Next Article in Journal
Whole Transcriptome Analyses of Apricots and Japanese Plum Fruits after 1-MCP (Ethylene-Inhibitor) and Ethrel (Ethylene-Precursor) Treatments Reveal New Insights into the Physiology of the Ripening Process
Next Article in Special Issue
Iron-Sepiolite High-Performance Magnetorheological Polishing Fluid with Reduced Sedimentation
Previous Article in Journal
The Autism Spectrum Disorder-Associated Bacterial Metabolite p-Cresol Derails the Neuroimmune Response of Microglial Cells Partially via Reduction of ADAM17 and ADAM10
Previous Article in Special Issue
Natural Weathering Effects on the Mechanical, Rheological, and Morphological Properties of Magnetorheological Elastomer (MRE) in Tropical Climate
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Stable Magnetorheological Fluids Containing Bidisperse Fillers with Compact/Mesoporous Silica Coatings

Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23(19), 11044; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms231911044
by Martin Cvek 1,*, Thaiskang Jamatia 1, Pavol Suly 1, Michal Urbanek 1 and Rafael Torres-Mendieta 2
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23(19), 11044; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms231911044
Submission received: 24 August 2022 / Revised: 8 September 2022 / Accepted: 17 September 2022 / Published: 20 September 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Polymer Composites: Preparation, Properties, and Application)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

This paper enhances the stability of MRF by using bidisperse fillers with compact silica coatings. It is a well written paper with appropriate investigations that leads to good results and discussion. Only minor concerns should be looked at especially on the reduction of the Ms from 55.6 to 23.7 emu/g (Figure 6(a)), more than 50%. However,  with referring to Figure 8, NPs@TEOS has the lowest shear stress at off-state and approximately the same with NPs@m-TEOS at on-state. It shows that the absolute MR effect of NPs@TEOS is the highest at magnetic field of 216 kA/m. Since, it is not clear why the word “bidisperse” is used or in other words, the preparation of MRF is not clearly stated. The amount or weight % of magnetic particles in MRF plays an important role in determining the MR effect in which is the main concern of utilizing MR fluid in any devices.

Other than that, Table 1 is rather to be omitted or places in introduction section. 

Author Response

Please see the attachement. 

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

Dear Authors. The paper is well-prepared. Therefore, I will agree to the publication after some modifications:

Q1: Remove all the abbreviations from the abstract.

Q2: Line 56: Numbers in the chemical formula Fe3O4 should be subscript

Q3: Figure 7: What does “OFF” mean, and why the part of the curves are not visible?

Q4: I think it should be a break between the given number and standard deviation in the whole manuscript (for instance, in line 384)

Q5: The list of references is too long. Please remove some, especially when you put a few for the same text in the manuscript ( for instance, in line 290) . I do not understand how you access publication no 49, which is not yet published. Did you consider the following papers:

Effect of temperature on sedimentation stability and flow characteristics of magnetorheological fluids with damper as the performance analyzer.

Magnetorheological fluid based on submicrometric silica-coated magnetite particles under an oscillatory magnetic field

The effect of nano-silica and nano-magnetite on the magnetorheological fluid stabilization and magnetorheological effect

 

 

Author Response

Please see the attachment. 

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Back to TopTop