absorbance was measured by an Absorbance Microplate Reader (VersaMaxTM, Randor, PA, USA) at 550 nm.

4.2.3. Western Blot Analysis of AMPK Phosphorylation in Differentiated Mouse C2C12 Skeletal Myoblasts

C2C12 myoblasts were seeded onto a 6-well plate and incubated until 70–80% confluence. To prepare C2C12 myotubes, the cells were incubated with DMEM supplemented with 2% horse serum (Gibco, Waltham, MA, USA). The differentiation medium was changed every 1–2 days until the myotubes had formed. For the Western blot analysis, the myotubes were incubated with tested compounds for 30 min. After that, the cells were washed with cold PBS and lysed using the lysis buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl pH 7.6, 120 mM NaCl, 1 mM EDTA, 0.5% NP-40, 50 mM NaF, and centrifuged at 12,000 rpm for 20 min. The protein concentrations were determined using a protein assay kit (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc., Hercules, CA, USA). Aliquots of lysates were electrophoresed on 12% SDS-polyacrylamide gels and then the gels were electronically transferred to polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) membranes (PVDF 0.45 µm, Immobilon-P, Merck Kenilworth, NJ., USA). Membranes were then incubated with primary antibodies: p-AMPKα Thr172 (cell signaling), AMPKα (cell signaling), or mouse monoclonal actin (InvitrogenWaltham, MA, USA). After incubation with secondary antibodies, the membranes were detected using an enhanced chemiluminescence Western blot detection kit (Thermo sci., Rockford, IL, USA).

4.2.4. Sirt1 Assay

Cell Culture and Transfection. HEK293 cells were kept in a 37 °C incubator with 5% CO2 and cultured in DMEM containing 10% fetal bovine serum. The cells were placed in 24-well plates with a concentration of 105 cells/1 mL medium in each well. After 24 h, the cells were transfected with 0.2 μg PG13-luc plasmid, 0.2 μg RSV-β-gal plasmid, 0.1 μg myctagged p53 plasmid (myc-p53), and 0.2 μg flag-tagged SIRT1 plasmid (flag-SIRT1) using the PEI transfection reagent (Polyscience, Inc., Warrington, PA, USA). The cultures were then maintained in DMEM medium without serum and were treated with the compounds of interest after 24 h post-transfection.
SIRT1 Deacetylation with a Luciferase Reporter Cell-Based Assay. Cells were transfected with PG13-luc (wt p53 binding sites) and the reporter plasmid, as well as with the plasmid encoding flag−flag-SIRT1 and the plasmid encoding myc-p53, with an internal control of the RSV-β-gal plasmid. The amount of transfected DNA in each well was the same. Using an analytical luminometer (Promega, Madison, WI, USA), the luciferase activity was measured based on the addition of 30 μL of luciferin into 70 μL of lysate. A Dual-Luciferase assay kit (Promega, Madison, WI, USA) was used for checking the promoter activity based on measured renilla luciferase and luciferase. Cells were lysed and assayed for flag-SIRT1 reporter activities, namely, myc-p53 and p53, which were corrected by constitutive β-galactosidase luciferase expression. Calculation of normalized values was performed by dividing the luciferase activity by the renilla luciferase activity.

4.2.5. Two-Dimensional Electrophoresis and Western Blot Analysis

2-DE coupled with Western blot (WB) was employed to detect specific phosphorylated proteins. 2-DE was performed on mouse differentiated myotubes samples untreated and treated with 10 μM FA5 compound. 2-DE was carried out essentially as previously described [20]. Briefly, 200 µg of proteins were filled up to 450 μL in rehydration solution. Immobiline Dry-Strips (GE Health Care Life Sciences, Little Chalfont, UK), 18 cm, nonlinear gradient pH 3–10 were rehydrated overnight in the sample and then transferred to the Ettan IPGphor Cup Loading Manifold (GE Health Care Life Sciences, Little Chalfont, UK) for isoelectrofocusing (IEF). The second dimension (SDS-PAGE) was carried out by transferring the proteins to 11% polyacrylamide gels.
After protein separation, 2DE immunoblotting was performed essentially as previously described [20]. For phosphoprotein detection, membranes were incubated for 2 h at room temperature with phospho-threonine primary antibody (rabbit polyclonal; 1:1000 dilution, catalog n. #9381S, Cell Signaling Technology Inc., Danvers, MA, USA). Goat anti-rabbit IgG, polyclonal antibody (HRP conjugate) (1:10,000 dilution; Enzo Life Sciences, Inc., Ann Arbor, MI, USA) was used as a secondary antibody. Immunoblots were developed using the ECL detection system (PerkinElmer, Waltham, MA, USA). The chemiluminescent images were acquired by ‘‘ImageQuant LAS4010”. For the preparative gels at the end of the second dimension, gels were stained with 1 μM Ruthenium II tris (bathophenanthroline disulfonate) tetrasodium salt (RuBP) (RuBP) (Cyanagen Srl, Bologna, Italy) in 1% phosphoric acid and 30% ethanol O/N. The software Same Spot (v4.1, TotalLab; Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK) and Image-Master 2D Platinum 6.01 (GE Health Care Life Sciences, Little Chalfont, UK) were used to match the image of the membrane stained with RuBP with the image of the membrane with phosphorylated spots and the image of the preparative gel. The protein spots of interest were cut out from the gel and identified by LC-MS/MS analysis.

4.2.6. Spot Digestion and Protein Identification

Gel spots were trypsin digested and analyzed by LC-MS/MS as previously performed by [21] using a Proxeon EASY-nLCII (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Milan, Italy) chromatographic system coupled to a Maxis HD UHR-TOF (Bruker Daltonics GmbH, Bremen, Germany) mass spectrometer. Raw data were processed with DataAnalysis v4.2 to apply the lock mass calibration and then loaded into PEAKS Studio v7.5 software (Bioinformatic Solutions Inc, Waterloo, ON, Canada). The mass lists were searched against the Uniprot/Swiss-Prot database selecting Mus Musculus taxonomy (16,702 entries). Carbamidomethylation of cysteines was selected as fixed modification and oxidation of methionines, deamidation of asparagine and glutamine, phosphorylation of serine, threonine and tyrosine, and acetylation of lysines at the N-terminus were set as variable modifications. Non-specific cleavage was allowed to one end of the peptides, with a maximum of two missed cleavages and a maximum of three variable PTM per peptide. Furthermore, 10 ppm and 0.05 Da were set as the highest error mass tolerances for precursors and fragments respectively.

4.2.7. Ingenuity Pathway Analysis and Panther Analysis

Gene ontology and pathway analysis were performed with QIAGEN’s Ingenuity Pathway Analysis (IPA, QIAGEN Redwood City, www.qiagen.com/ingenuity (accessed on 20 April 2020), Build version: 321501M Content version: 21249400). The analysis was performed using the core analysis option and considered only direct relationships among genes. Swiss-Prot accession number of the regulated phosphoproteins with corresponding comparison ratios and p-values were uploaded into the IPA software and the top canonical pathways, and upstream and master regulators associated with the uploaded phosphoproteins were listed along with the p-values calculated using a right-tailed Fisher’s exact test (p < 0.05). Additionally, gene ontology annotation was conducted by the PANTHER database (Copyright© Paul Thomas, http://pantherdb.org/, accessed on 20 April 2020).

4.3. In Vivo Experiments

4.3.1. Animals

Albino male Sprague-Dawley rats (225–250 g bodyweight) were employed throughout the study. The animals were fed standard laboratory chow and tap water ad libitum and were not subjected to experimental procedures for at least 1 week after their delivery to the laboratory. Animal care and handling were in accordance with the provisions of the European Community Council Directive 2010/63/UE, recognized and adopted by the Italian Government. All experimental procedures were approved on 1 July 2016 by the Ethical Committee for Animal Experimentation of the University of Pisa and by the Italian Ministry of Health (authorization n° 674/2016-PR). All studies involving animals are reported in accordance with the ARRIVE guidelines for reporting experiments involving animals [58].

4.3.2. Induction of Colitis and Drug Treatments

Colitis was induced in accordance with the method described previously by Antonioli et al. (2007) [22]. In brief, during a short anesthesia with isoflurane (Abbott, Rome, Italy), 15 mg of 2,4-dinitrobenzenesulfonic acid (DNBS) in 0.25 mL of 50% ethanol was administered intrarectally via a polyethylene PE-60 catheter inserted 8 cm proximal to the anus. Control rats received 0.25 mL of 50% ethanol. Animals underwent subsequent experimental procedures 6 days after DNBS administration to allow a full development of histologically evident colonic inflammation. Test drugs were administered intraperitoneally (i.p.) for 7 days, starting 1 day before the induction of colitis.
Animals were assigned to the following treatment groups: (a) FA5 (0.5, 1, 3, 10, and 30 mg/kg/day), (b) acadesine (standard AMPK activator 10 mg/kg/day), and (c) dexamethasone (0.1 mg/kg/day). DNBS-untreated animals (control group) and DNBS-treated rats (DNBS group) received the drug vehicle to serve as controls. Test drugs were dissolved in sterile DMSO, and further dilutions were made with sterile saline. The reference in vivo doses of acadesine and dexamethasone were selected on the basis of previous studies [22,59]. The macroscopic score was evaluated on the whole colon, whereas biochemical analysis was performed on specimens taken from a region of inflamed colon immediately adjacent and distal to the gross necrotic damage.

4.3.3. Assessment of Colitis

At the end of the treatments, colonic tissues were excised, rinsed with saline, and scored for macroscopic and histological damage, in accordance with the criteria previously reported by Antonioli et al. (2010) [48]. The criteria for macroscopic scoring of colonic damage were as follows: (i) presence of adhesions between colonic tissue and other organs (0 none, 1 minor, 2 major adhesions); (ii) consistency of colonic fecal material (0 formed, 1 loose, 2 liquid stools); (iii) presence of ulceration (0 none, 1 hyperemia, 2 ulceration without hyperemia, 3 ulceration with inflammation at 1 side, 4 ≥ 2 sites of ulceration and inflammation, 5 major sites of damage, 6 major sites of damage extending > 2 cm). The score was then increased by 1 unit for each mm of colonic wall thickness. All parameters of macroscopic damages were recorded and scored for each rat by two observers blinded to the treatment. At the time of experiment, the colon length and the spleen weight were also measured.

4.3.4. Histologic Damage Score

Histologic damage and inflammation were assessed by light microscopy on Hematoxylin/Eosin-stained histological sections obtained from whole gut specimens [48]. The histological criteria included mucosal architecture loss (0–3), cellular infiltrate (0–3), muscle thickening (0–3), crypt abscess (0, absent; 1, present), and goblet cell depletion (0, absent; 1, present). All parameters of histological damages were recorded and scored for each rat by two observers blinded to the treatment.

4.3.5. Western Blot Analysis

The colon was collected from rats and flushed of fecal content with ice-cold phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), as described previously [60]. Tissues were minced and homogenized using a Potter-Elvehjem Grinder homogenizer on ice in 20% (w/v) TNE lysis buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl pH 7.4, 100 mM NaCl, 0.1 mM EDTA, 1% NP-40, 1% SDS, 0.1% DOC) with protease and phosphatase inhibitors. Samples were then sonicated and boiled for 5 min at 95 °C. Proteins were quantified with the Bradford assay. Total lysates were run on a 4–20% Criterion™ TGX™ Precast Midi Protein Gel (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA) and then transferred to PVDF membranes (Trans-Blot TurboTM PVDF Transfer packs, Biorad). Membranes were blocked with 3% BSA diluted in Tris-buffered saline (TBS, 20 mM Tris-HCl, PH 7.5, 150 mM NaCl) with 0.1% Tween 20. Primary antibodies against claudin-1 (sc-166338, Santa Cruz, Dallas, TX, USA), occludin (ab167161, Abcam, Cambridge, MA, USA), and ZO-1 (ab96587, Abcam) were used. Secondary antibodies were obtained from Abcam (anti-mouse ab97040 and anti-rabbit ab6721) phospho-AMPKα (BK2535T, Cell Signaling), AMPKα (BK5831T, Cell Signaling). Protein bands were detected with ECL reagents (Clarity Western ECL Blotting Substrate, Biorad). Densitometry was performed by IBright Analysis software (version, 1.2.2, Waltham, MA, USA).

4.3.6. Cytokine Assays

At the time of sacrifice, colonic specimens were taken for the determination of tissue TNF (Biosource International, Camarillo, CA, USA) and IL-10 (Pierce Biotechnology, Rockford, IL, USA) levels by means of kits for enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay as previously described by Silene da Silvia et al. (2010) with minor changes. Briefly, tissue samples, previously stored at −80 °C, were weighed, thawed, and homogenized by a Polytron homogenizer (Cole Palmer Homogenizer, Vernon Hills, IL, USA) in 0.3 mL of phosphate-buffered saline, pH 7.2/100 mg of tissue at 4 °C, and centrifuged at 13,400× g for 20 min. One hundred-microliter aliquots of the supernatants were then used for the assay. Tissue TNF and IL-10 levels were expressed as picograms per milligram of tissue.

4.3.7. Evaluation of Tissue Malondialdehyde

Malondialdehyde (MDA) concentration in colonic specimens was evaluated to obtain a quantitative estimation of membrane lipid peroxidation. Colonic tissues were weighed, minced by forceps, homogenized in 2 mL of cold buffer (20 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.4) by a Polytron homogenizer (Cole Palmer Homogenizer), and spun by centrifugation at 1500× g for 10 min at 4 °C. Colonic MDA concentrations were determined by means of a kit for colorimetric assay (Calbiochem-Novabiochem Corporation, San Diego, CA, USA), and the results were expressed as micromoles of MDA per milligram of colonic tissue.

4.4. Drugs and Reagents

2,4-Dinitrobenzenesulfonic acid, dexamethasone, and dihydroethidium dye were purchased from Sigma Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA). 5-Aminoimidazole-4-carboxamide-1-beta-4-ribofuranoside (acadesine) was purchased from Cayman (Ann Arbor, MI, USA). The synthesis of FA5 was performed as reported in the present manuscript. The solutions were then frozen into aliquots of 2 mL and stored at −80 °C until use.

4.5. Proteomic Data Analysis

The analysis of 2-DE images was performed using the Same Spot (v4.1, TotalLab; Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK) software. The volume of each spot obtained after the detection of immunocomplexes was normalized by the total protein content obtained with RuBP staining of membranes. A comparison between cells treated with and without FA5 was performed. The significance of the differences of normalized volume for each phosphorylated spot was calculated by the paired Student’s t-test.

4.6. Statistical Analysis

The results are given as mean ± S.E.M. The significance of differences was evaluated on raw data by one-way analysis of variance followed by post hoc analysis with Student-Newman-Keuls test. p-values < 0.05 were considered significantly different. All statistical procedures were performed by commercial software (GraphPad Prism, version 7.0 from GraphPad Software Inc., San Diego, CA, USA).

5. Patents

FA5 has been patented (PCT#WO 2018189683 A1; 29 January 2019).

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/ijms22126325/s1, Figure S1: Effects of novel putative AMPK activators on cytotoxicity in C2C12 myoblasts model, Figure S2: Stimulatory effects of novel compounds on phosphorylated AMPK (Thr172) in differentiated mouse C2C12 skeletal myoblasts, Figure S3: Synthesis of 3-amino-5 phenylbenzofuran-2-carboxamide (FA5).

Author Contributions

L.A., C.P., M.F., L.B. (Laura Benvenuti), C.D.S., G.S., V.D., R.C., L.B. (Lorenzo Bertani), Z.H.N. and G.H.: carried out the ex vivo experiments; C.L.M., L.Q., F.A. and V.C.: carried out the chemical synthesis of novel AMPK activators; L.G., L.Z. and M.R.: carried out the phosphoproteome experiments; W.-K.O. and Q.T.K.H.: carried out the in vitro experiments; L.A., Z.H.N., G.H. and C.B.: conceived and planned the experiments. All the authors actively contributed to the interpretation of the results and to the writing of the manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted according to the guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki, and approved by the Ethics Committee of University of Pisa (protocol code 674/2016-PR, 1 July 2016).

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available in this article or Supplementary Material.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Ahluwalia, B.; Moraes, L.; Magnusson, M.K.; Ohman, L. Immunopathogenesis of inflammatory bowel disease and mechanisms of biological therapies. Scand. J. Gastroenterol. 2018, 53, 379–389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Vancamelbeke, M.; Vanuytsel, T.; Farre, R.; Verstockt, S.; Ferrante, M.; Van Assche, G.; Rutgeerts, P.; Schuit, F.; Vermeire, S.; Arijs, I.; et al. Genetic and transcriptomic bases of intestinal epithelial barrier dysfunction in inflammatory bowel disease. Inflamm. Bowel Dis. 2017, 23, 1718–1729. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Kominsky, D.J.; Campbell, E.L.; Colgan, S.P. Metabolic shifts in immunity and inflammation. J. Immunol. 2010, 184, 4062–4068. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. Vyas, S.P.; Goswami, R. A decade of th9 cells: Role of th9 cells in inflammatory bowel disease. Front. Immunol. 2018, 9, 1139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Brand, S. Crohn’s disease: Th1, th17 or both? The change of a paradigm: New immunological and genetic insights implicate th17 cells in the pathogenesis of crohn’s disease. Gut 2009, 58, 1152–1167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Huang, Y.; Chen, Z. Inflammatory bowel disease related innate immunity and adaptive immunity. Am. J. Transl. Res. 2016, 8, 2490–2497. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  7. Pagnini, C.; Pizarro, T.T.; Cominelli, F. Novel pharmacological therapy in inflammatory bowel diseases: Beyond anti-tumor necrosis factor. Front. Pharmacol. 2019, 10, 671. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Bettencourt, I.A.; Powell, J.D. Targeting metabolism as a novel therapeutic approach to autoimmunity, inflammation, and transplantation. J. Immunol. 2017, 198, 999–1005. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  9. Ma, E.H.; Poffenberger, M.C.; Wong, A.H.; Jones, R.G. The role of ampk in t cell metabolism and function. Curr. Opin. Immunol. 2017, 46, 45–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Antonioli, L.; Colucci, R.; Pellegrini, C.; Giustarini, G.; Sacco, D.; Tirotta, E.; Caputi, V.; Marsilio, I.; Giron, M.C.; Nemeth, Z.H.; et al. The ampk enzyme-complex: From the regulation of cellular energy homeostasis to a possible new molecular target in the management of chronic inflammatory disorders. Expert Opin. Ther. Targets 2016, 20, 179–191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Di Fusco, D.; Dinallo, V.; Monteleone, I.; Laudisi, F.; Marafini, I.; Franze, E.; Di Grazia, A.; Dwairi, R.; Colantoni, A.; Ortenzi, A.; et al. Metformin inhibits inflammatory signals in the gut by controlling ampk and p38 map kinase activation. Clin. Sci. 2018, 132, 1155–1168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Bai, A.; Yong, M.; Ma, A.G.; Ma, Y.; Weiss, C.R.; Guan, Q.; Bernstein, C.N.; Peng, Z. Novel anti-inflammatory action of 5-aminoimidazole-4-carboxamide ribonucleoside with protective effect in dextran sulfate sodium-induced acute and chronic colitis. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 2010, 333, 717–725. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  13. Bai, A.; Ma, A.G.; Yong, M.; Weiss, C.R.; Ma, Y.; Guan, Q.; Bernstein, C.N.; Peng, Z. Ampk agonist downregulates innate and adaptive immune responses in tnbs-induced murine acute and relapsing colitis. Biochem. Pharmacol. 2010, 80, 1708–1717. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Glazunova, V.A.; Lobanov, K.V.; Shakulov, R.S.; Mironov, A.S.; Shtil, A.A. Acadesine triggers non-apoptotic death in tumor cells. Acta Nat. 2013, 5, 74–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Bowser, J.L.; Phan, L.H.; Eltzschig, H.K. The hypoxia-adenosine link during intestinal inflammation. J. Immunol. 2018, 200, 897–907. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Yang, J.L.; Ha, T.K.; Dhodary, B.; Kim, K.H.; Park, J.; Lee, C.H.; Kim, Y.C.; Oh, W.K. Dammarane triterpenes as potential sirt1 activators from the leaves of panax ginseng. J. Nat. Prod. 2014, 77, 1615–1623. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Yoshikawa, T.; Wu, J.; Otsuka, M.; Kishikawa, T.; Suzuki, N.; Takata, A.; Ohno, M.; Ishibashi, R.; Yamagami, M.; Nakagawa, R.; et al. Repression of microrna function mediates inflammation-associated colon tumorigenesis. Gastroenterology 2017, 152, 631–643. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Cseko, K.; Beckers, B.; Keszthelyi, D.; Helyes, Z. Role of trpv1 and trpa1 ion channels in inflammatory bowel diseases: Potential therapeutic targets? Pharmaceuticals 2019, 12, 48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  19. Toledo-Maurino, J.J.; Furuzawa-Carballeda, J.; Villeda-Ramirez, M.A.; Fonseca-Camarillo, G.; Meza-Guillen, D.; Barreto-Zuniga, R.; Yamamoto-Furusho, J.K. The transient receptor potential vanilloid 1 is associated with active inflammation in ulcerative colitis. Mediat. Inflamm. 2018, 2018, 6570371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Ciregia, F.; Bugliani, M.; Ronci, M.; Giusti, L.; Boldrini, C.; Mazzoni, M.R.; Mossuto, S.; Grano, F.; Cnop, M.; Marselli, L.; et al. Palmitate-induced lipotoxicity alters acetylation of multiple proteins in clonal beta cells and human pancreatic islets. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 13445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  21. Ciregia, F.; Giusti, L.; Ronci, M.; Bugliani, M.; Piga, I.; Pieroni, L.; Rossi, C.; Marchetti, P.; Urbani, A.; Lucacchini, A. Glucagon-like peptide 1 protects ins-1e mitochondria against palmitate-mediated beta-cell dysfunction: A proteomic study. Mol. Biosyst. 2015, 11, 1696–1707. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Antonioli, L.; Fornai, M.; Colucci, R.; Ghisu, N.; Da Settimo, F.; Natale, G.; Kastsiuchenka, O.; Duranti, E.; Virdis, A.; Vassalle, C.; et al. Inhibition of adenosine deaminase attenuates inflammation in experimental colitis. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 2007, 322, 435–442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  23. Sugimoto, M.A.; Vago, J.P.; Perretti, M.; Teixeira, M.M. Mediators of the resolution of the inflammatory response. Trends Immunol. 2019, 40, 212–227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Lyons, C.L.; Roche, H.M. Nutritional modulation of ampk-impact upon metabolic-inflammation. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018, 19, 3092. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  25. Sag, D.; Carling, D.; Stout, R.D.; Suttles, J. Adenosine 5′-monophosphate-activated protein kinase promotes macrophage polarization to an anti-inflammatory functional phenotype. J. Immunol. 2008, 181, 8633–8641. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Muller-Durovic, B.; Lanna, A.; Covre, L.P.; Mills, R.S.; Henson, S.M.; Akbar, A.N. Killer cell lectin-like receptor g1 inhibits nk cell function through activation of adenosine 5′-monophosphate-activated protein kinase. J. Immunol. 2016, 197, 2891–2899. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  27. Gualdoni, G.A.; Mayer, K.A.; Goschl, L.; Boucheron, N.; Ellmeier, W.; Zlabinger, G.J. The amp analog aicar modulates the treg/th17 axis through enhancement of fatty acid oxidation. FASEB J. 2016, 30, 3800–3809. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Guigas, B.; Sakamoto, K.; Taleux, N.; Reyna, S.M.; Musi, N.; Viollet, B.; Hue, L. Beyond aica riboside: In search of new specific amp-activated protein kinase activators. IUBMB Life 2009, 61, 18–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Day, P.; Sharff, A.; Parra, L.; Cleasby, A.; Williams, M.; Horer, S.; Nar, H.; Redemann, N.; Tickle, I.; Yon, J. Structure of a cbs-domain pair from the regulatory gamma1 subunit of human ampk in complex with amp and zmp. Acta Crystallogr. Sect. D Biol. Crystallogr. 2007, 63, 587–596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Niesler, C.U.; Myburgh, K.H.; Moore, F. The changing ampk expression profile in differentiating mouse skeletal muscle myoblast cells helps confer increasing resistance to apoptosis. Exp. Physiol. 2007, 92, 207–217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Egawa, T.; Ohno, Y.; Goto, A.; Ikuta, A.; Suzuki, M.; Ohira, T.; Yokoyama, S.; Sugiura, T.; Ohira, Y.; Yoshioka, T.; et al. Aicar-induced activation of ampk negatively regulates myotube hypertrophy through the hsp72-mediated pathway in c2c12 skeletal muscle cells. Am. J. Physiol. Endocrinol. Metab. 2014, 306, E344–E354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Price, N.L.; Gomes, A.P.; Ling, A.J.; Duarte, F.V.; Martin-Montalvo, A.; North, B.J.; Agarwal, B.; Ye, L.; Ramadori, G.; Teodoro, J.S.; et al. Sirt1 is required for ampk activation and the beneficial effects of resveratrol on mitochondrial function. Cell Metab. 2012, 15, 675–690. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  33. Ruderman, N.B.; Xu, X.J.; Nelson, L.; Cacicedo, J.M.; Saha, A.K.; Lan, F.; Ido, Y. Ampk and sirt1: A long-standing partnership? Am. J. Physiol. Endocrinol. Metab. 2010, 298, E751–E760. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Caruso, R.; Marafini, I.; Franze, E.; Stolfi, C.; Zorzi, F.; Monteleone, I.; Caprioli, F.; Colantoni, A.; Sarra, M.; Sedda, S.; et al. Defective expression of sirt1 contributes to sustain inflammatory pathways in the gut. Mucosal Immunol. 2014, 7, 1467–1479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Yang, W.; Zhou, G.; Yu, T.; Chen, L.; Yu, L.; Guo, Y.; Cong, Y.; Liu, Z. Critical role of rock2 activity in facilitating mucosal cd4(+) t cell activation in inflammatory bowel disease. J. Autoimmun. 2018, 89, 125–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Horowitz, S.; Binion, D.G.; Nelson, V.M.; Kanaa, Y.; Javadi, P.; Lazarova, Z.; Andrekopoulos, C.; Kalyanaraman, B.; Otterson, M.F.; Rafiee, P. Increased arginase activity and endothelial dysfunction in human inflammatory bowel disease. Am. J. Physiol. Gastrointest. Liver Physiol. 2007, 292, G1323–G1336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Jin, Y.; Blikslager, A.T. The regulation of intestinal mucosal barrier by myosin light chain kinase/rho kinases. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 3550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Novak, E.A.; Mollen, K.P. Mitochondrial dysfunction in inflammatory bowel disease. Front. Cell Dev. Biol. 2015, 3, 62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Herzig, S.; Shaw, R.J. Ampk: Guardian of metabolism and mitochondrial homeostasis. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2018, 19, 121–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  40. Weinberg, S.E.; Sena, L.A.; Chandel, N.S. Mitochondria in the regulation of innate and adaptive immunity. Immunity 2015, 42, 406–417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Chang, C.H.; Curtis, J.D.; Maggi, L.B., Jr.; Faubert, B.; Villarino, A.V.; O’Sullivan, D.; Huang, S.C.; van der Windt, G.J.; Blagih, J.; Qiu, J.; et al. Posttranscriptional control of t cell effector function by aerobic glycolysis. Cell 2013, 153, 1239–1251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  42. Palsson-McDermott, E.M.; O’Neill, L.A.J. Targeting immunometabolism as an anti-inflammatory strategy. Cell Res. 2020, 30, 300–314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  43. Viola, A.; Munari, F.; Sanchez-Rodriguez, R.; Scolaro, T.; Castegna, A. The metabolic signature of macrophage responses. Front. Immunol. 2019, 10, 1462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  44. Ursini, F.; Russo, E.; Pellino, G.; D’Angelo, S.; Chiaravalloti, A.; De Sarro, G.; Manfredini, R.; De Giorgio, R. Metformin and autoimmunity: A “new deal” of an old drug. Front. Immunol. 2018, 9, 1236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  45. Schuiveling, M.; Vazirpanah, N.; Radstake, T.; Zimmermann, M.; Broen, J.C.A. Metformin, a new era for an old drug in the treatment of immune mediated disease? Curr. Drug Targets 2018, 19, 945–959. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Morampudi, V.; Bhinder, G.; Wu, X.; Dai, C.; Sham, H.P.; Vallance, B.A.; Jacobson, K. Dnbs/tnbs colitis models: Providing insights into inflammatory bowel disease and effects of dietary fat. J. Vis. Exp. JoVE 2014, 58, e51297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  47. Barone, M.; Chain, F.; Sokol, H.; Brigidi, P.; Bermudez-Humaran, L.G.; Langella, P.; Martin, R. A versatile new model of chemically induced chronic colitis using an outbred murine strain. Front. Microbiol. 2018, 9, 565. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  48. Antonioli, L.; Fornai, M.; Colucci, R.; Awwad, O.; Ghisu, N.; Tuccori, M.; Da Settimo, F.; La Motta, C.; Natale, G.; Duranti, E.; et al. The blockade of adenosine deaminase ameliorates chronic experimental colitis through the recruitment of adenosine a2a and a3 receptors. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 2010, 335, 434–442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  49. Arab, H.H.; Al-Shorbagy, M.Y.; Saad, M.A. Activation of autophagy and suppression of apoptosis by dapagliflozin attenuates experimental inflammatory bowel disease in rats: Targeting ampk/mtor, hmgb1/rage and nrf2/ho-1 pathways. Chemico-Biol. Interact. 2021, 335, 109368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Deng, Z.; Ni, J.; Wu, X.; Wei, H.; Peng, J. Gpa peptide inhibits nlrp3 inflammasome activation to ameliorate colitis through ampk pathway. Aging 2020, 12, 18522–18544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Takahara, M.; Takaki, A.; Hiraoka, S.; Adachi, T.; Shimomura, Y.; Matsushita, H.; Nguyen, T.T.T.; Koike, K.; Ikeda, A.; Takashima, S.; et al. Berberine improved experimental chronic colitis by regulating interferon-gamma- and il-17a-producing lamina propria cd4(+) t cells through ampk activation. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 11934. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Lechuga, S.; Ivanov, A.I. Disruption of the epithelial barrier during intestinal inflammation: Quest for new molecules and mechanisms. Biochim. Biophys. Acta Mol. Cell Res. 2017, 1864, 1183–1194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Chelakkot, C.; Ghim, J.; Ryu, S.H. Mechanisms regulating intestinal barrier integrity and its pathological implications. Exp. Mol. Med. 2018, 50, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  54. Guragain, D.; Gurung, P.; Chang, J.H.; Katila, N.; Chang, H.W.; Jeong, B.S.; Choi, D.Y.; Kim, J.A. Ampk is essential for il-10 expression and for maintaining balance between inflammatory and cytoprotective signaling. Biochim. Biophys. Acta Gen. Subj. 2020, 1864, 129631. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Zhu, Y.P.; Brown, J.R.; Sag, D.; Zhang, L.; Suttles, J. Adenosine 5′-monophosphate-activated protein kinase regulates il-10-mediated anti-inflammatory signaling pathways in macrophages. J. Immunol. 2015, 194, 584–594. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  56. Wang, S.; Song, P.; Zou, M.H. Amp-activated protein kinase, stress responses and cardiovascular diseases. Clin. Sci. 2012, 122, 555–573. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  57. Rabinovitch, R.C.; Samborska, B.; Faubert, B.; Ma, E.H.; Gravel, S.P.; Andrzejewski, S.; Raissi, T.C.; Pause, A.; St-Pierre, J.; Jones, R.G. Ampk maintains cellular metabolic homeostasis through regulation of mitochondrial reactive oxygen species. Cell Rep. 2017, 21, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  58. Kilkenny, C.; Browne, W.; Cuthill, I.C.; Emerson, M.; Altman, D.G. NC3Rs Reporting Guidelines Working Group. Animal research: Reporting in vivo experiments: The arrive guidelines. J. Gene Med. 2010, 12, 561–563. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Fabian, T.C.; Fabian, M.J.; Yockey, J.M.; Proctor, K.G. Acadesine and lipopolysaccharide-evoked pulmonary dysfunction after resuscitation from traumatic shock. Surgery 1996, 119, 302–315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Antonioli, L.; Fornai, M.; Awwad, O.; Giustarini, G.; Pellegrini, C.; Tuccori, M.; Caputi, V.; Qesari, M.; Castagliuolo, I.; Brun, P.; et al. Role of the a(2b) receptor-adenosine deaminase complex in colonic dysmotility associated with bowel inflammation in rats. Br. J. Pharmacol. 2014, 171, 1314–1329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
Ijms 22 06325 g001 550
Figure 1. 2-DE coupled with WB was employed to detect specific phosphorylated proteins. Proteins from C2C12 cells were firstly separated according to pI on Immobiline Dry-Strips (18 cm, non-linear gradient pH 3–10) and then according to molecular weight using 11% polyacrylamide gels. Subsequently, proteins were transferred onto nitrocellulose membranes. Immediately after WB, membranes were stained with RuBP. Thereafter, membranes were incubated with the anti-phosphothreonine antibody. (A) A representative nitrocellulose image with a 2-DE protein map of C2C12 cells (control). Proteins were detected by RuBP staining. (B) The same membrane with detection of the immunoreactive spots. (C) A representative nitrocellulose membrane with detection of the immunoreactive spots of C2C12 cells treated with FA5. Spots differentially phosphorylated are highlighted.
Figure 1. 2-DE coupled with WB was employed to detect specific phosphorylated proteins. Proteins from C2C12 cells were firstly separated according to pI on Immobiline Dry-Strips (18 cm, non-linear gradient pH 3–10) and then according to molecular weight using 11% polyacrylamide gels. Subsequently, proteins were transferred onto nitrocellulose membranes. Immediately after WB, membranes were stained with RuBP. Thereafter, membranes were incubated with the anti-phosphothreonine antibody. (A) A representative nitrocellulose image with a 2-DE protein map of C2C12 cells (control). Proteins were detected by RuBP staining. (B) The same membrane with detection of the immunoreactive spots. (C) A representative nitrocellulose membrane with detection of the immunoreactive spots of C2C12 cells treated with FA5. Spots differentially phosphorylated are highlighted.
Ijms 22 06325 g001
Ijms 22 06325 g002 550
Figure 2. Body (A) and spleen weight (B) estimated in rats with DNBS-induced colitis treated with FA5 (0.5, 1, 3, 10, 30 mg/kg/day) acadesine (10 mg/kg/day) or dexamethasone (0.1 mg/kg/day). Each column represents the mean ± standard error of the mean (SEM) (n = 8). *, p < 0.05, significant difference versus control group; a, p < 0.05, significant difference versus DNBS group.
Figure 2. Body (A) and spleen weight (B) estimated in rats with DNBS-induced colitis treated with FA5 (0.5, 1, 3, 10, 30 mg/kg/day) acadesine (10 mg/kg/day) or dexamethasone (0.1 mg/kg/day). Each column represents the mean ± standard error of the mean (SEM) (n = 8). *, p < 0.05, significant difference versus control group; a, p < 0.05, significant difference versus DNBS group.
Ijms 22 06325 g002
Ijms 22 06325 g003 550
Figure 3. Colonic length (A) and macroscopic damage score (B) evaluated in rats with colitis, either in the absence or in the presence of FA5 (0.5, 1, 3, 10, 30 mg/kg/day), acadesine (10 mg/kg/day), or dexamethasone (0.1 mg/kg/day). Each column represents the mean ± standard error of the mean (SEM) (n = 8). *, p < 0.05, significant difference versus control group; a, p < 0.05, significant difference versus DNBS group.
Figure 3. Colonic length (A) and macroscopic damage score (B) evaluated in rats with colitis, either in the absence or in the presence of FA5 (0.5, 1, 3, 10, 30 mg/kg/day), acadesine (10 mg/kg/day), or dexamethasone (0.1 mg/kg/day). Each column represents the mean ± standard error of the mean (SEM) (n = 8). *, p < 0.05, significant difference versus control group; a, p < 0.05, significant difference versus DNBS group.
Ijms 22 06325 g003
Ijms 22 06325 g004 550
Figure 4. Microscopic damage score estimated for colon in rats under normal conditions or with DNBS-induced colitis, either alone or after treatment with FA5 (0.5–30 mg/kg/day), acadesine (mg/kg/day), or dexamethasone (1 mg/kg). Each column represents the mean ± standard error of the mean (SEM) (n = 8). * p < 0.05, significant difference vs. control group; a p < 0.05, significant difference vs. DNBS group.
Figure 4. Microscopic damage score estimated for colon in rats under normal conditions or with DNBS-induced colitis, either alone or after treatment with FA5 (0.5–30 mg/kg/day), acadesine (mg/kg/day), or dexamethasone (1 mg/kg). Each column represents the mean ± standard error of the mean (SEM) (n = 8). * p < 0.05, significant difference vs. control group; a p < 0.05, significant difference vs. DNBS group.
Ijms 22 06325 g004
Ijms 22 06325 g005 550
Figure 5. Representative blots and densitometric analysis of the expression of phospho-AMPK and AMPK in colonic tissues from control rats and animals treated with DNBS alone or in combination with FA-5 (0.5, 1, 3, 10, 30 mg/kg/day). Each column represents the mean ± standard error of the mean (SEM) (n = 6). One-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s post hoc test results: * p < 0.05, significant difference vs. the control group; a p < 0.05, significant difference vs. the DNBS group.
Figure 5. Representative blots and densitometric analysis of the expression of phospho-AMPK and AMPK in colonic tissues from control rats and animals treated with DNBS alone or in combination with FA-5 (0.5, 1, 3, 10, 30 mg/kg/day). Each column represents the mean ± standard error of the mean (SEM) (n = 6). One-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s post hoc test results: * p < 0.05, significant difference vs. the control group; a p < 0.05, significant difference vs. the DNBS group.
Ijms 22 06325 g005
Ijms 22 06325 g006 550
Figure 6. Representative blots (A) and densitometric analysis of the expression of ZO-1 (B), occludin (C), and claudin-1 (D) in colonic tissues from control rats and animals treated with DNBS alone or in combination with FA-5 (0.5, 1, 3, 10, 30 mg/kg/day). Each column represents the mean ± standard error of the mean (SEM) (n = 6). One-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s post hoc test results: * p < 0.05, significant difference vs. the control group; a p < 0.05, significant difference vs. the DNBS group.
Figure 6. Representative blots (A) and densitometric analysis of the expression of ZO-1 (B), occludin (C), and claudin-1 (D) in colonic tissues from control rats and animals treated with DNBS alone or in combination with FA-5 (0.5, 1, 3, 10, 30 mg/kg/day). Each column represents the mean ± standard error of the mean (SEM) (n = 6). One-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s post hoc test results: * p < 0.05, significant difference vs. the control group; a p < 0.05, significant difference vs. the DNBS group.
Ijms 22 06325 g006
Ijms 22 06325 g007 550
Figure 7. TNF (A), IL-10 (B), and MDA (C) levels in colonic tissues from control rats or in animals treated with DNBS either alone or in combination with FA5 (0.5, 1, 3, 10, 30 mg/kg/day), acadesine (10 mg/kg/day), or dexamethasone (0.1 mg/kg/day). Each column represents the mean ± standard error of the mean (SEM) (n = 8). *, p < 0.05, significant difference versus control group; a, p < 0.05, significant difference versus DNBS group.
Figure 7. TNF (A), IL-10 (B), and MDA (C) levels in colonic tissues from control rats or in animals treated with DNBS either alone or in combination with FA5 (0.5, 1, 3, 10, 30 mg/kg/day), acadesine (10 mg/kg/day), or dexamethasone (0.1 mg/kg/day). Each column represents the mean ± standard error of the mean (SEM) (n = 8). *, p < 0.05, significant difference versus control group; a, p < 0.05, significant difference versus DNBS group.
Ijms 22 06325 g007
Table
Table 1. List of the differentially phosphorylated protein spots identified by MS.
Table 1. List of the differentially phosphorylated protein spots identified by MS.
Spot n°/PositionIDProtein NameGene NameCoverage (%)Unique PeptidesMW
(th)		pI (th)Ratio
(FA5/CTRL)		ANOVA
(p-Value)		Fold Phosphorylation
192Q8CGC7Bifunctional glutamate/proline—tRNA ligaseEprs34170,0787.756.30.036.3
197Q6PDG5SWI/SNF complex subunit SMARCC2 Smarcc222132,6045.414.70.0134.7
201Q02053Ubiquitin-like modifier-activating enzyme 1Uba12118117,8095.432.20.0212.2
231Q8VDJ3Vigilin Hdlbp34141,7426.432.50.0232.5
247/aP58252Elongation factor 2Eef2252195,3146.415.20.0025.2
270/aP49717DNA replication licensing factor MCM4Mcm49996,7366.775.20.0025.2
272/aP49717DNA replication licensing factor MCM4Mcm45596,7366.775.80.0025.8
279/aP58252Elongation factor 2Eef2252095,3146.413.90.000083.9
283/aP58252Elongation factor 2Eef2282495,3146.412.20.000092.2
294/aP58252Elongation factor 2Eef2373595,3146.415.80.0025.8
296/aP49717DNA replication licensing factor MCM4Mcm45596,7366.775.40.0015.4
296/aP58252Elongation factor 2Eef2414095,3146.415.40.0015.4
302P13020GelsolinGsn241685,9425.832.70.0132.7
302Q9ERG0LIM domain and actin-binding protein 1Lima 17684,0606.182.70.0132.7
315P13020GelsolinGsn332185,9425.833.90.0173.9
315Q9ERG0LIM domain and actin-binding protein 1Lima 1201184,0606.183.90.0173.9
390P2002978 kDa glucose-regulated proteinHspa5585072,4225.074.50.000384.5
400P14824Annexin A6Anxa6342075,8855.348.20.0038.2
453P63017Heat shock cognate 71 kDa proteinHspa8603170,8715.372.80.000062.8
464Q9CZD3Glycine—tRNA ligaseGars181381,8786.244.50.0014.5
478Q9CZD3Glycine—tRNA ligaseGars262081,8786.246.20.0016.2
492Q9CZD3Glycine—tRNA ligaseGars262381,8786.244.80.000054.8
494P17156Heat shock-related 70 kDa protein 2Hspa221269,6425.51.630.000662.0
494P63017Heat shock cognate 71 kDa proteinHspa8593270,8715.371.630.000662.0
504P48678Prelamin-A/CLmna15974,2386.540.340.00032.9
520/aP49717DNA replication licensing factor MCM4Mcm4161596,7366.776.50.000496.5
520/aP58252Elongation factor 2Eef2413895,3146.416.50.000496.5
521/aP58252Elongation factor 2Eef2262295,3146.414.40.0034.4
526/aP49717DNA replication licensing factor MCM4Mcm45496,7366.773.70.0023.7
526/aP58252Elongation factor 2Eef2221795,3146.413.70.0023.7
538/aP58252Elongation factor 2Eef2332795,3146.416.80.0016.8
549Q8K009Mitochondrial 10-formyltetrahydrofolate dehydrogenAldh1l23224101,5905.937.20.037.2
594P61979Heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoprotein KHnrnpk5250,9765.390.150.0000866.5
652Q61881DNA replication licensing factor MCM7Mcm7332181,2115.982.10.0282.1
662Q91YW3DnaJ homolog subfamily C member 3Dnajc34257,4645.612.90.0012.9
698Q8R550SH3 domain-containing kinase-binding protein 1Sh3kbp19578,1707.153.50.0183.5
702P26041MoesinMsn3267,7676.22110.0005710.9
770/dP31324cAMP-dependent protein kinase type II-beta regulatoryPrkar2b16546,1674.90.410.000652.4
772/dP99024Tubulin beta-5 chainTubb530249,6714.780.370.0000552.7
777/cQ8C1A5Thimet oligopeptidaseThop1362378,0265.722.30.000232.3
784P56480ATP synthase subunit beta, mitochondrialAtp5b20856,3015.192.10.000152.1
847Q99L45Eukaryotic translation initiation factor 2 subunit 2Eif2s2501738,0925.610.130.0017.3
855P60843Eukaryotic initiation factor 4A-I Eif4a134746,1545.322.10.000212.1
909Q9Z1D1Eukaryotic translation initiation factor 3 subunit GEif3g7235,6385.70.470.000782.1
915Q9JKV1Proteasomal ubiquitin receptor ADRM1Adrm17342,0604.940.450.0012.4
917P11983T-complex protein 1 subunit alphaTcp1511760,4495.822.90.0082.9
917P6303860 kDa heat shock protein, mitochondrialHspd1271460,9565.912.90.0082.9
931Q04447Creatine kinase B-typeCkb341142,7135.40.410.0012.4
1060/dP5477526S protease regulatory subunit 6BPsmc4452047,4085.00.360.0032.7
1066Q99KV1DnaJ homolog subfamily B member 11Dnajb1128640.5555.920.230.00000094.3
1070/dP20152VimentinVim331453,6885.050.190.000045.1
1096/eQ3UM45Protein phosphatase 1 regulatory subunit 7 Ppp1r75241,2924.850.120.000058
1072/eP20152VimentinVim351453,6885.050.180.0000035.5
1078/eP60843Eukaryotic initiation factor 4A-IEif4a123946,1545.320.360.0042.8
1113/eQ9Z2X1Heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoprotein FHnrnpf17645,7305.30.360.0032.7
1119/eQ3UM45Protein phosphatase 1 regulatory subunit 7 Ppp1r711441,2924.850.120.000058
1213Q62433Protein NDRG1Ndrg132843,0095.694.90.000174.9
1227Q62433Protein NDRG1Ndrg132843,0095.692.20.0022.2
1238P50580Proliferation-associated protein 2G4Pa2g4331443,6996.412.30.0052.3
1274Q9DCL9Multifunctional protein ADE2Paics13647,0066.945.00.0435
1295P35486Pyruvate dehydrogenase E1 subunit alpha, mitochPdha1301243,2328.49100.0000510.4
1301P51174Long-chain specific acyl-CoA dehydrogenase, mitochAcadl341347,9088.532.60.000092.6
1313/fP60335Poly(rC)-binding protein 1Pcbp17237,4986.663.40.0023.4
1313/fQ91WK2Eukaryotic translation initiation factor 3 subunit H Eif3h391439,8326.193.40.0023.4
1326/fP60335Poly(rC)-binding protein 1Pcbp110337,4986.662.70.0012.7
1329/fP60335Poly(rC)-binding protein 1Pcbp140737,4986.665.50.00055.5
1330/fQ91WK2Eukaryotic translation initiation factor 3 subunit H Eif3h9239,8326.195.70.000115.7
1335/fQ91YR1Twinfilin-1Twf1371140,0796.25.70.000115.7
1408/gQ9CX34Suppressor of G2 allele of SKP1 homologSugt126738,1595.320.290.00013.4
1408/gQ9R1T2SUMO-activating enzyme subunit 1Sae115638,6205.240.290.00013.4
1409/gQ9CX34Suppressor of G2 allele of SKP1 homologSugt1561838,1595.320.310.00053.2
1409/gQ9R1T2SUMO-activating enzyme subunit 1Sae1371238,6205.240.310.00053.2
1412Q9Z0S13′(2′),5′-bisphosphate nucleotidase 1Bpnt125733,1965.546.50.0116.5
1419/gO35295Transcriptional activator protein Pur-betaPurb18433,9015.330.350.0012.9
1435/fP60335Poly(rC)-binding protein 1Pcbp137937,4986.663.00.0013
1441/fP60335Poly(rC)-binding protein 1Pcbp136637,4986.668.30.0018.3
1448/fP60335Poly(rC)-binding protein 1Pcbp118537,4986.664.70.0134.7
1449/fQ91YR1Twinfilin-1Twf1341140,0796.28.60.0038.6
1450/fQ91WK2Eukaryotic translation initiation factor 3 subunit HEif3h371239,8326.195.70.00055.7
1462P6198214-3-3 protein gammaYwhag43728,3034.80.230.044.3
1471P6310114-3-3 protein zeta/deltaYwhaz731527,7714.734.50.000394.5
1533Q9Z130Heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoprotein D-likeHnrnpdl20433,5596.854.40.0034.4
1563Q9D883Splicing factor U2AF 35 kDa subunitU2af114327,8159.092.90.0005352.9
1615P4796260S ribosomal protein L5Rpl59234,4019.789.70.000349.7
1787P6225914-3-3 protein epsilonYwhae752329,1744.630.320.000093.1
2489/bP2002978 kDa glucose-regulated proteinHspa5422772,4225.079.30.0019.3
ID: Uniprot accession number; MW (th): theoretical Molecular Weight; pI (th): theoretical Isoelectric Point; a, b, c, d, e, f name of the area highlighted in Figure 1C where the spots are.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Antonioli, L.; Pellegrini, C.; Fornai, M.; Benvenuti, L.; D’Antongiovanni, V.; Colucci, R.; Bertani, L.; Di Salvo, C.; Semeghini, G.; La Motta, C.; et al. Preclinical Development of FA5, a Novel AMP-Activated Protein Kinase (AMPK) Activator as an Innovative Drug for the Management of Bowel Inflammation. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 6325. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22126325

AMA Style

Antonioli L, Pellegrini C, Fornai M, Benvenuti L, D’Antongiovanni V, Colucci R, Bertani L, Di Salvo C, Semeghini G, La Motta C, et al. Preclinical Development of FA5, a Novel AMP-Activated Protein Kinase (AMPK) Activator as an Innovative Drug for the Management of Bowel Inflammation. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2021; 22(12):6325. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22126325

Chicago/Turabian Style

Antonioli, Luca, Carolina Pellegrini, Matteo Fornai, Laura Benvenuti, Vanessa D’Antongiovanni, Rocchina Colucci, Lorenzo Bertani, Clelia Di Salvo, Giorgia Semeghini, Concettina La Motta, and et al. 2021. "Preclinical Development of FA5, a Novel AMP-Activated Protein Kinase (AMPK) Activator as an Innovative Drug for the Management of Bowel Inflammation" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 22, no. 12: 6325. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22126325

APA Style

Antonioli, L., Pellegrini, C., Fornai, M., Benvenuti, L., D’Antongiovanni, V., Colucci, R., Bertani, L., Di Salvo, C., Semeghini, G., La Motta, C., Giusti, L., Zallocco, L., Ronci, M., Quattrini, L., Angelucci, F., Coviello, V., Oh, W.-K., Ha, Q. T. K., Németh, Z. H., ... Blandizzi, C. (2021). Preclinical Development of FA5, a Novel AMP-Activated Protein Kinase (AMPK) Activator as an Innovative Drug for the Management of Bowel Inflammation. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 22(12), 6325. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22126325

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop