Next Article in Journal
Dexamethasone for Severe COVID-19: How Does It Work at Cellular and Molecular Levels?
Next Article in Special Issue
Directional Persistence of Cell Migration in Schizophrenia Patient-Derived Olfactory Cells
Previous Article in Journal
The C-Terminal Domain of LRRK2 with the G2019S Substitution Increases Mutant A53T α-Synuclein Toxicity in Dopaminergic Neurons In Vivo
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Necrotizing Enterocolitis: Overview on In Vitro Models

by
Luigia De Fazio
1,2,
Isadora Beghetti
1,3,*,
Salvatore Nicola Bertuccio
1,2,
Concetta Marsico
1,3,
Silvia Martini
1,3,
Riccardo Masetti
1,2,
Andrea Pession
1,2,
Luigi Corvaglia
1,3,† and
Arianna Aceti
1,3,†
1
Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy
2
Pediatric Oncology and Hematology “Lalla Seragnoli”, Pediatric Unit-IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria, 40138 Bologna, Italy
3
Neonatal Intensive Care Unit-IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria, 40138 Bologna, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to the paper.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22(13), 6761; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22136761
Submission received: 6 June 2021 / Revised: 16 June 2021 / Accepted: 21 June 2021 / Published: 23 June 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Disease Modeling with Tissue-Specific Stem Cells or Organoid)

Abstract

:
Necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) is a gut inflammatory disorder which constitutes one of the leading causes of morbidity and mortality for preterm infants. The pathophysiology of NEC is yet to be fully understood; several observational studies have led to the identification of multiple factors involved in the pathophysiology of the disease, including gut immaturity and dysbiosis of the intestinal microbiome. Given the complex interactions between microbiota, enterocytes, and immune cells, and the limited access to fetal human tissues for experimental studies, animal models have long been essential to describe NEC mechanisms. However, at present there is no animal model perfectly mimicking human NEC; furthermore, the disease mechanisms appear too complex to be studied in single-cell cultures. Thus, researchers have developed new approaches in which intestinal epithelial cells are exposed to a combination of environmental and microbial factors which can potentially trigger NEC. In addition, organoids have gained increasing attention as promising models for studying NEC development. Currently, several in vitro models have been proposed and have contributed to describe the disease in deeper detail. In this paper, we will provide an updated review of available in vitro models of NEC and an overview of current knowledge regarding its molecular underpinnings.

1. Introduction

Necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) is the most serious gastrointestinal (GI) disease of prematurity and the most common cause of death in extremely preterm infants aged 2 to 8 weeks of age [1]. NEC primarily affects infants born before 32 weeks of gestation and with low birth weight (BW); the lower the gestational age, the higher is the incidence of the disease [2]. Recent meta-analyses estimated that NEC occurs in 7% of low-BW infants in neonatal intensive care units. Mortality varies from 10 to 30% and, despite several decades of basic and clinical research, has remained largely unchanged [3]. NEC is characterized by inflammation and necrosis of the distal small bowel and proximal colon, with extensive infiltration of neutrophils leading to perforation, peritonitis, systemic sepsis, and multiorgan failure [4]. The main factors involved in the pathogenesis include functional and anatomical immaturity of both the intestinal barrier and the GI immune system, and abnormal patterns of intestinal microbial colonization [5,6]. A proper colonization of the gut is essential for intestinal barrier function and immune maturation [7]. The gut microbiota of preterm infants, together with a unique set of environmental exposures, is made of a dramatically lower number of beneficial species, lower bacterial diversity, and higher proportion of pathogens compared to healthy breastfed term infants [8,9]. Such dysbiosis may result in a hyperinflammatory response by the premature immune system, causing a violent inflammatory storm that leads to increased intestinal permeability, bacterial translocation, and inflammation [10]. Metabolites and products, such LPS, secreted from colonizing bacteria interact with Toll-like receptors (TLRs) on the intestinal epithelial cells (IECs) and on the submucosal inflammatory T cells. Once activated, TLR-4 in the IECs elicits the activation of several signal transduction pathways, including the inhibitor of NF-κB (IκB) kinase (IKK) [11], a critical upstream kinase that activates NF-κB. This leads to the production of many inflammatory mediators, including cytokines and chemokines, which induce immune cell recruitment, especially neutrophils, and intestinal inflammation. Specifically, the exaggerated expression of TLR4 in the intestinal epithelium of the premature infant leads to the induction of the lymphocyte chemoattractant CCL25 on the intestinal epithelium; in addition, the over-expression of TLR4 is associated with increased expression of pSTAT3 [12]. Recent studies have highlighted the role of immune cells in NEC pathogenesis, describing an imbalance between Tregs and Th17 cells with a consequent exaggerated pro-inflammatory state [12]. The elevation in pSTAT3 leads to the induction of a Th17 phenotypic response and reduction in Foxp3+ Treg cells, resulting in the polarization of T cells toward a Th17 phenotype.
I-17 released by CD4+ Th17 cells results in intestinal mucosal injury, as demonstrated by impaired enterocyte tight junctions (TJs), increased enterocyte apoptosis, and decreased enterocyte proliferation, all of which are hallmark features of NEC [13].
Human milk (HM) feeding is well known to constitute a protective factor against NEC in preterm infant [14], even if the exact mechanisms through which this effect is exerted are still to be described in detail. The bioactive components of HM, including soluble immune factors, antimicrobial proteins and peptides, functional fatty acids, hormones, oligosaccharides, and stem cells, are thought to act synergistically by exerting immunomodulatory, anti-infective, antioxidant, growth-promoting, and gut-colonizing effects. Several studies have documented substantial differences in the composition of gut microbiota between preterm infants fed HM and those fed formula milk, with HM leading to the highest microbial diversity as well as a more gradual acquisition of diversity compared to formula milk [15,16].
Although numerous animal models for NEC exist and have contributed to shed light on its complex pathophysiology, response to injury and therapeutic interventions may be highly variable across species. Furthermore, it is ethically challenging to study disease pathophysiology or novel therapeutic agents directly in human subjects, especially in vulnerable populations such as preterm infants. Thus, it would be highly desirable to develop novel in vitro models of NEC using human tissue, leading to a better understanding of complex intestinal pathophysiology and, therefore, to promising prevention or therapeutic strategies.
Hence, this narrative review is aimed at summarizing available in vitro studies about NEC pathogenesis and innovative approaches used to disentangle NEC molecular underpinnings.

2. Modeling NEC in IECs

IECs are widely used to study the effects of NEC-associated factors at the cellular level. Several different cell lines have been used as intestinal models to study NEC in experimental conditions. The human epithelial cell line Caco-2 constitutes the most widely used intestinal model for NEC. This cell line undergoes a gradual villus-like enterocytic differentiation process, spontaneously starting after 30 days of culture, which is like that observed in the epithelium of the intact fetal small and large bowel. The Caco-2 cell line shows common features of the small intestine. This cell line cannot differentiate into goblet cells; thus, one important limitation of such a model is the inability to produce mucus. The HT-29 cell line is derived from a colon adenocarcinoma and is considered a pluripotent intestinal cell line, as changes in the culture media can lead to different enterocytic differentiation paths. Unlike in the Caco-2 cell line [17,18], differentiation in HT-29 [19,20] is not spontaneous, but rather depends on nutritional and culture conditions [21]. When treated with sodium butyrate, HT-29 cells can differentiate into goblet-like cells, thus having the ability to produce mucus. IEC-6 and IEC-18 [22] cells are non-transformed intestinal cells derived from the rat small intestine and from native rat ileal crypts, respectively. Both these cell lines are characterized by an epithelioid morphology; due to the lack of staining for the villous enterocyte marker, these cells are described as having an immature crypt-like phenotype [23]. FHs 74-Int and H4 cells are the most frequently used model of human epithelium in NEC experimental studies. The H4 cell line [24] was developed from fetal small intestinal epithelial cells at 20–22 weeks gestation, whereas the FHs-74-Int [25] is derived from a 12–16-weeks-old human fetus.
The best characterized in vitro experimental NEC model is obtained by treating IEC lines with LPS, which was demonstrated to induce a dose-dependent increase in the expression of TLR4 in IEC-6 cells [26]. In other experimental settings, H2O2 was used to induce IECs injury, decreased cell viability, upregulated oxidative damage, and increased inflammation, thus mimicking the damage to the gut epithelium which is seen in vivo [27]. H2O2 treatment in IECs is a well-established model of epithelial injury induced by oxidative stress and it relies on the evidence that radical oxygen species (ROS) cause epithelial permeability changes and mucosal injury in small intestinal cell lines [28]. ROS-mediated IEC apoptosis is known to play a significant role in the pathogenesis of NEC in premature infants [29].
TNF-α and IFN-γ are the main cytokines associated with intestinal inflammation [30]. Since TNF-α and IFN-γ are key regulators of inflammation in experimental NEC, those cytokines were used in vitro in order to mimic the inflammatory conditions of this disease [30]. Another model used to mimic the features of NEC in vitro is Cronobacter sakazakii (CS). A Gram-negative, rod-shaped, and non-spore-forming pathogen in the Enterobacteriaceae family, it is commonly found in dairy products, and contamination of infant formula with CS was described in association with NEC outbreaks [31]. A role for CS in the pathogenesis of NEC has been postulated, as its introduction into experimental NEC models was shown to exacerbate intestinal injuries [32,33].

2.1. Overview of In Vitro NEC Studies

2.1.1. Studies on Gut Permeability

A functional barrier including the mucus layer and TJ complexes (TJCs) limits the direct contact between pathogens and the epithelium while regulating the permeability of nutrients, water, and ions [34]. TJCs are specialized, multipurpose adhesion proteins that create a seal between neighboring IECs, whereas the mucus layer is the first line of defense from external molecules reaching the gut lumen. A disruption of the intestinal barrier is documented in NEC and several studies suggest that LPS, or bacteria which express LPS in their cell wall, increase the permeability across the intestinal epithelial layer by destroying TJCs.
In this respect, several studies have investigated the role of various proteins which are involved in the function of the TJC, such as claudins, zonulin, and occludins. Claudins have been proposed as potential biomarkers for intestinal TJ integrity. There are different published studies examining the role of claudins in NEC and all the studies highlight a change in claudin expression following NEC and correlating with increased intestinal permeability [35,36]. Ares et al. [37] suggested that the increased permeability observed in LPS-treated Caco-2 cells occurs because of the upregulation of claudin-2. The claudin 2 overexpression in experimental NEC cells is accompanied by a change in the protein localization within the subcellular compartment, with a decreased expression of membrane-bound claudin 2 and an increased expression in the cytoskeleton compartment.
Zonulin has been proposed to modulate intestinal permeability by disassembling the TJCs in the intestinal epithelium [38]. Ling et al. [39] used Caco-2 cells exposed to LPS to study the role of zonulin in NEC-associated gut barrier dysfunction. Electron and immunofluorescence microscopy of LPS-treated Caco-2 cells showed a greater length of the apical and basolateral TJP and their different localization and fainter structure characterized by a decrease in zonulin, occludin, and claudin-3 proteins compared to control cells.
Occludin plays an essential role in paracellular transport and regulation of macromolecules. Through its phosphorylation and dephosphorylation of serine/threonine residues, occludin changes the permeability of the cellular barrier [40]: in IECs, decreased occludin content is associated with increased barrier permeability [41]. Grothaus et al. [42] documented the importance of occludin in the maintenance of intestinal barrier function and integrity, showing that occludin gene expression is downregulated in human NEC samples. They observed that Caco-2 cell line exposed to LPS showed a decreased occludin expression, compared to controls. In addition, Lu et al. [43] observed that DRG1, a protein closely correlated with cell junctions, was constitutively expressed during the intestinal maturation process but significantly decreased in the ileum in the context of NEC. Data obtained from Caco-2 and FHs74int cell lines revealed that DRG1 deficiency destabilized the E-cadherin and occludin proteins near the cell membrane and increased the permeability of the epithelial cell monolayer. Fan et al. [31] observed that infection with Cronobacter sakazakii in HT-29 and Caco-2 cells reduced the transepithelial/transendothelial electrical resistance (TEER) of the monolayers in a time-dependent manner. Cronobacter sakazakii induced increased intestinal epithelial permeability in vitro, leading to the disruption of tight junctions by decreasing zonulin and occludin. In addition, the infection with Cronobacter sakazakii led to a downregulation of mucin production.
The role of the Hippo–YAP (Yes-associated protein) signaling pathway in reparative response after tissue injury and junctional integrity has also been investigated. Goswami et al. showed that RAB11A, a small GTPase that mediates the anterograde cellular trafficking, controls the biochemical associations of YAP with multiple components of adherens and TJ, including α-catenin and β-catenin. After chemical injury to the intestine, mice deficient in RAB11A were found to have reduced epithelial integrity, decreased YAP localization to adherens and TJ, and increased nuclear YAP accumulation in the colon epithelium [44].
Recently, Chen at al. [45] investigated the role of phenazine biosynthesis-like domain-containing protein (PBLD) in intestinal barrier function defects and dysregulation of the intestinal immune response. The authors studied colonic tissue samples from patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) and constructed specific intestinal epithelial PBLD-deficient (PBLDIEC−/−) mice. PBLD was decreased in patients with UC and was correlated with levels of TJ and inflammatory proteins. PBLDIEC−/− mice were more susceptible to chemical-induced colitis compared with wild-type (WT) mice. In the induced colitis model, PBLDIEC−/− mice had impaired intestinal barrier function, greater immune cell infiltration in colonic tissue, and less TJ proteins than WT mice. Furthermore, NF-κB activation was markedly elevated and resulted in higher expression levels of downstream effectors (IL-6, TNF-α) in colonic epithelial cells from PBLDIEC−/− mice than WT mice with colitis. Interestingly, PBLD overexpression in IECs consistently inhibited TNF-α/interferon-γ-induced intestinal barrier disruption and TNF-α-induced inflammatory responses via the interaction with IKKs [45].
Despite promising results from in vitro models of NEC examining gut permeability, which have implemented the understanding of the molecular mechanisms correlated with NEC pathophysiology, existing data are still insufficient to support a diagnostic or prognostic role of these biomarkers in NEC [46].

2.1.2. Studies on Gut Inflammation

The gut of preterm infants with NEC is characterized by an upregulation of inflammatory mediators, including cytokines, which induces intestinal injury and necrosis. Specifically, LPS treatment of IECs induces an inflammatory response by increasing the expression of IL-6, IL-8, and TNF-α. Ling et al. [39] reported, after stimulation with LPS, an increase in IL-6 and TNF-α in Caco-2 cells and in TNF-α mRNA expression in IEC-6 cells, compared with controls [47]. In a H2O2-induced NEC model, the increase in IL-6 was observed in IEC-18 and Caco-2 cells [48]. It was observed that SOCS3, a key regulator of cytokine signal transduction, was dramatically decreased in NEC tissue samples [49] and that the deletion of SOCS3 led to rapid inflammation in mice [50]. To determine the effects of SOCS3 on inflammatory factors, Zhang et al. [51] detected the expression of TNF-α, IL-10, and IL-6 in enterocytes (H4 and Caco-2 cells) undergoing LPS stimulation. They observed that LPS inhibited SOCS3 expression and that overexpression of SOCS3 decreased the levels of TNF-α and IL-6, and increased the levels of IL-10. Taken together, these data underscore the impact of SOCS3 in the protection from LPS-induced inflammation in enterocytes. As an important late inflammatory mediator, high-mobility group box 1 (HMGB1) is closely related to the occurrence, development, and complications of NEC. HMGB1 protein is upregulated in the progression of NEC, and the inhibition of HMGB1 expression has been demonstrated to inhibit the TLR4/NF-κB signaling pathway, alleviating intestinal inflammation in rat and human IEC models of NEC. Interestingly, HMGB1 gene single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) were recently associated with the susceptibility of NEC and with the survival prognosis of newborns with NEC [52]. Furthermore, intestinal injury may initiate in utero, induced by maternal inflammation. In a rat model, LPS-induced maternal inflammation was shown to induce intestinal injury in offspring, with intestinal mucosal barrier disruption, and changes in the composition of the intestinal microbiota similar to the microbiota alteration found in human infants who develop NEC.
Conversely, the exposure of human fetal IECs to human milk has been proposed as having an anti-inflammatory effect [53]. An interesting study compared the inflammatory profile of human fetal primary IEC line H4 with those obtained from adult cell lines HT29-cl19A and Caco-2 treated with TNF-α or IL-1β. The study highlighted that the immature intestine had an elevated baseline inflammatory state compared to adult enterocytes and differences in the pattern of alteration of IL-8 secretion by human milk factors such as transforming growth factor (TGF-β1 and TGF-β2), erythropoietin, IL-10, and epidermal growth factor (EGF). TGF-β1 and Epo decreased both IL-8 secretion stimulated by TNF-α or IL-1β in human fetal IECs [54]. Human milk has been shown to be protective and to modulate cytokine expression in IECs, but the underlying molecular mechanisms have not been elucidated yet.

2.1.3. Studies on Gut Cells Proliferation

Cytokines, such as IFN-γ and TNF, are known to induce sudden negative changes in the expression of the TJ proteins, but they can also induce cell death signaling. Autophagy, apoptosis, and necrosis are induced by multiple stress pathways, which may interfere with the intestinal barrier function, and they have been implicated in the pathogenesis of several GI diseases including NEC [55]. The effect of LPS on the proliferation of IECs was observed in different LPS-stimulated IECs. Zhang et al. [26] showed the inhibition of Caco-2 cells’ viability, suggesting that LPS inhibits cell growth and replication. Yuan et al. [47] observed an increased expression of the autophagy markers and a significantly higher TNF-α mRNA expression in IEC-6/NEC. The study suggests that TNF-α induced autophagy, thereby suppressing proliferation and promoting apoptosis in IEC-6/NEC cells. LPS is a physiological inducer of TNFα in various cell systems and its activation results in apoptosis and induction of inflammatory responses. The importance of TNF-α in the initiation and propagation of NEC has been well documented. Cyclic adenosine monophosphate (cAMP) and protein kinase A (PKA) are important mediators and regulators of apoptosis. Blackwood et al. [56] observed in IEC-6 and FHs 74 Int cells that both LPS and Cronobacter sakazakii caused an increase in cAMP and activation of PKA that contributed to cellular apoptosis. Apoptosis was even higher in FHs 74 Int cells than in IEC-6 cells, suggesting a higher susceptibility to inflammatory stimuli than adult IECs.

3. Intestinal Organoid Models

An organoid (Figure 1) is a self-organizing tridimensional structure which exhibits similar organ functionality and physiological features as the tissue of origin [57]. Intestinal organoids mimic in vivo epithelial regenerative capacity, with apoptotic cells being continually released into the lumen of the organoid, while new cells are differentiated from the Leucine-rich repeat-containing G-protein-coupled (Lgr5+) cells within the crypts to restore the epithelium. Intestinal organoids can be derived from two sources of stem cells: organ-restricted adult stem cells (ASCs) and pluripotent stem cells (PSCs), both in the form of induced (iPSCs) and embryonic stem cells (ESCs) [58,59,60]. ASC-derived organoids are generated by harvesting stem cells containing crypts or isolating single Lgr5+ expressed cells from human or mouse gut tissue [61]. ASC-derived organoids contain only epithelial cell types derived from the crypt-based stem cells and are referred to as enteroids or colonoids, depending on whether they originate from the small intestine or the colon [62]. Lgr5+ stem cells can spontaneously proliferate and differentiate in the absence of any stromal and mesenchymal cells. The formation of villi, a major characteristic of the differentiated intestine, has not been achieved with enteroids but only with organoids [63]. These data suggest that the presence of mesenchyme may be needed to activate the genes involved in villus formation. Organoids can be derived from human intestine harvested at the time of resection for NEC or from primary intestinal tissue of animals subjected to experimental NEC, by isolating the crypts of terminal ileum. Stress factors, such as hypoxia and LPS, were used to induce intestinal epithelial injury in an organoids model. The intestinal organoids treated with NEC-associated stress factors showed increased inflammation similar to intestinal injury found in mice with NEC [39].

Overview on Studies Using NEC-Organoid Models

Ares et al. [64] described the use of enteroids derived from human intestinal tissue samples as a novel ex vivo model for the study of NEC. The exposure of human intestinal enteroids to LPS caused an inflammatory response leading to histologic, genetic, and protein expression alterations similar to those found in human NEC. The LPS-treated enteroids experienced more apoptosis and an increased expression of Toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4) than controls. Another study on the NEC-enteroid models was conducted by Kovler et al. [65]: the authors harvested enteroids from a mouse intestine and simulated NEC features through the enteroids’ exposure to hypoxia and pathogenic bacteria. In NEC enteroids, the differentiated intestinal epithelium showed a disruption in tissue architecture, as documented by E-cadherin localization, an increase in inflammatory cytokines, and an upregulated activation of necroptosis. Similarly to what has been observed in the murine models [66], the single exposure of enteroids either to hypoxia or NEC bacteria did not induce such alterations, indicating that both components are probably necessary for a precision-based ex vivo NEC model. Lanik et al. [67] reported a decreased proliferation in enteroids derived from neonatal mice and premature infants in the presence of LPS. Importantly, the study suggested that breast milk restored the enteroid proliferation even in the presence of LPS, as demonstrated by the overexpression of Ki67, a protein strictly associated with cell proliferation. In a study conducted by Senger et al. [68], human fetal-derived (FEnS) and adult-derived enterospheres (AEnS) were generated from mice with NEC. Compared to controls, NEC-derived organoids were smaller, indicating less proliferation, and had more budding, suggesting higher differentiation. In addition, organoids cultured without Wnt medium showed a reduced proliferation and increased differentiation compared to the organoids cultured in medium with added Wnt. A similar growth response was observed in organoids derived from human NEC tissue, indicating that Wnt deficiency can lead to NEC-like injury in organoids. Several studies reported [63,68,69] that the Wnt and β-catenin pathways were dysregulated in organoids, in experimental NEC, and most importantly in human NEC. This deregulation leads to the impairment of intestinal epithelial stem cell proliferation and differentiation and leads to reduced enterocyte proliferation in response to TLR4 activation, as shown in organoids from TLR4-deficient mice [70]. NEC organoids also showed a lower expression of proliferation marker PCNA and ISC, genes associated with the innate immune response, intestinal epithelium maturation, and gut barrier function. Genes associated with Paneth cell antimicrobial activity, stem cell function, and the innate immune response (including inflammasome-related chemokines and cytokines, cytokine receptors, and TNF-related and CXCL8/IL-8 genes) were upregulated in a subgroup of FEnS. Although, the fetal-specific claudin-6, JAM3, claudin-2, and claudin-15 were highly expressed in all the FEnS but not in the AEnS. Li et al. [63] incubated organoids from fresh terminal ileum of newborn mice pups in a hypoxic condition and administered LPS to mimic NEC-like neonatal intestinal injury. Hypoxia and LPS exposure induced intestinal inflammation, as indicated by increased gene expression of pro-inflammation cytokines IL-6 and TNF-α Moreover, the immunostaining pattern of tight junction marker ZO-1 and claudin-3 showed the relocation of tight junction marker from the luminal to the outside membrane of the organoids.
Intestinal organoids can be derived from two sources of stem cells: ASCs and PSCs, both in the form of iPSCs and ESCs. ASC-derived organoids are generated by isolated Lgr5+ stem cells or whole intestinal crypts and contain only epithelial cell types derived from the crypt-based stem cells. Intestinal epithelial and mesenchymal organoids can be derived from minced pieces of intestinal tissue or from PSCs.

4. Human Gut-on-a-Chip

Organ-on-a-chip (OoC) is a microengineered platform that aims to develop an enhanced in vitro model by mimicking the complexity of native tissues [71], overcoming many of the limitations of previous in vitro models. Chips incorporate microfluidic channels lined by living human cells and utilize a microfluidic approach to supply tissues with the nutrients and factors needed for their functions. Through a combination of cell biology, engineering, and biomaterial technology, the microenvironment of the chip simulates tissue interfaces and mimics the complex physical and biochemical microenvironment of living human organs [72,73]. In recent years, OoC has been proposed as a novel cell-based assay tool in the μTAS (Micro Total Analysis Systems) research field and has emerged for its ability to fill the large gap between in vivo and in vitro conditions. OoC responds to the need for modeling and testing platforms that would be more predictive of human responses [74]. These microdevices can be used to test and to create in vitro models of human disease, to closely monitor cell-level and tissue-level events [75], simulate and reverse pathological situations, and study the effect of etiological factors on tissue [76]. In order to further understand gut physiology, the intestinal microbiota, and disease processes, a novel technology primarily based on microfluidics and cell biology, called “gut-on-chip” (GOC), was developed to simulate the structure, function, and microenvironment of the human gut [77]. It is well established that NEC is a complex and multi-factorial disease [78]. Gut-on-chip platforms could be employed to simplify the complexity of human intestine and could provide a robust modular platform for NEC studies, for analysis of intestine–microbiota interactions, etiology, and development of intestinal inflammation, but also for defining potential therapeutic targets and testing drug candidates for NEC treatment.

Overview on Studies Using Human Gut-on-a-Chip and Future Prospects for NEC

GOC models, based on established human intestinal epithelial cell lines (Caco-2 [17,18] or HT-29 [19,20] cells) growing on extracellular (ECM)-coated surfaces, have been used to study barrier function, intestinal cell and tissue morphology, or intestinal differentiated functions. In several studies, chip-based models were used to study gut inflammation. Kim et al. showed that LPS endotoxin elicited an increased secretion of proinflammatory cytokines such as interleukin IL-1β, IL6, IL-8, and TNF-α. That inflammatory storm is necessary and sufficient to compromise intestinal barrier function, as demonstrated by increased expression of intercellular adhesion molecule (ICAM)-1 and villous blunting [73]. Shin et al. used a gut chip-based model inspired by dextran sodium sulfate (DSS)-induced colitis models in mice in order to identify the initiating factors in gut inflammation. They demonstrated that epithelial barrier dysfunction, pathogenic bacteria (LPS), and immune cells (PBMC) were required to achieve gut inflammation [79]. GOC have been engineered with increasing complexity that also includes neighboring channels lined by immune cells, commensal microbes, pathogenic bacteria, and human microvascular endothelium. Gut microbiota study has been limited to genomic and metagenomic analysis given the difficulty in culturing the largely anaerobic bacterial population. In a recent study, a human GOC microdevice was used to coculture multiple commensal microbes in contact with living human intestinal epithelial cells and to analyze how gut microbiome and inflammatory cells contribute to intestinal bacterial overgrowth and inflammation [80]. Incorporation of the gut microbiota on-a-chip could help answer many questions previously unanswerable, such as how microbial composition differs on the cell surface versus lumen, how specific bacteria interact with host cells, and tracking microbiota changing over time in response to different stimuli. The presence of immune cells in the GOC model provides an efficient approach to study the interaction between intestinal and immune cells. Shah et al. [81] were able to co-culture human epithelial cells and microbial cells with primary human CD4+ T cells in a single microfluidic device. The device was used to examine the gut response to the subsequent interactions with the immune system. The lack of the cellular immune component, which plays a key role in the multifactorial landscape of NEC pathogenesis [12], could be a limit of the chip system because of the impossibility to study the interaction between immune and epithelial cells and the role of immune circulating factors. The presence of the endothelium cells in the GOC model allows analysis of the migration of immune cells. Since migration is regulated by the vasculature [82], interactions between immune cells and endothelial cells were studied by Han et al. [83], who used an inflammation GOC model to show the transendothelial migration of neutrophils. Furthermore, the relevance of angiogenesis to epithelial development/function and the importance to incorporate this into a novel GOC system was demonstrates by Sailer et al. [84].

5. Conclusions

Despite continuous progress in neonatal intensive care, NEC remains a devastating disease for premature infants, with few specific treatment options. Clinical and scientific research studies have identified risk factors for NEC and experimental animal models have obtained significant clues on the biological foundations of the disease. Despite continuous scientific advancements, the pathophysiological underpinnings of this disease remain incompletely understood. In vitro models of NEC have provided important tools to observe the molecular mechanisms involved in the disease, such as cell proliferation, apoptosis, and gene expression variation, and can serve as low-cost screening platforms for the discovery of the effect of new therapies and protective strategies, including human milk, and their mechanisms. Overall, existing experimental data suggest that inflammatory response, cell apoptosis, oxidative stress, gut permeability, and signal transduction differ significantly between NEC models and controls. In vitro models have the advantage of overcoming the difficulty in identifying cellular and molecular contributors to disease, but disadvantages include the lack of an immune component, which appears to be fundamental for the development of NEC [12]. So far, there are only a few published studies modeling NEC reproducing the characteristics of intestinal epithelium of the preterm infant. A comprehensive model of this disease is yet to be generated, despite continuous advancements toward the development of stress factors that mimic those seen in human NEC. Organoids overcome many of the limitations of standard cell lines, as they can more closely reflect normal physiology or disease pathogenesis and, to date, organoids from human intestine are one of the most promising tools for the development of a complete in vitro NEC model. Moreover, the development of the gut-on-a-chip model, incorporating not only GI epithelium but also immune, vascular, enteric, nervous, and other components of the GI microenvironment, could provide new insight into NEC disease mechanisms.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, L.D.F., I.B., L.C. and A.A.; methodology, L.D.F. and S.N.B.; data curation, L.D.F., C.M. and S.M.; writing—original draft preparation, L.D.F., I.B., R.M. and A.A.; writing—review and editing, S.N.B., C.M., S.M., A.P. and L.C.; supervision, R.M., A.P., L.C. and A.A. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Patel, R.M.; Kandefer, S.; Walsh, M.C.; Bell, E.F.; Carlo, W.A.; Laptook, A.R.; Sánchez, P.J.; Shankaran, S.; Van Meurs, K.P.; Ball, M.B.; et al. Causes and Timing of Death in Extremely Premature Infants from 2000 through 2011. N. Engl. J. Med. 2015, 372, 331–340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  2. Battersby, C.; Longford, N.; Mandalia, S.; Costeloe, K.; Modi, N. Incidence and enteral feed antecedents of severe neonatal necrotising enterocolitis across neonatal networks in England, 2012–2013: A whole-population surveillance study. Lancet Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2017, 2, 43–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  3. Alsaied, A.; Islam, N.; Thalib, L. Global incidence of Necrotizing Enterocolitis: A systematic review and Meta-analysis. BMC Pediatr. 2020, 20, 344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Lin, P.W.; Stoll, B.J. Necrotising enterocolitis. Lancet 2006, 368, 1271–1283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Neu, J.; Walker, W.A. Necrotizing Enterocolitis. N. Engl. J. Med. 2011, 364, 255–264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  6. Alganabi, M.; Lee, C.; Bindi, E.; Li, B.; Pierro, A. Recent advances in understanding necrotizing enterocolitis. F1000Research 2019, 8, 107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Takiishi, T.; Fenero, C.M.; Câmara, N.O.S. Intestinal barrier and gut microbiota: Shaping our immune responses throughout life. Tissue Barriers 2017, 5, e1373208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Mai, V.; Young, C.M.; Ukhanova, M.; Wang, X.; Sun, Y.; Casella, G.; Theriaque, D.; Li, N.; Sharma, R.; Hudak, M.; et al. Fecal Microbiota in Premature Infants Prior to Necrotizing Enterocolitis. PLoS ONE 2011, 6, e20647. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Carlisle, E.M.; Poroyko, V.; Caplan, M.S.; Alverdy, J.A.; Liu, D. Gram Negative Bacteria Are Associated with the Early Stages of Necrotizing Enterocolitis. PLoS ONE 2011, 6, e18084. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Guo, S.; Nighot, M.; Al-Sadi, R.; Alhmoud, T.; Nighot, P.; Ma, T.Y. Lipopolysaccharide Regulation of Intestinal Tight Junction Permeability Is Mediated by TLR4 Signal Transduction Pathway Activation of FAK and MyD88. J. Immunol. Baltim. Md 1950 2015, 195, 4999–5010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. De Plaen, I.G. Inflammatory Signaling in Necrotizing Enterocolitis. Clin. Perinatol. 2013, 40, 109–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Egan, C.E.; Sodhi, C.P.; Good, M.; Lin, J.; Jia, H.; Yamaguchi, Y.; Lu, P.; Ma, C.; Branca, M.F.; Weyandt, S.; et al. Toll-like receptor 4–mediated lymphocyte influx induces neonatal necrotizing enterocolitis. J. Clin. Investig. 2015, 126, 495–508. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Hodzic, Z.; Bolock, A.M.; Good, M. The Role of Mucosal Immunity in the Pathogenesis of Necrotizing Enterocolitis. Front. Pediatr. 2017, 5, 40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Miller, J.; Tonkin, E.; Damarell, R.A.; McPhee, A.J.; Suganuma, M.; Suganuma, H.; Middleton, P.F.; Makrides, M.; Collins, C.T. A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Human Milk Feeding and Morbidity in Very Low Birth Weight Infants. Nutrients 2018, 10, 707. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  15. Xu, W.; Judge, M.P.; Maas, K.; Hussain, N.; McGrath, J.; Henderson, W.; Cong, X. Systematic Review of the Effect of Enteral Feeding on Gut Microbiota in Preterm Infants. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Neonatal Nurs. 2018, 47, 451–463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  16. Gregory, K.E.; Samuel, B.S.; Houghteling, P.; Shan, G.; Ausubel, F.M.; Sadreyev, R.I.; Walker, W.A. Influence of maternal breast milk ingestion on acquisition of the intestinal microbiome in preterm infants. Microbiome 2016, 4, 68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  17. Hidalgo, I.J.; Raub, T.J.; Borchardt, R.T. Characterization of the Human Colon Carcinoma Cell Line (Caco-2) as a Model System for Intestinal Epithelial Permeability. Gastroenterology 1989, 96, 736–749. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Artursson, P.; Karlsson, J. Correlation between oral drug absorption in humans and apparent drug permeability coefficients in human intestinal epithelial (Caco-2) cells. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 1991, 175, 880–885. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Pinto, M.G.V.; Gómez, M.R.; Seifert, S.; Watzl, B.; Holzapfel, W.H.; Franz, C.M. Lactobacilli stimulate the innate immune response and modulate the TLR expression of HT29 intestinal epithelial cells in vitro. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2009, 133, 86–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Eveillard, M.; Fourel, V.; Bare, M.-C.; Kerneis, S.; Coconnier, M.-H.; Karjalainen, T.; Bourlioux, P.; Servin, A.L. Identification and characterization of adhesive factors of Clostridium difficile involved in adhesion to human colonic enterocyte-like Caco-2 and mucus-secreting HT29 cells in culture. Mol. Microbiol. 1993, 7, 371–381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Chantret, I.; Rodolosse, A.; Barbat, A.; Dussaulx, E.; Brot-Laroche, E.; Zweibaum, A.; Rousset, M. Differential expression of sucrase-isomaltase in clones isolated from early and late passages of the cell line Caco-2: Evidence for glucose-dependent negative regulation. J. Cell Sci. 1994, 107, 213–225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Ma, T.Y.; Hollander, D.; Bhalla, D.; Nguyen, H.; Krugliak, P. IEC-18, a nontransformed small intestinal cell line for studying epithelial permeability. J. Lab. Clin. Med. 1992, 120, 329–341. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  23. Wood, S.; Zhao, Q.; Smith, L.; Daniels, C. Altered morphology in cultured rat intestinal epithelial IEC-6 cells is associated with alkaline phosphatase expression. Tissue Cell 2003, 35, 47–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Maheshwari, A.; Lacson, A.; Lu, W.; Fox, S.E.; Barleycorn, A.A.; Christensen, R.D.; Calhoun, D.A. Interleukin-8/CXCL8 Forms an Autocrine Loop in Fetal Intestinal Mucosa. Pediatr. Res. 2004, 56, 240–249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Kanwar, J.R.; Kanwar, R.K. Gut health immunomodulatory and anti-inflammatory functions of gut enzyme digested high protein micro-nutrient dietary supplement-Enprocal. BMC Immunol. 2009, 10, 7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Zhang, D.; Wen, J.; Zhou, J.; Cai, W.; Qian, L. Milk Fat Globule Membrane Ameliorates Necrotizing Enterocolitis in Neonatal Rats and Suppresses Lipopolysaccharide-Induced Inflammatory Response in IEC-6 Enterocytes. J. Parenter. Enter. Nutr. 2019, 43, 863–873. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Li, B.; Zani, A.; Martin, Z.; Lee, C.; Zani-Ruttenstock, E.; Eaton, S.; Pierro, A. Intestinal epithelial cell injury is rescued by hydrogen sulfide. J. Pediatr. Surg. 2016, 51, 775–778. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Shahedi, Z.; Varedi, M.; Bagheri, Z.; Moatari, A.; Sharafpour, H. Attenuation by l-thyroxine of oxidant-induced gut epithelial damage. Iran. J. Basic Med. Sci 2019, 22, 1091–1096. [Google Scholar]
  29. Subramanian, S.; Geng, H.; Tan, X.-D. Cell death of intestinal epithelial cells in intestinal diseases. Sheng Li Xue Bao 2020, 72, 308–324. [Google Scholar]
  30. Khailova, L.; Patrick, S.K.M.; Arganbright, K.M.; Halpern, M.D.; Kinouchi, T.; Dvorak, B. Bifidobacterium bifidum reduces apoptosis in the intestinal epithelium in necrotizing enterocolitis. Am. J. Physiol. Gastrointest. Liver Physiol. 2010, 299, G1118–G1127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Fan, H.; Lin, R.; Chen, Z.; Leng, X.; Wu, X.; Zhang, Y.; Zhu, B.; Zhang, Q.; Bai, Y.; Zhi, F. Bacteroides Fragilis Defense against Cronobacter Sakazakii -Induced Pathogenicity by Regulating the Intestinal Epithelial Barrier Function and Attenuating Both Apoptotic and Pyroptotic Cell Death. BioRxiv 2018, 442046. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Hunter, C.J.; Singamsetty, V.K.; Chokshi, N.K.; Boyle, P.; Camerini, V.; Grishin, A.V.; Upperman, J.S.; Ford, H.R.; Prasadarao, N.V. Enterobacter sakazakiiEnhances Epithelial Cell Injury by Inducing Apoptosis in a Rat Model of Necrotizing Enterocolitis. J. Infect. Dis. 2008, 198, 586–593. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  33. Liu, Q.; Mittal, R.; Emami, C.N.; Iversen, C.; Ford, H.R.; Prasadarao, N.V. Human Isolates of Cronobacter sakazakii Bind Efficiently to Intestinal Epithelial Cells In Vitro to Induce Monolayer Permeability and Apoptosis. J. Surg. Res. 2012, 176, 437–447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  34. Odenwald, M.A.; Turner, M.A.O.J.R. The intestinal epithelial barrier: A therapeutic target? Nat. Rev. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2017, 14, 9–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Blackwood, B.P.; Wood, D.R.; Yuan, C.Y.; Nicolas, J.D.; Griffiths, A.; Mestan, K.; Hunter, C.J. Urinary Claudin-2 Measurements as a Predictor of Necrotizing Enterocolitis: A Pilot Study. J. Neonatal Surg. 2015, 4, 43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Thuijls, G.; Derikx, J.P.M.; van Wijck, K.; Zimmermann, L.J.I.; Degraeuwe, P.L.; Mulder, T.L.; Van der Zee, D.C.; Brouwers, H.A.A.; Verhoeven, B.H.; van Heurn, L.W.E.; et al. Non-Invasive Markers for Early Diagnosis and Determination of the Severity of Necrotizing Enterocolitis. Ann. Surg. 2010, 251, 1174–1180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Ares, G.; Buonpane, C.; Sincavage, J.; Yuan, C.; Wood, D.R.; Hunter, C.J. Caveolin 1 is Associated with Upregulated Claudin 2 in Necrotizing Enterocolitis. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Fasano, A. Zonulin, regulation of tight junctions, and autoimmune diseases. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 2012, 1258, 25–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Ling, X.; Linglong, P.; Weixia, D.; Hong, W. Protective Effects of Bifidobacterium on Intestinal Barrier Function in LPS-Induced Enterocyte Barrier Injury of Caco-2 Monolayers and in a Rat NEC Model. PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0161635. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Sakakibara, A.; Furuse, M.; Saitou, M.; Ando-Akatsuka, Y.; Tsukita, S. Possible Involvement of Phosphorylation of Occludin in Tight Junction Formation. J. Cell Biol. 1997, 137, 1393–1401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Ye, D.; Guo, S.; Al–Sadi, R.; Ma, T.Y. MicroRNA Regulation of Intestinal Epithelial Tight Junction Permeability. Gastroenterology 2011, 141, 1323–1333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Grothaus, J.S.; Ares, G.; Yuan, C.Y.; Wood, D.R.; Hunter, C.J. Rho kinase inhibition maintains intestinal and vascular barrier function by upregulation of occludin in experimental necrotizing enterocolitis. Am. J. Physiol. Gastrointest. Liver Physiol. 2018, 315, G514–G528. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Lu, L.; Xu, W.; Liu, J.; Chen, L.; Hu, S.; Sheng, Q.; Zhang, M.; Lv, Z. DRG1 Maintains Intestinal Epithelial Cell Junctions and Barrier Function by Regulating RAC1 Activity in Necrotizing Enterocolitis. Dig. Dis. Sci. 2021, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. RAB11A-Mediated YAP Localization to Adherens and Tight Junctions Is Essential for Colonic Epithelial Integrity—Science Direct. Available online: https://www-sciencedirect-com.ezproxy.unibo.it/science/article/pii/S0021925821006463 (accessed on 5 June 2021).
  45. Chen, S.; Liu, H.; Li, Z.; Tang, J.; Huang, B.; Zhi, F.; Zhao, X. Epithelial PBLD attenuates intestinal inflammatory response and improves intestinal barrier function by inhibiting NF-κB signaling. Cell Death Dis. 2021, 12, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Shelby, R.D.; Raab, R.; Besner, G.E.; McElroy, S.J. Hope on the horizon: Promising novel therapies for necrotizing enterocolitis. Pediatr. Res. 2020, 88, 30–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Yuan, Y.; Ding, D.; Zhang, N.; Xia, Z.; Wang, J.; Yang, H.; Guo, F.; Li, B. TNF-α induces autophagy through ERK1/2 pathway to regulate apoptosis in neonatal necrotizing enterocolitis model cells IEC-6. Cell Cycle 2018, 17, 1390–1402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Liu, J.; Li, B.; Lee, C.; Zhu, H.; Zheng, S.; Pierro, A. Protective effects of lactoferrin on injured intestinal epithelial cells. J. Pediatr. Surg. 2019, 54, 2509–2513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Tremblay, É.; Thibault, M.-P.; Ferretti, E.; Babakissa, C.; Bertelle, V.; Bettolli, M.; Burghardt, K.M.; Colombani, J.-F.; Grynspan, D.; Levy, E.; et al. Gene expression profiling in necrotizing enterocolitis reveals pathways common to those reported in Crohn’s disease. BMC Med. Genom. 2015, 9, 6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Ushiki, T.; Huntington, N.; Glaser, S.P.; Kiu, H.; Georgiou, A.; Zhang, J.-G.; Metcalf, D.; Nicola, N.A.; Roberts, A.W.; Alexander, W.S. Rapid Inflammation in Mice Lacking Both SOCS1 and SOCS3 in Hematopoietic Cells. PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0162111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Zhang, H.; Wang, Y.; Li, S.; Tang, X.; Liang, R.; Yang, X. SOCS3 protects against neonatal necrotizing enterocolitis via suppressing NLRP3 and AIM2 inflammasome activation and p65 nuclear translocation. Mol. Immunol. 2020, 122, 21–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Cao, H.; Guo, D. Association of High-Mobility Group Box 1 (HMGB1) Gene Polymorphisms with Susceptibility and Better Survival Prognosis in Chinese Han Neonatal Necrotizing Enterocolitis. Med. Sci. Monit. Int. Med. J. Exp. Clin. Res. 2021, 27, e930015-1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Gimeno-Alcañiz, J.V.; Collado, M.C. Impact of human milk on the transcriptomic response of fetal intestinal epithelial cells reveals expression changes of immune-related genes. Food Funct. 2019, 10, 140–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  54. Claud, E.C.; Savidge, T.; Walker, W.A. Modulation of Human Intestinal Epithelial Cell IL-8 Secretion by Human Milk Factors. Pediatr. Res. 2003, 53, 419–425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  55. Neal, M.D.; Sodhi, C.P.; Dyer, M.; Craig, B.T.; Good, M.; Jia, H.; Yazji, I.; Afrazi, A.; Richardson, W.M.; Beer-Stolz, D.; et al. A Critical Role for TLR4 Induction of Autophagy in the Regulation of Enterocyte Migration and the Pathogenesis of Necrotizing Enterocolitis. J. Immunol. Baltim. Md 1950 2013, 190, 3541–3551. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Blackwood, B.P.; Wood, D.R.; Yuan, C.; Nicolas, J.; De Plaen, I.G.; Farrow, K.N.; Chou, P.; Turner, J.R.; Hunter, C.J. A Role for cAMP and Protein Kinase A in Experimental Necrotizing Enterocolitis. Am. J. Pathol. 2017, 187, 401–417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  57. Fatehullah, A.; Tan, S.H.; Barker, N. Organoids as an in vitro model of human development and disease. Nat. Cell Biol. 2016, 18, 246–254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  58. Date, S.; Sato, T. Mini-Gut Organoids: Reconstitution of the Stem Cell Niche. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 2015, 31, 269–289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Middendorp, S.; Schneeberger, K.; Wiegerinck, C.L.; Mokry, M.; Akkerman, R.D.L.; Van Wijngaarden, S.; Clevers, H.; Nieuwenhuis, E.E.S. Adult Stem Cells in the Small Intestine Are Intrinsically Programmed with Their Location-Specific Function. Stem Cells 2014, 32, 1083–1091. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Directed Differentiation of Human Pluripotent Stem Cells into Intestinal Tissue In Vitro—Abstract—Europe PMC. Available online: https://europepmc.org/article/med/21151107 (accessed on 5 February 2021).
  61. Mahe, M.M.; Sundaram, N.; Watson, C.L.; Shroyer, N.F.; Helmrath, M.A. Establishment of human epithelial enteroids and colonoids from whole tissue and biopsy. J. Vis. Exp. 2015, e52483. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  62. Stelzner, M.; Helmrath, M.; Dunn, J.C.Y.; Henning, S.J.; Houchen, C.W.; Kuo, C.; Lynch, J.; Li, L.; Magness, S.T.; Martin, M.G.; et al. A nomenclature for intestinal in vitro cultures. Am. J. Physiol. Liver Physiol. 2012, 302, G1359–G1363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  63. Li, B.; Lee, C.; Cadete, M.; Miyake, H.; Lee, D.; Pierro, A. Neonatal intestinal organoids as an ex vivo approach to study early intestinal epithelial disorders. Pediatr. Surg. Int. 2018, 35, 3–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Ares, G.J.; Buonpane, C.; Yuan, C.; Wood, D.; Hunter, C.J. A Novel Human Epithelial Enteroid Model of Necrotizing Enterocolitis. J. Vis. Exp. 2019, e59194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Kovler, M.L.; Sodhi, C.P.; Hackam, D.J. Precision-based modeling approaches for necrotizing enterocolitis. Dis. Model. Mech. 2020, 24, dmm044388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Werts, A.D.; Fulton, W.B.; Ladd, M.R.; Saad-Eldin, A.; Chen, Y.X.; Kovler, M.; Jia, H.; Banfield, E.C.; Buck, R.H.; Goehring, K.; et al. A Novel Role for Necroptosis in the Pathogenesis of Necrotizing Enterocolitis. Cell. Mol. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2020, 9, 403–423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  67. Lanik, W.E.; Xu, L.; Luke, C.J.; Hu, E.; Agrawal, P.; Liu, V.S.; Kumar, R.; Bolock, A.M.; Ma, C.; Good, M. Breast Milk Enhances Growth of Enteroids: An Ex Vivo Model of Cell Proliferation. J. Vis. Exp. 2018, e56921. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Senger, S.; Ingano, L.; Freire, R.; Anselmo, A.; Zhu, W.; Sadreyev, R.; Walker, W.A.; Fasano, A. Human Fetal-Derived Enterospheres Provide Insights on Intestinal Development and a Novel Model to Study Necrotizing Enterocolitis (NEC). Cell. Mol. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2018, 5, 549–568. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  69. Sodhi, C.P.; Shi, X.; Richardson, W.M.; Grant, Z.S.; Shapiro, R.A.; Prindle, T.; Branca, M.; Russo, A.; Gribar, S.C.; Ma, C.; et al. Toll-Like Receptor-4 Inhibits Enterocyte Proliferation via Impaired β-Catenin Signaling in Necrotizing Enterocolitis. Gastroenterol. 2010, 138, 185–196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  70. Sodhi, C.P.; Neal, M.D.; Siggers, R.; Sho, S.; Ma, C.; Branca, M.F.; Prindle, T.; Russo, A.M.; Afrazi, A.; Good, M.; et al. Intestinal Epithelial Toll-Like Receptor 4 Regulates Goblet Cell Development and Is Required for Necrotizing Enterocolitis in Mice. Gastroenterology 2012, 143, 708–718.e5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  71. Lee, S.Y.; Sung, J.H. Gut–liver on a chip toward an in vitro model of hepatic steatosis. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2018, 115, 2817–2827. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Bhatia, S.N.; Ingber, D.E. Microfluidic organs-on-chips. Nat. Biotechnol. 2014, 32, 760–772. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Kim, H.J.; Ingber, D.E. Gut-on-a-Chip microenvironment induces human intestinal cells to undergo villus differentiation. Integr. Biol. Quant. Biosci. Nano Macro 2013, 5, 1130–1140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  74. Li, X.; Valadez, A.V.; Zuo, P.; Nie, Z. Microfluidic 3D cell culture: Potential application for tissue-based bioassays. Bioanalysis 2012, 4, 1509–1525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  75. Hassell, B.; Goyal, G.; Lee, E.; Sontheimer-Phelps, A.; Levy, O.; Chen, C.; Ingber, D.E. Human Organ Chip Models Recapitulate Orthotopic Lung Cancer Growth, Therapeutic Responses, and Tumor Dormancy In Vitro. Cell Rep. 2017, 21, 508–516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  76. Tsamandouras, N.; Chen, W.L.K.; Edington, C.D.; Stokes, C.L.; Griffith, L.G.; Cirit, M. Integrated Gut and Liver Microphysiological Systems for Quantitative In Vitro Pharmacokinetic Studies. AAPS J. 2017, 19, 1499–1512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  77. Ashammakhi, N.; Nasiri, R.; de Barros, N.R.; Tebon, P.; Thakor, J.; Goudie, M.; Shamloo, A.; Martin, M.G.; Khademhosseini, A. Gut-on-a-chip: Current progress and future opportunities. Biomaterials 2020, 255, 120196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Schnabl, K.L.; Van Aerde, J.E.; Thomson, A.B.; Clandinin, M.T. Necrotizing enterocolitis: A multifactorial disease with no cure. World J. Gastroenterol. 2008, 14, 2142–2161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Shin, W.; Hackley, L.A.; Kim, H.J. “Good Fences Make Good Neighbors”: How does the Human Gut Microchip Unravel Mechanism of Intestinal Inflammation? Gut Microbes 2020, 11, 581–586. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  80. Kim, H.J.; Li, H.; Collins, J.J.; Ingber, D.E. Contributions of microbiome and mechanical deformation to intestinal bacterial overgrowth and inflammation in a human gut-on-a-chip. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2016, 113, E7–E15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  81. Shah, P.; Fritz, J.V.; Glaab, E.; Desai, M.S.; Greenhalgh, K.; Frachet, A.; Niegowska, M.; Estes, M.; Jäger, C.; Seguin-Devaux, C.; et al. A microfluidics-based in vitro model of the gastrointestinal human–microbe interface. Nat. Commun. 2016, 7, 11535. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  82. Muller, W.A. How Endothelial Cells Regulate Transmigration of Leukocytes in the Inflammatory Response. Am. J. Pathol. 2014, 184, 886–896. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  83. A Versatile Assay for Monitoring in Vivo-Like Transendothelial Migration of Neutrophils—PubMed. Available online: https://pubmed-ncbi-nlm-nih-gov.ezproxy.unibo.it/22903230/ (accessed on 16 June 2021).
  84. Seiler, K.M.; Bajinting, A.; Alvarado, D.M.; Traore, M.A.; Binkley, M.M.; Goo, W.; Lanik, W.E.; Ou, J.; Ismail, U.; Iticovici, M.; et al. Patient-derived small intestinal myofibroblasts direct perfused, physiologically responsive capillary development in a microfluidic Gut-on-a-Chip Model. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 3842. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
Figure 1. Intestinal organoids’ cellular sources.
Figure 1. Intestinal organoids’ cellular sources.
Ijms 22 06761 g001
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

De Fazio, L.; Beghetti, I.; Bertuccio, S.N.; Marsico, C.; Martini, S.; Masetti, R.; Pession, A.; Corvaglia, L.; Aceti, A. Necrotizing Enterocolitis: Overview on In Vitro Models. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 6761. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22136761

AMA Style

De Fazio L, Beghetti I, Bertuccio SN, Marsico C, Martini S, Masetti R, Pession A, Corvaglia L, Aceti A. Necrotizing Enterocolitis: Overview on In Vitro Models. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2021; 22(13):6761. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22136761

Chicago/Turabian Style

De Fazio, Luigia, Isadora Beghetti, Salvatore Nicola Bertuccio, Concetta Marsico, Silvia Martini, Riccardo Masetti, Andrea Pession, Luigi Corvaglia, and Arianna Aceti. 2021. "Necrotizing Enterocolitis: Overview on In Vitro Models" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 22, no. 13: 6761. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22136761

APA Style

De Fazio, L., Beghetti, I., Bertuccio, S. N., Marsico, C., Martini, S., Masetti, R., Pession, A., Corvaglia, L., & Aceti, A. (2021). Necrotizing Enterocolitis: Overview on In Vitro Models. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 22(13), 6761. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22136761

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop