Next Article in Journal
Potential of Aqueous Humor as a Liquid Biopsy for Uveal Melanoma
Previous Article in Journal
Neuroinflammation in Vascular Cognitive Impairment and Dementia: Current Evidence, Advances, and Prospects
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

A Universal Fluorescent Immunochromatography Assay Based on Quantum Dot Nanoparticles for the Rapid Detection of Specific Antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 Nucleocapsid Protein

Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23(11), 6225; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23116225
by Zehui Li 1, Aiping Wang 1, Jingming Zhou 1, Yumei Chen 1, Hongliang Liu 1, Yankai Liu 1, Ying Zhang 1, Peiyang Ding 1, Xifang Zhu 1, Chao Liang 1, Yanhua Qi 1, Enping Liu 1 and Gaiping Zhang 1,2,3,*
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23(11), 6225; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23116225
Submission received: 18 May 2022 / Revised: 27 May 2022 / Accepted: 30 May 2022 / Published: 2 June 2022
(This article belongs to the Section Molecular Immunology)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Authors, Li et al present here an immunochromatography assay for rapid detection of SARS-CoV-2 N protein.

Major comments:

1.       No information on how the serum sample were obtained – positive, cross-reactive, etc. Please provide information on relevant ethical clearance as need.

Minor comments:

1.       Line 12. What do authors mean by ‘main’?

2.       Line 15: conservative among variants is not true. Please delete

3.       Throughout the manuscript, the authors describe the test and control lines as C and T lines, although they have not been defined in the manuscript (except in figure 3). Please mention it in Line 306.

4.       Line 116-117: It would be helpful to find the information on sample volume and running (dilution) buffer volume in the methods.

5.       Section 4.1: Please mention relevant information on sample pad; conjugate pad; NC; wicking pad etc

6.       Line 350-351: Authors mention no cross-reactivity was seen. However, in Figure 5D: There is some signal in both PEDV and PRV. Please explain and include the observation in the result and discussion

1.       6: Figure 6a and 6b: Is not needed to just make a statement regarding homology. Please remove.

7.       Line 305: elaborate on the composition of ‘treatment fluid’.

8.       Line 312: elaborate on the composition of ‘dilution buffer’

Author Response

Dear reviewer: 

Thank you for your valuable comments to this work. We provided response in turn to each question in the following Word file. Please see the attachment.

Wish you all the best!

Sincerely yours,

Gaiping Zhang

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 2 Report

Dear author,

It is an interesting study and the manuscript is well-written. 

I have some questions:

1. Could you precise if your quantum dot was designed for all SARS-CoV-2 variant?

2. Could this technique be used to detect sARS-CoV-2 in a nasopharyngeal swab? in saliva?

3. If so, what would be the advantages and disadvantages compared to PCR which is currently the universal technique?

4. Have you tested your quantum dot on patient samples?

Author Response

Dear reviewer:

Thank you so much for your insightful comments. We provided response to each question in the following Word file. Please see the attachment.

Wish you all the best!

Sincerely yours,

Gaiping Zhang

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 3 Report

The manuscript is well written and it could be accepted in the present form.

Author Response

Dear reviewer, 

Thank you very much for your approbation, which is a great encouragement to our work. We will take efforts to contribute more research for this field.

Wish you happy and all the best.

Sincerely yours,

Gaiping Zhang

Back to TopTop