Next Article in Journal
The Importance of Alpha-Actinin Proteins in Platelet Formation and Function, and Their Causative Role in Congenital Macrothrombocytopenia
Previous Article in Journal
Early Bone Healing on Hydroxyapatite-Coated and Chemically-Modified Hydrophilic Implant Surfaces in an Ovine Model
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Identification and Characterization of MIKCc-Type MADS-Box Genes in the Flower Organs of Adonis amurensis

College of Horticulture and Landscape Architecture, Northeast Agricultural University, Harbin 150030, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Authors contributed equally to the work.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22(17), 9362; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22179362
Submission received: 24 July 2021 / Revised: 25 August 2021 / Accepted: 26 August 2021 / Published: 28 August 2021
(This article belongs to the Section Molecular Plant Sciences)

Abstract

:
Adonis amurensis is a perennial herbaceous flower that blooms in early spring in northeast China, where the night temperature can drop to −15 °C. To understand flowering time regulation and floral organogenesis of A. amurensis, the MIKCc-type MADS (Mcm1/Agamous/ Deficiens/Srf)-box genes were identified and characterized from the transcriptomes of the flower organs. In this study, 43 non-redundant MADS-box genes (38 MIKCc, 3 MIKC*, and 2 Mα) were identified. Phylogenetic and conserved motif analysis divided the 38 MIKCc-type genes into three major classes: ABCDE model (including AP1/FUL, AP3/PI, AG, STK, and SEPs/AGL6), suppressor of overexpression of constans1 (SOC1), and short vegetative phase (SVP). qPCR analysis showed that the ABCDE model genes were highly expressed mainly in flowers and differentially expressed in the different tissues of flower organs, suggesting that they may be involved in the flower organ identity of A. amurensis. Subcellular localization revealed that 17 full-length MADSs were mainly localized in the nucleus: in Arabidopsis, the heterologous expression of three full-length SOC1-type genes caused early flowering and altered the expression of endogenous flowering time genes. Our analyses provide an overall insight into MIKCc genes in A. amurensis and their potential roles in floral organogenesis and flowering time regulation.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

The MADS (Mcm1/Agamous/Deficiens/Srf)-box transcription factor gene family plays an important role in the regulation of plant growth and development [1]. This large gene family is divided into two types, types I and II, based on phylogenetic relationships of the conserved MADS-box domain [2]. In plants, the type-I genes are further divided into Mα, Mβ, and Mγ subfamilies, and the type-II genes into the MIKCc-type and MIKC*-type [3,4]. The term MIKC originated from the four major domains, including MADS (M), intervening (I), keratin-like (K), and C-terminal (C) [5].
The MIKCc-type MADS-box genes are involved in flowering time regulation and floral organ identity. For example, flowering locus C (FLC), suppressor of overexpression of constans1 (SOC1), and short vegetative phase (SVP) were reported to be key regulators of flowering time; the FLC gene encodes a specific MADS domain protein that acts as a repressor of flowering, and SOC1 and SVP are important control factors of flowering time in the vernalization and ambient temperature pathways, respectively [6,7,8]. Moreover, the MADS-box genes of the extended ABCDE model explain how the different floral organ identities belong to the MIKCc subgroups [9], namely, sepals (A + E), petals (A + B + E), stamens (B + C + E), carpels (C + E), and ovules (D + E). In this model, class A contains APETALA1 (AP1) and FRUITFULL (FUL); class B contains PISTILLATA (PI) and APETALA3 (AP3); class C contains AGAMOUS (AG); class D contains SEEDSTICK (STK); and class E contains SEPALLATA genes (SEP1, SEP2, SEP3, and SEP4) [9]. The ABCDE model was initially established in Arabidopsis and also works for most eudicots.
The identification and characterization of MADS-box genes are extremely important for the study of flowering time regulation and flower organ development in plant species. Currently, MADS-box genes were identified and characterized in various plant species with reference genomic resources, including Arabidopsis [5], rice [10], Zea mays [11], soybean [12], Raphanus sativus [13], Phyllostachys edulis [14], and Jatropha curcas [15]. However, gene identification in non-model plant species without genomic resources is difficult. Recently, multiple functional MADS-box genes were identified and characterized in Lilium formosanum and Rosa chinensis using transcriptome sequencing [16,17], suggesting the feasibility of this method. A. amurensis is a perennial herbaceous flower in the family Ranunculaceae, which is naturally distributed in northeast China. A. amurensis can blossom before the ice and snow melts in the early spring, when the temperature is about −15 °C (night) and 10 °C (day) [18]. Therefore, it is the ideal plant species to study flowering control at extreme low temperatures. In this study, 43 non-redundant MADS-type transcripts were extensively identified from transcriptomes of flower organs at multiple development stages. Further, the conserved motifs, expression patterns, and subcellular localization of the expressed proteins were investigated. Moreover, the function of three SOC1-type MADS was characterized by heterogenous expression in Arabidopsis. This study will serve as a useful reference for further functional analyses of candidate genes involved in the flowering time control and flower development of A. amurensis at low temperatures.

2. Results

2.1. Identification and Annotation of MADS-Box Genes in A. amurensis

In our previous study, the 3216 transcription factors (TFs) in the A. amurensis flower organs at six developmental stages were identified and classified by transcriptome sequencing. Of these TFs, 91 MADS-type transcripts were annotated [18]. After removing the redundants, 43 MADS-box putative genes were finally obtained (Table S1). The phylogenetic tree and conserved motifs of these 43 AaMADS putative genes were constructed and identified (Figure 1A,B). Among the corresponding proteins, motifs 1 and 2 were identified and were conserved MADS domains. Motifs 3 and 5, which were keratin (K) domains, were identified in 27 AaMADS proteins (Figure 1B). The 43 AaMADS putative proteins were named and classified according to the phylogenetic relationship between AaMADS and Arabidopsis MADS (also known as the Agamous-like, AGL) proteins. They were subdivided into 3 major classes, Mα, MIKC*, and MIKCc, of which MIKCc was divided into 7 subclasses, including SVP (four members), A-class (AP1 and FUL, eight members), B-class (PI and AP3, eight members), C-class (AG, one member), D-class (STK, one member), E-class (SEP1/2/3 and AGL6, eight members), and SOC1 (four members) (Figure 1C). Interestingly, only two MIKC*-type AtAGL65 homologous proteins (CL19409.C1 and CL10680.C2) shared motifs 15, 16, 17, and 19 (Figure 1C).

2.2. Expression of AaMADS Genes in the Flowers of A. amurensis

Based on transcriptome data, the expression of the 43 AaMADS genes showed two different patterns in the A. amurensis flower organs at six developmental stages. One is the high expression of AaMADS genes in five development stages [young alabastrum (YA), visible color alabastrum (VCA), full bloom stage (FBS), and senescing flower stage (SFS)], while the other is the high expression of AaMADS genes only in the flower bud differentiation (FBD) stage (Figure 2). To understand their expression patterns, the expression of 24 AaMADS genes classified in the ABCDE model in stems, leaves, flowers, and achenes was examined. qPCR analysis showed that AaMADS genes belonging to the A-, B-, C-, D-, and E-classes were generally higher expressed in flowers than in stems, leaves, and achenes (Figure 3). Further, their expression in the four tissues of the flower organs was investigated. A. amurensis flower includes about 7–9 sepals (pale grayish purple), about 10–13 petals (yellow), ellipsoid ovary, stigma unsmooth, sac-like anther, and spherical pollen grains (Figure 4A). In the class A genes, five AP1 (U114330, U119430, U74157, CL3032.C1, and CL3350.C5) were expressed slightly higher in the petals, sepals, and stamens, while one FUL (CL26633.C2) was expressed higher in the petals (Figure 4B). In the class B genes, five AP3 (CL10616.C1, CL27078.C1, U1341, U31032, and U123412) and two PI (CL7220.C2 and U23673) were highly expressed in the petals and stamens, while one PI (CL7507.C2) was highly expressed in the sepals and stamens (Figure 4C). One C-class gene AG (CL18186.C3) and one D-class gene STK (U152236) were highly expressed in the stamens (Figure 4D). In the class E genes, one SEP1 (CL27155.C2) was highly expressed in the stamens, while one SEP1 (CL20429.C1) and two AGL6 (U113876 and U7086) were highly expressed in the petals, sepals, and stamens (Figure 4D).

2.3. Subcellular Localization of AaMADS Proteins

The subcellular localization of 17 full-length AaMADS proteins classified in the SOC1-, SVP-, TT16-type, and ABCDE model was investigated by transient expression with green fluorescent protein (GFP) fused with AaMADS proteins in tobacco leaves. Confocal observations showed the fluorescent signals of all 17 AaMADS-GFP, including three SOC1 (CL8076.C1, CL6237.C1, and CL10716.C2), two SVP (CL28194.C1 and CL28920.C2), one TT16 (CL2264.C2), two A-class (U11162 and U119430), four B-class (CL7220.C2, CL7507.C2, U31032, and CL10616.C1), one D-class (U152236), and four E-class (CL28019.C1, U158374, CL20429.C1, and U7086), were mainly localized in the nucleus, which was stained by DAPI (Figure 5A–G).

2.4. Characterization of Three SOC1-Type AaMADS Genes

SOC1 is a key flowering regulator, which was reported to be associated with the final steps of floral organ development [19]. Thus, the function of three full-length SOC1-type AaMADS (CL8076.C1, CL6237.C1, and CL10716.C2) was investigated by heterologous expression in Arabidopsis driven by the CaMV 35S promoter. CL8076.C1, CL6237.C1, and CL10716.C2 had 66.4%, 53.1%, and 56.3% amino acid sequence identity with AtSOC1, respectively (Figure 6A), and were thus named AaSOC1a, AaSOC1b, and AaSOC1c, respectively. The transient expression of the plasmid of GFP-fused AaSOC1a/b/c showed that they were localized into the nucleus in tobacco leaves (Figure 5A). These constructs were further transfected into Arabidopsis. Transgenic Arabidopsis lines overexpressing AaSOC1a-GFP, AaSOC1b-GFP, and AaSOC1c-GFP were identified by reverse transcription (RT) PCR (Figure 6B and Figure S1). Phenotypic observations showed that transgenic plants (30.5 ± 0.7 days) overexpressing AaSOC1a-GFP, AaSOC1b-GFP, and AaSOC1c-GFP flowered earlier than the wild-type (WT) control (40.3 ± 1.5 days) (Figure 6C). Furthermore, the expression of endogenous flowering time genes, AtFLC, AtFT, and AtSOC1, in transgenic Arabidopsis and WT was compared by qPCR, and results showed that expression of AtFLC and AtSOC1 was significantly lower in all transgenic Arabidopsis than in the WT (Figure 7A–C). The AtFT expression was likewise significantly lower in transgenic Arabidopsis overexpressing AaSOC1a-GFP and AaSOC1b-GFP than in the WT, while it was higher than the WT in transgenic Arabidopsis overexpressing AaSOC1c-GFP (Figure 7). These results suggest that the overexpression of AaSOC1a/b/c perturbates the expression of endogenous flowering time genes in Arabidopsis.

3. Discussion

The number of the MADS-box genes identified in various plant species shows great difference. For example, in Arabidopsis and rice, 107 and 75 MADS-box genes were annotated, respectively, while 42 and 39 MADS-box genes were identified in Phyllostachys edulis and Dianthus caryophyllus, respectively, using a genome-wide search [5,10,14,19]. Using transcriptional sequencing, 58 MADS-box genes were identified in the flower buds of R. chinensis [17]. Similarly, in our study, 43 MADS-box genes were identified from the transcriptional data of A. amurensis flower organs using transcriptional sequencing. Both A. amurensis and Aquilegia coerulea belong to the family Ranunculaceae. In A. coerulea from Ranunculaceae, 47 MADS-box genes were annotated using a genome-wide search [20]. The MIKC-type members are the most common in the MADS-box gene family. Among the 107 MADS-box genes in Arabidopsis, 39 are MIKC-type [5], whereas among the 75 genes in rice, 38 are MIKC-type [10]. Meanwhile, the identified 43 AaMADS genes in A. amurensis contain 38 MIKCc-type and 3 MIKC*-type (Figure 1). The vast majority of the identified AaMADS are MIKCc-type members, which may be related with identifying genes from the flower organs of A. amurensis, as MIKCc is primarily involved in flowering time regulation and flower organ identity [6,7,8,9]. The 38 MIKCc genes contain 26 ABCDE model genes and 4 SOC1-type genes. qPCR analysis showed that 24 AaMADS genes belonging to the ABCDE model were expressed relatively high in the flowers (Figure 3), while in the petals, the expression of A- (AP1 and FUL), B- (AP3 and PI), and E- (SEP1 and AGL6) class genes was slightly higher. Class A (AP1) and E (AGL6) genes were expressed slightly higher in the sepals. In the stamens, class B (AP3 and PI) and class E (SEP1) genes showed high expression, while the class C (AG) and D (STK) genes were highly expressed in the pistils (Figure 4). Gene expression of A-, B-, C-, D-, and E-class in A. amurensis showed similarities and differences found in Arabidopsis and other species. These results suggest that the ABCDE model genes may be involved in the flower organ identity of A. amurensis. Thus, a model of gene expression patterns in A. amurensis is proposed (Figure 8).
Some AaMADS sequences lack a full-length CDS due to the limitations of transcriptome sequencing. We successfully cloned 17 full-length AaMADS and observed their subcellular expression localization. Transient expression in the tobacco leaves showed that the 17 AaMADS-GFP were all localized mainly in the nucleus, suggesting their function as TFs (Figure 5). The 17 full-length AaMADS genes contain 3 SOC1-type AaMADS, named AaSOC1a, AaSOC1b, and AaSOC1c. SOC1 is a key transcription factor that regulates flowering time [21]. Heterologous expression of AaSOC1a-GFP, AaSOC1b-GFP, and AaSOC1c-GFP all caused the early flowering of Arabidopsis (Figure 6). Similarly, heterologous expression of SOC1 homologous genes from various plant species promotes the early flowering of Arabidopsis, for example, Z. mays [22], P. violascens [23], and Dendrobium nobile [24]. In transgenic Arabidopsis overexpressing AaSOC1a-GFP, AaSOC1b-GFP, or AaSOC1c-GFP, the AtFLC gene expression was significantly suppressed compared to the WT (Figure 7). AtFLC expression inhibition is a key step in the flowering of Arabidopsis [6]. The expression of AtSOC1 in all transgenic Arabidopsis was also significantly lower than the wild type. Moreover, the expression of flowering locus T (AtFT) was also affected relative to the WT (Figure 7). We speculated that AaSOC1 may functionally replace endogenous flowering time genes, such as AtSOC1 and AtFT, that further affect the flowering time of Arabidopsis. However, this hypothesis requires further study.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Identification of MADS-Box Genes in A. amurensis

In our previous study, the transcriptome of the floral organs of A. amurensis from six developmental stages, FBD, YA, VCA, EFS, FBS, and SFS, was assembled using Trinity [18]. All assembled unigenes were annotated by comparing the data available at the following public databases: NCBI non-redundant protein sequence (Nr), NCBI nucleotide sequence (Nt), Swiss-Prot protein, Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG), euKaryotic Ortholog Groups (KOG), InterPro, and Gene Ontology (GO) databases, using BLAST2GO analysis with a cut-off E-value of 105. TFs in the annotated unigenes were predicted using the Plant Transcription Factor Database (PlantTFDB; available online: http://planttfdb.gao-lab.org/. TFs with the same annotated information and the longest unigene were selected. Finally, sequences of 43 MADS-box putative genes were obtained from the transcriptional datasets of A. amurensis floral organs. The transcriptome datasets were deposited in the NCBI Gene Expression Omnibus with accession number GSE126456.

4.2. Conserved Motifs and Phylogenetic Analysis of MADS-Box Proteins

The conserved motifs of the 43 AaMADS putative proteins were identified by the multiple expectation for motif elicitation (MEME) tool (available online: https://meme-suite.org/meme/) according to the default parameters. Multiple sequence alignments were performed between MADS-box protein sequences from A. amurensis and Arabidopsis using the ClustalW software. The sequence of the Arabidopsis MADS protein family was taken from the TAIR website (available online: https://www.arabidopsis.org/). The phylogenetic tree was constructed by the neighbor-joining method using the molecular evolutionary genetics analysis (MEGA) 4.1 software (available online: http://www.megasoftware.net/). The amino acid sequences of the 43 putative AaMADS proteins are listed in Supplementary Data 1.

4.3. Expression-Pattern Clustering of AaMADS Genes

The expression levels of 43 AaMADS putative genes in A. amurensis floral organs at six developmental stages (FBD, YA, VCA, EFS, FBS, and SFS) were calculated using the Fragments Per Kilobase of transcript per million mapped reads (FPKM) (Table S2).

4.4. Quantitative Real-Time PCR (qPCR) Analysis

Total RNA from multiple organs (stems, leaves, flowers, and achene) and tissues (calyx, petals, stamens, and pistils) of A. amurensis was extracted using the TRIzol reagent (9108, TaKaRa, Kusatsu, Japan) and reverse transcribed with PrimeScript RT reagent Kit with gDNA Eraser (RR047A, TaKaRa, Kusatsu, Japan). The expression of the 24 AaMADS genes was investigated by qPCR. The primers for these assays (Table S3) were designed using Primer 5.0, and qPCR was performed using a CFX96 real-time PCR detection system (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA) and SYBR Green PCR Master Mix (RR420A, TaKaRa, Kusatsu, Japan) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. AaActin was used as a reference gene. Three biological and three technical replicates were performed for each sample.

4.5. Gene Cloning, Vector Construction, and Plant Transformation

Gene cloning was performed by PCR using specific primers (Table S4). To construct the AaMADS-GFP fusion genes, the open reading frame of 17 AaMADS genes without the stop codon was amplified using PCR and cloned at the XbaI/BamHI and AgeI/KpnI sites of the pBI121-GFP vector using specific primers (Table S5). The above constructs were confirmed by sequencing and transformed into Agrobacterium tumefaciens strain EHA105 for plant transformation. Transient expression in tobacco (Nicotiana benthamiana) leaves was performed as previously described [25]. Arabidopsis (Columbia ecotype) plants were transformed using the floral dip method [26]. Transgenic Arabidopsis plants were selected on 1/2 strength Murashige and Skoog (MS) medium containing 30 μg mL−1 kanamycin. Expression of AaMADS genes in the transgenic Arabidopsis was assessed by semi-quantitative RT-PCR analyses. The T3 generation was used for the phenotypic analyses. Arabidopsis seeds were treated at 4 °C for 2 days and then grown on 1/2 MS medium under long-day conditions (16 h light/8 h dark) at 22 °C for 10 days before being transplanted into soil. The light intensity of the growth chambers was 150 µE m2s1.

4.6. Subcellular Localization

The tobacco leaf epidermis was visualized using confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM; Nikon, A1, Tokyo, Japan). The nucleus was labeled using a DAPI (4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole) dye. GFP and DAPI signals were detected under 500–530 and 420–480 nm emission filters, respectively.

5. Conclusions

A. amurensis is a perennial plant that flowers under natural conditions at extremely low temperatures, which makes it a potential model for investigating the effects of temperature on flowering regulation in other angiosperms. Among the TFs involved in flowering regulation, the MADS-box genes stand out for their central role. Based on transcriptomic and phylogenetic analyses, we found 43 novel MIKCc-type MADS-box genes involved in the regulation of organogenesis and floral development in A. amurensis, including genes involved in the ABCDE model, SVP and SOC1. Moreover, heterologous expression in Arabidopsis of three of these SOC1-like genes was shown to induce early flowering, suggesting their critical role in the regulation of flowering time in A. amurensis. Further, loss-of-function, overexpression, and ectopic expression studies are needed to elucidate the processes regulated by each of these MADS-box genes, as well as the particular features of flowering regulation in A. amurensis.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/ijms22179362/s1.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, S.G. and A.Z.; investigation, L.R., H.S., S.D. and A.Z.; resources, J.W. and A.Z.; data curation, S.F., K.Q. and J.W.; writing—original draft preparation, L.R., H.S. and A.Z.; writing—review and editing, S.G. and A.Z.; funding acquisition, A.Z. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was supported by the Postdoctoral Science Foundation of Heilongjiang Province of China (LBH-Q19004), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (31902052), Natural Science Foundation of Heilongjiang Province of China (YQ2020C006).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

All the raw sequencing reads for all the samples have been submitted to the National Centre for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) Gene Expression Omnibus with accession number GSE126456.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, or in the decision to publish the results.

References

  1. Messenguy, F.; Dubois, E. Role of MADS box proteins and their cofactors in combinatorial control of gene expression and cell development. Gene 2003, 316, 1–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Kaufmann, K.; Melzer, R.; Theissen, G. MIKC-type MADS-domain proteins: Structural modularity, protein interactions and network evolution in land plants. Gene 2005, 347, 183–198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Yang, Y.Z.; Jack, T. Defining subdomains of the K domain important for protein-protein interactions of plant MADS proteins. Plant Mol. Biol. 2004, 55, 45–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Nam, J.; Kim, J.; Lee, S.; An, G.H.; Ma, H.; Nei, M.S. Type I MADS-box genes have experienced faster birth-and-death evolution than type II MADS-box genes in angiosperms. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2004, 101, 1910–1915. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  5. Parenicova, L.; de Folter, S.; Kieffer, M.; Horner, D.S.; Favalli, C.; Busscher, J.; Cook, H.E.; Ingram, R.M.; Kater, M.M.; Davies, B.; et al. Molecular and phylogenetic analyses of the complete MADS-box transcription factor family in Arabidopsis: New openings to the MADS world. Plant Cell 2003, 15, 1538–1551. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Michaels, S.D.; Amasino, R.M. FLOWERING LOCUS C encodes a novel MADS domain protein that acts as a repressor of flowering. Plant Cell 1999, 11, 949–956. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  7. Moon, J.; Suh, S.S.; Lee, H.; Choi, K.R.; Hong, C.B.; Paek, N.C.; Kim, S.G.; Lee, I. The SOC1 MADS-box gene integrates vernalization and gibberellin signals for flowering in Arabidopsis. Plant J. 2003, 35, 613–623. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Hartmann, U.; Hohmann, S.; Nettesheim, K.; Wisman, E.; Saedler, H.; Huijser, P. Molecular cloning of SVP: A negative regulator of the floral transition in Arabidopsis. Plant J. 2000, 21, 351–360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Theissen, G.; Saedler, H. Plant biology. Floral quartets. Nature 2001, 409, 469–471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Arora, R.; Agarwal, P.; Ray, S.; Singh, A.K.; Singh, V.P.; Tyagi, A.K.; Kapoor, S. MADS-box gene family in rice: Genome-wide identification, organization and expression profiling during reproductive development and stress. BMC Genom. 2007, 8, 242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Zhao, Y.; Li, X.Y.; Chen, W.J.; Peng, X.J.; Cheng, X.A.; Zhu, S.W.; Cheng, B.J. Whole-genome survey and characterization of MADS-box gene family in maize and sorghum. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. 2011, 105, 159–173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Shu, Y.J.; Yu, D.S.; Wang, D.; Guo, D.L.; Guo, C.H. Genome-wide survey and expression analysis of the MADS-box gene family in soybean. Mol. Biol. Rep. 2013, 40, 3901–3911. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Li, C.; Wang, Y.; Xu, L.; Nie, S.S.; Chen, Y.L.; Liang, D.Y.; Sun, X.C.; Karanja, B.K.; Luo, X.B.; Liu, L.W. Genome-wide characterization of the MADS-box gene family in radish (Raphanus sativus L.) and assessment of its roles in flowering and floral organogenesis. Front. Plant Sci. 2016, 7, 1390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Zhang, Y.; Tang, D.; Lin, X.; Ding, M.; Tong, Z. Genome-wide identification of MADS-box family genes in moso bamboo (Phyllostachys edulis) and a functional analysis of PeMADS5 in flowering. BMC Plant Biol. 2018, 18, 176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Tang, Y.; Wang, J.; Bao, X.; Wu, Q.; Yang, T.; Li, H.; Wang, W.; Zhang, Y.; Bai, N.; Guan, Y.; et al. Genome-wide analysis of Jatropha curcas MADS-box gene family and functional characterization of the JcMADS40 gene in transgenic rice. BMC Genom. 2020, 21, 325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Liao, W.Y.; Lin, L.F.; Lin, M.D.; Hsieh, S.C.; Li, A.Y.S.; Tsay, Y.S.; Chou, M.L. Overexpression of Lilium formosanum MADS-box (LFMADS) causing floral defects while promoting flowering in Arabidopsis thaliana, whereas only affecting floral transition time in Nicotiana tabacum. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018, 19, 2217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Liu, J.; Fu, X.; Dong, Y.; Lu, J.; Ren, M.; Zhou, N.; Wang, C. MIKC(C)-type MADS-box genes in Rosa chinensis: The remarkable expansion of ABCDE model genes and their roles in floral organogenesis. Hortic. Res. 2018, 5, 25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Zhou, A.; Sun, H.; Dai, S.; Feng, S.; Zhang, J.; Gong, S.; Wang, J. Identification of transcription factors involved in the regulation of flowering in Adonis amurensis through combined RNA-seq transcriptomics and iTRAQ proteomics. Genes 2019, 10, 305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Zhang, X.N.; Wang, Q.J.; Yang, S.Z.; Lin, S.N.; Bao, M.Z.; Bendahmane, M.; Wu, Q.S.; Wang, C.Y.; Fu, X.P. Identification and characterization of the MADS-box genes and their contribution to flower organ in carnation (Dianthus caryophyllus L.). Genes 2018, 9, 193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Sharma, B.; Kramer, E.M. The mads-box gene family of the basal eudicot and hybrid Aquilegia coerulea ‘Origami’ (Ranunculaceae). Ann. Mo. Bot. Gard. 2014, 99, 313–322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Fornara, F.; de Montaigu, A.; Coupland, G. SnapShot: Control of flowering in Arabidopsis. Cell 2010, 141, 550–550.e2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  22. Zhao, S.Z.; Luo, Y.Z.; Zhang, Z.L.; Xu, M.Y.; Wang, W.B.; Zhao, Y.M.; Zhang, L.; Fan, Y.L.; Wang, L. ZmSOC1, an MADS-box transcription factor from Zea mays, promotes flowering in Arabidopsis. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2014, 15, 19987–20003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Liu, S.N.; Ma, T.F.; Ma, L.Y.; Lin, X.C. Ectopic expression of PvSOC1, a homolog of SOC1 from Phyllostachys violascens, promotes flowering in Arabidopsis and rice. Acta Physiol. Plant 2016, 38, 166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Liu, X.R.; Pan, T.; Liang, W.Q.; Gao, L.; Wang, X.J.; Li, H.Q.; Liang, S. Overexpression of an orchid (Dendrobium nobile) SOC1/TM3-like ortholog, DnAGL19, in Arabidopsis regulates HOS1-FT expression. Front. Plant Sci. 2016, 7, 99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Gui, J.; Zheng, S.; Shen, J.; Li, L. Grain setting defect1 (GSD1) function in rice depends on S-acylation and interacts with actin 1 (OsACT1) at its C-terminal. Front. Plant Sci. 2015, 6, 804. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Clough, S.J.; Bent, A.F. Floral dip: A simplified method for Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant J. 1998, 16, 735–743. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
Figure 1. Classification and conserved motifs of MADS-box putative proteins in Adonis amurensis. (A) The phylogenetic tree of the identified 43 AaMADS putative proteins and their conserved motifs. (B) Motifs 1 to 20 are indicated by different colored boxes. The combined probability values are shown on the left side. (C) Classification and naming of 43 AaMADS putative proteins based on the similarity to Arabidopsis MADS-box homologous proteins. SVP: Short vegetative phase; AG: Agamous; AGL: Agamous-like; TT16: TRANSPARENT TESTA 16; PI: PISTILLATA; AP: APETALA; STK: SEEDSTICK; FUL: FRUITFULL; SEP: SEPALLATA; SOC1: Suppressor of overexpression of CONSTANS1; MIKC: MADS (M), intervening (I), keratin-like (K), and C-terminal (C) domain.
Figure 1. Classification and conserved motifs of MADS-box putative proteins in Adonis amurensis. (A) The phylogenetic tree of the identified 43 AaMADS putative proteins and their conserved motifs. (B) Motifs 1 to 20 are indicated by different colored boxes. The combined probability values are shown on the left side. (C) Classification and naming of 43 AaMADS putative proteins based on the similarity to Arabidopsis MADS-box homologous proteins. SVP: Short vegetative phase; AG: Agamous; AGL: Agamous-like; TT16: TRANSPARENT TESTA 16; PI: PISTILLATA; AP: APETALA; STK: SEEDSTICK; FUL: FRUITFULL; SEP: SEPALLATA; SOC1: Suppressor of overexpression of CONSTANS1; MIKC: MADS (M), intervening (I), keratin-like (K), and C-terminal (C) domain.
Ijms 22 09362 g001
Figure 2. Expression pattern clustering of 43 AaMADS putative genes in floral organs at six developmental stages (FBD: flower bud differentiation; YA: young alabastrum; VCA: visible color alabastrum; EFS: early flowering stage; FBS: full bloom stage; SFS: senescing flower stage). The levels of expression of each gene during FBD, YA, VCA, EFS, FBS, and SFS are indicated by red/blue rectangles, where red rectangles represent the upregulation of genes, while blue rectangles represent downregulation.
Figure 2. Expression pattern clustering of 43 AaMADS putative genes in floral organs at six developmental stages (FBD: flower bud differentiation; YA: young alabastrum; VCA: visible color alabastrum; EFS: early flowering stage; FBS: full bloom stage; SFS: senescing flower stage). The levels of expression of each gene during FBD, YA, VCA, EFS, FBS, and SFS are indicated by red/blue rectangles, where red rectangles represent the upregulation of genes, while blue rectangles represent downregulation.
Ijms 22 09362 g002
Figure 3. Expression analysis of 24 AaMADS genes in different tissues, including stems, leaves, flowers, and achene by qPCR. The AaActin gene was used as an internal control, and the transcript level in stems was set as 1.0. Asterisks indicate significant differences in gene expression levels between other tissues and the stem (* p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01; Student’s t-test). Error bars represent the SE (n = 3).
Figure 3. Expression analysis of 24 AaMADS genes in different tissues, including stems, leaves, flowers, and achene by qPCR. The AaActin gene was used as an internal control, and the transcript level in stems was set as 1.0. Asterisks indicate significant differences in gene expression levels between other tissues and the stem (* p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01; Student’s t-test). Error bars represent the SE (n = 3).
Ijms 22 09362 g003
Figure 4. Organ-specific expression analysis of 20 AaMADS genes classified in the ABCDE model in the flower of A. amurensis. (A) The flower morphology and its anatomy, including petals, calyx, stamens, and pistils (a1), simple pistil (a2) and stigma (a4), simple anther (a3) and pollen grain (a5). qPCR analysis of A-class (B), B-class (C), and C-, D-, and E-class (D) AaMADS gene expression in different flower structures. The AaActin gene was used as an internal control, and the transcript level in petals was set as 1.0. Asterisks indicate significant differences in gene expression levels between other tissues and petals (* p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01; Student’s t-test). Error bars represent the SE (n = 3).
Figure 4. Organ-specific expression analysis of 20 AaMADS genes classified in the ABCDE model in the flower of A. amurensis. (A) The flower morphology and its anatomy, including petals, calyx, stamens, and pistils (a1), simple pistil (a2) and stigma (a4), simple anther (a3) and pollen grain (a5). qPCR analysis of A-class (B), B-class (C), and C-, D-, and E-class (D) AaMADS gene expression in different flower structures. The AaActin gene was used as an internal control, and the transcript level in petals was set as 1.0. Asterisks indicate significant differences in gene expression levels between other tissues and petals (* p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01; Student’s t-test). Error bars represent the SE (n = 3).
Ijms 22 09362 g004
Figure 5. Subcellular localization of 17 AaMADS fused with green fluorescent protein (GFP) in tobacco leaves. The 17 AaMADS belonged to the SOC1 type (A), SVP type (B), TT16 type (C), A-class (D), B-class (E), D-class (F), and E-class (G) groups, respectively. GFP fluorescence is green and the nuclear dye DAPI is blue. Merge is created by merging the GFP, DAPI, and bright-field images. Scale bar = 10 µm.
Figure 5. Subcellular localization of 17 AaMADS fused with green fluorescent protein (GFP) in tobacco leaves. The 17 AaMADS belonged to the SOC1 type (A), SVP type (B), TT16 type (C), A-class (D), B-class (E), D-class (F), and E-class (G) groups, respectively. GFP fluorescence is green and the nuclear dye DAPI is blue. Merge is created by merging the GFP, DAPI, and bright-field images. Scale bar = 10 µm.
Ijms 22 09362 g005
Figure 6. Phenotypic analysis of transgenic Arabidopsis overexpressing three SOC1-type AaMADS genes. (A) Amino acid sequence alignment of three SOC1-type AaMADS (CL8076.C1, CL6237.C1, and CL10716.C2) with Arabidopsis AtSOC1 (At2g45660) protein. Semi-quantitative PCR detection (B) and flowering time phenotypes (C) of transgenic lines overexpressing three SOC1-type AaMADS genes. The AaActin gene was used as an internal control. WT: Wild-type.
Figure 6. Phenotypic analysis of transgenic Arabidopsis overexpressing three SOC1-type AaMADS genes. (A) Amino acid sequence alignment of three SOC1-type AaMADS (CL8076.C1, CL6237.C1, and CL10716.C2) with Arabidopsis AtSOC1 (At2g45660) protein. Semi-quantitative PCR detection (B) and flowering time phenotypes (C) of transgenic lines overexpressing three SOC1-type AaMADS genes. The AaActin gene was used as an internal control. WT: Wild-type.
Ijms 22 09362 g006
Figure 7. Relative expression level of endogenous flowering time genes in wild-type (WT) and transgenic Arabidopsis overexpressing AaSOC1a- (A), AaSOC1b- (B), and AaSOC1c-GFP (C) genes. The AtActin gene was used as an internal control, and the transcript level in WT was set as 1.0. Error bars represent the SE (n = 3). Asterisks indicate significant differences between transgenic lines and WT plants (* p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01; Student’s t-test). FLC: Flowering locus C; FT: Flowering locus T.
Figure 7. Relative expression level of endogenous flowering time genes in wild-type (WT) and transgenic Arabidopsis overexpressing AaSOC1a- (A), AaSOC1b- (B), and AaSOC1c-GFP (C) genes. The AtActin gene was used as an internal control, and the transcript level in WT was set as 1.0. Error bars represent the SE (n = 3). Asterisks indicate significant differences between transgenic lines and WT plants (* p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01; Student’s t-test). FLC: Flowering locus C; FT: Flowering locus T.
Ijms 22 09362 g007
Figure 8. Hypothetical model of expression pattern of AaMADS genes. Five colors represent five class AaMADS genes, including class A, B, C, D, and E.
Figure 8. Hypothetical model of expression pattern of AaMADS genes. Five colors represent five class AaMADS genes, including class A, B, C, D, and E.
Ijms 22 09362 g008
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Ren, L.; Sun, H.; Dai, S.; Feng, S.; Qiao, K.; Wang, J.; Gong, S.; Zhou, A. Identification and Characterization of MIKCc-Type MADS-Box Genes in the Flower Organs of Adonis amurensis. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 9362. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22179362

AMA Style

Ren L, Sun H, Dai S, Feng S, Qiao K, Wang J, Gong S, Zhou A. Identification and Characterization of MIKCc-Type MADS-Box Genes in the Flower Organs of Adonis amurensis. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2021; 22(17):9362. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22179362

Chicago/Turabian Style

Ren, Lulu, Hongwei Sun, Shengyue Dai, Shuang Feng, Kun Qiao, Jingang Wang, Shufang Gong, and Aimin Zhou. 2021. "Identification and Characterization of MIKCc-Type MADS-Box Genes in the Flower Organs of Adonis amurensis" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 22, no. 17: 9362. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22179362

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop