Next Article in Journal
Surface Activation of Titanium Dental Implants by Using UVC-LED Irradiation
Next Article in Special Issue
The Relationship between the Gut Microbiome and Metformin as a Key for Treating Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus
Previous Article in Journal
Sex-Related Differences in Chronic Myeloid Neoplasms: From the Clinical Observation to the Underlying Biology
Previous Article in Special Issue
A Molecular Perspective on the Potential Benefits of Metformin for the Treatment of Inflammatory Skin Disorders
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
IJMS
Volume 22
Issue 5
10.3390/ijms22052596
ijms-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Multifaceted Mechanisms of Action of Metformin Which Have Been Unraveled One after Another in the Long History

by
Hideaki Kaneto
*,
Tomohiko Kimura
,
Atsushi Obata
,
Masashi Shimoda
and
Kohei Kaku
Department of Diabetes, Endocrinology and Metabolism, Kawasaki Medical School, 577 Matsushima, Kurashiki 701-0192, Japan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22(5), 2596; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22052596
Submission received: 16 January 2021 / Revised: 20 February 2021 / Accepted: 2 March 2021 / Published: 5 March 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Tissue-Specific Direct and Indirect Effects of Metformin and Its Application)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
While there are various kinds of drugs for type 2 diabetes mellitus at present, in this review article, we focus on metformin which is an insulin sensitizer and is often used as a first-choice drug worldwide. Metformin mainly activates adenosine monophosphate-activated protein kinase (AMPK) in the liver which leads to suppression of fatty acid synthesis and gluconeogenesis. Metformin activates AMPK in skeletal muscle as well, which increases translocation of glucose transporter 4 to the cell membrane and thereby increases glucose uptake. Further, metformin suppresses glucagon signaling in the liver by suppressing adenylate cyclase which leads to suppression of gluconeogenesis. In addition, metformin reduces autophagy failure observed in pancreatic β-cells under diabetic conditions. Furthermore, it is known that metformin alters the gut microbiome and facilitates the transport of glucose from the circulation into excrement. It is also known that metformin reduces food intake and lowers body weight by increasing circulating levels of the peptide hormone growth/differentiation factor 15 (GDF15). Furthermore, much attention has been drawn to the fact that the frequency of various cancers is lower in subjects taking metformin. Metformin suppresses the mechanistic target of rapamycin (mTOR) by activating AMPK in pre-neoplastic cells, which leads to suppression of cell growth and an increase in apoptosis in pre-neoplastic cells. It has been shown recently that metformin consumption potentially influences the mortality in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and coronavirus infectious disease (COVID-19). Taken together, metformin is an old drug, but multifaceted mechanisms of action of metformin have been unraveled one after another in its long history.

1. Introduction

Pancreatic β-cell dysfunction and insulin resistance in insulin target tissues such as the liver, skeletal muscle and adipose tissues are the two main characteristics of type 2 diabetes mellitus. The number of subjects with type 2 diabetes mellitus is markedly increasing all over the world due to changes in lifestyle such as overeating and lack of exercise. Such an increase in subjects with type 2 diabetes has become a financial burden in many countries. So far, various kinds of drugs for type 2 diabetes mellitus have been developed, and at present, there are many kinds of anti-diabetic drugs from which we can choose depending on each patient’s pathophysiological conditions. Incretin-related drugs (dipeptidyl peptidase-IV (DPP-IV) inhibitors and glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor activators (GLP-1RA)) and sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors are relatively new drugs and have been drawing much attention in various aspects. In contrast, metformin is an old drug, but its pleiotropic mechanisms of action have been gradually clarified in its long history. There were times when the reputation of metformin was not very high, but due to various discoveries about new mechanisms of action of metformin, the Association for the Study of Diabetes (the American Diabetes Association and the European Association for the Study of Diabetes) consensus guideline on the management of type 2 diabetes stipulates that metformin should be used as a first-choice drug for type 2 diabetes mellitus. Indeed, it is very often used as a first-choice drug in clinical practice all over the world. In addition, since metformin is quite cheap compared to other anti-diabetic drugs, usage of metformin reduces the financial burden on subjects with type 2 diabetes mellitus. In this review article, we focus on metformin which is an old but marvelous drug.

2. Glucose Toxicity Is an Underlying Mechanism for Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

It is well known that insulin is secreted from pancreatic β-cells and the main insulin target tissues are the liver, skeletal muscle and adipose tissues. Type 2 diabetes mellitus is characterized by β-cell dysfunction and insulin resistance. Chronic exposure of β-cells and insulin target tissues to hyperglycemia leads to the deterioration of β-cell function and aggravation of insulin resistance [1,2,3,4,5,6]. Such phenomena are well known as glucose toxicity. First, overeating and/or obesity lead to the development of insulin resistance. Although pancreatic β-cells produce and secrete insulin in response to high glucose concentrations under healthy conditions, β-cells are compelled to secrete larger amounts of insulin to compensate such increased insulin resistance under diabetic conditions. Once hyperglycemia becomes apparent and β-cells are chronically exposed to hyperglycemia, β-cell function is gradually deteriorated due to some grueling overwork. Insulin production and secretion are progressively reduced, accompanied by reduced expression of insulin gene transcription factors MafA [7,8,9,10,11,12] and PDX-1 [13,14,15,16,17,18]. Insulin signaling in insulin target tissues is also weakened by the burden of glucose toxicity, which leads to the aggravation of insulin resistance. Such debilitation of β-cell function and development of insulin resistance lead to further aggravation of type 2 diabetes mellitus. In clinical practice, it is very essential to alleviate such β-cell glucose toxicity in order to forestall the aggravation of diabetes mellitus.
In response to ingestion of food, glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) and glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP) are released from the gastrointestinal tract, which augment glucose-stimulated insulin secretion, reduce β-cell apoptosis and facilitate β-cell proliferation. Under diabetic conditions, however, GLP-1 and GIP receptor expression levels are reduced, which is likely bothersome for β-cells [19,20,21]. While transcription factor 7-like 2 (TCF7L2) is an important transcription factor of GLP-1 and GIP receptors and plays a crucial role in the maintenance of β-cell function, decreased expression of TCF7L2 under diabetic conditions is likely involved in such reduction in both incretin receptors [22,23,24]. Even when GLP-1 and GIP are secreted and come close to β-cells, they cannot function fully due to a reduction in their receptor expression on the β-cell membrane.
In addition, there are several reports showing the essence of insulin signaling in endothelial cells [25,26,27,28,29,30]. Insulin binds to insulin receptors in the endothelial cell membrane, which activates insulin signaling in endothelial cells. After the binding, insulin receptor substrate (IRS), phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3-K), 3-phosphoinositide-dependent protein kinase-1 (PDK1) and protein kinase B (Akt) are phosphorylated sequentially. Such activation of insulin signaling finally increases expression of endothelial nitric oxide synthase. Therefore, activation of insulin signaling in endothelial cells augments the amount of nitric oxide production, which finally leads to the increase in blood flow and angiogenesis in islets. Since endothelial cell dysfunction is observed under diabetic conditions, it is possible that endothelial dysfunction leads to hypoxia and ischemia through reduced production of nitric oxide. In addition, since pancreatic islets are particularly vulnerable to hypoxia and/or ischemia, endothelial dysfunction can more easily lead to aggravation of β-cell function compared to other cells or tissues. Indeed, we recently reported that in vascular endothelial-specific knockout mice of PDK1, one of the important molecules in insulin signaling, β-cell mass became smaller and β-cell function was impaired [30]. Such ablation of endothelial PDK1 reduced vascularity in islets, which led to hypoxia, ER stress and inflammation in β-cells. Therefore, we think that endothelial dysfunction is also, at least in part, involved in β-cell dysfunction found in type 2 diabetes mellitus.

3. Various Agents for Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Protect Pancreatic β-Cells against Glucose Toxicity

There are various kinds of drugs for type 2 diabetes mellitus such as insulin secretagogues and insulin sensitizers. Among several insulin secretagogues, incretin-related drugs have most often been used in clinical practice. Dipeptidyl peptidase-IV (DPP-IV) inhibitors as well as glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor activators (GLP-1RA) enhance insulin secretion and suppress glucagon secretion, leading to amelioration of glycemic control. We have reported that DPP-IV inhibitors or GLP-1RA ameliorated glycemic control and protected β-cells against glucose toxicity in type 2 diabetic mice [31,32,33,34,35]. In addition, incretin-related drug liraglutide increased β-cell function and mass only at an early stage of diabetes but not at an advanced stage [35]. Only at an early stage, insulin biosynthesis and secretion were significantly enhanced by liraglutide, accompanied by augmentation of MafA and PDX-1 expression [35]. We think that it is very essential to use incretin-based drugs at an early stage of diabetes in order to make the most of such drugs. In addition, much attention has been drawn recently to the anti-arteriosclerosis effects of incretin-related agents in the basic research area [36,37,38,39,40,41] as well as in clinical practice [42,43,44,45,46,47,48,49,50,51,52]. In the basic research area, we recently reported that incretin expression was down-regulated under diabetic conditions [39] and that incretin-related drugs exerted more beneficial anti-arteriosclerosis at an early stage of diabetes [41]. There have been many large-scale clinical trials regarding the protective role of incretin-based agents against atherosclerosis or cardiovascular events in subjects with type 2 diabetes mellitus [42,43,44,45,46,47,48,49,50,51,52].
Metformin and thiazolidine are insulin sensitizers. Metformin, one of the insulin sensitizers, is often used as a first-choice drug worldwide. Metformin is known to have pleiotropic roles in a variety of tissues such as the liver and skeletal muscle, and a variety of mechanisms of its action have been elucidated so far, as described below in detail. Thiazolidine also has multifaceted effects such as enhancement of insulin sensitivity, β-cell protective effects, miniaturization of visceral fat cells, enhancement of adiponectin secretion and anti-arteriosclerosis effects [31,34,35,53,54].
Furthermore, recently, sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors have been drawing much attention in the diabetes research area as well as in clinical practice. SGLT2 inhibitors function in an insulin-independent manner and ameliorate glycemic control through an increase in urinary glucose excretion. We have reported that SGLT2 inhibitors protect β-cells against glucose toxicity in type 2 diabetic mice [55,56,57]. Indeed, SGLT2 inhibitors increased insulin biosynthesis and glucose-stimulated insulin secretion, as well as increasing β-cell mass through the reduction in β-cell apoptosis and the enhancement of β-cell proliferation. In addition, we recently showed that SGLT2 inhibitor luseogliflozin exerted more protective effects at an early stage of diabetes compared to an advanced stage. Furthermore, we reported that longer-term use of luseogliflozin exerted more beneficial effects on pancreatic β-cell function and mass compared to short-term use [57]. In addition, since several potential side effects of SGLT2 inhibitors, about which many clinicians were previously concerned, have substantially been wiped out at present, we should start SGLT2 inhibitors at an early stage of diabetes in subjects to whom therapy with SGLT2 inhibitors is thought to be appropriate in clinical practice as well. SGLT2 inhibitors are known to exert beneficial effects on insulin target tissues such as the liver, skeletal muscle and adipose tissues. Indeed, it was reported that SGLT2 inhibitors improved muscle insulin sensitivity, although it enhanced endogenous glucose production, and that SGLT2 inhibitors improved insulin resistance in skeletal muscle and accelerated lipolysis in adipose tissues [58,59,60,61]. Furthermore, it has been elucidated that SGLT2 inhibitors have preventive effects on heart failure and proteinuria and thereby have cardio-protective and renal protective effects, both of which have drawn much attention recently, although we did not describe these points in detail in this review article.

4. Metformin Activates Adenosine Monophosphate-Activated Protein Kinase (AMPK) in the Liver and Skeletal Muscle Which Leads to Suppression of Gluconeogenesis in the Liver and Increase in Glucose Uptake into Skeletal Muscle

Metformin enhances insulin sensitivity and ameliorates glycemic control mainly through a reduction in hepatic glucose production and enhancement of glucose utilization. AMPK is one of the major cellular regulators for glucose and lipid metabolism. It was reported that metformin activated AMPK in the liver, leading to a reduction in acetyl-CoA carboxylase (ACC), enhancement of fatty acid oxidation and suppression of lipogenic enzyme expression [62,63,64,65]. Metformin-mediated AMPK activation suppresses expression of sterol regulatory element binding protein-1c (SREBP-1), an important lipogenic transcription factor, leading to suppression of fatty acid synthesis (Figure 1). Further, while phosphoenolpyruvate carboxykinase (PEPCK) and glucose 6-phosphatase (G6Pase) are key gluconeogenic enzymes, metformin-mediated AMPK activation reduces both enzymes’ expression, leading to suppression of gluconeogenesis in the liver. Metformin also activates AMPK in skeletal muscle which increases translocation of glucose transporter 4 to the cell membrane and thereby increases glucose uptake. These effects finally ameliorate fatty liver and insulin resistance. It was reported recently that metformin inhibited mitochondrial respiratory complex I, leading to an increase in the ratio of adenosine monophosphate (AMP) to adenosine triphosphate (ATP). Such alteration likely leads to inactivation of AMPK [63]. It was also reported that metformin inactivated mitochondrial glycerol-3-phosphate dehydrogenase which was likely involved in suppression of gluconeogenesis in the liver [64].

5. Metformin Suppresses Glucagon Signaling in the Liver by Suppressing Adenylate Cyclase Which Leads to Suppression of Gluconeogenesis in the Liver

Glucagon is secreted from pancreatic α-cells and functions as one of the counter-regulatory hormones, leading to an increase in blood glucose levels. As one main mechanism of glucagon action, it is known that glucagon binds to the glucagon receptor in the liver, which activates adenylate cyclase and converts adenosine triphosphate (ATP) to cyclic AMP (cAMP). Increased cAMP activates protein kinase A (PKA), which facilitates gluconeogenesis. Thereby, glucagon leads to the aggravation of glycemic control. It was reported that metformin antagonized such action of glucagon, which led to amelioration of glycemic control. Metformin treatment led to the accumulation of AMP, which finally inhibited adenylate cyclase. Inactivation of adenylate cyclase reduced cyclic AMP levels and PKA activity and suppressed glucagon signaling, leading to suppression of gluconeogenesis (Figure 2) [66]. These findings clearly support the new mechanism of action of metformin as a suppressor of glucagon signaling in the liver. In addition, it was reported recently that metformin inhibited mitochondrial respiratory complex I, leading to an increase in the AMP/ATP ratio. Such alteration likely inactivates adenylate cyclase activity, leading to suppression of glucagon signaling in the liver [63]. Thereby, such inhibition of mitochondrial respiratory complex I suppresses gluconeogenesis through activation of AMPK, as well as suppressing glucagon signaling through inactivation of adenylate cyclase activity. Such alteration leads to amelioration of glucose metabolism and a reduction in insulin resistance in the liver, which finally leads to amelioration of glycemic control.

6. Metformin Reduces Autophagy Failure Observed in Pancreatic β-Cells under Diabetic Conditions

Autophagy is involved in a variety of phenomena in our body and has been paid much attention to in various research areas. For example, in the diabetes research area, it has been reported, so far, that autophagy failure is observed in pancreatic β-cells under diabetic conditions [67,68,69,70,71,72]. In the process of autophagy, formation of autophagosomes and proteolysis of autolysosomes are main and important steps. When the autophagy system functions normally, insulin resistance enhances autophagy in β-cells, which finally leads to compensatory hypertrophy of β-cells. However, when the autophagy system does not function well, autophagy in β-cells is not enhanced by insulin resistance and compensatory hypertrophy of β-cells is not observed. Further, in human pancreatic islets with type 2 diabetes mellitus, larger numbers of vacuoles were observed compared to the control, suggesting an increase in autophagosomes. In addition, expression levels of various lysosome-related enzymes were reduced under diabetic conditions. These data suggest that autophagy failure is involved in β-cell dysfunction found in type 2 diabetes mellitus.
Furthermore, it was reported that metformin reduced autophagy failure observed in pancreatic β-cells under diabetic conditions [72]. When healthy β-cells were treated with free fatty acids (FFA), autophagosomes were increased and lysosome-related enzyme expression was reduced. However, when β-cells were treated with FFA and metformin, autophagosomes were not increased and lysosome-related enzyme expression was not reduced, indicating that the autophagy system was recovered. These data suggest that metformin mitigates pancreatic β-cell autophagy failure observed under diabetic conditions.

7. Metformin Alters the Gut Microbiome and Glucose Absorption from the Intestine

Much attention has been drawn to the fact that alteration of the gut microbiome has a variety of influences on various tissues in our body. It was recently reported that metformin altered the gut microbiome which, at least in part, contributes to the therapeutic effects of metformin [73]. In a double-blind study, the authors randomized subjects with treatment-naive type 2 diabetes mellitus to metformin or placebo for 4 months and showed that metformin had strong effects on the gut microbiome. Furthermore, transfer of fecal samples from metformin-treated donors to germ-free mice showed that glucose tolerance was improved in mice that received metformin-altered microbiota. These findings support the idea that the altered gut microbiota is, at least in part, involved in the anti-diabetic effects of metformin. We think that the presence of such an underlying mechanism of metformin indicates that metformin would be very promising.
In addition, it was very recently reported that metformin altered glucose absorption from the intestine [74,75]. Indeed, positron emission tomography (PET)-computed tomography has shown that metformin facilitates the intestinal accumulation of [18F] fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG), a non-metabolizable glucose derivative. In this study, accumulation of [18F] FDG was evaluated in different portions of the intestine. As a result, [18F] FDG accumulation in the ileum and hemicolon was also larger in subjects with metformin. Furthermore, the maximum standardized uptake value for the intraluminal space of the ileum and hemicolon was larger in subjects with metformin. Taken together, metformin treatment is likely associated with increased accumulation of [18F] FDG in the intraluminal space of the intestine, indicating that metformin facilitates the transport of glucose from the circulation into excrement.

8. Metformin Reduces Food Intake and Lowers Body Weight by Increasing Circulating Level of the Peptide Hormone Growth/Differentiation Factor 15 (GDF15)

Weight gain and obesity are serious global health concerns, and pharmacological therapies or bariatric surgery have been performed for subjects with severe obesity. Metformin is known to lower body weight, and thus it seems that metformin has a health benefit beyond its glucose-lowering effect. Although its molecular mechanism remained unclear for a long time, it has been reported recently that metformin increases circulating levels of GDF15, a member of the transforming growth factor β superfamily, which leads to a reduction in food intake and body weight [76,77,78,79,80,81,82,83,84,85]. GDF15 is produced by various cells responding to a variety of stresses or stimuli, and GDF15 functions through its receptor which is expressed in the hindbrain and thereby reduces food intake. A recent clinical study showed that there was a close association between metformin usage and circulating levels of GDF15. Recent basic research also demonstrated that metformin increased circulating GDF15 in mice, accompanied by an increase in GDF15 expression in the intestine, colon and kidney. In addition, metformin suppressed body weight gain in mice treated with a high-fat diet, but such phenomena were not observed in mice lacking GDF15. Similarly, such phenomena were not observed in mice lacking GDNF family receptor α-like (GFRAL), which is known as a receptor of GDF15. In mice treated with a high-fat diet, the weight reduction effects of metformin were reduced by a GFRAL-antagonist antibody, although the glucose-lowering effect of metformin was not influenced by that antibody. These data further strengthen the idea that GDF15 is involved in the reduction in food intake and body weight in subjects with type 2 diabetes mellitus who are treated with metformin.

9. Metformin Suppresses Mechanistic Target of Rapamycin (Mtor) by Activating AMPK in Pre-Neoplastic Cells and Thereby Suppresses the Onset and/or Development of Various Cancers

Much attention has been drawn recently to the fact that the frequency of various types of cancer in subjects with diabetes mellitus is higher compared to that in healthy subjects [86,87,88,89,90,91,92,93]. In particular, the frequency of hepatocellular carcinoma and colorectal cancer is higher under diabetic conditions compared to healthy conditions. Thus, malignancy has been recently regarded as one of diabetic complications in addition to acute and chronic complications such as microangiopathies (diabetic nephropathy, retinopathy and neuropathy) and macroangiopathies (ischemic heart diseases, stroke and arteriosclerosis obliterans). There are several possible reasons why the frequency of malignancy is increased under diabetic conditions. First, chronic hyperglycemia increases various inflammatory cytokines and thereby activates nuclear factor-kappa B (NF-kB) and/or signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 (STAT3), which finally leads to the onset of neoplastic cells. Second, hyperinsulinemia, which is often observed in obese subjects with type 2 diabetes mellitus, activates insulin receptors in pre-neoplastic cells, leading to the onset of neoplastic cells. In addition, hyperinsulinemia decreases expression of insulin-like growth factor binding proteins 1 and 2 (IGFBP1 and IGFBP2) and thereby activates insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1), which could also lead to the onset of neoplastic cells.
Furthermore, attention has been drawn to the fact that the frequency of various cancers is lower in subjects taking metformin. Indeed, there is a large amount of clinical evidence showing the possibility that usage of metformin decreases the risk of neoplastic transformation and enhances the response to some chemotherapies [94,95,96,97,98,99,100]. Metformin suppresses mTOR by activating AMPK in pre-neoplastic cells which leads to suppression of cell growth and an increase in apoptosis in pre-neoplastic cells (Figure 3) [94,95]. It seems that metformin exerts potential anti-tumorigenic effects independently of its hypoglycemic effects. In general, insulin and IGF-1 activate PI3-K, Akt and mTOR, which finally leads to enhancement of cell growth and suppression of apoptotic cell death in pre-neoplastic cells. There are several potential mechanisms concerning how metformin can suppress the development of neoplastic cells. First, metformin activates the AMPK pathway in pre-neoplastic cells which leads to suppression of mTOR activation. Such a pathway finally leads to suppression of cell growth and an increase in apoptosis in pre-neoplastic cells. Second, since metformin is an insulin sensitizer, it reduces circulating insulin levels, which is also, at least in part, involved in the anti-tumorigenic effects of metformin. Inhibition of protein synthesis, inhibition of the unfolded protein response (UPR), activation of the immune system and eradication of cancer stem cells are also possibly involved in the anti-tumorigenic effects of metformin.
Taken together, while the frequency of various types of malignancies in subjects with diabetes mellitus is higher compared to that in healthy subjects, much attention has been drawn to the fact that the frequency of various cancers is lower in subjects taking metformin.

10. Metformin Consumption Potentially Influences the Mortality in Subjects with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus and Coronavirus Infectious Disease (COVID-19)

Coronavirus infectious disease (COVID-19) has caused a new pandemic all over the world. The mortality in patients with COVID-19 is extremely high, and the main reason for deaths is severe pneumonia [101]. In subjects with COVID-19, large amounts of inflammatory cytokines are produced which likely causes a cytokine storm and is involved in the development of various complications such as serious pneumonia. The defense mechanism and immune system against inflammation are very vulnerable in senior subjects or subjects with diabetes mellitus, respiratory tract diseases, malignancy or coronary heart disease. Therefore, the infection risk and severity become very high in such subjects with comorbidities. It was reported that the mortality was very high in subjects with both COVID-19 and diabetes mellitus [102,103]. Since it is known that diabetic subjects have low-grade inflammation, we assume that such inflammation is, at least in part, involved in the vulnerability of diabetic subjects to COVID-19 and the severity of COVID-19 under diabetic conditions.
It has been reported that metformin is associated with lower mortality in subjects with COVID-19 and diabetes mellitus [104,105]. In that study, several medical databases (Pubmed, EuropePMC, EBSCOhost, Proquest, Cochrane library) and two health science preprint servers (preprint.org and Medrxiv) were systematically searched for relevant literature. As a result, the meta-analysis with more than 10,000 subjects showed that metformin was associated with lower mortality in a pooled non-adjusted model (odds ratio (OR), 0.45; confidential interval (CI), 0.25–0.81) and a pooled adjusted model (OR, 0.64; CI, 0.43- 0.97). The analysis clearly indicates that metformin consumption is closely associated with lower mortality in subjects with COVID-19.
There are several possible mechanisms concerning how metformin exerts beneficial effects on mortality in subjects with COVID-19. First, it is known that metformin reduces pro-inflammatory cytokine levels such as tumor necrosis factor-α or interleukin-6. In addition, it was shown that metformin had some beneficial effects on viral infections such as hepatitis C virus or severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 [106,107,108]. Therefore, it is possible that metformin has some favorable effects on COVID-19 by altering inflammatory cytokine levels. Second, as described above, metformin alters the gut microbiome and mitigates autophagy failure, both of which likely lead to the activation of the immune response and defense mechanism against an inflammatory cytokine storm. Finally, as described above as well, it is known that metformin blocks the mTOR pathway, while mTOR plays a crucial part in the pathogenesis of influenza and Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus infection. Therefore, it is possible that blocking the mTOR pathway by metformin, at least in part, contributes to the beneficial effect of metformin on the mortality in subjects with type 2 diabetes mellitus and COVID-19. Although further studies are necessary to conclude such possible mechanisms of action of metformin, the possibility that metformin is associated with lower mortality in subjects with COVID-19 and diabetes mellitus brings some emerging hope to us amid the current worldwide pandemic situations caused by COVID-19.

11. Conclusions

In this review article, we featured various mechanisms of action of metformin which have been elucidated so far. First, metformin activates AMPK in the liver which leads to suppression of fatty acid synthesis and gluconeogenesis. Metformin also activates AMPK in skeletal muscle which increases translocation of glucose transporter 4 to the cell membrane and thereby increases glucose uptake. Second, metformin suppresses glucagon signaling in the liver by suppressing adenylate cyclase which leads to suppression of gluconeogenesis. Third, metformin reduces autophagy failure observed in pancreatic β-cells under diabetic conditions. Fourth, metformin alters the gut microbiome and glucose absorption from the intestine and facilitates the transport of glucose from the circulation into excrement. Fifth, metformin reduces food intake and lowers body weight by increasing circulating levels of GDF15. Sixth, much attention has been drawn to the fact that the frequency of various cancers is lower in subjects taking metformin. Metformin suppresses mTOR by activating AMPK in pre-neoplastic cells, which leads to suppression of cell growth and an increase in apoptosis in pre-neoplastic cells. Finally, while COVID-19 has caused a new pandemic all over the world, it has been reported recently that metformin consumption potentially influences the mortality in subjects with COVID-19 and type 2 diabetes mellitus, which brings great hope to us amid the current worldwide pandemic caused by COVID-19. Taken together, metformin is a medicine with a long history, but the multifaceted mechanisms of action of metformin have been elucidated one after another in its long history, and the usefulness of metformin is very promising from clinical points of view as well as in the basic research area.

Author Contributions

H.K. wrote this manuscript. T.K., A.O., M.S., K.K. participated in discussion. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Weir, G.C.; Laybutt, D.R.; Kaneto, H.; Bonner-Weir, S.; Sharma, A. β-Cell adaptation and decompensation during the progression of diabetes. Diabetes 2001, 50, S154–S159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  2. Poitout, V.; Robertson, R.P. Minireview: Secondary beta cell failure in type 2 diabetes: A convergence of glucotoxicity and lipotoxicity. Endocrinology 2001, 143, 339–342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Rhodes, C.J. Type 2 diabetes-a matter of beta-cell life and death? Science 2005, 307, 380–384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Halban, P.A.; Polonsky, K.S.; Bowden, D.W.; Hawkins, M.A.; Ling, C.; Mather, K.J.; Powers, A.C.; Rhodes, C.J.; Sussel, L.; Weir, G.C. β-Cell failure in type 2 diabetes: Postulated mechanisms and prospects for prevention and treatment. Diabetes Care 2014, 37, 1751–1758. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Kaneto, H.; Matsuoka, T.; Kimura, T.; Obata, A.; Shimoda, M.; Kamei, S.; Mune, T.; Kaku, K. Appropriate therapy for type 2 diabetes in view of pancreatic β-cell glucose toxicity: “The earlier, the better”. J. Diabetes 2016, 8, 183–189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Kaneto, H.; Obata, A.; Kimura, T.; Shimoda, M.; Sanada, J.; Fushimi, Y.; Katakami, N.; Matsuoka, T.; Kaku, K. Notable underlying mechanism for pancreatic β-cell dysfunction and atherosclerosis: Pleiotropic role of incretin and insulin signaling in various situation. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 9444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Wang, H.; Brun, T.; Kataoka, K.; Sharma, A.J.; Wollheim, C.B. MAFA controls genes implicated in insulin biosynthesis and secretion. Diabetologia 2007, 50, 348–358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Matsuoka, T.; Kaneto, H.; Miyatsuka, T.; Yamamoto, T.; Yamamoto, K.; Kato, K.; Shimomura, I.; Stein, R.; Matsuhisa, M. Regulation of MafA expression in pancreatic β-cells in db/db mice with diabetes. Diabetes 2010, 59, 1709–1720. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Yamamoto, K.; Matsuoka, T.; Kawashima, S.; Takebe, S.; Kubo, N.; Miyatsuka, T.; Kaneto, H.; Shimomura, I. A novel function of Onecut 1 as a negative regulator of MafA. J. Biol. Chem. 2013, 288, 21648–21658. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Matsuoka, T.; Kaneto, H.; Kawashima, S.; Miyatsuka, T.; Tochino, Y.; Yoshikawa, A.; Imagawa, A.; Miyazaki, J.; Gannon, M.; Stein, R.; et al. Preserving MafA expression in diabetic islet β-cells improves glycemic control in vivo. J. Biol. Chem. 2015, 290, 7647–7657. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Kaneto, H.; Matsuoka, T. Role of pancreatic transcription factors in maintenance of mature -cell function. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2015, 16, 6281–6297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Nishimura, W.; Takahashi, S.; Yasuda, K. MafA is critical for maintenance of the mature beta cell phenotype in mice. Diabetologia 2015, 58, 566–574. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Ahlgren, U.; Jonsson, J.; Jonsson, L.; Simu, K.; Edlund, H. β-cell-specific inactivation of the mouse Ipf1/Pdx1 gene results in loss of the β-cell phenotype and maturity onset diabetes. Genes Dev. 1998, 12, 1763–1768. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Holland, A.M.; Hale, M.A.; Kagami, H.; Hammer, R.E.; MacDonald, R.J. Experimental control of pancreatic development and maintenance. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2002, 99, 12236–12241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  15. Kaneto, H.; Xu, G.; Fujii, N.; Kim, S.; Bonner-Weir, S.; Weir, G.C. Involvement of c-Jun N-terminal kinase in oxidative stress-mediated suppression of insulin gene expression. J. Biol. Chem. 2002, 277, 30010–30018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Kawamori, D.; Kaneto, H.; Nakatani, Y.; Matsuoka, T.; Matsuhisa, M.; Hori, M.; Yamasaki, Y. The forkhead transcription factor Foxo1 bridges the JNK pathway and the transcription factor PDX-1 through its intracellular translocation. J. Biol. Chem. 2006, 281, 1091–1098. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  17. Zhou, Q.; Brown, J.; Kanarek, A.; Rajagopal, J.; Melton, D.A. In vivo reprogramming of adult pancreatic exocrine cells to beta-cells. Nature 2008, 455, 627–632. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Yamamoto, Y.; Miyatsuka, T.; Sasaki, S.; Miyashita, K.; Kubo, N.; Shimo, N.; Takebe, S.; Watada, H.; Kaneto, H.; Matsuoka, T.; et al. Recovered expression of Pdx1 improves β-cell failure in diabetic mice. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2017, 483, 418–424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Xu, G.; Kaneto, H.; Laybutt, D.R.; Duvivier-Kali, V.; Trivedi, N.; Suzuma, K.; King, G.L.; Weir, G.C.; Bonner-Weir, S. Downregulation of GLP-1 and GIP receptor expression by hyperglycemia: Possible contribution to the impaired incretin effects in diabetes. Diabetes 2007, 56, 1551–1558. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  20. Kubo, F.; Miyatsuka, T.; Sasaki, S.; Takahara, M.; Yamamoto, Y.; Shimo, N.; Watada, H.; Kaneto, H.; Gannon, M.; Matsuoka, T.; et al. Sustained expression of GLP-1 receptor differentially modulates β-cell functions in diabetic and nondiabetic mice. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2016, 471, 68–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  21. Shu, L.; Matveyenko, A.V.; Kerr-Conte, J.; Cho, J.H.; McIntosh, C.H.; Maedler, K. Decreased TCF7L2 protein levels in type 2 diabetes mellitus correlate with downregulation of GIP- and GLP-1 receptors and impaired beta-cell function. Hum. Mol. Genet. 2009, 18, 2388–2399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Liu, Z.; Habener, J.F. Glucagon-like peptide-1 activation of TCF7L2-dependent Wnt signaling enhances pancreatic beta cell proliferation. J. Biol. Chem. 2008, 283, 8723–8735. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  23. Takamoto, I.; Kubota, N.; Nakaya, K.; Kumagai, K.; Hashimoto, S.; Kubota, T.; Inoue, M.; Kajiwara, E.; Katsuyama, H.; Obata, A.; et al. TCF7L2 in mouse pancreatic beta cells plays a crucial role in glucose homeostasis by regulating beta cell mass. Diabetologia 2014, 57, 542–553. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  24. Mitchell, R.K.; Mondragon, A.; Chen, L.; McGinty, J.A.; French, P.M.; Ferrer, J.; Thorens, B.; Hodson, D.J.; Rutter, G.A.; Xavier, G.D. Selective disruption of Tcf7l2 in the pancreatic β cell impairs secretory function and lowers β cell mass. Hum. Mol. Genet. 2015, 24, 1390–1399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Kondo, T.; Vicent, D.; Suzuma, K. Knockout of insulin and IGF-1 receptors on vascular endothelial cells protects against retinal neovascularization. J. Clin. Investig. 2003, 111, 1835–1842. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Mukai, Y.; Rikitake, Y.; Shiojima, I.; Wolfrum, S.; Satoh, M.; Takeshita, K.; Hiroi, Y.; Salomone, S.; Kim, H.H.; Benjamin, L.E.; et al. Decreased vascular lesion formation in mice with inducible endothelial-specific expression of protein kinase Akt. J. Clin. Investig. 2006, 116, 334–343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Konishi, M.; Sakaguchi, M.; Lockhart, S.M.; Cai, W.; Li, M.E.; Homan, E.P.; Rask-Madsen, C.; Kahn, C.R. Endothelial insulin receptors differentially control insulin signaling kinetics in peripheral tissues and brain of mice. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2017, 114, E8478–E8487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  28. Kubota, T.; Kubota, N.; Kumagai, H.; Yamaguchi, S.; Kozono, H.; Takahashi, T.; Inoue, M.; Itoh, S.; Takamoto, I.; Sasako, T.; et al. Impaired insulin signaling in endothelial cells reduces insulin-induced glucose uptake by skeletal muscle. Cell Metab. 2011, 13, 294–307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Hashimoto, S.; Kubota, N.; Sato, H.; Sasaki, M.; Takamoto, I.; Kubota, T.; Nakaya, K.; Noda, M.; Ueki, K.; Kadowaki, T. Insulin receptor substrate-2 (Irs2) in endothelial cells plays a crucial role in insulin secretion. Diabetes 2015, 64, 876–886. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Obata, A.; Kimura, T.; Obata, Y.; Shimoda, M.; Kinoshita, T.; Kohara, K.; Okauchi, S.; Hirukawa, H.; Kamei, S.; Nakanishi, S.; et al. Vascular endothelial PDK1 plays pivotal roles for maintenance of pancreatic beta-cell mass and function in adult male mice. Diabetologia 2019, 62, 1225–1236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Kawashima, S.; Matsuoka, T.; Kaneto, H.; Tochino, Y.; Kato, K.; Yamamoto, K.; Yamamoto, T.; Matsuhisa, M.; Shimomura, I. Effect of alogliptin, pioglitazone and glargine on pancreatic β-cells in diabetic db/db mice. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2011, 404, 534–540. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Shimoda, M.; Kanda, Y.; Hamamoto, S.; Tawaramoto, K.; Hashiramoto, M.; Matsuki, M.; Kaku, K. The human glucagon-like peptide-1 analogue liraglutide preserves pancreatic beta cells via regulation of cell kinetics and suppression of oxidative and endoplasmic reticulum stress in a mouse model of diabetes. Diabetologia 2011, 54, 1098–1108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  33. Hamamoto, S.; Kanda, Y.; Shimoda, M.; Tatsumi, F.; Kohara, K.; Tawaramoto, K.; Hashiramoto, M.; Kaku, K. Vildagliptin preserves the mass and function of pancreatic beta cells via the developmental regulation and suppression of oxidative and endoplasmic reticulum stress in a mouse model of diabetes. Diabetes Obes. Metab. 2013, 15, 153–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  34. Hirukawa, H.; Kaneto, H.; Shimoda, M.; Kimura, T.; Okauchi, S.; Obata, A.; Kohara, K.; Hamamoto, S.; Tawaramoto, K.; Hashiramoto, M.; et al. Combination of DPP-4 inhibitor and PPARγ agonist exerts protective effects on pancreatic β-cells in diabetic db/db mice through the augmentation of IRS-2 expression. Mol. Cell. Endocrinol. 2015, 413, 49–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Kimura, T.; Kaneto, H.; Shimoda, M.; Hirukawa, H.; Hamamoto, S.; Tawaramoto, K.; Hashiramoto, M.; Kaku, K. Protective effects of pioglitazone and/or liraglutide on pancreatic β-cells: Comparison of their effects between in an early and advanced stage of diabetes. Mol. Cell. Endocrinol. 2015, 400, 78–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Arakawa, M.; Mita, T.; Azuma, K.; Ebato, C.; Goto, H.; Nomiyama, T.; Fujitani, Y.; Hirose, T.; Kawamori, R.; Watada, H. Inhibition of monocyte adhesion to endothelial cells and attenuation of atherosclerotic lesion by a glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist, exendin-4. Diabetes 2010, 59, 1030–1037. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Goto, H.; Nomiyama, T.; Mita, T.; Yasunari, E.; Azuma, K.; Komiya, K.; Arakawa, M.; Jin, W.L.; Kanazawa, A.; Kawamori, R.; et al. Exendin-4, a glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist, reduces intimal thickening after vascular injury. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2011, 405, 79–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Helmstädter, J.; Frenis, K.; Filippou, K.; Grill, A.; Dib, M.; Kalinovic, S.; Pawelke, F.; Kus, K.; Kröller-Schön, S.; Oelze, M.; et al. Endothelial GLP-1 (Glucagon-Like Peptide-1) Receptor Mediates Cardiovascular Protection by Liraglutide In Mice With Experimental Arterial Hypertension. Arter. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 2020, 40, 145–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Kimura, T.; Obata, A.; Shimoda, M.; Okauchi, S.; Hirukawa, H.; Kohara, K.; Kinoshita, T.; Nogami, Y.; Nakanishi, S.; Mune, T.; et al. Decreased GLP-1 receptor expression in endothelial and smooth muscle cells in diabetic db/db mice: TCF7L2 is a possible regulator of vascular GLP-1 receptor. Diabetes Vasc. Dis. Res. 2017, 14, 540–548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  40. Kimura, T.; Obata, A.; Shimoda, M.; Shimizu, I.; da Silva Xavier, G.; Okauchi, S.; Hirukawa, H.; Kohara, K.; Mune, T.; Moriuchi, S.; et al. Down-regulation of vascular GLP-1 receptor expression in human subjects with obesity. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 10644. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  41. Sanada, J.; Obata, A.; Obata, Y.; Fushiimi, Y.; Shimoda, M.; Kohara, K.; Nakanishi, S.; Mune, T.; Kaku, K.; Kaneto, H. Dulaglutide exerts beneficial anti-atherosclerotic effects in ApoE knockout mice with diabetes: The earlier, the better. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 1425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Mita, T.; Katakami, N.; Yoshii, H.; Onuma, T.; Kaneto, H.; Osonoi, T.; Shiraiwa, T.; Kosugi, K.; Umayahara, Y.; Yamamoto, T.; et al. Alogliptin, a dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor, prevents the progression of carotid Atherosclerosis in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: The Study of Preventive Effects of Alogliptin on Diabetic Atherosclerosis (SPEAD-A). Diabetes Care 2016, 39, 139–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  43. Mita, T.; Katakami, N.; Shiraiwa, T.; Yoshii, H.; Onuma, T.; Kuribayashi, N.; Osonoi, T.; Kaneto, H.; Kosugi, K.; Umayahara, Y.; et al. Sitagliptin attenuates the progression of carotid intima-media thickening in insulin-treated patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: The Sitagliptin Preventive study of Intima-media thickness Evaluation (SPIKE). Diabetes Care 2016, 39, 455–464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  44. Marso, S.P.; Daniels, G.H.; Brown-Frandsen, K.; Kristensen, P.; Mann, J.F.; Nauck, M.A.; Nissen, S.E.; Pocock, S.; Poulter, N.R.; Ravn, L.S.; et al. Liraglutide and cardiovascular outcomes in type 2 diabetes. N. Engl. J. Med. 2016, 375, 311–322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  45. Verma, S.; Poulter, N.R.; Bhatt, D.L.; Bain, S.C.; Buse, J.B.; Leiter, L.A.; Nauck, M.A.; Pratley, R.E.; Zinman, B.; Ørsted, D.D.; et al. Effects of liraglutide on cardiovascular outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus with or without history of myocardial infarction or stroke. Circulation 2018, 138, 2884–2894. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Marso, S.P.; Bain, S.C.; Consoli, A.; Eliaschewitz, F.G.; Jódar, E.; Leiter, L.A.; Lingvay, I.; Rosenstock, J.; Seufert, J.; Warren, M.L.; et al. Semaglutide and cardiovascular outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes. N. Engl. J. Med. 2016, 375, 1834–1844. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  47. Kaul, S. Mitigating cardiovascular risk in type 2 diabetes with antidiabetes drugs: A review of principal cardiovascular outcome results of EMPA-REG OUTCOME, LEADER, and SUSTAIN-6 Trials. Diabetes Care 2017, 40, 821–831. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  48. Gerstein, H.C.; Colhoun, H.M.; Dagenais, G.R.; Diaz, R.; Lakshmanan, M.; Pais, P.; Probstfield, J.; Riesmeyer, J.S.; Riddle, M.C.; Ryden, L.; et al. Dulaglutide and cardiovascular outcomes in type 2 diabetes (REWIND): A double-blind, randomised placebo-controlled trial. Lancet 2017, 394, 121–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Kristensen, S.L.; Rorth, R.; Jhund, P.S.; Docherty, K.F.; Sattar, N.; Preiss, D.; Kober, L.; Petrie, M.C.; McMurray, J.J.V. Cardiovascular, mortality, and kidney outcomes with GLP-1 receptor agonists in patients with type 2 diabetes: A systematic review and meta-analysis of cardiovascular outcome trials. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2019, 7, 776–785. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Husain, M.; Birkenfeld, A.L.; Donsmark, M.; Dungan, K.; Eliaschewitz, F.G.; Franco, D.R.; Jeppesen, O.K.; Lingvay, I.; Mosenzon, O.; Pedersen, S.D.; et al. Oral semaglutide and cardiovascular outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes. N. Engl. J. Med. 2019, 381, 841–851. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Husain, M.; Bain, S.C.; Jeppesen, O.K.; Lingvay, I.; Sorrig, R.; Treppendahl, M.B.; Vilsbøll, T. Semaglutide (SUSTAIN and PIONEER) reduces cardiovascular events in type 2 diabetes across varying cardiovascular risk. Diabetes Obes. Metab. 2020, 22, 442–451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Iqbal, A.M.; Imamudeen, N.; Basheer, A.; Menon, S.; Mohan, G.; Sani, T.N.; Haroon, N.N. Efficacy and Cardiovascular Safety of GLP-1 Receptor Analogues. Curr. Drug Saf. 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Smith, S.A. Central role of the adipocyte in the insulin-sensitising and cardiovascular risk modifying actions of the thiazolidinediones. Biochimie 2003, 85, 1219–1230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Bailey, C.J. Treating insulin resistance in type 2 diabetes with metformin and thiazolidinediones. Diabetes Obes. Metab. 2005, 7, 675–691. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Shimo, N.; Matsuoka, T.; Miyatsuka, T.; Takebe, S.; Tochino, Y.; Takahara, M.; Kaneto, H.; Shimomura, I. Short-term selective alleviation of glucotoxicity and lipotoxicity ameliorates the suppressed expression of key β-cell factors under diabetic conditions. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2015, 467, 948–954. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Okauchi, S.; Shimoda, M.; Obata, A.; Kimura, T.; Hirukawa, H.; Kohara, K.; Mune, T.; Kaku, K.; Kaneto, H. Protective effects of SGLT2 inhibitor luseogliflozin on pancreatic β-cells in obese type 2 diabetic db/db mice. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2016, 470, 772–782. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Kimura, T.; Obata, A.; Shimoda, M.; Okauchi, S.; Kanda-Kimura, Y.; Nogami, Y.; Hirukawa, H.; Kohara, K.; Nakanishi, S.; Mune, T.; et al. Protective effects of SGLT2 inhibitor luseogliflozin on pancreatic β-cells in obese diabetic db/db mice: The earlier and longer, the better. Diabetes Obes. Metab. 2018, 20, 2442–2457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Cefalu, W.T. Paradoxical insights into whole body metabolic adaptations following SGLT2 inhibition. J. Clin. Investig. 2014, 124, 485–487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  59. Ferrannini, E.; Muscelli, E.; Frascerra, S.; Baldi, S.; Mari, A.; Heise, T.; Broedl, U.C.; Woerle, H.J. Metabolic response to sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibition in type 2 diabetic patients. J. Clin. Investig. 2014, 124, 499–508. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  60. Merovci, A.; Solis-Herrera, C.; Daniele, G.; Eldor, R.; Fiorentino, T.V.; Tripathy, D.; Xiong, J.; Perez, Z.; Norton, L.; Abdul-Ghani, M.A.; et al. Dapagliflozin improves muscle insulin sensitivity but enhances endogenous glucose production. J. Clin. Investig. 2014, 124, 509–514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Obata, A.; Kubota, N.; Kubota, T.; Iwamoto, M.; Sato, H.; Sakurai, Y.; Takamoto, I.; Katsuyama, H.; Suzuki, Y.; Fukazawa, M.; et al. Tofogliflozin improves insulin resistance in skeletal muscle and accelerates lipolysis in adipose tissue in male mice. Endocrinology 2016, 157, 1029–1042. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Zhou, G.; Myers, R.; Li, Y.; Chen, Y.; Shen, X.; Fenyk-Melody, J.; Wu, M.; Ventre, J.; Doebber, T.; Fujii, N.; et al. Role of AMP-activated protein kinase in mechanism of metformin action. J. Clin. Investig. 2001, 108, 1167–1174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Rena, G.; Hardie, D.G.; Pearson, E.R. The mechanisms of action of metformin. Diabetologia 2017, 60, 1577–1585. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  64. Madiraju, A.K.; Erion, D.M.; Rahimi, Y.; Zhang, X.-M.; Braddock, D.; Albright, R.A.; Prigaro, B.J.; Wood, J.L.; Bhanot, S.; MacDonald, M.J.; et al. Metformin suppresses gluconeogenesis by inhibiting mitochondrial glycerophosphate dehydrogenase. Nature 2014, 510, 542–546. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  65. Minamii, T.; Nogami, M.; Ogawa, W. Mechanisms of metformin action: In and out of the gut. J. Diabetes Investig. 2018, 9, 701–703. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Miller, R.A.; Chu, Q.; Xie, J.; Foretz, M.; Viollet, B.; Birnbaum, M.J. Biguanides suppress hepatic glucagon signalling by decreasing production of cyclic AMP. Nature 2013, 494, 256–260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  67. Ebato, C.; Uchida, T.; Arakawa, M.; Komatsu, M.; Ueno, T.; Komiya, K.; Azuma, K.; Hirose, T.; Tanaka, K.; Kominami, E.; et al. Autophagy is important in islet homeostasis and compensatory increase of beta cell mass in response to high-fat diet. Cell Metab. 2008, 8, 325–332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  68. Fujitani, Y.; Ebato, C.; Uchida, T.; Kawamori, R.; Watada, H. β-cell autophagy: A novel mechanism regulating beta-cell function and mass: Lessons from b-cell-specific Atg7-deficient mice. Islets 2009, 1, 151–153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  69. Masini, M.; Lupi, R.; Bugliani, M.; Boggi, U.; Filipponi, F.; Masiello, P.; Marchetti, P. A role for autophagy in β-cell life and death. Islets 2009, 1, 157–159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  70. Bartolome, A.; Kimuta-Koyanagi, M.; Asahara, S.-I.; Guillen, C.; Inoue, H.; Teruyama, K.; Shimizu, S.; Kanno, A.; Garcia-Aguilar, A.; Koike, M.; et al. Pancreatic β-cell failure mediated by mTORC1 hyperactivity and autophagic impairment. Diabetes 2014, 63, 2996–3008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  71. Watada, H.; Fujitani, Y. Minireview: Autophagy in pancreatic β-cells and its implication in diabetes. Mol. Endocrinol. 2015, 29, 338–348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  72. Masini, M.; Bugliani, M.; Lupi, R.; del Guerra, S.; Boggi, U.; Filipponi, F.; Marselli, L.; Masiello, P.; Marchetti, P. Autophagy in human type 2 diabetes pancreatic beta cells. Diabetologia 2009, 52, 1083–1086. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  73. Wu, H.; Esteve, E.; Tremaroli, V.; Khan, M.T.; Caesar, R.; Manneras-Holm, L.; Stahlman, M.; Olsson, L.M.; Serino, M.; Planas-Felix, M.; et al. Metformin alters the gut microbiome of individuals with treatment-naive type 2 diabetes, contributing to the therapeutic effects of the drug. Nat. Med. 2017, 23, 850–858. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Morita, Y.; Nogami, M.; Sakaguchi, K.; Okada, Y.; Hirota, Y.; Sugawara, K.; Tamori, Y.; Zeng, F.; Murakami, T.; Ogawa, W. Enhanced Release of Glucose into the Intraluminal Space of the Intestine Associated With Metformin Treatment as Revealed by [18F] Fluorodeoxyglucose PET-MRI. Diabetes Care 2020, 43, 1796–1802. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Ito, J.; Nogami, M.; Morita, Y.; Sakaguchi, K.; Komada, H.; Hirota, Y.; Sugawara, K.; Tamori, Y.; Zeng, F.; Murakami, T.; et al. Dose-dependent accumulation of glucose in the intestinal wall and lumen induced by metformin as revealed by [18F]-labelled fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography-MRI. Diabetes Obes. Metab. 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Mullican, S.E.; Lin-Schmidt, X.; Chin, C.N.; Chavez, J.A.; Furman, J.L.; Armstrong, A.A.; Beck, S.C.; South, V.J.; Dinh, T.Q.; Cash-Mason, T.D.; et al. GFRAL is the receptor for GDF15 and the ligand promotes weight loss in mice and nonhuman primates. Nat. Med. 2017, 23, 1150–1157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Yang, L.; Chang, C.C.; Sun, Z.; Madsen, D.; Zhu, H.; Padkjær, S.B.; Wu, X.; Huang, T.; Hultman, K.; Paulsen, S.J.; et al. GFRAL is the receptor for GDF15 and is required for the anti-obesity effects of the ligand. Nat. Med. 2017, 23, 1158–1166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Emmerson, P.J.; Wang, F.; Du, Y.; Liu, Q.; Pickard, R.T.; Gonciarz, M.D.; Coskun, T.; Hamang, M.J.; Sindelar, D.K.; Ballman, K.K.; et al. The metabolic effects of GDF15 are mediated by the orphan receptor GFRAL. Nat. Med. 2017, 23, 1215–1219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Hsu, J.Y.; Crawley, S.; Chen, M.; Ayupova, D.A.; Lindhout, D.A.; Higbee, J.; Kutach, A.; Joo, W.; Gao, Z.; Fu, D.; et al. Non-homeostatic body weight regulation through a brainstem-restricted receptor for GDF15. Nature 2017, 550, 255–259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Gerstein, H.C.; Pare, G.; Hess, S.; Ford, R.J.; Sjaarda, J.; Raman, K.; McQueen, M.; Lee, S.; Haenel, H.; Steinberg, G.R.; et al. Growth differentiation factor 15 as a novel biomarker for metformin. Diabetes Care 2017, 40, 280–283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  81. Cimino, I.; Coll, A.P.; Yeo, G.S.H. GDF15 and energy balance: Homing in on a mechanism. Nat. Med. 2017, 23, 1119–1120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Tsai, V.W.W.; Husaini, Y.; Sainsbury, A.; Brown, D.A.; Breit, S.N. The MIC-1/GDF15-GFRAL pathway in energy homeostasis: Implications for obesity, cachexia, and other associated diseases. Cell Metab. 2018, 28, 353–368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  83. Apolzan, J.W.; Venditti, E.M.; Edelstein, S.L.; Knowler, W.C.; Dabelea, D.; Boyko, E.J.; Pi-Sunyer, X.; Kalyani, R.R.; Franks, P.W.; Srikanthan, P.; et al. Long-term weight loss with metformin or lifestyle intervention in the diabetes prevention program outcomes study. Ann. Intern. Med. 2019, 170, 682–690. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Patel, S.; Alvarez-Guaita, A.; Melvin, A.; Rimmington, D.; Dattilo, A.; Miedzybrodzka, E.L.; Cimino, I.; Maurin, A.C.; Roberts, G.P.; Meek, C.L.; et al. GDF15 provides an endocrine signal of nutritional stress in mice and humans. Cell Metab. 2019, 29, 707–718. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  85. Coll, A.P.; Chen, M.; Taskar, P.; Rimmington, D.; Patel, S.; Tadross, J.A.; Cimino, I.; Yang, M.; Welsh, P.; Virtue, S.; et al. GDF15 mediates the effects of metformin on body weight and energy balance. Nature 2020, 578, 444–448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Calle, E.E.; Kaaks, R. Overweight, obesity and cancer: Epidemiological evidence and proposed mechanisms. Nat. Rev. Cancer. 2004, 4, 579–591. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Mayor, S. High glucose and diabetes increase cancer risk. Lancet Oncol. 2005, 6, 71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Noto, H.; Goto, S.; Tsujimoto, T.; Noda, M. Cancer risk in diabetic patients treated with metformin: A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e33411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  89. Noto, H.; Goto, A.; Tsujimoto, T.; Osame, K.; Noda, M. Latest insights into the risk of cancer in diabetes. J. Diabetes. Investig. 2013, 4, 225–232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  90. Walker, J.J.; Johnson, J.A.; Wild, S.H. Diabetes treatments and cancer risk: The importance of considering aspects of drug exposure. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2013, 1, 132–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Shi, Y.; Hu, F.B. The global implications of diabetes and cancer. Lancet 2014, 383, 1947–1948. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Rahman, A. Type 2 diabetes and risk of pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Lancet Oncol. 2014, 15, e420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Gregg, E.W.; Cheng, Y.J.; Srinivasan, M.; Lin, J.; Geiss, L.S.; Albright, A.L.; Imperatore, G. Trends in cause-specific mortality among adults with and without diagnosed diabetes in the USA: An epidemiological analysis of linked national survey and vital statistics data. Lancet 2018, 391, 2430–2440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Dowling, R.J.; Zakikhani, M.; Fantus, I.G.; Pollak, M.; Sonenberg, N. Metformin inhibits mammalian target of rapamycin-dependent translation initiation in breast cancer cells. Cancer Res. 2007, 67, 10804–10812. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  95. Kourelis, T.V.; Siegel, R.D. Metformin and cancer: New application for an old drug. Med. Oncol. 2012, 29, 1314–1327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Chan, A.T. Metformin for cancer prevention: A reason for optimism. Lancet Oncol. 2016, 17, 407–409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Demb, J.; Yaseyyedi, A.; Liu, L.; Bustamante, R.; Earles, A.; Ghosh, P.; Gutkind, J.S.; Gawron, A.J.; Kaltenbach, T.R.; Martinez, M.E.; et al. Metformin is associated with reduced odds for colorectal cancer among persons with dDiabetes. Clin. Trans. Gastroenterol. 2019, 10, e00092. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  98. Shi, Y.Q.; Zhou, X.C.; Du, P.; Yin, M.Y.; Xu, L.; Chen, W.J.; Xu, C.F. Relationships are between metformin use and survival in pancreatic cancer patients concurrent with diabetes: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Medicine 2020, 99, e21687. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Kim, Y.S.; Choi, E.A.; Lee, J.W.; Kim, Y.; You, H.S.; Han, Y.E.; Kim, H.S.; Bae, Y.J.; Kang, H.T.; Kim, J. Metformin use reduced the overall risk of cancer in diabetic patients: A study based on the Korean NHIS-HEALS cohort. Nutr. Metab. Cardiovasc. Dis. 2020, 30, 1714–1722. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Lee, J.-W.; Choi, E.-A.; Kim, Y.-S.; Kim, Y.; You, H.-S.; Han, Y.-E.; Kim, H.-P.; Bae, Y.-J.; Kim, J.; Kang, H.-T. Metformin usage and the risk of colorectal cancer: A national cohort study. Int. J. Colorectal Dis. 2021, 36, 303–310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Zhu, N.; Zhang, D.; Wang, W.; Li, X.; Yang, B.; Song, J.; Zhao, X.; Huang, B.; Shi, W.; Lu, R.; et al. A novel coronavirus from patients with pneumonia in China, 2019. N. Engl. J. Med. 2020, 382, 727–733. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Guan, W.J.; Ni, Z.Y.; Hu, Y.; Liang, W.H.; Ou, C.Q.; He, J.X.; Liu, L.; Shan, H.; Lei, C.L.; Hui, D.S.C.; et al. Clinical characteristics of coronavirus disease 2019 in China. N. Engl. J. Med. 2020, 382, 1708–1720. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Huang, I.; Lim, M.A.; Pranata, R. Diabetes mellitus is associated with increased mortality and severity of disease in COVID-19 pneumoniae: A systematic review, meta-analysis, and meta-regression. Diabetes Metab. Syndr. Clin. Res. Rev. 2020, 14, 395–403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  104. Lukito, A.A.; Pranata, R.; Henrina, J.; Lim, M.A.; Lawrensia, S.; Suastika, K. The Effect of Metformin Consumption on Mortality in Hospitalized COVID-19 patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Diabetes Metab. Syndr. 2020, 14, 2177–2183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Penlioglou, T.; Papachristou, S.; Papanas, N. COVID-19 and Diabetes Mellitus: May Old Anti-diabetic Agents Become the New Philosopher’s Stone? Diabetes Ther. 2020, 11, 1–3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  106. Cariou, B.; Hadjadj, S.; Wargny, M.; Pichelin, M.; Al-Salameh, A.; Allix, I.; Amadou, C.; Arnault, G.; Baudoux, F.; Bauduceau, B.; et al. Phenotypic characteristics and prognosis of inpatients with COVID-19 and diabetes: The CORONADO study. Diabetologia 2020, 63, 1500–1515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Chen, Y.; Yang, D.; Cheng, B.; Chen, J.; Peng, A.; Yang, C.; Liu, C.; Xiong, M.; Deng, A.; Zhang, Y.; et al. Clinical characteristics and outcomes of patients with diabetes and COVID-19 in association with glucose-lowering medication. Diabetes Care 2020, 43, 1399–1407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Cheng, X.; Liu, Y.M.; Li, H.; Zhang, X.; Lei, F.; Qin, J.J.; Chen, Z.; Deng, K.Q.; Lin, L.; Chen, M.M.; et al. Metformin is associated with higher incidence of acidosis, but not mortality, in individuals with COVID-19 and pre-existing type 2 diabetes. Cell Metab. 2020, 32, 537–547. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Ijms 22 02596 g001 550
Figure 1. Metformin activates AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK) in the liver which leads to suppression of fatty acid synthesis and gluconeogenesis. Metformin also activates AMPK in skeletal muscle which increases translocation of glucose transporter 4 to the cell membrane and thereby increases glucose uptake. SREBP-1c, sterol regulatory element binding protein-1c; PEPCK, phosphoenolpyruvate carboxykinase; GAPase, glucose 6-phosphatase; GLUT 4, glucose transporter 4.
Figure 1. Metformin activates AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK) in the liver which leads to suppression of fatty acid synthesis and gluconeogenesis. Metformin also activates AMPK in skeletal muscle which increases translocation of glucose transporter 4 to the cell membrane and thereby increases glucose uptake. SREBP-1c, sterol regulatory element binding protein-1c; PEPCK, phosphoenolpyruvate carboxykinase; GAPase, glucose 6-phosphatase; GLUT 4, glucose transporter 4.
Ijms 22 02596 g001
Ijms 22 02596 g002 550
Figure 2. Metformin suppresses glucagon signaling in the liver by suppressing adenylate cyclase which leads to suppression of gluconeogenesis. PKA, protein kinase A.
Figure 2. Metformin suppresses glucagon signaling in the liver by suppressing adenylate cyclase which leads to suppression of gluconeogenesis. PKA, protein kinase A.
Ijms 22 02596 g002
Ijms 22 02596 g003 550
Figure 3. Metformin suppresses the mechanistic target of rapamycin (mTOR) by activating AMPK in pre-neoplastic cells which leads to suppression of cell growth and an increase in apoptosis in pre-neoplastic cells. IGF-1, insulin-like growth factor; PI-3K, phosphatidylinositol-3 kinase; Akt, protein kinase B.
Figure 3. Metformin suppresses the mechanistic target of rapamycin (mTOR) by activating AMPK in pre-neoplastic cells which leads to suppression of cell growth and an increase in apoptosis in pre-neoplastic cells. IGF-1, insulin-like growth factor; PI-3K, phosphatidylinositol-3 kinase; Akt, protein kinase B.
Ijms 22 02596 g003
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Kaneto, H.; Kimura, T.; Obata, A.; Shimoda, M.; Kaku, K. Multifaceted Mechanisms of Action of Metformin Which Have Been Unraveled One after Another in the Long History. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 2596. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22052596

AMA Style

Kaneto H, Kimura T, Obata A, Shimoda M, Kaku K. Multifaceted Mechanisms of Action of Metformin Which Have Been Unraveled One after Another in the Long History. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2021; 22(5):2596. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22052596

Chicago/Turabian Style

Kaneto, Hideaki, Tomohiko Kimura, Atsushi Obata, Masashi Shimoda, and Kohei Kaku. 2021. "Multifaceted Mechanisms of Action of Metformin Which Have Been Unraveled One after Another in the Long History" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 22, no. 5: 2596. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22052596

APA Style

Kaneto, H., Kimura, T., Obata, A., Shimoda, M., & Kaku, K. (2021). Multifaceted Mechanisms of Action of Metformin Which Have Been Unraveled One after Another in the Long History. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 22(5), 2596. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22052596

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop