Next Article in Journal
A Novel Synthetic Antibody Library with Complementarity-Determining Region Diversities Designed for an Improved Amplification Profile
Previous Article in Journal
SARS-CoV-2 Continuous Genetic Divergence and Changes in Multiplex RT-PCR Detection Pattern on Positive Retesting Median 150 Days after Initial Infection
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

A Multifunctional and Fast-Response Lysosome-Targetable Fluorescent Probe for Monitoring pH and Isoxaflutole

Department of Applied Chemistry, College of Arts and Sciences, Northeast Agricultural University, Harbin 150030, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23(11), 6256; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23116256
Submission received: 22 April 2022 / Revised: 13 May 2022 / Accepted: 30 May 2022 / Published: 2 June 2022
(This article belongs to the Section Molecular Biology)

Abstract

:
A new chemosensor, namely N-(2-morpholinoethyl)acetamide-4-morpholine-1,8-naphthimide (MMN), was designed and synthesized through an amidation reaction. MMN was fabricated as a multifunctional fluorescent probe for monitoring pH and isoxaflutole. MMN exhibited excellent stability in MeCN/H2O (v/v, 9/1), with an obvious “off–on” fluorescence response toward pH changes due to intramolecular charge transfer (ICT), where the linear response ranges of MMN in the weakly acidic system were from 4.2 to 5.0 and from 5.0 to 6.0 with apparent pKa = 4.62 ± 0.02 and 5.43 ± 0.02. Based on morpholine as the lysosome targetable unit, MMN could selectively locate lysosomes in live cells. MMN also successfully detected the presence of H+ in test papers. Finally, MMN could specifically recognize isoxaflutole at a detection limit of 0.88 μM. A possible sensing mechanism was identified based on density function theory calculations. These results indicate that MMN could be a superior potential chemosensor for detecting pH and isoxaflutole selectively and sensitively and could be used in real sample detection.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

pH is essential to human life and plays vital roles in some physiological and chemical processes, including enzymatic activity, cell function, environmental monitoring and human tissue fluid [1]. Intracellular pH homeostasis is necessary for the regulation of various basic cellular processes to maintain normal cell function [2,3,4]. Lysosomes, as essential acidic subcellular organelles (pH 4.5–5.5) in eukaryotic cells, participate in intracellular digestion and cellular differentiation [5,6]. Monitoring lysosome pH change is very important in the development of medical diagnoses and treatment methods. Hence, exploring a more effective strategy for the accurate detection of pH is crucial.
In the past few years, various techniques have been used for pH detection such as the colorimetric method [7], electrochemistry procedures [8], ion-sensitive field-effect transistors [9] and fluorescence techniques [10]. However, there are still shortcomings such as photobleaching, high background emission, alkalization, complicated sample preparation, the need for sophisticated instruments, and high time-consumption and costs. Despite these limitations, fluorescent techniques have the advantages of being convenient, efficient, sensitive and selective and have the potential to be used for monitoring pH.
Pesticides refer to chemical agents used in agriculture to control pests and to regulate plant growth. Pesticides are widely used in agriculture, forestry and animal husbandry; in environmental and family hygiene, pest control and epidemic prevention; and in industrial products to prevent mildew and moths [11]. Isoxaflutole is a highly effective preseedling herbicide that is used in maize, sugarcane and other dry crop fields [12,13,14]. However, the long-term application of pesticides across wide areas not only bring potential health risks to humans but also cause environmental pollution [15,16,17]. The negative impact of pesticide residue has thus aroused people’s attention.
Current reports on the detection methods for isoxaflutole residue mainly involve liquid chromatography and liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry [18,19]. Even though the chromatography method has the advantages of being highly sensitive, having a superior separation ability and having excellent selectivity, this method has a long pretreatment time and can have interferences in the detection process. It can also be costly and requires the presence of highly selective detectors for detecting pesticides. A more accurate, fast, efficient and convenient method in the detection of pesticides is needed. Chemosensors such as fluorescent probes have the potential to detect isoxaflutole with the advantages of low costs, easy operation, fast signal response and signal visualization.
A new lysosome-targetable pH fluorescent probe, namely N-(2-morpholinoethyl)acetamide-4-morpholine-1,8-naphthimide (MMN), was synthesized and characterized. MMN was synthesized by introducing the morpholine unit [20,21,22] as a lysosomal targeting group to naphthalimide, which was highly sensitive to pH changes due to intramolecular charge transfer (ICT) [23]. The fluorescence intensity of MMN increased linearly to 2.2 times in the apparent pH range from 4.2 to 6.0, and the apparent pKa was 4.62 ± 0.02 and 5.43 ± 0.02. The proposed sensing mechanism was confirmed by 1H NMR. MMN selectively located lysosomes in live cells and successfully detected H+ in test papers. Additionally, MMN could specifically recognize isoxaflutole at a detection limit of 0.88 μM.

2. Results and Discussion

2.1. Design and Synthesis of MMN

Naphthalimide, as a representative of fluorophore, shows a high fluorescence quantum yield and high thermal stability [24,25]. Morpholine has been recognized for its special lysosomal targeting function [26]. Based on a rational design, MMN was synthesized through an amidation reaction, as illustrated in Scheme 1. The fluorescent probe was characterized by FTIR, 1H NMR, 13C NMR and HRMS spectroscopy. MMN exhibited an obvious “off–on” fluorescence response toward pH changes and detected isoxaflutole.

2.2. pH-Dependent Sensing Performance

The solvent effect of MMN was studied through fluorescence measurements in different solvents (Figure S1). Based on the solvent fluorescence response and a low toxicity, the spectral properties of MMN were investigated in CH3CN/H2O (v/v, 9/1) where the apparent pH was 6.0. The fluorescence spectra of MMN exhibited a striking dependence on pH (Figure 1a). MMN showed a weak fluorescence signal at 529 nm in the strongly acidic apparent pH region (pH < 4.2). When the alkalinity of the solution increase to weakly alkaline (pH > 6.0), the fluorescence intensity increased significantly, with a slow blueshift by 6 nm.
To further evaluate the dependence of MMN on pH, the UV–Vis spectra of MMN at different pH values were investigated. As the pH values of the solution increased, a blueshift of the UV absorption band was observed (Figure 1b). MMN displayed a superior “off–on” switching behavior from apparent pH 2 to 10 and demonstrated an obvious change in the electron density of naphthalene rings, which was consistent with the fluorescent emission spectra analyses. The fluorescence spectra of MMN were investigated to examine its anti-interference in the presence of other ions at a representative pH value (pH = 4.2). As shown in Figure S2, MMN possesses the potential to accurately detect pH changes with negligible interference.

2.3. pKa Value, Reversibility and Photostability

As shown in Figure 2a, the fluorescence intensity of MMN expressed an excellent partitioned response to pH, i.e., the partitioned linear ranges of apparent pH were from 4.2 to 5.0 with a correlation coefficient (R2) of 0.99 and from 5.0 to 6.0 with an R2 of 0.99. The fluorescence intensity of MMN with different apparent pH values was used to calculate the acidity-constant apparent pKa values of MMN based on the Henderson–Hasselbalch equation in MeCN/H2O (v/v, 9/1):
p K a = p H l o g ( I m a x I I I m i n )
where I is the observed fluorescence intensity at a fixed wavelength, and Imax and Imin are the corresponding maximum and minimum intensities, respectively [27]. These results indicated that MMN exhibited a high sensitivity to weakly acidic pH with apparent pKa values of 4.62 ± 0.02 and 5.43 ± 0.02. The reversibility behavior of the prepared MMN probe was investigated by tracking the changes in emission intensity at 529 nm at apparent pH 4.2 and pH 6.0 (Figure 2b). The changes in colors (inset of Figure 2b) were recorded at apparent pH 4.2 and 6. There was no significant change in the reversibility up to four cycles. Thus, this proved that MMN could be used as a reversible pH monitor due to its excellent reversibility. In Figure 2c, the response of the proposed MMN to H+ was in real time, and the fluorescence intensity remained nearly unchanged over 130 min when tested at apparent pH 4.2 and 6.0. The results indicated that MMN could be reliably applied for real-time monitoring of pH in practical applications.

2.4. Recognition Mechanism of MMN to H+

To examine the proposed interactive mechanism of MMN on the pH value, 1H NMR spectra of MMN (D2O/DMSO-d6 (v/v, 1:1)) were measured by adding TFA (H+) or NaOH (OH) to solutions. As shown in Figure 3a, upon the addition of H+ to MMN, the signal at δ 8.10–8.13 ppm was downfield-shifted to 8.45–8.47 ppm owing to a decrease in the electron density around N-H of amide induced by H+. The signal of the aromatic protons (Ar-H) was not affected except for a later peak fraction. However, the 1H NMR spectrum of MMN + OH was consistent with that of MMN. Therefore, when H+ was added, the change in 1H NMR spectrum contributed to a decrease in electron density around N-H of amide and the active hydrogen protons NH produced a charge transfer process, where N atom was positively charged and C=N was formed due to tautomerism. When OH was added, the intramolecular charge transfer (ICT) effect was weakened, and a blueshift and enhancement of the fluorescent emission band were observed [23]. The mechanism of MMN for H+ is proposed in Figure 3b.

2.5. Colocalization Imaging Experiment and Test Stri

The colocalization experiment was carried out using a commercial lysosome-specific dye, Lyso-Tracker Red, to confirm the lysosome-targeting ability of MMN. As shown in Figure 4, MMN displayed blue punctuated fluorescence (Figure 4b), which merged well with the red fluorescence produced by Lyso-Tracker Red (Figure 4d) and had a high Pearson’s colocalization coefficient of 0.67 with an overlap coefficient of 0.99 (Figure 4e). Simultaneously, the intensity profile within the ROI in the blue and red channels displayed a trend of synchronization (Figure 4f). The results demonstrate that MMN could selectively locate lysosomes in live cells and has the potential to detect pH in lysosomal cells. This is evident in the test paper experiments shown in Figure 5. When the apparent pH decreased from 6.0 to 4.2, the fluorescent colors of the test papers changed from light green to ivory by degrees. The dye strip results show that MMN can be used for rapid and portable pH monitoring. In addition, the performance of MMN was compared with other previously reported pH probes (Table 1) [28,29,30].

2.6. Detection of Isoxaflutole

To further investigate the detection properties of MMN, MMN was placed in a CH3CN solution along with different pesticides, including triketones, fluorine, cyanide and isoxazole. In the fluorescence spectra (Figure 6a), the addition of isoxaflutole to the solution of MMN induced obvious fluorescence quenching, while the other pesticides exerted a negligible influence under the same conditions. Similarly, the MMN solution could be clearly observed only when isoxaflutole was added and the fluorescence changed from strongly green to quenched (inset in Figure 6a). When isoxaflutole was added to the probe solution, the absorption spectrum was not affected at 400 nm and a new strong absorption band appeared, centered at 293 nm. (Figure S3). The results indicate that MMN could be used to distinguish isoxaflutole from these other pesticides. To further illustrate the specific detection of isoxaflutole by MMN, the fluorescence spectra of MMN were investigated when other pesticides existed in the background. As shown in Figure 6b, no noticeable fluorescence interference from other pesticides was observed, revealing that MMN possesses high selectivity as a disturbance-free isoxaflutole fluorescent probe.
For a sensitivity analysis, a fluorescence titration study of MMN was conducted in the presence of various concentrations of isoxaflutole. The intensity of fluorescence at 529 nm decreased gradually with the addition of an increasing amount of isoxaflutole (Figure 7a). The emission intensity stabilized after the amount of added isoxaflutole ion reached 5 equiv. and showed a linear relationship (R2 = 0.98 or 0.99) with the concentration of isoxaflutole in the ranges of 10–27 or 28–50 µM (inset in Figure 7a). Moreover, based on the equation LOD = 3σ/k, the LOD of MMN for isoxaflutole was determined to be 0.88 µM, where σ is the standard deviation of the response at the lowest concentrations and k represents the slope of the calibration. The results indicate that MMN could be used to quantitatively determine isoxaflutole with a low detection limit. The binding constant of MMN with isoxaflutole was calculated according to the fluorescence intensity data using the modified Stern–Volmer equation: I 0 / ( I 0 I ) = 1 / A + 1 / K · 1 / [ Q ] [31], where I0 and I are the maximum luminescent intensities of MMN before and after adding isoxaflutole, K is the binding constant (M−1) and the unit measurement [A] represents molar concentration. The binding constant (K) was calculated as 3.7 × 105 M−1 (Figure 7b), which was compared with other previously reported fluorescent probes (Table S1). Considering that response time is a crucial factor for photostability, the time-dependent curve was studied, as shown in Figure S4. The results demonstrate that the fluorescence signal of free MMN remained stable while MMN showed immediate and distinct fluorescence quenching; the fluorescence intensity reached the minimum within 30 s and remained stable in the following 90 min, indicating a high reactivity of MMN with isoxaflutole.
A Job’s plot analysis was carried out to determine the stoichiometric ratios of MMN to isoxaflutole,. The emission intensity reached the maximum when the molar fraction of isoxaflutole was 0.5, which indicates that MMN and isoxaflutole act in a stoichiometric ratio of 1:1 (Figure S5). The possible mechanism of MMN for detecting pesticides was investigated by density functional theory (DFT) calculations exhibited via the electron density or energy level between isoxaflutole and MMN. As shown in Figure 8, several representative pesticide molecules for DFT were selected as examples for investigation. It was found that the LUMO energy levels of isoxaflutole and mesotrione were lower than those of other pesticides (glyphosate, oxyfluorfen, pyrazoxyfen and cypermethrin), indicating that the electron affinities of isoxaflutole with the -CF3 electron-withdrawing group and mesotrione with the -NO2 electron-withdrawing group were relatively higher than those of other pesticides. Meanwhile, their LUMO energy levels were between the HOMO and LUMO energy levels of MMN, which could cause the transition of electrons from the LUMO orbital of MMN to the LUMO orbitals of isoxaflutole and mesotrione in the excited state [32,33,34,35,36,37]. The transition of electrons from the LUMO orbital of MMN in the excited state to the LUMO of isoxaflutole prevented the electrons from returning to the HOMO orbital of MMN, leading to the phenomenon of fluorescence quenching in the recognition of isoxaflutole. The electron-withdrawing group in isoxaflutole may play a vital role in quenching effects due to the photoinduced electron transfer from MMN to electron-deficient isoxaflutole. Therefore, DFT illuminates the possible mechanism of how MMN detects isoxaflutole.

3. Experimental Section

3.1. Materials and Methods

All reagents used in the experiment, including raw materials, solvents and pesticides, were purchased from commercial suppliers and used without purification. A Bruker ALPHA-T spectrometer (KBr, Bruker, Ettlingen, Germany) was used to record FTIR spectra. The 1H NMR and 13C NMR spectra of the samples were obtained using a Bruker AVANCE 400 MHz system (Bruker, Germany). High-resolution mass spectrometry (HRMS) was performed on an FTMS Ultra Apex MS spectrometer (Bruker Daltonics Inc., Billerica, MA, USA). UV–Vis and fluorescence spectra were measured on a UV-2550 ultraviolet spectrophotometer (Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan) and a PerkinElmer LS55 fluorescence spectrometer (PerkinElmer, Buckinghamshire, UK), respectively. All pH values were measured with a PHS-3C pH meter (Inesa, Shanghai, China). Cell images were obtained on a LEICATCSSP2 confocal laser scanning microscope (Leica, Wetzlar, Germany).

3.2. Synthesis

3.2.1. Synthesis of 4-Morpholine-1,8-naphthalic Anhydride (1)

Compound 1 was synthesized based on the published literature [38]. 4-Bromo-1,8-naphthalic anhydride (5.54 g, 20.0 mmol) was added to 2-methoxyethanol (25 mL) in a three-necked flask and stirred at 25 °C until it dissolved. Then, 1.92 mL (22.0 mmol) of morpholine was dropped into the reaction system and the temperature was increased to 125 °C, after which the system was refluxed for 5 h. After cooling to room temperature, the insoluble orange needle-like precipitate was separated out. The residue was recrystallized from EtOH to obtain the final yellow needles (1). Yield: 90%. m.p.: 227.7–228.5 °C. All spectra of the structural characterization of compound 1 are presented in the electronic Supplementary Materials (Figures S6–S8). FT-IR (KBr) cm−1: 3076, 2954, 2852 (v C-H), 1762, 1724 (v C=O). 1H NMR (CDCl3, TMS, 400 MHz, ppm) δ 8.61 (m, 1H), 8.55 (d, J = 8.1 Hz, 1H), 8.48 (m, 1H), 7.76 (m, 1H), 7.28 (s, 1H), 4.07–4.00 (m, 4H), 3.35–3.29 (m, 4H). 13C NMR (CDCl3, TMS, 100 MHz, ppm): 156.83, 134.88, 133.32, 131.57, 126.18, 115.26, 77.22, 66.83, 53.31.

3.2.2. Synthesis of N-Carboxymethyl-4-morpholine-1,8-naphthalimide (2)

Compound 2 was synthesized by improving the previous synthesis method [39]. A mixture of compound 1 (2.85 g, 10 mmol) and glycine (1.15 g, 15 mmol) was refluxed with continuous stirring in N,N-dimethylformamide (DMF) (75 mL) at 100 °C for 30 h. The filtrate was transferred to a water-filled beaker. After the yellow solid was completely separated out, the crude product was obtained by filtration, which was purified by recrystallization from ethanol to give compound 2. Yield: 86%. m.p.: 247.7–248.4 °C. All spectra of the structural characterization of compound 2 are presented in the electronic Supplementary Materials (Figure S9–S11). FT-IR (KBr) cm−1: 3435 (v OH), 2960, 2821 (v C-H), 1735, 1701,1658 (v C=O). 1H NMR (DMSO-d6, TMS, 400 MHz, ppm) δ 13.04 (s, 1H), 8.57–8.42 (m, 3H), 7.85 (m, 1H), 7.39 (d, J = 8.1 Hz, 1H), 4.72 (s, 2H), 3.97–3.84 (m, 4H), 3.29–3.19 (m, 4H). 13C NMR (DMSO-d6, TMS, 100 MHz, ppm): 169.88, 163.75, 163.16, 156.35, 133.05, 131.58, 131.51, 129.71, 126.70, 125.79, 122.57, 115.67, 66.64, 53.51, 41.50.

3.2.3. Synthesis of N-(2-Morpholinoethyl)acetamide-4-morpholine-1,8-naphthimide (MMN)

The compound N-(2-morpholinoethyl)acetamide-4-morpholine-1,8-naphthimide was prepared by adopting the reported procedure [40,41,42]. Compound 2 (5 mmol) was reacted with 4-(2-aminoethyl)morpholine by the coupling reagents 1-ethyl-3-(3-dimethylaminopropyl)carbodiimide (EDC, 1.1 eq), the base N,N-diisopropylethylamine (DIEA, 2 eq) and hydroxybenzotrizole (HOBt, 1.2 eq) in dry DMF. After 10 h, the reaction was quenched by adding water and the desired product was precipitated from the reaction mixture, which was filtered and dried. The mixture was purified by column chromatography on silica gel eluted with CH2Cl2/MeOH (v/v, 15/1). Yield: 75%. m.p. > 280 °C. All spectra of the structural characterization of compound MMN are presented in the electronic Supplementary Materials (Figure S12–S15). FT-IR (KBr) cm−1: 3305 (v NH), 3097, 2924, 2854 (v C-H), 197, 1662 (v C=O). 1H NMR (DMSO-d6, TMS, 400 MHz, ppm) δ 8.54 (d, J = 8.5 Hz, 1H), 8.50 (d, J = 7.3 Hz, 1H), 8.43 (d, J = 8.1 Hz, 1H), 8.12 (s, 1H), 7.85 (s, 1H), 7.39 (m, 1H), 4.63 (s, 2H), 3.93 (t, J = 4.6 Hz, 4H), 3.56 (t, J = 4.7 Hz, 4H), 3.29–3.14 (m, 6H), 2.35 (m, 6H). 13C NMR (DMSO-d6, TMS, 100 MHz, ppm): 167.14, 163.92, 163.37, 156.08, 132.73, 131.21, 129.77, 126.61, 125.78, 123.03, 116.26, 115.56, 66.65, 55.38, 53.70, 53.52, 42.74; HRMS (ESI): calcd. for C24H28N4O5 ([M+H] +) 453.2060, found 453.2144.

3.3. General Method for the Spectra Experiments of MMN

The stock solution of MMN was prepared in CH3CN/H2O (v/v, 9/1). The 1.00 × 10−2 M stock solutions of metal cations (KCl, NaCl, AgNO3, PbCl2, SnCl2, CoCl2, CuCl2, HgCl2, BaCl2, MnCl2, CaCl2, ZnCl2, MgCl2, NiCl2, CrCl3, FeCl3 and AlCl3) were prepared with deionized water. The 1.00 × 10−2 M solutions of anions (F, Cl, Br, I, NO3, NO2, CN, SCN H2PO4, SO42− and HSO4) were prepared by tetrabutylammonium (TBA) salts and sodium salts with deionized water. The ionic salts were dissolved in distilled water to prepare the stock solutions for the cations and anions (1.00 × 10−2 M). The stock pesticide solutions (1.00 × 10−2 M) were prepared in DMSO due to the poor solubility of some pesticides using cypermethrin, cyhalothrin, oxyfluorfen, mesotrione, cyhalofop-butyl, teflubenzuron, NTBC, sulcotrione, tembotrion, isoxaflutole, pyrazoxyfen, glyphosate, clethodim, fluazuron, flusilazole, fluorobenzene and benoxacor. For different pH solutions, 1.00 × 10−1 M HCl or NaOH was added to 10 mL of 1.00 × 10−5 M MMN solution and the apparent pH value was determined with a pH meter. To investigate the anti-interference of MMN, 50 μL aliquots of 1.00 × 10−2 M different cation and anion solutions were used as the background to measure the fluorescence spectra at two representative apparent pH values (4.2 and 6.0). Different instruments were used for fluorescence spectroscopic detection of pH and isoxaflutole. The slit widths of excitation and emission were set to 10 nm, and the excitation wavelength was set to 415 nm in the fluorescence spectral experiment.

3.4. Cell Incubation and Fluorescence Imaging

Human stromal cell line (HSC) cells were purchased from the Chinese Academy of Sciences and cultured using the medium DMEM, which contains 15% fetal bovine serum, 100 µg/mL penicillin and 100 g/mL streptomycin at 37 °C within a humidified 5% CO2 atmosphere. One day before the fluorescence imaging experiment, the cells were placed on petri dishes (NESTC) at the bottom of 35 mm cover slides. The cells were incubated with Lyso-Tracker Red (70 nM) for 30 min, washed with PBS 3 times, fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde for 1 h, washed with PBS 3 times, washed with a solvent 3 times, stained overnight with MMN (100 nM), washed with a solvent 3 times, sealed and observed under a confocal microscope.

3.5. Computational Methods

The Perdew–Burke–Ernzerh (PBE) method of Generalized Gradient Approximation (GGA) in the Dmol3 module was used to calculate the exchange correlation energy using a DNP+ basis set calculation and dispersion correction with Grimme [43,44,45].

4. Conclusions

In summary, we designed and developed a multifunctional naphthimide-based fluorescent probe (MMN). Because of the H+-induced intramolecular charge transfer (ICT) effect, MMN displayed significant pH sensitivity with apparent pKa values of 4.62 ± 0.02 and 5.43 ± 0.02 as well as good linear apparent pH responses ranging from 4.2 to 5.0 and from 5.0 to 6.0, which were suitable for selectively detecting acidic lysosomes. MMN shows potential for the rapid detection of pH in test papers. Furthermore, MMN could quickly and easily detect isoxaflutole with an extremely low detection limit. Density function theory calculations revealed MMN’s potential underlying the sensing mechanism.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/ijms23116256/s1.

Author Contributions

F.Y. and Y.F. conceived and designed the experiment and conveyed the manuscript information as corresponding authors. L.Y. and Y.L. (Yan Liu) repeated the experiment multiple times and then applied the findings as in-depth research content. M.Y. used Origin and Excel to process the data. P.L. coordinated the data. Y.L. (Yulong Liu) consulted relevant literature, collected background knowledge and theoretical support. Y.L. (Yan Liu) synthesized and purified the compound. The manuscript was written by L.Y. and edited by F.Y. and Y.F. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

Thanks to the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 51903032); Postdoctoral Science Foundation of Heilongjiang Province (No. LBH-Z19045); and the University Nursing Program for Young Scholars with Creative Talents in Heilongjiang Province, China (No. UNPYSCT-2020111), for funding this work.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Chao, J.B.; Wang, H.J.; Zhang, Y.B.; Li, Z.Q.; Liu, Y.H.; Huo, F.J.; Yin, C.X.; Shi, Y.W.; Wang, J.J. A single pH fluorescent probe for bio-sensing and imaging of extreme acidity and extreme alkalinity. Anal. Chim. Acta 2017, 975, 52–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Grabe, M.; Oster, G. Regulation of organelle acidity. J. Gen. Physiol. 2001, 117, 329–344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  3. Ambrosio, F.; Wiktor, J.; Pasquarello, A. pH-dependent catalytic reaction pathway for water splitting at the BiVO4–water interface from the band alignment. ACS Energy Lett. 2018, 3, 829–834. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Parks, S.K.; Chiche, J.; Pouyssegur, J. pH control mechanisms of tumor survival and growth. J. Cell. Physiol. 2011, 226, 299–308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Settembre, C.; Fraldi, A.; Medina, D.L.; Ballabio, A. Signals from the lysosome: A control centre for cellular clearance and energy metabolism. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2013, 14, 283–296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  6. Xu, H.; Ren, D. Lysosomal physiology. Annu. Rev. Physiol. 2015, 77, 57–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Luka, G.S.; Nowak, E.; Kawchuk, J.; Hoorfar, M.; Najjaran, H. Portable device for the detection of colorimetric assays. R. Soc. Open Sci. 2017, 4, 171025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Manjakkal, L.; Szwagierczak, D.; Dahiya, R. Metal oxides based electrochemical pH sensors: Current progress and future perspectives. Prog. Mater. Sci. 2020, 109, 100635. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Miao, Y.; Chen, J.; Fang, K. New technology for the detection of pH. J. Biochem. Bioph. Meth. 2005, 63, 1–9. [Google Scholar]
  10. Ma, Q.; Zhuo, W.; Zhai, Z.; Gong, G.; Zhang, T.; Xiao, H.; Zhou, Z.; Liu, Y. A new fluorescent probe for neutral to alkaline pH and imaging application in live cells. Spectrochim. Acta A 2021, 261, 120031. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Kang, T.; Gao, S.; Zhao, L.X.; Zhai, Y.; Ye, F.; Fu, Y. Design, synthesis and SAR of novel 1,3-disubstituted imidazolidine or hexahydropyrimidine derivatives as herbicide safeners. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2021, 69, 45–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Pallett, K.E.; Cramp, S.M.; Little, J.P.; Veerasekaran, P.; Crudace, A.J.; Slater, A.E. Isoxaflutole: The background to its discovery and the basis of its herbicidal properties. Pest Manage. Sci. 2001, 57, 133–142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Stephenson, D.O.; Bond, J.A. Evaluation of thiencarbazone-methyl– and isoxaflutole-based herbicide programs in corn. Weed Technol. 2012, 26, 37–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Simmons, J.T.; Kells, J.J. Variation and inheritance of isoxaflutole tolerance in corn (zea mays). Weed Technol. 2003, 17, 177–180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Nelson, E.A.; Penner, D. Leaching of isoxaflutole and the herbicide safeners R-29148 and furilazole. Weed Technol. 2007, 21, 106–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Alletto, L.; Benoit, P.; Bergheaud, V.; Coquet, Y. Variability of retention process of isoxaflutole and its diketonitrile metabolite in soil under conventional and conservation tillage. Pest Manag. Sci. 2012, 68, 610–617. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Rouchaud, J.; Nues, O.; Eelen, H.; Bulcke, R. Soil metabolism of isoxaflutole in corn. Arch. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 2002, 42, 280–285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Lin, C.H.; Lerch, R.N.; Thuiman, E.M.; Garrett, H.E.; George, M.F. Determination of isoxaflutole (balance) and its metabolites in water using solid phase extraction followed by high-performance liquid chromatography with ultraviolet or mass spectrometry. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2002, 50, 5816–5824. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Lin, C.H.; Lerch, R.N.; Garrett, H.E.; Li, Y.X.; George, M.F. Improved HPLC-MS/MS method for determination of isoxaflutole (balance) and its metabolites in soils and forage plants. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2007, 55, 3805–3815. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Ye, Z.; Xiong, C.; Pan, J.; Su, D.; Zeng, L. Highly photostable, lysosometargeted BODIPYs with green to near-infrared emission for lysosome imaging in living cells. Dyes Pigm. 2018, 155, 30–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Zhang, Y.; Chen, H.; Chen, D.; Wu, D.; Chen, Z.; Zhang, J.; Chen, X.; Liu, S.; Yin, J. A colorimetric and ratiometric fluorescent probe for mercury (II) in lysosome. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2016, 224, 907–914. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Ye, F.; Wu, N.; Li, P.; Liu, Y.L.; Li, S.J.; Fu, Y. A lysosome-targetable fluorescent probe for imaging trivalent cations Fe3+, Al3+ and Cr3+ in living cells. Spectrochim. Acta A 2019, 222, 117242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Zhou, H.; Feng, R.; Liang, Q.; Su, X.; Deng, L.; Yang, L.; Ma, L.J. A sensitive pH fluorescent probe based on triethylenetetramine bearing double dansyl groups in aqueous solutions and its application in cells. Spectrochim. Acta A 2020, 229, 117881. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Fu, Y.; Pang, X.X.; Wang, Z.Q.; Chai, Q.; Ye, F. A highly sensitive and selective fluorescent probe for determination of Cu (II) and application in live cell imaging. Spectrochim. Acta A 2019, 208, 198–205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Ye, F.; Liang, X.M.; Xu, K.X.; Pang, X.X.; Chai, Q.; Fu, Y. A novel dithiourea-appended naphthalimide “on-off” fluorescent probe for detecting Hg2+ and Ag+ and its application in cell imaging. Talanta 2019, 200, 494–502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Dong, B.; Song, X.; Kong, X.; Wang, C.; Zhang, N.; Lin, W. A tumor-targeting and lysosome-specific two-photon fluorescent probe for imaging pH changes in living cells. J. Mater. Chem. B 2017, 5, 988–995. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Liu, L.J.; Guo, P.; Chai, L.; Shi, Q.; Xu, B.H.; Yuan, J.P.; Wang, X.G.; Shi, X.F.; Zhang, W.Q. Fluorescent and colorimetric detection of pH by a rhodamine-based probe. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2014, 194, 498–502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Dong, Y.; Xiao, H.; Xing, L.; Wu, C.; Zhou, J.; Zhou, Z.; Liu, Y.; Zhuo, S.; Li, P. Two-photon fluorescence visualization of lysosomal pH changes during mitophagy and cell apoptosis. Talanta 2020, 209, 120549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Georgiev, N.I.; Yaneva, I.S.; Surleva, A.R.; Asiri, A.M.; Bojinov, V.B. Synthesis, sensor activity and logic behavior of a highly water–soluble naphthalimide derivative. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2013, 184, 54–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Ding, Z.; Liu, G.; Hu, J. Ratiometric fluorescent mapping of pH and glutathione dictates intracellular transport pathways of micellar nanoparticles. Biomacromolecules 2020, 21, 3436–3446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Yang, L.; Liu, Y.L.; Liu, C.G.; Fu, Y.; Ye, F. A built-in self-calibrating luminescence sensor based on RhB@Zr-MOF for detection of cations, nitro explosives and pesticides. RSC Adv. 2020, 10, 19149–19156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Yang, L.; Liu, Y.L.; Liu, C.G.; Fu, Y.; Ye, F. A cationic metal-organic framework for dye adsorption and separation based on column-chromatography. J. Mol. Liq. 2020, 300, 112311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Yang, L.; Liu, Y.L.; Ji, X.X.; Liu, C.G.; Fu, Y.; Ye, F. A novel luminescent sensor based on Tb@UiO-66 for highly detecting Sm3+ and teflubenzuron. J. Taiwan Inst. Chem. Eng. 2021, 126, 173–181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Liu, Y.; Li, L.; Yue, M.; Yang, L.; Sun, F.; Xu, G.; Fu, Y.; Ye, F. A switch-on fluorescent probe for detection of mesotrione based on the straight forward cleavage of carbon-nitrogen double bond of Schiff base. Chem. Eng. J. 2022, 430, 132758. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Yang, L.; Liu, Y.L.; Liu, C.G.; Ye, F.; Fu, Y. Two luminescent dye@MOFs systems as dual-emitting platforms for efficient pesticides detection. J. Hazard. Mater. 2020, 381, 120966. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Sun, F.; Yang, L.; Li, S.; Wang, Y.; Wang, L.; Li, P.; Ye, F.; Fu, Y. New fluorescent probes for the sensitive determination of glyphosate in food and environmental samples. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2021, 69, 12661–12673. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Li, L.; Gao, S.; Yang, L.; Liu, Y.L.; Li, P.; Ye, F.; Fu, Y. Cobalt (II) complex as a fluorescent sensing platform for the selective and sensitive detection of triketone HPPD inhibitors. J. Hazard. Mater. 2021, 404, 124015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Dai, H.; Xu, H. Selective and sensitive fluorescent chemosensors for Cu2+ ion based upon bis-1,8-naphthalimide dyads. Chin. J. Chem. 2012, 30, 267–272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Liang, S.; Yu, H.; Xiang, J.; Yang, W.; Chen, X.; Liu, Y.; Gao, C.; Yan, G. New naphthalimide modified polyethylenimine nanoparticles as fluorescent probe for DNA detection. Spectrochim. Acta A 2012, 97, 359–365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Johansen, M.D.; Kremer, L.; Kumar, V. Variedly connected 1,8-naphthalimide-7-chloroquinoline conjugates: Synthesis, anti-mycobacterial and cytotoxic evaluation. Bioorg. Chem. 2019, 92, 103241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Zhou, L.; Jin, Z.; Fan, X.; Yao, Y.; Chen, Z.; Zhang, W.; Qian, J. Synthesis of 1,8-naphthalimide-based fluorescent nano-probes and their application in pH detection. Chin. Chem. Lett. 2018, 29, 1500–1502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Fu, Y.; Zhang, J.; Wang, H.; Chen, J.L.; Zhao, P.; Chen, G.R.; He, X.P. Intracellular pH sensing and targeted imaging of lysosome by a galactosyl naphthalimide-piperazine probe. Dyes Pigm. 2016, 133, 372–379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Adamo, C.; Barone, V. Toward reliable density functional methods without adjustable parameters: The PBE0 model. J. Chem. Phys. 1999, 110, 6158–6170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Frisch, M.J.; Pople, J.; Binkley, J.S. Self-consistent molecular orbital methods 25. Supplementary functions for Gaussian basis sets. J. Chem. Phys. 1984, 80, 3265–3269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Marenich, A.V.; Cramer, C.J.; Truhlar, D.G. Universal solvation model based on solute electron density and on a continuum model of the solvent defined by the bulk dielectric constant and atomic surface tensions. J. Chem. Phys. 2009, 113, 6378–6396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Scheme 1. Synthetic route of MMN.
Scheme 1. Synthetic route of MMN.
Ijms 23 06256 sch001
Figure 1. Effect of pH on (a) fluorescence and (b) UV–Vis absorption spectra of MMN at concentrations of 1.00 × 10−5 M. Inset: The maximum fluorescence intensity of MMN in different pH solutions at 529 nm.
Figure 1. Effect of pH on (a) fluorescence and (b) UV–Vis absorption spectra of MMN at concentrations of 1.00 × 10−5 M. Inset: The maximum fluorescence intensity of MMN in different pH solutions at 529 nm.
Ijms 23 06256 g001
Figure 2. (a) The linear responses of fluorescence intensity. (b) Reversibility of the fluorescence intensity of MMN between apparent pH 4.2 and 6.0. Inset: The color changes of MMN solution under UV light of 365 nm. (c) Changes in the fluorescence intensities of MMN with times among nonacidic and acid conditions.
Figure 2. (a) The linear responses of fluorescence intensity. (b) Reversibility of the fluorescence intensity of MMN between apparent pH 4.2 and 6.0. Inset: The color changes of MMN solution under UV light of 365 nm. (c) Changes in the fluorescence intensities of MMN with times among nonacidic and acid conditions.
Ijms 23 06256 g002
Figure 3. (a) The 1H NMR spectra of probe MMN, MMN + H+ and MMN + OH in D2O/DMSO-d6 (v/v, 1:1). (b) Proposed sensing mechanism of MMN toward H+.
Figure 3. (a) The 1H NMR spectra of probe MMN, MMN + H+ and MMN + OH in D2O/DMSO-d6 (v/v, 1:1). (b) Proposed sensing mechanism of MMN toward H+.
Ijms 23 06256 g003
Figure 4. (a) Bright field images. (b) MMN(λem = 415 nm). (c) Lyso-Tracker Red (λem = 577 nm). (d) Merge images of (ac). (e) The intensity scatter plot of blue channel and red channel. (f) Intensity profile of ROI across the cells in the red and blue channels.
Figure 4. (a) Bright field images. (b) MMN(λem = 415 nm). (c) Lyso-Tracker Red (λem = 577 nm). (d) Merge images of (ac). (e) The intensity scatter plot of blue channel and red channel. (f) Intensity profile of ROI across the cells in the red and blue channels.
Ijms 23 06256 g004
Figure 5. The photographs of MMN on test papers with different apparent pH solutions under a UV lamp (365 nm).
Figure 5. The photographs of MMN on test papers with different apparent pH solutions under a UV lamp (365 nm).
Ijms 23 06256 g005
Figure 6. (a) Fluorescence spectra changes of the MMN solution (10 µM) after adding different pesticides (50 µM). Inset: color changes of MMN solution before and after adding pesticides under UV light of 365 nm. (b) Competition selectivity of MMN (10 µM) toward isoxaflutole (50 µM) in the presence of other competition pesticides (100 µM).
Figure 6. (a) Fluorescence spectra changes of the MMN solution (10 µM) after adding different pesticides (50 µM). Inset: color changes of MMN solution before and after adding pesticides under UV light of 365 nm. (b) Competition selectivity of MMN (10 µM) toward isoxaflutole (50 µM) in the presence of other competition pesticides (100 µM).
Ijms 23 06256 g006
Figure 7. (a) Fluorescence spectra recorded for probe MMN (10 µM) upon spectrometric titration with isoxaflutole (0–60 µM). Inset: The relationship between the fluorescence intensity and the concentration of isoxaflutole. (b) Stern–Volmer plot of MMN between MMN and isoxaflutole.
Figure 7. (a) Fluorescence spectra recorded for probe MMN (10 µM) upon spectrometric titration with isoxaflutole (0–60 µM). Inset: The relationship between the fluorescence intensity and the concentration of isoxaflutole. (b) Stern–Volmer plot of MMN between MMN and isoxaflutole.
Ijms 23 06256 g007
Figure 8. HOMO and LUMO molecular orbitals and relative energy levels of MMN and six pesticides.
Figure 8. HOMO and LUMO molecular orbitals and relative energy levels of MMN and six pesticides.
Ijms 23 06256 g008
Table 1. Comparison with other reported pH probes based on naphthalimide.
Table 1. Comparison with other reported pH probes based on naphthalimide.
TypeWorking MediaSensitive Range (pH)Sensing MechanismApplicationReferences
Off–onMeCN/H2O (9/1)4.2–6.0ICTPaper strip/Targetable
Imaging/pesticide detection
MMN
On–offPBS buffer5.0–7.2PETCell imaging[28]
Off–on–offH2O2.0–10PET-[29]
Colorimetric probeDMSO4.5–8.0FRETCell imaging[30]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Yang, L.; Liu, Y.; Yue, M.; Li, P.; Liu, Y.; Ye, F.; Fu, Y. A Multifunctional and Fast-Response Lysosome-Targetable Fluorescent Probe for Monitoring pH and Isoxaflutole. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 6256. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23116256

AMA Style

Yang L, Liu Y, Yue M, Li P, Liu Y, Ye F, Fu Y. A Multifunctional and Fast-Response Lysosome-Targetable Fluorescent Probe for Monitoring pH and Isoxaflutole. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2022; 23(11):6256. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23116256

Chicago/Turabian Style

Yang, Liu, Yan Liu, Mingli Yue, Ping Li, Yulong Liu, Fei Ye, and Ying Fu. 2022. "A Multifunctional and Fast-Response Lysosome-Targetable Fluorescent Probe for Monitoring pH and Isoxaflutole" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 23, no. 11: 6256. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23116256

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop