Next Article in Journal
Polymorphism of Alpha-Synuclein Amyloid Fibrils Depends on Ionic Strength and Protein Concentration
Previous Article in Journal
Comprehensive Simulation of Ca2+ Transients in the Continuum of Mouse Skeletal Muscle Fiber Types
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
IJMS
Volume 22
Issue 22
10.3390/ijms222212381
ijms-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Evidence of G-Protein-Coupled Receptors (GPCR) in the Parasitic Protozoa Plasmodium falciparum—Sensing the Host Environment and Coupling within Its Molecular Signaling Toolkit

by
Pedro H. S. Pereira
and
Celia R. S. Garcia
*
Departamento de Análises Clínicas e Toxicológicas, Faculdade de Ciências Farmacêuticas, Universidade de São Paulo—USP, São Paulo 05508-900, Brazil
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22(22), 12381; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms222212381
Submission received: 2 November 2021 / Accepted: 12 November 2021 / Published: 17 November 2021
(This article belongs to the Section Molecular Endocrinology and Metabolism)
Browse Figure
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Throughout evolution, the need for single-celled organisms to associate and form a single cluster of cells has had several evolutionary advantages. In complex, multicellular organisms, each tissue or organ has a specialty and function that make life together possible, and the organism as a whole needs to act in balance and adapt to changes in the environment. Sensory organs are essential for connecting external stimuli into a biological response, through the senses: sight, smell, taste, hearing, and touch. The G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) are responsible for many of these senses and therefore play a key role in the perception of the cells’ external environment, enabling interaction and coordinated development between each cell of a multicellular organism. The malaria-causing protozoan parasite, Plasmodium falciparum, has a complex life cycle that is extremely dependent on a finely regulated cellular signaling machinery. In this review, we summarize strong evidence and the main candidates of GPCRs in protozoan parasites. Interestingly, one of these GPCRs is a sensor for K+ shift in Plasmodium falciparum, PfSR25. Studying this family of proteins in P. falciparum could have a significant impact, both on understanding the history of the evolution of GPCRs and on finding new targets for antimalarials.

1. An Overview of GPCRs in Multicellular Eukaryotes

G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) have a common core of seven successive transmembrane domains (7TM) linked by three extra and intracellular loops, conserved among eukaryotes [1]. Half of the receptors of this family identified in humans have a sensory function including smell and taste [2]. The role of these receptors is to translate extracellular signals into intracellular signals caused by stimuli that can be from molecules of the most varied physicochemical characteristics (from ions to proteins). Some 40% of all drugs found on the pharmaceutical market have a GPCR family member as a target, which reflects the importance of these proteins in cellular functions [3,4].
When an activated molecule, or agonist, binds to a GPCR on the extracellular side, causing a conformational change mainly of the transmembrane helix 6 of the receptor, the signal is transmitted to the heterotrimeric G protein. These receptors do not act in a bimodal manner, and the signal can be activated at several intensities that result in several different signal results [5,6]. GPCRs do not act exclusively through the G protein: they can act in a G-protein-independent pathway; activate ion channels, transcription factors, arrestins and kinases [7]. Some GPCRs have constitutive activity causing constant activation of G proteins that can be modulated by the action of several molecules [8]. One GPCR activation is not exclusively related to one agonist. There is increasing interest in the so-called biased ligands: molecules that activate one pathway at the expense of other pathways [9,10]. GPCRs ligands are mainly agonists, but there are also antagonists and inverse agonists [11].
Gα, Gβ and Gγ are the subunits of heterotrimeric G proteins and in humans the sixteen genes for Gα proteins have been classified into four families by sequence similarity and their functions: Gs, Gi/o, Gq/11 and G12/13 [12,13]. Heterotrimeric G proteins stay bound to a GDP molecule in an inactive state until activation of a GPCR allows the GDP to dissociate. An activated GPCR-bound GDP free Gα subunit binds to soluble GTP, since its cytoplasmatic concentration is high, causing a conformational change that dissociates the heterotrimeric G protein into free Gα and Gβγ [14,15]. The free GTP-bound Gα subunit can activate several effectors, such as guanylate/adenylate cyclases, phosphodiesterases, phospholipases, and guanine exchange factors (GEFs) [16]. Free Gβγ also has a role in signal transduction: to recruit GRKs to the receptor, regulate ion channels, adenylate cyclases, phospholipase C and kinases [17]. Due to the intrinsic GTPasic activity of Gα, GTP is hydrolyzed, causing reassociation of Gα and Gβγ abolishing the response and completing the cycle of activation [16]. GTPase activation proteins (GAP) can accelerate the signal termination and contribute to the reassociation of heterotrimeric G proteins. An active GPCR is able to associate with another G protein complex and initiate another cycle of signaling as long as it remains in the active state. Therefore, a GPCR desensitization process occurs in order to prevent the receptors from remaining active after the first propagation of the signal. This process happens by two steps: the action of G-protein-coupled receptor kinases (GRKs) that phosphorylate the GPCR C-tail and internalization for degradation or recycling of GPCRs by β-arrestin.
GRKs physically bind to the GPCRs by phosphorylating the C-terminal end of the receptor when the heterotrimeric G protein is absent. Phosphorylated GPCRs have lower activity, but the activation of G proteins does not cease [18]. GRKs can also interact with free Gβγ subunits, disrupting the signaling caused by these subunits. Besides participating in the desensitization of GPCRs, GRKs have other substrates [18]. β-arrestins are responsible for signal termination through a process known as GPCR desensitization. Both Gα and β-arrestin compete for the internal cavity of a GPCR cytoplasmatic side [19,20,21]. The phosphorylated C-terminal of an activated GPCR increases the affinity of β-arrestins, strongly binding to this region and favoring the process of desensitization [22,23]. β-arrestins have a C-terminal domain that is exposed after binding to a GPCR and can recruit clathrin and adaptor protein 2 (AP2) to start the internalization. In other words, β-arrestin not only physically blocks the binding of G proteins in an activated GPCR, but also promotes clathrin-dependent internalization, interrupting stimulus and signal transduction [21,24].

2. Molecular Machinery for Cellular Signaling in Plasmodium Genus

The P. falciparum life cycle starts with the bite of a female Anopheles mosquito, injecting saliva containing sporozoites into the bloodstream [25]. The sporozoites migrate to the liver invading hepatocytes, where asexual replication occurs, resulting in the formation of a large number of merozoites. The merozoites are released back into the bloodstream and are able to infect red blood cells, initiating the intraerythrocytic cycle [26,27]. After invasion, the merozoites pass through three morphologically different stages in a defined interval of 48 h (Figure 1): ring stage, where metabolism is low; trophozoite stage, in which there are protein and nucleic acid synthesis peaks while increasing cell volume; and schizont stages, where cell division occurs for the formation of new merozoites [28]. The schizonts rupture the host cell to release the merozoites into the bloodstream, continuing the erythrocytic cycle and giving rise to the main symptoms of malaria infection [29]. A small percentage of the parasites are able to break out of this cycle and engage in a process of differentiation into female and male gametocytes, which represent the infective forms to the mosquito vector. When the mosquito has a blood meal from an infected host, the gametocytes mature into gametes in the gut of the vector, which is followed by fertilization and generation of the zygote [30]. The zygote crosses the intestinal epithelium and differentiate into an oocyst. The oocysts go through successive cycles of cell division, until they rupture and release sporozoites, which migrate to the salivary gland of the mosquito, finishing the cycle [31].
The parasites of the Plasmodium genus have a complex cell signaling system capable of regulating all stages of parasite development [32]. Among the secondary messengers involved in this process are Ca2+ ions and cAMP, both of which are also essential for GPCR signaling in mammals. The process of in vivo parasite maturation occurs in a synchronous way, meaning that schizonts rupture the red blood cells and invade new cells at 48 h intervals, for Plasmodium falciparum. It has been shown that melatonin produced by the host is at least partially responsible for this synchrony [33,34,35]. Melatonin has been shown to have a role in regulating gene expression including the ubiquitin proteasome system (UPS) and the transcription factors PfNFYB and PfMORC [36,37,38,39,40].
P. falciparum protein kinase 7 (PfPK7) is an orphan kinase found only in Plasmodium parasites. The C-terminal of PfPK7 bears homology to the mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase (MAPKK), and the N-terminal bears similarity to protein kinase A (PKA) found in fungi [41]. Disruption of the pfpk7 gene is not lethal in vitro, but results in slow growth [42]. Interestingly, the PfPK7 knockout strain (PfPK7-) do not respond to melatonin: after treatment with the hormone, the proportion of asexual stages do not change, the increase in cytosolic Ca2+ is lower when compared to the wild-type strain, and there is no modulation of UPS genes [43]. The phosphoproteome of PfPK7- in schizonts resulted in the identification of 1047 proteins differently phosphorylated when compared to wild type Pf3D7 parasites [44]. In addition to PfPK7, the eukaryotic initiation factor kinase of P. falciparum (PfeIk1) is also involved in this signaling pathway, and its knockout is able to abolish the effect of melatonin on parasite synchronization [45].
The melatonin signal transduction in P. falciparum depends on the activation of PLC/IP3 pathway, including the activation of phospholipase C, which induces the formation of inositol triphosphate (IP3), leading to an increase in cytosolic Ca2+ concentration [46,47,48]. All attempts to elucidate the IP3 receptor in apicomplexan parasites have failed and no plausible candidate has been identified using bioinformatics and homology to other organisms [49]. This is not surprising considering the phylogenetic distance between the parasite and the mammalian counterparts. Although all attempts to find IP3R using bioinformatics analyses have failed, a recent study has merged affinity chromatography with bioinformatics meta-analyses to identify possible membrane proteins capable of binding to IP3. Among the results, the multidrug resistance transporter 1 (PfMDR1—PF3D7_0523000) stands out, a transporter widely studied due to its important role in resistance to several antimalarials located in the membrane of the digestive vacuole, essential for the survival of the parasite and capable of binding to IP3 [50].
Extracellular ATP is one of the most ubiquitous signalers, present in different biological models with varied functions. P. falciparum parasites sense extracellular ATP, causing a signaling cascade that results in an increase in cytoplasmic Ca2+ in trophozoites and schizonts [51]. In the in vitro culture of P. falciparum, the addition of apyrase, an enzyme that degrades nucleotides, or of purinergic receptor antagonists, dramatically reduces the rate of invasion of new RBCs [52,53]. These results opened up an area of research as they constitute strong evidence for the relevance of the role of ATP-mediated signaling in the processes of RBC invasion by the parasite.
Cyclic nucleotide (cAMP and cGMP) formation occurs through the cyclases (adenylate cyclase (AC) or guanylate cyclase (GC)) on the triphosphate forms of each nucleotide (ATP or GTP) forming a phosphodiester bond. The breaking of this phosphodiester bond by a cyclic nucleotide phosphodiesterase (PDE) causes disruption of the signal sent by cAMP and cGMP. Cyclic nucleotides stimulate the action of guanine exchange protein directly activated by cAMP (EPAC) and kinases such as PKA and PKG.
Plasmodium cyclases are structurally and functionally divergent from other organisms. Plasmodium falciparum ACα (PfACα) is insensitive to a known activator of AC in mammalian cells, forskolin. In addition, PfACα has a six transmembrane region that shares homology to voltage-dependent potassium channels [54,55]. PfACα knockout does not change parasite growth rate during the erythrocytic cycle, the survival during this stage, rate of gametocyte differentiation, mosquito stage growth or sporozoite formation. The infection of hepatocytes by sporozoites, on the other hand, show a reduced infection rate due to the incapability of apical proteins exocytosis [56]. Another cyclase, Plasmodium falciparum Acβ (PfACβ), is a human bicarbonate-sensitive soluble AC orthologous, essential for parasite survival and proliferation. There is a concentration-dependent increase in cytoplasmic Ca2+ and secretion of microneme proteins coupled to cAMP synthesis in merozoites. After pharmacological inhibition of PfACβ, this process is interrupted, highlighting the role of PfACβ in parasite invasion [57,58].
Thélu et al. (1994) identified Gα-like proteins in P. falciparum for the first-time, using extracts positive for Ras-like proteins during all stages of erythrocyte development. Furthermore, by using antibodies against the catalytic site common to all heterotrimeric G proteins a specific positive band was identified, but no band was observed when using an antibody against the C-terminal region of Gi and Gs [59]. Using radiolabeled ADP-ribosylation by cholera and pertussis toxins followed by Western blotting, a total of six bands with a molecular mass close to that expected for a G protein, between 34 and 54 kDa, were identified throughout the erythrocytic cycle, including gametocytes [60]. These toxins are known specific inhibitors of proteins of the Gαs and Gαi/o families. In addition, the same work detected a correlation between cholera toxin treatment and gametocyte formation, indicating a link between signaling and cell differentiation. Kaiser A. et al. (2015) described for the first time a non-canonical Ras-like G protein from Plasmodium (PfG—PF3D7_0313500) demonstrating GTP-binding capacity, GTPase activity, cytoplasmic localization, and a divergence from any known alpha subunit [61]. Furthermore, the possibility that Plasmodium uses the erythrocyte’s GPCR machinery cannot be excluded: it has been reported that the parasite uses endogenous β-adrenergic receptors and Gαs during the invasion process, and blocking them causes a reduction in parasitemia [62]. A comparative summary of GPCRs signaling pathway components between H. sapiens and P. falciparum can be found in Table 1.

3. In Silico Studies for the Identification of GPCR Candidates in Plasmodium falciparum

Madeira et al. (2008) performed a search in the Plasmodium genome aiming to identify GPCRs candidates in this organism. The approach for this search is indirect because the similarity of amino acid sequences between GPCRs is very small, even within the same species. For this purpose, all open reading frames of the genome were filtered for the presence of seven transmembrane domains using the TMHMM 2.0 algorithm, resulting in a total of sixty-six candidates. After this step, the candidates were filtered for several parameters, such as: conserved domains, similarity to other known proteins, signal sequences, presence of repeats, and finally were crossed with the possible GPCRs described by Inoue, Ikeda, and Shimizu, (2004) [63]. The analyses resulted in four promising candidate GPCRs, named PfSR1, PfSR10, PfSR12 and PfSR25 [64]. Due to filter restrictions several candidates were discarded, among them three that have an apicoplast targeting signal sequence PF3D7_1213500 (integral membrane protein GPR180, putative), PF3D7_1445800 (conserved Plasmodium membrane protein, unknown function) and PF3D7_1463900 (rhoptry neck protein 11, putative). A summary of the characteristics for each of the four putative GPCRs can be found in Table 2.
PfSR1 has 773 amino acids, and although the analyses performed by the SignalP 3.0 algorithm did not reveal the presence of a signal peptide, four other tools made the prediction of a plasma membrane localization signal sequence located at the N-terminal end (TMAP, TOPPRED2, TMPRED and HMMTOP) [64]. The N-terminal end is very long, with 508 amino acids, which brings this candidate closer to class C receptors, as predicted previously, using binary topology pattern methodology [63]. PfSR1 has a similarity with a region of CLPTM1 (cleft lip and palate transmembrane protein 1), whose function is not yet well established. This protein in humans and murines is located in the plasma membrane and is related to cell division, cancer, apoptosis, and other processes. The similarity comes from the multiple transmembrane regions present in both proteins. It is worth mentioning that the genus Plasmodium has an orthologous copy of CLPTM1 described in the genome, with no defined function. As for the similarity among the different Plasmodium species, P. falciparum and P. reichenowi are highly similar (93%), standing out from the other members of the genus, which share less than 50% similarity. Large-scale mutagenesis experiments indicated that deletion of the PfSR1 gene is not lethal, but causes a considerable fitness loss, leading to a 56% growth rate relative to the wild [65].
PfSR10 has 665 amino acids and a canonical plasma membrane localization signal peptide with a long N-terminal region of 381 amino acids, which resembles the size of hormone receptors such as follicle stimulating hormone and luteinizing hormone, both class A as classified using binary topology pattern methodology [63]. PfSR10 homologs can be found in all Plasmodium species, with a similarity greater than 70%. The lung seven transmembrane receptor domain (LUSTR) was identified due to the high homology of the transmembrane region, which is encountered in several orphan GPCRs. Tchoufack, N. et al. (2020) developed polyclonal antibodies using the N-terminal sequence of PfSR10 and genetically engineered parasites to express PfSR10-hemagglutinin tagged, which provided evidence for the subcellular localization of this protein: there is partial colocalization with endoplasmic reticulum markers, and presence in vesicular structures in intraerythrocytic stages and in gametocytes [67]. This localization matches the preliminary data described by Marapana et al. (2018) that describe SR10 as a molecular partner of the ER-resident signal peptide peptidase [68]. In contrast to the data presented by Nijila Tchoufack et al. (2020), high throughput mutagenesis experiments deposited in PlasmoDB [69] indicate that SR10 is not essential and does not cause significant changes in the growth of the parasites, both P. falciparum and P. chabaudi. As for the functional analysis, a knockout had a decrease in parasitemia by one third in the intraerythrocytic cycle and gametocyte production dropped by half, without any visible morphological change [67]. Subudhi et al. (2020) elegantly demonstrated that SR10 knockout causes the total duration of the intraerythrocytic cycle to decrease by 3 h, in addition to altering the rhythmic expression of several genes such as DNA replication, RNA processing, and UPS, highlighting the role of this protein in controlling the parasite cell cycle [70].
PfSR12 has a long N-terminal region of 231 amino acids out of 470. Like PfSR1, the homology of PfSR12 between Plasmodium species is quite divergent: the highest similarity found with Sr12 from P. falciparum is 62% in P. chabaudi. However, unlike the other putative receptors, there is a wide homology with another protein found in mammals, identified by PFAM, INTERPRO and PANTHER databases: both transmembrane regions and part of the N-terminal sequence are similar to the orphan GPCR intimal thickness related receptor (GPR180). Furthermore, the similarity of the transmembrane domain region indicates that SR12 belongs to the rhodopsin superfamily. GPR180 is an orphan receptor that plays a role in the vascular remodeling and maintenance of vascular restenosis in mice [76] and there is evidence of its relationship with the inhibition of cAMP synthesis in cells stimulated with L-lactate [77]. Using bioinformatics, Gupta et al. (2015) identified the presence of a P-loop domain and four amino acids capable of interacting with ATP, which would define SR12 as a purinergic receptor [71], and this theory has been reinforced recently with binding experiments to ATP and the purinergic receptor-specific inhibitor prasugrel [72]. Recently, the GPCR-related features of PfSR12 were studied in depth by Pereira et al. (2020). In this work, using a heterologous expression system of PfSR12 in HEK293 mammalian cells and BRET-based biosensors, several activation tests of signaling pathways downstream to GPCRs were performed. Using thrombin as a possible agonist of PfSR12, an increase in intracellular calcium concentration was detected, as well as diacylglycerol production and protein kinase C activation. It is worth noting that the detection of these intermediates was dependent on the concentration of thrombin and the amount of transfected PfSR12, which is consistent with a GPCR activation mediated by Gq/11 family proteins. In fact, using a specific pharmacological inhibitor or knockout of the Gq/11 family causes a loss of signal, but rescuing Gq, G11, and G14 proteins restores the signal or amplifies it. However, it has not been possible so far to separate the PfSR12 signaling described here from endogenous signaling of other receptors present in HEK293 cells, such as protease-activated receptors and muscarinic receptors [73].
PfSR25 has the shortest N-terminal end among the four putative P. falciparum GPCRs, containing only 22 amino acids, which classifies it as a putative class A receptor as described using binary topology pattern methodology [63]. Another feature that stands out is the first extracellular loop, which is longer than in the other receptors, containing 62 amino acids. PfSR25 can be found in all Plasmodium species with high similarity, but there is no homologous protein in human, but for some of the phylum Apicomplexa (Babesia bovis, Theileria annulata and Theileria parva). Using a gene-edited P. falciparum strain for knocking out PfSR25, Moraes et al. (2017) described PfSR25 as a sensor capable of detecting extracellular K+ concentration changes common in the egress/invasion process [78], activating PLC, and increasing cytoplasmic calcium concentration from the release of intracellular stores, as expected for a Gq-mediated signaling pathway. Furthermore, PfSR25 knockout experiments related it to control cell volume after hyperosmotic stress, to decreased survival and metacaspase expression after treatment with nitric oxide donor sodium nitroprusside (SNP), antimalarials, and when subjected to starvation [74]. In a screening with compounds derived from 1,2,3-triazoles, Santos et al. (2020) identified thirty-one compounds with antimalarial activity in the micromolar range, using wild P. falciparum strains. After selecting these compounds, they were tested in a knockout strain for PfSR25, confirming the results found previously: the wild-type strain shows a higher IC50 for antimalarials than the PfSR25 knockout strain [66]. Following the same approach, antimalarials commonly used to treat the disease were tested, along with selected compounds from the Medicine for Malaria Venture known to inhibit invasion and/or egress processes. Using flow cytometry, it was observed that lumefantrine and piperaquine are more active in parasites lacking PfSR25, while other antimalarials such as artemisinin, mefloquine, primaquine, and pyrimethamine showed no differences, indicating a role for PfSR25 in a mechanism of action differentiated so far for piperaquine and lumefantrine [75].

4. Conclusions

The importance of GPCRs for the organization of eukaryotes is evident, and researchers are indicating the new roles and functions of these receptors for the regulation of cell signaling pathways, such as G-protein-independent signaling, endosomal signaling, and biased signaling. The trend is that GPCRs will continue to be prime candidates as treatment targets for diseases affecting humans. The presence of GPCRs in intracellular parasites like Plasmodium, would indicate a divergent evolutionary branch from the one that gave rise to the GPCRs known in humans. Putting together the uniqueness of putative GPCRs in Plasmodium and their function in signaling in these parasites, a potentially promising new class of antimalarial drugs may emerge with GPCRs as targets.
The evidence for GPCR-like mediated signaling in Plasmodium goes far beyond the presence of several genes and/or candidates for the canonical components of this pathway (as shown in Table 1). There are several studies reporting the activation of kinases and the production or inhibition of cAMP production from the treatment of Plasmodium cells with various compounds. Worth noting is the PLC/IP3 signaling pathway, which is classically mediated by Gαq/11 in mammals. Despite unsuccessful attempts to identify the IP3 receptor, the remainder of the pathway has been shown to be functional, with cleavage of membrane phosphoinositols, IP3 release, and calcium release from the endoplasmic reticulum. This evidence leads us to believe that there are proteins that perform the same function in Plasmodium still unknown and quite divergent from homologs in humans.
The four main candidates for GPCRs have increasingly attracted the attention of malaria researchers. PfSR10, PfSR12 and PfSR25 are currently the best candidates with the most advanced studies: it is possible to infer functions in cell signaling and possible relationships with ligands, and these two candidates are the only ones with the common domain of LUSTR GPCRs. Apparently PfSR1 is very divergent from any other GPCR, lacking any conserved domain characteristic of that family, only a similarity to a protein that probably has a structural role (CLPTM1). PfSR25 is a promising candidate due to its relationship with the PLC/IP3 signaling pathway. In addition to the four putative receptors, we should highlight the putative integral membrane protein GPR180 (PF3D7_1213500), which despite having a localization signal to the apicoplast rather than the plasma membrane, the similarities to the orphan GPCR GPR180 are evident.
The presence of secondary messengers and signaling machinery (as shown for Sr10 and Sr25), the partially conserved structure of the transmembrane regions (as shown for Sr10 and SR12), and the possibility of G-protein-independent signaling and possible dimerization with other GPCRs (as shown for Sr12) are evidence of the presence of GPCRs in Plasmodium. Further studies need to be performed in order to elucidate the three-dimensional structure for more accurate comparison with known GPCRs, including ligand design and identification. In addition, possible intermediates between putative receptors and secondary messengers need to be identified, aiming to elucidate a G-protein homologue in this organism.

Author Contributions

P.H.S.P. (database analysis, writing the review); C.R.S.G. (writing the review). All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

We thank FAPESP (17/08684-7 and 18/07177-7) for funding CRSG.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Lander, E.S.; Linton, L.M.; Birren, B.; Nusbaum, C.; Zody, M.C.; Baldwin, J.; Devon, K.; Dewar, K.; Doyle, M.; Fitzhugh, W.; et al. Initial sequencing and analysis of the human genome. Nature 2001, 409, 860–921. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  2. Mombaerts, P. Genes and ligands for odorant, vomeronasal and taste receptors. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2004, 5, 263–278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Overington, J.P.; Al-Lazikani, B.; Hopkins, A. How many drug targets are there? Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 2006, 5, 993–996. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Rask-Andersen, M.; Masuram, S.; Schiöth, H.B. The Druggable Genome: Evaluation of Drug Targets in Clinical Trials Suggests Major Shifts in Molecular Class and Indication. Annu. Rev. Pharmacol. Toxicol. 2013, 54, 9–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Manglik, A.; Kobilka, B. The role of protein dynamics in GPCR function: Insights from the β2AR and rhodopsin. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 2014, 27, 136–143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Latorraca, N.R.; Venkatakrishnan, A.J.; Dror, R.O. GPCR Dynamics: Structures in Motion. Chem. Rev. 2016, 117, 139–155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Ahmad, R.; Lahuna, O.; Sidibe, A.; Daulat, A.; Zhang, Q.; Luka, M.; Guillaume, J.-L.; Gallet, S.; Guillonneau, F.; Hamroune, J.; et al. GPR50-Ctail cleavage and nuclear translocation: A new signal transduction mode for G protein-coupled receptors. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 2020, 77, 5189–5205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Venkatakrishnan, A.J.; Deupi, X.; Lebon, G.; Heydenreich, F.; Flock, T.; Miljus, T.; Balaji, S.; Bouvier, M.; Veprintsev, D.; Tate, C.G.; et al. Diverse activation pathways in class A GPCRs converge near the G-protein-coupling region. Nature 2016, 536, 484–487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Kenakin, T. New concepts in pharmacological efficacy at 7TM receptors: IUPHAR Review 2. Br. J. Pharmacol. 2013, 168, 554–575. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Rosenbaum, D.M.; Rasmussen, S.G.F.; Kobilka, B.K. The structure and function of G-protein-coupled receptors. Nature 2009, 459, 356–363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Mizuno, T.M.; Makimura, H.; Mobbs, C.V. The physiological function of the agouti-related peptide gene: The control of weight and metabolic rate. Ann. Med. 2003, 35, 425–433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Downes, G.; Gautam, N. The G Protein Subunit Gene Families. Genomics 1999, 62, 544–552. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Lokits, A.D.; Indrischek, H.; Meiler, J.; Hamm, H.E.; Stadler, P.F. Tracing the evolution of the heterotrimeric G protein α subunit in Metazoa. BMC Evol. Biol. 2018, 18, 51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  14. Hilger, D.; Masureel, M.; Kobilka, B.K. Structure and dynamics of GPCR signaling complexes. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 2018, 25, 4–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Kristiansen, K. Molecular mechanisms of ligand binding, signaling, and regulation within the superfamily of G-protein-coupled receptors: Molecular modeling and mutagenesis approaches to receptor structure and function. Pharmacol. Ther. 2004, 103, 21–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Oldham, W.; Hamm, H.E. Heterotrimeric G protein activation by G-protein-coupled receptors. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2008, 9, 60–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Khan, S.M.; Sleno, R.; Gora, S.; Zylbergold, P.; Laverdure, J.-P.; Labbé, J.-C.; Miller, G.J.; Hébert, T.E. The Expanding Roles of Gβγ Subunits in G Protein–Coupled Receptor Signaling and Drug Action. Pharmacol. Rev. 2013, 65, 545–577. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Gurevich, E.V.; Tesmer, J.; Mushegian, A.; Gurevich, V. G protein-coupled receptor kinases: More than just kinases and not only for GPCRs. Pharmacol. Ther. 2012, 133, 40–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Liang, Y.-L.; Khoshouei, M.; Radjainia, M.; Zhang, Y.; Glukhova, A.; Tarrasch, J.; Thal, D.; Furness, S.; Christopoulos, G.; Coudrat, T.; et al. Phase-plate cryo-EM structure of a class B GPCR–G-protein complex. Nature 2017, 546, 118–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Zhang, Y.; Sun, B.; Feng, D.; Hu, H.; Chu, M.; Qu, Q.; Tarrasch, J.T.; Li, S.; Kobilka, T.S.; Kobilka, B.K.; et al. Cryo-EM structure of the activated GLP-1 receptor in complex with a G protein. Nature 2017, 546, 248–253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Zhou, X.E.; He, Y.; de Waal, P.; Gao, X.; Kang, Y.; Van Eps, N.; Yin, Y.; Pal, K.; Goswami, D.; White, T.A.; et al. Identification of Phosphorylation Codes for Arrestin Recruitment by G Protein-Coupled Receptors. Cell 2017, 170, 457–469.e13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Cahill, T.J.; Thomsen, A.; Tarrasch, J.T.; Plouffe, B.; Nguyen, A.; Yang, F.; Huang, L.-Y.; Kahsai, A.W.; Bassoni, D.L.; Gavino, B.J.; et al. Distinct conformations of GPCR–β-arrestin complexes mediate desensitization, signaling, and endocytosis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2017, 114, 2562–2567. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  23. Kumari, P.; Srivastava, A.; Ghosh, E.; Ranjan, R.; Dogra, S.; Yadav, P.N.; Shukla, A.K. Core engagement with β-arrestin is dispensable for agonist-induced vasopressin receptor endocytosis and ERK activation. Mol. Biol. Cell 2017, 28, 1003–1010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Moaven, H.; Koike, Y.; Jao, C.C.; Gurevich, V.; Langen, R.; Chen, J. Visual arrestin interaction with clathrin adaptor AP-2 regulates photoreceptor survival in the vertebrate retina. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2013, 110, 9463–9468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Ménard, R.; Tavares, J.; Cockburn, I.; Markus, M.; Zavala, F.; Amino, R. Looking under the skin: The first steps in malarial infection and immunity. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2013, 11, 701–712. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Tavares, J.; Formaglio, P.; Thiberge, S.; Mordelet, E.; Van Rooijen, N.; Medvinsky, A.; Ménard, R.; Amino, R. Role of host cell traversal by the malaria sporozoite during liver infection. J. Exp. Med. 2013, 210, 905–915. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  27. Prudêncio, M.; Rodriguez, A.; Mota, M.M. The silent path to thousands of merozoites: The Plasmodium liver stage. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2006, 4, 849–856. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Grüring, C.; Heiber, A.; Kruse, F.; Ungefehr, J.; Gilberger, T.-W.; Spielmann, T. Development and host cell modifications of Plasmodium falciparum blood stages in four dimensions. Nat. Commun. 2011, 2, 165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  29. Garcia, C.R.S.; Markus, R.; Madeira, L. Tertian and Quartan Fevers: Temporal Regulation in Malarial Infection. J. Biol. Rhythm. 2001, 16, 436–443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Bansal, A.; Molina-Cruz, A.; Brzostowski, J.; Liu, P.; Luo, Y.; Gunalan, K.; Li, Y.; Ribeiro, J.M.C.; Miller, L.H. PfCDPK1 is critical for malaria parasite gametogenesis and mosquito infection. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2018, 115, 774–779. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Graumans, W.; Tadesse, F.G.; Andolina, C.; Van Gemert, G.-J.; Teelen, K.; Lanke, K.; Gadisa, E.; Yewhalaw, D.; Van De Vegte-Bolmer, M.; Siebelink-Stoter, R.; et al. Semi-high-throughput detection of Plasmodium falciparum and Plasmodium vivax oocysts in mosquitoes using bead-beating followed by circumsporozoite ELISA and quantitative PCR. Malar. J. 2017, 16, 356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Koyama, F.C.; Chakrabarti, D.; Garcia, C.R. Molecular machinery of signal transduction and cell cycle regulation in Plasmodium. Mol. Biochem. Parasitol. 2009, 165, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. Hotta, C.; Gazarini, M.; Beraldo, F.H.; Varotti, F.D.P.; Lopes, C.; Markus, R.; Pozzan, T.; Garcia, C. Calcium-dependent modulation by melatonin of the circadian rhythm in malarial parasites. Nature 2000, 2, 466–468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Beraldo, F.H.; Garcia, C.R.S. Products of tryptophan catabolism induce Ca2+ release and modulate the cell cycle of Plasmodium falciparum malaria parasites. J. Pineal Res. 2005, 39, 224–230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Budu, A.; Peres, R.; Bueno, V.B.; Catalani, L.H.; Garcia, C.R.D.S. N1-acetyl-N2-formyl-5-methoxykynuramine modulates the cell cycle of malaria parasites. J. Pineal Res. 2006, 42, 261–266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Lima, W.R.; Tessarin-Almeida, G.; Rozanski, A.; Parreira, K.S.; Moraes, M.S.; Martins, D.C.; Hashimoto, R.; Galante, P.; Garcia, C.R. Signaling transcript profile of the asexual intraerythrocytic development cycle of Plasmodium falciparum induced by melatonin and cAMP. Genes Cancer 2016, 7, 323–339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Koyama, F.C.; Azevedo, M.F.; Budu, A.; Chakrabarti, D.; Garcia, C.R.S. Melatonin-Induced Temporal up-Regulation of Gene Expression Related to Ubiquitin/Proteasome System (UPS) in the Human Malaria Parasite Plasmodium falciparum. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2014, 15, 22320–22330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Lima, W.R.; Moraes, M.; Alves, E.; Azevedo, M.; Passos, D.O.; Garcia, C.R.S. The PfNF-YB transcription factor is a downstream target of melatonin and cAMP signalling in the human malaria parasite Plasmodium falciparum. J. Pineal Res. 2012, 54, 145–153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Lima, W.R.; Martins, D.C.; Parreira, K.S.; Scarpelli, P.; De Moraes, M.S.; Topalis, P.; Hashimoto, R.; Garcia, C.R.S. Genome-wide analysis of the human malaria parasite Plasmodium falciparum transcription factor PfNF-YB shows interaction with a CCAAT motif. Oncotarget 2017, 8, 113987–114001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Singh, M.K.; Tessarin-Almeida, G.; Dias, B.K.M.; Pereira, P.S.; Costa, F.; Przyborski, J.M.; Garcia, C.R.S. A nuclear protein, PfMORC confers melatonin dependent synchrony of the human malaria parasite P. falciparum in the asexual stage. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 2057. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Dorin, D.; Semblat, J.-P.; Poullet, P.; Alano, P.; Goldring, J.P.D.; Whittle, C.; Patterson, S.; Chakrabarti, D.; Doerig, C. PfPK7, an atypical MEK-related protein kinase, reflects the absence of classical three-component MAPK pathways in the human malaria parasite Plasmodium falciparum. Mol. Microbiol. 2005, 55, 184–186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Dorin-Semblat, D.; Sicard, A.; Doerig, C.; Ranford-Cartwright, L.; Doerig, C. Disruption of the Pf PK7 Gene Impairs Schizogony and Sporogony in the Human Malaria Parasite Plasmodium falciparum. Eukaryot. Cell 2008, 7, 279–285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  43. Koyama, F.; Ribeiro, R.; Garcia, J.; Mauro, F.; Chakrabarti, D.; Garcia, C. Ubiquitin Proteassome System and the atypical kinase PfPK7 are involved in melatonin signaling in Plasmodium falciparum. J. Pineal Res. 2013, 53, 147–153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Pease, B.N.; Huttlin, E.; Jedrychowski, M.P.; Dorin-Semblat, D.; Sebastiani, D.; Segarra, D.T.; Roberts, B.F.; Chakrabarti, R.; Doerig, C.; Gygi, S.P.; et al. Characterization of Plasmodium falciparum Atypical Kinase PfPK7–Dependent Phosphoproteome. J. Proteome Res. 2018, 17, 2112–2123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Dias, B.K.; Nakabashi, M.; Alves, M.R.R.; Portella, D.P.; Santos, B.M.; Almeida, F.C.D.S.; Ribeiro, R.Y.; Schuck, D.C.; Jordão, A.K.; Garcia, C.R. The Plasmodium falciparum eIK1 kinase (PfeIK1) is central for melatonin synchronization in the human malaria parasite. Melatotosil blocks melatonin action on parasite cell cycle. J. Pineal Res. 2020, 69, e12685. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Alves, E.; Bartlett, P.J.; Garcia, C.R.; Thomas, A.P. Melatonin and IP3-induced Ca2+ Release from Intracellular Stores in the Malaria Parasite Plasmodium falciparum within Infected Red Blood Cells. J. Biol. Chem. 2011, 286, 5905–5912. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  47. Pecenin, M.F.; Borges-Pereira, L.; Levano-Garcia, J.; Budu, A.; Alves, E.; Mikoshiba, K.; Thomas, A.; Garcia, C.R. Blocking IP 3 signal transduction pathways inhibits melatonin-induced Ca2+ signals and impairs P. falciparum development and proliferation in erythrocytes. Cell Calcium 2018, 72, 81–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Beraldo, F.H.; Mikoshiba, K.; Garcia, C.R.S. Human malarial parasite, Plasmodium falciparum, displays capacitative calcium entry: 2-aminoethyl diphenylborinate blocks the signal transduction pathway of melatonin action on the P. falciparum cell cycle. J. Pineal Res. 2007, 43, 360–364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Garcia, C.R.; Alves, E.; Pereira, P.H.S.; Bartlett, P.J.; Thomas, A.P.; Mikoshiba, K.; Plattner, H.; Sibley, L.D. InsP3 Signaling in Apicomplexan Parasites. Curr. Top. Med. Chem. 2017, 17, 2158–2165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Alves, E.; Nakaya, H.; Guimarães, E.; Garcia, C.R.S. Combining IP affinity chromatography and bioinformatics reveals a novel protein-IP3 binding site on Plasmodium falciparum MDR1 transporter. bioRxiv 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Cruz, L.N.; Juliano, M.A.; Budu, A.; Juliano, L.; Holder, A.A.; Blackman, M.J.; Garcia, C.R. Extracellular ATP triggers proteolysis and cytosolic Ca2+ rise in Plasmodium berghei and Plasmodium yoelii malaria parasites. Malar. J. 2012, 11, 69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  52. Levano-Garcia, J.; Dluzewski, A.R.; Markus, R.P.; Garcia, C.R.S. Purinergic signalling is involved in the malaria parasite Plasmodium falciparum invasion to red blood cells. Purinergic Signal. 2010, 6, 365–372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  53. Budu, A.; Garcia, C.R. Generation of second messengers in Plasmodium. Microbes Infect. 2012, 14, 787–795. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Baker, D.A.; Kelly, J.M. Purine nucleotide cyclases in the malaria parasite. Trends Parasitol. 2004, 20, 227–232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Weber, J.H.; Vishnyakov, A.; Hambach, K.; Schultz, A.; Schultz, J.E.; Linder, J.U. Adenylyl cyclases from Plasmodium, Paramecium and Tetrahymena are novel ion channel/enzyme fusion proteins. Cell. Signal. 2003, 16, 115–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Ono, T.; Cabrita-Santos, L.; Leitao, R.; Bettiol, E.; Purcell, L.A.; Diaz-Pulido, O.; Andrews, L.B.; Tadakuma, T.; Bhanot, P.; Mota, M.M.; et al. Adenylyl Cyclase α and cAMP Signaling Mediate Plasmodium Sporozoite Apical Regulated Exocytosis and Hepatocyte Infection. PLoS Pathog. 2008, 4, e1000008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  57. Singh, S.; Alam, M.M.; Pal-Bhowmick, I.; Brzostowski, J.A.; Chitnis, C.E. Distinct External Signals Trigger Sequential Release of Apical Organelles during Erythrocyte Invasion by Malaria Parasites. PLoS Pathog. 2010, 6, e1000746. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  58. Dawn, A.; Singh, S.; More, K.R.; Siddiqui, F.A.; Pachikara, N.; Ramdani, G.; Langsley, G.; Chitnis, C.E. The Central Role of cAMP in Regulating Plasmodium falciparum Merozoite Invasion of Human Erythrocytes. PLoS Pathog. 2014, 10, e1004520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  59. Thélu, J.; Bracchi, V.; Burnod, J.; Ambroise-Thomas, P. Evidence for expression of a Ras-like and a stage specific GTP binding homologous protein by Plasmodium falciparum. Cell. Signal. 1994, 6, 777–782. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Dyer, M.; Day, K. Expression of Plasmodium falciparum trimeric G proteins and their involvement in switching to sexual development. Mol. Biochem. Parasitol. 2000, 108, 67–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Kaiser, A.; Langer, B.; Przyborski, J.; Kersting, D.; Krüger, M. A Putative Non-Canonical Ras-Like GTPase from P. falciparum: Chemical Properties and Characterization of the Protein. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0140994. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  62. Harrison, T.; Samuel, B.U.; Akompong, T.; Hamm, H.; Mohandas, N.; Lomasney, J.W.; Haldar, K. Erythrocyte G Protein-Coupled Receptor Signaling in Malarial Infection. Science 2003, 301, 1734–1736. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  63. Inoue, Y.; Ikeda, M.; Shimizu, T. Proteome-wide classification and identification of mammalian-type GPCRs by binary topology pattern. Comput. Biol. Chem. 2004, 28, 39–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Madeira, L.; Galante, P.A.F.; Budu, A.; Azevedo, M.F.; Malnic, B.; Garcia, C.R.S. Genome-Wide Detection of Serpentine Receptor-Like Proteins in Malaria Parasites. PLoS ONE 2008, 3, e1889. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  65. Zhang, M.; Wang, C.; Otto, T.D.; Oberstaller, J.; Liao, X.; Adapa, S.R.; Udenze, K.; Bronner, I.F.; Casandra, D.; Mayho, M.; et al. Uncovering the essential genes of the human malaria parasite Plasmodium falciparum by saturation mutagenesis. Science 2018, 360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  66. dos Santos, B.M.; Gonzaga, D.T.G.; da Silva, F.C.; Ferreira, V.F.; Garcia, C.R.S. Plasmodium falciparum Knockout for the GPCR-Like PfSR25 Receptor Displays Greater Susceptibility to 1,2,3-Triazole Compounds That Block Malaria Parasite Development. Biomolecules 2020, 10, 1197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Tchoufack, E.J.N.; Hahnfeld, L.; Pitschelatow, G.; Bennink, S.; Pradel, G. The endoplasmic reticulum-resident serpentine receptor SR10 has important functions for asexual and sexual blood stage development of Plasmodium falciparum. Mol. Biochem. Parasitol. 2020, 239, 111315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Marapana, D.S.; Dagley, L.F.; Sandow, J.J.; Nebl, T.; Triglia, T.; Pasternak, M.; Dickerman, B.K.; Crabb, B.S.; Gilson, P.R.; Webb, A.I.; et al. Plasmepsin V cleaves malaria effector proteins in a distinct endoplasmic reticulum translocation interactome for export to the erythrocyte. Nat. Microbiol. 2018, 3, 1010–1022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Aurrecoechea, C.; Brestelli, J.; Brunk, B.P.; Dommer, J.; Fischer, S.; Gajria, B.; Gao, X.; Gingle, A.; Grant, G.; Harb, O.S.; et al. PlasmoDB: A functional genomic database for malaria parasites. Nucleic Acids Res. 2009, 37, D539–D543. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  70. Subudhi, A.K.; O’Donnell, A.J.; Ramaprasad, A.; Abkallo, H.M.; Kaushik, A.; Ansari, H.R.; Abdel-Haleem, A.; Ben Rached, F.; Kaneko, O.; Culleton, R.; et al. Malaria parasites regulate intra-erythrocytic development duration via serpentine receptor 10 to coordinate with host rhythms. Nat. Commun. 2020, 11, 2763. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Gupta, S.; Singh, D.; Singh, S. In silico characterization of Plasmodium falciparum purinergic receptor: A novel chemotherapeutic target. Syst. Synth. Biol. 2015, 9, 11–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  72. Gupta, S.; Joshi, N.; Saini, M.; Singh, S. Antimalarial and Plasmodium falciparum serpentine receptor 12 targeting effect of a purinergic receptor antagonist FDA approved drug. bioRxiv 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Pereira, P.H.S.; Brito, G.; Moraes, M.; Kiyan, C.L.; Avet, C.; Bouvier, M.; Garcia, C.R. BRET sensors unravel that Plasmodium falciparum serpentine receptor 12 (PfSR12) increases surface expression of mammalian GPCRs in HEK293 cells. bioRxiv 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Moraes, M.S.; Budu, A.; Singh, M.; Borges-Pereira, L.; Levano-Garcia, J.; Curra, C.; Picci, L.; Pace, T.; Ponzi, M.; Pozzan, T.; et al. Plasmodium falciparum GPCR-like receptor SR25 mediates extracellular K+ sensing coupled to Ca2+ signaling and stress survival. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 9545. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Santos, B.M.; Dias, B.K.M.; Nakabashi, M.; Garcia, C.R.S. The Knockout for G Protein-Coupled Receptor-Like PfSR25 Increases the Susceptibility of Malaria Parasites to the Antimalarials Lumefantrine and Piperaquine but Not to Medicine for Malaria Venture Compounds. Front. Microbiol. 2021, 12, 638869. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Tsukada, S.; Iwai, M.; Nishiu, J.; Itoh, M.; Tomoike, H.; Horiuchi, M.; Nakamura, Y.; Tanaka, T. Inhibition of Experimental Intimal Thickening in Mice Lacking a Novel G-Protein–Coupled Receptor. Circulation 2003, 107, 313–319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  77. Mosienko, V.; Rasooli-Nejad, S.; Kishi, K.; De Both, M.; Jane, D.; Huentelman, M.J.; Kasparov, S.; Teschemacher, A.G. Putative Receptors Underpinning l-Lactate Signalling in Locus Coeruleus. Neuroglia 2018, 1, 25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  78. Kumar, K.A.; Garcia, C.; Chandran, V.R.; Van Rooijen, N.; Zhou, Y.; Winzeler, E.; Nussenzweig, V. Exposure of Plasmodium sporozoites to the intracellular concentration of potassium enhances infectivity and reduces cell passage activity. Mol. Biochem. Parasitol. 2007, 156, 32–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Ijms 22 12381 g001 550
Figure 1. Schematic figure of the intraerythrocytic cycle of P. falciparum. Merozoites from the liver stages are released into the bloodstream and invade the erythrocytes, differentiating into rings. The ring stage grows in volume taking advantage of the abundance of nutrients until it becomes a trophozoite, at which stage the metabolic activity is high and DNA replication begins. The development is completed in the schizont stage, where it is possible to notice several nuclei that will later segment into new merozoites. The mature merozoites rupture the RBC and are released into the bloodstream ready to invade new cells and complete the cycle. A small portion of the merozoites that invade the cells differentiate into gametocytes, which, over 14 days, complete the development and are able to infect mosquitoes.
Figure 1. Schematic figure of the intraerythrocytic cycle of P. falciparum. Merozoites from the liver stages are released into the bloodstream and invade the erythrocytes, differentiating into rings. The ring stage grows in volume taking advantage of the abundance of nutrients until it becomes a trophozoite, at which stage the metabolic activity is high and DNA replication begins. The development is completed in the schizont stage, where it is possible to notice several nuclei that will later segment into new merozoites. The mature merozoites rupture the RBC and are released into the bloodstream ready to invade new cells and complete the cycle. A small portion of the merozoites that invade the cells differentiate into gametocytes, which, over 14 days, complete the development and are able to infect mosquitoes.
Ijms 22 12381 g001
Table
Table 1. Common representatives of a canonical GPCR signaling pathway in H. sapiens and P. falciparum.
Table 1. Common representatives of a canonical GPCR signaling pathway in H. sapiens and P. falciparum.
ProteinH. sapiens 1P. falciparum
GRKAAA58620; AAA60175-
GαAAC50363; NP_002064; AAH87537- 2
GβAAA35922-
GγAAC39869; AAK53385-
Adenylate cyclaseCAA84552PF3D7_1404600
Guanylyl cyclaseNP_000848PF3D7_1360500
PhosphodiesteraseAAA03592PF3D7_1321500
Phospholipase CAAA60112PF3D7_1013500
PKCEAW89014-
PKAAAC41690PF3D7_0934800
β-ArrestinAAH03636; AAH67368-
ClathrinNP_009029; NP_001825PF3D7_1435500; PF3D7_1219100
MAPKNP_002736PF3D7_1113900
EPACNP_001362802PF3D7_1417400
IP3 receptorNP_002215-
1 Due to the abundance of isoforms and subunits present for each protein cited in this organism, a reduced number of examples are given for each component in this table. 2 Multiple proteins with no defined function have conserved domains referring to this component of the signaling pathway.
Table
Table 2. Characteristics of GPCR-like proteins found in Plasmodium genus.
Table 2. Characteristics of GPCR-like proteins found in Plasmodium genus.
SR1SR10SR12SR25
SIZE (AA)773655470357
N TERMINAL LENGTH50838123251
C TERMINAL LENGTH2335189
PREDICTED
CLEAVAGE SITE		-30–31 (SNG-QL)21–22 (YYL-TK)28–29 (VFT-AF)
7 TRANSMEMBRANEREGION509–750382–620233–452217–440
PREDICTED
CLASSIFICATION		Class CClass A-Class A
SIGNAL PEPTIDE
(SIGNALP 3.0)		noyesyesyes
SIGNAL PEPTIDE
(SIGNALP 5.0)		nononono
SIGNAL PEPTIDE
(PHOBIUS)		nono 1no 1yes
TRANSMEMBRANE
DOMAINS		78 278 2
EXPRESSED MAINLY IN (STAGES) 3Schizont, gametocytes, ookineteRing, schizont, gametocytesTrophozoite, schizont, gametocyte, ookineteRing, trophozoite, schizont, gametocyte
FOUND IN (SPECIES) 3,4P. falciparum, P. reichenowiP. falciparum, P. reichenowi, P. berghei, P. chabaudi, P. gallinaceum, P. knowlesi, P. malariae, P. ovale, P. vivaxP. falciparum, P. berghei, P. chabaudi, P. cynomolgi, P. gallinaceum, P. knowlesi, P. malariae, P. ovale, P. reichenowi, P. vivax, P. yoeliiP. falciparum, P. berghei, P. gallinaceum, P. knowlesi, P. malariae, P. ovale, P. reichenowi, P. vivax
KO PHENOTYPESlow growth rateSlow growth rate. Reduced cycle length.DispensableEssential [65]/dispensable [66]
REFERENCES-[67,68,69,70][71,72,73][66,74,75]
1 Approximately 45% probability of signal peptide. 2 1 N-terminal transmembrane (signal peptide) + 7 transmembrane cluster. 3 As described in PlasmoDB. 4 High similarity or same annotation.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Pereira, P.H.S.; Garcia, C.R.S. Evidence of G-Protein-Coupled Receptors (GPCR) in the Parasitic Protozoa Plasmodium falciparum—Sensing the Host Environment and Coupling within Its Molecular Signaling Toolkit. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 12381. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms222212381

AMA Style

Pereira PHS, Garcia CRS. Evidence of G-Protein-Coupled Receptors (GPCR) in the Parasitic Protozoa Plasmodium falciparum—Sensing the Host Environment and Coupling within Its Molecular Signaling Toolkit. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2021; 22(22):12381. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms222212381

Chicago/Turabian Style

Pereira, Pedro H. S., and Celia R. S. Garcia. 2021. "Evidence of G-Protein-Coupled Receptors (GPCR) in the Parasitic Protozoa Plasmodium falciparum—Sensing the Host Environment and Coupling within Its Molecular Signaling Toolkit" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 22, no. 22: 12381. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms222212381

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop