Next Article in Journal
Mesenchymal Stromal Cells Adapt to Chronic Tendon Disease Environment with an Initial Reduction in Matrix Remodeling
Previous Article in Journal
New Therapeutic Targets for Hepatic Fibrosis in the Integrin Family, α8β1 and α11β1, Induced Specifically on Activated Stellate Cells
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Biosorption of Zn(II) from Seawater Solution by the Microalgal Biomass of Tetraselmis marina AC16-MESO

by
Ronald Huarachi-Olivera
1,2,*,
María Teresa Mata
1,
Jorge Valdés
3 and
Carlos Riquelme
1
1
Centro de Bioinnovación Antofagasta (CBIA), Facultad de Ciencias del Mar y de Recursos Biológicos, Universidad de Antofagasta, Antofagasta 1270300, Chile
2
Programa de Doctorado en Ciencias Biológicas, Mención en Biología Celular y Molecular, Facultad de Ciencias de la Salud, Universidad de Antofagasta, Antofagasta 1270300, Chile
3
Laboratorio de Sedimentología y Paleoambientes, Instituto de Ciencias Naturales A. Von Humboldt, Facultad de Ciencias del Mar y de Recursos Biológicos, Universidad de Antofagasta, P.O. Box 170, Antofagasta 1270300, Chile
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22(23), 12799; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms222312799
Submission received: 20 October 2021 / Revised: 12 November 2021 / Accepted: 14 November 2021 / Published: 26 November 2021

Abstract

:
Biosorption refers to a physicochemical process where substances are removed from the solution by a biological material (live or dead) via adsorption processes governed by mechanisms such as surface complexation, ion exchange, and precipitation. This study aimed to evaluate the adsorption of Zn2+ in seawater using the microalgal biomass of Tetraselmis marina AC16-MESO “in vivo” and “not alive” at different concentrations of Zn2+ (0, 5, 10, and 20 mg L−1) at 72 h. Analysis was carried out by using the Langmuir isotherms and by evaluating the autofluorescence from microalgae. The maximum adsorption of Zn2+ by the Langmuir model using the Qmax parameter in the living microalgal biomass (Qmax = 0.03051 mg g−1) was more significant than the non-living microalgal biomass of T. marine AC16-MESO (Qmax = 0.02297 mg g−1). Furthermore, a decrease in fluorescence was detected in cells from T. marina AC16-MESO, in the following order: Zn2+ (0 < 20 < 5 < 10) mg L−1. Zn2+ was adsorbed quickly by living cells from T. marine AC16-MESO compared to the non-living microalgal biomass, with a decrease in photosystem II activities from 0 to 20 mg L−1 Zn2+ in living cells.

1. Introduction

Microalgae have a broad spectrum of mechanisms (extracellular and intracellular) to cope with heavy metal toxicity [1]. Microalgae strains revealed varied tolerance and response along with bioaccumulation capability toward heavy metals. Different functional groups, as well as proteins and peptides, are responsible for the metal-binding characteristics. Mechanisms such as extracellular adsorption, reduction, volatilization, complex formation, ion exchange, intracellular accumulation, chelation, and bio-methylation are involved in the bioremediation and biosorption of heavy metals [2]. “Heavy metals” is a term generally given to metals and metalloids with a density of more than 5 g/cm3, which include arsenic (As), cadmium (Cd), chromium (Cr), copper (Cu), iron (Fe), lead (Pb), mercury (Hg), silver (Ag), zinc (Zn), and others [3]. Microalgae consume trace amounts of heavy metals such as boron (B), cobalt (Co), copper (Cu), iron (Fe), molybdenum (Mo), manganese (Mn), and zinc (Zn) for the enzymatic processes and cell metabolism. However, other heavy metals such as As, Cd, Cr, Pb, and Hg are highly toxic to microalgae. Due to the hormesis phenomenon, low concentrations of toxic heavy metals can stimulate the growth and metabolism of microalgae [4]. Zinc is a masculine element that balances copper in the body and is also essential for male reproductive activity [5]. Chemically, Zn2+ is a Lewis acid that can bind to both the phosphate backbone and the nucleobases of the DNA. Zn2+ undergoes hydrolysis even at neutral pH. Furthermore, the partially hydrolyzed polynuclear complexes can affect the interactions with DNA. These features make Zn2+ a unique cofactor for DNAzyme reactions [6]. The largest distribution of Zn is in the water of the intertidal zone of the coastal sector of Bahía San Jorge, near the city of Antofagasta, which represents the highest population density in northern Chile. The coastal area of this bay is used extensively as a dumping ground for different sources of pollutants. Zn content varies between 1.7 µg L−1 in the northern part of the study area to 2.0 µg L−1 in front of the industrial discharge zone. The spatial distribution results from the different local contributions and coastal currents that dilute the contributions and movement of the water toward the North [7].
Experimental tests on the chemical forms of zinc in seawater revealed the following results: (1) ionic plus labile form, (2) inorganic complexes and colloids as well as weak organic complexes, and (3) impeded fraction in large organic molecules and/or organic colloids [8].
Adsorption of heavy metals on the surface of microalgae is a rapid process. It can happen via different paths, including forming a covalent bond between ionized cell walls with heavy metals, ionic exchange of heavy metal ions with cell wall cation, and binding of heavy metal cations with negatively charged uronic acids microalgae exopolysaccharides. However, the process of heavy metal accumulation inside the cell is much slower. The heavy metals are transported actively across the cell membrane and into the cytoplasm, followed by diffusion and subsequent binding with internal binding sites of proteins and peptides such as glutathione, metal transporter, oxidative stress-reducing agents, and phytochelatins [9,10]. Algae biomass adsorbents used for the adsorptive removal of heavy metal pollutants from wastewater show a promising alternative for a single analyte concerning different empirical isotherm models (i.e., Freundlich, Langmuir, Temkin, Sips, and Redlich-Peterson). Freundlich and Langmuir’s models are the most commonly used isotherm models in many studies [11]. For example, blue algae (Cyanophyta) biomass was an excellent sorbent to treat industrial effluents containing Zn2+ ions in single metal systems [12].
Photosynthesis is the most basic physiological process of microalgae. Most of the light energy absorbed by chlorophyll is utilized for photosynthesis. The remaining energy is released in the form of heat and fluorescence. Due to the mutual competition between these three methods for energy, photosynthesis can impact fluorescence emissions. Thus, the chlorophyll fluorescence analysis technology developed in recent years has become a new method for measuring and diagnosing plant living bodies based on the theory of photosynthesis [13].
Furthermore, when contaminants interact with algal cells, the toxic effects of pollutants on algae can be expressed through photosynthesis in the form of a change in chlorophyll fluorescence. Therefore, chlorophyll fluorescence as a probe for biological toxicity analysis has become a new method for comprehensively assessing water pollution [14]. At present, the maximum photochemical quantum yield of PSII (FV/FM) as a photosynthesis activity fluorescence parameter is widely used in the toxicity analysis of pollutants [15,16]. However, the other chlorophyll fluorescent parameters were not very efficient in evaluating the toxic effects of toxicants on algae [14].
Fluorescence recovery after photobleaching (FRAP) has been used to study protein diffusion since the 1970s [17,18]. FRAP technique is widely used in cell biology to observe the dynamics of biological systems, including the diffusion of membrane components providing information on it. The photosynthetic membrane has been considered an ideal model to study protein mobility, given its naturally fluorescent properties [19]. However, the complexity of the photosynthetic membrane should be considered in FRAP, as the numbers of fluorescent proteins are located densely in the membrane with a close functional association promoting efficient energy transfer [20]. Thylakoid membranes are dynamic systems in which the lateral mobility of proteins and lipids plays a crucial role in physiological processes, including electron transport, regulation of light-harvesting, membrane biogenesis, and turnover and repair of proteins. An optimum density of packing of protein complexes into the membrane allows some fluidity in the membrane combined with a high density of photosynthetic complexes and efficient interaction of reaction centers and light-harvesting complexes [21].
The microalga Tetraselmis marina AC16-MESO tolerates and removes high concentrations of metal ions. In addition, it is capable of eliminating these metals at a high rate, within a relatively short time, and with a high sedimentation efficiency. These characteristics make T. marina AC16-MESO a promising candidate for use in bioremediation [22]. This study aimed to evaluate the adsorption of Zn2+ in seawater using the microalgal biomass of Tetraselmis marina AC16-MESO “in vivo” and “not alive” at different concentrations of Zn2+ (0, 5, 10, and 20 mg L−1) at 72 h. In the present research, T. marina AC16 MESO “living” and “non-living” microalgal biomass was used as Zn2+ bio adsorbent material and subjected to the Langmuir adsorption isotherm model in the seawater solution at different concentrations of Zn2+.

2. Results

2.1. Algal Growth and Maximum Quantum Yield (FV/FM) from Microalgae Tetraselmis marina AC16-MESO in Bacteriological Agar Medium under Different Concentrations of Zn2+

In Figure 1C, the culture of the microalgae Tetraselmis marina AC16-MESO in concentrations from 0 to 10 mg/L of Zn2+ revealed a constant growth of T. marina AC16-MESO, except R3 of concentration 2 and 10 mg/L Zn2+. The lowest growth was observed at 20 mg/L Zn2+ in the repetitions (R2 and R3).
In Figure 1D, it is observed that the changes in Chl-a fluorescence measured by the optimal quantum yield of photosystem II (PSII, Fv/FM), at concentrations of 0.5, 2, 5, 10, and 20 mg L−1 Zn2+ where the statistical significance between groups was *** p < 0.001, ** p < 0.01, * p < 0.05 with respect to 0 mg/L Zn2+ (Tukey’s multiple comparison test).

2.2. Zn2+ Adsorption Experiments in Living and Non-Living Biomass from Tetraselmis marina AC16-MESO

The fittings of experimental equilibrium to the Langmuir model are represented in Figure 2, and the corresponding fitted parameters are depicted in Table 1. The adsorption capacity of Zn2+ of the live microalgal biomass was more significant than the microalgal dead biomass of T. marina AC16-MESO, which can be confirmed by the values of Qmax in Table 1. According to the Langmuir isotherm (1918) model, the Qmax, which is the maximum adsorption capacity, corresponds to the saturation of a monolayer of adsorbate molecules on the adsorbent surface. When molecules of adsorbate occupy all adsorption sites, each adsorbent has a unique Qmax for each adsorbate. Therefore, Qmax is used to predict adsorbent performance in real systems and for the design of adsorbents at different scales [23]. In this work, the Qmax determined by the microalgal live biomass (0.03051 mg g−1) was significantly higher than the microalgal dead biomass of T. marina AC16 MESO (0.02297 mg g−1) (Table 1).

2.3. Microalgal Growth, Evaluation on the Formation of Chlorophylls “a” and “b”, and Maximum Quantum Yield (Fv/FM) under Different Concentrations of Zn2+

The effect of Zn2+ on Tetraselmis marina AC16-MESO is shown in Figure 3A. A higher concentration of Zn2+ decreases the microalgal growth determined by counting every 24 h for 3 days.
In Figure 3B,C, the maximum values were found in the negative control (0 mg L−1 Zn2+). An increase or decrease is observed in both chlorophylls “a” and “b” at different concentrations of Zn2+ without significant differences (p > 0.05) (Tukey’s multiple comparison test), revealing an intermediate accumulation in concentration of 10 mg L−1 Zn2+. The lowest concentrations of chlorophylls “a” and “b” are observed in 5 and 20 mg L−1 Zn2+.
In Figure 3D,E, it can be seen that FV/FM is in the typical range of healthy cells (0 mg L−1 Zn2+: 0.657; 5 mg L−1 Zn2+: 0.663; 10 mg L−1 Zn2+: 0.642; 20 mg L−1 Zn2+: 0.657). After 72 h in Figure 3E, it is observed, under different concentrations of Zn2+, in a static system, a decrease in FV/FM values is shown below 0.4 where the highest value is observed in control (0 mg L−1 Zn2+) with a decrease in FV/FM from 5, 10, and 20 mg L−1 Zn2+ without significant differences (p > 0.05) (Tukey’s multiple comparison test.

2.4. “In Vivo” Fluorescence Analysis for Microalgae Tetraselmis marina AC16-MESO under Different Concentrations of Zn2+

Histograms of flow cytometry in autofluorescence of Tetraselmis marina AC16-MESO cells are shown in Figure 4. The cell count is along the Y-axis and light scattered forward is the X-axis (FSC), which is proportional to the size or surface of the cells or particles. The Tetraselmis marina AC16-MESO cells exposed to different concentrations of Zn2+ showed a decrease in fluorescence. This decrease was in the following order: 0 mg L−1 Zn2+: 83.8% < 20 mg L−1 Zn2+: 77.06% < 5 mg L−1 Zn2+: 69.33% < 10 mg L−1 Zn2+: 64.33% (Figure 4A–D).
According to Papageorgiou et al. [24] FRAP analysis can be used to assess the mobility of photosynthetic complexes by using the fluorescence recovery time. Microalgae are an excellent model for FRAP because many species have a regular and straightforward thylakoid membrane organization. Therefore, in FRAP analyses at different concentrations of Zn2+, an alteration is seen in the fluorescence recovery time, where the shorter recovery time is observed in control (0 mg L−1 Zn2+). At the same time, the longest recovery time is observed in 20 mg L−1 Zn2+ and the intermediate times in 5 and 10 mg L−1 Zn2+ (Figure 5).

3. Discussion

In the optimal quantum yield analysis of photosystem II (PSII, FV/FM) in T. marina AC16 MESO cultures, we saw a decrease in FV/FM from 0 to 20 mg L−1 Zn2+. This indicates that the chlorophyll fluorescence parameter FV/FM is dose-dependent and time-dependent with Zn2+. Furthermore, the photosynthesis activity of T. marina AC16-MESO was significantly affected by Zn2+. Similar results were found in marine microalgae Nitzschia closterium at different concentrations of Pb [14].
Zn2+ adsorption capacity was more significant in living biomass than dead biomass of T. marina AC16 MESO microalgae. These findings indicate a higher adsorption capacity of Zn2+ which is in agreement with previous reports conducted on the Qmax values obtained for the adsorption of Zn2+ (1.209 mg g−1) on microalgae Tetraselmis gracilis (Kylin) Butcher and Zn2+ (4.79 mg g−1) in blue green (Cyanophyta) living algae [12]. A strain of Desmodesmus pleiomorphus was isolated from a strongly contaminated industrial site in Portugal. The metal removal by that strain reached a maximum of 360 mg Zn g−1 biomass after 7 days, at 30 mg Zn L−1 concentration, in an initial rapid phase of uptake [25]. Suppose the amount of metal added results in solution concentrations exceeding the solubility limit in seawater. In that case, precipitation is predicted to occur, although the kinetics of precipitation are often complex, and the degree of precipitation observed will depend on the duration of the toxicity test. Practically, this causes many problems in understanding the concentration and form of metals that organisms are exposed to in seawater. Both dissolved and particulate metal species may be toxic, and the contributions of these forms to toxicity will likely change with time [26]. The biosorption of the heavy metal Zn2+ by dried marine green macroalgae (Chaetomorpha linum) was investigated at different solution pH values (2–6), different algal particle sizes (100–800 micron), and different initial metal solution concentrations (0.5–10 mM). The dried alga produced maximum zinc uptake values (Qmax) of 1.97 mmol g−1 (according to the Langmuir model) [27]. The adsorption for Zn (0.243 g g−1) was obtained on Cyclotella cryptica [28]. The isotherms of Zn sorption by dairy manure at 200 °C were better fitted to the Langmuir model, where the maximum sorption capacity of Zn is 31.6 mg g−1 [29]. The accumulation of zinc concentrations was most significant in Dictyota dichotoma with a value of 5.117 ± 0.017 µg g−1 dry weight. It was relatively uniform in three species of algae, Ulva lactuca, Codium fragile, and Jania rubens at 4.823 ± 0.010, 4.666 ± 0.006, and 4.651 ± 0.017 µg g−1 dry weight, respectively [30]. Therefore, live T. marina AC16 MESO biomass exhibited the highest value of maximum adsorption capacity compared to non-living biomass.
A higher concentration of Zn2+ decreases the growth of T. marina AC16-MESO. Similar effects were seen in a study that displayed that nano-ZnO caused a more potent inhibitory impact on microalgal development than bulk-ZnO. Compared with Zn2+ released by nano-ZnO into medium, lipid peroxidation injury, aggregation of nano-ZnO, and transmembrane process of nano-ZnO also contributed to toxicity [31]. It has been observed that the red microalga was highly resistant to ZnS nanoparticles, most likely due to the presence of phycoerythrin proteins in the outer membrane-bound Zn2+ cations defending their cells from further toxic influence [32]. However, the dissolved Zn2+ ions can disturb and inhibit photosynthesis and induce oxidative stress in the algal cell. This resulted in the inhibition of the growth of the microalgae [31], where various microalgal species regulate their cellular content of zinc [33]. The cell density from marine microalgae Pleurochrysis roscoffensis after 96 h exposure to five different Zn concentrations (50, 100, 500, 1000, and 1500 µg L−1), and a control (free of added Zn), in non-acidified natural seawater revealed significant differences (p < 0.01) of microalgae responses between concentrations of 500, 1000, and 1500 µg L−1 compared with the algae density of the control [34].
In T. marina AC16 MESO, a longer fluorescence recovery time is observed at higher concentrations of Zn2+, possibly due to decoupling in the photosystems located in the chloroplast thylakoidal membrane. In microalgae, large chloroplasts consist of sheets arranged parallel without stacking and occupy most of the intracellular space in vivo. Thus, this organization’s regular thylakoid is suitable for FRAP measurements [19,35]. As for the thylakoid membrane dynamics, it may be necessary to add fluorescent labels to membrane proteins that are not naturally fluorescent. However, fusions of the green fluorescent protein (GFP) genes do not appear to work in Synechococcus 7942. Yet, GFP can be successfully expressed in other cyanobacteria. Furthermore, many mutant forms are available whose excitation and fluorescence emission do not overlap severely with photosynthetic pigments [36]. In further investigations, direct observations of the fluorescence dynamics of phycoerythrins using FRAP demonstrated energetic decoupling of phycoerythrins in Phycobilisomes (PBsomes) against strong excitation light in vivo, which is projected as a photoprotective mechanism in red algae attributed by the PBsomes in response to excess light energy [37]. The complexity of cellular microenvironments and biological diffusion is often correlated over time and described by a time-dependent diffusion coefficient, D(t). Many efforts have been made to quantify D(t) by FRAP. However, straightforward approaches to quantify a general form of D(t) are still lacking [38].
The living and non-living biomass microalgae Tetraselmis marina AC16-MESO was used as a Zn2+ bioadsorbent. Regarding the experimental equilibrium results, the Langmuir isotherm model defines the results using the Qmax parameter where the live biomass microalgal (Qmax = 0.03051 mg g−1) value was more significant than the T. marina AC16-MESO microalgal dead biomass value (Qmax = 0.02297 mg g−1). Therefore, it is concluded that the microalgal T. marina AC16-MESO biomass can be used as a low-cost biosorbent to remove Zn2+ from industrial effluents. Furthermore, in additional investigations conducted on bioadsorption, changes in the fluorescence of microalgae with a decrease in photosystem II activities were observed in the range of Zn from 0 to 20 mg L−1.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Microalgae Culture

Tetraselmis marina AC16-MESO strain was isolated from the intertidal area of the Bay of San Jorge, Antofagasta, Chile, then identified and preserved in the Marine Mesocosmos Laboratory of the University of Antofagasta, Chile. The strain was cultivated at 20 °C in Erlenmeyer flasks of 250 mL using sterilized seawater with the addition of UMA5 medium [39] (NaNO3 4.55 × 10−5 M; NaH2PO4·H2O 2.41 × 10−4 M; NaHCO3 1.99 × 10−3 M) at 20 °C and with a continuous photosynthetic photon flux of 70 µmol m−2s−1 (24 h light). The algal cells were counted using a hemocytometer-type chamber in an optic microscope [40,41].

4.2. Evaluation of the PSII of Tetraselmis marina AC16-MESO in a Solid Medium in the Presence of Zn2+

The PSII of Tetraselmis marina AC16-MESO was assessed in f/2 solid medium (NaNO3, 75 g L−1; NaH2PO4•2H2O 5.65 g L−1) [42] containing OXOID marks bacteriological agar at different concentrations of Zn2+ (0, 0.5, 2, 5, 10, and 20 mg L−1 Zn2+). Filtered and autoclaved seawater was used to prepare the medium. The pH was adjusted to 8 with 1 M NaOH and HCl, and 15 g of bacteriological agar per liter was added and autoclaved for 15 min. For the sowing of the microalgae, Tetraselmis marine AC16 MESO was added into the Drigalsky glass handle along with 50 µL of liquid culture sample and then emptied into the Petri dishes.

4.3. Preparation of Living and Non-Living Microalgal Adsorbent Biomass

The live microalgal biomass of Tetraselmis marine AC16 MESO was used for bioadsorption studies to assess the ability to adsorb at different concentrations (0, 5, 10, 20 mg L−1 Zn2+). These concentrations are in line with those reported by others in the literature [43,44]. The samples were inoculated at 100 mL of logarithmic phase into 250 mL Erlenmeyer bottles. Microalgae were added to flasks containing 100 mL UMA5 medium prepared with sterilized seawater, without trace elements [45]. They were then incubated at 28 ± 2 °C and 70 mmol m−2s−1, with cold light intensity provided by the white fluorescent lamps for 72 h.
In non-living microalgal biomass assays, the dry biomass used in the adsorption processes was obtained from 2.5 L microalgal culture of non-living Tetraselmis marina AC16 MESO with 2,945,000 cell m L−1 equivalent wet weight of 45.6 g. The biomass obtained was washed twice with distilled water. Next, it was frozen and lyophilized [46]. Before using as an adsorbent, the lyophilized biomass was ground and homogenized to obtain a “non-living” microalgal biomass wherein each experimental unit contains 0.5 g of dry biomass in a volume of 40 mL of sterile seawater at 0.5, 10, and 20 mg L−1 of Zn2+ with a test time of 72 h.

4.4. Adsorbent Biomass and Adsorption Experiments

To measure Zn2+ in living and non-living biomass of the Tetraselmis marina AC16-MESO microalgae, 0.5 and 1 g of microalgal biomass sample (in triplicate) was homogenized using an agate mortar in a reflux system with a glass funnel covered with a watch glass. The pieces were placed in a 125 mL beaker for disintegration with 10 mL of HNO3 Suprapur and heated on a heating plate at 150 °C for 2 h. Subsequently, the resulting solution was filtered (0.45 µm) and packed into a 25 mL volumetric flask with deionized water. The quantification of metals was performed by atomic absorption spectrophotometry (Shimadzu, AA 6300) by using the flame technique at a wavelength of 213.9 nm with a mixture of C2H2 gas. The concentrations were expressed as mg g−1 wet weight [47].

4.5. Langmuir Equation

The balance of the adsorption isotherm of Zn2+ was calculated using the Langmuir sorption model [48] with the Origin6 program to determine the maximum adsorption of Zn2+ in “living” and “non-living” cells of Tetraselmis marina AC16-MESO. The adsorption of Zn2+ (q) for the construction of adsorption isotherms was determined using the following equation:
q = qmaxbCf/(1 + bCf)
where q is the adsorption of Zn2+ (mg Zn2+ g−1 dry biomass), qmax is the maximum adsorption (mg Zn2+g−1 dry biomass), Cf is the final concentration of Zn2+ in the solution (mg L−1), b (L mg−1) is the Langmuir constant. Here, adsorption rate is equal to the desorption ratio. For the preparation of experimental data, the Langmuir model was linearized using the following equation:
Cf/q = (1/qmaxb) + (Cf/qmax)

4.6. Determination of Chlorophylls “a” and “b”

For the quantification of chlorophyll, 2 mL of Tetraselmis marina AC16-MESO cell culture were taken for centrifugation and alteration in a sonicator (ultrasonic bath) for 7 min (20 kHz) by extracting with 2 mL of acetone. The extract was centrifuged at 3000× g for 5 min, and the optical density was measured at 647 and 664 nm [49]. The concentrations of chlorophyll a and chlorophyll b (µg mL−1) can be calculated based on optical density values as follows:
Chl a = −1.93 × OD647 + 11.93 × OD664
Chl b = 20.63 × OD647 − 5.5 × OD664

4.7. Measurement of the Fluorescence of Chlorophyll a (Chl-a) in the Living Culture of Tetraselmis marina AC16-MESO

The maximum quantum yield of PSII (FV/FM) of Tetraselmis marina AC16-MESO exposed to 0, 5, 10, and 20 mg L−1 Zn2+ was measured in triplicate after 10 min of adapting to darkness by using pulse amplitude modulated chlorophyll fluorometer (JUNIOR-PAM WALZ, Germany). The maximum quantum yield of photosystem II, FV/FM, was calculated according to Schreiber [50]:
FV/FM = (FM − F0)/FM

4.8. Flow Cytometric Analysis

The microalgal cells from Tetraselmis marina AC16-MESO at different concentrations of Zn2+ were suspended in 500 µL of the same medium with 3% formalin, and the autofluorescence emitted due to chlorophyll was observed. The size and complexity of the cells were determined using a BD FACSVerse™ flow cytometer equipped with an air-cooled 488 nm argon-ion laser exciting the cells at that wavelength.

4.9. Fluorescence Recovery after Photobleaching (FRAP) Analysis in Microalgal Autofluorescence from Tetraselmis marina AC16-MESO

In the FRAP analysis, live Tetraselmis marina AC16-MESO cells immobilized on a slide covered with a glass slip were observed under the objective lens of confocal spectral microscopy at different concentrations of Zn2+ (0, 5, 10, and 20 mg L−1). Due to the autofluorescence of the microalgae, images were obtained using a TCS SP8 Confocal Spectral microscopy system, mARK Leica, with a 40X objective. Photobleaching was performed in an area marked ROI in the microalgal cell. ROI areas were bleached with 100% Argon-405 power laser, and the images were grouped 2 × 2 to increase signal noise per camera.
After opening the laser shutter for 448 milliseconds (ms), images of the cells were taken by microscopy every 0.148 s for pre-whitening, bleaching, and post-whitening with a total duration of 448 ms and a total exposure time of 32.55 s. Then, the results were exported to Excel. The fluorescence intensity was calculated as MFI. The final data were analyzed using Graph Pad Prism 6.0.

4.10. Data Analysis and Statistics

For the study, the alteration of FRAP in Tetraselmis marina AC16-MESO at different concentrations (0, 5, 10, and 20 mg L−1) of Zn2+ were evaluated using the cell growth, maximum photochemical efficiency, fluorescence, and fluorescence recovery after photobleaching (FRAP) analysis. The mean and standard error were calculated to obtain a representative “average” at the end of 72 h. The ANOVA was performed with three repetitions in each treatment. The results were considered significant at p < 0.05.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, R.H.-O.; M.T.M. and C.R.; methodology, R.H.-O.; writing—original draft preparation, R.H.-O.; analyzed the data, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, approved the final draft. M.T.M. and C.R.; methodology adsorption, J.V. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by CONICYT, Chile through grant PAI/Concurso Nacional Inserción de Capital Humano avanzado en la Academia, convocatoria año 2017, Folio nº PAI79170067.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data available upon request.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Kumar, K.S.; Dahms, H.U.; Won, E.J.; Lee, J.S.; Shin, K.H. Microalgae–A promising tool for heavy metal remediation. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2015, 113, 329–352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Leong, Y.K.; Chang, J.S. Bioremediation of heavy metals using microalgae: Recent advances and mechanisms. Bioresour. Technol. 2020, 303, 122886. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Duruibe, J.O.; Ogwuegbu, M.O.C.; Egwurugwu, J.N. Heavy metal pollution and human biotoxic effects. Int. J. Phys. Sci. 2007, 2, 112–118. [Google Scholar]
  4. Sun, J.; Cheng, J.; Yang, Z.; Li, K.; Zhou, J.; Cen, K. Microstructures and functional groups of Nannochloropsis sp. cells with arsenic adsorption and lipid accumulation. Bioresour. Technol. 2015, 194, 305–311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Nolan, K. Copper Toxicity Syndrome. J. Orthomol. Psychiatry 2003, 12, 270–282. [Google Scholar]
  6. Moon, W.J.; Yang, Y.; Liu, J. Zn2+-Dependent DNAzymes: From Solution Chemistry to Analytical, Materials and Therapeutic Applications. ChemBioChem. 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Salamanca, M.A.; Camaño, A.; Jara, B.; Rodriguez, T. Cu, Pb and Zn Distribution in nearshore waters in San Jorge bay, northern Chile. Gayana (Concepc.) 2000, 64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Fukai, R.; Huynh-Ngoc, L. Chemical forms of zinc in sea water. J. Oceanogr. 1975, 31, 179–191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Ibuot, A.; Dean, A.P.; McIntosh, O.A.; Pittman, J.K. Metal bioremediation by CrMTP4 over-expressing Chlamydomonas reinhardtii in comparison to natural wastewater-tolerant microalgae strains. Algal Res. 2017, 24, 89–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Pradhan, D.; Sukla, L.B.; Mishra, B.B.; Devi, N. Biosorption for removal of hexavalent chromium using microalgae Scenedesmus sp. J. Clean. Prod. 2019, 209, 617–629. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Nazal, M.K. Marine Algae Bioadsorbents for Adsorptive Removal of Heavy Metals. In Advanced Sorption Process Applications; IntechOpen: London, UK, 2019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Abbas, S.H.; Ali, W.H. Evaluation of biomass type blue Cyanophyta algae for the sorption of Cr (III), Zn (II) and Ni (II) from aqueous solution using batch operation system: Equilibrium, kinetic and thermodynamic studies. Glob. Nest J. 2018, 20, 69–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Banks, J.M. Chlorophyll fluorescence as a tool to identify drought stress in Acer genotypes. Environ. Exp. Bot. 2018, 155, 118–127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Gan, T.; Zhao, N.; Yin, G.; Chen, M.; Wang, X.; Liu, J.; Liu, W. Optimal chlorophyll fluorescence parameter selection for rapid and sensitive detection of lead toxicity to marine microalgae Nitzschia closterium based on chlorophyll fluorescence technology. J. Photochem. Photobiol. B, Biol. 2019, 197, 111551. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Kumar, K.S.; Dahms, H.U.; Lee, J.S.; Kim, H.C.; Lee, W.C.; Shin, K.H. Algal photosynthetic responses to toxic metals and herbicides assessed by chlorophyll a fluorescence. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2014, 104, 51–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Huang, H.; Xiao, X.M.; Ghadouani, A.; Wu, J.; Nie, Z.; Peng, C.; Xu, X.; Shi, J. Effects of natural flavonoids on photosynthetic activity and cell integrity in Microcystis aeruginosa. Toxins 2015, 7, 66–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Axelrod, D.; Koppel, D.E.; Schlessinger, J.; Elson, E.; Webb, W.W. Mobility measurement by analysis of fluorescence photobleaching recovery kinetics. Biophys. J. 1976, 16, 1055–1069. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Lippincott-Schwartz, J.; Altan-Bonnet, N.; Patterson, G.H. Photobleaching and photoactivation: Following protein dynamics in living cells. Nat. Cell Biol. 2003, Suppl, S7–S14. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  19. Mullineaux, C.W. FRAP analysis of photosynthetic membranes. J. Exp. Bot. 2004, 55, 1207–1211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  20. Mullineaux, C.W.; Tobin, M.J.; Jones, G.R. Mobility of photosynthetic complexes in thylakoid membranes. Nature 1997, 390, 421–424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Mullineaux, C.W.; Kirchhoff, H. Role of lipids in the dynamics of thylakoid membranes. In Lipids in Photosynthesis. Advances in Photosynthesis and Respiration; Springer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2009; pp. 283–294. [Google Scholar]
  22. Cameron, H.; Mata, M.T.; Riquelme, C. The effect of heavy metals on the viability of Tetraselmis marina AC16-MESO and an evaluation of the potential use of this microalga in bioremediation. PeerJ 2018, 6, e5295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  23. Otero, M.; Zabkova, M.; Grande, C.A.; Rodrigues, A.E. Fixed-bed adsorption of salicylic acid onto polymeric adsorbents and activated charcoal. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2005, 44, 927–936. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Chlorophyll a Fluorescence: A Signature of Photosynthesis; Papageorgiou, G.C. (Ed.) Springer Science & Business Media: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2007; pp. 1–793. [Google Scholar]
  25. Monteiro, C.M.; Marques, A.P.; Castro, P.M.; Malcata, F.X. Characterization of Desmodesmus pleiomorphus isolated from a heavy metal-contaminated site: Biosorption of zinc. Biodegradation 2009, 20, 629–641. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  26. Angel, B.M.; Apte, S.C.; Batley, G.E.; Raven, M.D. Lead solubility in seawater: An experimental study. Environ. Chem. 2016, 13, 489–495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Ajjabi, L.C.; Chouba, L. Biosorption of Cu2+ and Zn2+ from aqueous solutions by dried marine green macroalga Chaetomorpha linum. J. Environ. Manag. 2009, 90, 3485–3489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Schmitt, D.; Müller, A.; Csögör, Z.; Frimmel, F.H.; Posten, C. The adsorption kinetics of metal ions onto different microalgae and siliceous earth. Water Res. 2001, 35, 779–785. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Xu, X.; Cao, X.; Zhao, L.; Wang, H.; Yu, H.; Gao, B. Removal of Cu, Zn, and Cd from aqueous solutions by the dairy manure-derived biochar. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2013, 20, 358–368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Laib, E.; Leghouchi, E. Cd, Cr, Cu, Pb, and Zn concentrations in Ulva lactuca, Codium fragile, Jania rubens, and Dictyota dichotoma from Rabta Bay, Jijel (Algeria). Environ. Monit. Assess. 2012, 184, 1711–1718. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Zhang, C.; Wang, J.; Tan, L.; Chen, X. Toxic effects of nano-ZnO on marine microalgae Skeletonema costatum: Attention to the accumulation of intracellular Zn. Aquat. oxicol. 2016, 178, 158–164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Pikula, K.; Mintcheva, N.; Kulinich, S.A.; Zakharenko, A.; Markina, Z.; Chaika, V.; Orlova, T.; Mezhuev, Y.; Kokkinakis, E.; Tsatsakis, A.; et al. Aquatic toxicity and mode of action of CdS and ZnS nanoparticles in four microalgae species. Environ. Res. 2020, 186, 109513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Knauer, K.; Behra, R.; Sigg, L. Effects of free Cu2+ and Zn2+ ions on growth and metal accumulation in freshwater algae. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 1997, 16, 220–229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Bautista-Chamizo, E.; De Orte, M.R.; DelValls, T.Á.; Riba, I. Simulating CO2 leakages from CCS to determine Zn toxicity using the marine microalgae Pleurochrysis roscoffensis. Chemosphere 2016, 144, 955–965. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Mullineaux, C.W.; Sarcina, M. Probing the dynamics of photosynthetic membranes with fluorescence recovery after photobleaching. Trends Plant Sci. 2002, 7, 237–240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Spence, E.; Sarcina, M.; Ray, N.; Møller, S.G.; Mullineaux, C.W.; Robinson, C. Membrane-specific targeting of green fluorescent protein by the Tat pathway in the cyanobacterium Synechocystis PCC6803. Mol. Microbiol. 2003, 48, 1481–1489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  37. Liu, L.N.; Aartsma, T.J.; Thomas, J.C.; Zhou, B.C.; Zhang, Y.Z. FRAP analysis on red alga reveals the fluorescence recovery is ascribed to intrinsic photoprocesses of phycobilisomes than large-scale diffusion. PLoS ONE 2009, 4, e5295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Kang, M.; Day, C.A.; Kenworthy, A.K. A novel computational framework for D(t) from Fluorescence Recovery after Photobleaching data reveals various anomalous diffusion types in live cell membranes. Traffic 2019, 20, 867–880. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Riveros, K.; Sepulveda, C.; Bazaes, J.; Marticorena, P.; Riquelme, C.; Acién, G. Overall development of a bioprocess for the outdoor production of Nannochloropsis gaditana for aquaculture. Aquac. Res. 2018, 49, 165–176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Rigobello-Masini, M.; Aidar, E.; Masini, J.C. Extra and intracelular activities of carbonic anhydrase of the marine microalga Tetraselmis gracilis (Chlorophyta). Braz. J. Microbiol. 2003, 34, 267–272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Rigobello-Masini, M.; Masini, J.C.; Aidar, E. The profiles of nitrate reductase and carbonic anhydrase activity in batch cultivation of the marine microalgae Tetraselmis gracilis growing under different aeration conditions. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 2006, 57, 18–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  42. Guillard, R.R. Culture of phytoplankton for feeding marine invertebrates. In Culture of Marine Invertebrate Animals; Springer: Boston, MA, USA, 1975; pp. 29–60. [Google Scholar]
  43. Zhou, G.J.; Peng, F.Q.; Zhang, L.J.; Ying, G.G. Biosorption of zinc and copper from aqueous solutions by two freshwater green microalgae Chlorella pyrenoidosa and Scenedesmus obliquus. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2012, 19, 2918–2929. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Alam, M.A.; Wan, C.; Zhao, X.Q.; Chen, L.J.; Chang, J.S.; Bai, F.W. Enhanced removal of Zn2+ or Cd2+ by the flocculating Chlorella vulgaris JSC-7. J. Hazard. Mater. 2015, 289, 38–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Goldman, J.C.; McCarthy, J.J. Steady state growth and ammonium uptake of a fast-growing marine diatom. Limnol. Oceanogr. 1978, 23, 695–703. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Coimbra, R.N.; Escapa, C.; Vázquez, N.C.; Noriega-Hevia, G.; Otero, M. Utilization of non-living microalgae biomass from two different strains for the adsorptive removal of diclofenac from water. Water 2018, 10, 1401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  47. Castillo, A.; Valdés, J. Contenido de metales en Cancer polyodon (Crustacea: Decapoda) en un sistema de bahías del norte de Chile (27S). Lat. Am. J. Aquat. Res. 2011, 39, 461–470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Langmuir, I. The adsorption of gases on plane surfaces of glass, mica and platinum. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1918, 40, 1361–1403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  49. Jeffrey, S.W.; Humphrey, G.F. New spectrophotometric equations for determining chlorophylls a, b, c1 and c2 in higher plants, algae and natural phytoplankton. Biochem Physiol Pflanz J. 1975, 165, 191–194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Schreiber, U. Pulse-amplitude-modulation (PAM) fluorometry and saturation pulse method: An overview. Chlorophyll Fluoresc. 2004, 279–319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Observation of the microalgae Tetraselmis marina AC16-MESO. (A,B) Photographs of microalgal cells through confocal microscopy. (C) Petri dishes with bacteriological agar medium at different concentrations of Zn2+ after 68 days. (D) Maximum quantum yield (FV/FM) in cultures of T. marina AC16 MESO exposed to different Zn2+ treatments for 68 days. Bars indicate the standard error (SE), *** p < 0.001, ** p < 0.01, * p < 0.05 with respect to 0 mg/L Zn2+ (Tukey’s multiple comparison test).
Figure 1. Observation of the microalgae Tetraselmis marina AC16-MESO. (A,B) Photographs of microalgal cells through confocal microscopy. (C) Petri dishes with bacteriological agar medium at different concentrations of Zn2+ after 68 days. (D) Maximum quantum yield (FV/FM) in cultures of T. marina AC16 MESO exposed to different Zn2+ treatments for 68 days. Bars indicate the standard error (SE), *** p < 0.001, ** p < 0.01, * p < 0.05 with respect to 0 mg/L Zn2+ (Tukey’s multiple comparison test).
Ijms 22 12799 g001aIjms 22 12799 g001b
Figure 2. Equilibrium results of the adsorption of Zn2+. (A) Tetraselmis marina AC16-MESO living biomass; (B) Tetraselmis marina AC16-MESO non-living biomass. Experimental data on the equilibrium adsorbed concentration of Zn2+ (q, mg·g−1) versus the equilibrium Zn2+ concentration in the liquid phase (C, mg·L−1) represented together and fit into the Langmuir equilibrium isotherm models.
Figure 2. Equilibrium results of the adsorption of Zn2+. (A) Tetraselmis marina AC16-MESO living biomass; (B) Tetraselmis marina AC16-MESO non-living biomass. Experimental data on the equilibrium adsorbed concentration of Zn2+ (q, mg·g−1) versus the equilibrium Zn2+ concentration in the liquid phase (C, mg·L−1) represented together and fit into the Langmuir equilibrium isotherm models.
Ijms 22 12799 g002
Figure 3. Effect of concentration Zn2+(mg/L): (A) growth microalgal Tetraselmis marina AC16-MESO at 24, 48, and 72 h. Concentrations of the photosynthetic pigment at 72 h: (B) chlorophyll “a”; (C) chlorophyll “b”. Maximum quantum yield (FV/FM) in T. marina AC16-MESO at (D) 0 h. (E) 72 h of exposure. Bars indicate the standard error (SE); ns indicates not significant, (p > 0.05). 5 vs 0; 10 vs 0; 20 vs 0 (mg/L Zn2+).
Figure 3. Effect of concentration Zn2+(mg/L): (A) growth microalgal Tetraselmis marina AC16-MESO at 24, 48, and 72 h. Concentrations of the photosynthetic pigment at 72 h: (B) chlorophyll “a”; (C) chlorophyll “b”. Maximum quantum yield (FV/FM) in T. marina AC16-MESO at (D) 0 h. (E) 72 h of exposure. Bars indicate the standard error (SE); ns indicates not significant, (p > 0.05). 5 vs 0; 10 vs 0; 20 vs 0 (mg/L Zn2+).
Ijms 22 12799 g003
Figure 4. Graphical representation of the autofluorescence signal movement in Tetraselmis marina AC16 MESO (red curves). Flow cytometer histograms representing the excited autofluorescence signal in cells of T. marine AC16 MESO with 488 nm blue laser, at different concentrations of Zn2+. (A) 0 mg/L Zn2+; (B) 5 mg/L Zn2+; (C) 10 mg/L Zn2+; (D) 20 mg/L Zn2+.
Figure 4. Graphical representation of the autofluorescence signal movement in Tetraselmis marina AC16 MESO (red curves). Flow cytometer histograms representing the excited autofluorescence signal in cells of T. marine AC16 MESO with 488 nm blue laser, at different concentrations of Zn2+. (A) 0 mg/L Zn2+; (B) 5 mg/L Zn2+; (C) 10 mg/L Zn2+; (D) 20 mg/L Zn2+.
Ijms 22 12799 g004
Figure 5. Analysis of fluorescence recovery after photobleaching (FRAP) in autofluorescence of native pigments in microalgae Tetraselmis marina AC16-MESO, at different concentrations of Zn2+ after 72 h of exposure. (A) 0 mg L−1; (B) 5 mg L−1; (C) 10 mg L−1; (D) 20 mg L−1.
Figure 5. Analysis of fluorescence recovery after photobleaching (FRAP) in autofluorescence of native pigments in microalgae Tetraselmis marina AC16-MESO, at different concentrations of Zn2+ after 72 h of exposure. (A) 0 mg L−1; (B) 5 mg L−1; (C) 10 mg L−1; (D) 20 mg L−1.
Ijms 22 12799 g005
Table 1. Parameters from fitting the experimental results with equilibrium isotherm (Langmuir equilibrium isotherms) model.
Table 1. Parameters from fitting the experimental results with equilibrium isotherm (Langmuir equilibrium isotherms) model.
Equilibrium Isotherms
ModelParameterBiomass Microalgae Tetraselmis marina AC-16 MESO
Non-Living(mg/g)Living (mg/g)
Qmax0.022970.03051
LangmuirK0.029640.03249
n0.840651.13885
r20.993450.98789
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Huarachi-Olivera, R.; Mata, M.T.; Valdés, J.; Riquelme, C. Biosorption of Zn(II) from Seawater Solution by the Microalgal Biomass of Tetraselmis marina AC16-MESO. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 12799. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms222312799

AMA Style

Huarachi-Olivera R, Mata MT, Valdés J, Riquelme C. Biosorption of Zn(II) from Seawater Solution by the Microalgal Biomass of Tetraselmis marina AC16-MESO. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2021; 22(23):12799. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms222312799

Chicago/Turabian Style

Huarachi-Olivera, Ronald, María Teresa Mata, Jorge Valdés, and Carlos Riquelme. 2021. "Biosorption of Zn(II) from Seawater Solution by the Microalgal Biomass of Tetraselmis marina AC16-MESO" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 22, no. 23: 12799. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms222312799

APA Style

Huarachi-Olivera, R., Mata, M. T., Valdés, J., & Riquelme, C. (2021). Biosorption of Zn(II) from Seawater Solution by the Microalgal Biomass of Tetraselmis marina AC16-MESO. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 22(23), 12799. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms222312799

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop