Next Article in Journal
Effects of Individual Amino Acids on PPARα Transactivation, mTORC1 Activation, ApoA-I Transcription and pro-ApoA-I Secretion
Next Article in Special Issue
Development of the Connecting Piece in ODF1-Deficient Mouse Spermatids
Previous Article in Journal
The Ability of Chlorophyll to Trap Carcinogen Aflatoxin B1: A Theoretical Approach
Previous Article in Special Issue
Understanding the Underlying Molecular Mechanisms of Meiotic Arrest during In Vitro Spermatogenesis in Rat Prepubertal Testicular Tissue
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
IJMS
Volume 23
Issue 11
10.3390/ijms23116067
ijms-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Endometrial Epithelial ARID1A Is Required for Uterine Immune Homeostasis during Early Pregnancy

by
Ryan M. Marquardt
1,2,
Soo Hyun Ahn
3,
Jake J. Reske
1,
Ronald L. Chandler
1,
Margaret G. Petroff
2,3,4,
Tae Hoon Kim
1 and
Jae-Wook Jeong
1,*
1
Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, Michigan State University, Grand Rapids, MI 49503, USA
2
Cell and Molecular Biology Program, College of Natural Science, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824, USA
3
Department of Pathobiology and Diagnostic Investigation, College of Veterinary Medicine, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824, USA
4
Department of Microbiology and Molecular Genetics, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23(11), 6067; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23116067
Submission received: 21 March 2022 / Revised: 13 May 2022 / Accepted: 24 May 2022 / Published: 28 May 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advance in Reproductive Biology and Related Diseases)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
A growing body of work suggests epigenetic dysregulation contributes to endometriosis pathophysiology and female infertility. The chromatin remodeling complex subunit AT-rich interaction domain 1A (ARID1A) must be properly expressed to maintain normal uterine function. Endometrial epithelial ARID1A is indispensable for pregnancy establishment in mice through regulation of endometrial gland function; however, ARID1A expression is decreased in infertile women with endometriosis. We hypothesized that ARID1A performs critical operations in the endometrial epithelium necessary for fertility besides maintaining gland function. To identify alterations in uterine gene expression resulting from loss of epithelial ARID1A, we performed RNA-sequencing analysis on pre-implantation uteri from LtfiCre/+Arid1af/f and control mice. Differential expression analysis identified 4181 differentially expressed genes enriched for immune-related ingenuity canonical pathways including agranulocyte adhesion and diapedesis and natural killer cell signaling. RT-qPCR confirmed an increase in pro-inflammatory cytokine and macrophage-related gene expression but a decrease in natural killer cell signaling. Immunostaining confirmed a uterus-specific increase in macrophage infiltration. Flow cytometry delineated an increase in inflammatory macrophages and a decrease in uterine dendritic cells in LtfiCre/+Arid1af/f uteri. These findings demonstrate a role for endometrial epithelial ARID1A in suppressing inflammation and maintaining uterine immune homeostasis, which are required for successful pregnancy and gynecological health.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

The endometrium, the inner lining of the uterus, is a highly dynamic and interconnected group of cells consisting of luminal epithelium, glandular epithelium, and stroma. Luminal epithelial cells face the uterine lumen and are the first uterine cells to interact with an embryo in the context of pregnancy. Glandular epithelial cells form gland structures apart from the uterine lumen and perform critical functions for pregnancy through their secretions, which contact the contents of the lumen, the luminal epithelium, and the surrounding stroma [1]. The stroma plays a supportive role from its position surrounding the epithelial cells and consists of a mixture of stromal fibroblasts, endothelial cells, and immune cells.
Together, these endometrial compartments maintain a dynamic homeostasis through tight regulation by the ovarian steroid hormones estrogen (E2) and progesterone (P4). Signaling primarily through their nuclear receptors, E2 and P4 function in a complex epithelial-stromal crosstalk that governs the menstrual cycle in humans, the estrous cycle in mice, and the window of implantation in both species [2,3]. Additionally, the differentiation of uterine stromal fibroblasts into specialized, secretory decidual cells is essential for pregnancy progression and is a progesterone-dependent cyclical process in humans, whereas it relies on the presence of an embryo and nidatory E2 to induce leukemia inhibitory factor (LIF) secretion from glands in rodents [4,5]. Proper embryo implantation and complete decidualization are required not only for the establishment of pregnancy but also for the healthy progression of pregnancy to placentation and on-time delivery [6].
To facilitate proper vascularization and tissue remodeling in the formation of the decidua, which goes on to act as a physical scaffold and provide essential nutritional support and immune tolerance for the developing embryo until placentation, at least three specific immune cell types must maintain an appropriate spaciotemporal balance [7]. Uterine natural killer cells (uNKs), an innate lymphoid cell type, constitute the majority of all human decidual lymphocytes and contribute to angiogenesis, vascular remodeling, and proper placentation [7,8]. More recently, a critical role for uNKs has been described in clearing senescent decidual cells [9,10]. In mice, uNKs appear by gestation day (GD) 6.5, just after implantation, peak at GD 12.5 after the placenta is fully formed, and play a role in decidual integrity [11].
Macrophages, a class of innate myeloid immune cells, are another common cell type in the uterus, and they can originate from circulating monocytes or be resident to the tissue [7]. These cells are key sensors of infection and regulators of the inflammatory response, and subtypes of macrophages can be either proinflammatory or anti-inflammatory depending on the cytokines they secrete. Homeostatic uterine macrophages are thought to be primarily anti-inflammatory outside of transient inflammation in preparation for pregnancy, but an abundance of proinflammatory macrophage activity in the uterus is associated with pathologies [12].
Dendritic cells in general are myeloid antigen-presenting cells that link innate immunity to the adaptive immune system. Uterine dendritic cells (uDCs) are normally rare, but increasing numbers are recruited to the decidua and appear to function there in tissue remodeling and angiogenesis [7,13,14]. Numbers of uNKs, uterine macrophages, and uDCs have all been reported to fluctuate during endometrial cycling and peak at the secretory phase, implying either direct or indirect regulation by steroid hormones, but the mechanism has not been well characterized [15].
When the normal hormone and immune-regulated homeostatic balance of the endometrium is lost, gynecological pathologies can develop including recurrent implantation failure, recurrent pregnancy loss, endometrial cancer, and endometriosis [16]. Endometriosis occurs when endometrium-like glands and stroma form ectopic lesions outside the uterus, and along with a high prevalence of chronic pain, it is often accompanied by infertility or subfertility [17]. The prevalence of this E2-driven, P4-resistant inflammatory disorder is estimated to be 10% of reproductive-age women, but the heterogeneity of its clinical presentation contributes to a high frequency of delayed diagnosis, making true prevalence estimates and systematic study difficult [18]. Surgical resection of lesions and hormone suppression are the standard treatment options for endometriosis-related pain, but suppression of ovulation precludes fertility, and surgical treatments have mixed results on fertility outcomes, leaving in vitro fertilization as the typical option for women affected by endometriosis-related infertility [19]. While its pathogenesis is not thoroughly understood and is almost certainly multifactorial, perturbations in local and systemic immune cell populations have been clearly implicated in both endometriotic lesion establishment and dysregulation of the endometrial environment [15].
Substantial work from our group and others has also identified a wide array of epigenetic factors dysregulated in the endometrium of women with endometriosis including histone-modifying enzymes, DNA modifiers, and chromatin architecture modifiers [20,21,22,23,24,25]. The SWItch/Sucrose Non-Fermentable (SWI/SNF) chromatin remodeling complex subunit AT-rich interaction domain 1A (ARID1A) is commonly known for its tumor suppressor role and its prevalent inactivating mutations in endometriosis-associated ovarian carcinomas, but it is also mutated in non-cancerous endometriotic lesions and underexpressed in the endometrium of infertile women with endometriosis [24,26,27]. Furthermore, studies using mouse models have shown that deletion of uterine Arid1a drives increased endometriosis-like lesion establishment and causes endometrial-factor infertility related to disrupted P4 and E2 signaling [22,24,28]. Focused study on the role of ARID1A in the endometrial epithelium has revealed its critical cell-type-specific roles of maintaining epithelial identity and enabling gland development and function in pregnancy [29,30,31]. Deletion of Arid1a in the adult mouse endometrial epithelium led to early pregnancy defects through attenuation of forkhead box A2 (FOXA2) expression and LIF secretion from uterine glands. However, disruption of this pathway does not appear to fully explain the pregnancy-related uterine defects resulting from epithelial Arid1a deletion, which led us to hypothesize that endometrial epithelial ARID1A performs other critical functions in the endometrial epithelium necessary for fertility.
In this study, we utilized RNA-sequencing analysis of endometrial epithelium-specific Arid1a knockout mice driven by lactoferrin (Ltf)-iCre (LtfiCre/+Arid1af/f) to explore the in vivo uterine transcriptome dysregulation in early pregnancy that results from loss of epithelial ARID1A. Our analysis revealed large scale disruption of immune-related pathways, most notably an increase in proinflammatory cytokine gene expression and a decrease in uNK cell markers. Further functional study demonstrated a marked increase in uterine infiltration by proinflammatory macrophages with correspondent decreases in uNKs and uDCs, revealing a critical role for endometrial epithelial ARID1A in maintaining uterine immune homeostasis during early pregnancy.

2. Results

2.1. Deletion of Endometrial Epithelial Arid1a in Mice Causes Diminished Implantation Site Size and uNK Cell Numbers at GD 7.5

LtfiCre/+Arid1af/f mice are severely subfertile and exhibit implantation and decidualization defects at the peri-implantation and early post-implantation stages (GD 4.5–5.5), but the effects of endometrial epithelial Arid1a deletion on subsequent stages of pregnancy have not been previously reported [31]. We collected uterine samples at GD 7.5 and found that although the number of implantation sites was not different from controls (Control = 4.88 ± 1.47, LtfiCre/+Arid1af/f = 5.00 ± 1.13, p = 0.8578), LtfiCre/+Arid1af/f implantation sites were significantly decreased in diameter (Control = 3.80 ± 0.05 mm, LtfiCre/+Arid1af/f = 2.89 ± 0.13 mm, p = 0.0002) and weight (Control = 0.0092 ± 0.0006 g, LtfiCre/+Arid1af/f = 0.0060 ± 0.0004 g, p = 0.0092; Figure 1).
Immunohistochemical staining of implantation site cross sections for the decidualization marker cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) revealed a substantially diminished decidual area (Figure 2A). Concurrent with the development of the decidua, uNK cells normally proliferate in a healthy implantation site and function in angiogenesis and vascular remodeling [7,11]. However, LtfiCre/+Arid1af/f mice exhibited significantly decreased numbers of uNK cells at GD 7.5 counted based on Dolichos biflorus (DBA) lectin staining (Control = 390.00 ± 90.63, LtfiCre/+Arid1af/f = 13.40 ± 5.92, p = 0.0079; Figure 2B,C).

2.2. RNA-Sequencing Analysis of LtfiCre/+Arid1af/f Uteri at GD 3.5 Reveals Altered Immune Pathways

Seeking to discover gene expression changes earlier in pregnancy that could explain compromised decidualization and deficiency of uNK cells due to Arid1a deletion, we performed RNA-sequencing analysis on LtfiCre/+Arid1af/f uteri collected at GD 3.5, when the uterus is preparing to receive an implanting embryo and just before the onset of decidualization. Principal component analysis of filtered, normalized log-transformed gene counts showed that the five LtfiCre/+Arid1af/f and five control Arid1af/f samples segregated from one another based on overall gene expression (Figure 3A). Differential expression analysis revealed that 4181 uterine genes (2174 increased, 2007 decreased) were significantly dysregulated due to deletion of endometrial epithelial Arid1a, which is visualized by hierarchical clustering heatmap (FDR < 0.05; Figure 3B; Supplementary Table S1). Ingenuity Pathway Analysis (IPA) of this gene set identified the most statistically significant overlaps with canonical pathways related to lipid biosynthesis, cell cycle regulation, and immune function and with upstream regulators including steroid hormones, cytokines, and other immune modulators (Figure 3C,D).
Because of the large number and broad spectrum of immune-related pathways in the dataset and the known change in uNK cells in LtfiCre/+Arid1af/f uteri, we examined the immune-related changes more closely. Altered immune-related canonical pathways involved both the innate and adaptive immune response and both lymphoid and myeloid immune cells (Figure 4A). Upstream regulator analysis revealed activation of inflammatory factor targets, notably interferon gamma (IFNG), tumor necrosis factor (TNF), and interleukin-1 beta (IL1B), and deactivation of target molecules for the anti-inflammatory interleukin-10 (IL-10) receptor (IL10RA; Figure 4B).
RT-qPCR validation of individual differentially expressed genes from the RNA-seq data confirmed that several genes coding for proinflammatory cytokines (interleukin-36 alpha, Il36a; interleukin-17A, Il17a; colony-stimulating factor 2, Csf2; interleukin-1 alpha, Il1a; Tnf; interleukin-18, Il18; colony-stimulating factor 3, Csf3; tumor necrosis factor ligand superfamily member 13B, Tnfsf13b) and cytokine receptors (C–C motif chemokine receptor 2, Ccr2; C–C motif chemokine receptor 4, Ccr4) were highly upregulated in the LtfiCre/+Arid1af/f uterus (p = 0.0079, 0.0079, 0.0079, 0.0079, 0.0159, 0.0001, 0.0013, 0.0469, 0.0079, 0.0317, respectively; Figure 4C). One receptor component (interleukin-17 receptor B, Il17rb) was decreased, possibly a compensatory effect due to the incredibly high levels of Il17a (p = 0.0317; Figure 4C). Genes related to innate immunity were also modulated, with one inflammasome-related gene (NLR family, apoptosis inhibitory protein 1, Naip1) increased and another (myeloid differentiation primary response 88, Myd88) decreased (p = 0.0079, 0.0013, respectively; Figure 4C).
The NK cell receptor gene (killer cell lectin-like receptor 7, Klra7) was downregulated, consistent with the finding of diminished uNK cells at GD 7.5 (p = 0.0316; Figure 4C). Scavenger receptor class A member 5 (SCARA5) and iodothyronine deiodinase 2 (DIO2) have been identified as marker genes for a diverging decidual response in vivo [10]. A shift toward dominance of senescent decidual cells, indicated by decreased SCARA5 and increased DIO2, is associated uNK cell-deficient pre-pregnancy endometrium in humans [10]. Along with decreased uNK cell signaling and cell proliferation, LtfiCre/+Arid1af/f uteri exhibited significantly decreased Scara5 and increased Dio2 expression, though not quite to a level of statistical significance (p = 0.0480, 0.0952, respectively; Figure 4C). Together, these results indicate that a highly proinflammatory uterine environment results from deletion of endometrial epithelial Arid1a concomitant with a decrease in normal uNK cell regulation of the endometrium.

2.3. Uterine Macrophage Numbers Are Elevated in LtfiCre/+Arid1af/f Mice at GD 3.5

Next, we asked if the pro-inflammatory gene expression in the LtfiCre/+Arid1af/f uterus at GD 3.5 was intrinsic to the endometrial stromal and epithelial cells or if it coincided with altered immune cell populations. Since macrophages are one of the major cell types that produce proinflammatory cytokines, such as TNF and IL-1A, and CSF2 and CCR2 are involved in the proliferation and homing of monocytes and macrophages, we assessed uterine macrophages in LtfiCre/+Arid1af/f mice by immunostaining for EGF-like module-containing mucin-like hormone receptor-like 1 (F4/80), a cell surface marker for macrophages and, to a lesser extent, monocytes [32,33]. While F4/80 positive cells were common in the control uterus, comprising approximately 30% of the stromal compartment, the percent of F4/80 positive cells was significantly increased, nearly doubling, in LtfiCre/+Arid1af/f uteri (Control = 27.86 ± 5.03, LtfiCre/+Arid1af/f = 57.30 ± 5.49, p = 0.0042; Figure 5). To determine if the changes in macrophage numbers were systemic or specific to the uterus, we stained control and LtfiCre/+Arid1af/f spleen tissue for F4/80, finding no difference in macrophage appearance or number (Control = 93.73 ± 1.43, LtfiCre/+Arid1af/f = 93.55 ± 1.80, p > 0.9999, Supplementary Figure S1).
To better characterize and more comprehensively assess the myeloid immune cell population in the LtfiCre/+Arid1af/f GD 3.5 uterus, we performed flow cytometry analysis, selecting among live, singlet leukocytes for a cluster of differentiation molecule 11B (CD11b)+ major histocompatibility complex class II (MHCII)+ cells, which were not different between genotypes (p = 0.5396, Figure 6A, Supplementary Figure S2). Within this myeloid population, F4/80− cluster of differentiation 64 (CD64)− lymphocyte antigen 6C (Ly6C)+ cells were unchanged, F4/80+ CD64+ Ly6C+ cells were significantly increased, and F4/80+ CD64+ Ly6C− cells were significantly decreased (p = 0.8154, 0.0050, 0.0029, respectively; Figure 6A,B, Supplementary Figure S2). Since CD64 is expressed primarily on macrophages, and Ly6C is thought to be specific to circulation-derived inflammatory monocytes and macrophages, the increase in F4/80+ macrophages in LtfiCre/+Arid1af/f uteri appears to be driven by infiltration of circulating Ly6C+ inflammatory cells rather than new growth of resident macrophages [33,34,35,36,37,38]. Further myeloid immune cell analysis revealed that Ly6G+ neutrophil numbers were consistent between genotypes, but CD64− cluster of differentiation 24 (CD24)+ uDCs, important for proper decidua formation, were significantly decreased in LtfiCre/+Arid1af/f mice [13,38] (p = 0.7818, 0.0016, respectively; Figure 6C,D, Supplementary Figure S2).
To assess the extrauterine peritoneal myeloid immune environment, we quantified monocytes, CD11b+ cells, large peritoneal macrophages, and small peritoneal macrophages in matched peritoneal fluid [39]. This analysis yielded no significantly altered peritoneal immune cell populations, suggesting again that the changes observed in myeloid immune cell composition in GD 3.5 LtfiCre/+Arid1af/f mice are specific to the uterus (p = 0.3214, 0.5941, 0.6783, 0.7649, respectively; Supplementary Figure S3). Together, these data demonstrate that deletion of endometrial epithelial Arid1a causes uterine-specific infiltration of circulating inflammatory myeloid cells during early pregnancy, resulting in elevated numbers of inflammatory macrophages alongside decreased uDCs and altered uNK cell signaling in the uterus.

3. Discussion

In gynecological pathologies such as endometriosis and infertility, the normally tightly regulated epigenetic landscape and immune environment of the endometrium are thrown off balance [40]. We previously showed that endometrial ARID1A levels are diminished in women with endometriosis and that abolishing endometrial epithelial ARID1A expression drives a loss of endometrial receptivity and failure of pregnancy establishment and maintenance [24,31]. Past research has also demonstrated that the endometrium of women with endometriosis experiences an increase in proinflammatory macrophages and alterations in uNK cell and uDC activity [15]. In this study, we describe a possible mechanism for a connection between these phenomena.
When we deleted Arid1a the endometrial epithelium using LtfiCre/+Arid1af/f mice, massive changes in immune-related gene expression patterns resulted in the pre-implantation (GD 3.5) uterus. Uterine expression of the proinflammatory cytokine genes Il36a, Il17a, Csf2, Il1a, Tnf, Il18, Csf3, and Tfnfs13b spiked alongside increased uterus-specific infiltration of F4/80+ CD64+ Ly6C+ inflammatory macrophages. At the same time, uDC numbers were diminished and pro-decidual uNK markers decreased. These disruptions were followed by reduced implantation site size, compromised decidua formation, and dramatic diminution of uNK cell presence post-implantation (GD 7.5). Interestingly, increases in IL-17A, IL18, TNFSF13B, and TNF signaling have all been previously identified in endometriosis conditions [41,42,43]. Increased IL-18 has been linked to failed embryo transfer and recurrent miscarriage [44,45]. Furthermore, TNF can inhibit trophoblast invasion, and one report showed that inhibiting its activity may improve live birth rates in women with recurrent spontaneous abortion [46,47]. Finally, high levels of uterine IL-36A were shown to correlate with an increased rate of fetal loss in mice [48].
Whether uNK cell numbers are altered in women with endometriosis is controversial; however, they do appear to be phenotypically altered with increased cytotoxicity [15]. In human pregnancy, the literature is clear regarding the importance of uNK cells for vasculature remodeling in the formation of the decidua and later on the placenta [49]. Moreover, a role for uNK cells in clearing senescent decidual cells has recently been described as important for maintaining uterine homeostasis and implantation [9]. An appropriate spaciotemporal balance between SCARA5+ decidual cells and DIO2+ senescent decidual cells must be maintained to allow implantation and prevent pregnancy loss, and low SCARA5, high DIO2, and low uNK populations are associated with recurrent pregnancy loss [10]. Our data from early pregnancy in LtfiCre/+Arid1af/f mice suggests that a lack of epithelial ARID1A leads to an early skew toward a pro-senescent decidual state that corresponds to the lack of sufficient uNK cells in the decidual post-implantation. Though uNK cells regulate the structure of the decidua and development of the placenta, they are not necessary in rodents for the delivery of normal numbers of pups [50,51,52]. Therefore, it is not clear if the diminished uNK cell population in LtfiCre/+Arid1af/f mice contributes to pregnancy failure or is simply a byproduct of the compromised early decidualization response. It also remains to be seen whether this phenomenon is a factor in endometriosis-related infertility in the human case.
The density of mature uDCs has been shown to be reduced in the endometrium of women with endometriosis potentially altering coordination of adaptive immunity and angiogenesis, though the functional outcome has not been thoroughly studied [15,53,54]. In mice, depletion of uDCs during pregnancy resulted in defective implantation, improper decidua formation, and embryo resorption [13]. Therefore, the reduction in uDCs following deletion of endometrial epithelial Arid1a in LtfiCre/+Arid1af/f mice may contribute to their compromised implantation and decidualization.
In endometriosis conditions, research to date has indicated that a decrease in anti-inflammatory macrophages and an increase in total macrophages accompanies upregulated proinflammatory cytokine signaling [15]. Similarly, our RNA-seq differentially expressed gene upstream regulator analysis identified deactivation of anti-inflammatory IL10RA target molecules but strong activation of proinflammatory TNF signaling targets in LtfiCre/+Arid1af/f uteri. TNF is considered a “master-regulator” of inflammatory cytokine production, and it can be both produced by and activate macrophages [55].
To analyze the relationship between increased inflammatory gene expression and macrophage cell presence in LtfiCre/+Arid1af/f uteri, we quantified macrophages with immunostaining and flow cytometry. Immunostaining identified a uterus-specific increase in total F4/80+ macrophages when endometrial epithelial Arid1a was deleted, but this analysis could not determine the source or characteristics of the cells since F4/80 marks tissue-resident macrophages as well as macrophages derived from circulating monocytes [38]. In our flow cytometry analysis, we were able to discriminate among F4/80+ CD64+ macrophages utilizing the monocyte and monocyte-derived cell marker Ly6C [33,35,37,38]. Since the Ly6C+ population increased in LtfiCre/+Arid1af/f uteri and the Ly6C− population decreased, we conclude that the increased F4/80+ macrophages in the uterus were derived from circulating inflammatory monocytes [33,35,37,38]. Since the F4/80− CD64− Ly6C+ cell populations were not different between genotypes, it appears that the altered cell type should be defined as an inflammatory monocyte-derived macrophage population rather than a classical monocyte population. However, we cannot conclude this with certainty since some monocytes also express F4/80 and CD64, and there is disagreement over whether Ly6C+ cells should be labeled as macrophages [33,35,37,38].
The observations of increased uterine proinflammatory cytokine gene expression and increased inflammatory macrophage infiltration in LtfiCre/+Arid1af/f mice raise the question of what factor first initiates the inflammatory conditions after epithelial deletion of Arid1a. Some level of inflammation is normal and required to facilitate implantation, but the inflammatory conditions we observed in LtfiCre/+Arid1af/f uteri were far beyond normal control levels. E2 signaling is generally considered to be proinflammatory, although this is a generalization of highly complex and context-dependent realities [56]. We previously reported a skew toward E2 signaling dominance in LtfiCre/+Arid1af/f uterine gene expression, which could contribute to the inflammatory environment, but serum E2 and P4 levels were not significantly altered [31]. We also previously demonstrated a defect of uterine gland function in LtfiCre/+Arid1af/f mice, which resulted in diminished Lif expression [31]. LIF regulates uterine immune cell composition in mice; however, Lif knockouts have half the normal numbers of uterine macrophages and double the uNKs, which is opposite from our findings here [57].
A more plausible mechanism for the triggering of extraordinary inflammation in LtfiCre/+Arid1af/f pregnant uteri is suggested by the fact that epithelial cells in the uterus as well as in other tissue types are known to produce TNF, CSF2, and other proinflammatory cytokines in certain circumstances [42,58,59,60,61]. In fact, ARID1A has been shown to directly bind near the promoter regions of Il36a, Tnfsf13, and other TNF-signaling related genes in the murine endometrial epithelium [30]. Furthermore, in 12Z endometriotic epithelial cells, genes bound by ARID1A and upregulated by knockdown of ARID1A expression include TNF signaling-related and inflammatory response pathway genes [29]. One gene from this ARID1A-bound and regulated group is CCL2, the gene for monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 (MCP-1), a major chemoattractant that regulates the migration of monocytes and macrophages by binding its receptor CCR2 [62]. Expression of both genes increases in endometriosis conditions [41,63]. Interestingly, we also found Ccr2 gene expression increased in LtfiCre/+Arid1af/f uteri. Together, these data suggest a mechanism where loss of endometrial epithelial ARID1A leads to cell-autonomous secretion of CCL2, TNF, CSF2, and other inflammatory factors, which leads to recruitment of inflammatory macrophages into the uterus, further exacerbating the inflammatory environment (Figure 7). Such a strong inflammatory response in the uterus can then result in decreased uDCs and uNKs as we observed in LtfiCre/+Arid1af/f uteri as well as generally hostile, non-receptive conditions [33].
One limitation of our study is that all our gene expression analyses were performed on whole uterine tissue, which did not allow us to distinguish between gene expression in endometrial epithelial, stromal, and immune cells. Therefore, we cannot be certain whether the increased expression of proinflammatory cytokine genes we observed in LtfiCre/+Arid1af/f uteri was driven by direct changes in the epithelial cells or indirect changes in stromal or immune cells. Additionally, Ltf-iCre can reportedly be expressed in neutrophils and other myeloid lineage immune cells [64,65]. Although we did not observe changes in the number of uterine neutrophils, and systemic myeloid immune cell alterations were not evident as assessed in the spleen or peritoneal fluid, we cannot rule out the possible contribution of Arid1a deletion in LtfiCre/+Arid1af/f myeloid immune cells themselves. Furthermore, we did not assess whether changes occurred in uterine adaptive immune cell populations or in the uterine immune environment of non-pregnant mice, both of which are areas of interest for future study. Finally, all the experiments in this study utilized mice as a model system. While mice share many aspects of uterine biology with humans, there are important differences of reproductive tract development and function between species that must be considered [66]. For example, the differences in the hormonal environment between the human menstrual cycle and murine estrous cycle could impact the basal immune cell populations [15,67]. Therefore, our findings still need to be validated in human samples.
In summary, we have shown that deletion of endometrial epithelial Arid1a in mice causes large scale uterine transcriptome dysregulation during early pregnancy, including many genes related to immune function. Most notably, we found increases in proinflammatory cytokine expression and alterations in uNK cell signaling. At the cell level, increased proinflammatory cytokine transcription accompanied a uterine-specific influx of proinflammatory macrophages, a decrease in uDCs, and, after implantation, a diminished uNK cell population at implantation sites. For many of the immune-related changes we observed parallel observations from the dysregulated endometrial immune environment present in women with endometriosis, suggesting that diminished endometrial epithelial ARID1A in endometriosis conditions may contribute to the proinflammatory environment and negatively impact receptivity of the endometriosis-affected endometrium to pregnancy.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Mouse Models

All mouse procedures were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of Michigan State University. All mice were housed and bred in a designated animal care facility at Michigan State University under controlled humidity and temperature conditions and a 12 h light/dark cycle at 5 mice/cage maximum. Access to water and food (Envigo 8640 rodent diet) was ad libitum. Endometrial epithelial conditional Arid1a knockout mice were generated in mixed background C57BL/6, 129S6/SvEvTac, 129P2/OlaHsd, 129S1/SvImJ strain mice by initially crossing LtfiCre/+ [64] (Jackson Laboratory Stock No: 026030) males with Arid1af/f [68] (Jackson Laboratory Stock No: 027717) females and then selecting LtfiCre/+Arid1af/f males and Arid1af/f females from the F2 generation for continuous breeding. All experiments were performed in 12–15-week-old mature adult mice to ensure sufficient LtfiCre/+ activation. For breeding, one male mouse was normally placed into a cage with one female mouse. Occasionally, one male mouse was housed with two female mice to increase breeding success, and females were separated with their pups until weaning. After weaning at postnatal day 21–28, male and female littermates were separated and housed in groups at 5 mice/cage maximum until use in breeding or experiments. Mice of appropriate genotypes were randomly allocated to experimental groups, using littermates for comparisons when possible.

4.2. Mouse Procedures and Tissue Collection

Uterine samples from specific times of pregnancy were obtained by mating control or conditional Arid1a knockout female mice with proven wildtype male breeder mice defining morning of identification of a vaginal plug as GD 0.5. Part of each uterine sample isolated at GD 3.5 was snap-frozen and stored at −80 °C for RNA extraction. The remaining uterine tissues and paired spleen tissues were prepared for histological analysis by fixing for 6 h in 4% (vol/vol) paraformaldehyde (Fisher Scientific, Hampton, NH, USA, Cat. #04042-500), cryopreserving in a series of sucrose solutions increasing from 10% to 15% to 20% sucrose in Hanks’ Balanced Salt Solution (HBSS; Gibco, Grand Island, NY, USA, Cat. #14170-112), and deep freezing in Tissue-Tek optimal cutting temperature (OCT) compound (Sakura Finetek, Torrance, CA, USA, Cat. # 4583) at −80 °C. Whole uterine samples collected at GD 7.5 were photographed and weighed before fixing with 4% (vol/vol) paraformaldehyde and processing in a graded alcohol series for paraffin embedding. Implantation sites were identified and measured based on gross morphology with subsequent histological confirmation. Individual implantation sites were weighed after tissue processing but before embedding.

4.3. Histology and Immunostaining

For IHC and DBA lectin staining, fixed, paraffin-embedded tissues were cut at 5 μm, mounted on slides, deparaffinized, and rehydrated in a graded alcohol series. Immunostaining was performed by incubating overnight at 4 °C with a COX-2-specific primary antibody (Cayman Chemical, Ann Arbor, MI, USA, Cat. #160106, 1:1000) after citrate-based antigen unmasking, quenching of exogenous peroxidases with 3% hydrogen peroxide in methanol, and blocking with 10% normal goat serum (NGS; Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, CA, USA, Cat. #S-1000) in pH 7.5 PBS. A biotinylated anti-rabbit secondary antibody (Vector Laboratories, Cat. #BA-1000) was applied, followed by incubation with horseradish peroxidase (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA, Cat. #434323) and developing using the Vectastain Elite DAB kit (Vector Laboratories, Cat. #SK-4100).
DBA staining was performed largely as previously described [11] by incubation with biotinylated Dolichos biflorus lectin (Vector Laboratories, B-1035-5, 1:250) overnight at 4°C after treatment with 1% hydrogen peroxide in pH 7.5 PBS and blocking with 10% NGS (Vector Laboratories, Cat. #S-1000) in pH 7.5 PBS. Horseradish peroxidase (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Cat. #434323) was applied, followed by developing using the Vectastain Elite DAB kit (Vector Laboratories, Cat. #SK-4100).
For immunofluorescence, frozen, OCT-embedded tissues were cut at 10 μm, mounted on slides, fixed in 4% (vol/vol) paraformaldehyde (Fisher Scientific, Cat. #04042-500), immersed in 0.3% hydrogen peroxide in methanol, and washed in 1/40 Triton-X 100 (Fisher Scientific, Cat. #BP151-500) before blocking with 10% normal goat serum (NGS; Vector Laboratories, Cat. #S-1000) in pH 7.5 PBS and incubating with an F4/80 primary antibody (BioLegend, San Diego, CA, USA, Cat. #123101) diluted in 10% NGS in PBS overnight at 4 °C. An anti-Rat Alexa Fluor 488 secondary antibody (Thermo Fisher Scientific, A-21208) was used before mounting with VECTASHIELD® Antifade Mounting Medium with DAPI (Vector Laboratories, Cat. #H-1200). Imaging was performed with a Nikon epi-fluorescence microscope and NIS-Elements imaging software (Nikon Instruments, Melville, NY, USA). The percentage of F4/80-positive uterine cells was counted in representative stromal fields of approximately 350 cells per sample. The percentage of F4/80-positive spleen cells was counted in representative red pulp fields of approximately 500 cells per sample.

4.4. RNA Isolation and RT-qPCR

As previously described [24], total RNA was extracted from uterine tissues using the RNeasy Mini Kit for total RNA isolation (Qiagen, Valencia, CA, USA, Cat. #74106). Template cDNA was produced from 3 μg of total RNA using random hexamers and MMLV Reverse transcriptase (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Cat. # 28025013). cDNA levels were measured by real-time PCR SYBR green analysis using an Applied Biosystems StepOnePlus system according to the manufacturer’s instructions (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA) using pre-validated primers (Table 1) and PowerUp SYBR Green Master Mix (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Cat. #A25742). The amplification conditions were 10 min at 95 °C, 40 cycles of 15 s at 95 °C followed by 1 min at 60 °C, then a melt curve phase consisting of 15 s at 95 °C, 1 min at 60 °C, and 15 s at 95 °C. Expression levels were normalized against ribosomal protein L7 (Rpl7) transcripts.

4.5. RNA-Sequencing

Libraries were prepared by the Van Andel Genomics Core from 500 ng of total RNA using the KAPA mRNA Hyperprep kit (v4.17) (Kapa Biosystems, Wilmington, MA, USA). RNA was sheared to 300–400 bp. Prior to PCR amplification, cDNA fragments were ligated to IDT Illumina UDI dual Indexed adapters (Illumina Inc, San Diego, CA, USA). Quality and quantity of the finished libraries were assessed using a combination of Agilent DNF-474 HS fragment kit (Agilent Technologies, Inc.) using a Fragment Analyzer (Agilent Technologies, Inc.), and QuantiFluor® dsDNA System (Promega Corp., Madison, WI, USA). Individually indexed libraries were pooled and 50 bp, paired end sequencing was performed on an Illumina NovaSeq6000 sequencer using an S2, 100 bp sequencing kit (Illumina Inc., San Diego, CA, USA) to an average depth of 50M reads per sample. Base calling was conducted by Illumina RTA3 and output of NCS was demultiplexed and converted to FastQ format with Illumina Bcl2fastq v1.9.0.

4.6. RNA-Sequencing Analysis

Based on previously described methods [29], raw reads were trimmed with cutadapt [81] v1.18 and Trim Galore! (http://www.bioinformatics.babraham.ac.uk/projects/trim_galore/) v0.6.4_dev. Quality control analysis was performed using FastQC (https://www.bioinformatics.babraham.ac.uk/projects/fastqc/) v0.11.9. Trimmed reads were aligned to the GRCm38 genome assembly using STAR [82] v2.7.3a, and feature counting was performed using the command “--quantMode GeneCounts”. Output gene count files were constructed into an experimental read count matrix in R. Low count genes were filtered (1 count per sample on average) prior to DESeq2 [83,84] v1.30.1 count normalization and subsequent differential expression analysis. Calculated differential expression probabilities were corrected for multiple testing by independent hypothesis weighting (IHW [85] v 1.18.0) for downstream analysis, referred to as false discovery rate (FDR) for simplicity. Differentially expressed gene thresholds were set at FDR < 0.05. All reported instances of log2 (fold-change) data from RNA-seq were adjusted by apeglm v1.12.0 for LFC shrinkage [86]. Principal component analysis was calculated based on the top 500 genes by variance using DESeq2 and plotted with ggplot2 [87] v3.3.3. The RNA-seq heatmap was generated with ComplexHeatmap v2.6.2 [88] and circlize v0.4.12 [89] using scaled regularized-logarithm (rlog) counts for visualization. Differentially expressed genes were classified using QIAGEN Ingenuity Pathway Analysis (IPA) with results plotted with ggplot2.

4.7. Flow Cytometry

Uterine horns from GD3.5 mice were excised, spliced open longitudinally, and finely chopped using spring scissors. To prepare single cell suspensions, uterine tissue fragments were continuously digested in Enzyme buffer (Liberase™ TH Research Grade (0.09625 mg/mL, Millipore Sigma, Burlington, MA, USA, Cat. #LIBTH-RO), 100 U of DNaseI (Millipore Sigma, Cat. #AMPD1) in RPMI 1640 (Gibco, Grand Island, NY, USA, Cat. #11835-030) at 37 °C. To aid dissociation, samples were taken out every 20 min and pushed through 18 and 23 gauge needles. Once fragments were dissociated (after 60 to 90 min), samples were filtered through 70 um mesh, centrifuged at 400× g for 5 min, then resuspended in flow staining buffer (5% fetal bovine serum in PBS) to neutralize the Liberase™ TH enzyme. Red blood cells were lysed by resuspending the cell pellet in 1 mL of ACK (Ammonium-Chloride-Potassium) lysis buffer. To collect peritoneal fluid samples, 2–3 mL PBS was injected into the peritoneal cavity, the mouse was gently massaged, then as much fluid as possible was withdrawn. This was repeated if necessary to collect at least 2 mL of fluid. The resulting single cell suspensions (uterus and peritoneal lavage) were counted using Countess II (Thermo Fisher Scientific), resuspended in flow staining buffer and placed on ice.
To analyze viability, all cells were stained with Live/Dead Blue (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Cat. #L23105) on ice for 30 min, followed by Fc receptor block (BD Biosciences, East Rutherford, NJ, USA, Cat. #553141) on ice for 20 min. Antibodies against specific mouse antigens were utilized for cell-surface staining (Table 2). Between 2 – 6 × 105 cells were stained using a cocktail of cell-surface antibodies for 30 min on ice, washed three times in flow staining buffer, and fixed in 1% paraformaldehyde prior to analysis. All samples were analyzed using spectral flow cytometry, Cytek® Aurora (Cytek Biosciences, Fremont, CA, USA) at Michigan State University Flow Cytometry Core. The flow cytometric analysis software Kaluza (Beckman Coulter, Indianapolis, IN, USA) was used for analysis and generation of gating strategy.

4.8. Statistical Analysis

To assess statistical significance of parametric data, we used Student’s t-test. For non-parametric data, we used the Mann–Whitney U test. All statistical tests were two-tailed when applicable, and a value of p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Statistical analyses were performed using the Instat 3 package from GraphPad (San Diego, CA, USA). Statistical test results (p-values) are presented with the results in the text and symbolically in the figures, with explanations in figure legends. The value of n for each experiment, representing number of animals unless noted as number of implantation sites, is reported in the appropriate figure legend.

4.9. Data and Code Availability

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the article, Supplementary Materials, and the publicly accessible GEO database under series GSE196489.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/ijms23116067/s1.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, R.M.M., T.H.K. and J.-W.J.; software, R.M.M. and J.J.R.; formal analysis, R.M.M.; investigation, R.M.M. and S.H.A.; resources, J.-W.J.; writing—original draft preparation, R.M.M. and S.H.A.; writing—review and editing, J.J.R., M.G.P., T.H.K. and J.-W.J.; visualization, R.M.M., S.H.A. and J.J.R.; supervision, R.L.C., M.G.P. and J.-W.J.; funding acquisition, R.M.M. and J.-W.J. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

Research reported in this publication was supported in part by the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development of the National Institutes of Health under Award Numbers R01HD102170, R01HD101243, R01HD084478 to J.W.J., F31HD101207 to R.M.M., and T32HD087166, MSU AgBio Research, and Michigan State University. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The animal study protocol was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Michigan State University (PROTO201900328, approved 2 October 2019).

Data Availability Statement

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the article, Supplementary Materials, and the publicly accessible GEO database under series GSE196489.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank the Van Andel Genomics Core for providing RNA-sequencing facilities and services.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Kelleher, A.M.; DeMayo, F.J.; Spencer, T.E. Uterine Glands: Developmental Biology and Functional Roles in Pregnancy. Endocr. Rev. 2019, 40, 1424–1445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Wu, S.P.; Li, R.; DeMayo, F.J. Progesterone Receptor Regulation of Uterine Adaptation for Pregnancy. Trends Endocrinol. Metab. 2018, 29, 481–491. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Li, R.; Wang, X.; Huang, Z.; Balaji, J.; Kim, T.H.; Wang, T.; Zhou, L.; Deleon, A.; Cook, M.E.; Marbrey, M.W.; et al. The role of epithelial progesterone receptor isoforms in embryo implantation. iScience 2021, 24, 103487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Gellersen, B.; Brosens, J.J. Cyclic decidualization of the human endometrium in reproductive health and failure. Endocr. Rev. 2014, 35, 851–905. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Cha, J.; Sun, X.; Dey, S.K. Mechanisms of implantation: Strategies for successful pregnancy. Nat. Med. 2012, 18, 1754–1767. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Ticconi, C.; Di Simone, N.; Campagnolo, L.; Fazleabas, A. Clinical consequences of defective decidualization. Tissue Cell 2021, 72, 101586. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Mori, M.; Bogdan, A.; Balassa, T.; Csabai, T.; Szekeres-Bartho, J. The decidua-the maternal bed embracing the embryo-maintains the pregnancy. Semin. Immunopathol. 2016, 38, 635–649. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Koopman, L.A.; Kopcow, H.D.; Rybalov, B.; Boyson, J.E.; Orange, J.S.; Schatz, F.; Masch, R.; Lockwood, C.J.; Schachter, A.D.; Park, P.J.; et al. Human decidual natural killer cells are a unique NK cell subset with immunomodulatory potential. J. Exp. Med. 2003, 198, 1201–1212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Brighton, P.J.; Maruyama, Y.; Fishwick, K.; Vrljicak, P.; Tewary, S.; Fujihara, R.; Muter, J.; Lucas, E.S.; Yamada, T.; Woods, L.; et al. Clearance of senescent decidual cells by uterine natural killer cells in cycling human endometrium. eLife 2017, 6, e31274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Lucas, E.S.; Vrljicak, P.; Muter, J.; Diniz-da-Costa, M.M.; Brighton, P.J.; Kong, C.S.; Lipecki, J.; Fishwick, K.J.; Odendaal, J.; Ewington, L.J.; et al. Recurrent pregnancy loss is associated with a pro-senescent decidual response during the peri-implantation window. Commun. Biol. 2020, 3, 37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Croy, B.A.; Zhang, J.; Tayade, C.; Colucci, F.; Yadi, H.; Yamada, A.T. Analysis of uterine natural killer cells in mice. Methods Mol. Biol. 2010, 612, 465–503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Chambers, M.; Rees, A.; Cronin, J.G.; Nair, M.; Jones, N.; Thornton, C.A. Macrophage Plasticity in Reproduction and Environmental Influences on Their Function. Front. Immunol. 2020, 11, 607328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Plaks, V.; Birnberg, T.; Berkutzki, T.; Sela, S.; BenYashar, A.; Kalchenko, V.; Mor, G.; Keshet, E.; Dekel, N.; Neeman, M.; et al. Uterine DCs are crucial for decidua formation during embryo implantation in mice. J. Clin. Investig. 2008, 118, 3954–3965. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  14. Collins, M.K.; Tay, C.S.; Erlebacher, A. Dendritic cell entrapment within the pregnant uterus inhibits immune surveillance of the maternal/fetal interface in mice. J. Clin. Investig. 2009, 119, 2062–2073. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  15. Vallve-Juanico, J.; Houshdaran, S.; Giudice, L.C. The endometrial immune environment of women with endometriosis. Hum. Reprod. Updat. 2019, 25, 564–591. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Marquardt, R.M.; Kim, T.H.; Shin, J.H.; Jeong, J.W. Progesterone and Estrogen Signaling in the Endometrium: What Goes Wrong in Endometriosis? Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 3822. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Saunders, P.T.K.; Horne, A.W. Endometriosis: Etiology, pathobiology, and therapeutic prospects. Cell 2021, 184, 2807–2824. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Zondervan, K.T.; Becker, C.M.; Missmer, S.A. Endometriosis. N. Engl. J. Med. 2020, 382, 1244–1256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Bulun, S.E.; Yilmaz, B.D.; Sison, C.; Miyazaki, K.; Bernardi, L.; Liu, S.; Kohlmeier, A.; Yin, P.; Milad, M.; Wei, J. Endometriosis. Endocr. Rev. 2019, 40, 1048–1079. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Kim, T.H.; Young, S.L.; Sasaki, T.; Deaton, J.L.; Schammel, D.P.; Palomino, A.W.; Jeong, J.W.; Lessey, B.A. Role of SIRT1 and Progesterone Resistance in Normal and Abnormal Endometrium. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2021, 107, 788–800. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Yoo, J.Y.; Kim, T.H.; Fazleabas, A.T.; Palomino, W.A.; Ahn, S.H.; Tayade, C.; Schammel, D.P.; Young, S.L.; Jeong, J.W.; Lessey, B.A. KRAS Activation and over-expression of SIRT1/BCL6 Contributes to the Pathogenesis of Endometriosis and Progesterone Resistance. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 6765. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Mai, H.; Liao, Y.; Luo, S.; Wei, K.; Yang, F.; Shi, H. Histone deacetylase HDAC2 silencing prevents endometriosis by activating the HNF4A/ARID1A axis. J. Cell. Mol. Med. 2021, 25, 9972–9982. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Kim, T.H.; Yoo, J.Y.; Choi, K.C.; Shin, J.H.; Leach, R.E.; Fazleabas, A.T.; Young, S.L.; Lessey, B.A.; Yoon, H.G.; Jeong, J.W. Loss of HDAC3 results in nonreceptive endometrium and female infertility. Sci. Transl. Med. 2019, 11, eaaf7533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Kim, T.H.; Yoo, J.Y.; Wang, Z.; Lydon, J.P.; Khatri, S.; Hawkins, S.M.; Leach, R.E.; Fazleabas, A.T.; Young, S.L.; Lessey, B.A.; et al. ARID1A Is Essential for Endometrial Function during Early Pregnancy. PLoS Genet. 2015, 11, e1005537. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Zhang, Q.; Dong, P.; Liu, X.; Sakuragi, N.; Guo, S.W. Enhancer of Zeste homolog 2 (EZH2) induces epithelial-mesenchymal transition in endometriosis. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 6804. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Maeda, D.; Shih Ie, M. Pathogenesis and the role of ARID1A mutation in endometriosis-related ovarian neoplasms. Adv. Anat. Pathol. 2013, 20, 45–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Anglesio, M.S.; Papadopoulos, N.; Ayhan, A.; Nazeran, T.M.; Noe, M.; Horlings, H.M.; Lum, A.; Jones, S.; Senz, J.; Seckin, T.; et al. Cancer-Associated Mutations in Endometriosis without Cancer. N. Engl. J. Med. 2017, 376, 1835–1848. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Kim, H.I.; Kim, T.H.; Yoo, J.Y.; Young, S.L.; Lessey, B.A.; Ku, B.J.; Jeong, J.W. ARID1A and PGR proteins interact in the endometrium and reveal a positive correlation in endometriosis. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2021, 550, 151–157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Wilson, M.R.; Reske, J.J.; Holladay, J.; Wilber, G.E.; Rhodes, M.; Koeman, J.; Adams, M.; Johnson, B.; Su, R.W.; Joshi, N.R.; et al. ARID1A and PI3-kinase pathway mutations in the endometrium drive epithelial transdifferentiation and collective invasion. Nat. Commun. 2019, 10, 3554. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Reske, J.J.; Wilson, M.R.; Holladay, J.; Siwicki, R.A.; Skalski, H.; Harkins, S.; Adams, M.; Risinger, J.I.; Hostetter, G.; Lin, K.; et al. Co-existing TP53 and ARID1A mutations promote aggressive endometrial tumorigenesis. PLoS Genet. 2021, 17, e1009986. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Marquardt, R.M.; Kim, T.H.; Yoo, J.Y.; Teasley, H.E.; Fazleabas, A.T.; Young, S.L.; Lessey, B.A.; Arora, R.; Jeong, J.W. Endometrial epithelial ARID1A is critical for uterine gland function in early pregnancy establishment. FASEB J. 2021, 35, e21209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Hamilton, J.A. GM-CSF-Dependent Inflammatory Pathways. Front. Immunol. 2019, 10, 2055. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  33. Zhao, H.; Kalish, F.; Schulz, S.; Yang, Y.; Wong, R.J.; Stevenson, D.K. Unique roles of infiltrating myeloid cells in the murine uterus during early to midpregnancy. J. Immunol. 2015, 194, 3713–3722. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  34. Akinrinmade, O.A.; Chetty, S.; Daramola, A.K.; Islam, M.U.; Thepen, T.; Barth, S. CD64: An Attractive Immunotherapeutic Target for M1-type Macrophage Mediated Chronic Inflammatory Diseases. Biomedicines 2017, 5, 56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  35. Yang, Q.; Wang, Y.; Pei, G.; Deng, X.; Jiang, H.; Wu, J.; Zhou, C.; Guo, Y.; Yao, Y.; Zeng, R.; et al. Bone marrow-derived Ly6C(-) macrophages promote ischemia-induced chronic kidney disease. Cell Death Dis. 2019, 10, 291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. Groves, A.M.; Johnston, C.J.; Williams, J.P.; Finkelstein, J.N. Role of Infiltrating Monocytes in the Development of Radiation-Induced Pulmonary Fibrosis. Radiat. Res. 2018, 189, 300–311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Krishnarajah, S.; Ingelfinger, F.; Friebel, E.; Cansever, D.; Amorim, A.; Andreadou, M.; Bamert, D.; Litscher, G.; Lutz, M.; Mayoux, M.; et al. Single-cell profiling of immune system alterations in lymphoid, barrier and solid tissues in aged mice. Nat. Aging 2022, 2, 74–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Yu, Y.R.; O’Koren, E.G.; Hotten, D.F.; Kan, M.J.; Kopin, D.; Nelson, E.R.; Que, L.; Gunn, M.D. A Protocol for the Comprehensive Flow Cytometric Analysis of Immune Cells in Normal and Inflamed Murine Non-Lymphoid Tissues. PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0150606. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Hogg, C.; Panir, K.; Dhami, P.; Rosser, M.; Mack, M.; Soong, D.; Pollard, J.W.; Jenkins, S.J.; Horne, A.W.; Greaves, E. Macrophages inhibit and enhance endometriosis depending on their origin. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2021, 118, e2013776118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Zondervan, K.T.; Becker, C.M.; Koga, K.; Missmer, S.A.; Taylor, R.N.; Vigano, P. Endometriosis. Nat. Rev. Dis. Primers 2018, 4, 9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Ahn, S.H.; Khalaj, K.; Young, S.L.; Lessey, B.A.; Koti, M.; Tayade, C. Immune-inflammation gene signatures in endometriosis patients. Fertil. Steril. 2016, 106, 1420–1431 e1427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  42. Ahn, S.H.; Edwards, A.K.; Singh, S.S.; Young, S.L.; Lessey, B.A.; Tayade, C. IL-17A Contributes to the Pathogenesis of Endometriosis by Triggering Proinflammatory Cytokines and Angiogenic Growth Factors. J. Immunol. 2015, 195, 2591–2600. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  43. Richter, O.N.; Dorn, C.; Rosing, B.; Flaskamp, C.; Ulrich, U. Tumor necrosis factor alpha secretion by peritoneal macrophages in patients with endometriosis. Arch. Gynecol. Obs. 2005, 271, 143–147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Ledee-Bataille, N.; Olivennes, F.; Kadoch, J.; Dubanchet, S.; Frydman, N.; Chaouat, G.; Frydman, R. Detectable levels of interleukin-18 in uterine luminal secretions at oocyte retrieval predict failure of the embryo transfer. Hum. Reprod. 2004, 19, 1968–1973. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  45. Wilson, R.; Moor, J.; Jenkins, C.; Miller, H.; Walker, J.J.; McLean, M.A.; Norman, J.; McInnes, I.B. Abnormal first trimester serum interleukin 18 levels are associated with a poor outcome in women with a history of recurrent miscarriage. Am. J. Reprod. Immunol. 2004, 51, 156–159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Haider, S.; Knofler, M. Human tumour necrosis factor: Physiological and pathological roles in placenta and endometrium. Placenta 2009, 30, 111–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  47. Winger, E.E.; Reed, J.L. Treatment with tumor necrosis factor inhibitors and intravenous immunoglobulin improves live birth rates in women with recurrent spontaneous abortion. Am. J. Reprod. Immunol. 2008, 60, 8–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Murrieta-Coxca, J.M.; Gomez-Chavez, F.; Baeza-Martinez, D.A.; Cancino-Diaz, M.E.; Cancino-Diaz, J.C.; Perez-Tapia, S.M.; Reyes-Maldonado, E.; Rodriguez-Martinez, S. Estrous Cycle and Gestational Age-Dependent Expression of Members of the Interleukin-36 Subfamily in a Semi-Allogeneic Model of Infected and Non-Infected Murine Pregnancy. Front. Immunol. 2016, 7, 376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  49. Dosiou, C.; Giudice, L.C. Natural killer cells in pregnancy and recurrent pregnancy loss: Endocrine and immunologic perspectives. Endocr. Rev. 2005, 26, 44–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Renaud, S.J.; Scott, R.L.; Chakraborty, D.; Rumi, M.A.; Soares, M.J. Natural killer-cell deficiency alters placental development in rats. Biol. Reprod. 2017, 96, 145–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Ashkar, A.A.; Black, G.P.; Wei, Q.; He, H.; Liang, L.; Head, J.R.; Croy, B.A. Assessment of requirements for IL-15 and IFN regulatory factors in uterine NK cell differentiation and function during pregnancy. J. Immunol. 2003, 171, 2937–2944. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  52. Ratsep, M.T.; Felker, A.M.; Kay, V.R.; Tolusso, L.; Hofmann, A.P.; Croy, B.A. Uterine natural killer cells: Supervisors of vasculature construction in early decidua basalis. Reproduction 2015, 149, R91-102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  53. Schulke, L.; Berbic, M.; Manconi, F.; Tokushige, N.; Markham, R.; Fraser, I.S. Dendritic cell populations in the eutopic and ectopic endometrium of women with endometriosis. Hum. Reprod. 2009, 24, 1695–1703. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  54. Maridas, D.E.; Hey-Cunningham, A.J.; Ng, C.H.M.; Markham, R.; Fraser, I.S.; Berbic, M. Peripheral and endometrial dendritic cell populations during the normal cycle and in the presence of endometriosis. J. Endometr. Pelvic Pain Disord. 2014, 6, 67–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  55. Parameswaran, N.; Patial, S. Tumor necrosis factor-alpha signaling in macrophages. Crit. Rev. Eukaryot. Gene Expr. 2010, 20, 87–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Straub, R.H. The complex role of estrogens in inflammation. Endocr. Rev. 2007, 28, 521–574. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  57. Schofield, G.; Kimber, S.J. Leukocyte subpopulations in the uteri of leukemia inhibitory factor knockout mice during early pregnancy. Biol. Reprod. 2005, 72, 872–878. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  58. Laird, S.M.; Tuckerman, E.M.; Saravelos, H.; Li, T.C. The production of tumour necrosis factor alpha (TNF-alpha) by human endometrial cells in culture. Hum. Reprod. 1996, 11, 1318–1323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  59. Roulis, M.; Armaka, M.; Manoloukos, M.; Apostolaki, M.; Kollias, G. Intestinal epithelial cells as producers but not targets of chronic TNF suffice to cause murine Crohn-like pathology. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2011, 108, 5396–5401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  60. Robertson, S.A.; Mayrhofer, G.; Seamark, R.F. Uterine epithelial cells synthesize granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor and interleukin-6 in pregnant and nonpregnant mice. Biol. Reprod. 1992, 46, 1069–1079. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  61. Zhao, Y.; Chegini, N. The expression of granulocyte macrophage-colony stimulating factor (GM-CSF) and receptors in human endometrium. Am. J. Reprod. Immunol. 1999, 42, 303–311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Deshmane, S.L.; Kremlev, S.; Amini, S.; Sawaya, B.E. Monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 (MCP-1): An overview. J. Interferon. Cytokine Res. 2009, 29, 313–326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Jolicoeur, C.; Boutouil, M.; Drouin, R.; Paradis, I.; Lemay, A.; Akoum, A. Increased expression of monocyte chemotactic protein-1 in the endometrium of women with endometriosis. Am. J. Pathol. 1998, 152, 125–133. [Google Scholar]
  64. Daikoku, T.; Ogawa, Y.; Terakawa, J.; Ogawa, A.; DeFalco, T.; Dey, S.K. Lactoferrin-iCre: A new mouse line to study uterine epithelial gene function. Endocrinology 2014, 155, 2718–2724. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  65. Kovacic, B.; Hoelbl-Kovacic, A.; Fischhuber, K.M.; Leitner, N.R.; Gotthardt, D.; Casanova, E.; Sexl, V.; Muller, M. Lactotransferrin-Cre reporter mice trace neutrophils, monocytes/macrophages and distinct subtypes of dendritic cells. Haematologica 2014, 99, 1006–1015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  66. Cunha, G.R.; Sinclair, A.; Ricke, W.A.; Robboy, S.J.; Cao, M.; Baskin, L.S. Reproductive tract biology: Of mice and men. Differentiation 2019, 110, 49–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Wang, H.; Dey, S.K. Roadmap to embryo implantation: Clues from mouse models. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2006, 7, 185–199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Gao, X.; Tate, P.; Hu, P.; Tjian, R.; Skarnes, W.C.; Wang, Z. ES cell pluripotency and germ-layer formation require the SWI/SNF chromatin remodeling component BAF250a. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2008, 105, 6656–6661. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  69. Mendes-Jorge, L.; Ramos, D.; Valenca, A.; Lopez-Luppo, M.; Pires, V.M.R.; Catita, J.; Nacher, V.; Navarro, M.; Carretero, A.; Rodriguez-Baeza, A.; et al. Correction: L-Ferritin Binding to Scara5: A New Iron Traffic Pathway Potentially Implicated in Retinopathy. PLoS ONE 2017, 12, e0180288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  70. Nittoli, V.; Colella, M.; Porciello, A.; Reale, C.; Roberto, L.; Russo, F.; Russo, N.A.; Porreca, I.; De Felice, M.; Mallardo, M.; et al. Multi Species Analyses Reveal Testicular T3 Metabolism and Signalling as a Target of Environmental Pesticides. Cells 2021, 10, 2187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Allam, R.; Maillard, M.H.; Tardivel, A.; Chennupati, V.; Bega, H.; Yu, C.W.; Velin, D.; Schneider, P.; Maslowski, K.M. Epithelial NAIPs protect against colonic tumorigenesis. J. Exp. Med. 2015, 212, 369–383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Kawamura, T.; Tomari, H.; Onoyama, I.; Araki, H.; Yasunaga, M.; Lin, C.; Kawamura, K.; Yokota, N.; Yoshida, S.; Yagi, H.; et al. Identification of genes associated with endometrial cell ageing. Mol. Hum. Reprod. 2021, 27, gaaa078. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Shi, Q.; Zhuang, F.; Liu, J.T.; Li, N.; Chen, Y.X.; Su, X.B.; Yao, A.H.; Yao, Q.P.; Han, Y.; Li, S.S.; et al. Single-cell analyses reveal functional classification of dendritic cells and their potential roles in inflammatory disease. FASEB J. 2019, 33, 3784–3794. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Schokrpur, S.; Hu, J.; Moughon, D.L.; Liu, P.; Lin, L.C.; Hermann, K.; Mangul, S.; Guan, W.; Pellegrini, M.; Xu, H.; et al. CRISPR-Mediated VHL Knockout Generates an Improved Model for Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 29032. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  75. Chan, H.Y.; Moldenhauer, L.M.; Groome, H.M.; Schjenken, J.E.; Robertson, S.A. Toll-like receptor-4 null mutation causes fetal loss and fetal growth restriction associated with impaired maternal immune tolerance in mice. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 16569. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Sand, J.; Haertel, E.; Biedermann, T.; Contassot, E.; Reichmann, E.; French, L.E.; Werner, S.; Beer, H.D. Expression of inflammasome proteins and inflammasome activation occurs in human, but not in murine keratinocytes. Cell Death Dis. 2018, 9, 24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Murayama, M.A.; Kakuta, S.; Maruhashi, T.; Shimizu, K.; Seno, A.; Kubo, S.; Sato, N.; Saijo, S.; Hattori, M.; Iwakura, Y. CTRP3 plays an important role in the development of collagen-induced arthritis in mice. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2014, 443, 42–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  78. Sneezum, L.; Eislmayr, K.; Dworak, H.; Sedlyarov, V.; Le Heron, A.; Ebner, F.; Fischer, I.; Iwakura, Y.; Kovarik, P. Context-Dependent IL-1 mRNA-Destabilization by TTP Prevents Dysregulation of Immune Homeostasis Under Steady State Conditions. Front. Immunol. 2020, 11, 1398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Shi, M.; Sekulovski, N.; Whorton, A.E.; MacLean, J.A., 2nd; Greaves, E.; Hayashi, K. Efficacy of niclosamide on the intra-abdominal inflammatory environment in endometriosis. FASEB J. 2021, 35, e21584. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Hashiguchi, Y.; Yabe, R.; Chung, S.H.; Murayama, M.A.; Yoshida, K.; Matsuo, K.; Kubo, S.; Saijo, S.; Nakamura, Y.; Matsue, H.; et al. IL-36alpha from Skin-Resident Cells Plays an Important Role in the Pathogenesis of Imiquimod-Induced Psoriasiform Dermatitis by Forming a Local Autoamplification Loop. J. Immunol. 2018, 201, 167–182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Martin, M. Cutadapt removes adapter sequences from high-throughput sequencing reads. EMBnet. J. 2011, 17, 10–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Dobin, A.; Davis, C.A.; Schlesinger, F.; Drenkow, J.; Zaleski, C.; Jha, S.; Batut, P.; Chaisson, M.; Gingeras, T.R. STAR: Ultrafast universal RNA-seq aligner. Bioinformatics 2013, 29, 15–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  83. Love, M.I.; Huber, W.; Anders, S. Moderated estimation of fold change and dispersion for RNA-seq data with DESeq2. Genome Biol. 2014, 15, 550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  84. Love, M.I.; Anders, S.; Kim, V.; Huber, W. RNA-Seq workflow: Gene-level exploratory analysis and differential expression. F1000Research 2015, 4, 1070. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Ignatiadis, N.; Klaus, B.; Zaugg, J.B.; Huber, W. Data-driven hypothesis weighting increases detection power in genome-scale multiple testing. Nat. Methods 2016, 13, 577–580. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  86. Zhu, A.; Ibrahim, J.G.; Love, M.I. Heavy-tailed prior distributions for sequence count data: Removing the noise and preserving large differences. Bioinformatics 2019, 35, 2084–2092. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Wickham, H. ggplot2: Elegant Graphics for Data Analysis. In Use R! 2nd ed.; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  88. Gu, Z.; Eils, R.; Schlesner, M. Complex heatmaps reveal patterns and correlations in multidimensional genomic data. Bioinformatics 2016, 32, 2847–2849. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  89. Gu, Z.; Gu, L.; Eils, R.; Schlesner, M.; Brors, B. circlize Implements and enhances circular visualization in R. Bioinformatics 2014, 30, 2811–2812. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Ijms 23 06067 g001 550
Figure 1. Deletion of endometrial epithelial Arid1a in mice causes diminished implantation site size and uNK cell numbers at GD 7.5. (A) Implantation sites were grossly visible in both control (n = 8) and LtfiCre/+Arid1af/f (n = 10) uteri at GD 7.5, appearing smaller in LtfiCre/+Arid1af/f uteri. (B) Implantation site number (left) as counted based on gross morphology was similar between control (n = 8, empty bar) and LtfiCre/+Arid1af/f (n = 10, grey bar) uteri at GD 7.5, but the average implantation site diameter (middle) and weight (right) were significantly decreased in LtfiCre/+Arid1af/f (n = 7, grey bar) uteri compared to controls (n = 5, empty bar). The graphs represent the mean ± SEM. * p < 0.05; ***, p < 0.001; ns, p > 0.05. Abbreviations: Arid1a, AT-rich interaction domain 1A; GD, gestation day; Ltf, lactoferrin; uNK, uterine natural killer.
Figure 1. Deletion of endometrial epithelial Arid1a in mice causes diminished implantation site size and uNK cell numbers at GD 7.5. (A) Implantation sites were grossly visible in both control (n = 8) and LtfiCre/+Arid1af/f (n = 10) uteri at GD 7.5, appearing smaller in LtfiCre/+Arid1af/f uteri. (B) Implantation site number (left) as counted based on gross morphology was similar between control (n = 8, empty bar) and LtfiCre/+Arid1af/f (n = 10, grey bar) uteri at GD 7.5, but the average implantation site diameter (middle) and weight (right) were significantly decreased in LtfiCre/+Arid1af/f (n = 7, grey bar) uteri compared to controls (n = 5, empty bar). The graphs represent the mean ± SEM. * p < 0.05; ***, p < 0.001; ns, p > 0.05. Abbreviations: Arid1a, AT-rich interaction domain 1A; GD, gestation day; Ltf, lactoferrin; uNK, uterine natural killer.
Ijms 23 06067 g001
Ijms 23 06067 g002 550
Figure 2. Deletion of endometrial epithelial Arid1a in mice causes diminished decidual area and decreased uNK cell numbers in GD 7.5 implantation sites. (A) Representative images of COX-2 IHC in control and LtfiCre/+Arid1af/f mouse uteri at GD 7.5 (n = 5 IS/genotype). (B) Representative images of DBA lectin staining for uNK cells in control and LtfiCre/+Arid1af/f mouse uteri at GD 7.5 (n = 5 IS/genotype). (C) Quantification of the average number of DBA-stained uNK cells counted per tissue section in control (n = 5 IS, empty bar) and LtfiCre/+Arid1af/f (n = 5 IS, grey bar) uteri. The graph represents the mean ± SEM. **, p < 0.01. Abbreviations: Arid1a, AT-rich interaction domain 1A; COX-2, cyclooxygenase-2; DBA, Dolichos biflorus; GD, gestation day; IS, implantation site; Ltf, lactoferrin; uNK, uterine natural killer.
Figure 2. Deletion of endometrial epithelial Arid1a in mice causes diminished decidual area and decreased uNK cell numbers in GD 7.5 implantation sites. (A) Representative images of COX-2 IHC in control and LtfiCre/+Arid1af/f mouse uteri at GD 7.5 (n = 5 IS/genotype). (B) Representative images of DBA lectin staining for uNK cells in control and LtfiCre/+Arid1af/f mouse uteri at GD 7.5 (n = 5 IS/genotype). (C) Quantification of the average number of DBA-stained uNK cells counted per tissue section in control (n = 5 IS, empty bar) and LtfiCre/+Arid1af/f (n = 5 IS, grey bar) uteri. The graph represents the mean ± SEM. **, p < 0.01. Abbreviations: Arid1a, AT-rich interaction domain 1A; COX-2, cyclooxygenase-2; DBA, Dolichos biflorus; GD, gestation day; IS, implantation site; Ltf, lactoferrin; uNK, uterine natural killer.
Ijms 23 06067 g002
Ijms 23 06067 g003 550
Figure 3. RNA-sequencing analysis of LtfiCre/+Arid1af/f uteri at GD 3.5 reveals large scale transcriptome dysregulation. (A) RNA-sequencing was performed on GD 3.5 control and LtfiCre/+Arid1af/f uterine RNA samples (n = 5/genotype). The PCA plot graphically shows that the overall gene expression patterns are distinct between groups. The plot was created using DESeq2 and ggplot2 in Rstudio. (B) Differential expression analysis with DESeq2 identified 4181 (2007 decreased, 2174 increased) significantly differentially expressed genes (DEGs) meeting the threshold of FDR < 0.05, corrected for multiple testing by independent hypothesis weighting. Hierarchical cluster analysis clearly distinguished the two groups based on gene expression patterns. The plot was created using ComplexHeatmap in Rstudio. (C) Ingenuity Pathway Analysis of the 4181 genes differentially expressed between control and LtfiCre/+Arid1af/f uteri (FDR < 0.05) identified 194 significantly enriched canonical pathways (p < 0.05). The plot shows the top 30 pathways from this list based on their corresponding p-values and also displays ratios (genes in current set/total genes in pathway) and number of genes from each pathway dysregulated in LtfiCre/+Arid1af/f uteri. (D) Ingenuity Pathway Analysis of the 4181 genes differentially expressed between control and LtfiCre/+Arid1af/f uteri (FDR < 0.05) identified 1526 significantly enriched upstream regulators (p < 0.05). The plot shows the top 30 upstream regulators from this list based on their corresponding p-values and also displays activation z-score and number of target molecules in the dataset. The plots were created with ggplot2 in Rstudio. Abbreviations: Arid1a, AT-rich interaction domain 1A; FDR, false discovery rate; GD, gestation day; Ltf, lactoferrin; PCA, principal component analysis.
Figure 3. RNA-sequencing analysis of LtfiCre/+Arid1af/f uteri at GD 3.5 reveals large scale transcriptome dysregulation. (A) RNA-sequencing was performed on GD 3.5 control and LtfiCre/+Arid1af/f uterine RNA samples (n = 5/genotype). The PCA plot graphically shows that the overall gene expression patterns are distinct between groups. The plot was created using DESeq2 and ggplot2 in Rstudio. (B) Differential expression analysis with DESeq2 identified 4181 (2007 decreased, 2174 increased) significantly differentially expressed genes (DEGs) meeting the threshold of FDR < 0.05, corrected for multiple testing by independent hypothesis weighting. Hierarchical cluster analysis clearly distinguished the two groups based on gene expression patterns. The plot was created using ComplexHeatmap in Rstudio. (C) Ingenuity Pathway Analysis of the 4181 genes differentially expressed between control and LtfiCre/+Arid1af/f uteri (FDR < 0.05) identified 194 significantly enriched canonical pathways (p < 0.05). The plot shows the top 30 pathways from this list based on their corresponding p-values and also displays ratios (genes in current set/total genes in pathway) and number of genes from each pathway dysregulated in LtfiCre/+Arid1af/f uteri. (D) Ingenuity Pathway Analysis of the 4181 genes differentially expressed between control and LtfiCre/+Arid1af/f uteri (FDR < 0.05) identified 1526 significantly enriched upstream regulators (p < 0.05). The plot shows the top 30 upstream regulators from this list based on their corresponding p-values and also displays activation z-score and number of target molecules in the dataset. The plots were created with ggplot2 in Rstudio. Abbreviations: Arid1a, AT-rich interaction domain 1A; FDR, false discovery rate; GD, gestation day; Ltf, lactoferrin; PCA, principal component analysis.
Ijms 23 06067 g003
Ijms 23 06067 g004 550
Figure 4. LtfiCre/+Arid1af/f uteri exhibit immune-related gene expression changes at GD 3.5. (A) Ingenuity Pathway Analysis of the 4181 genes differentially expressed between Arid1af/f and LtfiCre/+Arid1af/f uteri (FDR < 0.05) identified 194 significantly enriched canonical pathways (p < 0.05). The plot shows the top 15 immune-related pathways from this list based on their corresponding p-values and also displays ratios (genes in current set/total genes in pathway) and number of genes from each pathway dysregulated in LtfiCre/+Arid1af/f uteri. (B) Ingenuity Pathway Analysis of the 4181 genes differentially expressed between Arid1af/f and LtfiCre/+Arid1af/f uteri (FDR < 0.05) identified 1526 significantly enriched upstream regulators (p < 0.05). The plot shows the top 15 immune-related upstream regulators from this list based on their corresponding p-values and also displays activation z-score and number of target molecules in the dataset. The plots were created with ggplot2 in Rstudio. (C) Relative expression levels of the mRNA from each gene were normalized to Rpl7 in whole uterine RNA preparations from control (n = 5, empty bar and empty dot) and LtfiCre/+Arid1af/f (n = 5, grey bar and filled dot) uteri at GD3.5 determined with RT-qPCR. The graphs represent the mean ± SEM. *, p < 0.05; **, p < 0.01; ***, p < 0.001; ns, p > 0.05. Abbreviations: Arid1a, AT-rich interaction domain 1A; Ccr2, C–C motif chemokine receptor 2; Ccr4, C–C motif chemokine receptor 4; Csf2, colony-stimulating factor 2; Csf3, colony-stimulating factor 3; Dio2, iodothyronine deiodinase 2; FDR, false discovery rate; GD, gestation day; Klra7, killer cell lectin-like receptor 7; Il1a, interleukin 1 alpha; Il17a, interleukin-17A; Il17rb, interleukin-17 receptor B; Il18, interleukin-18; Il36a, interleukin-36 alpha; Ltf, lactoferrin; Myd88, myeloid differentiation primary response 88; Naip1, NLR family, apoptosis inhibitory protein 1; NK, natural killer; PCA, principal component analysis; Rpl7, ribosomal protein L7; Scara5, scavenger receptor class A member 5; Tnf, tumor necrosis factor; Tnfsf13b, tumor necrosis factor ligand superfamily member 13B.
Figure 4. LtfiCre/+Arid1af/f uteri exhibit immune-related gene expression changes at GD 3.5. (A) Ingenuity Pathway Analysis of the 4181 genes differentially expressed between Arid1af/f and LtfiCre/+Arid1af/f uteri (FDR < 0.05) identified 194 significantly enriched canonical pathways (p < 0.05). The plot shows the top 15 immune-related pathways from this list based on their corresponding p-values and also displays ratios (genes in current set/total genes in pathway) and number of genes from each pathway dysregulated in LtfiCre/+Arid1af/f uteri. (B) Ingenuity Pathway Analysis of the 4181 genes differentially expressed between Arid1af/f and LtfiCre/+Arid1af/f uteri (FDR < 0.05) identified 1526 significantly enriched upstream regulators (p < 0.05). The plot shows the top 15 immune-related upstream regulators from this list based on their corresponding p-values and also displays activation z-score and number of target molecules in the dataset. The plots were created with ggplot2 in Rstudio. (C) Relative expression levels of the mRNA from each gene were normalized to Rpl7 in whole uterine RNA preparations from control (n = 5, empty bar and empty dot) and LtfiCre/+Arid1af/f (n = 5, grey bar and filled dot) uteri at GD3.5 determined with RT-qPCR. The graphs represent the mean ± SEM. *, p < 0.05; **, p < 0.01; ***, p < 0.001; ns, p > 0.05. Abbreviations: Arid1a, AT-rich interaction domain 1A; Ccr2, C–C motif chemokine receptor 2; Ccr4, C–C motif chemokine receptor 4; Csf2, colony-stimulating factor 2; Csf3, colony-stimulating factor 3; Dio2, iodothyronine deiodinase 2; FDR, false discovery rate; GD, gestation day; Klra7, killer cell lectin-like receptor 7; Il1a, interleukin 1 alpha; Il17a, interleukin-17A; Il17rb, interleukin-17 receptor B; Il18, interleukin-18; Il36a, interleukin-36 alpha; Ltf, lactoferrin; Myd88, myeloid differentiation primary response 88; Naip1, NLR family, apoptosis inhibitory protein 1; NK, natural killer; PCA, principal component analysis; Rpl7, ribosomal protein L7; Scara5, scavenger receptor class A member 5; Tnf, tumor necrosis factor; Tnfsf13b, tumor necrosis factor ligand superfamily member 13B.
Ijms 23 06067 g004
Ijms 23 06067 g005 550
Figure 5. Uterine F4/80+ macrophage numbers are elevated in LtfiCre/+Arid1af/f mice at GD 3.5. (A) Representative images of F4/80 immunofluorescence (green) counterstained with DAPI (blue) in control (left) and LtfiCre/+Arid1af/f (right) mouse uterine sections at GD 3.5 (n = 5/genotype). For each group, the left image is higher magnification (scale bar = 50 µm) and the right image is a lower magnification region containing the zoomed region (indicated by large white rectangle; scale bar = 100 µm). The small insets in the upper right corner of the control images show no primary antibody negative controls (scale bar = 400 µm). (B) The percentage of F4/80-positive uterine cells was counted in representative stromal fields of approximately 350 cells per sample of control (n = 5, empty bar) and LtfiCre/+Arid1af/f (n = 5, grey bar) uteri at GD3.5. The graph represents the mean ± SEM. **, p < 0.01. Abbreviations: Arid1a, AT-rich interaction domain 1A; F4/80, EGF-like module-containing mucin-like hormone receptor-like 1; GD, gestation day; Ltf, lactoferrin.
Figure 5. Uterine F4/80+ macrophage numbers are elevated in LtfiCre/+Arid1af/f mice at GD 3.5. (A) Representative images of F4/80 immunofluorescence (green) counterstained with DAPI (blue) in control (left) and LtfiCre/+Arid1af/f (right) mouse uterine sections at GD 3.5 (n = 5/genotype). For each group, the left image is higher magnification (scale bar = 50 µm) and the right image is a lower magnification region containing the zoomed region (indicated by large white rectangle; scale bar = 100 µm). The small insets in the upper right corner of the control images show no primary antibody negative controls (scale bar = 400 µm). (B) The percentage of F4/80-positive uterine cells was counted in representative stromal fields of approximately 350 cells per sample of control (n = 5, empty bar) and LtfiCre/+Arid1af/f (n = 5, grey bar) uteri at GD3.5. The graph represents the mean ± SEM. **, p < 0.01. Abbreviations: Arid1a, AT-rich interaction domain 1A; F4/80, EGF-like module-containing mucin-like hormone receptor-like 1; GD, gestation day; Ltf, lactoferrin.
Ijms 23 06067 g005
Ijms 23 06067 g006 550
Figure 6. F4/80+ CD64+ Ly6C+ cells are increased, while uDCs are decreased in LtfiCre/+Arid1af/f uteri at GD 3.5. (A) The flow gating strategy to identify F4/80+ CD64+ Ly6C+ and F4/80+ CD64+ Ly6C-cells in the mouse uterus is shown. (B) The percentage Gated proportion of F4/80+ CD64+ Ly6C+ cells (left) and F4/80+ CD64+ Ly6C− (right) cells in control (n = 14, empty bar) and LtfiCre/+Arid1af/f (n = 8, grey bar) uteri at GD 3.5 is shown. (C) The flow gating strategy to identify uDCs in the uterus is shown. (D) The percentage Gated proportion of uDCs in control (n = 14, empty bar) and LtfiCre/+Arid1af/f (n = 8, grey bar) uteri at GD 3.5. The graphs represent the mean ± SEM. **, p < 0.01. Abbreviations: Arid1a, AT-rich interaction domain 1A; CD64, cluster of differentiation 64; DCs, dendritic cells; F4/80, EGF-like module-containing mucin-like hormone receptor-like 1; GD, gestation day; Ltf, lactoferrin; Ly6c, lymphocyte antigen 6C.
Figure 6. F4/80+ CD64+ Ly6C+ cells are increased, while uDCs are decreased in LtfiCre/+Arid1af/f uteri at GD 3.5. (A) The flow gating strategy to identify F4/80+ CD64+ Ly6C+ and F4/80+ CD64+ Ly6C-cells in the mouse uterus is shown. (B) The percentage Gated proportion of F4/80+ CD64+ Ly6C+ cells (left) and F4/80+ CD64+ Ly6C− (right) cells in control (n = 14, empty bar) and LtfiCre/+Arid1af/f (n = 8, grey bar) uteri at GD 3.5 is shown. (C) The flow gating strategy to identify uDCs in the uterus is shown. (D) The percentage Gated proportion of uDCs in control (n = 14, empty bar) and LtfiCre/+Arid1af/f (n = 8, grey bar) uteri at GD 3.5. The graphs represent the mean ± SEM. **, p < 0.01. Abbreviations: Arid1a, AT-rich interaction domain 1A; CD64, cluster of differentiation 64; DCs, dendritic cells; F4/80, EGF-like module-containing mucin-like hormone receptor-like 1; GD, gestation day; Ltf, lactoferrin; Ly6c, lymphocyte antigen 6C.
Ijms 23 06067 g006
Ijms 23 06067 g007 550
Figure 7. Proposed mechanism: Endometrial epithelial ARID1A loss leads to increased proinflammatory cytokine expression and macrophage-driven uterine inflammation during early pregnancy. Abbreviations: ARID1A, AT-rich interaction domain 1A; CCL2, monocyte chemoattractant protein-1; CCR2, C–C motif chemokine receptor 2; IL-17A, interleukin-17A; IL-18, interleukin-18; IL-36A, interleukin-36 alpha; TNF, tumor necrosis factor.
Figure 7. Proposed mechanism: Endometrial epithelial ARID1A loss leads to increased proinflammatory cytokine expression and macrophage-driven uterine inflammation during early pregnancy. Abbreviations: ARID1A, AT-rich interaction domain 1A; CCL2, monocyte chemoattractant protein-1; CCR2, C–C motif chemokine receptor 2; IL-17A, interleukin-17A; IL-18, interleukin-18; IL-36A, interleukin-36 alpha; TNF, tumor necrosis factor.
Ijms 23 06067 g007
Table
Table 1. SYBR green primers used for RT-qPCR.
Table 1. SYBR green primers used for RT-qPCR.
Gene NameForward Primer (5′–3′)Reverse Primer (5′–3′)Source
Klra7TCACAGCACACAGGTAGAGGAGCTGGAAATCTGGCAGGTCSelf-designed
Scara5AGGAGGGAAAGCCAGGTAGCCCCCTAGCTTCCCATCATCA[69]
Dio2CCTCTTCCTGGCGCTCTATGTTCAGGATTGGAGACGTGCA[70]
Myd88CCCACTCGCAGTTTGTTGGATAGGGGGTCATCAAGGGTGGSelf-designed
Naip1CAGCCACCTAAAATAAGCTCTGGGGACCCATGTTGGTCACTCC[71]
Il17rbCCATCCCTCCAGATGACAACTGCTCCTTCCTTGCCTCCAAGTTA[72]
Ccr2GACAAGCACTTAGACCAGGCACCTTCGGAACTTCTCTCCA[73]
Ccr4CCATTCTGGGGCTACTACGCACCAGGTACATCCATGAAACGA[73]
Tnfsf13bACACTGCCCAACAATTCCTGTCGTCTCCGTTGCGTGAAATC[74]
Csf3GCAGACACAGTGCCTAAGCCACATCCAGCTGAAGCAAGTCCA[75]
Il18GACTCTTGCGTCAACTTCAAGGCAGGCTGTCTTTTGTCAACGA[76]
TnfGCCTCCCTCTCATCAGTTCTCACTTGGTGGTTTGCTACGA[77]
Il1aCCATCCAACCCAGATCAGCAGTTTCTGGCAACTCCTTCAGC[78]
Csf2CCTGGGCATTGTGGTCTACAGGGCATGTCATCCAGGAGGTT[75]
Il17aGGAGAGCTTCATCTGTGTCTCTGTTGGCCTCAGTGTTTGGACA[79]
Il36aCTACAGCTTGGGGAAGGGAACATACCCTTTAGAGCAGACAGCGATGAA[80]
Table
Table 2. Antibodies used for flow cytometry.
Table 2. Antibodies used for flow cytometry.
AntibodyConjugateCloneCompanyCat. #
CD45PE Cy530-F11BioLegend, San Diego, CA, USA103110
CD11cPEN418BioLegend, San Diego, CA, USA117307
CD11bPercp Cy5.5M1/70BioLegend, San Diego, CA, USA101228
Ly6CBV510HK1.4BioLegend, San Diego, CA, USA128033
Ly6GBV7111A8BioLegend, San Diego, CA, USA127643
CD64FITCX54-5/7.1BioLegend, San Diego, CA, USA136316
CD24APCM1/69BioLegend, San Diego, CA, USA101813
F4/80APC Cy7BM8BioLegend, San Diego, CA, USA127117
MHCIIEF450M5/114.15.2Invitrogen, Waltham, MA, USA48-5321-82
LDBlue-Thermo Fisher, Waltham, MA, USAL23105
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Marquardt, R.M.; Ahn, S.H.; Reske, J.J.; Chandler, R.L.; Petroff, M.G.; Kim, T.H.; Jeong, J.-W. Endometrial Epithelial ARID1A Is Required for Uterine Immune Homeostasis during Early Pregnancy. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 6067. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23116067

AMA Style

Marquardt RM, Ahn SH, Reske JJ, Chandler RL, Petroff MG, Kim TH, Jeong J-W. Endometrial Epithelial ARID1A Is Required for Uterine Immune Homeostasis during Early Pregnancy. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2022; 23(11):6067. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23116067

Chicago/Turabian Style

Marquardt, Ryan M., Soo Hyun Ahn, Jake J. Reske, Ronald L. Chandler, Margaret G. Petroff, Tae Hoon Kim, and Jae-Wook Jeong. 2022. "Endometrial Epithelial ARID1A Is Required for Uterine Immune Homeostasis during Early Pregnancy" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 23, no. 11: 6067. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23116067

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop