Next Article in Journal
Antitumor Applications of Photothermal Agents and Photothermal Synergistic Therapies
Next Article in Special Issue
Remodeling of the Lamina Cribrosa: Mechanisms and Potential Therapeutic Approaches for Glaucoma
Previous Article in Journal
Co-Crystal Structure-Guided Optimization of Dual-Functional Small Molecules for Improving the Peroxygenase Activity of Cytochrome P450BM3
Previous Article in Special Issue
Erythropoietin in Optic Neuropathies: Current Future Strategies for Optic Nerve Protection and Repair
 
 
Review
Peer-Review Record

Neuromyelitis Optica Spectrum Disorder: From Basic Research to Clinical Perspectives

Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23(14), 7908; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23147908
by Tzu-Lun Huang 1,2,*, Jia-Kang Wang 1,2,3,4,5, Pei-Yao Chang 1,2, Yung-Ray Hsu 1,2, Cheng-Hung Lin 2,6, Kung-Hung Lin 7 and Rong-Kung Tsai 8,9,*
Reviewer 1:
Reviewer 2:
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23(14), 7908; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23147908
Submission received: 8 June 2022 / Revised: 8 July 2022 / Accepted: 15 July 2022 / Published: 18 July 2022

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

You present a comprehensive review on a topic of great international interest y actuality. Your paper it is well-designed and the flow of the material is appropriate. There are some segments of the manuscript where the text should be more clear and informative for the reader. Even though the reader may obtain the missing information by consulting the references provided, the authors should provide the missing information as part of the general introduction. (1) Page 3, 2nd paragraph: the extent of the optic nerve involvement in positive anti-AQP4-IgG and anti-MOG-IgG is not discussed. In the same paragraph I would advise more extensive discussion between the sex ratio distributions among these disorders. (2) Explain what are the different anatomical distributions of involvement in children and adults referring to the maturation location of M1 and M23 proteins (page 4 first paragraph). This is mentioned but no discussed. (3) Please review your references for clarity. For instance reference # 4 is written defectively. 

Author Response

Please see the attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

authors mentioned satralizumab and tocilizumab, it would be interesting to discuss their mechanism of action

in conclusion section, I would suggest to develop perspectives of such therapies

Could you develop the role of astrocyte in the disease, also it would be interesting to discuss how micrgolia/immune cells affect the astrocytes and the disease

Author Response

Please see the attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Back to TopTop