Next Article in Journal
Fragrance in Pandanus amaryllifolius Roxb. Despite the Presence of a Betaine Aldehyde Dehydrogenase 2
Next Article in Special Issue
Design and Synthesis of Water-Soluble and Potent MMP-13 Inhibitors with Activity in Human Osteosarcoma Cells
Previous Article in Journal
Chitinases and Chitinase-Like Proteins as Therapeutic Targets in Inflammatory Diseases, with a Special Focus on Inflammatory Bowel Diseases
 
 
Review
Peer-Review Record

MMPs and TIMPs Expression Levels in the Periodontal Ligament during Orthodontic Tooth Movement: A Systematic Review of In Vitro and In Vivo Studies

Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22(13), 6967; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22136967
by Christian Behm 1,2, Michael Nemec 1, Fabian Weissinger 2, Marco Aoqi Rausch 1,2, Oleh Andrukhov 2,* and Erwin Jonke 1
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22(13), 6967; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22136967
Submission received: 27 May 2021 / Revised: 22 June 2021 / Accepted: 23 June 2021 / Published: 28 June 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue MMPs and EMMPRIN/CD147 in Physiological and Pathological Processes)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

At the end of the discussion section, it would be useful to present a suggested protocol for this kind of research, based on the analysis of the existing literature performed in this review.

 

Why only PubMed was searched? Other databases, such as for example Scopus and Web of Science, should be searched. Language should not be restricted to English only.

 

GCF: the meaning of this abbreviation must be reported the first time it is used

 

Line 680. “It possible that the exact” must be “It is possible that the exact”

 

Supplementary files are missing: the link in the manuscript is not working.

Author Response

Reviewer 1

Comment 1

At the end of the discussion section, it would be useful to present a suggested protocol for this kind of research, based on the analysis of the existing literature performed in this review.

Authors’ answer

We thank reviewer 1 for this interesting suggestion. Within the discussion section we added some recommendations which points have to be considered in future studies in this research field. Concerning in vitro studies an important point is the high heterogeneity of used parameter combinations and cell donor variability. To overcome this issue, we recommend in the discussion section to test and directly compared MMPs expression levels under different combinations of force type, application mode and force magnitude and duration. Further, the usage of cells from the same passage and donor will reduce donor variability.     
Concerning in vivo studies, we recommend to precisely describe control groups and substantiate the choice of the control type, since investigated studies show a heterogeneity in the choice of the control type. Additionally, we recommend to investigate MMPs and TIMPs expression levels directly in the periodontal ligament.

 

Comment 2

Why only PubMed was searched? Other databases, such as for example Scopus and Web of Science, should be searched. Language should not be restricted to English only.

Authors’ answer

We thank the reviewer for this important comment. Due to the comment of the reviewer, we have also searched Web of Science. We have adopted the PubMed search strategy to Web of Science and found 1345 papers. After screening the Web of Science search according to the PICO criteria and our defined inclusion and exclusion criteria, no additional paper could be included into this systematic review. All this information were added into the Material and Methods sections and the results sections.

In our opinion, non-English written papers have to be excluded from this systematic review, since data extraction and performing “Risk of Bias Assessment” would not be possible. We added the exclusion of non-English written papers as a limitation of this systematic review in the discussion section.

 

Comment 3

GCF: the meaning of this abbreviation must be reported the first time it is used

Authors’ answer

We have explained this abbreviation at its first appearance in the results section.

 

Comment 4

Line 680. “It possible that the exact” must be “It is possible that the exact”

Authors’ answer

We have revised this sentence.

 

Comment 5

Supplementary files are missing: the link in the manuscript is not working.

Authors’ answer

We apologize for this. As far as we know, the journal provides supplementary files to the Reviewers without any link in the manuscript draft. We have uploaded supplementary files together with the main manuscript.

Reviewer 2 Report

Journal: International Journal of Molecular Sciences

Manuscript ID: ijms-1257529

Type of manuscript: Systematic Review

Title: MMPs and TIMPs expression levels in the periodontal ligament during orthodontic tooth movement: a systematic review of in vitro and in vivo studies

Authors: Christian Behm, Michael Nemec, Fabian Weissinger, Xiaohui Rausch-Fan, Oleh Andrukhov *, Erwin Jonke

Submitted to section: Macromolecules

General comments:

In the present review, which was performed according to the systematic reference search, the effects of specific orthodontic forces on the expressions of matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) and their inhibitors tissue inhibitor of matrix metalloproteinases (TIMPs) in periodontal ligament (PDL) were investigated. The objective was to characterize the expression levels of MMPs and TIMPs during orthodontic tooth movement after the application of specific orthodontic forces. Studies conducted in vitro (28 studies) and in vivo (12 studies) were selected and analyzed according to objective parameters. Two main outcomes were found: (1) Given the very high variability in the combination of treatment parameters used, the authors could not determine to characterize the effects of a particular combination on specific MMPs/TIMPs in PDL. (2) The mechanical forces induce increased expressions of MMP at the compression and tension sites. Increased expressions of TIMP by the mechanical forces occur at the compression and tension sites where the expressions of MMP decrease. From these results, the authors concluded that the expression levels of MMP and TIMP in PDL could contribute to the controlled degradation and formation of extracellular matrix in the compression and tension zones during orthodontic tooth movement.

This is an interesting review. The analyzed studies with the controls were well selected and the results were well discussed.

Minor point:

Some references should be corrected according to Journal guidelines.

 

 

 

Comments for author File: Comments.docx

Author Response

Reviewer 2

Comment 1

In the present review, which was performed according to the systematic reference search, the effects of specific orthodontic forces on the expressions of matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) and their inhibitors tissue inhibitor of matrix metalloproteinases (TIMPs) in periodontal ligament (PDL) were investigated. The objective was to characterize the expression levels of MMPs and TIMPs during orthodontic tooth movement after the application of specific orthodontic forces. Studies conducted in vitro (28 studies) and in vivo (12 studies) were selected and analyzed according to objective parameters. Two main outcomes were found: (1) Given the very high variability in the combination of treatment parameters used, the authors could not determine to characterize the effects of a particular combination on specific MMPs/TIMPs in PDL. (2) The mechanical forces induce increased expressions of MMP at the compression and tension sites. Increased expressions of TIMP by the mechanical forces occur at the compression and tension sites where the expressions of MMP decrease. From these results, the authors concluded that the expression levels of MMP and TIMP in PDL could contribute to the controlled degradation and formation of extracellular matrix in the compression and tension zones during orthodontic tooth movement.

This is an interesting review. The analyzed studies with the controls were well selected and the results were well discussed.

Authors’ answer

We thank reviewer 2 for this overall positive feedback.

 

Comment 2

Minor point:

Some references should be corrected according to Journal guidelines.

Authors’ answer

We apologize for this mistake and thank the reviewer for this criticism. We have carefully revised the reference list in accordance to the journals’ reference guidelines.

 

Round 2

Reviewer 1 Report

In this revised version of the manuscript, all my previous comments were addressed

Author Response

Thank you for your positive feedback.

Back to TopTop