Next Article in Journal
Taking a Step Back: Insights into the Mechanisms Regulating Gut Epithelial Dedifferentiation
Previous Article in Journal
Peptide/β-Peptoid Hybrids with Ultrashort PEG-Like Moieties: Effects on Hydrophobicity, Antibacterial Activity and Hemolytic Properties
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
IJMS
Volume 22
Issue 13
10.3390/ijms22137042
ijms-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Clinicopathologic and Prognostic Association of GRP94 Expression in Colorectal Cancer with Synchronous and Metachronous Metastases

by
Sumi Yun
1,
Sukmook Lee
2,
Ho-Young Lee
3,
Hyeon Jeong Oh
4,
Yoonjin Kwak
5,* and
Hye Seung Lee
5,*
1
Samkwang Medical Laboratories, Department of Diagnostic Pathology, Seoul 06742, Korea
2
Biopharmaceutical Chemistry Major, School of Applied Chemistry, Kookmin University, Seoul 02707, Korea
3
Department of Nuclear Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seongnam 13620, Korea
4
Department of Pathology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seongnam 13620, Korea
5
Department of Pathology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul 03080, Korea
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22(13), 7042; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22137042
Submission received: 8 June 2021 / Revised: 22 June 2021 / Accepted: 22 June 2021 / Published: 30 June 2021
(This article belongs to the Section Molecular Oncology)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Patients with advanced colorectal cancer (CRC) with distant metastases have a poor prognosis. We evaluated the clinicopathological relevance of GRP94 expression in these cases. The immunohistochemical expression of GRP94 was studied in 189 CRC patients with synchronous (SM; n = 123) and metachronous metastases (MM; n = 66), using tissue microarray; the association between GRP94 expression, outcome, and tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) was also evaluated. GRP94 was expressed in 64.6% (122/189) patients with CRC; GRP94 positivity was found in 67.5% and 59.1% patients with SM and MM, respectively. In the SM group, high GRP94 expression was more common in patients with a higher density of CD4+ TILs (p = 0.002), unlike in the MM group. Survival analysis showed that patients with GRP94 positivity had significantly favorable survival (p = 0.030); after multivariate analysis, GRP94 only served as an independent prognostic factor (p = 0.034; hazard ratio, 0.581; 95% confidence interval, 0.351–0.961) in the SM group. GRP94 expression was detected in 49.4% of metastatic sites and showed significant heterogeneity between primary and metastatic lesions (p = 0.012). GRP94 is widely expressed in CRC with distant metastases; its expression was associated with favorable prognosis in the SM group, unlike in the MM group.

1. Introduction

Although the incidence and mortality rates of colorectal cancer (CRC) have improved with early screening and multidisciplinary therapeutic approaches, some patients continue to present with advanced disease; the mortality of these patients remains relatively high [1,2]. There is therefore a clear need to identify markers for better prediction of patient outcomes and treatment responses in advanced CRC.
Glucose-regulated protein 94 (GRP94), a member of the heat shock protein family, is a specialized chaperone protein [3,4], and has been implicated in carcinogenesis [3]. Numerous studies have identified GRP94 to be a chaperone with various essential proteins; it forms complexes with the Wnt signaling cofactor, glycoprotein A repetitions predominant, and several integrins, leading to cell proliferation, epithelial–mesenchymal transition, and tumor progression. Previous studies have reported that GRP94 expression is associated with tumor progression and unfavorable prognosis in lung, breast, and esophageal cancers [5,6,7,8]. In addition, a potential cancer-suppressing function of GRP94 has recently been identified. Surface expression of GRP94 contributes to tumor regression via the modulation of immune surveillance, leading to dendritic cell maturation and differentiation of T lymphocytes [4,9,10]. Despite these findings, the clinicopathologic significance and survival effect of GRP94 remain controversial in patients with CRC [11,12,13,14]. Reports suggest that GPR94 correlates with poorly differentiated histology and advanced Duke stage [11]. Several recent reports have described an association between GRP94 and a favorable prognosis in colon cancer [13,14]. Furthermore, some studies suggest that it may be related to chemoresponse in some types of cancers, and its inhibition could significantly reduce the proliferation of cetuximab-resistant colon cancer cells [15,16,17,18,19].
Based on these findings, we analyzed the expression of GRP94 and evaluated its prognostic significance and association with tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) in advanced CRC with distant metastasis.

2. Results

2.1. Clinicopathologic Features of Colorectal Cancer

The baseline characteristics of all patients with metastatic CRC are described in Table S1. Briefly, 102 (54.0%) male and 87 (46.0%) female CRC patients with a median age of 60 years (range: 28–93 years) were identified. A total of 141 (74.6%) tumors were located on the left side of the colon, and low-grade differentiation was documented in 164 (86.8%) cases. The most common site of distant metastasis was the liver (n = 88), followed by the lung (n = 41), peritoneum (n = 37), ovary (n = 18), and non-regional lymph nodes (n = 5).

2.2. GRP94 Expression in CRC

We evaluated the immunohistochemical expression of GRP94 in primary CRC tissues (Figure 1); GRP94 expression was detected in 122 cases (64.6%). Overall, 83 (67.5%) and 39 (59.1%) patients demonstrated GPR94 positivity in the SM and MM groups, respectively. KRAS, PIK3CA, and BRAF mutations were found in 101 (53.4%), 26 (13.8%), and 7 (3.7%) cases, respectively; 9 (9/185, 4.9%) cases harbored HER2 amplifications. CRC patients with GRP94 expression commonly harbor PIK3CA mutations (p = 0.021). Regarding various clinicopathologic parameters, there were no other significant differences in the entire cohort. In the SM group, GPR92 expression was associated with PIK3CA mutations (p = 0.026). In addition, it showed a tendency for association with low-grade histology; however, this tendency was not statistically significant (p = 0.087). There were no statistically significant differences between GRP94 expression and other clinicopathological factors in either the SM or MM groups (Table 1, Table S1).

2.3. GRP94 Expression Status in Primary CRC, Its Invasive Border, and Metastasis

To investigate the heterogeneity of GRP94 expression between the primary and metastatic sites, we also performed immunohistochemical staining in tissue from the invasive border of the primary tumor and matching metastatic tumor specimens (Figure S1). Cases with tissue loss and insufficient tumor material were excluded from the analysis. Among the 175 samples with invasive borders analyzed, GRP94 expression was found in 108 cases (61.7%); there was no significant discordance in GRP94 expression status. Among 170 specimens from metastatic tissue, 84 (49.4%) revealed GRP94 positivity; this frequency was significantly lower than that observed in primary CRC lesions. Lung metastases and peritoneal seeding demonstrated high GRP94 expression (66.7% [24/36] and 63.6% [21/33], respectively), followed by metastases in the ovary (55.6% [10/18]), liver (35.9% [28/78]), and distant nodes (20.0% [1/5]). Similar trends were observed in the SM group; GRP94 expression was more frequently observed in lung and peritoneal seeding (66.7% and 63.0%, respectively), and all 4 cases of non-regional lymph node metastases tested negative for GRP94. In the MM group, GRP94 expression was found in 66.7% of patients with both, lung metastases and peritoneal seeding (Figure S2). As shown in Table S2, GRP94 expression was inconsistent between the primary and metastatic sites. In the SM group, GRP94 expression was observed in 59.8% (70/117) and 47.2% (51/108) cases with invasive borders and metastatic sites, respectively. In the MM group, GPR94 positivity was detected in 65.5% (38/58) and 53.2% (33/62) cases with invasive borders and metastatic sites, respectively. Similar to the results in the total cohort, no significant difference was found between the primary tumor and its invasive border; GRP94 was significantly less commonly expressed in the metastatic sites and showed significantly different expression rates compared with those in primary tumors in the SM group. This trend was not observed in the MM group (Table S2).
With regard to metastatic sites, lung metastases and peritoneal seeding showed high GRP94 expression (66.7% [24/36] and 63.6% [21/33], respectively), followed by the ovary (55.6% [10/18]), liver (35.9% [28/78]), and distant nodes (20.0% [1/5]). Similar trends were observed in the SM group; GRP94 expression was more frequently observed in lung metastases and peritoneal seeding (66.7% and 63.0%, respectively); all 4 cases with non-regional lymph node metastases tested negative for GRP94. In the MM group, GRP94 expression in both, lung metastases and peritoneal seeding was found in 66.7% of patients (Table S3).

2.4. Association between GRP94 Expression and TILs

We explored the association between GRP94 expression and TIL status (Figure 2). The median densities of each immune cell were as follows: CD3, 297.68 (range: 11.64–1658.51); CD4, 97.09 (range: 1.61–969.03); CD8, 108.05 (range: 5.57–1322.19); and Foxp3, 12.71 (range: 0–265.54). In the entire cohort, GRP94 positivity correlated significantly positively with higher infiltration of CD4+ TILs (p = 0.011). Furthermore, analysis of the SM group demonstrated the association between GRP94 expression and CD4+ TILs (p = 0.002). However, there was no significant difference in TIL density depending on GRP94 expression in either the SM or MM groups.

2.5. Survival Analysis

The average survival time of patients was 42.9 months (range, 0.8–104.6 months). In all 189 patients, GRP94 expression did not influence overall survival (OS p = 0.384). In the SM group, patients with GRP-positive tumors had significantly improved OS compared with those having GRP94 negative tumors (p = 0.030). On multivariate Cox regression analysis, GRP94 expression remained an independent prognostic factor for prolonged OS only in the SM group (hazard ratio [HR], 0.581; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.351–0.961, p = 0.034). In contrast, no association was found between GRP94 expression and OS in the MM group (p = 0.702; Figure 3, Table 2, Table S4).

2.6. Correlation between GRP94 Expression and Genetic Alterations

A recent study by Jeoung et al. found that surface GRP94 inhibitors may contribute to enhanced survival in cetuximab-resistant CRC [19]. As the response to cetuximab may be influenced by the presence of several genetic alterations including KRAS, PIK3CA, and BRAF mutations, and HER2 amplification, we sought to investigate the association with survival in patients harboring genetic alterations in these genes. In the SM group, 80 of 123 (65.0%) tumors carried one or more genetic alterations in these genes; GRP94 positivity was found in 56 of 80 (70.0%) cases. Although the number of cases was small, GRP94 positive patients also displayed significantly better OS (p = 0.009) among those with genetic alterations. Multivariate survival analyses also indicated that the prognostic association of GRP94 positivity was obvious in this subgroup (HR = 0.438, 95% CI: 0.234–0.821, p = 0.010). Among the 65 patients in the MM group, one or more genetic alterations were detected in 39 (60.0%) cases. GRP94 positivity was detected in 23 (59.0%) of these patients. Unlike the previous results in the SM group, GRP94 expression was not significantly associated with OS (p = 0.766) in CRC with MM and genetic alterations. The detailed results are presented in Figure 4 and Table 3.

3. Discussion

In this study, we demonstrated that GRP94 is widely expressed in advanced CRC with synchronous and metachronous metastasis. Although we failed to find an association between GRP94 expression and various clinicopathological parameters, we demonstrated that GRP94 expression correlated significantly with a favorable prognosis on univariate and multivariate analyses. We also observed that GRP94 expression correlated with higher infiltration of CD4+ TILs. Findings for GRP94 positive patients with CRC having SM were similar, with favorable survival; this was not observed in the MM subgroup.
Recent studies have focused on surface-located GRP94 as a therapeutic target. Monoclonal antibodies for the inhibition of GRP94 have been shown to be related to anti-tumoral effects in melanoma and breast cancer [16,20,21]. In addition, in a study using a cetuximab-resistant colon cancer cell line model, antibody-based targeting of surface GRP94 demonstrated therapeutic impact [19]. We investigated the prognostic impact of GRP94 in metastatic CRC harboring genetic alterations associated with chemoresistance to cetuximab. Our results show that GRP94 is still widely expressed in these cancer tissues (66.4%). In particular, its expression was slightly more frequent in the SM group. In this study, the expression status of GRP94 in primary cancers frequently differed from that of the paired distant metastases, especially in the SM group. Therefore, both primary and metastatic cancers should be tested for GRP94 expression if the SM group is tested. In addition, GRP94 expression rates were high in CRC cases with peritoneal seeding or lung metastasis; this makes complete metastasectomy relatively difficult to perform. This may be one of the possible advantages of using GRP94 inhibitors in patients with stage IV CRC.
The link between endoplasmic reticulum stress (ERS) and cancer cell death is intriguing. The endoplasmic reticulum has many biological functions including protein synthesis, transportation, and folding. Many unfolded proteins accumulate beyond the capacity of the ER from a variety of causes, such as inflammation and oxidative stress, that trigger ERS [22,23]. In cancer, it has been suggested that prolonged ERS promotes autophagy and apoptosis, and reduces resistance to chemotherapy via various mechanisms such as downregulation of the PI3K/Akt/mTOR pathway and activation of caspase-dependent apoptosis [22,24,25,26,27]. Fu et al. showed that GRP94 expression, one of the hallmarks of the ERS response, was associated with cancer cell death and reduced chemoresponse in an in vitro model [28]. In this study, we found that GRP94 expression was detected more frequently in PIK3CA mutant CRC; further studies are needed to explore the detailed mechanism and function of GRP94 in such regulatory networks in CRC.
As a major chaperone protein, GRP94 is known to participate in the regulation of various biological processes, such as carcinogenesis and cancer progression. It has also been suggested to play a key role in anti-tumor immune responses via immune cell recruitment [4,20]. We analyzed the association between high GRP94 expression and TIL levels and found that the expression of the former was significantly associated with higher infiltration of CD4+ TILs. This association was observed more clearly in the SM than in the MM group. Several studies have suggested that CD4+ T cells are needed to activate CD8+ T cells; their population has also been suggested to have a direct anti-tumor effect. In addition, CD4+ T cells are required for the induction of B cell-mediated cellular immune responses against tumor cells [29,30,31]. Takagi et al. observed that GRP94 was associated with the infiltration of CD8+ and CD4+ T cells via the maturation of dendritic cells; they suggested that this could improve patient survival in cholangiocarcinoma [32]. Baker-LePain et al. also found that GRP94 may influence the activation of CD4+ TILs in a chaperone-independent manner [33]. In our study, patients with higher CD4+ TILs tended to show prolonged survival (data not shown); however, the prolongation was not statistically significant. Interestingly, some previous studies revealed the interactive role of GRP94 with macrophages, another component of the tumor microenvironment. Tumor-derived GRP94 also might induce the maturation of dendritic cells and macrophages, and enhance the macrophage mediate host defense [20,32]. In view of these findings, GRP94 expression may improve prognosis through various mechanisms including recruitment of TILs in the late stage of metastatic CRC, rather than promote the progression of cancer. Although our analysis included a limited number of cases, evaluation of TILs among diverse tumor microenvironment components, and molecular alterations that affect the response to cetuximab, the present study may provide several clues for understanding the role of GRP94 expression in CRC pathogenesis. However, further research studies investigating these mechanisms and prospective studies involving a large cohort of patients with CRC are warranted.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Patient, Tissue Samples, and Tissue Microarray Construction

This study included 189 patients with advanced CRC with distant metastasis, between 2003 and 2009. Patients were divided into two groups, namely, synchronous (SM) and metachronous (MM) metastasis. SM was defined as distant metastasis identified within six months after the diagnosis of primary CRC; MM included patients with distant metastasis identified six months after the initial diagnosis of CRC. Among 189 patients, 123 (65.1%) had SM and 66 (34.9%) had MM. The patients’ clinicopathologic data including those of clinical follow-up, were retrieved from the medical records. All patients underwent surgical resection of the primary CRC without neoadjuvant treatment. For the construction of the tissue microarray (TMA), Hematoxylin and Eosin-stained slides were evaluated by an expert gastrointestinal pathologist. The most representative core measuring 2 mm in diameter was obtained from the primary tumor and transferred to a recipient block. Additional tissue cores were taken from the invasive border of the primary tumor and the paired metastatic lesion [34].

4.2. Immunohistochemistry and Interpretation

Immunohistochemical staining was performed on the four micrometer TMA sections. Immunostaining for CD3 (DAKO, Glostrup, Denmark), CD8 (Neomarkers, Fremont, CA, USA), and Foxp3 (Abcam, Cambridge, UK) were performed using a Leica BOND-MAX autostainer. For GRP94 (Abcam, Cambridge, UK) and CD4 (Ventana, Tucson, AZ, USA), immunohistochemical staining was performed using the BenchMark XT platform. For detection of EGFR mutations, we performed immunohistochemistry using the EGFR pharmDx kit (Dako, Glostrup, Denmark) following the manufacturer’s instructions. Moderate to strong immunostaining for GRP94 in more than 25% of tumor cells was defined as GRP94 positivity; EGFR-positivity was defined by the presence of any membranous immunostaining of tumor cells [34]. For quantitative TIL analysis, immunostained TMA slides were scanned using an Aperio ScanScope CS slide scanner (Aperio Technologies, Vista, CA, USA) at 40× magnification. After digitalization, the automated digital image analysis algorithm (ImageScope TM, Aperio Technologies, Vista, CA, USA) of Aperio was used to quantify CD3+, CD4+, CD8+, and Foxp3+ TILs, and the density of each TIL was recorded [35]. The density of each immunoreactive TIL was dichotomized into high and low groups based on the median values.

4.3. Microsatellite Instability

The real-time polymerase chain reaction-based test was performed on formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue for the determination of microsatellite instability (MSI status). Using a deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) automatic sequencer (ABI 3731 Applied Biosystems, Inc., Foster City, CA, USA), the two mononucleotides (BAT-25 and BAT-26) and three dinucleotide markers (D2S123, D5S346, and D17S250) recommended by the National Cancer Institute were evaluated. MSI-high and MSI-low tumors included those with instability in two or more and one markers, respectively. Tumor samples with no instability were classified as microsatellite stable [35].

4.4. KRAS, PIK3CA, and BRAF Mutational Analysis

Mutations in the KRAS, PIK3CA, and BRAF genes were detected using a real-time polymerase chain reaction. Briefly, the tumor area containing more than 60% of the tumor cells was microdissected from 8-μm thick formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded sections. After DNA extraction using the Cobas DNA Sample Preparation kit (Roche, Basel, Switzerland), mutation analysis was performed for each gene using the Cobas 4800 Mutation test (Roche Molecular Systems, Inc., Branchburg, NJ, USA), which detected KRAS mutations in codons 11, 13, and 61, PIK3CA mutation in exons 1, 4, 7, 9, and 20, and the BRAF V600E mutation [34].

4.5. HER2 Amplification

HER2 amplification was determined using silver in situ hybridization (SISH) on a Ventana XT automated SISH instrument; INFORM HER2 DNA and INFORM Chromosome 17 (CEP17) probes (Ventana Medical Systems, Tuscon, AZ, USA) were used as previously described [34]. SISH was performed in 185 cases for HER2 amplification; cases with HER2/CEP17 ratios ≥2.0, were classified as HER2 positive, following the American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists guidelines for HER2 testing in gastric cancer [34,36].

4.6. Statistical Analysis

Statistical comparisons between groups were performed using the chi-square, Fisher’s exact, and McNemar’s tests for categorical variables, and the Mann–Whitney U test for continuous variables. The Kaplan–Meier method with the log-rank test was used for survival analysis. the Significant prognostic factors for patient survival were determined using univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazard models. All data analyses were performed using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences software package (version 21.0; IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA); a p-value of <0.05 was regarded as statistically significant.

5. Conclusions

In this cohort, we found that GRP94 expression was commonly detected in advanced CRC with SM and MM; however, significant heterogeneity in GRP94 expression was observed between the primary tumor and metastatic site. Additionally, GRP94 positivity correlated with higher infiltration of CD4+ TILs. Its association with patient outcomes suggests that GRP94 expression may contribute to a better prognosis in CRC with SM. Further prospective studies in larger cohorts are needed to validate our findings.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/ijms22137042/s1, Figure S1: The representative images of GRP94 positive and GRP94 negative tumors in metastatic sites, Figure S2: GRP94 expression among metastatic specimens, Table S1: Baseline clinicopathologic characteristics of advanced colorectal cancer with distant metastasis, Table S2: GRP94 expression status in the tumor center, its invasive border, and the corresponding metastasis of CRC, Table S3: GRP94 expression at different metastatic sites, Table S4: Univariate analysis for overall survival in CRC patients by synchronous and metachronous metastases.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, S.L., H.-Y.L., and H.S.L.; methodology, S.Y. and Y.K.; investigation, S.Y., Y.K., H.J.O., and H.S.L., analysis, S.Y. and Y.K.; writing-original draft preparation, S.Y.; writing-review and editing, Y.K., S.L., H.-Y.L., and H.S.L.; supervision, Y.K., and H.S.L. funding acquisition, S.L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was supported by a grant from the Bio & Medical Technology Development Program of the National Research Foundation funded by the Korean government (NRF-2019M3E5D5065844, 2020M3A9I2107093).

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted according to the guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki, and approved by the Institutional Review Board of the Seoul National University Bundang Hospital (B-1210-174-301, date of approval: 10 October 2012).

Informed Consent Statement

The requirement for obtaining informed consent from patients was waived by the Institutional Review Board of the Seoul National University Bundang Hospital.

Data Availability Statement

Data are contained within the article and Supplementary Material.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Hong, S.; Won, Y.J.; Lee, J.J.; Jung, K.W.; Kong, H.J.; Im, J.S.; Seo, H.G. Cancer Statistics in Korea: Incidence, Mortality, Survival, and Prevalence in 2018. Cancer Res. Treat. 2021, 53, 301–315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Arnold, M.; Sierra, M.S.; Laversanne, M.; Soerjomataram, I.; Jemal, A.; Bray, F. Global patterns and trends in colorectal cancer incidence and mortality. Gut 2017, 66, 683–691. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  3. Ansa-Addo, E.A.; Thaxton, J.; Hong, F.; Wu, B.X.; Zhang, Y.; Fugle, C.W.; Metelli, A.; Riesenberg, B.; Williams, K.; Gewirth, D.T.; et al. Clients and Oncogenic Roles of Molecular Chaperone gp96/grp94. Curr. Top. Med. Chem. 2016, 16, 2765–2778. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  4. Wu, B.X.; Hong, F.; Zhang, Y.; Ansa-Addo, E.; Li, Z. GRP94/gp96 in Cancer: Biology, Structure, Immunology, and Drug Development. Adv. Cancer Res. 2016, 129, 165–190. [Google Scholar]
  5. Duan, X.F.; Xin, Y.W. Overexpression of molecule GRP94 favors tumor progression in lung adenocarcinoma by interaction with regulatory T cells. Thorac. Cancer 2020, 11, 704–712. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Liu, S.; Li, R.; Zuo, S.; Luo, R.; Fang, W.; Xie, Y. GRP94 overexpression as an indicator of unfavorable outcomes in breast cancer patients. Int. J. Clin. Exp. Pathol. 2018, 11, 3061–3067. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  7. Buc Calderon, P.; Sennesael, A.L.; Glorieux, C. Glucose-regulated protein of 94 kDa contributes to the development of an aggressive phenotype in breast cancer cells. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2018, 105, 115–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Huang, C.Y.; Lee, C.H.; Tu, C.C.; Wu, C.H.; Huang, M.T.; Wei, P.L.; Chang, Y.J. Glucose-regulated protein 94 mediates progression and metastasis of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma via mitochondrial function and the NF-kB/COX-2/VEGF axis. Oncotarget 2018, 9, 9425–9441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  9. Zheng, H.; Dai, J.; Stoilova, D.; Li, Z. Cell surface targeting of heat shock protein gp96 induces dendritic cell maturation and antitumor immunity. J. Immunol. 2001, 167, 6731–6735. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Dai, J.; Liu, B.; Caudill, M.M.; Zheng, H.; Qiao, Y.; Podack, E.R.; Li, Z. Cell surface expression of heat shock protein gp96 enhances cross-presentation of cellular antigens and the generation of tumor-specific T cell memory. Cancer Immun. 2003, 3, 1–11. [Google Scholar]
  11. Wang, X.P.; Qiu, F.R.; Liu, G.Z.; Chen, R.F. Correlation between clinicopathology and expression of heat shock protein 70 and glucose-regulated protein 94 in human colonic adenocarcinoma. World J. Gastroenterol. 2005, 11, 1056–1059. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Ryan, D.; Carberry, S.; Murphy, Á.C.; Lindner, A.U.; Fay, J.; Hector, S.; McCawley, N.; Bacon, O.; Concannon, C.G.; Kay, E.W.; et al. Calnexin, an ER stress-induced protein, is a prognostic marker and potential therapeutic target in colorectal cancer. J. Transl. Med. 2016, 14, 196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  13. Kim, K.; Lee, H.W.; Lee, E.H.; Park, M.I.; Lee, J.S.; Kim, M.S.; Kim, K.; Roh, M.S.; Pak, M.G.; Oh, J.E.; et al. Differential expression of HSP90 isoforms and their correlations with clinicopathologic factors in patients with colorectal cancer. Int. J. Clin. Exp. Pathol. 2019, 12, 978–986. [Google Scholar]
  14. Lee, J.S.; Roh, M.S.; Lee, H.W.; Lee, E.H.; Pak, M.G.; Kim, K.; Nam, H.Y.; Kim, K.M.; Jung, S.B. Prognostic significance of glucose-related protein 94 in colorectal cancer. Pathol. Res. Pract. 2020, 216, 153013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Zhang, L.Y.; Zhang, X.C.; Wang, L.D.; Zhang, Z.F.; Li, P.L. Increased expression of GRP94 protein is associated with decreased sensitivity to adriamycin in ovarian carcinoma cell lines. Clin. Exp. Obstet. Gynecol. 2008, 35, 257–263. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  16. Sabbatino, F.; Favoino, E.; Wang, Y.; Wang, X.; Villani, V.; Cai, L.; Yang, L.; Ferrone, S.; Ferrone, C.R. Grp94-specific monoclonal antibody to counteract BRAF inhibitor resistance in BRAFV600E melanoma. J. Transl. Med. 2015, 13, K12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Huang, C.Y.; Wei, P.L.; Wang, J.W.; Makondi, P.T.; Huang, M.T.; Chen, H.A.; Chang, Y.J. Glucose-Regulated Protein 94 Modulates the Response of Osteosarcoma to Chemotherapy. Dis. Markers 2019, 2019, 4569718. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Zhang, L.; Wang, S.; Wangtao; Wang, Y.; Wang, J.; Jiang, L.; Li, S.; Hu, X.; Wang, Q. Upregulation of GRP78 and GRP94 and its function in chemotherapy resistance to VP-16 in human lung cancer cell line SK-MES-1. Cancer Investig. 2009, 27, 453–458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Jeoung, M.H.; Kim, T.K.; Kim, J.W.; Cho, Y.B.; Na, H.J.; Yoo, B.C.; Shim, H.; Song, D.K.; Heo, K.; Lee, S. Antibody-Based Targeting of Cell Surface GRP94 Specifically Inhibits Cetuximab-Resistant Colorectal Cancer Growth. Biomolecules 2019, 9, 681. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Duan, X.; Iwanowycz, S.; Ngoi, S.; Hill, M.; Zhao, Q.; Liu, B. Molecular Chaperone GRP94/GP96 in Cancers: Oncogenesis and Therapeutic Target. Front. Oncol. 2021, 11, 629846. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Li, X.; Sun, L.; Hou, J.; Gui, M.; Ying, J.; Zhao, H.; Lv, N.; Meng, S. Cell membrane gp96 facilitates HER2 dimerization and serves as a novel target in breast cancer. Int. J. Cancer 2015, 137, 512–524. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Cubillos-Ruiz, J.R.; Bettigole, S.E.; Glimcher, L.H. Tumorigenic and Immunosuppressive Effects of Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress in Cancer. Cell 2017, 168, 692–706. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Oakes, S.A.; Papa, F.R. The role of endoplasmic reticulum stress in human pathology. Annu. Rev. Pathol. 2015, 10, 173–194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. Hu, J.L.; Hu, X.L.; Guo, A.Y.; Wang, C.J.; Wen, Y.Y.; Cang, S.D. Endoplasmic reticulum stress promotes autophagy and apoptosis and reverses chemoresistance in human ovarian cancer cells. Oncotarget 2017, 8, 49380–49394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Zhou, F.; Li, Y.H.; Wang, J.J.; Pan, J.; Lu, H. Endoplasmic reticulum stress could induce autophagy and apoptosis and enhance chemotherapy sensitivity in human esophageal cancer EC9706 cells by mediating PI3K/Akt/mTOR signaling pathway. Tumor Biol. 2017, 39, 1010428317705748. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  26. Wang, W.A.; Groenendyk, J.; Michalak, M. Endoplasmic reticulum stress associated responses in cancer. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2014, 1843, 2143–2149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  27. Kim, J.W.; Cho, Y.B.; Lee, S. Cell Surface GRP94 as a Novel Emerging Therapeutic Target for Monoclonal Antibody Cancer Therapy. Cells 2021, 10, 670. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Fu, Y.F.; Liu, X.; Gao, M.; Zhang, Y.N.; Liu, J. Endoplasmic reticulum stress induces autophagy and apoptosis while inhibiting proliferation and drug resistance in multiple myeloma through the PI3K/Akt/mTOR signaling pathway. Oncotarget 2017, 8, 61093–61106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  29. Tay, R.E.; Richardson, E.K.; Toh, H.C. Revisiting the role of CD4+ T cells in cancer immunotherapy—New insights into old paradigms. Cancer Gene Ther. 2021, 28, 5–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Ostroumov, D.; Fekete-Drimusz, N.; Saborowski, M.; Kühnel, F.; Woller, N. CD4 and CD8 T lymphocyte interplay in controlling tumor growth. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 2018, 75, 689–713. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  31. Kwak, Y.; Seo, A.N.; Lee, H.E.; Lee, H.S. Tumor immune response and immunotherapy in gastric cancer. J. Pathol. Transl. Med. 2020, 54, 20–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  32. Takagi, S.; Miyagawa, S.; Ichikawa, E.; Soeda, J.; Miwa, S.; Miyagawa, Y.; Iijima, S.; Noike, T.; Kobayashi, A.; Kawasaki, S. Dendritic cells, T-cell infiltration, and Grp94 expression in cholangiocellular carcinoma. Hum. Pathol. 2004, 35, 881–886. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Baker-LePain, J.C.; Sarzotti, M.; Nicchitta, C.V. Glucose-regulated protein 94/glycoprotein 96 elicits bystander activation of CD4+ T cell Th1 cytokine production in vivo. J. Immunol. 2004, 172, 4195–4203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  34. Nam, S.K.; Yun, S.; Koh, J.; Kwak, Y.; Seo, A.N.; Park, K.U.; Kim, D.W.; Kang, S.B.; Kim, W.H.; Lee, H.S. BRAF, PIK3CA, and HER2 Oncogenic Alterations According to KRAS Mutation Status in Advanced Colorectal Cancers with Distant Metastasis. PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0151865. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  35. Kwak, Y.; Koh, J.; Kim, D.W.; Kang, S.B.; Kim, W.H.; Lee, H.S. Immunoscore encompassing CD3+ and CD8+ T cell densities in distant metastasis is a robust prognostic marker for advanced colorectal cancer. Oncotarget 2016, 7, 81778–81790. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. Bartley, A.N.; Washington, M.K.; Colasacco, C.; Ventura, C.B.; Ismaila, N.; Benson, A.B., 3rd; Carrato, A.; Gulley, M.L.; Jain, D.; Kakar, S.; et al. HER2 Testing and Clinical Decision Making in Gastroesophageal Adenocarcinoma: Guideline From the College of American Pathologists, American Society for Clinical Pathology, and the American Society of Clinical Oncology. J. Clin. Oncol. 2017, 35, 446–464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Ijms 22 07042 g001 550
Figure 1. GRP94 expression in colorectal cancer. (a) negative (b) positive.
Figure 1. GRP94 expression in colorectal cancer. (a) negative (b) positive.
Ijms 22 07042 g001
Ijms 22 07042 g002 550
Figure 2. Association between GRP94 expression and TIL density in the (a) total, (b) SM group, and (c) MM group. n.s.: not significant.
Figure 2. Association between GRP94 expression and TIL density in the (a) total, (b) SM group, and (c) MM group. n.s.: not significant.
Ijms 22 07042 g002
Ijms 22 07042 g003 550
Figure 3. Kaplan–Meier curves of overall survival for advanced colorectal cancer with synchronous metastasis in the (a) total cohort, (b) SM group, and (c) MM group.
Figure 3. Kaplan–Meier curves of overall survival for advanced colorectal cancer with synchronous metastasis in the (a) total cohort, (b) SM group, and (c) MM group.
Ijms 22 07042 g003
Ijms 22 07042 g004 550
Figure 4. Survival analysis in the (a) SM group, and (b) MM group harboring KRAS, PIK3CA, BRAF mutations or HER2 amplification.
Figure 4. Survival analysis in the (a) SM group, and (b) MM group harboring KRAS, PIK3CA, BRAF mutations or HER2 amplification.
Ijms 22 07042 g004
Table
Table 1. Clinicopathologic characteristics of advanced colorectal cancer with synchronous or metachronous metastasis by GRP94 expression status.
Table 1. Clinicopathologic characteristics of advanced colorectal cancer with synchronous or metachronous metastasis by GRP94 expression status.
Characteristics CRC with SMpCRC with MMp
GRP94 (−)GRP94 (+)GRP94 (−)GRP94 (+)
Age 0.341 0.347
 <6529 (35.4%)53 (64.6%) 17 (45.9%)20 (54.1%)
 ≥6511 (26.8%)30 (73.2%) 10 (34.5%)19 (65.5%)
Sex 0.399 0.756
 M17 (28.8%)42 (71.2%) 17 (39.5%)26 (60.5%)
 F23 (35.9%)41 (64.1%) 10 (43.5%)13 (56.5%)
Location 0.470 0.748
 Right sided10 (27.8%)26 (72.2%) 4 (33.3%)8 (66.7%)
 Left sided 30 (34.5%)57 (65.5%) 23 (42.6%)31 (57.4%)
Differentiation 0.087 1.000
 Low grade31 (29.5%)74 (70.5%) 24 (40.7%)35 (59.3%)
 High grade9 (50.0%)9 (50.0%) 3 (42.9%)4 (57.1%)
Lymphatic invasion 0.394 0.982
 Absent 10 (27.0%)27 (73.0%) 11 (40.7%)16 (59.3%)
 Present 30 (34.9%)56 (65.1%) 16 (41.0%)23 (59.0%)
Venous invasion 0.416 0.935
 Absent 24 (30.0%)56 (70.0%) 21 (41.2%)30 (58.8%)
 Present 16 (37.2%)27 (62.8%) 6 (40.0%)9 (60.0%)
Perineural invasion 0.732 0.566
 Absent 17 (30.9%)38 (69.1%) 14 (37.8%)23 (62.2%)
 Present 23 (33.8%)45 (66.2%) 13 (44.8%)16 (55.2%)
pT stage 0.950 0.748
 pT2-320 (32.3%)42 (67.7%) 23 (42.6%)31 (57.4%)
 pT420 (32.8%)41 (67.2%) 4 (33.3%)8 (66.7%)
pN stage 0.217 0.539
 pN02 (16.7%)10 (83.3%) 11 (45.8%)13 (54.2%)
 pN+38 (34.2%)73 (65.8%) 16 (38.1%)26 (61.9%)
MSI 1.000 0.509
 MSS/MSI-low40 (32.8%)82 (67.2%) 27 (42.2%)37 (57.8%)
 MSI-high0 (0%)1 (100%) 0 (0%)2 (100%)
EGFR 0.497 0.085
 Negative23 (30.3%)53 (69.7%) 13 (32.5%)27 (67.5%)
 Positive17 (36.2%)30 (63.8%) 14 (53.8%)12 (46.2%)
KRAS mutation 0.661 0.522
 Wild type20 (34.5%)38 (65.5%) 11 (36.7%)19 (63.3%)
 Mutant 20 (30.8%)45 (69.2%) 16 (44.4%)20 (55.6%)
PIK3CA mutation 0.026 0.691
 Wild type38 (36.5%)66 (63.5%) 25 (42.4%)34 (57.6%)
 Mutant 2 (10.5%)17 (89.5%) 2 (28.6%)5 (71.4%)
BRAF mutation 1.000 1.000
 Wild type38 (32.5%)79 (67.5% 27 (41.5%)38 (58.5%)
 Mutant 2 (33.3%)4 (66.7%) 0 (0%)1 (100%)
HER2 amplification 0.268 NA
 Negative38 (34.2%)73 (65.8%) 26 (40.0%)39 (60.0%)
 Positive1 (11.1%)8 (88.9%) 0 (0%)0 (0%)
Any mutation 0.416 0.836
 Absent16 (37.2%)27 (62.8%) 10 (38.5%)16 (61.5%)
 Present 24 (30.0%)56 (70.0%) 16 (41.0%)23 (59.0%)
Table
Table 2. Multivariate analysis for overall survival.
Table 2. Multivariate analysis for overall survival.
Factor Hazard Ratio (95% CI)Significance
Total
 Lymphatic invasion (present vs. absent)1.803 (1.001–3.251)0.050
 Neural invasion (present vs. absent)1.687 (1.039–2.740)0.035
 pT stage (pT4 vs. pT2-3)1.579 (1.007–2.476)0.047
 pN stage (pN+ vs. pN0)2.689 (1.231–5.960)0.015
Synchronous metastasis group
 Age (≥65 vs. <65)1.978 (1.196–3.271)0.008
 Lymphatic invasion (present vs. absent)2.014 (1.070–3.791)0.030
 GRP94 (positive vs. negative) 0.581 (0.351–0.961)0.034
Metachronous metastasis group
 Neural invasion (present vs. absent)8.082 (2.307–28.319)0.001
Table
Table 3. Multivariate regression model of prognostic factors in synchronous metastasis group harboring KRAS, PIK3CA, BRAF mutations or HER2 amplification.
Table 3. Multivariate regression model of prognostic factors in synchronous metastasis group harboring KRAS, PIK3CA, BRAF mutations or HER2 amplification.
Factor Hazard Ratio (95% CI)Significance
Synchronous metastasis group
 Age (≥65 vs. <65)2.449 (1.354–4.431)0.003
 GRP94 (positive vs. negative) 0.438 (0.234–0.821)0.010
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Yun, S.; Lee, S.; Lee, H.-Y.; Oh, H.J.; Kwak, Y.; Lee, H.S. Clinicopathologic and Prognostic Association of GRP94 Expression in Colorectal Cancer with Synchronous and Metachronous Metastases. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 7042. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22137042

AMA Style

Yun S, Lee S, Lee H-Y, Oh HJ, Kwak Y, Lee HS. Clinicopathologic and Prognostic Association of GRP94 Expression in Colorectal Cancer with Synchronous and Metachronous Metastases. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2021; 22(13):7042. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22137042

Chicago/Turabian Style

Yun, Sumi, Sukmook Lee, Ho-Young Lee, Hyeon Jeong Oh, Yoonjin Kwak, and Hye Seung Lee. 2021. "Clinicopathologic and Prognostic Association of GRP94 Expression in Colorectal Cancer with Synchronous and Metachronous Metastases" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 22, no. 13: 7042. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22137042

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop