Next Article in Journal
Sodium Benzoate, a Metabolite of Cinnamon and a Food Additive, Improves Cognitive Functions in Mice after Controlled Cortical Impact Injury
Next Article in Special Issue
Graphene for Antimicrobial and Coating Application
Previous Article in Journal
Flavonoids Seen through the Energy Perspective
Previous Article in Special Issue
Role of Defect Engineering and Surface Functionalization in the Design of Carbon Nanotube-Based Nitrogen Oxide Sensors
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
IJMS
Volume 23
Issue 1
10.3390/ijms23010190
ijms-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

“Turn on” Fluorescence Sensor of Glutathione Based on Inner Filter Effect of Co-Doped Carbon Dot/Gold Nanoparticle Composites

by
Thi-Hoa Le
,
Ji-Hyeon Kim
and
Sang-Joon Park
*
Department of Chemical and Biological Engineering, Gachon University, Seongnam 13120, Korea
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23(1), 190; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23010190
Submission received: 18 November 2021 / Revised: 18 December 2021 / Accepted: 21 December 2021 / Published: 24 December 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Carbon-Based Nanomaterials 3.0)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Glutathione (GSH) is a thiol that plays a significant role in nutrient metabolism, antioxidant defense and the regulation of cellular events. GSH deficiency is related to variety of diseases, so it is useful to develop novel approaches for GSH evaluation and detection. In this study we used nitrogen and phosphorus co-doped carbon dot-gold nanoparticle (NPCD–AuNP) composites to fabricate a simple and selective fluorescence sensor for GSH detection. We employed the reductant potential of the nitrogen and phosphorus co-doped carbon dots (NPCDs) themselves to form AuNPs, and subsequently NPCD–AuNP composites from Au3+. The composites were characterized by using a range of spectroscopic and electron microscopic techniques, including electrophoretic light scattering and X-ray diffraction. The overlap of the fluorescence emission spectrum of NPCDs and the absorption spectrum of AuNPs resulted in an effective inner filter effect (IFE) in the composite material, leading to a quenching of the fluorescence intensity. In the presence of GSH, the fluorescence intensity of the composite was recovered, which increased proportionally to increasing the GSH concentration. In addition, our GSH sensing method showed good selectivity and sensing potential in human serum with a limit of detection of 0.1 µM and acceptable results.

1. Introduction

Glutathione (GSH) is a tripeptide compound produced by the liver that is composed of three different amino acids: cysteine, glutamic acid and glycine (ƴ-Glu-Cys-Gly) [1]. GSH acts as an antioxidant and is involved in many processes in the body, including tissue building and repair, cysteine transport and storage, signal transduction modulation, cell propagation control and immune system response regulation [2,3]. Abnormal levels of GSH have been reported to contribute to oxidative stress, which plays a key role in aging, and in a variety of diseases, including cancer, neurotoxicity, psoriasis, liver damage, Parkinson’s disease, and Alzheimer’s disease. Therefore, GSH is considered a universal biomarker in the diagnosis and therapeutic monitoring of cancers [4,5].
Many techniques have been used for the identification and quantification of GSH, such as HPLC [6], electrochemistry [7], fluorescence [8], electrochemiluminescence [9] and surface enhanced Raman scattering (SERS) [10].
Fluorescence-based methods are widely used for sensing different analytes based on photoinduced electron transfer (PET), photoinduced charge transfer (PCT), fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET) and the inner filter effect (IFE). PET and PCT are intramolecular processes, whereas IFE and FRET are intermolecular processes, all of which involve energy transfer between at least two independent molecules [11,12,13,14]. We developed FRET-based sensors in previous studies and designed detection methods that reply via IFE in this study. The IFE is a decrease in the fluorescence intensity of a fluorophore (donor) due to the absorption of the excitation/emission light by an absorber (acceptor). This occurs when the absorption spectrum of the absorber overlaps with the fluorescence excitation or emission spectrum of the fluorophore [14]. The IFE is classified as primary when the excitation beam is attenuated by the volume of the sample, and secondary when the emission of the fluorophore is absorbed by a molecule present in the solution [15]. Unlike FRET-based sensors, IFE-based sensors do not provide site-specific information and cannot be used to determine donor–acceptor interactions. However, the IFE has been shown to be useful for converting analytical absorption signals into fluorescence signals, which has been proven to enhance sensitivity and selectivity [16,17]. Moreover, IFE-based sensors do not require any surface modification, or covalent linking between a donor and acceptor, which makes probe fabrication simpler and flexible [18].
Recently, the combination of carbon dots (CDs) and gold nanoparticles (AuNPs) has been shown to be an effective IFE pair because of the outstanding properties of both materials. CDs are a promising class of fluorescent carbon materials that have attracted considerable interest because of their distinctive properties, such as excellent solubility, low toxicity, good biocompatibility, high photostability, tunable surface functionalities and cell membrane permeability [19,20]. AuNPs have been widely used in fundamental studies for a variety of applications. It is worth noting that the AuNP solutions have different colors depending on their size distributions and morphologies, which is advantageous for the recognition of different target molecules [21,22,23]. In addition, AuNPs are ideal fluorescent absorbers because of their high extinction coefficients, and extensive absorption spectrum that can easily overlap with the excitation/emission spectra of CDs to produce an IFE process [24,25].
Many previous studies have used CD/AuNP pair-based IFE mechanisms for sensing analytes, such as hyaluronidase [26], aldicarb [27], metformin hydrochloride [28], cyanide ion [29] and biothiols. For the analytes, AuNPs were obtained via the reduction of chloroauric acid using tri-sodium citrate as a reductant and surfactant. This results in several negatively charged citrate ions on the surfaces of AuNPs, which may affect the IFE process. Most fluorescence-based sensors have focused on the fluorescence properties of CDs. However, it is beneficial to take full advantage of CDs, including their reducing and stabilizing potential. CDs synthesized using the hydrothermal method contain a large number of carboxyl and hydroxyl groups [30]. Negatively charged carboxyl groups on the CDs can stabilize metal particles in solution [31]. In addition, the hydroxyl groups allow CDs to act as green reducing agents in the synthesis of metal nanoparticles [32]. Hence, the CDs have two important roles: (1) a fluorescence source, and (2) a reducing agent and stabilizer for AuNPs in the fabrication of CD/AuNP pair-based IFE sensors.
Another novelty of this research is the use of nitrogen and phosphorus co-doped carbon dots (NPCDs) in an IFE-based sensor for GSH detection. NPCDs possess enhanced fluorescence properties and more negatively charged functional groups and amine groups on the surface compared to pristine CDs [19]. The amine and thiol groups show strong binding affinity to the surfaces of AuNPs [33,34], which can increase the effectiveness of the IFE process between NPCDs and AuNPs. NPCDs can successfully reduce HAuCl4 salt to AuNPs without adding any other reductant and surfactant. Once AuNPs are formed, NPCDs act as fluorescence donors that trigger the IFE process with AuNP acceptors, which leads to the quenching of the fluorescence of NPCDs. The fluorescence of NPCDs is “turned on” after GSH is added. The introduction of GSH to the AuNP system can induce aggregation of AuNPs [24]. In addition, because of its specific multidentate and steric structure, GSH molecules are able to preferentially enclose AuNPs and isolate them from NPCDs. Hence, the interaction between NPCDs and AuNPs can be disrupted by GSH, leading to a decrease in the IFE and a restoration in the fluorescence of NPCDs. The mechanism of “turn on” fluorescence for detecting GSH is illustrated in Scheme 1. Compared to “turn off” fluorescence sensors, the “turn on” fluorescence sensors are preferable because the likelihood of false positives is reduced.

2. Chemicals and Experiments

2.1. Chemicals

All chemicals including (NH4)2HPO4, citric acid monohydrate, HAuCl4·3H2O, glutathione, cysteine, homocysteine, alanine, glycine, lysine, tryptophan, methionine, glutamic acid, human serum and deionized (DI) water were obtained from Sigma-Aldrich.

2.2. Instruments

Photoluminescence (PL) and UV–Vis spectra were obtained using a QuantaMaster TM 50 PTI spectrofluorometer (Photon Technology International, San Diego, CA, USA) and a G1103A UV–Vis spectrophotometer (Agilent, Santa Clara, CA, USA). Size distribution measurements were performed using electrophoretic light scattering (ELS; Photal Otsuka Electronics, ELS 8000, Osaka, Japan). The structural and morphological characterization of the samples was carried out by scanning electron microscopy (SEM; S-4700, Hitachi Ltd., Tokyo, Japan) and transmission electron microscopy (TEM; Tecnai, F30S-Twin, Hillsboro, OR, USA). X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) and powder X-ray diffraction (XRD) were performed using an X-ray photoelectron spectrometer (PHI 5000, Chigasaki, Kanagawa Prefecture, Japan) and X-ray source (Rigaku/Smartlab, Tokyo, Japan), respectively.

2.3. Preparation of NPCDs

NPCDs were fabricated according to the method presented in our previous work [19]. In particular, (NH4)2HPO4 (5 g) and citric acid (2 g) monohydrate (molar ratio of 4:1) were mixed with DI water (30 mL). Subsequently, the mixture was transferred into a 50 mL Teflon-lined stainless-steel autoclave and heated at 180 °C for 4 h. After cooling, the solution was purified by filtering through a 0.22-µm polyethersulfone membrane into a dialysis bag (MWCO: 1000 Da) to dialyze for 48 h. The obtained light-violet colored solution was lyophilized to collect a powdery substance.

2.4. Synthesis of NPCD–AuNP Composites

The NPCD solution (1.2 mL, 0.075 g/mL) was added to DI water (10 mL). The solution was heated to boiling before 1% HAuCl4 (100 µL) was dropped into the solution. The color of the solution quickly changed to purple and then burgundy after 10 min, indicating the successful formation of AuNPs.

2.5. Fluorescence Sensing of GSH

GSH sensing was carried out at room temperature. First, NPCD–AuNP solution (300 µL) was added to DI water (2700 µL) to obtain a solution concentration of 9.05 × 10−4 g/mL. Subsequently, different volumes of GSH solution were added via dropping into the NPCD–AuNP solution to obtain various concentrations from 0.1 to 300 µM. The solutions were further diluted to the mark using DI water and kept in equilibrium for 60 min before fluorescence measurements were made with an excitation wavelength of 340 nm. Each concentration was measured three times to determine the standard deviation.

2.6. Detection of GSH in Human Serum

Human serum (30 µL) was added to DI water (2670 µL) followed by NPCD–AuNP solution (300 µL). A quantity of GSH was dropped into the solution, followed by dilution to the mark with DI water before fluorescence analysis without pretreatment. The sensing of GSH in human serum samples was performed using the method described above.

2.7. Selectivity

To study the GSH specificity of the NPCD–AuNP-based fluorescence sensing approach, the fluorescence responses of other biothiols, including HCys, Cys and some amino acids, were investigated.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Characterization of NPCDs-AuNPs Composites

UV–Vis absorption and fluorescence spectroscopy were used to characterize the optical properties of the NPCDs and NPCD–AuNP composites. The UV–Vis spectrum of the aqueous NPCD solution (Figure 1) shows a peak appears at 234 nm and another at 334 nm, which originate from the surface states [20,35,36]. There is a peak located at 521 nm in the spectrum of AuNP solution synthesized using sodium citrate as a reductant. The maximum absorption peak of AuNPs can redshift with an increase in size of AuNPs [37]. The spectrum of an aqueous solution of NPCD–AuNP composites shows the same peak of NPCDs at 334 nm and a specific peak at 548 nm, which confirms the successful reduction of NPCDs to form AuNPs.
The NPCD and NPCD–AuNP composites’ fluorescence emission peaks appeared at 447 and 442 nm under excitation wavelengths of 355 and 340 nm, respectively (Figure 2). Therefore, there was a blue shift in the emission and excitation peaks for the NPCD–AuNP composites. In comparison to the fluorescence intensity of the NPCDs, that of the NPCD–AuNP composites was considerably quenched. As shown in Figure 1, the absorption spectrum of the NPCD–AuNP composites presents a broad peak between 440 and 650 nm with a peak maximum at 548 nm because of the presence of AuNP components, and the emission peak is located at 442 nm due to the NPCD components. Hence, an overlap between the absorption and emission peaks in the composite material easily produced an IFE process, leading to the quenching of fluorescence intensity.
The morphology and size of the NPCD–AuNP composites were analyzed by SEM, TEM and DLS. Under the influence of NPCDs, the synthesized AuNPs were relatively monodispersed and spherical. They had a narrow size distribution range of 19.2 to 51.5 nm and an average size of 32.5 nm (Figure 3). A high-resolution (HR) TEM image (inset of Figure 3D) shows a crystal of the AuNPs, which was further characterized by powder XRD.
The powder XRD pattern of the NPCD–AuNP composites is shown in Figure 4. The composites exhibited six planes of (111), (200), (220), (311), (222) and (400), which were assigned to sharp peaks at 38.2°, 44.4°, 64.5°, 77.5°, 81.7° and 98.1° and lattice fringe distances of 2.36, 2.04, 1.44, 1.23, 1.18 and 1.02 Å, respectively. Hence, the pattern closely matches with the XRD pattern of pure crystalline Au° with face-centered cubic crystal structures (PDF 04-0784).
The XPS profile (Figure 5A) presents typical peaks at 83.97, 133.71, 284.92, 336.14, 354.3, 400.5 and 532.33 eV, corresponding to Au4f, P2p, C1s, Au4d (Au4d5/2 and Au4d3/2), N1s and O1s, respectively. The atomic percentages of Au, C, O, N and P were found to be 5.35%, 39.18%, 45.61%, 6.98% and 2.87%, respectively. The high-resolution XPS profile of the Au4f peak is shown in Figure 5B. Two peaks of Au4f5/2 and Au4f7/2 located at 84.4 and 87.7 eV, respectively, correspond to the metallic state of Au0. Figure 5C shows that the C1s peak can be parsed to four peaks at 284.2, 285, 286 and 288.4 eV, which are assigned as C-C/C=C, C-N/C-P, C-O and C=O bonds, respectively. These peaks originate from the sp2 graphitic structure [38] and several carboxyl, hydroxyl, amine and phosphate groups on the surfaces of the NPCDs. These assignments can be further confirmed from the P2p and N1s spectra, which are similar to those measured in the our previous study [19].

3.2. Detection of GSH

3.2.1. Mechanism of Sensing

As previously discussed, the overlap of the absorption spectrum of the AuNP components and the emission spectrum of the NPCD components led to a significant quenching in the fluorescence intensity of the NPCD–AuNP composites compared to that of pure NPCDs. This overlap is illustrated in Figure 6A. However, the intensity of the NPCD–AuNP composites recovered in the presence of GSH. This phenomenon did not occur with NPCDs. In other words, GSH cannot affect the fluorescence of NPCDs but can turn on that of the NPCD–AuNP composites (Figure 7). This is explained by the fact that GSH can bind to AuNP surfaces via Au–S bonding and subsequently induce the aggregation of AuNPs [34,39]. This can be clearly seen in the SEM images of the NPCD–AuNP composites in the presence and absence of GSH (Figure 3A,B). Moreover, the color of the composite solution changed from red to purple blue, and the absorbance peak of the composites redshifted (Figure 6B), further indicating the aggregation of AuNPs in the composites after the addition of GSH. Aggregation may limit the ability of AuNPs to act as acceptors in the IFE process. Furthermore, GSH shows a strong affinity to bind AuNPs through its multidentate ligands, and has a steric structure that can keep the bound AuNPs separate from the NPCDs, which results in fluorescence recovery of NPCDs.
After adding GSH to a fixed concentration of NPCD–AuNP composites, the fluorescence intensity was recorded every 10 min to investigate the kinetics of the IFE process. As shown in Figure 8, the intensity of the composites increased steadily in the presence of GSH from 0 to 60 min. Thereafter, the intensity remained relatively stable. Therefore, 60 min was chosen as the optimal time for the next step.

3.2.2. GSH Sensing

Figure 9 clearly shows the fluorescence recovery of the NPCD–AuNP composites in the presence of GSH. The fluorescence intensity of the composites increased steadily when the GSH concentration was increased from 0 to 300 µM. When the GSH level was within the range of 10–120 µM, there was a linear relationship between the NPCD–AuNP composite intensity and the GSH concentration, I/I0 = 1.22872 + 0.00303CM, with a correlation coefficient (R2) value of 0.99716. The measurement was performed three times, and the data were plotted with standard deviations. In addition, the limit of detection (LOD) value was determined to be approximately 0.1 µM. A comparison of the detection results using our approach with those of other approaches is presented in Table 1.

3.2.3. Sensing in Serum

To further investigate the practicality and reliability of the NPCD–AuNP composite-based sensor, we tested this material for GSH detection in human serum. The results are displayed in Table 2. The recovery range of GSH was 90.74–107.04%. The experiment was repeated three times, and all relative standard deviations (RSDs) were less than 5%. These results indicate that the method has potential applications for practical the detection of GSH.

3.2.4. Selectivity

High specificity is a necessary condition for a good sensor. To confirm that NPCD–AuNP composites are specific to sensing GSH, the “turn on” fluorescence responses of other biothiols—including Cys; HCys; and amino acids, such as glycine (Gly), alanine (Ala), lycine (Lys), trytophan (Trp), glutamic acid (Glu) and methionine (Met)—were studied in the absence and presence of GSH. As shown in Figure 10, all biothiols, such as GSH, Cys and Hcys, enhanced the fluorescence intensity of the composites. On the other hand, the addition of an amino acid did not increase the fluorescence intensity of the composites or affect the role of the fluorescence “turn on” of GSH. The introduction of biothiols to the fluorescent NPCD–AuNP composites can induce the aggregation of AuNPs in the order of HCys >> Cys > GSH [48]. The intensity was the strongest in the presence of GSH, followed by HCys and Cys. This is explained by the high denticity of GSH, which is typically two or more parts of the molecule (–SH and –COO−). This chelation makes the GSH–metal atom interactions stronger than interactions of metal atoms with the other two biothiols or amino acids that possess either a single –SH, weak amine or –COO− binding group [49]. In addition, the large steric hindrance effect created by GSH is greater than that of Cys or HCys, so it is much more able to coordinate stably to the metal atoms or ions [50]. In addition, many studies indicate that GSH is superior to Cys and HCys in the role of a capping ligand for semiconductor nanocrystals [51]. For these reasons, the interaction between GSH and AuNPs is much stronger than the interactions of the other molecules studied. This results in significant enhancement in the fluorescence intensity of the composites only when GSH is added, which ensures that the sensor based on NPCD–AuNP composite material is highly selective for GSH sensing.

4. Conclusions

In summary, we successfully synthesized NPCD–AuNP composites, which are ideal IFE pairs for GSH sensing applications. We effectively utilized the enhanced fluorescence properties of NPCDs and their reducing nature to synthesize AuNPs and the subsequent composites from an Au3+ salt. The fluorescence of the NPCD–AuNP composites recovered steadily with increasing concentrations of GSH. A linear relationship of fluorescence against GSH concentration from 10 to 120 µM was determined, with an R2 value of 0.99716 and LOD value of 0.1 µM. In comparison to the results of some previous studies, our sensing results were not as sensitive. However, our NPCD–AuNP composite-based GSH sensor does not require a complicated design or expensive instruments. Its simplicity, sensitivity, selectivity and effectivity make it a potentially viable sensor for GSH detection. Thus, we have introduced a new strategy for development of simple sensors for biomedical applications.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, S.-J.P.; Data curation, J.-H.K.; Investigation, T.-H.L.; Methodology, J.-H.K.; Writing—original draft, T.-H.L.; Writing—review & editing, S.-J.P. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was supported by the Basic Science Capacity Enhancement Project through Korea Basic Science Institute (National Research Facilities and Equipment Center) grant funded by the Ministry of Education (grant number 2019R1A6C1010016).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Saydam, N.; Kirb, A.; Demir, O.; Hazan, E.; Oto, O.; Saydam, O.; Guner, G. Determination of glutathione, glutathione reductase, glutathione peroxidase and glutathione S-transferase levels in human lung cancer tissues. Cancer Lett. 1997, 119, 13–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Tsiasioti, A.; Tzanavaras, P.D. Determination of glutathione and glutathione disulfide using zone fluidics and fluorimetric detection. Talanta 2021, 222, 121559. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Sen, C.K. Nutritional biochemistry of cellular glutathione. J. Nutr. Biochem. 1997, 8, 660–672. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Torres, S.; Matías, N.; Baulies, A.; Nuñez, S.; Alarcon-Vila, C.; Martinez, L.; Nuño, N.; Fernandez, A.; Caballeria, J.; Levade, T.; et al. Mitochondrial GSH replenishment as a potential therapeutic approach for niemann pick type C disease. Redox Biol. 2017, 11, 60–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Kong, F.; Liang, Z.; Luan, D.; Liu, X.; Xu, K.; Tang, B. A glutathione (GSH)-responsive near-infrared (NIR) theranostic prodrug for cancer therapy and imaging. Anal. Chem. 2016, 88, 6450–6456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Giustarini, D.; Dalle-Donne, I.; Colombo, R.; Milzani, A.; Rossi, R. An improved HPLC measurement for GSH and GSSG in human blood. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 2003, 35, 1365–1372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Noh, H.-B.; Chandra, P.; Moon, J.O.; Shim, Y.-B. In vivo detection of glutathione disulfide and oxidative stress monitoring using a biosensor. Biomaterials 2012, 33, 2600–2607. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Yang, C.; Deng, W.; Liu, H.; Ge, S.; Yan, M. Turn-on fluorescence sensor for glutathione in aqueous solutions using carbon dots–MnO2 nanocomposites. Sens. Actuators B 2015, 216, 286–292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Niu, W.-J.; Zhu, R.-H.; Cosnier, S.; Zhang, X.-J.; Shan, D. Ferrocyanide-ferricyanide redox couple induced electrochemiluminescence amplification of carbon dots for ultrasensitive sensing of glutathione. Anal. Chem. 2015, 87, 11150–11156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Saha, A.; Jana, N.R. Detection of cellular glutathione and oxidized glutathione using magnetic—Plasmonic nanocomposite-based “turn-off” surface enhanced raman scattering. Anal. Chem. 2013, 85, 9221–9228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Suzuki, Y.; Yokoyama, K. Development of functional fluorescent molecular probes for the detection of biological substances. Biosensors 2015, 5, 337–363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Sauer, M. Single-molecule-sensitive fluorescent sensors based on photoinduced intramolecular charge transfer. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2003, 42, 1790–1793. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Ma, Y.Q.; Pandzic, E.; Nicovich, P.R.; Yamamoto, Y.; Kwiatek, J.; Pageon, S.V.; Benda, A.; Rossy, J.; Gaus, K. An intermolecular FRET sensor detects the dynamics of T cell receptor clustering. Nat. Commun. 2017, 8, 15100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Al-Hashimi, B.; Omer, K.M.; Rahman, H.S. Inner filter effect (IFE) as a simple and selective sensing platform for detection of tetracycline using milk-based nitrogen-doped carbon nanodots as fluorescence probe. Arab. J. Chem. 2020, 13, 5151–5159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Panigrahi, S.K.; Mishra, A.K. Inner filter effect in fluorescence spectroscopy: As a problem and as a solution. J. Photochem. Photobiol. C Photochem. Rev. 2019, 41, 100318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Chang, H.C.; Ho, J.A.A. Gold nanocluster-assisted fluorescent detection for hydrogen peroxide and cholesterol based on the inner filter effect of gold nanoparticles. Anal. Chem. 2015, 87, 10362–10367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Yan, X.; Li, H.X.; Han, X.S.; Su, X.G. A ratiometric fluorescent quantum dots based biosensor for organophosphorus pesticides detection by inner-filter effect. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2015, 74, 277–283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. He, H.R.; Li, H.; Mohr, G.; Kovacs, B.; Werner, T.; Wolfbeis, O.S. Novel type of ion-selective fluorosensor based on the inner filter effect—An optrode for potassium. Anal. Chem. 1993, 65, 123–127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Le, T.H.; Lee, H.J.; Kim, J.H.; Park, S.J. Detection of ferric ions and catecholamine neurotransmitters via highly fluorescent heteroatom co-doped carbon dots. Sensors 2020, 20, 3470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Ming, F.L.; Hou, J.Z.; Hou, C.J.; Yang, M.; Wang, X.F.; Li, J.W.; Huo, D.Q.; He, Q. One-step synthesized fluorescent nitrogen doped carbon dots from thymidine for Cr (VI) detection in water. Spectroc. Acta Part A-Molec. Biomolec. Spectr. 2019, 222, 117165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Vilela, D.; González, M.C.; Escarpa, A. Sensing colorimetric approaches based on gold and silver nanoparticles aggregation: Chemical creativity behind the assay. A review. Anal. Chim. Acta 2012, 751, 24–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Kailasa, S.K.; Koduru, J.R.; Desai, M.L.; Park, T.J.; Singhal, R.K.; Basu, H. Recent progress on surface chemistry of plasmonic metal nanoparticles for colorimetric assay of drugs in pharmaceutical and biological samples. TrAC Trends Anal. Chem. 2018, 105, 106–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Kateshiya, M.R.; George, G.; Rohit, J.V.; Malek, N.I.; Kumar Kailasa, S. Ractopamine as a novel reagent for the fabrication of gold nanoparticles: Colorimetric sensing of cysteine and Hg2+ ion with different spectral characteristics. Microchem. J. 2020, 158, 105212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Qin, X.; Yuan, C.; Chen, Y.; Wang, Y. A fluorescein—Gold nanoparticles probe based on inner filter effect and aggregation for sensing of biothiols. J. Photochem. Photobiol. B 2020, 210, 111986. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Chen, S.; Yu, Y.-L.; Wang, J.-H. Inner filter effect-based fluorescent sensing systems: A review. Anal. Chim. Acta 2018, 999, 13–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Lu, H.Z.; Quan, S.; Xu, S.F. Highly sensitive ratiometric fluorescent sensor for trinitrotoluene based on the inner filter effect between gold nanoparticles and fluorescent nanoparticles. J. Agric. Food. Chem. 2017, 65, 9807–9814. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Sajwan, R.K.; Lakshmi, G.; Solanki, P.R. Fluorescence tuning behavior of carbon quantum dots with gold nanoparticles via novel intercalation effect of aldicarb. Food Chem. 2021, 340, 127835. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Zhang, G.Q.; Zhang, X.Y.; Luo, Y.X.; Li, Y.S.; Zhao, Y.; Gao, X.F. A flow injection fluorescence “turn-on” sensor for the determination of metformin hydrochloride based on the inner filter effect of nitrogen-doped carbon dots/gold nanoparticles double-probe. Spectrochim. Acta A Mol. Biomol. Spectrosc. 2021, 250, 119384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Zhang, J.; Dong, L.; Yu, S.H. A selective sensor for cyanide ion (CN-) based on the inner filter effect of metal nanoparticles with photoluminescent carbon dots as the fluorophore. Sci. Bull. 2015, 60, 785–791. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Singh, I.; Arora, R.; Dhiman, H.; Pahwa, R. Carbon quantum dots: Synthesis, characterization and biomedical applications. Turkish J. Pharm. Sci. 2018, 15, 219–230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Li, M.X.; Chen, T.; Gooding, J.J.; Liu, J.Q. Review of carbon and graphene quantum dots for sensing. ACS Sens. 2019, 4, 1732–1748. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Ma, J.L.; Yin, B.C.; Wu, X.; Ye, B.C. Simple and cost-effective glucose detection based on carbon nanodots supported on silver nanoparticles. Anal. Chem. 2017, 89, 1323–1328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Kumar, N.; Seth, R.; Kumar, H. Colorimetric detection of melamine in milk by citrate-stabilized gold nanoparticles. Anal. Biochem. 2014, 456, 43–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Gao, Q.; Zheng, Y.; Song, C.; Lu, L.Q.; Tian, X.K.; Xu, A.W. Selective and sensitive colorimetric detection of copper ions based on anti-aggregation of the glutathione-induced aggregated gold nanoparticles and its application for determining sulfide anions. RSC Adv. 2013, 3, 21424–21430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Amjadi, M.; Hallaj, T.; Manzoori, J.L.; Shahbazsaghir, T. An amplified chemiluminescence system based on Si-doped carbon dots for detection of catecholamines. Spectrochim. Acta A Mol. Biomol. Spectrosc. 2018, 201, 223–228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Wang, W.J.; Peng, J.W.; Li, F.M.; Su, B.Y.; Chen, X.; Chen, X.M. Phosphorus and chlorine co-doped carbon dots with strong photoluminescence as a fluorescent probe for ferric ions. Microchim. Acta 2019, 186, 32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Borse, V.; Konwar, A.N. Synthesis and characterization of gold nanoparticles as a sensing tool for the lateral flow immunoassay development. Sens. Int. 2020, 1, 100051. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Xu, Q.; Li, B.F.; Ye, Y.C.; Cai, W.; Li, W.J.; Yang, C.Y.; Chen, Y.S.; Xu, M.; Li, N.; Zheng, X.S.; et al. Synthesis, mechanical investigation, and application of nitrogen and phosphorus co-doped carbon dots with a high photoluminescent quantum yield. Nano Res. 2018, 11, 3691–3701. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Basu, S.; Pal, T. Glutathione-induced aggregation of gold nanoparticles: Electromagnetic interactions in a closely packed assembly. J. Nanosci. Nanotechnol. 2007, 7, 1904–1910. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Vobornikova, I.; Pohanka, M. Smartphone-based colorimetric detection of glutathione. Neuro Endocrinol. Lett. 2016, 37, 139–143. [Google Scholar]
  41. Wang, Q.; Li, L.F.; Wang, X.D.; Dong, C.; Shuang, S.M. Graphene quantum dots wrapped square-plate-like MnO2 nanocomposite as a fluorescent turn-on sensor for glutathione. Talanta 2020, 219, 121180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Zheng, C.; Ding, L.; Wu, Y.N.; Tan, X.H.; Zeng, Y.Y.; Zhang, X.L.; Liu, X.L.; Liu, J.F. A near-infrared turn-on fluorescence probe for glutathione detection based on nanocomposites of semiconducting polymer dots and MnO2 nanosheets. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2020, 412, 8167–8176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Chu, S.Y.; Wang, H.Q.; Du, Y.X.; Yang, F.; Yang, L.; Jiang, C.L. Portable smartphone platform integrated with a nanoprobe-based fluorescent paper strip: Visual monitoring of glutathione in human serum for health prognosis. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2020, 8, 8175–8183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Anik, U.; Cubukcu, M.; Ertas, F.N. An effective electrochemical biosensing platform for the detection of reduced glutathione. Artif. Cells Nanomed. Biotechnol. 2016, 44, 971–977. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Rawat, B.; Mishra, K.K.; Barman, U.; Arora, L.; Pal, D.; Paily, R.P. Two-dimensional MoS2-based electrochemical biosensor for highly selective detection of glutathione. IEEE Sens. J. 2020, 20, 6937–6944. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Barman, U.; Mukhopadhyay, G.; Goswami, N.; Ghosh, S.S.; Paily, R.P. Detection of glutathione by glutathione-S-transferase-nanoconjugate ensemble electrochemical device. IEEE Trans. Nanobiosci. 2017, 16, 271–279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Tian, J.; Zhao, P.; Zhang, S.S.; Huo, G.A.; Suo, Z.C.; Yue, Z.; Zhang, S.M.; Huang, W.P.; Zhu, B.L. Platinum and iridium oxide Co-modified TiO2 nanotubes array based photoelectrochemical sensors for glutathione. Nanomaterials 2020, 10, 522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  48. Li, Y.; Wu, P.; Xu, H.; Zhang, H.; Zhong, X.H. Anti-aggregation of gold nanoparticle-based colorimetric sensor for glutathione with excellent selectivity and sensitivity. Analyst 2011, 136, 196–200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Díaz-Cruz, M.S.; Mendieta, J.; Tauler, R.; Esteban, M. Cadmium-binding properties of glutathione: A chemometrical analysis of voltammetric data. J. Inorg. Biochem. 1997, 66, 29–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Han, B.; Yuan, J.; Wang, E. Sensitive and selective sensor for biothiols in the cell based on the recovered fluorescence of the cdte quantum dots−Hg(II) system. Anal. Chem. 2009, 81, 5569–5573. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Qian, H.F.; Dong, C.Q.; Weng, J.F.; Ren, J.C. Facile one-pot synthesis of luminescent, water-soluble, and biocompatible glutathione-coated CdTe nanocrystals. Small 2006, 2, 747–751. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Ijms 23 00190 sch001 550
Scheme 1. Demonstration of the glutathione detection based on inner filter effect happening in NPCD–AuNP composite material.
Scheme 1. Demonstration of the glutathione detection based on inner filter effect happening in NPCD–AuNP composite material.
Ijms 23 00190 sch001
Ijms 23 00190 g001 550
Figure 1. UV–Vis spectra of NPCDs, NPCD–AuNP composites and AuNPs (inset: aqueous solution of NPCDs (a), NPCD–AuNP composites (b) and AuNPs (c)).
Figure 1. UV–Vis spectra of NPCDs, NPCD–AuNP composites and AuNPs (inset: aqueous solution of NPCDs (a), NPCD–AuNP composites (b) and AuNPs (c)).
Ijms 23 00190 g001
Ijms 23 00190 g002 550
Figure 2. Excitation (a, a’) and emission (b, b’) fluorescence spectra of the NPCDs (a’, b’) and NPCD–AuNP composites (a, b) (inset: enlarged fluorescence spectrum of NPCD–AuNP composites).
Figure 2. Excitation (a, a’) and emission (b, b’) fluorescence spectra of the NPCDs (a’, b’) and NPCD–AuNP composites (a, b) (inset: enlarged fluorescence spectrum of NPCD–AuNP composites).
Ijms 23 00190 g002
Ijms 23 00190 g003 550
Figure 3. SEM images of NPCD–AuNP composites in the (A) absence and (B) presence of GSH. (C) TEM image. (D) High-resolution TEM image (inset: fast Fourier transform (FFT) pattern). (E) DLS analysis of NPCD–AuNP composites.
Figure 3. SEM images of NPCD–AuNP composites in the (A) absence and (B) presence of GSH. (C) TEM image. (D) High-resolution TEM image (inset: fast Fourier transform (FFT) pattern). (E) DLS analysis of NPCD–AuNP composites.
Ijms 23 00190 g003
Ijms 23 00190 g004 550
Figure 4. Powder XRD pattern of NPCD–AuNP composites.
Figure 4. Powder XRD pattern of NPCD–AuNP composites.
Ijms 23 00190 g004
Ijms 23 00190 g005 550
Figure 5. (A) XPS survey spectrum of NPCD–AuNP composites. High resolution XPS spectra of Au4f (B) and C1s (C).
Figure 5. (A) XPS survey spectrum of NPCD–AuNP composites. High resolution XPS spectra of Au4f (B) and C1s (C).
Ijms 23 00190 g005
Ijms 23 00190 g006 550
Figure 6. (A) Overlap of absorption peaks and emission peaks of NPCD–AuNP composites. (B) Absorption spectra (inset: image of colored solution) of NPCD–AuNP composites in the presence and absence of GSH (300 µM).
Figure 6. (A) Overlap of absorption peaks and emission peaks of NPCD–AuNP composites. (B) Absorption spectra (inset: image of colored solution) of NPCD–AuNP composites in the presence and absence of GSH (300 µM).
Ijms 23 00190 g006
Ijms 23 00190 g007 550
Figure 7. Variation in fluorescence intensity of NPCDs and NPCD–AuNP composites (inset: enlarged fluorescence spectra of NPCD–AuNP composites) in the presence and absence of GSH (40 µM).
Figure 7. Variation in fluorescence intensity of NPCDs and NPCD–AuNP composites (inset: enlarged fluorescence spectra of NPCD–AuNP composites) in the presence and absence of GSH (40 µM).
Ijms 23 00190 g007
Ijms 23 00190 g008 550
Figure 8. (A) Fluorescence intensity of NPCD–AuNP composites with GSH over time. (B) Relative fluorescence (I/I0) of NPCD–AuNP composites over time with 20 µM GSH.
Figure 8. (A) Fluorescence intensity of NPCD–AuNP composites with GSH over time. (B) Relative fluorescence (I/I0) of NPCD–AuNP composites over time with 20 µM GSH.
Ijms 23 00190 g008
Ijms 23 00190 g009 550
Figure 9. (A) Fluorescence spectra. (B) Relative fluorescence of NPCD–AuNP composites in the presence of various concentrations of GSH (inset: linear relationship between I/I0 and GSH concentration in the range of 10 to 120 µM).
Figure 9. (A) Fluorescence spectra. (B) Relative fluorescence of NPCD–AuNP composites in the presence of various concentrations of GSH (inset: linear relationship between I/I0 and GSH concentration in the range of 10 to 120 µM).
Ijms 23 00190 g009
Ijms 23 00190 g010 550
Figure 10. Fluorescence response of NPCD–AuNP composites on adding 200 µM of different biothiols and amino acids.
Figure 10. Fluorescence response of NPCD–AuNP composites on adding 200 µM of different biothiols and amino acids.
Ijms 23 00190 g010
Table
Table 1. Comparison of the GSH detection results of our method to those of other methods.
Table 1. Comparison of the GSH detection results of our method to those of other methods.
MethodLinear RangeLODReference
Colorimetric 0.03 mM[40]
Fluorescence0.07–70 µM48 nM[41]
Fluorescence0.5–300 µM0.26 µM[42]
Fluorescence0–50 µM0.19 µM[43]
Electrochemical10–250 µM25 µM[44]
Electrochemical10 µM–500 mM703 nM[45]
Electrochemical100 nM–10 mM41.9 nM[46]
Photoelectrochemical1–10 µM0.8 µM[47]
Fluorescence10–20 µM0.1 µMOur method
Table
Table 2. Determination of GSH in human serum.
Table 2. Determination of GSH in human serum.
SampleAdded (µM)Founded (µM)Recovery (%)RSD (n = 3)
1109.0790.742.27 Ijms 23 00190 i001
23031.49104.964.54
38078.1997.732.75
410095.4395.434.35
5120128.45107.041.55
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Le, T.-H.; Kim, J.-H.; Park, S.-J. “Turn on” Fluorescence Sensor of Glutathione Based on Inner Filter Effect of Co-Doped Carbon Dot/Gold Nanoparticle Composites. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 190. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23010190

AMA Style

Le T-H, Kim J-H, Park S-J. “Turn on” Fluorescence Sensor of Glutathione Based on Inner Filter Effect of Co-Doped Carbon Dot/Gold Nanoparticle Composites. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2022; 23(1):190. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23010190

Chicago/Turabian Style

Le, Thi-Hoa, Ji-Hyeon Kim, and Sang-Joon Park. 2022. "“Turn on” Fluorescence Sensor of Glutathione Based on Inner Filter Effect of Co-Doped Carbon Dot/Gold Nanoparticle Composites" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 23, no. 1: 190. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23010190

APA Style

Le, T.-H., Kim, J.-H., & Park, S.-J. (2022). “Turn on” Fluorescence Sensor of Glutathione Based on Inner Filter Effect of Co-Doped Carbon Dot/Gold Nanoparticle Composites. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 23(1), 190. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23010190

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop