Next Article in Journal
Coumarin Interferes with Polar Auxin Transport Altering Microtubule Cortical Array Organization in Arabidopsis thaliana (L.) Heynh. Root Apical Meristem
Next Article in Special Issue
The Selectivity of Immunoassays and of Biomimetic Binding Assays with Imprinted Polymers
Previous Article in Journal
Reprogramming mRNA Expression in Response to Defect in RNA Polymerase III Assembly in the Yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
IJMS
Volume 22
Issue 14
10.3390/ijms22147304
ijms-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Polyurethane Composites Reinforced with Walnut Shell Filler Treated with Perlite, Montmorillonite and Halloysite

by
Sylwia Członka
1,*,
Agnė Kairytė
2,
Karolina Miedzińska
1 and
Anna Strąkowska
1
1
Institute of Polymer & Dye Technology, Lodz University of Technology, 90-924 Lodz, Poland
2
Laboratory of Thermal Insulating Materials and Acoustics, Faculty of Civil Engineering, Institute of Building Materials, Vilnius Gediminas Technical University, Linkmenu St. 28, LT-08217 Vilnius, Lithuania
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22(14), 7304; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22147304
Submission received: 8 June 2021 / Revised: 29 June 2021 / Accepted: 2 July 2021 / Published: 7 July 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advanced Polymer Composite Materials III)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
In the following study, polyurethane (PUR) composites were modified with 2 wt.% of walnut shell filler modified with selected mineral compounds–perlite, montmorillonite, and halloysite. The impact of modified walnut shell fillers on selected properties of PUR composites, such as rheological properties (dynamic viscosity, foaming behavior), mechanical properties (compressive strength, flexural strength, impact strength), dynamic-mechanical behavior (glass transition temperature, storage modulus), insulation properties (thermal conductivity), thermal characteristic (temperature of thermal decomposition stages), and flame retardant properties (e.g., ignition time, limiting oxygen index, heat peak release) was investigated. Among all modified types of PUR composites, the greatest improvement was observed for PUR composites filled with walnut shell filler functionalized with halloysite. For example, on the addition of such modified walnut shell filler, the compressive strength was enhanced by ~13%, flexural strength by ~12%, and impact strength by ~14%. Due to the functionalization of walnut shell filler with thermally stable flame retardant compounds, such modified PUR composites were characterized by higher temperatures of thermal decomposition. Most importantly, PUR composites filled with flame retardant compounds exhibited improved flame resistance characteristics-in all cases, the value of peak heat release was reduced by ~12%, while the value of total smoke release was reduced by ~23%.

1. Introduction

Polyurethanes (PUR) were first synthesized by Wurtz in 1849. A few decades later, in 1937, Otto Bayer obtained polyurethane in the known to this day, polyaddition reaction of polyol and polyisocyanate [1]. Now polyurethanes are widely used in different applications, such as building construction, packaging, and furnishing [2,3]. Polyurethanes are composed of rigid (hydrogen bonds) and flexible (the rest of the polyol chain) segments. After the formation of polyurethane macromolecule, the rigid segments are joined together, which leads to the formation of soft and hard domains [4]. The polyaddition reaction leading to the production of polyurethane materials is carried out in the presence of chain extenders, catalysts, flame retardants, and blowing agents [5]. Due to the wide range of selection and modification of used raw materials, polyurethane products can be obtained in various forms, including foams, coatings, sealants, adhesives, films, and fibers [6,7,8].
Foams have the largest share in the polyurethane materials market. PUR foams are divided into rigid, semi-rigid, and flexible.
Rigid foams are mainly used in building construction, to fill empty spaces near the window and door frames, for thermal and acoustic insulation [9,10]. Polyurethanes decompose at temperatures about 200 °C [11]. PUR materials are flammable, and their combustion process is accompanied by the release of heat and toxic gases. The easy ignition and high flame spreadability of polyurethane foams are the main disadvantages that noticeably limiting of PUR foams in many applications [12]. However, it is possible to use special additives aimed at reducing the flammability of the obtained materials–flame retardants. In line with the environmental goals and the principles of Sustainable Development, in recent years the research has been conducted to search for more and more natural and effective modifiers for polymer materials. To move away from chlorine-containing flame retardants, so-called non-halogen substances based on nitrogen, phosphorus, silicon, and boron compounds are used [13,14]. Moreover, recently more modifiers, not only flame retardant, have been used. Fillers of natural and plant origin may also positively affect the mechanical properties of the obtained composites. The literature commonly describes the use of natural additives in polymeric materials [8,9,15,16,17,18,19,20].
Perlite (P) is an inorganic chemically inert in many environments compound, composed mainly of SiO2, Al2O3, Na2O, K2O, and water [21]. Accordingly, with the estimation of global production, the leading producers of world production of perlite are China (47%), Greece (20%), Turkey (16%), and United States (13%) [22]. Perlite is an amorphous volcanic glass showing very low density and high porosity. It is also characterized by high thermal stability. Interestingly, when heated to a temperature between 760 and 1100 °C, perlite can expand even 7–16 times its original volume and acquires the properties of a thermal and acoustic insulator [23,24]. Perlite exhibits low thermal conductivity and good fire resistance, which makes it a potentially good flame retardant modifier [25].
Another interesting inorganic compound is montmorillonite (MMT), described with the chemical composition of Al2O3·4SiO2·3H2O. Montmorillonite has a layered structure, where the octahedron Al-O layer is between two tetrahedron Si-O layers [26,27]. MMT is characterized by a large specific surface, due to this it may delay thermal degradation and create a thermal barrier [28]. Due to its properties, in recent years montmorillonite has been increasingly used to increase the fire retardancy and thermal stability of polymer composites [29]. It may also improve the mechanical properties of the obtained materials which additionally increases its attractiveness as a modifier [30].
Halloysite is another layered mineral. It is aluminosilicate clay with the chemical composition of Al2Si2O5(OH)4. Naturally, halloysite occurs as small cylinders. It is characterized by a layered structure and specific surface area [31]. When heated to high temperatures, the halloysite loses the water between layers. Halloysite can be used as reinforcement in the preparation of polymer materials due to its physico-chemical properties and thermal stability [32,33]. Recently, it was proved that the layered structure of the halloysite can alter the thermal stability and flammability properties of polymer composites [34,35,36].
In the present study, the influence of modified walnut fillers on mechanical properties and the burning behavior of rigid polyurethane foams was determined. In our previous studies [37,38,39], the effect of polyol obtained based on walnut shells and silane-modified walnut filler on the properties of PUR foams. However, to our best knowledge, there have been no studies related to the modification of walnut fillers in the direction of reducing flammability. A goal of this study was to investigate the influence of non-halogen fire retardants (perlite, montmorillonite, and halloysite) as modifiers of walnut fillers.

2. Results and Discussion

2.1. Filler Characterization

The structure of walnut shell fillers was examined using scanning electron microscopy (SEM). The obtained images (Figure 1) revealed that before the treatment, the surface of walnut shell filler is quite smooth and uniform. After the modification of walnut shell filler with perlite, montmorillonite, and halloysite the external morphology of the fillers seems to be less uniform with visible particles of the modifying compounds located on the surface of the walnut shell filler. This confirms a successful modification of walnut shell filler with perlite, montmorillonite, and halloysite.
This, in turn, determines the further properties of PUR foams. The size of walnut shell fillers modified with perlite, montmorillonite, and halloysite was measured in a polyol dispersion. According to the results presented in Figure 2, the size of walnut shell fillers ranges between 900 and 4000 nm. In the case of unmodified walnut shell filler, the highest percentage (22.5%) is shown by the particles with an average size of 1720 nm. After the modification of the walnut shells with perlite and halloysite the average size of the particles decreases to 1480 nm (20.2% of the particles) and 1280 (20.4% of the particles), respectively. The particles of walnut shell filler modified with montmorillonite exhibit an average size of 1990 nm (22.5% of the particles).
The viscosity of the PUR systems is a critical parameter, which affects the foaming process and the proper expansion of the cells [40,41]. According to the results presented in Figure 3, the addition of walnut shell fillers affects the viscosity of the PUR systems. When compared with the reference PUR system (without the addition of the filler), the PUR systems containing each type of walnut shell fillers exhibit an increased viscosity due to the presence of walnut shell filler particles. This may be connected with fact that the filler particles can interact with the polyether polyol through physical interactions—mainly hydrogen bonding and van der Wall interaction, increasing the total viscosity of the PUR system [42]. Compared to the reference PUR system, the greatest increase in dynamic viscosity exhibits PUR system with the addition of walnut shell filler modified with montmorillonite—the dynamic viscosity (measured at 0.5 RPM) increases from 860 to 1950 mPa·s. Most importantly, in the case of each PUR system, the viscosity decreases with increasing the shear rates. Such behavior is characteristic for non-Newtonian fluids with a pseudoplastic nature [43,44].

2.2. Characterization of PUR Composites Reinforced with Walnut Shell Fillers

The foaming behavior was evaluated by measuring the processing times of the PUR synthesis—start, growth, and tack-free times. The start time was measured from the start of mixing of components to a visible start of foam growth, extension time elapsing until reaching the highest volume of the foam, and gelation time was determined as the time when the foam solidifies completely and the surface is no longer tacky [45]. According to the results presented in Table 1 the addition of walnut shell fillers affects the value of start time and growth time. When compared with reference PUR foam, the value of start time increases from 40 s (for PUR_0) to 57, 55, 62, and 51 s for PUR_WS, PUR_WS/P, PUR_WS/MMT, and PUR_WS/HL, respectively. A similar tendency is observed in the case of growth time—after the addition of walnut shell fillers, the value increases from 295 s to 358, 340, 370, and 325 s, respectively. This dependence may be connected with higher viscosity of the PUR systems containing walnut shell fillers. According to the literature, the higher viscosity of PUR systems has a significant impact on the expansion process of PUR cells and may extend the reaction time by up to several minutes [39]. Moreover, the increased viscosity influences the proper stoichiometry of the PUR synthesis reaction, slowing down the polymerization process and leading to phase separation [40]. This effect may be additionally enhanced with the presence of filler particles which contribute to limiting the mobility of the polymer chains during the PUR synthesis [46,47]. Among all studied PUR systems walnut the highest increase in the value of processing times exhibits PUR composites containing walnut shell fillers modified with montmorillonite, probably as a result of the high viscosity of such a modified PUR system.
The cellular structure of PUR composites is one of the most important factors, which determines the further physico-mechanical performances of PUR composites [44,48]. Therefore, a crucial factor determining the formation of PUR composites with a well-developed closed-cell structure is the proper balance between the concentration of the filler, the viscosity of the PUR systems, and the appropriate dispersion of the filler in the PUR matrix [49]. The morphology of the reference PUR foam and PUR composites containing walnut shell fillers are presented in Figure 4.
The morphology of the reference foam is well-preserved and consists of uniform closed-cells with a negligible number of open-cells. The addition of WS filler results in a similar structure, however, the number of broken cells is slightly increased. The effect is more prominent in the case of PUR_WS/MMT. A more homogenous structure is observed in the case of PUR_WS/P and PUR_WS/HL. This may be connected with the fact that montmorillonite-modified walnut shell filler possesses larger particles, and the viscosity of such modified PUR system is higher when compared with the PUR_WS/P and PUR_WS/HL (see Figure 2). This may result in poor interfacial adhesion between the filler surface and the PUR matrix, which promotes earlier cell collapsing phenomena and increases a high possibility of generating open pores [50]. Deterioration of the foam morphology after the incorporation of the filler was reported in previous studies as well [51,52,53].
According to the results presented in Figure 5, the addition of walnut shell fillers affects the average cell diameter. The average cell diameter of reference foam (PUR_0) is 470 µm, and it decreases to 420, 410, 415, and 390 for PUR_WS, PUR_WS/P, PUR_WS/MMT, and PUR_WS/HL, respectively. According to the previous studies, the filler particles incorporated into the PUR system may act as nucleating centers for the formation of the cells, changing the nucleation character from homogenous to heterogonous. Because of this, greater numbers of the cells start to nucleate at the same time, which reduces the diameter of the cells. Moreover, the further expansion of the cells is limited by increased viscosity of the PUR systems, which in turn contribute to the formation of the smaller cells [54,55,56,57,58,59]. On the other hand, as presented in Figure 5. after the incorporation of the walnut shell filler, the overall distribution of the cells becomes less uniform. This effect is more prominent in the case of PUR composites containing walnut shell filler modified with montmorillonite. Previous studies have shown, that the application of the filler particles with larger diameters, results in rupturing of the cells, due to incomplete incorporation of the filler particles into the PUR matrix [50]. The confirmation of these results may be also found in the results of the closed-cell content (Figure 6). For reference foam (PUR_0) the closed-cell content is 90.8%. After the addition of walnut shell fillers, the value decreases to 86.5, 87.1, 80.2, and 88.1% for PUR_WS, PUR_WS/P. PUR_WS/MMT and PUR_WS/HL, respectively.
According to the results presented in Figure 7 the addition of walnut shell fillers increases the value of apparent density of developed PUR composites. The apparent density of the reference PUR_0 is 35.9 kg m−3 and it increases to 37.9, 38.2, 38.6, and 41.0 kg m−3 for PUR_WS, PUR_WS/P, PUR_WS/MMT, and PUR_WS/HL. This is mostly connected with the increased dynamic viscosity of PUR systems containing solid particles of walnut shell fillers and the molecular weight of the fillers. However, the changes in the apparent density of PUR density are not significant and may be considered negligible. Most importantly, the addition of walnut shell fillers does not deteriorate significantly the value of thermal conductivity of PUR composites, which is a crucial factor, determining the further application of PUR materials in the construction industry. According to the result presented in Figure 6, the thermal conductivity of reference PUR_0 is 0.025 Wm−1 K−1 and it increases insignificantly to 0.028, 0.027, 0.030, and 0.026 Wm−1 K−1 for PUR_WS, PUR_WS/P, PUR_WS/MMT, and PUR_WS/HL. A slight increase in the thermal conductivity of PUR composites may be related to the presence of solid particles in the PUR matrix, which contributes to the increase in the value of λsolid. Among all developed PUR composites, the highest value of thermal conductivity is observed for PUR composites containing walnut shell filler modified with montmorillonite (PUR_WS/MMT). As discussed previously, such modified PUR composites are characterized by a less uniform structure with a lower content of closed-cells. Taking into consideration that the thermal conductivity of the air (λ = 0.025 Wm−1 K−1) is higher than that of the blowing agent encapsulated in the closed-cells of PUR structure (CO2), the thermal conductivity of PUR composites containing montmorillonite-modified walnut shell filler is increased.
The mechanical properties of polyurethane foams are dependent on the apparent density and filler properties. As shown in previous studies [27,60,61], the mechanical properties of the obtained PUR composites strongly depend on the type of filler, its surface, particle size, and its interaction with the polymer matrix. Therefore, the effect of walnut fillers on compressive strength, flexural strength, and impact strength were assessed.
The results of the compressive strength measured at 10% deformation (σ10%) are shown in Figure 8. Comparing with PUR_0 in the case of compression parallel to the foam growth direction, the value of σ10% increases by ~3, 11, 8, and 13% for PUR_WS, PUR_WS/P, PUR_WS/MMT, and PUR_WS/HL, respectively. A similar relationship is observed in the case of perpendicular compression. The value of the compressive strength increases from the value of 129 kPa for PUR_0 to 135, 143, 138, and 145 kPa for PUR_WS, PUR_WS/P, PUR_WS/MMT, and PUR_WS/HL, respectively.
As presented in Figure 9, the incorporation of analyzed fillers influences also the flexural and impact strength of PUR composites. When comparing with PUR_0 aforementioned properties are improved. The best values for both of these properties are achieved by PUR_WS/HL. When comparing the flexural strength results with the reference foams, an increase by ~5, 11, 10, and 12% respectively for PUR_WS, PUR_WS/P, PUR_WS/MMT, and PUR_WS/HL are observed. The impact strength increases from 358 J m−2 for PUR_0 to 366, 389, 387 and 401 J m−2 for PUR_WS, PUR_WS/P, PUR_WS/MMT, and PUR_WS/HL, respectively. On the basis of the obtained results, it can be observed that the foams with the addition of walnut fillers showed improved mechanical properties. The best results were noticed for foams with the addition of modified fillers (PUR_WS/HL, PUR_WS/P, and PUR_WS/MMT). The improvement of the mechanical properties of modified foams compared to the reference foam may be related to the morphology of these foams, their viscosity, and the incorporation of reinforcing walnut filler particles into the PUR structure [57,59]. The modified foams show a better cross-linked cell structure, with smaller cells, which better stabilizes and prevents foam damage, which can be observed in better results of modified PUR foams, obtained during the analysis of flexural, compressive, and impact strength [60,61,62,63].
According to the results presented in Figure 10a, the incorporation of walnut shell fillers affects the value of Tg. When compared with PUR_0, after the addition 2 wt.% of each filler, the values of Tg shift towards higher temperatures. The highest value of Tg exhibits PUR composites reinforced with 2 wt.% of walnut shell filler modified with halloysite–comparing to PUR_0 the value of Tg increases from 147 to 166 °C. These results are in agreement with the results of apparent density. As presented in Figure 8, the values of apparent density of PUR composites containing walnut shell fillers are somewhat higher, while the overall structure quite uniform with a great number of closed-cells. Some deterioration in Tg is observed d in the case of PUR composites reinforced with walnut shell filler modified with montmorillonite. The value of Tg decreases slightly to 143 °C, however, it is still comparable with the value obtained for PUR_0. This may be connected with the more porous structure of PUR_WS/MMT, which contributes to an increase in the mobility of the polymer chains. The confirmation of the Tg results may be also found in the results of the storage modulus (E’). According to the results presented in Figure 10b the incorporation of walnut shell fillers increases the value of E’. It is believed that well-dispersed particles of walnut shell fillers can generate some interlocks between the cells. The more complex PUR structure limits the mobility of PUR chains, thereby improving the reinforcement effect of the PUR composites.
The dimensional stability was determined based on the linear changes in dimensions, volume, and mass of PUR composites. Measurements were carried out for 14 days at +70 and −20 °C. The results obtained during the analysis are summarized in Table 2.
As can be noticed based on the presented data, the addition of the used fillers affected the dimensional stability of the foams conditioned with both higher and lower temperatures. The dimensional stability of PUR composites indicates that the addition of walnut shell fillers resulted in negligible changes in dimensional stability of the modified composites in relation to the reference foam. However, when comparing the results obtained during the test, a decrease in changes in width, length, and thickness is observed. This proves that the addition of fillers minimally but increases the dimensional stability of the modified PUR composites.
The burning behavior of PUR composites was assessed using the cone calorimetry method. Table 3 presents summarized results obtained during the experiment including the ignition time (IT), the peak rate of heat release (pHRR), the total heat release (THR), the total smoke release (TSR), the average yield of CO, and CO2 (COY and CO2Y), and the limiting oxygen index (LOI).
When comparing the modified PUR composites to the reference PUR_0, it can be observed that the modifications affected the ignition time (IT) slightly. The ignition time increases from 4 s for PUR_0 to 6 s for PUR_WS, 7 s for PUR_WS/MMT, and 8 s for PUR_WS/P and PUR_WS/HL, respectively. The intensity of the flame was determined by the heat peak release value (pHRR), related to the release of low molecular weight compounds (olefins, amines, or isocyanates). As it can be noticed in Figure 11, all analyzed PUR composites show one main peak of this parameter. When compared with PUR_0, which has a peak value of 265 kW m−2, PUR composites show lower values of this parameter and are 236, 234, 233, and 232 kW m−2 respectively for PUR_WS/P, PUR_WS/HL, PUR_WS/MMT, and PUR_WS, which proves a slight reduction of heat released during combustion of PUR composites. The incorporation of walnut fillers affects also the total heat release (THR). The value of this parameter increased for PUR_WS to 23.8 MJ m−2, comparing with PUR_0 (21.9 MJ m−2), and decreased for PUR_WS/MMT (21.3 MJ m−2), PUR_WS/P (20.7 MJ m−2), and PUR_WS/HL (20.1 MJ m−2).
When analyzing the effect of modifiers on the total smoke release (TSR) presented in Figure 11, it can be noticed that the addition of walnut fillers decreased this value from 1516 m2 m−2 for the reference foam to 1394, 1329, 1274, and 1160 m2 m−2 for PUR_WS, PUR_WS/P, PUR_WS/MMT, and PUR_WS/HL, respectively. The inclusion of walnut fillers also affected the amount of gas released. Compared to the foam PUR_0, the amount of carbon monoxide released increased from 0.375 kg kg−1 to 0.393 and 0.394 kg kg−1 in the case of PUR_WS/P and PUR_WS/MMT, and to even 0.439 kg kg−1 for PUR_WS and decreased to 0.368 kg kg−1 in the case of PUR_WS/HL. On the other hand, in the case of carbon dioxide, all modified foams showed a lower amount of released gas. The CO2Y parameter was 0.388 kg kg−1 for the reference foam and decreased to 0.315, 0.312, 0.311 and even 0.299 kg kg−1 for PUR_WS, PUR_WS/MMT, PUR_WS/P and PUR_WS/HL, respectively. Concerning the limiting oxygen index (LOI), it could be seen that the used fillers also influenced this parameter. The PUR_WS (19.9%) showed a slightly lower LOI value than the reference foam (20.2%). On the other hand, the remaining foams achieved better, higher values of this parameter. Compared to PUR_0, the LOI value increased to 20.8% for PUR_WS/MMT, 21.0% for PUR_WS/P, and PUR_WS/HL—reaching the highest value of 21.5%. Based on the obtained results, it could be concluded that the application of modified walnut filler can improve the flammability properties of PUR composites. Among the analyzed composites, the foam PUR_WS/HL showed the best fire resistance properties in this experiment.
To assess the effect of walnut shell fillers on the thermal stability of the PUR composites the thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) and derivative thermogravimetry analysis (DTG) were performed. During the study, the following stages of thermal decomposition were determined. Moreover, char residues at the temperature of 600 °C were determined. The results of TGA/DTG analysis are presented in Figure 12 and Table 4. According to the results presented in Figure 12a,b, it can be concluded, that in the case of non-modified walnut shell filler, three stages of thermal decompositions are observed. The first stage of mass loss occurs at a relatively low temperature (~100 °C) and refers to the evaporation of the moisture absorbed by the filler and volatile compounds (low molecular weight esters and fatty acids) which are inherent to the filler. The second stage representing 30% of mass loss occurs between 300 and 500 °C. The maximum rate at ~300 °C refers to the thermal degradation of cellulose and hemicellulose [64,65]. The last step of thermal decomposition occurs between 400 and 500 °C with the maximum rate at ~460 °C and refers to the thermal decomposition of lignin [65]. When comparing with non-modified walnut shell filler, the walnut shell fillers modified with perlite, montmorillonite, and halloysite also reveal three main stages of thermal decomposition; however, the weight loss of hemicellulose and lignin is reduced. This behavior may be connected with the presence of thermal protective layers created by layered fillers—perlite, montmorillonite, and halloysite, which effectively improve the thermal stability of modified walnut shell fillers.
DSC/TGA analysis of PUR composites is presented in Figure 12c,d. In general, thermal degradation of PUR porous materials involves three stages. The individual stages correspond to characteristic temperatures (Tmax) determined based on the results obtained during thermogravimetric analysis (TGA). The first stage of thermal degradation (Tmax1) is related to the thermal decomposition of low molecular weight compounds [66,67]. In the case of analyzed PUR composites, the first stage of decomposition occurs between 203 and 221 °C. It can be noticed that the incorporation of walnut shell fillers results in higher values of Tmax1, which can be related to the modification of the filler with natural flame retardant compounds—perlite, montmorillonite, and halloysite [68]. The value of Tmax1 increases from 209 °C (for PUR_0) to 221, 209, and 211 °C, respectively. The slight deterioration in thermal stability of PUR composites is observed after the incorporation of unmodified walnut shell filler—the value of Tmax1 decreases slightly from 209 to 203 °C due to the cellulosic nature of the filler. The second stage of thermal degradation refers to the thermal degradation of hard segments of PUR composites and thermal degradation of walnut shell fillers (cellulose/hemicellulose/lignin) [60]. In all cases, the thermal degradation occurs in the range between 306 and 325 °C. Based on the obtained results, it can be concluded that the greatest improvement in thermal degradation of PUR composites is observed for PUR composites containing walnut shell filler modified with halloysite—the value of Tmax2 increases from 306 to 325 °C. The last, third stage of thermal degradation (Tmax3) is related to the degradation of the compounds and fragments that were generated during previous stages [69]. In the case of analyzed PUR composites, it occurs in the temperature range between 571 and 599 °C. The incorporation of the walnut shell fillers results in a slight increase in the temperature characteristic for this stage Tmax3. The greatest improvement in Tmax3 is observed for PUR composites containing walnut shell filler modified with halloysite compound. By analyzing the influence of walnut shell fillers on the thermal stability of the obtained PUR composites, the char residue amount at 600 °C was also evaluated. When comparing the carbonization residue with the PUR_0 result, it can be concluded that with increasing walnut shell fillers content, the residue content also increases. More specifically, the amount of char residue increases from 22.6% for PUR_0 to 31.8, 35.0, 31.3 and 35.8%, respectively for PUR_WS, PUR_WS/P, PUR_WS/MMT and PUR_WS/HL. Based on the obtained results, it can be concluded that the incorporation of walnut shell fillers improves the thermal stability of the obtained PUR composites.

3. Materials and Methods

3.1. Materials

Polymeric diphenulmethane diisocyanate with the brand name of Purocyn B was supplied by Purinova Company (Bydgoszcz, Poland). Polyether polyol with the brand name of Stepanpol PS-2352 was purchased from Stepan Company (Northfield, IL, USA). Potassium octoate with a brand name of Kosmos 75 and potassium acetate with a brand name of Kosmos 33 was supplied by Evonik Industry (Essen, Germany). The silicone-based surfactant with the brand name Tegostab B8513 was purchased from Evonik Industry (Essen, Germany). Pentane and cyclopentane (used as a blowing agent in a volume ratio of 50:50 v/v) were supplied by Sigma-Aldrich Corporation (Saint Louis, MO, USA). Walnut shells (WS) were supplied by a local company from Poland. The halloysite powder with a specific surface of 64 m2/g, material was purchased from by Sigma-Aldrich (Saint Louis, MO, USA), montmorillonite clay, Nanomer® contains 15–35 wt. % octadecylamine, 0.5–5 wt.% aminopropyltriethoxysilane was purchased from Merck (Darmstadt, Germany), perlite powder with a specific surface of 60–70 m2/g was supplied by Sigma-Aldrich (Saint Louis, MO, USA).

3.2. Synthesis of PUR Composites

Before adding to the polyol system, walnut shell filler was mechanically ground and sieved using a 100 µm sieve. In the next step, walnut shell filler was modified with perlite/montmorillonite/halloysite using a high-energy ball milling process. Walnut shell filler was mixed with perlite/montmorillonite/halloysite powder (walnut shell filler weight to perlite/montmorillonite/halloysite weight ratio = 1:2) and milled using a high-energy ball milling process (60 min, 3000 rpm, ball weight to powder weight ratio = 12:1). Walnut shells modified with perlite/montmorillonite/halloysite were used as reinforcing filler in the synthesis of PUR composites. The impact of the type of filler on the selected physical and mechanical properties of PUR composites was determined. Each component of the PUR system was added based on the weight percentage of polyol (Stepanpol PS2352). The preweighted amount of polyol, blowing agent (pentane/cyclopentane), surfactant (Tegostab B8513), catalysts (Kosmos 33, Kosmos 75), and water were placed in the beaker and mechanically stirred for 60 s (2000 RPM). In the next step, the walnut shell filler modified with perlite/montmorillonite/halloysite was added to the mixture and continually stirred for another 60 s. After that, the polymeric diphenylmethane diisocyanate (Purocyn B) was added to the mixture and such obtained system was mixed vigorously for 30 s (2000 RPM). As synthesized PUR composites were freely expanded and cured for 24 h at room temperature. The produced PUR composites were labeled as PUR_0, PUR_WS, PUR_WS/P, PUR_WS/MMT, and PUR_WS/HL. The formulations of PUR composites reinforced with walnut shell fillers are given in Table 5. The schematic procedure of the synthesis of PUR composites presents Figure 13.

3.3. Methods and Instruments

Morphology and cell size distribution of foams were determined based on the cellular structure pictures of foams taken using JEOL JSM-5500 LV scanning electron microscopy (JEOL LTD, Akishima, Japan). The average pore diameters and pore size distribution were determined using ImageJ software (Media Cybernetics Inc. Rockville, MD, USA). The closed-cell content was determined according to PN-EN ISO 4590 using the helium pycnometer AccuPyc 1340 with the FoamPyc option (Micrometrics, Norcross, GA, USA) in S.Z.T.K. ‘TAPS’—Maciej Kowalski Company (Lodz, Poland). The chemical structure of fillers was determined by Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR, Nicolet iS50 spectrometer, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). The average size of filler particles was assessed with the dynamic light scattering (DLS) method, using a Zetasizer NanoS90 instrument (Malvern Instruments Ltd., Malvern, UK). The apparent density of foams was examined accordingly to the standard ASTM D1622, which is equivalent to ISO 845. A three-point bending test of foams was carried out following the standard ASTM D7264, which is equivalent to ISO 178, using Zwick Z100 Testing Machine (Zwick/Roell Group, Ulm, Germany). The compressive strength (σ10%) of foams was examined accordingly to the standard ASTM D1621, which is equivalent to ISO 844, using Zwick Z100 Testing Machine (Zwick/Roell Group, Ulm, Germany). The impact examination was carried out accordingly to the standard ASTM D4812, which is equivalent to ISO 180, using Zwick Z100 Testing Machine (Zwick/Roell Group, Ulm, Germany). The dimensional stability of foams was determined accordingly to the standard ASTM D2126, which is equivalent to ISO 2796. The thermal stability of foams was determined using a Mettler Toledo thermogravimetric analyzer TGA/DSC1 (Columbus, OH, USA). The burning behavior of foams was determined accordingly to the standard ISO 5660 using the cone calorimeter apparatus in S.Z.T.K ‘TAPS’—Maciej Kowalski Company (Saugus, Poland). The thermal conductivity of the foams was determined using the LaserComp 50 heat flow meter (HFMA, Westchester, IL, USA).

4. Conclusions

Polyurethane (PUR) composites were modified with 2 wt.% of walnut shell filler modified with selected mineral filler—perlite, montmorillonite, and halloysite. The impact of modified walnut shell fillers on selected properties of PUR composites, such as rheological properties (dynamic viscosity, foaming behavior), mechanical properties (compressive strength, flexural strength, impact strength), dynamic-mechanical behavior (glass transition temperature, storage modulus), insulation properties (thermal conductivity), thermal characteristic (temperature of thermal decomposition stages), and flame retardant properties (e.g., ignition time, limiting oxygen index, heat peak release) was investigated. Among all modified types of PUR composites, the greatest improvement was observed for PUR composites filled with walnut shell filler functionalized with halloysite. For example, on the addition of such modified walnut shell filler, the compressive strength was enhanced by ~13%, flexural strength by ~12%, and impact strength by ~14%. Due to the functionalization of walnut shell filler with thermally stable flame retardant compounds, such modified PUR composites were characterized by higher temperatures of thermal decomposition. Most importantly, PUR composites filled with flame retardant compounds exhibited improved flame resistance characteristics—in all cases, the value of peak heat release was reduced by ~12%, while the value of total smoke release was reduced by ~23%. Moreover, the incorporation of walnut shell fillers modified with perlite, montmorillonite, and halloysite improved the thermal stability of PUR composites—e.g., the value of char residue (measured at 600 °C) increased from 22.6% to 35.8%, for PUR composites containing halloysite.

Author Contributions

Methodology, Investigation, Data Curation, Writing—Original Draft, Writing—Review and Editing, Visualization, S.C.; Methodology, Investigation A.K.; Methodology, Investigation K.M.; Methodology, Investigation A.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

No data available.

Acknowledgments

This article has been completed while the third author was the Doctoral Candidate in the Interdisciplinary Doctoral School at the Lodz University of Technology, Poland.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors reported no conflicts of interest related to this study.

References

  1. Arévalo-Alquichire, S.; Valero, M. Castor Oil Polyurethanes as Biomaterials. Intech 2017, 137–157. [Google Scholar]
  2. Paciorek-Sadowska, J.; Borowicz, M.; Isbrandt, M.; Czupryński, B.; Apiecionek, Ł. The Use of Waste from the Production of Rapeseed Oil for Obtaining of New Polyurethane Composites. Polymers 2019, 11, 1431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  3. Borowicz, M.; Paciorek-Sadowska, J.; Lubczak, J.; Czupryński, B. Biodegradable, flame-retardant, and bio-based rigid polyurethane/polyisocyanurate foams for thermal insulation application. Polymers 2019, 11, 1816. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  4. Sałasińska, K.; Leszczyńska, M.; Celiński, M.; Kozikowski, P.; Kowiorski, K.; Lipińska, L. Burning behaviour of rigid polyurethane foams with histidine and modified graphene oxide. Materials 2021, 14, 1184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Engels, H.W.; Pirkl, H.G.; Albers, R.; Albach, R.W.; Krause, J.; Hoffmann, A.; Casselmann, H.; Dormish, J. Polyurethanes: Versatile materials and sustainable problem solvers for today’s challenges. Angew. Chemie Int. Ed. 2013, 52, 9422–9441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Ionescu, M. Chemistry and Technology of Polyols for Polyurethanes; Rapra Technology; iSmithers Rapra Publishing: Shropshire, UK, 2005; ISBN 9781847350350. [Google Scholar]
  7. Joshi, M.; Adak, B.; Butola, B.S. Polyurethane nanocomposite based gas barrier films, membranes and coatings: A review on synthesis, characterization and potential applications. Prog. Mater. Sci. 2018, 97, 230–282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Członka, S.; Kairytė, A.; Miedzińska, K.; Strąkowska, A. Polyurethane Hybrid Composites Reinforced with Lavender Residue Functionalized with Kaolinite and Hydroxyapatite. Materials 2021, 14, 415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Paciorek-Sadowska, J.; Borowicz, M.; Czuprynski, B.; Liszkowska, J. Composites of rigid polyurethane-polyisocyanurate foams with oak bark. Polimery 2017, 62, 666–672. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Członka, S.; Bertino, M.F.; Strzelec, K.; Strąkowska, A.; Masłowski, M. Rigid polyurethane foams reinforced with solid waste generated in leather industry. Polym. Test. 2018, 69, 225–237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Jiao, L.; Xiao, H.; Wang, Q.; Sun, J. Thermal degradation characteristics of rigid polyurethane foam and the volatile products analysis with TG-FTIR-MS. Polym. Degrad. Stab. 2013, 98, 2687–2696. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Kaur, R.; Kumar, M. Addition of anti-flaming agents in castor oil based rigid polyurethane foams: Studies on mechanical and flammable behaviour. Mater. Res. Express 2020, 7, 015333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Ding, H.; Huang, K.; Li, S.; Xu, L.; Xia, J.; Li, M. Flame retardancy and thermal degradation of halogen-free flame-retardant biobased polyurethane composites based on ammonium polyphosphate and aluminium hypophosphite. Polym. Test. 2017, 62, 325–334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Visakh, P.M.; Semkin, A.O.; Rezaev, I.A.; Fateev, A.V. Review on soft polyurethane flame retardant. Constr. Build. Mater. 2019, 227, 116673. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Das, B.; Konwar, U.; Mandal, M.; Karak, N. Sunflower oil based biodegradable hyperbranched polyurethane as a thin film material. Ind. Crops Prod. 2013, 44, 396–404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Strąkowska, A.; Członka, S.; Miedzińska, K.; Strzelec, K. Rigid polyurethane foams with antibacterial properties modified with pine oil. Polimery/Polymers 2020, 65, 691–697. [Google Scholar]
  17. Mosiewicki, M.A.; Casado, U.; Marcovich, N.E.; Aranguren, M.I. Vegetable oil based-polymers reinforced with wood flour. Mol. Cryst. Liq. Cryst. 2008, 484, 509–516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Marson, A.; Masiero, M.; Modesti, M.; Scipioni, A.; Manzardo, A. Life Cycle Assessment of Polyurethane Foams from Polyols Obtained through Chemical Recycling. ACS Omega 2021, 6, 1718–1724. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Odalanowska, M.; Woźniak, M.; Ratajczak, I.; Zielińska, D.; Cofta, G.; Borysiak, S. Propolis and organosilanes as innovative hybrid modifiers in wood-based polymer composites. Materials 2021, 14, 464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Khalili, P.; Liu, X.; Zhao, Z.; Blinzler, B. Fully biodegradable composites: Thermal, flammability, moisture absorption and mechanical properties of Natural fibre-reinforced composites with nano-hydroxyapatite. Materials 2019, 12, 1145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Papa, E.; Medri, V.; Natali Murri, A.; Laghi, L.; De Aloysio, G.; Bandini, S.; Landi, E. Characterization of alkali bonded expanded perlite. Constr. Build. Mater. 2018, 191, 1139–1147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. US Geological Survey. Mineral Commodity Summaries 2020; US Geological Survey: Reston, VA, USA, 2020; ISBN 9781411343627.
  23. Karaipekli, A.; Biçer, A.; Sarı, A.; Tyagi, V.V. Thermal characteristics of expanded perlite/paraffin composite phase change material with enhanced thermal conductivity using carbon nanotubes. Energy Convers. Manag. 2017, 134, 373–381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Demirbaş, O.; Alkan, M.; Doğan, M. The removal of victoria blue from aqueous solution by adsorption on a low-cost material. Adsorption 2002, 8, 341–349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Tekin, N.; Kadinci, E.; Demirbaş, Ö.; Alkan, M.; Kara, A.; Doǧan, M. Surface properties of poly(vinylimidazole)-adsorbed expanded perlite. Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 2006, 93, 125–133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Fan, Q.; Han, G.; Cheng, W.; Tian, H.; Wang, D.; Xuan, L. Effect of intercalation structure of organo-modified montmorillonite/polylactic acid on wheat straw fiber/polylactic acid composites. Polymers 2018, 10, 896. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Członka, S.; Kairytė, A.; Miedzińska, K.; Strąkowska, A.; Adamus-Włodarczyk, A. Mechanically Strong Polyurethane Composites Reinforced with Montmorillonite-Modified Sage Filler (Salvia officinalis L.). Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 3744. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Gou, J.; Zhang, L.; Li, C. A new method combining modification of montmorillonite and crystal regulation to enhance the mechanical properties of polypropylene. Polym. Test. 2020, 82, 106236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Xu, F.; Zhong, L.; Zhang, C.; Wang, P.; Zhang, F.; Zhang, G. Novel High-Efficiency Casein-Based P-N-Containing Flame Retardants with Multiple Reactive Groups for Cotton Fabrics. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2019, 7, 13999–14008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Zahedi, Y.; Fathi-Achachlouei, B.; Yousefi, A.R. Physical and mechanical properties of hybrid montmorillonite/zinc oxide reinforced carboxymethyl cellulose nanocomposites. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2018, 108, 863–873. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Levis, S.R.; Deasy, P.B. Characterisation of halloysite for use as a microtubular drug delivery system. Int. J. Pharm. 2002, 243, 125–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Makaremi, M.; Pasbakhsh, P.; Cavallaro, G.; Lazzara, G.; Aw, Y.K.; Lee, S.M.; Milioto, S. Effect of Morphology and Size of Halloysite Nanotubes on Functional Pectin Bionanocomposites for Food Packaging Applications. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2017, 9, 17476–17488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Cavallaro, G.; Chiappisi, L.; Pasbakhsh, P.; Gradzielski, M.; Lazzara, G. A structural comparison of halloysite nanotubes of different origin by Small-Angle Neutron Scattering (SANS) and Electric Birefringence. Appl. Clay Sci. 2018, 160, 71–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Bertolino, V.; Cavallaro, G.; Lazzara, G.; Milioto, S.; Parisi, F. Halloysite nanotubes sandwiched between chitosan layers: Novel bionanocomposites with multilayer structures. New J. Chem. 2018, 42, 8384–8390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Smith, R.J.; Holder, K.M.; Ruiz, S.; Hahn, W.; Song, Y.; Lvov, Y.M.; Grunlan, J.C. Environmentally Benign Halloysite Nanotube Multilayer Assembly Significantly Reduces Polyurethane Flammability. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2018, 28, 1703289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Goda, E.S.; Yoon, K.R.; El-sayed, S.H.; Hong, S.E. Halloysite nanotubes as smart flame retardant and economic reinforcing materials: A review. Thermochim. Acta 2018, 669, 173–184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Członka, S.; Strakowska, A.; Kairyte, A. Application of walnut shells-derived biopolyol in the synthesis of rigid polyurethane foams. Materials 2020, 13, 2687. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Członka, S.; Strąkowska, A.; Kairytė, A. Effect of walnut shells and silanized walnut shells on the mechanical and thermal properties of rigid polyurethane foams. Polym. Test. 2020, 87, 106534. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Członka, S.; Strąkowska, A. Rigid Polyurethane Foams Based on Bio-Polyol and Additionally Reinforced with Silanized and Acetylated Walnut Shells for the Synthesis of Environmentally Friendly Insulating Materials. Materials 2020, 13, 3245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Kairytė, A.; Vaitkus, S.; Vėjelis, S.; Girskas, G.; Balčiūnas, G. Rapeseed-based polyols and paper production waste sludge in polyurethane foam: Physical properties and their prediction models. Ind. Crops Prod. 2018, 112, 119–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Lehmhus, D.; Vesenjak, M.; Schampheleire, S.; Fiedler, T. From Stochastic Foam to Designed Structure: Balancing Cost and Performance of Cellular Metals. Materials 2017, 10, 922. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  42. Amin, M.; Najwa, K. Cellulose Nanocrystals Reinforced Thermoplastic Polyurethane Nanocomposites. Master’s Thesis, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  43. Kuranska, M.; Prociak, A.; Michalowski, S.; Cabulis, U.; Kirpluks, M. Microcellulose as a natural filler in polyurethane foams based on the biopolyol from rapeseed oil. Polimery/Polymers 2016, 61, 625–632. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Yan, D.; Xu, L.; Chen, C.; Tang, J.; Ji, X.; Li, Z. Enhanced mechanical and thermal properties of rigid polyurethane foam composites containing graphene nanosheets and carbon nanotubes. Polym. Int. 2012, 61, 1107–1114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Formela, K.; Hejna, A.; Zedler, Ł.; Przybysz, M.; Ryl, J.; Saeb, M.R.; Piszczyk, Ł. Structural, thermal and physico-mechanical properties of polyurethane/brewers’ spent grain composite foams modified with ground tire rubber. Ind. Crops Prod. 2017, 108, 844–852. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Silva, M.C.; Takahashi, J.A.; Chaussy, D.; Belgacem, M.N.; Silva, G.G. Composites of Rigid Polyurethane Foam and Cellulose Fiber Residue. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2010, 117, 3665–3672. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Song, Z.L.; Ma, L.Q.; Wu, Z.J.; He, D.P. Effects of viscosity on cellular structure of foamed aluminum in foaming process. J. Mater. Sci. 2000, 35, 15–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Dolomanova, V.; Jens, C.M.R.; Jensen, L.R.; Pyrz, R.; Timmons, A.B. Mechanical properties and morphology of nano-reinforced rigid PU foam. J. Cell. Plast. 2011, 47, 81–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Septevani, A.A.; Evans, D.A.C.; Annamalai, P.K.; Martin, D.J. The use of cellulose nanocrystals to enhance the thermal insulation properties and sustainability of rigid polyurethane foam. Ind. Crops Prod. 2017, 107, 114–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Sung, G.; Kim, J.H. Influence of filler surface characteristics on morphological, physical, acoustic properties of polyurethane composite foams filled with inorganic fillers. Compos. Sci. Technol. 2017, 146, 147–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Luo, X.; Mohanty, A.; Misra, M. Lignin as a reactive reinforcing filler for water-blown rigid biofoam composites from soy oil-based polyurethane. Ind. Crops Prod. 2013, 47, 13–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Wolska, A.; Goździkiewicz, M.; Ryszkowska, J. Thermal and mechanical behaviour of flexible polyurethane foams modified with graphite and phosphorous fillers. J. Mater. Sci. 2012, 47, 5627–5634. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  53. Adnan, S.; Tuan Ismail, T.N.M.; Mohd Noor, N.; Nek Mat Din, N.S.M.; Hanzah, N.; Shoot Kian, Y.; Abu Hassan, H. Development of Flexible Polyurethane Nanostructured Biocomposite Foams Derived from Palm Olein-Based Polyol. Adv. Mater. Sci. Eng. 2016, 2016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  54. Guo, C.; Zhou, L.; Lv, J. Effects of expandable graphite and modified ammonium polyphosphate on the flame-retardant and mechanical properties of wood flour-polypropylene composites. Polym. Polym. Compos. 2013, 21, 449–456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Kim, J.M.; Han, M.S.; Kim, Y.H.; Kim, W.N. Thermal, morphological and rheological properties of rigid polyurethane foams as thermal insulating materials. AIP Conf. Proc. 2008, 1027, 905–907. [Google Scholar]
  56. Chang, L. Improving the Mechanical Performance of Wood Fiber Reinforced Bio-based Polyurethane Foam. Master Appl. Sci. 2014, 101, 1572052. [Google Scholar]
  57. Kuranska, M.; Prociak, A. Porous polyurethane composites with natural fibres. Compos. Sci. Technol. 2012, 72, 299–304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Kurańska, M.; Aleksander, P.; Mikelis, K.; Ugis, C. Porous polyurethane composites based on bio-components. Compos. Sci. Technol. 2013, 75, 70–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Hamilton, A.R.; Thomsen, O.T.; Madaleno, L.A.O.; Jensen, L.R.; Rauhe, J.C.M.; Pyrz, R. Evaluation of the anisotropic mechanical properties of reinforced polyurethane foams. Compos. Sci. Technol. 2013, 87, 210–217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  60. Ciecierska, E.; Jurczyk-Kowalska, M.; Bazarnik, P.; Gloc, M.; Kulesza, M.; Kowalski, M.; Krauze, S.; Lewandowska, M. Flammability, mechanical properties and structure of rigid polyurethane foams with different types of carbon reinforcing materials. Compos. Struct. 2016, 140, 67–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Madaleno, L.; Pyrz, R.; Crosky, A.; Jensen, L.R.; Rauhe, J.C.M.; Dolomanova, V.; De Barros Timmons, A.M.M.V.; Cruz Pinto, J.J.; Norman, J. Processing and characterization of polyurethane nanocomposite foam reinforced with montmorillonite-carbon nanotube hybrids. Compos. Part A Appl. Sci. Manuf. 2013, 44, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Benhamou, K.; Kaddami, H.; Magnin, A.; Dufresne, A.; Ahmad, A. Bio-based polyurethane reinforced with cellulose nanofibers: A comprehensive investigation on the effect of interface. Carbohydr. Polym. 2015, 122, 202–211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Afzaluddin, A.; Jawaid, M.; Salit, M.S.; Ishak, M.R. Physical and mechanical properties of sugar palm/glass fiber reinforced thermoplastic polyurethane hybrid composites. J. Mater. Res. Technol. 2019, 8, 950–959. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Cichosz; Masek Cellulose Fibers Hydrophobization via a Hybrid Chemical Modification. Polymers 2019, 11, 1174. [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  65. Cichosz, S.; Masek, A.; Rylski, A. Cellulose Modification for Improved Compatibility with the Polymer Matrix: Mechanical Characterization of the Composite Material. Materials 2020, 13, 5519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Cichosz, S.; Masek, A. Superiority of cellulose non-solvent chemical modification over solvent-involving treatment: Application in polymer composite (part II). Materials 2020, 13, 2901. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Cichosz, S.; Masek, A. Thermal Behavior of Green Cellulose-Filled Thermoplastic Elastomer Polymer Blends. Molecules 2020, 25, 1279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  68. Zhang, S.; Jin, X.; Gu, X.; Chen, C.; Li, H.; Zhang, Z.; Sun, J. The preparation of fully bio-based flame retardant poly(lactic acid) composites containing casein. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2018, 135, 46599. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Tian, H.; Wu, J.; Xiang, A. Polyether polyol-based rigid polyurethane foams reinforced with soy protein fillers. J. Vinyl Addit. Technol. 2018, 24, E105–E111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Ijms 22 07304 g001 550
Figure 1. The external surface of (a) unmodified walnut shell filler, and walnut shell filler modified with (b) perlite, (c) montmorillonite, and (d) halloysite.
Figure 1. The external surface of (a) unmodified walnut shell filler, and walnut shell filler modified with (b) perlite, (c) montmorillonite, and (d) halloysite.
Ijms 22 07304 g001
Ijms 22 07304 g002 550
Figure 2. Particle size distribution of (a) WS (b) WS/P, (c) WS/MMT, and (d) WS/HL.
Figure 2. Particle size distribution of (a) WS (b) WS/P, (c) WS/MMT, and (d) WS/HL.
Ijms 22 07304 g002
Ijms 22 07304 g003 550
Figure 3. The results of dynamic viscosity of PUR systems containing WS fillers.
Figure 3. The results of dynamic viscosity of PUR systems containing WS fillers.
Ijms 22 07304 g003
Ijms 22 07304 g004 550
Figure 4. Cellular structure of (a) PUR_0, (b) PUR_WS, (c) PUR_WS/P, (d) PUR_WS/MMT, (e) PUR_WS/HL.
Figure 4. Cellular structure of (a) PUR_0, (b) PUR_WS, (c) PUR_WS/P, (d) PUR_WS/MMT, (e) PUR_WS/HL.
Ijms 22 07304 g004
Ijms 22 07304 g005 550
Figure 5. Call size distribution of (a) PUR_0, (b) PUR_WS, (c) PUR_WS/P, (d) PUR_WS/MMT and (e) PUR_WS/HL.
Figure 5. Call size distribution of (a) PUR_0, (b) PUR_WS, (c) PUR_WS/P, (d) PUR_WS/MMT and (e) PUR_WS/HL.
Ijms 22 07304 g005
Ijms 22 07304 g006 550
Figure 6. Closed-cell content and thermal conductivity results of PUR composites containing walnut shell fillers.
Figure 6. Closed-cell content and thermal conductivity results of PUR composites containing walnut shell fillers.
Ijms 22 07304 g006
Ijms 22 07304 g007 550
Figure 7. The results of apparent density and cell size of PUR composites containing walnut shell fillers.
Figure 7. The results of apparent density and cell size of PUR composites containing walnut shell fillers.
Ijms 22 07304 g007
Ijms 22 07304 g008 550
Figure 8. The impact of walnut fillers on the compressive strength of PUR foams.
Figure 8. The impact of walnut fillers on the compressive strength of PUR foams.
Ijms 22 07304 g008
Ijms 22 07304 g009 550
Figure 9. The impact of walnut shell fillers on the flexural strength and impact strength of PUR foams.
Figure 9. The impact of walnut shell fillers on the flexural strength and impact strength of PUR foams.
Ijms 22 07304 g009
Ijms 22 07304 g010 550
Figure 10. Dynamic-mechanical performance of PUR composites containing walnut shell filler–(a) tan δ and (b) storage modulus.
Figure 10. Dynamic-mechanical performance of PUR composites containing walnut shell filler–(a) tan δ and (b) storage modulus.
Ijms 22 07304 g010
Ijms 22 07304 g011 550
Figure 11. The results of the cone calorimeter experiment—(a) the peak rate of heat release (pHRR), (b) the total smoke release (TSR), (c) the average yield of CO, and (d) the average yield of CO2.
Figure 11. The results of the cone calorimeter experiment—(a) the peak rate of heat release (pHRR), (b) the total smoke release (TSR), (c) the average yield of CO, and (d) the average yield of CO2.
Ijms 22 07304 g011
Ijms 22 07304 g012 550
Figure 12. Thermogravimetric (TGA) and derivative thermogravimetry (DTG) results of (a,b) walnut shell fillers and (c,d) PUR composites.
Figure 12. Thermogravimetric (TGA) and derivative thermogravimetry (DTG) results of (a,b) walnut shell fillers and (c,d) PUR composites.
Ijms 22 07304 g012
Ijms 22 07304 g013 550
Figure 13. Schematic procedure of the synthesis of PUR composites reinforced with walnut shells modified with perlite/montmorillonite/halloysite.
Figure 13. Schematic procedure of the synthesis of PUR composites reinforced with walnut shells modified with perlite/montmorillonite/halloysite.
Ijms 22 07304 g013
Table
Table 1. Processing times of PUR mixtures containing walnut shell fillers.
Table 1. Processing times of PUR mixtures containing walnut shell fillers.
SampleProcessing Times [s]
Start TimeGrowth TimeTack-Free Time
PUR_040 ± 2295 ± 6358 ± 8
PUR_WS57 ± 3358 ± 5346 ± 9
PUR_WS/P55 ± 2340 ± 7348 ± 7
PUR_WS/MMT62 ± 3370 ± 8340 ± 8
PUR_WS/HL51 ± 3325 ± 6355 ± 7
Table
Table 2. Dimensional stability of PUR composites containing walnut shell fillers.
Table 2. Dimensional stability of PUR composites containing walnut shell fillers.
SampleDimensional Stability at 70 °C [%]Dimensional Stability at −20 °C [%]
WidthLengthThicknessWidthLengthThickness
PUR_01.82 ± 0.011.70 ± 0.011.85 ± 0.011.93 ± 0.011.79 ± 0.011.77 ± 0.01
PUR_WS1.72 ± 0.011.64 ± 0.011.77 ± 0.011.84 ± 0.011.77 ± 0.011.73 ± 0.01
PUR_WS/P1.68 ± 0.011.53 ± 0.011.73 ± 0.011.76 ± 0.011.69 ± 0.011.65 ± 0.01
PUR_WS/MMT1.66 ± 0.011.42 ± 0.011.67 ± 0.011.73 ± 0.011.74 ± 0.011.71 ± 0.01
PUR_WS/HL1.65 ± 0.011.49 ± 0.011.71 ± 0.011.77 ± 0.011.77 ± 0.011.68 ± 0.01
Table
Table 3. The results of the cone calorimeter experiment.
Table 3. The results of the cone calorimeter experiment.
SampleIT
(s)		pHRR
(kW m−2)		THR
(MJ m−2)		TSR
(m2 m−2)		COY
(kg kg−1)		CO2Y
(kg kg−1)		LOI
(%)
PUR_0426521.915160.3750.38820.2
PUR_WS623223.813940.4390.31519.9
PUR_WS/P823620.713290.3930.31121.0
PUR_WS/MMT723321.312740.3940.31220.8
PUR_WS/HL823420.111600.3680.29921.5
Table
Table 4. The results of thermal stability of PUR composites.
Table 4. The results of thermal stability of PUR composites.
SampleTmax (°C)Char Residue
(wt. %) at 600 °C
1st Stage2nd Stage3rd Stage
PUR_0209 ± 4306 ± 4571 ± 422.6 ± 0.2
PUR_WS203 ± 5319 ± 5583 ± 531.8 ± 0.1
PUR_WS/P221 ± 2321 ± 4595 ± 535.0 ± 0.2
PUR_WS/MMT209 ± 2313 ± 2590 ± 231.3 ± 0.2
PUR_WS/HL211 ± 5325 ± 4599 ± 635.8 ± 0.2
Table
Table 5. The formulations of PUR composites reinforced with walnut shell fillers.
Table 5. The formulations of PUR composites reinforced with walnut shell fillers.
ComponentPUR_0PUR_WSPUR_WS/PPUR_WS/MMTPUR_WS/HL
Parts by Weight (wt.%)
Stepanpol PS-2352100
Purocyn B160
Kosmos 756
Kosmos 330.8
Tegostab B85132.5
Water0.5
Pentane/cyclopentane11
Walnut shells02000
Walnut shells modified with perlite00200
Walnut shells modified with montmorillonite00020
Walnut shells modified with halloysite00002
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Członka, S.; Kairytė, A.; Miedzińska, K.; Strąkowska, A. Polyurethane Composites Reinforced with Walnut Shell Filler Treated with Perlite, Montmorillonite and Halloysite. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 7304. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22147304

AMA Style

Członka S, Kairytė A, Miedzińska K, Strąkowska A. Polyurethane Composites Reinforced with Walnut Shell Filler Treated with Perlite, Montmorillonite and Halloysite. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2021; 22(14):7304. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22147304

Chicago/Turabian Style

Członka, Sylwia, Agnė Kairytė, Karolina Miedzińska, and Anna Strąkowska. 2021. "Polyurethane Composites Reinforced with Walnut Shell Filler Treated with Perlite, Montmorillonite and Halloysite" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 22, no. 14: 7304. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22147304

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop