Next Article in Journal
Molecular Dynamics Simulations of Mitochondrial Uncoupling Protein 2
Next Article in Special Issue
Loss of P2Y12 Has Behavioral Effects in the Adult Mouse
Previous Article in Journal
Bisindolylpyrrole Induces a Cpr3- and Porin1/2-Dependent Transition in Yeast Mitochondrial Permeability in a Low Conductance State via the AACs-Associated Pore
Previous Article in Special Issue
Nucleotides-Induced Changes in the Mechanical Properties of Living Endothelial Cells and Astrocytes, Analyzed by Atomic Force Microscopy
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Purinergic Regulation of Endothelial Barrier Function

1
Experimental Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine I, Justus Liebig University, Aulweg 129, 35392 Giessen, Germany
2
Department of Cardiology, Kerckhoff Clinic GmbH, 61231 Bad Nauheim, Germany
3
DZHK (German Centre for Cardiovascular Research), Partner Site Rhein-Main, 61231 Bad Nauheim, Germany
4
Department of Cardiology and Angiology, Evangelisches Jung Stilling Krankenhaus GmbH, 57074 Siegen, Germany
5
Institute of Physiology, Justus Liebig University, 35392 Giessen, Germany
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22(3), 1207; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22031207
Submission received: 14 December 2020 / Revised: 10 January 2021 / Accepted: 22 January 2021 / Published: 26 January 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Dissecting the Purinergic Signaling Puzzle)

Abstract

:
Increased vascular permeability is a hallmark of several cardiovascular anomalies, including ischaemia/reperfusion injury and inflammation. During both ischaemia/reperfusion and inflammation, massive amounts of various nucleotides, particularly adenosine 5′-triphosphate (ATP) and adenosine, are released that can induce a plethora of signalling pathways via activation of several purinergic receptors and may affect endothelial barrier properties. The nature of the effects on endothelial barrier function may depend on the prevalence and type of purinergic receptors activated in a particular tissue. In this review, we discuss the influence of the activation of various purinergic receptors and downstream signalling pathways on vascular permeability during pathological conditions.

1. Introduction

The vascular endothelium (VE), consisting of monolayers of endothelial cells (ECs), is located at the interface between the vascular and perivascular compartments and extends over a wide surface area. The VE separates strictly two compartments and regulates the trafficking of ions, solutes, macromolecules and leukocytes across the vessel wall, thus maintaining tissue homeostasis [1,2]. Additionally, it secretes several vasoactive agents that not only maintain its integrity but also regulate platelet function and vascular smooth muscle tone, and thus actively participate in the regulation of blood pressure. The semipermeable barrier function of VE is dependent on the size of the molecules, and this size-selective nature of the barrier to plasma proteins is a key factor in establishing protein gradients, which is required for fluid balance of tissues [1,3]. The loss of this barrier function of VE results in increased vascular permeability and leakage of blood components, which may finally result in organ dysfunction and life-threatening oedema formation [2,4].
Endothelial barrier integrity is maintained by the equilibrium of competing adhesive and contractile forces generated by adhesive molecules located at cell–cell and cell–matrix contacts and the acto-myosin-based contractile machinery, respectively [5]. ECs are tightly interconnected by the interaction of junctional proteins such as VE-cadherin, zona occluding 1 (ZO-1), occludins, and catenins that are linked to the actin cytoskeleton of adjacent cells [6,7]. Therefore, changes in the actin cytoskeleton dynamics and/or activation state of the EC contractile machinery may affect the stability of cell–cell junctions and barrier function.
Two members of the Rho family of GTPases, RhoA and Rac1, are the major regulators of endothelial actin cytoskeleton dynamics and contraction and thereby play a key role in the maintenance of endothelial barrier integrity. Constitutive activation of RhoA results in the loss of basal VE-cadherin and potentiates hypoxia-reoxygenation (H/R)-induced loss of endothelial barrier function, whereas suppression of RhoA activity attenuates the agonist-induced increase in endothelial permeability [8,9]. On the other hand, suppression of Rac1 activity in cultured ECs results in loss of the endothelial barrier and abolishes the recovery of EC barrier integrity following H/R-induced barrier failure. Accordingly, constitutive activation of Rac1 results in strong junctional staining of VE-cadherin and abrogates H/R-induced loss of cell–cell junctions [8].
The activation state of the endothelial contractile machinery is regulated by the phosphorylation state of regulatory myosin light chains (MLC), which are phosphorylated by MLC kinase (MLCK) [10] and dephosphorylated by MLC phosphatase (MLCP) [11]. Activation of Rho/Rho kinase (Rock) and MEK/ERK pathways induces MLC phosphorylation via inhibition of MLCP or activation of MLCK, respectively [12,13,14]. Thrombin inhibits MLCP by inducing the phosphorylation of its regulatory subunit MYPT1 at T850 and activates MLCK via phospholipase C/inositol tris-phosphate (PLC/IP3)-dependent release of Ca2+ from intracellular stores [12,14,15]. Both of these actions contribute to its endothelial barrier destabilisation properties. A schematic presentation of mechanisms regulating endothelial barrier properties is shown below (Figure 1).
Endothelial barrier integrity is influenced by several circulating, blood-borne hormones and agents/factors such as adenosine triphosphate (ATP) and its metabolites adenosine diphosphate (ADP) and adenosine. The major sources of vascular nucleotides are erythrocytes, platelets, and the endothelium [16]. Platelets contain nucleotides in their granules, and upon degranulation, bulk plasma levels of ATP can reach 50 μM [17], with even higher local concentrations predicted at the endothelial surface [18]. The endothelium releases nucleotides in response to shear stress [19], inflammatory mediators like thrombin [20], and hypoxia [21,22]. ATP and other nucleotides either released from vascular cells or applied exogenously can act at endothelial purinoceptors and modulate the barrier function of the endothelium [21,23,24]. Activation of purinergic receptors also induces the release of von Willebrand Factor (vWF) from ECs [25], which via reactive oxygen species (ROS)-dependent upregulation of endothelin-1 [26] may modulate endothelial barrier function.

2. Purine Receptors

There are two main classes of purine receptors: P1 receptors activated by adenosine and analogues, and P2 receptors recognised by purine and pyrimidine nucleotides (ATP, ADP, uridine triphosphate (UTP), uridine diphosphate (UDP)). P1 receptors are further divided into A1, A2, and A3 subtypes, depending on their affinity for adenosine. P2 receptors are further classified into ionotropic P2X and metabotropic P2Y receptors [27,28]. Nineteen different human purine receptors have been identified, cloned, and characterised [29]. Nearly all of these receptors are expressed on various cells of the cardiovascular system [27,29]. Several types of cells, particularly ECs and platelets, actively release nucleotides such as ATP that can activate a variety of the purine receptors in the vicinity [30,31]. This receptor activation scheme may be further complicated by the activity of ectonucleotidases that hydrolyse ATP to adenosine, which can activate P1 receptors [32].

3. Adenosine and Adenosine (P1) Receptors

Physiological extracellular adenosine levels range from 20 to 300 nM, which rise to a low micromolar range during exercise and to a high micromolar level under pathological conditions like ischaemia [33,34]. Under physiological conditions, the major source of extracellular adenosine is intracellular adenosine released by nucleotide transporters; however, under stress conditions, it is generated from its precursors ATP, ADP, and adenosine monophosphate (AMP) by the combined activities of extracellular ectonucleotidases, CD73 and CD39 [35]. Extracellular adenosine mediates its effects via adenosine receptors. There are four well-characterised adenosine receptors, namely adenosine A1, A2A, A2B, and A3, which are classified as high (A1, A2A, A3) or low (A2B) affinity for binding their parent physiological agonist, adenosine [36]. All four adenosine receptors possess seven transmembrane domains and belong to the family of G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCR) [37]. The A1 and A3 receptors are coupled to Gq and/or Gi/o, whereas A2A and A2B are coupled to Gs proteins. Activation of A1 and A3 receptors results in inhibition of adenylyl cyclase (AC) activity, leading to reduction in cyclic AMP (cAMP) production and suppression of downstream signalling [37,38]. Their activation also leads to PLC/IP3-dependent release of Ca2+ from the endoplasmic reticulum (ER), protein kinase C (PKC) activation, and nitric oxide (NO) production [39,40,41,42]. In cardiomyocytes and neurons, activation of A1 adenosine receptors stimulates the opening and blockade of K+ channels and P- and N-type Ca2+ channels, respectively [43,44]. Activation of both A1 and A3 receptors leads to PKC-dependent and independent mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) activation [45]. Activation of both adenosine A2A and A2B receptors results in activation of AC, enhanced cAMP production, and activation of downstream signalling [36]. Adenosine receptors are widely distributed throughout the nervous, cardiovascular, respiratory, urogenital, gastrointestinal, and immune systems. All adenosine receptors are expressed on various cells of the cardiovascular system, including ECs [37,46].

3.1. Adenosine Receptors and the Endothelial Barrier

Adenosine is a non-selective agonist for all adenosine receptors and produces differential effects on endothelial permeability of various vascular beds depending on the type of receptors expressed.

3.1.1. Adenosine Receptors and Lung Microvascular Permeability

In the lung vasculature, adenosine signalling has largely been shown to enhance endothelial barrier properties and ameliorate agonist-induced hyperpermeability. In a mouse model of acute lung injury, knockdown of CD39 or inhibition of CD73, the two sequential enzymes responsible for adenosine production, resulted in development of severe lung oedema in response to ventilation compared with wild-type littermates. These animals were rescued by the addition of exogenous apyrase, suggesting a protective role played by adenosine [47]. Both adenosine A2A or A2B receptors seem to mediate the protective effects of adenosine in the lung [48,49]. In an isolated rat lung perfusion model of ischaemia/reperfusion (IR), a selective A2-receptor agonist reduced the IR-induced increase in microvascular permeability [50]. Pharmacological activation of adenosine A2A and A2B receptors protected against hypoxia and lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-induced development of lung oedema [51,52], whereas deletion of adenosine A2A or A2B receptors in mice resulted in loss of adenosine-mediated preservation of the lung microvascular endothelial barrier [51,52]. These protective effects are mediated via augmented production of cAMP and downstream activation of Rac1 [53]. Likewise, we have previously shown that elevation of intracellular cAMP via adrenomedullin receptor activation protects against lung oedema [54]. On the other hand, too much adenosine also seems to be detrimental for the lung vasculature. Deletion of adenosine deaminase, an enzyme responsible for adenosine degradation, resulted in severe respiratory distress and lung inflammation in mice [55]. However, deletion of A2B receptors in these mice did not rescue but worsened the conditions, which were accompanied by enhanced loss of pulmonary barrier function [56], suggesting a protective role of A2B receptors. In contrast to murine lungs, in feline lungs, adenosine A1 receptor activation mediates IR- and LPS-induced pulmonary microvascular barrier disruption [57,58]: perfusion with A1 receptor antagonists xanthine amine congener (XAC)/8-cyclopentyl-1,3-dipropylxanthine (DPCPX) ameliorates IR-induced lung injury and oedema in these animals. These species differences are probably due to differential expression of adenosine receptors in murine and feline lungs. Like A2 receptor activation, pharmacological activation of adenosine A3 receptors with a selective agonist also protects against reperfusion-induced lung oedema. This protective effect is lost in A3 knockout mice in vivo [59]. However, the mechanism of this protective effect is still elusive.

3.1.2. Adenosine Receptors and the Blood–Brain Barrier

The blood–brain barrier is a highly specialised structure formed by a very tight monolayer of microvascular ECs that are distinct from ECs of other vascular beds [60]. The brain ECs form tight junctions consisting of claudins, occludins, VE-cadherin, junctional adhesion molecules (JAMs), and zonula occludens (particularly ZO-1). Human and murine brain microvascular ECs express adenosine A1 and A2A receptors [61,62,63]. Adenosine causes an elevation of central nervous system (CNS) barrier permeability. In an elegant study, Carman et al. demonstrated that a stable adenosine analogue 5’-N-ethylcarboxamidoadenosine (NECA) and selective A1 and A2A receptor agonists increased blood–brain barrier permeability to low-molecular-weight dextran [63]. These adenosine effects were attenuated in mice lacking either A1 or A2A receptors [63]. Similarly, mice lacking CD73 had low levels of extracellular adenosine and were protected against experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis-induced development of brain oedema and leukocyte infiltration [64]. Accordingly, inhibition of endothelial A2A receptors protected mice against thromboembolic stroke-induced development of cerebral oedema and leukocyte infiltration [65]. Likewise, regadenson, a selective A2A receptor agonist used clinically as a coronary vasodilator for myocardial perfusion imaging, increased permeability of the human blood–brain barrier in vitro [66] and in that of the mouse in vivo [63]. It has recently been shown that certain viruses and bacteria exploit this reaction of the blood–brain barrier to adenosine to open the barrier for their entry into the brain by increasing local production of adenosine, which causes transient opening of the blood–brain barrier and allows their entry to the central nervous system (CNS) [67,68]. Several groups have also recently tried to exploit this property of adenosine receptor activation to transiently open the blood–brain barrier for the local delivery of drugs to the CNS [69,70,71,72,73,74].

3.1.3. Adenosine Receptors and Coronary Microvascular Barrier

As in the blood–brain barrier, adenosine receptor activation in the coronary microvasculature results in loss of barrier integrity. A2 receptor activation increased permeability of rat coronary microvascular ECs in vitro [75]. Infusion of adenosine in pigs on a high-fat diet resulted in increased cardiac microvascular permeability in vivo [76]. Similarly, Di Napoli et al. showed that DPCPX abrogates reperfusion-induced coronary hyperpermeability [77]. However, the authors used DPCPX at a concentration that blocks all adenosine receptors, suggesting A2 receptors were also antagonised. In line with these reports, we have previously demonstrated that reperfusion caused the release of ATP from isolated rat coronary microvascular ECs that was degraded to adenosine. Inhibition of either ectonucleotidases or adenosine receptors abrogated endothelial barrier failure, whereas addition of apyrase and ectonucleotidases worsened reperfusion-induced endothelial barrier failure [21]. In a follow-up study, we demonstrated that adenosine induced an increase in rat mesentery microvascular permeability in situ and cardiac oedema in vivo. These adenosine effects were blocked by adenosine receptor antagonists. Furthermore, we showed that these effects were due to cAMP-mediated disruption of the microvascular endothelial cytoskeleton [78]. In a related study, we demonstrated that adenosine induced cAMP production (via adenosine A2 receptors) in coronary microvascular ECs [79] that caused an inhibition of RhoA and Rac1 signalling [80]. This is in contrast to macrovascular ECs, where cAMP production inhibited RhoA/Rock signalling while activating Rac1 GTPase [81,82]. Inhibition of both RhoA and Rac1 results in complete breakdown of the EC cytoskeleton and disruption of cell–cell junctions [78,80]. Activation of Rac1 rescued these cells from the loss of endothelial barrier integrity [80].

3.1.4. Adenosine Receptors and the Macrovascular Endothelial Barrier

In general, adenosine receptor activation in macrovascular ECs enhances endothelial barrier properties and ameliorates the effect of barrier-disrupting agents [79,83,84,85]. The mechanism involves the production of cAMP via activation of A2A and A2B receptors by adenosine and its analogues. Enhanced cellular cAMP levels suppress the activity of the endothelial contractile machinery in a RhoA/Rock-dependent manner and activate Rac1 GTPase via protein kinase A (PKA) and exchange protein directly activated by cAMP (Epac) activation [82]. Table 1 summarises the major preclinical studies that investigated purinergic receptors in relation to endothelial barrier function, and Figure 2 summarises the key mechanisms involved in the adenosine receptors-mediated endothelial barrier regulation in various vascular beds.

4. P2X Receptors and Signalling

The family of P2X receptors are non-selective ion channels comprising one or more of seven monomeric proteins (P2X1–P2X7). Each monomeric P2X protein consists of two transmembrane domains (TM1 and TM2) linked via an extracellular ligand-binding loop. The monomeric P2X proteins combine to form trimeric homomultimeric or heteromultimeric ion pores [96,97,98,99]; thus, each P2X receptor complex contains three ATP binding sites. At least 13 different trimeric combinations (P2X1, P2X2, P2X3, P2X4, P2X5, P2X7, P2X1/2, P2X1/4, P2X1/5, P2X2/3, P2X2/5, P2X2/6, and P2X4/6) have been reported and functionally characterised in vitro and partly in vivo [28,99]. Of note, P2X6 exists only in heteromeric combinations. Binding of ATP to the extracellular ligand-binding domain induces conformational changes in the multimeric ion pore, leading to opening of the pore and allowing the passage of ions into the cell. P2X receptors are generally known as non-selective cation channels, mainly permeable to Na+, K+, and Ca2+ under physiological conditions, although a recombinant P2X5 receptor has been shown to allow the passage of Cl¯. Excitable cells are thus depolarised upon activation of P2X receptors. Moreover, increased intracellular Ca2+ levels initiate a diverse array of Ca2+-dependent signalling pathways, both in excitable and non-excitable cells, that regulate various cellular processes, including cell migration, proliferation, necrosis, and apoptosis.

P2X Receptors and Endothelial Barrier

P2X receptors are widely expressed throughout the cardiovascular system. mRNA and protein of all P2X receptors have been detected in the endothelium of various types of blood vessels [100,101,102,103,104,105,106,107], but—with the possible exceptions of P2X4 and to some extent P2X7—their roles are unclear [100,103,108]. Human venous endothelium expresses higher levels of P2X4 than arterial endothelium [109]. The most studied human primary ECs are umbilical vein ECs (HUVECs), which express primarily P2X4 and P2X7 and low levels of P2X6 receptors [107] (unpublished data). P2X4 receptors mediate shear stress-induced Ca2+ currents in endothelium [110] that may be responsible for shear stress-mediated endothelial NO production and vasodilation [111]. The vessels from P2X4(−/−) mice do not show an EC response to flow, such as calcium influx and subsequent production of NO [112]. A loss-of-function mutation in the human P2X4 receptor is associated with increased pulse pressure [113]. Cardiac ectopic expression of the P2X4 receptor was protective in a mouse model of heart failure [114]. Accordingly, the P2X4 receptor was the major regulator of ischemic preconditioning-mediated neuroprotection [87]. In HUVECs, the P2X4 receptor associates with VE-cadherin and may be involved in the regulation of cell–cell junctions [100]. In this context, we observed that ivermectin, a positive modulator of the P2X4 receptor, attenuated thrombin-induced HUVEC monolayer hyperpermeability (Figure 3). On the other hand, the P2X4 receptor is also reported to be an inflammation-regulated purinergic receptor. In rabbit aortic endothelium, the expression of P2X4 was upregulated after balloon injury followed by a high-fat diet [115]. A high-glucose and palmitate diet induced upregulation of P2X4 and P2X7 receptors accompanied by hyperpermeability of HUVEC monolayers that was attenuated by respective antagonists [116]. In line with this, ATP-mediated coronary microvascular endothelial barrier stabilisation was strengthened in the presence of P2X4 receptor antagonist (5-(3-bromophenyl)-1,3-dihydro-2H-benzofuro[3,2-e]-1,4-diazepin-2-one (5-BDBD)) and attenuated in the presence of the receptor modulator ivermectin [78]. Differential effects of P2X4 receptor activation on endothelial barrier function under different experimental conditions may be partly explained by the downstream signalling mechanisms. For example, under basal conditions, ECs express high levels of endothelial NO synthase (eNOS), which has been reported to be downregulated under chronic inflammatory conditions that may result in an upregulation of reactive oxygen species production, leading to barrier failure.
Unlike P2X4 receptors, activation of P2X7 receptors in ECs is primarily linked to a proinflammatory and hyperpermeability response. In an in vitro model of the blood–brain barrier, ATP induced an increased production of matrix metallopeptidase 9 (MMP9) in an interleukin (IL)-1β-dependent manner, which was responsible for the degradation of tight junction proteins [117]. These ATP effects were abrogated by P2X7 receptor antagonist, suggesting that they were P2X7 receptor-dependent. Similarly, hyperglycaemia induced the production of IL-1β via P2X7 receptor activation and caused damage to the retinal endothelial cell–cell junctions and barrier that was abrogated by a selective P2X7 receptor antagonist [118]. Likewise, in an in vivo model of intracranial haemorrhage, an upregulation of P2X7 receptor expression accompanied by the development of cranial oedema was observed. Pharmacological inhibition or siRNA-mediated knockdown of P2X7 receptors attenuated the disruption of the blood–brain barrier and the resultant oedema [88]. These effects were mediated via P2X7-induced activation of the RhoA/Rock pathway. Likewise, P2X7(−/−) mice were protected against traumatic brain injury-induced development of brain oedema [89] and also the development of lung inflammation and oedema in vivo [119]. In contrast, Kaiser et al. [90] reported a protective role of P2X7 receptors in a cerebral transient IR model of brain injury and oedema formation. The mice deficient in P2X7 receptors developed more severe oedema after transient cerebral artery occlusion compared with their wild-type littermates [90].

5. P2Y Receptors and Signalling

P2Y receptors are membrane-bound class A GPCRs for extracellular nucleotides [120]. At present, eight mammalian P2Y receptor subtypes (P2Y1, P2Y2, P2Y4, P2Y6, P2Y11, P2Y12, P2Y13, and P2Y14) have been cloned and are further classified into two sub-families based on sequence similarities and signal transduction pathways [121,122,123,124,125,126,127,128]. The P2Y1-like subfamily includes the P2Y1, P2Y2, P2Y4, P2Y6, and P2Y11 receptors that are coupled to Gq proteins. The P2Y11 receptors are coupled additionally to Gs proteins, activation of which leads to an activation of AC and enhanced production of cAMP [128,129]. The P2Y12-like subfamily includes P2Y12, P2Y13, and P2Y14 receptors, which mediate cellular signalling via Gi proteins [128], activation of which leads to inhibition of AC and reduction in cellular cAMP levels [127,128]. Moreover, activation of several P2Y receptors is associated with activation of the MAPK pathway, and consequently these receptors are involved in cell survival and proliferation [123,130].

P2Y Receptors and Endothelial Barrier

ECs express several of the P2Y receptor subtypes that are distributed over the entire vasculature. The endothelial P2Y receptors have been investigated primarily within the context of their NO-mediated vasorelaxant properties; therefore, fewer data are available in relation to their role in maintaining the endothelial barrier. The P2Y1 receptor is a ubiquitously expressed endothelial purinergic receptor on most EC types. It is a Gq-linked GPCR that has been well-studied in platelet biology, for which ADP acts as a natural agonist and ATP an antagonist [131,132]. P2Y1 knockout mice are viable, fertile, normal in size, and do not present gross physical or behavioural abnormalities [133]. P2Y1(−/−) homozygous mice are more susceptible to lung infections and are resistant to ADP/collagen-induced thrombin formation [133,134]. Moreover, P2Y1(−/−) apoE(−/−) double knockout mice have reduced amounts of atherosclerotic lesions [91] that were not affected by transplanting wild-type bone marrow to the knockouts, suggesting the vascular but not the haematopoietic P2Y1 receptor may be involved in the atherogenic response [91]. Moreover, leukocyte recruitment to inflamed vessels was reduced in vivo and leukocyte transendothelial migration was reduced in P2Y1 knockout as well as P2Y1 receptor antagonist-treated ECs in vitro [135]. These studies suggest that the P2Y1 receptor may potentiate vascular inflammation and hyperpermeability. However, in a mouse model of traumatic brain injury, development of cerebral oedema was ameliorated in mice treated with the P2Y1 agonist 2-methylthioadenosine 5′diphosphate (2MeSADP). These protective effects of the P2Y1 agonist were lost in inositol 3-phosphate receptor 2 (IP3R2)-knockout mice, suggesting that it is an IP3/Ca2+-dependent phenomenon [92]. We observed that P2Y1 mRNA is expressed in HUVECs, and treatment of cultured HUVEC monolayers with ADP as well as P2Y1-selective agonist 2MeSADP antagonised thrombin-induced HUVEC hyperpermeability (Figure 4). This barrier-protective effect of P2Y1 agonist is probably mediated via Gq/IP3/Ca2+-dependent activation of Rac1 [136].
P2Y2 and P2Y4 are Gq/G11-coupled receptors that are activated by both UTP and ATP [128]. Global deletion of the P2Y2 gene reduces shear stress-induced vasodilation and hypertension [137]. However, P2Y2-knockout mice show reduced inflammatory cell infiltration into injured vessels [138], and endothelial-specific deletion of the P2Y2 receptor in apoE(−/−) mice results in reduced inflammatory response and increased plaque stability [93], suggesting a pathological role of chronic P2Y2 receptor activation under inflammatory conditions. Accordingly, knockdown of P2Y2 receptors in HUVECs ameliorated LPS-induced transendothelial migration of activated neutrophils [139].
P2Y4-null mice are viable but display microcardia (small hearts), suggesting that the P2Y4 receptor plays a role in postnatal heart development [140]. Interestingly, cardiac ECs and not cardiomyocytes express the P2Y4 receptor, and loss of the P2Y4 receptor in cardiac ECs results in reduced growth and migratory capacity in vitro [140]. Surprisingly, P2Y4 knockout mice are protected from myocardial ischaemic injury, cardiac inflammation, and fibrosis in a left anterior descending (LAD) coronary artery ligation model [94]. Moreover, P2Y4-knockout mice are protected from an LPS-induced cardiac microvascular hyperpermeability response. These data suggest that although the endothelial P2Y4 receptor is required for normal development of the heart in mice, its activation may induce vascular hyperpermeability under pathological conditions.
P2Y6 is a Gq-coupled receptor activated by UDP [128] that is expressed on aortic and cerebral ECs [141,142]. Global loss of P2Y6 receptors results in macrocardia (larger heart), and mice lacking the P2Y6 receptor show an amplified pathological cardiac hypertrophic response [143]. However, vascular deficiency of P2Y6 receptors results in reduced vascular inflammation and ameliorated neointima formation in an atherosclerosis mouse model [95,144]. In contrast, inhibition of cerebral P2Y6 receptors with a selective antagonist aggravates development of cerebral oedema in a mouse model of ischaemic brain injury [145].
P2Y11 is the only known human P2Y receptor coupled to Gs [124,128,129]. The murine orthologue of the P2Y11 receptor does not exist or at least has not yet been identified. Moreover, the lack of selective agonists and antagonists for this receptor as well as specific detection tools (antibodies) make functional investigations of the P2Y11 receptor difficult [146]. We did not detect P2Y11 mRNA in HUVECs, but other EC types were not investigated. Presumably, if it is expressed in some EC type, one would expect its activation would raise intracellular cAMP levels that can interact with multiple signalling pathways, e.g., Rac1-dependent actin cytoskeleton rearrangement and MLCP-mediated inactivation of the contractile machinery, thus modulating endothelial barrier properties.
The P2Y12-like subfamily comprises three members: P2Y12, P2Y13, and P2Y14. All of these receptors are coupled to Gi, and their activation leads to suppression of AC activity and cAMP production [128]. P2Y12 is well-studied in relation to platelet biology, and its antagonists are used clinically as anticoagulants in various pathological conditions. In human cardiac-derived mesenchymal cells, ticagrelor, a P2Y12 receptor antagonist, induces the release of anti-apoptotic exosomes [147] that may also modulate the coronary microvascular endothelial barrier. Endothelial expression of both P2Y12 [84,148] and P2Y13 [104] has been documented. Recently, we demonstrated the expression of P2Y12 receptor mRNA and protein in HUVECs, and a specific P2Y12 antagonist increased intracellular cAMP levels and protected against thrombin-induced hyperpermeability [84]. We also observed the expression of P2Y13 but not P2Y14 mRNA in primary HUVECs (unpublished). In vasa vasorum ECs, ADP mediates a mitogenic response partly via P2Y13 receptors [104]. The expression of P2Y14 receptor has been reported in rat primary brain microvascular ECs [149], and activation of this receptor induces a pro-inflammatory response in ECs. Moreover, UDP-glucose (an agonist for P2Y14 receptor) mediated a contractile response in isolated pancreatic arteries in an endothelium-dependent manner, and this effect was abrogated by a selective P2Y14 receptor antagonist [150]. No further data are available related to the involvement of P2Y13 and P2Y14 receptors in the control of endothelial barrier properties. Figure 5 presents an overview about the effects of various P2Y receptors’ activation on endothelial barrier function.

6. Conclusions and Perspective

Endothelial barrier properties are influenced by extracellular nucleotides via activation of various purinergic receptors. The response depends on the type of receptor(s) present and the local concentration of the nucleotides. Adenosine, primarily via activation of A2A and A2B receptors, raises intracellular levels of cAMP in the lung microvascular bed and thus strengthens the barrier properties and ameliorates hypoxia- and inflammation-induced development of oedema. Selective agonists for adenosine A2 receptors are available that may be tested (for local application) for clinical use in various oedematous abnormalities of the lung, e.g., acute lung injury. Conversely, A2 receptor activation in brain and coronary microvasculature results in transient opening of the cell–cell junction in a cAMP-dependent manner. This property of the brain microvasculature can be exploited for local delivery of drugs to the CNS. P2 receptors are also widely distributed in the vascular bed. Chronic P2X receptor activation leads to endothelial barrier destabilisation and oedema formation, an effect primarily attributed to the P2X7 receptors. There is a need for the development of more selective and potent P2X7 receptor antagonists to ameliorate inflammation-induced loss of endothelial barrier function. There is also a lack of selective P2Y receptor agonists and antagonists, which makes the investigation of P2Y receptors in relation to endothelial barrier function difficult. We and others have documented that ATP at low micromolar concentrations stabilises endothelial barrier function, mainly via activation of various P2Y receptors, whereas at high concentration (in the millimolar range), it may act as a danger-associated molecular pattern (DAMP) [151], amplifying the inflammatory response. Inhibition of the P2Y12 receptor blocks inflammation-induced increases in endothelial permeability [84]. Further studies are needed to identify specific P2Y receptors that mediate endothelial barrier stabilisation and destabilisation.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/1422-0067/22/3/1207/s1.

Author Contributions

M.A., D.G., and R.S. conceptualised the manuscript. M.A. and D.G. wrote the manuscript. M.A. prepared the figures. C.T., J.H., C.W.H. and R.S. critically reviewed and appraised the manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The study was supported by University of Giessen Anschubfinanzierung grant to M. Aslam and UKGM grant (No. 62589122) to D. Gündüz.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted according to the guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki, and approved by the Ethics Committee of Medical Faculty of Justus-Liebig University (Approval no. AZ132/09 dated 29 October 2009).

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available within the manuscript.

Acknowledgments

The technical support by S. Schäffer, D. Reitz, and H. Thomas is gratefully acknowledged. In preparing the figures, some illustrations were used from open access “Library of Science and Medical Illustration” https://gumroad.com/l/library.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Abbreviations

AJAdherens junctions
ADPAdenosine 5′-diphosphate
AMPAdenosine 5′-monophosphate
ATPAdenosine 5′-triphosphate
cAMP3′, 5′-cyclic adenosine monophosphate
DAMPDanger-associated molecular pattern
DPCPX8-Cyclopentyl-1,3-dipropylxanthine
EREndoplasmic reticulum
ERKExtracellular signal-regulated kinase
GPCRG protein-coupled receptor
H/RHypoxia-reoxygenation
HUVECHuman umbilical vein endothelial cells
I/RIschaemia reperfusion
LPSLipopolysaccharide
MAPKMitogen-activated protein kinase
MEKMAPK/ERK kinase 1
MLCKMyosin light-chain kinase
MLCPMyosin light-chain phosphatase
MMP9matrix metallopeptidase 9
MYPT1Myosin phosphatase targeting subunit 1
NECA5′-N-Ethylcarboxamidoadenosine
PKCProtein kinase C
ROCKRho-associated kinase
ROSReactive oxygen species
UDPUridine diphosphate
UTPUridine triphosphate
XACXanthine amine congener
VEVascular endothelium
vWFvon Willebrand Factor
ZO-1Zonula occludens-1

References

  1. Komarova, Y.A.; Kruse, K.; Mehta, D.; Malik, A.B. Protein Interactions at Endothelial Junctions and Signaling Mechanisms Regulating Endothelial Permeability. Circ. Res. 2017, 120, 179–206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  2. Wettschureck, N.; Strilic, B.; Offermanns, S. Passing the Vascular Barrier: Endothelial Signaling Processes Controlling Extravasation. Physiol. Rev. 2019, 99, 1467–1525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Kumar, P.; Shen, Q.; Pivetti, C.D.; Lee, E.S.; Wu, M.H.; Yuan, S.Y. Molecular mechanisms of endothelial hyperpermeability: Implications in inflammation. Expert. Rev. Mol. Med. 2009, 11, e19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. Daniel, A.E.; van Buul, J.D. Endothelial junction regulation: A prerequisite for leukocytes crossing the vessel wall. J. Innate Immun. 2013, 5, 324–335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Mehta, D.; Malik, A.B. Signaling mechanisms regulating endothelial permeability. Physiol. Rev. 2006, 86, 279–367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Lampugnani, M.G.; Corada, M.; Caveda, L.; Breviario, F.; Ayalon, O.; Geiger, B.; Dejana, E. The molecular organization of endothelial cell to cell junctions: Differential association of plakoglobin, beta-catenin, and alpha-catenin with vascular endothelial cadherin (VE-cadherin). J. Cell Biol. 1995, 129, 203–217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  7. Dejana, E.; Orsenigo, F.; Lampugnani, M.G. The role of adherens junctions and VE-cadherin in the control of vascular permeability. J. Cell Sci. 2008, 121, 2115–2122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  8. Wojciak-Stothard, B.; Tsang, L.Y.; Haworth, S.G. Rac and Rho play opposing roles in the regulation of hypoxia/reoxygenation-induced permeability changes in pulmonary artery endothelial cells. Am. J. Physiol. Lung Cell. Mol. Physiol. 2005, 288, L749–L760. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Wojciak-Stothard, B.; Tsang, L.Y.; Paleolog, E.; Hall, S.M.; Haworth, S.G. Rac1 and RhoA as regulators of endothelial phenotype and barrier function in hypoxia-induced neonatal pulmonary hypertension. Am. J. Physiol. Lung Cell. Mol. Physiol. 2006, 290, L1173–L1182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Wysolmerski, R.B.; Lagunoff, D. Regulation of permeabilized endothelial cell retraction by myosin phosphorylation. Am. J. Physiol. 1991, 261, C32–C40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Goeckeler, Z.M.; Wysolmerski, R.B. Myosin phosphatase and cofilin mediate cAMP/cAMP-dependent protein kinase-induced decline in endothelial cell isometric tension and myosin II regulatory light chain phosphorylation. J. Biol. Chem. 2005, 280, 33083–33095. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Birukova, A.A.; Smurova, K.; Birukov, K.G.; Kaibuchi, K.; Garcia, J.G.; Verin, A.D. Role of Rho GTPases in thrombin-induced lung vascular endothelial cells barrier dysfunction. Microvasc. Res. 2004, 67, 64–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Nguyen, D.H.; Catling, A.D.; Webb, D.J.; Sankovic, M.; Walker, L.A.; Somlyo, A.V.; Weber, M.J.; Gonias, S.L. Myosin light chain kinase functions downstream of Ras/ERK to promote migration of urokinase-type plasminogen activator-stimulated cells in an integrin-selective manner. J. Cell Biol. 1999, 146, 149–164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Gündüz, D.; Troidl, C.; Tanislav, C.; Rohrbach, S.; Hamm, C.; Aslam, M. Role of PI3K/Akt and MEK/ERK Signalling in cAMP/Epac-Mediated Endothelial Barrier Stabilisation. Front. Physiol. 2019, 10, 1387. [Google Scholar]
  15. Goeckeler, Z.M.; Wysolmerski, R.B. Myosin light chain kinase-regulated endothelial cell contraction: The relationship between isometric tension, actin polymerization, and myosin phosphorylation. J. Cell Biol. 1995, 130, 613–627. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  16. Bergfeld, G.R.; Forrester, T. Release of ATP from human erythrocytes in response to a brief period of hypoxia and hypercapnia. Cardiovasc. Res. 1992, 26, 40–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Communi, D.; Janssens, R.; Suarez-Huerta, N.; Robaye, B.; Boeynaems, J.M. Advances in signalling by extracellular nucleotides. The role and transduction mechanisms of P2Y receptors. Cell. Signal. 2000, 12, 351–360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Beigi, R.; Kobatake, E.; Aizawa, M.; Dubyak, G.R. Detection of local ATP release from activated platelets using cell surface-attached firefly luciferase. Am. J. Physiol. 1999, 276, C267–C278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Buxton, I.L.; Kaiser, R.A.; Oxhorn, B.C.; Cheek, D.J. Evidence supporting the Nucleotide Axis Hypothesis: ATP release and metabolism by coronary endothelium. Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol. 2001, 281, H1657–H1666. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Gödecke, S.; Roderigo, C.; Rose, C.R.; Rauch, B.H.; Godecke, A.; Schrader, J. Thrombin-induced ATP release from human umbilical vein endothelial cells. Am. J. Physiol. Cell Physiol. 2012, 302, C915–C923. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Gündüz, D.; Kasseckert, S.A.; Härtel, F.V.; Aslam, M.; Abdallah, Y.; Schäfer, M.; Piper, H.M.; Noll, T.; Schäfer, C. Accumulation of extracellular ATP protects against acute reperfusion injury in rat heart endothelial cells. Cardiovasc. Res. 2006, 71, 764–773. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Bodin, P.; Milner, P.; Winter, R.; Burnstock, G. Chronic hypoxia changes the ratio of endothelin to ATP release from rat aortic endothelial cells exposed to high flow. Proc. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 1992, 247, 131–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Gündüz, D.; Hirche, F.; Härtel, F.V.; Rodewald, C.W.; Schäfer, M.; Pfitzer, G.; Piper, H.M.; Noll, T. ATP antagonism of thrombin-induced endothelial barrier permeability. Cardiovasc. Res. 2003, 59, 470–478. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Härtel, F.V.; Rodewald, C.W.; Aslam, M.; Gündüz, D.; Hafer, L.; Neumann, J.; Piper, H.M.; Noll, T. Extracellular ATP induces assembly and activation of the myosin light chain phosphatase complex in endothelial cells. Cardiovasc. Res. 2007, 74, 487–496. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Vischer, U.M.; Wollheim, C.B. Purine nucleotides induce regulated secretion of von Willebrand factor: Involvement of cytosolic Ca2+ and cyclic adenosine monophosphate-dependent signaling in endothelial exocytosis. Blood 1998, 91, 118–127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  26. Dushpanova, A.; Agostini, S.; Ciofini, E.; Cabiati, M.; Casieri, V.; Matteucci, M.; Del Ry, S.; Clerico, A.; Berti, S.; Lionetti, V. Gene silencing of endothelial von Willebrand Factor attenuates angiotensin II-induced endothelin-1 expression in porcine aortic endothelial cells. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 30048. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Burnstock, G. Purinergic Signaling in the Cardiovascular System. Circ. Res. 2017, 120, 207–228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Burnstock, G. Purine and purinergic receptors. Brain Neurosci. Adv. 2018, 2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Ralevic, V.; Dunn, W.R. Purinergic transmission in blood vessels. Auton. Neurosci. 2015, 191, 48–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Burnstock, G.; Knight, G.E. Cell culture: Complications due to mechanical release of ATP and activation of purinoceptors. Cell Tissue Res. 2017, 370, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Haselton, F.R.; Alexander, J.S. Platelets and a platelet-released factor enhance endothelial barrier. Am. J. Physiol. 1992, 263, L670–L678. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Idzko, M.; Ferrari, D.; Riegel, A.K.; Eltzschig, H.K. Extracellular nucleotide and nucleoside signaling in vascular and blood disease. Blood 2014, 124, 1029–1037. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  33. Newby, A.C. The role of adenosine kinase in regulating adenosine concentration. Biochem. J. 1985, 226, 343–344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  34. Newby, A.C.; Worku, Y.; Holmquist, C.A. Adenosine formation. Evidence for a direct biochemical link with energy metabolism. Adv. Myocardiol. 1985, 6, 273–284. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  35. Eltzschig, H.K. Adenosine: An old drug newly discovered. Anesthesiology 2009, 111, 904–915. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. De Filippo, E.; Hinz, S.; Pellizzari, V.; Deganutti, G.; El-Tayeb, A.; Navarro, G.; Franco, R.; Moro, S.; Schiedel, A.C.; Müller, C.E. A2A and A2B adenosine receptors: The extracellular loop 2 determines high (A2A) or low affinity (A2B) for adenosine. Biochem. Pharmacol. 2020, 172, 113718. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Borea, P.A.; Gessi, S.; Merighi, S.; Vincenzi, F.; Varani, K. Pharmacology of Adenosine Receptors: The State of the Art. Physiol. Rev. 2018, 98, 1591–1625. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Chen, J.F.; Eltzschig, H.K.; Fredholm, B.B. Adenosine receptors as drug targets—What are the challenges? Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 2013, 12, 265–286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Shim, J.O.; Shin, C.Y.; Lee, T.S.; Yang, S.J.; An, J.Y.; Song, H.J.; Kim, T.H.; Huh, I.H.; Sohn, U.D. Signal transduction mechanism via adenosine A1 receptor in the cat esophageal smooth muscle cells. Cell Signal. 2002, 14, 365–372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Fenton, R.A.; Shea, L.G.; Doddi, C.; Dobson, J.G., Jr. Myocardial adenosine A1-receptor-mediated adenoprotection involves phospholipase C, PKC-epsilon, and p38 MAPK, but not HSP27. Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol. 2010, 298, H1671–H1678. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Robin, E.; Sabourin, J.; Benoit, R.; Pedretti, S.; Raddatz, E. Adenosine A1 receptor activation is arrhythmogenic in the developing heart through NADPH oxidase/ERK- and PLC/PKC-dependent mechanisms. J. Mol. Cell Cardiol. 2011, 51, 945–954. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Sterin-Borda, L.; Gomez, R.M.; Borda, E. Role of nitric oxide/cyclic GMP in myocardial adenosine A1 receptor-inotropic response. Br. J. Pharmacol. 2002, 135, 444–450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  43. Nayeem, M.A.; Matherne, G.P.; Mustafa, S.J. Ischemic and pharmacological preconditioning induces further delayed protection in transgenic mouse cardiac myocytes over-expressing adenosine A1 receptors (A1AR): Role of A1AR, iNOS and K(ATP) channels. Naunyn-Schmiedeberg’s Arch. Pharmacol. 2003, 367, 219–226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Umemiya, M.; Berger, A.J. Activation of adenosine A1 and A2 receptors differentially modulates calcium channels and glycinergic synaptic transmission in rat brainstem. Neuron 1994, 13, 1439–1446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Schulte, G.; Fredholm, B.B. Signalling from adenosine receptors to mitogen-activated protein kinases. Cell. Signal. 2003, 15, 813–827. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Layland, J.; Carrick, D.; Lee, M.; Oldroyd, K.; Berry, C. Adenosine: Physiology, pharmacology, and clinical applications. JACC Cardiovasc. Interv. 2014, 7, 581–591. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  47. Eckle, T.; Fullbier, L.; Wehrmann, M.; Khoury, J.; Mittelbronn, M.; Ibla, J.; Rosenberger, P.; Eltzschig, H.K. Identification of ectonucleotidases CD39 and CD73 in innate protection during acute lung injury. J. Immunol. 2007, 178, 8127–8137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Reece, T.B.; Ellman, P.I.; Maxey, T.S.; Crosby, I.K.; Warren, P.S.; Chong, T.W.; LeGallo, R.D.; Linden, J.; Kern, J.A.; Tribble, C.G.; et al. Adenosine A2A receptor activation reduces inflammation and preserves pulmonary function in an in vivo model of lung transplantation. J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 2005, 129, 1137–1143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  49. Eckle, T.; Grenz, A.; Laucher, S.; Eltzschig, H.K. A2B adenosine receptor signaling attenuates acute lung injury by enhancing alveolar fluid clearance in mice. J. Clin. Investig. 2008, 118, 3301–3315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Khimenko, P.L.; Moore, T.M.; Hill, L.W.; Wilson, P.S.; Coleman, S.; Rizzo, A.; Taylor, A.E. Adenosine A2 receptors reverse ischemia-reperfusion lung injury independent of beta-receptors. J. Appl. Physiol. 1995, 78, 990–996. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Konrad, F.M.; Neudeck, G.; Vollmer, I.; Ngamsri, K.C.; Thiel, M.; Reutershan, J. Protective effects of pentoxifylline in pulmonary inflammation are adenosine receptor A2A dependent. FASEB J. 2013, 27, 3524–3535. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Konrad, F.M.; Witte, E.; Vollmer, I.; Stark, S.; Reutershan, J. Adenosine receptor A2b on hematopoietic cells mediates LPS-induced migration of PMNs into the lung interstitium. Am. J. Physiol. Lung Cell Mol. Physiol. 2012, 303, L425–L438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Lu, Q.; Harrington, E.O.; Newton, J.; Casserly, B.; Radin, G.; Warburton, R.; Zhou, Y.; Blackburn, M.R.; Rounds, S. Adenosine protected against pulmonary edema through transporter- and receptor A2-mediated endothelial barrier enhancement. Am. J. Physiol. Lung Cell. Mol. Physiol. 2010, 298, L755–L767. [Google Scholar] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  54. Pfeil, U.; Aslam, M.; Paddenberg, R.; Quanz, K.; Chang, C.L.; Park, J.I.; Gries, B.; Rafiq, A.; Faulhammer, P.; Goldenberg, A.; et al. Intermedin/adrenomedullin-2 is a hypoxia-induced endothelial peptide that stabilizes pulmonary microvascular permeability. Am. J. Physiol. Lung Cell Mol. Physiol. 2009, 297, L837–L845. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  55. Blackburn, M.R.; Volmer, J.B.; Thrasher, J.L.; Zhong, H.; Crosby, J.R.; Lee, J.J.; Kellems, R.E. Metabolic consequences of adenosine deaminase deficiency in mice are associated with defects in alveogenesis, pulmonary inflammation, and airway obstruction. J. Exp. Med. 2000, 192, 159–170. [Google Scholar]
  56. Zhou, Y.; Mohsenin, A.; Morschl, E.; Young, H.W.; Molina, J.G.; Ma, W.; Sun, C.X.; Martinez-Valdez, H.; Blackburn, M.R. Enhanced airway inflammation and remodeling in adenosine deaminase-deficient mice lacking the A2B adenosine receptor. J. Immunol. 2009, 182, 8037–8046. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  57. Neely, C.F.; Keith, I.M. A1 adenosine receptor antagonists block ischemia-reperfusion injury of the lung. Am. J. Physiol. 1995, 268, L1036–L1046. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Neely, C.F.; Jin, J.; Keith, I.M. A1-adenosine receptor antagonists block endotoxin-induced lung injury. Am. J. Physiol. 1997, 272, L353–L361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Mulloy, D.P.; Sharma, A.K.; Fernandez, L.G.; Zhao, Y.; Lau, C.L.; Kron, I.L.; Laubach, V.E. Adenosine A3 receptor activation attenuates lung ischemia-reperfusion injury. Ann. Thorac. Surg. 2013, 95, 1762–1767. [Google Scholar]
  60. Kadry, H.; Noorani, B.; Cucullo, L. A blood-brain barrier overview on structure, function, impairment, and biomarkers of integrity. Fluids Barriers CNS 2020, 17, 69. [Google Scholar]
  61. Kalaria, R.N.; Harik, S.I. Adenosine receptors and the nucleoside transporter in human brain vasculature. J. Cereb. Blood Flow Metab. 1988, 8, 32–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  62. Mills, J.H.; Alabanza, L.; Weksler, B.B.; Couraud, P.O.; Romero, I.A.; Bynoe, M.S. Human brain endothelial cells are responsive to adenosine receptor activation. Purinergic Signal. 2011, 7, 265–273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  63. Carman, A.J.; Mills, J.H.; Krenz, A.; Kim, D.G.; Bynoe, M.S. Adenosine receptor signaling modulates permeability of the blood-brain barrier. J. Neurosci. 2011, 31, 13272–13280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Mills, J.H.; Thompson, L.F.; Mueller, C.; Waickman, A.T.; Jalkanen, S.; Niemela, J.; Airas, L.; Bynoe, M.S. CD73 is required for efficient entry of lymphocytes into the central nervous system during experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2008, 105, 9325–9330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  65. Zhou, Y.; Zeng, X.; Li, G.; Yang, Q.; Xu, J.; Zhang, M.; Mao, X.; Cao, Y.; Wang, L.; Xu, Y.; et al. Inactivation of endothelial adenosine A2A receptors protects mice from cerebral ischaemia-induced brain injury. Br. J. Pharmacol. 2019, 176, 2250–2263. [Google Scholar]
  66. Kim, D.G.; Bynoe, M.S. A2A Adenosine Receptor Regulates the Human Blood-Brain Barrier Permeability. Mol. Neurobiol. 2015, 52, 664–678. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  67. Caporarello, N.; Olivieri, M.; Cristaldi, M.; Scalia, M.; Toscano, M.A.; Genovese, C.; Addamo, A.; Salmeri, M.; Lupo, G.; Anfuso, C.D. Blood-Brain Barrier in a Haemophilus influenzae Type a In Vitro Infection: Role of Adenosine Receptors A2A and A2B. Mol. Neurobiol. 2018, 55, 5321–5336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Zhao, Z.; Shang, X.; Chen, Y.; Zheng, Y.; Huang, W.; Jiang, H.; Lv, Q.; Kong, D.; Jiang, Y.; Liu, P. Bacteria elevate extracellular adenosine to exploit host signaling for blood-brain barrier disruption. Virulence 2020, 11, 980–994. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Jackson, S.; Anders, N.M.; Mangraviti, A.; Wanjiku, T.M.; Sankey, E.W.; Liu, A.; Brem, H.; Tyler, B.; Rudek, M.A.; Grossman, S.A. The effect of regadenoson-induced transient disruption of the blood-brain barrier on temozolomide delivery to normal rat brain. J. Neurooncol. 2016, 126, 433–439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  70. Gao, X.; Qian, J.; Zheng, S.; Changyi, Y.; Zhang, J.; Ju, S.; Zhu, J.; Li, C. Overcoming the blood-brain barrier for delivering drugs into the brain by using adenosine receptor nanoagonist. ACS Nano 2014, 8, 3678–3689. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Sun, Z.; Zhong, X.L.; Zong, Y.; Wu, Z.C.; Zhang, Q.; Yu, J.T.; Tan, L. Activation of adenosine receptor potentiates the anticonvulsant effect of phenytoin against amygdala kindled seizures. CNS Neurol. Disord. Drug Targets 2015, 14, 378–385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Tan, L.; Wang, Y.; Jiang, Y.; Wang, R.; Zu, J.; Tan, R. Hydroxysafflor Yellow A Together with Blood-Brain Barrier Regulator Lexiscan for Cerebral Ischemia Reperfusion Injury Treatment. ACS Omega 2020, 5, 19151–19164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Pak, R.W.; Kang, J.; Valentine, H.; Loew, L.M.; Thorek, D.L.J.; Boctor, E.M.; Wong, D.F.; Kang, J.U. Voltage-sensitive dye delivery through the blood brain barrier using adenosine receptor agonist regadenoson. Biomed. Opt. Express 2018, 9, 3915–3922. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Han, L.; Cai, Q.; Tian, D.; Kong, D.K.; Gou, X.; Chen, Z.; Strittmatter, S.M.; Wang, Z.; Sheth, K.N.; Zhou, J. Targeted drug delivery to ischemic stroke via chlorotoxin-anchored, lexiscan-loaded nanoparticles. Nanomed. Nanotechnol. Biol. Med. 2016, 12, 1833–1842. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  75. Watanabe, H.; Kuhne, W.; Schwartz, P.; Piper, H.M. A2-adenosine receptor stimulation increases macromolecule permeability of coronary endothelial cells. Am. J. Physiol. 1992, 262, H1174–H1181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Bonetti, P.O.; Wilson, S.H.; Rodriguez-Porcel, M.; Holmes, D.R., Jr.; Lerman, L.O.; Lerman, A. Simvastatin preserves myocardial perfusion and coronary microvascular permeability in experimental hypercholesterolemia independent of lipid lowering. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2002, 40, 546–554. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  77. Di, N.P.; Di, C.A.; Taccardi, A.A.; Di, M.M.; Statile, D.; Maggi, A.; Giuliani, P.; Di, I.P.; Barsotti, A. Effect of A1 adenosine receptor blockade on postischemic damage to the coronary microcirculation. Cardiologia 1998, 43, 387–393. [Google Scholar]
  78. Gündüz, D.; Aslam, M.; Krieger, U.; Becker, L.; Grebe, M.; Arshad, M.; Sedding, D.G.; Härtel, F.V.; Abdallah, Y.; Piper, H.M.; et al. Opposing effects of ATP and adenosine on barrier function of rat coronary microvasculature. J. Mol. Cell. Cardiol. 2012, 52, 962–970. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  79. Bindewald, K.; Gündüz, D.; Härtel, F.; Peters, S.C.; Rodewald, C.; Nau, S.; Schäfer, M.; Neumann, J.; Piper, H.M.; Noll, T. Opposite effect of cAMP signaling in endothelial barriers of different origin. Am. J. Physiol. Cell Physiol. 2004, 287, C1246–C1255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Aslam, M.; Gündüz, D.; Schuler, D.; Li, L.; Sharifpanah, F.; Sedding, D.; Piper, H.M.; Noll, T. Intermedin induces loss of coronary microvascular endothelial barrier via derangement of actin cytoskeleton: Role of RhoA and Rac1. Cardiovasc. Res. 2011, 92, 276–286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  81. Aslam, M.; Hartel, F.V.; Arshad, M.; Gunduz, D.; Abdallah, Y.; Sauer, H.; Piper, H.M.; Noll, T. cAMP/PKA antagonizes thrombin-induced inactivation of endothelial myosin light chain phosphatase: Role of CPI-17. Cardiovasc. Res. 2010, 87, 375–384. [Google Scholar] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  82. Aslam, M.; Tanislav, C.; Troidl, C.; Schulz, R.; Hamm, C.; Gunduz, D. cAMP controls the restoration of endothelial barrier function after thrombin-induced hyperpermeability via Rac1 activation. Physiol. Rep. 2014, 2, e12175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  83. Haselton, F.R.; Alexander, J.S.; Mueller, S.N. Adenosine decreases permeability of in vitro endothelial monolayers. J. Appl. Physiol. 1993, 74, 1581–1590. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Gündüz, D.; Tanislav, C.; Schluter, K.D.; Schulz, R.; Hamm, C.; Aslam, M. Effect of ticagrelor on endothelial calcium signalling and barrier function. Thromb. Haemost. 2017, 117, 371–381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Umapathy, S.N.; Kaczmarek, E.; Fatteh, N.; Burns, N.; Lucas, R.; Stenmark, K.R.; Verin, A.D.; Gerasimovskaya, E.V. Adenosine A1 receptors promote vasa vasorum endothelial cell barrier integrity via Gi and Akt-dependent actin cytoskeleton remodeling. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e59733. [Google Scholar]
  86. Capell, B.C.; Olive, M.; Erdos, M.R.; Cao, K.; Faddah, D.A.; Tavarez, U.L.; Conneely, K.N.; Qu, X.; San, H.; Ganesh, S.K.; et al. A farnesyltransferase inhibitor prevents both the onset and late progression of cardiovascular disease in a progeria mouse model. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2008, 105, 15902–15907. [Google Scholar]
  87. Ozaki, T.; Muramatsu, R.; Sasai, M.; Yamamoto, M.; Kubota, Y.; Fujinaka, T.; Yoshimine, T.; Yamashita, T. The P2X4 receptor is required for neuroprotection via ischemic preconditioning. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 25893. [Google Scholar]
  88. Zhao, H.; Zhang, X.; Dai, Z.; Feng, Y.; Li, Q.; Zhang, J.H.; Liu, X.; Chen, Y.; Feng, H. P2X7 Receptor Suppression Preserves Blood-Brain Barrier through Inhibiting RhoA Activation after Experimental Intracerebral Hemorrhage in Rats. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 23286. [Google Scholar]
  89. Kimbler, D.E.; Shields, J.; Yanasak, N.; Vender, J.R.; Dhandapani, K.M. Activation of P2X7 promotes cerebral edema and neurological injury after traumatic brain injury in mice. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e41229. [Google Scholar]
  90. Kaiser, M.; Penk, A.; Franke, H.; Krugel, U.; Norenberg, W.; Huster, D.; Schaefer, M. Lack of functional P2X7 receptor aggravates brain edema development after middle cerebral artery occlusion. Purinergic Signal. 2016, 12, 453–463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  91. Hechler, B.; Freund, M.; Ravanat, C.; Magnenat, S.; Cazenave, J.P.; Gachet, C. Reduced atherosclerotic lesions in P2Y1/apolipoprotein E double-knockout mice: The contribution of non-hematopoietic-derived P2Y1 receptors. Circulation 2008, 118, 754–763. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  92. Talley Watts, L.; Sprague, S.; Zheng, W.; Garling, R.J.; Jimenez, D.; Digicaylioglu, M.; Lechleiter, J. Purinergic 2Y1 receptor stimulation decreases cerebral edema and reactive gliosis in a traumatic brain injury model. J. Neurotrauma 2013, 30, 55–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  93. Chen, X.; Qian, S.; Hoggatt, A.; Tang, H.; Hacker, T.A.; Obukhov, A.G.; Herring, P.B.; Seye, C.I. Endothelial Cell-Specific Deletion of P2Y2 Receptor Promotes Plaque Stability in Atherosclerosis-Susceptible ApoE-Null Mice. Arter. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 2017, 37, 75–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  94. Horckmans, M.; Esfahani, H.; Beauloye, C.; Clouet, S.; di Pietrantonio, L.; Robaye, B.; Balligand, J.L.; Boeynaems, J.M.; Dessy, C.; Communi, D. Loss of mouse P2Y4nucleotide receptor protects against myocardial infarction through endothelin-1 downregulation. J. Immunol. 2015, 194, 1874–1881. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  95. Stachon, P.; Peikert, A.; Michel, N.A.; Hergeth, S.; Marchini, T.; Wolf, D.; Dufner, B.; Hoppe, N.; Ayata, C.K.; Grimm, M.; et al. P2Y6 deficiency limits vascular inflammation and atherosclerosis in mice. Arter. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 2014, 34, 2237–2245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  96. Barrera, N.P.; Ormond, S.J.; Henderson, R.M.; Murrell-Lagnado, R.D.; Edwardson, J.M. Atomic force microscopy imaging demonstrates that P2X2 receptors are trimers but that P2X6 receptor subunits do not oligomerize. J. Biol. Chem. 2005, 280, 10759–10765. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  97. Jiang, L.H.; Kim, M.; Spelta, V.; Bo, X.; Surprenant, A.; North, R.A. Subunit arrangement in P2X receptors. J. Neurosci. 2003, 23, 8903–8910. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  98. Kawate, T.; Michel, J.C.; Birdsong, W.T.; Gouaux, E. Crystal structure of the ATP-gated P2X4 ion channel in the closed state. Nature 2009, 460, 592–598. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Nicke, A.; Baumert, H.G.; Rettinger, J.; Eichele, A.; Lambrecht, G.; Mutschler, E.; Schmalzing, G. P2X1 and P2X3 receptors form stable trimers: A novel structural motif of ligand-gated ion channels. EMBO J. 1998, 17, 3016–3028. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Glass, R.; Loesch, A.; Bodin, P.; Burnstock, G. P2X4 and P2X6 receptors associate with VE-cadherin in human endothelial cells. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 2002, 59, 870–881. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  101. Loesch, A.; Burnstock, G. Ultrastructural localisation of ATP-gated P2X2 receptor immunoreactivity in vascular endothelial cells in rat brain. Endothelium 2000, 7, 93–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  102. Glass, R.; Bardini, M.; Robson, T.; Burnstock, G. Expression of nucleotide P2X receptor subtypes during spermatogenesis in the adult rat testis. Cells Tissues Organs 2001, 169, 377–387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Glass, R.; Burnstock, G. Immunohistochemical identification of cells expressing ATP-gated cation channels (P2X receptors) in the adult rat thyroid. J. Anat. 2001, 198, 569–579. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  104. Lyubchenko, T.; Woodward, H.; Veo, K.D.; Burns, N.; Nijmeh, H.; Liubchenko, G.A.; Stenmark, K.R.; Gerasimovskaya, E.V. P2Y1 and P2Y13 purinergic receptors mediate Ca2+ signaling and proliferative responses in pulmonary artery vasa vasorum endothelial cells. Am. J. Physiol. Cell Physiol. 2011, 300, C266–C275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  105. Menzies, R.I.; Unwin, R.J.; Dash, R.K.; Beard, D.A.; Cowley, A.W., Jr.; Carlson, B.E.; Mullins, J.J.; Bailey, M.A. Effect of P2X4 and P2X7 receptor antagonism on the pressure diuresis relationship in rats. Front. Physiol. 2013, 4, 305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  106. Ramirez, A.N.; Kunze, D.L. P2X purinergic receptor channel expression and function in bovine aortic endothelium. Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol. 2002, 282, H2106–H2116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  107. Wilson, H.L.; Varcoe, R.W.; Stokes, L.; Holland, K.L.; Francis, S.E.; Dower, S.K.; Surprenant, A.; Crossman, D.C. P2X receptor characterization and IL-1/IL-1Ra release from human endothelial cells. Br. J. Pharmacol. 2007, 151, 115–127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  108. Schwiebert, L.M.; Rice, W.C.; Kudlow, B.A.; Taylor, A.L.; Schwiebert, E.M. Extracellular ATP signaling and P2X nucleotide receptors in monolayers of primary human vascular endothelial cells. Am. J. Physiol. Cell. Physiol. 2002, 282, C289–C301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  109. Ray, F.R.; Huang, W.; Slater, M.; Barden, J.A. Purinergic receptor distribution in endothelial cells in blood vessels: A basis for selection of coronary artery grafts. Atherosclerosis 2002, 162, 55–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Yamamoto, K.; Korenaga, R.; Kamiya, A.; Ando, J. Fluid shear stress activates Ca2+ influx into human endothelial cells via P2X4 purinoceptors. Circ. Res. 2000, 87, 385–391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  111. Sathanoori, R.; Rosi, F.; Gu, B.J.; Wiley, J.S.; Müller, C.E.; Olde, B.; Erlinge, D. Shear stress modulates endothelial KLF2 through activation of P2X4. Purinergic Signal. 2015, 11, 139–153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  112. Yamamoto, K.; Sokabe, T.; Matsumoto, T.; Yoshimura, K.; Shibata, M.; Ohura, N.; Fukuda, T.; Sato, T.; Sekine, K.; Kato, S.; et al. Impaired flow-dependent control of vascular tone and remodeling in P2X4-deficient mice. Nat. Med. 2006, 12, 133–137. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  113. Stokes, L.; Scurrah, K.; Ellis, J.A.; Cromer, B.A.; Skarratt, K.K.; Gu, B.J.; Harrap, S.B.; Wiley, J.S. A loss-of-function polymorphism in the human P2X4 receptor is associated with increased pulse pressure. Hypertension 2011, 58, 1086–1092. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  114. Yang, R.; Beqiri, D.; Shen, J.B.; Redden, J.M.; Dodge-Kafka, K.; Jacobson, K.A.; Liang, B.T. P2X4 receptor-eNOS signaling pathway in cardiac myocytes as a novel protective mechanism in heart failure. Comput. Struct. Biotechnol. J. 2015, 13, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  115. Pulvirenti, T.J.; Yin, J.L.; Chaufour, X.; McLachlan, C.; Hambly, B.D.; Bennett, M.R.; Barden, J.A. P2X (purinergic) receptor redistribution in rabbit aorta following injury to endothelial cells and cholesterol feeding. J. Neurocytol. 2000, 29, 623–631. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Sathanoori, R.; Sward, K.; Olde, B.; Erlinge, D. The ATP Receptors P2X7 and P2X4 Modulate High Glucose and Palmitate-Induced Inflammatory Responses in Endothelial Cells. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0125111. [Google Scholar]
  117. Yang, F.; Zhao, K.; Zhang, X.; Zhang, J.; Xu, B. ATP Induces Disruption of Tight Junction Proteins via IL-1 Beta-Dependent MMP-9 Activation of Human Blood-Brain Barrier In Vitro. Neural Plast. 2016, 2016, 8928530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  118. Platania, C.B.M.; Lazzara, F.; Fidilio, A.; Fresta, C.G.; Conti, F.; Giurdanella, G.; Leggio, G.M.; Salomone, S.; Drago, F.; Bucolo, C. Blood-retinal barrier protection against high glucose damage: The role of P2X7 receptor. Biochem. Pharmacol. 2019, 168, 249–258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Galam, L.; Rajan, A.; Failla, A.; Soundararajan, R.; Lockey, R.F.; Kolliputi, N. Deletion of P2X7 attenuates hyperoxia-induced acute lung injury via inflammasome suppression. Am. J. Physiol. Lung Cell. Mol. Physiol. 2016, 310, L572–L581. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Burnstock, G.; Kennedy, C. Is there a basis for distinguishing two types of P2-purinoceptor? Gen. Pharmacol. 1985, 16, 433–440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Ralevic, V.; Burnstock, G. Receptors for purines and pyrimidines. Pharmacol. Rev. 1998, 50, 413–492. [Google Scholar]
  122. Von Kügelgen, I.; Wetter, A. Molecular pharmacology of P2Y-receptors. Naunyn-Schmiedeberg’s Arch. Pharmacol. 2000, 362, 310–323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Abbracchio, M.P.; Burnstock, G.; Boeynaems, J.M.; Barnard, E.A.; Boyer, J.L.; Kennedy, C.; Knight, G.E.; Fumagalli, M.; Gachet, C.; Jacobson, K.A.; et al. International Union of Pharmacology LVIII: Update on the P2Y G protein-coupled nucleotide receptors: From molecular mechanisms and pathophysiology to therapy. Pharmacol. Rev. 2006, 58, 281–341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  124. Kennedy, C. P2Y11 Receptors: Properties, Distribution and Functions. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 2017, 1051, 107–122. [Google Scholar]
  125. Von Kügelgen, I. Structure, Pharmacology and Roles in Physiology of the P2Y12 Receptor. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 2017, 1051, 123–138. [Google Scholar]
  126. Perez-Sen, R.; Gomez-Villafuertes, R.; Ortega, F.; Gualix, J.; Delicado, E.G.; Miras-Portugal, M.T. An Update on P2Y13 Receptor Signalling and Function. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 2017, 1051, 139–168. [Google Scholar]
  127. Müller, C.E.; Baqi, Y.; Namasivayam, V. Agonists and Antagonists for Purinergic Receptors. Methods Mol. Biol. 2020, 2041, 45–64. [Google Scholar]
  128. Jacobson, K.A.; Delicado, E.G.; Gachet, C.; Kennedy, C.; von Kugelgen, I.; Li, B.; Miras-Portugal, M.T.; Novak, I.; Schoneberg, T.; Perez-Sen, R.; et al. Update of P2Y receptor pharmacology: IUPHAR Review 27. Br. J. Pharmacol. 2020, 177, 2413–2433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  129. Prada, M.P.; Syed, A.U.; Buonarati, O.R.; Reddy, G.R.; Nystoriak, M.A.; Ghosh, D.; Simo, S.; Sato, D.; Sasse, K.C.; Ward, S.M.; et al. A Gs-coupled purinergic receptor boosts Ca2+ influx and vascular contractility during diabetic hyperglycemia. eLife 2019, 8, e42214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Miras-Portugal, M.T.; Queipo, M.J.; Gil-Redondo, J.C.; Ortega, F.; Gomez-Villafuertes, R.; Gualix, J.; Delicado, E.G.; Perez-Sen, R. P2 receptor interaction and signalling cascades in neuroprotection. Brain Res. Bull. 2019, 151, 74–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Hechler, B.; Vigne, P.; Leon, C.; Breittmayer, J.P.; Gachet, C.; Frelin, C. ATP derivatives are antagonists of the P2Y1 receptor: Similarities to the platelet ADP receptor. Mol. Pharmacol. 1998, 53, 727–733. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  132. Aslam, M.; Sedding, D.; Koshty, A.; Santoso, S.; Schulz, R.; Hamm, C.; Gündüz, D. Nucleoside triphosphates inhibit ADP, collagen, and epinephrine-induced platelet aggregation: Role of P2Y1 and P2Y12 receptors. Thromb. Res. 2013, 132, 548–557. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  133. Fabre, J.E.; Nguyen, M.; Latour, A.; Keifer, J.A.; Audoly, L.P.; Coffman, T.M.; Koller, B.H. Decreased platelet aggregation, increased bleeding time and resistance to thromboembolism in P2Y1-deficient mice. Nat. Med. 1999, 5, 1199–1202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  134. Geary, C.; Akinbi, H.; Korfhagen, T.; Fabre, J.E.; Boucher, R.; Rice, W. Increased susceptibility of purinergic receptor-deficient mice to lung infection with Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Am. J. Physiol. Lung Cell. Mol. Physiol. 2005, 289, L890–L895. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  135. Zerr, M.; Hechler, B.; Freund, M.; Magnenat, S.; Lanois, I.; Cazenave, J.P.; Leon, C.; Gachet, C. Major contribution of the P2Y1receptor in purinergic regulation of TNFalpha-induced vascular inflammation. Circulation 2011, 123, 2404–2413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  136. Soulet, C.; Hechler, B.; Gratacap, M.P.; Plantavid, M.; Offermanns, S.; Gachet, C.; Payrastre, B. A differential role of the platelet ADP receptors P2Y1 and P2Y12 in Rac activation. J. Thromb. Haemost. 2005, 3, 2296–2306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  137. Wang, S.; Iring, A.; Strilic, B.; Albarran Juarez, J.; Kaur, H.; Troidl, K.; Tonack, S.; Burbiel, J.C.; Müller, C.E.; Fleming, I.; et al. P2Y2 and Gq/G11 control blood pressure by mediating endothelial mechanotransduction. J. Clin. Investig. 2015, 125, 3077–3086. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  138. Agca, Y.; Qian, S.; Agca, C.; Seye, C.I. Direct Evidence for P2Y2 Receptor Involvement in Vascular Response to Injury. J. Vasc. Res. 2016, 53, 163–171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  139. Kukulski, F.; Ben Yebdri, F.; Bahrami, F.; Fausther, M.; Tremblay, A.; Sevigny, J. Endothelial P2Y2 receptor regulates LPS-induced neutrophil transendothelial migration in vitro. Mol. Immunol. 2010, 47, 991–999. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  140. Horckmans, M.; Robaye, B.; Leon-Gomicronmez, E.; Lantz, N.; Unger, P.; Dol-Gleizes, F.; Clouet, S.; Cammarata, D.; Schaeffer, P.; Savi, P.; et al. P2Y4nucleotide receptor: A novel actor in post-natal cardiac development. Angiogenesis 2012, 15, 349–360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  141. Bar, I.; Guns, P.J.; Metallo, J.; Cammarata, D.; Wilkin, F.; Boeynams, J.M.; Bult, H.; Robaye, B. Knockout mice reveal a role for P2Y6 receptor in macrophages, endothelial cells, and vascular smooth muscle cells. Mol. Pharmacol. 2008, 74, 777–784. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  142. Anwar, Z.; Albert, J.L.; Gubby, S.E.; Boyle, J.P.; Roberts, J.A.; Webb, T.E.; Boarder, M.R. Regulation of cyclic AMP by extracellular ATP in cultured brain capillary endothelial cells. Br. J. Pharmacol. 1999, 128, 465–471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  143. Clouet, S.; Di Pietrantonio, L.; Daskalopoulos, E.P.; Esfahani, H.; Horckmans, M.; Vanorle, M.; Lemaire, A.; Balligand, J.L.; Beauloye, C.; Boeynaems, J.M.; et al. Loss of Mouse P2Y6 Nucleotide Receptor Is Associated with Physiological Macrocardia and Amplified Pathological Cardiac Hypertrophy. J. Biol. Chem. 2016, 291, 15841–15852. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  144. Garcia, R.A.; Yan, M.; Search, D.; Zhang, R.; Carson, N.L.; Ryan, C.S.; Smith-Monroy, C.; Zheng, J.; Chen, J.; Kong, Y.; et al. P2Y6 receptor potentiates pro-inflammatory responses in macrophages and exhibits differential roles in atherosclerotic lesion development. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e111385. [Google Scholar]
  145. Wen, R.X.; Shen, H.; Huang, S.X.; Wang, L.P.; Li, Z.W.; Peng, P.; Mamtilahun, M.; Tang, Y.H.; Shen, F.X.; Tian, H.L.; et al. P2Y6 receptor inhibition aggravates ischemic brain injury by reducing microglial phagocytosis. CNS Neurosci. Ther. 2020, 26, 416–429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  146. Dreisig, K.; Kornum, B.R. A critical look at the function of the P2Y11 receptor. Purinergic Signal. 2016, 12, 427–437. [Google Scholar]
  147. Casieri, V.; Matteucci, M.; Pasanisi, E.M.; Papa, A.; Barile, L.; Fritsche-Danielson, R.; Lionetti, V. Ticagrelor Enhances Release of Anti-Hypoxic Cardiac Progenitor Cell-Derived Exosomes Through Increasing Cell Proliferation In Vitro. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 2494. [Google Scholar]
  148. Uehara, K.; Uehara, A. P2Y1, P2Y6, and P2Y12 receptors in rat splenic sinus endothelial cells: An immunohistochemical and ultrastructural study. Histochem. Cell Biol. 2011, 136, 557–567. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  149. Li, F.; Li, W.; Li, X.; Li, F.; Zhang, L.; Wang, B.; Huang, G.; Guo, X.; Wan, L.; Liu, Y.; et al. Geniposide attenuates inflammatory response by suppressing P2Y14 receptor and downstream ERK1/2 signaling pathway in oxygen and glucose deprivation-induced brain microvascular endothelial cells. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2016, 185, 77–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  150. Alsaqati, M.; Latif, M.L.; Chan, S.L.; Ralevic, V. Novel vasocontractile role of the P2Y14 receptor: Characterization of its signalling in porcine isolated pancreatic arteries. Br. J. Pharmacol. 2014, 171, 701–713. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  151. Relja, B.; Land, W.G. Damage-associated molecular patterns in trauma. Eur. J. Trauma Emerg. Surg. 2020, 46, 751–775. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
Figure 1. Schematic presentation of regulators of endothelial barrier properties. Rock: Rho associated kinase
Figure 1. Schematic presentation of regulators of endothelial barrier properties. Rock: Rho associated kinase
Ijms 22 01207 g001
Figure 2. Key mechanisms involved in adenosine receptors-mediated endothelial barrier regulation. In lung microvasculature and macrovascular endothelium, A2 receptor activation causes an activation of Rac1 and an inhibition of RhoA, leading to stabilisation of the endothelial barrier. On the other hand, in coronary microvascular ECs, inhibition of both RhoA and Rac1 results in disruption of endothelial cytoskeleton and barrier failure. Black arrows indicate sequence of signal transduction, broken arrow indicates involvement of multiple steps in between, and green arrows indicate increase in cellular levels of indicated second messenger. Red bocks mean inhibition. AC: adenylyl cyclase; cAMP: cyclic adenosine monophosphate; GEF: guanine exchange factor; IP3: inositol triphosphate; PKA: protein kinase A; PKC: protein kinase C; PLC: phospholipase C.
Figure 2. Key mechanisms involved in adenosine receptors-mediated endothelial barrier regulation. In lung microvasculature and macrovascular endothelium, A2 receptor activation causes an activation of Rac1 and an inhibition of RhoA, leading to stabilisation of the endothelial barrier. On the other hand, in coronary microvascular ECs, inhibition of both RhoA and Rac1 results in disruption of endothelial cytoskeleton and barrier failure. Black arrows indicate sequence of signal transduction, broken arrow indicates involvement of multiple steps in between, and green arrows indicate increase in cellular levels of indicated second messenger. Red bocks mean inhibition. AC: adenylyl cyclase; cAMP: cyclic adenosine monophosphate; GEF: guanine exchange factor; IP3: inositol triphosphate; PKA: protein kinase A; PKC: protein kinase C; PLC: phospholipase C.
Ijms 22 01207 g002
Figure 3. Effect of P2X4 receptor modulator (ivermectin; IVM) and antagonist ((5-(3-bromophenyl)-1,3-dihydro-2H-benzofuro[3,2-e]-1,4-diazepin-2-one: 5-BDBD) on thrombin-induced endothelial hyperpermeability. HUVEC monolayers cultured on filter membranes were exposed to human thrombin (Thr, 0.3 IU/mL) in the absence (red) or presence (green) of ivermectin (IVM; 50 µM) and the flux of labelled albumin was measured as described previously [84]. In a parallel set of experiments, P2X4 receptor antagonist (5-BDBD; 10 µM) was added before the addition of ivermectin and thrombin. n = 4, * p < 0.05 vs. control, # p < 0.05 vs. Thr alone, § p < 0.05 vs. IVM + Thr. For experimental details, please see methods in Supplementary File.
Figure 3. Effect of P2X4 receptor modulator (ivermectin; IVM) and antagonist ((5-(3-bromophenyl)-1,3-dihydro-2H-benzofuro[3,2-e]-1,4-diazepin-2-one: 5-BDBD) on thrombin-induced endothelial hyperpermeability. HUVEC monolayers cultured on filter membranes were exposed to human thrombin (Thr, 0.3 IU/mL) in the absence (red) or presence (green) of ivermectin (IVM; 50 µM) and the flux of labelled albumin was measured as described previously [84]. In a parallel set of experiments, P2X4 receptor antagonist (5-BDBD; 10 µM) was added before the addition of ivermectin and thrombin. n = 4, * p < 0.05 vs. control, # p < 0.05 vs. Thr alone, § p < 0.05 vs. IVM + Thr. For experimental details, please see methods in Supplementary File.
Ijms 22 01207 g003
Figure 4. Effect of ADP and P2Y1 antagonist (MRS2500) on thrombin-induced endothelial hyperpermeability: HUVEC monolayers cultured on filter membranes were exposed to human thrombin (Thr, 0.3 IU/mL) in the absence (red) or presence (blue) of P2Y1 receptor agonist ADP (10 µM), and the flux of labelled albumin was measured as described previously [84]. In a parallel set of experiments P2Y1 receptor antagonist (MRS2500; 10 µM; black) was added before the addition of ADP and thrombin. n = 4, * p < 0.05 vs. control, # p < 0.05 vs. Thr alone, § p < 0.05 vs. ADP + Thr.
Figure 4. Effect of ADP and P2Y1 antagonist (MRS2500) on thrombin-induced endothelial hyperpermeability: HUVEC monolayers cultured on filter membranes were exposed to human thrombin (Thr, 0.3 IU/mL) in the absence (red) or presence (blue) of P2Y1 receptor agonist ADP (10 µM), and the flux of labelled albumin was measured as described previously [84]. In a parallel set of experiments P2Y1 receptor antagonist (MRS2500; 10 µM; black) was added before the addition of ADP and thrombin. n = 4, * p < 0.05 vs. control, # p < 0.05 vs. Thr alone, § p < 0.05 vs. ADP + Thr.
Ijms 22 01207 g004
Figure 5. Schematic presentation of effect of various P2Y receptors’ activation on endothelial barrier function. Activation of P2Y1 receptor stabilises while chronic activation of P2Y2, P2Y4, and P2Y6 receptors results in atherosclerosis. Loss of endothelial barrier integrity is one of the early features of development of atherosclerotic plaques. The molecular mechanisms are not clear yet. P2Y12 receptor is Gi-linked and its activation results in inhibition of adenylyl cyclase (AC) and reduction in intracellular cAMP content that leads to endothelial barrier destabilisation. The P2Y11 is Gs-linked and its activation would lead to opposite effects and endothelial barrier stabilisation. The effects of P2Y11 are hypothetical based on available information about the P2Y11 receptor. Black solid arrows indicate sequence of signalling, broken arrows indicate multiple steps in between, green arrow shows increase in cellular cAMP levels, and red arrows indicate signalling via Gi leading to reduction in cAMP and endothelial barrier disruption. Red blocks mean inhibition.
Figure 5. Schematic presentation of effect of various P2Y receptors’ activation on endothelial barrier function. Activation of P2Y1 receptor stabilises while chronic activation of P2Y2, P2Y4, and P2Y6 receptors results in atherosclerosis. Loss of endothelial barrier integrity is one of the early features of development of atherosclerotic plaques. The molecular mechanisms are not clear yet. P2Y12 receptor is Gi-linked and its activation results in inhibition of adenylyl cyclase (AC) and reduction in intracellular cAMP content that leads to endothelial barrier destabilisation. The P2Y11 is Gs-linked and its activation would lead to opposite effects and endothelial barrier stabilisation. The effects of P2Y11 are hypothetical based on available information about the P2Y11 receptor. Black solid arrows indicate sequence of signalling, broken arrows indicate multiple steps in between, green arrow shows increase in cellular cAMP levels, and red arrows indicate signalling via Gi leading to reduction in cAMP and endothelial barrier disruption. Red blocks mean inhibition.
Ijms 22 01207 g005
Table 1. Effect of purinergic receptor activation/inhibition on endothelial barrier of various vascular beds.
Table 1. Effect of purinergic receptor activation/inhibition on endothelial barrier of various vascular beds.
Receptor/AgonistModelObservationReference(s)
AdenosineCD39 KO miceLung oedema[47]
ATP + ApyraseRat heart perfusion in vivoIncreased oedema[78]
A1 antagonistFeline lung (IR) in vivo Reduced lung oedema[57,58]
A1 and A2A KOsA1 and A2A agonistsMouse BBB in vivoA1/A2A agonists induced BBB permeability, effects lost in KOs[63,66]
FDA approved A2A agonist regadenosonRat model of brain drug deli-veryIncreased BBB permeability of test drugs[69,70,72,73]
A2A agonistIsolated pig lungs (IR)Reduced lung oedema[48]
A2A KO/A2A agonistLung permeability in vivoA2A agonist reduced lung permeability/Effect lost in A2A KO[51]
A2B KOVentilator-induced lung injuryIncreased lung oedema[49]
A3 KO/A3 agonist perfusionLung IR (oedema) in vivoA3 agonist reduced lung oedema/Effect lost in A3 KO[86]
P2X4 antagonistBrain middle artery occlusion (IPC-IR) mouse model P2X4 antagonist abrogates protective effects of IPC[87]
P2X7 antagonists Rat intracranial haemorrhage/oedemaP2X7 antagonists alleviate oedema deve-lopment[88]
P2X7 KOMouse traumatic brain injuryReduced oedema development in KOs[89]
P2X7 KOMouse middle cerebral artery occlusionAggravated oedema development in KOs[90]
P2Y1/apoE double KOAtherosclerosisReduced atherosclerotic plaques in double KOs[91]
P2Y1 agonistMouse traumatic brain injuryP2Y1 agonist ameliorates oedema development[92]
EC-specific P2Y2/apoE double KOAtherosclerosisDevelopment of stable plaques in double KOs[93]
P2Y4 KOMyocardial infarctionProtection against myocardial infarction injury[94]
P2Y6/apoE double KOAtherosclerosisDouble KOs develop smaller and less inflamed lesions[95]
P2Y12 antagonistIn vitro endothelial barrier modelP2Y12 antagonist ameliorates thrombin-induced hyperpermeability[84]
ATP: adenosine 5′-triphosphate; BBB: Blood–brain barrier; EC: endothelial cell; FDA: United-States food and drug administration; IR: Ischaemia reperfusion; IPC: Ischaemic pre-conditioning; KO: Knockout.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Aslam, M.; Gündüz, D.; Troidl, C.; Heger, J.; Hamm, C.W.; Schulz, R. Purinergic Regulation of Endothelial Barrier Function. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 1207. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22031207

AMA Style

Aslam M, Gündüz D, Troidl C, Heger J, Hamm CW, Schulz R. Purinergic Regulation of Endothelial Barrier Function. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2021; 22(3):1207. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22031207

Chicago/Turabian Style

Aslam, Muhammad, Dursun Gündüz, Christian Troidl, Jacqueline Heger, Christian W. Hamm, and Rainer Schulz. 2021. "Purinergic Regulation of Endothelial Barrier Function" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 22, no. 3: 1207. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22031207

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop