Next Article in Journal
Quantum Artificial Neural Network Approach to Derive a Highly Predictive 3D-QSAR Model for Blood–Brain Barrier Passage
Next Article in Special Issue
Bio-Efficacy of Chrysoeriol7, a Natural Chemical and Repellent, against Brown Planthopper in Rice
Previous Article in Journal
Anti-Allergic and Anti-Inflammatory Effects of Neferine on RBL-2H3 Cells
Previous Article in Special Issue
The Protective Function and Modification of Secondary Metabolite Accumulation in Response to Light Stress in Dracocephalum forrestii Shoots
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

5-Methoxyindole, a Chemical Homolog of Melatonin, Adversely Affects the Phytopathogenic Fungus Fusarium graminearum

Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22(20), 10991; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms222010991
by Mengmeng Kong, Jing Liang, Qurban Ali, Wen Wen, Huijun Wu, Xuewen Gao and Qin Gu *
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Reviewer 3: Anonymous
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22(20), 10991; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms222010991
Submission received: 26 August 2021 / Revised: 30 September 2021 / Accepted: 5 October 2021 / Published: 12 October 2021

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

This ms can be published in its current status.

Author Response

Reviewer 1:

Point 1

This MS can be published in its current status.

Response: Thank you very much for your review of our manuscript and we are very appreciating to get you approve of our submitted manuscript.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 2 Report

Dear Authors,

The article submitted for review is indeed the first work on the use of 5-methoxyindole to combat Fusarium graminearum in the environment to protect agricultural crops. Thus, the work presented here is an interesting discussion of two issues: effective fungus control and the use of environmentally friendly agents. 

My comments:

1. Introduction part

A). The authors state that Fusarium graminearum is a major problem in agriculture but do not state the extent of this threat to crops. I, therefore, ask you to correct this part of the literature introduction with data.. This will allow better visualization of the problem.
B). My curiosity was piqued by the description of melatonin and its uses while the manuscript deals with 5-methoxyindole. Can the authors similarly describe the use of the chemical compound they use in their study to get rid of the fungus?

2. Materials and Methods part

Well organized part. However, Sections 4.2 and 4.3 as well as 4.6 need references.

3. Results and discussion part

This part very thoroughly describes the measurement results obtained. Each section is followed by a good commentary and discussion.

A). However, since the authors claim that their results reveal a mechanism for the antifungal action of the melatonin-homologue 5-methoxyindole, I would request that a graphical version of this mechanism be prepared and included in the manuscript.


Authors, please improve the manuscript in the major mode.

Author Response

Reviewer 2:

Point 1

Introduction part A). The authors state that Fusarium graminearum is a major problem in agriculture but do not state the extent of this threat to crops. I, therefore, ask you to correct this part of the literature introduction with data. This will allow better visualization of the problem.

Response: Thank you very much for your helpful suggestions and valuable input in our research manuscript. We have modified and corrected this part of the literature introduction with data in our manuscript, see the lines (30-34)

Point 2

B). My curiosity was piqued by the description of melatonin and its uses while the manuscript deals with 5-methoxyindole. Can the authors similarly describe the use of the chemical compound they use in their study to get rid of the fungus?

Response:Thanks, in our present study, our results indicated melatonin homolog, 5-methoxyindole, shows the stronger adverse activity to F. graminearum PH-1 as compared with melatonin. The synthetic compound 5-methoxyindole also increased morphology malformation and accumulation of ROS of F. graminearum hyphae and conidia as same as melatonin. Finally, we also identified 5-methoxyindole could directly induce the apoptosis, cell death of F. graminearum hyphae and conidia which were similar with melatonin. Collectively, the data suggest that melatonin homolog, 5-methoxyindole, have anti-phytopathogenic activities in the filamentous fungus F. graminearum, which may take the place role in controlling crop diseases. see the lines (88-95).

Point 3

  1. Materials and Methods part

Well organized part. However, Sections 4.2 and 4.3 as well as 4.6 need references.

Response:Thanks, we have added the references in the Sections 4.2 and 4.3 as well as 4.6 of our manuscript, see the lines (388, 398, 418)

Point 4

  1. Results and discussion part

This part very thoroughly describes the measurement results obtained. Each section is followed by a good commentary and discussion. However, since the authors claim that their results reveal a mechanism for the antifungal action of the melatonin-homologue 5-methoxyindole, I would request that a graphical version of this mechanism be prepared and included in the manuscript. Authors, please improve the manuscript in the major mode.

Response:Thanks, we have made a graphical version of antifungal action of the melatonin-homologue 5-methoxyindole mechanism in our research manuscript (Graphical Abstract, see Supporting Information).

Reviewer 3 Report

Please read the manuscript and the recommended comments and changes. Other comments Page 5Fig 2 what it mean "ck" is it control? 

This manuscript in my opinion has many short comes. First of all they used "malatonin" as positive control, and they used it's chemical homolog 5-methoxyindol as chemical against fusarium head blight. In Positive control you use a registered synthetic chemical that is proven to control fusarium head blight for comparative control with the tested material. fusarium head blight is only tested in laboratory only on artificial medium  and not on the plants e.g. wheat or barley. I cannot provide any comments on statistical analyses, you should seek the help of an statistician. As negative control they used only pure water in one stage in another stage authors mention methanol mixed with water. 

Author Response

Reviewer 3:

Point 1

Please read the manuscript and the recommended comments and changes. Other comments Page 5Fig 2 what it means "ck" is it control? 

Response:Thank you very much for your helpful suggestions, we have modified the “control” to “ck” in all the figures of our whole manuscript.

Point 2

This manuscript in my opinion has many short comes. First of all they used "malatonin" as positive control, and they used it's chemical homolog 5-methoxyindol as chemical against Fusarium head blight. In Positive control you use a registered synthetic chemical that is proven to control Fusarium head blight for comparative control with the tested material. Fusarium head blight is only tested in laboratory only on artificial medium and not on the plants e.g. wheat or barley. I cannot provide any comments on statistical analyses, you should seek the help of an statistician. As negative control they used only pure water in one stage in another stage authors mention methanol mixed with water. 

Response: Thank you very much for your helpful suggestions and valuable input in our research manuscript. We also have carefully modified the whole manuscript. In our previous studies, we had implicated melatonin homolog, 5-methoxyindole, could directly induce the plant immune system to increase the disease resistance against plant pathogens as same as melatonin (Kong M., et al. 2021). However, the direct inhibition mechanism of melatonin homolog, 5-methoxyindole, has not been investigated in plant pathogens, which could be a potential compound to protect crop production from the stress of plant pathogens in the future. Then, we investigated the direct inhibition mechanism of melatonin-homolog 5-methoxyindole in our manuscript.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Round 2

Reviewer 2 Report

Dear Authors,

After revision, I accept the author's amendments and I ask for publication of this manuscript in its current form.

Author Response

Reviewer 2

After revision, I accept the author's amendments and I ask for publication of this manuscript in its current form.

Response: Thank you very much for your review of our manuscript and we are very appreciating to get you approve of our submitted manuscript.

Reviewer 3 Report

See minor corrections in abstract and in page 3 lin3  97.

Author Response

Reviewer 3

See minor corrections in abstract and in page 3 lin3  97.

Response: Thank you very much for your helpful suggestions and valuable input in our research manuscript. We have modified and corrected our whole manuscript, including the abstract and in page 3 lin3  97.

Back to TopTop