Next Article in Journal
Regulatory Influence of Galanin and GALR1/GALR2 Receptors on Inflamed Uterus Contractility in Pigs
Previous Article in Journal
Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma: The Dawn of the Era of Nuclear Medicine?
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
IJMS
Volume 22
Issue 12
10.3390/ijms22126414
ijms-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Genome-Wide Identification of the Nramp Gene Family in Spirodela polyrhiza and Expression Analysis under Cadmium Stress

by
Yan Chen
1,2,
Xuyao Zhao
1,2,3,
Gaojie Li
1,2,
Sunjeet Kumar
1,2,
Zuoliang Sun
1,2,
Yixian Li
1,2,
Wenjun Guo
1,2,
Jingjing Yang
1,2,* and
Hongwei Hou
1,2,*
1
The State Key Laboratory of Freshwater Ecology and Biotechnology, The Key Laboratory of Aquatic Biodiversity and Conservation of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Institute of Hydrobiology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan 430072, China
2
University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
3
College of Environment and Chemical Engineering, Pingdingshan University, Pingdingshan 467000, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22(12), 6414; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22126414
Submission received: 25 April 2021 / Revised: 18 May 2021 / Accepted: 28 May 2021 / Published: 15 June 2021
(This article belongs to the Section Molecular Genetics and Genomics)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Natural resistance-associated macrophage proteins (Nramps) are specific metal transporters in plants with different functions among various species. The evolutionary and functional information of the Nramp gene family in Spirodela polyrhiza has not been previously reported in detail. To identify the Nramp genes in S. polyrhiza, we performed genome-wide identification, characterization, classification, and cis-elements analysis among 22 species with 138 amino acid sequences. We also conducted chromosomal localization and analyzed the synteny relationship, promoter, subcellular localization, and expression patterns in S. polyrhiza. β-Glucuronidase staining indicated that SpNramp1 and SpNramp3 mainly accumulated in the root and joint between mother and daughter frond. Moreover, SpNramp1 was also widely displayed in the frond. SpNramp2 was intensively distributed in the root and frond. Quantitative real-time PCR results proved that the SpNramp gene expression level was influenced by Cd stress, especially in response to Fe or Mn deficiency. The study provides detailed information on the SpNramp gene family and their distribution and expression, laying a beneficial foundation for functional research.

1. Introduction

Natural resistance-associated macrophage proteins (Nramps), which comprise a highly conserved gene family across all species, from bacteria to humans, and are identified as an integral membrane protein family, are critical proton/metal transporters in plants [1,2,3,4]. The genes of the Nramp transporter family play important roles in the transport of ions, such as Cd, Fe, Mn, and Zn [5,6,7,8,9,10]. In Arabidopsis thaliana, AtNramp1 is located in the plasma membrane and is identified as an Fe, Mn, and Cd transporter [11,12], whereas AtNramp2 is located in endomembrane and acts in the distribution of Mn between intracellular organelles [13,14]. AtNramp3 and AtNramp4 participate in the vacuolated export of Mn during seed germination, and function in photosynthesis and growth under Mn deficiency [15,16]. AtNramp5 is involved in the transport of Cd and Fe [17]. AtNramp6 is involved in the intracellular transport of Cd [18]. In rice, the Nramp genes transport Fe, Cd, As, Mn, and other ions. OsNramp1 encodes a transport protein of Fe, As, and Cd, but not Mn [6,19,20], while OsNramp3 transports Mn but not Fe or Cd [21]. Besides, OsNramp4 is a transporter for Al that cannot transport divalent cations in yeast [22], whereas OsNramp5 is an Fe, Mn, and Cd transporter [23,24]. OsNramp6 is a plasma membrane-localized protein that acts as Fe and Mn transporters [25], whereas OsNramp2 is induced by high Cd accumulation in the shoots [26]. The overexpression of some Nramp genes from Thlaspi caerulescens (TcNramp3 and TcNramp4), Crotalaria juncea (CjNramp1), and Thlaspi japonicum (TjNramp4) enhance the accumulation of ions, such as Cd, Fe, and Ni [12,27,28]. By contrast, MhNramp1 from Malus hupehensis leads to cell death by Cd uptake in tobacco and apple calli [29]. Ethylene-insensitive protein 2 (EIN2), a unique membrane-anchored protein, is similar to the eukaryotic Nramp family of metal ion transporters with a 12-membrane span, and it is important for stress response and ethylene-signaling pathways [2,30].
Reports on Nramp genes have shown their diverse functions in different species in metal ion transport. Over the past few years, people have focused more on metals in the aquatic environment [31,32], especially Cd. Although Cd is not an essential nutrient element, it could be absorbed directly by plants from the environment, transferred to human beings through the food chain, and may thus cause severe damage to human health, even at low concentrations [33,34,35].
In comparison with terrestrial plants, aquatic plants suffer from more damage under improper metal ion concentration when the whole plant is exposed to the environment [36,37,38,39,40]. Therefore, the absorption and transportation mechanism of toxic metal ions in aquatic plants should be studied. S. polyrhiza, a monocotyledonous free-floating named giant duckweed, is widely distributed throughout the world, and represents the largest duckweed (1.5 cm long) with the smallest genome size (158 Mb) among all duckweeds measured [41]. Moreover, the genome of S. polyrhiza has been estimated, and the annotation has been further refined, thus providing a convenient model for molecular research [41,42,43,44], including the molecular mechanism studies of metal ion resorption and excretion [45,46,47,48,49,50].
Up to now, many Nramp gene families have been characterized and analyzed, while the Nramp genes of evolutionary and functional information under heavy metal stress in S. polyrhiza are rarely reported. To reveal the function of Nramp genes response to Cd stress, we identified the Nramp genes in S. polyrhiza, constructed a phylogenetic tree, analyzed phylogenetic relationships, gene structures and features, cis-acting elements, and conserved motifs with 21 other species. We also investigated the structural characteristics and physicochemical properties among all selected species, and then determined the colinear relationships among nine species. To effectively understand the function of S. polyrhiza, we carried out promoter analysis by fusion protein expression of β-glucuronidase (GUS). Furthermore, we analyzed the expression patterns of SpNramp genes under several heavy metal stressors.
Promoter analysis results indicate that SpNramp1, SpNramp2, and SpNramp3 highly accumulated under Cd stress. According to quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR) results, the relative expression level was influenced by Cd stress and Cd stress with Fe2+ or Mn2+ deficiency in S. polyrhiza. To date, the relative study of SpNramp genes has been rarely reported. Our findings provide a foundation for future investigation on the role of Nramp genes in S. polyrhiza.

2. Results

2.1. Identification of Nramp Genes in S. polyrhiza

Nramp genes in 22 species were identified using BLAST-HMMER methods. We had divided the protein into the Nramp family with the conserved Nramp domain and several transmembrane regions, including the Nramp metal transporter family and EIN2 [2]. After the deletion of repetitive and short coverage sequences, 138 amino acid Nramp sequences were analyzed, as shown in Supplemental Materials Table S1. We named Nramp genes based on the order of gene location in chromosomes or scaffolds, except for those that have been named in the previous studies. Retrieved protein sequences included 1, 2, and 3 Nramp sequences for Escherichia coli (EcMntH), Homo sapiens (HsNramp1 and HsNramp2), and Saccharomyces cerevisiae (SMF1, SMF2, and SMF3), respectively, and without EIN2 sequence in thesespecies. The algae (Chlamydomonas reinhardtii) and moss (Physcomitrella patens) had five and four Nramps, respectively. The ancient vascular plant species Selaginella moellendorffii had seven Nramp homologs. However, the basal angiosperm Amborella trichopoda had four Nramp protein sequences. Among the eudicot species, 4–14 Nramp homolog proteins were identified. In comparison with eudicot species, monocot had just 4–10 Nramp protein sequences. A maximum number of 15 Nramps were identified in the eudicot species Glycine max, possibly because the copies underwent lineage-specific expansion [51].
These Nramp genes encode putative proteins 412–1633 amino acid residues in length, molecular weight of 44.70–169.30 KDa, isoelectric point (pI) 4.80–9.65, 1–16 exons, and 7–13 putative transmembrane domains (TMDs) (Supplemental Materials Table S1). To estimate the phylogenetic relationships among the Nramp gene family, we performed phylogenetic analyses of the Nramp protein sequences based on a maximum likelihood method (Figure 1). Based on its topology, Nramps were categorized into five groups, namely A, B, C, D, and E. The moss, algae, and fungus Nramps constituted the strongly supported basal cluster A, which was similar to the major derived clusters B and C. Moreover, clusters A, B, and C were kept away from clusters D and E. Among the similar clusters, species are mainly composed of moss, algae, fungus, Selaginella, and bacteria except for the Nramps of EIN2. Cluster B and C were exclusively formed by the Nramps of EIN2, algae, and the bacteria, respectively. Sub-cluster D2 included typical Nramp homologs from all Viridiplantae species in the present study, whereas cluster E comprised Nramps exactly from vascular plants.
Four Nramp genes, namely SpNramp1, SpNramp2, SpNramp3, and SpEIN2, were identified in S. polyrhiza. Among these genes, the SpNramp genes carried the consensus residues GQSSTITGTYAGQF(/Y)I(/V)MQ(/G)GFLN(/D) (Table 1), a unique structural feature in a Nramp metal transporter family [2].

2.2. Gene Structure, Conserved Motif, and Chromosomal Distribution

A gene structure map was constructed using a Gene Structure Display Server for the investigation of the gene structure feature of Nramps genes in all selected species (Figure 2). The evolution of multigene families was conducted on gene structural diversity to some degree [52]. According to the map, NnNramp1 had the largest length (~ 74 kb) with 14 coding regions. HsNramp2 had the maximum coding regions (16) with ~ 48 kb, whereas SMF3 had the minimum length (1422 bp) coding regions (1). In addition, these genes have similar numbers of introns, exons, and gene structures on the same branch of the evolutionary tree. Interestingly, the Nramp genes of EIN2, with similar structures and motifs, were defined as EIN2 protein and belong to cluster B. To further elucidate the role of Nramp genes, we analyzed the conserved motifs of Nramp proteins using MEME online software, and 10 conserved motifs were identified (Figure 2). The identified conserved motifs of Nramps had a length of 23–41 amino acids. The conserved motifs revealed a closely correlation with motifs and structures. The members of the same group almost shared the same motifs and similar structures. Motif 1 had a characteristic Nramp domain in Nramp metal transporter in all the Nramp family but not in OsNramp4, HsNramp2, AtrEIN2, and CpEIN2. This was one of the reasons that we divided the EIN2 into the Nramp family. Motif 3 and 5 occurred in almost all selected species with conserved domains KTIRQAVGVVGCVIMPHNVFLHSALVQSR and LWILAEVAVIAADIPEVIGTAFALNILFH, except for SmNramp3 and HsNramp1, respectively.
The members of clusters A, B, and C showed the same motif (motif 2–6) and a similar structure with a long CDS region, except for CrNramp4, CrNramp3, and ZmEIN2b. Sub-cluster D2 had less exon–intron number and the same structure (motif 1–8), except for CrNramp1, CpNramp1, EgNramp1, and CpNramp3. Nevertheless, sub-cluster D1 involved more exon–intron, and motif 9 was not found. In comparison with the other groups, the members of clusters A, B, C, and D were free of motif 9 with NLNPEQANCSDLDLNKASFLLKNVLGNWSSKLFAVALLAS, except for CpNramp3, SMF1, SMF3, and SiEIN2b, respectively, indicating their primitive evolutionary relationship. By contrast, motif 9 and 10 were present in cluster E, except for BdNramp6, CpNramp2, ZmNramp6, and CpNramp2, respectively, while motif 10 contained the Nramp domain IIGINVYYLSTGFVGWLIHNNLPKVANVFIGIIVFPLMALY. Besides, cluster E showed more exons, introns, and complex structures. It indicates cluster E has higher evolutionary status. The duplication and distribution of the SpNramp genes were analyzed in the present study with chromosome-level genome assembly of S. polyrhiza. Duplication events not only generate functional novelty but also lead to functional redundancy [53]. No tandem repeat and segmental duplication events were observed in S. polyrhiza, and this finding might be correlated with the number of SpNramp genes and the extent of conservation. The chromosome distribution of SpNramp gene was analyzed in S. polyrhiza. The four SpNramp genes were distributed across the three chromosomes, and SpNramp1 (Spo005087) and SpNramp3 (Spo016860) were distributed in chromosome numbers 3 and 16, respectively. SpNramp2 (Spo014584) and SpEIN2 (Spo014632) were distributed in chromosome number 13 (Figure 3).
To better know the evolutionary relationships of Nramp family among the nine species, we constructed a colinear map of Nramp family by using nine species, including Fabaceae plants (G. max), Salicaceae plants (Populus trichocarpa), Araceae plants (S. polyrhiza), Brassicaceae plants (Arabidopsis thaliana), Poaceae plants (Setaria italica, Zea mays, Brachypodium distachyon, Oryza sativa), and Solanaceae plants (Solanum lycopersicum) (Figure 4). Among the nine species, the colinear gene pairs were identified, as shown in Table 2.
The result implies that the continuous colinear gene pairs were found in G. max, P. trichocarpa, S. polyrhiza, A. thaliana, S. italica, Z. mays branch, G. max, P. trichocarpa, S. polyrhiza, B. distachyon, S. lycopersicum, and O. sativa branch, and we elucidate that the gene might have come from the same ancestor. Furthermore, the multiple colinear gene pairs were found in some selected species, which inferred that the genetic copies underwent lineage specific expansion.

2.3. Cis-Element and Promoter Analysis

The cis-acting elements were related to gene expression in the promoter regions and play a vital role in abiotic stress. To investigate the potential regulatory and genetic expression diversification of Nramp genes, we extracted the upstream 2 kb promoter regions of Nramp genes from all selected species to analyze the cis-acting elements using the online software PLANTCARE. Afterwards, 23 cis-acting elements were selected, including the key metabolism pathway elements, hormone response elements, and stress response elements (STREs), which were visualized using TBtools (Figure 5). The MYC (CATG(T)TG) motif occurred most frequently (452 times) in all selected species involved in the stress response, while the number of F-box (CTATTCTCATT) and MBSI (aaaAaaC(G/C)GTTA) were present as the least abundant elements (both occurred 10 times). Interestingly, stress- (MYB, MYC, ARE, and MBS) and hormone- (ABRE) responsive regulatory elements were found in all species. In S. polyrhiza, the motif elements of circadian, TC-rich repeats, TGA-element, AuxRR-core, F-box, and MBSI were not observed. In addition, the motif element of STRE in SpEIN2 or SpNramp3 occurred most frequently on the SpNramp genes promoter regions, followed by ABRE (ACGTG) in SpNramp2. The stress response elements of MYB, MYC, and STRE were the most common elements in the promoter of the SpNramp metal transporter family, indicating that the promoter of SpNramp metal transporters could be engaged in stress responsiveness.
The element of ARE, a cis-acting regulatory element essential for the anaerobic induction, was distributed in all SpNramp metal transporters. The element of ABRE, TGACG-motif, CGTCA-motif, and TCA-element were involved in hormone-response. Among these hormone-responsive elements, the TGACG and CGTCA motifs were involved in the MeJA-responsiveness, and the ABRE and TCA-element were involved in the abscisic acid and salicylic acid responsiveness, respectively. Furthermore, GARE-motif and ERE elements were engaged in gibberellin-responsiveness, the MYB binding site of MBS was involved in drought-inducibility, and the W-box element was involved in injury-responsiveness. The O2- site and LTR elements, a cis-acting regulatory element, participated in zein metabolism regulation and low-temperature responsiveness, respectively.
To investigate the tissue-specific expression pattern of SpNramp genes, we constructed the SpNramps: GUS vector and transferred them into S. polyrhiza. Then histochemical GUS staining was carried out as shown in Figure 6. We detected the GUS staining under the two following conditions: one group for the control condition was treated with normal 1/2 MS liquid medium, the other group was assessed under 50 μM Cd2+ hydroponics with 1/2 MS liquid medium conditions in S.polyrhiza for 7 days. The GUS activity was significantly induced in treated groups but there was almost no GUS staining in the control group. Therefore, we selected 1/2 MS liquid medium containing 50 μM Cd2+ for 7 days for semithin section analysis. The result showed SpNramp1 was distributed in the root, frond, and joint between mother and daughter frond in most lines. SpNramp2 was mainly focused on the root and frond. SpNramp3 was widely distributed in the root and joint between mother and daughter frond.

2.4. Expression Profiles of Nramp Genes in Response to Different Stress in S. polyrhiza

To further determine the role of the SpNramp genes under stress, we used qRT-PCR to detect the gene expression. The amplified agarose gel of internal reference and target genes for qRT-PCR were shown in Supplemental Materials Figure S1. Different groups were used to examine the expression levels of SpNramp genes under four abiotic stress conditions. We used ANOVA at a significance threshold of p ≤ 0.05, expression variation among each experiment was determined with Duncan’s multiple range test, and variables marked with different letters indicate a significant difference. The results of qRT-PCR are shown in Figure 7. Under 50 μM Cd2+, all relative expression levels were downregulated, especially SpNramp3 and SpEIN2. In comparison with the control, the expression level of SpNramp3 and SpEIN2 was higher than five-fold at 72 h. Moreover, the relative expression level of SpNramp1 and SpNramp2 initially decreased and then increased, whereas SpNramp3 and SpEIN2 decreased (6 h) and then increased (24 h), and finally decreased again (72 h). Under Fe2+ deficiency treatments, the SpNramp genes were differentially expressed under the same stress. SpNramp1 was upregulated, except at 24 h, whereas SpNramp2 initially decreased and then increased, and its relative expression level was higher than that of control. SpNramp3 depicts a negatively regulated trend. SpEIN2 was downregulated after treatment for 6 h, and then its expression increased significantly at 24 h. Finally, the expression level dropped dramatically at 72 h. Among the Mn2+ deficiency group, the initially expression level of SpNramp1 decreased and then increased significantly. Moreover, SpNramp2 followed a similar trend, whereas SpNramp3 was negatively regulated. The expression of SpEIN2 dropped dramatically and then slightly increased. Some SpNramp genes were upregulated under Fe2+ or Mn2+ deficiency, which suggests that they could play a vital role in response to metal cation deficiency.

3. Discussion

In the present study, we carried out bioinformatics analysis for all Nramp genes in 22 species, because gene organization might lead to functional divergence [54]. Four Nramp genes were identified from S. polyrhiza, and a phylogenetic tree was constructed with other Nramp genes from all selected species. Then Nramp genes were classified into five clusters as previously described [51]. Based on conserved motif and gene structure (exon/intron) analyses, similar motif and gene structure compositions were divided into the same cluster in the phylogenetic tree, indicating that the same subfamily had similar function (Figure 2).
The members of clusters A, B, and C were located in the phylogenetic tree root, and most of them had fewer motif and a long CDS region, and the results are similar to previous studies [55]. Additionally, similar structure features and motif arrangements were shown in D and E subfamily members. The D subfamily included fewer exon–intron and similar motif features that are greater than those of A, B, and C subfamilies. However, subfamily E had more exons, similar motif arrangements, and greater exon number than subfamily D (Figure 2). This result further confirmed the classifications of the Nramp genes. Previous studies had defined plant genes as high expression levels with the following features: more and longer introns, less compact, and a larger primary transcript, while it was the opposite for animals [56,57]. Jeffares et al. (2008) reported that the genes contain fewer introns among yeasts, thale cress, and mice, and this condition might be caused by rapid activated genes in response to all kinds of environmental stress [58]. Therefore, we speculate that it is on the other way in plants, and it is consistent with the result of the current study. In the present study, the phylogenetic tree showed that the intron length of Nramp transporter genes increased with evolution in plants, whereas the intron number of EIN family remained almost unchanged (4–8). Similarly, the number of motifs of the Nramp transporter genes also increased through evolution in general while the number of motifs of EIN family remained stable. Collectively, the change in the number of motifs and introns demonstrates that the plants generated a protective measure to adapt to the environment under stress.
Several previous trials showed that the expansion and evolution of gene families depend on the whole genome, segmental, tandem, and gene duplication events [59,60,61,62]. Tandem duplicate events had a higher probability with a higher level of complementarity compared with segmental duplicates [63]. Moreover, the tandem and segmental duplication events were the main duplication patterns [64]. Previous reports indicated the presence of one tandem duplicated pair and one segmental duplication pair in T. cacao, six pair duplicated blocks in G. max, one syntenic block with the paralogous pair in O. sativa, and two segmental duplication pairs in A. thaliana [51,65]. However, the findings showed that no tandem duplication, segmental duplication, and genomic collinearity events were present in S. polyrhiza. These findings probably resulted from the following reasons. First, S. polyrhiza, as a basal monocot with small genome (158 Mb), was located in a relatively primitive evolutionary position and did not contain a specific expansion [41,51]. Then, gene loss events might have occurred. Moreover, only four SpNramp genes were observed, thus minimizing the possibility for gene duplication events. To investigate the evolutionary relationship of Nramp genes, we performed genomic collinearity analysis in nine species and found many colinear gene pairs. In these colinear genes in nine species, continuous colinear gene pairs were observed, which indicated that the Nramp genes were highly conserved, thus representing one of the origins of homologous genes.
The cis-acting elements play a specific role in regulating gene transcription and expression in plants [66]. The promoter regions of Nramps contained many stress response elements (LTR, ARE, MBS, MYB, MYC, WUN-motif, TC-rich repeats, W-box, STRE, and F-box) and hormone response elements (ABRE, AuxRR-core, GARE-motif, P-box, CGTCA-motif, TGACG-motif, TCA-element, and TGA-element). Hence, Nramp genes may be involved in response to multiple stresses.
OsNramp1 and OsNramp5 were mainly expressed in leaves and roots, and OsNramp1 was induced by Cd treatment and Fe starvation [67,68], indicating that some Nramps might be inducible promoters. In the present study, the transformed lines carried out histochemical staining with various organs throughout plant development under a control or 50 μM Cd2+ group. Then we monitored the GUS staining in S. polyrhiza. GUS staining was present in many identified transformed lines without obvious distribution pattern under treatment (Figure 6). Therefore, we speculate that the promoter of SpNramps may be an inducible promoter and not tissue specific.
To obtain further insight into the transcript levels, we determined the expression of SpNramp genes under different conditions using qRT-PCR. The experimental data indicated that all the SpNramp gene families were negatively regulated under 50 μM Cd2+ treatments. However, the expression of SpNramp genes were generally upregulated under some limiting ions, such as Fe2+ or Mn2+. Several similar features have been reported in the paralog genes, and the AtNramp1 was upregulated in response to Fe2+ starvation [17,19]. A similar phenomenon was observed in rice, in which OsNramp5 was upregulated under Fe2+ deficiency [24]. Under Fe2+ limited conditions, SpEIN2 was significantly upregulated at 24 h, and then significantly downregulated. The main reason for this result was that the EIN2 was a sense divalent cation, which monitors the physiological state in the cell or tissue and then integrates the signal with ethylene stimuli [16,30]. Beyond functioning in Fe transport, it also could be induced by Mn2+ starvation, and its expression can be upregulated [11]. As shown in Figure 7, SpNramp1 was significantly upregulated, SpNramp2 was slightly upregulated, whereas SpNramp3 and SpEIN2 were significantly downregulated, which proved that SpNramp1 and SpNramp2 could be induced by Mn deficiency. Collectively, SpNramp1 was significantly upregulated by Mn deficiency or Fe deficiency, whereas SpNramp3 was sharply downregulated in response to both stress conditions. In addition, all SpNramp genes responded to heavy metal or heavy metal under Mn or Fe deficiency, which implies that the Nramp genes in S. polyrhiza might have the function of metal ions transport. To further verify the function of the SpNramp genes, a series of gene overexpression and knockdown tests are essential.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Identification of Nramp Genes in S. polyrhiza

All non-redundancy Nramp sequences and genome databases of O. sativa, Nelumbo nucifera cerevisiae, H. sapiens, E. coli, P. trichocarpa, Zostera marina, Carica papaya, Citrus clementina, Ricinus communis, Eucalyptus grandis, P. patens, Z. mays, S. polyrhiza, S. moellendorffii, S. italica, S. lycopersicum, G. max, C. reinhardtii, B. distachyon, and A. thaliana were downloaded from the NCBI (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/, accessed on 28 February 2021) and Phytozome (https://phytozome.jgi. doe.gov/pz/, accessed on 28 February 2021). The Hidden Markov Model (HMM) profile of the Nramp domain (PF01566) was extracted from the Pfam database (http://pfam.xfam.org/, accessed on 28 February 2021). The Nramp proteins of A. thaliana and O. sativa were used as query sequences in BLASTP to identify the orthologs in these species. To identify the Nramps conserved protein domains, we used the HMMER program (http://hmmer.org/, accessed on 28 February 2021) [69]. The protein domains of all sequences were screened and confirmed using the SMART (http://smart.embl.de/smart/batch.pl, accessed on 28 February 2021), CDD (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/cdd/, accessed on 28 February 2021), and Pfam databases.

4.2. Phylogenetic, Gene Feature, Gene Duplication, Cis-Acting Element, Classification, and Conserved Motif Analysis

Multiple alignments of Nramp domains were performed using ClustalW [70], and displayed by TBtools software [71]. A maximum likelihood phylogenetic tree was constructed by MEGA X (v10.2.2) [72] with a minimum bootstrap of 1000 replicates, visualized and annotated using iTOL [73]. The Nramp genes were classified into different groups based on their topology. The PI and MW of the Nramps sequences were computed by the online ExPASy-ProtParam tool (http://web.expasy.org/protparam/, accessed on 3 March 2021) [74]. TMDs were predicted by the online software TMHMM Server v.2.0 (http://www.cbs.dtu.dk/services/TMHMM/, accessed on 3 March 2021) [75]. The subcellular localization of each Nramps protein was predicted using the online CELLO v2.5 server (http://cello.life.nctu.edu.tw/, accessed on 3 March 2021), pLoc-mPlant (http://www.jci-bioinfo.cn/pLoc-mPlant/, accessed on 3 March 2021) and PSORT (https://psort.hgc.jp/, accessed on 3 March 2021) [76,77,78]. Exon–intron structure information for Nramp genes were constructed using the online tools Gene Structure Display Server 2.0 (http://gsds.cbi.pku.edu.cn/, accessed on 3 March 2021) [79]. The MEME program (http://meme-suite.org/, accessed on 3 March 2021) was employed to identify the conserved motifs in Nramp proteins with the maximum number of motifs set as 10 [80]. The cis-acting regulatory DNA elements (cis-elements) in the promoter regions (2000 bp upstream of the start codon) of Nramp genes were predicted and analyzed using PLANTCARE (http://bioinformatics.psb.ugent.be/webtools/plantcare/html/, (accessed on 3 March 2021) and visualized using the TBtools [71,81]. The chromosomal distribution of the Nramp genes on S. polyrhiza was determined from the genome annotation gff3 file. Synteny, collinearity, and segmental duplication pairs were analyzed by MCScanX and MCScanX-transposed [82,83]. We also identified the syntenic relationships among the nine species using MCScanX and displayed by TBtools.

4.3. Promoter Analysis

A series of SpNramp1, SpNramp2, and SpNramp3 promoter fragments (956, 1144, and 2141 bp) were amplified by PCR with the template of S. polyrhiza genome. All SpNramp genes of primers are generated by primer–primer 5 (Supplemental Materials Table S2). All amplified sequences were inserted into the HindIII sites of DX2181G (Figure 6i) by homologous recombination (TsingKe, Wuhan, China). The recombinant plasmids of SpNramp genes were introduced into Agrobacterium tumefaciens strain LBA4404 using the liquid nitrogen freeze–thaw method [66]. Consequently, agrobacterium harboring the plasmids (OD600 = 0.5–1) were transferred into S. polyrhiza by the frond transformation system. After obtaining independent transgenic lines, 20 transgenic lines were treated with 50 μM Cd2+ and then applied for GUS staining analysis. The histological staining of GUS was assayed using the method of Jefferson et al. (1987) with slight modifications [84]. Fronds were placed directly in a staining solution containing 0.96 mM 5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolyl-β-D-glucuronic acid sodium salt (X-Gluc, Sigma, St. Louis, MO, USA), 0.5 mM K3[Fe (CN)6], 0.5 mM K4[Fe (CN)6], 5 mM ethylene diamine tetraacetic acid (EDTA), and 100 mM KPO4 buffer (pH 7.0) for 40–60 min, vacuum-infiltrated, and incubated for 16–24 h in the dark at 37 °C. Then, the chlorophyll was removed from fronds using 75% ethanol, and the samples were photographed using Leica Z16 microscope (Germany).

4.4. Expression Profile Analysis of SpNramp Genes

S. polyrhiza strain 5543 was collected from East Lake (30°32′ N, 114°21′ E) at the city of Wuhan, Hubei Province, China. The plants were cultured in 1/2 MS medium under the conditions described in Murashige and Skoog. (1962) with 16 h/8 h photoperiod (day/night) and temperature of 25 °C/15 °C (day/night) [85]. To display the expression levels of SpNramp genes under different abiotic stresses, we have set the four following groups: (1) control, (2) Fe2+ starvation and 50 μM Cd2+, (3) Mn2+ starvation and 50 μM Cd2+, and (4) 50 μM Cd2+ under the same conditions described above. Each group included three biological replicates. All plants were sampled at each time point (0, 6, 24, and 72 h) and then immediately frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at −80 °C for further analysis.
The oligonucleotide primers of SpNramp genes were designed by primer–primer 5 (Supplemental Materials Table S2). The Ominiplant RNA kit (CoWin Biosciences, Beijing, China) was used to extract the total RNA. The first-strand cDNA was synthesized using the PrimeScriptTM RT reagent kit (TaKaRa, Dalian, China). Bio-Rad CFX96 touch real time PCR system (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA) was used to run qRT-PCR with the TB Green® Premix Ex TaqTM kit (TaKaRa, Dalian, China). The qPCR program under the following conditions: 10 min at 95 °C, 40 cycles of 95 °C for 15 s, 59 °C for 30 s, and 72 °C for 30 s. A melting process at 60–95 °C was designed to generate the melting curve. The Actin (ACT) gene was used as an internal control. The 2−ΔΔCt method was employed to calculate the SpNramp genes’ relative expression [86]. Data were presented as the means ± standard deviations. Analysis of variance was carried out by SPSS 24.0 software using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA).

5. Conclusions

Notably, the study was the first to elaborate in detail about the Nramp gene family information in genome-wide in S. polyrhiza. A series of promoter analysis indicated that there exists many stress and hormone response elements, which play a vital role in metal stress responses. GUS staining results indicate that SpNramp1, SpNramp2, and SpNramp3 were highly expressed in the root, indicating that the roots are involved in ions uptake. Furthermore, expression patterns demonstrate that SpNramp1, SpNramp2, and SpNramp3 were significantly induced by Fe or Mn starvation, but suppressed by single Cd treatment. Collectively, the study provided a foundation for the mechanisms research of heavy metal element absorption and transport in S. polyrhiza.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/ijms22126414/s1.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, Y.C. and H.H.; methodology, Y.C., Y.L., Z.S., and W.G.; software, Y.C. and X.Z.; formal analysis, Y.C., X.Z., and J.Y.; writing—original draft preparation, Y.C.; writing—review and editing, Y.C., G.L., X.Z., S.K., and H.H.; supervision, H.H.; funding acquisition, H.H. and J.Y. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the National Key R & D Program (Grant numbers, 2018YFD0900801, 2020YFD090011) and National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant number, 31870384, 32001107).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Acknowledgments

We especially thank Wenqin Wang (Shanghai Jiao Tong University) and Deqiang Duanmu (Huazhong Agricultural University) for providing the S. polyrhiza genome (v3) database and the vector of DX2181G. We also thank Xin Wang and Fang Zhou at The Analysis and Testing Center of Institute of Hydrobiology, Chinese Academy of Sciences for experimental support.

Conflicts of Interest

There are no declarations of interest between authors.

References

  1. Vidal, S.M.; Malo, D.; Vogan, K.; Skamene, E.; Gros, P. Natural resistance to infection with intracellular parasites: Isolation of a candidate for Bcg. Cell 1993, 73, 469–485. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Cellier, M.; Prive, G.; Belouchi, A.; Kwan, T.; Rodrigues, V.; Chia, W.; Gros, P. Nramp defines a family of membrane proteins. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1995, 92, 10089–10093. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  3. Bozzi, A.T.; Bane, L.B.; Weihofen, W.A.; McCabe, A.L.; Singharoy, A.; Chipot, C.J.; Schulten, K.; Gaudet, R. Conserved methionine dictates substrate preference in Nramp-family divalent metal transporters. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2016, 113, 10310–10315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. Bozzi, A.T.; Bane, L.B.; Weihofen, W.A.; Singharoy, A.; Guillen, E.R.; Ploegh, H.L.; Schulten, K.; Gaudet, R. Crystal Structure and Conformational Change Mechanism of a Bacterial Nramp-Family Divalent Metal Transporter. Structure 2016, 24, 2102–2114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  5. Nevo, Y.; Nelson, N. The NRAMP family of metal-ion transporters. BBA-Mol. Cell Res. 2006, 1763, 609–620. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Tiwari, M.; Sharma, D.; Dwivedi, S.; Singh, M.; Tripathi, R.D.; Trivedi, P.K. Expression in Arabidopsis and cellular localization reveal involvement of rice NRAMP, OsNRAMP1, in arsenic transport and tolerance. Plant Cell Environ. 2014, 37, 140–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Tripathi, D.K.; Singh, S.; Gaur, S.; Singh, S.; Yadav, V.; Liu, S.L.; Singh, V.P.; Sharma, S.; Srivastava, P.; Prasad, S.M.; et al. Acquisition and Homeostasis of Iron in Higher Plants and Their Probable Role in Abiotic Stress Tolerance. Front. Environ. Sci. 2018, 5, 86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Wang, T.K.; Li, Y.X.; Fu, Y.F.; Xie, H.J.; Song, S.F.; Qiu, M.D.; Wen, J.; Chen, M.W.; Chen, G.; Tian, Y.; et al. Mutation at Different Sites of Metal Transporter Gene OsNramp5 Affects Cd Accumulation and Related Agronomic Traits in Rice (Oryza sativa L.). Front. Plant Sci. 2019, 10, 1081. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Wang, C.; Chen, X.; Yao, Q.; Long, D.; Fan, X.; Kang, H.Y.; Zeng, J.; Sha, L.N.; Zhang, H.Q.; Zhou, Y.H.; et al. Overexpression of TtNRAMP6 enhances the accumulation of Cd in Arabidopsis. Gene 2019, 696, 225–232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Zhang, J.; Zhang, M.; Song, H.; Zhao, J.; Shabala, S.; Tian, S.; Yang, X. A novel plasma membrane-based NRAMP transporter contributes to Cd and Zn hyperaccumulation in Sedum alfredii Hance. Environ. Exp. Bot. 2020, 176, 104121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Cailliatte, R.; Schikora, A.; Briat, J.F.; Mari, S.; Curie, C. High-Affinity Manganese Uptake by the Metal Transporter NRAMP1 Is Essential for Arabidopsis Growth in Low Manganese Conditions. Plant Cell 2010, 22, 904–917. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Nakanishi-Masuno, T.; Shitan, N.; Sugiyama, A.; Takanashi, K.; Inaba, S.; Kaneko, S.; Yazaki, K. The Crotalaria juncea metal transporter CjNRAMP1 has a high Fe uptake activity, even in an environment with high Cd contamination. Int. J. Phytoremediat. 2018, 20, 1427–1437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Alejandro, S.; Cailliatte, R.; Alcon, C.; Dirick, L.; Domergue, F.; Correia, D.; Castaings, L.; Briat, J.F.; Mari, S.; Curie, C. Intracellular Distribution of Manganese by the Trans-Golgi Network Transporter NRAMP2 Is Critical for Photosynthesis and Cellular Redox Homeostasis. Plant Cell 2017, 29, 3068–3084. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Gao, H.L.; Xie, W.X.; Yang, C.H.; Xu, J.Y.; Li, J.J.; Wang, H.; Chen, X.; Huang, C.F. NRAMP2, a trans-Golgi network-localized manganese transporter, is required for Arabidopsis root growth under manganese deficiency. New Phytol. 2018, 217, 179–193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Lanquar, V.; Lelievre, F.; Bolte, S.; Hames, C.; Alcon, C.; Neumann, D.; Vansuyt, G.; Curie, C.; Schroder, A.; Kramer, U.; et al. Mobilization of vacuolar iron by AtNRAMP3 and AtNRAMP4 is essential for seed germination on low iron. Embo J. 2005, 24, 4041–4051. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Lanquar, V.; Ramos, M.S.; Lelievre, F.; Barbier-Brygoo, H.; Krieger-Liszkay, A.; Kramer, U.; Thomine, S. Export of Vacuolar Manganese by AtNRAMP3 and AtNRAMP4 Is Required for Optimal Photosynthesis and Growth under Manganese Deficiency. Plant Physiol. 2010, 152, 1986–1999. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  17. Thomine, S.; Wang, R.C.; Ward, J.M.; Crawford, N.M.; Schroeder, J.I. Cadmium and iron transport by members of a plant metal transporter family in Arabidopsis with homology to Nramp genes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2000, 97, 4991–4996. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Cailliatte, R.; Lapeyre, B.; Briat, J.F.; Mari, S.; Curie, C. The NRAMP6 metal transporter contributes to cadmium toxicity. Biochem. J. 2009, 422, 217–228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Curie, C.; Alonso, J.M.; Le Jean, M.; Ecker, J.R.; Briat, J.F. Involvement of NRAMP1 from Arabidopsis thaliana in iron transport. Biochem. J. 2000, 347, 749–755. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Takahashi, R.; Ishimaru, Y.; Senoura, T.; Shimo, H.; Ishikawa, S.; Arao, T.; Nakanishi, H.; Nishizawa, N.K. The OsNRAMP1 iron transporter is involved in Cd accumulation in rice. J. Exp. Bot. 2011, 62, 4843–4850. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Yang, M.; Zhang, W.; Dong, H.X.; Zhang, Y.Y.; Lv, K.; Wang, D.J.; Lian, X.M. OsNRAMP3 Is a Vascular Bundles-Specific Manganese Transporter That Is Responsible for Manganese Distribution in Rice. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e0083990. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Xia, J.X.; Yamaji, N.; Kasai, T.; Ma, J.F. Plasma membrane-localized transporter for aluminum in rice. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2010, 107, 18381–18385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Ishikawa, S.; Ishimaru, Y.; Igura, M.; Kuramata, M.; Abe, T.; Senoura, T.; Hase, Y.; Arao, T.; Nishizawa, N.K.; Nakanishi, H. Ion-beam irradiation, gene identification, and marker-assisted breeding in the development of low-cadmium rice. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2012, 109, 19166–19171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  24. Sasaki, A.; Yamaji, N.; Yokosho, K.; Ma, J.F. Nramp5 Is a Major Transporter Responsible for Manganese and Cadmium Uptake in Rice. Plant Cell 2012, 24, 2155–2167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Peris-Peris, C.; Serra-Cardona, A.; Sanchez-Sanuy, F.; Campo, S.; Arino, J.; San Segundo, B. Two NRAMP6 Isoforms Function as Iron and Manganese Transporters and Contribute to Disease Resistance in Rice. Mol. Plant Microbe 2017, 30, 385–398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  26. Zhao, J.L.; Yang, W.; Zhang, S.H.; Yang, T.F.; Liu, Q.; Dong, J.F.; Fu, H.; Mao, X.X.; Liu, B. Genome-wide association study and candidate gene analysis of rice cadmium accumulation in grain in a diverse rice collection. Rice 2018, 11, 61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  27. Oomen, R.J.F.J.; Wu, J.; Lelievre, F.; Blanchet, S.; Richaud, P.; Barbier-Brygoo, H.; Aarts, M.G.M.; Thomine, S. Functional characterization of NRAMP3 and NRAMP4 from the metal hyperaccumulator Thlaspi caerulescens. New Phytol. 2009, 181, 637–650. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Mizuno, T.; Usui, K.; Horie, K.; Nosaka, S.; Mizuno, N.; Obata, H. Cloning of three ZIP/NRAMP transporter genes from a Ni hyperaccumulator plant Thlaspi japonicum and their Ni2+-transport abilities. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2005, 43, 793–801. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Zhang, W.; Yue, S.; Song, J.; Xun, M.; Han, M.; Yang, H. MhNRAMP1 From Malus hupehensis Exacerbates Cell Death by Accelerating Cd Uptake in Tobacco and Apple Calli. Front. Plant Sci. 2020, 11, 957. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Alonso, J.M.; Hirayama, T.; Roman, G.; Nourizadeh, S.; Ecker, J.R. EIN2, a bifunctional transducer of ethylene and stress responses in Arabidopsis. Science 1999, 284, 2148–2152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Schaller, J.; Brackhage, C.; Mkandawire, M.; Dudel, E.G. Metal/metalloid accumulation/remobilization during aquatic litter decomposition in freshwater: A review. Sci. Total Environ. 2011, 409, 4891–4898. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Meena, R.A.A.; Sathishkumar, P.; Ameen, F.; Yusoff, A.R.M.; Gu, F.L. Heavy metal pollution in immobile and mobile components of lentic ecosystems-a review. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. Int. 2018, 25, 4134–4148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Nawrot, T.; Plusquin, M.; Hogervorst, J.; Roels, H.A.; Celis, H.; Thijs, L.; Vangronsveld, J.; Van Hecke, E.; Staessen, J.A. Environmental exposure to cadmium and risk of cancer: A prospective population-based study. Lancet Oncol. 2006, 7, 119–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  34. Fulda, B.; Voegelin, A.; Kretzschmar, R. Redox-controlled changes in cadmium solubility and solid-phase speciation in a paddy soil as affected by reducible sulfate and copper. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2013, 47, 12775–12783. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Chaney, R.L. How Does Contamination of Rice Soils with Cd and Zn Cause High Incidence of Human Cd Disease in Subsistence Rice Farmers. Curr. Pollut. Rep. 2015, 1, 13–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Xu, Q.S.; Min, H.L.; Cai, S.J.; Fu, Y.Y.; Sha, S.; Xie, K.B.; Du, K.H. Subcellular distribution and toxicity of cadmium in Potamogeton crispus L. Chemosphere 2012, 89, 114–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Chen, M.; Zhang, L.L.; Tuo, Y.C.; He, X.J.; Li, J.; Song, Y. Treatability thresholds for cadmium-contaminated water in thewetland macrophyte Hydrilla verticillata (L.f.) Royle. Ecol. Eng. 2016, 96, 178–186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Hirayama, T.; M.Alonso., J. Ethylene Captures a Meta Metal Ions Are Involved in Ethylene Perception_and Signal Transduction. Plant Cell Physiol. 2000, 41, 548–555. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Das, S.; Mazumdar, K. Phytoremediation potential of a novel fern, Salvinia cucullata, Roxb. Ex Bory, to pulp and paper mill effluent: Physiological and anatomical response. Chemosphere 2016, 163, 62–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Huang, W.M.; Shao, H.; Zhou, S.N.; Zhou, Q.; Li, W.; Xing, W. Modulation of cadmium-induced phytotoxicity in Cabomba caroliniana by urea involves photosynthetic metabolism and antioxidant status. Ecotox Environ. Safe 2017, 144, 88–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Wang, W.; Messing, J. High-throughput sequencing of three Lemnoideae (duckweeds) chloroplast genomes from total DNA. PLoS ONE 2011, 6, e24670. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  42. Wang, W.; Haberer, G.; Gundlach, H.; Glasser, C.; Nussbaumer, T.; Luo, M.C.; Lomsadze, A.; Borodovsky, M.; Kerstetter, R.A.; Shanklin, J.; et al. The Spirodela polyrhiza genome reveals insights into its neotenous reduction fast growth and aquatic lifestyle. Nat. Commun. 2014, 5, 3311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Michael, T.P.; Bryant, D.; Gutierrez, R.; Borisjuk, N.; Chu, P.; Zhang, H.Z.; Xia, J.; Zhou, J.F.; Peng, H.; El Baidouri, M.; et al. Comprehensive definition of genome features in Spirodela polyrhiza by high-depth physical mapping and short-read DNA sequencing strategies. Plant J. 2017, 89, 617–635. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  44. An, D.; Zhou, Y.; Li, C.S.; Xiao, Q.; Wang, T.; Zhang, Y.T.; Wu, Y.R.; Li, Y.B.; Chao, D.Y.; Messing, J.; et al. Plant evolution and environmental adaptation unveiled by long-read whole-genome sequencing of Spirodela. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2019, 116, 18893–18899. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  45. Ziegler, P.; Sree, K.S.; Appenroth, K.J. Duckweeds for water remediation and toxicity testing. Toxicol. Environ. Chem. 2016, 98, 1127–1154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Zhao, Z.; Shi, H.J.; Liu, C.Q.; Kang, X.J.; Chen, L.C.; Liang, X.F.; Jin, L. Duckweed diversity decreases heavy metal toxicity by altering the metabolic function of associated microbial communities. Chemosphere 2018, 203, 76–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Chaudhary, E.; Sharma, P. Chromium and cadmium removal from wastewater using duckweed-Lemna gibba L. and ultrastructural deformation due to metal toxicity. Int. J. Phytoremediat. 2019, 21, 279–286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Xu, J.L.; Cui, W.H.; Cheng, J.J.; Stomp, A.M. Production of high-starch duckweed and its conversion to bioethanol. Biosyst. Eng. 2011, 110, 67–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Yin, Y.H.; Yu, C.J.; Yu, L.; Zhao, J.S.; Sun, C.J.; Ma, Y.B.; Zhou, G.K. The influence of light intensity and photoperiod on duckweed biomass and starch accumulation for bioethanol production. Bioresour. Technol 2015, 187, 84–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Toyama, T.; Hanaoka, T.; Tanaka, Y.; Morikawa, M.; Mori, K. Comprehensive evaluation of nitrogen removal rate and biomass, ethanol, and methane production yields by combination of four major duckweeds and three types of wastewater effluent. Bioresour. Technol. 2018, 250, 464–473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Ullah, I.; Wang, Y.; Eide, D.J.; Dunwell, J.M. Evolution, and functional analysis of Natural Resistance-Associated Macrophage Proteins (NRAMPs) from Theobroma cacao and their role in cadmium accumulation. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 14412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  52. Hu, R.B.; Qi, G.A.; Kong, Y.Z.; Kong, D.J.; Gao, Q.A.; Zhou, G.K. Comprehensive Analysis of NAC Domain Transcription Factor Gene Family in Populus trichocarpa. BMC Plant Biol. 2010, 10, 145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  53. Moore, R.C.; Purugganan, M.D. The evolutionary dynamics of plant duplicate genes. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2005, 8, 122–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Xu, G.X.; Guo, C.C.; Shan, H.Y.; Kong, H.Z. Divergence of duplicate genes in exon-intron structure. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2012, 109, 1187–1192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  55. Tian, W.J.; He, G.D.; Qin, L.J.; Li, D.D.; Meng, L.L.; Huang, Y.; He, T.B. Genome-wide analysis of the NRAMP gene family in potato (Solanum tuberosum): Identification, expression analysis and response to five heavy metals stress. Ecotox Environ. Safe 2021, 208, 111661. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Ren, X.Y.; Vorst, O.; Fiers, M.W.E.J.; Stiekema, W.J.; Nap, J.P. In plants, highly expressed genes are the least compact. Trends Genet. 2006, 22, 528–532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Chung, B.Y.W.; Simons, C.; Firth, A.E.; Brown, C.M.; Hellens, R.P. Effect of 5′UTR introns on gene expression in Arabidopsis thaliana. BMC Genom. 2006, 7, 120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  58. Jeffares, D.C.; Penkett, C.J.; Bahler, J. Rapidly regulated genes are intron poor. Trends Genet. 2008, 24, 375–378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. De Grassi, A.; Lanave, C.; Saccone, C. Genome duplication and gene-family evolution: The case of three OXPHOS gene families. Gene 2008, 421, 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Chothia, C.; Gough, J.; Vogel, C.; Teichmann, S.A. Evolution of the protein repertoire. Science 2003, 300, 1701–1703. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  61. Ohno, S.; Wolf, U.; Atkin, N.B. Evolution from Fish to Mammals by Gene Duplication. Hered. Genet. A 1968, 59, 169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Vision, T.J.; Brown, D.G.; Tanksley, S.D. The origins of genomic duplications in Arabidopsis. Science 2000, 290, 2114–2117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  63. Force, A.; Lynch, M.; Pickett, F.B.; Amores, A.; Yan, Y.L.; Postlethwait, J. Preservation of duplicate genes by complementary, degenerative mutations. Genetics 1999, 151, 1531–1545. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Kong, H.; Landherr, L.L.; Frohlich, M.W.; Leebens-Mack, J.; Ma, H.; dePamphilis, C.W. Patterns of gene duplication in the plant SKP1 gene family in angiosperms: Evidence for multiple mechanisms of rapid gene birth. Plant J. 2007, 50, 873–885. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Qin, L.; Han, P.; Chen, L.; Walk, T.C.; Li, Y.; Hu, X.; Xie, L.; Liao, H.; Liao, X. Genome-Wide Identification and Expression Analysis of NRAMP Family Genes in Soybean (Glycine Max L.). Front. Plant Sci. 2017, 8, 1436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  66. Lu, S.; Gu, H.; Yuan, X.; Wang, X.; Wu, A.M.; Qu, L.; Liu, J.Y. The GUS reporter-aided analysis of the promoter activities of a rice metallothionein gene reveals different regulatory regions responsible for tissue-specific and inducible expression in transgenic Arabidopsis. Transgenic Res. 2007, 16, 177–191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Chang, J.D.; Huang, S.; Yamaji, N.; Zhang, W.; Ma, J.F.; Zhao, F.J. OsNRAMP1 transporter contributes to cadmium and manganese uptake in rice. Plant Cell Environ. 2020, 43, 2476–2491. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Yang, M.; Zhang, Y.Y.; Zhang, L.J.; Hu, J.T.; Zhang, X.; Lu, K.; Dong, H.X.; Wang, D.J.; Zhao, F.J.; Huang, C.F.; et al. OsNRAMP5 contributes to manganese translocation and distribution in rice shoots. J. Exp. Bot. 2014, 65, 4849–4861. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  69. Wheeler, T.J.; Eddy, S.R. nhmmer: DNA homology search with profile HMMs. Bioinformatics 2013, 29, 2487–2489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  70. Thompson, J.D.; Higgins, D.G.; Gibson, T.J. Clustal-W—Improving the Sensitivity of Progressive Multiple Sequence Alignment through Sequence Weighting, Position-Specific Gap Penalties and Weight Matrix Choice. Nucleic Acids Res. 1994, 22, 4673–4680. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  71. Chen, C.; Chen, H.; Zhang, Y.; Thomas, H.R.; Frank, M.H.; He, Y.; Xia, R. TBtools: An Integrative Toolkit Developed for Interactive Analyses of Big Biological Data. Mol. Plant. 2020, 13, 1194–1202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Kumar, S.; Stecher, G.; Li, M.; Knyaz, C.; Tamura, K. MEGA X: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis across Computing Platforms. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2018, 35, 1547–1549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Letunic, I.; Bork, P. Interactive Tree of Life (iTOL) v4: Recent updates and new developments. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019, 47, W256–W259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  74. Gasteiger, E.; Gattiker, A.; Hoogland, C.; Ivanyi, I.; Appel, R.D.; Bairoch, A. ExPASy: The proteomics server for in-depth protein knowledge and analysis. Nucleic Acids Res. 2003, 31, 3784–3788. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  75. Krogh, A.; Larsson, B.; von Heijne, G.; Sonnhammer, E.L.L. Predicting transmembrane protein topology with a hidden Markov model: Application to complete genomes. J. Mol. Biol. 2001, 305, 567–580. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  76. Wu, Z.C.; Xiao, X.; Chou, K.C. iLoc-Plant: A multi-label classifier for predicting the subcellular localization of plant proteins with both single and multiple sites. Mol. Biosyst. 2011, 7, 3287–3297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Yu, C.S.; Lin, C.J.; Hwang, J.K. Predicting subcellular localization of proteins for Gram-negative bacteria by support vector machines based on n-peptide compositions. Protein Sci. 2004, 13, 1402–1406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  78. Horton, P.; Park, K.J.; Obayashi, T.; Fujita, N.; Harada, H.; Adams-Collier, C.J.; Nakai, K. WoLF PSORT: Protein localization predictor. Nucleic Acids Res. 2007, 35, W585–W587. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  79. Hu, B.; Jin, J.P.; Guo, A.Y.; Zhang, H.; Luo, J.C.; Gao, G. GSDS 2.0: An upgraded gene feature visualization server. Bioinformatics 2015, 31, 1296–1297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  80. Bailey, T.L.; Boden, M.; Buske, F.A.; Frith, M.; Grant, C.E.; Clementi, L.; Ren, J.; Li, W.W.; Noble, W.S. MEME SUITE: Tools for motif discovery and searching. Nucleic Acids Res. 2009, 37, W202–W208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Lescot, M.; Dehais, P.; Thijs, G.; Marchal, K.; Moreau, Y.; Van de Peer, Y.; Rouze, P.; Rombauts, S. PlantCARE, a database of plant cis-acting regulatory elements and a portal to tools for in silico analysis of promoter sequences. Nucleic Acids Res. 2002, 30, 325–327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Wang, Y.; Tang, H.; Debarry, J.D.; Tan, X.; Li, J.; Wang, X.; Lee, T.H.; Jin, H.; Marler, B.; Guo, H.; et al. MCScanX: A toolkit for detection and evolutionary analysis of gene synteny and collinearity. Nucleic Acids Res. 2012, 40, e49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  83. Wang, Y.; Li, J.; Paterson, A.H. MCScanX-transposed: Detecting transposed gene duplications based on multiple colinearity scans. Bioinformatics 2013, 29, 1458–1460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  84. Jefferson, R.A.; Kavanagh, T.A.; Bevan, M.W. GUS fusions: Beta-glucuronidase as a sensitive and versatile gene fusion marker in higher plants. Embo J. 1987, 6, 3901–3907. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Murashige, T.; Skoog, F. A Revised Medium for Rapid Growth and Bio Assays with Tobacco Tissue Cultures. Physiol. Plant. 1962, 15, 473–497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Pfaffl, M.W. A new mathematical model for relative quantification in real-time RT-PCR. Nucleic Acids Res. 2001, 29, e45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Ijms 22 06414 g001 550
Figure 1. Phylogenetic analysis of 138 Nramp proteins in S. polyrhiza and 22 other species. The maximum likelihood tree was constructed using MEGA X (bootstrap value = 1000) based on the JTT matrix-based model. Various colored circles represent the different groups.
Figure 1. Phylogenetic analysis of 138 Nramp proteins in S. polyrhiza and 22 other species. The maximum likelihood tree was constructed using MEGA X (bootstrap value = 1000) based on the JTT matrix-based model. Various colored circles represent the different groups.
Ijms 22 06414 g001
Ijms 22 06414 g002 550
Figure 2. Phylogenetic relationship, gene structure, and conserved motif of Nramp genes. (a). Phylogenetic tree of 138 Nramp proteins. (b). Intron–exon structures of Nramp genes. Blue boxes represent the upstream/downstream region, and yellow boxes represent exons and black lines represent introns of Nramp proteins. (c). Number and distribution of conserved motifs in Nramp genes. Ten putative motifs were predicted by MEME, and various colors represent different colored boxes. Details of motifs are summarized in Table 1.
Figure 2. Phylogenetic relationship, gene structure, and conserved motif of Nramp genes. (a). Phylogenetic tree of 138 Nramp proteins. (b). Intron–exon structures of Nramp genes. Blue boxes represent the upstream/downstream region, and yellow boxes represent exons and black lines represent introns of Nramp proteins. (c). Number and distribution of conserved motifs in Nramp genes. Ten putative motifs were predicted by MEME, and various colors represent different colored boxes. Details of motifs are summarized in Table 1.
Ijms 22 06414 g002
Ijms 22 06414 g003 550
Figure 3. Distribution of SpNramp gene family on the chromosomes of S. polyrhiza. chromosome numbers are shown at the left of chromosome. SpNramp genes are labeled at the right of the chromosomes. Scale bar on the left indicates the chromosome lengths (Mb).
Figure 3. Distribution of SpNramp gene family on the chromosomes of S. polyrhiza. chromosome numbers are shown at the left of chromosome. SpNramp genes are labeled at the right of the chromosomes. Scale bar on the left indicates the chromosome lengths (Mb).
Ijms 22 06414 g003
Ijms 22 06414 g004 550
Figure 4. Synteny relationship of Nramp genes pairs among S. polyrhiza and eight other species. The red represents the synteny genes, and the gray lines show the collinear blocks of the plant genome. The chromosome number is labeled at the top of each chromosome.
Figure 4. Synteny relationship of Nramp genes pairs among S. polyrhiza and eight other species. The red represents the synteny genes, and the gray lines show the collinear blocks of the plant genome. The chromosome number is labeled at the top of each chromosome.
Ijms 22 06414 g004
Ijms 22 06414 g005 550
Figure 5. The cis-acting elements in the promoter regions in the 2000 bp upstream promoter in all selected Nramp genes are shown in the figure. The cis-acting elements were predicted by the online software PLANTCARE, and visualized using TBtools.
Figure 5. The cis-acting elements in the promoter regions in the 2000 bp upstream promoter in all selected Nramp genes are shown in the figure. The cis-acting elements were predicted by the online software PLANTCARE, and visualized using TBtools.
Ijms 22 06414 g005
Ijms 22 06414 g006 550
Figure 6. Histochemical analysis of GUS activity and the vector of frame for promoter. GUS staining in each representative transformed line constructed using promoter-GUS. GUS staining of transgenic lines SpNramp1 (a–c), SpNramp2 (d), (e), and SpNramp3 (f–h) under 50 μM Cd2+ stress. (a–c) represent the SpNramp1 that is mainly distributed in frond, root, and joint between mother and daughter frond. (d,e) represent the SpNramp2 that is mainly accumulated on the root and frond. (f–h) indicate the SpNramp3 that is focused in the root and joint between mother and daughter frond. (i). Vector of promoters. SpNramp1, SpNramp2, and SpNramp3 are inserted on HindIII sites.
Figure 6. Histochemical analysis of GUS activity and the vector of frame for promoter. GUS staining in each representative transformed line constructed using promoter-GUS. GUS staining of transgenic lines SpNramp1 (a–c), SpNramp2 (d), (e), and SpNramp3 (f–h) under 50 μM Cd2+ stress. (a–c) represent the SpNramp1 that is mainly distributed in frond, root, and joint between mother and daughter frond. (d,e) represent the SpNramp2 that is mainly accumulated on the root and frond. (f–h) indicate the SpNramp3 that is focused in the root and joint between mother and daughter frond. (i). Vector of promoters. SpNramp1, SpNramp2, and SpNramp3 are inserted on HindIII sites.
Ijms 22 06414 g006
Ijms 22 06414 g007 550
Figure 7. Expression patterns of four SpNramp genes under three abiotic stress. Quantitative RT-PCR was used to analyze the expression levels of each SpNramp gene. The X-axis represents the RNA samples from S. polyrhiza under different treatments at different time points (0, 6, 24, and 72 h). The Y-axis represents the relative expression levels of SpNramp genes by 2−ΔΔCt method. (A) is treated by 50 μM Cd2+. (B,C) contains 50 μM Cd2+ under Fe2+ or Mn2+ deficiency, respectively. The Actin (ACT) gene was used as an internal control. The 2−ΔΔCt was carried out to calculate the SpNramp genes’ relative expression. Different letters represent significant differences as determined by Duncan’s multiple range test (p ≤ 0.05). Error bars, mean ± SD.
Figure 7. Expression patterns of four SpNramp genes under three abiotic stress. Quantitative RT-PCR was used to analyze the expression levels of each SpNramp gene. The X-axis represents the RNA samples from S. polyrhiza under different treatments at different time points (0, 6, 24, and 72 h). The Y-axis represents the relative expression levels of SpNramp genes by 2−ΔΔCt method. (A) is treated by 50 μM Cd2+. (B,C) contains 50 μM Cd2+ under Fe2+ or Mn2+ deficiency, respectively. The Actin (ACT) gene was used as an internal control. The 2−ΔΔCt was carried out to calculate the SpNramp genes’ relative expression. Different letters represent significant differences as determined by Duncan’s multiple range test (p ≤ 0.05). Error bars, mean ± SD.
Ijms 22 06414 g007
Table
Table 1. List of the putative motifs of Nramp proteins.
Table 1. List of the putative motifs of Nramp proteins.
MotifLogoBest Possible MatchE-ValueWidth
Motif 1 Ijms 22 06414 i001GQSSTITGTYAG
QFIMGGFLNLRL
KKWMRALITRS
CAIVPT		1.6e-372341
Motif 2 Ijms 22 06414 i002PGFLMSIAFLDP
GNLEGDLQAGA
IAGYSLLWLLM
WAT		3.6e-305337
Motif 3 Ijms 22 06414 i003KTIRQAVGVVG
CVIMPHNVFLH
SALVQSR		9.2e-253029
Motif 4 Ijms 22 06414 i004QLLSARLGVVT
GRHLAEHCREE
Y		2.6e-220723
Motif 5 Ijms 22 06414 i005LWILAEVAVIAA
DIPEVIGTAFAL
NILFH		3.4e-225029
Motif 6 Ijms 22 06414 i006MILSFELPFALIP
LLKFSSSRTKM
GPHKNS		1.4e-222430
Motif 7 Ijms 22 06414 i007PLWAGVIITALD
CFIFLFLENYGV
RKLEAVFAVLIA
TMALS		1.7e-282541
Motif 8 Ijms 22 06414 i008VQEALRYYSIES
TIALVVSFMINL
FVTTVFAKGFY
GT		1.5e-231737
Motif 9 Ijms 22 06414 i009NLNPEDQANCS
DLDLNKASFLL
KNVLGNWSSK
LFAVALLAS		8.9e-133641
Motif 10 Ijms 22 06414 i010IIGINVYYLSTG
FVGWLIHNNLP
KVANVFIGIIVF
PLMALY		4.3e-112641
Table
Table 2. The colinear gene pairs.
Table 2. The colinear gene pairs.
Species 1Species 2Colinear Gene Pairs
Glycine maxPopulus trichocarpaGmNramp1a: PtNramp3, GmNramp1a: PtNramp5, GmNramp1b: PtNramp3, GmNramp1b: PtNramp5, GmNramp2a: PtNramp3, GmNramp2a: PtNramp5, GmNramp2b: PtNramp3, GmNramp2b: PtNramp5, GmNramp3a: PtNramp3, GmNramp3a: PtNramp5, GmNramp3b: PtNramp3, GmNramp3b: PtNramp5, GmNramp6a: PtNramp1, GmNramp6b: PtNramp1
Populus trichocarpaSpirodela polyrhizaPtNramp3: SpNramp1, PtNramp5: SpNramp1
Spirodela polyrhizaArabidopsis thalianaSpNramp1: AtNramp3, SpNramp1: AtNramp4
Arabidopsis thalianaSetaria italicaAtNramp4: SiNramp8
Setaria italicaZea maysSiNramp2: ZmNramp3, SiNramp2: ZmNramp7, SiNramp2: ZmNramp8, SiNramp4: ZmNramp1, SiNramp7: ZmNramp1, SiNramp8: ZmNramp1, SiNramp8: ZmNramp8
Spirodela polyrhizaBrachypodium distachyonSpNramp1: BdNramp1, SpNramp1: BdNramp5, SpNramp1: BdNramp7, SpNramp2: BdNramp2
Brachypodium distachyonSolanum lycopersicumBdNramp5: SlNramp4, BdNramp1: SlNramp2, BdNramp5: SlNramp2
Solanum lycopersicumOryza sativaSlNramp2: OsNramp2, SlNramp4: OsNramp2
Spirodela polyrhizaOryza sativaSpNramp1: OsNramp2, SpNramp1: OsNramp6, SpNramp2: OsNramp3, SpEIN2: OsEIN2
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Chen, Y.; Zhao, X.; Li, G.; Kumar, S.; Sun, Z.; Li, Y.; Guo, W.; Yang, J.; Hou, H. Genome-Wide Identification of the Nramp Gene Family in Spirodela polyrhiza and Expression Analysis under Cadmium Stress. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 6414. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22126414

AMA Style

Chen Y, Zhao X, Li G, Kumar S, Sun Z, Li Y, Guo W, Yang J, Hou H. Genome-Wide Identification of the Nramp Gene Family in Spirodela polyrhiza and Expression Analysis under Cadmium Stress. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2021; 22(12):6414. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22126414

Chicago/Turabian Style

Chen, Yan, Xuyao Zhao, Gaojie Li, Sunjeet Kumar, Zuoliang Sun, Yixian Li, Wenjun Guo, Jingjing Yang, and Hongwei Hou. 2021. "Genome-Wide Identification of the Nramp Gene Family in Spirodela polyrhiza and Expression Analysis under Cadmium Stress" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 22, no. 12: 6414. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22126414

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop