Next Article in Journal
The Effect of Uridine on the State of Skeletal Muscles and the Functioning of Mitochondria in Duchenne Dystrophy
Next Article in Special Issue
Importance of Micromilieu for Pathophysiologic Mineralocorticoid Receptor Activity—When the Mineralocorticoid Receptor Resides in the Wrong Neighborhood
Previous Article in Journal
Nutritional Interventions for Patients with Mitochondrial POLG-Related Diseases: A Systematic Review on Efficacy and Safety
Previous Article in Special Issue
Nonsteroidal Mineralocorticoid Receptor Antagonism by Finerenone—Translational Aspects and Clinical Perspectives across Multiple Organ Systems
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Effects of Chronic Kidney Disease on Nanomechanics of the Endothelial Glycocalyx Are Mediated by the Mineralocorticoid Receptor

Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23(18), 10659; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms231810659
by Benedikt Fels 1,2,*, Arne Beyer 3, Violeta Cazaña-Pérez 4, Teresa Giraldez 4, Juan F. Navarro-González 4,5, Diego Alvarez de la Rosa 4, Franz Schaefer 6, Aysun K. Bayazit 7, Łukasz Obrycki 8, Bruno Ranchin 9, Johannes Holle 10,11, Uwe Querfeld 10 and Kristina Kusche-Vihrog 1,2
Reviewer 2:
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23(18), 10659; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms231810659
Submission received: 15 July 2022 / Revised: 31 August 2022 / Accepted: 3 September 2022 / Published: 13 September 2022

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

I think this is very excellent study. However, there are some modifications/clarifications needed.

1. How can the investigators indentify/define uremic human sera, and if the BUN cut-off is arbitrary? Any references? given there is no specific cut-off of BUN for uremia in clinical practice

2. Figure 1 is very difficult to evaluate, especially electron microscopy Figure 1D.

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

This submission concluded that MR as a possible mediator of uremia-induced endothelial dysfunction. This study is well designed, data are sound, results from this study provide new information for clinical management. However, there are several issues need to be improved. A revision is suggested.

1.          Please also study p-NOS in fig 3.

2.          Please discuss the clinical implications of this study.

3.          Please discuss the limitations of this study.

4.          Please briefly address methods in the abstraction.

5.          The method of Nitrite accumulation is missed.

6.          How many passages of cells used in this study. Please address.

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Round 2

Reviewer 2 Report

My questions had been well addressed. This submission is acceptable. 

Back to TopTop