Next Article in Journal
Regulation of the Soluble Amyloid Precursor Protein α (sAPPα) Levels by Acetylcholinesterase and Brain-Derived Neurotrophic Factor in Lung Cancer Cell Media
Next Article in Special Issue
Transcriptional Response of Circadian Clock Genes to an ‘Artificial Light at Night’ Pulse in the Cricket Gryllus bimaculatus
Previous Article in Journal
New Insight into Assembled Fe3O4@PEI@Ag Structure as Acceptable Agent with Enzymatic and Photothermal Properties
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
IJMS
Volume 23
Issue 18
10.3390/ijms231810744
ijms-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Morphofunctional State and Circadian Rhythms of the Liver of Female Rats under the Influence of Chronic Alcohol Intoxication and Constant Lighting

by
David A. Areshidze
* and
Maria A. Kozlova
Avtsyn Research Institute of Human Morphology of Federal State Budgetary Scientific Institution “Petrovsky National Research Center of Surgery”, 117418 Moscow, Russia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23(18), 10744; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms231810744
Submission received: 5 August 2022 / Revised: 12 September 2022 / Accepted: 13 September 2022 / Published: 15 September 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Disturbances of Circadian Hormonal and Metabolic Rhythms in a Changing Environment)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
A separate and combined effect of constant illumination and chronic alcohol intoxication (CAI) on diurnal dynamics of micromorphometric parameters of hepatocytes in female Wistar rats and p53, Ki-67, PER2, BMAL1, and ADH5 expression in these cells were studied. The increase in apoptotic activity and proliferation in all animals under the action of chronodestructors is shown. All experimental animals showed a decrease in BMAL1 expression and increase in PER2 expression; ADH5 is overexpressed under the influence of ethanol. Circadian rhythms (CRs) of BMAL1, PER2, p53, and Ki-67 expression persist in all groups, except combined action of chronodestructors, and ADH5 CRs persist in all groups—thus, these rhythms in females are quite stable. CRs of the hepatocyte nuclei area are preserved in all the studied groups, although they undergo a significant shift. At the same time, the CRs of the hepatocyte area are destroyed under the action of light, both independently and in combination with CAI, and the CR of the nuclear-cytoplasmic ratio (NCR) is destroyed by exposure to CAI. It can be assumed that CRs of the hepatocyte area are significantly affected by dark deprivation and NCR rhythm is sensitive to ethanol consumption, while the stability of studied genes’ expression rhythms at separate influences of studied chronodestructors is maintained by yet unknown adaptation mechanisms. It is necessary to note that, according to our previous studies of male rats, rat females show significantly greater stability of the studied CRs.

1. Introduction

Circadian rhythms (CRs) are biological processes that proceed with a period of about 24 h and provide synchronization of biological processes with environmental factors, which is crucial for maintaining homeostasis, as well as adapting to changing environmental conditions [1]. They are associated with the light–dark cycle, causing the existence of cycles of sleep–wake, feeding–starvation, secretion of hormones, the exchange of energy resources, and body temperature [2]. CRs are described in living organisms ranging from bacteria to mammals [3].
Being genetically determined, the temporal organization of systems of organism, nevertheless, is quite plastically modulated by the influence of periodic environmental factors [4,5]. The CRs of separate physiological processes of various systems are strictly synchronized with each other. This synchronization determines the necessary order and optimal coherence of these processes between themselves and the external environment [6,7]. The degree of synchronization of the mammalian CRs is a reflection of the degree of its adaptation to existence in specific environmental conditions. In cases of successful adaptation processes, the grade of impact of stressors on circadian rhythms is insignificant. Otherwise, the rhythmic processes of the organism lose their correctness, regularity, and chronodisruption occurs, which can lead to the development of diseases and pathological conditions [8,9].
In hepatocytes, as well as in cells of other organs, the biological clock at the molecular level is generated by a core transcription and translation feedback loop comprising the clock genes BMAL1 (Brain and muscle ARNT-Like 1), CLOCK (Circadian Locomotor Output Cycles Kaput), PER1 (period 1) and PER2 (period 2), and CRY1 (cryptochrome 1) and CRY2 (cryptochrome 2). BMAL1 and CLOCK proteins form a heterodimer that activates transcription of PER and CRY genes and other clock-controlled genes by binding to E-box response elements within their promoters. CRY and PER proteins are subsequently phosphorylated by CKI (casein kinase I) ε or CKIδ (casein kinase I delta) and translocate into the nucleus, where they repress the transcriptional activity of BMAL1 and CLOCK proteins. PP1 (protein phosphatase 1) dephosphorylates PER proteins, shortening the oscillation period of clock genes. Thus, the balance of CKI and PP1 activity determines the circadian oscillator period. In addition, other feedback loops are interwoven into the core clock feedback loop. Transcription of BMAL1, CRY1, NPAS2 (neuronal PAS domain-containing protein 2, a paralogue of CLOCK), and NFIL3 (nuclear factor, interleukin 3 regulated, also known as E4BP4, a negative regulator of PER1 and PER2) is repressed by REV-ERBα (also known as nuclear receptor subfamily 1 group D member 1, NR1D1) and REV-ERBβ (nuclear receptor subfamily 1 group D member 2, NR1D2) and activated by ROR (RAR-related orphan receptor) α, RORβ, and RORγ via binding of their ROR-responsive element promoter regions. The Rev-erb and Ror families of genes are in turn positively regulated by CLOCK and BMAL1 proteins [10,11].
Most of liver functions follow a circadian rhythmicity [12,13]. Expression of genes, which provide the wide spectrum of liver functions, can be regulated as directly by the autonomic circadian system of hepatocytes, by rhythmic signals from the external environment (light, food intake), or by a combination of both mechanisms [14,15]. At the same time, a high degree of dependence of the functioning of the liver on the normally synchronized control of its CRs by the suprachiasmatic nuclei of hypothalamus (SCN) and the pineal gland was proved [16,17]. There is an opinion that light, not being directly a factor critical for maintaining circadian rhythms, affects their period and amplitude, the expression of some genes, and the coordination of rhythms among themselves [18].
Violation of the normal circadian rhythmicity of the functioning of the liver is considered as one of the leading factors in the development of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD), non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH), and a number of other diseases [19,20]. Such disturbances of the normal functioning of clock genes in hepatocytes are associated with a number of liver dysfunctions and pathologies [21,22]. In particular, the disruption of normal functioning of PER gene family at hepatitis was established [23].
The relationship between disorders of the liver CRs and the risks of developing oncological diseases is also known [24,25]. Abnormal expression of the main clock genes was found in human hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) biopsy tissue samples. Chronic jetlag also induces spontaneous HCC in wild-type mice. The process begins with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease that progress to NASH, cirrhosis, and HCC. This path is based on gene dysregulation caused by jetlag, dysfunction, and circadian desynchronization of metabolic processes in the liver [26].
The role of clock genes in the regulation and circadian rhythm of apoptosis is described [27]. In addition to clock genes, melatonin is involved in the regulation of CRs of apoptosis [28,29].
Constant lighting is one of the leading causes of pronounced morphofunctional changes in the mammalian organs and systems of organs. Due to social reasons, there is an extensive number of sources of artificial lighting at night in the modern world, whose influence leads to a shift in the circadian rhythms of the whole organism of humans and other species and the development of desynchronization in it [30]. One of the causes of such desynchronization is shift work, which is now considered the main factor in violation of the structure and coordination of the CRs of an organism of humans [31]. Change in rhythmicity in peripheral organs under conditions of constant lighting may be linked with the disorder in CRs of SCN [32], production of melatonin by the pineal gland, or changes that occur directly in the tissues [33,34]. A significant amount of data indicating changes in the CRs of peripheral organs of mammals under conditions of dark deprivation have been collected to date [35,36,37].
Another significant factor that causes chronodisruption in humans is alcohol. It is shown that that circadian desynchronization is one of the signs of alcoholism [38,39,40]. There are interesting links between alcohol consumption and circadian rhythm disturbance: just as alcohol alters the functioning of the SCN, disruption of the normal circadian rhythm causes alcohol cravings [41,42,43]. In addition, alcohol and its metabolites have an impact both on the functioning of peripheral pacemakers and directly on the work of clock genes [44,45]. Circadian rhythm disorders of various etiologies are important, if not decisive, in increasing the susceptibility of the liver to alcohol-induced damage and play a defining role in the severity of alcohol pathology [46,47]. The significant way in which ethanol influences the structure of CRs of an organism is its pineal-mediated effect. The use of even small doses of alcohol for 14 days causes a phase shift in the circadian rhythm of melatonin [48], and in alcoholics, the production of nocturnal melatonin is significantly reduced [49,50].
The question of sex differences in the circadian rhythmicity of the mammalian organism is very complicated. Just a few publications are devoted to the CRs of the liver, including the influence of its rhythmic work on processes in other tissues. Traditionally, male experimental animals are used in most studies of mammalian circadian rhythms [51,52], and only 20% of studies are devoted to the study of females [53].
A number of liver functions has differences depending on sex. It is primarily the sex-specific production of liver proteins, xenobiotic transporters, and cytochrome P450 enzymes involved in the metabolism of sex steroids [54]. According to the current point of view, the liver of females is characterized by a highly efficient metabolic phenotype, increased biogenesis, which is necessary for a successful course of pregnancy [55].
Our previous studies showed that in male rats, the constant illumination and CAI, both with separate and combined action of these factors, led to the destruction of the CRs of expression of Ki-67 (marker of proliferation Ki-67), PER2, p53 (tumor protein p53 gene), BMAL1, ADH5 (alcohol dehydrogenase 5 (Class III) gene), and also of a number of biochemical parameters and micromorphometric characteristics of hepatocytes with background of pathological structural changes in the liver [56,57,58].
It is considered that the sexual dimorphism of the liver depends on the pulsating (in males) and constant (in females) secretion of growth hormones, as well as on the influence of androgens and estrogens [59,60,61].
Studies on the daily dynamics of lipid and carbohydrate metabolism allowed the establishment of the presence of their CRs in mammals of both sexes, but there were gender differences in the mesor, acrophase, and amplitude of rhythms [62]. Sexual dimorphism of circadian rhythms is also established for nuclear peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors (PPAR) playing an important role in the initiation of the inflammatory response [63]. Sexual dimorphism is also described for the daily dynamics of lipid metabolism and BMAL1 expression and for the expression of genes that ensure the functioning of the antioxidant system of the liver [64,65].
Anyway, the issue of sexual dimorphism of liver circadian rhythms remains poorly understood now. We conducted the study on the effect of constant lighting, chronic alcohol intoxication, and the combined action of these factors on the morphometric parameters of hepatocytes (the linear dimensions of hepatocytes and their nuclei, nuclear-cytoplasmic ratio). A number of other micromorphometric parameters are significant indicators for assessing the state and functional changes in the liver [65,66,67], on levels of expression of Ki-67, PER2, BMAL1, p53, and ADH5 in hepatocytes, on daily dynamics of these parameters, and also on morphological conditions of the liver in female Wistar rats.

2. Results

2.1. Influence of Constant Lighting and CAI on the Morphofunctional Condition of the Liver

The morphological pattern of the liver in the rats of the control group corresponded to the age norm, i.e., the liver had a preserved structure of hepatic cords, composed of polygonal hepatocytes with a rounded, centrally located nuclei, without signs of dystrophic changes and necrosis. In the liver of rats of all of the experimental groups, a significant number of vacuole-containing hepatocytes was found (Figure 1). The control staining with Sudan-III verified the presence of lipid drops in the cytoplasm of the hepatocytes in this group, which indicates the beginning of the development of fatty degeneration of the liver. At the same time, we observed both single cells in a state of apoptosis and groups of hepatocytes in a state of necrosis (Figure 2).
In the liver of rats of the control group, a number of hepatocytes containing lipid drops were 2.40 ± 0.22%, thus, the steatosis grade was zero. In the liver of the EtOH and CL groups, a number of cells containing lipids were 16.30 and 10.35 times higher (39.20 ± 7.88% and 24.85 ± 5.96%); the steatosis grades were two and one, respectively. In the group EtOH + CL, steatosis grade was three; the proportion of cells in the state of fatty degeneration was 29.95 times higher than in control group (71.88 ± 8.84%).

2.2. Influence of Constant Lighting and CAI on the Micromorphometric Parameters of Hepatocytes of Rats

Three-week alcohol intoxication caused an elongation of the small and mean diameters of hepatocyte nuclei, a decrease in the nuclear contour index, and a significant increase in cell size, which led to a decrease in the NCR value.
Exposure to constant lighting during the same period of time led to significant differences from the norm in morphometric parameters. We found an increase in the area and volume of hepatocytes relative to the control, which caused a decrease in NCR. Moreover, with an increased area of nuclei, their long diameter also increased, and this change is reflected in a decrease in the elongation index.
The joint action of ethanol and constant illumination for three weeks also caused changes in the micromorphometric parameters of hepatocytes. The area, volume, and perimeter of the nucleus and NCR of hepatocytes decreased, as well as the length of the small diameter of the nucleus (Table 1).

2.3. Influence of Constant Lighting and CAI on Gene Expression

In the liver of control group, the proportion of Ki-67+ hepatocytes was small—1.02 ± 0.40%. However, the value of this parameter was significantly higher in all experimental groups: 1.79 times (1.83 ± 0.87%) in EtOH group, 1.36 times (1.39 ± 0.78%) in CL, and 5.59 times (5.70 ± 1.30%) in EtOH +CL (Figure 3 and Figure 4).
In hepatocytes of animals of control group, p53 expression was observed in 2.32 ± 0.50% of hepatocytes. It increased in animals of all experimental groups: 2.81 times higher in EtOH group (6.51 ± 0.94%), 2.06 times higher in CL (4.78 ± 0.63%), and 2.02 times higher (4.68 ± 0.95%) in EtOH + CL group (Figure 5 and Figure 6).
The proportion of BMAL1-positive hepatocytes in control group was 72.09 ± 9.63%. However, in females of the experimental groups there was a decrease in the proportion of BMAL1+ cells. In animals of the EtOH group, their proportion was 1.47 times lower (48.91 ± 8.88%), in CL group—4.32 times lower (16.67 ± 6.84%), and 2.58 times lower (27.90 ± 6.91%) in rats of the EtOH + CL group (Figure 7 and Figure 8).
Expression of PER2 in hepatocytes of rats in the control group was 34.99 ± 7.65%. In the liver of EtOH, CL, and EtOH + CL rats, the proportion of PER2-positive hepatocytes increased 1.27 times (44.53 ± 11.54%), 1.32 times (46.18 ± 13.05%), and 1.23 times (42.94 ± 6.33%), respectively (Figure 9 and Figure 10).
ADH5 expression was found in 4.33 ± 0.67% of hepatocytes of rats of the control group; it remained practically unchanged in the CL group, but increased 4.28 times (18.55 ± 4.72%) and 6.75 times (29.22 ± 5.94%) in the liver of females of groups EtOH and EtOH + CL (Figure 11 and Figure 12).

2.4. Influence of CAI and Constant Lighting on Circadian Dynamics of Morphometric Parameters of Hepatocytes

The minimum size of the nucleus in female rats under a fixed light regime (control) was observed at 0900, the maximum at 2100. Under CAI conditions, the minimum values of this parameter were noted at 2100 and the maximum at 1500. Under constant lighting, the extrema of the chronogram were opposite to those of the control, with a maximum at 900 and a minimum at 2100. Under the combined action of ethanol and constant lighting with the same maximum, the minimum nuclei sizes were noted at 300 (Figure 13).
In control group, the acrophase of rhythm was revealed at 2339 and amplitude of the rhythm made up 1.96 µm2. In CAI, the acrophase of the rhythm was observed at 1208 with 2.46 times higher amplitude than in control group (4.84 μm2). Under constant lighting and its combined action with CAI, acrophases of rhythms were detected in the morning hours, 904 и and 1051 with amplitudes of 4.63 μm2 and 2.31 μm2–2.36 and 1.18 times higher than control, respectively (Table 2).
In females of the control group, hepatocytes reached their largest size by 300, decreasing to a minimum at 1500. CAI at fixed light led to a shift of the maximum by 1500 and the minimum by 2100 h. Constant lighting caused opposite changes—the maximum was noted at 2100; the minimum at 1500. In animals of the EtOH + CL group, the largest sizes of hepatocytes were noted at 900 with a minimum at 1500 (Figure 14).
In the control group, CR was characterized by an acrophase at 454 and amplitude of 8.99 µm2, CAI caused a shift of the acrophase by 1226 and a 2.71 times increase in amplitude up to 24.34 µm2. CRs of hepatocyte area in groups CL and EtOH + CL were not significant (Table 2).
In the liver of intact females, the maximum NCR was observed at 2100, and the minimum at 900. In animals of the EtOH group, the maximum was shifted by 300 h and the minimum was shifted by 2100 h. Under constant illumination with the same minimum, the maximum NCR was observed at 1500, and in rats of the EtOH + CL group, the maximum was observed at 900 with a minimum at 300 (Figure 15).
For the NCR rhythm in females of the control group, an acrophase was noted at 2052 and amplitude made up 0.020. The impact of CAI led to the destruction of the CR of NCR, constant illumination led to a displacement of the acrophase by 1103 and a 1.65 times increase in amplitude up to 0.033. In rats of the EtOH + CL group, acrophase was observed at 1447 with 1.17 times decreased amplitude (0.017) (Table 2).

2.5. Influence of Constant Illumination and CAI on the Organization of Circadian Rhythms of the Expression of the Studied Genes

In females of the control group, the maximum expression of Ki-67 was noted at 300 with a minimum at 1500. In the liver of animals of the EtOH group, the maximum occurred at 900, the minimum–at 2100; in rats of the group CL, with the same maximum, the minimum expression was noted at 300; in animals of the group EtOH + CL, the maximum was noted at 1500, the minimum–at 300 (Figure 16).
Significant CRs were noted in the control—acrophase at 347 with an amplitude of 0.29%—and in the liver of rats of groups EtOH and CL with acrophases of 1040 and 1006 and 3,6 times and 2.13 times increased amplitudes (1.04% and 0.62%), respectively (Table 3).
In hepatocytes of animals of control and EtOH groups, a maximum of p53 expression was found at 1500 with a minimum at 900. In group CL, the maximum expression of p53 was noted at 300 with a minimum at 900, and in group EtOH + CL, a maximum at 1500 with a minimum at 2100 (Figure 17).
Significant CRs of this parameter were noted in the control group and in the EtOH and CL groups. In the control, the acrophase of the rhythm was noted at 1706 with an amplitude of 0.23%. In the group EtOH, the acrophase shifted by 1854 with a practically unchanged amplitude, and in the hepatocytes of rats of the group CL, an acrophase was noted at 1119 and the amplitude of the rhythm increased 7.17 times up to 1.65% (Table 3).
Considering the daily dynamics of BMAL1 expression in hepatocytes of rats of the control group, we found a maximum expression at 1500 and minimum–at 900, and in groups EtOH, CL, and EtOH + CL, with the maximum at 900, the minimum expression of BMAL1 was found at 2100, 1500, and 300, respectively (Figure 18).
CR of BMAL1 expression in hepatocytes of rats of control group was characterized by an acrophase of 419 and an amplitude of 11.14%, in cells of group EtOH, 730 and 10.78% (1.03 times lower), and in cells of group CL, by acrophase of 456 and an amplitude of 3.95% (2.82 times lower) (Table 3).
In intact rats, the extremum points of the PER2 expression rhythm were characterized by a maximum at 300 with a minimum at 1500. In animals of EtOH and CL groups, the maximum was noted at 1500, the minimum at 300, and in the rats of the group EtOH + CL, both extrema were shifted to the previous time points (Figure 19).
Significant CRs were noted in the control group—acrophase at 316 and amplitude of 9.22%—and in EtOH and CL groups, with similar parameters—acrophases at 1339 and 1316 and an amplitude of 14.41% and 15.03% (1.56 and 1.63 times higher than in control group), respectively (Table 3).
In rats of the control group, the maximum of ADH5 expression was noted at 1500, the minimum at 300; in animals of the EtOH group the picture was opposite to the control. In the CL group, the maximum was noted at 2100 with a minimum at 900; the parameters of the EtOH + CL group were opposite to those of CL (Figure 20).
Cosinor analysis revealed that CRs of this parameter were present in all groups of female rats. In the control group, it was characterized by an acrophase at 1501 and an amplitude of 0.46%; in group EtOH, acrophase occurred at 156 with 13.78 times higher amplitude (6.34%); in group CL, acrophase is noted at 2205 with 1.34 times increased amplitude (0.62%); in group EtOH + CL, acrophase was noted at 1219 and the amplitude of the rhythm increased 16.54 times (7.61%) (Table 3).

3. Discussion

The study of pathomorphological changes in the liver of female rats showed that the influence of two factors—constant lighting and chronic alcohol intoxication—led to significant disturbances in the morphofunctional condition of this organ within three weeks. These changes were manifested in the development of the fatty degeneration of the liver, which is most pronounced at combined action of CAI and constant lighting.
Our previous studies [55,56,57,58] showed that both constant illumination and CAI have a significant effect on the morphological and functional integrity of the liver of male rats, which manifests itself primarily in the development of fatty degeneration and steatohepatitis in them. However, our study revealed a number of significant gender differences in the response of hepatocytes to the combined and separate effects of these factors. So, in males, the influence of alcohol under a normal (fixed) light regime provoked the occurrence of fatty degeneration of the liver, and the same factor in combination with constant illumination led to the development of hepatitis; in some animals, there were already signs of liver cirrhosis. In females of all experimental groups, under the same conditions, we noted only fatty degeneration.
There are a number of common features in pathogenesis of alcoholic liver disease (ALD) and NAFLD [68]. Both ALD and NAFLD are based on steatosis, which is considered a benign and reversible condition. It is shown that one of the contributing factors in the development of NAFLD is the disruption of the day/night cycle [69].
It was also found that CAI and dark deprivation cause a number of changes in the micromorphometric parameters of hepatocytes. In particular, in animals of the EtOH and CL groups, hypertrophy of hepatocytes was noted. The NCR decreased in rats of all groups. The greatest changes, manifested in a decrease in the size of the nucleus, were noted in the liver of rats of the EtOH + CL group. At the same time, in males under the same conditions, a three-week CAI did not cause changes in the studied micromorphometric parameters.
According to some reports, hepatocyte hypertrophy can be observed during polyploidization of nuclei and during the formation of binuclear cells. In turn, an increase in the linear dimensions of hepatocytes after three weeks under constant illumination is the result of an intensification of their functional activity. Increase in the areas of hepatocytes is also associated with an increase in levels of stress hormones. Such changes are described for the liver under conditions of chronic stress, such as the 21-day darkness deprivation [70,71].
The development of small-drop fatty degeneration in hepatocytes under stress is a described phenomenon; it correlates with the duration of stress exposure [72], being associated with an increase in the level of adrenal cortex hormones, primarily glucocorticoids. This, in turn, causes an increase in the expression of serotonin 5-HT2A and 5-HT2B receptors and tryptophan hydroxylase 1, as well as in the synthesis of serotonin [73]. The accumulation of lipid droplets by hepatocytes under stress is accompanied by an increase in lipolysis gene expression and β-oxidation of fatty acids [74].
Increased expression of Ki-67 and p53 indicates intensification of proliferation and apoptosis processes in the liver of rats of all experimental groups [75]. The increase in the expression of these genes in our study is least pronounced in animals of the CL group. At the same time, the expression of p53 increased to a greater extent in rats of the EtOH group, and the expression Ki-67 in animals of the EtOH + CL group. Decrease in the expression of BMAL1 and increase in the expression of its antagonist PER2 served as a confirmation of the chronodestructive effects of both constant lighting and ethanol. The expression of ADH5, as expected, was higher in the hepatocytes of rats that consumed ethanol.
Numerous studies indicate that lipid metabolism disorders can enhance the expression of the proapoptotic p53 protein [76]. Apoptosis plays a significant role in the pathogenesis of non-alcoholic hepatosteatosis, but the mechanisms of its intensification have not been fully elucidated. There is an opinion that the increased expression of the p53 protein, indicating the intensification of apoptosis in hepatocytes, can be induced by the activation of inflammatory stimuli and oxidative stress [77]. It can be assumed that increased expression of this protein is only one link among numerous factors involved in the mechanism of hepatosteatosis development.
There is an opinion that in disorders of lipid metabolism of the liver, an increase in p53 expression is accompanied by a decrease in the intensity of proliferation [78]. However, in males exposed to the combined influence of CAI and constant illumination, an increase in Ki-67 expression occurred, and in females this was observed in all experimental groups. Studies by S. Stöppeler [79] showed increased expression of Ki-67 in experimental steatosis in rats, with females having a higher expression level than males. It was assumed that this is due to the work of some genes of receptors of VGF (VGF nerve growth factor inducible) 1 and 2 (FLT1, FLK1), which demonstrate a higher expression profile in females. These changes in gene expression were in agreement with higher proliferation rates of females. VGF-mediated signaling can protect hepatocytes and improve the impaired regeneration of steatotic liver [80].
Thus, with the same proapoptotic activity in hepatocytes, females showed regenerative activity already under the separate influence of the studied chronodestructors.
The decrease in the expression level of BMAL1 as a result of CAI, which we found, is confirmed by studies [81]. It is noteworthy that the BMAL1 protein plays an important role in the protection of hepatocytes in alcoholic liver disease [82]. At the same time, an increase in the expression of the PER family genes in the liver was described in response to alcohol consumption [83]. Changes in the expression of BMAL1 and PER2 during long-term constant illumination were probably the result of long-term melatonin deficiency [84,85].
In our studies, there was an increase in both p53 and PER2 in the liver of animals of all experimental groups. There are some data that PER2 may directly regulate p53 activity: inactivation of PER2 by mutation delayed p53 accumulation after ionizing radiation, sensitizing mice to both cancer development and death [86]. Supporting these data, it was showed that high levels of PER2 in cancer cell lines and glioma xenografts correlated with increased p53 induction and apoptosis [87].
The mechanisms of interaction between PER2, p53, and MDM2 (Mouse double minute 2 homolog) are not fully understood to date. It is proved that interrelation between p53 and PER2 is bidirectional, as p53 can influence PER2 both at the gene expression and protein level. Under unstressed conditions, PER2 and p53 form a stable complex in the cytosol and, along with MDM2, a trimeric complex in the nucleus. Association of PER2 to the C-terminus end of p53 prevents MDM2 (Mouse double minute 2 homolog) mediated ubiquitylation and degradation of p53 as well as p53’s transcriptional activation. p53 can antagonize PER2 expression by directly binding to the PER2 promoter and blocking CLOCK-BMAL1 transactivation of the gene [88].
Gallego and Virshup (2007) [89] proposed a hypothesis that PER2 may exist in two pools: one bound to p53 and one bound to CRY and CK1ε for control of circadian rhythm and subsequent degradation. It was also assumed that in stress conditions, p53 induction will radically alter the circadian clock through its modulation of PER2, which may perhaps be an adaptive pro-survival process [90].
CRs of morphometric parameters undergo significant changes under the influence of CAI and constant lighting. The most stable is the CR of the area of nuclei, which was preserved in a rearranged form in the hepatocytes of rats of all experimental groups. The CR of the hepatocyte area was destroyed under constant illumination, and the NCR rhythm was destroyed only at CAI.
We did not find an explanation for this fact in the available literature. It can be assumed that both in the case of the influence of ethanol on the SCN and the pineal gland, and in the case of the deficiency of pineal melatonin due to dark deprivation, the role of pacemaker was played by some other structure or process. Intracellular processes associated with the regulation of the rhythms of the molecules that form the cytoskeleton of the cell can be proposed as candidates for this role [91].
In females, the destruction of the CRs of expression of p53 and Ki-67 was observed only in rats that were under the combined influence of CAI and constant illumination, while in males, CRs of expression of these genes was noted only in the control and in animals under CAI conditions with a changeable light regime, albeit in a rearranged form.
Similarly, we found that in females, the CRs of expression of BMAL1 and PER2 were present in hepatocytes of all groups, except rats which were under the combined influence of CAI and constant lighting, while in males it was destroyed both under the separate action of CAI and under the action of CAI combined with constant illumination.
The rhythm of ADH5 expression in hepatocytes of females was preserved in all groups; in males it is destroyed only under constant illumination.
Thus, it can be assumed that the CRs of expression of Ki-67 and p53 are more affected by the light regime, while the violation of the clock gene expression CR is largely caused by the influence of ethanol.
At the same time, it is necessary to note the high stability of the studied CRs in females. In males, the CRs of Ki-67 and p53 expression were destroyed under constant illumination and the combined action of CAI and dark deprivation, and the rhythms of the clock genes were destroyed under both separate action of CAI and its complex with light. In females, only the combined action of chronodestructors caused the destruction of these CRs, and the rhythm of ADH5 expression was preserved in animals of all groups.
Sex differences in the circadian system in mammals arise already at the level of SCN, whose neurons have estrogen and androgen receptors. Even afferent inputs to the SCN, including the retinohypothalamic tract, are characterized by sexual characteristics [92].
One of the probable explanations for intersexual differences in the circadian organization is that the formation of the structure of CRs of an organism can occur during the prenatal period or during the perinatal period of sexual differentiation of the brain [93].
For example, from the moment of birth to the end of the third week of postnatal ontogenesis, male mice showed a significantly higher expression of androgen receptors in the SCN than female mice [94]. The mechanism of this gender difference remains unclear, but it does not depend on the regulation of sex hormones.
At the same time, it is shown that SCN neurons in adult mammals have a small amount of estrogen receptors, but are rich in androgen receptors. They are localized mainly on neurons of the ventrolateral part of the SCN that secrete gastrin-releasing peptide (GRP); in addition, terminals of retinal axons are projected onto the same neurons, which can cause depolarization of these cells and cause expression of the PER gene [95].
Androgen receptor-positive cells carry out light-induced FOS (FOS Proto-Oncogene, AP-1 Transcription Factor Subunit) expression; this process can be attenuated by gonadectomy and restored by the non-aromatizing androgen dihydrotestosterone. Thus, both light impulses from the external environment and male sex hormones affect the same population of SCN neurons, and, in turn, the rhythm of testosterone secretion is regulated by this brain structure, forming a neuroendocrine feedback loop in the circadian system [96].
In females, neurons containing estrogen receptors are located predominantly outside the SCN, but in structures with a large number of projections into it [97]. For example, estradiol modulates light-induced FOS expression of serotonergic neurons in the dorsal raphe nucleus, which has afferent connections with SCN [98].
Morphological sex features of the SCN structure are described for both humans and animals. For example, electron microscopic analysis shows that in the SCN of male rats, the number of synapses in neurons is higher than in females, and neuron nuclei contain more nucleoli [99]. In gerbils, the volume of the SCN is sexually dimorphic, as is the organization of the astroglia [100]. In humans, the volume and length of the rostrocaudal axis of the SCN are greater in women [101]. Sex differences in electrical activity coincide with the above anatomical features; the transmission and processing of sensory information through sex-dimorphic neural networks also differ [102]. Sexual differences in circadian rhythm may also occur in structures that receive information from the SCN. For example, in the hypothalamic–pituitary–adrenal system (HPAS), the circadian rhythm of glucocorticoids is well-studied, which, in addition to classical functions, are involved in the regulation of the expression of some clock genes (in cells of the myocardium, liver, and kidneys) [103,104]. Sexual dimorphism in the CRs of synthesis and secretion of hormones of adrenal cortex, which determine the rhythm of a number of physiological processes, is described [105].
In addition, gender differences in CRs of melatonin are described; this hormone has a wide range of effects on functions of organisms and is involved in the regulation of a number of circadian rhythms. Thus, it was found that in women, the CR’s amplitude of melatonin is significantly higher, the amplitude of the CR of temperature is lower, and the synchronization of daily rhythms of body temperature and melatonin secretion in conditions of isolation from external factors proceeds faster than in men [106].
Sexual characteristics were noted in the functioning of the hypothalamic–pituitary–adrenal system in general and the CRs controlled by it. Corticosteroids, which normally have strict CRs, in addition to their traditional functions (participation in stress reactions, energy metabolism, etc.), perform the function of secondary oscillators, having the ability to shift the expression of some clock genes in peripheral organs, including the liver [107].

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Object of Study

This study was conducted on 160 female rats of Wistar outbred stock at an age of 6 months, with a body weight of 350 g. Animals were taken from the “Stolbovaya” affiliate of the FSBIS Scientific Center for Biomedical Technologies of the Federal Medical and Biological Agency. Initially, the animals were kept in natural lighting, at a temperature of 20–22 °C and a relative humidity of 60–70%. The rats had free access to drinking water and briquetted food. Keeping of animals and experiments were performed in accordance with the European Convention for the Protection of Vertebrate Animals used for Experimental and other Scientific Purposes (Strasbourg, 18 March 1986). This research was approved by the Bioethical Committee of the Federal State Budgetary Scientific Institution “Research Institute of Human Morphology”, protocols No. 27/3 (11.10.2021), No. 34 (10) (14.03. 2022).

4.2. Design of Study

Rats were divided into 4 equal groups. To model the CAI, we used a 15% aqueous solution of ethanol [108].
Control group (n = 40) (control) was kept under fixed light regime (light:dark/10:14 h with lights on at 8:00 and off at 18:00).
First group (n = 40) (EtOH) was kept at the same conditions as control, but a 15% aqueous ethanol solution was offered daily as a drink ad libitum instead of water.
Second group (n = 40) (CL) was kept under the regime of constant lighting.
Third group (n = 40) (EtOH + CL) was kept under the regime of constant light and received as a drink a 15% aqueous solution of ethanol ad libitum.
The criterion for selecting rats for the study, along with the absence of visible abnormalities in condition and behavior, was the initial preference for a 15% solution of ethyl alcohol in comparison with tap water. For this, a preliminary experiment was carried out for 3 days in individual cages with free access to both liquids.
During the experiment, the volume of the drunken ethanol solution was determined daily, and then, the mass of alcohol per 1 kg of body weight was calculated. On average, the animals drank 15.48 ± 1.28 mL/day, which in terms of absolute ethanol is 7 g/kg of body weight.
Euthanasia was carried out three weeks after the start of the experiment in a carbon dioxide chamber equipped with a device for the upper gas supply (100% CO2) at 9:00, 15:00, 21:00, and 3:00. The chamber volume was filled with gas at a rate of 20% per minute to avoid dyspnea and pain in animals. After sacrifice, the evisceration was performed.

4.3. Morphological, Morphometric, and Histochemical Methods

The liver was fixed in 10% neutral buffered formalin with further passage through alcohols of increasing concentration (50%, 60%, 70%, 80%, and 96%) and xylol, followed by pouring into Histomix histological medium (BioVitrum, Russia). When conducting studies of organs embedded in paraffin, serial sections with a thickness of 5–6 μm were prepared. Histological sections were made on the sliding microtome Leica SM2010 R (Germany). Hematoxylin and eosin staining was carried out according to the standard technique [109]. Stained sections were put in a BioMount mounting medium (BioVitrum, Russia).
Fragments of the liver were frozen for subsequent histological examination, using a freezing table for the MFT-01 “Unicon” microtome; serial frozen sections with a thickness of 6–8 μm were prepared. To confirm the presence of fatty degeneration, standard staining of frozen sections with a solution of Sudan-III in 70% ethyl alcohol was performed [110]. Steatosis (percentage of hepatocytes containing lipid droplets) was scored using the non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) activity scoring (NAS) protocol. While the NAS protocol is not intended for AD, we applied this system to assign a histopathology score to cases in this experimental animal study. Steatosis was scored as: 0, <5%; 1, 5–33%; 2, >34–65%; 3, >66% of hepatocytes containing lipid droplets [111]. Microscopy of histological preparations was performed using a Leica DM 2500 microscope with use of a Leica DFC 290 digital camera (Germany). From each studied preparation, 10 digital images of randomly selected visual fields were taken at a magnification of ×200, ×400, and ×1000, with the use of which karyo- and cytometry were subsequently carried out. In morphometric studies, the Fiji software package, a program built on the basis of ImageJ v2 with appropriate plugins, was used [112]. The measurements were carried out in micrometers after preliminary geometric calibration on an object-micrometer scale digitized with the same magnification. Micromorphometry was performed only for mononuclear interphase hepatocytes without signs of pathological changes.
With use of «ImageJ», the cross-sectional area of nuclei of hepatocytes (area of nuclei, Sn), small (d) and long (D) diameters of nuclei, perimeter of nuclei (Pn), cross-sectional area of hepatocytes (area of cell, Scell), and small (a) and long (b) diameters of hepatocytes, were determined.
The several parameters were calculated with use of appropriate formulas [113].
Nuclear-cytoplasmic ratio of hepatocytes was calculated by the formula: NCR = Sn/Sc, where: Sn—area of nucleus of cell; Sc—area of cytoplasm.
Mean diameter of nuclei was calculated by the formula: M = (D + d)/2, where D—long diameter; d—small diameter [113].
Volume of nuclei was calculated by the formula: Vn = 0.523 M3, where M—mean diameter of nuclei.
Volume of cells was calculated by the formula: Vc = 0.523 M3, where M—mean diameter of cells.
The nucleus volume to nucleus area ratio (V/A coefficient) was calculated by the formula: Vn/An, where Vn is the mean volume of nuclei; An—mean area of nuclei.
Elongation index of nucleus was calculated by the formula: EI = D/d, where D—long diameter; d—small diameter.
For calculation of coefficient of form, the formula was used: CF = 4 × π × Sn/Pn2, where Sn—area of nucleus; Pn—perimeter of nucleus.
Contour index of nucleus, which reflects the topography of its surface, was determined by formula: CI= Pn/√ Sn, where Sn—the area of nucleus; Pn—perimeter of nucleus.

4.4. Immunohistochemical Methods

To carry out immunohistochemical reactions, liver sections were dewaxed, rehydrated, and treated with 3% hydrogen peroxide solution to block endogenous peroxidase. Then, the slices were put in the «Ultra V Block» (Thermo Fisher Scientific; Waltham, MA, USA) solution; the antigens were previously unmasked by boiling in citrate buffer (pH 6.0). Immunohistochemical reactions with primary antibodies were performed [114].
The following antibodies were used:
  • Ki-67–Rabbit polyclonal (Cloud-Clone Corp., Houston, TX, USA), 1:300;
  • PER2–Rabbit polyclonal (Cloud-Clone Corp., Houston, TX, USA), 1:200;
  • BMAL1–Rabbit polyclonal (Cloud-Clone Corp., Houston, TX, USA), 1:200;
  • p53–Rabbit polyclonal (Cloud-Clone Corp., Houston, TX, USA), 1:200;
  • ADH5–Rabbit polyclonal (Cloud-Clone Corp., Houston, TX, USA), 1:300.
Sections were incubated with antibodies for 60 min at room temperature. The UltraVision Quanto Detection System (Thermo Fisher Scientific; Waltham, MA, USA) set was used as a detection system.
Reactions with replacement of primary antibodies with phosphate buffer solution served as control.
After the sections acquired a blue hue, the slides were removed, dehydrated in alcohols of ascending concentration and xylene according to the standard scheme, and embedded in the BioMount mounting medium (BioVitrum, St Petersburg, Russia).
The results of immunohistochemical reaction were appreciated by the proportion of stained cells or cell nuclei (depending on the localization of the antigen) in relation to the total number of hepatocytes. Two investigators reviewed and scored slides independently by estimating the percentage of hepatocytes showing characteristic staining. Percentage of stained cells was estimated in 4 fields of view at ×400 magnification. The expression of studied genes was assessed by counting the percentage of positive cells over the total cells in each slide and expressed as percentages of positive cells (0–100%) [115].

4.5. Methods of Statistical Processing

The obtained data were analyzed using the “GraphPad Prism 6.0” software by calculating the mean values, standard deviation, and mean error of the arithmetic mean. Numerical rows characterizing the daily fluctuations of the studied physiological rhythms of animals were subjected to mathematical processing, on the basis of which the group chronograms were drawn. We studied the shape of the chronograms and calculated the average daily values. The statistical difference was determined using the Kruskal–Wallis test. Differences were considered statistically significant at p < 0.05.
Cosinor analysis with the application of CosinorEllipse2006-1.1 program (certificate of state registration No. 2006611345, Siberian State University of Physical Culture and Sports, Omsk, Russia) was used to calculate the amplitude and acrophase of CRs.
Cosinor analysis was assigned to analyze wave processes and process chronobiological data. The presence of a reliable circadian rhythm was determined, as well as its acrophase and amplitude. The output information of the cosinor analysis was the main parameter of the rhythms: mesor, i.e., the value of the average level of the sinusoid (h), the amplitude of the sinusoid (A), and the acrophase (Phi), that is the time of the onset of the maximum of the function. Mesor coincides in magnitude with the average daily value of the investigated function. Acrophase is a measure of the peak time of total rhythmic variability over a 24-h period, i.e., the time of the onset of the maximum of the function. The amplitude corresponds to half of the total rhythmic variability in the cycle. Acrophase is expressed in hours; amplitude values are expressed in the same units as the studied variables [116].

5. Conclusions

The explanation of the effects of dark deprivation, CAI, and their combined action, as well as their intersexual differences, that we discovered, is rather complicated and requires further study. It remains unclear what is the leading factor in the effect of alcohol on the CRs of the expression of the studied genes: a direct effect on the hepatocyte, or mediated through the SCN, the pineal gland, and secondary oscillators, or whether there is an effect along all pathways. It is also necessary to continue research on the effect of constant illumination on these CRs, since dark deprivation, in addition to its effect on SCN, causes a decrease in the level of pineal melatonin, which is actively involved in the organization of the CRs and is an adaptogen with a wide action profile.

Author Contributions

D.A.A. and M.A.K. conceived the study and designed the experiment; M.A.K. collected the data and performed the analysis; D.A.A. wrote the paper; D.A.A. and M.A.K. edited the manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The work was carried out within the framework of the state task of “Avtsyn Research Institute of Human Morphology of Federal State Budgetary Scientific Institution “Petrovsky National Research Centre of Surgery””, No. 122030200535-1.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Keeping of animals and experiments were performed in accordance with the European Convention for the Protection of Vertebrate Animals used for Experimental and other Scientific Purposes (Strasbourg, 18 March 1986). This research was approved by the Bioethical Committee of the Federal State Budgetary Scientific Institution “Avtsyn Research Institute of Human Morphology”, protocols No. 27/3 (11 October 2021), №34 (10) (14 March 2022).

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available within the article text, tables, and figures.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. McKenna, H.; Van Der Horst, G.T.J.; Reiss, I.; Martin, D. Clinical chronobiology: A timely consideration in critical care medicine. Crit. Care 2018, 22, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Serin, Y.; Tek, N.A. Effect of Circadian Rhythm on Metabolic Processes and the Regulation of Energy Balance. Ann. Nutr. Metab. 2019, 74, 322–330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Dunlap, J.C. Molecular Bases for Circadian Clocks. Cell 1999, 96, 271–290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Foster, R.G.; Roenneberg, T. Human Responses to the Geophysical Daily, Annual and Lunar Cycles. Curr. Biol. 2008, 18, R784–R794. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Michel, S.; Meijer, J.H. From clock to functional pacemaker. Eur. J. Neurosci. 2019, 51, 482–493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Harmer, S.L.; Panda, S.; Kay, S.A. Molecular bases of circadian rhythms. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 2001, 17, 215–253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Zimmet, P.; Alberti, K.G.M.M.; Stern, N.; Bilu, C.; El-Osta, A.; Einat, H.; Kronfeld-Schor, N. The Circadian Syndrome: Is the Metabolic Syndrome and much more! J. Intern. Med. 2019, 286, 181–191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Verlande, A.; Masri, S. Circadian Clocks and Cancer: Timekeeping Governs Cellular Metabolism. Trends Endocrinol. Metab. 2019, 30, 445–458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Anisimov, V.N. Light desynchronosis and health. Light Eng. 2019, 27, 14–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Ueda, H.R.; Hayashi, S.; Chen, W.; Sano, M.; Machida, M.; Shigeyoshi, Y.; Iino, M.; Hashimoto, S. System-level identification of transcriptional circuits underlying mammalian circadian clocks. Nat. Genet. 2005, 37, 187–192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Tahara, Y.; Shibata, S. Circadian rhythms of liver physiology and disease: Experimental and clinical evidence. Nat. Rev. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2016, 13, 217–226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Adamovich, Y.; Aviram, R.; Asher, G. The emerging roles of lipids in circadian control. Biochim. Biophys. Acta (BBA)-Mol. Cell Biol. Lipids 2015, 1851, 1017–1025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Panda, S. Circadian physiology of metabolism. Science 2016, 354, 1008–1015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Kornmann, B.; Schaad, O.; Reinke, H.; Saini, C.; Schibler, U. Regulation of Circadian Gene Expression in Liver by Systemic Signals and Hepatocyte Oscillators. Cold Spring Harb. Symp. Quant. Biol. 2007, 72, 319–330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Vollmers, C.; Gill, S.; DiTacchio, L.; Pulivarthy, S.R.; Le, H.D.; Panda, S. Time of feeding and the intrinsic circadian clock drive rhythms in hepatic gene expression. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2009, 106, 21453–21458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Wang, J.; Mauvoisin, D.; Martin, E.; Atger, F.; Galindo, A.N.; Dayon, L.; Sizzano, F.; Palini, A.; Kussmann, M.; Waridel, P.; et al. Nuclear Proteomics Uncovers Diurnal Regulatory Landscapes in Mouse Liver. Cell Metab. 2016, 25, 102–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Koronowski, K.B.; Kinouchi, K.; Welz, P.-S.; Smith, J.G.; Zinna, V.M.; Shi, J.; Samad, M.; Chen, S.; Magnan, C.N.; Kinchen, J.M.; et al. Defining the Independence of the Liver Circadian Clock. Cell 2019, 177, 1448–1462.e14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Li, H.; Zhang, S.; Zhang, W.; Chen, S.; Rabearivony, A.; Shi, Y.; Liu, J.; Corton, C.J.; Liu, C. Endogenous circadian time genes expressions in the liver of mice under constant darkness. BMC Genom. 2020, 21, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Mukherji, A.; Bailey, S.M.; Staels, B.; Baumert, T.F. The circadian clock and liver function in health and disease. J. Hepatol. 2019, 71, 200–211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Saran, A.R.; Dave, S.; Zarrinpar, A. Circadian Rhythms in the Pathogenesis and Treatment of Fatty Liver Disease. Gastroenterology 2020, 158, 1948–1966.e1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Chen, P.; Han, Z.; Yang, P.; Zhu, L.; Hua, Z.; Zhang, J. Loss of clock gene mPer2 promotes liver fibrosis induced by carbon tetrachloride. Hepatol. Res. 2010, 40, 1117–1127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Ma, K.; Xiao, R.; Tseng, H.-T.; Shan, L.; Fu, L.; Moore, D.D. Circadian Dysregulation Disrupts Bile Acid Homeostasis. PLoS ONE 2009, 4, e6843. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Diallo, A.B.; Coiffard, B.; Leone, M.; Mezouar, S.; Mege, J.-L. For Whom the Clock Ticks: Clinical Chronobiology for Infectious Diseases. Front. Immunol. 2020, 11, 1457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Feillet, C.; van der Horst, G.T.J.; Levi, F.; Rand, D.A.; Delaunay, F. Coupling between the Circadian Clock and Cell Cycle Oscillators: Implication for Healthy Cells and Malignant Growth. Front. Neurol. 2015, 6, 96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Cui, M.; Zheng, M.; Sun, B.; Wang, Y.; Ye, L.; Zhang, X. A Long Noncoding RNA Perturbs the Circadian Rhythm of Hepatoma Cells to Facilitate Hepatocarcinogenesis. Neoplasia 2015, 17, 79–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Kettner, N.M.; Voicu, H.; Finegold, M.J.; Coarfa, C.; Sreekumar, A.; Putluri, N.; Katchy, C.A.; Lee, C.; Moore, D.D.; Fu, L. Circadian Homeostasis of Liver Metabolism Suppresses Hepatocarcinogenesis. Cancer Cell 2016, 30, 909–924. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Ozturk, N.; Ozturk, D.; Kavakli, I.H.; Okyar, A. Molecular Aspects of Circadian Pharmacology and Relevance for Cancer Chronotherapy. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2017, 18, 2168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Sadiq, Z.; Varghese, E.; Büsselberg, D. Cisplatin’s dual-effect on the circadian clock triggers proliferation and apoptosis. Neurobiol. Sleep Circadian Rhythm. 2020, 9, 100054. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Yang, S.; Liu, Y.; Guo, Y.; Liu, R.; Qi, F.; Li, X.; Yu, H.; Cheng, S.; Wang, Z. Circadian gene Clock participates in mitochondrial apoptosis pathways by regulating mitochondrial membrane potential, mitochondria out membrane permeablization and apoptosis factors in AML12 hepatocytes. Mol. Cell. Biochem. 2020, 467, 65–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Fárková, E.; Schneider, J.; Šmotek, M.; Bakštein, E.; Herlesová, J.; Kopřivová, J.; Šrámková, P.; Pichlerová, D.; Fried, M. Weight loss in conservative treatment of obesity in women is associated with physical activity and circadian phenotype: A longitudinal observational study. Biopsychosoc. Med. 2019, 13, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Jensen, M.A.; Garde, A.H.; Kristiansen, J.; Nabe-Nielsen, K.; Hansen, M. The effect of the number of consecutive night shifts on diurnal rhythms in cortisol, melatonin and heart rate variability (HRV): A systematic review of field studies. Int. Arch. Occup. Environ. Health 2015, 89, 531–545. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Ohta, H.; Yamazaki, S.; McMahon, D.G. Constant light desynchronizes mammalian clock neurons. Nat. Neurosci. 2005, 8, 267–269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Gubin, D. Melatonin attenuates light-at-night effects on systolic blood pressure and body temperature but does not affect di-astolic blood pressure and heart rate circadian rhythms. Biol. Rhythm. Res. 2020, 51, 780–793. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Armstrong, S.M. Melatonin and circadian control in mammals. Experientia 1989, 45, 932–938. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Mota, M.C.; Silva, C.M.; Balieiro, L.C.T.; Fahmy, W.M.; Crispim, C.A. Social jetlag and metabolic control in non-communicable chronic diseases: A study addressing different obesity statuses. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Masri, S.; Sassone-Corsi, P. The emerging link between cancer, metabolism, and circadian rhythms. Nat. Med. 2018, 24, 1795–1803. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Yalçin, M.; El-Athman, R.; Ouk, K.; Priller, J.; Relógio, A. Analysis of the Circadian Regulation of Cancer Hallmarks by a Cross-Platform Study of Colorectal Cancer Time-Series Data Reveals an Association with Genes Involved in Huntington’s Disease. Cancers 2020, 12, 963. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Rosenwasser, A.M. Chronobiology of ethanol: Animal models. Alcohol 2015, 49, 311–319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Davis, B.T.; Voigt, R.M.; Shaikh, M.; Forsyth, C.B.; Keshavarzian, A. Circadian Mechanisms in Alcohol Use Disorder and Tissue Injury. Alcohol. Clin. Exp. Res. 2018, 42, 668–677. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Gaucher, J.; Kinouchi, K.; Ceglia, N.; Montellier, E.; Peleg, S.; Greco, C.M.; Schmidt, A.; Forne, I.; Masri, S.; Baldi, P.; et al. Distinct metabolic adaptation of liver circadian pathways to acute and chronic patterns of alcohol intake. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2019, 116, 25250–25259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Prosser, R.; Mangrum, C.; Glass, J. Acute ethanol modulates glutamatergic and serotonergic phase shifts of the mouse circadian clock in vitro. Neuroscience 2008, 152, 837–848. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Schluter, P.J.; Turner, C.; Benefer, C. Long working hours and alcohol risk among Australian and New Zealand nurses and midwives: A cross-sectional study. Int. J. Nurs. Stud. 2012, 49, 701–709. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Hammer, S.B.; Ruby, C.L.; Brager, A.J.; Prosser, R.A.; Glass, J.D. Environmental Modulation of Alcohol Intake in Hamsters: Effects of Wheel Running and Constant Light Exposure. Alcohol. Clin. Exp. Res. 2010, 34, 1651–1658. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Cederbaum, A.I.; Wu, D.; Mari, M.; Bai, J. CYP2E1-dependent toxicity and oxidative stress in HepG2 cells. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 2001, 31, 1539–1543. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Pronko, P.; Bardina, L.; Satanovskaya, V.; Kuzmich, A.; Zimatkin, S. Effect of chronic alcohol consumption on the ethanol- and acetaldehyde-metabolizing systems in the rat gastrointestinal tract. Alcohol. Alcohol. 2002, 37, 229–235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Keshavarzian, A.; Holmes, E.; Patel, M.; Iber, F.; Fields, J.Z.; Pethkar, S. Leaky Gut in Alcoholic Cirrhosis: A Possible Mechanism for Alcohol-Induced Liver Damage. Am. J. Gastroenterol. 1999, 94, 200–207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Bailey, S.M. Emerging role of circadian clock disruption in alcohol-induced liver disease. Am. J. Physiol. Liver Physiol. 2018, 315, G364–G373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Swanson, G.R.; Gorenz, A.; Shaikh, M.; Desai, V.; Kaminsky, T.; Berg, J.V.D.; Murphy, T.; Raeisi, S.; Fogg, L.F.; Vitaterna, M.H.; et al. Night workers with circadian misalignment are susceptible to alcohol-induced intestinal hyperpermeability with social drinking. Am. J. Physiol. Liver Physiol. 2016, 311, G192–G201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Wetterberg, L.; Aperia, B.; Gorelick, D.A.; Gwirtzman, H.E.; McGuire, M.T.; Serafetinides, E.A.; Yuwiler, A. Age, alcoholism and de-pression are associated with low levels of urinary melatonin. J. Psychiatry Neurosci. 1992, 17, 215–224. [Google Scholar]
  50. Fonzi, S.; Solinas, G.P.; Costelli, P.; Parodi, C.; Murialdo, G.; Bo, P.; Albergati, A.; Montalbetti, L.; Savoldi, F.; Polleri, A. Melatonin and cortisol circadian secretion during ethanol withdrawal in chronic alcoholics. Chronobiologia 1994, 21, 109–112. [Google Scholar]
  51. Zucker, I.; Beery, A. Males still dominate animal studies. Nature 2010, 465, 690. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Beery, A.K.; Zucker, I. Sex bias in neuroscience and biomedical research. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 2011, 35, 565–572. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  53. Kuljis, D.A.; Loh, D.; Truong, D.; Vosko, A.M.; Ong, M.L.; McClusky, R.; Arnold, A.P.; Colwell, C. Gonadal- and Sex-Chromosome-Dependent Sex Differences in the Circadian System. Endocrinology 2013, 154, 1501–1512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Roy, A.K.; Chatterjee, B. Sexual Dimorphism in the Liver. Annu. Rev. Physiol. 1983, 45, 37–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Justo, R.; Boada, J.; Frontera, M.; Oliver, J.O.; Bermudez, J.; Gianotti, M. Gender dimorphism in rat liver mitochondrial oxidative metabolism and biogenesis. Am. J. Physiol. Physiol. 2005, 289, C372–C378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Kozlova, M.A.; Kirillov, Y.A.; Makartseva, L.A.; Chernov, I.; Areshidze, D.A. Morphofunctional State and Circadian Rhythms of the Liver under the Influence of Chronic Alcohol Intoxication and Constant Lighting. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 13007. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Kirillov, Y.A.; Kozlova, M.A.; Makartseva, L.A.; Areshidze, D.A.; Chernov, I.A.; Shtemplevskaya, E.V. Character of the Daily Dynamics of a Number of Morphometric Parameters of Hepatocytes of Wistar Rats at Chronic Alcohol Intoxica-tion. World Heart J. 2021, 13, 215–217. [Google Scholar]
  58. Areshidze, D.A.; Kozlova, M.A.; Makartseva, L.A.; Chernov, I.A.; Sinelnikov, M.Y.; Kirillov, Y.A. Influence of constant lightning on liver health: An experimental study. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2022, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Jansson, J.-O.; Edén, S.; Isaksson, O. Sexual Dimorphism in the Control of Growth Hormone Secretion*. Endocr. Rev. 1985, 6, 128–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Zheng, D.; Wang, X.; Antonson, P.; Gustafsson, J.; Li, Z. Genomics of sex hormone receptor signaling in hepatic sexual dimorphism. Mol. Cell. Endocrinol. 2018, 471, 33–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Bur, I.M.; Cohen-Solal, A.M.; Carmignac, D.; Abecassis, P.-Y.; Chauvet, N.; Martin, A.O.; van der Horst, G.T.; Robinson, I.C.; Maurel, P.; Mollard, P.; et al. The Circadian Clock Components CRY1 and CRY2 Are Necessary to Sustain Sex Dimorphism in Mouse Liver Metabolism. J. Biol. Chem. 2009, 284, 9066–9073. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Guillaumond, F.; Gréchez-Cassiau, A.; Subramaniam, M.; Brangolo, S.; Peteri-Brünback, B.; Staels, B.; Fiévet, C.; Spelsberg, T.C.; Delaunay, F.; Teboul, M. Kruppel-Like Factor KLF10 Is a Link between the Circadian Clock and Metabolism in Liver. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2010, 30, 3059–3070. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Berthier, A.; Johanns, M.; Zummo, F.P.; Lefebvre, P.; Staels, B. PPARs in liver physiology. Biochim. Biophys. Acta (BBA)-Mol. Basis Dis. 2021, 1867, 166097. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Pérez-Mendoza, M.; Rivera-Zavala, J.B.; Rodríguez-Guadarrama, A.H.; Montoya-Gomez, L.M.; Carmona-Castro, A.; Díaz-Muñoz, M.; Miranda-Anaya, M. Daily cycle in hepatic lipid metabolism in obese mice, Neotomodon alstoni: Sex differences. Chronobiol. Int. 2018, 35, 643–657. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Xu, Y.-Q.; Zhang, D.; Jin, T.; Cai, D.-J.; Wu, Q.; Lu, Y.; Liu, J.; Klaassen, C.D. Diurnal Variation of Hepatic Antioxidant Gene Expression in Mice. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e44237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Li, W.; Li, L.; Hui, L. Cell Plasticity in Liver Regeneration. Trends Cell Biol. 2020, 30, 329–338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Junatas, K.L.; Tonar, Z.; Kubíková, T.; Liška, V.; Pálek, R.; Mik, P.; Králíčková, M.; Witter, K. Stereological analysis of size and density of hepatocytes in the porcine liver. J. Anat. 2017, 230, 575–588. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Rowell, R.J.; Quentin, M.A. An overview of the genetics, mechanisms and management of NAFLD and ALD. Clin. Med. 2015, 15, s77–s82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Shetty, A.; Hsu, J.W.; Manka, P.P. Role of the Circadian Clock in the Metabolic Syndrome and Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Dis-ease. Dig. Dis. Sci. 2018, 63, 3187–3206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Kobayashi, T.; Saito, Y.; Ohtake, Y.; Maruko, A.; Yamamoto, Y.; Yamamoto, F.; Kuwahara, Y.; Fukumoto, M.; Fukumoto, M.; Ohkubo, Y. Effect of aging on norepinephrine-related proliferative response in primary cultured periportal and perivenous hepatocytes. Am. J. Physiol. Liver Physiol. 2012, 303, G861–G869. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Lang, F. Mechanisms and Significance of Cell Volume Regulation. J. Am. Coll. Nutr. 2007, 26, 613S–623S. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Corona-Pérez, A.; Díaz-Muñoz, M.; Rodríguez, I.S.; Cuevas, E.; Martínez-Gómez, M.; Castelán, F.; Rodríguez-Antolín, J.; Nicolás-Toledo, L. High Sucrose Intake Ameliorates the Accumulation of Hepatic Triacylglycerol Promoted by Restraint Stress in Young Rats. Lipids 2015, 50, 1103–1113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Fu, J.; Ma, S.; Li, X.; An, S.; Li, T.; Guo, K.; Lin, M.; Qu, W.; Dong, X.; Han, X.; et al. Long-term stress with hyperglucocorti-coidemiainduced hepatic steatosis with VLDL overproduction is dependent on both 5-HT2 receptor and 5-HT synthesis in liver. Int. J. Biol. Sci. 2016, 12, 219–234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  74. Schott, M.B.; Rasineni, K.; Weller, S.G.; Schulze, R.J.; Sletten, A.C.; Casey, C.A.; McNiven, M.A. β-Adrenergic induction of lipolysis in hepatocytes is inhibited by ethanol exposure. J. Biol. Chem. 2017, 292, 11815–11828. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Derdak, Z.; Lang, C.H.; Villegas, K.A.; Tong, M.; Mark, N.M.; de la Monte, S.M.; Wands, J.R. Activation of p53 enhances apoptosis and insulin resistance in a rat model of alcoholic liver disease. J. Hepatol. 2011, 54, 164–172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Yatsuji, S.; Hashimoto, E.; Tobari, M.; Tokushige, K.; Shiratori, K. Influence of age and gender in Japanese patients with non-alcoholic steatohepatitis. Hepatol. Res. 2007, 37, 1034–1043. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Tobari, M.; Hashimoto, E.; Kabutake, A.; Yatsuji, S.; Taniai, M.; Tokushige, K.; Shiratori, K. Genderspecific clinicopathological features in nonalcoholic steatohepatitis. Gastroenterology 2007, 132, 815. [Google Scholar]
  78. Panasiuk, A.; Dzięcioł, J.; Panasiuk, B.; Prokopowicz, D. Expression of p53, Bax and Bcl-2 proteins in hepatocytes in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. World J. Gastroenterol. 2006, 12, 6198–6202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Stöppeler, S.; Palmes, D.; Fehr, M.; Hölzen, J.P.; Zibert, A.; Siaj, R.; Schmidt, H.H.-J.; Spiegel, H.-U.; Bahde, R. Gender and strain-specific differences in the development of steatosis in rats. Lab. Anim. 2013, 47, 43–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Veteläinen, R.; Bennink, R.J.; van Vliet, A.K.; van Gulik, T.M. Mild steatosis impairs functional recovery after liver resection in an experimental model. Br. J. Surg. 2007, 94, 1002–1008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Zhou, Y.; Wu, M.; Xu, L.; Cheng, J.; Shen, J.; Yang, T.; Zhang, L. Bmal1 Regulates Macrophage Polarize Through Glycolytic Pathway in Alcoholic Liver Disease. Front. Pharmacol. 2021, 12, 640521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  82. Zhang, D.; Tong, X.; Nelson, B.B.; Jin, E.; Sit, J.; Charney, N.; Yang, M.; Omary, M.B.; Yin, L. The hepatic BMAL1/AKT/lipogenesis axis protects against alcoholic liver disease in mice via promoting PPARα pathway. Hepatology 2018, 68, 883–896. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  83. Swanson, G.R.; Gorenz, A.; Shaikh, M.; Desai, V.; Forsyth, C.; Fogg, L.; Burgess, H.J.; Keshavarzian, A. Decreased melatonin secretion is associated with increased intestinal permeability and marker of endotoxemia in alcoholics. Am. J. Physiol. Gastrointest. Liver Physiol. 2015, 308, G1004-11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Sato, K.; Meng, F.; Francis, H.; Wu, N.; Chen, L.; Kennedy, L.; Zhou, T.; Franchitto, A.; Onori, P.; Gaudio, E.; et al. Melatonin and circadian rhythms in liver diseases: Functional roles and potential therapies. J. Pineal Res. 2020, 68, e12639. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. González-Fernández, B.; Sánchez, D.I.; Crespo, I.; San-Miguel, B.; De Urbina, J.O.; González-Gallego, J.; Tuñón, M.J. Melatonin Attenuates Dysregulation of the Circadian Clock Pathway in Mice With CCl4-Induced Fibrosis and Human Hepatic Stellate Cells. Front. Pharmacol. 2018, 9, 556. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Fu, L.; Pelicano, H.; Liu, J.; Huang, P.; Lee, C.C. The circadian gene period2 plays an important role in tumor suppression and DNA damage response in vivo. Cell 2002, 111, 41–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Zhanfeng, N.; Chengquan, W.; Hechun, X.; Jun, W.; Lijian, Z.; Dede, M.; Wenbin, L.; Lei, Y. Period2 downregulation inhibits glioma cell apoptosis by activating the MDM2-TP53 pathway. Oncotarget 2016, 7, 27350–27362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Miki, T.; Matsumoto, T.; Zhao, Z.; Lee, C.C. p53 regulates Period2 expression and the circadian clock. Nat. Commun. 2013, 4, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Gallego, M.; Virshup, D.M. Post-translational modifications regulate the ticking of the circadian clock. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2007, 8, 139–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Altman, B.J. Cancer Clocks Out for Lunch: Disruption of Circadian Rhythm and Metabolic Oscillation in Cancer. Front. Cell Dev. Biol. 2016, 4, 62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Uchiyama, Y. Rhythms in morphology and function of hepatocytes. J. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 1990, 5, 321–333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Morin, L.P. Neuroanatomy of the extended circadian rhythm system. Exp. Neurol. 2012, 243, 4–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Bailey, M.; Silver, R. Sex differences in circadian timing systems: Implications for disease. Front. Neuroendocr. 2013, 35, 111–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Karatsoreos, I.N.; Wang, A.; Sasanian, J.; Silver, R. A Role for Androgens in Regulating Circadian Behavior and the Suprachiasmatic Nucleus. Endocrinology 2007, 148, 5487–5495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  95. Karatsoreos, I.N.; Butler, M.P.; LeSauter, J.; Silver, R. Androgens Modulate Structure and Function of the Suprachiasmatic Nucleus Brain Clock. Endocrinology 2011, 152, 1970–1978. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Kriegsfeld, L.J.; Silver, R. The regulation of neuroendocrine function: Timing is everything. Horm. Behav. 2006, 49, 557–574. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Silver, R.; Kriegsfeld, L.J. Circadian rhythms have broad implications for understanding brain and behavior. Eur. J. Neurosci. 2014, 39, 1866–1880. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Güldner, F.-H. Suprachiasmatic nucleus: Numbers of synaptic appositions and various types of synapses. Cell Tissue Res. 1984, 235, 449–452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Collado, P.; Beyer, C.; Hutchison, J.; Holman, S. Hypothalamic distribution of astrocytes is gender-related in Mongolian gerbils. Neurosci. Lett. 1995, 184, 86–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. A Hofman, M.; Fliers, E.; Goudsmit, E.; Swaab, D.F. Morphometric analysis of the suprachiasmatic and paraventricular nuclei in the human brain: Sex differences and age-dependent changes. J. Anat. 1988, 160, 127–143. [Google Scholar]
  101. McCarthy, M.M.; Arnold, A.P.; Ball, G.; Blaustein, J.D.; de Vries, G. Sex Differences in the Brain: The Not So Inconvenient Truth. J. Neurosci. 2012, 32, 2241–2247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Oishi, K.; Amagai, N.; Shirai, H.; Kadota, K.; Ohkura, N.; Ishida, N. Genome-wide Expression Analysis Reveals 100 Adrenal Gland-dependent Circadian Genes in the Mouse Liver. DNA Res. 2005, 12, 191–202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Chrousos, G.P.; Kino, T. Glucocorticoid action networks and complex psychiatric and/or somatic disorders. Stress 2007, 10, 213–219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Kloehn, I.; Pillai, S.B.; Officer, L.; Klement, C.; Gasser, P.J.; Evans, J.A. Sexual Differentiation of Circadian Clock Function in the Adrenal Gland. Endocrinology 2016, 157, 1895–1904. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Moisan, M.-P. Sexual Dimorphism in Glucocorticoid Stress Response. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 3139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Balsalobre, A.; Brown, S.A.; Marcacci, L.; Tronche, F.; Kellendonk, C.; Reichardt, H.M.; Schütz, G.; Schibler, U. Resetting of Circadian Time in Peripheral Tissues by Glucocorticoid Signaling. Science 2000, 289, 2344–2347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Oishi, K.; Miyazaki, K.; Kadota, K.; Kikuno, R.; Nagase, T.; Atsumi, G.; Ohkura, N.; Azama, T.; Mesaki, M.; Yukimasa, S.; et al. Genome-wide expression analysis of mouse liver reveals CLOCK-regulated circadian output genes. J. Biol. Chem. 2003, 278, 41519-27, Epub 5 July 2003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Rodd-Henricks, Z.A.; Bell, R.L.; Kuc, K.A.; Murphy, J.M.; McBride, W.J.; Lumeng, L.; Li, T.K. Effects of ethanol exposure on subsequent acquisition and extinction of ethanol self-administration and expression of alcohol-seeking behavior in adult alco-hol-preferring (P) rats: I. Periadolescent exposure. Alcohol. Clin. Exp. Res. 2002, 26, 1632–1641. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Fischer, A.H.; Jacobson, K.A.; Rose, J.; Zeller, R. Hematoxylin and Eosin Staining of Tissue and Cell Sections. Cold Spring Harb. Protoc. 2008, 2008, pdb-prot4986. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Christman, J.F.; Werner, H.J. Chromatography and Biological Stains IV. Preparation of a Suitable Fat Stain from Commercial Sudan III. Stain Technol. 1953, 28, 259–264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Brunt, E.M.; Janney, C.G.; Di Bisceglie, A.M.; Neuschwander-Tetri, B.A.; Bacon, B.R. Nonalcoholic steatohepatitis: A proposal for grading and staging the histological lesions. Am. J. Gastroenterol. 1999, 94, 2467–2474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Broeke, J.; Pérez, J.M.M.; Pascau, J. Image Processing with ImageJ; Packt Publishing: Birmingham, UK, 2015; p. 346. [Google Scholar]
  113. Smitha, T.; Sharada, P.; Girish, H. Morphometry of the basal cell layer of oral leukoplakia and oral squamous cell carcinoma using computer-aided image analysis. J. Oral Maxillofac. Pathol. 2011, 15, 26–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Kim, S.-W.; Roh, J.; Park, C.-S. Immunohistochemistry for Pathologists: Protocols, Pitfalls, and Tips. J. Pathol. Transl. Med. 2016, 50, 411–418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Rubin Grandis, J.; Melhem, M.F.; Barnes, E.L.; Tweardy, D.J. Quantitative immunohistochemical analysis of transforming growth factor-alpha and epidermal growth factor receptor in patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. Cancer 1996, 78, 1284–1292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Cornelissen, G. Cosinor-based rhythmometry. Theor. Biol. Med Model. 2014, 11, 16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Ijms 23 10744 g001 550
Figure 1. Liver of rats: (A)—control; (B)—EtOH; (C)—CL; (D)—EtOH + CL. Hematoxylin and eosin staining, ×200. Yellow arrows indicate hepatocytes in a state of fatty degeneration; red arrows—hepatocytes in a state of apoptosis; black arrows—hepatocytes in a state of necrosis.
Figure 1. Liver of rats: (A)—control; (B)—EtOH; (C)—CL; (D)—EtOH + CL. Hematoxylin and eosin staining, ×200. Yellow arrows indicate hepatocytes in a state of fatty degeneration; red arrows—hepatocytes in a state of apoptosis; black arrows—hepatocytes in a state of necrosis.
Ijms 23 10744 g001
Ijms 23 10744 g002 550
Figure 2. Liver of rat of EtOH + CL group. Hematoxylin and eosin staining, ×1000. Red arrow indicates hepatocyte in a state of apoptosis; black arrows—hepatocytes in a state of necrosis.
Figure 2. Liver of rat of EtOH + CL group. Hematoxylin and eosin staining, ×1000. Red arrow indicates hepatocyte in a state of apoptosis; black arrows—hepatocytes in a state of necrosis.
Ijms 23 10744 g002
Ijms 23 10744 g003 550
Figure 3. Levels of Ki-67 expression in hepatocytes of rats. * (p ≤ 0.05); *** (p ≤ 0.0005)—in comparison with the parameters of animals of the control group.
Figure 3. Levels of Ki-67 expression in hepatocytes of rats. * (p ≤ 0.05); *** (p ≤ 0.0005)—in comparison with the parameters of animals of the control group.
Ijms 23 10744 g003
Ijms 23 10744 g004a 550Ijms 23 10744 g004b 550
Figure 4. Expression of Ki-67 in liver of rats. (A)—Control; (B)—EtOH; (C)—CL; (D)—EtOH + CL. ×200.
Figure 4. Expression of Ki-67 in liver of rats. (A)—Control; (B)—EtOH; (C)—CL; (D)—EtOH + CL. ×200.
Ijms 23 10744 g004aIjms 23 10744 g004b
Ijms 23 10744 g005 550
Figure 5. Levels of p53 expression in hepatocytes of rats. *** (p ≤ 0.0005)—in comparison with the parameters of animals of the control group.
Figure 5. Levels of p53 expression in hepatocytes of rats. *** (p ≤ 0.0005)—in comparison with the parameters of animals of the control group.
Ijms 23 10744 g005
Ijms 23 10744 g006a 550Ijms 23 10744 g006b 550
Figure 6. Expression of p53 in liver of rats. (A)—Control; (B)—EtOH; (C)—CL; (D)—EtOH + CL. ×200.
Figure 6. Expression of p53 in liver of rats. (A)—Control; (B)—EtOH; (C)—CL; (D)—EtOH + CL. ×200.
Ijms 23 10744 g006aIjms 23 10744 g006b
Ijms 23 10744 g007 550
Figure 7. Levels of BMAL1 expression in hepatocytes of rats. *** (p ≤ 0.0005)—in comparison with the parameters of animals of the control group.
Figure 7. Levels of BMAL1 expression in hepatocytes of rats. *** (p ≤ 0.0005)—in comparison with the parameters of animals of the control group.
Ijms 23 10744 g007
Ijms 23 10744 g008 550
Figure 8. Expression of BMAL1 in liver of rats. (A)—Control; (B)—EtOH; (C)—CL; (D)—EtOH + CL. ×200.
Figure 8. Expression of BMAL1 in liver of rats. (A)—Control; (B)—EtOH; (C)—CL; (D)—EtOH + CL. ×200.
Ijms 23 10744 g008
Ijms 23 10744 g009 550
Figure 9. Levels of PER2 expression in hepatocytes of rats. *** (p ≤ 0.0005)—in comparison with the parameters of animals of the control group.
Figure 9. Levels of PER2 expression in hepatocytes of rats. *** (p ≤ 0.0005)—in comparison with the parameters of animals of the control group.
Ijms 23 10744 g009
Ijms 23 10744 g010 550
Figure 10. Expression of PER2 in liver of rats. (A)—Control; (B)—EtOH; (C)—CL; (D)—EtOH + CL. ×200.
Figure 10. Expression of PER2 in liver of rats. (A)—Control; (B)—EtOH; (C)—CL; (D)—EtOH + CL. ×200.
Ijms 23 10744 g010
Ijms 23 10744 g011 550
Figure 11. Levels of ADH5 expression in hepatocytes of rats. *** (p ≤ 0.0005)—in comparison with the parameters of animals of the control group.
Figure 11. Levels of ADH5 expression in hepatocytes of rats. *** (p ≤ 0.0005)—in comparison with the parameters of animals of the control group.
Ijms 23 10744 g011
Ijms 23 10744 g012 550
Figure 12. Expression of ADH5 in liver of rats. (A)—Control; (B)—EtOH; (C)—CL; (D)—EtOH + CL. ×200.
Figure 12. Expression of ADH5 in liver of rats. (A)—Control; (B)—EtOH; (C)—CL; (D)—EtOH + CL. ×200.
Ijms 23 10744 g012
Ijms 23 10744 g013 550
Figure 13. Daily dynamics of hepatocyte nuclei area of rats.
Figure 13. Daily dynamics of hepatocyte nuclei area of rats.
Ijms 23 10744 g013
Ijms 23 10744 g014 550
Figure 14. Daily dynamics of hepatocyte area of rats.
Figure 14. Daily dynamics of hepatocyte area of rats.
Ijms 23 10744 g014
Ijms 23 10744 g015 550
Figure 15. Daily dynamics of NCR of hepatocytes of rats.
Figure 15. Daily dynamics of NCR of hepatocytes of rats.
Ijms 23 10744 g015
Ijms 23 10744 g016 550
Figure 16. Daily dynamics of Ki-67 expression in hepatocytes of rats.
Figure 16. Daily dynamics of Ki-67 expression in hepatocytes of rats.
Ijms 23 10744 g016
Ijms 23 10744 g017 550
Figure 17. Daily dynamics of p53 expression in hepatocytes of rats.
Figure 17. Daily dynamics of p53 expression in hepatocytes of rats.
Ijms 23 10744 g017
Ijms 23 10744 g018 550
Figure 18. Daily dynamics of BMAL1 expression in hepatocytes of rats.
Figure 18. Daily dynamics of BMAL1 expression in hepatocytes of rats.
Ijms 23 10744 g018
Ijms 23 10744 g019 550
Figure 19. Daily dynamics of PER2 expression in hepatocytes of rats.
Figure 19. Daily dynamics of PER2 expression in hepatocytes of rats.
Ijms 23 10744 g019
Ijms 23 10744 g020 550
Figure 20. Diurnal dynamics of ADH5 expression in hepatocytes of rats.
Figure 20. Diurnal dynamics of ADH5 expression in hepatocytes of rats.
Ijms 23 10744 g020
Table
Table 1. Results of micromorphometric studies of hepatocytes of rats.
Table 1. Results of micromorphometric studies of hepatocytes of rats.
ControlEtOHCLEtOH + CL
Cross-sectional area of nuclei, µm236.54 ± 4.2638.72 ± 6.039.69 ± 4.17 *31.03 ± 3.98 **
Volume of nuclei, µm3130.80 ± 28.73149.40 ± 39.79144.20 ± 50.23108.30 ± 20.36
Perimeter of nuclei, µm24.83 ± 2.4623.59 ± 1.9826.28 ± 2.0521.38 ± 1.28 ***
Nucleus volume to nucleus area ratio (V/A coefficient)3.70 ± 0.853.82 ± 0.483.61 ± 1.113.51 ± 0.56
Long diameter of nuclei, µm6.78 ± 0.406.90 ± 0.547.23 ± 0.63 **6.44 ± 0.39
Small diameter of nuclei, µm5.76 ± 0.696.36 ± 0.90 **5.81 ± 1.535.29 ± 0.44
Mean diameter of nuclei, µm6.26 ± 0.456.63 ± 0.55 *6.52 ± 0.715.85 ± 0.37 *
Elongation index of nucleus1.19 ± 0.131.10 ± 0.151.39 ± 0.64 **1.22 ± 0.09
Contour index of nucleus4.19 ± 0.563.80 ± 0.13 *4.19 ± 0.393.85 ± 0.06
Coefficient of form of nucleus0.75 ± 0.160.87 ± 0.070.73 ± 0.120.85 ± 0.02
Cell area, µm2128.60 ± 20.51199.30 ± 31.57 ***171.8 ± 21.36 ***139.5 ± 16.62
Cell volume, µm31118.0 ± 268.802050.0 ± 494.1 ***1571.4 ± 302.7 ***1196.0 ± 214.1
NCR0.29 ± 0.070.20 ± 0.02 ***0.24 ± 0.04 ***0.22 ± 0.026 ***
Note: hereinafter * (p ≤ 0.05); ** (p ≤ 0.005); *** (p ≤ 0.0005)—in comparison with the parameters of animals of the control group.
Table
Table 2. Results of the cosinor analysis of the daily dynamics of the micromorphometric parameters of hepatocytes of rats.
Table 2. Results of the cosinor analysis of the daily dynamics of the micromorphometric parameters of hepatocytes of rats.
GroupAcrophaseAmplitude
Area of Nuclei of Hepatocytes, μm2
Control23391.96
EtOH12084.84
CL9044.63
EtOH + CL10512.31
Area of Hepatocytes, μm2
Control4548.99
EtOH122622.34
CLNot significant CR
EtOH + CLNot significant CR
NCR
Control20520.02
EtOHNot significant CR
CL11030.033
EtOH + CL14570.017
Table
Table 3. Results of the cosinor analysis of the daily dynamics of the expression of the studied genes.
Table 3. Results of the cosinor analysis of the daily dynamics of the expression of the studied genes.
GroupAcrophaseAmplitude
Ki-67, %
Control3470.29
EtOH10401.04
CL10060.62
EtOH + CLNot significant CR
p53, %
Control17060.23
EtOH18540.24
CL11191.65
EtOH + CLNot significant CR
BMAL1, %
Control41911.14
EtOH73010.78
CL4563.95
EtOH + CLNot significant CR
PER2, %
Control3169.22
EtOH133914.41
CL131615.03
EtOH + CLNot significant CR
ADH5, %
Control15010.46
EtOH1566.34
CL22050.62
EtOH + CL12197.61
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Areshidze, D.A.; Kozlova, M.A. Morphofunctional State and Circadian Rhythms of the Liver of Female Rats under the Influence of Chronic Alcohol Intoxication and Constant Lighting. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 10744. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms231810744

AMA Style

Areshidze DA, Kozlova MA. Morphofunctional State and Circadian Rhythms of the Liver of Female Rats under the Influence of Chronic Alcohol Intoxication and Constant Lighting. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2022; 23(18):10744. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms231810744

Chicago/Turabian Style

Areshidze, David A., and Maria A. Kozlova. 2022. "Morphofunctional State and Circadian Rhythms of the Liver of Female Rats under the Influence of Chronic Alcohol Intoxication and Constant Lighting" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 23, no. 18: 10744. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms231810744

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop